Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.





2008-09
Departmental Performance Report



Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada






Supplementary Information (Tables)






Table of Contents




Table: Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue

This table identifies revenues by program activity received from sources both internal and external to the government. For 2008-2009, OSFI’s total revenues were $100.6 million, including non-respendable revenue of $486 thousand for the collection of late and erroneous filing penalties. The respendable revenues are largely comprised of asset- or premium-based industry assessments, surcharge assessments to staged institutions, and user fees for specific services related to Regulatory Approvals. The majority of cost-recovered services under Regulation and Supervision of Federally Regulated Financial Institutions in 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 relate to implementing the internal ratings-based approach of the New Basel Capital Accord. Ongoing Basel costs are recovered through base assessments effective November 30, 2007, following the expiry of the Memorandum of Understanding with the major banks.

Respendable Revenues

OSFI matches its revenue to its operating costs. The increase in respendable revenues in 2008-2009 from the previous year is explained in the “Performance Summary” and “Expenditure Profile” sections of OSFI’s 2008-2009 Departmental Performance Report.


Respendable Revenue
($ thousands)
Program
Activity
Actual
2006-2007
Actual
2007-2008
2008-2009
Main
Estimates
Planned
Revenue
Total
Authorities
Actual
1) Regulation and Supervision of Federally Regulated Financial Institutions
Base Assessments 60,375 70,080 76,516 76,516 76,516 81,695
User Fees and Charges 3,588 3,226 2,185 2,185 2,185 2,471
Cost-Recovered Services 4,248 3,403 915 915 915 1,401
(2) Regulation and Supervision of Federally Regulated Private Pension Plans
Pension Plan Fees 5,281 7,220 6,521 6,521 6,521 8,216
(3) International Assistance
Base Assessments 93 - 461 461 461 -
Cost-Recovered Services 1,610 1,582 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,623
(4) Office of the Chief Actuary
User Fees and Charges 145 21 55 55 55 69
Cost-Recovered Services 3,919 4,527 4,757 4,757 4,757 4,662
Total Respendable Revenue 79,259 90,059 92,850 92,850 92,850 100,137

Revenue by Type Total 2008-2009 respendable revenues were $100.1 million, an increase of $10.0 million (11.2%) over the previous year’s total of $90.1 million. Base Assessments of $81.7 million accounted for 81.6% of total revenue, representing an increase of $11.6 million over the previous year and attributed to higher costs in the Regulation and Supervision of Federally Regulated Financial Institutions program activity, as well as decreases in both cost recovered services and in user fees and charges.

Respendable Revenue 2005-06 to 2008-09 Cost recovered services revenue was $7.7 million, down $1.8 million (19.2%) from the previous year, largely due to the expiry of the Memorandum of Understanding with the major banks related to the implementation of the internal ratings-based approach of the New Basel Capital Accord. User pay and charges were $2.5 million, down $0.7 million (21.8%) from the previous year, while pension plan fees increased by $1.0 million (13.8%) to $8.2 million, driven mainly by increased pension plan membership and higher cash receipts from pension plan fee billings.

Base assessments increased from 78.0% of total revenue in 2005-2006 to 81.6% in 2008-2009, while pension plan fees increased from 4.4% to 8.2%. Both cost recovered services and user fees and charges decreased over the same time period from 10.2% to 7.7%, and from 7.3% to 2.5%, respectively.

Non-Respendable Revenues

The non-respendable revenues are all related to late and erroneous filing penalties. Effective 2002-2003, OSFI began collecting late and erroneous filing penalties from financial institutions that submit late and/or erroneous financial and corporate returns. On August 31, 2005 the Administrative Monetary Penalties Regulations (OSFI) came into force. These Regulations implement an administrative monetary penalties regime pursuant to which the Superintendent can impose penalties in respect of specific violations, as designated in the schedule to the Regulations. These Regulations incorporate the late and erroneous filing penalty regime and replace the Filing Penalties Regulations (OSFI). These penalties are billed quarterly, collected and remitted to the Consolidated Revenue Fund. By regulation, OSFI cannot use these funds to reduce the amount that it assesses the industry in respect of its operating costs.


Non-Respendable Revenue
($ thousands)
Program
Activity
Actual
2006-2007
Actual
2007-2008
2008-2009
Main
Estimates
Planned
Revenue
Total
Authorities
Actual
1) Regulation and Supervision of Federally Regulated Financial Institutions
Filing Penalties 227 374 450 450 450 486
             
 
             
             
Total Non-respendable Revenue 227 374 450 450 450 486




Table A: User Fees
($ thousands)
User Fee Fee Type Fee-setting Authority Date Last Modified 2008-2009 Planning Years
Forecast
Revenue
Actual
Revenue
Full
Cost
Performance
Standards
1
Performance
Result
1
Fiscal
Year
Forecast
Revenue
Estimated
Full Cost
Category 2 – Superintendent Non-deemed Approvals Except Deposit and Trust Agreements and Letters of Credit
Approval to maintain a representative office of a foreign bank R OSFI Act April 28, 2006 59 46 46 90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt 98% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt

2008-2009

2009–2010

2010–2011

65

65

65

65

65

65

Reservation of a name
Accreditation of a provincial reinsurer
Category 4 – Ministerial Approvals
Letters patent of incorporation R OSFI Act April 28, 2006 1,125 492 492 80% will be processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt 99% were processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt

2008-2009

2009–2010

2010–2011

1,352

1,352

1,352

1,352

1,352

1,352

Letters patent of continuance
Order permitting a foreign bank to carry on banking business in Canada
Order approving the insuring in Canada of risks by a foreign body corporate
Exemption from material banking group status
Approval for a foreign bank or entity associated with a foreign bank to have a financial establishment in Canada
Approval for a foreign bank or entity associated with a foreign bank in respect of investments and activities in Canada
Category 5 – Precedents/ Rulings/ Interpretations
Written, precedent-setting ruling relating to the quality of capital R OSFI Act Aug 13, 2003 40 36 36 80% will be processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt 82% were processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt

2008-2009

2009–2010

2010–2011

40

40

40

40

40

40

Written interpretation of Acts, regulations, guidelines or rulings
Category 6 – Non-precedential Confirmations of Quality of Capital
Written, non-precedent-setting confirmation of quality of capital R OSFI Act Aug 13, 2003 273 340 340 90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt 100% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt

2008-2009

2009–2010

2010–2011

276

276

276

276

276

276

Category 7 – Copies of Corporate Documents and Certificates of Confirmation
Copies of any one of the following corporate documents (per request and per body corporate): (a) a certificate of confirmation; (b) a certified copy of letters patent or of incorporation or amalgamation documents; and (c) the corporate history of a body corporate O OSFI Act Aug 13, 2003 102 104 104 90% will be processed within 2 business days of receipt 100% were processed within 2 business days of receipt

2008-2009

2009–2010

2010–2011

102

102

102

102

102

102

       

1,497 (R)

102 (O)

Total – 1,599

914 (R)

104 (O)

Total - 1,018

914 (R)

104 (O)

Total - 1,018

   

2008-2009

2009–2010

2010–2011

1,835

1,835

1,835

Total - 5,505

1,835

1,835

1,835

Total - 5,505

Category 7 – Access to Information User Fees
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) Other products and services (O) Access to Information Act 1992 4 1 241 Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides fuller details: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/218072.htm. Statutory deadline of 30 days met 91% of the time

2008-2009

2009–2010

2010–2011

4

4

4

254

266

280

Total 4 1 241       12 800
B. Date Last Modified: 1992

Other Information

In July 2000, the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency ruled that most of the service charges are exempted from GST under the Excise Tax Act.

A fee is either identified as “Regulatory” (R) or “Other Products and Services” (O). A Regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a department that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and successful achievement of the program mandate requires moderating, directing, testing, or approving the actions of external parties. All OSFI service fees are classified as “Regulatory” except those found in category 7.

The full cost is based on the fiscal year salary levels according to collective agreements, the fiscal year Treasury Board benefit factors and OSFI’S factor for indirect costs.

1. Note:

According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:

  • the performance standard, if provided, may not have received parliamentary review; and
  • the performance standard, if provided, may not respect all establishment requirements under the User Fee Act (e.g. international comparison; independent complaint address).
  • the performance result, if provided, is not legally subject to section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.

 


Table B: 2008-2009 User Fee Reporting - External Fees
($ thousands)
A. External Fee Service Standard1 Performance Results2 Stakeholder Consultation
Category 2 – Superintendent Non-deemed Approvals Except Deposit and Trust Agreements and Letters of Credit In March 2005, paying and non-paying stakeholders were asked to review and comment on the proposed service standards that were developed in response to the government’s policy that all user fees should be subject to an appropriate standard.
Stakeholders were generally supportive of OSFI’s proposed service standards and supported OSFI’s early implementation of the government’s policy.

OSFI believes that having specific service standards serve to enhance OSFI’s accountability and transparency. In 2006, the Regulations setting out OSFI’s user fees were substantially amended to reduce the number of services from 52 to 14, recognizing that the initial charges did not result in a significant redistribution of OSFI’s costs among FRFIs and that the charges did not recover a meaningful percentage of OSFI’s annual operating costs, which are primarily recovered through base assessments on FRFIs. However, it is OSFI’s intention to keep the service standards in place for the services provided regardless of whether there is an associated fee.

OSFI continues to monitor and review the standards on an ongoing basis.

Approval to maintain a representative office of a foreign bank 90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt 98% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt
Reservation of a name
Accreditation of a provincial reinsurer
Category 4 – Ministerial Approvals
Letters patent of incorporation 80% will be processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt 99% were processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt
Letters patent of continuance
Order permitting a foreign bank to carry on banking business in Canada
Order approving the insuring in Canada of risks by a foreign body corporate
Exemption from material banking group status
Approval for a foreign bank or entity associated with a foreign bank to have a financial establishment in Canada
Approval for a foreign bank or entity associated with a foreign bank in respect of investments and activities in Canada
Category 5 – Precedents/ Rulings/ Interpretations
Written, precedent-setting ruling relating to the quality of capital 80% will be processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt 82% were processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt
Written interpretation of Acts, regulations, guidelines or rulings
Category 6 – Non-precedential Confirmations of Quality of Capital
Written, non-precedent-setting confirmation of quality of capital 90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt 100% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt
Category 7 – Copies of Corporate Documents and Certificates of Confirmation
Copies of any one of the following corporate documents (per request and per body corporate): (a) a certificate of confirmation; (b) a certified copy of letters patent or of incorporation or amalgamation documents; and (c) the corporate history of a body corporate 90% will be processed within 2 business days of receipt 100% were processed within 2 business days of receipt
Category 8 – Access to Information Requests Policy on Service Standards for External Fees
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA).

Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.

The Access to Information Act provides fuller details:
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/index.html

Statutory deadlines met 91% of the time. The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992.

B. Other Information: None

  1. As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
    • service standards may not have received parliamentary review; and
    • service standards may not respect all performance standard establishment requirements under the User Fee Act (e.g. international comparison; independent complaint address).
  2. Performance results are not legally subject to section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.


Table: Green Procurement

Meeting Policy Requirements

1. Has the department incorporated environmental performance considerations in its procurement decision-making processes?


OSFI's procurement needs are fairly standard (see question 2). OSFI takes advantage of green options in its procurement processes by using Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements negotiated by PWGSC, which incorporate green considerations.

2. Summary of initiatives to incorporate environmental performance considerations in procurement decision-making processes:

OSFI’s procurement needs are predominantly for commodity goods such as computers, printers, office supplies or furniture, and for informatics or other professional services including construction services. OSFI continues to take advantage of tools such as Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements and in so doing, achieves the levels of Green Procurement that have been negotiated by PWGSC.

3. Results achieved:

OSFI has achieved increased levels of Green Procurement by capitalizing on Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements negotiated by PWGSC with companies that supply environmentally preferable goods and services.

4. Contributions to facilitate government-wide implementation of green procurement:

N/A

Green Procurement Targets

5. Has the department established green procurement targets?


OSFI recognizes the importance of green procurement and takes advantage of opportunities such as PWGSC vehicles which already factor in green procurement. We also endeavour to optimize the greening of procurement wherever possible through changes in our practices. These opportunities are shared with key management and procurement services personnel.

6. Are these green procurement targets the same as those identified in your Sustainable Development Strategy (Table 8)?


N/A

7. Summary of green procurement targets:

No set targets have been established for green procurement but OSFI endeavours to take advantage of opportunities for this in its procurement activities and decisions.

8. Results achieved:

N/A



Table: Internal Audits and Evaluations

The most recent Audit Plan and Audit Reports are available on OSFI’s website: OSFI’s Internal Audit Reports.

The table below provides the list of key internal audits that pertain to OSFI’s work during the reporting period (2007-2008 and 2008-2009 IA planning period), including electronic links to completed internal audits.

Internal Audits (2008-2009 reporting period – covering 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 IA planning period)


Name of Internal Audit Audit Type Status Completion Date Electronic Link to Report
Superintendent’s office- Management Oversight Superintendent’s Office Completed January 2009 2009 Jan - Superintendent Management Oversight Framework Review
Superintendent’s office- OSFI Planning Activities and Processes Superintendent’s Office Completed April 2008 2008 April - Report on Planning Activities and Processes
Regulation Sector: Actuarial Division (support for Supervision) Supervision – Risk Assessment and Interventions Completed June 2008 2008 June - RS - Actuarial Supervision Support - Life Insurance Review
Regulation Sector: Approvals & Precedents - Legislative Approvals Regulation Sector - Approvals Completed October 2008 2008 Oct - RS - Approvals & Precedents - Legislative Approvals Review
Regulation Sector: Legislation and Policy Initiatives (LAPI) – Rule Making Division Regulation Sector – Rule Making Completed July 2009 2009 July – LAPI: Management Control Framework Review
Regulation Sector: Accounting Rules & Supervision Support: Rule Making Process Regulation Sector – Rule Making In Progress 2009-2010  
Corporate Services: Human Resources Planning Framework Corporate Services – Human Services Completed January 2009 2009 Jan - Human Resources Planning Framework Review
Corporate Services: IM/IT - Infrastructure Technology Services (ITS) – ITS Planning Corporate Services – Information Management and Information Technology Completed January 2009 2009 Jan - Infrastructure Technology Services Planning Activities and Processes Audit
Corporate Services: Portfolio Management Corporate Services Completed July 2009 2009 July - Portfolio Management Framework Review
Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA): Professional Services – Statutory Actuarial Reports – Canada Pension Plan (CPP) Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA) Completed June 2009 2009 June - OCA Statutory Actuarial Reports Review (CPP)