This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
I am pleased to report on the achievements of the Department of Justice for 2010-2011.
Over the past year, my Department has done outstanding work to improve Canada's justice system and deliver effective and responsive legal services.
The Department has been instrumental in providing excellent advice and support for the Government’s efforts to make our streets and communities safer and stand up for the rights of victims and law-abiding Canadians.
The Department has also played a role in supporting Government priorities through providing legal services to departments involved in strengthening Canada’s financial system and implementing Canada’s Economic Action Plan.
In addition, the Department has continued to implement administrative initiatives to ensure the delivery of high quality legal services across government, as well as improve financial management and renew its management systems.
As Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, I am confident that the many dedicated and professional public servants at the Department of Justice will continue to devote their skills and leadership to further strengthening the Department and our system of justice.
I invite you to read this report for further details on my Department’s progress in ensuring that our justice system delivers justice and in supporting the priorities of the Government of Canada.
The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
The Mission of the Department of Justice is to:
The Department of Justice is headed by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. The responsibilities associated with the dual role of Minister of Justice and Attorney General are set out in the Department of Justice Act and some 49 other Acts of Parliament. The Department of Justice fulfils three distinctive roles within the Government of Canada, acting as:
The Department’s two strategic outcomes reflect the dual role of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. The Minister of Justice is concerned with questions of policy, particularly as these relate to his role as steward of the Canadian justice system. The Attorney General is the chief law officer for the Crown.
The following graphic presentation of the Program Activity Architecture gives an overview of the activities and programs for which the Department is responsible, showing the linkages between strategic outcomes, program activities and sub-activities.
Legend
Exceeded: More than 100 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) was achieved during the fiscal year.
Met All: 100 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.
Mostly Met: 80 to 99 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.
Somewhat Met: 60 to 79 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.
Not Met: Less than 60 percent of the expected level of performance for the priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year.
Priority | Type2 | Program Activity |
---|---|---|
Develop law reform proposals to tackle crime and to support safe and resilient communities | Previously committed to | Program Activity A1 - Justice policies, laws and programs |
Status: Met All | ||
|
Priority | Type | Program Activity |
---|---|---|
Actively participate in initiatives to tackle crime and to support safe and resilient communities | Ongoing | Program Activity A1 - Justice policies, laws and programs |
Status: Met All | ||
|
Priority | Type | Program Activity |
---|---|---|
Direct and indirect support for implementation of Government priorities | Ongoing | Program Activity B1 - Services to Government |
Status: Met All | ||
The Department provided legal services to support client departments in implementing Government priorities. Examples include:
|
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome(s) |
---|---|---|
Public Service Renewal | Ongoing |
Strategic Outcome I - A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services |
Status: Met All | ||
The Department is taking steps to renew, develop and sustain its work force to meet its business goals. Some highlights include the following:
|
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Implementation of the Law Practice Model for the delivery of legal services across government | Ongoing | Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services | ||||||||||||||||
Status: Mostly Met | ||||||||||||||||||
The Department began implementation of the Law Practice Model in 2009-10, and expects it will be fully implemented by March 31, 2012. As part of the gradual implementation of the Law Practice Model, the mix of counsel in the Department has been realigned, primarily through increased recruitment of junior counsel and attrition of more senior counsel. Progress is presented in the following table:
The Law Practice Model is achieving efficiencies and flexibilities in the management of resources devoted to the delivery of legal services across government through closer monitoring and matching of assigned work based on legal practitioner competencies, giving consideration to the complexity of work, the level of expertise, and the level of legal risk associated with each file. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome(s) |
---|---|---|
Improved support for law practice management across government | Ongoing | Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services |
Status: Mostly Met | ||
The Department is creating efficiencies by developing and enhancing tools and processes related to knowledge management, legal risk management, information sharing, and quality assurance. Most of the planned initiatives were completed during this reporting period. The remaining initiatives will be completed over a longer period. Among the initiatives completed in 2010-11, the Department:
|
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome(s) |
---|---|---|
Renewal of departmental systems | Ongoing |
Strategic Outcome I - A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services |
Status: Met All | ||
The Department developed an implementation strategy to ensure the integration of departmental financial, case management and information management systems, resulting in improved efficiency. Activities completed include the following:
|
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome(s) |
---|---|---|
Enhance financial management framework | Ongoing |
Strategic Outcome I - A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values Strategic Outcome II - A federal government supported by effective and responsive legal services |
Status: Met All | ||
The Department has implemented consistent, standardized departmental practices and processes that meet Treasury Board financial management policy requirements through the following measures:
|
Risks to Justice Policies, Laws and Programs
Many factors influence the Department of Justice’s operating environment and pose potential risks to the Department’s capacity to effectively deliver its policies, laws and programs. Primarily, the Department’s ability to address funding challenges has been affected throughout the year by fiscal pressures that affect Justice programs. To address this risk area, the Department has remained prudent and responsive in its business planning and budget exercises, as well as in its staffing models. A greater focus was placed on high-priority initiatives to ensure that the Department remained well positioned to continue to deliver services to the Minister and the Government.
A second risk area is the increasingly complex and variable policy process. Through the Policy Sector’s Transformation Initiative, the Department strengthened management and organizational capacity for change. The Department also enhanced collaboration, and supported succession planning and knowledge management initiatives. Furthermore, professional and personal development activities were supported to facilitate the adaptation of the work force to the increasingly complex policy work environment.
Finally, the Report on Plans and Priorities highlighted the risk that the complex operating environment could put a strain on the partnerships required for effective justice policy development and program delivery. To mitigate this risk, the Department took steps toward strengthening collaboration with its partners. This included the implementation of the Departmental Action Plan on Grants and Contributions Reform to simplify and reduce administration burdens on recipients by using a risk-based approach while strengthening accountability. Efforts also included convening four regional Aboriginal youth gang intervention forums with police, criminal justice personnel and community stakeholders, and a two-day forum with program managers and researchers to explore effective approaches for dealing with young people in conflict with the law and youths with drug abuse issues. The Department also took a leadership role on the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Steering Committee on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and in implementing an engagement strategy with the Canadian Bar Association.
Risks to Legal Services to Government
In 2010-11, three interrelated risks were identified as factors that have the potential to adversely impact the Department of Justice’s ability to deliver high-quality legal services to government. The first risk focussed on the ability to recruit and retain highly skilled legal professionals in a competitive environment. To mitigate this risk, the Department has continued to implement and monitor human resources action plans and associated recruitment and staffing strategies.
The second risk pertained to the corporate function capacity to support the delivery of legal services. To mitigate this risk, the Department reviewed its levels of management and support, and identified actions to ensure counsel had adequate levels of support from direct management, administration, paralegals and legal assistants. In addition, investment in the corporate capacity was continued, based on a five-year strategy, which is reviewed annually.
The third identified risk related to the Department’s ability to address the rapid changes in law practice management, particularly the volume of information that is crucial to effective management. In pursuit of mitigation strategies for this risk area, the Department focused on developing and enhancing tools and systems to support effective knowledge management, legal risk management, case management and quality assurance. In collaboration with an Interdepartmental Advisory Committee, the Department developed a paper on best practices for legal risk management to assist in the early identification of legal risks and help manage the demand for legal services across the federal government.
Planned Spending | Total Authorities4 | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
719.2 | 1,090.4 | 1,049.6 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
4,878 | 4,998 | 120 |
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010-11 Performance |
---|---|---|
Public confidence in the justice system | Level of public confidence in the justice system remains stable or improves |
Met all In 2011, overall, the level of public confidence in the Justice System remained relatively stable, compared to 2009 levels:
|
Canada’s international ranking on whether or not justice is “fairly administered” | Canada’s high relative international ranking on justice issues is maintained or improved |
Met all Canada’s ranking improved to the ninth place out of 59 countries in 20116 (up from 10th place in 2010) |
Number of bills tabled in Parliament by the Minister of Justice | Not available7 |
Unable to assess8 15 bills tabled (of which six were passed and received Royal Assent)9 |
Program Activity | 2009-10 Actual Spending ($ millions) |
2010-1110 ($ millions) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending11 |
|||
A1 Justice policies, laws and programs | 436.4 | 424.9 | 429.8 | 443.1 | 428.1 | Social Affairs - A Safe and Secure Canada |
A2 Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | Social Affairs - A Safe and Secure Canada |
Total | 437.7 | 426.2 | 431.1 | 444.5 | 429.4 |
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010-11 Performance |
---|---|---|
Client feedback on the quality of legal advisory, litigation, legislative and regulatory drafting services | Attain mean score of 8.0/10 on each item for which client feedback is obtained |
Exceeded (Interim Results)12
|
Client feedback on Department of Justice performance against service standards for the delivery of legal services13 | Attain mean score of 8.0/10 on each item for which client feedback is obtained |
Not Met (Interim Results)12
|
Program Activity | 2009-10 Actual Spending ($ millions) |
2010-11 ($ millions) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending15 |
Total Authorities16 |
Actual Spending17 |
|||
B1 Services to Government | 442.7 | 181.9 | 183.4 | 494.4 | 455.5 | Government affairs - Ensuring well-managed and smoothly operating government machinery |
Program Activity | 2009-10 Actual Spending ($ millions) |
2010-11 ($ millions) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending18 |
Total Authorities19 |
Actual Spending20, 21 |
||
C1 Internal Services | 147.50 | 104.1 | 104.8 | 151.6 | 164.7 |
As presented in the graph below, the Main Estimates totalled $712.3M in 2010-11. The Department also received funding through the Supplementary Estimates in the amount of $42.0M. The Department’s total authorities include Net Vote Authority of $290.0M, which allows it to spend revenues generated from the provision of legal services to other government departments.
Departmental spending has increased over the last three years by 12%, for a net increase of $112.1M, with totals of $937.6M in 2008-09, $1,027.9M in 2009-10, and $1,049.6M in 2010-11. This increase is due primarily to increasing demand for legal services from other government departments and agencies; mandatory retroactive compensation for counsel (2009-10 arbitral award); and to increasing transfers to provinces and territories.
For information on the Department of Justice’s organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please refer to the 2010-11 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II). An electronic version of the Public Accounts is available at http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/recgen/txt/72-eng.html.