Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - RPP 2007-2008
Indian Specific Claims Commission


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.


Section IV – Other Items of Interest

List of All ISCC Concluded Inquiries and Mediations

This table updates readers on the status of claims for which the Indian Specific Claims Commission has completed its inquiry or mediation activities. For all the claims listed below, an inquiry or mediation report has been published and is available at http://www.indianclaims.ca/publications/claimsreports-en.asp.

The table tracks the progress of each claim through the specific claims process once the ISCC has completed its inquiry or mediation/facilitation services.

The first column lists the name of the First Nation and the type or title of the specific claim it brought to the ISCC for inquiry or mediation/facilitation. This information is followed by the outcome of the ISCC's inquiry or its mediation activities. The next column contains the date of the ISCC's report, which is followed by a column containing the date of Canada's response to ISCC's recommendation(s). The nature of that response and any settlement information available are also found in the last column.


Name of First Nation, and Province
Type or title of claim
Outcome
Date and Type of ISCC Report Canada’s Response
1 Alexis, AB
TransAlta Utilities rights of way
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry
March
2003

In July 2005, government rejected recommendations, stating that a lump sum payment was adequate cmpensation, that there was no duty to advise the First Nation respecting its taxation powers, and that informed consent to the expropriation was not required.
2 Athabasca Chipewyan, AB
W.A.C. Bennett Dam and damage to IR 201 Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
1998
In April 2001, government rejected recommendations made in March 1998: "Canada did not have a fiduciary duty to protect Reserve No. 201 against damage caused by construction and the operation of the Bennett Dam by a third party. Canada did not have the duty to invoke the provisions of the Navigable Waters Protection Act to stop the construction of the Bennett Dam or dispose of it once it was built. Furthermore, Canada did not have an obligation on the basis of Treaty No. 8 to ensure that the reserve would be protected from any damage resulting from the construction and operation of the Bennett Dam."
3 Athabasca Denesuline, SK
Treaty harvesting rights
1993 report recommended negotiation outside specific claims process.
1995 supplementary report noted failure of negotiations; recommended government recognize treaty rights or provide litigation funding.
Inquiry December 1993 Supplemen- tary report November 1995

In August 1994, government accepted recommendations made in December 1993 report.

November 1995 supplementary report acknowledged; no further response.

4 Betsiamites Band, QC
Highway 138
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
2005
In January 2004, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
5 Betsiamites Band, QC
Rivière Betsiamites Bridge
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
2005
In January 2004, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
6 Bigstone Cree Nation, AB
Treaty land entitlement
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
2000
In October 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
7 Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa, AB
1889 Akers surrender
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
June
1999
In April 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
8 Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa,
AB

Akers surrender
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
August
2005
In September 2003, claim settled for $3.55 million in compensation.
9 Blueberry River and Doig River, BC
Highway right of way IR 172
Accepted while inquiry underway
Inquiry
March
2006
In September 2004, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.

10 Buffalo River, SK
Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights
Recommended part of claim be accepted for negotiations

Inquiry
September
1995
In March 2002, government rejected recommendations stating:
"[C]ompensation for commercial harvesting rights was not based on either Indian status or membership in an Indian Band; rather, it was to be paid to anyone who held a licence on the land which became the Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range."
11 Canoe Lake, SK
Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range - breach of treaty and
fiduciary obligations
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
August
1993
In June 1997, claim settled for $13,412,333 in federal compensation and a requirement that the First Nation purchase between 2,786 hectares and 20,224 hectares of land.
12 Canupawakpa Dakota, MB
Turtle Mountain surrender
Recommended claim not be accepted, but recommended Canada and the First Nation work together to acquire and properly designate the burial sites
Inquiry
July
2003
Report acknowledged October 2003.
13 Carry the Kettle, SK
Cypress Hills
Recommended claim not be accepted, but, pursuant to supplementary mandate, recommended government recognize the Carry the Kettle First Nation's historical connection to the Cypress Hills and restore to the Assiniboine people their connection to the territory
Inquiry
July
2000
Rejected in January 2001. Government agreed with the Commission's conclusion that the claim did not disclose a lawful obligation on the part of the government under the Specific Claims Policy. The government rejected the Commission's recommendation to restore to the Assiniboine people their connection to the territory.
14 Chippewa Tri-Council,
ON

Coldwater-Narrows reservation surrender Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
2003
In July 2002, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
15 Chippewa Tri-Council, ON
Collins Treaty
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
1998
In December 1998, claim settled for $565,000 in federal compensation.
16 Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point, ON
1927 surrender
Recommended claim be
accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
1997
No response from government. In 1998, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision in the First Nation's appeal of the Ontario Court of Appeal's finding that the surrender was valid. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the reasons of the lower court to find the surrender valid.
17 Chippewas of the
Thames, ON

Clench defalcation
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
2002
In June 2001, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
18 Chippewas of the
Thames, ON

Clench defalcation
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
August
2005
In November 2004, claim settled for $15 million in federal compensation.
19 Chippewas of the
Thames, ON

Muncey land inquiry
Settled with assistance of
Commission
Inquiry
December
1994
In January 1995, claim settled for $5,406,905 in federal compensation.
20 Cold Lake, AB
Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range - breach of treaty and fiduciary obligations
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
August
1993
In March 2002, claim settled for $25.5 million in federal compensation.
21 Cowessess, SK
1907 surrender
Recommended the portion of IR 73 surrendered in 1907 be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2001
In March 2002, government rejected recommendation, disagreeing with finding of number of voters present and with interpretation of "majority," but will proceed to phase II of this inquiry as previously agreed upon by the parties.
22 Cowessess, SK
1907 surrender - Phase II
Split panel: 2 Commissioners recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation on the single issue of fiduciary duty; while 1 Commissioner recommended it be accepted
Inquiry
July
2006
No response from government.
23 Cowessess, SK
QVIDA flooding claim
Recommended claim be
accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1998
In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
24 Cumberland House, SK
IR 100A
Recommended that the claim regarding IR 100A be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2005
No response from government.
25 Duncan's, AB
1928 surrender
Majority of claim not recommended for negotiation, however, recommended that the surrender of IR 151E be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
September
1999
In June 2001, government rejected recommendation regarding IR 151E made in September 1999 report, stating: "[T]he Commission did not examine the terms of the proposed lease and, as a result, made no finding that the 1923 lease proposal was either more or less advantageous to the First Nation than a surrender."
26 Eel River Bar, NB
Eel River Dam
Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
December
1997
No substantive response from government required.
27 Esketemc, BC
IR 15, 17, and 18
Recommended that the disallowance or reduction of IR 15, 17, and 18 be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
November
2001
In June 2005, government rejected recommendation, stating that Canada had no obligation or power to create reserves for the First Nation, and that the Commission's conclusions "are largely premised on findings ... that the First Nation had aboriginal rights and title to the land at issue."
28 Fishing Lake, SK
1907 surrender
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
1997
In August 1996, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
29 Fishing Lake, SK
1907 surrender
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
March
2002
In August 2001, claim settled for $34.5 million in federal compensation.
30 Flying Dust, SK
Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights
Recommended part of claim be accepted for negotiations
Inquiry
September
1995
In March 2002, government rejected recommendations made in September 1995 report, stating: "[C]ompensation for commercial harvesting rights was not based on either Indian status or membership in an Indian Band; rather, it was to be paid to anyone who held a licence on the land which became the Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range."
31 Fort McKay, AB
Treaty land entitlement
Recommended that government owed outstanding entitlement of 3,815 acres to First Nation
Inquiry
December
1995
In April 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
32 Friends of the Michel
Society, AB

1958 enfranchisement
No lawful obligation found, but recommended that government grant special standing to submit specific claims
Inquiry
March
1998
In October 2002, government rejected recommendation made in March 1998 report, stating: "Canada has declined to accept the ISCC's recommendation to grant the Friends of the Michel Society special standing to advance specific claims."
33 Gamblers, MB
Treaty land entitlement
Recommended that outstanding entitlement if any should be based on 1877 date of first survey
Inquiry
October
1998
In November 1998, government accepted recommendation.
34 Homalco, BC
Aupe IR 6 and 6A - statutory or fiduciary obligation to obtain 80 acres of land from province of BC
Part of claim recommended for negotiation re: 10 acres
Inquiry
December
1995
In December 1997, government rejected recommendation, stating that, as the lands were not alleged to be reserve lands, the Policy does not apply, and that Canada does not "recognize a general duty to protect traditional Indian lands (as distinct from reserve lands) from the actions of others."
35 James Smith, SK
IR 100A
Recommended that the lawful obligations that arise from Canada's dispositions of IR 100A be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2005
No response from government.
36 James Smith, SK
Chakastaypaysin IR 98
Recommended that the claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2005
No response from government.
37 Joseph Bighead, SK
Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
September
1995
No substantive response from government required.
38 Kahkewistahaw, SK
Treaty land entitlement
Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
November
1996
No substantive response from government required.
39 Kahkewistahaw, SK
1907 reserve land surrender
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1997
In December 1997, government accepted claim for negotiation.
40 Kahkewistahaw, SK
1907 surrender
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
February
2003
In November 2002, claim settled for $94.65 million in federal compensation.
41 Kawacatoose, SK
Treaty land entitlement
Recommended that government owed a shortfall of 8,576 acres to Band, subject to confirming research
Inquiry
March
1996
In October 2000, claim settled for $23 million in federal compensation.
42 The Key, SK
1909 surrender
Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2000
No substantive response from government required.
43 Keeseekoowenin, MB
1906 land claim
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
August
2005
In March 2005, claim settled for $6,999,900 in compensation.
44 Lac La Ronge, SK
Treaty land entitlement
Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
1996
No substantive response from government required.
45 Lax Kw'alaams, BC
Demand for absolute surrender as precondition to settlement
Recommended that government exclude Aboriginal rights from the surrender that was to be a condition of the claim settlement
Inquiry
June
1994
In December 2001, government rejected recommendations stating "Aboriginal interests were never excluded from any of the appraisals considered during the negotiations ... they cannot be considered to have been excluded from the discussions ... It is legally impossible to exempt Aboriginal interests from the scope of a section 38 surrender without jeopardizing the legal effect of the surrender ..."
46 Long Plain, MB
Loss of use of treaty
entitlement land
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
2000
In November 2005, government accepted claim for negotiation.
47 Lucky Man, SK
Treaty land entitlement
Recommended further research to establish the proper TLE population
Inquiry
March
1997
In May 1997, government accepted recommendation: government research indicated no TLE shortfall; First Nation is reviewing and conducting its own research.
48 Mamaleleqala
Qwe'Qwa'Sot'Enox, BC

McKenna-McBride applications
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
1997
In December 1999, government rejected recommendations, disagreeing with the interpretation of "lawful obligation" in Outstanding Business, and asserting that no fiduciary obligation can exist "in relation to Aboriginal interests in non-reserve lands."
49 Micmacs of Gesgapegiag, QC
Pre-Confederation claim to
500-acre island
No substantive recommendations made because government agreed to reconsider merits of claim
Inquiry
December
1994
In March 1995, government acknowledged receipt of report and advised claim was in abeyance pending outcome of related court case.
50 Mikisew Cree, AB
Economic benefits under Treaty 8
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
1997
In December 1996, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
51 Mississaugas of the New Credit, ON
Toronto Purchase
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
June
2003
In July 2002, Government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
52 Mistawasis, SK
1911, 1917, and 1919 surrenders
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
2002
In September 2001, claim settled for $16.3 million in federal compensation.
53 Moose Deer Point, ON
Pottawatomi rights
Recommended additional research
Inquiry
March
1999
In March 2001, government rejected recommendations, stating that the claim submission had already been "fully researched."
54 Moosomin, SK
1909 reserve land surrender
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
1997
In December 1997, government accepted claim for negotiation.
55 Moosomin, SK
1909 reserve land surrender
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
March
2004
In September 2003, claim settled for $41 million in federal compensation.
56 Muscowpetung, SK
QVIDA flooding claim
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1998
In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
57 Nak'azdli, BC
Aht-Len-Jees IR 5
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
1996
In January 1996, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
58 'Namgis, BC
Cormorant Island
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
1996
In May 2001, government rejected recommendation, disagreeing that any fiduciary obligation arose on the facts of this claim.
59 'Namgis, BC
McKenna-McBride
applications
Recommended part of claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1997
In December 1999, government rejected recommendation, disagreeing with the interpretation of "lawful obligation" in Outstanding Business and disagreeing that any fiduciary obligation arose on the facts of this claim.
60 Nekaneet, SK
Agricultural and other
benefits under Treaty 4
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
1999
In October 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway
61 Ochapowace, SK
QVIDA flooding claim
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1998
In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
62 Pasqua, SK
QVIDA flooding claim
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1998
In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
63 Peepeekisis, SK
File Hills Colony
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2004
In June 2006, government rejected recommendation on ground that 1956 court decision which the Commission held was limited to validity of memberships, was applied to all issues in inquiry.
64 Peguis, MB
Treaty land entitlement
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
2001
In June 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
65 Qu'Appelle Valley Indian Development Authority (Cowessess, Kahkewistahaw, Muscowpetung, Ochapowace, Pasqua, Piapot, Sakimay), SK
Flooding claim
Mediation unable to resolve issues; separate negotiations ongoing with Cowessess, Muscowpetung, Pasqua
Mediation
December
2005
No substantive response from government required.
66 Roseau River Anishinabe, MB
Medical aid
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
2001
In September 2003, government rejected recommendations, stating that medical aid deductions from the trust fund account were permissible, that no treaty promise of medical aid was made or survived, and that no outstanding lawful obligation exists.
67 Roseau River Anishinabe, MB
Treaty land entitlement
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
March
1996
In March 1996, claim settled for $14 million in federal compensation.
68 Sakimay, SK
QVIDA flooding claim
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1998
In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
69 Standing Buffalo, SK
QVIDA flooding claim
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1998
In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
70 Standing Buffalo, SK
QVIDA flooding claim
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
March
2004
In March 2003, claim settled for $3.6 million in compensation and the ability to acquire up to 640 acres of agricultural land to be set apart as reserve land pursuant to Canada's Additions to Reserves Policy.
71 Sturgeon Lake, SK
Red Deer Holdings agricultural lease
Accepted with assistance of Commission
Inquiry
March
1998
In October 1998, claim settled for $190,000 in federal compensation.
72 Sumas, BC
IR 6 railway right of way
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
February
1995
In June 2005, government accepted claim for negotiation.
73 Sumas, BC
1919 surrender of IR 7
Recommended joint research to assess fair market value of surrendered land
Inquiry
August
1997
In January 1998, government stated it was willing to explore possibility of joint research to determine if evidence exists for a claim.
74 Taku River Tlingit, BC
Wenah specific claim
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2006
No response from government.
75 Thunderchild, SK
1908 surrender
Settled with assistance of Commission
Mediation
March
2004
In September 2003, claim settled for $53 million in compensation and ability to acquire up to 5,000 acres of land within 15 years to be set apart as a reserve.
76 Touchwood Agency, SK
Mismanagement (1920-24) claim
Mediation unable to resolve issues, Agency requested ISCC inquiry
Mediation
August
2005
No substantive response from government required.
77 Walpole Island, ON
Boblo Island
Recommended First Nation resubmit its claim under the Comprehensive Claims Policy
Inquiry
May
2000
No substantive response from government required.
78 Waterhen Lake, SK
Primrose Lake Air Weapons
Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights
Recommended part of claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
September
1995
In March 2002, government rejected recommendations made in September 1995 report, stating: "[C]ompensation for commercial harvesting rights was not based on either Indian status or membership in an Indian Band; rather, it was to be paid to anyone who held a licence on the land which became the Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range."
79 Williams Lake, BC
Village site
Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation
Inquiry
March
2006
No response from government.
80 Young Chipeewayan, SK
Stoney Knoll IR 107
Recommended that claim not be accepted for negotiation but that further research be undertaken regarding the surrender proceeds
Inquiry
December
1994
No substantive response from government required.

List of Current ISCC Inquiries and Mediations

Claims Within Inquiry Process*

Athabasca Chipewayan First Nation [Compensation criteria - agricultural benefits]
Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa [Big claim]
Blueberry River First Nation and Doig River First Nation [Compensation criteria - Highway
right of way - IR 172 claim]
Carry the Kettle First Nation [1905 surrender]
Chippewas of the Thames First Nation [Ontario Hydro right of way]
Esketemc First Nation [Wright's meadow preemption claim]
James Smith Cree Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Kitselas First Nation [Railway specific claim]
Kluane First Nation [Kluane Game Sanctuary and Kluane National Park Reserve Creation]
Lheidli T'enneh Band [Surrender Fort George IR 1]
Lower Similkameen Indian Band [Victoria, Vancouver and Eastern Railway right of way]
Lucky Man Cree [Treaty land entitlement - Phase II]
Mississaugas of the New Credit [Crawford Purchase]
Mississaugas of the New Credit [Gunshot Treaty]
Muskowekwan First Nation [1910 and 1920 surrenders]
Nadleh Whut'en Indian Band [Lejac School]
Neskonlith, Adams Lake and Little Shuswap Bands [Neskonlith reserve]
Ocean Man First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Opaskwayak Cree Nation [Streets and lanes claim]
Pasqua First Nation [1906 surrender]
Paul Indian Band [Kapasawin Townsite claim]
Red Earth and Shoal Lake Cree Nations [Quality of reserve lands (agriculture)]
Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation [1903 surrender]
Sakimay First Nation [Treaty land entitlement shortfall]
Sandy Bay Ojibway First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Saulteau First Nation [Treaty land entitlement and land in severalty claims]
Siksika Nation [1909 surrender]
Stanjikoming First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Stó:lõ [Douglas reserves]
Sturgeon Lake First Nation [1913 surrender]
Touchwood Agency Tribal Council (Five First Nations) [Mismanagement claim - compensation
criteria]
Treaty 8 Tribal Association (Seven First Nations) [Consolidated annuity claim]
Tsawwassen First Nation [English Bluffs specific claim]
U'mista Cultural Centre [Prohibition of the potlatch]
Whitefish Lake First Nation [Agricultural benefits pursuant to Treaty 8: compensation criteria]
Whitefish Lake First Nation [Agricultural benefits pursuant to Treaty 8: historic claim]
Wolf Lake First Nation [Reserve lands]

*Some of these claims, while still the subject of an ISCC inquiry, are in abeyance.

Claims in Mediation/Facilitation at the ISCC*

Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa [Cattle claim]
Chippewa Tri-Council [Coldwater-Narrows reservation claim]
Cote First Nation [Pilot project]
Cote First Nation [1905-07-13-14 surrenders claim]
Cowessess First Nation [Flooding claim]
Fort William First Nation [Boundary claim]
Fort William First Nation [GTP claim]
Fort William First Nation [Pilot project]
Gordon First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Lac Seul First Nation [Flooding claim]
Metepenagiag Mi’kmaq Nation [Hosford Lot and Indian Reserve 7 claim]
Michipicoten First Nation [Pilot project]
Missanabie Cree First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation [Toronto Purchase claim]
Mohawk Council of Akwesasne [Dundee claim]
Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte [Culbertson Tract]
Muscowpetung First Nation [Flooding claim]
Muskoday First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Nekaneet First Nation [Treaty benefits]
Pasqua First Nation [Flooding claim]
Pasqua First Nation [Treaty land entitlement claim]
Sakimay First Nation [Flooding claim]
Sakimay First Nation [Treaty land entitlement claim]
Siksika Nation [Castle Mountain claim]
Skway First Nation [Schweyey Road claim]
Sturgeon Lake First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]
Wikwemikong Unceded Indian Reserve [41 islands claim]

*Some of these claims, while still the subject of an ISCC mediation, are on hold.

Recent Publications

Since March 2006, the ISCC has released the following four inquiry reports:

  1. Blueberry River First Nation and Doig River First Nation (Highway right-of-way
    and Indian Reserve #172;
  2. Cowesses First Nation (1907 Surrender – Phase II);
  3. Taku River Tlingit First Nation (Wenah Specific Claim); and
  4. Williams Lake Indian Band (Village Site).

Each of these reports is available on the ISCC website at: http://www.indianclaims.ca