Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Citizenship and Immigration Canada

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.





2009-10
Report on Plans and Priorities



Citizenship and Immigration Canada






Supplementary Information (Tables)






Table of Contents




Details of Transfer Payment Programs


Program Activity
($ millions)
Forecast Spending
2008–2009
(Note 1)
Planned Spending
2009–2010
Planned Spending
2010–2011
Planned
Spending
2011–2012
Integration Program – Grants
Grant for the Canada-Quebec Accord 226.0 234.2 253.7 253.7
Total grants 226.0 234.2 253.7 253.7
         
Canada’s Role in International Migration and Protection – Contributions
Migration Policy Development 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
International Organization for Migration 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Integration Program – Contributions
Settlement Program 599.2 581.9 721.7 691.7
Resettlement Assistance Program 49.6 48.5 44.6 44.6
Total contributions 651.1 632.7 768.6 738.6
         
Total transfer payments 877.1 866.9 1,022.3 992.3

Note 1. Includes Main Estimates plus Supplementary Estimates.

Explanation of change: Planned spending increases in 2010–2011, compared to the previous year, due to the deferral of settlement funding from 2009–2010 to future years and due to additional funding for the Canada-Quebec Accord on Immigration.

Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs:

As per the Policy on Transfer Payments, CIC is required each year to provide a three-year plan for its Transfer Payment Programs. A summary of this plan is available at http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/tpp/index.asp.



Green Procurement

How is your department planning to meet the objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement?

Education

  1. Procurement staff participation in Canada School of Public Service Green Procurement course
  2. Presentations on green procurement to administrative assistants at the annual Administrative Assistants Conference

Systems

  1. Inclusion of the data point in the Integrated Financial and Materiel System (SAP) purchasing module allows identification and tracking of green purchases
  2. Departmental forms (Purchase Requisition, Contract Request Summary) to be updated to highlight green procurement as a consideration in planning procurements; link on CIC’s internal website for additional information on green procurement

Has your department established green procurement targets?


Yes    

Describe the green procurement targets that have been set by your department and indicate the associated benefits anticipated.

Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) has established the following green procurement targets as part of its overall Sustainable Development (SD) Strategy:

  1. Note that targets are continually changing and improving based on the findings from CIC’s SD Action Plan.
  2. CIC is working to protect the environment and promote sustainable development through various initiatives, including the reduction of fleet size and use of alternative fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the reduction of waste through recycling, and the inclusion of environmental factors in procurement decisions.
  3. 100% of CIC administrative assistants will be applying the green procurement guidelines by March 2010.
  4. CIC administrative assistants will receive updated information on green procurement through CIC’s annual Administrative Assistants Conference.
  5. 100% participation in SD/Green Procurement Working Groups or meetings where CIC is represented.
  6. 5% increase over two years in the total amount of green products and services purchased by CIC by March 2010.
  7. The findings from the SD Action Plan will be integrated into the green procurement policy.


Sustainable Development Strategy

Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) tabled its current Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) in Parliament on December 13, 2006. Based on lessons learned from previous strategies, and on recommendations made by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, this strategy focuses efforts on fewer and more concrete commitments that will allow CIC to rethink how it approaches sustainable development (SD) and lay a strong foundation on which to build future strategies.

The main challenge for the Department is to establish clear links between its ongoing core activities and its sustainable development objectives. A review of the sustainable development program undertaken in 2008–2009 highlighted the need for CIC to develop management and analytical tools to assist employees and senior management in identifying sustainability issues inherent to the departmental mandate, and establish clear guidelines on how to deal with these issues.

The four key goals of CIC’s Sustainable Development Strategy are to:

  1. Promote awareness of sustainable development principles and objectives among departmental staff, clients and stakeholders;
  2. Strengthen federal governance and decision making to support sustainable development;
  3. Contribute to building sustainable communities that enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and equitable society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations; and
  4. Minimize the negative environmental impacts of departmental operations.

The Department’s focus in its 2007–2010 SDS is on governance and capacity building. More specifically, in 2009–2010, CIC will:

  • Continue implementing the communications plan developed during SDS III;
  • Begin internal consultations to identify gaps in its sustainable development program, define clear departmental requirements, clarify roles and responsibilities, and strengthen its procedures;
  • Continue working on the development of a training plan; and
  • Review and update its guidelines.

Report on the progress of the SDS is found in CIC’s annual Departmental Performance Report.


SDS Departmental Goal 1: Promote Awareness of Sustainable Development Principles and Objectives among Departmental Staff, Clients and Stakeholders
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals Activity Performance measurement from current SDS Department’s expected results for 2009–10
Sustainable Communities: “Federal SD Goal IV” Develop and implement an SD training plan for CIC covering topics such as:
  • Principles of SD
  • Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs)
  • Waste management
  • Green procurement
  • Fleet management
  • Optimal use of information technologies.
Training material is developed or obtained for each component of the training plan. In 2009–2010, CIC will make use of the suite of training tools necessary to start building analytical capacity within the Department and ensure that all employees are in a position to integrate the principles of sustainability within their daily work.
  Implementation of the SD communications plan to raise employee awareness of SD throughout the year on various themes, such as:
  • Water conservation
  • Energy efficiency
  • Clean air
  • Waste management
  • Workplace well-being and health and safety programs
  • Green commuting practices
  • Optimal use of information technologies.
An SD resource centre is created by March 2010. CIC employees will have access to SD-related resources through the departmental library services.
  Develop an integrated policy framework for citizenship to raise the profile of citizenship among newcomers and Canadian-born individuals, and to promote active citizenship. Number of community-focused citizenship ceremonies. At least one additional community-focused citizenship ceremony.
  Distribute information on sustainable development and environmental issues to visa-ready immigrants, newly settled immigrants and prospective citizens. Number of copies of Welcome to Canada and A Newcomer’s Introduction to Canada distributed to immigrants and prospective citizens. Maintaining distribution to 100% of immigrants.



SDS Departmental Goal 2: Strengthen Federal Governance and Decision Making to Support Sustainable Development
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals Activity Performance measurement from current SDS Department’s expected results for 2009–10
Governance for Sustainable Development: “Federal SD Goal VI” Take stock of SD capacity in all branches and identify potential activities and approaches to promote SD behaviour before the next SDS. Number of branches approached in the context of the stock-taking exercise.
Gap analysis identifies areas for improvement in CIC’s SD program.
All CIC branches are consulted over the course of SDS IV.
At least three areas of improvement are identified for SDS V.
At least two options are identified to further integrate SDS into key planning and reporting processes.
  Fully implement CIC’s SEA Policy into policies, plans and program proposals requiring ministerial or Cabinet decisions. Number and percentage of eligible proposals for which the SEA process is followed.
Number and percentage of proposals for which a full SEA is completed.
100% of documents eligible under the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals undergo the SEA process.
  Review and implementation of updated procedures related to CIC’s SD program, including the SEA Policy Statement and Guide. SD procedural documents are updated or created as needed starting March 2008. Clear and effective governance mechanisms to integrate SD into decision making.
  CIC will contribute to a joint initiative with other government departments and the Canada School of Public Service to design and deliver new Government of Canada SD training material. Number of CIC employees participating in training. 90% of CIC policy analysts are trained.



SDS Departmental Goal 3 : Contribute to Building Sustainable Communities That Enjoy a Prosperous Economy, a Vibrant and Equitable Society, and a Healthy Environment for Current and Future Generations
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals Activity Performance measurement from current SDS Department’s expected results for 2009–10
Sustainable Communities:
“Federal SD Goal IV”
Ensure that programming supports the successful integration of newcomers into Canadian society and their contribution to a prosperous economy. CIC’s immigration, citizenship and refugee programs support the successful integration of newcomers into Canadian society and their contribution to a prosperous economy. For details on CIC’s planned activities, see Section II of this report.



SDS Departmental Goal 4: Minimize the Negative Environmental Impacts of Departmental Operations
Federal SD goal, including Greening of Government Operation goals Activity Performance measurement from current SDS Department’s expected results for 2009–10
SD and use of natural resources: “Federal SD Goal V” Reduce greenhouse gas emissions:
“Federal SD Goal III”
Implementation of CIC’s Thinking Green Waste Reduction (TGWR) Plan developed and piloted under SDS III at CIC national headquarters. Number of branches in which the TGWR Plan is implemented. 5% waste reduction in at least 4 of the 6 branches by March 2009.
10% waste reduction in at least 2 of the 6 branches by March 2010.
  Revise CIC’s procurement practices to incorporate new government-wide directions on green procurement. New green procurement guidelines implemented. 100% of CIC’s administrative assistants will apply the new guidelines.
Description of tracking and monitoring methodologies. CIC administrative assistants receive information on green procurement through CIC’s annual Administrative Assistants Conference.
Total amount of green products and services purchased by CIC between 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. 5% increase over 2 years based on the results of 2007–2008.



Internal Audits

The mission, vision and values described in Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s (CIC) Internal Audit Charter, together with the Treasury Board internal audit policy and directives, provide the fundamental framework for the audit planning process at CIC. CIC’s audit strategy is outlined in its risk-based audit plan, which forms the basis for audit activities within the Department.

Audits that are currently under way or planned for 2009–2010 include the following:


Name of Internal Audit Internal Audit Type Status Expected Completion Date
Audit of Inland Temporary Resident Applications Program audit  In progress  Quarter 1
2009–2010
Audit of Information System – iCAMS  Information technology audit  Planned 2009–2010
Audit of Ontario Region Governance and Risk Management Audit of functional area In progress Quarter 1
2009–2010
Audit of Quebec Region Governance and Risk Management Audit of functional area In progress Quarter 1
2009–2010
Audit of Integration Program – Administration of Grants and Contributions Program audit Planned 2009–2010
Audit of the Interim Federal Health Program Program audit In progress Quarter 1
2009–2010
Audit of Immigration Program in Missions Abroad – Tokyo Mission audit In progress Quarter 1
2009–2010
Audit of the CIC Memorandum of Understanding with the Canada Border Services Agency Audit of agreement Planned 2009–2010
Audit of Prairies and Northern Territories Region Governance and Risk Management Audit of functional area Planned 2009–2010
Audit of Atlantic Region Governance and Risk Management Audit of functional area Planned 2009–2010
Audit of compliance with policies, legislation and the management framework for security Audit of functional area Planned 2009–2010
Audit of Departmental Performance Report against criteria established by Office of the Auditor General Audit of administrative process Planned 2009–2010
Audit of compliance with travel and hospitality policies and directives Compliance audit Planned 2009–2010
Audit of Immigration Program in Regional Processing Centre Abroad Mission audit Planned 2009–2010
Audit of Inland Permanent Residence Applications Program audit Planned 2009–2010
Follow-up and monitoring of prior year audit recommendations related to:
  1. Reports by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada; and
  2. Reports by Internal Audit
Other audit-related activities  Planned 2009–2010

Electronic Link to Internal Audit and Evaluation Plan: www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/menu-audit-eval.asp



Evaluations

Citizenship and Immigration Canada maintains an effective evaluation function to provide the Department with objective, timely and evidence-based information and conclusions on the results of programs, policies and initiatives, including conducting evaluations of the main grants and contributions programs.


Name of the Evaluation Program  Type Status (as of March 31, 2009) Expected Completion Date
Immigration Programs
Evaluation of the Federal Skilled Workers Program Operating Fund In progress 2009–2010
Sponsorship Evaluation – Parents and Grandparents Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Sponsorship Evaluation – Spouses, Partners and Children Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of the Humanitarian and Compassionate Claims Program Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of the Canadian Experience Class Program Operating Fund Planned 2011–2012
Temporary Resident Programs
Evaluation of the Foreign Student Program Operating Fund In progress 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program Operating Fund Planned 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Live-in Caregiver Program Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of Tourists and Visitors Program Operating Fund Planned 2011–2012
Canada’s Role in International Migration and Protection
Evaluation of the International Organization for Migration Contribution Planned 2009–2010
Refugee Programs
Evaluation of the Government-Assisted Refugee Program and the Resettlement Assistance Program Operating Fund/
Contribution
Planned 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Canadian Asylum System Operating Fund Planned 2011–2012
Integration Programs
Evaluation of the Language Instruction for Newcomers Program Contribution In progress 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Immigrant Settlement and Adaptation Program Contribution In progress 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Host Program Contribution In progress 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Welcoming Communities Initiative Contribution In progress 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Canada-Ontario Immigration Agreement Strategic Plan Operating Fund/ Contribution Planned 2009–2010
Evaluation of the Going to Canada Internet Portal Operating Fund/ Contribution Planned 2009–2010
Evaluation of Canadian Orientation Abroad Contribution Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of the Enhanced Language Training Program Contribution Planned 2011–2012
Evaluation of the Foreign Credentials Referral Office Contribution Planned 2011–2012
Citizenship Program
Evaluation of Citizenship Grants Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of Citizenship Searches and Proofs Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of Citizenship Education Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of Citizenship Promotion Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Other Programs
Evaluation of Knowledge Transfer Component of Metropolis II Operating Fund Completed 2008–2009
Evaluation of the Medical Surveillance Program Operating Fund Completed 2008–2009
Evaluation of the Immigration Medical Examination Program Operating Fund Planned 2011–2012
Internal Programs and Services
Evaluation of the staffing function at CIC Operating Fund In progress 2010–2011
Evaluation of the Office of Conflict Resolution Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of the Public Service Health Overseas Program Operating Fund Planned 2011–2012
Horizontal Initiatives
Evaluation of the Security Certificates (Public Safety Lead) Operating Fund Planned 2009–2010
Evaluation of the 2010 Olympics (Canadian Heritage Lead) Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of Canada’s Action Plan Against Racism (Canadian Heritage Lead) Operating Fund/ Contribution Planned 2010–2011
Evaluation of the Enhanced Driving License Program (Canada Border Services Agency Lead) Operating Fund Planned 2010–2011

Electronic link to evaluation plan: www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/evaluation/index.asp



Sources of Non-respendable Revenue
($ millions)


Program Activity Forecast Revenue
2008–2009
Planned Revenue
2009–2010
Planned Revenue
2010–2011
Planned Revenue
2011–2012
Immigration Program        
Immigration cost-recovery fees for permanent residents 182.3 190.6 199.3 208.4
Immigration rights fees 77.4 78.1 77.7 77.6
Sub-total 259.7 268.7 277.0 286.0
Temporary Resident Program        
Immigration cost-recovery fees for temporary residents 164.3 167.1 169.9 172.8
Sub-total 164.3 167.1 169.9 172.8
Canada’s Role in International Migration Nil Nil Nil Nil
Refugee Program        
Immigration cost-recovery fees for refugees 8.6 9.0 9.1 9.1
Sub-total 8.6 9.0 9.1 9.1
Integration Program        
Interest on the Immigrant Loans Program 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8
Sub-total 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8
Citizenship Program        
Citizenship cost-recovery fees 18.4 18.4 18.4 18.4
Right of citizenship fees 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Sub-total 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4
Other        
Access to Information 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Non-respendable Revenue
(See Notes 1 and 2)
464.0 476.1 487.3 499.2

Note 1 – All revenue is deposited into the Consolidated Revenue Fund and is not available for respending by the Department. All service fees are set in recognition of the full Government of Canada cost of providing the service.

Note 2 – A listing of Citizenship and Immigration Canada fees can be found at www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/fees/index.asp.



Status Report on Major Crown Projects

Global Case Management System

Description:

The Global Case Management System (GCMS) is a multi-year program that will replace several aging, archaic and incompatible core business systems of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). The GCMS is an essential secure technology platform upon which to build a modern, global, integrated, information-based solution that will strengthen program integrity, improve efficiency and enhance client service delivery.

The GCMS will establish the next-generation business operational environment, and improve flexibility to adapt to future legislative and major program initiatives (such as biometrics). The GCMS will also facilitate communications and data sharing with the CBSA and with our other partners for the purposes of administrating the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA).

Project Phase:

Building on the success of the first deployment of the GCMS in 2004 (the Citizenship Release), strategies for completing the projects were re-evaluated and a revised go-forward plan was prepared that reduces risk and delivers considerable business value. The GCMS is currently in the development phase for the second release, which will be oriented towards the immigration business line.


Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
Lead Department Citizenship and Immigration Canada
Participating Agency Canada Border Services Agency
Contracting Authority Public Works and Government Services Canada
Prime Contractor None (The Department is responsible for system integration.)


Major Milestones Date
Treasury Board approves funding for the GCMS project at the same time as CIC’s Treasury Board submission on the implementation of policy reforms and the new IRPA. August 2000
Treasury Board grants Preliminary Project Approval and major Crown project designation to the GCMS. March 2001
Treasury Board grants Effective Project Approval (EPA) to the GCMS. January 2002
Request for proposal for the acquisition of a commercial, off-the-shelf software package for case management posted for tender by Public Works and Government Services Canada. February 2002
Contract for the off-the-shelf software package for case management awarded. March 2003
Treasury Board grants amended EPA to the GCMS to address the impact of procurement delays. October 2003
The first GCMS business component (Citizenship) is implemented. September 2004
Treasury Board grants a second amendment to the EPA to address the impact of cumulative slippage, include critical new requirements in project scope, and provide for an incremental deployment approach. September 2005
Completion of a System Under Development audit of the GCMS project. November 2005
Treasury Board grants a third amendment to the EPA to address a wording anomaly with regard to the GST. December 2006
Independent review indicates the need to assess project status and review options for completing GCMS objectives. December 2006
Treasury Board grants a fourth amendment to the EPA to undertake this assessment and to develop a revised go-forward plan. February 2007
Treasury Board grants a fifth amendment to the EPA, extending the time frame for completion of a substantive go-forward plan to late fiscal 2007–2008. October 2007
Independent review validates project’s recovery plan and project team’s readiness to deliver. December 2007
Treasury Board grants a sixth amendment to the EPA with a reduced scope for the second release of GCMS. August 2008
Deployment of GCMS Release 2 to first international mission June 2010

Progress Report and Explanation of Variances

  • The GCMS has faced its share of challenges, adding to the cost and time needed to complete the project:
    • an overly ambitious scope at the beginning of the project;
    • a change of government direction to commercial off-the-shelf software;
    • a need to respond to increased security risks post-9/11 while respecting privacy;
    • new legislation (IRPA), representing a major change in the administration of the immigration system;
    • the introduction of the Permanent Resident Card; and
    • a significant change in responsibility with the creation of the CBSA in 2003.
  • Preliminary Project Approval was obtained from Treasury Board on March 1, 2001, with a planned cost of $194.8 million (excluding GST).
  • An EPA was obtained from Treasury Board on January 31, 2002, with a planned cost of $194.8 million (excluding GST) and a completion date of March 31, 2005.
  • On October 9, 2003, Treasury Board increased the project spending authority from $194.8 to $202.6 million (excluding GST). The $7.8 million variance was approved to address the impact on activities and resources of the decision to use a commercial software package rather than develop one in-house. The lengthy competitive procurement and contracting process delayed the project by nine months and pushed back the overall project completion date to December 31, 2005.
  • On September 29, 2005, Treasury Board approved a second increase in the amount of $40.2 million (excluding GST) over two additional fiscal years, bringing the total project spending authority to $242.8 million (excluding GST) and extending the project to 2007–2008. This increment was granted to cover costs associated with new requirements resulting from an increased focus on national security post-9/11 and the division of responsibility across two organizations for the administration of IRPA in December 2003, and to make the necessary adjustments to the system’s functionality based on lessons learned with the first deployment of the GCMS in September 2004.
  • On February 8, 2007, a further increase of $48.1 million in spending authority was approved by Treasury Board to reflect the GST in project estimates, undertake an assessment of the project status and consider alternative options for completing the GCMS objectives. This brought the total authority to $290.9 million (including GST).
  • Results of the project quality verification and options analysis indicated that the project scope and complexity must be reduced and focus placed on first delivering the business components of greatest value.
  • On October 18, 2007, Treasury Board granted an extension of the project authority to March 31, 2008, to provide the time frame needed to advance business requirements to the level necessary to develop a reliable cost and schedule estimate for the recommended path forward. There was no cost increase with this approval.
  • Forecasted expenditures up to March 31, 2008, indicate shortfalls in funding have been covered by CIC internally reallocating a total of $58.6 million and CBSA contributing $8.1 million for its share of the costs.
  • An amended EPA submission of February 2008, providing a substantive plan to complete the project, was deferred pending a broader review of major Crown projects. To allow time for the process to unfold, project authority was extended beyond March 31, 2008, within the previously approved level.
  • On July 29, 2008, Treasury Board met to discuss the GCMS. Approval was granted through an addendum in August 2008 for an extension of the project authority to March 31, 2011, and an increase of the total authority to $387 million (including GST). Consistent with recommendations from independent reviews conducted between December 2006 and December 2007, the project will be completed with a reduced scope focusing on systems used by operations overseas.

Temporary Residents Biometrics Project

Description:

CIC and the CBSA are jointly responsible for the delivery of Canada’s immigration program. In accordance with IRPA, CIC and the CBSA work together to manage the movement of clients across and within Canada’s borders. Under the Customs Act, all people and goods entering Canada must report to the CBSA at a port of entry (POE). Among the issues addressed by the CBSA are illegal migration, preventing the admission into Canada of persons involved in war crimes or crimes against humanity, and detention and removal from Canada of inadmissible persons.

Today, the use of biometrics is expanding rapidly given its unique approach and its potential to identify an individual reliably. The introduction of biometric technology into the temporary resident stream screening process will enhance the screening of applicants in the temporary program, thereby fixing the client’s identity at the time of visa application and study or work permit application, and allowing verification of that identity when the individual seeks entry at the border. As a result, the Government of Canada will better ensure the safety and security of Canadian society and reduce abuse of the immigration system by limiting opportunities for persons with Canadian criminal or deportation histories to use alternate identities to return to Canada. The project will also facilitate the processing of legitimate temporary workers, students and visitors. Many other countries, including such key migration countries as the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia have either recently implemented or are planning to implement similar projects.

Project Phase:

The Temporary Residents Biometrics Project is currently in the initiation phase. Final Treasury Board submission documents are being submitted in early 2009 for Preliminary Project Approval.

The planning phase will define the solution, and the approaches and plans for implementing it. A critical first step is the clear definition of a set of comprehensive business and supporting infrastructure requirements agreed to by all partners. Requirements will then be used to define the business solution and how it will work (functional design), how technology will enable the solution (technical design), and how all the pieces fit and work together (supporting architectures).

Substantive plans and strategies for completing the project and managing the business change will be developed, culminating in a submission to obtain Effective Project Approval.

Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies

In late 2007, CIC sought policy approval for the introduction of biometrics into the Temporary Resident Program, and funding to support this initiative was included in Budget 2008. Following the budget announcement, a Biometrics Project Office was established in CIC as the lead organization for managing this investment. The project will be developed and implemented with the active participation of three primary federal government departments and agencies: CIC, CBSA and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).


Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
Lead Department Citizenship and Immigration Canada
Contracting Authority Public Works and Government Services Canada
Participating Agencies CBSA
RCMP



Prime and Major Subcontractor(s)
Prime Contractor  
Major Subcontractor(s)


The project to date has had one editorial contract, one planning and scheduling contract and one application architect contract.
  1. Brainhunter
    Carling Executive Park
    1545 Carling Ave. Suite 600
    Ottawa, ON
    K1Z 8P9
  2. Cornerstone Word Company
    19 Glen Avenue
    Ottawa, ON
    K1S 2Z6
  3. CGI
    275 Slater Street,
    14th Floor
    Ottawa, Ontario
    K1P 5H9



Major Milestones
Date Major Milestone
2010 Effective Project Approval
2011 Phase 1 Deployment – 15% of clients enrolled abroad
2012 Phase 2 Deployment – 50% of clients enrolled abroad
2013 Phase 3 Deployment – 100% clients enrolled and verified
2013 Project Shutdown

Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

Funding was included in Budget 2008 to enhance and strengthen identity management within the Temporary Resident Program, allowing overseas visa officers and border service officers at POEs to make decisions based on accurate identity and immigration admissibility information, and permitting border service officers to verify applicants’ identity at Canada’s POEs.

The project is currently working with a tight budget allocation and is proceeding as planned and on budget.

Industrial Benefits

This major Crown project does not directly benefit Canadian industry; it is a project to improve the safety of Canadian citizens. Immigration and the granting of Canadian citizenship are vital to the continued growth and prosperity of Canada. To support the Government of Canada outcomes of strong economic growth and a safe and secure world, a balance between the desire to welcome newcomers to Canada and the obligation to protect the health, safety and security of Canadian society must be maintained. Criminals, terrorists and other known inadmissible persons must not be allowed to enter or stay in Canada.