Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Department of Justice Canada - Report


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Minister's Message

The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.

I am pleased to report on the achievements of the Department of Justice for 2010-2011.

Over the past year, my Department has done outstanding work to improve Canada's justice system and deliver effective and responsive legal services.

The Department has been instrumental in providing excellent advice and support for the Government’s efforts to make our streets and communities safer and stand up for the rights of victims and law-abiding Canadians.

The Department has also played a role in supporting Government priorities through providing legal services to departments involved in strengthening Canada’s financial system and implementing Canada’s Economic Action Plan.

In addition, the Department has continued to implement administrative initiatives to ensure the delivery of high quality legal services across government, as well as improve financial management and renew its management systems.

As Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, I am confident that the many dedicated and professional public servants at the Department of Justice will continue to devote their skills and leadership to further strengthening the Department and our system of justice.

I invite you to read this report for further details on my Department’s progress in ensuring that our justice system delivers justice and in supporting the priorities of the Government of Canada.

The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada



Section I: Organizational Overview

Raison d’être

The Mission of the Department of Justice is to:

  • support the Minister of Justice in working to ensure that Canada is a just and law-abiding society with an accessible, efficient and fair system of justice;
  • provide high-quality legal services and counsel to the government and to client departments and agencies; and
  • promote respect for rights and freedoms, the law and the Constitution.

Responsibilities

The Department of Justice is headed by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. The responsibilities associated with the dual role of Minister of Justice and Attorney General are set out in the Department of Justice Act and some 49 other Acts of Parliament. The Department of Justice fulfils three distinctive roles within the Government of Canada, acting as:

  • a policy department with broad responsibilities for overseeing all matters relating to the administration of justice that fall within the federal domain;
  • a provider of a range of legal advisory, litigation and legislative services to government departments and agencies; and
  • a central agency responsible for supporting the Minister in advising Cabinet on all legal matters.

Strategic Outcomes and Program Activity Architecture (PAA)

The Department’s two strategic outcomes reflect the dual role of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. The Minister of Justice is concerned with questions of policy, particularly as these relate to his role as steward of the Canadian justice system. The Attorney General is the chief law officer for the Crown.

The following graphic presentation of the Program Activity Architecture gives an overview of the activities and programs for which the Department is responsible, showing the linkages between strategic outcomes, program activities and sub-activities.

Program Activity Architecture Diagram

1

[Description]

 

Organizational Priorities

Legend

Exceeded: More than 100 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) was achieved during the fiscal year.

Met All: 100 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.

Mostly Met: 80 to 99 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.

Somewhat Met: 60 to 79 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.

Not Met: Less than 60 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.


Priority Type2 Program Activity
Develop law reform proposals to tackle crime and to support safe and resilient communities Previously committed to Program Activity A1 - Justice policies, laws and programs
Status: Met All
  • The Minister of Justice tabled 15 bills (up one from last year), of which six were passed and received Royal Assent.
  • In order to modernize the law and provide law enforcement with new investigative tools to respond to new technologies, the Department developed Bill C-50, the Improving Access to Investigative Tools for Serious Crimes Act, to clarify the wiretap provisions and supported the re-introduction of the Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act (Bill C-51), which proposed amendments to the Criminal Code that would update language and provide new tools for law enforcement. This will enhance capacities to investigate cybercrime and increase Canada’s capacity to cooperate internationally in this area.
  • The Department developed the Regulations Prescribing Certain Offences to be Serious Offences under the Criminal Code in order to provide more flexibility in responding to the threats posed by organized crime groups. The Regulations designate 11 specific offences addressing gambling, prostitution and drug activity as “serious offences” for which the maximum punishment will be at least five years’ imprisonment.
  • The Department supported international initiatives to tackle crime, including the development of the G8 Leaders' Statement on Countering Terrorism and workshops sponsored by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, and enhanced international crime prevention and anti-terrorism capacity building. These initiatives also served to strengthen the legal framework for international cooperation in addressing organized crime, security and terrorism.


Priority Type Program Activity
Actively participate in initiatives to tackle crime and to support safe and resilient communities Ongoing Program Activity A1 - Justice policies, laws and programs
Status: Met All
  • In support of safe and resilient communities, two new funding priorities were implemented this year, under the Federal Victims Strategy, to support:
    1. victim services for families of missing and murdered Aboriginal women; and
    2. child advocacy centres for children and youths who have been victims of crime or witnesses to crime.
  • The following two components, under the Justice Partnership and Innovation Program, were furthered in 2010-11 to address issues related to missing and murdered Aboriginal women:
    1. awareness materials on breaking cycles of violence and abuse were developed under the Family Violence Initiative; and
    2. school-based and community programs to provide alternatives for high-risk young Aboriginal women were supported under the Access to Justice for Marginalized Populations component.
  • The Department led the National Anti-Drug Strategy, which provides a focused approach to addressing crime associated with illegal drugs. This year’s initiatives included the consideration of a bill to address serious drug crimes by proposing minimum penalties, which was introduced on May 5, 2010.
  • The Department also ensured that Canadian interests were considered on the world stage by participating in the Hemispheric Drug Strategy at the Organization of American States.
  • The Department worked with Canadian agencies and foreign administrations to enhance cross-border law enforcement and extradition to advance the next generation of integrated law enforcement bilateral operations and counter-terrorism.


Priority Type Program Activity
Direct and indirect support for implementation of Government priorities Ongoing Program Activity B1 - Services to Government
Status: Met All

The Department provided legal services to support client departments in implementing Government priorities. Examples include:

  • Implementing Canada’s Economic Action Plan by providing legal services that supported activities related to Canada’s infrastructure renewal, program delivery, environmental evaluations and consultations, all of which contributed to enhancing Canada’s economic recovery.
  • Strengthening Canada’s financial system by providing legal advice with respect to fiscal, economic and tax issues. The proper functioning of the harmonized sales tax revenue allocation framework was supported, as were the Government’s increased efforts to collect outstanding taxes and manage the level of tax debt. The Department reviewed measures to regulate federally regulated financial institutions and defended Parliament’s authority to enact securities legislation. Amendments to private and public pension legislation and regulations were also supported.
  • Ensuring the defence and security of Canada and safeguarding Canadians by enhancing information sharing between Canadian government departments and agencies and foreign entities in an effort to improve Canada’s ability to identify and deal with threats to national security. In order to continue to address the harms caused by prostitution, the Government appealed the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision that provisions of the Criminal Code related to prostitution are unconstitutional (in Bedford et al. v. AGC). The Department also successfully defended the constitutionality of the security certificate provisions of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act at the Federal Court.
  • Strengthening Canada’s response to migrant smuggling by providing legal services in response to the arrival of the marine vessels Ocean Lady (October 2009) and Sun Sea (August 2010), which carried 76 and 492 illegal migrants, respectively. The arrival of these vessels presented serious challenges to the operations of several departments and agencies of the Government of Canada. The Department promptly responded to the increase in demand for legal services that flowed as a consequence of those arrivals.
  • Supporting sustainable development by providing advice to its clients on the implementation of the Federal Sustainable Development Act, particularly in respect of the federal sustainable development strategy, finalized in October 2010. The Department also drafted a variety of regulatory measures to protect the environment (including those related to the Chemicals Management Plan) and received the Community of Federal Regulators Award for work on the Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations and the Renewable Fuels Regulations. The Department also introduced a template for preparing sustainable development checklists for legal services and a template to ensure that such criteria are considered during the development of all policies and programs.


Priority Type Strategic Outcome(s)
Public Service Renewal Ongoing

Strategic Outcome I - A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services

Status: Met All

The Department is taking steps to renew, develop and sustain its work force to meet its business goals. Some highlights include the following:

  • In support of renewing the work force and supporting the Law Practice Model, 124 entry-level counsel and 89 articling students were recruited.
  • The Department successfully carried out the requirements to implement the first Collective Agreement for the Law Group (LA), ensuring that the supporting infrastructure (i.e. systems, policies, and processes) were aligned to the new provisions for the represented Law Group.
  • In the context of the accurate description of work, the Department completed the work required for the creation of the manager stream as part of the Law Group Classification Reform in addition to pursuing work for the creation of generic job descriptions for the legal practitioner stream. In order to meet the new mandatory continuing professional development requirements introduced by some of the Canadian Law Societies, the Department successfully sought the accreditation of numerous departmental courses that meet these mandatory requirements.
  • The Department’s solid performance in employment equity was maintained for the second year in a row, with a strong rating on employment equity, and ranking first out of 49 departments in the Management Accountability Framework assessment. The Department was also cited as a model in employment equity in the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Employment Equity in the Public Service of Canada annual report for building a positive workplace culture and for strengthening its leadership in this area. In addition, the Department received the Employment Equity and Diversity Public Service Award of Excellence for its outstanding contribution to making the Department of Justice an inclusive workplace. This included, for example, the exceptional work in developing and launching the Department’s Employment Equity Action Plan (2010-13).


Priority Type Strategic Outcome
Implementation of the Law Practice Model for the delivery of legal services across government Ongoing Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services
Status: Mostly Met

The Department began implementation of the Law Practice Model in 2009-10, and expects it will be fully implemented by March 31, 2012. As part of the gradual implementation of the Law Practice Model, the mix of counsel in the Department has been realigned, primarily through increased recruitment of junior counsel and attrition of more senior counsel. Progress is presented in the following table:

Professional Group and level3 Target (proportion of LA work force) 2010-11 proportion of LA work force 2009-10 proportion of LA work force
LA-01 and below 25.5% 22.1% 16.7%
LA-2A 47.0% 48.0% 50.4%
LA-2B and above 27.5% 29.9% 32.9%

 

The Law Practice Model is achieving efficiencies and flexibilities in the management of resources devoted to the delivery of legal services across government through closer monitoring and matching of assigned work based on legal practitioner competencies, giving consideration to the complexity of work, the level of expertise, and the level of legal risk associated with each file.



Priority Type Strategic Outcome(s)
Improved support for law practice management across government Ongoing Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services
Status: Mostly Met

The Department is creating efficiencies by developing and enhancing tools and processes related to knowledge management, legal risk management, information sharing, and quality assurance. Most of the planned initiatives were completed during this reporting period. The remaining initiatives will be completed over a longer period. Among the initiatives completed in 2010-11, the Department:

  • developed and piloted a working prototype of a national legal knowledge management repository that will provide one system for capturing and sharing comprehensive legal knowledge;
  • completed pilot projects to support a harmonized yet flexible approach for legal risk management;
  • introduced an accountability framework to support consistency in the development and implementation of Memoranda of Understanding related to the provision of legal services;
  • developed a prototype management dashboard to support the planning and management of resources and the demand for legal services;
  • implemented case management application enhancements to support managers in validating overtime, to support new reporting requirements pertaining to contingent liabilities and gains, and to enable reporting on legal services effort on the basis of the Department’s revised Chart of Accounts; and
  • developed and launched the second generation of the Legislative Information Management System for the on-line publication of laws.


Priority Type Strategic Outcome(s)
Renewal of departmental systems Ongoing

Strategic Outcome I - A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services

Status: Met All

The Department developed an implementation strategy to ensure the integration of departmental financial, case management and information management systems, resulting in improved efficiency. Activities completed include the following:

  • The Department’s financial accounting system was aligned with the Government of Canada standard operating system and prepared for future integration with other systems, including the departmental case management system, which will allow for consistent and integrated planning and reporting.
  • Technical changes were made to the Department’s case management system in order to support the latest Web browser, office productivity suite, and document security permissions.
  • The Department led the functional development, configuration and implementation of the proof of concept and pilot projects related to the Enterprise Information Management Service, hosted by the Government of Canada, along with other departments and agencies.


Priority Type Strategic Outcome(s)
Enhance financial management framework Ongoing

Strategic Outcome I - A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services

Status: Met All

The Department has implemented consistent, standardized departmental practices and processes that meet Treasury Board financial management policy requirements through the following measures:

  • The Department approved a Budget Management Framework that defines the responsibilities and expectations for its management of financial resources, which is expected to result in strengthened and standardized budget and financial risk management processes and controls.
  • A new Salary Forecasting Tool to replace the former system was implemented, providing a standardized and integrated platform for salary forecasting.
  • A revised Chart of Accounts was put in place to enable the accurate and reliable recording of financial data in a manner consistent with central agency and parliamentary requirements.


Risk Analysis

Risks to Justice Policies, Laws and Programs

Many factors influence the Department of Justice’s operating environment and pose potential risks to the Department’s capacity to effectively deliver its policies, laws and programs. Primarily, the Department’s ability to address funding challenges has been affected throughout the year by fiscal pressures that affect Justice programs. To address this risk area, the Department has remained prudent and responsive in its business planning and budget exercises, as well as in its staffing models. A greater focus was placed on high-priority initiatives to ensure that the Department remained well positioned to continue to deliver services to the Minister and the Government.

A second risk area is the increasingly complex and variable policy process. Through the Policy Sector’s Transformation Initiative, the Department strengthened management and organizational capacity for change. The Department also enhanced collaboration, and supported succession planning and knowledge management initiatives. Furthermore, professional and personal development activities were supported to facilitate the adaptation of the work force to the increasingly complex policy work environment.

Finally, the Report on Plans and Priorities highlighted the risk that the complex operating environment could put a strain on the partnerships required for effective justice policy development and program delivery. To mitigate this risk, the Department took steps toward strengthening collaboration with its partners. This included the implementation of the Departmental Action Plan on Grants and Contributions Reform to simplify and reduce administration burdens on recipients by using a risk-based approach while strengthening accountability. Efforts also included convening four regional Aboriginal youth gang intervention forums with police, criminal justice personnel and community stakeholders, and a two-day forum with program managers and researchers to explore effective approaches for dealing with young people in conflict with the law and youths with drug abuse issues. The Department also took a leadership role on the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Steering Committee on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and in implementing an engagement strategy with the Canadian Bar Association.

Risks to Legal Services to Government

In 2010-11, three interrelated risks were identified as factors that have the potential to adversely impact the Department of Justice’s ability to deliver high-quality legal services to government. The first risk focussed on the ability to recruit and retain highly skilled legal professionals in a competitive environment. To mitigate this risk, the Department has continued to implement and monitor human resources action plans and associated recruitment and staffing strategies.

The second risk pertained to the corporate function capacity to support the delivery of legal services. To mitigate this risk, the Department reviewed its levels of management and support, and identified actions to ensure counsel had adequate levels of support from direct management, administration, paralegals and legal assistants. In addition, investment in the corporate capacity was continued, based on a five-year strategy, which is reviewed annually.

The third identified risk related to the Department’s ability to address the rapid changes in law practice management, particularly the volume of information that is crucial to effective management. In pursuit of mitigation strategies for this risk area, the Department focused on developing and enhancing tools and systems to support effective knowledge management, legal risk management, case management and quality assurance. In collaboration with an Interdepartmental Advisory Committee, the Department developed a paper on best practices for legal risk management to assist in the early identification of legal risks and help manage the demand for legal services across the federal government.

Summary of Performance

2010–11 Financial Resources ($ millions)


Planned Spending Total Authorities4 Actual Spending
719.2 1,090.4 1,049.6

2010–11 Human Resources (FTEs)


Planned Actual Difference
4,878 4,998 120


Strategic Outcome I: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values
Performance Indicators Targets 2010-11 Performance
Public confidence in the justice system Level of public confidence in the justice system remains stable or improves

Met all

In 2011, overall, the level of public confidence in the Justice System remained relatively stable, compared to 2009 levels:

  • Public confidence level in the Adult Criminal Justice System 2011: 50.5%. (+3.77%)
  • Public confidence level in the Youth Criminal Justice System 2011: 39.7% (-1.45%)5
Canada’s international ranking on whether or not justice is “fairly administered” Canada’s high relative international ranking on justice issues is maintained or improved

Met all

Canada’s ranking improved to the ninth place out of 59 countries in 20116 (up from 10th place in 2010)

Number of bills tabled in Parliament by the Minister of Justice Not available7

Unable to assess8

15 bills tabled (of which six were passed and received Royal Assent)9

Program Activity 2009-10
Actual
Spending
($ millions)
2010-1110 ($ millions) Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome
Main
Estimates
Planned
Spending
Total
Authorities
Actual
Spending11
A1 Justice policies, laws and programs 436.4 424.9 429.8 443.1 428.1 Social Affairs - A Safe and Secure Canada
A2 Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 Social Affairs - A Safe and Secure Canada
Total 437.7 426.2 431.1 444.5 429.4  


Strategic Outcome II: A federal government that is supported by effective and responsive legal services
Performance Indicators Targets 2010-11 Performance
Client feedback on the quality of legal advisory, litigation, legislative and regulatory drafting services Attain mean score of 8.0/10 on each item for which client feedback is obtained

Exceeded (Interim Results)12

  • Legal advisory services: 8.4/10
  • Litigation services: 8.2/10
  • Legislative drafting services: 8.6/10
  • Regulatory drafting services: 8.8/10
Client feedback on Department of Justice performance against service standards for the delivery of legal services13 Attain mean score of 8.0/10 on each item for which client feedback is obtained

Not Met (Interim Results)12

  • Overall quality of services: 8.4
  • Five of the ten service standards received a score of 8.0/10 or higher14
Program Activity 2009-10
Actual
Spending
($ millions)
2010-11 ($ millions) Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome
Main
Estimates
Planned
Spending15
Total
Authorities16
Actual
Spending17
B1 Services to Government 442.7 181.9 183.4 494.4 455.5 Government affairs - Ensuring well-managed and smoothly operating government machinery


Program Activity 2009-10
Actual
Spending
($ millions)
2010-11 ($ millions)
Main
Estimates
Planned
Spending18
Total
Authorities19
Actual
Spending20, 21
C1 Internal Services 147.50 104.1 104.8 151.6 164.7

Expenditure Profile

As presented in the graph below, the Main Estimates totalled $712.3M in 2010-11. The Department also received funding through the Supplementary Estimates in the amount of $42.0M. The Department’s total authorities include Net Vote Authority of $290.0M, which allows it to spend revenues generated from the provision of legal services to other government departments.

Departmental Spending Trend

 

Departmental Spending Trend Graph

[Description]

Departmental spending has increased over the last three years by 12%, for a net increase of $112.1M, with totals of $937.6M in 2008-09, $1,027.9M in 2009-10, and $1,049.6M in 2010-11. This increase is due primarily to increasing demand for legal services from other government departments and agencies; mandatory retroactive compensation for counsel (2009-10 arbitral award); and to increasing transfers to provinces and territories.

Estimates by Vote

For information on the Department of Justice’s organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please refer to the 2010-11 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II). An electronic version of the Public Accounts is available at http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/recgen/txt/72-eng.html.