This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
It is my pleasure to present the 2010–11 Departmental Performance Report for the Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal. The Registry’s role is to provide services for the efficient and effective administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal, while protecting the Tribunal’s independence.
The Registry continued its effort to complete work to establish the administrative services needed to support Tribunal activities and to ensure transparency, accountability and fairness in Registry operations. Support also continued to be provided to the Tribunal in the development of its Rules of Procedure and Practice Directions.
The Registry now has the basic infrastructure in place to provide the support required by Tribunal members and First Nations to accept the filings of claims. As soon as the Rules of Procedure and Practice Directions are established, the Registry will communicate them to all interested parties, and First Nations will then be able to start filing claims.
The financial and human resources allocated to the Registry were adequate for this year but there is a high probability that they will not be enough to support the processing of many claims in future years. The Registry will have to wait until the Tribunal has processed a number of claims before it can prepare an informed assessment of the resources and time required to process an average claim.
A number of challenges remain but activities undertaken over the year ensure the Registry is well placed to deliver on its core mandate of providing administrative services to support the Specific Claims Tribunal in the disposition of specific claims.
Raynald Chartrand
Deputy Head and Registrar
The Specific Claims Tribunal is an independent tribunal established under the Specific Claims Tribunal Act (which came into force October 16, 2008) to adjudicate First Nations grievances against the Crown. The purpose of the Act is not only to resolve outstanding grievances, but also to encourage reconciliation between First Nations and the Crown. The Tribunal has the express mandate of deciding specific claims, including claims related to the non-fulfilment of treaties, fraud, illegal leases and dispositions, or inadequate compensation for reserve lands or other assets.
The Specific Claims Tribunal Act provides for an administrative infrastructure, the Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal, to support the work of the Tribunal.
The Registry is designated as a government department under Schedule I.1 of the Financial Administration Act, and therefore must adhere to federal public administration policies. Those policies include the preparation of this report, which pertains to the activities of the Registry in support of the Tribunal, and not to the Tribunal itself.
The Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal supports all aspects of the Tribunal’s work to ensure that the Tribunal can hold hearings. As the repository for filing claims and for all documents and orders for all claims brought before the Tribunal, the Registry is responsible for providing First Nations with efficient registry services:
These services support the independent resolution of claims fairly, without delay, and with an efficient, effective and economic application of resources. The Registry must exercise these functions in a manner that protects the administrative and adjudicative independence of the Specific Claims Tribunal. Independence is central to the role of the Specific Claims Tribunal and its ability to resolve claims fairly.
Although the Registry’s offices are located in Ottawa, it provides services throughout Canada to Tribunal Members, First Nations, the Crown and the public.
Registry Services
These services facilitate timely access to the Specific Claims Tribunal through client service, quality of advice, efficient and timely processing of claims, and unbiased service delivery.
Internal Services.
Internal Services are groups of related activities and resources that are administered to support the needs of programs and other corporate obligations of an organization.
Performance/Priority Status Legend
Met all: 100 per cent of the expected level of performance (as evidenced by the indicator and target or planned activities and expected outputs) for the expected result or priority identified in the corresponding Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) was achieved during the fiscal year. Mostly met: 80 to 99 per cent of the expected level of performance (as evidenced by the indicator and target or planned activities and expected outputs) for the expected result or priority identified in the corresponding RPP was achieved during the fiscal year. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Implement and configure an electronic registry and case management system. | Previously committed to | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Mostly met | ||
The Registry acquired a records management system and narrowed down the concept of a case management module and an electronic registry. A major consideration in the decision is that claims can be filed from any part of the country and Tribunal members will probably be located in chambers provided by their provincial superior court. Staff members were trained on the records management portion of the project. A consultant is assisting with the final phase of the implementation of the system. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Support Tribunal Members in drafting rules of practice and procedure. | Previously committed to | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Met all | ||
A prerequisite for the proper operation of the Tribunal, official rules of procedure describe to the parties the steps to follow to file documents and the litigation process associated with the processing of a claim before the Tribunal. The Registry provided Tribunal members full support in terms of human and financial resources for the drafting of the Rules of Procedure and Practice Directions. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Implement communication plan to increase awareness of the Tribunal and its activities and procedures. | Ongoing | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Met all | ||
The Registry used a number of communications media such as interviews with journalists, speaking engagements and an enhanced website to increase the awareness of the Tribunal. These activities were key in the early stages of the existence of the Tribunal because they answered a lot of questions and informed interested parties on developments at the Tribunal. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Development of work descriptions and staffing for Registry positions. | Ongoing | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Met all | ||
An adequate complement of staff was hired during the year. The Registry completed seven staffing processes and five job descriptions during the year. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Development of student work programs. | New | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Met all | ||
The organization has been hiring students for the last two years and is planning to continue doing so. Hiring students is an efficient way to identify potential indeterminate employees and ensure continuity in the level of service provided to the parties and Tribunal members. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Delivery of training including cultural, values and ethics, and professional developmental. | New | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Met all | ||
A well-trained workforce must be in place to support the work of the Tribunal when the doors officially open to accept filings. Training plans were developed at the beginning of the year and funding was set aside to support staff in the completion of their training. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Development of a succession plan to ensure that the Registry has a pool of qualified candidates to fill critical positions as they become vacant. | Ongoing | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Mostly met | ||
The Registry started discussions with some provincial court administration services to develop service-level agreements for them to provide services to Tribunal members working from their provincial superior court chambers. This initiative will expand the number of qualified employees who can provide assistance to the parties on various aspects of the claims process. |
Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|
Completion of a business continuity plan to ensure that Registry services are not disrupted by unforeseen events. | Ongoing | Efficient administration of the Specific Claims Tribunal |
Status: Mostly met | ||
To meet the requirements of Treasury Board’s Management of Information Technology Security policies and establish a plan to support the work of the Tribunal in an emergency, an information technology back-up solution was implemented and short-term staffing strategies were identified in the Business and Human Resources Plan. |
The workload of the Tribunal arises from the decisions and activities of other parties. Claims may be submitted to the Specific Claims Tribunal only after they have been submitted to the Specific Claims program at Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada.
Another risk that the Registry faces relates to the relative workload associated with processing claims. The Registry can only estimate how many claims will be brought to the Tribunal, the true number will depend on the prerogative of First Nations. This creates a risk that a substantially greater number of claims will be brought to the Registry than anticipated. This risk will be heightened until the Registry has baseline information for an accurate assessment of the resources and time required to process an average claim. A large volume of claims could deplete Registry resources, and additional financial support may need to be sought to ensure claims are processed in a timely manner.
The small complement of the Registry also creates risks associated with continuity of operations should people in key positions leave the organization.
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
2,840 | 2,871 | 2,165 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
17 | 9.2 | 7.8 |
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010-11 Performance |
---|---|---|
A Registry that is staffed with qualified individuals capable of providing corporate and registry services in an efficient and effective manner. |
|
In 2010–11, the Registry established operations—including staffing, information technology and administrative procedures—in preparation for the Tribunal opening its doors in June 2011. The financial and human resources allocated to the Registry were adequate for this year. |
An electronic Registry that utilizes technology to introduce efficiencies and overcome logistical challenges associated with administering a national tribunal. |
|
The website of the organization has been enhanced to become the main tool used to communicate with stakeholders. It also forms the basis of the case management system. |
Engagement and outreach enabling clients and the public to have sufficient information—and input into—Tribunal activities, practices and procedures. |
|
An advisory committee was created to provide advice and feedback on the draft Rules of procedure. |
Program Activity | 2009-10 Actual Spending ($ thousands) |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Registry Services | 881 | 1,250 | 1,250 | 1,263 | 1,392 | A vibrant Canadian culture and heritage |
Program Activity | 2009-10 Actual Spending ($ thousands) |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
Internal Services | 1,121 | 1,590 | 1,590 | 1,608 | 773 |
($ thousands)
Expenses in 2010–11 were slightly higher than 2009–10 but considerably lower than the total authorities allocated to the Registry for the fiscal year. The gap stems from the fact that no resources were required to process cases in 2010-11 because the Tribunal only began accepting cases in June 2011.For information on the Registry’s organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please see the 2010–11 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II) publication. An electronic version of the Public Accounts is available on the Public Works and Government Services Canada website.