ARCHIVED - Supreme Court of Canada
This page has been archived.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
II: Analysis of Program Activities by
Strategic Outcome
A. Strategic Outcome
The Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada has a single
strategic outcome:
To provide the best decision making environment for the
Supreme Court.
The performance indicators for the strategic outcome relate mainly to the
quality and timeliness of the service provided.
- Level of satisfaction among judges regarding quality of service.
The judges are the primary clients of the Office of the Registrar, and thus
it is critical to measure their satisfaction with performance. Satisfaction
is monitored informally on an ongoing basis throughout the year by the
Registrar's regular communication with the judges. However, satisfaction
will be more formally monitored on an annual basis by conducting interviews
with the judges. The interview will solicit among other things feedback on
the timeliness of case processing and the quality of support provided.
- Level of satisfaction among lawyers regarding quality of
service. Lawyers represent the Office of the Registrar's second
major group of stakeholders. The Office of the Registrar will continue to
receive ad hoc feedback from counsel who appear before the Court as well as
more formalized feedback from bench and bar committees such as the Court
Ottawa Agents Practice and Procedures Committee and the SCC/CBA Liaison
Committee. Feedback from counsel and self-represented litigants will also be
collected via a “comment card” at the Registry counter.
B. Program Activity
Program Activity: Process hearings and decisions
Human
Resources (FTEs) and Planned Spending ($ millions) |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
FTEs |
Planned Spending |
FTEs |
Planned Spending |
FTEs |
Planned Spending |
201 |
28.6 |
201 |
28.7 |
201 |
28.8 |
The sole Program Activity supporting the Strategic Outcome is: “Process
hearings and decisions”. The Office of the Registrar exists to provide the
services the Court must have to render its decisions as the court of last
resort. The principal responsibilities of the Office of the Registrar are to
provide a full range of administrative and support services to the Judges and to
manage cases coming to the Court.
The following provides additional information on the expected result and
performance indicators.
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
Cases processed without delay |
- Number of months between filing of application for leave and and
decision on application for leave
- Number of months between hearing and judgment
|
- Number of months between filing of application for leave and
decision on application for leave. The receipt of an application
for leave is the beginning of the process for most appeals. Before hearing
an appeal from the highest court in a province or the Federal Court of
Appeal, the Supreme Court must give permission (or leave to appeal) to the
appellant. The Office of the Registrar receives the application for leave,
offers assistance to the parties, reviews the application, and provides
legal and case management support to the panel of three judges of the Court
who decide whether to grant or dismiss the application for leave. There is
continuing pressure on the Office of the Registrar to minimize the
processing time for applications for leave. The target for decision on an
application for leave is 14 weeks, and statistics are maintained, allowing
for regular monitoring.
- Number of months between hearing and judgment. Once
leave to appeal is granted, a hearing date is set. Following the hearing of
the appeal, the decision is rendered by the judges. Decisions can be
delivered immediately, but most often there is a delay to allow the judges
to issue reasons for the decision. Judges are supported in the decision
writing process by their law clerks and staff of the Registry and the Law
Branch. The bulk of the employee work is in translating, editing and
summarizing the decisions of the Court and publishing decisions in the
Supreme Court Reports, in accordance with the Supreme Court Act.
The target for release of judgments is six months from the hearing date.
Statistics are maintained, and elapsed time is monitored regularly.
Statistics can be found on the Supreme Court’s website: (http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/home-accueil/index-eng.asp).
C. Sub-activities
The Program Activity has three sub-activities which are key contributors to
overall performance. They are:
- Management of Court Cases. In order to render
decisions, the Court requires the support of the Office of the Registrar in
the management of cases from receipt of an application for leave to appeal
to the release of the bilingual judgment on appeal and its publication. The
expected results for this sub-activity are “access to Court services and
information” and “courtroom systems reliability”. Both of these are key
elements of the hearing process and must be in place if the Supreme Court is
to render judgments.
- Library Services. The Supreme Court Act
requires the Registrar to, under the direction of the Chief Justice, manage
and control the library of the Court. Accordingly the Office of the
Registrar provides legal library services with an extensive civil law and
common law collection suited to the broad jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
of Canada. The expected result for this sub-activity is “access to reference
information”, which is a necessary part of the Supreme Court’s
decision-making process.
- Process Payments to the Supreme Court Judges Pursuant to the
Judges Act. The Judges Act specifies the salaries of
the Supreme Court judges, and prescribes other payments to be made to
judges, namely allowances, removal, meeting, conference and seminars, and
annuities, all of which are processed by the Office of the Registrar. The
expected result for this sub-activity is “timely and accurate processing of
payments”. This is necessary to meet its statutory obligations.
1) Management of Court Cases
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
- Access to court services and information
- Courtroom systems reliability
|
- % of lawyers and unrepresented litigants that were "satisfied" or "very
satisfied" with Registry services
- Number of hearing disruptions for technical reasons per year
|
- Percentage of lawyers and unrepresented litigants that were
"satisfied" or "very satisfied" with Registry services. The
Registry branch is the interface between the Office of the Registrar and its
“clients” or lawyers, self-represented litigants and the public. These
groups contact the Registry for information regarding cases, the application
for leave to appeal and appeal processes and the procedures for filing
documents. In 2006-07, a comprehensive survey was undertaken to assess the
satisfaction of lawyers and self-represented litigants with Registry
services. Results were very positive. It is planned to conduct similar
surveys every four years to regularly assess performance. The target is to
have 95% of those surveyed respond that they are satisfied or very satisfied
with service. The Registry is also monitoring client satisfaction by means
of a “comment card” for any client attending at the Registry counter. The
target for a "satisfied" or above rating will also be set at 95%.
- Number of hearing disruptions for technical reasons per year.
The Office of the Registrar completed the upgrade of the Courtroom's
Audio-Visual and Information Technology systems in 2008-09. The systems in
place are now more robust and stable, and include redundancy that will
ensure seamless and undisturbed proceedings in the case of a technical
failure. Courtroom systems performance and availability rates are monitored
on an ongoing basis. Measures are in place to minimize failures (such a
testing, maintenance schedules, a robust replacement plan, etc.), and to
ensure action is taken quickly in the event of systems failure. The target
is to have no disruption to hearings due to systems failure.
2) Library Services
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
- Access to reference information
|
- % of factual/bibliographic requests for reference assistance responded
to within service standard of 1 working day
- % of complex/substantive requests for reference assistance responded to
by date required by client
- % of users that were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with library
services
- % of citations in judgments that are in the collection
|
- Percentage of requests for reference assistance responded to
within service standards or by date required by client. Requests
for reference assistance may be factual or bibliographic, which can
generally be responded to by reference to an authoritative source, or may be
complex or substantive in nature, which means the request may require unique
approaches, consultation with various sources, and ultimately the exercise
of judgment. Therefore two separate indicators have been developed that
focus on the timeliness in responding to reference queries, based on a
standard of one working day for factual requests and on a fixed time
established by the client for complex research requests. In both cases, the
Library has established a target of 95%. Requests received in the months of
November and March will be analysed and clients will be asked to validate
whether turnaround times have met their expectations.
- Percentage of users that were "satisfied" or "very satisfied"
with library services. The Library provides legal information and
research services, including the acquisition of a comprehensive legal
collection in print and electronic formats, customized legal awareness tools
and services such as an inter-library loan service, and access to electronic
resources. In order to formally capture user satisfaction with the Library's
services, collection and current awareness tools, a survey of all staff and
judges is conducted approximately every four years. The next formal survey
is planned for the Fall of 2010. In the coming year, the Library will focus
on ensuring that two specific products, the New Book Titles and Law Journal
Contents, meet the needs of its primary clients.
- Percentage of citations in judgments that are in the collection.
A newly revised Collection Development Policy, approved in early 2009, will
impact the proportion of print and electronic resources available in the
Library. The Library monitors the percentage of citations to case law,
legislation and secondary material referred to in the decisions of the
Supreme Court, to ensure that the information needs of the Court continue to
be met. A target of 85% of cited material is expected to be available in the
Library's print collection.
3) Process payments to the Supreme Court Judges pursuant to the
Judges Act
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
- Timely and accurate processing of payments
|
- % of payments processed within service standards
- % of errors on payments
|
- Percentage of payments processed within service standards.
The Financial Management Branch commenced tracking processing times for
payments to judges in 2008-09. The standard is to process a payment within
five working days. The target is to have 95% of payments processed within
the five day standard.
- Percentage of errors on payments. Financial Management
staff may receive feedback from judges when errors have been made in
payments, however, this is not a reliable method of assessing the accuracy
of the payments. A file review will be conducted in 2009-10. The target is
to have no more than a two percent error rate.
D. Benefits to Canadians
The Supreme Court of Canada is Canada’s highest court of law. It is the final
general court of appeal, the last judicial resort for all litigants, whether
individuals or governments. The Supreme Court of Canada stands at the apex of
the Canadian judicial system, and as such is a fundamental element of the
Canadian structure of government. Because of this position, the strategic
outcome of the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada - “to
provide the best decision-making environment for the Supreme Court” -
contributes to the Government Affairs outcome area.
E. Internal Services
Internal Services are groups of related activities and resources that are
administered to support the needs of programs and other corporate obligations of
an organization. As advised by Treasury Board, internal services are aligned
according to size. For small departments these groups are: Governance and
Management Support, Resource Management Services, Asset Management Services.