This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The purpose of the Joint Voisey's Bay Employment and Training Authority (JETA) is to promote maximum employment opportunities for Aboriginal people at the Voisey's Bay mine/concentrator site as well as in related spin-off activities. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: To support the Aboriginal groups of Labrador to provide programs and services to assist Aboriginal individuals to prepare for, obtain and maintain employment associated with major developments in Labrador, building on the development at the Voisey's Bay site. The contribution agreement with JETA ended March 31, 2006, as the Voisey's Bay Nickel/Mine site is now in Operation. The jobs now available at the Voisey's Bay site will be through attrition, and as such longer term planning and more effective programming is required to ensure that Aboriginal people have the appropriate skill sets for areas of demand with VBNC as well as other employers, as appropriate. The extension of the AHRDP – JETA funding into 2007/2008 will provide the necessary timeline to enter into a new agreement(s) with the Aboriginal groups in Labrador for the effective utilization of the remaining funds, leading to lasting benefits for the Aboriginal people of Labrador. Service Canada is currently working with the Aboriginal groups to develop plans for the remaining funds and the associated result targets.
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions1 |
4.5 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0 |
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
4.5 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Evaluation An evaluation of the Voisey's Bay project is planned for completion by December 2006 and results will be available in early 2007. The evaluation activities include formative (program design, delivery, and implementation) and summative (program relevance, success, cost-effectiveness) components, based on multiple lines of inquiry. These consist of key informant interviews, focus group discussions, a survey of participants, and a review of files/documents and administrative data. |
||||
1 A request for re-profile of $1.2M from fiscal year 2005-06 to 2007-08 was approved in the ARLU 2006-09. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: Transfer payments made under the Aboriginal Human Resources Development Strategy (AHRDS) are predominantly in the form of contributions to Aboriginal organizations. The AHRDS provides support to Aboriginal organizations to design and deliver:
|
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: To support Aboriginal organizations to develop and implement labour market, youth and child care programs that are designed to address the local and regional needs of Aboriginal people. This programming will:
Increase the supply of quality child care services in First Nations and Inuit communities, thereby raising the availability of distinct and diverse services in these communities to a level comparable to that of the general populationAssist 50,000 Aboriginal clients, of whom 20,000 are expected to find and keep work or become self employed, and approximately 2,000 will return to school. Approximately, 7,500 child care spaces will continue to be supported and occupied. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions |
263.6 | 257.0 | 250.1 | 249.3 |
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs1 | 263.6 | 257.0 | 250.1 | 249.3 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: A formative evaluation of the AHRDAs is underway. It will increase our understanding of the issues and factors framing the design, delivery, implementation and effectiveness of the Strategy. Results of the formative evaluation, as well as those of the summative evaluation, planned for 2007-08, will help inform the renewal of the AHRD program. The formative evaluation strategy includes a literature review, a socio-economic profile of AHRDA communities, an assessment of data collection and accountability systems, and an examination of issues relating to the design, delivery and implementation of thirteen case study AHRDAs. The formative evaluation will also examine the design, delivery and implementation of the First Nations and Inuit Child Care Initiative. An internal audit of selected AHRDAs will be conducted in fiscal year 2007-08 to measure the progress made on recommendations provided by previous audits. |
||||
1 Expected result(s) and outcomes are based on total program funding through the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) and Employment Insurance Act Part II. The forecast and planned spending figures reflect only CRF program. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership (ASEP) initiative is a targeted Aboriginal skills development program designed to promote maximum employment for Aboriginal people on major economic developments through a collaborative partnership approach. It is designed to address a broad spectrum of skills and learning needs and provide access to jobs. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: Anticipated targets for 2006/2007 are as follows (targets currently under negotiation):
The overall objectives of the ASEP initiative:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions1 |
25.2 |
23.5 | 18.2 | 0 |
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
25.2 | 23.5 | 18.2 | 0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Evaluation An evaluation of the ASEP program is underway and planned for completion by March 2008. The evaluation includes formative (program design, delivery and implementation) and summative (program relevance, success, and cost-effectiveness) components. The evaluation employs multiple lines of inquiry, including a survey of ASEP participants, key informant interviews, focus groups discussions, socio-economic profiles, a review of baseline data, a document/file review, and a detailed analysis of administrative data from various sources. There is no separate program audit planned for ASEP, however the program is included in the Departments horizontal audit. Currently, the program is included in the review of contribution agreements to determine how the Segregation of Duties directive is being applied. |
||||
1 The 2006-07 Planned Spending includes a re-profile of $5,263k from fiscal year 2005-2006. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: Promote lifelong learning by reducing non-financial barriers to adult learning and facilitate the creation of opportunities for Canadians to acquire and develop learning, literacy, and essential skills, in collaboration with partners. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: The program outputs, which will begin to be reported in year two of the Program, will include:
The expected immediate program outcomes will be:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
23.8 | 28.4 | 28.4 | 28.4 |
Total Contributions |
8.7 | 13.3 | 18.8 | 4.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
32.5 | 41.7 | 47.2 | 32.5 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: An evaluation framework will be developed in 2006-2007 in preparation for a formative evaluation in 2007-2008. |
||||
1 The Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills Program (ALLESP) came into effect April 1, 2006 and integrates three former programs, the National Literacy Program, the Office of Learning Technologies, and the Learning Initiatives Program. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: 1998 |
End Date: Ongoing |
|||
Description: The Canada Education Savings Grant encourages Canadians to save for the post-secondary education of children through Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs). |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: The expected results of the Canada Education Savings (CES) Program are:
The Canada Education Savings (CES) Program's long-term outcome is to increase the participation rate of Canadians in post-secondary education (PSE) through savings incentives. By increasing financial capacity to attend PSE, the CES Program's ultimate outcome is to contribute to the development of more skilled and knowledgeable Canadians who are able to fully participate in the workplace and society. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
462.5 | 575.0 | 560.0 | 575.0 |
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
462.5 | 575.0 | 560.0 | 575.0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: An interim formative evaluation is scheduled for Fall 2006. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Canada Learning Bond (CLB) was introduced to further encourage low-income families to open RESPs to save for their children's post-secondary education. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: The immediate outcomes of the Canada Education Savings (CES) Program are:
The Canada Education Savings (CES) Program's long-term outcome is to increase the participation rate of Canadians in post-secondary education (PSE) through savings incentives. By increasing financial capacity to attend PSE, the CES Program contributes to the ultimate outcome of developing more skilled and knowledgeable Canadians who are able to fully participate in the workplace and society. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
2.2 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 49.0 |
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
2.2 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 49.0 |
Planned Audits and Evaluations: An interim formative evaluation is scheduled for Fall 2006. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: Provide Alternative Payments to non-participating jurisdictions, Interest Relief and Debt Reduction in Repayment benefits to borrowers, and the value of loans forgiven according to prescribed criteria. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: To ensure alternative payments, interest relief, debt reduction in repayment benefits, and the amount of loans forgiven are accurately reflected in financial reports. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions (statutory) |
211.2 | 223.7 | 238.2 | 247.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
211.2 | 223.7 | 238.2 | 247.1 |
Planned Audits and Evaluations: Not Applicable |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: To track the benefits and administrative costs related to the risk-shared loan regime. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: To ensure interest subsidy, Interest Relief benefits, Debt Reduction in Repayment benefits, the amount of loans forgiven, risk premium and put-backs are accurately reflected in financial reports. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions (statutory) |
70.1 | 46.4 | 30.5 | 19.3 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
70.1 | 46.4 | 30.5 | 19.3 |
Planned Audits and Evaluations: Not Applicable |
||||
1 Current Year figures include recoveries and balance to Public Accounts; Planned Spending figures are from ARLU. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: To track the claims submitted by financial institutions related to the Guaranteed Loan Portfolio. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: To ensure claim payments are accurately reflected in financial reports. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions (statutory) |
(27.7) | 9.5 | 6.5 | 4.5 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
(27.7) | 9.5 | 6.5 | 4.5 |
Planned Audits and Evaluations: Not Applicable |
||||
1 Current year figures include recoveries and balance to Public Accounts; Planned Spending figures are from ARLU. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: Provide targeted grants for eligible borrowers to increase access to post-secondary education by reducing financial barriers. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: Since 1995, the Government of Canada has offered the Canada Study Grant to encourage participation in post-secondary education by providing additional non-repayable assistance or reducing debt. The Canada Study Grants are designed to address the education-related costs of students with dependants, women in certain doctoral programs, and high-need part-time students, and to accommodate students with permanent disabilities by covering the exceptional education-related costs associated with their disability. In August 2005, the Government of Canada introduced two Canada Access Grants, which provides up-front non-repayable assistance intended to improve access to post-secondary education and reduce financial barriers for students from low-income families and students with permanent disabilities. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total Authority |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
129.7 | 119.9 | 123.1 | 127.2 |
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
129.7 | 119.9 | 123.1 | 127.2 |
Planned Audits and Evaluations: None in 2006-2007. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: CPRN is an independent, non-profit policy research organization whose mission is to create knowledge and lead public debate on social and economic issues of importance to Canadians. A $12 million grant was awarded to CPRN to be disbursed in $3 million annual installments over four years starting in 2006-07 and ending n 2009-2010. |
||||
Strategic outcome: N/A |
||||
Expected Results: To increase opportunities for social and economic policy development in Canada and to engage Canadians for public debate in a non-partisan forum. The production of quality, non-partisan policy research in order to facilitate wide-scale public dialogue to inform policy issues. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: An evaluation of funding to CPRN was completed in 2005. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: Transfer of funds for one year (2006-07) to all provincial and territorial governments as a transition period to enable them to adjust the new approach of the Government of Canada's to child care. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: The Government of Canada respects the role of provinces and territories in determining their priorities. Provinces and territories have discretion to use this transitional funding as they see fit to improve their child care systems. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
||||
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
650.0 | |||
Total Program Activity |
650.0 | |||
Planned Audit and Evaluation: None have been planned. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enabling Fund for Official Language Minority Communities |
||||||||||||||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||||||||||||||
Description: The Enabling Fund provides funding to Official Language Minority Communities (OLMC) designated organizations, the Regroupements de développement économique et d'employabilité (RDÉE) and Community Economic Development and Employability Committees (CEDEC) through contribution agreements. Contributions can be made under the Enabling Fund for the OLMC to support activities such as:
|
||||||||||||||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||||||||||||||
Expected Results:
The Enabling Fund for OLMC is delivered under the authority of Section 6 of the Department of Human Resources Development Act, which provides the Minister with authority relating to the development of Canada's human resources to enhance employment, encourage equality and promote social inclusion. The objective of the Enabling Fund is to ensure continuity of activities and funding for the organizations that foster the development of human resources, economic growth, and job creation and retention in OLMCs. |
||||||||||||||||
$ Million | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|||||||||||||
Program Activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Grants |
||||||||||||||||
Total Contributions |
12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | |||||||||||||
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||||||||||||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | |||||||||||||
Planned Audits and Evaluations:
|
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description of Transfer Payment Program: The Foreign Credential Recognition (FCR) Program provides financial and strategic support to provincial and territorial partners and stakeholders, including Sector Councils, regulatory bodies, immigrant serving organizations and post secondary educational institutions, to develop a pan-Canadian approach to assessing and recognizing foreign credentials within targeted occupations and sectors of the economy to facilitate entry into, and mobility within, the Canadian labour market. The FCR Program supports the research and project-based activities of partners and stakeholders to develop tools and processes to assess and recognize foreign credentials in targeted occupations and sectors. The goal of the Program is to deliver on its mandate of improving the labour market outcomes of internationally trained workers in targeted occupations and sectors. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: In the short-term, the Program will work with in partnership to:
In the medium and long-term, the Program will work in partnership to:
The Program will work with partners and stakeholders to achieve these short, medium and long-term outcomes in order to meet its ultimate objective of improving labour market outcomes in targeted occupations and sectors of internationally trained workers. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total Authority 2005-2006 |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions |
$7.8M |
$15.7M |
$19.4M |
$18.9M |
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
$7.8M |
$15.7M |
$19.4M |
$18.9M |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: A formative evaluation of the FCR Program will be completed in 2006-07. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Guaranteed Income Supplement is a monthly benefit paid to residents of Canada who receive a basic, full or partial Old Age Security pension and who have little or no other income. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: Social Investment |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
6,476.5 | 6,820.0 | 7,219.0 | 7,512.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||
Total Program Activity | 6,476.5 | 6,820.0 | 7,219.0 | 7,512.0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Planned Audits and Evaluations: The Terms of Reference for an Evaluation of Guaranteed Income Supplement Take-up are under development with a planned completion date of 2008-2009. An Evaluation of Guaranteed Income Supplement will also take place in the same time period. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The goal of the Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities is to improve the employment situation of Canadians with disabilities, by enhancing their employability, increasing the employment opportunities available to them, and building on their existing knowledge base. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: Measuring and reporting on program and societal indicators and undertaking evaluation activities will help to assess progress toward enhancing program effectiveness and improving the employment situation of persons with disabilities. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
||||
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
219.8 | 222.0 | 222.0 | 222.0 |
Total Program Activity |
219.8 | 222.0 | 222.0 | 222.0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Reporting under the Agreements will include selected societal indicators (employment income, educational attainment and employment rate of working age persons with disabilities) and the following program indicators:
|
||||
1 The total cost for this program is $223 million, comprised of $222 million in other transfer payments and $1 million in operating costs. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
Total Funding prior to April 1, 2007: 784 M |
||
Description: Grants and contributions to not-for-profit organizations, individuals, municipal governments, Band/tribal councils and other Aboriginal organizations, public health and educational institutions, Régies régionales, for-profit enterprises, research organizations and research institutes to carry out research on homelessness to help communities better understand and more effectively address homelessness issues. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: Objectives:
Expected Results: By March 31, 2007, the National Homelessness Initiative aims to achieve the following outcomes:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
2.0 | 0.9 | ||
Total Contributions |
175.4 | 137.4 | ||
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
177.4 | 138.3 | ||
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Summative Evaluation |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: This program supports local projects across Canada that help seniors participate in social activities, pursue an active life and contribute to their communities. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: The specific objectives are:
The NHSP targeted outcomes are:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
10.8 | 15.6 | 19.5 | 19.5 |
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
10.8 | 15.6 | 19.5 | 19.5 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: An evaluation framework and methodology report for the formative evaluation has been developed, and it is scheduled to be completed in 2007-2008. |
||||
1 Note: The total budget for this program was $15 million in 2005-06 comprised of 11.7 million in grants and 3.3 million in operating costs, 20 million in 2006-07 comprised of 15.6 million in grants and 4.4 million in operating costs and 25 million in 2007-08 and on-going comprised of $19.5 million in grants and $5.5 million in operating costs. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Old Age Security pension is a monthly benefit available, if applied for, to most Canadians 65 years of age or over. Old Age Security residence requirements must also be met. An applicant's employment history is not a factor in determining eligibility, nor does the applicant need to be retired. Old Age Security pensioners pay federal and provincial income tax. (Higher income pensioners also repay part or all of their benefit through the tax system). |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
22,043.7 | 23,255.0 | 24,139.0 | 25,285.0 |
Total Contributions | ||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | ||||
Total Program Activity | 22,043.7 | 23,255.0 | 24,139.0 | 25,285.0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: A Summative Evaluation of Old Age Security will be initiated in 2006-07 with a completion date planned for 2008-2009. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Opportunities Fund for Persons with Disabilities1 |
||||
Start Date: April 1, 2004 |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Opportunities Fund Program is designed to assist persons with disabilities to return to work. Persons with disabilities who are unemployed and not normally eligible for Employment Insurance Part II Employment Programs can apply for assistance under the Opportunities Fund. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
||||
Total Contributions |
25.3 | 26.7 | 26.7 | 26.7 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
25.3 | 26.7 | 26.7 | 26.7 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: A summative evaluation of the Opportunities Fund program is currently underway with a target timeline for completion of late Fall 2007. |
||||
1 Note: The total cost for this program is $30 million, comprised of $26.7 million in contributions and $3.3 million in operating costs. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sector Council Program |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Sector Council Program supports research and project-based activities proposed by Sector Councils, as well as ad-hoc national sector like organizations working on skills and learning issues. SCP supports sector council activities that include:
|
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: In the short-term, the Program and Sector Councils will continue to work in partnership to:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions |
$22.5M |
$26.5M |
$26.5M |
$26.5M |
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
$22.5M |
$26.5M |
$26.5M |
$26.5M |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: The summative evaluation of the Sector Council Program has commenced and is expected to be completed by 2006-2007. Phase 1 draft interim reports are anticipated by the end of September 2006, and a final report is anticipated by the end of the fiscal year. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Social Development Partnerships Program1 |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Social Development Partnerships Program provides grants and contributions funding to non-profit organizations working to meet the social development needs of persons with disabilities, children and their families, and other vulnerable or excluded populations in Canada. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results:
The program's more immediate objectives, against which the program will be evaluated, are to:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
10.2 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 14.2 |
Total Contributions |
20.8 | 15.0 | 17.8 | 21.1 |
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
31.0 | 29.3 | 32.1 | 35.3 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: The summative evaluation of the SDPP is scheduled to begin in Fall 2006 and a draft report is expected in Fall 2007. |
||||
1 Note that funds for the Voluntary Sector Strategy, Understanding the Early Years and Early Childhood Development for Official Language Minority Communities are administered through the SDPP Terms and Conditions. Operating costs are not included. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Allowance is designed to recognize the difficult circumstances faced by many surviving persons and by couples living on the pension of only one spouse or common-law partner. |
||||
Strategic outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: The Allowance and the Allowance for the Survivor will continue to keep pace with inflation, along with the second installment of the increase to the Allowance announced in Budget 2005. Its implementation in January 2007 will increase benefits for Allowance recipients by $18. |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants (statutory) |
472.1 | 500.0 | 537.0 | 568.0 |
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments |
||||
Total Program Activity |
472.1 | 500.0 | 537.0 | 568.0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: None Planned |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Training Centre Infrastructure Fund |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The three-year, Training Centre Infrastructure Funding (TCIF) pilot program will improve workplace skilled trades training and worker productivity by enabling tradespersons to train on equipment they will likely use on the job. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: In pursuing the core objective TCIF will institute a range of core activities in support of its overarching mission to increase the use of up-to-date training equipment at union training centres:
Immediate – medium-term outcomes:
Longer-term outcomes:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions |
$7.2M | $11.0M | $4.2M | $0 |
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
$7.2M | $11.0M | $4.2M |
$0 |
Planned Audits and Evaluations: An evaluation is planned to take place over the course of this 3-year pilot and will include various evaluation methods, including case studies of union training centres, end-user surveys, interviews and focus groups. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: Effective July 2006 families will receive up to $1,200 per year for each child under six, to be taxable in the hands of the lower-income spouse. Payments are being made directly to families so that they can choose the child care that is best for their children and their family's needs. The Universal Child Care Benefit is provided in addition to existing federal programs such as the Canada Child Tax Benefit, the National Child Benefit Supplement and the Child Care Expense Deduction and will not affect the benefits families receive under these programs. Further information can be found at www.universalchildcare.ca. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities. |
||||
Expected Results: For 2006-07: 95% of eligible children under six years of age for whom their parents are receiving the Universal Child Care Benefit For 2007 onward: 100% of eligible children under six years of age for whom their parents are receiving the Universal Child Care Benefit |
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions |
||||
Total Other Transfer Payments |
1,610.0 | 2,085.0 | 2,065.0 | |
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
1,610.0 | 2,085.0 | 2,065.0 | |
Planned Audit and Evaluation:
Evaluation activities to be undertaken in the first three years of this initiative include the development of an evaluation framework and a formative evaluation. These activities will assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes and procedures established for the administration of the UCCB, in order to identify strenghts and areas for improvement, and inform policy and program planning for future years. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||
Description: The Workplace Skills Initiative (WSI) will fund projects that test and evaluate innovative, partnership-based, outcomes-focused approaches to skills development for employers and employed Canadians:
|
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results: The Workplace Skills Initiative is expected to contribute towards:
|
||||
$ Million | ||||
Total |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Program Activity: |
||||
Total Grants |
||||
Total Contributions |
$34.7 |
$37.7 |
$0 |
|
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
$34.7 |
$37.7 |
$0 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: Audits and evaluations will be conducted as outlined in the WSI Results-Based Management and Accountability Framework and the WSI Risk-Based Audit Framework, and in accordance with the WSI Evaluation Framework in the amended Treasury Board Submission. |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: |
||||
Start Date: 2003 |
End Date: On going |
|||
Description: Transfer payments made under the Youth Employment Strategy (YES)1 are predominantly in the form of contributions from participating departments for wage subsidies for participant youth or for the development and delivery of youth support services. Such support services include client assessment and case management services and employability tools so as to help participants acquire needed skills. Transfer payments contribute directly to the program objectives by encouraging organizations to create meaningful skills-enhancement opportunities for youth, providing supporting services or providing all youth with employment and career related tools and information. |
||||
Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. |
||||
Expected Results:
|
||||
$ Million |
||||
HRSD with Service Canada |
Total |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
Planned Spending |
Program Activity: Employment Programs |
||||
Total Contributions 2 |
215.4 | 255.1 | 255.1 | 255.1 |
Total Other Transfer Payments |
||||
Total - Transfer Payment Programs |
215.4 | 255.1 | 255.1 | 255.1 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Not Applicable |
||||
1 Youth Awareness is not part of the Strategy 2 Includes resources transferred from Public Service Human Resources Agency for the Federal Public Sector Youth Internship Program. |
Name of Foundation: Canadian Council on Learning | ||||||
Start Date: March 30, 2004 |
End Date: March 31, 2009 |
Total Funding: $85 million1 |
||||
Description: To promote and support evidence-based decision making in all areas of lifelong learning by informing Canadians regularly on Canada's progress on learning outcomes, and promoting knowledge and information exchange among learning partners. |
||||||
Strategic Outcomes:
|
||||||
Summary of Annual Plans of Recipient:
|
||||||
$ million | ||||||
Actuals 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
|||
Conditional Grant(s)1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Third Party formative evaluation to be completed by September 30, 2006 |
||||||
URL to Recipient Site: www.ccl-cca.ca | ||||||
1A one-time grant was provided to CCL in fiscal year 2004-05. All funds are to be dispersed by March 31, 2009. |
Name of Foundation: The Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation | ||||
Start Date: 2000 |
End Date: 2010 |
Total Funding: $2.5 billion |
||
Description: The Budget Implementation Act, 1998, provides for the creation of the Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation. The Act establishes that the Minister of Human Resources and Social Development is responsible for tabling the Foundation's annual report before Parliament and provides for the $2.5B endowment made to the Foundation in 1998. The endowment is managed in accordance with the Funding Agreement between the Foundation and the Government of Canada, as represented by the Ministers of Finance and Human Resources and Social Development. The objective of the foundation is to increase access to post-secondary education so that Canadians can acquire the skills needed to participate in a changing economy and society by granting scholarships to students who are in financial need and who demonstrate merit. |
||||
Strategic outcome:
|
||||
Summary of Annual Plans of Recipient:
|
||||
$ million | ||||
Actuals 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
|
Conditional Grant(s) | 307.4 | 348.5 | 349.6 | 350.4 |
Administration | 22.5 | 27.0 | 28.0 | 30.0 |
Planned Audit and Evaluation: The Foundation's annual audit will be conducted in the first quarter, and program reviews and audits of granting processes will be conducted in three provinces. |
||||
URL to Foundation site: www.millenniumscholarships.ca |
Name of Foundation: The Peter Gzowski Foundation for Literacy | ||||||
Start Date: 31/03/03 |
End Date: Ongoing |
Total Funding: $5 million1 |
||||
Description: The purpose of this foundation is to provide one time funding and a vehicle for corporations and private citizens, who supported Peter Gzowski's work in literacy, to make donations in his name. The intent is to support increased public awareness of, and support for, literacy issues; leveraged funds; promotion of literacy and its importance; and literacy activities that support the promotion of literacy and leverage funds for literacy throughout Canada. |
||||||
Strategic Outcome:
|
||||||
Summary of Annual Plans of Recipient:
|
||||||
$ million | ||||||
Actuals 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
|||
Conditional Grant(s) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | ||
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Annual audits as required under new Treasury Board guidelines for foundations |
||||||
URL to Foundation site: www.abc-canada.org/pgi_tournaments | ||||||
1The amount of $5 million was paid in 2003-2004. Therefore, no further funding will be provided to the Foundation. With the assistance of HRSD Legal Services, negotiations will proceed to amend reporting obligations in order to meet the Office of the Auditor General and Treasury Board standards. |
Name of Foundation: The Winnipeg Foundation | ||||||
Start Date: February 28, 2003 |
End Date: Ongoing |
Total Funding: $1 million |
||||
Description: The purpose of this foundation is to help support existing and innovative family literacy initiatives in Manitoba, more specifically to create and increase the availability of materials and resources to the family literacy field in the province. This includes the Literacy for Life endowment challenge fund which will support existing literacy activities and innovative family literacy initiatives at the grassroots level. |
||||||
Strategic outcome:
|
||||||
Summary of Annual Plans of Recipient:
|
||||||
$ million | ||||||
Actuals 2005-2006 |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
|||
Conditional Grant(s) | $.075M | $.177M 1 | N/A | N/A | ||
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Annual audits as required under new Treasury Board guidelines for foundations. |
||||||
URL to Foundation site: www.wpgfdn.org | ||||||
1Federal payments are contingent on matching funds raised by The Winnipeg Foundation. A total of $822,720 out of $1 million has been paid to the Winnipeg Foundation from February 28, 2003 to the end of the 2005-06 fiscal year. The balance of $177,280 remains to be paid out conditional upon The Winnipeg Foundation contributing a matching dollar amount. Matched funding will end September 30, 2006. With the assistance of HRSD Legal Services, negotiations will proceed to amend reporting obligations in order to meet the Office of the Auditor General recommendations and Treasury Board guidelines. |
Name of Foundation: Read to Me! Foundation Inc. | ||||||
Start Date: February 28, 2003 |
End Date: Not Applicable |
Total Funding: $1 million 1 |
||||
Description: To implement a province-wide family literacy program whereby each newborn in Nova Scotia receives a tote bag of books and learning supports before leaving the hospital. The intent is:
Ultimately, it is expected that this initiative will contribute to improving literacy levels in Nova Scotia. |
||||||
Strategic outcome:
|
||||||
Summary of Annual Plans of Recipient:
|
||||||
$ million | ||||||
Actuals 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
|||
Conditional Grant(s) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | ||
Planned Audit and Evaluation: Annual audits as required under new Treasury Board guidelines for foundations. |
||||||
URL to Foundation site: Not Applicable | ||||||
1 The amount of $1 million was paid in three payments: one payment in 2002-2003 and two payments in 2003-2004. Therefore, no further funding will be provided to the Foundation. With the assistance of HRSD Legal Services, negotiations will proceed to amend reporting obligations in order to meet the Office of the Auditor General and Treasury Board standards. |
Name of Horizontal Initiative: |
Name of Lead Department(s): |
||||||
Start Date: 1999 |
End Date: 2009 |
||||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
|||||||
Description of the Horizontal Initiative: The Aboriginal Human Resources Development Strategy (AHRDS) was originally approved in 1999 for a five-year period with $1.6B committed for labour market and skills development. In the Fall of 2003, AHRDS was approved for another five years (2004-09). The AHRDS is a pan-Aboriginal human resources and skills development strategy that provides support to Aboriginal organizations (80 Human Resources Development Agreement holders to date), to design and deliver :
As part of a broader Aboriginal agenda, the AHRDS will assist to improve Aboriginal people's skills, facilitate their participation in the labour market, and, thus, close the gap in employment outcomes between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. |
|||||||
Shared Outcome(s):
|
|||||||
Governance Structure(s):
|
|||||||
$ million |
|||||||
Federal Partners Involved in Each Program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007 |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
|||
1. HRSD |
Total : On going |
$361.3M a |
|
||||
Total |
Total |
||||||
Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): There will be 80 Agreements with Aboriginal organizations across Canada. The expected results above are an aggregate total of the results to be achieved by the 80 agreement holders for 2006-2007. |
|||||||
Contact Information: Keith Conn |
Approved by: Karen Jackson, |
Date Approved: September 26, 2006 |
|||||
a. The planned spending figures reflect Consolidated Revnue Fund (CRF) and Employment-Insurance Act Part II. There is an estimated $14.2M in planned spending for operating resources related to AHRDS. |
Name of Horizontal Initiative: |
Name of Lead Department(s): |
||||||
Start Date: 2003 |
End Date: 2008 |
||||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
|||||||
Description of the Horizontal Initiative: The Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership (ASEP) program is a five year initiative with a total funding allocation of $85 million. It is targeted at developing the skills of Canada's Aboriginal workforce, promoting maximum employment for Aboriginal people on major economic developments across Canada and providing lasting benefits for Aboriginal communities, families and individuals. The entire initiative is geared to providing Aboriginal people with the skills needed to participate in economic opportunities such as northern mining, oil and gas, and hydro development projects across Canada. A key feature of the ASEP program is that a partnership must be established that includes significant funding contribution from the private sector, the provincial or territorial government as well as a commitment from all of the local Aboriginal communities. The partnership must also develop a comprehensive Aboriginal human resources training-to-employment plan for the large scale economic development project that will cover a broad continuum ranging from basic skills, literacy and academic upgrading, through job-specific training and apprenticeships to retention counselling and other on-the-job supports. The plan must have a commitment from the major employer to provide at least 50 long-term, sustainable jobs for Aboriginal people. There will be a number of major projects under development over the next decade as oil and gas, mining, forestry and hydro-electric projects are launched or expanded across Canada. There will be a wide range of employment opportunities, including the skilled trades and opportunities in secondary and service industries which offer good potential for sustainable employment. Training needs will be high, as many jobs now require higher education and computer skills. Within its currently funding capacity, ASEP is supporting nine such projects. |
|||||||
Shared Outcome(s): Long term sustainable employment for Aboriginal people on major economic developments, thereby resulting in increased employment and savings to income support programs. |
|||||||
Governance Structure(s):
|
|||||||
$ million |
|||||||
Federal Partners Involved in Each Program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007 |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
|||
1. HRSDC |
a. ASEP |
$85 million |
$25.3 milliona (program and operating) |
|
|||
Total |
Total |
||||||
a A request for re-profile of $5,263k from fiscal year 2005-2006 to 2006-2007 was approved. |
|||||||
Results to be achieved by Non-federal Partners ( if applicable): |
|||||||
Contact Information: Keith Conn, DG |
Approved by: Karen Jackson |
Date Approved: September 26, 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Lead Department(s): |
Start Date: 1964 |
End Date: ongoing |
Total Federal Funding Allocated: ongoing |
|
Description: The February 2004 Speech from the Throne and the 2004 and 2005 Federal Budgets outlined the Government of Canada's commitment to ensuring access to post-secondary education by modernizing the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP). The Government set out a balanced package of improvements to loans and grants, ensuring that student financial assistance evolves to meet the changing needs of learners and society. The purpose of the CSLP is to promote accessibility to post-secondary education for individuals with demonstrated financial need by lowering financial barriers through the provision of loans and grants and to ensure Canadians have an opportunity to develop the knowledge and skills to participate in the workplace and community. Since 1964, the CSLP has assisted millions of students in their pursuit of post-secondary education. In August of 2000, CSLP shifted from the risk-shared financing arrangements that had been in place with financial institutions between 1995 and 2000 to a direct student loan financing regime. This meant that the Program had to redesign the delivery mechanism in order to directly finance student loans. In the new arrangement, the Government of Canada provides the necessary funding to students and currently two service providers have contracts to administer the loans. For 2006-2007, it is estimated that approximately 455,000 full-time and part-time students will be assisted in accessing learning opportunities through student loans, study and access grants and non-repayable in-study interest subsidies. The amount of total financial support is expected to reach $2.2 billion. Of that amount, more than $1.9 billion will be disbursed as Canada Student Loans to approximately 355,000 students and approximately $120 million will be granted in non-repayable Canada Study Grants (CSG) and Canada Access Grants (CAG) to over 80,000 of those same students. The remaining amount (about $173 million) will be spent on in-study interest subsidies for all of the above plus approximately 100,000 previous additional borrowers remaining in study. Information for the public on saving, planning and paying for post-secondary studies and specific information for CSLP clients (including information on learning opportunity selection, financial planning, and how to apply for, maintain and repay student loans) can be accessed at: www.canlearn.ca. |
|
Shared Outcome(s): The shared outcomes for the Canada Student Loans Program are to:
|
|
Governance Structure(s): Through the Canada Student Loans Program, the Government of Canada develops policies regarding needs assessment, eligibility criteria, in-study account management, loan repayment and debt management, provides information on post-secondary education, and lends money to post-secondary students to finance their studies. In addition, it coordinates the delivery of the Direct Loan Program while managing both the Risk-Shared and Guaranteed Loan portfolios. The Government of Canada has entered into Integration Agreements with four provinces in order to create a "one-student-one-loan’ service approach. The administration of the current Program is the product of a co-operative effort between Human Resources and Social Development Canada (HRSDC), Service Canada, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), participating provinces and the Yukon Territory, two Service Providers and Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC). These agents are responsible for conducting one or more activities during the loan lifecycle. Program documents and communications tools are typically prepared with the input and approval of both federal and participating provincial and territorial governments. Quebec, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut do not participate in the CSLP. These jurisdictions receive an alternative payment to assist in the cost of delivering a similar student financial assistance program. Effective management of relations with third-party agents is the primary responsibility of the CSLP. Other Program activities include client relations and comptrollership. The front end of the Program is delivered by provincial student assistance offices, which also administer provincial aid. The participating provinces and the Yukon Territory:
Service Providers assume responsibility for maintaining the loans when the loan agreement is signed. Service Providers' responsibilities include:
PWGSC is responsible for disbursing loans. CRA Non-Tax Collection Services is the agent responsible for debt collection. Delinquent guaranteed and risk-shared loans become debts to the Crown when the Government of Canada buys back the debt from financial institutions. CRA Non-Tax Collection Directorate becomes responsible for directly financed loans after the Service Provider has attempted collection of a set period of time and the borrower has either not been located or is unwilling to repay. These activities may also be conducted by private collection agencies under contract to CRA. These private collection agencies must abide by CRA collection guidelines when carrying out the recovery of Crown debts. |
Federal Partners Involved in each program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation (Actuals for 2005-2006) |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007c |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
HRSDC |
N/A |
Final Operating Results $693.7 M Loans disbursed under the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act $1.9B |
$648.7 M Loans disbursed under the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act $1.9B |
|
Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): N/A |
||||
Contact: Trudy Albert, |
Approved by: Rosaline Frith |
Date Approved: |
||
a Please note that the number is estimated as loans are awarded based on client eligibility and demonstrated need. b Please note that the number is estimated as grants are awarded based on client eligibility and demonstrated need. c Please note that planned spending for 2006-2007 does not include items revealed in the 2006 Federal Budget relating to the Canada Student Loans Program. |
Name of Horizontal Initiative: |
Name of Lead Department(s): |
||||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
||||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
|||||||
Description of the Horizontal Initiative: September 2000, Federal/Provincial/Territorial Early Childhood Development (ECD) Agreement. To improve and expand early childhood development supports for young children (prenatal to age 6) and for their parents. The specific objectives are:
The Government of Quebec supports the general principles expressed in the Early Childhood Development Initiative but did not participate in developing the Initiative because it wants to retain sole responsibility for social matters. However, it receives its share of funding granted by the Government of Canada and makes significant investments in programs and services that benefit families and children. Information about the Agreement, including the text of the First Ministers' communiqué on ECD, is available on the federal, provincial and territorial web portal on early childhood development and early learning and child care at www.ecd-elcc.ca. |
|||||||
Shared Outcome(s): The objectives of the initiative, as outlined in the ECD Agreement are:
|
|||||||
Governance Structure(s): In the ECD Agreement, First Ministers recognized that provinces and territories have the primary responsibility for early childhood development programs and services. |
|||||||
Federal Partners Involved | Not applicable. The ECD Agreement is a federal-provincial-territorial initiative. | ||||||
Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): Provincial and territorial governments are investing the funds transferred to them by the Government of Canada in any or all of the following four areas of action outlined in the ECD Agreement:
All participating F/P/T governments have committed to three reporting requirements:
Within the Government of Canada, responsibility for implementation of the commitments outlined in the ECD Agreement is shared jointly between Human Resources and Social Development Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada. |
|||||||
Contact Information: Lorri Biesenthal |
Approved by: Deborah Tunis |
Date Approved: September 26, 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Lead Department(s): |
|||||
Start Date: 2003-2004 |
End Date: 2008-2009 and ongoing |
|||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
||||||
Description: The Foreign Credential Recognition (FCR) Program provides financial and strategic support to provincial and territorial partners and stakeholders, including Sector Councils, regulatory bodies, immigrant serving organizations and post secondary educational institutions, to develop a pan-Canadian approach to assessing and recognizing foreign credentials within targeted occupations and sectors of the economy to facilitate entry into, and mobility within, the Canadian labour market. The FCR Program supports the research and project-based activities of partners and stakeholders to develop tools and processes to assess and recognize foreign credentials in targeted occupations and sectors. The goal of the Program is to deliver on its mandate of improving the labour market outcomes of internationally trained workers in targeted occupations and sectors. |
||||||
Shared Outcome(s): As the actual implementation of FCR rests with partners and stakeholders, the program primarily plays a support role in the development of tools and processes to assess and recognize foreign credentials. Efforts focus on achieving the following short-, medium- and long-term outcomes in support of the program's overarching ultimate objective. In the short term, the program will work in partnership to:
In the medium and long term, the program will work in partnership to:
The program will work with partners and stakeholders to achieve these short-, medium- and long-term outcomes to meet its ultimate objective of improving labour market outcomes in targeted occupations and sectors of internationally trained workers. |
||||||
Governance Structure(s): FCR is an area of shared jurisdiction with provinces and territories. In turn, provinces and territories have delegated this responsibility to over 400 regulatory bodies. This means some FCR Program outcomes are linked directly to the operations of its partners and explains why the accountability for achieving these outcomes is a shared responsibility. Federally, a committee of senior officials from 15 departments meet regularly to ensure policy and program coherence to improve the labour market outcomes of internationally trained workers. This committee is co-chaired by Human Resources and Social Development Canada and Citizenship and Immigration Canada. |
||||||
$ Million | ||||||
Federal Partners Involved in Each Program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007 |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
||
1. HRSDC |
a. Foreign Credential Recognition |
$59.8M over six (6) years |
$15.7M |
Further developing and strengthening the Foreign Credential Recognition program |
||
Total $59.8M |
Total $15.7M |
|||||
Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): N/A |
||||||
Contact Information: Corinne Prince-St. Amand |
Approved by: Karen Jackson |
Date Approved: September 26, 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Lead Department(s): |
|||||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
||||||||
Description: Labour Market Development Agreements (LMDAs) are designed to assist unemployed Canadians prepare for, find and maintain employment. These agreements seek to achieve labour market program objectives such as improving client labour market outcomes, ensuring better coordination of federal/provincial programs to reduce duplication, and to more effectively meet the needs of regional and local labour markets. Pursuant to sections 57 and 63 of the Employment Insurance (EI) Act, LMDAs have been signed with all of the provinces/territories, in the form of either a co-managed or transfer agreement. A transfer agreement was signed with Ontario in November 2005. It will come into effect on January 1st, 2007. LMDAs are indeterminate agreements and are not subject to renewal, however, each agreement contains certain provisions for either party to give notice of termination. Part II of the EI Act requires the federal government to "work in concert" with provinces and territories in designing, implementing and evaluating Employment Benefits and Support Measures (EBSMs). EBSMs reduce dependency on insurance benefits and social assistance by helping individuals obtain and maintain employment. For further information on EBSM spending, please refer to the Monitoring and Assessment Report (MAR) at the following URL: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/ei/reports/eimar_2005.shtml The Employment Insurance Commission is mandated in section 3(1) of the Employment Insurance Act to provide the Minister responsible for the Employment Insurance (EI) program with an annual report on the usage, impact and effectiveness of the program. The 2005 EI Monitoring and Assessment Report continues an annual examination of EI from the perspective of the economy, communities and individual workers. The report examines the use of the program, the program’s impacts and effectiveness, the use of active re-employment measures, and the interaction between EI and the workplace for the fiscal year April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005. The Employment Benefits and similar provincial-territorial programs delivered under the LMDAs help unemployed EI insured Canadians gain work experience, improve job skills or start new businesses, as well as encourage employers to provide opportunities for work experience. The first of four employment benefits is the Skills Development (SD) benefit which provides financial assistance to help eligible individuals pay for the cost of skills training and related expenses, while they are enrolled in a training program. The second is the Self-Employment (SE) benefit which provides eligible individuals with financial support and assistance in business planning while they begin to establish and operate their businesses. Thirdly, the Job Creation Partnerships (JCP) benefit provides eligible individuals with opportunities to gain valuable work experience on projects developed in conjunction with industry, other levels of government, and/or community groups. Finally, Targeted Wage Subsidies (TWS) helps eligible individuals who are experiencing difficulty accessing employment due to employment barriers. Employers receive a temporary wage subsidy as an incentive to hire individuals they would not normally hire in the absence of a subsidy. The Support Measures and similar provincial-territorial programs delivered under the LMDAs, provide funding to organizations, businesses and communities for three types of activities: The first measure, Employment Assistance Services (EAS) helps unemployed individuals prepare for, obtain and maintain employment by providing them with services such as counselling, job search techniques, action planning, job placement, and labour market information. The second support measure is Labour Market Partnerships (LMP) which provides funding to assist employers, employee and/or employer associations and communities, to improve their capacity to deal with human resource requirements and to implement labour force adjustments. Finally, Research and Innovation (R&I) helps support experimental activities which identify improved methods of helping Canadians prepare for and maintain employment, as well as be productive participants in the labour force. Summative evaluations of EBSMs, which are aimed at providing information on the impact of active measures in helping participants prepare for, obtain and maintain employment, are currently underway in several jurisdictions. Final results from the British Columbia, Quebec Alberta, Ontario, Nunavut and Newfoundland and Labrador summative evaluations are discussed in the 2005 Monitoring and Assessment Report. This report has been tabled in Parliament and is available from the above link to the MAR website. Other summative evaluations are currently underway and where available, findings will be presented in the 2006 Monitoring and Assessment Report. |
||||||||
Shared Outcome(s): The shared outcomes of partners are to help unemployed EI insured Canadians gain work experience, improve job skills or start new businesses, and to provide funding to organizations, businesses and communities that provide employment services to unemployed Canadians. Three measurement indicators will be used to assess the performance of these programs: |
||||||||
1. EI Clients Served: |
Represents active claimants and former Quebec claimants. |
|||||||
2. Returns to Work: |
Represents those insured participants (active and former Part I claimants) who have been referred to and participated in an EI Act Part II activity and who have subsequently returned to employment. |
|||||||
3. Unpaid Benefits: |
Measures the difference between the individual's entitlement to regular EI Act Part I benefits and the actual benefits paid out as the result of EI Active claimants who have been referred and participated in an EI Act Part II activity and who have returned to employment before exhausting their employment insurance entitlement. |
|||||||
Governance Structure(s):
|
||||||||
Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007a |
Expected Results for 2006-2007a |
||||
HRSDC Co-Managed LMDAs and Ontario HRSDC and co-managed provinces and territories (NL, PEI, NS, BC, and YK) share responsibility for the design of labour market development programs and services. HRSDC, through Service Canada continues to be responsible for the management and delivery of the EBSMs through its network of local offices. In the case of Ontario where there was until recently no signed agreement, HRSDC is responsible for the design of programs, while HRSDC, through Service Canada is responsible for program management and delivery). Ontario will assume responsibility for design, management and delivery under the terms of the Canada-Ontario LMDA which will come into effect in January 2007. |
EBSMs
|
$1,060.8M (NB: the allocation noted above includes the portion allocated for Ontario - $526.7M - this will be split in the next RPP to reflect the coming into force of the transfer LMDA on January 1st, 2007. The specific quanta remain to be determined) |
$1,060.8M |
EI Clients Served Returns to Work Unpaid EI Act Part I benefits |
||||
Total $1,060.8M |
Total $1,060.8 |
|||||||
Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): Provincial / territorial governments - Transfer LMDA Under transfer agreements, the delivery of similar EBSM programs is the responsibility of the devolved provinces and territories (NB, QC, MB, SK, AL, NWT, and NU). |
||||||||
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending |
Expected Results |
||||||
Transfer LMDAs |
$889.2 million (see note regarding Ontario allocation, above: the allocation noted in this column does not include Ontario’s allocation) |
$889.2 million |
EI Clients Served Returns to Work Unpaid EI Act Part I benefits |
|||||
Contact: John Atherton |
Approved by: Karen Jackson |
Date Approved: |
||||||
a Above Planned Spending and Expected Results exclude Pan-Canadian activities as these are not delivered through LMDAs. |
Name of Horizontal Initiative: |
Name of Lead Department(s): |
||||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
||||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
|||||||
Description of the Horizontal Initiative: In March 2003, Federal/ Provincial/Territorial Ministers Responsible for Social Services, reached agreement on a framework for improving access to affordable, quality, provincially and territorially regulated early learning and child care programs and services. Under the Multilateral Framework, the Government of Canada is providing $1.05 billion over five years through the CST to support provincial and territorial government investments in early learning and child care. This initiative complements the September 2000 ECD Agreement. The objective of this initiative is to further promote early childhood development and support the participation of parents in employment or training by improving access to affordable, quality early learning and child care programs and services. Early learning and child care programs and services funded through this initiative will primarily provide direct care and early learning for children in settings such as child care centres, family child care homes, preschools, and nursery schools. Types of investments can include capital and operating funding, fee subsidies, wage enhancements, training, professional development and support, quality assurance, and parent information and referral. Programs and services that are part of the formal school system are not included in this initiative. Governments also committed to transparent public reporting that will give Canadians a clear idea of the progress being made in improving access to affordable, quality early learning and child care programs and services, beginning with a baseline report in November 2003. Information about the initiative, including the text of the Multilateral Framework on Early Learning and Child Care, is available on the federal, provincial and territorial Web portal on early childhood development and early learning and child care at www.ecd-elcc.ca. |
|||||||
Shared Outcome(s): The objectives of the initiative, as outlined in the Multilateral Framework on Early Learning and Child Care are:
|
|||||||
Governance Structure(s): The Multilateral Framework for Early Learning and Child Care recognizes that provinces and territories have the primary responsibility for early learning and child care programs and services. Implementation of the commitments outlined in the Multilateral Framework has been tasked to a Working Group comprised of officials from all jurisdictions (including Québec, which participates as an observer). This Working Group reports to Deputy Ministers Responsible for Social Services, and is jointly chaired by Human Resources and Social Development Canada and Saskatchewan. |
|||||||
Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): Provincial and territorial governments have agreed to invest the funding provided in regulated early learning and child care programs for children under the age of six. Early learning and child care programs and services funded through this initiative will primarily provide direct care and early learning for children in settings such as child care centres,
family child care homes, preschools, and nursery schools. Investments can include capital and operating funding, fee subsidies, wage enhancements, training, professional development and support, quality assurance, and parent information and referral. Programs and services that are part of the formal school system are not included in this initiative. The Government of Quebec supports the general principles expressed in the Early Learning and Child Care Initiative but did not participate in developing the Initiative because it wants to retain sole responsibility for social matters. However, it receives its share of funding granted by the Government of Canada and makes significant investments in programs and services that benefit families and children |
|||||||
Contact Information: Barbara Moran |
Approved by: Deborah Tunis |
Date Approved: September 26, 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Name of Lead Department(s): |
|||||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|||||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
||||||||
Horizontal Initiative: The Government of Canada is committed to helping to ensure that children in low-income families are supported in achieving their full potential. The National Child Benefit contributes to a larger federal/provincial/territorial (F/P/T) strategy, the National Children's Agenda, designed to help Canadian children. Through the National Child Benefit, the Government of Canada is working in partnership with provincial and territorial governments* to provide income support, as well as benefits and services, for low-income families with children. The initiative also includes a First Nations component. * The Government of Quebec has stated that it agrees with the basic principles of the National Child Benefit. Quebec chose not to participate in the initiative because it wanted to assume control over income support for children in Quebec; however, it has adopted a similar approach to the National Child Benefit. Throughout this document, references to joint F/P/T positions do not include Quebec. |
||||||||
Shared Outcome(s): The National Child Benefit initiative has three goals:
F/P/T Ministers Responsible for Social Services are committed to focusing on program outcomes as the primary goal of public reporting. Program monitoring, evaluation and reporting are essential to ensuring government accountability for the funds invested in the National Child Benefit and to determining whether the initiative's objectives are being achieved. Annual National Child Benefit Progress Reports include information on the level of spending by all jurisdictions. There is a data collection process to which all participating jurisdictions contribute in order to present comparable information by jurisdiction on National Child Benefit initiatives. The data submitted by each jurisdiction is reviewed jointly to ensure consistency in reporting. To obtain the most recent Progress Report or for further information, please visit the F/P/T National Child Benefit website: www.nationalchildbenefit.ca. Federal Spending: The Government of Canada contributes to the National Child Benefit initiative through a supplement to its Canada Child Tax Benefit. In addition to the base benefit of the Canada Child Tax Benefit, which is targeted to both low- and middle-income families, the NCB Supplement provides extra income support to low-income families with children. Federal spending on the Canada Child Tax Benefit is tracked by the Canada Revenue Agency, which is responsible for the delivery of the NCB Supplement. The federal government provided $2.9 billion through the NCB Supplement in 2004-05. By 2007-2008, total annual federal support delivered through the Canada Child Tax Benefit system, including the NCB Supplement, is projected to reach $9.5 billion, including a projected $3.7 billion through the NCB Supplement. Provincial/Territorial and First Nations Spending: Under the National Child Benefit, provinces, territories and First Nations provide benefits and services that further the goals of the initiative. The National Child Benefit Progress Report: 2004, reports that in 2003-2004, provinces, territories and First Nations reinvested about $697 million in available social assistance savings plus another $183 million in additional funds into benefits and services for low-income families with children. This includes First Nations reinvestments in programs and services which are estimated to be $53.2 million in 2003-2004. Indicators and Impacts: The National Child Benefit Progress Report: 2004 includes an analysis of both societal level indicators, which measure areas such as low income and labour force attachment and do not assume that any changes are necessarily caused by the initiative, and direct outcome indicators, which measure only those changes that are directly attributed to the National Child Benefit. With respect to societal level indicators, the report shows that the proportion of families with children living in low income has declined significantly since the mid-1900s, decreasing from 17.6 percent in 1996 to 11.4 percent in 2002, based on Statistics Canada's post-tax low-income cutoffs (post-tax LICOs). During this period, the number of children living in low income decreased from 1,304,000 in 1996 to 839,500 in 2002, a decrease of approximately 464,500 children. Further, the report estimates that in 2002, as a direct result of the National Child Benefit:
In addition, in June 2005, F/P/T governments released a synthesis report of a comprehensive evaluation of the first three years of the National Child Benefit initiative (1988-99, 1999-00, 2000-01). The evaluation compiled evidence from a number of studies and showed that the National Child Benefit is meeting its objectives of helping to prevent and reduce the depth of child poverty, supporting parents as they move into the labour market by ensuring they are better off working, and reducing overlap and duplication of government programs. For a complete discussion of indicators, please see Chapters 5 and 6 of the NCB Progress Report: 2004. For a discussion of evaluation results, please see the Evaluation of the National Child Benefit Initiative: Synthesis Report. These reports are available free of charge on the National Child Benefit website, at: www.nationalchildbenefit.ca. |
||||||||
Governance Structure(s): The National Child Benefit Governance and Accountability Framework outlines the key characteristics of the F/P/T partnership: cooperation, openness, flexibility, evolution and accountability. As a co-operative effort among governments, the NCB combines the strengths of a national program with the flexibility of provincial and territorial initiatives designed to meet the specific needs and conditions within each jurisdiction. With respect to accountability, under the Governance and Accountability Framework, federal, provincial and territorial Ministers Responsible for Social Services have committed to sharing data on reinvestment initiatives and reviewing results and outcomes achieved in order to identify best practices. F/P/T governments have also agreed to report annually to the public with a primary focus on performance of the initiative. To date, six annual progress reports have been published, as well as a synthesis report on a comprehensive evaluation of the first three years of the initiative. The Federal Role: Under the National Child Benefit, the Government of Canada provides additional income support to low-income families with children via the NCB Supplement component of the Canada Child Tax Benefit. Canada Revenue Agency delivers these benefits to families. Human Resources and Social Development Canada is responsible for policy development with respect to the National Child Benefit initiative, and the Minister of Human Resources and Social Development represents the Government of Canada in this F/P/T initiative. The Canada Child Tax Benefit (including the NCB Supplement) is a tax measure, and is administered by Canada Revenue Agency. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada and Citizenship and Immigration Canada have roles in reinvestments and investments. The Provincial and Territorial Role: Under the National Child Benefit, provinces, territories and First Nations provide benefits and services that further the goals of the initiative. The National Child Benefit is designed so that provinces, territories and First Nations have the flexibility to develop and deliver programs and services that best meet the needs and priorities of their communities. As part of this flexibility, provinces and territories may adjust social assistance or child benefit payments by the full or partial amount of the National Child Benefit Supplement. This approach has resulted in families on social assistance being no worse off in terms of their level of benefits, while providing additional funds for new or enhanced provincial and territorial programs benefiting low-income families with children. It is important to note that, as the National Child Benefit initiative has matured, the majority of provinces and territories no longer recover increases to the NCB Supplement. This means that the vast majority of children living in low-income families, including those on social assistance, are currently receiving some or all of the NCB Supplement. Under the National Reinvestment Framework, provincial and territorial governments, along with First Nations, have committed to re-allocating available social assistance funds into benefits and services for children in low-income families that further the goals of the initiative. Jurisdictions have focused reinvestments primarily in five key areas:
First Nations Role: The federal government is responsible for ensuring programs for First Nations children on reserve are comparable to those available to other Canadian children. Under the National Child Benefit, First Nations have the flexibility to reinvest savings from adjustments to social assistance into programs and services tailored to meet the needs and priorities of individual communities. Some 500 First Nations participate in the National Child Benefit and implement their own programs. |
||||||||
Federal Partners* Involved in Each Program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007 |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
||||
1. Canada Revenue Agency* |
National Child Benefit Supplement |
Ongoing |
$3.7 billion (projected) |
Continued progress on the goals of the NCB initiative, as described in "Shared Outcomes’, above. |
||||
* While Human Resources and Social Development Canada is responsible for policy development with respect to the National Child Benefit initiative, the Canada Child Tax Benefit (including the NCB Supplement) is a tax measure, and is administered by Canada Revenue Agency. In addition, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada and Citizenship and Immigration Canada have roles in reinvestments and investments. |
||||||||
17. Results Achieved by Non-federal Partners: N/A |
||||||||
18. Contact Information: Lenore Duff, A/Director |
19. Approved by: Virginia Poter, Director General |
20. Date Approved: 25 September 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Lead Department(s): |
|||||
Start Date: 1999 |
End Date: March 31, 2007. |
|||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: $784 million (grants and contribution funds only) |
||||||
Description: In December 1999, the Government of Canada launched the National Homelessness Initiative (NHI), a three-year initiative with a budget allocation of $753 million to develop new programs and to enhance existing programs to address the homelessness crisis in Canada. In February 2003, the Government extended the NHI for an additional three years with a budget allocation of $405 million. In November 2005, the Government announced a one-year extension (2006-2007) of the NHI with a budget allocation of $134.8 million to sustain communities through investments in successful homelessness initiatives. In 1999, the Government of Canada launched the NHI to assist communities in responding to the needs of the homeless population and those at risk of homelessness in Canada. The NHI makes strategic investments in community priorities and a planning process that encourages cooperation between governments, agencies and community-based organizations to find local solutions for homeless people and those at-risk. The NHI is designed to provide supports to 61 designated communities and some small, rural and Aboriginal communities to develop community-based measures that assist homeless individuals and families move toward self-sufficiency. Although the responsibility for homelessness programs falls under Human Resources and Social Development, most NHI program components are delivered by regional staff, now part of Service Canada. The NHI will continue to:
For more information, please visit the NHI website: http://www.homelessness.gc.ca |
||||||
Shared Outcome: Enhanced community capacity to contribute to the reduction of homelessness in Canada. |
||||||
Governance Structure(s): The NHI's community-based program is delivered via two models:
In Quebec, unlike other provinces and territories, two NHI components - the Supporting Communities Partnership Initiative (SCPI) and the Regional Homelessness Fund (RHF) - are delivered under a formal Canada-Quebec agreement, in collaboration with the Province Quebec. The community entity model and the shared delivery model deliver the components of the NHI, specifically the SCPI, Urban Aboriginal Homelessness (UAH) and the RHF. In addition, regions are actively involved in setting the agenda of the National Research Program (NRP) and the delivery of Surplus Federal Real Property for Homelessness Initiative (SFRPHI). Action for Neighbourhood Change (ANC) is a two-year action research initiative led by the Housing and Homelessness Branch (HHB), through its National Research Program (NRP), that examines how to further horizontal collaboration across government departments to increase the capacity and strength of distressed neighbourhoods. SFRPHI is an NHI program co-managed by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) and Human Resources and Social Development/Housing and Homelessness Branch (HRSD/HHB), with advice and support from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). Together, HHB and PWGSC submitted a Treasury Board submission to transform surplus federal property into facilities that serve homeless people or those at risk of homelessness and contribute to building a coordinated response to homelessness and housing challenges. In coordination with the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs' Urban Aboriginal Strategy (UAS), the HHB will explore new ways for federal departments to work in a complementary fashion to better meet the needs of urban Aboriginal people in the eight communities originally included in the UAS (i.e., Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Saskatoon, Regina, Winnipeg, Thunder Bay and Toronto). In coordinating this program, emphasis is placed on culturally appropriate Aboriginal community-planning and decision-making processes where priorities have been identified in each of the eight pilot cities, to guide investments. UAS expanded its program to include four new communities: Prince George, Prince Albert, Thompson, and Lethbridge; SCPI partners in those communities have been asked to work collaboratively with local UAS partners. |
||||||
Federal Partners Involved in each program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation (1999-2007) |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007 |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
||
1. Human Resources and Social Development (HRSD) - Housing and Homelessness Branch (HHB) | Supporting Communities Partnership Initiative (SCPI) | $600 | $113 |
|
||
Health Canada; Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada; | National Research Program (NRP) | $6 | $1.5 |
|
||
Solicitor General (National Crime Prevention Centre) | Action for Neighbourhood Change | $0 | $2.1 |
|
||
2. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) - Federal Interlocutor Division (FID) |
Urban Aboriginal Strategy/urban Aboriginal Homelessness (UAS/UAH) |
$109 |
$15 |
|
||
3. Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) |
Surplus Federal Real Property for Homelessness Initiative (SFRPHI) |
$0 [SFRPHI funding is administered by PWGSC] |
|
|||
Total |
Total |
|||||
Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): N/A |
||||||
Contact: Jim Young |
Approved by: Bayla Kolk A/Assistant Deputy Minister of Housing and Homelessness |
Date Approved: July 12, 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Lead Department(s): |
||||
Start Date: 2002-2003 |
End Date: ongoing |
||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
|||||
Description: The Sector Council Program supports research and project-based activities proposed by Sector Councils, as well as ad-hoc national sector like organizations working on skills and learning issues. SCP supports sector council activities that include:
|
|||||
Shared Outcome(s): While the specific goals of the industry-sponsored Sector Council may vary, depending on the particular needs of the sector, some interests and objectives are common. In the short-term, the Program and Sector Councils will continue to work in partnership to:
|
|||||
Governance Structure(s): As previously mentioned, SCP works in partnership with the aforementioned organizations in order to deliver on its mandate; and as such, the Program is in a "shared accountability regime". Some of the program outcomes that SCP is mandated to achieve are directly linked to the performance of its partners and therefore, the accountability for achieving these outcomes should be shared. SCP contributes to HRSDC's commitment under Chapter 7 of the Agreement on Internal Trade by supporting professional bodies in the development of Mutual Recognition Agreements. Once completed, these Mutual Recognition Agreements provide a plan for recognizing the credentials of professionals who move from one province or territory to another. Note: There are also national organizations with the mandate to address skills issues. While they do not form sector councils, they often work with industrial/occupational sector councils to address issues related to one or more councils. |
|||||
Federal Partners Involved in Each Program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007 |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
|
1. HRSDC |
a. Sector Council Program |
$83.9M |
$26.5M |
Refining and broadening the impact of the Sector Council Program, testing new and innovative approaches to sectoral skills development |
|
Total |
Total |
||||
Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): N/A |
|||||
Contact Information: Éric Parisien |
Approved by: Karen Jackson |
Date Approved: September 26 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Lead Department(s): |
|
Start Date: |
End Date: |
|
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
||
Description: Service Canada was publicly launched in September 2005 to provide Canadians with better, more convenient and more responsive service delivery and one-stop access to an extensive range of programs and services from federal government departments and agencies. It builds on over a decade of work within the Government of Canada to improve the delivery of services to Canadians. Service Canada supercedes Modernizing Service for Canadians and the Service Canada Access Centres that were folded into Service Canada following Budget 2005. |
||
Shared Outcome(s): As part of its citizen focus, Service Canada has developed a Service Charter that describes its commitment for better service, Service Standards to communicate the level of service Canadians should expect, and a Performance Scorecard which includes service indicators for measuring access and Client Satisfaction results. These results are monitored and discussed by senior executives on a regular basis. An Office for Client Satisfaction was created to monitor and manage suggestions, compliments and complaints and identify where Service Canada can improve its processes to be more responsive and fair. For more details on Service Canada's governance structure, accomplishments, future plans and partners please refer to the Service Canada information in HRSDC's 2005-2006 Departmental Performance Report and the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities or the Service Canada Annual Report planned for publication in fall/winter 2006. |
||
Contact: |
Approved by: |
Date Approved: |
Horizontal Initiative: |
Lead Department(s): |
||||
Start Date: |
End Date: |
||||
Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
|||||
Description: The Youth Employment Strategy (YES) supports Canadian youth as they move into the world of work. YES has played an instrumental role in developing Canada's workforce of the future by providing young Canadians with access to programs and services to help them gain the skills, knowledge, career information and work experience they need to find and maintain employment and in making a successful transition into the labour market. YES has been streamlined based on information and knowledge gained through research and program evaluations which indicated the need to keep pace with the changing labour market and needs of youth, especially youth facing barriers to employment. The realigned YES features three key programs for youth aged 15-30 years: Career Focus, Skills Link and Summer Work Experience. For the period 2006-2007, the estimated YES investment is planned to be $400.1 million ($334.1 million CRF program funds and $66M in operating resources). The Government of Canada's support to young Canadians is a shared responsibility and a partnership effort among many departments and organizations. Through YES, HRSD with Service Canada and 12 other federal government departments work cooperatively with other levels of government, Aboriginal organizations, educational institutions, and private sector, not-for-profit and voluntary sectors to deliver YES initiatives. |
|||||
Shared Outcome(s): 1. The shared outcomes of partners are:
|
|||||
Governance Structure(s): YES has in place an umbrella Results-based Management and Accountability Framework (RMAF) that represents a commitment amongst the thirteen participating federal departments and agencies to undertake ongoing collection of common performance management data to ensure effective overall performance management of the program. As lead department, HRSD with Service Canada chairs and is responsible for the coordination and management of an Interdepartmental Operations Committee that is responsible for reporting on the implementation of YES. The Evaluation Steering Committee is another YES interdepartmental committee. There is also a Communications Sub-Committee reporting to the Operations Committee. YES initiatives are delivered nationally/regionally and locally using a variety of funding instruments such as contribution agreements and some direct delivery methods. Transfer payments are primarily provided by participating departments through contribution agreements and service delivery agreements in support of participant's remuneration and, overhead costs. Youth Protocols for joint planning mechanisms have been signed with Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Manitoba. |
|||||
$ million |
|||||
Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
Names of Programs |
Total Allocation |
Planned Spending for 2006-2007: |
Expected Results for 2006-2007: |
|
1. Career Focus |
1. Human Resources and Social Development Canada with Service Canadaa |
On-going |
$10.4 M SC - $6.2M HRSD-HRP - $4.2 M |
Service Canada
HRSD - HRP
Over the full course of the agreements, the total sector contribution is predicted to be $19,968,130 (agreements run from mid 05-06 to March 2008) This would equate to approximately $8M sector (recipient) contribution for 2006-07 Targets are not set by HRSD for OGD's, but results are reported in the DPR |
|
2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |
$1.1 M |
||||
3. Canadian Food Inspection Agency |
$0.1 M |
||||
4. Canadian International Development Agency |
$6.4 M |
||||
5. Canadian Heritage |
$0.9 M |
||||
6. Department of Foreign Affairs/ Department of International Trade |
$6.4 M |
||||
7. Environment Canada |
$3.3 M |
||||
8. Industry Canada |
$9.8 M |
||||
9. National Research Council |
$5.4 M |
||||
10. Natural Resources Canada |
$0.6 M |
||||
2. Skills Link |
1. Human Resources and Social Development Canada with Service Canadaa |
On-going |
$146.6 M |
HRSD with Service Canada
Targets revised August 06 Targets are not set by HRSD for OGD's, but results are reported in the DPR |
|
2. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation |
$1.0 M |
||||
3. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada |
$14.0 M |
||||
3. Summer Work Experience |
1. Human Resources and Social Development Canada with Service Canadaa |
On-going |
$ 98.1 M |
HRSD with Service Canada
Targets revised August 06 Funds Leveraged $65M. Targets are not set by HRSD for OGD's, but results are reported in the DPR. |
|
2. Canadian Heritage |
$8.0 M |
||||
3. Industry Canada |
$10.0 M |
||||
4. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada |
$10.0 M |
||||
5. Parks Canada |
$2.0 M |
||||
Total: |
Total: |
||||
Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): N/A |
|||||
Contact: |
Approved by: |
Date Approved: |
|||
a HRSD planned spending reflects Consolidated Revenue Fund. There is an estimated $66M in planned spending for operating resources related to YES. |