This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer payments for Governance and Institutions of Government
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The efforts related to this program activity assist in achieving social and economic vibrancy in First Nation and Inuit communities. It supports individual community and aggregate based governments and governance systems by assisting them establishing effective governance and associated capacities, processes and mechanisms (such as by-law making authority, election processes). Particularly, support is provided to First Nation and Inuit governments as well as their respective institutions of government. These institutions include, but are not limited to, those that provide services in the areas of governance, land claim organizations and professional associations.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Government
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Governance and Institutions of Government |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
288.2 |
321.6 |
407.5 |
343.6 |
343.2 |
64.3 |
Total Contributions |
322.7 |
318.8 |
239.1 |
322.7 |
322.6 |
(83.5) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
610.9 |
640.4 |
646.7 |
666.2 |
665.8 |
(19.2) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects additional funding provided through supplementary estimates/Governor General's Special Warrants for the First Nations Finance Authority and for the implementation of several Yukon self-government agreements, as well as the realignment of program-specific support funding from the Internal Services program activity.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Co-operative Relationships
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity addresses constitutional and historic obligations, reduce conflict through negotiation and enable all parties to work together toward reconciliation. Co-operative Relationships are about mutual respect. They establish an atmosphere of trust, accountability and respectful partnerships among governments, First Nations and Inuit. This atmosphere, in turn, supports social, economic and cultural growth in First Nation and Inuit communities and increases their self-reliance. Co-operative Rrelationships are the basis for mutually reached resolution of claims and other rights issues. Through Co-operative Relationships, land claims and self-government agreements are negotiated and implemented, treaty relations between the Crown and First Nations are clarified and supported, certainty is obtained over the ownership, use, and management of land and resources, and Inuit are effectively represented in federal policy decisions.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Government
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Co-operative Relationships |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
– |
– |
– |
2.5 |
2.5 |
(2.5) |
Total Contributions |
87.4 |
91.2 |
83.0 |
91.8 |
90.1 |
(7.1) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
87.4 |
91.2 |
83.0 |
94.3 |
92.6 |
(9.6) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects incremental funding provided through supplementary estimates to continue implementing treaty-related measures with First Nations in British Columbia and to support the Nunavut Sivuniksavut in the purchase and renovation of a new school facility. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects reduced loan requirements for First Nations involved in claims negotiations as well as the deferral of activities for treaty-related measures; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned: Preliminary Survey of Modern Treaty Obligations and Self-Government Agreements (planned for 2011-2012)
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Claims Settlements
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity consists in providing approved payments to First Nations for the settlement of special, specific and comprehensive claims which were successfully concluded through a negotiation process.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Government
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Claims Settlements |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
406.3 |
336.8 |
464.1 |
849.3 |
835.8 |
(371.7) |
Total Contributions |
3.9 |
4.1 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
410.2 |
340.8 |
464.1 |
849.3 |
835.8 |
(371.7) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects incremental funding provided through supplementary estimates for specific claim settlements, the settlement of treaty land entitlement claims submitted by the Bigstone Cree and the implementation of the Eeyou Marine Region Land Claim Agreement. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the deferral of funding for the implementation of the Eeyou Marine Region Land Claim Agreement; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Federal Government's Implementation of Self-Government and Self-Government Agreements (completed February 2011)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Education
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity provides First Nations and Inuit communities with tools to achieve educational outcomes comparable to those of other Canadians. AANDC has primary responsibility under the Indian Act for the elementary and secondary education of Status Indians living on-reserve. As a matter of social policy, AANDC also supports on-reserve Status Indians and Inuit students in the pursuit of post-secondary education. Support provided through the Education programs includes provisions for instructional services, special education services as well as targeted initiatives which aim to enhance First Nation education management, improve teacher recruitment and retention, and encourage parental and community engagement. New targeted funds have been recently included to improve the provision of elementary and secondary education services through both a partnership and a student success program.
Strategic Outcome(s): The People
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Education |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
35.0 |
35.9 |
39.5 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
1.1 |
Total Contributions |
1,611.9 |
1,678.0 |
1,699.3 |
1,721.6 |
1,717.3 |
(17.9) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
1,646.9 |
1,713.9 |
1,738.8 |
1,760.0 |
1,755.7 |
(16.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities relates primarily to the reallocation of resources, mainly from Community Infrastructure, to meet the increased demand for education programs and services. In addition, incremental funding was provided through supplementary estimates for the continued support of the two Labrador Innu communities of Natuashish and Sheshatsiu, the continued support of the Youth Employment Strategy and for First Nations SchoolNet Youth Initiatives. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the deferral of funding for the Qalipu Mi’kmaq First Nation band; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned: Review of the Education Information System (completed November 2010)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Social Development
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Supports the provision of income assistance to meet basic needs for food, clothing and shelter to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals and families consistent with provincial programs and standards; First Nations child and family services to improve their well-being and security; assisted living for social support services of a non-medical nature, such as in-home care, short-term respite care, foster care and institutional care to improve their well-being and security; Family Violence Program to improve safety and security, particularly of women and children at risk; National Child Benefit Re-investment to support low-income families with children to help prevent or reduce the depth of child poverty; and other social services to build self-reliant, sustainable, healthy and stable First Nation communities.
Strategic Outcome(s): The People
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Social Development |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
7.6 |
8.7 |
10.0 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
0.9 |
Total Contributions |
1,471.5 |
1,539.5 |
1,475.2 |
1,593.6 |
1,587.6 |
(112.3) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
1,479.1 |
1,548.2 |
1,485.2 |
1,602.7 |
1,596.7 |
(111.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities relates primarily to the reallocation of resources, mainly from community infrastructure, to meet the increased demand for social development programs and services. In addition, incremental funding was provided through supplementary estimates for the First Nations Child and Family Services Program to implement a prevention-focused approach in Manitoba and for the continued support of the two Labrador Innu communities of Natuashish and Sheshatsiu. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the deferral of funding for the prevention-focused approach for child and family services in Manitoba; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned: Preliminary Survey of Family Violence and Other Social Services (November 2010)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Managing Individual Affairs
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Managing Individual Affairs program activity ensures responsible federal stewardship of the provisions of the Indian Act that pertain to estates, band moneys, registration and band membership through direct client services as well as partnerships with First Nations to deliver select services, including the administration of estates and the Indian Registration Program. The program activity is also responsible for administering the portions of the First Nations Oil and Gas and Moneys Management Act (FNOGMMA) that pertain to Indian moneys as well as the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, implemented on September 19, 2007, which oversees the federal obligations outlined within the Agreement and other federal initiatives related to the impact of residential schools on Aboriginal people in Canada.
Strategic Outcome(s): The People
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Managing Individual Affairs |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
1.9 |
2.2 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
(0.1) |
Total Contributions |
7.8 |
8.1 |
18.3 |
14.0 |
13.0 |
5.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
9.6 |
10.3 |
19.7 |
15.5 |
14.6 |
5.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects incremental funding provided through supplementary estimates for obligations related to the implementation of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the deferral of payments related to the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Clarity of Title to Land and Resources
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity aims to provide legal certainty on ownership over on-reserve land and resources. It enables financial institutions and other investors to partner with First Nations in economic development opportunities on reserve. This includes adding land to reserve, providing clarity of title to reserve lands and resources through surveys, ensuring that the government's fiduciary obligations are met, implementing land transfers under specific and comprehensive claims, and negotiating restoration of mineral title to AANDC for the benefit of First Nation communities.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Land
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Clarity of Title to Land and Resources |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
1.2 |
1.0 |
5.8 |
3.2 |
0.4 |
5.5 |
Total Contributions |
1.2 |
1.4 |
– |
1.4 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
2.5 |
2.4 |
5.8 |
4.6 |
1.8 |
4.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects the reduced funding requirements for the implementation of treaty land entitlements in Saskatchewan. The difference between total authorities and actual spending also reflects the deferral of activities associated with the implementation of treaty land entitlements in Saskatchewan. Specifically, payments to the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities and to the Province of Saskatchewan, Ministry of Education, to compensate for the loss of their tax base as a result of the settlement of treaty lands are not required in 2010-2011 due to delays in the transfer of lands to reserve status; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned: Preliminary Survey of Additions to Reserves (planned for 2011-2012)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Impact Evaluation of Contributions to Indian Bands for Land Management on Reserve (completed September 2010)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Responsible Federal Stewardship
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity contributes to the objective established by the Priorities and Planning Committee of Cabinet in September 2007 to promote economic development and good governance on‑reserve. It establishes the conditions for First Nations under the Indian Act to accelerate the pace at which they are able to exercise greater control over the management of their reserve land, resources and environment and effectively implementing and expanding the First Nations Land Management (FNLM) regime to facilitate the movement of more First Nations beyond the Indian Act. It involves a close collaboration with First Nations, Aboriginal associations and organizations, other government departments and private stakeholders such as oil and gas companies.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Land
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Responsible Federal Stewardship |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
72.6 |
91.2 |
81.1 |
122.7 |
118.3 |
(37.1) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
72.6 |
91.2 |
81.1 |
122.7 |
118.3 |
(37.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects additional funding provided for contaminated sites and emergency management activities on‑reserve. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects funding for emergency management activities on‑reserve that was not required.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for First Nations Governance Over Land, Resources and the Environment
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The overall program framework for the assumption of governance responsibility of First Nations is composed of several programs which may act either as an incremental process toward self-government or as individual, discrete, optional programs which that First Nations may select and opt into. The Reserve Land and Environmental Management Program (RLEMP) program builds First Nations capacity through training and participation in land management in conjunction with AANDC officers. The Regional Land Administration Programs (RLAPs) involve the delegation of some Ministerial authorities that allow First Nations to act on their own behalf. First Nation Land Management (FNLM) offers First Nations the opportunity to assume full control over their land, transferring from the Indian Act to an individual land code.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Land
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: First Nations Governance Over Land, Resources and the Environment |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
11.4 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
3.0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
11.4 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
3.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned: Audit of Environmental Management and Contaminated Sites – South of 60 (planned for 2011-2012)
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Summative Evaluation of First Nations Oil and Gas Moneys Management Act Implementation (completed May 2010)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Individual and Community Business Development
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Activities under the Aboriginal Business Development Program aim to create a modern business climate for Aboriginal individuals and communities to participate in Canada's economy and further share in its economic prosperity by addressing the limited range of financing provided by commercial lenders. To support sustainable business development, the program enables access to private-sector business financing at competitive rates, as well as essential business information/advice. It also facilitates private-sector partnerships in major resource and energy business projects and strengthens Aboriginal-owned or -controlled financing institutions to provide developmental lending and advisory services to Aboriginal businesses.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Economy
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Individual and Community Business Development |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
|
49.4 |
45.7 |
45.2 |
45.2 |
0.5 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
|
49.4 |
45.7 |
45.2 |
45.2 |
0.5 |
* In 2008-2009, a total of $171.9 million was spent under the Economic and Employment Opportunities for Aboriginal People ($36.0 million) and Economic Development ($135.9 million) program activities. These 2008-2009 program activities were jointly replaced by the Individual and Community Business Development program activity and the Community Investment program activity beginning in 2009-2010.
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Community Investment
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: For most First Nation and Inuit communities, economic development progress has been slow. The Community Investment program activity provides project-based and core funding to support communities and individuals in their efforts to effectively identify, assess, organize and plan economic development pursuits. This program activity is intended to enhance the ability of communities and individuals to participate in the economy and benefit from economic development opportunities. The activity is expected to yield increased employment and income levels, leading to improvements in the overall economic well-being and prosperity of First Nations, Inuit and Métis people.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Economy
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Community Investment |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
|
79.9 |
114.5 |
95.6 |
95.6 |
19.0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
|
79.9 |
114.5 |
95.6 |
95.6 |
19.0 |
* In 2008-2009, a total of $171.9 million was spent under the Economic and Employment Opportunities for Aboriginal People ($36.0 million) and Economic Development ($135.9 million) program activities. These 2008-2009 program activities were jointly replaced by the Individual and Community Business Development program activity and the Community Investment program activity beginning in 2009-2010.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects the carry-over from previous years of funding for loans and loan guarantees through the Indian Economic Development Account, offset by reduced requirements for the Strategic Partnerships Initiative. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the carry-over to future years of funding for loans and loan guarantees through the Indian Economic Development Account.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Community Infrastructure
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: For most First Nations and Inuit communities, economic development progress has been slow. The Community Investment program activity provides project-based and core funding to support communities and individuals in their efforts to effectively identify, assess, organize and plan economic development pursuits. This program activity is intended to enhance the ability of communities and individuals to participate in the economy and benefit from economic development opportunities. The activity is expected to yield increased employment and income levels, leading to improvements in the overall economic well-being and prosperity of First Nations, Inuit and M�tis people.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Economy
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Community Infrastructure |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
– |
75.0 |
0.1 |
– |
– |
0.1 |
Total Contributions |
1,057.9 |
1,182.1 |
1,268.0 |
1,269.1 |
1,261.7 |
6.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
1,057.9 |
1,257.1 |
1,268.1 |
1,269.1 |
1,261.7 |
6.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects reallocations to address pressures in other program activities (Education and Social Development programs and services in particular), offset by incremental funding provided through supplementary estimates to continue supporting the implementation of the First Nations Water and Wastewater Action Plan. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the deferral of projects under the First Nations Infrastructure Fund; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Northern Governance
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity strengthens Northern governments by devolving province-like responsibilities for the land and natural resources, adopting effective intergovernmental mechanisms, managing strategic issues and strengthening domestic and international intergovernmental cooperation on circumpolar issues.
Strategic Outcome(s): The North
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Northern Governance |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
3.8 |
13.2 |
7.4 |
8.3 |
7.5 |
(0.1) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
3.8 |
13.2 |
7.4 |
8.3 |
7.5 |
(0.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects the carry-over from previous years of funding for loan authorities and the realignment of program-specific support funding from the Internal Services program activity. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the carry-over of funding for these loan authorities to future years.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Healthy Northern Communities
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity benefits all Northerners by reducing the costs of transporting nutritious, perishable foods and other essential items to isolated Northern communities and by researching the sources and effects of contaminants on the Arctic food chain. Through grants for hospital and physician services, the program activity also supports improvements to the health and well-being of members of First Nations communities and Inuit who live in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
Strategic Outcome(s): The North
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Healthy Northern Communities |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
46.4 |
47.3 |
48.3 |
48.3 |
48.3 |
– |
Total Contributions |
10.5 |
9.8 |
4.8 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
56.9 |
57.1 |
53.1 |
50.7 |
50.7 |
2.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects incremental funding provided through supplementary estimates to subsidize the shipment of food to isolated Northern communities and to promote nutrition.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Northern Land and Resources
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity supports the sustainable development and regulatory oversight of the land and natural resources of the North. Oil and gas development, including offshore projects, as well as the management of mines and mineral activity are facilitated. Improved environmental management and stewardship is promoted through the continued development of the Northern regulatory regime. The identification and clean-up of contaminated sites improves environmental conditions, while the development of Arctic science and the increase to the knowledge base through, among others, the activities of the International Polar Year, helps in the development of strategies in response to the challenges of climate change and adaptation. The concerns and issues of climate change are addressed in the interests of maintaining sustainable Aboriginal and Northern communities.
Strategic Outcome(s): The North
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Northern Land and Resources |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
– |
Total Contributions |
22.4 |
68.3 |
78.5 |
97.9 |
94.9 |
(16.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
23.6 |
69.4 |
79.6 |
99.0 |
96.0 |
(16.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects the transfer of funding through supplementary estimates to other government departments to support activities related to the Arctic Research Infrastructure Fund. The difference between total authorities and actual spending primarily reflects the deferral of projects under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan; this deferred funding that was not required in 2010-2011 has been reprofiled to 2011-2012, when it will be available for the intended purpose.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Urban Aboriginal Strategy
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity helps respond to the needs of Aboriginal people living in urban centres. It promotes the self-reliance and economic participation of urban Aboriginal people and expands their life choices. Through the Urban Aboriginal Strategy (UAS), the federal government partners with other governments, community organizations and Aboriginal people to support (financially and through other means) projects that respond to local priorities. The Strategy enhances the federal government's ability to align expenditures directed toward urban Aboriginal people in key centres with provincial and municipal programming in a way that both advances federal objectives and responds effectively to local challenges and opportunities.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Office of the Federal Interlocutor
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Urban Aboriginal Strategy |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
|
12.6 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
(0.1) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
12.6 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
(0.1) |
* In 2008-2009, $30.3 million was spent under the Cooperative Relationships program activity; the Cooperative Relationships program activity was replaced by three program activities beginning in 2009-2010.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and total authorities primarily reflects incremental funding provided for the operating budget carry-over and reallocations from within the Office of the Federal Interlocutor to address priority issues.
Audit Completed or Planned: Audit of Implementation of the Urban Aboriginal Strategy (completed May 2010)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation of Urban Aboriginal Strategy (completed June 2011)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Métis and Non-Status Indian Organizational Capacity Development
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity is carried out by the Office of the Federal Interlocutor, the Government of Canada's principal point of contact for Métis and non-status Indian organizations, and an advocate within government on their key issues. The main mandate of the Office is to support (financially and through other means) the work of these organizations, and help find practical ways to reduce dependency and improve the self-reliance, and social and economic conditions of Métis, non-status Indians (MNSI) and off-reserve Aboriginal people. The Office fulfills this mandate by helping Métis and non-status Indian organizations develop their organizational and professional capacity, so that they can build effective partnerships with federal and provincial governments, and the private sector.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Office of the Federal Interlocutor
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Métis and Non-Status Indian Organizational Capacity Development |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
|
12.2 |
12.1 |
13.4 |
12.7 |
(0.6) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
12.2 |
12.1 |
13.4 |
12.7 |
(0.6) |
* In 2008-2009, $30.3 million was spent under the Cooperative Relationships program activity; the Cooperative Relationships program activity was replaced by three program activities beginning in 2009-2010.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): In 2010-2011, resources from Métis Rights Management were transferred out to the MNSI Organizational Capacity Development Program activity for research and to address financial accountability. Given the cross-cutting nature of these activities, they are funded under the same authority.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transfer Payments for Métis Rights Management
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity is the federal response to the 2003 Supreme Court of Canada's Powley decision, which affirmed that Métis hold section 35 Aboriginal rights under the Canadian Constitution. The program works with (through financial support and other means) non-profit, representative Aboriginal organizations that have substantial Métis memberships to develop objectively verifiable membership systems for Métis members and harvesters in accordance with the Supreme Court's direction.
Strategic Outcome(s): The Office of the Federal Interlocutor
Results Achieved: Please refer to Section II
Program Activity: Métis Rights Management |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual |
Actual |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
Variance(s) |
Total Grants |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Contributions |
|
6.6 |
– |
6.6 |
6.6 |
(6.6) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total Program Activity |
6.6 |
– |
6.6 |
6.6 |
(6.6) |
* In 2008-2009, $30.3 million was spent under the Cooperative Relationships program activity; the Cooperative Relationships program activity was replaced by three program activities beginning in 2009-2010.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): In 2010-2011, resources from Métis Rights Management were transferred out to the MNSI Organizational Capacity Development Program activity for research and to address financial accountability. Given the cross-cutting nature of these activities, they are funded under the same authority.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agri-Opportunities Program (New Opportunities for Agriculture Initiatives) (Voted)
Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Agri-Opportunities program was a five-year program, ending March 2011, that focused on new innovative value-added agricultural, agri-food and agri-based products, services or processes that were not commercially produced or available in Canada and that were ready to be introduced into the marketplace. The program provided repayable contributions for commercialization projects that were
expected to increase market opportunities for the Canadian agricultural industry across the value chain and to increase demand for primary agricultural products.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
The Agri-Opportunities program has signed agreements to fund 27 innovative commercialization projects for a total of $50.3 million helping to accelerate the pace of innovation in Canada. AAFC funded the establishment, modernisation or expansion of 14 facilities which collectively brought 30 products to market. 124 employees increased
their skill levels and 15 organisations have increased their knowledge and expanded their capacity while creating 94 full time and 134 temporary jobs. In total, the demand for primary agricultural products was increased by $22 million, adding income to agricultural producers, while providing new revenue streams to 9 organisations each of which is now participating in a value added
industry.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Science, Innovation and Adoption | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 9.0 | 10.3 | 31.1 | 25.4 | 15.1 | 16.0 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 9.0 | 10.3 | 31.1 | 25.4 | 15.1 | 16.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Despite the beginning of economic recovery, actual spending was less than planned spending because access to debt and equity financing did not reach expected levels, thereby hampering program uptake and the progress of projects.
Audit Completed or Planned: An internal audit is currently underway and will be completed in 2011-12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of this program was completed during 2010-11.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (Voted)
Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP) is an initiative designed to strengthen the capacity of Canadian science providers and industry through the creation of networks for research, technology development, and commercialization of agricultural bioproducts and bioprocesses.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
The ABIP supported nine R&D networks with activities focused on three overarching themes. These themes and examples of the results related to each are as follows:
All the Final Reports, and the Performance Management Reports have been received from all the networks, and are currently being reviewed for approval.
The productivity output for all nine networks is as follows:
Note: The targets and current actual results noted above are for the overall output of the ABIP Networks, which includes operating and capital spending, in addition to contribution spending.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Science, Innovation and Adoption | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 7.3 | 20.5 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 15.7 | - |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 7.3 | 20.5 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 15.7 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Expended as planned.
Audit Completed or Planned: The following audits were conducted in 2010-11:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The ABIP evaluation report was officially approved by the Deputy Minister on March 25, 2011, and the report will be posted on AAFC's external website in August 2011.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agricultural Disaster Relief Program (ADRP) / AgriRecovery (Statutory)
Start Date: December 6, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
During the 2010–11 fiscal year, the program authorities were extended until March 31, 2012.
Description:
The AgriRecovery framework is one of the core pillars of the business risk management suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriRecovery enables federal, provincial and territorial (FPT) governments to provide timely assistance to help producers quickly re-establish their income stream and contain the long-term impacts after small- to mid-size disasters (e.g. disease, pest and weather). Programs under AgriRecovery are developed on a case-by-case basis after an assessment is completed and it is determined that there is need for assistance beyond existing programs, such as AgriInvest, AgriStability and AgriInsurance.
Under AgriRecovery, the ADRP helps focus the coordination effort, providing a process to fast-track authorities for programs to quickly fund initiatives.
Participating provinces and territories cost-share initiatives on a 60:40 FPT basis. For AgriRecovery programming outside the ADRP, funding options are negotiated with the provinces and territories on a case-by-case basis. Authorities for the program include sub-section 12(5) of the Farm Income Protection Act, as well as various agreements for individual programming developed under AgriRecovery.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
12 initiatives were put in placed in 2010-11 under the ADRP to help producers deal with disaster events. The results of the initiatives put in place will be available in the 2011-12 program year. In the most recent surveys, provinces reported that almost all of the producers who received AgriRecovery assistance indicated it has
helped in the recovery of their operations, surpassing the target of 75%. In the majority of cases, the producers were still in faming business one year after the disaster payments.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
Total Grants | 1.0 | 3.2 | 54.2 | - | - | 54.2 |
Total Contributions | 55.4 | (9.1) | 54.2 | 256.2 | 256.2 | (202.0) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 56.3 | (5.9) | 108.4 | 256.2 | 256.2 | (147.8) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The increase in spending in 2010-11 is as a result of four initiatives that were implemented to respond to wide spread excessive moisture and flooding in the western provinces.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11. An internal audit is planned for 2013-14.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A program evaluation is currently underway and is scheduled to be completed in October 2011.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriInsurance Program (Statutory)
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: AgriInsurance contributions are statutory and ongoing.
Description:
The AgriInsurance program is one of the core pillars of the business risk management suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriInsurance (formerly the Production Insurance program), aims to reduce the financial impact on producers of production losses caused by uncontrollable natural perils.
Authorities for the program include Section 4 of the Farm Income Protection Act (FIPA), as well as Growing Forward: A Federal-Provincial-Territorial Framework Agreement on Agriculture, Agri-Food and Agri-Based Products Policy and Federal Provincial AgriInsurance Agreement.
Federal AgriInsurance website
British Columbia
Alberta
Saskatchewan
Manitoba
Ontario
Quebec
New Brunswick
Nova Scotia
Prince Edward Island
Newfoundland
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
The financial impacts of production losses are mitigated by providing effective insurance protection. Production losses were mitigated with indemnity payments of $1.116 billion (including $257.3 million for unseeded benefits) as 65.6 million of acres were covered for a value of $12.3 billion.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 548.3 | 502.9 | 452.0 | 514.9 | 514.9 | (62.9) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 548.3 | 502.9 | 452.0 | 514.9 | 514.9 | (62.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending in 2010-11 was higher than planned spending due to a substantial increase in premiums caused by higher grain prices which are reflected in the insurable values.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11. An audit is planned for the 2012-13 fiscal year.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11. An internal evaluation is scheduled to be completed by June of 2012.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriInvest Program (Statutory)
Start Date: December 19, 2007
Agreements were signed with the provinces to implement the program starting in the 2007 program year.
End Date: AgriInvest grants and contributions are statutory and ongoing.
Description:
The AgriInvest program is one of the core pillars of the business risk management suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriInvest allows producers to self-manage, through producer-government funded savings accounts, the first 15% of their margin losses for a production year and/or make investments to reduce on-farm risks or increase farm revenues. Under the program, annual producer deposits of up to 1.5% of their allowable net sales are matched by government deposits. Government deposits are cost-shared 60:40 by federal and provincial/territorial governments. In combination with the AgriStability program, AgriInvest is the successor to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program. AgriInvest provides coverage for smaller income declines, while AgriStability assists producers in managing larger losses.
AgriInvest provides producers with a secure, accessible, predictable and bankable source of income assistance to address small drops in farm income and manage on-farm risks.
Federal AgriInvest Website
AgriInvest in Quebec (La Financière agricole du Québec)
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
About 60% of participants who suffered an income decline and triggered an AgriStability payment for the 2008 program year also made a withdrawal from their AgriInvest account. The 2010 Business Risk Management (BRM) performance indicator survey indicated that 90% of those who withdrew AgriInvest funds used them to address income declines.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
Total Grants | 175.7 | 113.6 | 155.8 | 167.4 | 167.4 | (11.6) |
Total Contributions | 17.7 | 26.7 | 19.0 | 29.2 | 29.2 | (10.3) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 193.4 | 140.3 | 174.8 | 196.6 | 196.6 | (21.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): AgriInvest is demand-driven, rather than being funded from a set allocation for each fiscal year. Although the administrative costs of the program remain relatively constant, the variance of the year to year grant and contribution payments is directly related to both participation and commodity prices, as producer deposits and government contributions are based on a percentage of their income generated from the sale of commodities for a production year. Commodity prices were stronger in fiscal 2010-11 contributing to increased payments under the program.
Audit Completed or Planned: A performance audit initiated in fiscal 2010-11 by the Office of the Auditor General is currently underway and expected to be completed in the fall of 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A program evaluation is in progress and is scheduled to be completed in March 2012.
Note:
The Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program was replaced by the AgriStability and AgriInvest programs as of April 1, 2008.
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriStability Program (Statutory)
Start Date: December 19, 2007
Agreements were signed with the provinces to implement the program starting in the 2007 program year.
End Date: AgriStability grants and contributions are statutory and ongoing.
Description:
The AgriStability program is one of the core pillars of the business risk management suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriStability is a margin-based program that provides support when a producer experiences larger farm income losses, which are drops in their margin (eligible farm income, less eligible farm expenses) for the program year of more than 15% of the producer's average margin from previous years (i.e., their reference margin). Thus, a payment is triggered under the program when a producer's program year margin drops below 85% of their reference margin. AgriStability also includes coverage for negative margins, as well as mechanisms to advance a participant a portion of their expected payment during the year when a significant decline in income is expected (interim payments and Targeted Advance Payments). In combination with the AgriInvest program, it is the successor to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program. AgriInvest provides coverage for smaller income declines where AgriStability assists producers in managing larger losses.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
Results reported in 2010-11 relate to farming activities in the 2008 program year. This reporting lag is due to the fact that final program payments are based on information the producer provides in filling income tax for the year. This information must then be processed for all producers and summary information collected from all program administrations to allow for reporting on performance
results.
Participation in the 2008 program year declined largely due to improved farm incomes. The percentage of market revenues covered by AgriStability for the 2008 program year was 68%. AgriStability program payments brought producers' current year margin up to 65% of the reference margin based on the 2008 program year.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
Total Grants | - | 105.2 | 95.3 | 39.5 | 39.5 | 55.8 |
Total Contributions | 340.5 | 419.5 | 500.0 | 332.0 | 332.0 | 168.0 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 340.5 | 524.7 | 595.3 | 371.5 | 371.5 | 223.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
AgriStability is a demand-driven program rather than being funded from a set allocation for each fiscal year. Although the administrative costs remain relatively constant, the variance of the year to year grant and contribution payments is directly related to participation and the needs of the agricultural industry. As such, in good years, the program will cost governments less, while in bad
years (i.e., years with dropping commodity prices, disasters, etc.) the costs of the program will be higher. Finally, AgriStability payments are affected by the level of assistance provided by other programs; payments received by recipients through these programs may reduce the amount of AgriStability funding disbursed.
Actual spending under the AgriStability program was lower than planned in 2010-11 primarily due to stronger commodity prices and payments provided by the AgriInsurance and AgriRecovery programs. These factors contributed to reduced funding requirements under the AgriStability program.
Audit Completed or Planned: A performance audit initiated in fiscal 2010-11 by the Office of the Auditor General is currently underway and expected to be completed in the fall of 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A program evaluation is in progress and is scheduled to be completed in March 2012.
Note:
The Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program was replaced by the AgriStability and AgriInvest programs as of April 1, 2008.
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Cattlemen's Association Legacy Fund (Statutory)
Start Date: June 27, 2005
End Date: March 31, 2015
Description:
The purpose of the Canadian Cattlemen's Association Legacy Fund is to support the Canadian beef sector to develop markets for beef cattle, beef cattle genetics, beef and beef products in a post-BSE environment. A grant totalling $50 million over 10 years will be provided.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Trade and Market Development | ||||||
Total Grants | 7.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 8.4 | 8.4 | (3.4) |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 7.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 8.4 | 8.4 | (3.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): In developing the spending profile for the Legacy Fund, annual expenditures were estimated by prorating the $50 million fund over the ten year time frame at $5 million per year. However, funds are actually allocated based on the requirements outlined in the annual business plan which reflects the priorities of the fund recipients. As such, the funds needed in any particular year will vary depending on the marketing plan developed for that year. These forecasts are made even more difficult by challenges in predicting when Canadian beef might actually regain access to a key market (e.g. South Korea).
Audit Completed or Planned: AAFC initiated a compliance audit in March 2010, the audit is expected to be completed by December 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to support the Specified Risk Material Innovation Program (Voted)
Start Date: June 17, 2010
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The three-year, up to $40 million Specified Risk Material Innovation Program (being delivered under the name of Slaughter Waste Innovation Program (SWIP)) provides industry with the ability to capitalize on the knowledge, experience and technology advancement gained in dealing with the first three years of the Enhanced Feed
Ban (EFB) and to move towards implementing longer term solutions that have the potential to improve the competitiveness of the sector. The objective of SWIP is to support research, development and commercialization or adoption of innovative technologies or processes related to the removal, disposal or use of Specified Risk
Material (SRM) to reduce handling costs and to create potential revenue sources from SRM.
Eligible recipients include provincially and federally inspected slaughterhouses, and standalone businesses handling SRMs, including rendering plants, and to support pre-commercial research and development work, research or engineering firms in partnership with livestock industry associations or slaughter facilities. Recipients must be Canadian legal entities, including Canadian subsidiaries of foreign companies, and capable of entering into legally binding contracts.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
The Slaughter Waste Innovation Program has signed agreements to fund four projects to reduce the cost of processing SRM for a total of $18 million helping to increase the efficiency of the cattle industry in Canada.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Agri-Business Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | 9.0 | 3.1 | (3.1) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | - | - | 9.0 | 3.1 | (3.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): There was no planned spending reported as this program was approved after the 2010-11 RPP. Program expenditures have been on track and are in line with expectations.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11. This program is included in the Evaluation of Cattle Slaughter Industry Assistance that is planned to be completed in 2013-14.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions in support of the Assistance to the Pork Industry Initiative (Statutory)
Start Date: September 22, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description:
The Assistance to the Pork Industry Initiative is composed of two programs:
The terms of the loans are negotiated between lenders and applicants but shall not exceed 15 years. Where possible, a maximum 10-year term will be encouraged. Lenders are responsible for assessing applications, extending and managing loan amounts in accordance with the program's terms and conditions, managing their Reserve Fund and for any losses beyond those that can be drawn from the Reserve Fund. As such, lenders continue to bear a proportion of the risk for loans extended under the HILLRP.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
HILLRP
The maximum total loan loss reserve that AAFC could provide under HILLRP was $404 million. There were 21 signed contribution agreements between AAFC and financial institutions, 263 loans issued under the program for a
total of $408.1 million which represents a reserve amount of $243.8 million. To date there has been no withdrawals from the financial institutions' reserve fund. Producers had until March 26, 2010 to apply for a HILLRP loan. The program is now closed and reserve funding under the HILLRP was spent during the 2009-10 fiscal year. There is no authority for new spending.
HFTP
HFTP is a $75 million program. A total of 446 hog producers were successful bidders in four tender events for a total of $71.9 million or an average of $838.35 per animal unit equivalent, resulting in an estimated annual reduction of 2.7 million hogs.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 285.8 | 39.1 | 36.0 | 36.0 | 3.1 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 285.8 | 39.1 | 36.0 | 36.0 | 3.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
HFTP: After having successfully bid in the tender events, approximately 50 producers withdrew from the program as market hog prices began to rise.
Audit Completed or Planned:
HILLRP
A program under development audit was concluded in June 2010. It found that the governance, risk management and control framework established for the HILLRP were adequate and provide a reasonable expectation that funds were used for their intended purpose. Commendable management practices were identified. A program audit framework
will be developed by program officials by December 2011.
HFTP
A program under development audit was concluded in April 2010. It found that the governance, risk management and control frameworks established for the HFTP are adequate to provide a reasonable expectation that funds will be used for their intended purpose and that planned outcomes will be achieved. Controls are in place over Program payments,
and payments are made in accordance with the provisions of the contribution agreement, Program Terms and Conditions, the Treasury Board Policy on Transfer Payments, and the Financial Administration Act. A compliance audit for the period of August 15, 2009 to March 31, 2010 had similar findings with respect to the implementation of the agreement by the CPC.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
HILLRP
The intermediate outcome will be based on the percentage of hog producers who have received a reserve-backed loan that continue to repay the loan without defaulting. This information will be collected through annual reports and/or notifications from the participating financial institutions.
HFTP
An interim evaluation of the HFTP was undertaken in 2010-11 by the CPC. The evaluation found that the performance of the Program was strong; appropriately structured and delivered to meet its objectives as defined in the Contribution Agreement. The speed of the Program launch was a notable strength.
The application of the Program was consistent and the Animal Unit Equivalent (AUE) concept was a strong Program feature. Both recipients and non-recipients were satisfied with the overall Program management. The CPC must complete a final program evaluation by September 30, 2014.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Rural and Co-operatives Development (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The programming for Rural and Co-operatives Development covers the following two initiatives:
Rural development programming, whose objective is to support local, regional, and national stakeholders to develop collaborative activities that contribute to the engagement, knowledge development and knowledge transfer activities to address barriers to rural competitiveness, innovation and amenities development. This is part of Canada's Rural Partnership (CRP).
Co-operative Development Initiative (CDI) which provides support for the development, innovation and growth of co-operatives, by:
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
Rural development
As part of Canada's Rural Partnership, 38 rural community initiatives were undertaken to engage community partners in identifying issues and seizing opportunities for development, ranging from improving access to local foods to building capacity to capture new opportunities in the production of alternative energy.
In addition, 14 rural development tools were developed or adapted and disseminated throughout rural Canada to assist communities and local decision-makers in overcoming barriers and engaging in sustainable regional planning; 15 rural communities identified and assessed their local natural and cultural amenities as a means of increasing their competitiveness; and 23 resource-reliant rural communities worked to innovate and diversify their economies through the use of updated or adapted information and tools.
Co-operative Development Initiative
Under the Co-operative Development Initiative (CDI), 21 national and provincial co-op sector associations have created an integrated co-op development advisory services network that provides information, education, advice and technical assistance to community groups and organizations. These activities have resulted in significant
improvements in the number and quality of technical assistance and other co-op development services available to Canadians. In 2010-11, 75 new co-operatives were created (target was 40) and 281 existing co-operatives had their operations consolidated/strengthened (target was eight). In addition, 127 innovative co-op projects were approved (target was 25), testing new and innovative
applications of the co-op model to address economic, social and environmental challenges at the community level. Finally, a national project was approved to stimulate research and knowledge development on co-operatives. Six more projects were positively assessed and should be implemented in the next fiscal year (target is five by 2013).
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Rural and Co-operatives Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 4.6 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.3 | 2.1 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 4.6 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.3 | 2.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Rural development
Although higher when compared to the previous year, actual program funding was lower than expected. As rural communities are recovering from the economic slow down, their needs are changing towards activities generating more concrete economic activity. Adjustment of the program to match this evolving need occured over the last few months of the year when program changes were implemented to
offer funding to initiatives offering more concrete benefits to rural communities.
Co-operative Development Initiative
A slight spending shortfall occurred in the CDI: During the year, CDI faced challenges in the implementation of its Research and Knowledge Development component. The call for proposals and selection of projects was completed during the last quarter, hence project spending was
delayed until the end of the fiscal year.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Rural development
The Community Development Program was audited in 2010-11 as part of the Horizontal Audit of Grants and Contributions Programs of the Office of Audit and Evaluation.
Co-operative Development Initiative
A compliance audit of the Canadian Co-operative Association (CCA) and Conseil Canadien de la Coopération et de la Mutualié (CCCM), responsible for the administration of two of three CDI program components, was completed in 2010-11. The
auditors confirmed that recipients comply in general with the signed agreement. The scope of the report was limited to the first year of the agreement (2009-10) and it identified a small number of clarifications and non-critical issues that, when corrected, will ensure full compliance to the contribution agreement and improved operational efficiencies. A number of issues were related to
the start up and were already corrected at the time of the audit.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11. An evaluation for the Canada's Rural Partnership is planned for 2012-13.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to accelerate the Pace of Innovation and Facilitate the Adoption of New Technologies (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The program is designed to accelerate industry led innovation activities leading to the development and commercialization of new products, practices and processes by supporting the required academia, industry and government foresight and applied science, technology and development activities.
The program initiatives are designed to work systematically along the three phases of the innovation continuum; they are:
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
Agri-Science Clusters (Clusters), and Developing Innovative Agri-Products (DIAP) are initiatives within the federal-only Growing Canadian Agri-Innovations Program. All remaining contribution agreements were signed in 2010-11; and all 10 Clusters and most of the 25 DIAP projects were fully operational by the end of 2010-11.
As most projects started in 2010-11, significant achievements of the research results are limited. However, a few early success stories have been identified, such as the following with the Organic Science Cluster:
Organic farmers in Prince Edward Island (PEI) are seeking high-value options for production and identified a market for specialty fruits including black currants. The Organic Science Cluster (OSC) conducted trials on two farms in PEI to identify optimum methods of weed control for promoting black current bush size, harvest-ability yield and fruit quality. Preliminary results indicate the use of landscape fabric for weed control increased plant growth by up to 50%, and concentrations of nutrients in leaf tissue were higher. Plants will be further evaluated in the next few years to determine if this increase translates into larger root reserves, higher yield and greater fruit quality. Already, farmers in PEI are seeing the increase in plant growth and potential labour savings are planning to adopt similar weed control practices.
The OSC has reached over 1000 farmers/producers, processors and manufacturers across Canada over the past 18 months through technology transfer events such as field days, meetings with farmer associations and producers updates.
The Bilateral Agreements to implement Growing Forward: A Federal-Provincial-Territorial Framework Agreement on Agriculture, Agri-Food and Agri-Based Products Policy specify that the Parties shall prepare annual performance reports containing information and provide them to the other Party on or before August 31 in respect of activities carried out under Designated Programs by Thematic Area in the previous fiscal year (consistent with Schedule 1: Part C: Performance Indicators and Targets). As such, performance information relating to Growing Forward cost-shared programs will not be available for inclusion in this Departmental Performance Report. Once performance results for this program are available, they can be found at: Growing Forward Reporting.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Science, Innovation and Adoption | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 25.2 | 60.6 | 49.9 | 48.5 | 12.0 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 25.2 | 60.6 | 49.9 | 48.5 | 12.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities was due to planned spending being based on estimated program costs, due to timing of the 2010-11 RPP. Actual spending was slightly less than authorities due to timing of program implementation and additional time required in the planning stages, reviewing and assessing areas of priority that required further action under this initiative. This included discussions with provincial partners and key industry stakeholders. A portion of this variance could potentially be carried forward into 2011-12.
Audit Completed or Planned: Two audits of Growing Forward cost-shared programs will be completed by 2012 for British Columbia and Prince Edward Island.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Under the Growing Forward Bilateral Agreement, Provincial and Territorial governments are to report the results of their Growing Forward evaluation to AAFC by March 2012.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to enable Competitive Enterprises and Sectors (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
Agri-Business Development provides support for provincial and territorial activities and to national organizations to increase the use of sound business management practices by producers and agri-businesses to enable businesses to be profitable.
Eligible programs and initiatives equip producers and agri-businesses with the skills, knowledge and expertise needed to understand their businesses' financial situation, assess opportunities, respond to change, and realize business goals. It also enables agri-businesses to be profitable and invest where needed to manage the natural resource base sustainably, and produce and market safe food and other products.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
The Bilateral Agreements to implement Growing Forward: A Federal-Provincial-Territorial Framework Agreement on Agriculture, Agri-Food and Agri-Based Products Policy specify that the Parties shall prepare annual performance reports containing information and provide them to the other Party on or before August 31 in respect of activities carried out under Designated Programs by
Thematic Area in the previous fiscal year (consistent with Schedule 1: Part C: Performance Indicators and Targets). As such, performance information relating to Growing Forward cost-shared programs will not be available for inclusion in this Departmental Performance Report. Once performance results for this program are available, they can be found at: Growing Forward Reporting.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Agri-Business Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 22.8 | 23.5 | 55.4 | 40.0 | (16.5) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 22.8 | 23.5 | 55.4 | 40.0 | (16.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variances between Planned Spending and Total Authorities are due to Planned Spending being based on estimated program costs, due to timing of the 2010-11 RPP. There is an increase between Planned Spending and Actual Spending, as some provinces modified the eligibility criteria and the level of benefits for some of their cost-shared programs which resulted in higher spending than planned. As well, strong levels of uptake of cost-shared programs have also resulted in higher spending than anticipated.
Audit Completed or Planned: Two audits of Growing Forward cost-shared programs will be completed by 2012 for British Columbia and Prince Edward Island.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Under the Growing Forward Bilateral Agreement, Provincial and Territorial governments are to report the results of their Growing Forward evaluation to AAFC by March 2012.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to enhance the Safety and Security of Canada's Food System (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
Programming for the Contributions to enhance the Safety and Security of Canada's Food System is comprised of the following components:
Food Safety Systems Development
Food Safety Systems Development focuses on the development of voluntary science-based food safety systems by national organizations to effectively minimize food safety risks. It supports national (or equivalent) organizations in developing on-farm and/or post-farm Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) based food safety
systems. Intended clients are national or regional non-profit organizations that are not represented by entities at the national level.
Food Safety Systems Implementation
Food Safety Systems Implementation facilitates the early adoption of government-recognized food safety systems by producers and non-federally registered food-processing enterprises through financial incentives. Eligible projects could include the implementation of good manufacturing practices towards HACCP or ISO 22000 standards in
non-federally registered processing plants and the implementation of government reviewed HACCP-based food safety systems on farms. Implementation is administered by provinces and territories under Growing Forward.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
Food Safety Systems Development
National on-farm organizations and post-farm organizations are in the process of developing food safety systems which are ready to submit to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) for Technical Review Part 1 or 2 under the CFIA food safety recognition program. The target is six
for on-farm and seven post-farm by March 2013. Since 2009 six on-farm organizations have submitted to CFIA for technical reviews. In 2010-11 CFIA issued two Letters of Completion for Technical Review Part 1 to the Ontario Veal Association and the Fédération
des producteurs de bovins du Québec bringing the total to six on-farm organizations receiving letters of completion since 2009. The Canadian Sheep Federation started a second Technical Review Part 1 because of major changes to their on-farm food safety program. The Chicken Farmers of Canada also started a Technical Review Part 1 for free range chickens and the Turkey Farmers of Canada
submitted to CFIA for a Technical Review Part 2. No post-farm organization has submitted to CFIA for a Technical Review Part 1 because the technical review process is in the final stages of development by CFIA. However AAFC has approved an application from Canadian Produce Marketing Association that will allow this association in 2011-12 to submit to CFIA for a post-farm Technical Review Part 1. In 2010-11 seven agreements were signed (five post-farm, two on-farm), one project was approved to start in 2011-12
and four applications are under review. In the first two years of this initiative 19 food safety development agreements have been signed and seven projects have been completed.
Food Safety Systems Implementation
The Bilateral Agreements to implement Growing Forward: A Federal-Provincial-Territorial Framework Agreement on Agriculture, Agri-Food and Agri-Based Products Policy specify that the Parties shall prepare annual performance reports containing information and provide them to the other Party on or before August 31 in respect of activities carried out under Designated Programs by
Thematic Area in the previous fiscal year (consistent with Schedule 1: Part C: Performance Indicators and Targets). As such, performance information relating to Growing Forward cost-shared programs will not be available for inclusion in this Departmental Performance Report. Once performance results for this program are available, they can be found at: Growing Forward Reporting.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Food Safety and Biosecurity Risk Management Systems | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 10.7 | 19.0 | 28.0 | 18.0 | 0.9 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 10.7 | 19.0 | 28.0 | 18.0 | 0.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): For the Food Safety Systems Development component, the actual spending was lower than planned with 58% of available funds contractually committed of which 88% was spent by clients. This variance is due to the lower than expected demand for food safety systems development by post-farm organizations at this time, as well as the fact that many on-farm organizations have simply been maintaining their systems rather than progressing through the recognition process.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Food Safety and Traceability Programs Division Compliance Audit Plan provided for three project-specific audits for 2010-11. These three audits are on-going and are scheduled to be completed in 2011-12. Two audits of Growing Forward cost-shared programs will be completed by 2012 for British Columbia and Prince Edward Island.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluations are scheduled as follows: in 2011-12 for Food Safety Systems Implementation and in 2012-13 for Food Safety Systems Development. Under the Growing Forward Bilateral Agreement, Provincial and Territorial governments are to report the results of their Growing Forward evaluation to AAFC by March 2012.
Note:
Eligible projects under Food Safety Systems Development are comprised of activities that allow organizations to support, develop, and prepare for implementation of food safety systems as follows: Phase 1 (P1) projects: establish a national integrated food safety strategy; Phase 2 (P2) projects: develop a food safety system; a management system; and the training, audit and communication
materials to prepare in implementing the system and Review (R) projects: Enhancement of an existing food safety system. The following indicates the organizations who have entered into agreement with AAFC during 2010-11, their project phase and the date of any news releases issued prior to June 30, 2011: Canadian Produce Marketing
Association (P1); Canadian Bottled Water Association (P2); Canadian Vintners Association (P2 - Nov 27, 2010); Jewish Community Council of Montreal (P1); Canadian Cattlemen's Association (P2 + R); Canadian Grains Council (R); Canadian Celiac Association (P1). To see news releases about some of the organizations and their projects please
visit the AAFC Newsroom site and the AAFC Proactive Disclosure site.
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to minimize the Occurrence and Extent of Risk Incidents (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
Programming for the Contributions to minimize the Occurrence and Extent of Risk Incidents is comprised of the following components:
Biosecurity Standards Implementation
The approved national Biosecurity Standards form the basis for implementation of the minimum biosecurity requirements for a particular sector at the farm level. Provinces and territories are responsible for farm-level implementation and are able to impose additional standards to respond to a particular, unique need of the local industry.
Traceability Industry Infrastructure
Investment in Traceability Industry Infrastructure will enhance the industry's ability to follow the movement of a food through specific stages of production, processing and distribution. It supports the development and implementation of industry infrastructure to participate in the National Agriculture and Food Traceability System. This program invests in the development of industry-led
systems that collect and verify identification and movement data, and accelerates industry capacity.
Traceability Enterprise Infrastructure
The Traceability Enterprise Structure provides funding to individual businesses to assist in the purchase and installation of traceability infrastructure and the training of staff to implement traceability systems for plants, animals and products. This could include implementation of animal handling systems, equipment and data systems necessary to record and report data to industry databases.
These actions will enable recipients to participate fully in the National Agriculture and Food Traceability System.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
Biosecurity Standards Implementation and Traceability Enterprise Infrastructure
The Bilateral Agreements to implement Growing Forward: A Federal-Provincial-Territorial Framework Agreement on Agriculture, Agri-Food and Agri-Based Products Policy specify that the Parties shall prepare annual performance reports containing information and provide them to the other Party on or before August 31 in respect of activities carried out under Designated Programs by
Thematic Area in the previous fiscal year (consistent with Schedule 1: Part C: Performance Indicators and Targets). As such, performance information relating to Growing Forward cost-shared programs will not be available for inclusion in this Departmental Performance Report. Once performance results for this program are available, they can be found at: Growing Forward Reporting.
Traceability Industry Infrastructure
There is a target of 10 organizations or private entities implementing industry-led traceability systems by March 2013. Since 2009-10, 12 national organizations have entered into 19 agreements. Seven of these projects are completed and 12 are on-going. AAFC is funding three implementation projects for the following two organizations:
Canadian Pork Council and Canadian Animal Health Coalition. The remaining nine projects involve systems development activities. Two projects have been approved to start in 2010-11 and six applications are undergoing review.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Food Safety and Biosecurity Risk Management Systems | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 12.9 | 32.6 | 27.8 | 17.8 | 14.8 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 12.9 | 32.6 | 27.8 | 17.8 | 14.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): For the Traceability Industry Infrastructure component, the actual spending was lower than planned with 81% of available funds contractually committed of which 87% was spent by clients. This variance is due to normal program year to year fluctuations caused by lower than planned expenditures by clients and the fact that the program spending is demand driven. However the program's contractual commitments and demand based on current applications received is expected to fully utilize the total funding available for this program.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Food Safety and Traceability Programs Division Compliance Audit Plan provided for five project-specific audits for 2010-11. Two audits were completed with no significant findings and three audits are on-going and are scheduled to be completed in 2011-12. Two audits of Growing Forward cost-shared programs will be completed by 2012 for British Columbia and Prince Edward Island.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluations are scheduled as follows: in 2011-12 for Biosecurity Standards Implementation and Traceability Enterprise Infrastructure and in 2012-13 for Traceability Industry Infrastructure. Under the Growing Forward Bilateral Agreement, Provincial and Territorial governments are to report the results of their Growing Forward evaluation to AAFC by March 2012.
Note:
Eligible projects under Traceability Industry Infrastructure will support activities related to traceability systems development on a national or regional basis. Eligible activities may include: Phase A (PA) – systems development activities such as: strategic assessments and industry systems development and Phase B (PB)
industry systems implementation activities such as: data management systems, technology adoption and testing, data auditing and verification. The following indicates the organizations who have entered into agreements with AAFC during 2010-11, their project phase and the date of any news releases issued prior to June 30, 2011: Canadian
Cattle Identification Agency (PA - March 11, 2011 – three agreements); Agri-Tracabilite Quebec (PA); Federation des producteurs acericoles du Quebec (PA - February 15, 2011); Canadian Pork Council (PA and PB); Canadian Sheep Federation/Canadian National Goat Federation (PA -January 31, 2011). To see news releases about some of the organizations and their projects please visit the AAFC Newsroom site and the AAFC Proactive Disclosure site.
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to promote Environmentally Responsible Agriculture (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) supports farmers through agri-environmental risk assessment and planning; providing expertise, information and incentives to increase the adoption of sustainable agriculture practices at the farm and landscape levels; investigating and developing new approaches that encourage and support the adoption of sustainable agriculture practices; and increasing the recognition of the value of sustainable agriculture practices. This program supports environmental stewardship and helps reduce the sector's overall impact on the environment. It contributes to a cleaner environment and healthier living conditions for Canadian people, and a more profitable agriculture sector.
Strategic Outcome: An environmentally sustainable agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
Environmental Knowledge, Technology, Information and Measurement
On target - tools are being investigated and added to improve functionality of modelling and economic models. Scaling-up options for extrapolating Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices (WEBS) findings beyond the immediate watershed where they occur are under active investigation. Development of
a fully-distributed model application at one of the sites will enhance decision support capabilities for all sites.
On-Farm Action
The Bilateral Agreements to implement Growing Forward: A Federal-Provincial-Territorial Framework Agreement on Agriculture, Agri-Food and Agri-Based Products Policy specify that the Parties shall prepare annual performance reports containing information and provide them to the other Party on or before August 31 in respect of activities carried out under Designated Programs by
Thematic Area in the previous fiscal year (consistent with Schedule 1: Part C: Performance Indicators and Targets). As such, performance information relating to Growing Forward cost-shared programs will not be available for inclusion in this Departmental Performance Report. Once performance results for this program are available, they can be found at: Growing Forward Reporting.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Environmental Knowledge, Technology, Information and Measurement | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 1.2 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
Total Environmental Knowledge, Technology, Information, and Measurement | - | 1.2 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
Program Activity: On-Farm Action | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 50.6 | 67.1 | 73.4 | 55.9 | 11.3 |
Total On-Farm Action | - | 50.6 | 67.1 | 73.4 | 55.9 | 11.3 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 51.8 | 70.0 | 75.8 | 58.0 | 12.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities was due to planned spending being based on estimated program costs, due to timing of the 2010-11 RPP. There is a decrease between total authorities and actual spending due to timing of program implementation and additional time required in the planning stages, reviewing and assessing areas of priority that required further action under this initiative. This included discussions with provincial partners and key industry stakeholders. A portion of this variance could potentially be carried forward into 2011-12.
Audit Completed or Planned: Two audits of Growing Forward cost-shared programs will be completed by 2012 for British Columbia and Prince Edward Island.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Under the Growing Forward Bilateral Agreement, Provincial and Territorial governments are to report the results of their Growing Forward evaluation to AAFC by March 2012.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to strengthen the competitiveness of Canada's red meat packing and processing industry / Slaughter Improvement Program (SIP) (Voted)
Start Date: June 4, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description:
The national, applications-based Slaughter Improvement Program (SIP) provides eligible red meat packers and processors with repayable federal contributions to implement sound business plans for projects aimed at improving the operations of federally inspected packing plants. The program aims to allow industry stakeholders to strengthen
their competitiveness by supporting new investments that could support profitability for red meat packers. These new investments focus on reducing operating costs, increasing revenues, adopting innovation to meet future business conditions and consumer expectations and addressing slaughter capacity gaps in regions where it can be demonstrated that this factor is constraining sector
growth.
Recipients must also be involved or present a business plan to be involved in the slaughter of red meat. They must be federally inspected red meat packing and processing plants; provincially inspected plants implementing projects to become federally inspected to market their products beyond provincial boundaries; or legal entities planning to establish a federally inspected plant in a region where a deficit in slaughter capacity is constraining sector growth. The program is applications-based, and functions under a request-for-applications approach.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
Fifteen contribution agreements have been signed, two are currently being negotiated and one still remains conditionally approved. Two of the approved SIP projects have submitted final claims, however, since they have not completed their reporting year, there are no specific results available at this time.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Agri-Business Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 7.0 | 19.6 | 29.6 | 15.3 | 4.3 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 7.0 | 19.6 | 29.6 | 15.3 | 4.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Budget 2010 announced an additional $10M for the SIP bringing Total Authorities to $29.6M. Actual spending was less than the planned spending due to the timing of the approval of the projects as well as the multi-year nature of most of the proposals. Unspent funding is expected to be carried forward for use in 2011-12.
Audit Completed or Planned: A "Program Under Development Audit" was conducted between February and May 2010 in accordance with the 2009-12 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Risk-Based Audit Plan. A further audit has not been scheduled at this time.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11. An evaluation of the program is currently planned in the AAFC Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2011-12 to 2015-16) to begin in 2013-14 with planned completion by 2014-15.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to support the Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program (Voted)
Start Date: May 28, 2009
End Date: On-going, subject to evaluation of relevance and effectiveness by March 31, 2014.
Description:
The Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program (CAAP)'s objective is to facilitate the agriculture, agri-food, and agri-based products sector's ability to seize opportunities, to respond to new and emerging issues, and to pathfind and pilot solutions to new and ongoing issues in order to help it adapt and remain competitive. Launched
as a successor to the Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food (ACAAF) program, CAAP will continue to support industry-led initiatives at the national, regional and multi-regional levels.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
CAAP supports industry-led initiatives at the national, regional and multi-regional levels. Most projects funded take place over several years and longer-term impacts materialize a few years after project completion. Since CAAP is currently in the early stages (with
a focus on longer-term projects), the program measures short-term outcomes with two performance indicators:
Information available on national and industry-led projects indicate that:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Science, Innovation and Adoption | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 31.1 | 33.4 | 35.1 | 35.1 | (1.8) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 31.1 | 33.4 | 35.1 | 35.1 | (1.8) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The program has been very well received at the regional level, resulting in more applications than anticipated and higher than expected spending for 2010-11.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11. An evaluation is planned for 2013-14 to support program renewal.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to transform Canada's Strengths into Domestic and Global Success (Voted) (related funding is found under Grant payments for the Organization for the Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (Voted))
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The programming for transforming Canada's Strengths into Domestic and Global Success is composed of the following:
The AgriMarketing Program (AMP) provides a platform to equip industry, including small and medium-sized enterprises, for success in global markets. AgriMarketing cost-shares with industry associations for international market development, export promotion activities and in-depth research to form long-term international strategies that contribute and build on the Canada Brand.
The Enabling Research for Competitive Agriculture (ERCA) Program supports research, complements AAFC policy analysis and development, and contributes to a more informed policy dialogue by engaging the external policy research community on priority issues that can be used by industry groups and producers to assist them in identifying new opportunities, markets and ways to enhance productivity and improve competitiveness to improve their success in global and domestic markets.
A small component of the ERCA initiative provides a grant to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to enhance research on priority issues for Canada in the global context through collaborative activities, thereby providing a unique, global perspective on Canada's competitiveness.
Market Information and Export Capacity Building
Initiatives falling under this category aim to perform market analysis on Canada's performance in key markets and emerging countries to aid exporting companies and producers in capitalizing on global market opportunities and trends, and strengthen the capacity of the agriculture and food sector to maintain and enter new foreign markets.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
AgriMarketing Program
ERCA Program
Grant to OECD (part of ERCA):
ERCA Contributions:
Five Contribution Agreements were signed in October 2009 with four canadian universities for a total of $5.2M over 4 fiscal years (from 2009-2010 to 2012-2013), thus creating five networks of experts in the following areas: Consumer and Market Demand (CMD), Environment (ENV), Innovation and
Regulation (IR), Trade and Competitiveness Research (TCR), Structure and Performance of Agriculture and Agri-Food Industry (SPAA).
There are 160 researchers involved in this program: CMD: 30, ENV: 28, IR: 33, TCR: 43, SPAA: 26. There were 68 graduate students funded at Canadian universities in Canada through this program: CMD: 11, ENV: 14, IR: 13, TCR: 14, SPAA: 16. There were 48 projects funded directly by ERCA in 2010-2011: CMD: 12, ENV: 2, IR: 19, TCR: 8, SPAA: 7. There were 344 research reports, policy briefs, professional articles, working papers, and other publications released by network members including projects directly funded by ERCA and papers focuses on issues related to the network activities. The networks hosted along with the Canadian Agriculture Economic Society a major policy conference in Ottawa in January, 2011. There were 16 total conferences/workshops hosted or partially sponsored by the networks in 2010-11: CMD: 5, ENV: 4, IR: 1, TCR: 4, SPAA: 2.
Market Information and Export Capacity Building
The Bilateral Agreements to implement Growing Forward: A Federal-Provincial-Territorial Framework Agreement on Agriculture, Agri-Food and Agri-Based Products Policy specify that the Parties shall prepare annual performance reports containing information and provide them to the other Party on or before August 31 in respect of activities carried out under Designated Programs by
Thematic Area in the previous fiscal year (consistent with Schedule 1: Part C: Performance Indicators and Targets). As such, performance information relating to Growing Forward cost-shared programs will not be available for inclusion in this Departmental Performance Report. Once performance results for this program are available, they can be found at: Growing Forward Reporting.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Trade and Market Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - |
Total Contributions | - | 21.5 | 22.7 | 28.0 | 26.3 | (3.6) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 21.6 | 22.8 | 28.1 | 26.4 | (3.6) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
AgriMarketing
The variance between total authorities and actual spending is primarily as a result of some of the associations' inability to spend all of their approved funding related to AgriMarketing. Since recipients of AgriMarketing funding are associations which are undertaking activities in foreign markets, some of the associations were unable to undertake and complete some of their activities due to
resource limitations and/or changes to timing and planning as a result of shifting market conditions.
ERCA Contributions
2010-11 Actual Spending was slightly lower than authorities due to some of the variable expenses for the networks not being as high as anticipated.
Market Information and Export Capacity Building
The variance between total authorities and actual spending is due to timing of program implementation and additional time required in the planning stages, reviewing and assessing areas of priority that required further action under this initiative. This included discussions with provincial partners and key industry stakeholders. A portion of this variance could potentially be
carried forward into 2011-12.
Audit Completed or Planned:
AgriMarketing: AMP completed one audit in 2010-11. There are three audits planned for 2011-12.
Grant to OECD (part of ERCA): There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
ERCA Contributions: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Market Information and Export Capacity Building: Two audits of Growing Forward cost-shared programs will be completed by 2012 for British Columbia and Prince Edward Island.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
AgriMarketing: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Grant to OECD (part of ERCA): There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
ERCA Contributions: The Recipient Audit Unit of the Centre of Program Excellence conducted an initial risk assessment of the 5 ERCA programs and deemed them to be of low risk. The Office of Audit and Evaluation has initiated an Evaluation of the Trade and Market Development Initiative (of which ERCA is a part of) starting in June, 2011 that will conclude in June, 2012.
Market Information and Export Capacity Building: Under the Growing Forward Bilateral Agreement, Provincial and Territorial governments are to report the results of their Growing Forward evaluation to AAFC by March 2012.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Control of diseases in the hog industry - Phase 2 (Voted)
Start Date: September 4, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The overarching goal of the Initiative for the Control of Diseases in the Hog Industry is to improve the health of the Canadian hog herd, which will help sustain the long-term viability and profitability of the sector. The Initiative for the Control of Diseases in the Hog Industry Phase 2 is a mid to long-term strategy to establish the foundation of a risk management framework for the
Canadian hog sector. It is aimed at developing the capacities and structures within the hog industry to achieve long-term health and stability of the Canadian hog herd. This phase of the program is being delivered by the industry-led Canadian Swine Health Board (CSHB). CSHB is responsible
for:
Circovirus Inoculation Program
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
Under the Biosecurity Pillar, the National Biosecurity Standard was completed; Under the Research Pillar, 13 research projects are underway and 6 post doctoral fellowships were established; Under the Long Term Disease Risk Management Pillar, development of a pork mortality insurance product is underway.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Food Safety and Biosecurity Risk Management Systems | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 2.6 | 4.0 | 37.9 | 37.9 | 8.9 | 28.9 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 2.6 | 4.0 | 37.9 | 37.9 | 8.9 | 28.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual Spending in 2010–11 was less than Planned Spending largely due to timing in program implementation. Budget 2011 announced an extension to the Initiative for the Control of Diseases in the Hog Industry Phase 2 for an additional two years to March 31, 2013. This will enable the Canadian Swine Health Board to complete initiatives directed at national biosecurity standards and best management practices. As such, the majority of unspent funding from 2010-11 is expected to be carried forward for use in future years.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11. According to AAFC's five year Strategic Evaluation Plan, the program is expected to be evaluated in 2014-15 with a number of other recent assistance programs for the hog sector.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: EcoAgriculture Biofuels Capital Initiative (Voted)
Start Date: March 29, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The ecoAgriculture Biofuels Capital initiative (ecoABC) is a six-year, federal initiative that provides conditionally repayable contributions towards the construction or expansion of biofuel facilities that have equity investments from farmers and use agricultural feedstock. The initiative, which is part of the federal renewable fuels
strategy, is providing an opportunity for farmers to benefit from the emerging renewable fuels industry while helping the government to achieve its targets for renewable fuel content in gasoline and diesel fuel through domestic production. Eligible recipients include corporations (including but not restricted to co-operatives), individuals, and partnerships, which are not subject to a
controlling interest by a federal, provincial or municipal government, which can demonstrate that their equity investments from agricultural producers are equal to or exceed five percent of projected eligible project costs, and which intend to build plants or expand existing facilities to produce renewable transportation fuels in Canada from agricultural feedstock.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
EcoABC has committed $53 million to 9 biofuels projects representing 690 million new litres per year of biofuels production and $48 million of investment by 534 farmers.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Science, Innovation and Adoption | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 17.4 | 1.5 | 65.3 | 36.9 | 33.1 | 32.2 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 17.4 | 1.5 | 65.3 | 36.9 | 33.1 | 32.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Planned Spending was higher than actual because, due to the timing of the RPP, the Planned Spending did not reflect the reallocation of funding over the two-year extension of the program from March 2011 to March 2013. Under this extension, program parameters were broadened and, in response to the poor economic conditions of 2008-09, more time was provided for projects to be completed and better aligned with other programs under the federal Renewable Fuels Strategy.
Audit Completed or Planned: EcoABC was part of the Horizontal Audit of Grants and Contribution Programs during 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of this program was completed during 2010-11.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Orchards & Vineyards Transition Program (Voted)
Start Date: October 25, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
This Orchards and Vineyards Transition program (OVTP) funded plant removal to support replanting orchards and vineyards or planting other crops to help producers compete in changing global markets. The program responded to market pressure by funding strategic planning activities to increase the industry's knowledge and
decision-making. The program operated in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, and ended on March 31, 2011.
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
The objective of the program was to ensure acreage was readily available for replanting of more marketable crops, and to develop an improved understanding of the opportunities for the orchards and vineyards sector. The OVTP resulted in fruit trees and grape vines being removed from 7,000 hectares, which made land available for the
planting of more marketable varieties of tree fruits, grapes and other crops. The program encouraged producers to make the adjustments necessary to become more competitive.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Agri-Business Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 11.4 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 11.3 | 11.1 | (2.0) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 11.4 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 11.3 | 11.1 | (2.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between the planned spending and the actual spending in 2010-11 is due to higher than expected demands for the program in the province of Quebec.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A lessons learned exercise for the program is expected to be finalized in 2011-12. Under the federal-provincial agreements, the provinces are responsible for evaluating the activities carried out under the agreements.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Over Thirty Months Payment Program (Voted)
Start Date: June 17, 2010
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
This program, also referred to as the Abattoir Competitiveness Program (ACP), was a one year, $25 million program which ended on March 31, 2011. The program provided direct payments (grants) to eligible recipients based on the volume of specified risk materials produced from over thirty month old (OTM) cattle during the 2010 calendar year. ACP was designed to:
Strategic Outcome: An innovative agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector
Results Achieved:
The short-term assistance provided under this program has been well received by industry with 16 applications received from federally inspected facilities and 217 applications received from provincially inspected facilities for a total of 233 applications received nationally. The expected result was that Canadian OTM (over thirty months old)
slaughter capacity be maintained, the target being 75% of the 2009 value. This target was exceeded, as capacity was maintained at 98%.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Agri-Business Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | 23.0 | 22.7 | (22.7) |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | - | - | 23.0 | 22.7 | (22.7) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): There was no planned spending reported as this program was approved after the 2010-11 RPP.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There was no evaluation undertaken for this program in 2010-11. This program is included in the Evaluation of Cattle Slaughter Industry Assistance that is planned to be completed in 2013-14.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments in connection with the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act (AMPA) / Advance Payments Program (Statutory)
Start Date: 1997
End Date: On-going under AMPA
Description:
The Advance Payments Program (APP) is a financial loan guarantee program that guarantees cash advances to producers, enabling them to produce and market their agricultural products when conditions are most ideal. Producers can receive cash advances of up to $400,000 per production period, the first $100,000 of which is interest-free. Advances can
be on a variety of crops and/or livestock and producers have up to 18 months (usually from April until September of the following year) to use their cash advance for whatever purpose they feel necessary. The producer must repay their advance (as they are selling/delivering their product) in full before the end of the 18 month production period.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector that proactively manages risk
Results Achieved:
For the 2010-11 production period, 64 agreements were signed to deliver the APP with producer organizations. Approximately $1.57 billion was issued in advances to approximately 39,566 producers. The uptake of the program fluctuates from year to year. 2010-11 saw an increase in the number of participants but a decrease in the amount
advanced. This is likely due to lower commodity prices and a decrease in the amount that livestock producers are borrowing under the program.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 37.0 | 28.5 | 184.0 | 34.0 | 34.0 | 150.0 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 37.0 | 28.5 | 184.0 | 34.0 | 34.0 | 150.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned and actual spending was primarily due to the fact that in 2010-11, fewer guarantee payments related to advances provided for the 2008 production period were made than originally expected due to two separate stays of default. Low interest rates during the fiscal year also resulted in a large cost savings.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The Advance Payments Program (APP) is enacted and governed by the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act (AMPA). The AMPA requires that a legislative review take place every five years in consultation with the Minister of Finance (the next five year anniversary being November 27, 2011).
The legislative review is currently underway and is comprised of 3 distinct activities: a program evaluation, a review of program delivery, and an evaluation of administrative efficiency. In spring 2011, targeted engagement sessions were conducted across Canada with industry stakeholders, APP administrators and producer organizations. Additionally, 3,000 individual producers were selected to complete a questionnaire, and 20 key stakeholders were selected for personal interviews.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Plum Pox Eradication Program (PPEP) (Voted)
Start Date: April 19, 2004
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Plum Pox Eradication Program (PPEP) provided funding for activities aimed at eradicating the Plum Pox Virus (PPV) from the Niagara region of Canada while ensuring the viability of the tender fruit industry (peaches, plums, apricots, nectarines). The bulk of the funding supports an extensive
survey of tender fruit orchards, research and financial assistance for tender fruit producers whose orchards are affected by the PPV. The program also includes an asset loss compensation component. This seven-year program (2004-05 to 2010-11) was a follow-up of the original three-year program (2001-02 to 2003-04).
The program is jointly funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA).
Canadian Food Inspection Agency
Results Achieved:
During 2010-11, the number of trees and orchards that have been identified as PPV positive were 211 cases and 58 cases respectively. One of the program's key performance targets was a 15% reduction in PPV incidences annually between 2004-2011. While this target had been met during the first six years of the program, a
significant increase in positive tested trees during 2010-11 resulted in an annual reduction of 11% (a reduction from 942 PPV positives in 2004 to 211 PPV positives in 2010) when the program was terminated as of March 31, 2011.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Food Safety and Biosecurity Risk Management Systems | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | - |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Funding has been fully spent as planned.
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no audit undertaken for this program in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The final evaluation report and management responses for the Plum Pox Eradication Program are expected to be completed in September 2011.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Programming related to the Agricultural Flexibility Fund (Voted)
Start Date: June 18, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description:
Agricultural Flexibility Fund (AgriFlexibility) initiatives will fall under three project categories or elements:
Strategic Outcomes:
Results Achieved:
As the Agricultural Flexibility Fund was meant to be flexible, no targets were set at the beginning of the fund for provincial, territorial and industry initiatives in partnership with the federal government. Provinces, territories and industry identified needs for the sector and presented proposals accordingly. Targets for individual contribution agreements/bilateral agreements were then
established. In general, targets are for the duration of the agreements. Performance indicators, specific to the nature of each initiative, were developed and included in contribution/bilateral agreements. As most AgriFlexibility projects/initiatives are taking place over several years, it is a challenge to report annually on the achievement of specific targets. It should also be noted that
targets may change, as provinces and territories are allowed to change their targets annually under their contribution agreements. From the beginning of the Fund to March 31, 2011 a total of 36 proposals received from provinces, territories and industry have been approved for a total value of about $149.4 million.
Under the Agri-Processing Initiative (API), a federal initiative established under AgriFlexibility, 20 facilities completed upgrades before the end of March 2011 compared to a target of 35 facilities. Another eight projects had agreements signed in the reporting period but projects will not be completed until 2011-12 and later. In total, by the end of March 2011, API had 33 contribution agreements signed for a total of $19.1 million compared to a target of 53 agreements and $20.7 million.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Environmental Knowledge, Technology, Information, and Measurement | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | 2.6 | 0.9 | - | 2.6 |
Total Environmental Knowledge, Technology, Information, and Measurement | - | - | 2.6 | 0.9 | - | 2.6 |
Program Activity: On-Farm Action | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | 22.8 | 11.6 | 0.9 | 21.9 |
Total On-Farm Action | - | - | 22.8 | 11.6 | 0.9 | 21.9 |
Program Activity: Food Safety Biosecurity Risk Management Systems | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | 17.7 | 10.9 | 0.2 | 17.4 |
Total Food Safety Biosecurity Risk Management System | - | - | 17.7 | 10.9 | 0.2 | 17.4 |
Program Activity: Trade and Market Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | 12.1 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 9.7 |
Total Trade and Market Development | - | - | 12.1 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 9.7 |
Program Activity: Science, Innovation and Adaptation | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 4.1 | 28.8 | 25.8 | 14.8 | 14.0 |
Total Science, Innovation and Adaptation | - | 4.1 | 28.8 | 25.8 | 14.8 | 14.0 |
Program Activity: Agri-Business Development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | 2.1 | 6.0 | 4.3 | (2.2) |
Total Agri-Business Development | - | - | 2.1 | 6.0 | 4.3 | (2.2) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 4.1 | 86.1 | 62.3 | 22.7 | 63.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): As announced in Budget 2010, a total of $42M of 2010-11 planned spending was transferred to the Slaughter Improvement Program (SIP), the Over Thirty Months Payment Program (OTMPP) and the Slaughter Waste Improvement Program (SWIP), and is not reflected in the AgriFlexibility actual spending. A portion of the unspent funding is expected to be carried forward into future years.
Audit Completed or Planned: A "Program under Development Audit" was completed in January 2011. Observations from the audit were generally positive. Most of the expected elements of the governance, risk management and control frameworks of the Agricultural Flexibility Fund were found to be in place and working appropriately. Roles and responsibilities were clear, a senior-level committee provided appropriate oversight, key risks were identified and controls implemented to mitigate the assessed risks, templates consistent with the approved terms and conditions were used to assess projects, and funding agreements were generally complete and consistent with program terms and conditions.
An internal audit is planned for 2013-14.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A mid-term evaluation was planned for 2011-12. Given that the scope of the audit was broader than anticipated, it was determined that the mid-term evaluation was no longer necessary and a complete evaluation will take place in 2015-16.
Note:
Due to rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Atlantic Innovation Fund – Voted
Start Date: May 10, 2001
End Date: Ongoing
Description:
The Atlantic Innovation Fund (AIF) focuses on increasing research and development linked to economic growth and commercialization objectives in areas that are of strategic importance to the region, in particular, the growth of strategic sectors/clusters. The AIF emphasizes building Atlantic Canada’s system of innovation, including components that bridge the gap between research
institutions and the marketplace. It encourages synergies among the various components of this system through partnerships, alliances and networks. Furthermore, the AIF supports research and development projects that focus on the areas of natural sciences, applied sciences, and social sciences and humanities, where these are linked explicitly to the development of technology-based products,
processes or services or their commercialization, thereby strengthening the region’s system of innovation. More information on the AIF can be found on ACOA's website.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Results Achieved:
ACOA focuses on accelerating the development of the knowledge-based economy and on facilitating transition within traditional industries. The Agency uses the AIF to increase the region’s capacity to carry out leading-edge research and development and to contribute to the development of new technology-based economic activity in Atlantic Canada. In 2010-11, there were 27 projects approved
under the AIF, accounting for over $69 million in ACOA assistance toward projects valued at $116.4 million.
The AIF facilitates the development of strategic sectors characterized by regional clusters of firms. Twenty-one of 27 approved projects in 2010-11, accounting for $49.3 million in AIF funding, augmented development of the IT, life sciences-biotechnology, and oil and gas-oceans technology clusters, and complement the National Research Council’s Atlantic Cluster initiative.
ACOA encourages prospective stakeholders, including universities, colleges, research organizations and private-sector firms, to take an active role in seeking opportunities for partnerships/collaboration. In 2010-11, there were 77 meaningful partnerships stemming from AIF-funded projects.
Furthermore, ACOA continued to support Springboard Atlantic Inc., which combines the research and commercialization strengths of its 19 university and college members to create a pan-Atlantic network. Springboard Atlantic Inc. supports the commercialization of Atlantic Canadian research through the transfer of knowledge and technology to the private sector. This network has been instrumental in facilitating public-private partnerships nationally, internationally and throughout Atlantic Canada.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 58.1 | 57.6 | 38.1 | 57.1 | 55.7 | (17.6) |
Comment on Variance:
Planned spending for 2010-11 was affected by the timing of the approval of ongoing funding for AIF of $19 million (which was approved only on August 3, 2010 – TB #835763). It was excluded from the Main Estimates and, therefore, was not part of the planned spending reported in the 2010-11 Report on Plans and Priorities.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Following the introduction of the Program Activity Architecture (PAA), the Agency began to conduct evaluations at the program sub-activity level starting in fiscal year 2009-10. In addition to direct program spending, program sub-activity evaluations include the assessment of transfer payment programs. The next planned evaluation of the Innovation program sub-activity (which includes the AIF)
is 2013-14.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Business Development Program – Voted
Start Date: July 25, 1995
End Date: Ongoing
Description:
Through its Business Development Program (BDP), ACOA works to create opportunities for economic growth in Atlantic Canada by helping small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) become more competitive, innovative and productive by working with communities to develop and diversify local economies and by championing the strengths of the region in partnership with Atlantic Canadians.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Results Achieved:
During 2010-11, to improve productivity and preserve long-term employment prospects, the BDP invested in 27 projects to establish new businesses, 146 projects to help companies expand and/or modernize their facilities, and 64 innovation projects. This program continues to focus on innovation, skills development and trade activities to enhance the business environment in Atlantic Canada. The
program serves to fill gaps in the financing continuum for SMEs and entrepreneurs in Atlantic Canada.
The BDP also invested more than $25 million in community development projects in 2010-11. These projects improved community capacity to identify economic development needs and opportunities, ensured that Atlantic Canada businesses had access to capital as well as business information and counselling, and improved community capacity to address economic and business development needs and opportunities. More information on the BDP can be found on ACOA's website.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | (0.1) |
Total Contributions | 99.9 | 105.7 | 87.5 | 92.9 | 108.6 | (21.1) |
Total Program Activity | 100.1 | 105.8 | 87.6 | 93.9 | 108.8 | (21.2) |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | (0.3) |
Total Contributions | 23.3 | 42.3 | 28.5 | 23.9 | 39.6 | (11.1) |
Total Program Activity | 23.8 | 42.6 | 28.6 | 24.9 | 40.0 | (11.4) |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | (0.1) |
Total Contributions | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | (0.1) |
Total Program Activity | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | (0.2) |
Total for TPP | 124.5 | 149.1 | 116.7 | 119.9 | 149.5 | (32.8) |
Comments on Variances:
An additional $32.8 million was made available for the BDP during the year due to an increased demand for programming. This provided funding to SMEs facing challenges during the current economic downturn and for the funding of initiatives in communities.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Following the introduction of the Program Activity Architecture (PAA), the Agency began to conduct evaluations at the program sub-activity level starting in fiscal year 2009-10. In addition to direct program spending, program sub-activity evaluations include the assessment of transfer payment programs. Evaluations completed or in progress related to the Business Development Program
include:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Futures Program – Voted
Start Date: May 18, 1995
End Date: Ongoing (renewed on an ongoing basis as of October 2011)
Description:
The Community Futures (CF) Program supports community economic development and builds the capacity of communities to realize their full sustainable potential. The program provides financial support to CF organizations (i.e. Community Business Development Corporations in Atlantic Canada), enabling them, in collaboration with other partners and stakeholders, to assess their respective situation
and develop strategies to meet their needs. The CF Program also provides support to small and medium-sized enterprises and social enterprises for undertaking appropriate community economic development initiatives.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Results Achieved:
In 2010-11, Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs) continued to achieve sustainable solutions for their economic need by approving 1,121 loans that represent an investment of $52.5 million and 954 new jobs in rural communities in the Atlantic region. The CBDCs also provided 7,844 counselling sessions to clients throughout the region. The Agency provides other support by using
various funding programs to respond to the need for building community economic development capacity and identifying opportunities, which includes regional strategic planning.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 12.4 | 13.0 | 11.0 | 12.6 | 12.9 | (1.9) |
Comment on Variance:
The variance between planned spending and actual spending occurred because the incremental funding for the CF Treasury Board Submission was approved in September 2010, which affected the normal budgeting cycle. Additional funding was subsequently received.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Following the introduction of the Program Activity Architecture (PAA), the Agency began to conduct evaluations at the program sub-activity level starting in fiscal year 2009-10. In addition to direct program spending, program sub-activity evaluations include the assessment of transfer payment programs. The next planned evaluation of the Community-based Business Development program
sub-activity (which includes the Community Futures Program) is 2012-13. This evaluation is expected to be completed before June 2014.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Innovative Communities Fund – Voted
Start Date: April 1, 2005
End Date: Ongoing (renewed as an ongoing program in March 2010)
Description:
The program is designed to support strategic initiatives that respond to the economic development needs of communities through non-repayable contributions. To effectively address the wide range of challenges and opportunities of regions, communities and sectors, the Innovative Communities Fund (ICF) takes a comprehensive approach to working with communities at various stages along the
economic development continuum while ensuring sustainable economic outcomes.
The ICF has three distinct components. The first component, Strategic Community Capacity (SC), is designed to support non-commercial, non-profit strategic initiatives that target the economic development needs of rural communities. The second, Proactive Investments (PI), is intended to stimulate transformative change. This component supports proactive identification and implementation of strategic opportunities with local partners. The third component, the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF), was a two-year funding initiative ending March 31, 2011, that was part of Canada’s Economic Action Plan (CEAP). CAF was put in place by the Government of Canada to provide economic stimulus to mitigate the short-term impacts of the economic downturn; it created employment opportunities and addressed transitional and adjustment challenges in restructuring communities. In Atlantic Canada, ACOA delivered CAF using its existing Innovative Communities Fund (ICF) and Business Development Program.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Results Achieved:
During fiscal year 2010-11, 159 projects were approved under the ICF, of which 142 were funded under the SC component, 17 under the PI component. Another 20 projects were funded under the CAF component. The 159 projects approved under the original ICF (SC and PI components) had total project costs of $119.4 million, with an ACOA contribution of $45.5 million and dollars leveraged amounting to
$73.9 million. The 20 CAF projects had total project costs of $8.1 million, with an ACOA contribution of $3.8 million and dollars leveraged amounting to $4.3 million.
In 2010-11, ACOA continued to work in partnership with communities and stakeholders in strategic investments that focused on infrastructure, capacity building at the community level, and business-sector development. Strategic investments reflect economic development plans and priorities that are elaborated and implemented by communities. The ICF exceeded its annual target for partnership, with a total of 495 collaborators for 308 approved projects.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 48.9 | 73.4 | 87.8 | 92.8 | 72.8 | 15.0 |
Comment on Variance:
The variance can be explained by the timing of the program’s renewal and ACOA’s focus on the delivery of initiatives under Canada’s Economic Action Plan, such as the Community Adjustment Fund and Recreational Infrastructure Canada program.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Following the introduction of the Program Activity Architecture (PAA), the Agency began to conduct evaluations at the program sub-activity level starting in fiscal year 2009-10. In addition to direct program spending, program sub-activity evaluations include the assessment of transfer payment programs. The next planned evaluation of the Community Investment program sub-activity (which
includes the ICF) is 2012-13.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Recreational Infrastructure Canada – Voted
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: October 31, 2011
Description:
The Recreational Infrastructure Canada (RInC) program provided $500 million nationally for projects to assist in the rehabilitation of recreational facilities across Canada. The initial end date for the RInC program was March 31, 2011. An extension to the program was announced on December 2, 2010, with a new end date of October 31, 2011.
Through RInC, the Government of Canada committed to support upgrades and repairs of existing recreational assets, including new construction that adds to or replaces existing recreational infrastructure assets or capacity. The program was designed to provide a timely, targeted stimulus to the economy and to help mitigate the impacts of the global economic recession by increasing the total volume of construction activity related to recreational infrastructure. Through the rehabilitation of recreational infrastructure, this program also encouraged participation in physical activity and community building.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Results Achieved: ACOA has fully committed its RInC allocation by investing $34.2 million in 230 approved projects across Atlantic Canada. During fiscal year 2010-11, seven projects were approved under RInC, with total projects costs of $1.6 million and dollars leveraged amounting to $1.2 million. Since the beginning of the RInC program, 188 projects were successfully completed by March 31, 2011, and 49 were proposed to be extended to October 31, 2011.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 0.0 | 11.3 | 22.4 | 24.0 | 19.4 | 3.0 |
Comment on Variance:
The discrepancy is due to a number of factors, many of which were beyond ACOA’s control, including severe weather conditions and consequent delays to construction schedules. Forty-nine projects were proposed for an extension to October 31, 2011, as per the conditions announced by the Prime Minister in December 2010.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Not applicable. There is no evaluation planned for this transfer payment program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Saint John Shipyard Adjustment Initiative – Voted
Start Date: May 29, 2003
End Date: May 31, 2011
Description:
The initiative aims to address the economic impact of the lack of manufacturing activities at the site of the former Saint John shipbuilding yard in the province of New Brunswick.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Results Achieved:
On June 16, 2010, the Minister of ACOA agreed to make changes to the Saint John Shipyard Adjustment Initiative (SJSAI). These modifications allowed for the extension of the project approval date to May 31, 2011, and for project contract payments to be made beyond this date.
On March 4, 2011, the Minister approved a $6.1-million project for Atlantic Wallboard Limited Partnership to install natural gypsum rock crushing equipment at its plant in Saint John. A total of $3 million was committed for the 2010-11 fiscal year, in addition to $3.1 million that will flow in 2011-12.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 |
Comment on Variance:
The client did not proceed with the project, which was expected to flow $10 million during fiscal 2010-11. A replacement project was not approved until late in the year, and only $3 million of the approved project funds were expended during the year. The balance of this project and the remaining initiative funds are expected to flow during 2011-12, with two projects currently under
review.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Not applicable. There is no evaluation planned for this transfer payment program.
Two transfer payment programs with payments in excess of $5 million were administered by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2010-2011. These are:
Start Date: Aug. 28, 1995 Footnote 1
Description of Transfer Payment Program: Tax-free monthly payments made to agencies and foster parents who are licensed by provincial or federal governments to provide for the care and education of children under the age of 18 who physically reside in Canada and who are not in the care of their parents. Children’s Special Allowance (CSA) payments are equivalent to Canada Child Tax Benefit payments. CSA payments are governed by the Children’s Special Allowance Act which provides that this allowance be paid out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible families and individuals receive timely and correct benefit payments
Results Achieved: Monthly payments were made to 281 agencies and foster parents on behalf of 53,951 children. Payments were issued on schedule, no delays were reported.
Program Activity: Benefit Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Transfer Payments Table note 1
|
||||||
Comment(s) on variance(s): N/A
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s): N/A
End Date: October 12, 2013 with an option for an additional 2 years
Description of Transfer Payment Program: The export charge, to be levied by Canada on exports of softwood lumber products to the United States, is collected and administered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) with support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade on behalf of the provinces. Under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006, the CRA is responsible for making statutory disbursements to the provinces of a portion of the charge collected over the course of the application of the Softwood Lumber Agreement, 2006. These disbursements are reduced by several factors: refunds paid to the industry, costs for the administration and implementation of the Agreement and the Act as well as the costs incurred for certain litigation resulting from the Agreement or Act. The Act applies to the following regions: British Columbia Interior, British Columbia Coastal, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. Exports from the remaining provinces and territories are excluded.
Strategic Outcome: Taxpayers meet their obligations and Canada’s revenue base is protected
Results Achieved: Disbursements will continue on a quarterly basis until the termination of the Agreement, unless lumber market prices increase to the point where no export charge is applicable for that period.
Program Activity: Taxpayer and Business Assistance
Total Other Transfer Payments Table note 2
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comment(s) on variance(s): N/A
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s): N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Compensation Payments
Start Date: N/A
End Date: N/A
Description of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by regulations under the Plant Protection Act, and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act. These payments are to compensate Canadians, in accordance with the appropriate regulations, for plants ordered destroyed for the purpose of disease control.
Strategic Outcome: A safe and sustainable plant and animal resource base.
Results Achieved: 53 Canadians were compensated for plants ordered destroyed.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Contributions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 11.9 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | -0.1 |
Total Program Activity: Plant Health Risks and Production Systems | 11.9 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | -0.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual compensation payments made to Canadians were only $100,000 less than the amount that was earmarked under Planned Spending.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Compensation Payments
Start Date: N/A
End Date: N/A
Description of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by regulations under the Health of Animals Act and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act. These payments are to compensate Canadians, in accordance with the appropriate regulations, for animals ordered destroyed for the purpose of disease control.
Strategic Outcome: A safe and sustainable plant and animal resource base.
Results Achieved: 127 Canadians were compensated for animals ordered destroyed.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Contributions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 8.6 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.2 |
Total Program Activity: Plant Health Risks and Production Systems | 8.6 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual compensation payments made to Canadians were $2.2 million higher than the $0.7 million that was earmarked under Planned Spending. This increase is largely attributed to Avian Influenza ($1.2M) and Chronic Wasting Disease ($0.7M).
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Arts Presentation Fund
Start Date: 2001–02
End Date: 2014–15
Description: The Canada Arts Presentation Fund (CAPF) aims to give Canadians direct access to a variety of professional artistic experiences in their communities. It provides financial assistance to Canadian not-for-profit organizations that professionally present arts festivals or performing arts series, as well as their support organizations. The CAPF also supports the emergence of presenters and presenter support organizations for under-served communities or artistic practices. The expected result is that more Canadians, from all regions, experience and value professional artistic experiences.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad.
Results Achieved: The CAPF has provided access for Canadians to a wide variety of professional artistic experiences in their communities. In recent years, CAPF recipients have reported an annual total attendance of more than 20 million. In 2010-11, funded organizations presented a variety of disciplines: music (75% of all funded organizations present music as part of their activities); dance (49%); theatre (49%); visual arts (26%); literature (14%); and media arts (17%).
The CAPF has helped organizations expand and diversify their audiences. The percentages of funded organizations that reach out to a variety of audiences in underserved communities are: 64% for culturally diverse audiences, 72% for young audiences, 32% for Aboriginal audiences, 40% for rural/remote regions and 35 % for official language minorities.
The following two examples illustrate results achieved by organizations and activities funded by CAPF in 2010-11:
Labrador Creative Arts Festival (Newfoundland)
The Labrador Creative Arts Festival is an annual, multi-disciplinary, week-long festival presented in Goose Bay, Newfoundland. The festival estimated 1,500 participants in 2010-11.The Festival's mandate is to provide young audiences from rural and remote Labrador, including aboriginal students, with arts experiences that
are not otherwise available in the region. The Festival also allows Aboriginal youth to participate in a performing arts apprenticeship program through a partnership with the Ross Creek Centre for the Arts in Nova Scotia. The 2010 Festival explored the theme of Flight in relation to the history and cultural development of Labrador. In 2010-11, the CAPF awarded $20,000 over two years for the
2010 and 2011 editions of the festival, including $10,000 in community engagement funding.
Festival du Voyageur (Manitoba)
The Festival du Voyageur is a culture, arts and heritage festival that celebrates the culture and heritage of the Manitoba Francophone community with cultural activities like popular, folk and traditional performances. The festival expected 103,000 participants in 2010-11. The Festival du Voyageur unifies its community and is
internationally renowned for its unique historic and cultural experiences. Festival activities are geared to a variety of demographic groups and contribute to audience development, thanks to numerous community partnerships and a school-based program that attracts more than 10,000 students per year. In 2010–11, the CAPF made an investment of $199,000 over two years for the 2010 and 2011
festivals, including $90,000 for community engagement.
Output
In fiscal year 2010-11, the program provided funding to 268 festivals (45%), 246 performing arts series presenters (42%), as well as 49 organizations presenting both a series and a festival (8%), and 29 presenter support organizations (5%). A total of 592 projects in 245 communities were supported through grants and contributions provided by CAPF in
2010-11.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $5,803,425 | $7,025,086 | $10,500,000 | $10,500,000 | $7,724,063 | $2,775,937 |
Total Contributions | $24,066,547 | $21,649,785 | $17,378,855 | $17,001,855 | $18,618,678 | ($1,239,823) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $29,869,972 | $28,674,871 | $27,878,855 | $27,501,855 | $26,342,741 | $1,536,114 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A1 | $138,904,779 | $105,448,850 | $105,071,850 | $104,497,091 | $951,759 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.5M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Cultural Spaces Fund
Start Date: 2001–02
End Date: 2014–15
Description: The Canada Cultural Spaces Fund (CCSF) seeks to contribute to the improvement of physical conditions for arts and heritage related creation, presentation, preservation and exhibition; and to increase and improve access for Canadians to performing arts, visual arts, media arts, and to museum collections and heritage displays. To achieve these objectives, the CCSF provides financial assistance to Canadian not-for-profit arts and heritage organizations for construction/renovation projects, specialized equipment purchases and/or feasibility studies for cultural infrastructure projects. The expected result is that Canadians in all regions have access to arts and heritage spaces for creation, presentation, preservation and/or exhibition.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad.
Results Achieved: Since its inception in 2001-02, the CCSF program has contributed to 925 projects, in more than 295 communities across Canada through contributions totaling $283,659,830. In 2010-11, the second year of Canada’s Economic Action Plan (EAP), the CCSF program contributed to 64 infrastructure improvement projects across the country. These included funding to 27 construction and major renovation projects; 31 projects devoted specifically to the purchase and installation of specialized equipment; and 6 projects that assisted organizations with the costs of feasibility studies for cultural infrastructure projects, with a total of $16,861,014 awarded in 2010-11.
These projects improve infrastructure to allow for greater access for Canadians to arts and heritage spaces. For instance, a $1.6 million contribution from CCSF was approved in 2010-11 to support the construction of a Discovery Centre both for the Upper Canada Village, a living pioneer village, and the adjoining Crysler’s Farm, a National Historic Site in Ontario. The new facility will provide space for year-round interactive exhibits, including a rotating display of some 7,000 artifacts, as well as a multi-purpose space for augmenting program activities, festivals and events. The project will provide Canadians increased access to arts and heritage spaces for creation, presentation, conservation and exhibition activities.
Also in 2010-11, CCSF provided assistance to the Musée de la Mer located in the Magdalen Islands in the Gulf of St Lawrence. CCSF contributed $273,000 to support major renovations and expansion of the Museum. This project involves bringing the existing building up to current safety standards, optimizing the entrance conditions and adding additional exhibition spaces. This project will increase and improve access for Canadians to museum collections, arts and heritage displays.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $477,866 | $2,105,630 | $4,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $708,753 | $3,291,247 |
Total Contributions | $28,652,220 | $61,549,649 | $22,949,850 | $22,949,850 | $27,430,352 | ($4,480,502) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $29,130,086 | $63,655,279 | $26,949,850 | $26,949,850 | $28,139,105 | ($1,189,255) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A3 | $138,904,779 | $105,448,850 | $105,071,850 | $104,497,091 | $951,759 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($1.2M) is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
3 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
4 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Cultural Investment Fund
Start Date: 2001–02
End Date: 2014–15
Description: The Canada Cultural Investment Fund (CCIF) aims to help arts and heritage organizations build and diversify their revenue streams, strengthen their organizational capacity, business skills and competencies, and to assist them in being better rooted and recognized in their communities. This will be achieved through four components: Endowment Incentives, Cultural Capitals of Canada, Strategic Initiatives, and Limited Support to Endangered Arts Organizations. The CCIF provides financial assistance to Canadian not-for-profit organizations in the arts and heritage sectors, foundations, Canadian municipalities, as well as First Nations, Métis, and Inuit equivalent governments. The expected result is to contribute to the long-term organizational, administrative and financial health of Canadian arts and heritage organizations.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved: The CCIF encourages leadership, high standards of entrepreneurial and managerial skills, and the leveraging of a full range of partnerships between Canadians, Canadian businesses, various levels of government and the broader public sector, and communities, to contribute to the long-term sustainability of a healthy, competitive cultural sector that matters to Canadians. Federal investment through CCIF is delivered mainly through the Endowment Incentives component, Cultural Capitals of Canada and Strategic Initiatives (launched in 2010).
The following are highlights of results achieved by the CCIF in 2010-11 based on key performance indicators.
Strategic Initiatives
2010-11 marked the launch of the new Strategic Initiatives component which aims to encourage cultural organizations to work with one another as well as partners from various other sectors in order to become better rooted in their communities. Working together, cultural organizations and their partners pool knowledge and resources so that they are better equipped to strengthen management
practices, can make strategic use of new technologies and can succeed with their revenue diversification goals.
During the first intake in 2010-11, 83* organizations formed various partnerships and shared resources, including financial investments and professional expertise, to undertake 15 strategic initiatives. Over 70% of these organizations had never worked together before. Partners were from a number of sectors including: the private sector such as Sun Life Financial, the Power Corporation of Canada and The Globe and Mail; universities such as the University of Alberta and the University of Ottawa; Crown corporations such as the CBC/Radio-Canada and the Canada Council for the Arts; various levels of government and a number of other not-for-profit organizations such as the Guelph Jazz Festival, Les Arts et la Ville and the Dawson City Arts Festival.
To successfully undertake the 15 projects, organizations developed a number of activities and tools, the majority of which were aimed at improving financial self-sufficiency, developing markets and making strategic use of new technologies. Projects included cross-promotional marketing campaigns, the development of Smartphone applications, leadership development programs and workshops, online tools and a business-arts prize. According to applicants, it is anticipated that the 15 strategic initiatives will have a direct impact on over 3000 organizations.
The total amount CCIF has committed to invest in these projects is close to $3 million; which represents only 21% of the total cost for undertaking such initiatives. This means that for every one dollar invested by the CCIF, close to $4 came from a combination of the lead applicant’s investment and partners within their community.
Endowment Incentives
The Endowment Incentives component of the CCIF aims to incent private sector donations to well-managed arts organizations by providing matching funds to these organizations’ endowment funds. To have the most significant impact and respond to Canadians’ desire to strongly invest in arts organizations’ endowment funds, this year, the program invested a new high of $18.9
million in matching grants. This means that for every dollar donated by Canadians, Canadian businesses, non-government foundations and arts organizations, the program invested $0.71.
In 2010-11, through the CCIF Endowment Incentives application process, Canadians donated close to $26.6 million to 85 endowment funds, a 26.9% increase from the previous year. Of this amount, nearly half (50% or $13.4 million) was donated by individuals while corporations and non-government foundations donated 12% ($3.3 million) and 19% ($5.1 million) respectively – the remainder came from other sources. This significant financial commitment is a clear indication that Canadians and arts organizations continue to believe in the value of endowments.
Since the launch of Endowment Incentives, the federal government’s contribution of $122 million has leveraged close to $176 million in donations from the private sector, for a total combined investment of $298 million in arts organizations’ endowment funds across Canada.
Cultural Capitals of Canada
Cultural Capitals of Canada (CCC) recognizes and supports Canadian communities that have a record of harnessing the many benefits of arts and culture in community life. Its objective is to stimulate sustained community support for the arts and heritage.
In 2010-11, eleven communities submitted applications for the 2011 CCC Awards. Of these, three were awarded a designation, for a total of $3,250,000 in approved contributions. The 2011 Cultural Capitals of Canada are: Lévis, Quebec; Vancouver, British Columbia; and Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.
Over 50 partner organizations within these communities have committed to assist their municipality in undertaking arts and culture activities during the year of designation. Similar to last year, this year’s partners include: private sector organizations, post-secondary institutions; arts and culture organizations; economic development associations, as well as local Aboriginal,
culturally diverse and official language minority communities. Heritage exhibits and festivals, multi-media and theatre productions, public art programs, workshops and cultural planning tools are among those activities that are being funded; close to 70% of these activities are new and a direct result of the CCC designation. Over 36% of these activities are intended to leave a lasting legacy
in the designated communities.
The application process alone brought together over 200 partners within applicant communities to develop proposals.
Since 2002-03, 152 eligible applications have been submitted to the program and 40 CCC designations have been awarded, for a total of $29.45million in approved contributions.
Output
Through its various components, CCIF approved 90 grants and 13 contributions for a total of $25,046,066 awarded, in 2010-11.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $15,930,869 | $15,685,600 | $19,038,432 | $19,038,432 | $19,019,844 | $18,588 |
Total Contributions | $8,376,411 | $6,599,029 | $6,144,273 | $6,144,273 | $5,820,401 | $323,872 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $24,307,280 | $22,284,629 | $25,182,705 | $25,182,705 | $24,840,245 | $342,460 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A5 | $138,904,779 | $105,448,850 | $105,071,850 | $104,497,091 | $951,759 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.3M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
5 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
6 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program:Canada Arts Training Fund
Start Date: 1997-98
End Date: 2012–13
Description: The Canada Arts Training Fund (CATF) aims to contribute to the development of Canadian creators and future cultural leaders of the Canadian arts sector by supporting the training of artists with high potential through institutions that offer training of the highest calibre. It provides financial assistance to independent professional Canadian not-for-profit institutions that specialize in providing focused, intensive and practice-based studies. These schools provide professional training at the highest level in disciplines such as ballet, contemporary dance, theatre, circus arts, Aboriginal and culturally diverse art forms, musical performance (opera, orchestral), etc. The expected result is that Canadians and the world benefit from high-quality artistic achievements by Canadian artists trained in Canada.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved: Since the inception of the program, from 1997-98 through 2010-11, the CATF has disbursed a total of $208,415,992 in operating funding to national arts training schools in a range of disciplines. In 2010-11, the program supported 39 organizations specializing in a wide variety of artistic disciplines and awarded a total of $22,270,000 in contributions.
In 2010-11, Canada’s Economic Action Plan provided 35 funded organizations with an additional $12 million in stimulus support to enable increased long-term competitiveness and stability as well as capacity to deliver expected results.
A summative evaluation of the CATF, completed in March 2007, identified a need for continued federal support in national arts training and that the program is meeting its overall objective to provide arts training of the highest calibre across Canada. The CATF’s ultimate outcome; that Canadians and the world benefit from high-quality artistic achievements by Canadian artists trained in Canada; was also substantiated by the evaluation. It indicated that the program had an “invaluable” and “significant” impact on Canadians’ access to high quality artistic and cultural products. The evaluation also noted that graduates of CATF-funded schools were more likely to earn a living wholly by the practice of their art within three years, as compared to peers from unfunded schools, who were more likely to seek work unrelated to their art.
One of CATF’s expected results is that graduates of funded institutions have professional careers and are recognized for their excellence in Canada and internationally. Annual surveys of these institutions indicate that there are approximately 1,300 graduates per year and that another 2,300 participate in shorter-term workshops. Over 80% of these individuals are working professionally, of whom 20% also work internationally. The surveys show that nearly 50% of graduates of CATF-funded institutions receive an award in their first three years after graduation. The summative evaluation revealed that they are more likely to receive honours, distinctions and awards than graduates of unfunded institutions.
A 2009 public opinion research survey report revealed that of the surveyed professional Canadian performing arts organizations, the majority had hired from at least one CATF-funded institution in the last five years and that graduates of CATF-funded performing arts programs were highly assessed in all aspects of their training by employers. The highest ratings were in the areas of technical expertise in their discipline (89%); professionalism and career readiness (88%); and performance qualifications and experience (87%). The research also confirmed that CATF-funded training institutions are recognized by Canadian performing arts employers as being among the leaders in their fields.2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $18,400,000 | $21,825,000 | $22,742,440 | $22,742,440 | $22,270,000 | $472,440 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $18,400,000 | $21,825,000 | $22,742,440 | $22,742,440 | $22,270,000 | $472,440 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A7 | $138,904,779 | $105,448,850 | $105,071,850 | $104,497,091 | $951,759 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.5M is explained as follows:
Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
7 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
8 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Periodical Fund9
Start Date: 2010-11
End Date: N/A
Description: The objective of the Canada Periodical Fund (CPF) is to ensure that Canadians have access to diverse Canadian magazines and non-daily newspapers. It is delivered through three components:
1) Aid to Publishers provides formula funding to Canadian magazines and non-daily newspapers for publishing activities, such as distribution, content creation, online activities and business development.
2) Business Innovation provides project funding to print and online magazines for business development and innovation.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, the CPF helped to further the Department’s goal of supporting the creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural content through:
Output
Funding delivered through 961 grants and 38 contributions, including projects from the Business Innovation and Collective Initiatives components.
In 2010-11:
2008-09 Actual Spending10 |
2009-10 Actual Spending11 |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) 13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $45,400,000 | $56,300,000 | $72,775,054 | $72,775,054 | $69,595,441 | $3,179,613 |
Total Contributions | $14,296,262 | $13,892,239 | $1,999,544 | $1,999,544 | $3,118,917 | ($1,119,373) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $59,696,262 | $70,192,239 | $74,774,598 | $74,774,598 | $72,714,358 | $2,060,240 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A12 | $285,984,236 | $290,061,337 | $292,711,337 | $281,496,752 | $8,564,585 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $2.1M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
9 The Publications Assistance Program and the Canada Magazine Fund were replaced by the Canada Periodical Fund on April 1, 2010.
10 For 2008-09 Actual Spending amounts please refer to the 2009-10 Departmental Performance Report (DPR) for the former Canada Magazine Fund and Publications Assistance programs.
11 For 2009-10 Actual Spending amounts refer to the 2009-10 Departmental Performance Report (DPR) for the former Canada Magazine Fund and Publications Assistance programs.
12 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
13 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Book Fund
Start Date: 2010-11
End Date: 2014-15
Description: The Canada Book Fund (CBF) supports the activities of Canadian book publishers and other sectors of the book industry to ensure access to a broad range of Canadian-authored books. This support is delivered through two components: 1) Support for Publishers (SFP), which helps to ensure the sustainable production and marketing of Canadian-authored books by offsetting the high costs of publishing in Canada and building the capacity and competitiveness of the sector (the bulk of SFP support is distributed through a sales-based funding formula that rewards publishers’ success in delivering content to consumers); and 2) Support for Organizations, which helps to develop the Canadian book industry and the market for its products by assisting industry associations and related organizations to undertake collective projects offering a broad benefit to the industry and, ultimately, to readers everywhere.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, the CBF helped to further the Department’s goal of supporting the creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural content through:
Output:
In 2010-11:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $5,200,000 | $8,300,000 | $405,003 | $4,794,997 |
Total Contributions | $36,206,767 | $36,001,249 | $31,466,301 | $28,366,301 | $35,178,962 | ($3,712,661) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $36,206,767 | $36,001,249 | $36,666,301 | $36,666,301 | $35,583,965 | $1,082,336 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A14 | $285,984,236 | $290,061,337 | $292,711,337 | $281,496,752 | $8,564,585 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.1M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
14 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
15 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Music Fund
Start Date: 2001-02
End Date: 2014-15
Description: The Canada Music Fund is the principal means for achieving the goals of the Canadian Sound Recording Policy, ‘From Creators to Audience’, which seeks to: enhance Canadians’ access to a diverse range of Canadian music choices through existing and emerging media, increase the opportunities available for Canadian music artists and
entrepreneurs to make a significant contribution to Canadian cultural expression, and ensure that Canadian music artists and entrepreneurs have the means to succeed in a global and digital environment.
It achieves these objectives by providing support to music artists and entrepreneurs for the creation, production, marketing, and distribution of Canadian music. Support is also provided to a range of organizations for activities to develop the industry as a whole. Finally, support is provided for the preservation of Canadian musical sound recordings.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, the CMF helped to further the Department’s goal of supporting the creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural content through:
Output:
In 2010-11:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)17 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $2,000,000 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $24,907,581 | $25,340,985 | $25,828,331 | $23,828,331 | $25,800,528 | $27,803 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $24,907,581 | $25,340,985 | $25,828,331 | $25,828,331 | $25,800,528 | $27,803 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A16 | $285,984,236 | $290,061,337 | $292,711,337 | $281,496,752 | $8,564,585 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
16 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
17 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Media Fund18
Start Date: 2010-11
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Canada Media Fund (CMF), a public/private partnership, provides funding for the creation of television convergent digital content in both official languages and leading-edge non-linear content and applications designed for distribution on multiple platforms (e.g. television broadcast, the Internet, and/or mobile phones). The CMF focuses investments on the creation of content Canadians want and harnesses the opportunities provided by new technologies to deliver the content to Canadians where and when they want it. Organizations supported by the CMF include, but are not limited to, Canadian television and interactive production companies, broadcasters, broadcast distribution undertakings, Internet service providers and mobile communications operators. Canadians as consumers of convergent programs and creators of leading-edge content and applications represent to ultimate target group. Aboriginal communities and francophones in minority language communities are also targeted by specific production envelopes.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved:
In 2010-11, the CMF invested $337 million in Canadian content creation, generating over 2,400 hours of new Canadian programming.*
This funding is broken down as follows:
English market (total hours tuned of Canadian Television Funds-funded shows in comparison to all other Canadian and foreign programming)
French market (total hours tuned of CTF-funded shows in comparison to all other Canadian and foreign programming)
Number of users of digital convergent content from platforms other than television: user data would not be available until the release of the program’s next CMF annual report in October 2011.
* Data is not final until the release of the program’s annual report. Numbers may not add up due to rounding. The CMF annual report for 2010-11 will be available at www.cmf-fmc.ca.2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $134,450,000 | $134,250,000 | $134,146,077 | $134,146,077 | $134,146,000 | $77 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $134,450,000 | $134,250,000 | $134,146,077 | $134,146,077 | $134,146,000 | $77 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A19 | $285,984,236 | $290,061,337 | $292,711,337 | $281,496,752 | $8,564,585 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
18 The Canadian Television Fund and Canada New Media Fund were combined to form the Canada Media Fund on April 1, 2010.
19 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
20 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Interactive Fund21
Start Date: 2010-11
End Date: 2014-15
Description: The Canada Interactive Fund (CIF) provides funding for the creation of online Canadian content developed by Official Language Minority Community (OLMC), Aboriginal, ethnocultural and other not-for-profit cultural organizations by focusing on the creation of interactive cultural products and applications. Examples of projects supported under the CIF could be where not-for-profit cultural organization partners with a targeted community to develop a living history of a community which combines a blog, an interactive timeline, community photos and stories of individual members. As Canadians increasingly adopt new technologies, the CIF is needed to ensure that OLMC, Aboriginal, ethnocultural and other not-for-profit cultural organizations contribute to leading-edge content online. This will complement action the Government has taken to update cultural programs, in particular the CMF which ensures the for-profit sector to create and distribute Canadian programming on multiple platforms.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, 34 contribution agreements were signed for a total dollar value awarded of $7.6M. As this is the first year of the CIF, no projects have been completed yet, but will be in 2011-12.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)23 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $13,065,512 | $8,056,875 | $6,185,130 | $8,835,130 | $1,140,866 | $5,044,264 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $13,065,512 | $8,056,875 | $6,185,130 | $8,835,130 | $1,140,866 | $5,044,264 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A22 | $285,984,236 | $290,061,337 | $292,711,337 | $281,496,752 | $8,564,585 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $5.0M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
21 The Canada Interactive Fund was built on the successes of the Partnerships and Gateway Funds.
22 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore ca nnot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
23 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: TV5
Start Date: 1990-91
End Date: 2012-13
Description: The international French-language TV channel TV5 is a partnership made up of France, Belgium’s Francophone community, Switzerland, Canada and Quebec. The department of Canadian Heritage provides annual funding to the channel (single-recipient program) through a contribution agreement to TV5 Québec Canada and a grant to TV5MONDE. Funding from Canadian Heritage and the province of Quebec enables Canadian productions to be presented in Canada and abroad; and provides Canadians with an additional French-language channel that allows them to become familiar with the many diverse cultures that make up the international Francophonie. TV5 enriches Francophone programming across the country and provides outlets for Francophone productions from every region of Canada. Canada's contribution to TV5 makes it possible to offer all Canadians a window on the Francophonie.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions are cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)25 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $4,385,826 | $7,049,448 | $8,000,000 | $8,000,000 | $7,435,690 | $564,310 |
Total Contributions | $2,581,174 | $5,093,440 | $4,460,900 | $4,460,900 | $4,675,345 | ($214,445) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $6,967,000 | $12,142,888 | $12,460,900 | $12,460,900 | $12,111,035 | $349,865 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A24 | $285,984,236 | $290,061,337 | $292,711,337 | $281,496,752 | $8,564,585 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.3M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
24 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
25 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Museums Assistance Program
Start Date: 1972-73
End Date: 2010-11
Description: The Museums Assistance Program (MAP) supports museums in their effort to reach audiences and care for their collections by providing grants and contributions to Canadian museums and related organizations for eligible projects which aim to develop and circulate travelling exhibitions across different regions of Canada, to preserve and present Aboriginal heritage, and to enhance professional excellence in the management of key museological functions, including projects submitted under the Canada-France Agreement.
MAP also supports the Canadian Museums Association through a single-beneficiary component for activities to enhance professional standards of Canada’s museum community. In addition, MAP includes Young Canada Works (YCW) at Building Careers in Heritage and Young Canada Works in Heritage Organizations, in support of the Youth Employment Strategy (YES), a horizontal initiative coordinated by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. The objective of the YES heritage components is to enable heritage institutions to benefit from the assistance of young, qualified workers by providing summer employment and career internship opportunities that help students develop and upgrade their skills in heritage and to encourage them to pursue advanced studies in this field.Strategic Outcome: Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad
Results Achieved:
In 2010-11, MAP assessed 178 applications and funded a total of 147 projects, of which 92 were new projects and 55 were multi-year projects initiated in previous years
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)27 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $1,973,189 | $1,774,587 | $2,500,000 | $2,500,000 | $2,042,921 | $457,079 |
Total Contributions | $11,990,808 | $12,195,813 | $12,076,284 | $12,076,284 | $12,146,174 | ($69,890) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $13,963,997 | $13,970,400 | $14,576,284 | $14,576,284 | $14,189,095 | $387,189 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A26 | $14,365,019 | $15,739,964 | $15,739,964 | $14,701,491 | $1,038,473 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.4M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
26 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
27 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Celebration and Commemoration Program
Start Date: 2008-09
End Date: 2011-12
Description: The Celebration and Commemoration Program aims to support or create opportunities for Canadians to celebrate/commemorate their history, diversity and achievements through a two fold approach that includes the Celebrate Canada 11-day period culminating on July 1st with Canada Day celebrations and a five-year plan which is a theme-based dynamic approach to celebrating and commemorating significant people, places, symbols, anniversaries and events. These activities are delivered in collaboration with other federal departments, agencies, regions, partners and stakeholders. The Program provides opportunities to bring Canadians together in their communities to discover and appreciate the richness and diversity of Canadian society and to show their sense of belonging to Canada and pride in being Canadian.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity
Results Achieved: Celebrate Canada supported 1872 projects in 2010 providing approximately 9 million Canadians the opportunity to participate in over 3,000 community events across Canada celebrating one or more of the days in the Celebrate Canada period from June 21 through July 1 (National Aboriginal Day, Saint-Jean Baptiste Day, Canadian Multiculturalism Day, and Canada Day).
The Canada Day youth outreach initiative, the Canada Day Poster Challenge, resulted in 10,000 entries from children and youth, aged 5 to 18, creatively expressing the theme ‘My Canada is…”. The original artwork of the thirteen provincial/territorial winning posters was displayed at the Canadian Children’s Museum in Gatineau from June 21st through Fall 2010.
Commemorate Canada provides opportunities for Canadians to commemorate significant national events or people and fosters pride and a sense of belonging to Canada. Support to the ‘Memory Project: Stories of the Second World War’ project resulted in 462,000 unique visitors to the web site to date. The ‘Membertou: Building a Nation’ event drew more than 80,000 participants and another 12,000 unique visits to their web site. Support to new projects such as the Canadian Fallen Firefighters Memorial and projects related to the commemoration of the War of 1812 were also a focus in 2010.
The Program’s Interdepartmental Commemorations Committee (ICC) met bi-annually in 2010 bringing together representatives from 27 federal departments and agencies to share information on commemoration activities and to ensure a coordinated federal approach to commemorations.
The ICC working group for the War of 1812 Bicentennial is composed of representatives from 14 federal departments and they met 4 times. The advisory committee for the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012 also met 4 times. These sub-committees continue to meet and provide strategic advice and direction for these two high-profile commemoration initiatives.
A new ICC working group on Canada’s 150th was struck in January 2011 and brings together 17 departments for the planning of this major national celebration. The Canada 150 working group met once and will continue to meet on an as-needed basis.2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)29 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $3,643,642 | $8,473,765 | $5,500,000 | $5,500,000 | $4,829,987 | $670,013 |
Total Contributions | $42,243,050 | $49,754,485 | $6,329,553 | $6,329,473 | $5,769,102 | $560,451 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $45,886,692 | $58,228,250 | $11,829,553 | $11,829,473 | $10,599,089 | $1,230,464 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A28 | $99,663,403 | $52,512,012 | $52,176,692 | $50,327,479 | $2,184,533 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.2M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
28 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
29 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Exchanges Canada Program
Start Date: 2000-01
End Date: No end date. The program is ongoing, but subject to evaluation every 5 years.
Description: The Exchanges Canada Program supports youth participation initiatives that allow young Canadians across the country to learn about Canada, create linkages with each other and better appreciate the diversity and common aspects of the Canadian reality. The Program has two main components: Youth Exchanges Canada and Youth Forums Canada. The Program works with non-profit delivery organizations to provide young Canadians with a range of exchange and forum activities that enable them to experience Canada's cultural, geographical and linguistic diversity; build their knowledge of Canada; and develop their Canadian identity and sense of belonging to Canada.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)33 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $100,000 | $100,000 | $17,000 | $83,000 |
Total Contributions | $18,537,122 | $17,882,489 | $17,686,359 | $17,686,359 | $18,116,151 | ($429,792) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $18,537,122 | $17,882,489 | $17,786,359 | $17,786,359 | $18,133,151 | ($346,792) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A32 | $99,663,403 | $52,512,012 | $52,176,692 | $50,327,479 | $2,184,533 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.3M) is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
30 Based on final reports from recipients for 2009-10.
31 Given that the results from participant surveys for a specific fiscal year are only made available the following fiscal year in September, statistics provided here reflect the 2009-10 survey results.
32 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
33 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Katimavik Program
Start Date: 1997-98
End Date: No end date. The program is ongoing, but subject to evaluation every 5 years.
Description: The Katimavik Program provides opportunities for young Canadians to discover their country and create ties with communities and with other Canadians. The objectives of the program are to contribute significantly to the personal, social and professional development of the participants; to promote social engagement and community service; and to offer a diverse experience, fostering a better understanding of the Canadian reality. Through complementary six-month programs, comprising community service, training and group interaction, participants aged 17 to 21 are enabled to acquire personal, social and professional skills through participation in community projects in diverse regions of Canada, including French-speaking and English-speaking communities.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)37 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $18,992,154 | $20,411,654 | $19,776,000 | $15,000,000 | $17,000,000 | $2,776,000 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $18,992,154 | $20,411,654 | $19,776,000 | $15,000,000 | $17,000,000 | $2,776,000 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A36 | $99,663,403 | $52,512,012 | $52,176,692 | $50,327,479 | $2,184,533 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $2.8M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
Audit of the Katimavik Program – Completed October 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Summative Evaluation of the Katimavik Program – Completed November 2010.
34 Note that the programming year overlaps two fiscal years (2010-11 and 2011-12). For the purposes of this exercise, it should be highlighted that the activities for the programming year 2010-11 took place between September 1, 2010 and June 30, 2011.
35 Based on the 2009-10 partner organizations survey results.
36 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
37 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Communities Through Arts and Heritage Program
Start Date: September 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The Building Communities Through Arts and Heritage Program supports activities that celebrate local historical heritage as well as local artists and artisans. Its objective is to engage citizens in their communities through performing and visual arts as well as through the expression, celebration and preservation of local historical heritage. The program has three components: 1) Local Festivals; 2) Community Anniversaries; and 3) Legacy Fund.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity
Results Achieved:
Over the 2010-11 fiscal year, the Program provided funding to local festivals, community anniversaries, and commemorative capital projects. In 2010-11, the Program supported 914 projects (811 grants and 103 contribution agreements), held in 561 communities across the country, thus offering increased exposure for local artists and artisans within their community and providing Canadians with the opportunity to engage in their communities through performing and visual arts as well as through the expression, celebration and preservation of local historical heritage38.
In addition, the Program updated its guidelines and application forms and changed its spring application deadline in response to client recommendations. The Program also completed preparatory work for the summative evaluation that is to take place in 2011-12.2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)40 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $4,427,594 | $8,399,200 | $14,355,000 | $14,355,000 | $9,514,241 | $4,840,759 |
Total Contributions | $2,381,951 | $6,154,664 | $4,800,000 | $4,800,000 | $6,476,758 | ($1,676,758) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $6,809,545 | $14,533,864 | $19,155,000 | $19,155,000 | $15,990,999 | $3,164,001 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A39 | $76,623,691 | $76,512,187 | $79,662,187 | $75,737,509 | $774,678 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $3.2M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
38 Based on the comparison of data from final reports data from fiscal year 2009-10 and 2010-11.
39 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
40 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal People’s Program
Start Date: 1971-72
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Aboriginal Peoples’ Program serves to strengthen Aboriginal cultural, identity and participation in Canadian society and to preserve and promote Aboriginal languages and cultures as living cultures. It is organized around two broad themes:
1) The Aboriginal Communities Component supports the efforts of Aboriginal communities to develop innovative and culturally appropriate solutions to the social, cultural, economic and other obstacles that impede community and personal prospects. It focuses specifically on the unique challenges faced by Aboriginal women, youth and urban communities with the intent of strengthening
Aboriginal cultural identity and participation of Aboriginal Peoples in Canadian society.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity
Results Achieved:
Aboriginal Communities Component
Aboriginal Friendship Centres – A contribution agreement with the National Association of Friendship Centres provided for operational support (core funding) to the Association and the 118 friendship centre organizations across Canada. Core funding of this network of Aboriginal Friendship Centres enabled them to serve the urban Aboriginal population through key activities focused on social development and community engagement across Canada.
Cultural Connections for Aboriginal Youth – Contribution agreements with 10 national, provincial and regional Aboriginal organizations and 66 local community organizations provided 228 projects, in which more than 60,000 Aboriginal youth across Canada participated. These projects were supported by community youth committees across Canada. The projects provided Aboriginal youth with the opportunity to learn about their heritage, culture and identity, to build self-confidence, and a sense of pride in being an Aboriginal person leading to better leadership and citizenship skills. Eighteen Aboriginal Youth Advisory Committees assisted in the administration of the Cultural Connections for Aboriginal Youth.
Young Canada Works for Aboriginal Urban Youth – A contribution agreement with the National Association of Friendship Centres provided employment to 229 summer students across Canada. These summer jobs enabled the creation of projects in over 74 communities that focused on cultural development, social development and community engagement.
Scholarships and Youth Initiatives – A contribution agreement with the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation for endowed scholarships contributed to $5,035,250 being available in scholarships and bursaries for 1,395 Aboriginal post-secondary students. Another contribution agreement provided funding for career fairs, which included 73 seminars and 60 booths held in Thunder Bay and Saskatoon, and were attended by 1,500 students in grades 9-12.
Aboriginal Women’s Programming Elements – Grants and contribution agreements with 31 Aboriginal women's organizations gave Aboriginal women access to 45 projects in communities across Canada that focused on cultural development, social development, community engagement, Aboriginal self-government and family violence.
Aboriginal Living Cultures Component
Territorial Language Accords - The Territorial Language Accords (TLA) provided funding to the Governments of the Northwest Territories and Nunavut for activities to ensure the preservation, development and enhancement of Aboriginal languages.
National Aboriginal Achievement Awards – A contribution agreement with the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation supported the production and television broadcast of the National Aboriginal Achievement Awards, which were presented to 14 recipients in Regina, Saskatchewan. The awards show was attended by over 2,000 people, and was broadcast on Aboriginal Peoples Television Network and the Global Television network, reaching over 10,000,000 households through cable, direct-to-home satellite and wireless television providers.
Aboriginal Languages Initiative – Contribution agreements provided funding for 55 national, provincial and regional Aboriginal organizations to administer 210 Aboriginal language projects in communities across Canada in the preservation and revitalization of 55 Aboriginal languages. An estimated 29.000 individuals participated in language learning projects.
National Aboriginal Day – A contribution agreement with the National Association of Friendship Centres provided funding for National Aboriginal Day events in the National Capital Region from June 17 to 21 which included educational events aimed at students and educators held at the Canadian Museum of Civilization and Victoria Island, and performances and events targeted to the Aboriginal community and the general public held at Victoria Island. Over 25,000 people attended the various events.
Northern Aboriginal Broadcasting – Contribution agreements with 13 Aboriginal communications societies enabled the production and broadcasting of original television and radio programming in 17 Aboriginal languages. These broadcasts reached 367 Aboriginal communities in Canada.2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)42 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $598,426 | $586,568 | $1,340,000 | $1,340,000 | $582,414 | $757,586 |
Total Contributions | $56,810,730 | $59,040,288 | $54,724,907 | $54,874,907 | $54,640,023 | $84,884 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $57,409,156 | $59,626,856 | $56,064,907 | $56,214,907 | $55,222,437 | $842,470 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A41 | $76,623,691 | $76,512,187 | $79,662,187 | $75,737,509 | $774,678 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
For many of our historical funding recipients, 2009-10 was the last year of either a three or four-year contribution agreement. During these last three to four years, much has changed with respect to due diligence and accountability requirements. In addition, the 2008 and 2009 audits of the APP identified many deficiencies in terms of management of funds and adherence to Treasury Board
requirements.
For 2010-11 funding, the branch instituted formal funding procedures and required that all organizations adhere to the new standards and to program objectives and authorities. The historical system of specific allocations to specific groups was changed to a competitive process, based on merit. Recognizing that some flexibility would be needed to accommodate clients, 2010-11 was planned to be
a year of transition. Nonetheless, many of the 21 historic third party delivery relationships have ended.
As a result, the branch proceeded with direct delivery in many regions across Canada. This new means to access funding took some time to be understood by new direct recipients. A further complication arose as, in many cases; the branch could only direct calls for proposals to "members" of the third party delivery organizations. This limited our clientele and resulted in a lower
intake than expected in some regions. The branch was therefore unable to award all monies set aside for these regions.
Based on the experiences and results of this current year, the APP is holding a series of workshops with community organizations on program and application requirements. The APP is specifically targeting regions with low application intake in the 2010-11 process. Workshops have taken place in seven regions. The objective is also to increase general awareness of the program and to foster open
access, as well as to inform potential clients on the new direct delivery process and requirements.
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.8M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Summative Evaluation of the Aboriginal Peoples’ Program – February 2011.
41 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
42 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Development of Official‑Language Communities Program
Start Date: 2009–10
End Date: 2013–14
Description: The Development of Official‑Language Communities Program has three components: Community Life, Minority‑Language Education, and Language Rights Support. The Program fosters the vitality of Canada’s English‑ and French‑speaking minority communities and enables them to participate fully in all aspects of Canadian life. Through partnerships and agreements with community organizations, provinces, territories, municipalities, and federal departments and agencies, the Program aims to give minority official‑language communities greater access to quality education and various programs and services in their language in their communities.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity
Results Achieved:
Members of official‑language minority communities (OLMCs) have access to programs and services in their language, in their communities
Support to more than 400 community organizations across Canada in their efforts to promote the development and vitality of official‑language minority communities (OLMCs).
13 education agreements with all provinces and territories that help:
13 agreements with each province and territory to allow them to offer services in the minority language, particularly in the areas of justice, health, culture, economic development and municipal services. An agreement with the City of Ottawa as the national capital.
Knowledge and integration of the responsibilities set out in section 41 of the Official Languages Act (OLA) and OLMC perspectives in federal institutions’ development of initiatives and programs
Monitoring of federal institutions for optimal implementation of Part VII of the OLA:
Monitoring of Canadian Heritage programs for exemplary implementation of section 41 of the OLA
Agreements (cooperation agreements with communities, intergovernmental agreements, agreements with the Council of Education Ministers (Canada), etc.)
13 agreements (cooperation agreements with communities, intergovernmental agreements, agreements with the Council of Education Ministers (Canada), etc.)
Grants, contributions, funds transfers
Over 750 grants, contributions and funds transfers
Federal institution support and coordination mechanisms, action plan summaries and section 41 record of achievement summaries from federal institutions
32 action plans submitted by federal institutions2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)44 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $7,666,376 | $6,592,172 | $33,322,973 | $33,322,973 | $6,250,717 | $27,072,256 |
Total Contributions | $224,391,091 | $225,418,803 | $192,709,011 | $192,634,011 | $217,500,489 | ($24,791,478) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $232,057,467 | $232,010,975 | $226,031,984 | $225,956,984 | $223,751,206 | $2,280,778 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A43 | $351,479,343 | $337,555,115 | $337,480,115 | $340,561,244 | ($3,006,129) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $2.3M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
43 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
44 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enhancement of Official Languages Program
Start Date: 2009–10
End Date: 2013–14
Description: The Enhancement of Official Languages Program has three components: Promotion of Linguistic Duality, Second‑Language Learning, and Language Rights Support. The Program fosters among Canadians a greater understanding and appreciation of the benefits of linguistic duality. Through partnerships and agreements with provinces, territories and non‑government organizations in support of second‑language learning as well as initiatives fostering mutual understanding between English‑ and French‑speaking Canadians, this program allows Canadians to recognize and support linguistic duality as a fundamental value of Canadian society.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity
Results Achieved:
A greater number of Canadians have a better understanding of and appreciation for the benefits of linguistic duality:
Support to close to 70 community organizations that promote second‑language learning or linguistic duality
Over 100 Canadian volunteer organizations have been able to hold some of their activities (conferences, annual meetings, services) in both official languages.
In 2006 the number of bilingual (English–French) individuals reached an unparalleled high in Canada (5.4 million according to the most recent census). The English–French bilingualism rate in 2006 was 17.4%. (2006 Census)
13 education agreements with the provinces and territories support the teaching of English and French as a second language to 2.4 million young Canadians, including over 317,000 immersion students; over 7,900 young Canadians (out of more than 17,000 applications) participated in a summer Language Acquisition Development Program; over 300 young people out of 1,000 applications got jobs as language instructors, and more than 750 found a job through Young Canada Works.
Knowledge and integration of the responsibilities set out in section 41 of the Official Languages Act (OLA) and OLMC perspectives in federal institutions’ development of initiatives and programs
Performance indicator:
Monitoring of federal institutions for optimal implementation of Part VII of the OLA:
Monitoring of Canadian Heritage programs for exemplary implementation of section 41 of the OLA .
Agreements (federal–provincial/territorial agreements, Council of Education Ministers (Canada), etc.)
13 agreements (cooperation agreements with communities, intergovernmental agreements, agreements with the Council of Education Ministers (Canada), etc.).
Grants and contributions
Close to 200 grants, contributions, funds transfers.
Support and coordination mechanisms, and summaries of action plans and section 41 records of achievement
32 action plans submitted by federal institutions.2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)46 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $1,293,027 | $655,167 | $5,599,842 | $5,599,842 | $507,871 | $5,091,971 |
Total Contributions | $120,180,195 | $118,813,200 | $105,923,289 | $105,923,289 | $116,302,167 | ($10,378,878) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $121,473,222 | $119,468,367 | $111,523,131 | $111,523,131 | $116,810,038 | ($5,286,907) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A45 | $351,479,343 | $337,555,115 | $337,480,115 | $340,561,244 | ($3,006,129) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($5.3M) is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No projects were completed or planned for the 2010-11 reporting period.
45 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
46 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sport Hosting Program
Start Date: 1967
End Date: 2010-11
Description: The Hosting Program is a key instrument in the Government of Canada’s overall approach to sport development in Canada and aims to enhance the development of sport excellence and the international profile of sport organizations by assisting sport organizations to host the Canada Games and international sport events in Canada. These events are expected to produce significant sport, economic, social and cultural benefits. The Program has four components: 1) International Major Multisport Games; 2) International Single Sport Events; 3) International Multisport Games for Aboriginal Peoples and Persons with a Disability; and 4) the Canada Games. The Hosting Program offers Canada-at-large a planned and coordinated approach to realizing direct and significant benefits, from bidding and hosting projects, in the areas of sport development, economic, social, cultural and community impacts, across a broad range of government priorities. The Program is characterized by active liaison with collaborators/stakeholders and by a diligent contribution system.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians participate and excel in sport
Results Achieved:
1. Canadian athletes, coaches and officials had opportunities during the 2010-11 fiscal year to participate at events in Canada. Based on the analysis of 79 applications1 for funding for the 2010-11 fiscal year, 55 events and 2 bids were selected for funding, including International Single Sport Events (ISSE), 2011 Canada Winter Games and 2010 Défi Sportif. Based on the data reports from 34 of the events hosted in the summer and fall of 2010, the Hosting Program has delivered on its objectives by providing competition opportunities for 5,577 Canadian athletes, 1,436 Canadian coaches and managers, and 1,359 Canadian officials.
2. The Hosting Program provided opportunities for 305 athletes who chose to self-identify as part of an under-represented group, namely aboriginal peoples and persons with a disability. There were no International Multisport Games for Aboriginal Peoples and Persons with a Disability (IMGAPPD) hosted during the 2010-11 fiscal year.
Output: During the 2010-11 fiscal year, there were 48 contribution agreements covering 53 ISSE events, plus 2 contribution agreements covering 2 ISSE bids. The discrepancy in the number of contribution agreements to the number of events is due to some events being included in either a Multi-Event contribution agreement or a Multi-Year contribution agreement. There were 2 contribution agreements and 1 multiparty agreement in effect for the 2011 Canada Games, and there was 1 contribution agreement in effect for the 2010 Défi Sportif. There was 1 contribution agreement signed for the 2012 Arctic Winter Games and 1 contribution agreement signed for the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games during the 2010-11 fiscal year.
Note 1: There was funding provided during the 2010-11 for events that will occur in future fiscal years (e.g. 2015 PanAmerican and Parapan American Games), however only events and bids that took place during the 2010-11 fiscal year have been included in this report .2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)48 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $44,521,653 | $58,499,142 | $16,315,575 | $16,043,739 | $23,809,991 | ($7,494,416) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $44,521,653 | $58,499,142 | $16,315,575 | $16,043,739 | $23,809,991 | ($7,494,416) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A47 | $198,264,884 | $160,316,547 | $189,927,551 | $196,602,216 | ($36,285,669) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($7.5M) is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
Audit of the Sport Canada Branch – June 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Evaluation of Sport Canada Programs – Completed May 2011.
47 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
48 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sport Support Program
Start Date: 1961
End Date: 2010-11
Description: The Sport Support Program is the primary funding vehicle for initiatives associated with the delivery of the Canadian Sport Policy. Sport Support Program funding is aimed at developing athletes and coaches at the highest international levels; providing sound technically-based sport programming for all athletes; increasing the number of Canadians from all segments of society involved in sport, and advancing Canadian interests and values in Canada and abroad. Funding helps to ensure that the essential components of an ethically-based, athlete/participant-centred development system are in place and is provided to eligible organizations for programming that supports the goals of the Canadian Sport Policy.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians participate and excel in sport
Results Achieved:
1. As sports progress with the approval and implementation of their Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) models, more and more have aligned their coaching programs with LTAD. 16 NSOs (29%) report to have aligned the National Coaching Certification Program coaching programs with their LTADs. An additional 34 NSOs (61%) reported they are in the process of aligning their coaching programs with their LTADs.49
2. The 56 (100%) funded National Sport Organizations (NSOs) and the 15 (100%) Multisport Service Organizations (MSOs) all comply with the CPADS. This is an eligibility condition for funding.
3. There are a total of 5 (100%) domestic knowledge transfers and leadership actions between Sport Canada and federal departments. Health/PHAC (ParticipACTION), Justice (Working Together Initiative); DFAIT( Special Olympics Canada Missions); Intergovernmental Affaires (Bilateral Agreements); and INAC (Aboriginal Sport Circle); and there were 27 international knowledge transfer and leadership actions that took place, with international organizations and with five countries (China, El Salvador, France, Haiti, Russia).
Outputs:
There were a total of
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)51 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $111,930,707 | $113,657,960 | $117,000,972 | $146,883,812 | $146,916,885 | ($29,915,913) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $111,930,707 | $113,657,960 | $117,000,972 | $146,883,812 | $146,916,885 | ($29,915,913) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A50 | $198,264,884 | $160,316,547 | $189,927,551 | $196,602,216 | ($36,285,669) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($29.9M) is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
Audit of the Sport Canada Branch – June 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Evaluation of Sport Canada Programs – Completed May 2011.
49 Sport Canada has worked to increase the number of NSOs with a sport specific Long-Term Athlete Development Model in place. There are now 52 NSOs which have completed their model, up from 37 in 2009-10. This is a greater rate of increase from 2005-06 when only one NSO had completed their LTAD model and 2007-08 when 12
were completed. By 2008-09 28 were done. Furthermore by January 2010, 18 NSOs had also completed their LTAD competition reviews.
50 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
51 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Athlete Assistance Program
Start Date: 1971
End Date: 2010-11
Description: The Athlete Assistance Program contributes to the pursuit of excellence through its support for improved Canadian athlete performances at major international sporting events, enabling athletes to combine their sport and academic or working careers while training intensively in pursuit of world-class performances. To this end, the program identifies and supports athletes already at or having the potential to be in the top sixteen in the world in their sport.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians participate and excel in sport
Results Achieved:
4. Athletes’ level of satisfaction with financial resources available from the Athlete Assistance Program will be evaluated through the 2013 Status of the High Performance Athlete survey. The most recently completed survey (2009) indicated that the financial support received was considered adequate by 27% of athletes and moderately adequate by 54%.52 Please note thatthese results are not specific to the AAP
5. In 2010-11, 545 carded athletes used tuition grants for a total amount of $1,600,941 and a total of 236 formerly carded athletes used Deferred tuition grants for a total amount of $753,617.
6. The total dollar amount allocated, by card type and category are as follow:
Card Type | Payment Category | Total $ Amount |
---|---|---|
Development | Living & Training | $7,880,400 |
Tuition/Deferred Tuition | $1,202,346 | |
Special Needs | $12,522 | |
Senior | Living & Training | $15,434,100 |
Tuition/Deferred Tuition | $1,152,212 | |
Special Needs | $70,060 |
7. In 2010-11, a total amount of $23,314,500 in Living and Training allowances was granted to carded athletes.
Total amount of $2,354,558 in Tuition and Deferred Tuition was granted.
Total of $82,582 in Special Needs Allowance was granted.
8. In 2010-11 the total number of carded athletes by card type are as follow:
Development cards (Development (D), Development, injured DI, first year Senior National (C1)): 964.
9. Senior cards (Senior National (SR), Senior National, injured (SRI), first year Senior International (SR1), second year Senior International (SR2), Olympic (OLY)): 907.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s)54 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $26,486,000 | $26,107,782 | $27,000,000 | $27,000,000 | $25,875,340 | $1,124,660 |
Total Contributions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $26,486,000 | $26,107,782 | $27,000,000 | $27,000,000 | $25,875,340 | $1,124,660 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A53 | $198,264,884 | $160,316,547 | $189,927,551 | $196,602,216 | ($36,285,669) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.1M is explained as follows:
Audit Completed or Planned:
Audit of the Sport Canada Branch – June 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Evaluation of Sport Canada Programs – Completed May 2011.
52 Status of the High Performance Athlete, Ekos Research Associates, 2009, p. 25
53 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-10 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2008-09 expenditures under the new architecture.
54 Difference between Planned Spending 2010-11 and Actual Spending 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grants for Research Projects and Personnel Support
Start Date: October 2000
End Date: N/A
Description: CIHR provides a wide array of funding programs under this transfer payment program. This includes grants which provide support for the direct costs of health research projects and awards that provide support to individual health researchers and trainees. Infrastructure grants help create optimum environments for the conduct of health research. This includes funding for researcher networking and collaborative activities and grants to select organizations.
Strategic Outcome: 1.0 A world-class health research enterprise that creates, disseminates and applies new knowledge across all areas of health research.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $ 852.9 | $ 845.1 | $ 842.9 | $ 870.8 | $ 870.0 | $ 0.8 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 852.9 | $ 845.1 | $ 842.9 | $ 870.8 | $ 870.0 | $ 0.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between authorities and actual spending is not significant.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Graduate Scholarships
Start Date: 2003-04
End Date: N/A
Description: The Canada Graduate Scholarships (CGS) Program provides financial support to develop future researchers at both the Masters and Doctoral levels. The CGS is a tri-council program with CIHR responsible for administering that portion of the program that is directed at students pursuing health related studies.
Strategic Outcome: 1.0 A world-class health research enterprise that creates, disseminates and applies new knowledge across all areas of health research.
Results Achieved: CIHR's ability to train, retain and sustain outstanding health researchers remains a key priority in its five-year strategic plan. In 2010-11, CIHR supported the learning and development of its health research trainees by awarding 178 new Doctoral awards and 171 new Master's awards through the CGS program.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $ 18.7 | $ 34.6 | $ 36.3 | $ 36.3 | $ 35.2 | $ 1.1 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 18.7 | $ 34.6 | $ 36.3 | $ 36.3 | $ 35.2 | $ 1.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between authorities and actual spending is not significant.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Institute Support Grants
Start Date: October 2000
End Date: N/A
Description: The Institute Support Grant (ISG) Program provides funding to select Canadian academic institutions, including universities and teaching hospitals, to assist them in hosting the 13 Institutes of CIHR. The Institutes help CIHR maintain strong ties to Canada's research communities and to understand their needs. Each CIHR-appointed Institute Scientific Director is among the top scientists in his/her field and helps CIHR define its strategic health research priorities and develop research partnerships with other interested parties.
Strategic Outcome: 1.0 A world-class health research enterprise that creates, disseminates and applies new knowledge across all areas of health research.
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, CIHR provided each of its 13 Institutes a $1.0M grant to support Institute operations, including the salaries of Scientific Directors, Institute Staff and other administrative expenses. Institute Support Grants also support activities that facilitate and develop national research networks linking the Institutes' respective research communities.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $ 13.0 | $ 13.1 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ - |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 13.0 | $ 13.1 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Networks of Centres of Excellence
Start Date: October 2000
End Date: N/A
Description: The Networks of Centres of Excellence (NCE) Program is a federal class grants program administered jointly by the three federal granting agencies - CIHR, along with the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) - in partnership with Industry Canada. Networks are not-for-profit corporations with an establish Board of Directors and are unique partnerships among the academic, private, public and not-for-profit sectors. These nation-wide, multidisciplinary and multi-sectoral partnerships connect excellent research with industrial know-how and strategic investment. Networks put in place well-defined strategies to transfer knowledge to users, ensuring that discoveries and technological advances are turned into social and economic benefits for all Canadians.
Strategic Outcome: 1.0 A world-class health research enterprise that creates, disseminates and applies new knowledge across all areas of health research
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, 14 recipients of ongoing, multi-year NCE awards received funds which helped them build structured networks, establish multi-sectoral partnerships, and commercialize health research findings. Through the NCE Program, CIHR was able to help mobilize Canada's health research talent in the academic, private and public sectors and apply it to the task of developing the economy and improving the quality of life of Canadians.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $ 26.1 | $ 27.5 | $ 27.5 | $ 27.5 | $ 27.1 | $ 0.4 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 26.1 | $ 27.5 | $ 27.5 | $ 27.5 | $ 27.1 | $ 0.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between authorities and actual spending is not significant.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships
Start Date: 2008-09
End Date: N/A
Description: Administered by CIHR, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC). The Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships program is designed to attract and retain world-class doctoral students by offering them a significant financial award to assist them during their studies at Canadian universities. Vanier Scholars demonstrate leadership skills and a high standard of scholarly achievement in the social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and engineering, and health-related fields.
Strategic Outcome: 1.0 A world-class health research enterprise that creates, disseminates and applies new knowledge across all areas of health research.
Results Achieved: Through Vanier Scholarship Program, CIHR contributed to building world-class research capacity by attracting and retaining the best doctoral students, both nationally and internationally. In 2010-11, CIHR awarded a total of 56 Vanier CGS Doctoral Awards, which includes 6 awardees from abroad.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $ - | $ 2.7 | $ 5.5 | $ 5.5 | $ 5.5 | $ - |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | $ - | $ 2.7 | $ 5.5 | $ 5.5 | $ 5.5 | $ - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Centres of Excellence for Commercialization and Research
Start Date: 2007-2008
End Date: N/A
Description: The Centres of Excellence for Commercialization and Research (CECR) Program supports research and commercialization centres capable of achieving global leadership for Canada and translating knowledge into significant commercial advantage. CECR is a joint program of the Tri-council, in partnership with Industry Canada. Through this program, the Federal Government will identify the best initiatives based on international peer review and advice from a Private Sector Advisory Board, and make investments in partnership with others, such as the provinces and businesses.
Strategic Outcome: 1.0 A world-class health research enterprise that creates, disseminates and applies new knowledge across all areas of health research.
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, CIHR supported Canadian universities in their efforts to build on Canada's growing reputation as a global leader in research and innovation by awarding two Centres of Excellence for Commercialization and Research Awards to advance research and facilitate commercialization of technologies, products and services within the four priority areas identified in the federal Science and Technology (S&T) Strategy.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $ 4.4 | $ 4.4 | $ - | $ 9.8 | $ 9.8 | $ - |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 4.4 | $ 4.4 | $ - | $ 9.8 | $ 9.8 | $ - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) between 2010-2011 Planned and Actual Spending | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fragile countries and crisis-affected communities | ||||||
Total Grants | 696.86 | 687.19 | 539.01 | 715.52 | 715.52 | (176.50) |
Total Contributions | 126.63 | 141.00 | 71.38 | 210.87 | 210.08 | (138.70) |
Total Other Types of TPs | 0.00 | |||||
Total Program Activity | 823.49 | 828.20 | 610.39 | 926.38 | 925.60 | (315.21) |
Low-income countries | ||||||
Total Grants | 172.68 | 195.64 | 259.98 | 303.48 | 303.48 | (43.50) |
Total Contributions | 687.78 | 518.65 | 503.18 | 502.31 | 501.63 | 1.55 |
Total Other Types of TPs | 0.00 | |||||
Total Program Activity | 860.46 | 714.29 | 763.16 | 805.80 | 805.12 | (41.95) |
Middle-income countries | ||||||
Total Grants | 123.38 | 135.28 | 154.38 | 111.16 | 111.16 | 43.22 |
Total Contributions | 251.24 | 216.52 | 250.40 | 185.49 | 185.24 | 65.16 |
Total Other Types of TPs | 0.00 | |||||
Total Program Activity | 374.62 | 351.79 | 404.78 | 296.65 | 296.40 | 108.38 |
Global engagement and strategic policy | ||||||
Total Grants | 612.21 | 928.20 | 700.63 | 762.92 | 762.92 | (62.29) |
Total Contributions | 239.29 | 223.15 | 6.10 | 18.82 | 18.82 | (12.71) |
Total Other Types of TPs | 238.55 | 268.10 | 230.69 | 269.39 | 269.39 | (38.70) |
Total Program Activity | 1,090.05 | 1,419.45 | 937.42 | 1,051.13 | 1,051.13 | (113.71) |
Canadian engagement | ||||||
Total Grants | 1.13 | 2.70 | 31.37 | 13.97 | 13.97 | 17.41 |
Total Contributions | 19.65 | 11.03 | 246.96 | 221.00 | 221.00 | 25.96 |
Total Other Types of TPs | 0.00 | |||||
Total Program Activity | 20.78 | 13.73 | 278.34 | 234.97 | 234.97 | 43.37 |
Total | 3,169.40 | 3,327.47 | 2,994.10 | 3,314.93 | 3,313.22 | (319.12) |
CIDA's transfer payments actual spending of 3,313.22 millions accounts for 92% of CIDA's 2010-2011 total actual spending, excluding non-budgetary expenditures.
"Since 2010-2011 is the first year of the new program activity architecture, no comparaison with the previous years is provided by program activity. CIDA's Program Activities were amended as follows: "Countries of Concentration" and "Selected Countries and Regions" realigned to "Low" and "Middle-Income Countries"; "Multilateral, International and Canadian Institutions" realigned to "Global Engagement and Strategic Policy" and "Canadian Engagement", and; "Engaging Canadian Citizens" realigned to "Canadian Engagement."
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Adjustment Fund (voted)
Start Date: April 23, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Community Adjustment Fund (CAF) is a two-year national program established under Budget 2009, Canada’s Economic Action Plan. Its objectives are to provide economic stimulus to create or maintain jobs in and around communities affected by the global recession, and to promote economic diversification of those communities. CanNor delivers CAF in Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
Strategic Outcome: Developed and diversified territorial economies that support prosperity for all Northerners
Results Achieved: There were 27 active CAF projects in 2010-11 with a total funding expenditure of $18,095M. These 27 projects leveraged $7.3M from other partners.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total Contributions | N/A | 13.964 | 15.585 | 18.223 | 18.096 | 2.51 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | N/A | |||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A | 13.964 | 15.585 | 18.223 | 18.096 | 2.51 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The approved re-profiling of unspent 2009-10 G&C funds increased the total 2010-11 authority of this program by $2.638M. Sources of these funds are: $1.611M; $967,250 unspent Aboriginal Business Development Program funds; and $59,550 unspent Community Economic Development funds. The variance of $2.51M is the difference of the increased total authority and the spending by project against the allocation.
Audit Completed or Planned: The OAG conducted audits of the programs under the Economic Action Plan.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: CanNor has provided input into this horizontal initiative.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Strategic Investments in Northern Economic Development (SINED)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: Strategic Investments in Northern Economic Development is a project-based suite of programs to strengthen the driver sectors of the territorial economies; diversifying them; and encouraging Northerners’ participation in the economy. Eligible recipients include social enterprises, individuals, other levels of government and other non-federal entities, public or private, that have an interest in economic development in the North.
Strategic Outcome: Developed and diversified territorial economies that support prosperity for all Northerners
Results Achieved:
Through the implementation of the SINED Investment Plans, CanNor has made progress in all of the following areas:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total Contributions | N/A | 7.867 | 18.157 | 18.232 | 16.084 | 2.073 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | N/A | |||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A | 8.157 | 18.157 | 18.232 | 16.084 | 2.073 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The approved re-profiling of unspent 2009-10 G&C funds increased the total 2010-11 authority of this program by $75,000. Sources of these funds are from an inter-departmental letter of agreement with HRSDC, PCO and AANDC to support the Conference Board of Canada - Centre for the North project. The variance of $2.073M is the difference of the increased total authority and the spending by project against the allocation.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation is planned for 2013-14.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Economic Development (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: On-going
Description: Aboriginal Economic Development funding is designed to increase Aboriginal participation in the Canadian economy. Through community investment, community infrastructure programming, and individual and community business development, CanNor provides funding and other supports to viable and sustainable proposals brought forward by First Nation, Métis and Inuit entrepreneurs in the North, as well as by northern communities, Aboriginal businesses and financial organizations.
Strategic Outcome: Developed and diversified territorial economies that support prosperity for all Northerners
Results Achieved:
Through the Aboriginal Economic Development programming, CanNor’s funding helped to increase northern Aboriginal participation in the Canadian economy. The Agency provided funding to support a wide array of viable Aboriginal economic businesses in the three territories. CanNor’s funding also helped to support the development of a skilled Aboriginal workforce.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total Contributions | N/A | 9.6 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 10.169 | 1.631 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | N/A | |||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A | 9.6 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 10.169 | 1.631 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance of $1.631 is the difference of the total authority and the spending by project against allocation.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: CanNor will provide input into an evaluation of Aboriginal Economic Development programming planned by Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development in 2012-13.
Start date: January 1, 2000
End Date: December 31, 2019
Description
Enhance Canadian industry's technological base and provide access to European markets for value added products and services in the fields of Earth Observation (EO), telecommunications and generic technological activities; foster the participation of Canadian academia and make possible the demonstration of Canadian space technologies in European science and exploration missions. This is achieved through a financial contribution by the CSA to ESA optional programs.
Strategic Outcome
Canada's presence in space meets the needs of Canadians for scientific knowledge, space technology and information.
Expected Results (Program Activities Level)
Space Based Earth Observation: The benefits of activities involved in Earth Observation from space serve Canadian users in the fields of environment, resource and land-use management, and, security and sovereignty.
Space Science and Exploration: Participation in Canadian and international missions expands the scientific knowledge base made available to Canadian academia and R&D communities in the areas of astronomy, space exploration and solar-terrestrial relations, as well as in physics and life sciences.
Satellite Communications: State-of-the-art systems and applications are developed to satisfy the needs of the Canadian government and population in order to ensure that Canada remains a world leader in satellite communications.
Generic Technological Activities in support of EO, SE, and SC : Canada's industrial technological capabilities can meet the needs of future space missions and activities.
Expected Results Specific to the Transfer Payment Program:
Successful development and demonstration of advanced technologies, systems, components, and studies provided for in the contracts awarded by ESA to Canadian firms under the following ESA EO programs: EOEP (Earth Observation Envelop Program), GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security) Service Element and GMES Space Component.
Successful development and demonstration of advanced technologies, systems, components, or studies provided for in the contracts awarded by ESA to Canadian firms under the following ESA Telecommunications and Navigation programs: ARTES 1, 3-4, 5, 8 and GalileoSat.
Successful development and demonstration of advanced technologies, systems, components, or studies provided for in the contracts awarded by ESA to Canadian firms under Europe's space exploration program Aurora, under the European Transportation and Human Exploration Preparatory Activities program and under the European Physical and Life Science program (ELIPS).
Growing utilization of data obtained from ESA relating to European markets and Earth observation and telecommunications technologies as strategic information for government departments, agencies and industries in Canada.
Because of our participation in Europe's satellite communication, Earth observation and science and space exploration programs, increased demonstration opportunities for space-qualified technologies and products developed by Canadian firms for the space markets are available.
Development of new alliances and/or strengthening of established alliances between Canadian and European companies.
Actual Accomplishments
Several technologies and skills have been developed and improved through the participation of Canadian companies in ESA programs. Some businesses have integrated these technologies into products, allowing them to sell these products in other than European markets. In addition to generating revenues, the development and improvement of space technologies also created or maintained specialized jobs. In addition, specialized skills were created in the areas of space hardware, ground segment, and space technology applications.
The program served to boost the visibility of Canada in European markets. Canadian contractors see the ESA Contribution program as a means of cultivating business relationships. The program also fosters regional development and access to other markets by virtue of the successes of companies in Europe. Furthermore, Canada expanded its knowledge and technology in fields such as weather and ice movement forecasting, Earth Observation data, satellite communications technologies, environmental monitoring and security.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variances | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Space Based Earth Observation (EO) | 7.4 | 6.0 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 6.9 | 2.4 |
Space Science and Exploration (SE) | 8.2 | 8.8 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 6.9 | 1.9 |
Satellite Communications (SC) | 10.9 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 6.0 | 2.3 |
Generic Technological Activities (GTA) in support of EO, SE and SC | 8.3 | 8.0 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 12.7 | (2.3) |
Total Contributions | 34.9 | 30.4 | 37.8 | 37.8 | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Total Program Activities | 34.9 | 30.4 | 37.8 | 37.8 | 33.5 | 4.3 |
Comment on Variances
The positive variance of $4.3 million in 2010-2011 corresponds to the difference between risk funds re-profiled to future years; and strategic year-end reallocations to help the Program meet additional commitments stemming from the application of the ESA industrial policy which is based on the "juste retour" principle. These variances arise from the sound management of this Program, and are in accordance with its objectives and terms and conditions.
Several factors explain the year to year fluctuations in spending as well as the yearly variation between program activities: the budgetary cycle of ESA differs from the one of Canada, the cash flow requirements of ESA programs which Canada is participating in, and the slippage in the planned disbursements. The programs and associated contracts to industry are delivered by ESA, hence, the CSA has no control on actual program implementation, on potential cost increases, on inflation rates, and exchange rate fluctuations.
Significant Audit and Evaluation Findings and URL (s) to the Last and/or Evaluation
Further to the summative evaluation of the Canada/European Space Agency Cooperation Agreement, the contribution program under the said Agreement was recommended for continuation. Therefore, the revised terms and conditions for the contributions under the 2010-2019 Cooperation Agreement was aligned with the new 2011-2012 Program Activity Architecture (PAA).
To learn more about it, go to:
www.asc-csa.gc.ca/pdf/evaluation_2010-canada-esa_eng.pdf
Notes:
Start date: October 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description
This program supports knowledge growth and innovation in the Canadian Space Agency's (CSA) priority areas while increasing the awareness and participation of Canadians in space-related disciplines and activities. The program has two components: a) Research and b) Awareness and Learning.
The research component aims to support the development of science and technology; foster the continual development of a critical mass of researchers and highly qualified people in Canada; and, support information-gathering and, space-related studies and research pertaining to Canadian Space Agency priorities.
The awareness and learning component aims to increase awareness of Canadian space science and technology among Canadian youth and educators and their participation in related activities; provide learning opportunities to Canadian students and physicians in various space-related disciplines; and support the operations of organizations dedicated to space research and education.
Strategic Outcome
Canada's presence in space meets the needs of Canadians for scientific knowledge, space technology and information.
Expected Results (Program Activities Level)
Space Based Earth Observation: The benefits of activities involved in Earth Observation from space serve Canadian users in the fields of environment, resource and land-use management, and, security and sovereignty.
Space Science and Exploration: Participation in Canadian and international missions expands the scientific knowledge base made available to Canadian academia and R&D communities in the areas of astronomy, space exploration and solar-terrestrial relations, as well as in physics and life sciences.
Generic Technological Activities in support of EO, SE, and SC: Canada's industrial technological capabilities can meet the needs of future space missions and activities.
Space Awareness and Learning: Targeted level of awareness of space among Canadians is reached.
Expected Results (Transfer Payment Program Level):
1. Research Component
2. Awareness and Learning component
Awareness: Increased availability and use of the space theme in learning opportunities and materials related to science and technology.
Learning: Post-secondary level and physicians will have increased knowledge and skills in space-related disciplines.
Actual Accomplishments
In 2010-2011 the program was in its first full year of implementation. Performance measurement has mainly focus on immediate results and establishing baselines in 2010-2011 and will capture more outcomes as the program matures.
Research Component
Canadian universities have made significant contribution to knowledge creation in space science and technology areas in 2010-2011 through more than 80 research projects (6M$ awarded). More than 185 peer reviewed publications have resulted from these initiatives involving around 130 Highly Qualified Personnel.
CSA supported academic teams engaged in developing new knowledge and information from missions supported by the CSA (Space Science Enhancement Program); and specific projects in areas of priority for the Agency in the field of space astronomy (BRITE, Spider, EBEX).
CSA launched two new competitive Announcements of Opportunity to train the next generation of space scientists and engineers (FAST) and create distributed Centres of Excellence in areas of priority for the CSA (Cluster Pilots).
Awareness and Learning component
Over 235 learning and awareness opportunities were supported in 2010-2011. A total of $1.2 million was awarded to individuals and organization to facilitate conferences, workshops, scientific competitions and trainings opportunities targeting audiences ranging from elementary school to university students, as well as supporting not-for-profit organizations and educational institutions in the development of space-focused content designed for Canadian students. Some specific projects reached visually impaired students or underprivileged youth. Approximately 1.7 million Canadian students were the ultimate beneficiaries of this funding.
Five Canadian physicians have had the chance this year to trained in aerospace medicine, enhancing Canadian expertise in this field. and supporting the medical needs of CSA astronauts during all phases of human spaceflight and exploration of space Recent R&D medicine related projects financed contributed to expand knowledge in areas such as muscle atrophy and bone loss in space, the development of autonomous telemedicine system and of a regional anesthetic capability for spaceflight, and long duration mission challenge for the human psyche.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variances | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Space Based Earth Observation (EO) | - | - | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 0.5 |
Space Science and Exploration (SE) | - | - | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
Space Awareness and Learning (AL) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | - |
Generic Technological Activities (GTA) in support of EO, SE and SC | - | - | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 0.5 |
Total Contributions | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
Space Based Earth Observation (EO) | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 | (1.3) |
Space Science and Exploration (SE) | 2.4 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.3 | (0.2) |
Space Awareness and Learning (AL) | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
Generic Technological Activities (GTA) in support of EO, SE and SC | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Total Grants | 3.8 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 | (1.2) |
Total TPPs | 4.1 | 6.0 | 7.7 | 9.0 | 7.2 | 0.4 |
Notes:
Comment on Variances
No comment.
Significant Audit and Evaluation Findings and URL (s) to the Last and / or Evaluation
The summative evaluation of the previous Class Grant and Contribution Program was completed in 2009.
To learn more about it, go to:
www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/publications/ar-0570-2745.asp.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Historical Recognition Program (CHRP)
Start Date: 2006–07
End Date: 2011–12
Description: CHRP provides funding for eligible community-based projects that (i) commemorate and/or recognize the historical experiences of communities affected by federally legislated wartime measures and/or immigration restrictions or prohibitions that were applied in Canada, and (ii) promote their respective contributions. It aims to provide recognition for, and educate Canadians about, the historical experiences of these communities, and highlight their contributions to Canada.
Expected Results:
Strategic Outcome(s): Successful integration of newcomers into society and promotion of Canadian citizenship
Results Achieved: During 2010–11, 42 new projects received ministerial approval, bringing the overall total of funded projects to 60.
Eight projects are complete, while many additional projects released products, including monuments, films, books, plays and other deliverables. Several projects won awards for their film, website or theatrical production.
During 2010–11, six news releases were produced in support of new projects and several public announcements of funded projects were made by the Minister and delegated members of Parliament.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | – | $0.3 | $0.3 | $0.3 | $0.3 |
$0.0 |
Total Contributions | – | $1.6 | $5.9 | $5.9 | $2.9 | $3.0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Program Activity(ies) | – | $1.9 | $6.2 | $6.2 | $3.2 | $3.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): CHRP’s $3.0 million lapse is due primarily to the delays in approvals for projects that were scheduled to start earlier in 2010–11.
Audit Completed or Planned: No internal audit completed or planned.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A summative evaluation is planned for 2012–13.
* Authorities for this program were transferred to Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) from Canadian Heritage (PCH). As a result, there are no comparable figures for planned spending or previous years’ actual spending.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Multiculturalism Program
Start Date: 1982–83
End Date: Program terms and conditions end on March 31, 2012.
Description: The Multiculturalism Program is an important way the Government of Canada supports its Multiculturalism Policy. In 2010–11, funding was provided under the terms and conditions of the program to address the following new program objectives: (i) building an integrated socially cohesive society; (ii) improving the responsiveness of institutions to the needs of a diverse population; and (iii) actively engaging in discussions on multiculturalism and diversity at an international level.
To support these objectives, the funding priorities for 2010–11 were: (i) supporting economic, social and cultural integration of new Canadians and cultural communities; (ii) facilitating programs such as mentorship, volunteerism, leadership and civic education among at-risk youth; and (iii) promoting intercultural understanding and Canadian values.
Expected Results:
Strategic Outcome(s): Successful integration of newcomers into society and promotion of Canadian citizenship
Results Achieved: Inter-Action, the new component of the Multiculturalism Program’s grants and contributions program, was launched in 2010–11with two streams, projects and events. The projects stream focuses on long-term, multi-year projects that support community engagement. A call for proposals approach was introduced for projects to enhance the transparency and integrity of the selection process. A new events stream was introduced to provide grants to small community-based events that promote intercultural understanding.
All Multiculturalism Program tools, such as funding guidelines, general application form and a new eligibility and assessment grid, were revised to streamline and provide a stronger rationale for programming.
CIC encourages intercultural dialogue at national and international levels to combat all forms of discrimination and racism, including anti-Semitism. The Department worked with the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism, which is affiliated with the Inter-parliamentary Coalition for Combating Antisemitism (ICCA), to support the development of the ICCA conference in Ottawa (November 7–9, 2010). Parliamentarians and experts from over 50 countries were in attendance. The Ottawa Protocol was a major outcome of this conference and represents global cooperation in the fight against anti-Semitism.
2008-09 Actual Spending* |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | – | $0.1 | $3.0 | $3.0 | $1.0 | $2.0 |
Total Contributions | – | $4.1 | $7.9 | $7.9 | $5.8 | $2.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Program Activity(ies) | – | $4.2 | $10.9 | $10.9 | $6.8 | $4.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The $4.1 million variance in the Multiculturalism Program is caused by delays in the implementation of the program and recipients not spending as planned.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit is planned for 2011–12, and expected to be completed in December 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation is planned for 2011–12.
* Authorities for this program were transferred to CIC from PCH. As a result, there are no comparable figures for planned spending or previous years’ actual spending.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada–Quebec Accord Grant
Start Date: Financial compensation to the province (in the form of a grant) is based on the Canada–Quebec Accord, which came into force on April 1, 1991.
End Date: The Accord does not have an expiry date.
Description: The Canada–Québec Accord Relating to Immigration and Temporary Admission of Aliens gives Quebec the responsibility for providing settlement and integration services to all immigrants in Quebec, including all refugees. Quebec receives an annual grant from the federal government to support these settlement and integration services.
Objective/Anticipated Outcomes: An objective of the Canada–Quebec Accord is, among other things, the preservation of Quebec’s demographic importance within Canada and the integration of immigrants to the province in a manner that respects the distinct identity of Quebec.
Activities: Quebec has responsibility for the selection, reception and integration of immigrants to Quebec. Under section 26 of the Canada–Quebec Accord, Canada is required to pay compensation to Quebec, where it is established that:
Expected Results: The Government of Quebec is responsible for developing and publishing its own expected results related to immigration.
Strategic Outcome(s): Successful integration of newcomers into society and promotion of Canadian citizenship
Results Achieved: The Government of Quebec is responsible for developing and publishing its own expected results related to immigration.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $226.0 | $234.2 | $253.7 | $258.4 | $258.4 | ($4.7) |
Total Contributions | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $226.0 | $234.2 | $253.7 | $258.4 | $258.4 | ($4.7) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was $4.7 million higher than planned due to adjustments in the final payment formula, which were higher than anticipated.
Audit Completed or Planned: No internal audit completed or planned.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation planned for 2011–12.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP)
Start Date: 1970s (under another name; RAP implemented 1998)
End Date: September 30, 2011 (CIC will seek renewal of program terms and conditions before they expire)
Description: RAP support provides immediate resettlement assistance to government-assisted refugees who have been resettled in Canada. The program provides income support and immediate and essential services to government-assisted refugees who lack the resources to provide for their own basic needs. In addition, it provides referrals to settlement programs for newcomers.
Expected Results: Government-assisted refugees are able to live safely and independently.
Note: CIC is currently developing performance measures and performance indicators for monitoring and reporting.
Strategic Outcome(s): Successful integration of newcomers into society and promotion of Canadian citizenship
Results Achieved:As part of the Balanced Refugee Reform Act, CIC received $5.2 million additional funding for RAP, bringing the budget from $44.6 million to a total of $49.8 million.
Work was initiated to revise the RAP terms and conditions and clarify the text to increase flexibility and provide users with a clearer understanding of the program. In addition, a RAP performance measurement framework (PMF) is being developed to measure program outcomes. This PMF will allow for a more efficient way of measuring program success.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Contributions | $51.6 | $56.5 | $44.6 | $54.0 | $54.0 | ($9.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $51.6 | $56.5 | $44.6 | $54.0 | $54.0 | ($9.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending exceeded planned spending by $9.4 million; additional authorities were received through Supplementary Estimates and internal reallocations, however, to meet additional program requirements.
Audit Completed or Planned: An internal audit of the administration of the resettlement programs was completed in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation completed in 2010–11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Settlement Program
Start Date: May 15, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: The terms and conditions for the Settlement Program describe both eligible recipients of contribution funding and eligible clients. The eligible recipients (often referred to as service providers for settlement services) include the following:
Eligible clients for settlement services are primarily permanent residents. However, they may also include some prospective immigrants and refugees who are highly likely to obtain permanent residency, but have not yet received their permanent resident visa. These include, for example, individuals who have been selected by CIC pending completion of medical, security and criminal verification requirements.
Expected Results: The program’s ultimate outcomes are that:
Strategic Outcome(s): Successful integration of newcomers into society and promotion of Canadian citizenship
Results Achieved: CIC delivers settlement programs across Canada except in Quebec, Manitoba and British Columbia, and for the period 2010–11 there was an increase of more than 8% in the number of interventions for newcomers.
To facilitate newcomers landing in Canada, CIC funded in-person pre-departure orientation sessions. Third parties delivered these sessions to 14,251 individuals in 2010–11 (13,104 through Canadian Orientation Abroad, and 1,147 through the Active Engagement and Integration Project).
2008-09 Actual Spending* |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Contributions | – | $641.7 | $654.8 | $644.6 | $628.1 | ($26.7) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total Program Activity(ies) | – | $641.7 | $654.8 | $644.6 | $628.1 | ($26.7) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was $26.7 million less than planned because of enhanced review of claims and recipient claims cost less than planned.
Audit Completed or Planned: Internal audit of the administration of the Settlement Program was completed in 2010–11.
Evaluations Completed or Planned:
Completed: 2010–11—Host, Welcoming Communities Initiative, Immigration Settlement and Adaptation Program, Going to Canada Immigration Portal.
Planned: The next program evaluation will be carried out in stages. By 2014–15 the entire Settlement Program will be evaluated:
* The reconfiguration of the Settlement Program in the 2009–10 Estimates Cycle has affected the comparability of previous years’ information.
NEW (not included in the 2010–11 Report on Plans and Priorities)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation to Canadian Agencies or Entities Established by an Act of Parliament for Reduction of Debts of Debtor Countries (Vote 5)
Start Date: 1991–92
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Compensation to Export Development Canada (EDC) and the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) for reduction of debts of debtor countries
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payment to EDC and CWB to compensate for debt relief to debtor countries
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 172.1 | 53.4 | 229.0 | 229.0 | 25.1 | 203.9 |
Total Contributions | 16.2 | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 188.3 | 53.4 | 229.0 | 229.0 | 25.1 | 203.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variances between planned spending and actual expenditures are generally unavoidable because of the many uncertainties surrounding the timing and amounts of debt relief payments. Each year the International Trade and Finance Branch of the Department of Finance Canada estimates the amounts of debt relief compensation payments that the Department of Finance Canada will pay to EDC and CWB for the fiscal year. This is always a rough estimate because EDC and CWB provide debt relief only after heavily indebted poor countries have fulfilled certain conditions and are granted their debt relief "completion point" by the executive boards of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. The timing of when the "completion point" is given varies depending on the progress of the country toward that point. As soon as the conditions are deemed to be met, EDC and CWB provide debt relief to the country and issue an invoice to the Department for compensation.
For example, Côte D'Ivoire was expected to reach its completion point in 2010–11, which would have resulted in a payment to EDC for full debt relief to Côte D'Ivoire. However, because of delays resulting from political instability in Côte D'Ivoire, the country is not expected to receive debt relief until 2011–12 at the earliest.Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The Internal Audit and Evaluation Committee of the Department of Finance Canada performed an evaluation of Canada's international debt relief initiatives, which is available at http://www.fin.gc.ca/treas/evaluations/ecidri-eiiadc-eng.asp.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Initiative (Vote 5)
Start Date: April 2001
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: The Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Initiative (TWRI) is both an infrastructure and an urban renewal investment. The goals of the TWRI include positioning Canada, Ontario and Toronto in the new economy, thereby ensuring Canada's continued success in the global economy. This includes increasing economic growth and development opportunities; recognizing the intrinsic links between economic, social and environmental health; enhancing the quality of life in Toronto; and encouraging sustainable urban development.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Five TWRI projects receiving federal funding were completed during 2010–11, including two waterfront venues that are well used by the public (Sugar Beach and the Sherbourne Common South Side Park). In addition, capital work was carried out on several federally funded projects that are scheduled to open in 2011–12.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | 107.7 | 65.0 | 75.2 | 53.6 | 11.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | 107.7 | 65.0 | 75.2 | 53.6 | 11.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between planned spending and actual spending is attributable to the budget re-profiling to future years that was necessary to address project requirements beyond fiscal year 2010–11. This is consistent with the program's automatic re-profile authority.
The decrease in actual spending from 2009–10 to 2010–11 occurred because the majority of the projects associated with the program were completed in fiscal year 2009–10.Audit Completed or Planned: Project audits were carried out on behalf of the federal TWRI Secretariat in 2010–11 on the contracting practices of the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation and on the Central Waterfront Public Realm Planning and Design Contribution Agreement. The audits found that the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation has implemented controls related to previous audit recommendations that dealt with contracting and procurement issues and that the organization was complying with the Terms and Conditions of the Central Waterfront Public Realm Planning and Design Contribution Agreement.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: In 2010, a consultant engaged by the federal TWRI Secretariat completed evaluation work related to the York and John Quay projects. The evaluation determined that the projects were successful from multiple perspectives and represented "important early wins in the overall effort to develop the Toronto waterfront."
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Harbourfront Centre Funding Program (Vote 5)
Start Date: March 2006
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The primary objective of the Harbourfront Centre Funding Program is to provide operational funding support to Harbourfront Centre until March 31, 2012. Such support will assist Harbourfront Centre in covering its fixed operational costs. The funding program will also facilitate Harbourfront Centre's ability to leverage funding from other levels of government and to pursue other revenue-generating strategies that allow the organization to provide the general public with continued access to cultural, recreational, and educational programs and activities held in Toronto's waterfront area.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians.
Results Achieved: Harbourfront Centre received and spent the full complement of its annual funding under the Harbourfront Centre Funding Program, using the funding to cover its operational costs. Accordingly, Harbourfront Centre remained open and carried out its mandate to provide the general public with continued access to cultural, educational and recreational activities.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 0.8 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 0.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between planned spending and actual spending occurred because the first quarterly payment for fiscal year 2010–11 was made in advance in fiscal year 2009–10, as allowed for in the Contribution Agreement. This advance payment was also the cause of the decrease in actual expenditures from 2009–10 to 2010–11.
Audit Completed or Planned: A federal desk audit of the Harbourfront Centre Funding Program concluded that the funds were being spent according to the Terms and Conditions of the program.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The five-year evaluation of the Harbourfront Centre Funding Program that was completed in 2010 received approval from the Departmental Audit and Evaluation Committee in December 2010. The report can be found at http://www.fin.gc.ca/treas/evaluations/ehcfp-epfhc-eng.asp.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments to the International Development Association
Start Date: 1960
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program provides encashment of demand notes to allow the International Development Association (IDA) to disburse concessional financing for development projects and programs in the world's poorest countries. IDA has been consistently evaluated by independent studies as one of the top ways to deliver aid and constitutes an integral part of how Canada delivers its international assistance.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians.
Results Achieved: Payments were completed on time. Results achieved by IDA over the last five years include the following:
For more information on IDA's results, please visit http://www.worldbank.org/ida/.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 318.3 | 384.3 | 384.3 | 384.3 | 384.3 | 0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 318.3 | 384.3 | 384.3 | 384.3 | 384.3 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): No variance identified
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Internal evaluation ongoing, with results expected in fall 2011
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Fiscal Equalization (Part I—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 1957
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Formula-based Equalization payments are made to eligible provincial governments to enable them to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation. Equalization payments are unconditional.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for financial support to provinces
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 13,462.2 | 14,185.0 | 14,372.0 | 14,372.0 | 14,372.0 | 0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 13,462.2 | 14,185.0 | 14,372.0 | 14,372.0 | 14,372.0 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The increase in expenditures from 2009–10 to 2010–11 is attributable to the commitment in Budget 2009 to establish a sustainable growth path for the Equalization program that had been announced by the Minister of Finance in November 2008. Aggregate payments, including those for 2010–11, are based on a three-year moving average of nominal Gross Domestic Product growth applied to the previous year's Equalization amount.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch released its Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories in December 2010. The audit concluded that overall, "the Department's controls and processes related to the administration of the four major statutory vote transfer payments are effective and appropriate." The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Territorial Formula Financing (Part I.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 1985
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Territorial Formula Financing payments are made to all territorial governments to provide the resources they need to deliver services that are comparable to those delivered by provincial governments, taking into account the high costs and unique challenges in the North.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for financial support to territories
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 2,312.9 | 2,497.9 | 2,663.6 | 2,663.6 | 2,663.6 | 0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 2,312.9 | 2,497.9 | 2,663.6 | 2,663.6 | 2,663.6 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Territorial Formula Financing is a gap-filling formula between a proxy of each territory's expenditure need and its revenue-raising capacity. The increase in expenditures from 2009–10 to 2010–11 of $165.6 million (6.6 per cent) is attributable to an increase in the gap between the measured proxies of territorial expenditure need (Gross Expenditure Bases, or GEBs) and their measured revenue capacities. While revenue capacities increased, they did not increase by as much as GEBs.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch released its Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories in December 2010. The audit concluded that overall, "the Department's controls and processes related to the administration of the four major statutory vote transfer payments are effective and appropriate." The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Health Transfer (Part V.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 2004
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Canada Health Transfer (CHT) provides equal per capita support for health care through cash and tax transfers to provincial and territorial governments. The CHT supports the government's commitment to maintain the Canada Health Act's national criteria (comprehensiveness, universality, portability, accessibility and public administration), conditions and prohibitions against user fees and extra-billing.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for support to provinces and territories
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 22,759.0 | 24,081.0 | 25,426.3 | 25,605.4 | 25,605.4 | (179.1) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 22,759.0 | 24,081.0 | 25,426.3 | 25,605.4 | 25,605.4 | (179.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned and actual spending occurred because the Main Estimates did not include the protection payment amounts added as a result of the fall 2010 re-estimates of prior years. These protection payments were legislated in Budget 2007 as additional funding to provinces and territories to ensure that their Canada Health Transfer payments were not lower than the 2007–08 amounts that they would have received prior to the introduction of other changes in Budget 2007. These amounts are recalculated on a regular basis. In addition, the Main Estimates figure did not include March 2011 deductions under the Canada Health Act.
The year-over-year change in actual expenditures is primarily attributable to the annual 6 percent escalated payment. In addition, there was funding from Budget 2007 that legislated protection payments to provinces and territories to ensure that their payments were not lower than the 2007–08 amounts that they would have received prior to the introduction of other changes in Budget 2007. Each year's actual expenditures also include (different) amounts for deductions under the Canada Health Act.Audit Completed or Planned: The Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch released its Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories in December 2010. The audit concluded that overall, "the Department's controls and processes related to the administration of the four major statutory vote transfer payments are effective and appropriate." The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Social Transfer (Part V.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 2004
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Canada Social Transfer (CST) provides equal per capita cash support and tax transfer support to provincial and territorial governments to assist them in financing social programs, post-secondary education, and programs for children. The CST gives provinces and territories the flexibility to allocate payments to those areas according to their own priorities and supports the government's commitment to prohibit minimum residency requirements for social assistance.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for financial support to provinces and territories
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 10,567.9 | 10,857.9 | 11,178.7 | 11,178.8 | 11,178.8 | (0.1) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 10,567.9 | 10,857.9 | 11,178.7 | 11,178.8 | 11,178.8 | (0.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):The variance between planned and actual spending occurred because the 2010–11 Main Estimates did not include the protection payment amounts added as a result of the fall 2010 re-estimates of prior years. These protection payments were legislated in Budget 2007 as additional funding to provinces and territories to ensure that their payments were not lower than the 2007–08 amounts that they would have received prior to the introduction of other changes in Budget 2007. These amounts are recomputed on a regular basis.
The increase in actual spending from 2009–10 to 2010–11 is attributable to the annual payment increase of 3 per cent. In addition, there was funding resulting from Budget 2007 that legislated protection payments to provinces and territories to ensure that their payments were not lower than the 2007–08 amounts that they would have received prior to the introduction of other changes in Budget 2007.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch released its Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories in December 2010. The audit concluded that overall, "the Department's controls and processes related to the administration of the four major statutory vote transfer payments are effective and appropriate." The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Subsidies (Constitution Act, 1867; Constitution Act, 1982; and other statutory authorities)
Start Date: 1867
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Statutory subsidies provide a source of funding to provinces in accordance with terms of entry into Confederation.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for financial support to provinces
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 32.0 | 32.2 | 32.0 | 32.1 | 32.1 | (0.1) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 32.0 | 32.2 | 32.0 | 32.1 | 32.1 | (0.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Very small variance due to rounding
Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Allowances Recovery (Federal-Provincial Fiscal Revision Act, 1964)
Start Date: 1964
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Youth Allowances Recovery is a recovery from the Province of Quebec for an additional tax point transfer (three points) above and beyond the Canada Health Transfer and Canada Social Transfer tax point transfers. In the 1960s, Quebec chose to use the federal government's contracting-out arrangements for certain federal-provincial programs. Quebec continues to receive the value of these tax points through its own income tax system and reimburses the Government of Canada for the discontinued programs for which it had received a tax point transfer. Taken together, the Alternative Payments for Standing Programs and the Youth Allowances Recovery are known as the "Quebec Abatement." These arrangements ensure that all provinces and territories are treated the same through cash and tax transfers in support of health and social programs.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | (332.7) | (596.3) | (655.8) | (678.2) | (678.2) | 22.4 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | (332.7) | (596.3) | (655.8) | (678.2) | (678.2) | 22.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Youth Allowance Recovery represents a recovery from Quebec of the cash value of the tax points (three points) that under previous funding arrangements, the Province opted to collect through its own tax system, instead of receiving cash payments from the Government of Canada to fund a youth allowances program. Since the program for which it received this tax transfer no longer exists, the value of these tax points is reimbursed to the Government of Canada each year. Until the tax data for 2010 are finalized, the figures will be based on forecasts.
The variance between the planned and actual amounts is a result of prior year adjustments as well as a revised estimate of the 2010–11 recovery, made in March 2011.
The recovery for 2010–11 was greater than that for 2009–10 because the value of the estimated tax points was greater in that year.Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Alternative Payments for Standing Programs (Part VI—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 1977
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Description: The Alternative Payments for Standing Programs is a recovery from the Province of Quebec for an additional tax point transfer (13.5 points) above and beyond the Canada Health Transfer (CHT) and Canada Social Transfer (CST) tax point transfers. In the 1960s, Quebec chose to use the federal government's contracting-out arrangements for certain federal-provincial programs. Since Quebec, like other provinces, receives its full cash entitlement under the CHT and CST, the value of these tax points is reimbursed to the Government of Canada each year. Taken together, the Alternative Payments for Standing Programs and the Youth Allowances Recovery are known as the Quebec Abatement. These arrangements ensure that all provinces and territories are treated the same through cash and tax transfers in support of health and social programs.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | (2,973.9) | (2,702.6) | (2,976.7) | (3,072.6) | (3,072.6) | 95.9 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | (2,973.9) | (2,702.6) | (2,976.7) | (3,072.6) | (3,072.6) | 95.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Alternative Payments for Standing Programs program represents a recovery from Quebec of the cash value of tax points (13.5 points) that under previous funding arrangements, the province opted to collect through its own tax system, instead of receiving cash payments from the Government of Canada to fund social programs. Since, like other provinces, Quebec now receives its full cash entitlement under the Canada Health Transfer and the Canada Social Transfer, the value of these tax points is reimbursed to the Government of Canada each year. Until the tax data for 2010 and 2011 are finalized, the figures will be based on forecasts.
The variance between planned spending and actual amounts is a result of prior-year adjustments arising from the estimates cycle as well as a revised estimate of 2010–11 recoveries, made in February 2011. The recovery for 2010–11 was greater than that for 2009–10 because the value of the estimated tax points was greater in that year.Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Wait Times Reduction Transfer (Part V.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 2004–05
End Date: 2013–14
Description: As part of the 10-Year Plan to Strengthen Health Care, the Government of Canada committed support to the provinces and territories to help reduce wait times in the health care system—primarily in support of human resources and tools to manage wait times. A total of $4.25 billion was provided through a third-party trust fund in 2004 and was notionally allocated over five years, from 2004–05 to 2008–09. This amount has been paid in full. From 2009–10 to 2013–14, annual funding of $250 million will be provided to the provinces and territories through a transfer.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for financial support to provinces and territories
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | 0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): No variance identified
Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payment to Ontario Related to the Canada Health Transfer (Budget Implementation Act, 2009)
Start Date: 2009–10
End Date: 2010–11
Description: Direct payments are made to the Government of Ontario to ensure that its per capita cash entitlements in relation to the Canada Health Transfer are the same as for other Equalization-receiving provinces.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all the legislative requirements for financial support to Ontario
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | 489.1 | 213.8 | 160.4 | 160.4 | 53.4 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | 498.1 | 213.8 | 160.4 | 160.4 | 53.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Budget Implementation Act, 2009 provides Ontario with separate payments outside of the Canada Health Transfer (CHT) cash envelope for 2009–10 and 2010–11. These payments ensure that Ontario's per capita cash entitlements in relation to the CHT are the same as those for other Equalization-receiving provinces. With the recalculation of the CHT for 2010–11, the decline in the value of Ontario's CHT tax point transfer leads to a decline in the value of this payment to $160 million.
The payment for 2009–10 of $489 million was a legislated fixed amount, based on the December 2008 first estimate of the CHT; the payment for 2010–11 of $160 million is formula-based, such that payments are recalculated along with each new CHT estimate. With this recalculation of the CHT for 2010–11, the decline in the value of Ontario's CHT tax point transfer leads to a decline in the value of this outside payment.Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Incentive for Provinces to Eliminate Taxes on Capital (Part IV—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 2007–08
End Date: 2010–11
Description: Financial incentive to encourage provinces to eliminate provincial general capital taxes and/or to eliminate or restructure an existing provincial capital tax on financial institutions into a minimum tax
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increased business investment, higher standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: All provincial general capital taxes will be eliminated by July 1, 2012, increasing the competitiveness of businesses by strengthening Canada's business tax advantage.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 170.0 | 163.4 | 170.0 | 160.9 | 160.9 | 9.1 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 170.0 | 163.4 | 170.0 | 160.9 | 160.9 | 9.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between planned spending and actual expenditures reflects the fact that one planned payment did not occur because one province did not provide the required information in time for a payment in 2010–11. This payment will be carried over to 2011–12.
The impact of this deferred payment on actual spending in 2010–11 was partly offset by the fact that provincial entitlements were generally higher than anticipated when compared to the projections by the provinces in 2009–10. Higher provincial entitlements reflected the use of updated corporate tax data.
The variation in payments from 2009–10 to 2010–11 reflects the change in the amount of forgone provincial capital tax revenue that is eligible for the incentive payment.Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Establishment of a Canadian Securities Regulation Regime and Canadian Regulatory Authority (Budget Implementation Act, 2009)
Start Date: 2009–10
End Date: 2010–11
Description: In Budget 2009, the Government of Canada committed to move forward quickly with willing provinces and territories to establish a Canadian securities regulator that respects regional interests and expertise as well as constitutional jurisdiction. Program funds will be used to compensate participating provinces and territories for matters relating to the transition toward a Canadian securities regulator.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians.
Results Achieved: In May 2010, the government tabled for information in Parliament the proposed Canadian Securities Act, and concurrently referred it to the Supreme Court of Canada for a ruling on whether Parliament has the constitutional authority to enact the proposed legislation. Should a favourable ruling be received from the Supreme Court of Canada, the government plans to introduce for adoption in Parliament the proposed Canadian Securities Act, which would then go through the normal parliamentary legislative process.
Compensation was not provided to participating provinces and territories for matters relating to the transition toward a Canadian securities regulator in 2010–11 but is expected to be made in 2011–12 after an agreement is reached between participating jurisdictions and the government as part of the transition to a Canadian securities regulator.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | 150.0 | 0 | 0 | 150.0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | — | 150.0 | 0 | 0 | 150.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): In Budget 2009, the government indicated that it is prepared to enter into financial arrangements with participating jurisdictions as it moves toward a Canadian securities regulator. The Budget Implementation Act, 2009 provided up to $150 million for compensating provinces and territories for matters relating to transition. The payment was not made in 2010–11 but is expected to be made in 2011–12 after an agreement is reached between participating jurisdictions and the government as part of the transition to a Canadian securities regulator.
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Securities Regulation Regime Transition Office (Canadian Securities Regulation Regime Transition Office Act)
Start Date: 2009–10
End Date: 2011–12
Description: In Budget 2009, the Government of Canada committed to move forward quickly with willing provinces and territories to establish a Canadian securities regulator that respects regional interests and expertise as well as constitutional jurisdiction. In July 2009, the Canadian Securities Regulation Regime Transition Office (Transition Office) was created under the Canadian Securities Regulation Regime Transition Office Act to lead and manage all aspects of the transition to a Canadian securities regulator. The Act also provided its funding.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: The Transition Office led the development of the proposed Canadian Securities Act, which was tabled in Parliament in May 2010 and concurrently referred to the Supreme Court of Canada for a ruling on whether Parliament has the constitutional authority to enact the proposed legislation. In July 2010, the Transition Office released the Transition Plan for the Canadian Securities Regulatory Authority. The Transition Office developed the proposed Canadian Securities Act and Transition Plan in consultation with participating provinces and territories.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | 5.4 | 11.0 | 13.2 | 13.2 | (2.2) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | 5.4 | 11.0 | 13.2 | 13.2 | (2.2) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Transition Office's enabling statute, the Canadian Securities Regulation Regime Transition Office Act, authorizes the Minister of Finance to make direct payments to the Transition Office for its use in fulfilling its mandate, in an amount not to exceed $33 million for a three-year period commencing July 13, 2009. In this regard, three equal $11 million payments were planned over the course of the mandate. Actual funding transferred to the Transition Office reflected its shorter initial year of operation for 2009-10 as well as its anticipated work for 2009-10 and 2010-11. Further information on the Transition Office's funding and activities is available in its Annual Report tabled in Parliament.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Transition Office's enabling statute requires that its financial statements be audited annually by the Auditor General of Canada. The financial statements and audit report are available in the Transition Office's Annual Report tabled in Parliament.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Debt Payments on Behalf of Poor Countries to International Organizations pursuant to section 18(1) of the Economic Recovery Act
Start Date: 2010
End Date: 2054
Description: Payments for Canada's commitment to the G8-led Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Responsible administration of financial obligations under the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 149.3 | 51.2 | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | 51.2 | 73.4 | 73.4 | (22.4) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.3 | 51.2 | 51.2 | 73.4 | 73.4 | (22.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Prior to fiscal year 2010–11, this payment was considered a grant. The change to a statutory vote was made at the request of the World Bank in order to further solidify the legal framework underpinning these payments. The increase over planned spending is attributable to the contributions that Canada made for international debt relief to Haiti following the 2010 earthquake.
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The Internal Audit and Evaluation Committee of the Department of Finance Canada performed an evaluation of Canada's international debt relief initiatives, which is available at http://www.fin.gc.ca/treas/evaluations/ecidri-eiiadc-eng.asp.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transitional Assistance to Provinces Entering into the Harmonized Value-Added Tax Framework (Part III.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 2010
End Date: 2011
Description: Ontario and British Columbia decided to enter into a harmonized value-added tax framework and signed Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreements with the Government of Canada. Canada entered into these agreements under the authority of Part III.1 of the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act. As part of the agreements, Canada has committed to providing Ontario with $4.3 billion and British Columbia with $1.599 billion in transitional assistance. In 2009–10, British Columbia received $250 million. In 2010–11, Ontario received $3 billion and British Columbia received $769 million.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Transitional assistance payments for 2010–11 to Ontario and British Columbia were made as scheduled.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | 250.0 | 3,000.0 | 3,769.0 | 3,769.0 | (769.0) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | 250.0 | 3,000.0 | 3,769.0 | 3,769.0 | (769.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): A footnote to the 2010–11 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) indicated that additional payments of transitional assistance could be made to British Columbia. Under the Canada-British Columbia Comprehensive Integrated Tax Coordination Agreement, $769 million was provided to British Columbia in 2010–11, which accounts for the difference between planned spending in the 2010–11 RPP and actual spending in the 2010–11 Departmental Performance Report. The $769 million payment was recorded in the Supplementary Estimates (A) for 2010–11 as a statutory appropriation.
The total amount of transitional assistance scheduled to be paid to Ontario and British Columbia as a result of their entering into the Harmonized Value-Added Tax Framework was $5.899 billion. The payment schedule for British Columbia was revised, in keeping with the terms of the agreement, and is available on the province's website. One payment of $250 million was paid to British Columbia in 2009–10. Two payments totalling $3.769 billion were paid in 2010–11: $3 billion to Ontario and $769 million to British Columbia. The remaining $1.88 billion was paid in 2011–12, as identified in the Main Estimates for 2011–12: $1.3 billion to Ontario and $580 million to British Columbia.Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Small and Medium Enterprise Finance Challenge
Start Date: June 2010
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: Rapid growth in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) drives job creation in a wide range of economies, yet more than two-thirds of SMEs in developing countries have no access to private sector financing. The large gap between the demand and supply of SME financing is a serious constraint on efforts to promote strong and sustainable global recovery. To overcome this challenge, leaders of the G20 launched the Small and Medium Enterprise Finance Challenge. The goal was to solicit innovative and scalable proposals from the private sector for governments and public institutions to be more effective in leveraging private finance for SMEs in developing countries.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Together with contributions from other countries, follow through on the G20's commitment to mobilize funding for the implementation of the fourteen winning proposals of the Small and Medium Enterprise Finance Challenge, including the leveraging of investment resources from international financial institutions and other interested parties
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | 20.0 | 20.0 | (20.0) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | — | — | 20.0 | 20.0 | (20.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Spending plans had not been made public in time for inclusion in the 2010–11 Main Estimates.
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Finance Corporation (IFC)—Financial Mechanisms for Climate Change
Start Date: March 8, 2011
End Date: December 31, 2030
Description: As part of Canada's commitment under the Copenhagen Accord on climate change, the Department of Finance Canada provided $285.7 million of concessional financing to IFC to leverage energy efficiency and clean energy projects by the private sector in developing countries, and $5.8 million of technical assistance to build expertise and capacity for these types of projects.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: As part of the $400 million in new and additional climate change financing that Canada provided in 2010–11, Canada delivered on its commitment to provide its fair share of fast-start financing under the Copenhagen Accord. The Department of Finance Canada will work with the IFC to track the amount of private investment directly mobilized by this contribution, as well as the emissions reductions achieved.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | 5.8 | 5.8 | (5.8) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | — | — | 5.8 | 5.8 | (5.8) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Spending plans had not been made public in time for inclusion in the 2010-11 Main Estimates
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Funding for the Global Risk Institute in Financial Services
Start Date: 2010–11
End Date: 2010–11
Description: The Global Risk Institute in Financial Services (GRi) is a collaborative effort between the Toronto Financial Services Alliance, a partnership of the City of Toronto and the financial services industry, and the governments of Canada and Ontario. GRi will be a world-class centre for research and training across multiple financial risk management and regulatory disciplines. Research conducted by GRi will form the basis for training and ongoing professional development of capital market practitioners and regulators. The main beneficiaries of GRi's research will be the financial services practitioners and regulators as well as policy makers. Research will be conducted by participating universities and consultants and disseminated by GRi through publications and public events.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: GRi was incorporated on January 1, 2011, under the Canada Business Corporations Act, thus allowing it to enter into legal agreements. Federal funding was transferred to GRi by March 31, 2011. GRi is in the process of selecting its board of directors and preparing a calendar of events.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | 10.0 | 10.0 | (10.0) |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | — | — | 10.0 | 10.0 | (10.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Spending plans had not been made public in time for inclusion in the 2010–11 Main Estimates
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Subsidy Resources to the International Monetary Fund's Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust
Start Date: April 1, 2010
End Date: September 22, 2010
Description: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has established the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT) as its concessional lending framework for low-income countries. The PRGT's assistance and conditionality is guided by a country's Poverty Reduction Strategy, which is country-specific and involves broad-based participation by civil society and the private sector. In Budget 2010, Canada provided $40 million in subsidy resources to PRGT to support its poverty reduction activities in low-income countries over the medium-term, which is consistent with the commitments made at the G20 London Summit.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Together with contributions from G20 countries and the IMF's internal resources, Canada's contribution will allow PRGT to provide up to US$17 billion worth of flexible and concessional financing to low-income countries over the medium term, thereby allowing them to meet their poverty reduction and Millennium Development Goals.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | 40.0 | 40.0 | (40.0) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | — | — | 40.0 | 40.0 | (40.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Spending plans had not been made public in time for inclusion in the 2010-11 Main Estimates
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Additional Fiscal Equalization Payment – Total Transfer Protection (Part I—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)
Start Date: 2010–11
End Date: 2010–11
Description: Complementing Canada's Economic Action Plan, the Government of Canada provided provinces with protection to prevent declines in major transfers between 2009–10 and 2010–11. Specifically, for those two years, a comparison was made of the sum of Equalization, the Canada Health Transfer, the Canada Social Transfer, and the Payment to Ontario Related to the Canada Health Transfer. When there was a decline, the province received Total Transfer Protection. For Equalization-receiving provinces, this payment was made as an additional Fiscal Equalization payment. Under this program, protection payments were made to Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Manitoba.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for financial support to provinces
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | 509.5 | 509.5 | (509.5) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | — | — | 509.5 | 509.5 | (509.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Legislation was not passed in time for the transfer payment to be included in Planned Spending
Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Health Transfer and Canada Social Transfer to Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador – Total Transfer Protection
Start Date: 2010–11
End Date: 2010–11
Description: Complementing Canada's Economic Action Plan, the Government of Canada provided provinces with protection to prevent declines in major transfers between 2009–10 and 2010–11. Specifically, for those two years, a comparison was made of the sum of Equalization, the Canada Health Transfer, the Canada Social Transfer, and the Payment to Ontario Related to the Canada Health Transfer. When there was a decline, the province received Total Transfer Protection. Protection payments to provinces that did not receive Equalization were provided as additional Canada Health Transfer payments. Under this measure, protection payments were made to Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador.
Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians
Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that met all legislative requirements for financial support to provinces
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | 15.7 | 15.7 | (15.7) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | — | — | — | 15.7 | 15.7 | (15.7) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Legislation was not passed in time for the transfer payment to be included in Planned Spending.
Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit by the Office of the Auditor general of Canada was in progress in August 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation by the Department's Internal Audit and Evaluation Branch of the Federal-Provincial Relations Division, including the administrative aspects of all major transfer payments, was in progress in August 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Legal Aid Systems (voted)
Start Date: August 17, 1971
End Date: March 31, 2012 and ongoing
Description: The objective of the federal Legal Aid Program is to contribute to sustaining a national system of justice, that helps to ensure that economically disadvantaged persons have access to the justice system, through contribution funding in support of criminal, youth criminal justice and immigration and refugee legal aid services provided by the provinces (funding for criminal and civil legal aid in the territories is provided through the Access to Justice Agreements).
Recipients: Provinces
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.
Results Achieved: Provinces were enabled to provide legal aid services to eligible persons involved in serious criminal, youth criminal justice, and immigration and refugee matters.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $119,827,507 | $125,827,507 | $119,827,507 | $124,572,507 | $124,572,507 | -$4,745,000 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $119,827,507 | $125,827,507 | $119,827,507 | $124,572,507 | $124,572,507 | -$4,745,000 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Additional resources were provided to address the increased costs faced by the six provinces providing immigration and refugee legal aid (Newfoundland and Labrador, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia).
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The Legal Aid Program Impact Evaluation activities are being conducted over a five-year period. In 2009-2010, the Legal Aid Program Impact Design Study was completed (December 2009). The Legal Aid Program Impact Evaluation is planned to be completed in the 2011-12 fiscal year.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Justice Services Funding Program (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 1984
End Date: March 31, 2011 and ongoing
Description: The overall objective of this Program is to support the policy directions of the Youth Justice Initiative. The specific objectives of the individual agreements are to support and promote an appropriate range of programs and services that: encourage accountability measures for unlawful behaviour that are proportionate and timely; encourage the effective rehabilitation and reintegration of young persons into their communities; target the formal court process to the most serious offences; and target detention and custody to the most serious offences.
Recipients: Provinces and territories
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.
Results Achieved: Despite the capping of federal funding under this Program since 2006-07, the Provinces and Territories appear to have been able to maintain most of the high priority services developed under the previous agreements.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $177,302,415 | $0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A summative evaluation of the funding components of the Youth Justice Initiative undertaken during 2009-10 was completed in 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Victims of Crime Initiative (voted) and Federal Victims Strategy (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2000
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Policy Centre for Victim Issues (PCVI) administers the federal Victims Fund, which has a broad set of objectives that are intended to improve the experience of victims in the criminal justice system. The Fund can be accessed by victim service providers, non-governmental organizations, provincial and territorial governments, victim advocates and researchers, as well as victims (Canadians who are victimized abroad, as well as victims registered with Correctional Services Canada and their support persons to attend National Parole Board hearings).
Recipients:
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values
Results Achieved:
In 2010-2011, the Victims Fund provided:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $398,752 | $842,605 | $850,000 | $850,000 | $847,249 | $2,751 |
Total Contributions | $3,100,934 | $4,067,867 | $6,900,000 | $9,981,500 | $6,179,736 | $720,264 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $3,499,686 | $4,910,472 | $7,750,000 | $10,831,500 | $7,026,985 | $723,015 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Management practices implemented in 2010-2011 have resulted in greater awareness of the fund and the development of project proposals that are supported (resulting in a decrease in the variance from previous years). Working directly with victims of crime to support them in accessing financial assistance, as well as working with NGOs, Aboriginal organizations and/or provincial and territorial (PT) partners to develop strong and viable proposals which satisfy government requirements for due diligence, are resource intensive processes to which we are committed. Justice Canada is making changes to improve our ability to deliver this funding.
While in 2010-2011 the Financial Assistance component of the fund saw an increase in the resources committed to victims and their support persons as well as in resources committed to Canadians victimized abroad, those commitments are difficult to forecast as the Victims Fund responds directly to requests for assistance from victims of crime.
Further improvements to the criteria, processes and administration of the Fund will be developed to ensure that federal funding continues to meet the needs of victims of crime and this variance continues to decrease.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The summative evaluation of the Federal Victim Strategy (FVS) was completed in the Fall 2010. The evaluation found that the FVS is highly relevant to the Government of Canada’s priorities, is improving the experience of victims in the criminal justice system, and that there is a strong continuing need for the FVS. The evaluation also concluded that funding lapses are impeding the full potential of the Victims Fund. In future years, improvements to the criteria, processes and administration of the Fund will be developed to ensure that federal funding meets the needs of victims of crime. For example, PT partners and NGOs will be encouraged to seek funding for longer-terms to augment victim services across the country and develop new services where required, more flexibility in project spending will be advanced when appropriate, and multi-purpose funding will be supported. In addition, methods for decreasing the administrative burden on recipient organizations will be identified as will opportunities to increase awareness of the Fund.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision Program (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2002
End Date: March 31, 2013 and ongoing
Description: The overall objective of this Program is to financially assist provinces and territories in providing the specialized therapeutic services required for the implementation of the Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision (IRCS) sentence [paragraph 42(2) (r) and subsection 42(7) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA)] and other sentencing options applicable under the YCJA to serious violent youth offenders with mental health problems. It is expected that these services may reduce future violence in those convicted of the most serious violent offences.
Recipients: Provinces and territories
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.
Results Achieved: During 2010-11, a total of 12 Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision (IRCS) orders were issued by the courts and became eligible for federal funding, bringing the total number of active IRCS cases funded to 44. In addition, another 13 exceptional cases were approved for funding during 2010-11, bringing the total number of other active cases to 15.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $9,028,126 | $10,561,587 | $11,048,000 | $11,048,000 | $10,929,773 | $118,227 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $9,028,126 | $10,561,587 | $11,048,000 | $11,048,000 | $10,929,773 | $118,227 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Spending under this Program is largely dependent on court decisions and as such remains highly unpredictable.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A summative evaluation of the funding components of the Youth Justice Initiative undertaken during 2009-10 was completed in 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Implementation of Official Languages Requirements in respect of the Contraventions Act (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2002
End Date: March 31, 2013 and ongoing
Description: The Contraventions Act allows the federal government to designate federal statutory offences as contraventions so that they can be processed using a contraventions scheme, thus reducing the burden on the court system, reducing the costs for the accused and the government, and limiting the impact of a conviction based on a federal offence. The Act authorizes the federal government to sign administration agreements with provinces, territories and municipalities allowing the federal government to use existing provincial penal regimes to prosecute federal contraventions. The Contraventions Act Fund provides funding to provinces, territories and municipalities that have signed administration agreements so that they can implement the Act in a manner consistent with the applicable constitutional language rights laws involving compliance with judicial services (section 530 and 530.1 of the Criminal Code) and extra-judicial services (Part IV of the Official Languages Act).
Recipients: Provincial and territorial departments and agencies and municipalities designated by provincial and territorial governments as being responsible for judicial activities and for providing extra-judicial services in both official languages.
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $4,289,100 | $4,580,600 | $9,094,900 | $5,799,900 | $4,541,496 | $4,553,404 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $4,289,100 | $4,580,600 | $9,094,900 | $5,799,900 | $4,541,496 | $4,553,404 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The actual spending was lower than anticipated for the following reasons:
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The Department undertook an evaluation of the Contraventions Act in 2010 to better understand the experience of enforcement officers and federal departments in using the ticketing system included in the Act. This evaluation is complementary to those evaluations that the Department already conducted of the Contraventions Act Fund (2007), which provides assistance in the delivery of services in both official languages.
The summative evaluation of the Fund will be undertaken in 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Supporting Families Fund (voted)2
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: The Supporting Families Fund is a key component of the Supporting Families Experiencing Separation and Divorce Initiative (SFI) which was announced by the Minister of Justice in September, 2008. The Fund is aimed at facilitating access to the family justice system for families experiencing separation and divorce, through various services, programs, and information resources, particularly those that promote compliance with financial support and custody/access obligations. The Fund also supports projects that promote public awareness about family law reforms concerning parenting arrangements, child support guidelines and support enforcements.
Recipients: Provincial and territorial departments, agencies, or other organizations designated by provincial and territorial governments as responsible for child support, the enforcement of support orders and agreements and parenting arrangement programs and services are eligible to apply for contribution funding under the Family Justice Initiatives and the Pilot Projects components of the Fund.
Any of the following may apply for contribution or class grant funding under the Public Legal Education and Information and Professional Training component of the Fund:
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.
Results Achieved: Provided funding in the amount of $15,485,228 to provincial and territorial governments for family justice services and programs, particularly those that promote compliance with family law obligations.
Provided $450,154 to non-government organizations for developing family justice information resources, particularly those that promote compliance with family law obligations.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $7,600 | $29,970 | $50,000 | $23,259 | $23,249 | $26,751 |
Total Contributions | $15,992,391 | $15,847,819 | $15,950,000 | $15,976,741 | $15,975,107 | -$25,107 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $15,999,991 | $15,877,789 | $16,000,000 | $16,000,000 | $15,998,356 | $1,644 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The actual spending was lower than anticipated for the following reasons:
Under the Supporting Families Initiative, the amount of funding available to each jurisdiction and funding criteria has been established and shared with jurisdictions. Due to limitations in their internal capacity, some jurisdictions were not able to fully utilize the funds available to them in 2010-2011.
Fewer grant proposals than anticipated were received under the PLEI and Professional training component of the SF Fund in fiscal year 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The impact evaluation of the Supporting Families Initiative will be initiated in 2012/13, so that results will be available before the SFI’s funding cycle is completed in March 2014.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Justice Strategy (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 1991 as Aboriginal Justice Initiative, renewed as Aboriginal Justice Strategy in 1996, 2002, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The Aboriginal Justice Strategy (AJS) enables Aboriginal communities to have increased involvement in the local administration of justice and, as such, provides timely and effective alternatives to mainstream justice processes in appropriate circumstances. AJS programs are also aimed at reducing the rates of victimization, crime and incarceration among Aboriginal people in communities operating AJS programs, and helping the mainstream justice system become more responsive and sensitive to the needs and culture of Aboriginal communities.
Recipients:
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, the Aboriginal Justice Strategy supported 1443 community-based justice programs serving approximately 400 Aboriginal communities across Canada. This represents an overall increase of two community-based justice programs as compared to the 2009-2010 fiscal year.
48 capacity building projects, which support Aboriginal communities’ involvement in the local administration of justice, were funded during 2010-2011. This includes an increase of one capacity building project as compared to last fiscal year.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $13,105 | $85,836 | $260,000 | $72,000 | $62,702 | $197,298 |
Total Contributions | $11,706,919 | $11,904,293 | $12,240,000 | $11,943,000 | $11,942,639 | $297,361 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $11,720,024 | $11,990,129 | $12,500,000 | $12,015,000 | $12,005,341 | $494,659 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was lower than anticipated due to a late fall national call for proposals under the Capacity Building Fund. As well, the negotiations and signing of some of the funding agreements under the Community-Based Justice Programs Fund occurred late in the fiscal year which contributed to the lower than anticipated spending.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A formative evaluation of the AJS was completed in spring 2010. The evaluation is available on the DOJ website. A summative evaluation is planned for 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Justice Fund (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 1999
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Youth Justice Fund provides grants and contributions to projects that encourage a fairer and more effective youth justice system, respond to emerging youth justice issues and enable greater citizen and community participation in the youth justice system. The Fund includes three components: the Youth Justice Main Fund, Drug Treatment under the National Anti-Drugs Strategy, and Guns, Gangs and Drugs.
The Fund supports the development, implementation, and evaluation of pilot projects that provide programming and services for youth in conflict with the law. It supports professional development activities such as training and conferences for justice professionals and youth service providers. Additionally, it funds research on the youth justice system and related issues.
Projects must target youth who are between the ages of 12 and 17 and currently in conflict with the law, or justice professionals and/or service providers who work with these youth.
Recipients: Non-governmental organizations, youth justice stakeholders, Aboriginal organizations and provincial/territorial departments and agencies.
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $384,169 | $632,739 | $730,000 | $730,000 | $674,678 | $55,322 |
Total Contributions | $2,805,596 | $3,796,700 | $4,275,000 | $4,275,000 | $3,770,350 | $504,650 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $3,189,765 | $4,429,439 | $5,005,000 | $5,005,000 | $4,445,028 | $559,972 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Youth Justice Fund’s variance has decreased significantly in recent years, from approximately 40% in 2007-2008 to slightly over 10% in 2010-2011. This is due to greater uptake, as the Guns, Gangs and Drugs and Drug Treatment components become better known; the Fund’s increasing focus on larger, multi-year projects; and management initiatives, including Calls for Proposals in areas of priority.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The Youth Justice Fund was evaluated as part of the 2010 Youth Justice Funding Components Evaluation.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Access to Justice in Both Official Languages Support Fund (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2013 and ongoing
Description: In June 2008, the Government launched the Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality 2008-2013: Acting for the Future. The Department of Justice supports the Roadmap through the Initiative in Support of Access to Justice in Both Official Languages. This Initiative includes a consulting mechanism, a training Component in both Official Languages for Justice personnel, a component to encourage young bilingual Canadians to pursue law related careers in justice and a grants and contributions program called the Access to Justice in Both Official Languages Support Fund (the Support Fund).
Objectives: In order to attain the objectives of the Initiative, the Department will invest resources into the Support Fund. All projects and activities must respond to one of the following objectives:
Recipients:
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $49,912 | $0 | $50,000 | $50,000 | $24,050 | $25,950 |
Total Contributions | $2,776,839 | $3,295,230 | $7,175,845 | $6,975,845 | $4,471,689 | $2,704,156 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $2,826,751 | $3,295,230 | $7,225,845 | $7,025,845 | $4,495,739 | $2,730,106 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): There were fewer projects than anticipated related to the training component that were received and approved in fiscal year 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Case studies were undertaken of four recipients.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Courtwork Program (voted)
Start Date: April 1, 1978
End Date: March 31, 2013 and ongoing
Description: The objective of the Aboriginal Courtwork Program is to improve access to justice by helping Aboriginal people involved in the criminal justice system obtain fair, just, equitable and culturally-sensitive treatment. It is the only ongoing contribution funding justice program available to all Aboriginal people (adult and youth) regardless of status and residency. The Program provides Aboriginal persons charged with an offence with timely and accurate information on their rights, obligations, roles and responsibilities at the earliest possible stage of the criminal justice process. Services also include referring clients to appropriate legal and social resources in their community. Aboriginal Courtworkers serve as a “bridge” between criminal justice officials and Aboriginal people and communities, by providing information, cultural context, liaison and promoting communications and understanding.
Recipients: Provincial governments. A province may authorize one or more agencies to deliver Aboriginal Courtwork services on its behalf. All designated delivery agencies will be accountable to the funders. In addition, the new Projects in Support of the Aboriginal Courtwork Program component provide modest support for projects that further the mandate of the Program.
Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $5,320,708 | $5,366,085 | $4,911,363 | $5,411,363 | $5,352,416 | -$441,053 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $5,320,708 | $5,366,085 | $4,911,363 | $5,411,363 | $5,352,416 | -$441,053 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Aboriginal Courtwork Program expanded its terms and conditions in February 2008, to include a new component, “Projects in support of the Aboriginal Courtwork Program”. The costs associated with the new component exceeded the forecasted budget.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A1
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A national court official survey began in 2010/2011. A national client survey is underway in 2011-2012. Both surveys will be used to inform the summative evaluation planned for 2012-2013.
1 Audits completed or planned sections were deemed non-applicable (N/A) as no internal audits were completed or planned during the reporting period for the various transfer payment programs.
2 The Supporting Families Fund replaces the former Child-centred Family Justice Fund which terminated on March 31st, 2009
3 Flow-through agreements are in place in Nunavut and the Northwest Territories, which provide Federal support to 38 community-based justice programs in the region.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Diversification. This program represents a voted item, except for 2009-2010, for which the funding portion dedicated to Canada’s Economic Action Plan (CEAP) corresponds to a statutory appropriation.
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The Community Diversification program helps Quebec regions maintain and develop their economic activity base. A community’s vitality depends on its ability to develop by building on its own assets. This program has three objectives: to foster communities’ development and increase their mobilization by drawing up visions and projects of local and regional scope; to assist communities through support for entrepreneurship and through creation or maintenance of viable enterprises; and to increase communities’ capability to attract tourists and skilled individuals.
This program has also led to intervention for implementation of the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF), a temporary CEAP initiative (2009-2010 and 2010-2011), and of the Temporary Initiative for the Strengthening of Quebec’s Forest Economies (TISQFE) and the Economic Development Initiative (EDI).
Eligible beneficiaries are primarily small and medium-sized enterprises and non-profit organizations.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec
Results Achieved:
With respect to the CAF:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities1 |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program activity: Community development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 67.7 | 86.7 | 93.7 | 96.7 | 82.3 | (9.2) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Program activity: Special intervention measures | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 78.0 | 81.1 | 86.0 | 86.0 | 2.8 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activities | 67.7 | 164.7 | 174.8 | 182.7 | 168.3 | (6.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Total authorities are higher than planned spending, primarily owing to the awarding of new funding to support vulnerable communities, for the CAF and for implementation of the TISQFE.
The variance between total authorities and actual expenditures is primarily attributable to the reprofiling of funds to 2011-2012 for such initiatives as the Support Initiative for International Cruise Development, the Linguistic Duality Economic Development Initiative and the Montreal Planetarium project.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The formative evaluation of the Community Diversification program was completed in 2010. The report is available at: Formative Evaluation of the Community Diversification and Business and Regional Growth programs . The summative evaluation is in progress, and will be completed in 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Futures Program (CFP). This program represents a voted item.
Start Date: May 18, 1995
End Date: Indeterminate, in line with the Treasury Board of Canada’s Policy on Transfer Payments, in effect since October 1, 2008.
Description: This Canada-wide program provides support for communities in all parts of the country to help them take charge of their own local economic development. In Quebec, the CFP financially supports local and regional development agencies, including
Community Futures Development Corporations (CFDCs), Community Economic
Development Corporations (CEDCs) and Business Development Centres (BDCs).
Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities2 |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program activity: Community development | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 41.7 | 42.6 | 32.3 | 44.0 | 44.0 | 11.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity | 41.7 | 42.6 | 32.3 | 44.0 | 44.0 | 11.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the payment of funds, in 2010-2011, for the Business Startup and Succession initiative and the Réseau mandataire initiative and for capitalization of the Fonds commun des SADC (CFDC Common Fund). Actual expenditures correspond to total authorities.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP)
Start Date: October 2000
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: Within the framework of the pan-Canadian Infrastructure Program under Treasury Board Secretariat responsibility, a Canada-Quebec Agreement was signed in October 2000. The objective of this agreement was to upgrade urban and rural municipal infrastructure in the province and improve Quebecers’ quality of life. The Agency acts on behalf of the Government of Canada as the federal department responsible for implementation in Quebec. This agreement was amended in July 2005 to postpone the deadline for disbursements to March 31, 2011. Since December 2005, under the terms of the agreement, no more new projects may be approved under the program.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec
Results Achieved: Rural and urban communities have quality public infrastructure.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities3 |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program activity: Infrastructure | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 50.0 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 10.7 | 10.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity | 50.0 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 10.7 | 10.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the reprofiling of unused funds under the ICP in 2009-2010, with a view to improving water quality, fostering transit and generating regional economic spinoffs.
The variance between actual expenditures and authorities is attributable to progress in
the completion of ICP-funded projects. Under the agreement signed with the Government
of Canada, the Quebec government is the implementing authority for the program.
Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit of the Infrastructure Canada Program was completed in 2011, and the report will be available during 2011-2012.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The summative evaluation of the Canada-Quebec Infrastructure Works 2000 program was completed in 2010. The report is available at: Evaluation of the Canada-Quebec Infrastructure Works 2000 Program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Recreational Infrastructure Canada (RInC)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: October 31, 2011
Description: RInC is a Canada-wide initiative intended to be a targeted, short-term measure to stimulate the Canadian economy. Its aim is to help reduce the impact of the recent global recession by increasing the total value of construction activities associated with recreational infrastructure. RInC-funded projects primarily involve modernizing, repairing, replacing or expanding existing recreational infrastructure, such as swimming pools, arenas and playing fields. In Quebec, the program is implemented in partnership with the Quebec government.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec
Results Achieved: Rural and urban communities have quality public infrastructure.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities4 |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program activity: Infrastructure | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 0.0 | 1.4 | 73.1 | 76.7 | 60.2 | (12.9) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity | 0.0 | 1.4 | 73.1 | 76.7 | 60.2 | (12.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the reprofiling of $3.6 million in funding under RInC between 2009-2010 and 2010-2011.
Actual expenditures, which are lower than authorities obtained, depend on progress in the completion of projects. Under the agreement signed with the Government of Canada, the Quebec government is the implementing authority for RInC. Funds unused in 2010-2011 were thus carried forward to 2011-2012.
Audit Completed or Planned: An internal audit of project analyses under the CAF and RInC was completed in 2010-2011. An internal audit on the co-ordination of the delivery of financial assistance under the CAF and RInC also ended in 2010-2011. The Agency is currently conducting a follow-up review of agreements under the CAF and RInC, which is to be completed during 2011-2012.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution program to supply the Municipality of Shannon with drinking water
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: Financial assistance for the water treatment project to supply the Municipality of Shannon, Quebec, with drinking water.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec
Results Achieved: Rural and urban communities have quality public infrastructure.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities5 |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program activity: Infrastructure | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 0.0 | 6.4 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 6.9 | (0.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity | 0.0 | 6.4 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 6.9 | (0.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the fact that certain work scheduled for 2010-2011 was brought forward to 2009-2010. Actual expenditures correspond to authorities.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Business and Regional Growth
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: This program reinforces conditions conducive to the sustainable growth of regions and SMEs, and has three objectives:
This program has also been used for implementation of the CAF, a temporary CEAP initiative (2009-2010 and 2010-2011), and of the TISQFE and the Linguistic Duality Economic Development Initiative (EDI).
Eligible recipients are primarily small and medium-sized enterprises and non-profit organizations.
Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec
Results Achieved:
With respect specifically to the CAF:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities6 |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program activity: Enterprise competitiveness | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 40.4 | 60.7 | 67.0 | 100.1 | 79.7 | 5.9 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Program activity: Competitive positioning of sectors and regions | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 29.2 | 34.1 | 30.3 | 36.2 | 36.2 | 2.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Program activity: Special intervention measures | ||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 17.8 | 25.3 | 18.1 | 18.1 | 0.9 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activities | 69.6 | 112.6 | 122.6 | 154.4 | 134 | 9.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Total authorities are higher than planned spending owing to the receipt of additional funding for vulnerable communities, through the Business and Regional Growth program, and for implementation of the TISQFE.
The variance between total authorities and actual expenditures is attributable to the fact that contribution applications were submitted at a slower pace than anticipated. Part of the unused funding will be carried forward to 2011-2012.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The formative evaluation of the Business and Regional Growth program was completed in 2010. The report is available at: Formative Evaluation of the Community Diversification and Business and Regional Growth programs. The summative evaluation of the program is in progress, and will be completed in 2011-2012.
Notes:
1 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.
2 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.
3 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.
4 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.
5 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.
6 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to EcoAction Community Funding Initiative.
Start Date: 1998. The program’s terms and conditions were renewed and approved by the Minister of the Environment on December 1, 2009.
End Date: Terms and conditions apply for the duration of the program, provided an evaluation is completed at least once every five years. The next evaluation scheduled for 2012–2013.
Description: Provides financial support to non-profit organizations to undertake environmental projects that yield positive, measurable results; increases capacity and engagement at the community level; and supports Canadians to take action for the environment.
Strategic Outcome(s): Canada’s natural environment is conserved and restored for present and future generations.
Results Achieved: The EcoAction Community Funding delivered 196 projects through contribution agreements in 2010–2011. Of these, 125 were new projects representing a departmental investment of $4.47 million. These projects leveraged $9.1 million in cash and in-kind support, which translates into $2.04 leveraged for every dollar of federal funding with an average of 5.6 partner sectors involved in each project. The program funded 41.4% of project applications received. In support of the 2010 International Year of Biodiversity, 53 biodiversity-related projects were funded for a total of $1.84 million in federal funding. These projects will reduce biodiversity loss, protect wildlife and improve species habitat, and increase urban re-naturalization. Clean water projects to reduce or divert toxic or harmful waste, reduce water consumption or to protect, stabilize or improve shorelines represented 31% of new projects funded for a total of $1.4 million in federal funding. The remaining projects (23%) focused on climate change and clean air initiatives. Approximately 385,000 individuals were engaged in EcoAction projects across Canada, including participants and volunteers.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $4.3 | $4.46 | $5.1 | $4.5 | $4.1 | $1.0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $4.3 | $4.46 | $5.1 | $4.5 | $4.1 | $1.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance in contribution spending is a result of internal reallocation to other departmental priorities ($0.6M) as well as some lapses in projects ($0.4M).
Audit Completed or Planned: Not required.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None in 2010–2011. The next evaluation is planned for 2012–2013.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to support Canada's international commitments.
Start Date: June 1999.
End Date: March 31, 2010.
Description: The objectives of this class contribution are to ensure that Canadian interests are represented in international environmental fora; to sustain and enhance Canada's participation in international multilateral and bilateral environmental organizations, agreements and protocols; to facilitate developing countries' participation in global environmental and sustainable development issues; and to build, strengthen and maintain Canada's linkages with the international community on global environmental and sustainable development issues.
Strategic Outcome(s): Not applicable.
Results Achieved: The results achieved and progress made are reflected through program delivery. This class contribution facilitated access on a national level to existing knowledge tools and methods for making good policy decisions on the environment and health that are appropriate, given the social, cultural and economic contexts.
In June 2010, this program was a part of the Department’s redesign of the class transfer payment programs in order to align with the Department’s revised Program Activity Architecture. Projects that commenced during 2010–2011, including projects between April and June, are reflected under the new programs.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 |
Total Contributions | $7.3 | $10.5 | $8.8 | $13.8 | $0.0 | $13.8 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $7.3 | $10.5 | $8.8* | $13.8* | $0.0* | $13.8* |
Total Program Activity adjusted* | $7.3 | $10.5 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 |
* The $8.8M in planned spending, originally stated in the 2010-2011 RPP, was approved under the transfer payment program “Contributions to support Canada's international commitments”.
It is important to note that Environment Canada’s transfer payment programs were redesigned in 2010–2011 mid-year to align with the Department’s revised 2010–2011 Program Activity Architecture (PAA). As a result all funding was allocated to a new class of transfer payments: Biodiversity – Wildlife and Habitat; Water Resources; Sustainable Ecosystems; Weather and Environmental Service; Substances and Waste Management; and Climate Change and Clean Air, expenditures for which are reported in the Public Accounts.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Please see note following table.
Audit Completed or Planned: None.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation of the International Actions Theme of the Clean Air Agenda was published in 2010–2011 and can be found at http://www.ec.gc.ca/doc/ae-ve/2010-2011/1268/COM-1268-eng.doc.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to support environment research and development.
Start Date: June 1999.
End Date: March 31, 2010.
Description: The purpose of this class is to stimulate, increase or improve scientific knowledge and information, and to support the promotion and coordination of research and development in areas that support Environment Canada objectives such as wildlife, toxicology, climate change and atmospheric studies.
Strategic Outcome(s): Not applicable.1
Results Achieved: Environment Canada funds contributions to support environmental research and development that are aligned with departmental and program priorities. The Department continued ongoing relationships with a number of Canadian universities on a wide variety of initiatives, resulting in increases in knowledge in atmospheric sciences, toxic chemicals, water and the impacts of pollutants on water, as well as wildlife and the impacts of pollutants on wildlife.
Contributing to these organizations enables the Department to leverage its investment in science, technology and monitoring systems, as well as to influence access to other data, science and technology to better serve Canadian interests.
The progress made is reflected through the delivery of Environment Canada programs and results reported in Section II of the 2010–2011 Departmental Performance Report.
1 See “Comment(s) on Variance(s)” below. This transfer payment program was redesigned in 2010–2011 to align with the Department’s revised 2010–2011 Program Activity Architecture (PAA). The redesign and alignment to the PAA will improve performance measurement and reporting in the 2011–2012 DPR.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | |
Total Contributions | $5.7 | $8.4 | $10.6 | $15.4 | $1.5 | $9.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $5.7 | $8.4 | $10.6* | $15.4* | $1.5* | $9.1* |
Total Program Activity adjusted* | $5.7 | $8.4 | $1.8 | $1.8 | $1.5 | $0.3 |
* The $10.6M in planned spending, originally stated in the 2010-2011 RPP, was approved under the transfer payment program “Contribution to Support Environmental Research and Development”.
It is important to note that Environment Canada’s transfer payment programs were redesigned in 2010–2011 mid-year to align with the Department’s revised 2010–2011 Program Activity Architecture (PAA). As a result, the “Contribution to Support Environmental Research and Development” program had already been approved and funded for a total of $1.8M.
The remaining $8.8M was allocated to a new class of transfer payments: Biodiversity – Wildlife and Habitat; Water Resources; Sustainable Ecosystems; Weather and Environmental Service; Substances and Waste Management; and Climate Change and Clean Air, expenditures for which are reported in the Public Accounts.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Please see note following table.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to support environmental and sustainable development initiatives.
Start Date: June 1999.
End Date: March 31, 2010.
Description: The objective of this class contribution is to enable Canadian groups, associations and organizations to become actively involved in environmental and sustainable development initiatives, while accommodating regional ecosystem and socio-economic considerations. Contributions enable recipients to plan, manage and complete environmental and sustainable development initiatives at the regional or ecosystem level. This funding also serves to increase awareness and understanding of environmental and sustainable development issues and to encourage environmentally responsible action.
Strategic Outcome(s): Not applicable.2
Results Achieved: Environment Canada funds contributions to support environmental and sustainable development initiatives that are aligned with departmental and program priorities. The contributions facilitate access, on a national level, to existing knowledge, tools and methods for making good decisions on the environment and sustainable development that are appropriate, given the social, cultural and economic contexts.
Through various scientific projects, advances were made on furthering our understanding of how climate change will affect Canada and how Canadians, their businesses and their institutions can adapt to take advantage of the possibilities offered by future climates while reducing their adverse impacts. Other projects have furthered our understanding of the various processes occurring within the atmosphere or between the atmosphere and the surface. In time, these will lead to better forecasts of the weather, climate or air quality. Other projects have furthered the Department's outreach initiatives to increase Canadians' understanding of matters like air quality and the Air Quality Health Index.
The progress made is reflected in the delivery of Environment Canada's programs and results, reported in Section II of the 2010–2011 Departmental Performance Report.
2 See “Comment(s) on Variance(s)” below. This transfer payment program was redesigned in 2010–2011 to align with the Department’s revised 2010–2011 Program Activity Architecture (PAA). The redesign and alignment to the PAA will improve performance measurement and reporting in the 2011–2012 DPR.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | |
Total Contributions | $25.8 | $23.0 | $22.8 | $22.5 | $1.1 | $21.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | $0.0 | |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $25.8 | $23.0 | $22.8* | $22.5* | $1.1* | $21.7* |
Total Program Activity adjusted* | $25.8 | $23.0 | $1.1 | $1.1 | $1.1 | $0.0 |
* The $22.8M in planned spending, originally stated in the 2010-2011 RPP, was approved under the transfer payment program “Contributions to support environmental and sustainable development initiatives”.
It is important to note that Environment Canada’s transfer payment programs were redesigned in 2010–2011 mid-year to align with the Department’s revised 2010–2011 Program Activity Architecture (PAA). As a result, the “Contributions to support environmental and sustainable development initiatives” program had already been approved and funded for a total of $1.1M.
The remaining $21.7M was allocated to a new class of transfer payments: Biodiversity – Wildlife and Habitat; Water Resources; Sustainable Ecosystems; Weather and Environmental Service; Substances and Waste Management; and Climate Change and Clean Air, expenditures for which are reported in the Public Accounts.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Please see note following table.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: None
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to the Canada Foundation for Sustainable Development Technology for the Next-Generation Biofuels Fund™ (NGBF).
Start Date: April 1, 2007.
End Date: September 30, 2027 (the last appropriation by Parliament will be in fiscal year 2014–2015, with the last disbursement by Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) by March 31, 2017).
Description: The $500M NGBF is one of two funds managed by SDTC. It supports the establishment of first-of-kind large demonstration-scale facilities for production of next-generation renewable fuels. As sponsoring departments for the federal government, Environment Canada (EC) and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) provide federal oversight to SDTC to ensure it complies with the two funding agreements and the founding legislation. Under the NGBF, SDTC provides grants with conditional repayment terms to eligible recipients for the establishment of facilities that involve both non-conventional technologies and non-traditional feedstocks, and that are built in Canada using representative Canadian feedstock. Selection is based on the potential of the technology (rather than of the plant) for environmental and other benefits (social or economic).
Of the $500M in total funding, $200M is statutory, with the remaining $300M being appropriated funding, to be spread over 7 fiscal years, beginning in 2008–2009 and ending in 2014–2015. The funding is equally divided between EC and NRCan.
While the spending listed below captures the funds transferred from EC to the foundation, the actual planned disbursements to NGBF projects in 2011–2012 are $28.5M. According to the 2011 Corporate Plan, SDTC plans to disburse $200M to NGBF projects between 2012 and 2015.
Strategic Outcome(s): Threats to Canadians and their environment from pollution are minimized.
Results Achieved: No allocations from NGBF were made in 2010. However, four applications were in the NGBF project assurance process, which is based on best practices used by multinational companies and includes a review by a roster of biofuels experts. SDTC received indications of interest from 5 proponents working towards eligibility for funding. Some 20 high-potential candidates are aligned with promising technology rollouts, while more than 100 companies are being tracked.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $31.5 | $0 | $37.5 | $37.5 | $0 | $37.5 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | $31.5 | $0 | $37.5 | $37.5 | $0 | $37.5 |
*These grants are EC’s portion of the payment made to SDTC based on cash flow statements received from the Foundation. Funding is divided equally between EC and NRCan.
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The $25M that was appropriated by Parliament for NGBF in 2010–2011 was re-profiled forward to 2012–2013. In addition to this $25M, $12.5M for NGBF was previously re-profiled from 2009–2010 to 2010–2011 and again to 2012–2013.
No payments were made to SDTC in 2010–2011. The NGBF had an opening balance of $64.2M, as of December 31, 2009. Accordingly, SDTC had on hand the funds that it had estimated as its requirement for the period January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. Actual spending by SDTC was significantly less than its estimates in cash flow statements, because the anticipated payments to projects have been delayed by the proponents (see also “Up-front Multi-year Funding” for SDTC).
Audit Completed or Planned: There was no performance audit in fiscal year 2010–2011, except for the standard financial audit required for the financial data in the annual report. A value-for-money (performance) audit may be conducted by the government at least once every five years.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There were no evaluations in fiscal year 2010–2011. Three interim evaluations will be performed by an independent third party selected by the Foundation (November 30, 2012; November 30, 2017; and November 30, 2022). A final evaluation is due by September 30, 2027. The federal government may choose to evaluate the foundation at any time to determine whether it is meeting its objectives.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) for Species at Risk.
Start Date: August 20, 2000.
End Date: Program is ongoing. March 2012 is the end date for a portion of HSP funding ($4 M).
Description: The purpose of the HSP is to contribute to the recovery of endangered, threatened and other species of concern, and to prevent other species from becoming a conservation concern, by engaging Canadians in conservation actions to benefit wildlife. HSP fosters partnerships among organizations interested in the recovery of species at risk and provides funding for implementing activities that protect or conserve habitats for species at risk. It enables non-governmental organizations, landowners, the private sector, Aboriginal organizations, educational institutions, community groups and other levels of government to plan, manage and complete projects that will achieve the program goal.
Strategic Outcome(s): Canada’s natural environment is conserved and restored for present and future generations.
Results Achieved: From April 2010 to March 2011, the Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) contributed $12.4 million to 228 projects addressing terrestrial and aquatic species-at-risk issues in all provinces and territories. The HSP directed $42 million (program plus matching funds) to projects addressing both habitat conservation and threat mitigation issues. These stewardship activities benefited more than 300 SARA-listed or COSEWIC-assessed species through increased awareness of species at risk and through the development of strategies, guidelines and practices or the completion of monitoring, surveying and inventorying studies. A total of 2607 landowners participated in conservation activities, leading to the protection of 10 264 ha of habitat through legally binding protection measures and to the protection of an additional 151 104 ha through non-binding protection measures. Nearly 11 486 ha of habitat and 3942 km of shoreline were improved through vegetation planting, exotic species removal and other habitat improvement activities.
Overall, since its inception in 2000, HSP has contributed over $106 million to more than 1800 projects, leveraging an additional $261 million in matching funds from project partners.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | $11.8 | $12.1 | $13.0 | $12.4 | $12.0 | $1.0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): As a result of Environment Canada's reallocation to government-wide priorities, the budget was reduced by $606,000. Additional variance results from normal program operational slippage and the withdrawal or cancellation of some projects in the fourth quarter due to delayed approvals, so that final expenditures can vary yearly.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/a.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/a.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Initiatives of the Action Plan on Clean Water—Freshwater Programs—Contributions
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: The objective of this class contribution is to enable the remediation of contaminated sediment in eight Areas of Concern (AOCs) to fully restore and remove these sites from the list of Great Lakes AOCs, and advance clean-up efforts to restore Lake Winnipeg and Lake Simcoe. Transfer payments made under the program will be in the form of contributions to a broad range of entities to support the remediation of contaminated sediment in Great Lakes AOCs and/or rehabilitation measures that reduce nutrient loads to Lake Winnipeg and Lake Simcoe and their tributaries, including domestic or international non-profit organizations, provincial and municipal governments, regional conservation authorities, Canadian individuals, businesses, post-secondary institutions, First Nations, and Aboriginal organizations and associations.
Strategic Outcome(s): Canada’s natural environment is conserved and restored for present and future generations
Results Achieved: Under the Lake Winnipeg Basin Stewardship Fund, a public advisory committee oversaw and provided project funding recommendations for stewardship projects. In 2010–2011, rounds three and four of funding were completed and 19 new projects were funded to reduce pollutants, particularly nutrients loads, in priority areas of the Lake Winnipeg Basin. A list of recommended projects was established and approved for round five (grants and contributions (G&C) spending in 2010–2011 totalling $946,887).
Under the Lake Simcoe Clean-up Fund, in 2010–2011, the processing was completed for rounds five and six proposals, leading to the approval of 43 projects for funding, totalling $8,326,181 over 2010–11 and 2011–2012. This is part of an overall investment of $30 million over five years, which was announced in February 2008 to restore Lake Simcoe. This funding supports projects by federal, provincial and municipal governments, as well as universities, conservation authorities, non-governmental and community organizations, and landowners. The projects contribute to meeting the objectives of reducing rural and urban non-point sources of pollution, rehabilitating priority habitats to restore the health of the aquatic ecosystem and coldwater fishery in Lake Simcoe, and improving information and monitoring for decision makers (G&C spending in 2010–2011 totalling $6.99 million) (62 active projects).
Under the Great Lakes Contaminated Sediment Removal Program, based on the assessment of project status at AOCs, funds were reallocated to future years via the Annual Reference Level Update (ARLU) process. Project initiation for the Randle Reef Contaminated Sediment project in Hamilton Harbour is delayed pending confirmation of local funding. In fiscal year 2010–2011, G&C funding ($25K) was provided for the Niagara River Lyon’s Creek East contaminated sediment management project.
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $2.1 | $6.6 | $8.4 | $8.4 | $8.0 | $0.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $2.1 | $6.6 | $8.4 | $8.4 | $8.0 | $0.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned: The Lake Winnipeg Basin Initiative was included in the Monitoring Water Resources Chapter of the 2010 Fall Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Office of the Auditor General.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of Freshwater Initiatives (Action Plan on Clean Water—Lake Simcoe, Lake Winnipeg, Great Lakes Contaminated Sediment Removal) is being conducted as per the Program Evaluation Plan developed by Environment Canada’s Audit and Evaluation Branch. The report should be available in 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Vehicle Scrappage Program – Contributions.
Start Date: April 1, 2007.
End Date: March 31, 2011.
Description: The National Vehicle Scrappage Program is primarily a contribution program that provides funding to a national not-for-profit organization for program delivery and incentives to encourage Canadians to retire their old, high-polluting personal vehicles.
Strategic Outcome(s): Threats to Canadians and their environment from pollution are minimized.
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2009-2010 |
Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
Total Authorities 2010-2011 |
Actual Spending 2010-2011 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $4.6 | $25.8 | $41.2 | $41.2 | $28.8 | $12.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $4.6 | $25.8 | $41.2 | $41.2 | $28.8 | $12.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): $11.2M in contribution funding that was not going to be spent by the National Vehicle Scrappage Program was reallocated to unfunded departmental priorities with the consent of the Minister and Treasury Board Secretariat. Treasury Board Secretariat approved a $1.2M re-profiling request to allow the program to complete the processing of all vehicles retired and to wrap up its activities in 2011–2012.
Audit Completed or Planned: Third-party recipient audit of financial report until September 2009. The final report was completed in July 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Third-party program evaluation to be completed by July 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Southern Ontario Development Program (SODP)
Start Date: August 13, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: SODP was established as a core program of the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario). It builds upon the assets and strengths of communities to create an environment where businesses can thrive, and maximizes southern Ontario's potential to succeed in the knowledge-based economy. Funding under this program is aimed at projects that can stimulate local economies and enhance the growth and competitiveness of local businesses and communities. Seven new Southern Ontario Advantage (SOA) initiatives were created under the umbrella of SODP in 2010. One initiative was launched in April; the remaining six were launched in the fall of 2010:
Southern Ontario Advantage | Objective(s) |
---|---|
People Advantage | |
Youth STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Math) | Encourage youth to pursue education and careers in STEM. Improve youth's understanding of the business of science |
Graduate Enterprise Internship | Develop business and management skills in graduate students/recent graduates of STEM programs to complement their technical skills |
Scientists and Engineers in Business | Develop improved business and management skills of STEM entrepreneurs in southern Ontario. Improve access to financing and/or business support services needed to successfully launch and manage start-up small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in southern Ontario. |
Knowledge Advantage | |
Applied Research and Commercialization Initiative | Encourage greater collaboration between SMEs and post-secondary institutions (PSIs). Accelerate innovation, improve productivity and competitiveness of SMEs. |
Technology Development Program | Increase investment to bridge the gap between research and development and commercialization of market-driven and "game-changing" technologies. |
Entrepreneurial Advantage | |
Investing in Business Innovation | Accelerate the commercialization of new products, processes, and practices. Increase, stimulate and leverage private sector investment. Encourage growth of angel investment funds. |
Prosperity Advantage | |
Prosperity Initiative | Increase economic diversification, improved productivity and enhance competitiveness of southern Ontario regions. |
Results Achieved: Communities in southern Ontario are viable and businesses in the region are competitive
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | n.a. | 43.5 | 176.2 | 159.2 | 72.2 | 104.0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | n.a. | n.a. | 176.2 | 159.2 | 72.2 | 104.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Funding for SODP was initially allocated evenly over the Agency's five-year mandate, which did not account for the need to staff the Agency, develop programs and build capacity. Given the effort required to create seven new initiatives under SODP (the Southern Ontario Advantage initiatives), these initiatives were not ready to be announced and rolled out until the fall of 2010. As a result, a limited number of 1) applications were received; and 2) agreements put in place before the end of the 2010–11 fiscal year, which accounts for the variance in actual spending. In addition, $17 million from 2010–11 planned spending was transferred to the National Research Council's Industrial Research Assistance Program, which enabled the Agency to further extend its reach to SMEs.
Audit Completed or Planned: No audits relative to this funding have been conducted to date.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation is planned in 2014–15.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Eastern Ontario Development Program (EODP)
Start Date: October 12, 2004
End Date: EODP was renewed for two years in Budget 2011 (to March 31, 2013)
Description: EODP supports the economic development and diversification of rural eastern Ontario communities. The program makes funding available through repayable and non-repayable contribution agreements to businesses and not-for-profit organizations [including Community Futures Development Corporations (CFDCs) and the Eastern Ontario CFDC Network] for activities in six priority areas: innovation and deployment of information and communication technologies, business development, community development, skills development, attraction and retention of youth, and improved access to capital and leveraged capital. Applicant projects are assessed against program criteria and decisions are made by EODP staff, the CFDCs, and the eastern Ontario CFDC network based on local and/or regional needs, priorities and opportunities.
Results Achieved: Communities and businesses in rural eastern Ontario are sustainable and competitive.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N.A.
Audit Completed or Planned: No audits relative to this funding have been conducted to date.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the EODP was undertaken in 2010–11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Futures Program
Start Date: 1986
End Date: N.A. (ongoing program)
Description: The Community Futures Program supports community economic development and builds the capacity of non-metropolitan communities in Ontario. The Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario administers and delivers the program within its geographic mandate. The program makes funding available through contribution agreements to Community Futures Development Corporations (CFDCs) in Ontario that provide services relating to: strategic community planning; community economic development; business services; and business investment funds.
Results Achieved: Through the Community Futures Program, 2,233 businesses were created, expanded, maintained or strengthened in rural southern Ontario. For every Community Futures dollar invested by the Agency, $1.70 was leveraged.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | n.a. | n.a. | 9.6 | 12.5 | 12.5 | (2.9) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | n.a. | n.a. | 9.6 | 12.5 | 12.5 | (2.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned and actual spending is a result of the Community Futures program receiving additional ongoing funding. Planned spending was originally based on the funding allocation received from Industry Canada/FedNor when the agency was created. This funding split between Industry Canada and the agency was readjusted and additional funding announced in Budget 2010.
Audit Completed or Planned: None
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation will be conducted in 2014.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Official Languages Minority Communities (OLMCs)
Start Date: June 2009
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: The OLMC Development program is delivered through the Economic Development Initiative as part of the Government of Canada's Roadmap for Linguistic Duality 2008–2013: Acting for the Future. The Economic Development Initiative is intended to create jobs and economic growth in southern Ontario by providing funding to promote the development of new expertise through innovation, diversification of economic activities, partnerships and increased support of small- and medium-sized businesses in southern Ontario Francophone communities. Contribution agreements with businesses and organizations encourage sustainable growth in OLMCs by focusing on community strategic planning initiatives, incremental project based activities, and business and economic development initiatives that foster economic growth in sectors such as Francophone tourism, cultural, knowledge-based and manufacturing industries.
Results Achieved: Small and medium-sized businesses in official language minority communities have improved access to economic development projects.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | n.a. | n.a. | 1.9 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | n.a. | n.a. | 1.9 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): A significant portion of the variance between planned and actual spending can be explained by the temporary suspension of program delivery. Program elements were redesigned to improve program delivery, including a move to a continuous intake of applications. As a result, only a limited number of applications were received, assessed and approved by the end of 2010–11.
Audit Completed or Planned: No audits are currently planned.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A results report was conducted in May 2011. A full evaluation is planned for the spring of 2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Ontario Potable Water Program1 (OPWP)
Start Date: December 13, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: OPWP provides financial assistance in the form of grants to Ontario municipalities that incurred additional costs in the development of their Canada–Ontario Infrastructure Program (COIP) drinking water projects to meet Ontario drinking water regulations. The program ended on March 31, 2011.
Results Achieved: OPWP supports municipal investments in drinking water projects to meet Ontario drinking water regulations. In this reporting period FedDev Ontario's focus was to close out the program.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 10.4 | 12.0 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 12.2 | 10.3 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 10.4 | 12.0 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 12.2 | 10.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): A variance of $10.3 million is due to savings in the final costs of the individual projects administered by the program. Total authorities were based on the costing provided by recipients.
Audit Completed or Planned: No audits relative to this funding have been conducted or planned to date.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There are no planned evaluations for this program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Brantford Greenwich-Mohawk Remediation Project
Start Date: May 8, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: The project provides a total federal grant of $12 million for the remediation of 50 acres of land spread over three sites in Brantford, Ontario. Once remediated, the land will be redeveloped according to a community design plan that has been developed in consultation with the residents of Brantford. The plan includes residential development and some light commercial development with a heritage/cultural component. Funding payments are aligned with the achievement of project milestones.
Results Achieved: The project will result in 50 acres of remediated land in Brantford. Funding payments are aligned with the achievement of project milestones and the project plan has several milestones over the 2008–2012 period. A payment of $404,488 was made to the city in 2008–09.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 0.4 | 8.1 | 2.3 | 10.4 | 0 | 2.3 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 0.4 | 8.1 | 2.3 | 10.4 | 0 | 2.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Although negotiations were completed during the 2010–11 fiscal year, as of March 31, 2011, the recipient was still in the process of organizing the implementation of the project. The total authorities amount of $10.4 million for 2010–11 has been re-profiled to 2011–12.
Audit Completed or Planned: No audits relative to this funding have been conducted to date.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation is planned for 2011–12.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Development Projects for Communities and Businesses – Community Adjustment Fund
Start Date: June 11, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: Projects funded under the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF) aim to improve the quality of life in southern Ontario. The Development Projects for Communities and Businesses program delivers short-term, targeted community and business development projects, primarily through the delivery and administration of contribution agreements to communities, not-for-profit organizations and small and medium-sized businesses from the private sector.
Results Achieved: In 2010–11, $123 million was committed for 130 projects to enhance and accelerate community development. Funding was provided for small and medium-sized businesses, social enterprises, communities, post-secondary institutions and aboriginal organizations. The majority of projects were completed by the end-date, however, some infrastructure related projects have been continued into the 2011–12 fiscal year under the Southern Ontario Development Program.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 116.0 | 152.8 | 167.4 | 139.3 | 13.5 | |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 116.0 | 152.8 | 167.4 | 139.3 | 13.5 |
Comments on Variance: The variance between the planned and the actual spending is due to an additional $42.5 million re-profile provided under supplementary estimates. It also includes a projected re-profile amount of $7.5 million to fiscal 2011–12 for 18 projects continuing under the Southern Ontario Development Program. The remainder of the variance reflects uncommitted funds, lapsed funds, and the completion of projects under budget.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Office of the Auditor General completed Phase I of their audit of selected Economic Action Plan (EAP) programs which included CAF. The objective of the first phase of the audit was to determine whether selected federal entities adequately managed certain programs under Canada's EAP, by ensuring appropriate management practices were implemented and ensuring that recipients were eligible.
Phase II of the OAG audit is underway. The objective of this second phase is to determine whether selected federal entities have adequately monitored and reported on the approved projects. The final report of findings is expected in the fall of 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of CAF is underway. The objective of the evaluation is to determine the relevance and performance of the program. A report of findings is expected in the fall of 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Program (COIP)
Start Date: October 25, 2000
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: COIP provides funding to local governments and public or private-sector corporate bodies for the construction, renewal, expansion or materials enhancement of infrastructure that will contribute to improving the quality of life for Ontarians through investments that enhance the quality of the environment, support long-term economic growth, enhance community infrastructure, and build 21st-century infrastructure through using new approaches and the best technologies. FedDev Ontario delivers the program on behalf of Infrastructure Canada, and in partnership with the Province of Ontario. The program was due to sunset on March 31, 2011.
Results Achieved: COIP supports infrastructure investments in a number of investment categories that improve the quality of life for Ontarians. In this reporting period FedDev Ontario's focus was to close out the program, process payments to recipients, and ensure projects completed construction and final reporting requirements by March 31, 2011. In total, $680.7 million was allocated for the program to over 500 projects.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 11.8 | 6.2 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 11.8 | 6.2 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
Comments on Variance: In order to support the need for project recipients to file their final claims and reach completion, the program received an extension to March 31, 2011, and a re-profile of funds in 2010–11. All funds authorized were expended.
Audit Completed or Planned: There were no audits required or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There were no evaluations required or planned in 2010–11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Recreational Infrastructure Canada Program in Southern Ontario (RInC)
Start Date: May 2009
End Date: October 31, 2011
Description: RInC, launched in May 2009, is a two-year economic stimulus program which was part of Canada's Economic Action Plan. RInC was designed to create jobs and spur construction activity related to recreational infrastructure. In 2010–2011, FedDev Ontario continued to work with the Ontario government to administer and deliver the Ontario portion of RInC. This program supports the renewal and rehabilitation of recreational infrastructure projects in the following categories of investment: arenas, gymnasia, swimming pools, sports fields and courts, parks, fitness trails, bike paths and other multi-purpose recreational facilities.
Results Achieved: The RInC program in Ontario supports the renewal and rehabilitation of 761 recreational infrastructure projects representing a federal investment of $188 million in Ontario. In 2010–11, $121.7 million was paid out to recipients including local and First Nation governments, and non-profit private sector entities. By March 31, 2011, 342 projects were completed, and the program was still awaiting final reports of completion from 417 projects. A total of 230 projects were approved for an extension until October 31, 2011.
2008–09 Actual Spending |
2009–10 Actual Spending |
2010–11 Planned Spending |
2010–11 Total Authorities |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | n/a | 30.0 | 94.6 | 161.1 | 121.6 | (27.0) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | n/a | 30.0 | 94.6 | 161.1 | 121.6 | (27.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Despite best efforts by recipients to launch RInC projects immediately in 2009–10, most of the expenditure took place in 2010–11. In addition to the planned spending, $66.5 million was re-profiled from 2009–10 to 2010–11. With the program receiving an extension to October 31, 2011, the variance along with additional funding totaling $35 million has been re-profiled from 2010–11 into 2011–12.
Audit Completed or Planned: EAP audit done in May 2010 included RInC.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: No evaluation is required. A summary report is planned for 2011–12.
1 – The Ontario Potable Water Program (OPWP) was incorrectly labelled as "New Architecture for Infrastructure Support – Building Canada Fund Ontario Potable Water Program (OPWP)". This program is separate from the Building Canada Fund and has been corrected to reflect this. return to text
Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Program Activity: Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
Start Date: 1992
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Launched in 1992, the Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy (AFS) provides for negotiated arrangements with Aboriginal groups around the harvesting, use and management of Aboriginal food, social and ceremonial fisheries and, where applicable, communal commercial fisheries. In 1994, DFO introduced a commercial access component to the AFS, the Allocation Transfer Program (ATP). The ATP facilitates the voluntary retirement of commercial fishing licences and the issuance of communal licences to eligible Aboriginal groups in a manner that does not add to the existing effort on the resource.
Provisions of negotiated fisheries agreements under the AFS may include:
Where Agreements pertaining to the FSC Fisheries cannot be concluded between DFO and an Aboriginal group, DFO will issue to the group a communal fishing licence that establishes the terms and conditions of its FSC fishery.
The AFS is applicable where DFO manages the fishery and where a fisheries management regime has not already been established under a land claims settlement.
Expected Results:
Link to 3-year Transfer Payment Program Plan: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/reports-rapports/tpp-ppt/tpp-ppt2010-eng.htm
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | 29.8 | 32.1 | 32.3 | 34.9 | 34.7 | (2.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Transfer Payments | 29.8 | 32.1 | 32.3 | 34.9 | 34.7 | (2.4) |
Comment on Variance: $2.6 million was transferred from other aboriginal programs and $0.2 million was not spent.
Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Program Activity: Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
Start Date: 2005-06
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Launched in October 2004, the Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management (AAROM) Program provides for Capacity Building and Collaborative Management initiatives that supports the involvement of Aboriginal groups, working together, to obtain access to technical, scientific and administrative expertise in order to facilitate their participation in multi-stakeholder and other decision-making processes used to manage aquatic resources and ocean spaces.
Aboriginal groups transition from Capacity Building into Collaborative Management. Provisions of Contribution Agreements under AAROM may include:
AAROM is applicable in areas where DFO manages the fishery, and where land claim agreements addressing those matters covered under AAROM are not in place. Where the Aboriginal group has signed a comprehensive land claims agreement, and one or more of the matters covered by the AAROM Program are not dealt with in the agreement, the group would be eligible to apply for support in those matters not covered.
Expected Results: 34 AAROM Agreements (23 Collaborative Management and 11 Capacity Building) with Aboriginal organizations involving approximately 330 member communities. These agreements allow Aboriginal groups to:
Link to 3-year Transfer Payment Program Plan: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/reports-rapports/tpp-ppt/tpp-ppt2010-eng.htm
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | 14.4 | 13.1 | 13.9 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 0.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Transfer Payments | 14.4 | 13.1 | 13.9 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 0.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): $0.1 million was not spent.
Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Program Activity: Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
Start Date: 2007-08
End Date: 2011-12
Description: The long-term goal of the Atlantic Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative (AICFI) is to continue to create positive conditions towards concluding longer-term DIAND-led arrangements for Mi'kmaq and Maliseet First Nations (MMFN). The immediate goals are to assist MMFNs to:
AICFI has been developed to proceed along two separate paths of deployment. The first is through individual MMFNs where the individual First Nations can apply for funding for components of the initiative provided they have completed the prerequisite planning as per component requirements. This will allow First Nations the ability to personalize their development to their own needs and development schedule.
The second path of deployment is through associated aggregate bodies which may apply for funding to proceed with the development of the Commercial Fishing Enterprise (CFE) Business Development Unit as well as co-management and various training and mentoring projects. Aggregate bodies will develop expertise that can be shared with individual First Nations which will provide smaller First Nations a larger voice within the commercial fishery as well as provide a higher value for dollar on mentoring and training sessions.
Expected results : AICFI has developed an RMAF/RBAF which sets the performance measurement and risk management strategy to assist DFO management in the delivery of the program. The following results are expected for the participating MMFNs:
Link to 3-year Transfer Payment Program Plan: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/reports-rapports/tpp-ppt/tpp-ppt2010-eng.htm
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | 2.9 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 12.6 | 12.6 | (1.0) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Transfer Payments | 2.9 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 12.6 | 12.6 | (1.0) |
Comment on Variance: The variance was covered by a transfer from the Pacific Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative.
Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Program Activity: Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
Start Date: July 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: On July 16, 2007, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans announced the Pacific Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative (PICFI), which is designed to support increased First Nations participation in integrated commercial fisheries, where all commercial harvesters fish under common and transparent rules, a higher standard of accountability for all resource users, and strengthened collaboration and cooperation amongst all fishery interests.
PICFI is a $175 million, 5-year initiative, developed to support the implementation of much needed reforms which includes the following four distinct yet integrated elements:
Expected results:
Link to 3-year Transfer Payment Program Plan: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/reports-rapports/tpp-ppt/tpp-ppt2010-eng.htm
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | 26.3 | 23.2 | 35.5 | 32.9 | 32.1 | 3.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Transfer Payments | 26.3 | 23.2 | 35.5 | 32.9 | 32.1 | 3.4 |
Comment on Variance: The variance is due to a $2.6 million transfer to other Aboriginal programs and $0.8 million that was not spent.
Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Program Activity: Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
Start Date: September 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: This is one of two programs to support restructuring of Canada's Atlantic Lobster Fishery. The Atlantic Lobster Sustainability Measures (ALSM) will provide support for the development and implementation of lobster sustainability plans which will help the fishery to make changes that will enhance its economic prosperity (through self-rationalization) and long-term sustainability (through mandatory and possible, additional conservation measures).
ALSM is a five-year, $50 million initiative with an overall goal to support the implementation of sustainability plans within Lobster Fishing Areas by providing funding to supplement and help leverage other sources of funds obtained by harvesters, such as provincial programs, financial institutions, etc. The outcomes of sustainability plans will help achieve the conservation measures necessary for a sustainable future and enable and provide incentive for the long-term structural change needed within the lobster fishery. This structural change, through rationalization, is necessary to improve the economic viability across the sector and help ensure long term sustainability. An economically viable sector will, in turn, be more willing to invest in strengthened conservation measures. In addition, when self-rationalization is on a significant scale, it may provide conservation benefits as well as economic benefits.
Expected results:
Link to 3-year Transfer Payment Program Plan: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/reports-rapports/tpp-ppt/tpp-ppt2010-eng.htm
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | — | 8.6 | — | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | 14.3 | 14.2 | 10.7 | 3.6 | ||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Transfer Payments | — | 8.6 | 14.3 | 14.2 | 10.7 | 3.6 |
Comment on Variance: The variance is due to a $3.5 million reprofile.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Anti-Crime Capacity Building Program (ACCBP)
Start Date: December 9, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: The security challenges facing the Americas are urgent and complicated. The corrosive growth of transnational organized crime is putting intense pressure on societies struggling with the legacy of civil conflict, weak institutions and high levels of impunity. In response, the ACCBP was launched in 2009 to provide up to $15 million a year to enhance the capacity of key beneficiary states, government entities and international organizations to prevent and respond to threats posed by international criminal activity throughout the Americas.
Strategic Outcome: INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Increased capacity of beneficiary states and government entities to prevent and respond to criminal activity in the Americas; increased capacity of international organizations responsible for supporting states' anti-crime efforts.
Some key results achieved through the ACCBP include:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0 |
Total Contributions | 0 | 20.9 | 21.3 | 21.3 | 19.8 | 1.5 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 0 | 20.9 | 28.3 | 28.3 | 26.8 | 1.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Cost savings were identified for a number of projects, resulting in variance between the planned spending and the actual spending.
Audit Completed or Planned: No internal audits have been completed or are planned. Recipient audits are planned for 2011–12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A Formative Program Evaluation is planned for 2011–12.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Commonwealth Secretariat
Start Date: September 28, 1965
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's assessed contribution to the regular budget of the Commonwealth is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of Canada's membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to international peace, security and development and, to this end, to enhance relationships among the 54 Commonwealth member countries. For further information, see www.thecommonwealth.org.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Much of the regular budget is directed to supporting and implementing the decisions of the biennial Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) and a large number of regular meetings of Commonwealth sectoral ministers, including the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) and Commonwealth ministers of foreign affairs, finance, health and education. Two significant decisions of the 2009 CHOGM implemented this year were the establishment of the Eminent Persons Group, which is developing recommendations to reform and strengthen the Commonwealth, and a parallel review by the CMAG to improve its effectiveness. Both will report to the 2011 CHOGM in Perth, Australia.
Linkages between the Commonwealth and the G-8/G-20 processes were established via a joint visit to Canada by the Secretaries-General of the Commonwealth and La Francophonie in advance of Canada’s G-8 and G-20 summits. Canada continues its efforts to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Commonwealth Secretariat through increased accountability and transparency and improved budgeting and priority setting. The Secretariat’s results include diplomatic interventions in the form of good offices and public pressure by the Secretariat and/or coordinated action by Commonwealth ministers to support democratic institutions and procedures; programs to build capacity in democratic and human rights procedures; and enhanced cooperation among Commonwealth countries related to economic, social and political development.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 0.9 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 0.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The assessed budgets of international organizations are negotiated outcomes, and Canada is legally bound by the final outcome of those negotiations. There are also regular currency fluctuations.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Commonwealth Secretariat is regularly audited by an external auditor.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions under the Global Partnership Program for the Destruction, Disposal and Securing of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction and Related Expertise
Start Date: August 12, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: These contributions implement Canada's commitment to the G-8 Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction, a US$20-billion initiative launched at the 2002 Kananaskis Summit, through projects for the destruction of chemical weapons, the dismantlement of nuclear submarines, the enhancement of nuclear and radiological security, the employment of former weapons scientists, and the prevention of biological weapons proliferation. Canada committed up to $1 billion over 10 years to implement the goals of the Global Partnership, initially in the former Soviet Union, where the threat was most acute. The justification for the Partnership was based on an assessment of threats to Canadian and international security following the terrorist attacks of September 2001. Twenty-three countries are engaged in projects.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Canada’s activities under the Global Partnership Program have had a tangible impact on Canadian and global security by working to secure vulnerable materials related to weapons of mass destruction (WMD). This has contributed to preventing terrorist acquisition of WMD materials, to strengthening the international non-proliferation, arms control and disarmament regime, as well as to achieving Canada’s domestic and international security objectives.
Some key results achieved through the Global Partnership Program (GPP) include:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 107.0 | 119.9 | 98.9 | 111.5 | 111.5 | -12.6 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 107.0 | 119.9 | 98.9 | 111.5 | 111.5 | -12.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The GPP spent $12.5 million more than planned in 2010–11. Other DFAIT divisions were on the verge of lapsing funds, and the GPP was able to absorb these funds in order to fulfill projects that otherwise would not have received funding until the next fiscal year.
Audit Completed or Planned: An internal audit of the Global Partnership Program was completed in July 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A Summative Evaluation is planned for 2012–13.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program (CTCBP)
Start Date: September 2005
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: Provision of assistance to enhance the capacity of key beneficiary states, government entities and international organizations to prevent and respond to threats posed by terrorist activity, in a manner consistent with human rights obligations, norms and standards.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Increased capacity of beneficiary states and government entities to prevent and respond to terrorist activity; increased capacity of international organizations responsible for supporting states’ counterterrorism-related efforts.
Some key results achieved through the CTCBP include:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 3.9 | 4.7 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 0.6 |
Total Contributions | 3.9 | 4.3 | 7.4 | 13.2 | 13.2 | -5.8 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 7.8 | 9.0 | 12.9 | 18.1 | 18.1 | -5.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program spent $1.2 million more than planned in 2010–11. Other DFAIT divisions were on the verge of lapsing funds, and the Program was able to absorb these funds in order to fulfill projects that otherwise would not have received funding until the next fiscal year.
Audit Completed or Planned: No internal audits have been completed or are planned. Recipient audits were completed in 2010–11 and additional recipient audits are planned for 2011-12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A Formative Evaluation of the Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program was completed in 2009; a Summative Evaluation is planned for fiscal year 2013–14.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Start Date: July 1982
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the FAO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to agricultural development and provide it with a voice in the international community. For further information, see www.fao.org.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 17.4 | 15.8 | 16.2 | 16.2 | 14.6 | 1.6 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 17.4 | 15.8 | 16.2 | 16.2 | 14.6 | 1.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to a stronger than average Canadian dollar.
Audit Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, the FAO is regularly audited both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, the FAO is regularly evaluated both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Global Commerce Support Program (GCSP)
Start Date: December 11, 2008
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Approved under the new transfer payment policy, the GCSP is a contribution program that harmonizes three previously existing programs under one umbrella mechanism:
The objective of the program is to build a stronger and more competitive Canadian capacity to compete in the global economy.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | N/A | N/A | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 0.6 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A | N/A | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 0.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The total program budget was committed; however, recipient actual spending against commitments that had been made was less than anticipated.
Audit Completed or Planned: An early program implementation audit is currently under way and a final report will likely be completed by the audit division in early September 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The Evaluation Division plans to complete a Formative Evaluation of the GCSP in 2011–12 and a Summative Evaluation in 2015–16.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Global Peace and Security Fund (GPSF) and its sub-programs: the Global Peace and Security Program, the Global Peace Operations Program, and the Glyn Berry Program for Peace and Security
Start Date: October 3, 2005; operationalized September 18, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: Sourced from the Peace and Security Pool of the International Assistance Envelope, the GPSF funds the operations of the Stabilization and Reconstruction Task Force (START) and is used to conduct international assistance programming in fragile and conflict-affected states such as Afghanistan, Haiti and Sudan. START and the GPSF were originally created to fill a policy, institutional and funding gap between the humanitarian and long-term development assistance of the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and the military and training assistance of the Department of National Defence (DND). START has effectively played a role and established itself as a platform to facilitate whole-of-government engagement as well as policy development where appropriate. In recent years, an increasing number of other government departments, such as Public Safety, the RCMP, Correctional Service Canada, the Canada Border Services Agency and Justice Canada, have actively participated in stabilization and reconstruction initiatives as well as crisis response activities at the request of START.
GPSF programming provides timely, focused, effective and accountable international assistance in response to critical peace and security challenges that implicate Canadian interests and reflect Canadian foreign policy priorities. GPSF programming includes both transfer and non-transfer payments. Non-transfer payment programming enables DFAIT to work closely with other federal government departments to provide beneficiary states and civilian components of multilateral peace operations with critical expertise in the areas of security and justice system reform.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Over the last year, GPSF programming has supported many initiatives that have garnered international recognition for their contributions to advancing freedom, democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights. Despite programming in some of the most difficult environments in the world, START employed 98.8% of planned programming funds in 2010–11 and served as a platform to channel additional Government of Canada funding to support foreign policy priorities. Highlights include:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 25.7 | 19.6 | 30.0 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 4.0 |
Total Contributions | 121.4 | 82.0 | 89.5 | 101.2 | 99.7 | -10.2 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 147.1 | 101.6 | 119.5 | 127.2 | 125.7 | -6.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Additional in-year funding was received from the Crisis Pool to support the Government of Canada’s response to the Pakistan flooding as well as from other departmental sources to support priorities such as mine action.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: In August 2010, the Summative Evaluation of the Global Peace and Security Fund concluded that GPSF is an effective instrument for advancing Canadian foreign policy priorities and interests.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grants and Contributions in Aid of Academic Relations
Start Date: January 1, 1989
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Grants and contributions in aid of academic relations support the following initiatives:
These programs support public diplomacy and advocacy by fostering partnerships, cooperation and linkages in the area of education between Canadian and international individuals and institutions; establishing a network of international experts on Canada to advance Canada’s interests abroad; and promoting public discussion of key issues through networking, exchanges and conferences. In addition, they advance Canada’s global citizenship (in support of the International Assistance Envelope) through scholarships and other programs that promote academic cooperation and mobility with developing countries.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA’S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada’s benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Among other benefits, the 900 international scholarships granted to priority countries encouraged the migration of knowledge workers to Canada, favoured the creation of joint research projects, and allowed future leaders from priority regions to create a professional network in Canada. Canadian youth equally benefited from reciprocal scholarships to study abroad. Approximately 80% of the scholarships were granted within the Americas, which contributed to Canada’s objectives for the region. In addition, the program “Understanding Canada” awarded over 550 grants to projects that support government priorities. A recent study demonstrated that for each dollar that the Canadian government invested in the “Understanding Canada” program, $36 was invested from other sources; the program generated $70 million to be directly invested in the Canadian economy. These programs have completely met the expectations contained in the department’s Report on Plans and Priorities.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 5.9 | 7.1 | 9.9 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 2.3 |
Total Contributions | 7.8 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | -2.0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 13.7 | 15.3 | 17.9 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 0.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): During the current fiscal year, a part of the “grants” budget was transferred to the “contributions” budget for the scholarships program. Spending is within budget predictions. Note that the program is authorized to spend up to $28 million in contributions each year.
Audit Completed or Planned: The most recent audit occurred during the 2010–11 fiscal year. No other audit is planned over the next three years.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The most recent evaluation occurred during the 2009–10 fiscal year and the results were published in January 2011. No further evaluation is planned over the next three years.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Start Date: December 19, 1989
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the IAEA is a legally binding obligation of membership. Payment is made to ensure that membership is in good standing and to maintain influence and credibility in a key international body, the aims of which Canada supports. The IAEA is the world's centre for nuclear cooperation and it works to further the safe, secure and peaceful use of nuclear technology, in particular by verifying that states adhere to their commitments to use nuclear energy only for peaceful purposes. Canada has significant interests at the IAEA, based on our belief in the importance of the Agency's role in advancing the goals of nuclear non-proliferation, safety and security, our advanced and extensive nuclear energy and radioisotope production industries, and our important uranium sector.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Canadian participation in the IAEA has resulted in the projection of Canadian values abroad, the preservation of domestic national security, the strengthening of international stability, the promotion of world economic growth and prosperity, and support for multilateral institutions and mechanisms. Canadian participation has ensured the effective and
efficient implementation of the IAEA’s major programs, effective participation for Canada in the Agency's activities, and direct and indirect technical and commercial dividends to the Canadian nuclear industry and nuclear regulator; it has also helped to steer IAEA actions and decisions to be more consistent with Canadian foreign policy priorities.
Payment of the IAEA contribution has furthered DFAIT’s work as specified in the department’s Program Activity Architecture by way of offering “strategic direction, intelligence and advice, including integration and coordination of Canada’s foreign and international economic policies” and by “engaging and influencing international players and delivering
international programs and diplomacy.”
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 13.3 | 13.4 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 13.2 | 2.5 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 13.3 | 13.4 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 13.2 | 2.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The mechanism by which expenses are assessed and apportioned is re-examined annually at the IAEA General Conference (to take into account a myriad of factors, including the operational and administrative costs of the organization, salaries and benefits of staff, travel, specialized training and equipment, maintenance of the premises, etc.), usually after the period that domestic estimates are produced.
The assessment is based on and adopted from the United Nations Scale of Assessment, approved every three years by the UN General Assembly (last approved in December 2009).
Canada is obligated by the IAEA Statute to pay its assessments once they are approved by the IAEA General Conference.
Audit Completed or Planned: The IAEA’s Office of Internal Oversight Services provides functions such as internal audit, program monitoring, program evaluation, inspections, consulting and investigations. The IAEA also appoints an external auditor to audit the IAEA’s accounts. The current external auditor (until the end of this year) is the vice-president of the German Supreme Audit Institution (Bundesrechnungshof).
Canada's representatives to the IAEA will have access to any audit and financial reports produced by the various oversight bodies and presented to the Board of Governors or General Conference. DFAIT officials are able to review these reports and advocate Canadian issues as required.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: This year’s audit will be made available at the upcoming IAEA General Conference in September.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Criminal Court (ICC)
Start Date: April 1, 2005
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This is an assessed contribution transfer payment.
Strategic Outcome: Canada strongly supports the rule of law and the aim of holding perpetrators of serious international crimes accountable for their actions. Contributions to the ICC support DFAIT’s priority of contributing to effective global governance and international security and stability.
Results Achieved: The ICC is the first permanent international court with jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute persons accused of the most serious crimes of international concern. To date, there are 114 States Parties to the Rome Statute.
The ICC has cases open in six countries: Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Libya, Sudan and the Central African Republic. In the DRC situation, four accused are in custody and one is at large. The trials of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui started in 2009. In March 2010, the Pre-Trial Chamber granted the prosecutor’s request to open an investigation in Kenya. Following summonses to appear issued in March 2011, six Kenyan citizens voluntarily appeared before the Court in April 2011. Hearings to confirm the charges are scheduled to begin in September 2011. In the Darfur (Sudan) situation, five individuals face charges. Arrest warrants have been issued for Ahmad Harun, Ali Kushayb and Sudanese President Omar Al Bashir, but all three remain at large. Charges were confirmed against two men, Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus, in March 2011 and both are awaiting trial. The trial of Jean-Pierre Bemba in the Central African Republic situation has been ongoing since November 2010.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 3.5 | 15.2 | 18.1 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 11.7 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 3.5 | 15.2 | 18.1 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 11.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance appears to be attributable to a clerical error. The Annual Reference Level Update (ARLU) survey that was completed in 2010–11 lists the ICC budget as $103,980,000, but the ARLU survey for 2011–12 lists it as $303,980,000. The first number is correct and the second number is a clerical error.
Audit Completed or Planned: The ICC’s Office of Internal Audit conducts compliance, performance and financial audits. An external auditor conducts an annual audit of the ICC in conformity with generally accepted common auditing standards. An Audit Committee, chaired by an external member, meets bi-annually to provide strategic advice on organizational matters. The Committee on Budget and Finance, which meets twice a year and reports to the Assembly of States Parties, provides a mechanism for budgetary and financial review and monitoring of the resources of the ICC.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Labour Organization (ILO)
Start Date: January 1, 1989
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the ILO, a UN specialized agency, is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to international labour and social policy issues and provide it with a voice in the international community.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 11.1 | 11.7 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.1 | 0.4 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 11.1 | 11.7 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.1 | 0.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The strength of the Canadian dollar has led to positive variances against invoices in U.S. dollars.
Audit Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, the ILO is regularly audited both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, the ILO is regularly evaluated both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Organisation of La Francophonie (OIF)
Start Date: March 9, 1972
End Date: Ongoing
Description: As a member of the OIF, Canada is required to contribute to the operational costs of the organization.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: The OIF was a major actor in responding to political crises within member states during the year, including the aftermath of the presidential elections in Côte d’Ivoire and the return of constitutional legitimacy to Niger and Guinea. The ministerial meetings and the summit that it organized provided forums to address major issues such as violence against women, challenges related to energy, the development of democracy in Africa, or the contribution of member states to meeting the Millennium Development Goals. These meetings resulted in the adoption of declarations and other specific commitments agreed by member states. Canada used La Francophonie to advance the objectives of its G-8 and G-20 presidency and to take onboard the concerns of developing countries, which make up the majority of OIF members.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 13.7 | 13.7 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 13.7 | 13.7 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): There was no variance, but the amount is paid in euros and varies from year to year because of exchange rate fluctuations.
Audit Completed or Planned: DFAIT completed a liaison visit to the OIF in 2010 and issued a report that was shared with that organization.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: CIDA undertook a thorough evaluation of all contributions to La Francophonie in 2008–09.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Investment Cooperation Program (INC)
Start Date: January 4, 2010
End Date: Ongoing
Description: INC promotes and encourages responsible, sustainable Canadian private sector investment in developing countries to create sustainable employment and economic growth and lead to poverty reduction. The program does not finance the actual investment; rather, it provides support for activities surrounding an investment. Specifically, the program contributes up to 75% of the cost of studying the viability of an investment, demonstrating and adapting appropriate technologies, and undertaking activities aimed at making investments, including public investments, more sustainable. The program is part of Canada's official development assistance for developing countries.
Strategic Outcome: International Services for Canadians—Canadians are satisfied with commercial, consular and passport services.
Results Achieved: Most investment proposals take up to three years to be fully implemented. Thus, companies are only required to report results three years following full implementation of the proposal. Expected results include the creation, expansion and modernization of sustainable businesses; the creation of new or higher-skilled jobs; and increased sales of Canadian and developing-country partner firms’ products or services.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | N/A | N/A | 20.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 14.0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/A | N/A | 20.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 14.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The 2010–11 fiscal year is the first full transition year for the program at DFAIT (having been transferred from CIDA on January 1, 2010. Two factors accounted for the variance: the lack of awareness of the program among the Canadian business community and the lag time from the date that the proposal is approved and the time required to submit expense claims for the supported activity. This variance is expected to narrow significantly in 2011–12 through a more concerted marketing plan and the completion of the activities for which INC has agreed to provide financial support.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A Formative (preliminary) Evaluation of the program is planned for 2012–13.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Civil Administration
Start Date: January 1, 1989
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to NATO is a legally binding obligation of membership based on the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty. Canada's contribution furthers its foreign policy goals by funding the administrative budget of NATO, an international organization vital to Canadian defence and security interests. NATO was designed to promote the stability of the North Atlantic area and to safeguard the freedom and security of its people by political and military means, based on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and international law. The NATO civil budget, structured along “output based” lines in response to objectives set annually by the North Atlantic Council, covers the activities of the NATO Secretary General, the NATO headquarters and the NATO international staff. The NATO civil administration supports the process of consensus building and decision making among alliance members and manages NATO's relations with its partners. The NATO civil budget also supports the work of various NATO agencies with specialized responsibilities. An effective and efficient NATO civil administration assists alliance members in promoting security and stability in the North Atlantic area and in responding effectively to current security challenges, particularly in Afghanistan. The NATO accounts are subject to annual audit by the International Board of Auditors for NATO.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Through our contribution to NATO Civil Administration, DFAIT has promoted effective decision making by the alliance in pursuit of NATO’s objectives of stability and security in the North Atlantic region and beyond, including the transition of responsibility for security in Afghanistan to Afghan control by 2014; NATO's assumption of the responsibility for operations to enforce UN Security Council Resolution 1973 in Libya; NATO ministerial meetings and the 2010 Lisbon Summit, where allied leaders adopted a new strategic concept to guide future alliance decision making, as well as new policies on enhancing cooperation with Russia and other partners; NATO missile defence and a comprehensive approach to crisis management; progress in other NATO-led operations such as in Kosovo and with respect to counter-piracy; timely implementation of decisions taken by the alliance; and proper management of the alliance's resources.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 17.7 | 22.2 | 22.3 | 22.7 | 18.1 | 4.2 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 17.7 | 22.2 | 22.3 | 22.7 | 18.1 | 4.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance can be attributed to fluctuations in the exchange rate as well as an advance payment of 2.9 million euros made in late 2009–10, which fulfilled part of Canada’s contribution to the civil budget account for 2010–11.
Audit Completed or Planned: The financial statements of the civil budget and the pension schemes are audited by the International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN) each year in May-June. We are awaiting the audit report on 2010. In 2009, the IBAN recorded a disclaimer stating that "The Board was not able to confirm that expenses in the Statement of Financial Performance and the related payables in the Statement of Financial Position were properly recorded in accordance with the accrual basis of accounting due to limitations in the accounting system used by the International Staff. However, the Board was able to satisfy itself that the Statement of Budget Execution and the underlying transactions of the entity are in all significant respects in compliance with budgetary authorizations and applicable NATO regulations. In addition, we were able to confirm that the cash balances were, in all material respects, fairly presented." This situation relates to NATO's decision to adopt International Public Service Accounting Standards without having made provision for the computer systems to support the standards. The situation is well documented and will not be resolved until the new enterprise resource planning system for NATO is operational in 2013.
Other audit observations were minor in nature: irregular carry forward of funds, non-receipt of letters of representation (hospitality) from information system managers, lack of procurement guidelines, weak commitment controls and weak internal control of inventories. These issues are being or have been resolved.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: NATO’s performance is regularly evaluated by Canada as a member of the alliance.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Start Date: March 20, 1975
End Date: Ongoing
Description: As a member of the OECD, Canada is required to pay an assessed contribution for its participation. The contribution pays for the Secretariat (professionals and support staff who provide high-quality research and analysis) and maintenance of the headquarters, located in Paris.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: OECD programs and policy positions reflect input from across the Canadian government in areas such as:
The OECD continued to work to address economic problems, including the financial crisis, through cooperation among members on the use of “soft law,” guidelines and agreements. Canada continued to influence policy development among OECD members and non-members alike to improve the functioning of the international economic environment.
The OECD also continued to identify and address new and emerging issues for analysis, both domestic and global, that affect the Canadian economy and standard of living. The OECD maintained its sound management by working on institutional reforms to improve budgeting, priority setting and management of human resources.
Four new members joined the OECD, and the accession process for one candidate is ongoing. Efforts to enhance engagement between the OECD and major emerging economies intensified, reflecting Canadian priorities to increase the long-term effectiveness of the organization and build relationships with China, India and the Americas (particularly Brazil). The OECD strengthened linkages with the G-8 to address accountability and development agendas, and with the G-20 in support of leaders’ efforts to address the financial crisis.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 13.9 | 14.5 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 11.8 | 2.6 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 13.9 | 14.5 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 11.8 | 2.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Planned amounts are based on the previous year's assessed contribution, increased by a small amount to reflect French inflation (the OECD is based in Paris), and are calculated in euros. Canada's share of the budget changes annually, as it is based on a formula that takes into account a country's three-year average GDP and population statistics. Variances also occur due to exchange rate fluctuations with the euro.
Audit Completed or Planned: Audits are performed annually, but results are not declassified for three years. Financial statements can be found at www.oecd.org.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
Start Date: January 1, 1993
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the OSCE is an obligation arising out of Canada's commitments as one of the 56 participating states of the organization. Canada's contribution furthers its foreign policy goals by funding programs implemented by the OSCE's institutions and field operations in priority foreign policy areas for Canada related to regional and international security.
The OSCE is a focused regional forum with a comprehensive and cooperative approach to security. Canada's contribution to the organization's unified budget covers the costs associated with the implementation of the OSCE’s work programs and activities in three dimensions of security and cooperation: political and military; economic and environmental; and human rights and democratization. This integrated approach allows the OSCE to make a significant contribution to furthering European security and transatlantic cooperation through non-coercive measures. Canada's contribution also supports a stronger partnership with Canadians in developing and implementing Canada's international security policy, through the involvement of members of Parliament in the work of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the deployment of Canadians to election observation missions, and the contribution of Canadian experts to the organization.
The OSCE unified budget, based on a programmatic approach, is approved by the OSCE Permanent Council on a yearly basis. The OSCE accounts are subject to an annual report by external auditors as well as an internal oversight annual report, both of which are made available to participating states. An independent Audit Committee also oversees the work conducted by both internal oversight and the external auditors and thus provides an additional assessment.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: During 2010–11, the OSCE, due to its comprehensive approach to security, contributed to furthering European and Eurasian security and transatlantic cooperation through the implementation of programs and activities in priority areas for Canada, such as good governance and respect for human rights, election monitoring, conflict prevention and crisis management. A Summit of Heads of State and Government of participating states of the OSCE was held, in Astana, Kazakhstan, in December 2010 for the first time in 11 years. Review conferences to examine the implementation of participating states’ commitments in all three dimensions of the OSCE’s work (political and military, economic and environmental, and human rights and democratization) were held ahead of the Summit in Astana.
The OSCE budget supports programs of the OSCE Secretariat in Vienna, as well as the OSCE institutions and the organization’s 17 field missions (as of April 2011). The results include effective and timely implementation of the decisions of the OSCE Permanent Council, continuous monitoring of security and stability in Europe, concerted programming to actively contribute to conflict prevention (such as the community policing initiative in Kyrgyzstan), conflict resolution and post-conflict institution building and proper management of the organization’s resources. The OSCE also maintained a zero net growth budget (in part as a result of successful advocacy by Canada).
OSCE financial regulations and administrative procedures are kept under constant review by the Advisory Committee on Management and Finance, in which Canada plays a leading role.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 7.4 | 15.5 | 14.1 | 14.1 | 10.7 | 3.4 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 7.4 | 15.5 | 14.1 | 14.1 | 10.7 | 3.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance can be attributed to an early payment of the second bill for assessed contributions during the last fiscal year, favourable exchange rates for the Canadian dollar, unused funds returned to Canada from the OSCE, and successful efforts by Canada and other participating states in advocating for effective internal financial management by the organization.
Audit Completed or Planned: OSCE financial reports (for 2008 and previous years) are available at www.osce.org/cio/66129. The 2009 audited financial statements are at www.osce.org/secretariat/71879.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Organization of American States (OAS)
Start Date: May 31, 1990
End Date: Ongoing
Description: To pay Canada's annual assessed contribution to the OAS, a charter obligation of membership.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 11.0 | 12.5 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 10.7 | 1.4 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 11.0 | 12.5 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 10.7 | 1.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Canada’s quota assessment contribution is paid in U.S. dollars. The DFAIT Main Estimate, on which the planned spending figure is based, is set at a level to accommodate possible exchange rate differences and changes in the OAS’s annual program budget ceiling. The variance in 2010–11 between planned and actual spending reflects currency fluctuation and an overestimate of the increase in Canada’s assessed contribution.
Audit Completed or Planned: The OAS Board of External Auditors is an external audit committee charged with examining the accounts of the General Secretariat. It submits an annual report to the General Assembly, available at http://scm.oas.org/pdfs/2011/CP26200E.pdf (for 2009 and 2010). The independent Board of External Auditors assessed the OAS as being well managed overall.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments in Lieu of Taxes on Diplomatic, Consular and International Organizations' Property in Canada
Start Date: January 18, 1979
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The purpose of this memorandum of understanding is to outline the relationship between Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada and Public Works and Government Services Canada, National Capital Area, under the Diplomatic, Consular and International Organizations' Property Grants Order (P.C.1979-59, January 18, 1979), the Municipal Grants Act, and successor Orders and Acts. It establishes responsibilities and procedures governing the provision of services related to the payment of grants in lieu of real property and frontage or area taxes with respect to diplomatic and consular property. These procedures are designed to ensure fiscal and operational accountability, while promoting efficient program delivery and optimal reciprocal conditions for the Government of Canada abroad.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Canada fulfilled its international legal obligations toward foreign diplomatic missions and consular posts based in Canada while ensuring the most favourable reciprocal conditions for its network of representation abroad.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 11.4 | 12.7 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 12.6 | 0.9 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 11.4 | 12.7 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 12.6 | 0.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between the planned and actual spending is attributable to lower than anticipated municipal realty taxes. Changes in the volume and entitlement of grants are other factors in the year-end variance.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Projects and Development Activities Resulting from Francophonie Summits
Start Date: March 9, 1979
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This fund provides funding to cooperation programs and activities undertaken by the International Organisation of La Francophonie (OIF). It also provides financial support to the Government of New Brunswick to foster its participation in international Francophonie activities. This fund helps to promote Canadian interests and is consistent with political and economic objectives that Canada has set for itself for La Francophonie. It also promotes active participation by the Government of New Brunswick in summits, ministerial conferences and other related Francophonie activities.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Highlights include development of the first three linguistic pacts with member states at the 2010 Montreux Summit, as mandated at the 2008 Quebec Summit; the development and beginning of the implementation of a plan to rehabilitate the Haitian education system following the January 2010 earthquake; and assistance for the presidential elections in Guinea that restored a legitimate government to the country. The various institutions financed by Canada through this program have all been important contributors to these results. In the longer term, the publication La langue française dans le monde 2010 (Report of the State of the French Language2010) demonstrated that the use of French is growing significantly, largely due to rising education levels in sub-Saharan Africa, an area where La Francophonie has devoted significant resources in its four decades of existence.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 6.9 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | -1.0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 6.9 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | -1.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The amounts paid are based on the percentage of the planned programming that is actually implemented, which is always less than 100%. Special single-year projects can also cause a variance, as does a shift in responsibility among DFAIT, CIDA and Canadian Heritage for supporting certain operations.
Audit Completed or Planned: DFAIT completed a liaison visit to the OIF in 2010 and issued a report that was shared with the organization.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: CIDA undertook a thorough evaluation of all contributions to La Francophonie in 2008–09.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
Start Date: January 1, 1988
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to UNESCO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to culture, science and education, and to provide it with a voice in the international community.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 12.6 | 11.4 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 10.0 | 2.3 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 12.6 | 11.4 | 12.6 | 12.3 | 10.0 | 2.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to the higher than average Canadian dollar.
Audit Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, UNESCO is regularly audited both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, UNESCO is regularly evaluated both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: United Nations Peacekeeping Operations
Start Date: October 5, 2000
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's assessed contribution to UN peacekeeping operations is a legally binding obligation of membership. For further information, see www.un.org.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 203.3 | 236.2 | 285.9 | 251.6 | 251.6 | 34.3 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 203.3 | 236.2 | 285.9 | 251.6 | 251.6 | 34.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): A number of missions required fewer resources than initially expected. In addition, the strong dollar and various internal UN credits offset expected costs.
Audit Completed or Planned: UN peacekeeping operations are subject to internal evaluation, audit and oversight within the UN system. These measures are regularly reviewed by member states, including Canada.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: UN Peacekeeping operations are subject to internal evaluation, audit and oversight within the UN system. These measures are regularly reviewed by member states, including Canada.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: United Nations Organization (UN)
Start Date: March 27, 1980
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's assessed contribution to the regular budget of the United Nations is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to international peace, security and development and provide it with a voice in the international community. Assessed contributions are used to finance the organization's programs toward attainment of the UN's objectives, as set out in its Charter. For further information, see www.un.org.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 117.0 | 89.7 | 124.3 | 115.3 | 93.3 | 31.0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 117.0 | 89.7 | 124.3 | 115.3 | 93.3 | 31.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The strong Canadian dollar and various internal UN credits offset expected costs.
Audit Completed or Planned: The UN program budget is subject to internal evaluation, audit and oversight within the UN system and is regularly reviewed by member states, including Canada.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The UN program budget is subject to internal evaluation, audit and oversight within the UN system and is regularly reviewed by member states, including Canada.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: World Health Organization (WHO)
Start Date: January 1, 1990
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the WHO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to health and provide it with a voice in the international community.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 17.5 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 15.3 | 14.7 | 0.6 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 17.5 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 15.3 | 14.7 | 0.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to a higher than average Canadian dollar.
Audit Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, the WHO is regularly audited both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: As a United Nations organization, the WHO is regularly evaluated both internally and through a third-party auditor.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: World Trade Organization (WTO)
Start Date: January 1, 1995
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The purpose of this program is to pay the assessed contribution for Canada's membership in the WTO.
Strategic Outcome: CANADA'S INTERNATIONAL AGENDA—The international agenda is shaped to Canada's benefit and advantage in accordance with Canadian interests and values.
Results Achieved: Canada participated in all standing and ad hoc meetings of the WTO in 2010–11. This included regular participation in General Council meetings, the Dispute Settlement Body, the Trade Policy Review Body, senior official meetings, as well as numerous other councils, committees, working parties and negotiating groups covering the wide range of WTO issues. Canada also remains committed to the broader Aid for Trade agenda and provides extensive support to the Enhanced Integrated Framework. Other international work by Canada—for example, in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum (APEC), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the G-20 and the Cairns Group—also supports the work at the WTO.
Canada’s ambassador to the WTO, John Gero, acted as chairperson of the General Council, the WTO’s highest-level decision-making body, which is responsible for institutional and administrative issues that have a strong trade policy component.
Canada participated in WTO Trade Policy Reviews that took place in 2010–11. During this period there were 16 reviews, including reviews of the United States, China and Japan. The Trade Policy Review is a peer review exercise designed to provide a collective appreciation and understanding of the full range of individual members’ trade policies and practices and their impact on the multilateral trading system. On June 20 and 22, 2011, Canada successfully participated in its ninth Trade Policy Review as a member of the WTO in Geneva, Switzerland. As part of the 2010–11 Review process, Canada hosted a visit of the WTO Secretariat and drafted a government report outlining changes to its trade and investment regimes that occurred during the period under review.
Canada continues to be an active participant in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. During 2010–11, Canada was active as a complainant in three cases, against the United States, Korea and the European Union. These are: U.S.—Certain Country of Origin Labelling (DS384), Korea—Measures Affecting the Importation of Bovine Meat and Meat Products (DS391) and European Communities—Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products(DS400). Canada is a defendant in one case brought by Japan regarding Ontario's Green Energy and Green Economy Act and its related feed-in tariff program (DS412). In addition, Canada is actively participating as a third party in five cases, including the two disputes between the U.S. and the EU regarding support to the large civil aircraft sector.
In 2010–11, Canada worked with other WTO members to make further progress on the accession of 12 acceding governments to the WTO: Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, the Bahamas, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kazakhstan, Laos, Samoa, Serbia, Seychelles, Tajikistan, Vanuatu and Yemen. During that same period, Canada concluded bilateral market access negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Laos, and reached the final stages of bilateral accession negotiations with Samoa.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 6.4 | 6.1 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.0 | 0.8 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 6.4 | 6.1 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.0 | 0.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): No variances to note.
Audit Completed or Planned: The WTO Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration produced a 2010 financial performance report for the financial year ended December 31, 2010. These statements were audited by external auditors appointed by the WTO General Council.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: There is no evaluation planned.
Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Payments to First Nations and Inuit Health Services Transfer
Start Date
April 2007
End Date
March 2012
Description
To increase responsibility and control by First Nations and Inuit for their own health programs and services to improve health conditions for First Nations and Inuit people.
Strategic Outcome
Better Health outcomes and reduction of Health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Increased control or accountability by First Nations and Inuit for their own of health care programs and services.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 213.7 | 266.4 | 256.1 | 448.1 | 448.1 | (192.0) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 213.7 | 266.4 | 256.1 | 448.1 | 448.1 | (192.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Due to the nature of this program, actual spending includes a total of $191.2M from other classes of contributions, as FN, under this program authority, manage funds previously identified with other classes. This authority allows FN recipients to manage funds under a single consolidated agreement as they assume more responsibility for development and management of their own health programs. As such, funds from other classes are expended under this contribution authority. Correspondingly, those classes affected by spending under Payments to First Nations and Inuit Health Services Transfer will have reference to this spending in their comments.
* It is also expected that this class grows over time as it supports the increasing desire of First Nations and Inuit to assume management of health programs and services and the opportunity to redesign these programs and services so that they are more suited to local priorities.
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Planned as part of the funding models evaluation in 2011-12.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Governance and Infrastructure Support
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
Health Governance and Infrastructure Support aims to increase First Nations and Inuit control over health programs and services. Activities include: health planning and management; health research, knowledge and information management; health consultation and liaison; health delivery and infrastructure; integration and adaptation of health services; and health human resources.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Improved health status of First Nations and Inuit through strengthened governance and infrastructure.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 148.6 | 164.2 | 166.8 | 84.3 | 76.9 | 89.9 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 148.6 | 164.2 | 166.8 | 84.3 | 76.9 | 89.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Planned spending is reduced by $11.8 for transfer between branches and Supps A & C items.
* $43.6 of the Actual Spending of this contribution class is reported under 'Payments to First Nations and Inuit Health Services Transfer'" due to the desire of First Nations and Inuit to assume management of health programs and services.
* Most of the remaining variance is due to Actual Spending reported under Contribution Class "FNI Community Programs". The amount assigned to this Transfer Payment Program at its establishment in 2005 was overestimated and a realignment towards three other Transfer Payment Programs will be requested for future years.
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Evaluation of the funding models planned in 2011-12.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Community Programs
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
Community programs support child and maternal-child health; mental health promotion; addictions prevention and treatment; chronic disease prevention and health promotion services.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Increased participation of First Nations and Inuit individuals, families, and communities in programs and supports.
Improved continuum of programs and services in First Nations and Inuit communities.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 285.1 | 265.9 | 170.0 | 180.7 | 180.0 | (10.0) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 285.1 | 265.9 | 170.0 | 180.7 | 180.0 | (10.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Planned spending is increased by $73.5 for Supps A, B & C items.
* $89.0 of the Actual Spending of this contribution class is reported under 'Payments to First Nations and Inuit Health Services Transfer'" due to the desire of First Nations and Inuit to assume management of health programs and services.
* Most of the remaining variance is due to Actual Spending that belongs to Contribution Class "Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Governance and Infrastructure Support".
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Completed for Mental Health and Addictions and Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention Clusters in 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Facilities and Capital Program
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
Provides funding to eligible recipients for the construction acquisition, leasing, operation and maintenance of nursing stations, health centres, health stations, health offices, treatment centres, staff residences, and operational support buildings.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Increase availability of health facilities, equipment and other moveable assets in First Nations and Inuit communities that support the provision of health services.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 66.1 | 98.7 | 112.9 | 116.3 | 116.3 | (3.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 66.1 | 98.7 | 112.9 | 116.3 | 116.3 | (3.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Actual Spending was higher than forecasted by 3% due to additional Capital pressures.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Audit of Health Facilities and Capital Program completed in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Completed in 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Benefits
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
A limited range of medically necessary health-related goods and services which supplement those provided through other private or provincial/territorial health insurance plans is provided to registered Indians and recognized Inuit. Benefits include drugs, dental care, vision care, medical supplies and equipment, short-term crisis intervention mental health services, and transportation to access medical services not available on reserve or in the community of residence.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Access by eligible clients to Non-Insured Health Benefits.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 150.0 | 166.7 | 168.7 | 168.1 | 168.1 | 0.6 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 150.0 | 166.7 | 168.7 | 168.1 | 168.1 | 0.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
N/A
Audit Completed or Planned:
Audit of Non-Insured Health Benefits - Medical Transportation completed in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Protection
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
Communicable Disease and Environmental Health and Research programs facilitate preparedness to implement measures in the control, management and containment of outbreaks of preventable diseases and improve management and control of environmental hazards.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 24.4 | 27.4 | 12.8 | 21.7 | 21.7 | (8.9) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 24.4 | 27.4 | 12.8 | 21.7 | 21.7 | (8.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Planned spending is increased by $5.2 for Supps A items.
* $6.8 of the Actual Spending of this contribution class is reported under 'Payments to First Nations and Inuit Health Services Transfer'" due to the desire of First Nations and Inuit to assume management of health programs and services.
* Approximately $4.0 of the variance is due to increased pressure for First Nations Water Monitoring Program.
* Remaining variance of approximately $6.0 is due to increased pressure in other Health Protection Programs.
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Communicable Disease Control, Environmental Health and Environmental Research Clusters completed in 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Primary Health Care
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
Primary Health Care services include emergency and acute care health services, Community primary health care services which include illness and injury prevention and health promotion activities. These programs also include: the First Nations and Inuit Home and Community Care; and the Oral Health Strategy.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Improved access to quality well-coordinated culturally appropriate primary health care programs and services for First Nations and Inuit individuals, families and communities.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 147.9 | 144.6 | 129.5 | 103.3 | 103.3 | 26.2 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 147.9 | 144.6 | 129.5 | 103.3 | 103.3 | 26.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Planned spending is increased by $6.0 for Supps A items.
* $51.5 of the Actual Spending of this contribution class is reported under 'Payments to First Nations and Inuit Health Services Transfer'" due to the desire of First Nations and Inuit to assume management of health programs and services.
* Most of the variance of $19.3 is explained by a continued increase in Nursing costs.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Audit of Primary Care - Nursing Services completed in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Planned in 2011-12
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions for Bigstone Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) Pilot Project
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
Administration and delivery of benefits with Bigstone Health Commission to registered Indians and recognized Inuit.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Improved access to quality well-coordinated culturally appropriate primary health care programs and services for First Nations and Inuit individuals, families and communities.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 10.0 | 10.4 | 9.1 | 10.9 | 10.9 | (1.8) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 10.0 | 10.4 | 9.1 | 10.9 | 10.9 | (1.8) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Variance is mainly due to additional spending related to NIHB program growth.
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions to the Organization for the Advancement of Aboriginal People's Health
Start Date
April 2005
End Date
March 2011
Description
To support the Organization for the Advancement of Aboriginal People's Health.
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.
Results Achieved
Continued empowerment of Aboriginal peoples through advancements in knowledge and sharing of knowledge on Aboriginal health.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.6 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Actual Spending was lower than expected by $0.6.
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Indian Residential Schools Resolution Health Support Program
Start Date
November 2006
End Date
March 2013
Description
This program is to support the mental wellness of former Indian Residential School (IRS) students, their families and communities by providing:
(Voted)
Strategic Outcome
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians
Results achieved:
Services which are culturally sensitive, holistic, comprehensive, effective and efficient, ultimately improving emotional and mental wellness of former IRS students.
Services allow former IRS students to disclose accounts of childhood sexual and physical abuses in a safe and effective manner.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 18.8 | 24.0 | 5.4 | 33.4 | 33.4 | (28.0) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 18.8 | 24.0 | 5.4 | 33.4 | 33.4 | (28.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
* Planned spending is increased by $26.9 for Supps B items. The remaining variance is due to a higher than expected demand that results in increased costs for this program.
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Contributions in support of the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy
Start Date
July 1, 2007
End Date
March 31, 2012 (Ts&Cs expire March 31, 2012)
Description
The purpose of the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy (FTCS) Contribution Program is to contribute to the achievement of FTCS objectives through assistance to provinces, non-governmental organizations, researchers and other tobacco control stakeholders. In 2007, the Government of Canada announced new goals and objectives for the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy until 2011. These are:
Goal:
Reducing the overall smoking prevalence from 19% (2005) to 12% by 2011.
The new objectives are to:
Strategic Outcome
Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances and healthy, sustainable living and working environments
Results Achieved
With 104 projects funded since 2007, the following results are some highlights:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 7.4 | 12.7 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.7 | 0.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 7.4 | 12.7 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.7 | 0.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Differences between planned spending and actual spending is minimal and is related to minor lapses from committed projects.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audits have been performed, nor are they planned for the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy at this time.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
The Federal Tobacco Control Strategy incorporates a full summative evaluation which includes process and impact evaluations of the contribution funding program. Final report of the process evaluation is expected in September 2011, and final report of the impact evaluation is expected in July 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Drug Treatment Funding Program
Start Date
October 2007 - Services component
April 2008 - Systems component
End Date
March 31, 2012 (Services component)
March 31, 2013(Systems component)
Description
Drug Treatment Funding Program (DTFP), under the National Anti-Drug Strategy, provides $111 million in financial support over five years to provincial and territorial governments to support illicit drug treatment services for at-risk youth, and to assist in strengthening the quality of drug treatment services. An additional $10M over five years is designated support for a project in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.
Strategic Outcome
Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances and healthy, sustainable living and working environments.
Results Achieved
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 1.4 | 5.9 | 29.9 | 29.9 | 16.5 | 13.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 1.4 | 5.9 | 29.9 | 29.9 | 16.5 | 13.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending of $16.5M versus total authorities and planned spending results in a variance of $13.4M. Of this, $2.2M was reallocated to the National Native Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program and the Drug Strategy Community Initiatives Fund both under the National Anti-Drug Strategy. Health Canada is exploring options to retain the remaining $10.9 M to achieve the desired program objectives.
The Report on Plans and Priorities reported planned spending at the amount of $28M. An adjustment has been made to reflect the correct amount of $29.9M.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audits have been performed, nor are they planned for the DTFP at this time.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An implementation evaluation of the DTFP was conducted in 2010-11 which examined the implementation of the program, relevance of the program to federal priorities, and progress towards achievement of immediate outcomes.
Departmental Performance Measurement and Evaluation Directorate will be overseeing an evaluation of DTFP in 2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Drug Strategy Community Initiatives Fund (voted contribution dollars)
Start Date
April 2004
End Date
Ts&Cs renewed effective April 1, 2010
Description
The Drug Strategy Community Initiatives Fund (DSCIF) will contribute to reducing illicit drug use among Canadians, particularly among vulnerable populations such as youth, by focussing on health promotion and prevention approaches to address drug abuse before it happens. The objectives of the DSCIF are to facilitate the development of local, provincial, territorial, national and community-based solutions to drug use among youth and to promote public awareness of illicit drug use among youth. The Program is delivered through Health Canada's regional and national offices.
Strategic Outcome
Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances and healthy, sustainable living and working environments
Results Achieved
During 2010-11, 35 new contribution agreements were signed.
DSCIF continues to work closely with recipients to aid in performance reporting including delivering evaluation training (regional evaluation training sessions held for most new projects in 2010-11), development of standardised instruments as part of the cluster evaluation and development of standardised quarterly reporting templates.
In 2010-11, DSCIF worked with the Department Centre of Excellence towards implementing Risk Management Tools.
In 2010-11, British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba/Saskatchewan and Quebec held regional Showcases or Knowledge Exchange Events where funded projects were brought together to share results, lessons learned and to network.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 4.9 | 9.0 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 12.7 | 0.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 4.9 | 9.0 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 12.7 | 0.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The $0.3M variance of actual spending in excess of the total authorities and planned spending is the result of the transfer of resources from the Drug Treatment Funding Program to be spent under this program which is also related to the National Anti-Drug Strategy. The planned spending has been adjusted to reflect proper G & C planned spending amounts.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audits have been performed, nor are they planned for the DSCIF at this time.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluations were completed in 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Assessed Contribution to the Pan-American Health Organization
Start Date
April 15, 2008
End Date
March 31, 2013
Description
To support Canada's membership in the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO).
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians.
Results Achieved
Canada receives direct and indirect benefits from its membership in PAHO. Attendance at meetings of the governing bodies and at expert consultations provides a forum for the wider dissemination of Canadian-based values related to health and the provision of health care services and public health approaches. Participation by Canadian health experts ensures bilateral linkages are created and maintained with key countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.
The Director of PAHO annually reports the Organization's accomplishments and how it has spent its resources to meet stated objectives. Link to PAHO's website: (http://www.paho.org/English/gov/govbodies-index.htm).
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 12.0 | 13.0 | 12.5 | 13.2 | 13.2 | -1.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 12.0 | 13.0 | 12.5 | 13.2 | 13.2 | -1.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Variance in spending is due to increases in Canada's assessed contribution to PAHO and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The variance was accommodated by using funds from the overall International Health Grants Program budget under which the PAHO payment sits.
Audit Completed or Planned:
None. As per the program Terms and Conditions, Health Canada relies upon the PAHO's internal and external audit regimes to monitoraccountability.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
None
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Grant to Canadian Blood Services
Start Date
April 2000
End Date
Ongoing
Description
To support basic, applied and clinical research on blood safety and effectiveness issues through the auspices of Canadian Blood Services.
Strategic Outcome
Access to safe and effective health products and food information for healthy choices.
Results Achieved
Continued improvements to basic applied and clinical research on blood safety and effectiveness.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
No variance.
Audit Completed or Planned:
None
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
None
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Official Languages Health Contribution Program
[replaces: Contribution Program to Improve Access to Health Services for Official Language Minority Communities 2003-04 to 2008-09]
Start Date
April 1, 2009
End Date
March 31, 2013
Description
The Official Languages Health Contribution Program has the following objectives:
These objectives are realized through the following three mutually reinforcing program components:
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians.
Results Achieved
23 contribution agreements were launched with educational institutions and community-based organisations for the engagement of new program activities to address program objectives.
1,147965 students new student registrations were accepted in 20109-110 into training programs sponsored through the ten post-secondary institutions and one provincial government agency (New Brunswick) funded under the coordination of the Consortium national de formation en santé. There were 518 graduates from these same programs for the academic year ending in May/June 2010. A follow-up survey of training graduates from 2008-09 - which was released in 2010-11 - revealed that 86% of graduates surveyed were employed in health professions serving official language minority communities.
McGill University coordinated language training activities in 20109-110 for some 1,325000 health professionals in Quebec to improve their ability to service English-speaking minority communities.
Approximately 70 projects are being launched during 2010-13 in French-speaking minority communities outside Quebec. Examples of projects launched in 2010-11:
A total of 38 projects have been launched in English-speaking minority communities in Quebec over 2010-13. Examples of projects launched in 2010-11:
New projects aimed at improving the health and health access of official language minority communities were implemented in 2009-2010. For example, a new French-language telehealth site was launched in Manitoba under the sponsorship of the Société Santé en français and an initiative to improve access to health and social services in English in the Estrie region of Quebec was launched through the Community Health and Social Services Network.
Further information regarding these projects is available from the websites of Program recipients:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 27.9 | 35.5 | 36.7 | 36.8 | 36.8 | -0.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 27.9 | 35.5 | 36.7 | 36.8 | 36.8 | -0.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Increased spending for 2010-11 was due to $75,000 in funds transferred from Canadian Heritage in support of a community-based public opinion research project directed by the Société Santé en français.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No.Trois bénéficiaires ont fait l'objet d'une vérification financière (déplacements et frais d'accueil) pour l'exercice 2009-2010. Nous avons reçu les ébauches des rapports vers la fin mai. Nous devons maintenant commenter pour finaliser le rapport. Il reste le suivi à faire, donc le tout n'est pas encore complété.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
A mid-term review of the program that was initiated in 2010-11 is to be completed in 2011-12. The program's summative evaluation will be launched in 2011-12 and completed in 2012-13.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Grant for Territorial Health System Sustainability Initiative
Start Date
April 1, 2010
End Date
March 31, 2012
Description
The Territorial Health System Sustainability Initiative (THSSI) is divided into the following three funds:
Strategic Outcome
A health system responsive to the needs of Canadians
Results Achieved
The overriding goal of the two-year extended THSSI is to assist the three territories to consolidate progress made under the THSSI in reducing the reliance on outside health care systems and medical travel. For territories, consolidating projects that have achieved their goals and integrating projects with an ongoing mandate into territorial core business.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of TPs | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
No variance. The program was renewed for 2 additional years to the end of fiscal year 2011-12 at the same amounts ($30 million in total per year).
Audit Completed or Planned:
N/A - This program activity is a Grant.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
N/A - the program has been renewed for an additional 2 years as stated above.
Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Health Care Policy Contribution Program (Voted)
Start Date
September 24, 2002
End Date
Ongoing
Description
The Health Care Policy Contribution Program (HCPCP) provides contribution funding for projects that address the challenges facing Canada's health care system. The Program fosters strategic and evidence-based decision-making for quality health care, and promotes innovation through pilot projects, evaluation, research, and policy development on current and emerging health care system issues. The Program has continued to evolve in response to changing health care system priorities and currently consists of three components: the Health Care System Innovation Fund, which includes the Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System; the Health Human Resource Strategy; and the Internationally Educated Health Professionals Initiative. Two components, the National Wait Times Initiative (NWTI) and the Patient Wait Times Guarantee Pilot Project Fund (PWTGPPF), ended on March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively.
The Health Care System Innovation Fund (HCSIF) is designed to be flexible and support projects that address a wide range of health care policy issues to encourage innovation and achieve maximum benefit for the health care system and for Canadians. The Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System (CMIRPS) aims to reduce harm caused by preventable medication incidents through activities such as the collection and analysis of standardized incident data and the development and dissemination of information including best practices in safe medication use systems.
The goal of the Health Human Resource Strategy (HHRS) is to aid in the establishment and maintenance of a stable and optimal health workforce. The HHRS is pursuing four key strategic directions: more health care providers; using human resources skills effectively; creating healthy, supportive, learning workplaces; and more effective planning and forecasting. The HHRS supports key stakeholders such as provincial/territorial governments, health professional associations, educational institutions and national non-government health care organizations, in their efforts to address health human resource issues that correspond to both federal and stakeholder goals and priorities. Currently, the distribution of physicians, particularly in underserved locations, is a priority health human resource issue for the federal government and stakeholders.
The Internationally Educated Health Professionals Initiative (IEHPI) is designed to facilitate the integration of internationally educated health professionals by assisting them in obtaining licensure and reducing barriers to practice within the Canadian health care workforce. The ultimate goal is to increase the number of internationally educated health professionals in the health care workforce. In the spring 2005 budget, the Canadian government committed $75 million to support IEHPI over its first five years and $18M annually thereafter. The IEHPI is complementary to the Pan-Canadian Framework for the Assessment and Recognition of Foreign Qualifications announced by the Forum of Labour Market Ministers in 2009.
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians.
Results Achieved
The Health Care System Innovation Component directed funding toward research and knowledge transfer activities to support innovation and implementation of best practices in key policy areas such as wait times, aging and end of life care.
CMIRPS projects continued to contribute to system level changes to improve the safety of medication use in Canada. For example, through ISMP Canada's individual practitioner incident report analyses, discussions continued with pharmaceutical manufacturers to inform enhancements to labeling and packaging. Over 30 improvements have been made by manufacturers since the inception of CMIRPS. In addition, project results have led Accreditation Canada to include three additional areas of requirements related to medication safety in its 2009 Required Organizational Practices (ROPs): i) dangerous abbreviations, symbols and dose designations, ii) Heparin storage and availability, and iii) Narcotic (opioid) storage and availability. To date, more than 50 recommended system-based safeguards from medication incident analysis learning have been incorporated into Accreditation Canada standards
The Health Human Resource Strategy and the Internationally Educated Health Professionals Initiative enable Health Canada to maintain a leadership role in priority areas of HHR. Some examples include:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 40.6 | 40.9 | 32.7 | 29.6 | 29.2 | 3.5 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 40.6 | 40.9 | 32.7 | 29.6 | 29.2 | 3.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Planned spending estimates were impacted by many factors that are often beyond the control of funded recipients and Health Canada, including delays and/or rescheduling of activities. In some cases, projects may also be withdrawn altogether. Contributions are monitored closely and potential surpluses are identified as early as possible.
Audit Completed or Planned:
In 2008-09, the Program initiated three recipient audits that were completed in 2009-10. Two recipient audits were completed in 2010-11 for projects selected in 2009-10 and three recipient audits are planned for 2011-12. In 2010-11, the Program participated in the Horizontal Audit of the Management Control Framework for Contribution Programs led by the Audit and Accountability Bureau of Health Canada.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
In May 2011, work began on the summative evaluation for the Program, due for completion by December 2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Named Grant to the Canadian Patient Safety Institute
Start Date
December 10, 2003
End Date
March 31, 2013
Description
The Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) is an independent not-for-profit corporation mandated to provide leadership and coordinate the work necessary to build a culture of patient safety and quality improvement throughout the Canadian health system. CPSI promotes leading ideas and best practices, raises awareness and provides advice on effective strategies to improve patient safety.
This named grant provides financial assistance to support CPSI's efforts to implement the provisions in the 2003 First Ministers' Accord on Health Care Renewal towards improving health care quality by strengthening system co-ordination and national collaboration related to patient safety. CPSI's grant agreement was renewed in 2008 for a five-year period, beginning April 1, 2008 and ending March 31, 2013.
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians
Results Achieved
To continue to fulfill its mandate, CPSI is focusing on its strategic priorities of: improving the safety of patient care in Canada through learning, sharing and implementing interventions that are known to reduce avoidable harm; building governance capability; supporting networks; and increasing capacity through evidence-informed resources and tools. For example:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
0.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 8.0<</td> | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned:
The Institute's financial records are reviewed and audited annually by independent external accountants.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
As per their Funding Agreement, CPSI is required to submit a final independent evaluation report to the Minister by March 31, 2012, and to make that report public.
Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant to the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Voted)
Start Date
April 1, 2007
End Date
March 31, 2012
Description
The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) is responsible for implementing the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control with the following objectives: (1) to reduce the expected number of new cases of cancer among Canadians; (2) to enhance the quality of life of those living with cancer; and (3) to lessen the likelihood of Canadians dying from cancer.
The mandate of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer corporation is to provide a leadership role with respect to cancer control in Canada, through the management of knowledge and the coordination of efforts among provinces and territories, cancer experts, stakeholder groups and Aboriginal organizations to champion change and improve health outcomes related to cancer. The CPAC will act as a pan-Canadian resource to provide the most up-to-date knowledge across strategic priority areas including prevention, screening/early detection, patient-centred care, guidelines, health human resources, standards, as well as supporting key research activities and facilitating the development of a pan-Canadian surveillance system.
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians
Results Achieved
Since it began operating in April 2007, the CPAC has:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 58.2 | 57.5 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 0.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 58.2 | 57.5 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 0.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned:
Health Canada's Audit and Accountability Bureau is expected to complete an Audit of the Grant to the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer in fiscal year 2011-12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Health Canada completed an evaluation of the Partnership in July 2010. The results indicate that the Partnership is a relevant organization that has made good progress and has strong stakeholder support and engagement.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Grant to the Health Council of Canada
Start Date
September 1, 2004
End Date
March 31, 2015
Description
The Health Council of Canada was established by First Ministers in the 2003 Accord on Health Care Renewal with the mandate to report on jurisdictional progress in meeting Accord commitments. The Health Council's mandate was expanded by First Ministers in the 2004 Health Accord to report on health outcomes and the health status of Canadians.
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians
Results Achieved
To continue to fulfill its mandate, as reconfirmed in Spring 2010 by participating federal, provincial and territorial Ministers of Health in their role as Corporate Members of the Council, the organization undertook a wide variety of projects, released associated public reports and undertook supporting promotional activities. For example, in 2010-11 the Council:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 6.2 | 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 6.4 | 3.6 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 6.2 | 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 6.4 | 3.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The annual operating budget of the Health Council of Canada can be up to $10M per year. The Health Council of Canada's 2009-10 work plan, approved by Corporate Members, requested $6.4M. Payments were made accordingly.
Audit Completed or Planned:
The Health Council of Canada's financial records are reviewed and audited annually by independent external accountants. Audited financial statements can be found on the Health Council's website: http://www.healthcouncilcanada.ca
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
As per their Funding Agreement, the Health Council of Canada is required to submit a final evaluation framework to the Minister by March 31, 2013, and a final evaluation report by March 31, 2014.
Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (Voted)
Start Date
April 1, 2008
End Date
March 31, 2013
Description
The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) is an independent not-for-profit corporation funded by federal, provincial, and territorial governments to provide credible, impartial advice and evidence-based information about the effectiveness of drugs and other health technologies to Canadian health care decision-makers. The Named Grant's purpose is to provide financial assistance to support CADTH's core business activities, namely: the Common Drug Review (CDR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), and the Canadian Optimal Medication Prescribing and Utilization Service (COMPUS). Fiscal years 2010-11 and 2011-12 will see CADTH receiving an extra $1M and $2M respectively to complete a 2 year project on Isotope.
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians.
Results Achieved
Evidence-based information that supports informed decisions on the effectiveness of drugs and health technologies, in terms of health outcomes and cost.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 16.9 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 17.9 | 17.9 | -1.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 16.9 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 17.9 | 17.9 | -1.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
CADTH received a one time increase in funding of $3M ($1M in 2010-2011; $2M in 2011-20121) for a finite project on Isotope, hence the variance.
Audit completed or planned::
Per Audit Plan approved by the Health Canada Executive Committee to be reviewed by the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC), CADTH audit is planned for fiscal year 2011-12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An independent evaluation of CADTH's core business activities and Isotope project is required as part of Health Canada's 2008-13 funding agreement with CADTH. The funding agreement stipulates that this evaluation cover April 1, 2007 - March 31, 2011, and be submitted to the Minister by October 31, 2012. The evaluation is intended to assess CADTH's performance in achieving the purpose of the Grant, including CADTH's value-for-money.
Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Named Grant for the Mental Health Commission of Canada (Voted)
Start Date
April 1, 2008
End Date
March 31, 2017
Description
As part of Budget 2007, the Government of Canada announced funding for the establishment of a Mental Health Commission of Canada (MHCC), an independent, arm's length organization, designed to focus national attention on mental health issues and to work to improve the health and social outcomes for people living with mental illness. To fulfill its mandate, the Commission has been tasked with:
In serving as a national focal point for addressing mental health and mental illness, the MHCC will undertake a more targeted approach to addressing these issues in Canada; foster improved coordination and information sharing among mental health stakeholders and the public health community; and encourage a better public understanding of mental health and mental illness nationally.
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians
Results Achieved
The MHCC has made significant headway since its inception in 2007, in its ability to build partnerships and bring national awareness to the challenges of mental health and illness. Over the past year, progress has been made on several fronts:
Progress continues to be made on the anti-stigma initiative Opening Minds which was launched in 2009. The initiative is supporting 49 anti-stigma pilot projects directed at three target groups - youth, health care providers and the workforce. Successful projects are being replicated nationally through the development of toolkits, publication of papers in reputable scientific journals, conferences and the sharing of information through an extensive network of partners.
The Knowledge Exchange Centre (KEC) has completed a scoping exercise and environmental scan to gain a better understanding of knowledge translation and exchange in the mental health field. In addition, the Commission developed the infrastructure for an online portal providing access to the work of the Commission and highlighting best practices around knowledge exchange in mental health. A launch is planned for 2011-12 fiscal year.
The framework document for the National Mental Health Strategy, Toward Recovery & Well-being, which was released in 2009, continues to be disseminated. Consultations to guide the second phase of the development of the strategy took place during summer 2010 which led to a revision of the approach. The approach is now focussing on priorities that will have the highest impact and produce the best possible return on investment. A final strategy document will be released in early 2012.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 7.5 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 0.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 7.5 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 0.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
n/a
Audit Completed or Planned:
As outlined in the Grant Funding Agreement, the MHCC must engage an independent auditor to conduct a full audit of its financial statements each Fiscal Year. The 2010-11 audited financial statements have now been completed and were presented to the Board of Directors for approval during their meeting on June 14, 2011.
An internal audit by Health Canada is planned for 2011-12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
As a requirement of the Funding Agreement with Health Canada, an independent evaluation was undertaken during 2010-11. The evaluation set out to assess the MHCC's progress between July 2007 and December 2010 in the following areas: ability to meet its mandate; effectiveness of policy and/or programs; intended and unintended impacts across the mental health system; and alternative ways to achieve expected results.
The evaluation demonstrated the organization's positive efforts to strengthen its accountability, and performance management processes and practices, and is making progress on most of its initiatives. However, the evaluation also found the MHCC needs to strengthen its outreach and establish a leadership presence within the stakeholder community, increase transparency and integration within the MHCC, and advance the Knowledge Exchange and Partners initiatives.
Progress on implementing the evaluation's recommendations will be reported on through various means, including future Business Plans, Annual Reports, and reports to the MHCC Board of Directors.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
Grant to the Canadian Institute for Health Information (Voted)
Start Date
April 1, 1999
End Date
March 31, 2012
Description
The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) is an independent, not-for-profit organization supported by federal, provincial and territorial governments that provides essential data and analysis on Canada's health system and the health of Canadians. CIHI was created in 1991 by the F/P/T Ministers of Health toaddress significant gaps in health information. CIHI's data and its reports inform health policies, support the effective delivery of health services and raise awareness among Canadians about the factors that contribute to good health.
Since 1999, the federal government has provided funding to CIHI through a series of grants and conditional grants, known as the Roadmap Initiative. More recently CIHI's funding has been consolidated through the Health Information Initiative.
Through the past Roadmap Initiatives I, II and II Plus, CIHI was provided with about $260 million since 1999. Budget 2005 allocated an additional $110 million over five years (2005-06 to 2009-10) to CIHI through Roadmap III. This has allowed CIHI to provide quality and timely health information, including the delivery of data on a variety of important health indicators and other health publications to support health sector decision-making and improve accountability.
Since 2007/08, the Health Information Initiative has been providing grant funding to CIHI, replacing the previous Roadmap II, II Plus, III funding and also providing additional funds for new initiatives. This funding allows CIHI to continue work under the Roadmap Initiative and to further enhance the coverage of health data systems so Canadians get information on their health care system, including information on wait times, and continued development of comparable health indicators. The funding will also enable CIHI to respond effectively to emerging priorities. Under this initiative, up to $406.49 million will be delivered to CIHI over five years (2007-08 to 2011-12).
Strategic Outcome
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians.
Results Achieved
In 2010-11 CIHI continued to make progress in producing more and better data, more relevant and actionable analysis, and improved client understanding and use of CIHI data and information products. The following are selected highlights from the Corporate Performance Reporting 2010-11.
More and Better Data
Relevant and Actionable Analysis
Over the last year, CIHI continued to increase the overall depth and breadth of analysis and reporting across all data holdings, developing and releasing 34 analytic products. These included special analytic reports relevant to ongoing themes (e.g. access and quality of care, wait times, continuity of care) and special studies related to priority health services themes (e.g. costs, patient
safety). CIHI also developed and released a number of annual reports and various other policy-relevant analytic outputs relating to health services, health expenditures, pharmaceuticals, and health human resources.
Improved Understanding and Use
CIHI completed 380 requests for data in 2010-11, the majority of which (91%) were completed within 90 days, a higher proportion than was achieved in the previous fiscal year. An area of focus for the organization is improving access to CIHI's data and reports for our clients and stakeholders through the development of better access tools. The Data Request Tracking Tool (DaRT) is a system
launched early in 2008-09 that captures information on all custom data requests from external clients. In 2010-11, CIHI staff handled a total of 523 customized data requests, which is a 29% increase from 405 in the previous year. The vast majority (79%) of the data requests were from third-parties, with the remaining 21% being requests from data suppliers themselves or Ministries of Health.
Effective April 1st, 2011, an automated process tool replaced the DaRT excel spreadsheets to track and report on CIHI data requests. This system is expected to improve monitoring of data requests and administrative processes related to data requests.
Media Coverage
A concerted effort was made this year to focus on quality over quantity in media products. As a result, this fiscal year saw 23 media products (16 releases, 7 advisories), compared to 28 (17 releases, 11 advisories) in 2009-10:
Tools to capture mentions and audience reach are constantly evolving - for web metrics in particular - making
year-over-year comparisons challenging. The large discrepancy in total reach between this year and last year is
largely driven by web reach numbers which are still being honed for greater accuracy.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 81.7 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 0.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 81.7 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 0.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned:
In accordance with CIHI's Funding Agreement with Health Canada, a performance audit of the Health Information Initiative (HII) was completed and provided to Health Canada by March 31, 2011. This report presented a summary of the approach followed in planning and conducting the performance audit as well as observations and recommendations for improvement.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Third Party Evaluation completed and provided to Health Canada in 2010-11. CIHI undertook an Independent Evaluation, as part of its obligations under the Health Information Initiative (HII) Funding Agreement with Health Canada. The overall conclusion from the evaluation is that CIHI has met the objectives of the Health Information Initiative.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2010
End Date: March 31, 2015
Description: The Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy (ASETS) is the successor program to the Aboriginal Human Resource Development Strategy (AHRDS) which expired in March 2010.
The objective of ASETS is to increase Aboriginal participation in the Canadian labour market, ensuring that First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people are engaged in sustainable, meaningful employment. ASETS aims to improve labour market outcomes through supporting demand-driven skills development, fostering partnerships with the private sector and provinces and territories, and emphasising increased accountability and results.
ASETS supports a network of over 80 Aboriginal service delivery organizations that develop and deliver programs and services to help Aboriginal clients at the local level to prepare for, obtain and maintain meaningful and sustainable employment, assist Aboriginal youth to make successful transitions from school to work or to support their return to school, and support child care programs. Under this strategy Aboriginal Agreement Holders design and deliver employment programs and services best suited to the unique needs of their clients.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: The expected result is that Aboriginal people will receive programs, services and skills training for employment and are integrated into the labour market.
ASETS’ predecessor strategy AHRDS, resulted in an average of 13,500 - 15,000 jobs filled per year. Using these results as a baseline, it is expected that the focus on demand-driven skills development and partnerships in the ASETS will result in approximately 14,000 - 16,500 jobs filled per year and 8,500 child care spaces through the First Nations and Inuit Child Care Initiative (FNICCI).
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, the ASETS resulted in:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 257.2 | 257.0 | 245.6 | 254.5 | 254.5 | (8.9) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 257.2 | 257.0 | 245.6 | 254.5 | 254.5 | (8.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is related to internal transfers including additional investments in Aboriginal youth projects and legal remedies.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of the implementation of the Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy is planned to begin in fiscal year 2011-2012.
(Source: HRSDC’s Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan 2011-2014)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A combined Evaluation of the Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy (ASETS) and Skills and Partnership Fund (SPF) is planned to begin in fiscal year 2013-2014.
(Source: HRSDC’s Departmental Evaluation Plan 2011-2012 to 2015-2016)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Skills and Partnership Fund (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2010
End Date: March 31, 2015
Description: The Skills and Partnership Fund (SPF) shares the Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy (ASETS) objective to increase Aboriginal participation in the Canadian labour market, ensuring that First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people are engaged in sustainable, meaningful employment. SPF is a separate, yet complementary program to ASETS. SPF supports projects that encourage innovation, partnerships and new approaches for delivery of employment services. Aboriginal organizations may submit proposals for funding through the application based process.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: SPF aims to improve employment outcomes for Aboriginal people. It is expected to encourage innovation and partnership by testing new approaches and supporting partnership-based projects that increase Aboriginal participation in labour market activities.
Results Achieved: Two calls for proposals were completed in 2010-2011. Projects are being assessed and developed and will begin in 2011-2012. The program will begin to generate results in 2011-2012.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | 10.0 | 10.0 | 0.1 | 9.9 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | - | 10.0 | 10.0 | 0.1 | 9.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is mainly due to re-profiling of funds into future years as there were deferrals of projects to the next fiscal year caused by delays in project proposal start dates.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A combined evaluation of the Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy (ASETS) and Skills and Partnership Fund (SPF) is planned to begin in fiscal year 2013-2014.
(Source: HRSDC’s Departmental Evaluation Plan 2011-2012 to 2015-2016)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership (Voted)
Start Date: October 3, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership (ASEP) program is a nationally managed skills development program designed to promote greater employment for Aboriginal people on major economic initiatives through a collaborative partnership approach. The ASEP program supports multi-year training and employment strategies that are developed and managed by formalized partnerships to train individuals for targeted jobs.
Formalized partnerships including the private sector and Aboriginal organizations, and others such as the provincial governments and training institutions, are responsible for jointly developing and managing comprehensive, multi-year skills development (training-to-employment) plans leading directly to targeted jobs. The plan must have a commitment from the employers to provide at least 50 long-term jobs for Aboriginal people. The partnership must also make a significant financial contribution to the training plan (at least 50%) and must develop a governance model that will manage and oversee the activities of the project.
The Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership (ASEP) program was launched as an $85M initiative in 2003-2009 that was expanded in 2007 with an additional $105M, and extended to 2012. Budget 2009 announced an additional $100M investment over three years beginning in 2009-2010 as part of Canada’s Economic Action Plan.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: Increased employment for Aboriginal people on major economic developments as measured by:
It was estimated that there would be 2,200-2,600 Aboriginal clients served with 3,300-3,900 interventions completed and 1,600 -1,800 clients employed in 36 projects during 2010-2011.
Results Achieved: Ten new partnerships and projects were started in 2010-2011 bringing the total number of projects underway to 36. These projects will be completed by March 31, 2012. As of December 2010:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 23.9 | 31.5 | 96.0 | 96.3 | 75.7 | 20.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 23.9 | 31.5 | 96.0 | 96.3 | 75.7 | 20.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is mainly due to re-profiling of funds into future years as there were deferrals of projects to the next fiscal year caused by delays in project proposal start dates and fluctuations in some resource based industry activities that effected the project cycles.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A summative evaluation was completed in 2009-2010 and a second summative evaluation is underway and planned for completion in 2012-2013.
(Source: HRSDC’s Departmental Evaluation Plan 2011-2012 to 2015-2016)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Skills and Training Strategic Investment Fund (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Aboriginal Skills and Training Strategic Investment Fund (ASTSIF) was a two year initiative under Canada's Economic Action Plan supporting short-term, focused initiatives designed to help Aboriginal people get the specific skills they require to benefit from economic opportunities, including those generated by other Economic Action Plan initiatives. The program ended March 31, 2011.
The Fund was designed to strengthen partnerships between Aboriginal employment service organizations and employers through training-to-employment programs related to job opportunities and to support investments in training for individuals facing barriers to employment such as low literacy and essential skills.
ASTSIF also focused on three main objectives:
There was both a regional and a national component to the ASTSIF. The regional component supported training-to-employment projects, skills development projects and service improvement projects on a regional basis, while the national component supported initiatives that were national in scope, partnership-based and resulted in the development of tools, services or promising practices to enhance the range of client and business services provided under the new Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: The development and strengthening of opportunities-based partnerships and the delivery of targeted training, leading to concrete employment outcomes for Aboriginal people. It is expected that approximately 8,200 Aboriginal clients will be served through ASTSIF funding, of which 2,800 are expected to secure employment.
Results Achieved: Through ASTSIF regional and national projects combined, in 2010-2011 a total of:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | 21.0 | 45.1 | 45.1 | 42.5 | 2.6 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | 21.0 | 45.1 | 45.1 | 42.5 | 2.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): ASTSIF ended on March 31, 2011 and this variance is the funding lapsed due to the short-term nature of the program.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Aboriginal Skills and Training Strategic Investment Fund was included in the scope of the Audit of Program Eligibility, completed in March 2010.
(http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/publications_resources/audit/2010/17019/page00.shtml)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An Evaluation of the Aboriginal Skills and Training Strategic Investment Fund (ASTSIF) was initiated in fiscal year 2010-2011 with an anticipated DM approval date in fiscal year 2013-2014.
(Source: HRSDC’s Departmental Evaluation Plan 2011-2012 to 2015-2016)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Employment Strategy (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Youth Employment Strategy is in place to ensure that Canada's youth are well prepared to participate and succeed in today's changing labour market. HRSDC, along with 11 other federal government departments and agencies, works cooperatively with other levels of government, Aboriginal organizations, educational institutions, and private sector, not-for-profit and voluntary sector organizations to deliver Youth Employment Strategy initiatives. Initiatives are delivered nationally, regionally and locally using a variety of funding instruments. The Youth Employment Strategy plays a role in developing Canada's workforce of the future by providing young Canadians with access to programs and services to help them gain the skills, knowledge, career information and work experience they need to successfully transition into the labour force.
The program is designed to respond to labour market challenges facing youth, aged 15 to 30 years of age. The Strategy has multiple streams: Skills Link, Career Focus, and Summer Work Experience, which includes the Canada Summer Jobs Initiative. Skills Link provides disadvantaged youth with opportunities to develop skills they need to find work or return to school. Career Focus helps post-secondary graduates find work in their area of specialization. Summer Work Experience helps secondary and post-secondary graduates acquire career-related skills and financing for their education through summer jobs.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: Programs respond to the needs of young workers, employers and other stakeholders.
The common key results commitments for all initiatives receiving funding under the Youth Employment Strategy are:
Results Achieved:
Canada Summer Jobs:
Skills Link:
Career Focus:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 221.2 | 227.7 | 249.6 | 281.9 | 275.1 | (25.5) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 221.2 | 227.7 | 249.6 | 281.9 | 275.1 | (25.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Deficit variance due mainly to additional Youth Employment Strategy funding received through Budget 2010 that was not included in the 2010-2011 planned spending amounts.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of the Youth Employment Strategy is planned to begin fiscal year 2012-2013.
(Source: HRSDC’s Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan 2011-2014)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The next YES evaluation is expected to be completed by 2014. It will include an analysis of the outcomes from the incremental funding received as part of Canada's Economic Action Plan for Canada Summer Jobs.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Targeted Initiative for Older Workers (Voted)
Start Date: October 17, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: This program is a federal-provincial/territorial cost-shared initiative to assist unemployed older workers in communities affected by significant downsizing, closures, or ongoing high unemployment, through programming aimed at reintegrating them into the workforce. The initiative is delivered through bilateral agreements with provinces and territories. Participating provinces and territories are responsible for identifying affected communities to target for activities, the design and delivery of projects and monitoring and reporting on projects. Projects must include employment assistance activities such as résumé writing, interview techniques, counselling and job finding clubs, and at least two other employability improvement activities such as prior learning assessment, skills training, work experience or assistance to start a small business.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: Programs respond to the needs of older workers, employers and other stakeholders.
The shared outcomes of partners are to help unemployed older workers reintegrate into the workforce. Where there is little likelihood of immediate employment, intermediate outcomes would be to increase their employability, and assist them to remain active and productive in the labour market while their communities undergo adjustment.
Results Achieved: As of October 2010, all provinces and territories are participating in Targeted Initiative for Older Workers (TIOW). To date, 304 projects have been approved (72 in 2010-2011) and 15,584 unemployed older workers are expected to benefit from the program (2,818 in 2010-2011).
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 23.1 | 18.0 | 71.7 | 74.1 | 50.9 | 20.8 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 23.1 | 18.0 | 71.7 | 74.1 | 50.9 | 20.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Spending significantly increased from 2009-2010 to 2010-2011 due to an increase in project activity in all jurisdictions, in particular those that have most recently joined the program (from nine P/Ts participating in 2007 to all P/Ts participating as of October 2010). With the program service delivery infrastructure now established in most jurisdictions, project activity has increased and a greater number of project extensions have been implemented. Finally, despite increased spending, carry-overs from previous years have resulted in requests for re-profiling into future years.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A formative evaluation covering the period from October 2006 to October 2008 has been completed and was released in June 2010. The report is available at the following link:
http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/publications_resources/evaluation/2010/
sp_958_07_10e/page00.shtml
A two-phased summative evaluation is planned for completion by 2014. Phase I of the TIOW Summative Evaluation was completed in Summer 2011 and preliminary findings are informing policy development. Phase 2, a synthesis report incorporating a benchmarking exercise, will be launched in 2012-2013.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enabling Fund for Official Language Minority Communities (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2005
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: The Enabling Fund is the Government of Canada’s cornerstone initiative for supporting community economic and human resource development in Official Language Minority Communities (OLMC) under the Roadmap for Canada’s Linguistic Duality 2008-2013.
The program enhances the development and vitality of official language minority communities (OLMC) by strengthening community capacity in areas of human resources and economic development. The Enabling Fund provides funding to OLMC-designated organizations to support activities such as developing, adopting and implementing community economic and human resource development plans; creating, implementing and consolidating collaborative community projects; and mobilizing community stakeholders to further community economic development.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: Respond to the needs of Official Language Minority Community workers, employers and other stakeholders
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, 14 OLMC organizations have received funding through the Enabling Fund for a total amount of $12M.
Recipient organizations have demonstrated tangible outcomes in support of five strategic sectors related to community economic and human resources development:
In 2010-2011, recipient organizations have leveraged additional project funding of approximately $33M from a variety of public, private and not-for-profit partners. These partners include Industry Canada and its regional economic development agencies, Canadian Heritage, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, a number of provincial governments, Chambers of Commerce, and municipal governments.
The EF Program also supports the operations of National Committees which bring together a number of federal departments and community representatives dedicated to OLMC economic development and employability. In 2010-2011, two meetings of the National Human Resources Development Committee for the English Linguistic Minority of Quebec were held.
The Program has also allowed for activities of a federal interdepartmental research committee which coordinates research and analysis on issues related to OLMC economic development and employability.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 12.1 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 11.8 | 0.2 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 12.1 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 11.8 | 0.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The results of a formative evaluation of the Enabling Fund for Official Language Minority Communities (OLMCs) were released in 2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2004
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program contributes funding to provincial programs and services to improve the employment situation of Canadians with disabilities by enhancing their employability, increasing the employment opportunities available to them and building on the existing knowledge base.
Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities (LMAPDs) encourage the labour market participation of persons with disabilities. The program is complementary to the opportunities fund for persons with disabilities which is targeted to persons with disabilities who are not eligible for funding under EI Part II.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: The goal of the LMAPD is to improve the employment situation of Canadians with disabilities, by enhancing their employability, increasing the employment opportunities available to them, and building on their existing knowledge base. Reporting under the Agreements will include selected societal indicators (employment income, educational attainment and employment rate of working age people with disabilities) and the following program indicators:
Provinces report annually to the public
(http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/disability_issues/labour_market_agreements/index.shtml) and HRSDC on outcomes and program results.
Results Achieved: Based on aggregate information reported by the provinces in their 2009-2010 Annual Reports, approximately 300,000 persons with disabilities are served annually. This may include individuals who participate in multi-year interventions or multiple interventions.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 218.3 | 218.3 | 222.0 | 221.9 | 218.3 | 3.7 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 218.3 | 218.3 | 222.0 | 221.9 | 218.3 | 3.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): A total of $3.7M is set aside for the territories should they choose to participate in LMAPDs.
Audit Completed or Planned: Not applicable.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Not applicable.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Opportunities Fund for Persons with Disabilities (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program works in partnership with non-governmental organizations and the private sector to provide assistance for Canadians with disabilities to prepare for, obtain and maintain employment or self-employment. The Opportunities Fund assists people with disabilities who are ineligible to participate in employment programs available through the Employment Insurance program. It is complementary to the programs offered through the Labour Market, Agreements for Persons with Disabilities.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: The objective of the Opportunities Fund is to provide support for persons with disabilities who have little or no labour market attachment to prepare for, obtain and maintain employment or self-employment so that they may increase their economic participation and independence.
The key program indicators include
Results Achieved: The Opportunities Fund served 5,370 persons with disabilities, 1,621 clients found employment, 306 clients returned to school, and 3,827 had enhanced employability.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 27.2 | 25.9 | 26.8 | 26.8 | 26.2 | 0.6 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 27.2 | 25.9 | 26.8 | 26.8 | 26.2 | 0.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned: No audits of the Opportunities Fund were done in 2010-2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: No evaluations of the Opportunities Fund were done in 2010-2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Labour Market Agreements (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: This program is designed to improve the availability of labour market programs, to fill gaps within the Employment Insurance-funded system, and improve delivery for those Canadians who are non-EI insured. The Labour Market Agreements (LMAs) provide $500 million per year in funding to provinces and territories, totalling $3 billion between 2008-2009 and 2013-2014. The objectives of the Agreements are to facilitate increased labour force participation of underrepresented groups, ensure that Canadians have the right skills to compete in the labour market, and encourage employers to provide more training to their workers. The bilateral arrangements with provinces and territories recognize they are best placed to design and deliver this programming, and meet provincial need for funding to meet emerging challenges within the labour market.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: LMAs were designed to allow Provinces/Territories to develop and deliver labour market programming based on their specific priorities and objectives. Nevertheless, LMAs have broad objectives:
The LMAs include a robust accountability framework to allow the Government of Canada to measure results against policy objectives and demonstrate value for money to Canadians. Reporting under the Agreements will include the following indicators:
Eligible Client indicators:
Service Delivery Indicators:
Eligible Client Outcome and Impact Indicators:
Results Achieved: HRSDC has developed and implemented LMAs with all thirteen provinces and territories. Under the accountability framework for these agreements, provinces and territories are required to publish annual results to their publics. In the first two years of the agreements, over 350,500 Canadians have been helped by obtaining the training and supports they needed to get a job or return to work.
In 2008-2009, provinces and territories delivered over 375,000 interventions (programs, services and supports to return to employment) to just over 198,000 individuals. In 2009-2010, nearly 412,000 interventions were delivered to just over 350,500 individuals. Provinces and territories report results through their LMA annual reports. Results for 2010-2011 are still pending from provinces and territories.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 459.9 | 508.5 | 520.5 | 520.5 | 474.6 | 45.9 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 459.9 | 508.5 | 520.5 | 520.5 | 474.6 | 45.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to in-year adjustments made by provinces and territories to reflect revisions to their strategic plans. LMAs provide flexibility to provinces and territories to reprofile and/or carry forward funds between fiscal years as their plans evolve, to maximize effective use of the funding.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Each province and territory must complete an evaluation of the impact and effectiveness of their LMA by March 2013. Provinces and territories can elect to conduct the evaluation either independently or jointly with Canada. A federal–provincial/territorial (FPT) Labour Market Agreement Evaluation Advisory Committee— co-chaired by HRSDC and a provincial/territorial representative — was established in November 2010 to oversee the evaluation. The committee includes representative(s) from all provinces and territories.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sector Council Program (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2002
End Date: March 31, 2012 (Expiration of Terms and Conditions)
Description: This program supports formal, national partnerships of businesses and other key stakeholders that address issues of human resources investment and workplace skills development on a sectoral basis. Contribution payments primarily support demand-driven research and project-based activities proposed by Sector Councils and other national organizations (sector council-like) working on skills and learning issues. The main target groups of this program are businesses, workers, and learning institutions.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: The Sector Council Program (SCP) worked in collaboration with sector councils to oversee the production of industry-driven labour market intelligence reports, which continue to be used to manage skills development and training issues in key economic sectors. In 2010-2011, sector councils enhanced their impact with employers and provinces/territories through more frequent engagement, better alignment with their priorities, and increased provincial and territorial representation in the governance of proposed skills development and training solutions in their region. A concrete example is how national sector councils are partnering with educational institutions (e.g. school boards), which are within provincial/territorial jurisdiction, and employers to ensure that new entrants to the labour market have the skills demanded by employers is industry-education partnerships. In 2006, industry-education partnerships were launched as a four-year pilot with the Toronto District School Board and funded by HRSDC’s Sector Council Program. When the pilot ended in September 2010, 16 sector councils (e.g. supply chain, Information and Communications Technology Council) had formed partnerships with 45 (of the 692) schools in the Toronto District School Board with approximately 2,800 students benefiting from the industry-education partnership pilot.
SCP continued to work with sector councils to support the development of the labour market intelligence (LMI) products needed to develop effective strategies to address emerging human resources issues and support economic recovery. Sector councils regularly undertake comprehensive reviews of their sectors with a view to define demographics and identify prominent labour market issues. In addition to informing future directions, LMI contributed to the development and/or refinement of National Occupation Standards (NOS).
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 26.7 | 25.8 | 28.7 | 28.1 | 22.4 | 6.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 26.7 | 25.8 | 28.7 | 28.1 | 22.4 | 6.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance of $6.3M is mostly due to deferral of projects into next fiscal year and delays in approved project start-up.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A summative evaluation of the Sector Council Program was approved in March 2010 and will be posted to the departmental website once it becomes available.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Apprenticeship Incentive Grant (Voted)
Start Date: January 1, 2007
End Date: December 31, 2012 (Terms and Conditions)
Description: This program increases access to apprenticeships in the designated Red Seal trades, and encourages the progression of an apprentice through the early years of their apprenticeship program, building momentum for completion and Red Seal certification. The Apprenticeship Incentive Grant also provides an incentive for Canadians to pursue apprenticeships to meet the future need for skilled trades people that is crucial to the sustained growth of the economy, and improve labour mobility. The Apprenticeship Incentive Grant helps first or second year/level (or equivalent) apprentices in a designated Red Seal trade by funding a portion of expenses related to tuition, travel and tools.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: The Grant has been designed to meet the following objectives:
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, a total of 51,476 Apprenticeship Incentive Grants were issued.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 53.4 | 58.5 | 113.0 | 104.1 | 51.5 | 61.5 |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 53.4 | 58.5 | 113.0 | 104.1 | 51.5 | 61.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is mainly due to the decrease in the take-up growth rate to those from previous years. The decrease in apprenticeships registrations due to the recession is a major factor. In addition, initial forecasts were based on the data from the 2003 Registered Apprenticeship Information System (RAIS) and assumed 100% take-up by eligible apprentices. This was done to ensure sufficient funding in the event of high demand, based on the continued rise in apprenticeship enrolments.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Planning for a joint summative evaluation with the Apprenticeship Completion Grant is underway. Common Terms and Conditions expire in December 2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Apprenticeship Completion Grant (Voted)
Start Date: July 2009 (retroactive to January 1, 2009)
End Date: December 31, 2012 (Terms and Conditions)
Description: Introduced as part of Canada's Economic Action Plan, the Apprenticeship Completion Grant (ACG) provides a taxable grant of $2,000 to those registered apprentices who successfully complete their apprenticeship program and obtain journeyperson certification in one of the designated Red Seal trades on or after January 1, 2009. The ACG builds on, and enhances the Apprenticeship Incentive Grant (AIG) by providing additional incentive for Canadians to finish their apprenticeship training and launch rewarding careers in the Red Seal trades.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: The Apprenticeship Completion Grant is intended to increase the number of apprentices completing an apprenticeship program and obtaining journeyperson certification in a designated Red Seal trade. It is expected that approximately 20,000 individuals will benefit from the ACG each year.
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, a total of 25,678 Apprenticeship Completion Grants were issued.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | 37.7 | 39.3 | 52.0 | 51.3 | (12.0) |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | 37.7 | 39.3 | 52.0 | 51.3 | (12.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Demand for the ACG has been robust and exceeded forecasts. The ACG was launched in July 2009 with eligibility retroactive to January 1, 2009. Due to the retroactivity of the ACG, take-up for 2010-2011 reflects a 15 month intake period of the number of apprenticeship completions, rather than 12 months for all subsequent years. For both the ACG and the Apprenticeship Incentive Grant, apprentices have between six to 18 months to submit their application (i.e. June 30th deadline). Therefore, applicants that completed their apprenticeship training program between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009 were still eligible to apply in April, May or June 2010 which had an impact on the ACG budget for 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Planning for a joint summative evaluation with the AIG is underway. Common terms and conditions expire in December 2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills Program (ALLESP ) (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: ALLESP is administered through non-statutory grants and contribution and supports projects that a) build knowledge and expertise in adult literacy and essential skills (LES); b) develop, adapt and disseminate tools, supports and best practices; and c) create strategic partnerships (e.g. with provinces and territories, employers and literacy organizations.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: Through Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills programming, the capacity exists to deliver employment, training and assessment services to Canadians so that adult Canadians have the literacy and essential skills they need to :
The expected intermediate outcomes are:
The expected direct outcomes are:
Results Achieved: ALLESP provided core-funding to 22 organizations including national literacy organizations and provincial/territorial coalitions. These organizations provide valuable links to key partners and to a broad network of stakeholders in order to share knowledge, tools and best practices in the field of literacy and essential skills. Each organization is required to complete annual performance reports that demonstrate that they are sharing knowledge and expertise with partners as well as with Office of Literacy and Essential Skills and that they are filling capacity and awareness gaps across the country.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 7.0 | 5.0 | 21.8 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 19.8 |
Total Contributions | 8.1 | 14.6 | 3.2 | 22.6 | 22.6 | (19.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 15.1 | 19.6 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 24.6 | 0.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The formative evaluation was approved on July 30, 2010 and published on November 1, 2010. The summative evaluation was originally scheduled to be conducted in fiscal year 2010-2011; however, the program sought and obtained a one-year extension/continuation of its terms and conditions, to March 31, 2012. As a result, the summative evaluation will now be completed in fiscal year 2011-2012. It is currently underway.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Foreign Credential Recognition Program (Voted)
Start Date: January 2, 2003
End Date: 2014-2015
Description: The Foreign Credential Recognition Program (FCRP) works to ensure that internationally-trained individuals can fully participate in the labour market and Canadian society. The FCRP is one of the key Government of Canada initiatives that support the implementation of the Pan-Canadian Framework for the Assessment and Recognition of Foreign Qualifications for timely assessment and recognition of foreign qualifications across Canada. Foreign credential recognition (FCR),encompasses the assessment and recognition of knowledge, skills, work experience and education obtained outside of Canada.
The program provides strategic financial support to provincial and territorial partners and stakeholders, including regulatory bodies, Sector Councils and post-secondary educational institutions, to develop systems and processes for assessing and recognizing foreign qualifications in targeted occupations and sectors.
The FCRP also provides horizontal leadership in building partnerships and fostering foreign qualification recognition capacity through the development of innovative projects, tools, processes, and exchanges information about successful foreign credential recognition practices.
The goal of the program is to enhance labour market outcomes for internationally trained workers in targeted occupations and sectors.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: The Foreign Credential Recognition Program supports work that contributes to developing fair, transparent, consistent, and timely foreign qualification assessment and recognition and building institutional capacity.
The FCRP works with partners and stakeholders to achieve the following short, medium and long-term outcomes:
Short-term:
Medium-term:
Long-term:
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 13.9 | 14.7 | 30.3 | 26.4 | 19.9 | 10.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 13.9 | 14.7 | 30.3 | 26.4 | 19.9 | 10.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between the 2010-2011 planned and actual spending is mainly due to the time required to develop and negotiate project proposals and deferrals in project activities to future years. $2.5M of the variance is requested for reprofiling into fiscal year 2011-2012. The planned spending for 2010-2011 also included operating resources of $3.9M which was fully spent but related expenditures are not included in the actual contribution spending.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An Evaluability Assessment (EA) of the FCRP is planned for 2011-2012. The EA is undertaken to support preparations for the 2013-2014 FCRP summative evaluation.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Strategic Training and Transition Fund (Voted)
Start Date: 2009-2010 (varies by Province & Territory)
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Strategic Training and Transition Fund provides time-limited incremental funding for all provinces and territories to support the needs of workers affected by the economic downturn.
The Fund supports provincial and territorial initiatives that help meet the training needs of workers in affected communities and sectors so that they can stay in their jobs or move to new jobs, while offering provinces and territories the flexibility to design programming that best meets their needs. The Fund ensures that these Canadians, whether or not they qualify for Employment Insurance benefits, are eligible to participate in the training or other employment initiatives that they need during difficult times.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results: Following the conclusion of the initiative in 2011, it is projected that approximately 50,000 Canadians will have benefited from the Strategic Training and Transition Fund initiative.
Results Achieved: Provinces and territories report results through their Labour Market Agreement annual reports, including the number of clients that have been served under the Strategic Training and Transition Funds. Results for 2010-2011 are still pending.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | 250.0 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A formative evaluation is scheduled to begin in 2012-13 and to end in 2014-2015.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Education Savings Program (Statutory)
Start Date: January 1, 1998 (Canada Education Savings Grant
January 1, 2005 (Canada Learning Bond)
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Canadian Education Savings Program encourages the financing of children’s post-secondary education through savings, from early childhood, in Registered Education Savings Plans (RESP). The program provides clients with the Canada Education Savings Grant, which includes a regular matching grant available to all Canadian children, and enhanced grant portions for low and middle income families; and the Canada Learning Bond, which is a grant intended for low income families.
The Canada Education Savings Program delivers the Canada Education Savings Grant and the Canada Learning Bond through a public-private partnership with banks, mutual fund companies, and scholarship foundations.
The Canada Education Savings Program also administers the Education Savings Community Outreach initiative which funds organizations to develop outreach projects that encourage lower income Canadians to save for their children’s post-secondary education, use education savings, and increase their financial literacy.
Further information regarding the Canadian Education Savings Grant is found at:
http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/learning/education_savings/public/cesg.shtml
Further information regarding the Canada Learning Bond is found at:
http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/learning/education_savings/public/clb.shtml
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: By December 2010, 42.8% of Canadian children had received the Canada Education Savings Grant and had RESP savings for their future education, up from 40.6% in 2009.
Participation in the Canada Learning Bond (CLB) increased to over 21.8% of the eligible population in 2010, from 4.7% in 2006. The CLB is designed to help low-income families save for education using RESPs without requiring a contribution. The CLB’s target population continues to grow every year since the CLB was launched in 2005 (it is available to children born after 2003). This tends to mask the actual increase in participation that is being achieved each year. For example, the number of children eligible for the CLB has increased by 57% in the past two years (from 858,000 in 2008 to 1,344,000 in 2010). At the same time, the number of children receiving the CLB has more than doubled in two years, from over 140,000 in 2008 to 293,000 in 2010.
RESP assets reached 27.6 billion dollars by the end of December 2010 (up from 25.9 billion dollars in 2009), representing a 6.5% increase over last year.
Students attending post-secondary institutions are using these savings to finance their education. In 2010, 287,865 students withdrew 1.92 billion dollars from their RESPs to finance their participation in post-secondary education.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants CESG (Statutory) |
580.7 | 615.7 | 587.0 | 670.6 | 670.6 | (83.6) |
Total Grants CLB (Statutory) |
47.8 | 56.7 | 64.0 | 66.8 | 66.8 | (2.8) |
Total Contributions | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 0.5 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 631.7 | 675.5 | 654.9 | 741.3 | 740.8 | (85.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG): CESG payments were 83.6 million dollars more than planned, as more Canadian families saved in their children’s Registered Education Savings Plans than expected, following the economic recovery.
Canada Learning Bond (CLB): CLB payments are slightly higher than planned. The Government of Canada undertook targeted communications and outreach activities during 2010-2011 to increase CLB participation.
* Referring to the Education Savings Incentive (Voted Contribution).
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A Formative Evaluation of the Additional Canada Education Savings Grant and Canada Learning Bond was published in June 2010 and is found on-line at:
http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/publications_resources/evaluation/2009/
sp_951_05_10e/page00.shtml
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Student Loans Program – Liabilities (Statutory)
Start Date: September 1964
End Date: Ongoing
Description: From September 1964 to August 1, 1995, the Canada Student Loan Program operated a Guaranteed Loan regime with Canadian financial institutions, where financial assistance was provided to students through financial institutions in the form of 100 percent government guaranteed loans.
This transfer payment tracks claims submitted by financial institutions related to the remaining Guaranteed Loan Portfolio less payments received from loan recipients against those claimed amounts.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: Obligations under Canada Student Loans Act were met.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | (14.5) | (9.5) | 4.2 | (7.6) | (7.6) | 11.8 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | (14.5) | (9.5) | 4.2 | (7.6) | (7.6) | 11.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and actual spending can be explained by the fact that the actual spending is presented net of recoveries on bought-back guaranteed loans where planned spending represented only the forecasted expenditures.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of the Management Control Framework of Canada Student Loans Program is planned for 2012-2013 (no specific completion date has been set).
(Source: Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan 2011-2014)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A five year evaluation of the CSLP was recently completed and will be posted on the departmental webswite once it becomes available.
A second evaluation has been launched to address program changes announced in Budget 2008. This evaluation is scheduled to be completed in 2015-2016.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Student Loans Program – Interest Payments and Liabilities (Statutory)
Start Date: August 1, 1995
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This is the consolidated Cost of the Risk Shared Loans and represents interest subsidy, repayment assistance benefits, the amount of loans forgiven, risk premium and put-backs and administrative costs related to students who borrowed under the risk-shared regime which existed from August 1, 1995 to July 31, 2000. At that time, the Canada Student Loans Program operated on a shared risk model with Canadian financial institutions.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: Approximately 275,0001 students who borrowed under the risk-shared regime received in-study student financial assistance and debt management assistance in repayment; and
Canada met its obligations as set out under the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act in agreements with financial institutions.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 22.9 | 11.6 | 15.5 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.8 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 22.9 | 11.6 | 15.5 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and actual spending can be explained by the fact that the actual spending is presented net of recoveries on put-back loans where planned spending represented only the forecasted expenditures.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of the Management Control Framework of Canada Student Loans Program is planned for 2012-2013 (no specific completion date has been set).
(Source: Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan 2011-2014)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A five year evaluation of the CSLP was recently completed and will be posted on the departmental website once it becomes available.
A second evaluation has been launched to address program changes announced in Budget 2008. This evaluation is scheduled to be completed in 2015-2016.
1 This number is reported by fiscal year (April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011).
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Student Loans Program – Direct Financing Arrangement (Statutory)
Start Date: August 1, 2000
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This transfer payment provides alternative payments to provinces and territories who choose not to participate in the Canada Student Loans Program. These provinces and territories receive an alternative payment to assist in the cost of delivering a similar student financial assistance program.
The transfer payment also provides repayment assistance benefits to borrowers as part of the new Repayment Assistance Program, and the value of loans forgiven according to prescribed criteria. As of August 2009, individual debt measures including interest relief and debt reduction in repayment have been replaced by the Repayment Assistance Plan which is an optional program for students facing difficulty in meeting their student loan payments.
Finally, this transfer payment is used to ensure that full-time student military-reservists who interrupt their studies for a deployment on designated operations will not be charged interest or have to start paying back their student loan while they are away from their studies and on duty.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: As a result of these alternative payments, post-secondary education students in the province of Québec, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut continued to access financial assistance similar to the assistance provided to students in those jurisdictions that participate in the Canada Student Loans Program; and
155,239 students with financial hardship in participating jurisdictions received repayment benefits in 2010-11.
138,413 of these students were not required to make a payment in 2010-2011, while 16,826 were asked to make an affordable payment proportional to their level of income1.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Contributions | 209.4 | 154.8 | 355.2 | 370.5 | 370.5 | (15.3) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 209.4 | 154.8 | 355.2 | 370.5 | 370.5 | (15.3) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance of $15.3M can be explained by three main factors. First, the Alternative Payment was higher than previously forecast by $42.1M due to the implementation of the Canada Student Grants Program. Second, the cost of the Repayment Assistance Program was less than anticipated by $16.2M. Third, the amount of loans forgiven was also lower than anticipated by $10.5M as the Repayment Assistance Program for people with permanent disabilities has been put in place.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of the Management Control Framework of Canada Student Loans Program is planned for 2012-2013.
(Source: Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan 2011-2014)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A five year evaluation of the CSLP was recently completed and will be posted on the departmental website once it becomes available.
A second evaluation has been launched to address program changes announced in Budget 2008. This evaluation is scheduled to be completed in 2015-2016.
1 The number of students benefiting from the Repayment Assistance Plan is reported here by loan year (August 1 to July 31). Results for the full loan year will not be available until November, 2011 at the earliest.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Student Grants Program (Statutory)
Start Date: August 1, 2009 (for Canada Student Grant Program)
End Date: Ongoing
Description: As of August 1, 2009, the Canada Student Grants Program (CSGP) replaced Canada Study Grants and Canada Access Grants. The Canada Student Grants Program (CSGP) provides up-front grants to students from low- and middle-income families, students with dependants, part-time students and those with permanent disabilities. The new Canada Student Grants Program is simple, transparent, predictable and broad-based, providing certainty and predictability for students who qualify.
Students who received the former Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation (CMSF) general bursaries in past years receive transitional grants until they complete or withdraw from their program of study. Former CMSF recipients who are eligible for the new low and middle-income grants will have the difference between the amount of the CMSF general bursary and the amount of the new grant made up with a transition grant.
Strategic Outcome: A skilled, adaptable and inclusive labour force and an efficient labour market
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: Provided $587 million in Canada Student Grants to 310,445 students
Provided $29.5 million in Transition Grants 1
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 143.2 | 533.7 | 557.2 | 620.7 | 620.7 | (63.5) |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 143.2 | 533.7 | 557.2 | 620.7 | 620.7 | (63.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance in grants of $63.5M can be mainly explained by two factors: First, the uptake for the Canada Student Grants Program was higher than previously forecast by $190.7M. However, much of that increase was off-set due to the phasing out of the Canada Study Grants and the Canada Access Grants which were reduced by $130.0M.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of the Management Control Framework of Canada Student Loans Program is planned for 2012-2013 (no specific completion date has been set).
(Source: Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan 2011-2014)
An audit of the Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation is planned for 2011-2012 (no specific completion date has been set).
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A second evaluation has been launched to address program changes announced in Budget 2008. This evaluation is scheduled to be completed in 2015-2016.
1 Information about Canada Student Grants is reported here by loan year (August 1 - July 31) and is current to June 30, 2011. Information about Transition Grants is reported in fiscal year (April 1 - March 31).
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Wage Earner Protection Program (Statutory)
Start Date: July 2008
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Wage Earner Protection Program (WEPP) is a targeted federal Program providing financial support to workers who lose their job and are owed money when their employer goes bankrupt or becomes subject to receivership under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Specifically, WEPP reimburses eligible workers for unpaid wages and vacation, severance, and termination pay up to the equivalent of four weeks’ maximum insurance earnings under the Employment Insurance Act. To be eligible for WEPP compensation, workers must meet all of the following criteria: they are legally entitled to work in Canada; their employment has ended; their employer is bankrupt or in receivership; and they are owed wages, vacation pay, termination pay, or severance pay by their former employer. WEPP is administered by the Labour Program and is delivered by Service Canada.
Strategic Outcome: Safe, fair, and productive workplaces and cooperative workplace relations
Expected Results: Reduction in economic insecurity of Canadian workers with unpaid wages in insolvent workplaces.
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, the WEPP received 14,974 applications and issued $31.9 million in WEPP payments to eligible claimants.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 3.7 | 35.0 | 56.2 | 31.9 | 31.9 | 24.3 |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 3.7 | 35.0 | 56.2 | 31.9 | 31.9 | 24.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Wage Earner Protection Program compensates workers for owed eligible wages when their employer is bankrupt or under receivership. WEPP also compensates the trustees and receivers for the duties they perform under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act.
Annual WEPP payments vary from year-to-year depending on the number of applicants and the amounts for which the applicants are eligible. In 2010-2011, WEPP Statutory Budget for payments to workers was $53.7 million. The WEPP budget for payments to trustees and receivers was $2.5 million.
In 2010-2011, $31.9 million was paid to 14,305 workers. No trustee or receiver has been paid under WEPP in the last fiscal year.
The Labour Program cannot anticipate how much WEPP will pay out to workers, trustees and receivers in any given year. The WEPP Statutory Budget was determined based on projections of WEPP payments and was meant to be generous enough to be sufficient to cover expenditures in economically troubled years.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A summative evaluation of the Wage Earner Protection Program (WEPP) is underway and is scheduled to be completed at the end of the 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Old Age Security Pension (Statutory)
Start Date: 1952
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program contributes to the income security of seniors, in the form of a monthly payment to all Canadians aged 65 or older who meet the age, residence and legal status requirements. An applicant's employment history is not a factor in determining eligibility, nor does the applicant need to be retired.
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results: Eligible seniors receive a basic pension to which they are entitled.
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, approximately 4.8 million seniors per month received the basic pension. As required by the Old Age Security Act, benefits are reviewed quarterly to reflect increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index for Canada. In 2010-2011, Old Age Security (OAS) rates increased by 1.9%.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 25,334.5 | 26,391.3 | 28,048.0 | 27,213.5 | 27,213.5 | 834.5 |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 25,334.5 | 26,391.3 | 28,048.0 | 27,213.5 | 27,213.5 | 834.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The average monthly rate for OAS basic pension was $488.64, $15.60 less than the average rate forecasted, resulting in $904.5 million less than expected, attributed to the following factors: more new beneficiaries coming in at the end of the fiscal year than forecasted, a higher death rate at the beginning of the fiscal year, and more people with partial pensions because they have less than 40 years of residence in Canada.
This reduction was partially offset by an increase in the estimated average number of beneficiaries from 4,789,402 to 4,822,096 translating into an additional $199.6 million in benefit expenditures.
The benefit repayment from higher-income OAS recipients through the OAS recovery tax was $1.061 billion compared to an estimate of $932 million further increasing the variance by $129.6 million.
In total, these factors contributed to an over-estimation in OAS pension expenditures of $834.5 million in planned estimates for 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of Old Age Security Program Eligibility will be conducted in 2011-2012 (scheduled to be presented to the Departmental Audit Committee January 24, 2012).
(Source: Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan 2011-2014)
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Cluster Evaluation
A summative evaluation of the OAS Program, including the OAS pension, Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and the Allowances (ALW) to be completed by Fall 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Guaranteed Income Supplement (Statutory)
Start Date: 1967
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program contributes to the income security, in the form of an additional benefit, on top of the Old Age Security pension, of low-income seniors living in Canada. To be eligible for the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), applicants must be receiving the Old Age Security pension and have an income below a certain threshold.
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results: Canada's low-income seniors have a minimum guaranteed income and receive the benefits to which they are entitled.
Results Achieved: For fiscal year 2010-2011, over 1.6 million seniors received GIS benefits. As required by the Old Age Security Act, benefits are reviewed quarterly to reflect increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index for Canada. In 2010-2011, GIS rates increased by 1.9%.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 7,511.5 | 7,736.6 | 8,257.0 | 7,901.1 | 7,901.1 | 355.9 |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 7,511.5 | 7,736.6 | 8,257.0 | 7,901.1 | 7,901.1 | 355.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The average monthly rate was $394.41 as opposed to the expected $408.37, resulting in a decrease of $280.3 million in GIS expenditures. The number of beneficiaries was over-estimated from 1,684,943 (in the Main Estimates) to 1,669,418 (actual), accounting for a negative variance of $75.5 million.
This resulted in an overall overestimation of GIS expenditures of $355.9 million in the planned estimates for 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned: GIS Take-up Measures and Outreach Evaluation approved June 11, 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Cluster Evaluation:
A summative evaluation of the OAS Program, including the OAS pension, Guaranteed Income Supplement and the Allowances (ALW) to be completed by Fall 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Allowances (Statutory)
Start Date: 1975 - Allowance
1985 - Allowance for the Survivor
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program contributes to the income security, of spouses or common-law partners of low-income seniors, 60 to 64 years old, who receive the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS). It also provides an allowance for low-income survivors who are between 60-64 years of age. To be eligible, applicants must meet specific income and residence requirements.
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results: Low-income Canadians aged 60 to 64, who are the spouses/common-law partners of GIS recipients, or who are survivors, have a minimum guaranteed income and receive the benefits to which they are entitled.
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, approximately 92,000 persons received an Allowance or an Allowance for the Survivor benefit. As required by the Old Age Security Act, benefits are reviewed quarterly to reflect increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index for Canada. In 2010-2011, rates for Allowances increased by 1.9%.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 531.2 | 534.9 | 560.0 | 540.5 | 540.5 | 19.5 |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 531.2 | 534.9 | 560.0 | 540.5 | 540.5 | 19.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The average monthly rate was $481.18 compared to an estimate of $488.00, resulting in an over-estimation of $7.8 million. The number of beneficiaries was estimated at 95,629 but was actually 93,609, resulting in an over-estimation of $11.7 million. This resulted in an over-estimation of $19.5 million in Allowance expenditures.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Cluster Evaluation:
A summative evaluation of the OAS Program, including the OAS pension, Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and the Allowances (ALW) to be completed by Fall 2011.
Combined OAS Allowance and CPP Survivor Benefits Cluster Evaluation to be launched in 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Disability Savings Program – Grants and Bonds (Statutory)
Start Date: December, 2008
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program helps Canadians with severe and/or prolonged disabilities, and their families, save for the future, through Registered Disability Savings Plans (RDSPs). Canadian residents, under the age of 60, who have a Social Insurance Number (SIN) and are eligible for the Disability Tax Credit (DTC), can open a RDSP. The program provides matching grants of up to 300%, depending on the amount contributed and the beneficiary’s family income. The maximum amount paid in grants is $3,500 each year, with a $70,000 lifetime limit. The program also provides bonds of up to $1,000 per year to the RDSPs of low and modest income Canadians, with a lifetime limit of $20,000. Grants and bonds are paid until the year the beneficiary turns 49. The program has no impact on other federal benefits, such as the Canada Child Tax Benefit, the Goods and Services Tax Credit, Old Age Security, and Employment Insurance.
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results:
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.1 | 83.9 | 10.2 | 91.9 | 91.9 | (81.7) |
Total Contributions | - | 42.9 | 5.7 | 36.4 | 36.4 | (30.7) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 0.1 | 126.8 | 15.9 | 128.3 | 128.3 | (112.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Initially, the estimates for the Canada Disability Savings Grants and Bonds were based on the assumption that there would be 11,500 registered accounts opened in 2010-2011 (which was based on the experience of a similar program – the Canada Education Savings Program). The original target model forecasted $10.2 million for Canada Disability Savings Grants and $5.7 million for Canada Disability Savings Bonds for a total of $15.9 million for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. Initial take up was better than forecasted so, the actual performance of the Canada Disability Savings Program (CDSP) has surpassed original projections. From December 2008, when the CDSP became available to Canadians, to March 2011, 42,678 plans were registered. During this same period, the Government of Canada paid $79.3 million in bonds and $175.9 million in matching grants. Now that the CDSP has been in operation for two and a half years, more actual program-based data are available upon which to base projections. In the planned spending estimates for 2011-2012 and future years, the target model has been revised.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: CDSP Formative Evaluation to be launched in 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Homelessness Partnering Strategy (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: This program ensures that more effective and sustainable solutions to homelessness are found and that communities can better understand and more effectively prevent and reduce homelessness. It focuses on transitional and supportive housing to move people out of homelessness by fostering partnerships and structures, including longer-term housing solutions, to help homeless individuals achieve greater autonomy and self-sufficiency. The federal government provides grant and contribution funding to other levels of government, not for profit organizations, communities, researchers, Aboriginal organizations, public health and educational institutions, and works with other government departments and agencies as well as provinces and territories to deliver services that assist in preventing and reducing homelessness for Canada’s most vulnerable citizens, including Aboriginal people and individuals in major urban centres, rural communities, and the North.
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: Through its various funding programs, services and facilities that assist communities in helping homeless individuals and families move towards greater autonomy, the Homelessness Partnering Strategy contributed to preventing and reducing homelessness. This included providing housing and shelter to those in need through the Surplus Federal Real Property for Homelessness Initiative (SFRPHI) funding stream which provides surplus federal properties to community organizations, the not-for-profit sector, and other levels of government for projects that aim to prevent and reduce homelessness A total of seven properties were transferred in 2010-2011,resulting in 189 housing units being created.
In addition, 71.8% of HPS investments in regionally-delivered projects were targeted to longer-term transitional and supportive housing and services, exceeding the 65% target. As well, for every dollar invested by the HPS in community-based projects, the amount invested in communities by external partners (not-for-profit groups, private sector organizations and other government departments) was $2.48, exceeding the $1.50 target.
In 2010–2011, six horizontal pilot projects were launched with other federal departments and agencies to address factors that may lead to homelessness such as incarceration, employment, mental health, family violence, and immigration.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.9 | - | 2.5 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
Total Contributions | 117.7 | 92.3 | 124.1 | 150.1 | 127.1 | (3.0) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 118.6 | 92.3 | 126.6 | 152.8 | 127.6 | (1.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Planned grant funding for fiscal year 2010-2011 was not fully spent due in large part to the fact that the Homelessness Partnering Strategy was not renewed until November 2010, eight months into the fiscal year. This left only four months to provide grants, resulting in a grant funding lapse. This funding lapse may carry over into the 2011-2012 fiscal year.
Contribution funds committed were not fully spent due to delays stemming from the complexity of some capital and renovation projects, such as: granting of building permits; weather conditions; zoning and legislative issues; and administrative delays. These funds need to be re-profiled to enable project sponsors to cover contracted costs.
Capital projects that encountered delays due to unforeseen circumstances were extended for up to six months into fiscal year 2011-2012 with no additional money under the transitional measures of the HPS renewal. Negotiations with external partners, which are lengthy to ensure effective project design and accountability, take time but are now well advanced.
Audit Completed or Planned: Audit of the Homelessness Partnership Initiative completed in March 2011.
http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/publications_resources/audit/2011/17017/page00.shtml
Evaluation Completed or Planned: HPS Evaluation to be launched in 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Social Development Partnerships Program (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: ongoing
Description: The Social Development Partnerships Program (SDPP) provides grant and contribution funding to non-profit organizations. Consistent with Government priorities, these investments respond to the needs of children and families, people with disabilities, the voluntary sector, official languages minority communities and other vulnerable populations by playing a unique role in furthering broad social goals.
Understanding the Early Years (UEY): Ending in March 2011, this component provided grant and contribution funding to community-based organizations in order to help communities across Canada better understand the needs and improve the well-being of their young children and families. It provided members of participating communities with quality information on the readiness of their kindergarten children to learn; family and community factors that influence children's development; and the availability of local resources to support young children and families.
Children & Families: This component supports the creation of more responsive programs, services or tools to better serve the diverse needs of children and their families, particularly those living in disadvantaged circumstances.
Disability: This component provides grant and contribution funding to eligible non-profit organizations working to support projects that are designed to improve the participation and integration of people with disabilities in all aspects of Canadian society. The disability component supports a wide range of community-based initiatives that provide effective approaches in addressing social issues and barriers that face people with disabilities. More specifically, the component supports projects designed to: establish and maintain partnerships, alliances, networks and collaboration with communities, stakeholders and individuals; explore, test and develop innovative solutions, best practices and tools related to social development; increase not-for-profit organizations’ capacity in the areas of governance, policy and program development, and community outreach; and develop and share knowledge on existing and emerging social issues.
The Prime Minister’s Volunteer Awards (PMVA): This component was created to recognize the exceptional contributions of volunteers, local businesses and innovative not-for-profit organizations in improving the well-being of families and their communities across the country. The Prime Minister’s Volunteer Awards program consists of 17 awards in total: fifteen regional awards based on three in each of the five regions, across Canada and two national awards. Regional award recipients will be eligible to identify a not-for-profit organization to receive a $5,000 grant. National award recipients will be eligible to identify a not-for-profit organization to receive a $10,000 grant.
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, the Children and Families component of the SDPP provided funding through 37 multi-year contribution agreements and eight grants to national and community-based not-for-profit organizations helping children and families. Developed / evolving networks are enabling increased knowledge exchange, and organizations are developing stronger capacity as evidenced in the following types of projects:
In 2010-2011, the Disability component of the SDPP continued to provide multi-year funding to:
Additionally, 12 accommodation projects to enable people with disabilities to fully participate in conferences and other similar events were approved as a result of a Call for Proposals.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 8.7 | 9.1 | 14.3 | 16.6 | 14.2 | 0.1 |
Total Contributions | 16.3 | 10.1 | 6.3 | 12.7 | 12.7 | (6.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 25.0 | 19.2 | 20.6 | 29.3 | 26.9 | (6.3) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The amount used in the Planned Spending column is the Main Estimate amount, and does not include transfers from internal surpluses to fund additional projects.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:Understanding the Early Years (UEY) Summative Evaluation (Phase 1) to be approved September 20, 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: New Horizons for Seniors Program (Voted)
Start Date: Original program: October 1, 2004;
Expanded Program: September 27, 2007
Enhanced Program: September 30, 2010
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program provides grant and contribution funding to support projects across Canada that encourage seniors to contribute their skills, experience and wisdom in support of social well-being in their communities, and to promote the ongoing involvement of seniors in their communities to reduce their risk of social isolation. The underlying assumption of New Horizons for Seniors Program (NHSP) is that complex social issues are best addressed at the community level and by working in partnership across sectors. Therefore, the Program also seeks to strengthen networks and associations among community members, community organizations, and governments and enhance opportunities for building community capacity and partnerships to respond to existing or emerging social challenges. This program is delivered through the following components:
Community Participation and Leadership (CPL): This activity provides grant funding up to $ 25,000 to non-profit organizations for projects that encourage seniors to contribute to their communities by sharing their skills, wisdom and experience and helping to reduce isolation.
Capital Assistance (CA): This activity provides grant funding up to $ 25,000 to help non-profit organizations that need to upgrade their facilities or equipment used for existing seniors’ programs and activities. This enables seniors to continue to participate and lead active lives through programs in their communities.
Elder Abuse Awareness (EAA): This activity provides contribution funding of up to $250,000 per year for up to 3 years to help non-profit organizations develop national or regional education and awareness activities to help reduce the incidence of abuse of older adults in order to improve the quality of life, safety and security of seniors.
Modest enhancements to the NHSP design were made to fully support Budget 2010 commitments to implement projects which focused on volunteering among seniors and to ensure that today’s seniors can mentor the next generation of volunteers, passing on their valuable skills. It will also support projects that focus on raising awareness of financial abuse of seniors.
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results:
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, the Elder Abuse Awareness component of the NHSP continued to provide funding through 35 multi-year contribution agreements. Projects included:
As a result of funding under the Community Participation and Leadership component, 1,078 projects were provided with one-year grant funding. Similarly, under Capital Assistance component, 810 projects were provided with grant funding.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 26.3 | 24.4 | 26.3 | 31.3 | 31.3 | (5.0) |
Total Contributions | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.5 | (0.7) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 26.8 | 26.0 | 28.1 | 33.8 | 33.8 | (5.7) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Amount used in the Planned Spending column is the Main Estimate amount and does not include transfers from internal surpluses. Internal surpluses were used to support NHSP EAA projects.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: NHSP Formative and Summative Evaluation approved on December 20, 2010. The Program is revising their Performance Measurement Strategy and progress will be assessed via an Evaluability Assessment planned for 2011-2012.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enabling Accessibility Fund (Voted)
Start Date: December 6, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: This program contributes to the improvement of accessibility for people with disabilities in their communities. Funding is provided to eligible recipients through grants and contributions to support community based projects across Canada that improve accessibility, remove barriers, and enable Canadians with disabilities to participate in and contribute to their community.
The program has the following components:
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results: Removing barriers to help people with disabilities have access to opportunities to participate in their communities.
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, the Program achieved the following results:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 5.3 | 5.7 | - | 9.4 | 9.4 | (9.4) |
Total Contributions | - | 7.5 | 15.0 | 22.5 | 16.0 | (1.0) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 5.3 | 13.2 | 15.0 | 31.9 | 25.4 | (10.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Approval for the renewed program was not received until June 2010. As such, planned spending for Small projects (grants) was not included in the Planned Spending for 2010-2011.
The renewal stipulated that the Abilities Centre Durham needed to demonstrate its organizational capacity to undertake a multimillion dollar project prior to receiving funds. Thereby, a number of pre-conditions were outlined in the contribution agreement that had to be met before funding could be provided to the organization. Among the conditions, the recipient was required to hire a project manager, provide a fundraising plan, a detailed budget for the construction, a construction timetable, and enter into a contract with a construction firm. All pre-conditions were met by the recipient by August 2010, i.e. six months after the project start date.
The entire $15 million for the project was reprofiled into 2010-2011. However, since the contribution agreement was only signed in 2010-2011 and the detailed budget plan was only finalized in August 2010, the need to reprofile some funds in 2011-2012 was only confirmed in the latter part of 2010-2011.
Further, the project timelines were affected due to construction delays related, in part, to adverse weather conditions, which affected the delivery of the steel trusses needed for the construction of the building. As a result of the time needed to satisfy the conditions and construction delays, in February 2011 the Abilities Centre Durham confirmed it needed to reprofile $6.5 million to 2011-2012.
Audit Completed or Planned: Enabling Accessibility Fund Evaluability Assessment was reviewed in 2010-2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Universal Child Care Benefit (Statutory)
Start Date: July 1, 2006
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program activity was designed with the objective of supporting families in the choice of child care that best meets the needs of their family. Families receive up to $1,200 per year for each child under six, taxable in the hands of the lower-income spouse. Effective with the 2010 tax year, single parents can include all Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB) amounts received for the year in the income of the dependant for whom the Amount for an Eligible Dependant is being claimed. If there is no claim for the Amount for an Eligible Dependant, the parent can choose to include the UCCB amounts in their income in relation to the child for whom the UCCB was received.
Families can use this monthly benefit to best address their child care needs. The Universal Child Care Benefit is provided in addition to existing federal programs such as the Canada Child Tax Benefit and the National Child Benefit Supplement and the Child Care Expense Deduction. The 2010 Federal Budget enabled each eligible single parent in a shared custody arrangement to receive 50% of the annual benefit amount over twelve months (rather than 100% over six consecutive months).
Strategic Outcome: Income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities
Expected Results: 100 percent of children under age six for whom parents are receiving the Universal Child Care Benefit.
Results Achieved: It is estimated that in 2010-2011, eligible parents of 94.5% of children under age six received the UCCB. Effective 2010-2011, take-up rates are calculated based on number of children (not on number of families as was previously reported in earlier years). The new indicator provides a more accurate take-up rate between census periods as it is calculated based on annual post-censal estimates of child population.
In order to simplify the application process and to increase take-up of federal child benefits, including the UCCB, the CRA has implemented the Automated Benefits Application (ABA) initiative. The ABA is a joint partnership between the CRA and provincial/territorial Vital Statistics Agencies (VSA), whereby parents of newborns are offered the option of checking a single box on the birth registration form, which triggers automated applications for federal child benefits, related provincial/territorial programs, and the GST/HST credit. The ABA is now available in Ontario, Quebec, Prince Edward Island, British Columbia and Nova Scotia. Other provinces and territories have agreed to provide the service as their computer systems are updated.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance Between Planned and Actual 2010-11 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 2,547.8 | 2,593.6 | 2,594.0 | 2,651.2 | 2,651.2 | (57.2) |
Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 2,547.8 | 2,593.6 | 2,594.0 | 2,651.2 | 2,651.2 | (57.2) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual UCCB statutory payments are higher than planned due to a higher number of eligible recipients as a result of population growth and slight variations in take-up rates.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A formative evaluation of the UCCB was undertaken between August 2009 and January 2011 to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes and procedures established for the administration of the UCCB. The report will be finalized in early Fall 2011. A summative evaluation is to be completed in 2014-2015.
The following is a list by strategic outcome of Industry Canada's transfer payment programs with transfers in excess of $5 million.
The Canadian Marketplace is Efficient and Competitive
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
The following programs have been transferred to the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario:
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
Canada is signatory to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) treaty agreement, negotiated every 4 years at a plenipotentiary conference, in accordance with its treaty obligations under the ITU Constitution and Convention. Canada's membership, contribution and
standing in the ITU, and its involvement in related events, allow it to achieve results internationally across a broad range of issues affecting radiocommunications, standardization and telecommunication development. Canada's contribution to the ITU is commensurate with its
international standing and its commitment to the United Nations and its specialized agencies.
Strategic Outcome:
The Canadian Marketplace is Efficient and Competitive
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Marketplace Frameworks and Regulations for Spectrum, Telecommunications and the Online Economy
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 5.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 0.7 |
Total Transfer Payments | 5.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 0.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance is due to the fluctuation in the exchange rate between Swiss francs and Canadian dollars. ITU membership fees are in Swiss francs.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Start Date: April 2, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description:
The Institute for Quantum Computing is a research institute based at the University of Waterloo campus in Waterloo, Ontario, with a mission to be the world leader in the development of quantum technologies. Its objective is to create an environment for physicists, mathematicians, engineers and computer scientists to advance the fields of quantum information and quantum computation.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
In 2010–11, the Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC) achieved the following results:
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | - | 16.5 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 17.0 | - |
Total Transfer Payments | - | 16.5 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 17.0 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An evaluation will be carried out in 2013–14.
Start Date: July 2, 1997
End Date: December 31, 2017
Description:
The Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) is an independent corporation created by the Government of Canada to fund research infrastructure. CFI's mandate is to strengthen the capacity of Canadian universities, colleges, research hospitals and not-for-profit research institutions to
carry out world-class research and technology development that benefit Canadians. The CFI's key objectives are to:
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
The new competitions associated with the $600 million in new investments were announced and launched, as follows:
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 77.7 | 128.6 | 153.0 | 153.0 | 153.0 | - |
Total Contributions | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - |
Total Transfer Payments | 77.7 | 128.6 | 203.0 | 203.0 | 203.0 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
The CFI completed a value-for-money audit on March 31, 2010, as part of the Horizontal Audit of Management of Funding Agreements for Single Recipient Transfer Payments (approved January 2011). The audit found that the CFI's program design, practices and processes promote economy and efficiency in the use of resources, and are effective in supporting the achievement of the CFI's national objectives and expected results.
Audited financial statements are available in the CFI Annual Report (once tabled in Parliament by the Minister of Industry). The 2009–10 Annual Report was tabled in Parliament on November 1, 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
The CFI completed an overall performance evaluation on March 31, 2010, which found that the CFI is having a strong impact on Canadian research infrastructure and that its program architecture is sound.
Start Date: February 24, 2009
End Date: October 2011
Description:
The Knowledge Infrastructure Program is a 2-year, $2-billion measure to support infrastructure enhancement at post-secondary institutions, including universities and community colleges, across Canada. The program will promote employment and provide economic stimulus, and generate the advanced technological infrastructure needed to keep Canada's research
and educational facilities at the forefront of scientific advancement.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) |
Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | 487.9 | 485.5 | 485.5 | 485.5 | - |
Other Type of Transfer Payments — Statutory Payments (S) | - | 500.0 | 500.0 | 256.2 | 256.2 | 243.8 |
Total Transfer Payments | - | 987.9 | 985.5 | 741.7 | 741.7 | 243.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
As a result of the government's decision to extend the deadline for key infrastructure programs to October 31, 2011, some program funding has been reprofiled to 2011–12.
Audit Completed or Planned:
The Office of the Auditor General (OAG) tabled the results of its first audit on EAP programs on October 26, 2010. This audit resulted in a positive assessment of program delivery during the design and initial
implementation phase of KIP.
The OAG launched a second audit of selected EAP programs, including KIP, in early 2011. This audit, expected to be tabled in October 2011, will assess whether the program adequately monitored and reported on project progress and federal spending.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An evaluation of KIP is planned once the program has been completed.
Start Date: June 1986
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description:
The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) is a not-for-profit corporation that supports networks of Canadian and international researchers who conduct long-term research on scientific, social and economic issues. Working in association with Canadian and international institutions,
CIFAR provides opportunities for eminent scholars to add to the research base in Canada. CIFAR supports 12 research programs with 266 researchers in a range of areas that includes cosmology and gravity, experience-based brain and biological development, and
nanoelectronics.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
CIFAR also:
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - |
Total Transfer Payments | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
CIFAR completed an external performance audit on June 30, 2010, which found the following:
A compliance audit was completed on March 31, 2011, which found that CIFAR was in compliance with all material aspects of its funding agreement.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
CIFAR completed an external performance evaluation on June 30, 2010 which found the following:
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description:
The Canadian Network for the Advancement of Research, Industry and Education Inc. (CANARIE) operates and develops Canada's advanced, high-speed backbone network that facilitates the development and use of next-generation technologies. In partnership with advanced research networks in every
province, the CANARIE network connects research facilities, educational institutions, hospitals and other science facilities to each other and to their international peers. It is an essential tool for researchers and educators engaged in collaborative work.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Type of Transfer Payment — Statutory Payments (S) | 28.0 | 28.0 | 31.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 6.0 |
Total Transfer Payments | 28.0 | 28.0 | 31.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 6.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
$6-million funding profile revision occurred in 2010–11 through Supplementary Estimates in order to match cash requirements of the recipient.
Audit Completed or Planned:
An audit by Hickling-Arthurs titled Design and Implementation of a Performance Audit was completed in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Start Date: March 2000
End Date: March 2015
Description:
Genome Canada is an independent corporation that supports 6 regional genome centres across Canada. As the primary funding and information resource concerned with genomics and proteomics in Canada, Genome Canada has enabled Canada to undertake important research in key areas such as agriculture, the environment, fisheries, forestry, health and new technology development, as well as ethical,
environmental, economic, legal and social issues related to genomics (GE3LS). Genome Canada's objectives are the:
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
In 2010–11, Genome Canada:
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Type of Transfer Payment — Statutory Payments (S) | 29.5 | 82.9 | 43.0 | 46.9 | 46.9 | (3.9) |
Total Transfer Payments | 29.5 | 82.9 | 43.0 | 46.9 | 46.9 | (3.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The $43 million in planned spending for 2010–11 was a notional amount estimated at the beginning of the term of the funding agreement (in 2008). Consistent with the funding agreement, payments to the organization are made at the beginning of each fiscal year based on cash flow requirements. At the beginning of 2010–11, a payment of $46.9 million was provided to the organization
based on its planned spending for the year, and the disbursement of this funding was confirmed at the end of the fiscal year.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11. A performance audit was last completed in May 2009.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11. A 5-year evaluation was last completed in May 2009.
Start Date: March 30, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description:
The Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics (PI) is an independent, non-profit, resident-based research institute devoted to foundational issues in theoretical physics at levels of international excellence. PI pursues scientific research and educational outreach
activities where international scientists cluster to push the limits of understanding of physical laws and develop new ideas about the very essence of space, time, matter and information. PI provides a multidisciplinary environment to foster research in areas of cosmology, particle physics, quantum foundations, quantum gravity, quantum information,
superstring theory and related areas.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
In 2010–11, PI achieved the following results:
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) |
Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Type of Transfer Payment — Statutory Payments (S) | 13.5 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | - |
Total Transfer Payments | 13.5 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
A performance audit was completed in January 2011, which found that PI used the federal grant in a manner that was efficient and effective in supporting the Institute's objectives and expected results.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
A program evaluation will be completed by July 31, 2011.
Start Date: October 7, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description:
The Ivey Centre for Health Innovation and Leadership is a new initiative. Its objective is to become an internationally recognized centre dedicated to identifying, assessing and commercializing innovative technologies, systems and processes that will create real change for Canada's health care providers, patients and the health care system. It will use
the federal funding to support the following costs: the Chair of Health Innovation, management and administration, demonstration projects undertaken by the centre over the next 5 years, and the annual Ivey Global Health Innovation Conference.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
In 2010–11, the Ivey Centre for Health Innovation and Leadership:
The Ivey Centre for Health Innovation and Leadership is currently developing 6 case studies that explore issues in health innovation adoption and commercialization and will be used for practical application and decision making in the health care community.
Program Activity: Canada's Research and Innovation Capacity
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - |
Total Transfer Payments | - | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
There is no requirement for an audit. Audits can be initiated at the Minister's discretion.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An evaluation will be carried out in 2013–14.
Start Date: April 2, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description:
This program provides repayable contributions to the aerospace and defence (A&D) sector to support strategic industrial research and pre-competitive development projects. The program helps to encourage the development of innovative products and services; enhance the competitiveness of Canadian A&D firms; and foster collaboration among research institutes, universities, colleges and the private sector.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Commercialization and Research and Development Capacity in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 35.8 | 62.0 | 63.5 | 176.4 | 114.6 | (51.1) |
Total Transfer Payments | 35.8 | 62.0 | 63.5 | 176.4 | 114.6 | (51.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance between Planned Spending and Total Authorities is due to additional funding approved under the program authority to access repayments collected in previous years that are made available to reinvest. The variance between Total Authorities and Actual Spending is due to funds unspent in 2010–11 that are reprofiled to future years in order to match the cash requirements of the
recipient.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Start Date: October 3, 2005
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
This program provides the mechanism to fund larger strategic projects within the automotive sector (in whole or in part) from the fiscal framework. Strategic investments in industrial research, pre-competitive development, and technology adaptation and adoption within the automotive sector will help to increase economic growth and improve sustainable
industrial developments.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Commercialization and Research and Development Capacity in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 39.9 | 11.4 | - | - | - | - |
Total Transfer Payments | 39.9 | 11.4 | - | - | - | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Start Date: March 11, 1996
End Date: December 31, 2006
Description:
This program provides funding to support strategic R&D and demonstration projects in the aerospace and defence, environmental and enabling technologies sectors to produce economic, social and environmental benefits for Canadians. The terms and conditions of the program expired on December 31, 2006.
However, the program continues to manage existing contribution agreements for previously contracted projects.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Commercialization and Research and Development Capacity in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 198.8 | 130.9 | 69.4 | 46.7 | 46.7 | 22.7 |
Total Transfer Payments | 198.8 | 130.9 | 69.4 | 46.7 | 46.7 | 22.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance is due to uncertainties in the global economy that impacted the aerospace and defence sector, resulting in less investment by companies in research and development projects. This has resulted in a decline in amounts claimed by companies.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Start Date: May 29, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The Automotive Innovation Fund supports strategic, large-scale research and development projects in developing innovative, greener and more fuel-efficient vehicles.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Commercialization and Research and Development Capacity in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 9.0 | 16.5 | 68.6 | 68.6 | 8.6 | 59.9 |
Total Transfer Payments | 9.0 | 16.5 | 68.6 | 68.6 | 8.6 | 59.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The AIF was launched in spring 2008 in the context of a stable and sound economic period when the Canadian automotive industry sales and production volumes were assumed to gradually increase over time and across the sector. However, the recent recession has resulted in industry R&D
proceeding at a slower pace, over a longer time period as it continues to recover. As a result, the AIF has requested a reprofiling of funds to meet the changing needs of automotive companies.
Audit Completed or Planned:
In 2010–2011, Audit and Evaluation Branch (AEB) completed an audit of the Automotive Innovation Fund (Phase I) controls and processes. This phase evaluated to what extent selected core management controls, as defined by Treasury Board, have been effectively implemented.
The audit found during this first phase that the Department's administration of the program had no material weaknesses. The second phase of the audit will focus on payment processing and recipient monitoring, as well as program reporting and monitoring. This phase is expected to start once the program has processed the first payments to a recipient.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An Implementation Review of the AIF was conducted by the AEB during fiscal 2010–11 to examine the extent to which the performance measurement strategy has been implemented and whether sufficient ongoing performance information required for the summative evaluation is being gathered. The
results of this review indicated satisfaction with the progress made to measure the effectiveness of the AIF. A summative evaluation of the AIF program will be completed in 2012–13.
Start Date: September 2008
End Date: October 2015
Description:
In July 2008, the Government announced its intention to contribute $350 million to Bombardier Aerospace for R&D of aircraft technologies related to the CSeries, a new 110- to 130-seat family of commercial aircraft. The R&D projects will support the
Canadian aerospace industry's goal of developing new technologies for the next generation of safer and more fuel-efficient commercial aircraft. The contribution is being provided by Industry Canada and is conditionally repayable.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Commercialization and Research and Development Capacity in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) |
Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 39.7 | 36.9 | 66.9 | 89.4 | 62.0 | 4.9 |
Total Transfer Payments | 39.7 | 36.9 | 66.9 | 89.4 | 62.0 | 4.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The 2008 recession created cash flow issues that resulted in reduced expenditures under the program. Forecasted spending is expected to be more stable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
A Branch-initiated audit was finalized in October 2010 and ADMB has moved to implement the recommendations.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
A full evaluation will be completed at the end of the contribution period.
Start Date: April 1, 2005
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
Precarn is Canada's national organization for the development and commercialization of intelligent systems and robotics. In the Precarn model for commercializing research and development, a private sector technology developer enters into a formal collaborative agreement with Precarn. This agreement incorporates a commercialization plan and a marketing
strategy for the technology under development.
Strategic Outcome:
Science and Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation are Effective Drivers of a Strong Canadian Economy
Results Achieved:
During this period, Precarn Incorporated selected 42 projects for funding. Precarn Incorporated committed approximately $3.9 million to these projects, with a private sector contribution of $9.7 million, for a total of $13.6 million.
Program Activity: Commercialization and Research and Development Capacity in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | - | - | 5.5 | 5.5 | - |
Total Transfer Payments | - | - | - | 5.5 | 5.5 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit completed or planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An independent evaluation of the 2005–10 period found:
1) the development of 86 new technologies with projected new sales of $400 million;
2) leveraging of $15 million in project funds to attract an additional $39.7 million in private investment for a total of $54.7 million (i.e., $2.65 of private investment for every Precarn Incorporated dollar) and;
3) net economic benefit to Canada at $78.9 million, 3.6 times the Government's total investment in Precarn Incorporated.
Start Date: 1961
End Date: Ongoing
Description:
The Canada Small Business Financing (CSBF) Program is designed to help Canadian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) access financing that would not otherwise be available, or would only be available under less favourable terms. It is a loan
loss-sharing program in partnership with financial institutions. Under the program, financial institutions can make term loans on real property, leasehold improvements and equipment. In the event a registered loan defaults, the government pays 85% of the eligible losses. The CSBF Program is a national program and operates in all provinces
and territories. To be eligible for this program, SMEs must be for-profit businesses with revenues of less than $5 million per year. The CSBF Program includes the Small Business Loans Act (SBLA) and the Capital Leasing Pilot Project
(CLPP).
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Loans made:
Claims paid:
Program Activity: Entrepreneurial Economy
($ millions) |
Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Types of Transfer Payments (Statutory Payments) | CSBFA | 110.3 | 116.5 | 90.2 | 82.8 | 82.8 | 7.4 |
SBLA | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | |
Total Transfer Payments | 110.9 | 116.7 | 90.3 | 82.9 | 82.9 | 7.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Variances for the CSBF Program were due to lower-than-anticipated claims being received in the 2010–11 fiscal year. The main factors contributing to the variances were the following:
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Comprehensive review of the Canada Small Business Financing Act (CSBFA) was completed in April 2010.
Start Date: April 1, 2002
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Canadian Youth Business Foundation is designed to support and develop youth entrepreneurship. The youth business program provides loans, mentorship support and an interactive website to entrepreneurs between 18 and 34 years of age.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
The Canadian Youth Business Foundation (CYBF) exceeded the program's target of 480 by providing loans to 623 young entrepreneurs. The CYBF has also matched every loan recipient to a mentor.
Program Activity: Entrepreneurial Economy
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | 10.0 | - | 10.0 | 10.0 | (10.0) |
Total Transfer Payments | - | 10.0 | - | 10.0 | 10.0 | (10.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Budget 2010 provided CYBF with $10 million in additional funds under Canada's Economic Action Plan to continue the program in 2010–11.
Audit Completed or Planned:
An audit of CYBF was completed in 2010–11.
The CYBF was included in the Horizontal Audit of Management of Funding Agreements for Single Recipient Transfer. Payments (approved January 2011) were completed in April 2011.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Marquee Tourism Events Program (MTEP) is a 2-year Budget 2009 initiative that is intended to assist marquee tourism events to deliver world-class programs and experiences in support of tourism and the visitor economy. The MTEP makes non-repayable
contributions in support of tourism events that take place in Canada.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
The objective of the MTEP is to help existing marquee tourism events deliver world-class programs and experiences, thereby sustaining or increasing:
Currently, the economic impact studies that were conducted on the MTEP events have not been received. Results achieved for this program will be reported in future Departmental Performance Reports.
Program Activity: Global Reach and Agility in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | 46.3 | 48.4 | 40.4 | 39.7 | 8.7 |
Total Transfer Payments | - | 46.3 | 48.4 | 40.4 | 39.7 | 8.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned:
Office of the Auditor General: Audit of Canada's Economic Action Plan.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An evaluation of MTEP will be completed in 2011–12.
Start Date: September 31, 2001
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
This program provides financing support to qualifying domestic and foreign shipowners to build or refit vessels in Canada in order to stimulate economic activities in the Canadian shipbuilding and industrial marine industry and to help position the industry to meet government procurement requirements.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Global Reach and Agility in Targeted Canadian Industries
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 15.1 | 6.0 | 18.1 | 16.3 | 8.4 | 9.7 |
Total Transfer Payments | 15.1 | 6.0 | 18.1 | 16.3 | 8.4 | 9.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Of the $9.7 million variance, $8.8 million was reprofiled to future years to better match program requirements.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An evaluation conducted by the Audit and Evaluation Branch entitled Final Evaluation of the Structured Financing Facility — Final Report was completed on February 23, 2011.
Start Date: April 1, 2006
End Date: June 30, 2011
Description:
This program promotes economic development and diversification in Northern Ontario and builds upon the assets and strengths of communities to maximize their full potential. Funding through transfer payments provides contributions to not-for-profit organizations and small and medium-sized enterprises in 6 priority areas: community economic development, information and communications
technology, innovation, trade and tourism, human capital, and business financing support.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Community, Economic and Regional Development
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 40.8 | 38.6 | 36.8 | 36.4 | 36.4 | 0.4 |
Total Transfer Payments | 40.8 | 38.6 | 36.8 | 36.4 | 36.4 | 0.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An evaluation of the NODP in 2010–11, entitled Final Evaluation for the Northern Ontario Development Program, was conducted to assess the relevance and performance of the program. Key findings identified that there is a continued need for the
NODP to strengthen and diversify the Northern Ontario economy and that the program is consistent with federal roles and responsibilities, supports the federal government's priorities, has been successful at achieving its immediate outcomes, and, is cost-effective. Recommendations made in the evaluation include improvement to the
measurement of medium- and longer-term outcomes, improvement to the project approval process to decrease project approval times, and more strategic allocation of program resources and targeted program funding to core economic development activities.
Start Date: 1986
End Date: Ongoing
Description:
This program supports community economic development and builds the capacity of non-metropolitan communities in Ontario to realize their full sustainable potential. Funding is made available through transfer payments that provide contributions to designated Community Futures (CF) organizations in Ontario in support of strategic community planning and
socio-economic development, business services, repayable business financing through local investment funds, and community-based projects and special initiatives.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Community, Economic and Regional Development
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 21.5 | 21.6 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 0.1 |
Total Transfer Payments | 21.5 | 21.6 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 0.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending in past years included amounts that have since been transferred to FedDev Ontario.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Start Date: June 19, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The Economic Development Initiative will contribute to supporting an environment that allows individuals, businesses, youth and immigrants to thrive in the language of their choice and within their respective communities. SMEs will have improved access to opportunities and economic development
projects in regional areas. The initiative will enhance the visibility of both official languages and increase Canadians' awareness of the competitive advantages afforded by linguistic duality.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Community, Economic and Regional Development
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 |
Total Transfer Payments | - | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance due to temporary cash management between EDI and NODP.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
An evaluation of the EDI is currently being conducted to assess the program's relevance and early results. The findings will be incorporated along with those of the other Regional Development Agencies into a roll-up report, to be submitted to Canadian Heritage by March 31,
2012.
Start Date: June 19, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Community Adjustment Fund (CAF) is an economic stimulus initiative to create employment opportunities and support adjustment measures in communities impacted by the economic downturn. Budget 2009 identified $1 billion nationally over 2 years for the Community Adjustment Fund. In Ontario, the Community
Adjustment Fund will provide $348.9 million over 2 years to support adjustment measures in communities affected by the global economic downturn. In 2009–10, $11.7 million in funding will be delivered in Northern Ontario.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Community, Economic and Regional Development
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | - | 15.5 | 15.5 | 13.0 | 2.5 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments (Statutory) | - | 116.0 | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | (5.0) |
Total Transfer Payments | - | 116.0 | 15.5 | 20.5 | 18.0 | (2.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): $1.9 million was reprofiled to 2011–12 in support of 9 delayed projects. $5 million was reprofiled from 2009–10 to align with projects' cash requirements. Actual spending in 2009–10 included amounts that have since been transferred to FedDev Ontario.
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
A report was completed for the CAF for Northern Ontario to highlight results achieved through this initiative. Key findings indicated that there was a need for CAF Northern Ontario to mitigate the short-term impacts of the global economic downturn.
Start Date: October 1993
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
This program refurbishes surplus computers from federal government departments and private sector donors through contribution agreements to licensed delivery agents and distributes them, ready-to-use, to schools and not-for-profit learning organizations across Canada. Through a partnership-based national network, the program continues to meet the ongoing demand for adequate numbers of
computers in Canadian schools and libraries to ensure that more young Canadians have access to the benefits of a knowledge economy and society. This program also provides work experience for youth through the Technical Work Experience Program (TWEP). Youth who have demonstrated skills achieved at the post-secondary level are provided with
opportunities to work on innovative information and communications technology (ICT) projects in the context of computer refurbishment workshop activities. TWEP supports ICT projects, which enable participating
youth to develop practical work experience in such areas as computer repair, refurbishment and software testing, as well as skills such as teamwork, time management, administration and other activities related to managing a computer refurbishment workshop.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Community, Economic and Regional Development
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFS Operations | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | (0.6) |
CFS — Youth | 3.2 | 3.1 | 10.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 6.0 |
Total Transfer Payments | 7.3 | 7.2 | 13.4 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 5.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Industry Canada receives yearly funding from the Youth Initiatives Program that, due to timing and information available, was all recorded under planned spending of Computers for Schools. Total authorities provide the proper breakdown between CAP Youth ($4.1 million), CFS Youth ($1.5 million)
and Small Business Internship Program Youth ($1.0 million).
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
The Industry Canada Audit and Evaluation Branch will be evaluating the Computers for Schools program in fiscal year 2011–12.
Start Date: October 1994
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Community Access Program (CAP) provides affordable public access to the Internet and related information and communications technologies (ICTs) and applications; skills training; and delivery of public and private sector services and
information to Canadians in need of this critical support. CAP sites across Canada contribute to the economic and social development of Canadian communities and their residents who face barriers to the use of ICTs. While CAP meets the
access needs of all Canadians, a sizable portion of users live and work in rural and remote communities. CAP also provides work experience for up to 1,500 youth annually through placements at CAP sites throughout the country. Youth with demonstrated skills are afforded opportunities to work on
innovative ICT projects by providing CAP site users with basic training in Internet use, accessing online government services, developing websites and other web-related services. This enables them to develop practical work experience in training and promotion as well as other useful
work-related skills such as teamwork, time management and administration. CAP is subject to program review and funding approval on an annual basis.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Community, Economic and Regional Development
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAP Sustainability | 14.4 | 14.1 | - | 14.1 | 14.1 | (14.1) |
CAP — Youth | 9.0 | 9.6 | 8.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | (4.1) |
Total Transfer Payments | 23.4 | 23.7 | 8.5 | 26.9 | 26.7 | (18.2) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Industry Canada receives yearly funding from youth initiatives that, due to timing and information available, was all recorded under planned spending of Computers for Schools. Total authorities provide the proper breakdown between CAP Youth ($4.1 million), CFS Youth ($1.5 million) and Small Business Internship Program Youth ($1.0 million).
Audit Completed or Planned:
No audit was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation was completed or planned in 2010–11.
Start Date: April 1, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description:
Through the Broadband Canada: Connecting Rural Canadians initiative, Industry Canada will develop and implement a strategy to expand and extend the availability of broadband coverage to as many unserved and underserved households in rural and remote areas as possible, beginning in 2009–10.
Broadband Internet access is viewed as essential infrastructure for participating in today's Internet economy, as it enables citizens, businesses and institutions to access information, services and opportunities that could otherwise be out of reach.
Strategic Outcome:
Competitive Businesses are Drivers of Sustainable Wealth Creation
Results Achieved:
Program Activity: Community, Economic and Regional Development
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008–09 |
Actual Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
Total Authorities 2010–11 |
Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | - | 174.4 | 153.5 | 25.7 | 148.8 |
Total Transfer Payments | - | - | 174.4 | 153.5 | 25.7 | 148.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Broadband Canada: Connecting Rural Canadians reprofiled $94.3 million from 2010–11 to future years to accommodate the high number of applications received, delays in the assessment and selection process, multi-year build seasons for remote locations, and additional costs of satellite bandwidth for future years. $7 million was
accessed by the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) in 2010–11 to fund broadband initiatives through their Atlantic Innovation Fund.
Audit Completed or Planned:
The Broadband Canada: Connecting Rural Canadians initiative underwent an internal audit that commenced in November 2010 and ended May 2011. The objective of the audit was to assess the program's management control framework with a specific focus on internal controls, governance and risk management surrounding the program life cycle. The draft report Audit of the Broadband Contribution
Program made the following 2 recommendations for the management of the Broadband Canada program:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
No evaluation completed or planned in 2010–11.
Infrastructure Canada manages the following Transfer Payment Programs[1]:
As prescribed by the Policy on Transfer Payments, as of June 30, 2009 the summary of the Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs is available at: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/tpp-ppt/index-eng.html.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
2. Start Date: 2003-04
3. End Date: 2012-13
4. Description: Provides funding for projects in areas that are vital to sustaining economic growth and enhancing the quality of life of Canadians. The CSIF leverages additional contributions from other partners by providing up to 50 percent funding for eligible projects.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: In 2010-11 Infrastructure Canada collaborated with Federal Delivery Partners and project recipients to pursue the implementation of the projects funded under the CSIF. During 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada completed six projects and provided funding to 35 projects already underway.
13. Program Activity: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$505.4 |
$419.6 |
$523.7 |
$689.5 |
$335.3 |
$354.2 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Total Program Activity |
$505.4 |
$419.6 |
$523.7 |
$689.5 |
$335.3 |
$354.2 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The large and complex nature of CSIF projects makes them more vulnerable to experience unforeseen delays during their construction. In 2010-11, a number of CSIF projects encountered delays due to lengthier environmental processes, inclement weather, as well as acquisition issues and other construction-related reasons. Therefore, the amount of funding claimed by recipients for a number of projects has been significantly lower than forecasted. This has translated into variances between the total authorities and the actual amount of funding spent under the program during the fiscal year.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: The Management Control Framework Audit of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2007-08. Please refer to this website for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/mcf-finrep-ccg-rapfin-eng.html. There are currently no new audits planned.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: A joint formative evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2009. Please refer to the web site for more information: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/eval/20090205csifbif-fcisfif-eng.html. A joint evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2012-13.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Border Infrastructure Fund
2. Start Date: 2003-04
3. End Date: 2013-14
4. Description: Provides funding for investments in physical infrastructure, transportation system infrastructure, and improved analytical capacity at surface border crossings. The fund provides up to 50 percent federal funding.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: In 2010-11 Infrastructure Canada continued to work closely with Transport Canada to provide federal funding in support of infrastructure projects at border crossing under the Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF). During 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada spent $67.8 million in support of $135.6 million in eligible infrastructure costs by funding partners.
13. Program Activity: Border Infrastructure Fund.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$81.1 |
$80.8 |
$50.0 |
$69.3 |
$67.8 |
$1.5 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Total Program Activity |
$81.1 |
$80.8 |
$50.0 |
$69.3 |
$67.8 |
$1.5 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variances encountered during the period are not significant and reflect the normal contingency reserves that are considered for large and complex infrastructure projects.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: The Management Control Framework Audit of the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2007-08. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/mcf-finrep-ccg-rapfin-eng.html. There are currently no new audits planned.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: A joint formative evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2009. Please refer to the web site for more information: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/eval/20090205csifbif-fcisfif-eng.html. A joint evaluation of the Border Infrastructure Fund and the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2012-13.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Base Fund
2. Start Date: 2004-05
3. End Date: 2013-14
4. Description: Provides funding for small-scale, municipal infrastructure projects designed to promote and improve quality of life in both urban and rural communities. For most projects, the MRIF provides up to one-third federal funding for eligible projects.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: n 2010-11 Infrastructure Canada collaborated with Federal Delivery Partners, provinces and territories to pursue the implementation of projects funded under the MRIF. Although no new projects were approved in 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada spent $146 million of federal funding on projects under the MRIF, supporting over $292 million in eligible infrastructure costs by funding partners. In addition, 101 MRIF projects were completed during 2010-11 throughout Canada, of which 39 percent were water or wastewater projects.
13. Program Activity: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Base Fund.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$220.3 |
$221.2 |
$122.5 |
$306.7 |
$146.1 |
$160.6 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Total Program Activity |
$220.3 |
$221.2 |
$122.5 |
$306.7 |
$146.1 |
$160.6 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Construction delays, such as inclement weather, geological challenges, technical and other construction-related complexities prevented several proponents from meeting their project schedule. As a result, variances were encountered between actual and forecasted spending at the program level.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: An Assurance Audit of the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2010-11, and the audit report was approved by the Deputy Minister on January 25, 2011.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: A joint evaluation of the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund and the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2013-14.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Gas Tax Fund
2. Start Date: 2005-06
3. End Date: Ongoing
4. Description: Through provincial and other agreements, the Gas Tax Fund provides municipalities with predictable and long-term funding, coupled with local decision-making, to enable municipalities to build and rehabilitate public infrastructure that achieves environmental outcomes. GTF was launched in 2005-06 and extended in Budget 2007 as part of the Building Canada Plan. Through Budget 2011 the government committed to legislate the $2 billion per year under this program on a permanent basis.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Provinces, territories, and municipalities have federal financial support for their infrastructure priorities.
6. Results Achieved: In 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada collaborated with provinces and territories to ensure that recipients have access to stable and predictable funding to build and improve infrastructure. In support of the Economic Action Plan, the department accelerated the second and final payment of $869.4 million helping municipalities to take better advantage of the second spring and summer construction seasons.
13. Program Activity: Gas Tax Fund.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
$984.8 |
$1,872.4 | $2,001.8 |
$2,104.4 |
$1,751.0 |
$353.4 |
15. Total Program Activity |
$984.8 |
$1,872.4 |
$2,001.8 |
$2,104.4 |
$1,751.0 |
$353.4 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Two jurisdictions, accounting for ten percent of all municipal recipients, representing eight percent of federal funding under the GTF, did not receive their annual Gas Tax transfers due to outstanding Annual Expenditure Reports, in accordance with conditions set out in the Gas Tax Fund Agreements. Of the two jurisdictions affected, one has received its allocations in early 2011-12, while important progress is being made with the final jurisdiction.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: An Assurance Audit of the Gas Tax Fund Management Control Framework was completed in June 2009. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/gtf-fte-eng.html. There are currently no new audits planned.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: A joint National Summative Evaluation of the Gas Tax Fund (GTF) and the Public Transit Fund (PTF) was completed in August 2009. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/eval/nse-esn/nse-esn-eng.html. An evaluation of the Gas Tax Fund is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2012-13.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund
2. Start Date: 2007-08
3. End Date: 2013-14
4. Description: Provides funding ($175 million per jurisdiction over the life of the program) to provinces and territories for infrastructure priorities identified in each jurisdiction’s Capital Plan. In addition, over $26 million in per capita funding under the Building Canada Fund for the three territories is managed under this fund. The PT Base Fund was mostly designed to contribute towards the restoration of fiscal balance, particularly for smaller jurisdictions. Under the Economic Action Plan, jurisdictions could choose to accelerate their PT Base funding to focus on initiatives that could begin construction over fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010-11.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Provinces, territories, and municipalities have federal financial support for their infrastructure priorities.
6. Results Achieved: In 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada continued to focus on providing timely, accelerated funding to the jurisdictions that opted to accelerate their funding under the PT Base Fund. At the same time, the department continued to work with those jurisdictions that chose to remain under the original terms of the program. Overall, over $437 million of federal funding was spent on infrastructure under this program in 2010-11. The department leveraged nearly $424 million in additional funding from provinces, territories and other funders, bringing the total value of initiatives approved under this fund in 2010-11 to almost $799 million. The department also negotiated and signed the last remaining Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund Agreement.
13. Program Activity: Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
$390.6 |
$671.9 | $589.8 |
$507.9 |
$437.3 |
$70.6 |
15. Total Program Activity |
$390.6 |
$671.9 |
$589.8 |
$507.9 |
$437.3 |
$70.6 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Under the PT Base Fund, the Government of Canada’s flow of funding to the provinces and territories is subject to the submission and federal acceptance of Annual Capital Plans and Expenditure Reports. Actual spending was lower than planned in fiscal year 2010-11 due to delays in submitting and approving these Annual Capital Plans and Expenditure Reports, as well as delays in the signing of a funding agreement in one jurisdiction (which was signed in late 2010-11).
17. Audit Completed or Planned: A Program Change Analysis Internal Audit of the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Funding Initiative (Acceleration) was completed in 2010-11, and the results presented to the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) for discussion/information on June 28, 2010.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2011-12.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component.
2. Start Date: 2008-09
3. End Date: 2016-17
4. Description: Provides funding to address the unique infrastructure pressures facing smaller communities focusing on project investments in communities with populations of less than 100,000. The BCF-CC leverages additional contributions from other partners by normally limiting the maximum federal share for funded projects to one-third, with matching contributions from both the provinces and municipalities.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: In 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada collaborated with Federal Delivery Partners and provinces to advance the project selection for the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC), and signed a Service Level Agreement with its Federal Delivery Partners in August 2010. During 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada completed 160 projects and provided funding to 560 projects already underway.
13. Program Activity: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$0.8 |
$99.8 |
$262.6 |
$328.3 |
223.5 |
$104.7 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$0.8 |
$99.8 |
$262.6 |
$328.3 |
223.5 |
$104.7 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending lags behind forecasted amount due to a number of factors including:
Moving forward, Infrastructure Canada is placing a greater emphasis on financial management and program ownership of forecasts and expenditures. Starting in 2011-12, INFC is implementing a Financial Management Action Plan aimed at reducing this historical trend of program spending lagging so significantly behind target forecasts.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: An Assurance Engagement Internal Audit was planned for 2010-2011, and is currently underway/ongoing in 2011-12.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2013-14.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component
2. Start Date: 2008-09
3. End Date: 2016-17
4. Description: Targets larger infrastructure projects of national and regional significance. At least two-thirds of the funding is targeted to national priorities: water, wastewater, public transit, the core National Highway System, and green energy. By providing federal funding on a cost-shared basis, it leverages additional contributions from other partners to promote increased investment in large infrastructure projects.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: With the streamlining of the federal review process, in 2009-10, program funding was almost completely committed in six of the ten provinces (90% – 100% committed), and at least 70 percent of every province’s allocation was committed. In 2010-11, more than $863 million in federal funding was committed for 21 BCF-MIC projects worth $3.5 billion, leveraging funding commitments of over $2.6 billion.
13. Program Activity: Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$55.4 |
$194.8 |
$950.3 |
$1,154.8 |
$403.8 |
$751.1 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$55.4 |
$194.8 |
$950.3 |
$1,154.8 |
$403.8 |
$751.1 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Proponents have experienced delays for a variety of reasons in finalizing plans for projects and starting construction. In addition, there have been a number of delays in the negotiation of contribution agreements. Until contribution agreements are signed, and proponents incur eligible costs related to project activity, the Government of Canada cannot make any payments.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: A Program Change Analysis Internal Audit of the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) was completed in 2010-11, and the results presented to the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) for discussion/information on June 14, 2011.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2015-16.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up
2. Start Date: 2008-09
3. End Date: 2010-11
4. Description: Provides additional funding in the amount of $500 million (added to the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component) to fund additional infrastructure projects in communities with populations of less than 100,000. All Building Canada Fund-Communities Component funding had to be committed in order to access Top-Up funding.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Construction-ready infrastructure projects are provided with federal funding support.
6. Results Achieved: In 2010-11 Infrastructure Canada collaborated with Federal Delivery Partners, provinces and municipalities to complete the project selection for the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top- Up (BCF-CC Top-Up). As part of the Economic Action Plan, this fund provided needed stimulus to Canada’s economy, accelerated infrastructure projects in small communities, and amended Contribution Agreements to account for the project construction deadline extension from March 31, 2011 to October 31, 2011. During 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada re-allocated $1.5 million in federal funds to nine new projects, leveraging $3 million in infrastructure investment.
13. Program Activity: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$0 |
$30.0 |
$385.2 |
$470.0 |
$303.5 |
$166.5 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$0 |
$30.0 |
$385.2 |
$470.0 |
$303.5 |
$166.5 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Construction delays, such as inclement weather, geological challenges, technical and other construction-related complexities prevented several proponents from meeting their project completion dates. Consequently, the additional seven months of construction not only realized project cost-saving by delaying work initially planned for winter months, but also allowed Infrastructure Canada to re-allocate these savings to a few additional projects, further meeting the needs of Canadian communities. As a result, proponents re-focused their resources towards completing construction during the extension period and submitting their final invoices in the 2011-12 fiscal year.
17. Audit completed or planned: A Program Change Analysis Internal Audit of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up (BCF-CC Top-Up) for the top-up and acceleration funding was completed in 2010-11, and the results presented to the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) for discussion/information on April 8, 2010.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A Cluster Evaluation that includes the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up, and the National Trails Coalition Fund is ongoing, and is expected to be completed in November 2011.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Strategic Research and Strategic Partnership
2. Start Date: 2008-09
3. End Date: 2016-17
4. Description: To strengthen the information base for decision-making, support long-term solutions and sustainability, and support innovation and efficiency.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: Not applicable, as the program was not launched given the department’s general focus on the delivery of the EAP and related initiatives.
13. Program Activity: Economic Analysis and Research.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11[2] |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$0 |
$0 |
$4.5 |
$4.5 |
See Footnote 2 |
$4.5 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$0 |
$0 |
$4.5 |
$4.5 |
See Footnote 2 |
$4.5 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: There are currently no audits planned for the period of 2010 to 2013.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: To be determined.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Feasibility and Planning Studies
2. Start Date: 2008-09
3. End Date: 2016-17
4. Description: To support feasibility and planning studies on public infrastructure projects and issues.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: Infrastructure Canada funded one feasibility study under the Feasibility and Planning Studies program.
13. Program Activity: Economic Analysis and Research.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$0 |
$0 |
$6.7 |
$6.7 |
$0.1 |
$6.6 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$0 |
$0 |
$6.7 |
$6.7 |
$0.1 |
$6.6 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): To date, one feasibility study has been funded. The Economic Action Plan greatly accelerated decision-making by all partners, with a focus on jointly funded projects that were known to be construction ready, and able to contribute to job creation. As a result, the requirement for feasibility studies was greatly reduced.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: There are currently no audits planned for the period of 2010 to 2013.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: To be determined.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Green Infrastructure Fund
2. Start Date: 2009-10
3. End Date: 2013-14
4. Description: Provides funding over five years for infrastructure projects that promote cleaner air, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and cleaner water. The Green Infrastructure Fund provides up to 50 percent of eligible project costs to promote increased funding of infrastructure investment in support of a more sustainable economy.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment, and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: In 2010-11, a total of nearly $116 million was committed in support of projects under the Green Infrastructure Fund and an additional $170 million was transferred to other departments for high-priority initiatives, for a total of $286 million. Since the program launch in 2009, over $617 million had been committed in support of 17 large-scale infrastructure projects of regional significance under the Green Infrastructure Fund.
13. Program Activity: Green Infrastructure Fund.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$0 |
$5.2 |
$386.3 |
$233.3 |
$33.5 |
$199.8 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$0 |
$5.2 |
$386.3 |
$233.3 |
$33.5 |
$199.8 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): In 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada focused on the transition of the fund from start up to project approval and the negotiation of funding agreements. While ten projects, representing a total of $358 million in committed federal funding, are currently underway, the majority of these projects have yet to incur significant construction costs.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: A Preliminary Survey for Review of the Green Infrastructure Fund (GIF) was completed in 2010-11, and the results presented to the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) for discussion/information on April 8, 2010.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the Green Infrastructure Fund is planned, and is expected to be completed in 2014-15.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Infrastructure Stimulus Fund
2. Start Date: 2009-10
3. End Date: 2010-11
4. Description: The ISF was intended to accelerate and increase the number of provincial, territorial, municipal and some not-for-profit infrastructure projects. ISF focuses on the rehabilitation of existing assets and new infrastructure that is construction-ready and can be substantially completed by October 31, 2011. By providing up to 50 percent federal funding to projects, the ISF leverages funding from other partners, generating a much greater overall effect to the Canadian economy through infrastructure spending.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Construction-ready infrastructure projects are provided with federal funding support.
6. Results Achieved: As part of the Economic Action Plan, in 2010-11, the ISF provided needed stimulus to Canada’s economy. The completion date for ISF projects was extended from March 31, 2011 to October 31, 2011, allowing for one more construction season to complete projects without incurring additional government spending. In 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada re-allocated $184.3 million in federal funds to projects, leveraging $270 million in infrastructure investment. The funding commitments reflect Infrastructure Canada’s ability to reinvest funds resulting from project cancellations or cost savings realized by proponents.
13. Program Activity: Infrastructure Stimulus Fund.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$0 |
$490.7 |
$2,862.8 |
$3,268.5 |
$2,476.8 |
$791.7 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$0 |
$490.7 |
$2,862.8 |
$3,268.5 |
$2,476.8 |
$791.7 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Construction delays, such as inclement weather, geological challenges, technical difficulties and other construction-related complexities, prevented several proponents from meeting their project completion dates. Consequently, the additional seven months of construction not only realized project cost-savings by delaying work initially planned for winter months, but also allowed Infrastructure Canada to re-allocate these savings to additional projects, further meeting the needs of Canadian communities. As a result, proponents re-focused their resources towards completing construction during the extension period and submitting their final invoices in the 2011-12 fiscal year.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: A first compliance audit was completed and a second portion of the compliance audit is underway. The completed report should be available in winter 2012. Infrastructure Canada will focus oversight on projects deemed to be high or medium risk during the extension period.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: A Cluster Evaluation that includes the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up, and the National Trails Coalition Fund is ongoing, and is expected to be completed in November 2011.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Support for the G8 Summit 2010
2. Start Date: 2009-10
3. End Date: 2010-11
4. Description: This program provides funding for infrastructure projects that support the hosting of the G8 Summit in June 2010 in Huntsville, Ontario, and provides a legacy to help compensate local communities and residents as a result of hosting the Summit. The program provides $45.7 million to contribute to a safe, secure and successful hosting of the Summit. The maximum share of federal funding is up to one hundred percent (100%) of total eligible costs.
5. Strategic Outcome(s): Construction-ready infrastructure projects are provided with federal funding support.
6. Results Achieved: G8 funding investments were used for an airport, media centre, and to rehabilitate roads and sidewalks, to improve signage and lighting, to update streetscape furniture, and for improvements to public parks. In 2010-11, Infrastructure Canada paid $4.6 million towards eligible project costs, and 17 contribution agreement amendments were signed with municipal and provincial partners. All 32 projects were substantially completed by June 25, 2010, in advance of the June 2010 G8 Summit.
13. Program Activity: Support for the G8 Summit 2010.
|
7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. Total Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Total Contributions |
$0 |
$40.6 |
$9.4 |
$9.4 |
$4.6 |
$4.9 |
14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
|
|
|
|||
15. Total Program Activity |
$0 |
$40.6 |
$9.4 |
$9.4 |
$4.6 |
$4.9 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The $50 million fund was not fully allocated. The bulk of the variance represents the amount that was not allocated to projects; a small portion represents cost savings from projects that came in under budget.
17. Audit Completed or Planned: A Review of the G8 Legacy Fund was completed in 2010-11, and the results presented to the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) for discussion/information on January 26, 2011.
18. Evaluation Completed or Planned: The G8 program is a two-year specifically targeted program, and as such, an evaluation is not required.
[1] Allocations for Transfer Payment Programs include Contributions only, and do not include Operating and Maintenance (O&M).
[2] There was no Actual Spending 2010-11, as the program has not yet been launched.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments under the Supplementary Retirements Benefits Act (SRBA) [Statutory Payments]
Start date: 1970
End date: On-going
Description: The SRBA amount represents statutory payments to Defence Services Pension Continuation Act (DSPCA) pension recipients for inflation adjustments to their pensions.
Strategic Outcome: Care and Support to the Canadian Forces and Contribution to Canadian Society
Results Achieved: In compliance with the legislative provisions of SRBA, to provide supplementary retirement benefits payments for certain persons in receipt of a pension pursuant to the Defence Services Pension Continuation Act (DSPCA), Chapter D-3, of the Revised Statutes of Canada 1970, as a result of having been compulsorily retired from the Regular Force by reason of any mental or physical condition rendering the person unfit to perform duties as a member of the Regular Force, as the case may be. Statutory DSPCA and SRBA payments were processed by Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Program Activity: Defence Team Personnel Support ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $5.459 | $5.006 | $5.459 | $4.493 | $4.493 | $0.966 |
Total Program Activity | $6.742 | $6.169 | $6.701 | $5.511 | $5.500 | $1.201 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): As the DSPCA/SRBA population ages and becomes smaller, the funding requirement decreases.
Audits completed or planned: None.
Evaluation completed or planned: The Canadian Forces Pension Plan Comptroller manages the SRBA payments. While no specific evaluations are planned, expenditures are subject to monitoring and fall into the financial control framework of the Canadian Forces Pension Plan.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions in support of the Capital Assistance Program (CAP) [Voted payments]
Start date: 1983-84
End date: Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-11 (renewal in progress for 2011-12 and onward)
Description: The Department of National Defence uses the Capital Assistance Program to fund capital projects undertaken with Provinces, Territories and Municipalities and/or their agencies related to the operations of military bases and wings located within Canada. Projects include the construction of community-oriented facilities (such as arenas, gymnasiums, swimming pools, water treatment plants, water distribution systems) where the forces and/or military staff and their dependants are significant users, and where provinces or municipalities are in a better position to deliver services. Contributions are also made to support the transfer to municipalities of common infrastructure related to Residential Accommodation (formerly entitled Permanent Married Quarters) such as roads, sidewalks, sewers, storm pipes, etc.
Strategic Outcome: Resources are Acquired to Meet Government Defence Expectations
Results Achieved: Out of the planned projects, one which was approved and implemented was the construction of a new entrance/intersection on Highway 2 to give access to a new parking lot on the Trenton base. This project met the following objectives:
Program Activity: Real Property and Informatics Infrastructure Acquisition and Disposal ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $1.800 | $0.400 | $13.175 | $4.335 | $0.307 | $12.868 |
Total Program Activity | $1.800 | $0.400 | $13.175 | $4.335 | $0.307 | $12.868 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is explained by the fact that there are several projects still awaiting approval at the municipal level.
Audits completed or planned: None.
Evaluation completed or planned: The next planned evaluation will be in FY 2014-15 and will address the relevance and performance (effectiveness, efficiency and economy) of the contribution program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions in Support of the Military Training and Cooperation Program (MTCP) [Voted Payments]
Start date: 1992-93
End date: Ongoing
Description: The Military Training and Cooperation Program builds the capacities of member countries’ militaries through language training, and professional development courses including command and staff instruction, and peace support operations training.
Strategic Outcome: Defence Operations will Improve Peace, Stability and Security Wherever Deployed
Results Achieved: The Military Training and Cooperation Program (MTCP) continues to support and promote Canadian interests and values through the provision of military training assistance to developing, non-NATO countries and organizations. Training over 1,000 foreign officers from 61 states, MTCP successfully supported the Department of National Defence’s (DND) defence diplomacy agenda for the fiscal year (FY) 2010-11. The Program was successful in enhancing the ability of appropriate persons to communicate in English and/or French, improving understanding of democratic control over the armed forces, enhancing the ability for appropriate persons to function as efficient staff officers within a strategic/operational environment, and in developing capacity of member countries to undertake peace support operations. It also demonstrated “Cost-Effectiveness” in enhancing peace support operations interoperability among Canada’s partners to lessen the operational burden on Canada. Finally, MTCP demonstrated relevance to DND and the Government of Canada, to other nations and to participants by expanding and reinforcing Canadian bilateral defence relations, promoting Canadian democratic principles, the rule of law, international stability and the protection of human rights in the international arena, achieving influence in areas of strategic interest to Canada and by contributing to international peace and security. MTCP remains committed to further developing language, peace operations and staff training programmes in Canada, and continues to successfully develop peace support capacity among partner countries by expanding its in-theatre initiatives.
Program Activity: International Peace, Stability and Security ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $9.224 | $9.396 | $0.000 | $11.400 | $10.843 | $(10.843) |
Total Program Activity | $178.093 | $206.117 | $200.837 | $251.049 | $244.018 | $(43.181) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): At the time of preparation of the FY 2010-11 Report on Plans and Priorities, the renewal of the Terms and Conditions of the program had not received TB approval before the required deadlines and thus was not factored in the 2010-11 Planned Spending.
Audits completed or planned: None.
Evaluation completed or planned: The next planned evaluation will be in FY 2014-15 and will address the relevance and performance (effectiveness, efficiency and economy) of the contribution program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution Program in Support of the Remediation of the Former Mid-Canada Line Radar Sites in Ontario [Voted Payments]
Start date: 2008-09
End date: 2014-15
Description: This contribution program supports the remediation of certain contaminated sites on non-federal lands, to the extent the contamination was a direct result of federal government activities or operations, or where the contamination resulted from the Government of Canada’s national security efforts. To qualify, a site must also pose a human health and/or environmental risk, and be assessed as a National Classification System Class 1 (action required) or Class 2 (action likely required) site. The Government of Canada’s contribution will be used to fund specific eligible activities associated with the remediation of 11 of the 17 former Mid-Canada Line Radar Sites in Ontario.
Strategic Outcome: Care and Support to the Canadian Forces and Contribution to Canadian Society
Results Achieved: To date, work at two sites has been completed. In July 2010, work began at site 500, the largest of the 11 sites. Major mobilization of the work for clean up was completed in March 2011.
Program Activity: Environmental Protection and Stewardship ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $0.000 | $9.248 | $6.595 | $3.457 | $3.457 | $3.138 |
Total Program Activity | $1.500 | $10.748 | $8.095 | $4.957 | $4.957 | $3.138 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): During fiscal year (FY) 2010-11, DND re-profiled to future years its original planned spending based on progress of actual work activities. The re-profiled values were more reflective of actual expenditures for the year.
Audits completed or planned: None.
Evaluation completed or planned: A mid-term review, if required, is expected to be completed during FY 2011-12. An evaluation is planned in FY 2013-14 and will address the relevance and performance (effectiveness, efficiency and economy) of the contribution program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: NATO Military Budget (NATO Programs) [Voted Payments]
Start date: 1949
End date: Ongoing
Description: To contribute the Canadian share of the NATO Military Budget—a common-funded program to finance the operating and maintenance costs of the NATO military structure and activities, including Deployed Operations and missions.
Strategic Outcome: Defence Operations will Improve Peace, Stability and Security Wherever Deployed
Results Achieved: Canada’s financial contributions to NATO continued to ensure Canadian security and provided leverage and influence within the multi-national body. These contributions also provided access to military capabilities, which Canada itself does not possess.
The contributions further served to help protect and strengthen the freedom and security of all NATO Members by political and military means in accordance with the North Atlantic Treaty and the principles of the United Nations Charter.
The benefits of Canada’s investment in NATO included access to strategic information, intelligence, capabilities, interoperability with allied forces and an equal voice in high-level decisions affecting Euro-Atlantic security and stability.
Program Activity: International Peace, Stability and Security ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $74.649 | $73.278 | $126.861 | $138.771 | $138.771 | $(11.910) |
Total Program Activity | $178.093 | $206.117 | $200.837 | $251.049 | $244.018 | $(43.181) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-11 increase is mainly attributed to the fact that the last call for contribution to the operations and maintenance (O&M) budget was higher than planned. This should result in lower calls for contribution in FY 2011-12.
Note: Since FY 2010-11, the Military budget includes the O&M budget of the NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Programme (NAEW&C), thus reflecting the alignment of the NATO Terms and Conditions approved in October 2009.
Audits completed or planned: At the end of the year, the annual financial statements were presented for verification by the International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN), which is an independent entity reporting directly to the North Atlantic Council (NAC). The IBAN is composed of government officials from national audit institution in member countries. The IBAN conducts
financial audits on all accounts commonly-funded by NATO members. Designated committees in NATO, where Canada is well represented, analyzed all the IBAN reports and made recommendations to the relevant NATO entities to comply with IBAN findings.
Evaluation completed or planned: An evaluation of Defence’s NATO Contribution Program will be completed in FY 2011-12 by Chief Review Services.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: NATO Security Investment Program (NATO Programs) [Voted Payments]
Start date: 1949
End date: Ongoing
Description: To contribute the Canadian share of the NATO Security Investment Programme (NSIP) - a common funded program that finances the capital costs for the provision of communications and information systems, installations and facilities such as radar, military headquarters, airfields, fuel pipelines and storage, harbours and navigational aids needed to support the NATO military structure and activities, including Deployed Operations and Missions.
Strategic Outcome: Defence Operations will Improve Peace, Stability and Security Wherever Deployed
Results Achieved: NSIP continued to fund projects that meet NATO’s essential purpose, which is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members by political and military means in accordance with the North Atlantic Treaty and the principles of the United Nations Charter.
The benefits of Canada’s investment in NATO include access to strategic information, intelligence, capabilities, interoperability with allied forces and an equal voice in high-level decisions affecting Euro-Atlantic security and stability. It also includes a potential return on some of Canada’s eligible infrastructure projects in support of NATO operations.
Program Activity: International Peace, Stability and Security ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $48.948 | $57.780 | $48.490 | $78.851 | $78.851 | $(30.361) |
Total Program Activity | $178.093 | $206.117 | $200.837 | $251.049 | $244.018 | $(43.181) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The NSIP variance of $30M is mainly due to increasing requirements for NATO Alliance Operations and Missions in Afghanistan, which have more than quadrupled over the last five years, combined with the coming on-line of deployable capabilities and the introduction of new programs such as Cyber Defence and Theatre Missile Defence.
Audits completed or planned: At the end of the year, the annual financial statements were presented for verification by the International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN), which is an independent entity reporting directly to the North Atlantic Council (NAC). The IBAN is composed of government officials from national audit institution in member countries. The IBAN conducts
financial audits on all accounts commonly-funded by NATO members. Designated committees in NATO, where Canada is well represented, analyzed all the IBAN reports and made recommendations to the relevant NATO entities to comply with IBAN findings.
Evaluation completed or planned: An evaluation of Defence’s NATO Contribution Program will be completed in FY 2011-12 by Chief Review Services.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Programme Management Agency (NATO Major Activities) [Voted Payments]
Start date: 1979
End date: Ongoing
Description: The NATO Airborne Early Warning Force (NAEWF) is based on a Boeing 707 aircraft modified for military use that provides NATO with early warning and control capability - allowing NATO to detect and track enemy aircraft operating at low altitudes over all terrain. The surveillance capability of the Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) allow NATO forces to transmit data directly from the aircraft to command and control centres on land, sea or in the air. The military characteristics of the AWACS aircraft enable it to be deployed rapidly in support of operations and make it less vulnerable to attack than ground-based radar.
Strategic Outcome: Defence Operations will Improve Peace, Stability and Security Wherever Deployed
Results Achieved: Development was performed to continue to provide a state-of-the-art operating system that collects and disseminates, in real-time, data received from several on-board sensors.
Program Activity: International Peace, Stability and Security ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $40.798 | $60.327 | $12.635 | $9.176 | $9.176 | $3.459 |
Total Program Activity | $178.093 | $206.117 | $200.837 | $251.049 | $244.018 | $(43.181) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Two component programme upgrades reached the end of their implementation phase which resulted in less demand for funds in fiscal year (FY) 2010-11 than initially planned.
Note: Since FY 2010-11, the Military budget includes the operations and maintenance (O&M) budget of the NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Programme (NAEW&C) thus reflecting the alignment of the NATO Terms and Conditions approved in October 2009.
Audits completed or planned: At the end of the year, the annual financial statements were presented for verification by the International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN), which is an independent entity reporting directly to the North Atlantic Council (NAC). The IBAN is composed of government officials from national audit institution in member countries. The IBAN conducts
financial audits on all accounts commonly-funded by NATO members. Designated committees in NATO, where Canada is well represented, analyzed all the IBAN reports and made recommendations to the relevant NATO entities to comply with IBAN findings.
Evaluation completed or planned: An evaluation of Defence’s NATO Contribution Program will be completed in FY 2011-12 by Chief Review Services.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS) System (NATO Major Activities) [Voted Payments]
Start date: 2009-10
End date: 2038-39
Description: The Alliance Ground Surveillance Programme came into being with the signatures of the 15 participating NATO nations in September 2009. It is based upon eight, high altitude, long endurance, Global Hawk Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms equipped with the Multi-Platform Radar Technology Insertion Program (MP-RTIP) ground surveillance sensor which interface with several ground stations in various deployable configurations to support Command, Control, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance in operations.
Operations, training and support will be conducted from a single Main Operating Base but with the ability to further launch and recover the platforms from forward operating bases.
Strategic Outcome: Defence Operations will Improve Peace, Stability and Security Wherever Deployed
Results Achieved: Provision of a NATO owned and operated airborne ground surveillance system was initiated. The AGS is to provide command authorities with near real-time, continuous, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities in all weather conditions, to support timely decision making at the strategic, operational and tactical levels of command.
Program Activity: International Peace, Stability and Security ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 |
Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Total Authorities 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $0.000 | $0.549 | $10.152 | $10.152 | $4.183 | $5.969 |
Total Program Activity | $178.093 | $206.117 | $200.837 | $251.049 | $244.018 | $(43.181) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The AGS contract has yet to be awarded for this new NATO initiative. This resulted in less demand for funds in FY 2010-11 than initially planned.
Audits completed or planned: At the end of the year, the annual financial statements were presented for verification by the International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN), which is an independent entity reporting directly to the North Atlantic Council (NAC). The IBAN is composed of government officials from national audit institution in member countries. The IBAN conducts
financial audits on all accounts commonly-funded by NATO members. Designated committees in NATO, where Canada is well represented, analyzed all the IBAN reports and made recommendations to the relevant NATO entities to comply with IBAN findings.
Evaluation completed or planned: An evaluation of Defence’s NATO Contribution Program will be completed in FY 2011-12 by Chief Review Services.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution Program in support of the Search and Rescue (SAR) New Initiatives Fund (SAR NIF)
Start date: 1988
End date: Ongoing
Description: The SAR New Initiatives Fund (SAR NIF) is managed by the NSS on behalf of the Lead Minister for Search and Rescue (SAR) in partnership with other federal, provincial and territorial and SAR volunteer organizations. SAR NIF provides annual funding for new projects (or initiatives) that will improve the National Search and Rescue Program with the aim to enhance the effectiveness of SAR response in federal, provincial and territorial jurisdictions; promote the sharing of response and prevention best practices throughout the SAR community; and, promote and improve SAR prevention. Defence is one of 6 federal departments that are part of this program.
Strategic Outcome: Defence Operations improve Peace, Stability and Security Wherever Deployed.
Results Achieved: In Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-11, the SAR NIF provided more than $4M in contribution funding to 15 separate projects involving air, ground and marine SAR. Of the 15 projects, seven were the result of contribution agreements signed in 2010 and eight were for projects signed in previous years.
Program Activity: Canadian Peace, Stability and Security ($ millions) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending 2008-09 | Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
Total Contributions | $3.724 | $5.684 | $0.000 | $4.028 | $4.028 | $(4.028) |
Total Program Activity | $6.593 | $8.585 | $0.190 | $7.059 | $7.056 | $(6.866) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): At the time of preparation of the FY 2010-11 Report on Plans and Priorities, the renewal of the Terms and Conditions of the program had not received Treasury Board approval before the required deadlines and thus was not factored in the FY 2010-11 Planned Spending.
Audits completed or planned: None.
Evaluation completed or planned: The program will undergo a mid-term review in FY 2012-13 and a full term evaluation in FY 2014-15 to address the relevance and performance (effectiveness, efficiency and economy) of the program.
($ thousands) | 2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance | |||
Total Grants and Contributions | ||||||
Production of Audiovisual Works | 96 | 96 | 79 | 79 | 90 | 11 |
Distribution, Accessibility, Outreach | 161 | 153 | 168 | 168 | 162 | -6 |
Internal Services | 5 | - | 3 | 3 | - | -3 |
Total | 262 | 249 | 250 | 250 | 252 | 2 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: NRC-Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP)
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: This program provides a range of technical and business-oriented advisory services, as well as financial support for small and medium-sized (SME) Canadian businesses engaged in research and development of technological innovations. The program is important for enabling enterprises to generate significant economic activity for Canadian industry by augmenting the capacity and capability of enterprises to innovate and commercialize. Financial support is provided through a transfer payment program delivered by a cross-Canada network of more than 250 professionals, including over 230 Industrial Technology Advisors (ITAs), and located in approximately 100 communities. The field staff of professionals, recognized for their scientific, technical, engineering, business expertise, and knowledge of SMEs, provides clients with customized value-added advice, information, referrals and financial assistance. They work with clients at all stages of the innovation - commercialization continuum, including: project development; access to technical assistance, financial, business, marketing or management advice; access to competitive technical information; patent searches; and access to local, regional, national or international linkages. NRC-IRAP Innovation Network Advisors (INAs) represent and promote NRC-IRAP in the community innovation system and build effective regional innovation system relationships for the benefit of SMEs. This includes working with organizations that receive NRC-IRAP contributions as well as with other organizations to facilitate the implementation of multi-sector, multi-partner initiatives that are relevant to SMEs regionally and nationally. As well, the program supports the placement of graduates in SMEs through its participation in the delivery of Human Resources and Social Development Canada's Youth Employment Strategy (YES).
Strategic Outcome: Advancements in innovative technologies and increased innovation capacity in targeted Canadian industries and national priority areas.
Results Achieved: NRC-IRAP provided $232.8M to 3,098 firms and 190 organizations for 4,400 innovation projects that supported 12,821 jobs, including 1,442 for recent graduates.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 86.5 | 215.1 | 187.0 | 235.5 | 232.8 | 2.7 |
Total Program Activity | 86.5 | 215.1 | 187.0 | 235.5 | 232.8 | 2.7 |
Comment on Variance: The Planned Spending amount of $187.0M represents the best known amount at the time the Main Estimates were prepared. The Total Authorities includes Planned Spending, amounts from Budget 2010, amounts from Supplementary Estimates, and other statutory authorities. The difference between the Planned Spending and the Total Authorities is $48.5M ($26.6M for a transfer from Industry Canada for Community Adjustment Fund (CAF), $16.2M for FedDev Ontario's Southern Ontario Development Program (SODP), $3.6M for Youths and $2.1M for Clusters contributions to Organizations). The $2.7M difference between the Total Authorities and the Actual Spending is principally due to a lapse in the contribution budget for NRC-IRAP.
Audit Completed or Planned: In progress, to be completed in 2011-12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: 2011-12
Name of Transfer Payment Program: TRIUMF
Start Date: 1976
End Date: Continuing
Description: TRIUMF functions as Canada's national laboratory for research in subatomic physics and as Canada's gateway to international subatomic physics. It is operated as a joint venture by a consortium of more than 11 Canadian universities. TRIUMF houses a particle accelerator that produces energetic beams of subatomic particles for fundamental research in nuclear and particle physics and in nuclear medicine. This research lays the foundation for new technologies in the physical and life sciences, the facility being a unique and major contributor to advanced materials research in Canada and abroad. TRIUMF also operates four smaller cyclotrons used for medical research and to produce medical isotopes for the diagnosis and treatment of disease.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians have access to research and development information and infrastructure.
Results Achieved:
General
Nuclear Science and Particle Physics
Nuclear Medicine
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 43.5 | 44.0 | 19.3 | 45.0 | 45.0 | 0 |
Total Program Activity | 43.5 | 44.0 | 19.3 | 45.0 | 45.0 | 0 |
Comment on Variance: N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: NRC prepares a multi-year risk based audit plan that is updated and approved annually. TRIUMF Transfer Payment Program (TPP) was assessed as low risk, so no internal audit is planned.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: 2013-14
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Telescope Program
Start Date: 1978
End Date: Ongoing
Description: NRC, in partnership with other international bodies, provides financial contributions that support the management and operation of observatories maintained by the Canadian government and participates in the oversight and direction of the facilities and research.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians have access to research and development information and infrastructure.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 10.5 | 10.7 | 5.5 | 10.8 | 10.3 | 0.5 |
Total Program Activity | 10.5 | 10.7 | 5.5 | 10.8 | 10.3 | 0.5 |
Comment on Variance: The International Telescope Program manages agreements with a variety of partners to operate and maintain off-shore telescopes for the benefit of the Canadian astronomy community. Contributions to the majority of these agreements are made in U.S. dollars. The strength of the Canadian dollar in the last year has meant that NRC's actual expenditures were less than had been forecast on the basis of a strong American dollar.
Audit Completed or Planned: NRC prepares a multi-year risk based audit plan that is updated and approved annually. The Telescope TPP was assessed as low risk, so no internal audit is planned.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: 2011-12
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board (Statutory)
Start Date: 1987
End Date: Perpetuity
Description: NRCan covers 50% of the operating costs of the Canada Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board. The Province pays the other 50%. This is done pursuant to provisions of the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act.
Strategic Outcome: Economic Competitiveness - Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.
Results Achieved: Provided financial support to the Offshore Board to cover its costs for the management of offshore resources on behalf of Canada and Newfoundland and Labrador.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 4.1 | 4.9 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 6.3 | .2 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 4.1 | 4.9 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 6.3 | .2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to cost recovery that the Board received from industry.
Audit Completed or Planned: An OAG audit, to be performed jointly with the provincial auditor general, is planned for fiscal year 2011-12.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Clean Energy Fund (Voted)
Start Date: April 23, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: Clean energy is energy that is produced, transmitted, distributed and used with low or zero greenhouse gas (GHG) and other air emissions. The Government of Canada has committed that Canada’s total GHG emissions be reduced by 17 percent from 2005 levels by 2020.
In support of these goals, the Clean Energy Fund provides $795 million over five years for the demonstration of promising technologies, including large-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, and renewable energy and clean energy systems demonstration and research and development (R&D) projects.
Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility - Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: Design work has commenced on the three large-scale CCS demonstration projects announced in 2009-10, with the first of these projects currently under construction and expected to start-up operations in 2012. The other two projects are expected to start construction in 2012-13 and to start-up operations in 2015. These CCS projects are part of Canada's contribution to the G8 Leaders' goal of launching 25 such projects in the near future. In addition, 19 small-scale renewable and clean energy projects are underway. As part of the global effort to advance CCS technology, Canada is participating in a number of initiatives, including project knowledge sharing, public outreach, and regulatory development, and is sharing information widely with other governments, including the US (via the Canada-US Clean Energy Dialogue) the EU, Australia, etc. These projects are expected to provide short and medium term economic stimulus and are being tracked as part of Canada's Economic Action Plan.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | - | 30 | 161 | 157.7 | 104.3 | 56.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | 30 | 161 | 157.7 | 104.3 | 56.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Fourth Report to Canadians on the Economic Action Plan, reallocated $205M from the original $1Billion Clean Energy Fund to the ecoENERGY Retrofit-Homes program. As a result, the program reprofiled $53M to fiscal year 11-12 to better deliver its program commitments. In addition, Clean Energy Fund paid back $4M in previous year loans from the ecoENERGY Technology Initiative.
Audit Completed or Planned: The NRCan Risk-based Audit Plan for 2010-11 included the publication of the audit of the Clean Energy Fund. The completed audit report for project AU1111 can be found at the following link: http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/audit/reprap/2010/au1111-eng.php
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The NRCan 2011-12 to 2015-16 Strategic Evaluation Plan has determined that the evaluation for the Clean Energy Fund will be conducted in the 2013-14 fiscal year.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Departmental Class Grants and Contributions (Voted)
Start Date: January 31, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: Class Grants and Contributions support organizations associated with the research, development and promotion of activities that contribute to departmental objectives.
Strategic Outcome: Economic competitiveness, Environmental Responsibilities, Safety, Security, and Stewardship.
Results Achieved: Geo-mapping for Energy & Minerals [GEM] Program being delivered under the DCGCP:
The purpose of the GEM program is to accelerate the activities of the Geological Survey of Canada to provide the public geoscience knowledge base needed to support increased economic prosperity of northern Canada through stable, long term investment in resource development. GEM aims to provide a modern, regional-scale geological knowledge base in Canada’s territories to the minimum level needed for effective private sector exploration. Similarly, GEM also works with the provincial governments to fill critical gaps in the knowledge base needed to increase the effectiveness of exploration investment in the provinces.
Outcomes associated with negotiated GEM grants and contributions have included:
Energy Efficiency and Alternative Energy Program (EEAE) delivered under the DCGCP:
The Purpose of the EEAE program is to fund projects related to the following activities: performing basic and applied technology research, development, and demonstrations; standards development; scientific, engineering, and industry knowledge development and dissemination (technology transfer and outreach activities, including providing workshops and conferences).
This fiscal CanmetENERGY partnered with Hydrogenics Corporation of Mississauga, Ontario, to make major improvements in hydrogen production from Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) water electrolysis technology. These improvements included the continuous operation of the PEM water electrolyzer for 22,000 hours. The electrolyzer also demonstrated an increased energy efficiency which exceeded the U.S. Department of Energy target for 2017.
Ad hoc agreements delivered under the DCGCP:
Below are a number of examples of ad hoc activities that were funded under the DCGCP
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.4 |
Total Contributions | 8.6 | 10 | 3.1 | 12.2 | 11.8 | (8.7) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 10.3 | 11.9 | 5.4 | 14.4 | 13.7 | (8.3) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): As a mechanism which enables NRCan managers to take advantage of opportunities to provide financial support to projects falling under the departmental mandate but not covered under other transfer payment programs, Class Grant and Contribution actual spending exceeds the planned spending appearing in Main Estimates. This is primarily due to ad hoc opportunities identified as the fiscal year progresses, which are typically funded via cash management using flexibility from other transfer payment programs.
Audit Completed or Planned: This program was part of the horizontal audit on Transfer Payments that took place in fiscal year 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:Evaluation of entire program is scheduled to be completed during fiscal year 2012-13.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY for Biofuels (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2017
Description: ecoENERGY for Biofuels supports the production of renewable alternatives to gasoline and diesel and encourages the development of a competitive domestic renewable fuels industry. The program provides an operating incentive to facilities that produce renewable alternatives to gasoline and diesel in Canada, based on production volumes. ecoENERGY for Biofuels will invest up to $1.48 billion over 9 years, starting April 1, 2008, in support of biofuels production in Canada.
The program volume target is 2.5 billion litres of domestic production by December 2012, with a target of 2 billion litres of renewable alternatives to gasoline and 500 million litres of renewable alternatives to diesel. Key changes to the program were approved in 2009 and implemented in 2010. This involved a realignment of the nine-year funding allocation, a new payment regime and a new decision-making methodology
Strategic Outcome : Environmental Responsibility - Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: The program rendered final eligibility decisions in 2010. It currently has 31 signed contribution agreements and is finalizing the remaining 10 agreements or amendments. This in total will represent a signed production capacity of 1807 million litres per year of ethanol and 628 million litres per year of biodiesel by December 2012 at a value of $1.24 billion (currently signed agreements represent a total value of $1.133 billion and a domestic production capacity of approximately 1973 million litres, 1724 million litres of ethanol and 249 million litres of biodiesel, by December 2012). The program target is 2.5 billion litres of biofuels (2 billion litres of ethanol and 500 million litres of biodiesel) by December 2012.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 92.2 | 177.7 | 255.2 | 274.1 | 147.1 | 108.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 92.2 | 177.7 | 255.2 | 274.1 | 147.1 | 108.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Program design changes announced in December 2009 were implemented in 2010, requiring the review of 68 applications, the rendering of decisions and the negotiation of numerous contribution agreements; all of which could not be incented for the most part of 2010-2011. In addition, as a result of the economic downturn and the fact that Environment Canada’s biodiesel regulation is not yet in place, the Canadian biodiesel industry has been slow in developing its production capacity. Consequently, they have been unable to produce up to the amounts allowed by NRCan biofuels production subsidy program, and we have a significant amount of unspent money (lapse) from 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of ecoENERGY for Biofuels was completed in 2010-11.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: In 2011-12 ecoENERGY for Biofuels will be evaluated as part of the Alternative Transportation Fuels sub-sub activity (2.1.5.5) within the Energy Efficiency and Alternative Transportation Fuels sub-activity of the Department’s Program Activity Architecture (PAA).
Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY for Renewable Heat Initiative (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: As part of the ecoENERGY Initiative, the ecoENERGY Renewable Heat Program supports non-emitting renewable thermal energy technologies used for space heating and cooling, and water heating through a mix of deployment contributions, residential pilot program contributions and industry capacity development contributions.
Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility - Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: Since the program’s inception on April 1, 2007, 1,728 funding applications from industrial, commercial and institutional sectors to install solar air and solar hot-water systems were received. Contribution agreements were signed for 1,120 projects. These agreements represent 1,267 solar systems.
ecoENERGY for Renewable Heat entered into information sharing agreements with Ontario, Saskatchewan and British Columbia to provide one window access to federal and provincial industrial, commercial and institutional solar thermal programs.
In addition, 14 pilot projects were established with partners (utilities, developers and buyers’ groups) to test large-scale deployment mechanisms for solar water heating systems in the residential sector. Under these pilot projects, 1,100 solar water-heating systems were installed in Canadian homes. This Residential Pilot Initiative was also the driving force behind the creation of a new regulatory regime for Canadian residential solar water heating systems.
As well, the ecoENERGY for Renewable Heat program helped support a study to strengthen the Labour Market Information data for solar thermal and geo-exchange.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 6.7 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 0.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 6.7 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 0.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Many of the projects for which the program receives applications do not, in the end, proceed. Of the 1,728 applications received, 611 were cancelled, the majority by the proponent. Some proponents could not obtain the rest of the financing, some could not get other approvals needed, and some could not get the project finished by the deadline.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation was completed and posted on the NRCan website in 2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY for Renewable Power Initiative (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011 (The program stopped accepting applications in 2011. However, allocated funding will be issued to program participants until 2020-21).
Description: The ecoENERGY for Renewable Power program is investing $1.43 billion in transfer payments over 14 years to increase Canada's supply of clean electricity from renewable sources such as wind, biomass, low-impact hydro, geothermal, solar photovoltaic and ocean energy. It is intended to help position low-impact renewable energy technologies to make an increased contribution to Canada’s energy supply and thereby contribute to a more sustainable and diversified energy mix.
The program offers a production incentive of 1 cent per kilowatt hour for ten years to eligible projects using low impact renewable power sources such as wind, low impact hydro, biomass, geothermal, photovoltaics and ocean energy.
Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility - Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: At fiscal year end, 104 contribution agreements were in place, representing 4458 megawatts (MW) of renewable power capacity and commitments of $1.39 billion over 14 years.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 30.2 | 56.7 | 97.9 | 105.5 | 88.5 | 9.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 30.2 | 56.7 | 97.9 | 105.5 | 88.5 | 9.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Some projects experienced commissioning delays due to construction issues, and others were cancelled due to difficulties in obtaining financing by the end of the commitment period. A significant portion of the identified variance will be cash managed within the Clean Energy suite of initiatives in order for the funding to be available to the program in future years.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of the Program is planned for fiscal year 2012-13
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of Renewable Energy, including this program, was completed in fiscal year 2010-11.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY Retrofit Initiative
Grants in support of ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes (Voted)
Contributions in support of ecoENERGY Retrofit – Small and Medium Organizations (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The ecoENERGY Retrofit Initiative provided financial assistance to Canadian homeowners and small industrial and commercial businesses and institutions to support energy efficiency retrofits. There were three components:
Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility - Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: As of March 31, 2011, the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program had received over 510,000 grant applications from Canadian homeowners. Over the course of the program, more than $710 million in grants has been paid out to recipients, leading to a 21% reduction in energy use and a 1.78 Mt reduction in GHG emissions for retrofitted homes.
As of March 31, 2011, the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Small and Medium Organizations (SMO) program had signed a total of 1286 contribution agreements for retrofit projects. These projects are forecasted to have a combined energy savings of 2.8 PJ and GHG savings of approximately 0.23 Mt.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 89.7 | 267.9 | 425 | 394.3 | 355.1 | 69.9 |
Total Contributions | 3.9 | 6.7 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 11 | (.5) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 93.6 | 274.6 | 435.5 | 404.8 | 366.1 | 69.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Retrofit Grant program paid back 43.7M in previous year loans from other programs, while also having 37.9M frozen from its profile related to the TB submission “permanent access to TB vote 5”. 12.4M was subsequently, permanently transferred from other lapsing Clean Air Agenda program funds to cover estimated Retrofit PAYEs.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of ecoENERGY Retrofit – SMO was completed in 2009. An audit of ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes was completed in 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the ecoENERGY Retrofit Initiative was completed in 2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY Technology Initiative (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The ecoENERGY Technology Initiative is a $230-million investment in science and technology by the Government of Canada to accelerate the development and market readiness of technology solutions in clean energy. This initiative is directed towards increasing clean energy supplies, reducing energy waste, and reducing pollution from conventional energy
Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility - Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: Supported scientific research that will generate knowledge essential to achieving Canada’s climate change goals. Activities were in the areas of cleaner fossil fuels, cleaner transportation, energy efficiency in residential, commercial and institutional buildings, improved industrial processes, carbon capture and storage, and bioenergy. Examples include:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 13.6 | 28.5 | 61.1 | 55.4 | 48.6 | 12.5 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 13.6 | 28.5 | 61.1 | 55.4 | 48.6 | 12.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Two projects with key stakeholders (industrial and provincial) did not proceed due to unforeseen factors resulting in a surplus.
Audit Completed or Planned: The NRCan Risk-based Audit Plan for fiscal year 2011-12 included an audit of the ecoENERGY Technology Initiative.
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Recently completed as part of the following portfolio evaluations:
- Energy S&T: Clean Energy Systems for Clean Electric Power Generation
- Energy S&T: Clean Energy Systems for Frontier Oil & Gas
The NRCan 2011-12 to 2015-16 Strategic Evaluation Plan has determined that the evaluation for the remaining portfolio evaluations will be conducted as follows:
Fiscal year 2011-12:
- Energy S&T: Clean Energy Systems for Industry
- Energy S&T: Sustainable Bioenergy
Fiscal Year 2012-13:
- Energy S&T: Clean Energy Systems for Buildings and Communities
- Energy S&T: Clean Transportation Energy.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Implementation of the Adaptation Theme in Support of Canada’s Clean Air Agenda (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2013
Description: The objectives of the program are to generate and effectively deliver knowledge and information needed to understand the range of risks and opportunities from a changing climate; and effectively inform and engage decision-makers across a range of social and economic sectors that have responsibilities to adapt.
Strategic Outcome: Natural resource knowledge, landmass knowledge and management systems strengthen the safety and security of Canadians and the stewardship of Canada’s natural resources and lands
Results Achieved: Six Regional Adaptation Collaboratives (RACs) were established and have attracted the participation of 120 partners in municipalities, Aboriginal organizations, Non-governmental organizations, academia and the private sector, as well as 40 provincial and territorial agencies and departments. This collaborative will contribute to the capacity of these organizations to address adaptation issues.
Tools for adaptation were delivered in three areas: a risk management guide for communities, training modules for professional planners and an upgraded protocol to assist engineers in assessing infrastructure vulnerability to a changing climate.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 0.1 | 4.2 | 9.3 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 0.8 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 0.1 | 4.2 | 9.3 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 0.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance in contributions was due to slower than planned spending in several large projects.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A program evaluation is underway. Expected completion in October 2011.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Investments in Forest Industry Transformation (IFIT) (Voted)
Start Date: June 17, 2010
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: The objective of Investments in Forest Industry Transformation is to support forest industry transformation that will make the forest industry more economically viable and environmentally sustainable by investing in innovative technologies. These investments will lead to a more diversified, higher-value product mix including bioenergy and renewable power, as well as biomaterials, biochemicals, and next generation building products.
The Program will fund innovative projects implementing transformative technologies at the pilot to commercial scales that direct wood fibre, and by-products from wood processing, into higher value uses. Such projects will increase the total value generated from wood fibre, diversify product lines for the forest industry, and produce new bio-products or renewable energies. By providing funding to Canadian forest firms for capital investments to advance new technologies towards full, commercial-scale implementation, this Program will broaden and build upon previous departmental investments in forest sector transformation.
Strategic Outcome: Economic Competitiveness – Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | - | - | 23.6 | 23.6 | 6.6 | 17.6 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | - | 23.6 | 23.6 | 6.6 | 17.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance in planned spending vs. actual spending was cash managed within the sector. Final project funding decisions will be made during FY 2011-2012, based on technical, financial and environmental feasibility analyses, in order to fully allocate the funding available under the first call for proposals.The second call for proposals will take place mid-year of 2011-2012 to allocate remaining program funds.
Audit Completed or Planned: A program audit is planned for the 2011-2012 fiscal year.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A program evaluation is planned for the 2013-2014 fiscal
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Leadership for Environmental Advantage in Forestry (LEAF) Initiative (Voted)
Start Date: June 12, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The purpose of this program is to advance Canada’s trade interests by promoting the environmental reputation of Canada’s forest sector in international markets. Its aim is to promote the Canadian forest sector’s environmental record internationally through addressing science and information gaps, supporting market outreach, and monitoring and reporting on trends.
Strategic Outcome: Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to social well-being of Canadians.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 1.9 | 4.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | - |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 1.9 | 4.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: Two audits of the LEAF program are planned in 2011-2012:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Newfoundland and Labrador Fiscal Equalization Offset Payments (Statutory)
Start Date: 2002
End Date: March 2011
Description: To make the payments to the province to compensate for part of the reduction in fiscal equalization entitlements that would result from offshore revenues being included in the equalization program.
Strategic Outcome: Economic Competitiveness - Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.
Results Achieved: Payments were made to the province in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 556.7 | 465.3 | - | 641.9 | 641.9 | (641.9) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 556.7 | 465.3 | - | 641.9 | 641.9 | (641.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Offset payments are determined by Department of Finance. NRCan was informed of 2010-11 offset payments in early April 2010.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Non-reactor-based Isotope Supply Contribution Program (NISP) (Voted)
Start Date: May 13, 2010
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The NISP is a $35-million program to establish the feasibility of cyclotron and linear accelerator-based production of the key medical isotope technetium-99m (Tc-99m).
Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility - Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: The first year of the program focused on launching the program in a fair, open and transparent manner. All milestones for program launch were achieved, and the competitive process resulted in direct stakeholder engagement with the four project leads as well as with the more than 30 project partners, collaborators and subcontractors. In this way, the program has already increased collaboration among public, private and academic stakeholders in seven provinces across Canada, including engagement with the regulators involving regular communication and one Memorandum of Understanding between the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Canadian Light Source Inc. Also, investments in infrastructure and salaries for researchers have increased research capacity in Canada, with further increases expected by the end of the Program.
All other outcomes of the program are not expected until between 2012 and 2016 since the program is focused on the long-term outcomes of increased security of supply of isotopes and reduced nuclear waste. The knowledge products that will result from the NISP following 2012 will contribute to a better understanding of the commercial viability of the accelerator technologies, and consequently, to the ability to attract private sector investment that will bring the technologies to commercialization prior to when the National Research Universal ceases isotope production.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | - | - | 9.3 | 10.2 | 10.2 | (0.9) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | - | 9.3 | 10.2 | 10.2 | (0.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments to the Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund (Statutory)
Start Date: 1987
End Date: Perpetuity
Description: To make payments to the province of NL equivalent to the revenue amounts received by Canada in relation to Newfoundland offshore oil and gas activities.
Strategic Outcome: Economic Competitiveness - Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.
Results Achieved: The transfer to the Province of an amount equivalent to the amounts received by Canada in relation to oil and gas activity in the Newfoundland and Labrador offshore was completed in a timely manner, as set out in Sections 97, 214 and 217 of the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 2351.0 | 1180.9 | 1371.2 | 1227.7 | 1227.8 | 143.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 2351.0 | 1180.9 | 1371.2 | 1227.7 | 1227.8 | 143.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Forecast predicted higher crude oil prices and production
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Statutory Transfers was completed for fiscal year 2008-09.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments to the Nova Scotia Offshore Revenue Account (Statutory)
Start Date: 1988
End Date: Perpetuity
Description: To make payments to the province equivalent to amounts received by Canada in relation to offshore activities in accordance with provisions of the Canada Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resource Accord Implementation Act.
Strategic Outcome: Economic Competitiveness - Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.
Results Achieved: The transfer to the Province of an amount equivalent to the amounts received by Canada in relation to oil and gas activity in the Nova Scotia offshore was completed in a timely manner, as set out in Sections 99, 219 and 222 of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 577.4 | 109.4 | 295.3 | 225.2 | 225.2 | 70.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 577.4 | 109.4 | 295.3 | 225.2 | 225.2 | 70.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Diminished natural gas prices and reduced production resulted in actual spending lower than anticipated in forecast.
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Statutory Transfers was completed for fiscal year 2008-09.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: The “Investing in Canada’s Forest Sector” Initiative (Voted)
Start Date: March 12, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The “Investing in Canada’s Forest Sector” initiative consists of two main objectives:
Strategic Outcome: Economic Competitiveness - Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to social well-being of Canadians.
Results Achieved:
Promoting Forest Innovation and Investment
Expanding Market Opportunities
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 54.7 | 96.3 | 96.3 | 95.4 | 0.9 | |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 54.7 | 96.3 | 96.3 | 95.4 | 0.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: The “Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program” (Voted)
Start Date: July 30, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The objective of the “Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program” is to improve the environmental performance of Canada’s pulp and paper industry, which in turn will contribute to the environmental, and hence commercial, sustainability of the pulp and paper industry.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: The Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program supported innovation and environmentally friendly investments in Canada’s pulp and paper sector. The objective of this program is to improve the sustainability of Canadian pulp and paper mills by improving their energy efficiency and positioning them as leaders in the production of renewable energy from forest biomass. During 2010-11, contribution agreements were signed for 66 projects with 21 pulp and paper companies across Canada. These projects are expected to produce more than 1.7 million MWh/year of renewable energy – enough to power 144,000 homes, while saving more than 6.8 million GJ/year of energy – enough to power an additional 160,000 homes. These projects are also collectively expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 280,000 tonnes per year while reducing recipient mills’ consumption of fresh water, the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and odorous emissions.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | - | 48.7 | 637.1 | 387.1 | 388.5 | 248.6 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | 48.7 | 637.1 | 387.1 | 388.5 | 248.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): $250 million was re-profiled from 2010-11 to 2011-12 via the Annual Reference Level Update (ARLU) process. Remaining variance was cash managed within the Departmental Vote.
Audit Completed or Planned: An Audit was completed in 2010-11 and found the Program to be “operating well”.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation is planned for 2012-13 as a part of the Department’s Risk Based Evaluation Plan.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Wind Power Production Incentive Program (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2002
End Date: March 31, 2007 (Note: The program stopped accepting applications in 2007. However, allocated funding will be issued to program participants until 2016-17).
Description: The WPPI Program was set up to help establish wind energy as a full-fledged competitor in the electricity market by providing a financial incentive of about 1 cent per each kilowatt-hour produced from the installation of 1,000 MW of new wind power capacity in Canada by 2007. Eligible recipients claim payment of the incentive over a 10-year period.
The initial WPPI G&C budget was $255 million and an additional $69.9 million was allocated in 2005-06 to allow the program to continue to support the development of new wind farms.
Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility -Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.
Results Achieved: 22 wind farms were commissioned under the program, representing 924 megawatts of wind energy capacity in Canada and about $315 million in contribution funding over 15 years.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 29.3 | 28.0 | 32.7 | 28.3 | 26.4 | 6.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 29.3 | 28.0 | 32.7 | 28.3 | 26.4 | 6.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Wind farms supported under the program have lower than expected production numbers resulting in reduced obligations/lower payments to producers under the provisions of contribution agreements.
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of Renewable Energy, including this program, was completed in fiscal year 2010-2011
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Promote Science and Engineering | 4.5 | 6.5 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 11.9 | -6.3 |
Support Student and Fellows | 104.1 | 100 | 94.5 | 96.1 | 81.7 | 12.8 |
Attract and Retain Faculty | 149.8 | 166.2 | 161.9 | 161.4 | 149.3 | 12.6 |
Fund Basic Research | 357.9 | 361.2 | 350.5 | 351.5 | 363.4 | -12.9 |
Support for Research Equipment and Major Resources | 73.3 | 45.4 | 37.5 | 43.8 | 70.0 | -32.5 |
Fund Research in Strategic Areas | 79.8 | 121.5 | 131.7 | 131.7 | 105.8 | 25.9 |
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships | 88.2 | 56.0 | 53.2 | 58.0 | 65.7 | -12.5 |
Support Commercialization | 11.6 | 10.8 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 0.4 |
Total Grants/Contributions/Other types of transfer payments | 869.1 | 867.6 | 841.1 | 854.4 | 853.6 | -12.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Support Student and Fellows | 40.1 | 42.6 | 56.6 | 56.6 | 56.6 | 0 |
Total Grants | 40.1 | 42.6 | 56.6 | 56.6 | 56.6 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Support Student and Fellows | N/A | 2.8 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 0 |
Total Grants | N/A | 2.8 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. . |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Support Student and Fellows | N/A | 4.4 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0 |
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships | 4.5 | |||||
Total Grants | 4.3 | 4.4 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Attract and Retain Faculty | N/A | N/A | 12.7 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 1.9 |
Total Grants | 12.7 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 1.9 | ||
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships | 32.7 | 40.2 | 40.2 | 39.9 | 39.9 | 0 |
Total Grants | 32.7 | 40.2 | 40.2 | 39.9 | 39.9 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships | 7.0 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 0 |
Total Grants | 7.0 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Support Commercialization | 2.1 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 0 |
Total Grants | 2.1 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. . |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | ||||||
Support Commercialization | N/A | 19.1 | 17.8 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 0 |
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships | 26.7 | |||||
Total Grants | 4.3 | 19.1 | 17.8 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s). If an evaluation is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. | ||||||
Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to last audit(s). If an audit is planned, but has not yet occurred, indicate when it will be completed. |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Reimbursements to candidates, parties and auditors, and allowances to eligible political parties.
2. Start Date: Ongoing
3. End Date: Ongoing
4. Description: Elections Canada's role is to administer the Canada Elections Act (the Act), which has two main objectives: fairness and transparency.
To promote fairness, the Act provides for reimbursement of election expenses to candidates and parties as well as a subsidy for certain auditors' fees. A candidate who is elected or who receives at least 10 percent of the valid votes cast in an election is entitled to a reimbursement of 60 percent of paid election expenses and paid personal expenses, not exceeding 60 percent of the election
expenses limit. A registered party is eligible for reimbursement equivalent to 50 percent of election expenses paid if the party obtained 2 percent or more of the total valid votes cast nationally or 5 percent of the valid votes cast in electoral districts where the party endorsed candidates. The Act provides for a subsidy, equal to the lesser of $1,500 or 3 percent of a candidate's
election expenses, but a minimum of $250, to be paid out of public funds directly to the candidate's auditor.
A registered association that has, in a fiscal period, accepted contributions or incurred expenses of $5,000 or more in total (less transfers to other political entities) must obtain an audit report that provides an opinion as to whether the Registered Association Financial Transactions Return fairly presents the information contained in the financial records on which it is based.
When an audit of this return is required, the Act provides for a subsidy of a maximum of $1,500 for that audit. This amount is paid out of public funds directly to the electoral district association's auditor after the Chief Electoral Officer has received the return, the auditor's report and other documents that must accompany the return.
For eligible political parties, the Act also provides for the payment of a quarterly allowance according to the following formula: a registered political party that obtained at least 2 percent of the total valid votes cast in a general election, or 5 percent of the valid votes cast in the electoral districts where it presented candidates, has the right to a quarterly allowance that is
calculated as the product of $0.4375 multiplied by the number of valid votes cast in the most recent general election preceding that quarter and the inflation adjustment factor that is in effect for that quarter.
5. Strategic Outcome: To maintain and strengthen the recognition among Canadians, whether they are electors or other participants in the electoral process, that Elections Canada administers the Act in a fair, consistent, effective and transparent manner.
6. Results Achieved: In accordance with the Act, Elections Canada issued reimbursements of election expenses to eligible candidates and parties, audit subsidies to candidates' and registered electoral district associations' auditors and quarterly allowances to eligible registered parties.
($ thousands) | 7. Actual Spending 2008-09 |
8. Actual Spending 2009-10 |
9. Planned Spending 2010-11 |
10. Total Authorities 2010-11 |
11. Actual Spending 2010-11 |
12. Variance(s) Between Columns 9 and 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. General Elections and By-elections | ||||||
Candidates | 27,715 | (992) | – | 919 | 919 | (919) |
Political parties | 29,182 | – | – | 2 | 2 | (2) |
Candidates' auditors | 1,269 | (28) | – | 12 | 12 | (12) |
14. Quarterly Allowances | ||||||
Allowance to eligible political parties | 28,151 | 27,330 | 26,818 | 27,402 | 27,402 | (584) |
15. Electoral District Associations' Auditors | ||||||
Electoral district associations' auditors | 825 | 874 | 1,032 | 950 | 950 | 82 |
16. Total TPP* | 87,142 | 27,184 | 27,850 | 29,285 | 29,285 | (1,435) |
*TPP=Transfer payment programs
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Historic Sites of Canada Cost-Sharing Program (NHSCCSP) | |
---|---|
Start Date: 2008–2009 |
|
End Date: March 31, 2013 |
|
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: The NHSCCSP assists recipients in conducting activities aimed at ensuring the commemorative integrity of non-federally owned or administered national historic sites and, thereby, to support Parks Canada Agency in fulfilling its mandate to protect and present nationally significant examples of Canada's natural and cultural heritage, and foster public understanding, appreciation and enjoyment in ways that ensure the ecological and commemorative integrity of these places for present and future generations. Specifically, the Program provides financial contributions to eligible recipients to share the costs of eligible works deemed by Parks Canada as necessary to ensure the physical health of a national historic site and to ensure Canadians understand the importance of the site and its role in the history of Canada. |
|
Strategic Outcome: | |
REACH Canadians (indirect influence) |
STRATEGIC (END) OUTCOMES
|
|
INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES
|
|
IMMEDIATE OUTCOMES
|
Results Achieved: The expected strategic (end) outcomes of the Program are:
|
Actual Spending 2008–09 | Actual Spending 2009–10 | Planned Spending 2010–11 | Total Authorities 2010–11 | Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: Heritage Resources Conservation | ||||||
Total Contribution | 100 | 2,705 | 7,050 | 8,828 | 8,828 | 1,778 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: General Class Contribution Program (GCCP) |
---|
Start Date: 2006–2007 |
End Date: Ongoing (the Minister approved the continuation of the program in March 2011) |
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: The GCCP is not a "program" in the traditional sense but rather functions as a general funding authority that is available to Agency managers when programming needs periodically arise that may be most appropriately met by entering into contribution agreements with eligible recipients. |
Expected results: More Canadians recognizing, appreciating and being engaged in the values of natural and cultural conservation. Stakeholders being further engaged in terms of interest and involvement of common objectives towards ecological or cultural integrity. Access to a better knowledge base on commercial, ecological or aboriginal issues of mutual interest for informed decision-making and dialogue for Parks Canada managers and stakeholders. Heritage assets are protected, secured and researched. Targeted audiences are educated in such areas as ecology and safety. |
Expected outcomes: The expected outcomes mirror the Parks Canada mandate of engaging Canadians in preserving and presenting Canada's rich diversity of cultural and natural heritage. |
Actual Spending 2008–09 | Actual Spending 2009–10 | Planned Spending 2010–11 | Total Authorities 2010–11 | Actual Spending 2010–11 |
Variance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity: | ||||||
Heritage Places Establishment | 1,250 | 1,042 | 730 | 1,104 | 1,104 | 374 |
Heritage Resources Conservation | 1,850 | 1,678 | 1,700 | 2,192 | 2,192 | 492 |
Public Appreciation and Understanding | 1,001 | 887 | 882 | 3,188 | 3,188 | 2,306 |
Visitor Experience | 621 | 869 | 650 | 1,438 | 1,438 | 788 |
Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | 43 | 151 | 38 | 105 | 105 | 67 |
Total Contribution | 4,765 | 4,627 | 4,000 | 8,026 | 8,026 | 4,026 |
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Head Start in Urban and Northern Communities (AHSUNC)
Start date: 1995-96
End date: Ongoing
Description: This program supports locally designed and controlled early childhood development intervention strategies for off-reserve Aboriginal children and their families. The program focuses on health promotion, education and school readiness, aboriginal culture and language development, parental involvement, nutrition, and social support.
Expected results: To provide opportunities for the healthy development of Aboriginal pre-school children in urban and northern settings, including the development of positive self-esteem and a desire for learning, and opportunities to develop successfully as young people. The program helps to reduce health disparities experienced by vulnerable children and their families living in conditions of risk by increasing community capacity, helping participants make healthy choices and promoting multi-sectoral partnerships.
Results Achieved: AHSUNC provides comprehensive, culturally-appropriate, early childhood development programming to approximately 4,800 children and their families at 129 sites across Canada. The program mitigates inequalities in health and developmental outcomes for Aboriginal children in urban and northern settings. Improvements have been noted in physical development, health and personal/social development, school readiness, language, literacy and mathematical thinking. Parents have learned about healthy child development and positive parenting skills.
Over the past year, national implementation and training on the Brigance Head Start Screen took place. The Brigance Head Start Screen is a standardized early childhood development screening tool that assesses developmental progress on language development, literacy, mathematics and science, social and emotional development and physical health and development. The 2010 National Administrative Process Survey was completed by 113 sites. The survey showed more than 85% of sites setting aside time every day for physical activity which mitigates the risk of childhood obesity. In addition, sites reported health promotion activities related to injury prevention and oral health: 93% conducted Safety/Fire Drill Training and 83% organized visits from dental health professionals.
The Strategic Fund was also renewed for five years, with regional and national investments to extend the reach of the AHSUNC program focussed on developing a wide range of culturally and linguistically appropriate resources and tools to enhance programming. The AHSUNC Strategic Fund provided support for a well-received Leadership, Administration and Management Training in Yellowknife, NWT for 30 site staff and the development of Inuit specific literacy resources for sites.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 31.3 | 31.8 | 29.1 | 33.6 | 33.1 | (4.0) |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | $31.3M | $31.8M | $29.1M | $33.6M | $33.1M | $(4.0)M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending exceeded planned spending by $4.0M. The variance is due to the program receiving funding for strategic investments of $3.0M in Supplementary Estimates A; a temporary transfer to the regions to support amendments to contribution agreements from the Population Health Fund for $1.3M; and other transfer out of $0.3M to different programs within the Agency.
Audit completed or planned: The program was part of the September 2009 Audit of Health Promotion Programs.
Evaluation completed or planned: A national impact evaluation was completed in 2006. The next evaluation is scheduled to be completed in 2011-12 and will focus on program relevance and performance in accordance with TBS 2009 Policy on Evaluation.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Action Program for Children (CAPC)
Start date: 1993-94
End date: Ongoing
Description: CAPC provides funding to community-based groups and coalitions to develop and deliver comprehensive, culturally appropriate prevention and early intervention programs to promote the health and social development of children (0-6 years) and their families facing conditions of risk.
Expected results: To enhance community capacity through a population health approach and to respond to the health and development needs of young children and their families who are facing conditions of risk. To contribute to and improve health and social outcomes for young children and parents/caregivers facing conditions of risk, and to continue partnering with multiple sectors in the community.
Results Achieved: PHAC provided funding and support to 441 community based projects in 2010-11.
An evaluation of CAPC completed in January 2010 provided evidence that the program continues to be relevant to the Canadian context; reaches children and families living in conditions of risk; and contributes to their health and social development. A qualitative analysis of CAPC provided evidence of improved child development outcomes, community capacity and personal parental improvement.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 56.0 | 54.4 | 53.4 | 54.8 | 54.7 | (1.3) |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | $56.0M | $54.4M | $53.4M | $54.8M | $54.7M | $(1.3)M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending exceeded planned spending by $1.3M due to transfer of $0.8M from CPNP and $0.5M from other programs.
Audit completed or planned: The program was included in the September 2009 Audit of Health Promotion Programs.
Evaluation completed or planned: The Summative Evaluation of the Community Action Program for Children: 2004-2009 was completed in January 2010. The program will undergo its next evaluation in 2013-14.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP)
Start date: 1994-95
End date: Ongoing
Description: This program promotes the health of at-risk pregnant women, infants and their families through leadership and support to community groups. The program focuses on reducing the incidence of unhealthy birth weights, improving the health of both infant and mother, and encouraging breastfeeding.
Expected results: To enhance community capacity through a population health approach to respond to the health and development needs of pregnant women and their infants who are facing conditions of risk. To contribute to and improve health outcomes for pregnant women, infants and their families, and to continue partnering with multiple sectors in the community.
Results Achieved: PHAC provided funding and support to 325 community based projects in 2010-11.
An evaluation of CPNP completed in January 2010 provided evidence that the program continues to be relevant to the Canadian context, reaches vulnerable pregnant women and new mothers, is cost effective, and is effecting positive changes in the health practices of pregnant women/new mothers and promoting positive birth outcomes. CPNP participants were shown to have improved use of vitamin-mineral supplements during pregnancy; to cease or reduce alcohol consumption and/or smoking; to have increased initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Moreover, there was a decreased likelihood of low birth weight infants and preterm births among CPNP participants.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 27.2 | 26.4 | 27.2 | 27.3 | 27.0 | 0.2 |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | $27.2M | $26.4M | $27.2M | $27.3M | $27.0M | $0.2M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): n/a
Audit completed or planned: The program was included in the September 2009 Audit of Health Promotion Programs.
Evaluation completed or planned: The Summative Evaluation of the Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program 2004-2009 was completed in January 2010. The program will undergo its next evaluation in 2013-14.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Innovation Strategy (IS) previously known as the Population Health Fund
Start date: 1999-2000
End date: Ongoing
Description: The Innovation Strategy is a federal grants and contributions initiative designed to foster and support effective action on and across a broad range of factors that affect the health of Canadians. The IS focuses on innovation and learning in population health to address the determinants of health and to reduce health inequalities. The Strategy supports the development, adaptation, implementation and evaluation of innovative interventions and policy initiatives in various settings and populations in Canada as well as knowledge translation and dissemination based on the systematic collection of results and outcomes of interventions and the promotion of their use across Canada.
Expected results: To increase effective action to reduce health inequalities and their underlying causes. Performance measures include the extent of design and implementation of new promising interventions; the extent of exchange of new knowledge of effective interventions to take action on priority heath issues; and the increase in the number of intersectoral collaborations to address specific determinants of health or combinations of determinants.
Results Achieved: The program has invested more than $27 million over five years to support mental health promotion across Canada. This funding supports the implementation of ten innovative, multi-centre mental health promotion interventions over the period 2010-15. These initiatives will include thousands of children, youth and families in over 50 communities. The program has also invested $7 million over the period 2010-12 in projects to promote healthy weights and prevent obesity. The IS has undertaken capacity building initiatives to ensure effective implementation and evaluation of funded innovative interventions. Initiatives have also strengthened capacity to develop and implement inter-sectoral partnerships. The knowledge being collected and gained from these projects on the impact and effectiveness of interventions will be shared with stakeholders across the country and help shape future projects and programs.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 1.4 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 7.2 |
Total Contributions | 6.5 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 8.7 | 8.2 | (4.4) |
Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity | $7.9M | $7.7M | $11.3M | $9.2M | $8.5M | $2.8M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance in grant spending was $7.2M due to transfer of $6.6M from grants to contributions; transfer of $1.0M to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through Supplementary Estimates C; and other transfers of $0.6M. Actual spending in contributions exceeded planned spending by $4.4M mainly due to transfer from grants, which was offset by transfers out of $1.4M to other programs within PHAC.
Audit completed or planned: The IS was included in the September 2009 Audit of Health Promotion Programs.
Evaluation completed or planned: The Population Health Fund Evaluation 2008 covering the period of 2005-08 was completed in 2009. The next evaluation is planned for completion by 2014-15.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada (FI)
Start date: January 2005
End date: Ongoing
Description: Contributions towards the Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada.
Expected results: Projects funded at the national and regional levels will result in increased knowledge and awareness of the nature of HIV and AIDS and ways to address the disease; increased individual and organizational capacity to address HIV and AIDS; and enhanced engagement and collaboration on approaches to address HIV and AIDS.
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, national funding streams supported six projects under the Specific Populations Fund, seven projects under the National Voluntary Sector Response Fund, one under the Knowledge Exchange Fund, and six under the Non-Reserve First Nations, Inuit and Métis Communities HIV/AIDS Project Fund.
A further 21 projects across Canada under the Non-reserve First Nations, Inuit and Métis and Inuit and Métis Communities fund were approved for funding starting in 2011-12. These projects aim to promote the prevention of HIV infection; facilitate access to diagnosis; treatment and social supports for Aboriginal people living with HIV/AIDS and those at risk; and enhance the capacity of service providers to deliver culturally relevant, community-based interventions among Canada's off-reserve First Nations, Inuit and Métis populations.
A total of 20 projects were funded through national funding streams for a total of $7.4 M. PHAC's Regional Transfer Payment Funds, through the AIDS Community Action Program (ACAP), supported 43 time-limited and 84 operational projects across Canada, for a total of $12.4M.
Under the AIDS Community Action Program, projects reports from five of the seven regions-representing approximately 85 percent of ACAP funding-reported that 43,264 members of the target populations were reached through a variety of interventions intended to increase knowledge about HIV transmission and risk. Of those reached 19,400 (or 45%) reported that their knowledge about transmission and risk had increased as a result of the intervention and approximately 20% of the target population identified their intention to adopt behaviours that would reduce risk. Currently ACAP projects are involved in an outcome assessment evaluation with the purpose of collecting participant level data to examine increased practice of health behaviours, increased knowledge and awareness of HIV/Acquired immune deficiency syndromeand increased access to programs and services.
Under the Knowledge Transfer and Exchange Fund, project reports indicate that funded activities increased the knowledge of HIV among front-line workers across Canada. A survey of users showed that 92% of respondents indicated that the activities were useful or very useful in providing information, and that they enabled users to respond to the needs of clients and their community. Eighty-six percent of respondents used information provided to change work practices, or establish or adapt programming. As a result, the capacity of community based organizations to develop and deliver programs and services increased. Front line workers reported using funded services frequently-almost 70% used them at least monthly.
In one case, reports indicate that the rate of knowledge of Aboriginal women who are aware of their HIV status increased from 45% to 69% over the course of four years.
Based on a comparison of total numbers of volunteers and total numbers of volunteer hours reported in 2009-2010, and 2010-11 by nationally funded projects, volunteer engagement increased from 23 to 30 hours per volunteer.
Regional project data from all seven regions reported over 5000 volunteers who donated 159,312 hours (contributing an average of 31 hours per volunteer). There were over 2400 new volunteers. Significant training of over 900 sessions was reported by six of seven regions for both staff and volunteers.
Community-based organizations developed new partnerships with communities and provinces and territories to improve access to prevention and control programs and treatment. Partnerships increased at least 10% per year over the last two years.
Regional projects in six of the seven regions reported over 650 partnerships. Projects in five regions reported a total of 63 partnerships with local and provincial governments across a number of key sectors, and a total of 48 collaborative partnerships with researchers and/or academics (a substantial increase over the last two years). Additionally, in Quebec, 33 projects reported partnerships with government and 11 projects reported partnerships with researchers. Examples of the nature and results of partnerships with researchers include: exploring models of rehabilitation programming for people living with HIV; exploring and documenting innovative models of HIV service delivery; strengthening community-based research skills and knowledge; and greater involvement and access to research expertise. Results of partnerships with the public and voluntary sector include: increased ability to reach populations at risk and provide care, treatment and support to newly diagnosed cases of HIV; increased access to nutritious foods for women and families with HIV; and increased access to medical appointments and to programs and services in general for target populations.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.4 | 0.3 | 6.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Total Contributions | 21.3 | 21.1 | 16.7 | 21.4 | 19.9 | 1.5 |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | $21.7M | $21.4M | $22.7M | $21.6M | $19.9M | $1.7M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Funds were transferred from Grants to Contributions. The variance of $1.7M consists of: $0.5M contribution programming deferred under the national funding stream for community-based social marketing because of delays in internal processes; and $1.2M in transfers to other programs for joint action on Federal Initiative outcomes including: 1) $45,000 to Hepatitis C Prevention, Support and Research program for increased knowledge and awareness of Hepatitis C; 2) $0.3M to Canadian HIV Vaccine Initiative for increased capacity, knowledge and awareness on issues of new prevention technologies; and 3)$0.8M to Canadian HIV/AIDS Research Initiative for catalyst research on HIV co-infection, and knowledge dissemination.
Audit completed or planned: The program was part of the September 2009 Audit of Health Promotion Programs.
Evaluation completed or planned: In 2009-10 the Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada Evaluation Report (2004-07) was approved. An evaluation report summarizing AIDS Community Action Program 2007-09 was finalized in 2010-11. The report will be available online. The next evaluation of the FI to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada is planned for completion by 2013-14.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Collaborating Centres for Public Health (NCCPH)
Start date: 2004-05
End date: Ongoing
Description: Contributions to persons and agencies to support health promotion projects in community health resource development, training/skill development and research. The focus of the NCCPH program is to strengthen public health capacity, translate health knowledge and promote and support the use of knowledge and evidence by public health practitioners in Canada in collaboration with provincial/territorial and local governments, academia, public health practitioners and nongovernmental organizations.
Expected results: Increased opportunities for collaboration and networking between health portfolio partners, NCCs and other external organizations; increased knowledge translation activities-knowledge synthesis, translation and exchange-and the application of scan and research findings by researchers and knowledge users; knowledge gap identification-gaps are identified, acting as catalysts for new research; increased availability of knowledge for evidence-based decision making in public health with consequent increased use of evidence to inform public health programs, policies and practices; and improved public health programs and policies.
Results Achieved: Strategic review of program supported renewal for five years (2010-15). The NCCs are regularly invited to present to the Public Health Network Council and the Council of Chief Medical Officers of Health to inform on the use of evidence in policy and decision making in public health.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.6 | (0.3) |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | $8.8M | $8.8M | $8.3M | $8.6M | $8.6M | $(0.3)M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Additional funding has been provided from other PHAC program areas to support expanded work plan activities.
Audit completed or planned: Recipient audits of NCC centres are planned to occur on a rotating basis.
Evaluation completed or planned: The Formative Evaluation of the National Collaborating Centres for Public Health Program (NCCPH) was completed in 2008-09. An evaluation of Public Health Tools, including the National Collaborating Centres for Public Health, is planned for completion by 2013-14. The evaluation will focus on program relevance and performance in accordance with TBS 2009 Policy on Evaluation.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Healthy Living Fund (HLF)
Start date: June 2005
End date: Ongoing
Description: The HLF supports healthy living activities with community, regional, national and international impacts by funding and engaging the voluntary sector, and by building partnerships between and collaborating with governments, non-governmental organizations and other agencies.
Expected results: Funds will be used to build public health capacity and develop supportive environments for physical activity and healthy eating. Projects will help to strengthen the evidence base, contribute to knowledge development and exchange and help in the formation of health promotion activities.
Results Achieved: Objectives of the HLF are to support effective, sustainable community actions and systems that build community capacity to provide supportive environments for health. Contribution funding targeted Canadian voluntary, not-for-profit organizations to undertake national initiatives that directly support the Agency's mandate, goals and priorities in the area of physical activity and healthy eating and their relationship to healthy weights.
Funding was provided to the Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute for data collection and surveillance activities. This work supports the monitoring of physical activity levels of children and youth against targets set by federal and provincial/territorial ministers of Sport, Physical Activity and Recreation. Data will be used to inform stakeholder communities of current physical activity levels and conditions that influence participation.
In partnership with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, PHAC funded knowledge syntheses to inform future physical activity guideline development with a focus on (a) physical activity among preschool-aged children; and (b) physical activity among people with disabilities.
PHAC also approved funding for a project with Physical and Health Education Canada to undertake the development of an after-school framework to promote physical activity for children and youth. By addressing four key areas-policy development, capacity building, knowledge development and program delivery-the initiative will enable the delivery of quality after-school programs focussed on increased access to physical activity and healthy eating.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 7.8 | 7.4 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 1.2 |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | $7.8M | $7.4M | $5.2M | $4.2M | $4.0M | $1.2M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was lower by $1.2M than planned spending due to transfer of $0.3M to CIHR through Supplementary Estimates B to fund projects in Physical Activity; and transfers to other programs with PHAC of $0.9M.
Audit completed or planned: The program was part of the September 2009 Audit of Health Promotion Programs. There were no audits planned for fiscal year 2010-11.
Evaluation completed or planned: The Formative Evaluation of the Integrated Strategy on Healthy Living and Chronic Diseases, of which the Healthy Living Fund is a part, was completed in 2009-10.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Diabetes Strategy (non-Aboriginal elements) (CDS)
Start date: 2005-06
End date: Ongoing
Description: The CDS engages provinces, territories and stakeholders at the national and regional levels in order to improve information and services available to Canadians living with or at higher risk of developing diabetes. This is achieved through community-based programming, support for diabetes surveillance systems, and collaboration on knowledge development and exchange related to risk factors and determinants for diabetes and its complications.
Expected results: Improved capacity to apply best practices and clinical practice guidelines to better screen, educate and counsel at-risk Canadians; healthier public policies in organizations across sectors and jurisdictions to address high-risk populations; early detection and management of diabetes; increased organizational capacity for policy, program, services and research development; increased awareness of diabetes risks, complications and prevention strategies for high-risk populations; and, increased knowledge among high-risk populations of skills and behaviours necessary to prevent diabetes and its complications.
Results Achieved: In 2010-11, 40 organizations received funding from the CDS in two streams. National organizations carry out their activities across the country, whereas the regional stream supports local organizations which are able to target the unique needs of their communities. Examples include the following.
The Canadian Pharmaceutical Association developed and disseminated diabetes patient care resources and trained 500 pharmacists across the country through live and online workshops to counsel people with or at risk of developing diabetes that come through their pharmacies. The Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging developed a physical activity program geared for older Canadians with diabetes. Linkages were made with Diabetes Education Centres across the country and diabetes educators and community leaders were trained to deliver the program. The Canadian Association of Wound Care researched best practices to reduce foot complications in people with diabetes (which left unmanaged can lead to limb amputation). Print and Web-based resources were developed, translated into 12 languages, and disseminated to physicians, Diabetes Education Centres and local community organizations in order to raise awareness of the importance of proper foot care for people living with diabetes.
Many of the populations at high risk of developing diabetes face significant challenges in accessing, understanding, and acting upon information that can help them identify their risk and effectively manage their condition. This may be because of language barriers, cultural practices, or living in remote underserved locations. The focus of the regional community-based projects (34 in total) was on the development and implementation of diabetes awareness and self-management initiatives geared to specific populations such as, Nova Scotians of African descent, East Asians living in Alberta, low income populations in Toronto and rural communities in Saskatchewan and British Columbia. As a result, these Canadians were made aware of their risk and provided the support, often from trained peers to whom they could relate, to effectively manage their diabetes or pre-diabetes. In many of these programs emphasis was placed on the prevention of serious cardiovascular complications as well as consideration of the importance of mental health issues, which are prevalent in people living with diabetes.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 |
Total Contributions | 2.6 | 2.3 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 0.8 |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | 2.9 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 2.0 |
Program Activity: Surveillance and Population Health Assessment | ||||||
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Total Other types of transfer payments |
||||||
Total Program Activity | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Total Program Activities | $3.0M | $3.1M | $6.3M | $4.3M | $4.2M | $2.1M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The grant funding of $1.2M was transferred fully to contributions. However, contribution actual spending was lower than planned spending due to transfer of $0.5M to CIHR through Supplementary Estimates B and other various transfers to different programs within PHAC of $1.6M.
Audit completed or planned: In 2010-11 an audit of the Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Program was completed. The Canadian Diabetes Strategy was part of this audit.
Evaluation completed or planned: An evaluation on the CDS for the period 2004-09 was completed in February 2010 as part of the Promotion of Population Health Grant and Contribution Programs: Summary of Program Evaluations, 2004-09. Evaluations of the grants and contributions components of Chronic Diseases Prevention and Mitigation (including the Integrated Strategy on Healthy Living and Chronic Disease) are planned for 2013-14.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian HIV Vaccine Initiative (CHVI)
Start date: 2007-08
End date: 2016-17
Description: The CHVI is a collaborative undertaking between the Government of Canada and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to contribute to the global effort to develop a safe, effective, affordable and globally accessible HIV vaccine. This collaboration, formalized by a Memorandum of Understanding signed by both parties in August 2006 and renewed in July 2010, builds on the Government of Canada's commitment to a comprehensive, long-term approach to address HIV/AIDS. Participating federal departments and agencies are the Agency, Health Canada, Industry Canada, the Canadian International Development Agency, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
The CHVI's overall goals are to: advance the basic science of HIV vaccine discovery and social research in Canada and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs); support the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical research, with a focus on accelerating clinical trials in humans; address the enabling conditions to facilitate regulatory approval and community preparedness; improve the efficacy and effectiveness of HIV Prevention of Mother-to-Child services in LMICs by determining innovative strategies and programmatic solutions related to enhancing the accessibility, quality, and uptake; and ensure horizontal collaboration within the CHVI and with domestic and international stakeholders.
Expected results:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0 | 0.9 | 9.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 8.3 |
$0.0M | $0.9M | $9.3M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $8.3M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Government of Canada announced in February 2010 that they would not move forward with the manufacturing facility and in July 2010, announced the renewal of the CHVI, with the establishment of the Research and Development Alliance as its cornerstone.
Audit completed or planned: None.
Evaluation completed or planned: The CHVI Evaluation was completed in 2010-11. The final report will be available on line. A Performance Measurement Strategy is underway and will be implemented in 2011-12.
Strategic Outcome: Canada is able to promote health, reduce health inequalities, and mitigate disease and injury.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Hepatitis C Initiative (HCI)
Start date: April 2000
End date: March 31, 2020
Description: Payments provided every five years to provinces and territories to improve access to health care and treatment services to persons infected with hepatitis C through the blood system. The final payment will occur in 2014-15.
Expected results: Improved access to current emerging antiviral drug therapies, other relevant drug therapies, immunization and health care services for the treatment of hepatitis C infection and related medical conditions.
Results Achieved: The number of persons infected with hepatitis C in Canada demonstrates the continued need for an initiative of this nature. The Initiative provides $300M in transfer payments over a 20-year period to assist P/Ts in the provision of hepatitis C health care services for persons infected with hepatitis C through the blood system prior to January 1, 1986 and post July 1, 1990. Although the proportion of those infected with hepatitis C through the blood system represents just over one-tenth of estimated cases, the use of the funds to enhance the provision of health services across Canada have made all persons with hepatitis C potential beneficiaries of the HCI. One of the key activities of the Agency is to continue to lead federal programs to address HIV, sexually transmitted and blood borne infections (including viral hepatitis) and tuberculosis; the focus of this work is on effective prevention initiatives, education and awareness activities, diagnosis, care, equitable access to treatments, and support of those persons in Canada infected with, affected by or vulnerable to infectious diseases.
The federal government distributed the required funds according to the agreements. From 2000-01 to 2004-05, $200.6M was transferred to the P/Ts. Another $49.7M payment was made to the provinces in 2009-10 and the final $49.7M payment will be made in 2014-15.
Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending Variance(s) 2010-11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | |||||
Total Contributions | |||||
Total Other types of transfer payments |
49.7 | ||||
Total Program Activity | $0.0M | $49.7M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M $0.0M |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): n/a
Audit completed or planned: None.
Evaluation completed or planned: An evaluation of the first five years of the program (2000-05) was completed in 2006. Further evaluation of the program will be incorporated in a larger evaluation of community-associated infections, which is currently scheduled to be completed in 2012-13.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: First Nations Policing Program
Start Date: 1991-92
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Under the First Nations Policing Program (FNPP), Public Safety Canada negotiates, administers and monitors tripartite agreements for policing services in First Nation and Inuit communities. The FNPP is intended to supplement provincial/territorial policing services and funding. Financial contributions are provided based on a 52% federal and 48% provincial/territorial contribution ratio.
Strategic Outcome: A safe and resilient Canada
Results Achieved: The expected result has been achieved. In 2010-11, there was an overall increase in the total First Nation and Inuit population receiving dedicated and culturally appropriate policing services and a corresponding increase in the number of police officers funded under the FNPP to respond to this increased population.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $72,938,823 | $84,953,581 | $121,783,148 | $89,585,707 | $79,159,612 | $42,623,536 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $72,938,823 | $84,953,581 | $121,783,148 | $89,585,707 | $79,159,612 | $42,623,536 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): As per Public Accounts, the actual lapse for the FNPP is $10.4M and is represented by the difference between Total Authorities and Actual Spending. The lapse is due to the following:
The $42.6M variance between planned and actual spending in 2010-11 can be attributed to the actual lapse of $10.4M described above and an amount of $35.0M that was transferred through the Supplementary Estimates to the RCMP to cover the cost of the services they provide. An amount of $2.8M was also provided as additional authority through Supplementary Estimates "A" for the movement of funding (reprofile) from 2009-10 to 2010-11 to continue to address critical policing infrastructure needs in First Nation communities during fiscal year 2010-11 as part of Canada's Economic Action Plan.
Audit Completed or Planned: A Management Action Plan was approved in 2010-11 for the follow-up of the 2007 FNPP audit
Evaluation Completed or Planned: A program evaluation was completed in 2010-11 consistent with the Treasury Board Policy on Evaluation
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Crime Prevention Strategy
Start Date: 1998-99
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The National Crime Prevention Strategy (NCPS) provides national leadership on effective and cost-efficient ways to prevent and reduce crime by addressing known risk factors in high risk populations and places. It does so through supporting evidence-based, focused and targeted preventative interventions in local communities, producing and disseminating knowledge on tools and best practices in crime prevention for the benefit of practitioners across the country, and providing policy advice to advance the field of crime prevention in Canada and internationally. The Centre engages with stakeholders and works collaboratively with federal, provincial, and territorial partners.
Strategic Outcome: A safe and resilient Canada
Results Achieved: Evidence to demonstrate the achievement of the expected result will not be obtained until the projects have concluded (mostly in 2013). Projects will be evaluated to measure and validate results.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $842,571 | $1,504,791 | $8,460,000 | $2,363,142 | $1,504,163 | $6,955,837 |
Total Contributions | $19,050,822 | $27,093,646 | $43,039,899 | $40,867,784 | $38,731,836 | $4,308,063 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $19,893,393 | $28,598,437 | $51,499,899 | $43,230,926 | $40,235,999 | $11,263,900 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The $11.3M variance between planned and actual spending is due to a $6M in reduction of authorities following Strategic Review, $2.3M in reallocation to other G&C programs as well as a lapse of $3.0M that is explained by late approval of projects and surpluses on existing agreements.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Final Evaluation of the Youth Gang Prevention Fund was published in March 2011, Summative Evaluation of the NCPS planned for 2012-13.
Note: The above table includes the International Crime Prevention Centre Grant Budget of $500,000 and Actuals of $499,618.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements (DFAA)
Start Date: 1970
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Provision of federal financial assistance to provinces and territories following large-scale natural disasters.
Strategic Outcome: A safe and resilient Canada
Results Achieved: DFAA payments and commitments totalling $88,768,508 were made in 2010-11 to provide federal financial support to provinces and territories affected by major natural disasters.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $120,490,936 | $99,924,101 | $100,000,000 | $100,000,000 | $88,768,508 | $11,231,492 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $120,490,936 | $99,924,101 | $100,000,000 | $100,000,000 | $88,768,508 | $11,231,492 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): DFAA payments and commitments are made in response to provincial and territorial requests. Actual spending is largely dependant on when the required documentation is submitted by the province / territory. The amount of each DFAA payment is determined following a federal audit of provincial/territorial expenditures. DFAA is a quasi-statutory program therefore the Department is not at liberty to reallocate to other initiative and unused funding must therefore lapse.
Audit Completed or Planned: Audit of the Expenditures related to Grants and Contributions Programs completed in 2011
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation planned for 2011-12
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Joint Emergency Preparedness Program (JEPP)
Start Date: 1980
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Cost shared program with provinces and territories to prepare for emergencies of all types.
Strategic Outcome: A safe and resilient Canada
Results Achieved: In 2010-2011, 444 projects were approved, resulting in actual spending of 93% of the Joint Emergency Preparedness Program funding envelope of $8.5 million.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | $8,068,968 | $7,882,721 | $8,471,000 | $8,471,000 | $8,155,314 | $315,686 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $8,068,968 | $7,882,721 | $8,471,000 | $8,471,000 | $8,155,314 | $315,686 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): While over $8.3M was committed at the beginning of the fiscal year, the actual spending at year-end was slightly lower than planned as a result of claims submitted being less than originally anticipated and projects being withdrawn.
Audit Completed or Planned: Audit of the Expenditures related to Grants and Contributions Programs completed in 2011
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation planned for 2013
Note: The Joint Emergency Preparedness Program (JEPP) includes funding and actual spending of $187,500 for Worker's Compensation.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Security Cost Framework
Start Date: 2009-10
End Date: 2010-11
Description: The Contribution Program for the Security Cost Framework Policy in relation to the 2010 G8 Summit and G20 Meeting provided federal financial assistance to provincial and municipal security partners for eligible extraordinary, justifiable and reasonable incremental security costs incurred as a result of the G8 and G20 Summits held in 2010.
Strategic Outcome: A safe and resilient Canada
Results Achieved: Eight contribution agreements and two major amendments were negotiated and ratified with provincial and municipal security partners involved with the G8 Summit and/or the G20 Summit. In total, these contribution agreements amounted to $160,282,320.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities[1] |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | - | $15,300,000 | $127,355,000 | $260,802,500 | $144,982,320 | $(17,627,320) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | - | $15,300,000 | $127,355,000 | $260,802,500 | $144,982,320 | $(17,627,320) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The 2010-11 Planned Spending, at the time of the Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) did not include additional funding for G20 and reprofiling of funds provided through the Supplementary Estimates of $133.4M which resulted in year-end Total Authorities of $260.8M. Actual costs to deliver security for the Summits of $145M were lower than initially estimated due to lower than anticipated claims and resulted in unspent funding of $115.8M. The $17.6M variance expresses the difference between the originally Planned Spending of $127.4M and the portion of authorities sought through the Supplementary Estimates that was actually required ($17.6M) to meet the costs for security of the Summits ($115.8M).
Audit Completed or Planned: Evaluation planned no later than 2013
Evaluation Completed or Planned: By 2013
[1] Total authorities were sought on the basis of cost estimates developed on security planning assumptions and included significant contingencies given incomplete information on which security plans were being built to determine funding request. This amount covers the overall project over two fiscal years.
Actual Spending 2008–09 | Actual Spending 2009–10 | Planned Spending 2010–11 | Total Authorities 2010–11 | Actual Spending 2010–11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributions | |||||
Canadian Language Sector Enhancement Program (Note 1) | - | 0.6 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.2 |
Total Contributions | - | 0.6 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.2 |
OTHER PAYMENTS (STATUTORY) (Note 2) | |||||
Payments to Municipalities and Other Taxing Authorities | 469.2 | 471.3 | 509.1 | 491.6 | 491.6 |
Recoveries from custodian departments | (470.4) | (470.2) | (509.1) | (492.4) | (492.4) |
Total Other Payments | (1.2) | 1.1 | - | (0.8) | (0.8) |
Total Transfer Payments | (1.2) | 1.7 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Pensions under the RCMP Pension Continuation Act (PCA)
Start Date: 1959
End Date: Ongoing as long as there are remaining plan members and survivors.
Description: The PCA is a defined benefit pension plan the purpose of which is to provide a lifetime benefit for RCMP members and their survivors. It provides for the payment of pensions to Officers, Non-Commissioned Officers and Constables engaged prior to March 1, 1949, except those who elected to come under the RCMP Superannuation Act. The PCA is a predecessor to the RCMP Superannuation Act.
Strategic Outcome: N/A
Results Achieved: Pension benefits have been provided to eligible RCMP pensioners and survivors.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | ||||||
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 18.9 | 17.9 | 17.0 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 0.5 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 18.9 | 17.9 | 17.0 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 0.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): These pension payments are decreasing as the number of remaining pensioners and survivors decrease. All new members contribute under the RCMP Superannuation Act.
Audit Completed or Planned: Funding requirements for this program were reviewed as part of the comprehensive strategic review conducted by the RCMP in 2008. Resulting adjustments to the planned spending will be reflected in future estimates.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to compensate members of the RCMP for injuries received in the performance of their duties
Start Date: 1959
End Date: Ongoing
Description: This program significantly contributes to the higher level of expected results of the organization’s mandate in that it protects members of the organization in a real way in the event they become disabled as a result of carrying out the duties and activities associated with endeavouring to provide for a safe and secure Canada. This program provides financial assistance to members of the RCMP who die or suffer a permanent work-related illness or injury, leading to a loss of quality of life. The program’s financial assistance extends to the members’ survivors.
Strategic Outcome: Applicable to all strategic outcomes.
Results Achieved: Eligible clients are appropriately compensated for the non-economic effects of a service-related illness/injury and/or death.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 73.4 | 83.0 | 82.8 |
96.7 |
93.3 |
-10.5 |
Total Contributions | ||||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||||
Total Program Activity(ies) | 73.4 | 83.0 | 82.8 |
96.7 |
93.3 |
-10.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Increases in the costs of this program are related to increases in the number of benefit recipients, as well as the indexation of benefits.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The next evaluation is tentatively scheduled for fiscal year 2014-15.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Firearms Funding Program for Opt-in Provinces and/or Territorial Governments – Aboriginal and/or other communities and organizations
Start Date: 1995-1996
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Annual funding to participating provinces and/or territories for the reimbursement of costs incurred in the administration of the firearms program within their jurisdiction.
Strategic Outcome: Quality firearms program and support – the risks to public safety from firearms in Canada and international communities are minimized.
Results Achieved: Reduced access to firearms for those who pose a threat to public safety, useful information made available for policing and law enforcement purposes, safe use and storage of firearms, and increased understanding and knowledge of program requirements by clients, community organizations and Canadians.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Firearms Registration | ||||||
Contributions | 0.2 | 0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0 | 1.3 |
Firearms Licensing and Supporting Infrastructure | ||||||
Contributions | 13.4 | 13.8 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 0 |
Total Contributions | 13.6 | 13.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 14.5 | 1.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The RCMP has conducted a program evaluation. The report was published in 2010 and is now available on the RCMP’s website at:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grants and Scholarships (voted)
Start Date: 1978
End Date: No end date
Description: This transfer payment program consists of grants and scholarships awarded for research, research training and research dissemination activities in the social sciences and humanities.
Strategic Outcomes:
1. People-A first-class research capacity in the social sciences and humanities
2. Research-New knowledge based on excellent research in the social sciences and humanities
3. Knowledge Mobilization-Facilitating the use of social sciences and humanities knowledge within and beyond academia
Strategic Outcome 1: People
The development of talent through direct support to student and postdoctoral fellows has increased 27 per cent between 2006-07 and 2010-11, to $37 million. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) awarded 927 doctoral and postdoctoral fellowships and prizes in 2010-11 (excluding Canada Graduate Scholarships [CGS] and Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships [Vanier CGS]).
There has been a 41 per cent increase since 2006-07 in the number of postdoctoral fellowships and awards granted, reflecting proportionate increases in applications for that same period.
Performance has been maintained for the Canada Research Chairs Program. By March 31, 2011, there were 1,845 Canada Research Chairs at 72 postsecondary institutions across Canada. Of these chairs, 30 per cent were filled by researchers recruited from abroad, including 256 Canadian expatriates. Over 22 per cent of Canada Research Chairs are in the social sciences and humanities. In 2010-11, a total of 310 new or renewed Canada Research Chairs were announced at Canadian postsecondary institutions.
Strategic Outcome 2: Research
As SSHRC’s largest investment, funding levels for the direct costs of research were at $127 million.
Since 2006-07, the number of applications for Investigator-Framed Research, SSHRC’s largest program activity-providing approximately $86 million in funding-increased by 12 per cent. The number of awards granted annually since 2007-08 has increased by 17 per cent.
In 2010-11, funding opportunities under Investigator-Framed Research supported 3,147 new and ongoing projects across all areas of the social sciences and humanities. A total of 998 new grants were awarded in 2010-11 following peer review of the submitted proposals.
Since 2006-07, funding levels for Strategic Research Development and Targeted Research and Training Initiatives have remained largely unchanged, at $41 million.
The decline in the number of applications under the Targeted Research and Training program activity is a reflection of the realignment and streamlining of funding opportunities as SSHRC moved toward full implementation of its renewed program activity architecture.
In 2010-11, SSHRC developed and launched a partnered funding opportunity with a research and/or significant knowledge mobilization requirement. While investigator-driven, these Partnership Development Grants require a formal partnership (with financial and/or in-kind contributions) from postsecondary institutions and the public, private or community sectors. In 2010-11, the funding opportunity funded 45 partnerships involving 350 researchers and 192 partners representing multiple sectors from Canada and internationally. SSHRC’s 2010-11 investment was $3.3 million, with cash and in-kind contribution commitments of just over $1.8 million.
Strategic Outcome 3: Knowledge Mobilization
The Research Dissemination and Knowledge Translation program activity has been expanded to include sub-activities of Research Publishing and Knowledge Translation. Through its Public Outreach Grants funding vehicle, Knowledge Translation awarded 43 new grants in 2010-11 in support of the effective mobilization and implementation of research and research results, with almost 50 per cent of these falling within one of three SSHRC priority areas (Environmental Issues; Innovation, Leadership and Prosperity; and Northern Communities: Towards Social and Economic Prosperity).
Since 2006-07, funding support for knowledge mobilization has increased by 27 per cent, to $19.3 million.
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activities | ||||||
Fellowships, Scholarships and Prizes | 37.8 | 37.4 | 35.3 | 36.9 | 36.7 | 1.4 |
Research Chairs | 55.6 | 54.0 | 59.2 | 59.2 | 53.7 | -5.5 |
Investigator-Framed Research | 82.6 | 82.4 | 78.8 | 78.8 | 86.4 | 7.6 |
Targeted Research and Training Initiatives | 22.1 | 22.4 | 18.4 | 18.6 | 14.7 | -3.7 |
Strategic Research Development | 24.9 | 25.0 | 25.6 | 28.5 | 26.3 | 0.7 |
Research Communication and Interaction | 29.9 | This program activity was split into two new program activities for 2009-10 and beyond. | ||||
Research Dissemination and Knowledge Translation | N/A | 9.6 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 8.5 | 1.6 |
Research Networking | N/A | 9.0 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 10.8 | 2.6 |
Total Grants | 252.9 | 239.8 | 232.4 | 237.1 | 237.1 | 4.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | SSHRC’s grants and scholarships budget increased in 2010-11. SSHRC received additional funding as per Budget 2010 to support world-leading research in the social sciences and humanities through establishing and delivering the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships Program. | |||||
Audit Completed or Planned | No audit was conducted or planned during the reporting year. | |||||
Evaluation Completed or Planned |
|
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Graduate Scholarships (voted)
Start Date: 2003
End Date: No end date
Description: This transfer payment program seeks to develop research skills and assist in the training of highly qualified personnel by supporting students in the social sciences and humanities.
Strategic Outcome:
1. People—A first-class research capacity in the social sciences and humanities
The total number of Joseph-Armand Bombardier CGS master's and doctoral scholarships awarded in 2010-11 was 1,730. Of the above, 200 new CGS master’s scholarships were awarded in the targeted funding area of business, management and finance.
An evaluation of the CGS programs conducted in 2008-09 found that the programs are meeting two key goals: enhancing the quality of graduate training and increasing the number of highly qualified personnel graduating from Canadian universities. The evaluation generally supports the notion that there is a continuing need for CGS and related programs. However, the evidence was not strongly weighted to one side.
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activities | ||||||
Fellowships, Scholarships and Prizes | 67.3 | 75.7 | 76.0 | 76.0 | 75.0 | -1 |
Total Grants | 67.3 | 75.7 | 76.0 | 76.0 | 75.0 | -1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Audit Completed or Planned | No audit was conducted or planned during the reporting year. | |||||
Evaluation Completed or Planned | No evaluation was completed or planned during the reporting year. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships (voted)
Start Date: 2008
End Date: No end date
Description: This transfer payment program was created to attract and retain world-class doctoral students and to brand Canada as a global centre of excellence in research and higher learning.
Strategic Outcome:
1.People—A first-class research capacity in the social sciences and humanities
The second competition of the flagship Vanier CGS program was delivered in 2010-11, with:
58 doctoral scholarships awarded in the social sciences and humanities;
SSHRC, in collaboration with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), achieving harmonization of the program’s resources and delivery mechanisms, achieving the full uptake of 500 awards, and establishing a common Vanier website; and
SSHRC, in collaboration with Canadian universities, Industry Canada, and Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, implementing a national and international promotion and branding campaign for the program.
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activities | ||||||
Fellowships, Scholarships and Prizes | 0 | 2.6 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 0 |
Total Grants | 0 | 2.6 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Audit Completed or Planned | No audit was conducted or planned during the reporting year. | |||||
Evaluation Completed or Planned | No evaluation was completed or planned during the reporting year. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Indirect Costs of Research
Start Date: 2003
End Date: No end date
Description: This transfer payment program supports a portion of the indirect costs associated with conducting academic research in institutions that receive research grant funds from any of the three federal research granting agencies. Grants are awarded to eligible institutions using a progressive funding formula based on the average revenues from research grants received from CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC.
Strategic Outcome:
4. Institutional Environment—A strong Canadian science and research environment
Since 2006-07, there has been a more than 10 per cent increase in financial support to postsecondary institutions for indirect costs of research supported by the federal government’s three research granting agencies (SSHRC, CIHR and NSERC).
Since the Indirect Costs Program’s inception in 2001, SSHRC has allocated close to $2.5 billion in Indirect Costs grants to more than 140 eligible Canadian postsecondary institutions, including $329.3 million in 2010-11. The funding has provided vital support to the academic research environment in Canada.
In 2009-10, the most recent year for which data is available, eligible institutions invested along five key investment areas: 33 per cent of the Indirect Costs funds were spent on facilities; 18 per cent on research resources; 34 per cent on management and administration; 10 per cent on regulatory requirements and accreditation; and 5 per cent on intellectual property management.
The distribution of funds among the five expenditure areas has remained fairly stable since the program’s inception, with a gradual increase in the proportion of funds allotted to regulatory requirements, accreditation, and management and administration, combined with an equivalent decline in the proportion spent on resources and facilities.
In response to a recommendation from the Indirect Costs Program evaluation carried out in 2008-09, program management committed to working with the university community to establish a baseline measurement of the state of the research environment in Canada. A working group composed of senior administrators from various organizations (universities, the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada, the Canadian Association of University Business Officers, and the Canadian Association of University Research Administrators) has been tasked with identifying a set of indicators to assess the health of the university research environment every five years.
To date, the working group has identified indicators for three of the five components that define the health of the research environment (i.e., quality of facilities; availability and quality of research resources; and management and administration capacity). Work continues on identifying indicators for the two remaining components (degree of regulatory compliance; and intellectual property management capacity).
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activities | ||||||
Indirect Costs of Research | 328.3 | 324.6 | 322.1 | 329.3 | 329.3 | 7.2 |
Total Grants | 328.3 | 324.6 | 322.1 | 329.3 | 329.3 | 7.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | SSHRC received an additional $8 million in funding for the Indirect Costs Program, as per Budget 2010. Funds were received in January 2011 and spent by the end of the 2010-11 fiscal year. | |||||
Audit Completed or Planned | No audit was conducted or planned during the reporting year. | |||||
Evaluation Completed or Planned | No evaluation was completed or planned during the reporting year. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Networks of Centres of Excellence
Start Date: 1997
End Date: No end date
Description: This federal class grant transfer payment program is administered jointly by the three federal research granting agencies, in partnership with Industry Canada. It supports research in complex areas of critical importance to Canadian universities and hospitals, in partnership with private and public sectors. The networks funded through this program are multidisciplinary and multisectoral partnerships that stimulate leading-edge, internationally competitive research in areas critical to Canadian economic and social development.
Strategic Outcome:
3. Knowledge Mobilization—Facilitating the use of social sciences and humanities knowledge within and beyond academia
In 2010-11, SSHRC continued to work towards deepening the social sciences and humanities’ involvement in the Networks of Centres of Excellence.
($ millions) | Actual Spending 2008-09 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | Planned Spending 2010-11 | Total Authorities 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 | Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activities | ||||||
Research Networking | 0 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.2 | -0.6 |
Total Grants | 0 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.2 | -0.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s) | ||||||
Audit Completed or Planned | No audit was conducted or planned during the reporting year. | |||||
Evaluation Completed or Planned | No evaluation was completed or planned during the reporting year. |
2. Start Date: 1973 3. End Date: Ongoing 4. Description: The mandate of the Women’s Program is to advance equality for women across Canada through improvement of their economic and social conditions and their participation in democratic life. 5. Strategic Outcome: Equality for women and their full participation in the economic, social and democratic life of Canada 6. Results Achieved: Refer to Section II of this report for details on results achieved by this program. |
||||||
($ millions) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7. 2008– 2009 Actual Spend- ing |
8. 2009– 2010 Actual Spend- ing |
9. 2010– 2011 Planned Spend- ing |
10. 2010– 2011 Total Author- ities |
11. 2010– 2011 Actual Spend- ing |
12. Vari- ance(s) |
|
13. Total Grants | 17.55 | 14.69 | 14.75 | 14.75 | 14.75 | 0.00 |
14. Total Contributions | 3.47 | 4.80 | 5.20 | 5.20 | 4.80 | 0.40 |
15. Total Program Activity | 21.02 | 19.49 | 19.95 | 19.95 | 19.55 | 0.40 |
17. Audit Completed or Planned: Horizontal Internal Audit of Grants and Contributions Management Control completed in 2010–2011. Evaluation Completed or Planned: A summative evaluation of the Women’s Program to be completed in 2011–2012. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund
Start Date: October 20, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: The Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund is intended to establish the best transportation network, facilitating global supply chains between Asia and North America. The transportation infrastructure investments address near-term capacity problems and build strategically for the future.
Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system
Results Achieved:
Asia-Pacific Gateway Corridor and Initiative Investments Map
Significant progress has been made over the past year, including the following:
Transport Canada has conducted research on industry best practices in the innovation and development of reliability indicators and performance metrics. These indicators are intended to measure the reliability of transit times for containers originating from Asian ports through Asia-Pacific Gateway ports. The indicators will quantify Canada’s international trade supply chain performance and will provide the starting point for targeting bottlenecks.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $56.6 | $73.6 | $241.9 | $220.0 | $122.3 | $119.67 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $56.6 | $73.6 | $241.9 | $220.0 | $122.3 | $119.67 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance under the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund program resulted from delays in project design, approval the start of construction and finalizing the contribution agreements; the need to secure additional funding partners; and, finally, the need to undertake due diligence.
Audit Completed or Planned: Not at the present time
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Transport Canada’s Departmental Evaluation Services will complete an evaluation of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund in 2013-2014. The evaluation will examine a number of issues to determine the relevance, success and cost-effectiveness of the program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Gateways and Border Crossings Fund
Start Date: February 7, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2014
Description: The Gateways and Border Crossings Fund is a merit-based program that funds transportation infrastructure and other related initiatives to develop and exploit Canada’s strategic gateways, trade corridors and border crossings, and to better integrate the national transportation system.
Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system
Results Achieved: The majority of the $2.1 billion fund has been committed to projects in each of Canada’s gateways. Recent commitments have included investments in core National Highway System infrastructure, strategic border crossings, as well as major ports and airports. These projects are intended to enhance the flow of people and goods between Canada and the rest of the world by improving and integrating Canada’s transportation system.
In 2010-2011, a total of 16 new commitments were announced under the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund, including 13 new projects in support of the Atlantic Gateway. Four contribution agreements were signed between Canada and its infrastructure project partners.
In 2010-2011, Transport Canada has also continued to progress on studies and research projects financially supported by the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund that seek to identify challenges and opportunities in Canada’s transportation network.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $4.2 | $36.9 | $425.9 | $431.6 | $100.0 | $325.9 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $4.2 | $36.9 | $425.9 | $431.6 | $100.0 | $325.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): In 2010-2011, construction schedules and forecasts for several planned and ongoing infrastructure projects under the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund changed during the fiscal year. This is the main cause of the reported variance. Unforeseen changes in circumstances relating to provincial priorities, as well as construction, administrative and other logistical issues resulted in some approved projects being delayed. For certain announced projects, business cases were not received when expected, which delayed the federal due diligence process.
Audit Completed or Planned: In May 2009, Transport Canada undertook a risk and control assessment of Canada’s Economic Action Plan initiatives specific to the department. The Gateways and Border Crossings Fund was included in this assessment. This fund was also included in Transport Canada’s audit of selected departmental Economic Action Plan initiatives presented to the Departmental Audit Committee in June 2010, which indicated that the department reasonably and appropriately distributed Economic Action Plan funding to eligible recipients and projects, and that suitable monitoring measures were in place.
The Gateways and Border Crossings Fund will be the subject of an audit in 2012-2013 as a part of the department’s Internal Audit Plan.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An interim evaluation is planned for 2012-2013.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Northumberland Strait Crossing Subsidy Payment under the Northumberland Strait Crossing Act (Statutory)
Start Date: May 31, 1997
End Date: April 1, 2032
Description: The Northumberland Strait Crossing subsidy payments are made to the bridge operator to honour a constitutional obligation to provide a transportation link between Prince Edward Island and the mainland.
Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system
Results Achieved: Federal funding is provided for continuous and efficient year-round transportation of people and goods between Prince Edward Island and the mainland to support an efficient, integrated and accessible transportation system.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $56.1 | $56.7 | $57.8 | $57.7 | $57.7 | $0.1 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $56.1 | $56.7 | $57.8 | $57.7 | $57.7 | $0.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit Completed or Planned: N/A
Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Port Divestiture Fund
Start Date: April 18, 1996
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The Port Divestiture Fund was created to facilitate the divestiture process by providing new owners/operators with the resources to continue port operations for the foreseeable future.
Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system
Results Achieved: Ports have been successfully transferred to local communities and users, and are more responsive to local needs. In 2010-2011, Transport Canada transferred one regional/local port (Port Stanley, Ontario) and partially transferred one remote port (Bamfield West, British Columbia).
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $0.4 | $23.8 | $27.0 | $21.1 | $14.5 | $12.5 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $0.4 | $23.8 | $27.0 | $21.1 | $14.5 | $12.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Port divestitures are subject to negotiation with local entities and there were unexpected delays in reaching agreements on expected divestitures in 2010-2011. This resulted in actual spending being less than planned.
Audit Completed or Planned: Transport Canada conducted an internal audit on the Port Divestiture Fund in 2009.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The program will be evaluated in 2011-2012 as part of the Marine Infrastructure evaluation.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution program for the operating, capital and start-up funding requirement for regional and remote passenger rail services
Start Date: June 1, 2004
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The Regional and Remote Passenger Rail Services Class Contribution Program supports operating, capital and start-up funding requirements for regional and remote passenger rail services by ensuring the continuation of non-via remote and regional passenger rail services.
Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system
Results Achieved: Continuation of safe, viable and reliable regional and remote passenger rail services
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $16.5 | $20.0 | $3.4 | $18.3 | $17.9 | ($14.5) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $16.5 | $20.0 | $3.4 | $18.3 | $17.9 | ($14.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Budget 2010 provided additional funding of $14.1 million to the program for 2010-2011. The planned spending of $3.4 million represents the 2010-2011 Economic Action Plan funding from Budget 2009.
Audit Completed or Planned: The Economic Action Plan portion of the program was audited in 2010.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation of sub-subactivity 1.3.3.1 (Rail Passenger Stewardship and Support), under which the program falls, was completed in 2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to the Province of British Columbia for ferry and coastal freight and passenger services
Start Date: April 18, 1977
End Date: Grant in perpetuity
Description: The grant provides financial assistance to the Province of British Columbia to provide ferry services in the waters of the province as part of a federal obligation to provide transportation links to the national transportation system from various regions and isolated areas of British Columbia.
Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system
Results Achieved: The grant helps maintain transportation links to the national surface transportation system from various regions and isolated areas of British Columbia.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $26.3 | $26.9 | $27.4 | $27.4 | $26.9 | $0.5 |
Total Contributions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $26.3 | $26.9 | $27.4 | $27.4 | $26.9 | $0.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The grant amount is indexed annually to the Consumer Price Index, which was lower than expected in 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this grant in 2010-2011. The department will determine whether an internal audit will be conducted, based on its risk-based audit planning process.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation was completed in 2010-2011. The final report is not yet available.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Ferry Services Contribution Program
Start Date: 1941
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Ferry Services Contribution Program provided financial assistance to maintain interprovincial ferry transportation in Atlantic Canada and Eastern Quebec, more specifically for the service across the Northumberland Strait, between Wood Islands, Prince Edward Island, and Caribou, Nova Scotia, operated by Northumberland Ferries Ltd.; the service between Cap-aux-Meules, Îles de la Madeleine, Quebec, and Souris, Prince Edward Island, operated by CTMA Traversier Ltée; and the service between Saint John, New Brunswick, and Digby, Nova Scotia, operated by Bay Ferries Ltd.
Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $16.1 | $23.0 | $20.3 | $25.2 | $24.5 | $(4.2) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $16.1 | $23.0 | $20.3 | $25.2 | $24.5 | $(4.2) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Additional funding was received from Budget 2010 for safety-related projects.
Audit Completed or Planned: Recipient audits were undertaken in 2010-2011 for the 2009-2010 fiscal years. The final reports are not yet available.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the program was completed in 2009-2010. The evaluation will be posted online in the near future.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Airports Capital Assistance Program
Start Date: April 1, 1995
End Date: No sunset clause
Description: The Airports Capital Assistance Program assists eligible applicants in financing capital projects related to safety, while contributing to asset protection and operating cost reduction.
Strategic Outcome: A safe transportation system
Results Achieved: The program maintained or increased safety, contributed to asset protection, reduced operating costs and increased the use of environmentally sustainable practices at non-federal airports, where possible.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $ 51.1 | $26.3 | $38.0 | $38.0 | $9.6 | $28.4 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $51.1 | $26.3 | $38.0 | $38.0 | $9.6 | $28.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The renewal of the Airports Capital Assistance Program was delayed until June 2010 and as a result the completion of many of the projects originally scheduled for 2010-2011 were delayed to 2011-2012. In some cases, entire projects were postponed by a year. The majority of the funds were re-profiled to allow for the completion of these projects.
Audit Completed or Planned: Audits are conducted periodically; some projects will be audited in 2012-2013.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation was completed in 2009.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Outaouais Road Development Agreement
Start Date: January 7, 1972
End Date: The agreement will end once all projects have been completed.
Description: To improve the highway system in the Outaouais region, as per a 50-50 cost sharing agreement concluded on January 7, 1972, between the National Capital Commission and the Ministère des Transports du Québec (subsequently amended September 15, 1972, and again December 4, 1978). Transport Canada has been responsible for administering the agreement since 1996, when Cabinet authorized the transfer of the agreement from the National Capital Commission to Transport Canada. There were no resources provided with the transfer. Ongoing resources of $2.6 million were subsequently obtained; further resources are sought through the Treasury Board submissions for specific projects. Over the past 38 years, the federal government has contributed $263 million to the Outaouais Roads Agreement, of which $85 million has been spent since the administration of the agreement was transferred to Transport Canada in 1996.
Strategic Outcome: An Efficient Transportation System
Results Achieved: Construction of Phase 1 of Highway 5 to extend the divided highway was completed in 2009-2010, and this segment is open to traffic. Construction of Phase 2 of the project started in 2010-2011 and is expected to be complete in 2013-2014. This project will enhance the safety and efficiency of the Outaouais road network.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $7.3 | $3.3 | $15.0 | $15.0 | $1.8 | $13.2 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $7.3 | $3.3 | $15.0 | $15.0 | $1.8 | $13.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The environmental assessment for Phase 2 of the Highway 5 project was scheduled to be complete in 2009-2010. However, the completion of the environmental assessment was delayed due to extensive environmental analysis required by the Crown corporation owner of adjacent federal parklands. The additional analysis was needed to properly assess the impacts of the project on these parklands that are ecologically sensitive. The environmental assessment was completed in January 2011 and construction started in February 2011. Initially, the Ministère des Transports du Québec planned a full construction season for 2010-2011 (with planned spending of $15 million). Unfortunately, delays in completing the environmental assessment did not permit construction to start until late in 2010-2011 (resulting in actual spending of $1.8 million).
Audit Completed or Planned: An audit was completed in 2005.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluations were performed in 2005 and 2009. A new evaluation is planned in 2012-2013.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grade Crossing Improvement and Closure Program (approved under the Railway Safety Act)
Start Date: January 1, 1989
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: Payments made to railway companies and municipalities to improve the safety at public road-railway grade crossings.
Strategic Outcome: A safe transportation system
Results Achieved: Safety improvements at grade crossings that result in accident and incident reductions.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.3 | $0.3 | $0.2 | $0.1 |
Total Contributions | $7.3 | $13.7 | $11.1 | $8.6 | $7.4 | $3.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $7.4 | $13.8 | $11.4 | $8.9 | $7.6 | $3.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Some Grade Crossing Improvement and Closure Program projects were not completed in time and these delays were reported late in the fiscal year to Transport Canada, which did not allow the department time to move other projects forward. For the Grade Crossing Improvement and Closure Program, not enough requests were received to spend the entire $300,000, and one project was delayed to 2011-2012.
Audit Completed or Planned: No audit is planned in the near future.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: The evaluation was completed in 2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Safety Code Contribution Program
Start Date: 1987
End Date: March 31, 2015
Description: The purpose of this program is to provide federal support in the form of contributions to projects and recipients that support the national transportation policy to improve the safety of roadways, road users and motor vehicles in Canada. The National Safety Code is intended to ensure commercial motor carrier safety. The National Safety Code is a comprehensive set of 15 standards that provides the minimum performance requirements for all aspects of commercial vehicle, driver and motor carrier safety. The standards address key safety aspects of commercial vehicle operations as set out in the Motor Vehicle Transport Act, such as the Motor Carrier Safety Fitness Certificate Regulations and the Commercial Vehicle Drivers Hours of Service Regulations.
Strategic Outcome: A safe transportation system
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $4.3 |
$0 | $4.4 | $8.8 | $8.8 | ($4.4) |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | $4.3 | $0 | $4.4 | $8.8 | $8.8 | ($4.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The funding for 2009-2010 was received late in the year and could not be used by year end. For that reason, the 2009-2010 funding was fully re-profiled to 2010-2011. The 2010-2011 Planned Spending, Authorities and Actual Spending cover the fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 under Treasury Board submission number 835944.
Audit Completed or Planned: There is no requirement for an audit of the program.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the program was completed in 2009. There is an evaluation planned for 2013.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Pensions, and Allowances for Disability and Death
Start Date: September 1, 1919
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Provide pensions for disability or death and economic support in the form of allowances to: members of the Canadian Forces and Merchant Navy Veterans who served in the First World War, the Second World War or the Korean War; certain civilians who are entitled to benefits because of their wartime service; former and serving members of the Canadian Forces (including those who served in Special Duty Areas); survivors and dependants of military and civilian personnel.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other individuals achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Results Achieved: Successfully met
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 1,734.7 | 1,730.6 | 1,729.3 | 1,713.6 | 1,713.6 | 15.7 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 1,734.7 | 1,730.6 | 1,729.3 | 1,713.6 | 1,713.6 | 15.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is primarily due to a lower average cost per Canadian Forces pensioner than originally forecasted for 2010-2011.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation of Disability Pension and Awards (Completed August 2010)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Disability Awards and Allowances
Start Date: April 1, 2006
End Date: Ongoing
Description: Provide disability awards for disability or death and economic support in the form of allowances to former and serving members of the Canadian Forces, and in some cases to survivors and dependants, for the non-economic effects of a service-related disability, including pain and suffering, functional loss and the effects of permanent impairment on the lives of members, Veterans and their families.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other individuals achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Results Achieved: Successfully met
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 238.5 | 299.0 | 266.0 | 404.2 | 404.2 | (138.2) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 238.5 | 299.0 | 266.0 | 404.2 | 404.2 | (138.2) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to a greater number of individuals coming forward for reassessment or with new conditions than originally forecasted for 2010-2011, and higher intake in 2010-2011 than originally forecasted. The higher intake in 2010-2011 was due to a faster adjudication process in support of the shorter 16 week service standard. Increased costs from the above factors were partially offset by lower average expenditure than originally forecasted.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation of Disability Awards and Allowances (Completed August 2010)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Earnings Loss and Supplemental Retirement Benefit
Start Date: April 1, 2006
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Earnings Loss benefit provides temporary income replacement benefits while the Canadian Forces Veteran participates in rehabilitation in preparation for employment in civilian life. Ongoing long-term income replacement benefits are provided to age 65 when the Veteran is unable to engage in any suitable employment due to total and permanent incapacity. At age 65, recipients of long-term income replacement benefits receive a lump-sum retirement benefit to compensate for lost opportunity to contribute to a retirement pension due to a career-ending or service-related disability.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other individuals achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Results Achieved: Successfully met
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 19.1 | 28.3 | 34.0 | 40.2 | 40.2 | (6.2) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 19.1 | 28.3 | 34.0 | 40.2 | 40.2 | (6.2) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is the net of fewer individuals receiving payment and a higher average payment than originally forecasted.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: War Veterans Allowance/Civilian War Allowance
Start Date: September 1, 1930
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The War Veterans Allowance (WVA) is a form of financial assistance available to eligible Veterans, qualified civilians and their survivors, dependants and orphans. In recognition of war service, qualified persons are provided with regular, monthly income to meet basic needs. WVA is based on income, domestic status and number of dependants. Recipients are paid at a single, married or orphan’s rate. Payments are indexed annually to the CPI. Eligibility for WVA is determined by the wartime service of a Veteran or qualified civilian, age or health, income or residency.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other individuals achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Results Achieved: Successfully met
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 14.6 | 12.8 | 14.1 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 2.6 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 14.6 | 12.8 | 14.1 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 2.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to fewer individuals receiving benefits at a slightly lower average payment than originally forecasted.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Veterans Independence Program
Start Date: 1981
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Department’s Veterans Independence Program is a national home care program that assists eligible individuals to remain independent in their own homes or communities by offering a variety of programs and services, such as housekeeping, grounds maintenance, and personal care.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other individuals achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Results Achieved: Successfully met
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 320.0 | 338.0 | 353.9 | 354.4 | 354.4 | (0.5) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.0 | 338.0 | 353.9 | 354.4 | 354.4 | (0.5) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to a greater number of eligible individuals.
Audit Completed or Planned: May 2010
Evaluation Completed or Planned: In progress
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Last Post Fund
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Last Post Fund is a non-profit corporation which administers funeral, burial, and grave marking services for Veterans Affairs Canada. Canada Remembers provides eligible Veterans and civilians with a dignified funeral and burial through the Last Post Fund.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians remember and demonstrate their recognition of all those who served in Canada’s efforts during war, military conflict and peace.
Results Achieved: Successfully met
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 10.0 | 9.9 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 9.3 | 5.7 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 10.0 | 9.9 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 9.3 | 5.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to a lower number of Veterans being buried resulting in lower number of payments for funeral and burial costs than provided for in reference levels.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Commonwealth War Graves Commission
Start Date: N/A
End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Commonwealth War Graves Commission was established by Royal Charter in 1917. It’s duties are to mark and maintain the graves of the members of the forces of the Commonwealth who were killed in the two World Wars, to build memorials to those who have no known grave and to keep records and registers of Canadian war dead. Canada Remembers maintains Canadian war graves and cemeteries through a partnership with the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians remember and demonstrate their recognition of all those who served in Canada’s efforts during war, military conflict and peace.
Results Achieved: Successfully met
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 8.6 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 8.7 | 1.2 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | 8.6 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 8.7 | 1.2 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to fluctuation in the Canadian dollar and the Euro when payments are made.
Audit Completed or Planned:
Evaluation Completed or Planned:
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Western Diversification Program
Start Date: 1987-88
End Date: On-going
Description: This program was designed to promote economic development and diversification in Western Canada and advance the interests of Western Canada in national policy, program and project development and implementation.
Strategic Outcome: The western Canadian economy is developed and diversified.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 923 | 369 | 1,036 | 1,036 | 317 | 719 |
Total Policy, Advocacy and Coordination | 923 | 369 | 1,036 | 1,036 | 317 | 719 |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 1,475 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 475 |
Total Contributions | $41,774 | $173,717 | $182,493 | $198,535 | $185,742 | (3,249) |
Total Community Economic Developement | 41,774 | 173,717 | 183,968 | 199,535 | 186,742 | (2,774) |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1,654 |
Total Contributions | 21,382 | 21,459 | 12,681 | 16,423 | 23,372 | (10,691) |
Total Business Development | 21,382 | 24,459 | 14,326 | 16,423 | 23,372 | (9,046) |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 1,880 |
Total Contributions | 70,151 | 82,687 | 50,670 | 65,661 | 73,270 | (22,600) |
Total Innovation | 70,151 | 82,687 | 52,550 | 65,661 | 73,270 | (20,720) |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Western Diversification Program Grants & Contributions | 134,230 | 278,232 | 251,880 | 282,654 | 283,701 | (31,821) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending includes funding spent for the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF), under Canada’s Economic Action Plan. Variances in Community Economic Development, Business Development and Innovation, are the result of new funding provided through the Supplementary Estimates. This included the transfer of Community Adjustment Fund from previous year ($13.5 million) as well as increases to the Western Diversification Program ($13.0 million) and Rick Hansen Foundation ($4.5 million).
Audit Completed or Planned: Audit of CAF scheduled for 2011-12.
Previous WDP audit was completed September 2009.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Next evaluation scheduled to take place in 2013-14.
Previous evaluation completed October 2008.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Futures Program
Start Date: May 18, 1995
End Date: On-going
Description: This program was designed to provide funding for a network of Community Futures Organizations (CFOs) across Canada with WD as the delivery department for the West. CFOs are volunteer-led, non-profit organizations that lead strategic economic planning, and provide advice and commercial loans to local entrepreneurs, which foster economic development.
Strategic Outcome: The western Canadian economy is developed and diversified.
Results Achieved:
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 18,508 | 14,154 | 12,804 | 13,647 | 14,594 | (1,790) |
Total Program Activity | 18,508 | 14,154 | 12,804 | 13,647 | 14,594 | (1,790) |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Recreational Infrastructure Canada Program (RInC)
Start Date: May 11, 2009
End Date: October 31, 2011
Description: RInC is a contribution program aimed at addressing the short-term impacts of the global economic downturn felt in communities across Western Canada. RInC will normally focus on the rehabilitation or repair of existing recreational infrastructure facilities.
Strategic Outcome: Communities in Western Canada are economically viable.
Results Achieved: The focus of RInC is to provide timely, targeted and temporary economic stimulus for local communities and help mitigate the impacts of the global recession by increasing the total amount of construction activity related to recreational infrastructure.
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
2010-11 Planned Spending |
2010-11 Total Authorities |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Contributions | 0 | 43,228 | 86,203 | 105,802 | 91,086 | (4,883) |
Total Program Activity | 0 | 43,228 | 86,203 | 105,802 | 91,806 | (4,883) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): This program was announced in Budget 2009 as part of Canada’s Economic Action Plan. In December 2010, the Government of Canada announced that this program would be extended to October 31, 2011 (previous program end date was March 31, 2011). The negative variance is the difference between the transfer of funds from previous fiscal year through Supplementary Estimates of $19.6 million and the request to transfer unspent 2010-11 funds of $14.5 million to 2011-12 to meet contractual obligations.
Audit Completed or Planned: Next audit scheduled for 2011-12
Previous WDP audit was completed September 2009.
Evaluation Completed or Planned: Next evaluation scheduled to take place in 2013-14.
Previous audit completed September 2009.
Evaluation completed or planned: Next evaluation scheduled for 2011-12.
Evaluation planned for 2010-11.