ARCHIVED - Linkages between Audit and Evaluation in Canadian Federal Departments (TBS Paper) - September 30, 1993
This page has been archived.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
References
The following are selected references on linkages between internal audit
and evaluation.
- Chelimsky, E (1985), "Comparing and Contrasting Auditing and Evaluation:
some Notes on their Relationship", Evaluation Review, 9 (4), 483-503.
- Comptroller General of the United States (1988), Government Auditing
Standards, United States General Accounting Office.
- Davis, D. F. (1990), "Do you want a Performance Audit or a Program
Evaluation?", Public Administration Review, 50 (1), 35-41.
- Hendricks M., Mangano M.F. & Moran W.C. (1990), "Inspector Generals;
A New
Force in Evaluation", New Directions for Program Evaluation, 48.
- Management Advisory Board-Management Improvement Advisory Committee,
Australia (1993), Performance Information and the Management Cycle,
Publication no 10.
- Office of the Comptroller General (1991), Line Managers and Asssessing
Service to the Public.
- Office of the Comptroller General (1992), Assessing Performance: A Managers
Guide to Program Evaluation and Internal Audit.
- Rist, R.C. (1989), "Management Accountability: the Signals Sent by
Auditing
and Evaluation", Journal of Public Policy, 9 (3), 355-369.
- Segsworth R. V. (1990), Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 5 (1),41-
56, "Auditing and Evaluation in the Government of Canada: Some
Reflections".
- Walker W.E. (1988), Evaluation and Program Planning, 8, 271-280, "The
conduct of program evaluation reviews in the GAO".
- Walker W.E. (1988), Evaluation and Program Planning, 8, 359-366, "The
impact of program evaluations on government".