This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Program Activity ($ millions) |
Forecast Spending 2008–2009 (Note 1) |
Planned Spending 2009–2010 |
Planned Spending 2010–2011 |
Planned Spending 2011–2012 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Integration Program – Grants | ||||
Grant for the Canada-Quebec Accord | 226.0 | 234.2 | 253.7 | 253.7 |
Total grants | 226.0 | 234.2 | 253.7 | 253.7 |
Canada’s Role in International Migration and Protection – Contributions | ||||
Migration Policy Development | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
International Organization for Migration | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Integration Program – Contributions | ||||
Settlement Program | 599.2 | 581.9 | 721.7 | 691.7 |
Resettlement Assistance Program | 49.6 | 48.5 | 44.6 | 44.6 |
Total contributions | 651.1 | 632.7 | 768.6 | 738.6 |
Total transfer payments | 877.1 | 866.9 | 1,022.3 | 992.3 |
Note 1. Includes Main Estimates plus Supplementary Estimates.
Explanation of change: Planned spending increases in 2010–2011, compared to the previous year, due to the deferral of settlement funding from 2009–2010 to future years and due to additional funding for the Canada-Quebec Accord on Immigration.
Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs:
As per the Policy on Transfer Payments, CIC is required each year to provide a three-year plan for its Transfer Payment Programs. A summary of this plan is available at http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/tpp/index.asp.
Education
Systems
Has your department established green procurement targets?
Yes |
Describe the green procurement targets that have been set by your department and indicate the associated benefits anticipated.
Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) has established the following green procurement targets as part of its overall Sustainable Development (SD) Strategy:
Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) tabled its current Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) in Parliament on December 13, 2006. Based on lessons learned from previous strategies, and on recommendations made by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, this strategy focuses efforts on fewer and more concrete commitments that will allow CIC to rethink how it approaches sustainable development (SD) and lay a strong foundation on which to build future strategies.
The main challenge for the Department is to establish clear links between its ongoing core activities and its sustainable development objectives. A review of the sustainable development program undertaken in 2008–2009 highlighted the need for CIC to develop management and analytical tools to assist employees and senior management in identifying sustainability issues inherent to the departmental mandate, and establish clear guidelines on how to deal with these issues.
The four key goals of CIC’s Sustainable Development Strategy are to:
The Department’s focus in its 2007–2010 SDS is on governance and capacity building. More specifically, in 2009–2010, CIC will:
Report on the progress of the SDS is found in CIC’s annual Departmental Performance Report.
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals | Activity | Performance measurement from current SDS | Department’s expected results for 2009–10 |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainable Communities: “Federal SD Goal IV” |
Develop and implement an SD training plan for CIC covering topics such as:
|
Training material is developed or obtained for each component of the training plan. | In 2009–2010, CIC will make use of the suite of training tools necessary to start building analytical capacity within the Department and ensure that all employees are in a position to integrate the principles of sustainability within their daily work. |
Implementation of the SD communications plan to raise employee awareness of SD throughout the year on various themes, such as:
|
An SD resource centre is created by March 2010. | CIC employees will have access to SD-related resources through the departmental library services. | |
Develop an integrated policy framework for citizenship to raise the profile of citizenship among newcomers and Canadian-born individuals, and to promote active citizenship. | Number of community-focused citizenship ceremonies. | At least one additional community-focused citizenship ceremony. | |
Distribute information on sustainable development and environmental issues to visa-ready immigrants, newly settled immigrants and prospective citizens. | Number of copies of Welcome to Canada and A Newcomer’s Introduction to Canada distributed to immigrants and prospective citizens. | Maintaining distribution to 100% of immigrants. |
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals | Activity | Performance measurement from current SDS | Department’s expected results for 2009–10 |
---|---|---|---|
Governance for Sustainable Development: “Federal SD Goal VI” | Take stock of SD capacity in all branches and identify potential activities and approaches to promote SD behaviour before the next SDS. | Number of branches approached in the context of the stock-taking exercise. Gap analysis identifies areas for improvement in CIC’s SD program. |
All CIC branches are consulted over the course of SDS IV. At least three areas of improvement are identified for SDS V. At least two options are identified to further integrate SDS into key planning and reporting processes. |
Fully implement CIC’s SEA Policy into policies, plans and program proposals requiring ministerial or Cabinet decisions. | Number and percentage of eligible proposals for which the SEA process is followed. Number and percentage of proposals for which a full SEA is completed. |
100% of documents eligible under the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals undergo the SEA process. | |
Review and implementation of updated procedures related to CIC’s SD program, including the SEA Policy Statement and Guide. | SD procedural documents are updated or created as needed starting March 2008. | Clear and effective governance mechanisms to integrate SD into decision making. | |
CIC will contribute to a joint initiative with other government departments and the Canada School of Public Service to design and deliver new Government of Canada SD training material. | Number of CIC employees participating in training. | 90% of CIC policy analysts are trained. |
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals | Activity | Performance measurement from current SDS | Department’s expected results for 2009–10 |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainable Communities: “Federal SD Goal IV” |
Ensure that programming supports the successful integration of newcomers into Canadian society and their contribution to a prosperous economy. | CIC’s immigration, citizenship and refugee programs support the successful integration of newcomers into Canadian society and their contribution to a prosperous economy. For details on CIC’s planned activities, see Section II of this report. |
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals | Activity | Performance measurement from current SDS | Department’s expected results for 2009–10 |
---|---|---|---|
SD and use of natural resources: “Federal SD Goal V” Reduce greenhouse gas emissions: “Federal SD Goal III” |
Implementation of CIC’s Thinking Green Waste Reduction (TGWR) Plan developed and piloted under SDS III at CIC national headquarters. | Number of branches in which the TGWR Plan is implemented. | 5% waste reduction in at least 4 of the 6 branches by March 2009. 10% waste reduction in at least 2 of the 6 branches by March 2010. |
Revise CIC’s procurement practices to incorporate new government-wide directions on green procurement. | New green procurement guidelines implemented. | 100% of CIC’s administrative assistants will apply the new guidelines. | |
Description of tracking and monitoring methodologies. | CIC administrative assistants receive information on green procurement through CIC’s annual Administrative Assistants Conference. | ||
Total amount of green products and services purchased by CIC between 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. | 5% increase over 2 years based on the results of 2007–2008. |
The mission, vision and values described in Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s (CIC) Internal Audit Charter, together with the Treasury Board internal audit policy and directives, provide the fundamental framework for the audit planning process at CIC. CIC’s audit strategy is outlined in its risk-based audit plan, which forms the basis for audit activities within the Department.
Audits that are currently under way or planned for 2009–2010 include the following:
Name of Internal Audit | Internal Audit Type | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Audit of Inland Temporary Resident Applications | Program audit | In progress | Quarter 1 2009–2010 |
Audit of Information System – iCAMS | Information technology audit | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of Ontario Region Governance and Risk Management | Audit of functional area | In progress | Quarter 1 2009–2010 |
Audit of Quebec Region Governance and Risk Management | Audit of functional area | In progress | Quarter 1 2009–2010 |
Audit of Integration Program – Administration of Grants and Contributions | Program audit | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of the Interim Federal Health Program | Program audit | In progress | Quarter 1 2009–2010 |
Audit of Immigration Program in Missions Abroad – Tokyo | Mission audit | In progress | Quarter 1 2009–2010 |
Audit of the CIC Memorandum of Understanding with the Canada Border Services Agency | Audit of agreement | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of Prairies and Northern Territories Region Governance and Risk Management | Audit of functional area | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of Atlantic Region Governance and Risk Management | Audit of functional area | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of compliance with policies, legislation and the management framework for security | Audit of functional area | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of Departmental Performance Report against criteria established by Office of the Auditor General | Audit of administrative process | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of compliance with travel and hospitality policies and directives | Compliance audit | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of Immigration Program in Regional Processing Centre Abroad | Mission audit | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Audit of Inland Permanent Residence Applications | Program audit | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Follow-up and monitoring of prior year audit recommendations related to:
|
Other audit-related activities | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Electronic Link to Internal Audit and Evaluation Plan: www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/menu-audit-eval.asp
Citizenship and Immigration Canada maintains an effective evaluation function to provide the Department with objective, timely and evidence-based information and conclusions on the results of programs, policies and initiatives, including conducting evaluations of the main grants and contributions programs.
Name of the Evaluation | Program Type | Status (as of March 31, 2009) | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Immigration Programs | |||
Evaluation of the Federal Skilled Workers Program | Operating Fund | In progress | 2009–2010 |
Sponsorship Evaluation – Parents and Grandparents | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Sponsorship Evaluation – Spouses, Partners and Children | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of the Humanitarian and Compassionate Claims Program | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of the Canadian Experience Class Program | Operating Fund | Planned | 2011–2012 |
Temporary Resident Programs | |||
Evaluation of the Foreign Student Program | Operating Fund | In progress | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program | Operating Fund | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Live-in Caregiver Program | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of Tourists and Visitors Program | Operating Fund | Planned | 2011–2012 |
Canada’s Role in International Migration and Protection | |||
Evaluation of the International Organization for Migration | Contribution | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Refugee Programs | |||
Evaluation of the Government-Assisted Refugee Program and the Resettlement Assistance Program | Operating Fund/ Contribution |
Planned | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Canadian Asylum System | Operating Fund | Planned | 2011–2012 |
Integration Programs | |||
Evaluation of the Language Instruction for Newcomers Program | Contribution | In progress | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Immigrant Settlement and Adaptation Program | Contribution | In progress | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Host Program | Contribution | In progress | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Welcoming Communities Initiative | Contribution | In progress | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Canada-Ontario Immigration Agreement Strategic Plan | Operating Fund/ Contribution | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the Going to Canada Internet Portal | Operating Fund/ Contribution | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of Canadian Orientation Abroad | Contribution | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of the Enhanced Language Training Program | Contribution | Planned | 2011–2012 |
Evaluation of the Foreign Credentials Referral Office | Contribution | Planned | 2011–2012 |
Citizenship Program | |||
Evaluation of Citizenship Grants | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of Citizenship Searches and Proofs | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of Citizenship Education | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of Citizenship Promotion | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Other Programs | |||
Evaluation of Knowledge Transfer Component of Metropolis II | Operating Fund | Completed | 2008–2009 |
Evaluation of the Medical Surveillance Program | Operating Fund | Completed | 2008–2009 |
Evaluation of the Immigration Medical Examination Program | Operating Fund | Planned | 2011–2012 |
Internal Programs and Services | |||
Evaluation of the staffing function at CIC | Operating Fund | In progress | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of the Office of Conflict Resolution | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of the Public Service Health Overseas Program | Operating Fund | Planned | 2011–2012 |
Horizontal Initiatives | |||
Evaluation of the Security Certificates (Public Safety Lead) | Operating Fund | Planned | 2009–2010 |
Evaluation of the 2010 Olympics (Canadian Heritage Lead) | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of Canada’s Action Plan Against Racism (Canadian Heritage Lead) | Operating Fund/ Contribution | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Evaluation of the Enhanced Driving License Program (Canada Border Services Agency Lead) | Operating Fund | Planned | 2010–2011 |
Electronic link to evaluation plan: www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/evaluation/index.asp
Program Activity | Forecast Revenue 2008–2009 |
Planned Revenue 2009–2010 |
Planned Revenue 2010–2011 |
Planned Revenue 2011–2012 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Immigration Program | ||||
Immigration cost-recovery fees for permanent residents | 182.3 | 190.6 | 199.3 | 208.4 |
Immigration rights fees | 77.4 | 78.1 | 77.7 | 77.6 |
Sub-total | 259.7 | 268.7 | 277.0 | 286.0 |
Temporary Resident Program | ||||
Immigration cost-recovery fees for temporary residents | 164.3 | 167.1 | 169.9 | 172.8 |
Sub-total | 164.3 | 167.1 | 169.9 | 172.8 |
Canada’s Role in International Migration | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Refugee Program | ||||
Immigration cost-recovery fees for refugees | 8.6 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 |
Sub-total | 8.6 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 |
Integration Program | ||||
Interest on the Immigrant Loans Program | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Sub-total | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Citizenship Program | ||||
Citizenship cost-recovery fees | 18.4 | 18.4 | 18.4 | 18.4 |
Right of citizenship fees | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
Sub-total | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.4 |
Other | ||||
Access to Information | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Total Non-respendable Revenue (See Notes 1 and 2) |
464.0 | 476.1 | 487.3 | 499.2 |
Note 2 – A listing of Citizenship and Immigration Canada fees can be found at www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/fees/index.asp.
The Global Case Management System (GCMS) is a multi-year program that will replace several aging, archaic and incompatible core business systems of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). The GCMS is an essential secure technology platform upon which to build a modern, global, integrated, information-based solution that will strengthen program integrity, improve efficiency and enhance client service delivery.
The GCMS will establish the next-generation business operational environment, and improve flexibility to adapt to future legislative and major program initiatives (such as biometrics). The GCMS will also facilitate communications and data sharing with the CBSA and with our other partners for the purposes of administrating the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA).
Building on the success of the first deployment of the GCMS in 2004 (the Citizenship Release), strategies for completing the projects were re-evaluated and a revised go-forward plan was prepared that reduces risk and delivers considerable business value. The GCMS is currently in the development phase for the second release, which will be oriented towards the immigration business line.
Lead Department | Citizenship and Immigration Canada |
---|---|
Participating Agency | Canada Border Services Agency |
Contracting Authority | Public Works and Government Services Canada |
Prime Contractor | None (The Department is responsible for system integration.) |
Major Milestones | Date |
---|---|
Treasury Board approves funding for the GCMS project at the same time as CIC’s Treasury Board submission on the implementation of policy reforms and the new IRPA. | August 2000 |
Treasury Board grants Preliminary Project Approval and major Crown project designation to the GCMS. | March 2001 |
Treasury Board grants Effective Project Approval (EPA) to the GCMS. | January 2002 |
Request for proposal for the acquisition of a commercial, off-the-shelf software package for case management posted for tender by Public Works and Government Services Canada. | February 2002 |
Contract for the off-the-shelf software package for case management awarded. | March 2003 |
Treasury Board grants amended EPA to the GCMS to address the impact of procurement delays. | October 2003 |
The first GCMS business component (Citizenship) is implemented. | September 2004 |
Treasury Board grants a second amendment to the EPA to address the impact of cumulative slippage, include critical new requirements in project scope, and provide for an incremental deployment approach. | September 2005 |
Completion of a System Under Development audit of the GCMS project. | November 2005 |
Treasury Board grants a third amendment to the EPA to address a wording anomaly with regard to the GST. | December 2006 |
Independent review indicates the need to assess project status and review options for completing GCMS objectives. | December 2006 |
Treasury Board grants a fourth amendment to the EPA to undertake this assessment and to develop a revised go-forward plan. | February 2007 |
Treasury Board grants a fifth amendment to the EPA, extending the time frame for completion of a substantive go-forward plan to late fiscal 2007–2008. | October 2007 |
Independent review validates project’s recovery plan and project team’s readiness to deliver. | December 2007 |
Treasury Board grants a sixth amendment to the EPA with a reduced scope for the second release of GCMS. | August 2008 |
Deployment of GCMS Release 2 to first international mission | June 2010 |
Progress Report and Explanation of Variances
CIC and the CBSA are jointly responsible for the delivery of Canada’s immigration program. In accordance with IRPA, CIC and the CBSA work together to manage the movement of clients across and within Canada’s borders. Under the Customs Act, all people and goods entering Canada must report to the CBSA at a port of entry (POE). Among the issues addressed by the CBSA are illegal migration, preventing the admission into Canada of persons involved in war crimes or crimes against humanity, and detention and removal from Canada of inadmissible persons.
Today, the use of biometrics is expanding rapidly given its unique approach and its potential to identify an individual reliably. The introduction of biometric technology into the temporary resident stream screening process will enhance the screening of applicants in the temporary program, thereby fixing the client’s identity at the time of visa application and study or work permit application, and allowing verification of that identity when the individual seeks entry at the border. As a result, the Government of Canada will better ensure the safety and security of Canadian society and reduce abuse of the immigration system by limiting opportunities for persons with Canadian criminal or deportation histories to use alternate identities to return to Canada. The project will also facilitate the processing of legitimate temporary workers, students and visitors. Many other countries, including such key migration countries as the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia have either recently implemented or are planning to implement similar projects.
The Temporary Residents Biometrics Project is currently in the initiation phase. Final Treasury Board submission documents are being submitted in early 2009 for Preliminary Project Approval.
The planning phase will define the solution, and the approaches and plans for implementing it. A critical first step is the clear definition of a set of comprehensive business and supporting infrastructure requirements agreed to by all partners. Requirements will then be used to define the business solution and how it will work (functional design), how technology will enable the solution (technical design), and how all the pieces fit and work together (supporting architectures).
Substantive plans and strategies for completing the project and managing the business change will be developed, culminating in a submission to obtain Effective Project Approval.
In late 2007, CIC sought policy approval for the introduction of biometrics into the Temporary Resident Program, and funding to support this initiative was included in Budget 2008. Following the budget announcement, a Biometrics Project Office was established in CIC as the lead organization for managing this investment. The project will be developed and implemented with the active participation of three primary federal government departments and agencies: CIC, CBSA and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).
Lead Department | Citizenship and Immigration Canada |
---|---|
Contracting Authority | Public Works and Government Services Canada |
Participating Agencies |
CBSA RCMP |
Prime Contractor | |
---|---|
Major Subcontractor(s) The project to date has had one editorial contract, one planning and scheduling contract and one application architect contract. |
|
Date | Major Milestone |
---|---|
2010 | Effective Project Approval |
2011 | Phase 1 Deployment – 15% of clients enrolled abroad |
2012 | Phase 2 Deployment – 50% of clients enrolled abroad |
2013 | Phase 3 Deployment – 100% clients enrolled and verified |
2013 | Project Shutdown |
Funding was included in Budget 2008 to enhance and strengthen identity management within the Temporary Resident Program, allowing overseas visa officers and border service officers at POEs to make decisions based on accurate identity and immigration admissibility information, and permitting border service officers to verify applicants’ identity at Canada’s POEs.
The project is currently working with a tight budget allocation and is proceeding as planned and on budget.
This major Crown project does not directly benefit Canadian industry; it is a project to improve the safety of Canadian citizens. Immigration and the granting of Canadian citizenship are vital to the continued growth and prosperity of Canada. To support the Government of Canada outcomes of strong economic growth and a safe and secure world, a balance between the desire to welcome newcomers to Canada and the obligation to protect the health, safety and security of Canadian society must be maintained. Criminals, terrorists and other known inadmissible persons must not be allowed to enter or stay in Canada.