This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Program Activity: Food Safety and Nutrition Risks
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
31,203 | 31,592 | 329,043 | 2011-12 | 30,378 | 327,877 |
2012-13 | 30,962 | 319,522 | |||
2013-14 | 30,962 | 318,895 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Zoonotic Risks
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
200 | 187 | 67,817 | 2011-12 | 180 | 67,577 |
2012-13 | 183 | 65,855 | |||
2013-14 | 183 | 65,725 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Animal Health Risks and Production Systems
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
2,397 | 2,620 | 84,198 | 2011-12 | 2,520 | 83,899 |
2012-13 | 2,569 | 81,761 | |||
2013-14 | 2,569 | 81,601 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Plant Health Risks and Production Systems
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
3,862 | 4,095 | 74,531 | 2011-12 | 3,937 | 74,267 |
2012-13 | 4,013 | 72,374 | |||
2013-14 | 4,013 | 72,233 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Biodiversity Protection
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
448 | 446 | 11,764 | 2011-12 | 429 | 11,722 |
2012-13 | 437 | 11,424 | |||
2013-14 | 437 | 11,401 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Integrated Regulatory Framework
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
40 | 36 | 7,470 | 2011-12 | 35 | 7,444 |
2012-13 | 35 | 7,254 | |||
2013-14 | 35 | 7,240 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Domestic and International Market Access
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
15,221 | 15,185 | 37,643 | 2011-12 | 14,601 | 37,510 |
2012-13 | 14,882 | 36,554 | |||
2013-14 | 14,882 | 36,482 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Internal Services
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
78 | 75 | 173,157 | 2011-12 | 72 | 172,544 |
2012-13 | 74 | 168,147 | |||
2013-14 | 74 | 167,817 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Internal Services
Fee Type1: O
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
11 | 6 | 1,988 | 2011-12 | 6 | 1,981 |
2012-13 | 6 | 1,930 | |||
2013-14 | 6 | 1,927 |
Other Information: N/A
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 53,449 | 54,236 | 785,623 | 2011-12 | 52,152 | 782,840 |
2012-13 | 53,155 | 762,891 | ||||
2013-14 | 53,155 | 761,394 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 11 | 6 | 1,988 | 2011-12 | 6 | 1,981 |
2012-13 | 6 | 1,930 | ||||
2013-14 | 6 | 1,927 | ||||
Total | 53,460 | 54,242 | 787,611 | 2011-12 | 52,158 | 784,821 |
2012-13 | 53,161 | 764,821 | ||||
2013-14 | 53,161 | 763,321 |
1. R=Regulating. O=Other products and services.
2. The full cost of the user fees' activites includes all direct and indirect expenditures. The full cost also includes services provided without charge by other government departments.
3. These figures are taken from the reference levels established in the Annual Reference Level Updated (ARLU) and the estimated amounts of services provided without charge by other government departments.
Note: The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has begun a systematic review of its activities across all of its program areas with the objective of modernizing its user fee and service standard structure. The process from developing draft fee proposals to implementation of new fee and service standard structures can take some time as the User Fees Act (UFA) sets requirements, expectations and conditions for departments and agencies when proposing a new fee, or broadening the application or increasing the amount of an existing fee. This includes comprehensive stakeholder consultations, the striking of an independent complaints panel if required, and the tabling of proposals in both Houses of Parliament for review. This process can take an estimated 18 months. Once fee changes have been implemented, the Agency will begin more robust performance measurement and reporting on service standards, both requirements under the UFA.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. | Of the 424 requests completed under the ATIA last fiscal year, 132 (31%) were completed in under 30 days; 52 (12%) were completed in 31 to 60 days; 84 (20%) were completed in 61 to 120 days; and 156 (37%) were completed in 121 days or over. | The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Destination Inspection Service (fresh fruits and vegetables) http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/frefra/dis/dise.shtml | Goal is to achieve inspector response to 80% of the inspection requests within eight hours and 100% of requests within 24. | National Results: 81.5% within 8 hours and 95.2% within 24 hours. This is an increase of 3.86% and 7.96% respectively over 2009-2010. Met |
Service standards were established for Destination Inspection Service, in consultation with the fresh fruit and vegetable sector. The CFIA consults with the fresh fruit and vegetable sector on an ongoing basis by holding annual meetings with its National Advisory Board for destination inspection services. |
Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice Part 11 - Health of Animals Fees. Services related to veterinary biologics. Item 40. | To conform with the CFIA service delivery standards for veterinary biologics, the cost-recovered regulatory services must be delivered within specified service standards. See link below for service standards http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/vetbio/leg/vb105e.shtml |
In the current fiscal year, the CFIA's Canadian Centre for Veterinary Biologics (CCVB) met all key service standards for veterinary biologics regulatory services. Met |
Stakeholders are consulted during semi-annual meetings of the Canadian Animal Health Products Regulatory Advisory Committee (CAHPRAC) and in bilateral meetings with the Canadian Animal Health Institute. The regulated companies and other stakeholders are satisfied with the timeliness of delivery of cost-recovered regulatory services for the veterinary biologics sector. |
Dossier Review (new submission, change in product formulation or change in label claim) | See link below for service standards http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/vetbio/leg/vb105e.shtml |
Met |
|
Canadian Manufacturers of Veterinary Biologics | |||
1. Review initial submission and prepare response | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
To address stakeholder concerns, a phased review system is in place which allows for submission review and response while information and data are pending. |
2. Review supplemental data and prepare response | Response time 6 weeks maximuml |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
American Manufacturers of Veterinary Biologics | |||
3. Review initial submission and prepare response | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
To address stakeholder concerns about timely availability of US manufactured products, a concurrent review system was introduced to allow for submission review and response while US licensure is being finalized. |
4. Review supplemental data and prepare response | Response time 6 weeks maximum |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
Manufacturers from other countries of Veterinary Biologics | |||
5. Review initial submission and prepare response | Response time 6 months maximum |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
6. Review supplemental data and prepare response | Response time 6 weeks maximum |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
Laboratory Testing of Veterinary Biologics | |||
7. Each master cell line | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
|
8. Each master seed culture | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
|
9. Each pre-licensing serial tested, to a maximum of three | Response time is maximum 4 months |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
|
Facility Inspections/Audits of Veterinary Biologics | |||
10. Canadian manufacturers | Annual |
Average was annual. Met |
|
11. Canadian importers | Minimum every 3 years |
Average was every three years Met |
|
12. American manufacturers | Minimum every 3 years |
Average was every three years Met |
For facilities that are inspected annually and licensed by the US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS), CCVB may inspect when the product is first licensed in Canada. Subsequent inspections will be arranged as necessary. CCVB may request copies of inspection reports from USDA-APHIS. |
13. Other non-Canadian manufacturers | Minimum every 4 years |
Average was every four years Met |
For facilities that are inspected regularly for Good Manufacturing Practices, CCVB may inspect when the product is first licensed in Canada. Subsequent inspections will be arranged as necessary. |
14. Issuance of Permits, Licenses and Export Certificates | Response time maximum 2 weeks |
Average response time was every 2 weeks. Met |
|
Serial Release of Veterinary Biologics | |||
15. If not tested | Response time maximum 5 days |
Average response time was 2–3 days. Met |
|
16. If tested | Response time maximum 35 days |
Due to test scheduling and set up requirements, the average response time has consistently approached the maximum response time of 35 days. Met |
|
17. Label Review and Approval | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
|
18. Advertising Review and Approval | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
To address stakeholder concerns, CCVB is no longer reviewing and approving advertising. |
19. Protocol Review for Efficacy/Safety Studies | Response time maximum 45 days |
Average response time was 30 days. Met |
|
20. Production Outline Revisions | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
|
21. Suspected Adverse Reactions | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
|
Application for Feed Registration and Ingredient Approval i) Timeliness: For 90 percent or more of the applications received |
|||
(a) Feed Section screens applications within ten days of receiving it. |
Unable to measure. |
||
(b) For products requiring a review of efficacy data, a preliminary review is conducted within 10 days of the screening date, and the results of the review are communicated to the applicant. |
Unable to measure. |
||
(c) Animal Feed Division conducts efficacy, livestock, human and environmental safety reviews and responds to applicant within 90 days. |
14.9% of applications were completed within 90 days. |
To address stakeholders concerns about capacity and timeliness of the regulatory approval process, the CFIA is working through the Canadian Animal Health Products Regulatory Advisory Committee (CAHPRAC). | |
(d) The laboratory does a desk review of proposed method of analysis within 4 weeks of receiving it. If laboratory testing is required, it will be done within 12 weeks of receiving a suitable method and test samples depending on availability of specialized equipment. |
Unable to measure. |
||
(ii) Quality | |||
(a) The Feeds Regulations are consistently interpreted and applied in registration/approval decisions. |
Met |
||
(b) Information is openly exchanged between clients and evaluation specialists. |
Met |
||
(c) Analytical methods are evaluated for specificity, selectivity, reliability and accuracy, using internationally standardized method validation procedures. |
Met |