This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
It is my pleasure to present the 2010-11 Departmental Performance Report for Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
Our Department, including the Canadian Coast Guard, which is a Special Operating Agency within Fisheries and Oceans Canada, has again proven to be a leader in the management of oceans and freshwater resources, as well as in the crucial area of marine safety.
We continued to implement Canada's Economic Action Plan, using funding to finance vital fisheries and marine infrastructure, and provide support for coastal communities affected by the economic downturn.
In 2010-11, we focused on several areas to achieve our three strategic outcomes:
Improving the Economic Viability of Canada's Fisheries
Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture make a significant contribution to Canada's economy. An estimated 80,000 Canadians make their living directly from fishing and related activities, and seafood is one of our largest commodity exports. Last year, our sales abroad totalled more than $3.9 billion. Our objective is to ensure Canada remains a world leader in sustainable fish and seafood products.
We continued to work closely with industry stakeholders to help them obtain the certification needed to expand access to markets, maintained our emphasis on conservation and sustainable management of fisheries and the enforcement of regulations, and invested substantially in aquaculture innovation.
Enhancing Marine Safety and Security through Fleet Renewal
The Canadian Coast Guard carries out critical work in support of Canada's commercial fishing industry, maritime transportation, and national sovereignty. This requires a well-equipped and adaptable fleet of vessels. Our Department continued fleet renewal for the Canadian Coast Guard, acquiring 81 new small boats. To support our government's commitment to security and sovereignty under the Northern Strategy, a new polar icebreaker will be delivered in 2017.
Our Department's Canadian Hydrographic Service continued its work surveying Canadian waters and producing and updating hydrographic products and services to ensure safe navigation of Canadian waterways. This work supports national security, emergency preparedness, and the establishment of Canada's offshore boundaries.
We repaired or undertook maintenance projects at more than 200 core fishing harbours and completed the majority of phase one construction work for a small craft harbour in Pangnirtung, Nunavut.
Ensuring Sustainable Development of our Fisheries and Oceans
To help ensure sustainable development of our fisheries and oceans, we continued to focus on habitat management. Our Department is creating new oceans centres of expertise to broaden our knowledge of Canada's waters. We continued to expand our network of Marine Protected Areas and develop strategies to monitor our Arctic boundary waters.
We also continued to support the work of the Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River to determine what can be done to restore and conserve the stock.
Improving our Effectiveness through Collaboration
We recognize that collaboration is the key to improving our effectiveness as a department.
By working with the provinces and territories, advisory groups, and the public, we will build strong, sustainable fisheries and maritime sectors for future generations.
The Honourable Keith Ashfield, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) plays the lead role in managing Canada's fisheries and safeguarding its waters, ensuring safe, healthy, and productive waters and aquatic ecosystems for the benefit of present and future generations. The Department's work is built around three strategic outcomes:
Our Vision
Excellence in service to Canadians to ensure the sustainable development and safe use of Canadian waters.
DFO is responsible for developing and implementing policies and programs in support of Canada's scientific, ecological, social, and economic interests in oceans and fresh waters.
DFO is a national and international leader in marine safety and in the management of oceans and freshwater resources. Departmental activities and presence on Canadian waters help to ensure the safe movement of people and goods. As a sustainable development department, DFO integrates environmental, economic and social perspectives to ensure Canada's oceans and freshwater resources benefit this generation and those to come.
The Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), a Special Operating Agency within DFO, is responsible for services and programs that contribute to the safety, security, and accessibility of Canada's waterways. CCG supports other government organizations through the provision of a civilian fleet and a broadly distributed shore-based infrastructure.
The Oceans Act entrusts the Minister with leading integrated oceans management and providing coast guard and hydrographic services, while the Fisheries Act gives the Minister responsibility for the management of fisheries, habitat, and aquaculture. The Species at Risk Act gives the Minister responsibilities associated with the management of aquatic species at risk.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada is a highly decentralized department, with more than eight of every ten employees located outside national headquarters. National headquarters, in Ottawa, establish national objectives, policies, procedures, and standards for the Department and CCG.
Information about DFO's six regions and the Canadian Coast Guard is available at http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/dpr-rmr/2010-11/toc-tdm-eng.html. A diagram of DFO's organizational structure is available at http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/us-nous/organisation-eng.htm.
The Government of Canada's Management, Resources and Results Structure1 (MRRS) is the foundation of a common, government-wide approach to the collection, management, and reporting of financial and non-financial information. DFO's Program Activity Architecture (PAA) is a component of its MRRS and shows how DFO's programs align with the Department's three strategic outcomes.
Each program activity is linked to a single Government of Canada Outcome Area (as indicated in the figure that follows), permitting whole-of-government reporting. The Whole-of-Government Framework maps the financial and non-financial contributions of federal organizations receiving appropriations, by aligning their program activities to a set of high-level outcome areas defined for the government as a whole (additional information on the Whole-of-Government Framework is available at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ppg-cpr/frame-cadre-eng.aspx).
The PAA also includes a stand-alone program activity called Internal Services, defined as the activities and resources that support an organization's program needs and other corporate obligations. For more information on DFO's Internal Services, see Internal Services.
DFO focused on a number of priorities in 2010-11. Descriptions and key plans for each of the priorities can be found in the 2010-11 Report on Plans and Priorities.2 Key accomplishments are presented below, and an overall performance rating has been assigned to each priority based on the following:
If this percentage of expected performance is achieved… | The performance rating is defined as… | The performance rating is shown graphically as… |
---|---|---|
More than 100% | Exceeded | |
100% | Met All | |
80 to 99% | Mostly Met | |
60 to 79% | Somewhat Met | |
Less than 60% | Not Met |
Globally Competitive FisheriesContributing to …• Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type3: Ongoing | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Health of the OceansContributing to …• Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Previously committed to | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Fleet RenewalContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways • Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture • Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Ongoing | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Economic Action PlanContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways • Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture • Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: New | |
Key Accomplishments
|
International LeadershipContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways • Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture • Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Ongoing | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Northern StrategyContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways • Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture • Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Previously committed to | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Regulatory Improvement (Streamlining)Contributing to …• Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Revised | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Implementing e-Navigation in CanadaContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: New | |
Key Accomplishments
|
People ManagementContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways • Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture • Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Ongoing | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Asset ManagementContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways • Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture • Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Previously committed to | |
Key Accomplishments
|
Information ManagementContributing to …• Safe and Accessible Waterways • Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture • Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems |
Performance Rating: |
---|---|
Priority Type: Previously committed to | |
Key Accomplishments
|
With continued support from senior management, the Department advanced its efforts to integrate risk management into decision-making processes and business practices at both the program and corporate levels during 2010-11.
Corporate Risk Governance
Risk Management Activity
Training and Communications
While both the IRM processes and the corporate risk deliverables have improved from previous years, there is a need for further enhancement and refinement, in particular, for tracking and monitoring risks and for identifying how risk management affects performance.
At the beginning of the year, the Department identified eight horizontal corporate risks (see table below) that may have affected DFO's ability to deliver its outcomes, had they materialized.
From the risks identified, the Physical Infrastructure risk was noted as showing the greatest potential severity to the organization. Both the mid-year and year-end reviews attested that this risk materialized during the year and affected several programs. Three other notable risks were identified as having materialized during the year: Legal and Compliance, Human Capital, and Information for Decision-making.
All four risks have now been transferred to the Corporate Risk Profile for 2011-12. Mitigation actions undertaken to counter these risks include the establishment of a new Real Property Task Force and the revamped Investment Planning strategy (for Physical Infrastructure), Legal Risk Management Committee (for Legal and Compliance), national Human Resources Strategy (for Human Capital) and the Information Management Strategy (for Information for Decision- making).
A new risk related to climate change was noted, particularly by the science-based programs, and it too was added to the Corporate Risk Profile for 2011-12. Few programs identified risks relating to Stakeholder Expectations and Partnering and Collaboration as their main risks. These two have now been merged into a new risk, Third Party Reliance, and transferred to the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12 as a non-mission-critical risk.
The table below lists the risks and their risk statements, identifies whether the risks materialized, and specifies how they affected program outcomes and related strategic outcomes if they did materialize.
Key Corporate Risk (Corporate Risk Profile 2009) | Link to Departmental Priority | Risk Mitigation Measures in 2010-11 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) | Performance Summary and Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
Human Capital DFO may be unable to attract, develop and retain sufficiently qualified human resources to deliver on its mandate. |
• People Management • Information Management |
DFO will equip managers to fully address human capital risks impacting their delivery of policies and programs in support of DFO's mandate by identifying gaps in the recruitment, development, promotion, and retention of employees and ensuring access to appropriate guidance and tools. | • Four program activities, under all three strategic outcomes, identified this risk in their list of top three risks. • Three program activities indicated that this risk materialized during the year. Some programs re-focused and re-prioritized work to adjust to increasing staff turnover due to either an aging and retiring workforce or due to insufficient human resource capacity to effectively manage operations. Several program activities contended with delayed timelines for deliverables. • The main drivers for this risk continue to be an aging workforce and funding pressures. This risk was deemed "Tentatively Controlled" from a corporate perspective during the mid-year risk review in January 2011. This risk has now been transferred to the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12, and it will be managed by those program activities where the risk continues to be an area of focus. |
Information for Decision-making Sufficient and appropriate information may not be available on a timely basis to support decision-making. | • Information Management • Asset Management |
DFO will use an Information Management Strategic Plan to implement an enterprise approach to information management and will improve the management of information across the Department. | • Four program activities under two strategic outcomes, Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture and Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems, identified this risk in their list of top three risks. • This risk was deemed "Tentatively Controlled" from a corporate perspective during the mid-year risk review. This risk has now been transferred to the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12, and it will be managed by those program activities where the risk continues to be an area of focus. |
Organizational Adaptability DFO may be unable to effectively adapt to emerging priorities, directions and environmental conditions. |
• All Departmental Priorities | DFO will monitor and assess strategies developed by sectors to address emerging priorities and directions and continue to bolster its planning activities and regional committee work. | •None of the program activites identified this risk in their list of top three risks at the year-end review. • This risk was deemed "Tentatively Controlled" from a corporate perspective during the mid-year risk review. This risk has now been merged into a new risk in the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12, under Strategic Alignment, which better articulates this risk. |
Internal Alignment Activities, accountabilities and resources within DFO may not be optimally aligned to meet objectives. |
• No link specified in 2010-11 RPP | DFO will continue to use a risk-based process that analyzes departmental funding pressures, activities, and accountabilities to better align resources and priorities. | • Three program activities under the Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems strategic outcome identified this risk in their list of top three risks. • This risk was deemed "Controlled" from a corporate perspective during the mid-year risk review. Two program activities indicated that this risk materialized during the year. • This risk has now been merged into a new risk in the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12, under Strategic Alignment, which better articulates this risk. |
Physical Infrastructure DFO may be unable to invest in or maintain the infrastructure necessary to achieve its objectives. |
• Economic Action Plan • Fleet Renewal • Asset Management |
DFO will establish senior management accountabilities for asset management and develop a system to provide comprehensive and integrated asset information to ensure that investment planning will maintain DFO's physical infrastructure. | • Two program activities under two strategic outcomes, Safe and Accessible Waterways and Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture, identified this risk in their list of top three risks. • This risk was the only risk deemed "Attention Required" from a corporate perspective during the mid-year risk review. Several regions and sectors later indicated that this risk materialized during the year with repercussions on several fronts, including negative ratings for affected harbours and the inaccessibility of much-needed infrastructure by Science programs, compromising the delivery of the advice needed to support decision-making. This risk was considered a pressing concern for the regions because of funding pressures. • This risk has been transferred to the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12. During the prioritization of corporate risks for 2011-12, this risk was assessed as having the highest severity rating for the Department. |
Stakeholder Expectations DFO may be unable to manage expectations and maintain the confidence of stakeholder groups, the public, media and elected officials. |
• Globally Competitive Fisheries • Regulatory Streamlining • Information Management • International Leadership |
DFO will assess communications and consultation mechanisms as well as outreach efforts. DFO will assess learning and training strategies to foster more consistent core messages on priorities and strategic directions. | • None of the program activities identified this risk in their list of top three risks at the year-end review. • However, some program activities identified risks such as Legal and Compliance, Human Capital, Information for Decision-Making, and Internal Alignment as affecting Stakeholder Expectations over the year. • This risk has now been merged into a new risk in the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12, under Third Party Reliance, which better articulates this risk. |
Partnering and Collaboration DFO may be unable to create and sustain effective partnerships, or there will be failures on the part of third parties on which DFO relies. |
• Northern Strategy • Globally Competitive Fisheries • Regulatory Streamlining • Information Management |
DFO has begun to review and assess all types of collaborative arrangements that it has with organizations. | • None of the program activities identified this risk in their list of top three risks at the year-end review. • However, some program activities identified risks such as Legal and Compliance, Human Capital, Information for Decision-Making, and Internal Alignment as affecting Partnering and Collaboration over the year. • This risk has now been merged into a new risk in the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12, under Third Party Reliance, which better articulates this risk. |
Legal and Compliance DFO may be successfully challenged before the courts, resulting in either significant financial liability or negative effects on DFO’s legislative or regulatory authorities, and DFO may not be able to ensure public compliance with its legislation and regulations. |
• No link specified in 2010-11 RPP | The Department will develop and assess a complete, Department-wide inventory of key mitigation measures for this risk | • The Species at Risk Management Program, under the Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems strategic outcome, identified this risk in its list of top three risks. • The program activity stated that this risk made meeting the Department's legal obligations under the Species at Risk Act unfeasible because of capacity and human resources issues. • This risk was deemed "Tentatively Controlled" from a corporate perspective during the mid-year risk review. This risk remains in the Corporate Risk Profile 2011-12. During the prioritization of corporate risks for 2011-12, this risk was assessed as having the third-highest severity rating for the Department. |
Additional Risks Identified: Climate Change |
• Not identified for 2010-11 | Not identified for 2010-11 | • While not identified as a corporate risk in the Corporate Risk Profile 2010-11, two program activities identified this risk as being in their list of top three risks. • Science for Safe and Accessible Waterways and Science for Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems have indicated that changes to ocean conditions and aquatic ecosystems resulting from climate change have challenged the Department's ability to deliver results against program outcomes. • This risk has been transferred to the Corporate Risk Profile for 2011-12 and included in a broader risk statement that encompasses hazard- or crisis- type risk for which climate change may be a driver. This risk will be managed by those program activities where the risk continues to be an area of focus. |
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
1,992.2 | 2,073.1 | 1,992.9 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
11,025 | 11,001 | -24 |
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010-11 Performance |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Canadian public reporting confidence in the safety of the marine transportation system in Canada | 90% by March 31, 2011 | This result was to be derived from a Transport Canada survey of public opinion. However, because of a moratorium on syndicated studies pending centralized negotiations between Public Works and Government Services Canada and private-sector contractors, CCG was not able to evaluate its 2010-11 performance on this expected result. |
Percentage of core fishing harbours with performance ratings of fair, good, or very good | 70% by March 31, 2011 | 70% |
Program Activity | 2009-10 | 2010-11 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Spending | Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
Canadian Coast Guard | 736.1 | 725.9 | 732.6 | 758.3 | 742.8 | Safe and Secure communities |
Small Craft Harbours | 221.0 | 205.3 | 221.7 | 213.1 | 206.4 | Strong Economic Growth |
Science for Safe and Accessible Waterways | 40.2 | 38.9 | 38.9 | 40.0 | 39.3 | Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy |
Total | 997.4 | 970.0 | 993.2 | 1,011.5 | 988.5 |
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010-11 Performance |
---|---|---|
Year-over-year improvement in management and conservation of major stocks to support sustainable fisheries, as evidenced in growth of the sustainability index | Baseline of 5.4/10 with target of 2% increase for 2010 to 5.5/10 and additional 2% increase to 5.6/10 for 2011 | 5.5/10 (It should be noted that the number of stocks covered by the Fisheries Checklist has increased from 120 to 136 major stocks.) |
Year-over-year improvement in the social, economic and environmental sustainability of the Canadian aquaculture sector, as evidenced by a reduced regulatory burden, increased regulatory effectiveness, increased transparency, increased availability of scientific information, increased industry investment in innovation and certification projects and the development of sector-specific program and operational policy direction. | Development of a national data collection program and sustainability reporting process | The Reporting to Canadians draft was ready but the release was delayed because of the need for more collaborative work. |
Implementation of Regulatory Program in British Columbia and possibly nationally | The new federal Pacific Aquaculture Regulations came into effect in December 2010. There has been no direction to scale up the British Columbia regulatory program nationally. |
Program Activity | 2009-10 | 2010-11 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Spending | Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
Fisheries and Aquaculture Management | 339.6 | 349.0 | 350.2 | 372.9 | 356.2 | Strong Economic Growth |
Science for Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture | 134.9 | 140.0 | 140.0 | 146.7 | 133.7 | Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy |
Total | 474.5 | 489.0 | 490.2 | 519.6 | 490.0 |
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010-11 Performance |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Canadian aquatic ecosystems where the risk to ecosystem health and productivity has been assessed as medium or low | To be determined – baseline value to be measured in 2010 | Data for this indicator is unavailable. As a proxy, program activity results have been used to assess performance against targets. Results range from mostly met to exceeded. |
Program Activity | 2009-10 | 2010-11 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ActualSpending | Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
Oceans Management | 15.8 | 15.9 | 15.9 | 15.8 | 14.6 | Clean and Healthy Environment |
Habitat Management | 62.0 | 59.7 | 59.7 | 60.4 | 53.0 | Clean and Healthy Environment |
Species at Risk Management | 21.8 | 23.0 | 23.0 | 23.8 | 22.1 | Clean and Healthy Environment |
Science for Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems | 60.9 | 56.0 | 56.0 | 57.1 | 53.4 | Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy |
Total | 160.6 | 154.7 | 154.7 | 157.1 | 143.2 |
Program Activity | 2009-10 | 2010-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Spending | Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|
Internal Services | 348.8 | 354.0 | 354.0 | 384.8 | 371.2 |
Total | 348.8 | 354.0 | 354.0 | 384.8 | 371.2 |
The Department's total actual spending for 2010-11 was $1,992.9 million. Spending over the past two years has been relatively consistent. The increase in spending in 2009-10 and 2010-11 over the 2008-09 spending was due to increased spending authorities under Canada's Economic Action Plan.
The difference between Main Estimates and Total Authorities is largely due to additional funds received from the Operating Budget Carry Forward and Supplementary Estimates. The Supplementary Estimates funding was for items such as a small craft harbour in Pangnirtung, fleet and maritime services for the Canadian Coast Guard, and the establishment and implementation of the new federal Pacific Aquaculture Regulations in British Columbia.
Approximately 75% of the variance between Total Authorities and Actual Spending, after reimbursement for cash-managed items, will be spent in future years so the authorities will not be lost to the Department. The remaining variance, representing approximately 1% of total departmental authorities, will be lapsed.
Canada's Economic Action Plan (EAP) allocated close to $12 billion in new infrastructure funding over two years to create jobs across Canada and to ensure that Canada emerges from the economic downturn with a more modern and greener infrastructure. DFO received the following funding in 2010 11 as part of the government's EAP.
EAP Initiative | Summary of Performance | 2010-11 ($ millions) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Actual Spending |
Actual Spending, including contributions to Employee Benefit Plans | ||
Canadian Coast Guard Shipbuilding and Repair | • Five vessel life extensions completed • 35 vessel refits completed • 60 small craft built and delivered • 16 Environmental Response Barges delivered with 14 to be delivered by fall 2011 • Five 47-foot Search and Rescue Motor Lifeboats completed • Work continues on three In-shore science vessels to be delivered by fall 2011 |
85.0 | 92.81 | 93.0 |
Small Craft Harbours | • 220 repair and maintenance projects completed • 8 engineering only and 6 early planning stage projects completed1 • 38 projects currently underway to be completed by fall 2011 |
97.72 | 86.31 | 93.6 |
Pangnirtung Harbour | • Phase 1 to be completed by summer 2011 • Phase 2 contract has been awarded with construction to begin in summer 2011 |
10.0 | 6.93 | |
Federal Laboratories | • 57 sub-projects in the laboratories were completed • One sub-project is 98% complete (will be completed in July 2011) |
24.5 | 24.1 | 24.1 |
Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan | • 1,296 sites assessed for contamination • 79 sites had remediation and risk management projects completed • Provided expert support for the management of federal contaminated sites |
8.24 | 12.45 | 12.9 |
Total | 225.4 | 222.5 | 223.5 |
Additional information on Canada's Economic Action Plan is available at http://www.actionplan.gc.ca/eng/index.asp.
Information on our organizational votes or statutory expenditures is available in the 2010-11 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II). This publication is available at http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/recgon/txt/72-eng.html.