Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.





2008-09
Departmental Performance Report



Fisheries and Oceans Canada






Supplementary Information (Tables)






Table of Contents




Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue


Sources of Revenue
($ millions)
  Actual Revenue 2006-07 Actual Revenue 2007-08 Planned Revenue 2008-09 Actual Revenue 2008-09
Total Respendable Revenue 41.8 41.7 50.1 42.1
Total Non-Respendable Revenue 49.4 49.8 45.9 48.4
Total Revenue 91.2 91.5 96.0 90.5


Respendable Revenue
($ millions)
Program
Activity
Actual
Revenue
2006-07
Actual
Revenue
2007-08
2008-09
Main
Estimates
Planned
Revenue
Total
Authorities
Actual
Revenue
Canadian Coast Guard
Maintenance Dredging Services Tonnage Fees in the St. Lawrence Shipping Channel 5.2 5.4 4.6 4.6 6.6 5.9
Marine Navigation Services Fees 29.5 30.7 27.8 27.8 27.7 31.1
Coast Guard Radio Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Employee Deductions for Employee Housing 0.0 0.1 0.0
Icebreaking Service Fees 5.0 5.2 13.8 13.8 13.8 4.8
Canadian Coast Guard College 1.6 3.7 3.7 3.7
Sundries 0.5 0.4 0.3
Total Respendable Revenue 41.8 41.7 50.1 50.1 52.0 42.1

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown. Figures that cannot be presented in millions of dollars are shown as 0.0.



Non-Respendable Revenue
($ millions)
Program
Activity
Actual
Revenue
2006-07
Actual
Revenue
2007-08
2008-09
Main
Estimates
Planned
Revenue
Total
Authorities
Actual
Revenue
Canadian Coast Guard
Aids to Navigation in the Deep Water Channel between Montreal and Lake Erie 0.2 0.2 0.2
Rental of Land, Buildings and Equipment 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2
Miscellaneous 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2
Sub-total 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2
Small Craft Harbours
Small Craft Harbours Revenue 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2
Science for Safe and Accessible Waterways
Sale of Charts and Publications 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7
Technology Transfer Licences 0.7 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.5
Sub-total 2.5 3.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 3.2
Science for Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Technology Transfer Licences 0.1 0.2 0.2
Aquaculture Management
Commercial Licences 0.2
Fisheries Management
Commercial Licences 44.8 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.1
Recreational Licences 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.8
Conservation Stamps 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.2
Rental of Land, Buildings and Equipment 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3
Sub-total 44.9 44.7 41.9 41.9 41.9 43.2
Habitat Management
Rental of Land, Buildings and Equipment 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
Miscellaneous 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sub-total 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1
Science for Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems
Technology Transfer Licences 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Non-Respendable Revenue 49.4 49.8 45.9 45.9 45.9 48.4

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown. Figures that cannot be presented in millions of dollars are shown as 0.0.



Unplanned Revenues
($ millions)
Unplanned
Revenues
Actual
Revenue
2006-07
Actual
Revenue
2007-08
2008-09
Main
Estimates
Planned
Revenue
Total
Authorities
Actual
Revenue
Internal Revenues 0.8 1.7 0.5
Return on Investments 0.1 0.1
Refunds/Adjustments of Previous Year's Expenditures 5.0 3.5 6.0
Sale of Surplus Crown Assets 2.0 3.7 2.0
Miscellaneous (seizures and forfeitures, fines and sundries) 2.7 2.6 2.7
Total Unplanned Revenues 10.7 11.7 11.1



User Fees

On March 31, 2004, Parliament gave legal effect to the User Fees Act with the aim of strengthening the elements of accountability, oversight, and transparency in the management of user fee activities. The User Fees Act requires departments to annually submit to Parliament a list of all user fees in effect, irrespective of when the fees were established.

The table below lists DFO's user fees for which revenues were collected during the fiscal year 2008-09. Since the establishment of the User Fees Act, DFO has not introduced any new user fees, nor has the Department increased any existing user fees.

DFO collects fees for the conferring of Rights and Privileges (R&P) and for Other Goods and Services (O).

Note: Performance standards under the User Fees Act must be established as part of a user fee proposal process, with specific provisions outlining how the standards are to be established. DFO has not introduced new user fees, nor introduced amendments to existing ones that would require a user fee proposal under the Act; and has no such information to report. Information on DFO's service standards for current fees and performance results can be found in the table on External Fees.

 

User Fees


User Fee: Maintenance Dredging Services Tonnage Fee1

Description: Intended to recover from commercial vessels the total direct costs incurred by CCG to manage maintenance dredging services in the St. Lawrence Shipping Channel. Services provided consist of the management of the maintenance dredging program for the St. Lawrence Shipping Channel.

Fee Type: O

Fee-setting Authority: Section 47 of the Oceans Act

Date Last Modified: 2003


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
4,600 5,870 5,900 2009-10 4,600 6,600
2010-11 4,600 6,600
2011-12 4,600 6,600

1 Since 1997, and at the request of industry, the Canadian Coast Guard has managed the maintenance dredging of the navigation channel of the St. Lawrence River between the Port of Montreal and the Īle aux Coudres near Quebec City. The current fee schedule, which replaces the earlier fee schedule that expired on March 31, 2003, extends the arrangement whereby the Canadian Coast Guard is reimbursed, via fees, for the total direct costs it incurs to ensure commercial navigation. Full cost figures are based on total direct costs (rather than full costs), which include direct labour costs (including employee benefits), direct operating costs, direct material costs, program support costs, and capital acquisitions (to the extent that these capital acquisitions form part of an output).



User Fee: Marine Navigation Services Fee

Description: Intended to recover a portion of the full costs incurred by CCG to provide marine navigation services to commercial vessels. Services provided include short-range aids to navigation and vessel traffic services.

Fee Type: O

Fee-setting Authority: Section 47 of the Oceans Act

Date Last Modified: 2005


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
27,617 31,106   2009-10 27,617  
2010-11 27,617  
2011-12 27,817  



User Fee: Marine Communication and Traffic Services/Coast Guard Radio Communications Charges

Description: Rates charged for person-to-person communications by radio-telephone or radio-telegram from ship to shore or from shore to ship.

Fee Type: O

Fee-setting Authority: Section 19 of the Financial Administration Act

Date Last Modified: 1994


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
75 24 1,1162 2009-10 75 2
2010-11 75  
2011-12 75  

2 The full cost of the communications infrastructure associated with non-safety related, cost-recovered public correspondence services is $1,116,000. This communications infrastructure also supports various safety-related and non-cost-recovered communications services and, as such, these costs are integrated. CCG has structured its public correspondence services charges so that revenues do not exceed the incremental cost of providing these non-safety-related services.



User Fee: Icebreaking Services Fee

Description: Intended to recover a portion of the full costs incurred by CCG to provide icebreaking services to commercial vessels. Services provided include route assistance (channel maintenance and ship escorts), ice routing and information services, and some harbour/wharf breakouts where not provided by commercial operators.

Fee Type: O

Fee-setting Authority: Section 47 of the Oceans Act

Date Last Modified: 1998


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
13,824 4,809   2009-10 13,824  
2010-11 13,824  
2011-12 13,824  



User Fee: Hydrography

Description: Sale of charts and publications

Fee Type: O

Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act, Oceans Act

Date Last Modified: 1996


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
1,800 1,699 31,700 2009-10 1,802 31,700
2010-11 1,802 31,700
2011-12 1,802 31,700



User Fee: Fisheries Management

Description: Commercial fishing licence fees

Fee Type: R&P

Fee-setting Authority: Sections 7 and 8 of the Fisheries Act

Date Last Modified: 1995


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
35,015 37,289 3 2009-10 35,015 3
2010-11 35,015  
2011-12 35,015  



User Fee: Fisheries Management

Description: Recreational fishing licence fees

Fee Type: R&P

Fee-setting Authority: Sections 7 and 8 of the Fisheries Act

Date Last Modified: 1996


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
5,150 4,765 3 2009-10 5,150 3
2010-11 5,150  
2011-12 5,150  

3 Access fees that reflect the value of the privilege/benefit of access to a valuable natural resource owned by all Canadians and not the cost of fisheries management.



User Fee: Fisheries Management

Description: Pacific Salmon Conservation Stamp

Fee Type: R&P, O

Fee-setting Authority: Sections 7 and 8 of the Fisheries Act

Date Last Modified: 1995


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
1,490 1,116 15,000 2009-10 1,490 15,300
2010-11 1,490 15,606
2011-12 1,490 15,918



User Fee: Access to Information

Description: Fees charged for the processing of Access requests filed under the Access to Information Act

Fee Type: O

Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act

Date Last Modified: 1992


($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
15 11 2,0514 2009-10 14 1,900
2010-11 15 2,100
2011-12 16 2,300

4 This figure includes amounts for salaries and Operating and Maintenance for the Access to Information and Privacy Secretariat only.



User Fees Totals
($ thousands)
2008-09 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
Sub-Total (R) 40,165 42,054 2009-10 40,165
2010-11 40,165
2011-12 40,165
Sub-Total (O) 49,421 44,635 55,767 2009-10 49,422 55,500
2010-11 49,423 56,006
2011-12 49,624 56,518
Total 89,586 86,689 55,767 2009-10 89,587 55,500
2010-11 85,588 56,006
2011-12 89,789 56,518

 

External Fees

On November 29, 2004, Treasury Board Ministers approved the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees. The Policy requires departments to report on the status of service standards for all external fees charged on a non-contractual basis. DFO has established service standards for the following external fees:

  • Maintenance Dredging Services Tonnage Fee;
  • Marine Navigation Services Fee;
  • Icebreaking Services Fee;
  • Marine Communication and Traffic Services — Canadian Coast Guard Radio Communications Charges;
  • Hydrography — Sale of charts and publications; and
  • Fees charged for processing of access requests under the Access to Information Act.

DFO also collects external charging revenues through contractual arrangements that fall under the purview of separate federal governance instruments. The revenue information associated with these revenue arrangements continues to be reported in the tables on respendable and non-respendable revenues.


External Fee Service Standard1 Performance Results2 Stakeholder Consultation
Maintenance Dredging Services Tonnage Fee In general, dredging is intended to maintain the depths indicated on the sea charts and to ensure the optimal and safe use of the St. Lawrence seaway twelve months a year3. In 2008-09, the St. Lawrence seaway was maintained in conformity with the depths indicated on the sea charts. The annual meeting between the CCG and dredging service recipients took place in May 2008. The clients were very satisfied with the services which they received from the CCG and did not request any changes to the current agreement. The customers were also informed of the fee increase for the new year as a result of the consumer price index.
Marine Navigation Services Fee Short Range Aids to Navigation identified as required to support commercial shipping in Canadian waters are operational not less than 99% of the time in accordance with established levels of service. Short Range Aids to Navigation identified as required to support commercial shipping in Canadian waters were operational not less than 99% of the time in accordance with established levels of service. The current Marine Navigation Services Fee's rates and application were developed in co-operation with the commercial shipping industry in 1998.
All vessel traffic services identified as required to support commercial shipping in Canadian waters are available from the Canadian Coast Guard's Marine Communication and Traffic Services Centres in accordance with established levels of service. All vessel traffic services identified as required to support commercial shipping in Canadian waters were available not less than 97% of the time in accordance with established levels of service. The current Marine Navigation Services Fee's rates and application were developed in co-operation with the commercial shipping industry in 1998.
Icebreaking Services Fee All ice information and routing services in support of commercial shipping in Canadian waters are available from Canadian Coast Guard Ice Operations Centres in accordance with the Icebreaking Program's levels of service. All ice information and routing services in support of commercial shipping in Canadian waters were available from Canadian Coast Guard Ice Operations Centres in accordance with the Icebreaking Program's levels of service. The Icebreaking Services Fee's transit-based structure, rate and application were developed in 1998 by an Industry/Canadian Coast Guard Working Group that rejected a fee based on direct service. The Icebreaking Services Fee has remained unadjusted since then.
All requests for route assistance and commercial harbour breakouts in support of commercial shipping in Canadian waters will be responded to in accordance with established Icebreaking Program levels of service. All requests for route assistance and commercial harbour breakouts in support of commercial shipping in Canadian waters were responded to in accordance with established Icebreaking Program levels of service. Canadian Coast Guard officers in the region and from Headquarters liaise on a routine and regular basis with commercial shipping clients respecting icebreaking operations. This includes regular meetings in each region in the lead-up to each ice season, and a post mortem meeting at the end of each ice season.
Marine Communication and Traffic Services - Canadian Coast Guard Radio Communications Charges Where the service is available4 ship to shore, and shore to ship public correspondence communications are facilitated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, in accordance with established Marine Communication and Traffic Services levels of service. 1509 ship to shore/shore to ship telephone calls were placed via CCG personnel in accordance with Marine Communication and Traffic Services levels of service. The fees in place were established in 1994 and have remained unadjusted since then.
Hydrography — Sale of paper charts and publications on a wholesale basis through dealers Updated CHS Nautical Products will be provided in accordance with established levels of service that ensure the timeliness and accessibility of these products. Looking to core elements of CHS's Levels of Service, purchasers of charts and publications can expect that updates will be provided to these products within 4 months of the receipt of new critical information; that requests for products will be shipped within 5 working days following receipt of the order, and; that 20% of CHS high-risk charts are reviewed annually. CHS achieved its targets for processing and disseminating critical information. On average, updates were issued to clients within the 4 month period.

Orders for products were shipped within 5 working days 99% of the time.

20% of CHS high risk charts were reviewed.
CHS's Levels of Service were developed in consultation with CHS clients, the Levels of Service Advisory Panel and the Canadian Marine Advisory Council (CMAC) between 2005-2007. CHS reports to the Advisory Panel and CMAC annually on progress made in meeting the levels of service standards.
Fees charged for the processing of Access requests filed under the Access to Information Act Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides fuller details. Statutory deadlines were met 95% of the time. The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992.

1 As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees: service standards may not have received parliamentary review; and may not respect all performance standard establishment requirements under the User Fees Act (e.g. international comparison; independent complaint address).

2 Performance results are not legally subject to section 5.1 of the User Fees Act regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.

3 Seaway maintenance takes user delays into consideration. Ship loading capacity was not affected by shallow water in the seaway.

4 The cessation of the Canadian Coast Guard commercial public correspondence service has commenced as of December 31, 1999, in selected areas, based upon the demand for the service and the availability of alternate service delivery methods.

 

Other Information

Canadian Coast Guard Fees: Canadian Coast Guard is conducting a review of Levels of Service (LOS) to validate the LOS and service standards provided. Clients will be closely engaged in this process. The scope of the LOS covers all main CCG activities for which LOS are appropriate, regardless of whether there are external charges associated with them.

Access Fees: Commercial fishing licence fees and recreational fishing licence fees identified in the User Fees Table under Fisheries Management are not reflected in the External Fees Table, as reflect the value of the privilege/benefit of access to a valuable natural resource owned by all Canadians. Decisions that could come out of DFO's Fisheries Renewal initiative and Commercial Fishing Licence Fee Review could inform what future role and links should be made between access fees and service standards. The Pacific Salmon Conservation Stamp also has an access element, but is primarily designed to support salmon restoration and enhancement initiatives. The Sport Fishing Advisory Board of BC supports the licence and salmon stamp fees.



Details on Project Spending

The Department's project approval authority is:

  • $2 million for new Information Technology projects;
  • $5 million for replacement Information Technology projects; and
  • $20 million for all other projects.

In the table below, S-EPA refers to Substantive - Effective Project Approval and I-PPA refers to Indicative - Preliminary Project Approval.


($ millions)
Project Current Estimated
Total Cost
Actual
2006-07
Actual
2007-08
2008-09
Main
Estimates
Planned
Spending
Total
Authorities
Actual
Canadian Coast Guard
Quebec
Acquisition of Air Cushion Vehicle
(S-EPA)
27.9 2.6 7.0 5.7 5.7 11.0 8.3
Multi-Province
Offshore Fisheries Research Vessel
(I-PPA)
187.0 0.5 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.8
Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels
(S-EPA)
212.5 1.7 2.9 56.6 9.0 8.5 3.9
Search and Rescue Lifeboat Replacement - Phase II
(S-EPA)
41.1 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel 108.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.7
National Communications Control System - Marine Communications and Traffic Services Modernization
(I-EPA)
42.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Automatic Identification System - Security Funding
(S-EPA)
25.0 1.7 1.3 5.9 5.9 7.2 7.5
Configuration Management and Technical Data Management System
(I-PPA)
10.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Program Enablers - Information Management and Technology Services
Multi-Province
IMIT Security Enhancement Project 6.9 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Program Enablers - Real Property, Safety and Security
Maritimes - N.B.
St. Andrews Biological Station - New Science Building and Wet Lab Construction 54.9 0.5 0.5 7.1 7.1 7.1 5.9
Total1 716.7 9.7 14.5 75.3 27.7 37.1 27.6

1The totals include only those projects that exceed DFO's project approval authority.




Status Report on Major Crown Projects

Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels (MSPV)

Description

The Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels project will acquire up to 12 Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels (MSPV) for the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) Fleet — eight for Fisheries Conservation and Protection (C&P) duties and four for Maritime Security duties. This project serves two purposes:

  • Fleet Renewal — the acquisition of C&P patrol vessels represents the first step in modernization of the CCG fleet and will ensure the integrity of the fishery monitoring program and will provide the capacity for DFO to support the strategic role in fisheries enforcement; and
  • Maritime Security — the acquisition of MSPV for Maritime Security will allow CCG, in conjunction with the RCMP, to respond to the Government's commitment to enhance the security of the nation's coasts and waterways.

Project Phase

The MSPV Project is currently in the Implementation phase.


Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
Lead Department Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO)
Contracting Authority Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)
Participating Departments Industry Canada (IC); RCMP; Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS); Privy Council Office (PCO); Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA); Western Economic Diversification Canada (WED); Canadian Economic Development (CED); Finance Canada; Public Safety Canada; Department of National Defence (DND).


Major Milestones
Major Milestone Date
Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) August 2005
Effective Project Approval (EPA) June 2006
1st Request for Proposal (RFP) (cancelled) July 2007
Amended Effective Project Approval — to include 4 additional vessels identified in Budget 2007 December 2007
2nd RFP issued (cancelled) August 2008
3rd RFP to be issued Early 2009
Target Contract Award Fall 2009
First Vessel Delivery Fall 2011
Last vessel delivery for MSPV Summer 2014

Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

The contract for design and construction of nine (9) MSPV was awarded in August 2009. The Minister's formal announcement of the contract is scheduled for September 2, 2009. A project kick-off meeting is scheduled at the contractor's facility on September 16, and design review activities are expected to begin thereafter. First vessel delivery is anticipated in 2011.

Industrial Benefits

The RFP requires overall Industrial Benefits equal to 100% of contract value. Regional distribution will be determined at contract award.

 

Offshore Fisheries Science Vessels (OFSV)

Description

The Offshore Fisheries Science Vessels (OFSV) project will acquire three (3) OFSV for the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) Fleet. The OFSV will replace three (3) aging Coast Guard ships on the East and West Coasts of Canada that provide a platform from which critical scientific research and ecosystem-based management can be performed.

Project Phase

The OFSV Project is currently in the definition and design phase.


Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
Lead Department Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO)
Contracting Authority Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)
Participating Departments Industry Canada (IC); Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS); Privy Council Office (PCO); Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA); Western Economic Diversification Canada (WED); Canadian Economic Development (CED); Finance Canada.


Major Milestones
Major Milestone Date
Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) October 2005
Amended PPA November 2006
Effective Project Approval (EPA) — Target Date 2009
Contract Award 2009
First Vessel Delivery 2011
Delivery of last OFSV 2014

Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

The project solicitation strategy was reassessed in light of the previous MSPV competitive process experience and is now proceeding through the revised design activities. The competitive process to acquire three (3) OFSV is expected to be underway in 2010-11.

Industrial Benefits

Regional distribution will be determined at contract award.

 

Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel (OOSV)

Description

The Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel (OOSV) project will acquire a replacement vessel for the Canadian Coast Guard's largest science vessel - CCGS Hudson. This vessel was built in 1963 and its replacement is critical to fulfilment of the Department's science mandate as well as mandates of other government departments and agencies. The vessel currently operates on the East Coast of Canada.

Project Phase

The OOSV Project is currently in the definition and design phase.


Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
Lead Department Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO)
Contracting Authority Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)
Participating Departments Industry Canada (IC); Environment Canada; NRCan; Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS); Privy Council Office (PCO); Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA); Western Economic Diversification Canada (WED); Canadian Economic Development (CED); Finance Canada.


Major Milestones
Major Milestone Date
Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) July 2008
Effective Project Approval (EPA) and Authority to Contract — Target Date Spring 2010
Contract Award Fall 2010
Delivery of Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel 2012

Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

Preliminary Project Approval was obtained from Treasury Board in July 2008 and modified in June 2009. Project definition activities and procurement strategy are being refined. The competitive process for the acquisition of the OOSV design is targeted for 2009-10 with procurement activities planned to commence in the Fall of 2010.

Industrial Benefits

Regional distribution will be determined at contract award.



Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


  • Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management
  • Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management

Start date: 2005-2006

End date: Ongoing

Description: Launched in October 2004, the Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management (AAROM) Program provides for Capacity Building and Collaborative Management initiatives that supports the involvement of Aboriginal groups, working together, to obtain access to technical, scientific and administrative expertise in order to facilitate their participation in multi-stakeholder and other decision-making processes used to manage aquatic resources and ocean spaces.

Aboriginal groups transition from Capacity Building into Collaborative Management.

Provisions of Contribution Agreements under AAROM may include:
  • establishing AAROM collaborative management structures or AAROM bodies;
  • accessing skilled professional, administrative and technical expertise from within the Aboriginal community or other external sources but excluding public office holders;
  • participating in aquatic resource and oceans management planning — through development of resource and oceans management plans and coordination of community input into the development of plans;
  • developing or providing input into the development of models, structures and processes to guide the interactions of external bodies and agencies with the respective Aboriginal group;
  • planning and holding consultation sessions with member communities on AAROM-related issues;
  • participating in various government technical committees and other multi-stakeholder fora;
  • developing, implementing and monitoring AAROM capacity building strategies;
  • developing enforcement capacity including Aboriginal Fishery Officers and upgrading the skills of Aboriginal Guardians;
  • collaborating in scientific research efforts related to aquatic resource and oceans management;
  • participating in and providing input to various aquatic and oceans resource policy and management processes;
  • undertaking scientific research activities to support appropriate watershed/ecosystem-based management efforts, including the collection and gathering of Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK);
  • conducting community outreach, stewardship and awareness activities;
  • conducting liaison activities with other relevant/interested parties;
  • developing protocols on ATK — dealing with new and innovative approaches to collect, analyze and integrate this information into environmental and habitat assessments and management practices;
  • ongoing program planning, administration and reporting activities of the AAROM Collaborative Management body; and
  • negotiations and implementation of related AAROM agreements (and associated protocols) for which DFO is a signatory.

AAROM is applicable in areas where DFO manages the fishery, and where land claim agreements addressing those matters covered under AAROM are not in place. Where the Aboriginal group has signed a comprehensive land claims agreement, and one or more of the matters covered by the AAROM Program are not dealt with in the agreement, the group would be eligible to apply for support in those matters not covered.

Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture

Results Achieved: In 2008-09, DFO had 11 Capacity Building Agreements, and 21 Collaborative Management Agreements and one Umbrella Agreement. These agreements encompass approximately 319 Aboriginal communities nationally as well as three Native Councils in Atlantic Canada. AAROM agreements have increased collaboration amongst Aboriginal communities and strengthened the relationship between communities and DFO. While the structure of the Collaborative Management agreements varied between Aboriginal organizations, the majority of the agreements focused on enhancing core scientific, technical and administrative capacity of the Aboriginal organizations allowing them to obtain competencies that will enable them to strengthen their ability to participate in aquatic management and oceans resources decision making. Under the AAROM program Aboriginal Organizations have created approximately 263 full time positions. AAROM has also provided approximately $9.5 million to Aboriginal Organizations for commercial access including licenses, quotas, vessels and gear.


Program Activity: Fisheries Management
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-081
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants
Total Contributions 14.7 25.8 22.8 16.2 16.2 6.6
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments
Total Program Activity(ies) 14.7 25.8 22.8 16.2 16.2 6.6

1 The figure for Actual Spending for 2007-08 in the 2007-08 DPR was incorrect ($25.6 million). The correct amount ($25.8 million) is reported here.

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance is due to re-profile of Atlantic Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative of $4.99 million and movement between AFS and AAROM.

Audit Completed or Planned: An evaluation is planned for 2013-14.


 


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy

Start date: 1992

End date: Ongoing

Description: Launched in 1992, the Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy (AFS) provides for negotiated arrangements with Aboriginal groups around the harvesting, use and management of Aboriginal food, social and ceremonial fisheries and, where applicable, communal commercial fisheries.

In 1994, DFO introduced a commercial access component to the AFS, the Allocation Transfer Program (ATP). The ATP facilitates the voluntary retirement of commercial fishing licences and the issuance of communal licences to eligible Aboriginal groups in a manner that does not add to the existing effort on the resource.

Provisions of negotiated fisheries agreements under the AFS may include:

  • a harvest allocation to the Aboriginal group for FSC purposes;
  • terms and conditions pertaining to communal fishing licences;
  • enforcement provisions, including the training and engagement of Aboriginal Fisheries Guardians;
  • arrangements for the co-management and stewardship of fisheries resources and their supporting habitats, including the restoration and protection of species at risk;
  • co-management projects for the improvement of the management of fisheries generally, such as scientific research, stock assessment, fish enhancement and habitat management; and
  • communal commercial fishing arrangements including the transfer of vessels and gear as well as support for fisheries-related economic opportunities (e.g., demonstration fishery projects, aquaculture development, business planning support, etc.).

Where Agreements pertaining to the FSC Fisheries cannot be concluded between DFO and an Aboriginal group, DFO will issue to the group a communal fishing licence that establishes the terms and conditions of its FSC fishery.

The AFS is applicable where DFO manages the fishery and where a fisheries management regime has not already been established under a land claims settlement.

Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture

Results Achieved: In 2008-2009, DFO entered into approximately 140 AFS Agreements with Aboriginal organizations in all DFO regions. These agreements facilitated economic opportunities as well as Aboriginal participation in the management of their fisheries and other aquatic resource management.

Regarding economic development, DFO acquired 22 Commercial licences in Quebec and Pacific Regions and approximately $2M woth of Halibut Quota in the Pacific Region. In addition DFO provided approximately $1.2M for the acquisition of vessels and gear.

AFS agreements provided for management of the FSC fisheries, largely through the Guardian program which comprised of the enforcement component. In 2008 and 2009, 76 Guardians were retrained by DFO to upgrade skills in carrying out enforcement functions, i.e.; issuing warnings, inspecting fish and gear, catch monitoring.

Participation in other aquatic resource management activities included co-management and science related activities such as stock assessment, fish enhancement, counting fences, habitat related work, and river/stream/brook improvement projects.

These economic related and aquatic management activities from AFS agreements created approximately 1,600 seasonal jobs in areas described above.


Program Activity: Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-082
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants
Total Contributions 32.2 32.9 57.3 60.5 58.3 (1.0)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments
Total Program Activity(ies) 32.2 32.9 57.3 60.5 58.3 (1.0)

2 The figure for Actual Spending for 2007-08 in the 2007-08 DPR was incorrect ($32.5 million). The correct amount ($32.9 million) is reported here.

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance is due to movement between AAROM and AFS.

Audit Completed or Planned: The audit of the Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy was approved by the Departmental Audit Committee in November 2007. An evaluation is planned for 2013-14.




Horizontal Initiatives


Name of Horizontal Initiative: Health of the Oceans (HOTO)

Name of Lead Department(s): Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Lead Department Program Activity: Oceans Management

Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: April 1, 2007

End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2012

Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $61.5 million

Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): Building on the achievements of the Oceans Action Plan, the Health of the Oceans Initiative is a five-year, $61.5 million commitment by five departments — DFO, Transport Canada, Environment Canada, Parks Canada and INAC — to improve the health of the ocean environment. For its part, Fisheries and Oceans Canada will receive $23.2 million to support its protection and conservation work. Key DFO initiatives include establishing nine new Marine Protected Areas (including six under the Oceans Act), conducting scientific research to support designation of the new Marine Protected Areas, creating four new national Oceans Centres of Expertise, and enhancing spill-response capacity and emergency planning in the Arctic Ocean. For a complete list, see the table below. DFO will co-ordinate the entire Health of the Oceans Initiative. This will include bi-annual performance monitoring, the preparation of summary annual reports and preparation for a final summative evaluation.

Shared Outcome(s):

  • New Oceans Centres of Expertise
  • Federal Marine Protected Area Strategy: finalization of planning guidelines for federal MPA network
  • Federal Marine Protected Area Strategy: preparation of a status report of federal MPA
  • Federal-Provincial-Territorial Marine Protected Areas MPA network (2012)
  • Marine Protected Areas establishment
  • Collaboration with the World Wildlife Fund-Canada
  • Delivery of a suite of indicators to assess and monitor Arctic ecosystems
  • Integrated Oceans Management and Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) assessment tools linkage

Governance Structure(s): This initiative is subject to interdepartmental government through the Assistant Deputy Ministers Interdepartmental Committee on Oceans, supported by a shadow Director General Committee. This Governance structure reviews the initiatives on a regular basis including review and approval of annual reports to Ministers on the progress of this initiative.

Expected Results 2008-09:

  • Establish four Oceans Centres of Expertise to develop and implement common tools and approaches in the five LOMAs to protect deep-sea corals and sponge reefs, incorporate traditional ecological knowledge, develop information management and exchange standards, and accelerate progress in addressing coastal management issues.
  • Establish a federal network of MPAs that will strengthen and be managed within an integrated oceans management framework.
  • Develop a National (federal-provincial-territorial) marine protected area network in Canada's three oceans (target 2012).
  • Establish six new MPAs within the existing LOMAs and establish a national monitoring and reporting system for all Oceans Act MPAs.
  • Collaborate with World Wildlife Fund-Canada to encourage greater involvement by environmental non-government organizations(ENGOs) in the Health of the Oceans Initiative and integrated oceans management.
  • Develop a State of the Arctic Basin Report, use common ecosystem-monitoring strategies in shared and boundary waters, and initiate development of a demonstration project in the Beaufort Sea to test Ecosystem Based Management(EBM) in shared waters (2008-2009).
  • Through the Canada-US Gulf of Maine Steering Committee, build on the trans-boundary collaboration on and management of groundfish stocks; through the Gulf of Maine Council, build on co-operation between states and provinces. Advance Canada-US collaboration in the Gulf of Maine regarding integrated fisheries and oceans management. Support the work plan that DFO and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (USA) signed November 17, 2006.
  • Build linkages between integrated management carried out under the Health of the Oceans Initiative and other tools, such as project environmental assessments and strategic environmental assessments conducted under the authority of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.

Results Achieved 2008-09

Centres of Expertise (COEs) (HOTO #16)

The four centres were established and began operations. Work plans were developed with input from the Director General of Oceans and Regional Directors. Activities included presentations to provide context and background and to present the goals and objectives of the COEs; consultations to seek input on the proposed work plans; and participation in regional, national and international efforts as they related to the individual mandates of the centres.

MPA Implementation, Strategy and Network (HOTO #19, #13, #14)

A number of workshops contributed to preparation of the penultimate draft of the Federal Guide to Collaborative Planning of MPAs, which provides guidance for implementing a more systematic approach to MPA planning and establishment. The guide will be ready for approval early next fiscal year.

An agreement has been reached among partner government agencies that Canada's national network of MPAs will actually be a national system of bioregional networks of MPAs, and that national Science advisory processes would be followed to delineate those bioregional planning areas and to develop guidance on designing the networks. This national system will be developed in the context of integrated management (IM), and existing IM governance structures will be used where they exist (e.g., in Large Ocean Management Areas). An integrated management approach aims for a collective approach to MPA network development in order to contribute to broader conservation objectives and consider impacts on all aspects of an ecosystem.

An informal interdepartmental MPA network has been established to facilitate ongoing collaboration and exchange among federal MPA practitioners. DFO, EC and PCA also sought opportunities to jointly consult on establishment of new MPAs to limit duplication.

DFO regions of Quebec, Gulf, Newfoundland and Labrador, Central and Arctic and Pacific all conducted ecological and biological assessments followed by consultations. Preparation of the final reports and area of interest recommendations are in progress and should be announced in the next fiscal year. The Central and Arctic region is putting forward recommendations for two areas of interest.

As for the Maritimes region, consultation with Federal and Provincial partners took longer than anticipated and are still ongoing; this resulted in having to delay the public consultations on proposed AOIs until 2009-2010. It is currently anticipated that consultations with the public will begin in late summer or early fall 2009; this entails a likely recommendation to be put forward to the Minister no sooner than late fall 2009 or early winter 2010.

Collaboration with WWF (HOTO #17)

WWF has taken part in a number of DFO activities related to the Placentia Bay/Grand Banks Large Oceans Management Area operations in an effort to advance the oceans agenda and contribute to conservation and protection objectives. WWF-Canada participated by providing expert advice on activities such as the selection of areas of interest, the prioritization of conservation objectives, the development of social, economic and cultural objectives in an integrated management plan, stakeholder consultation process, and the development and subsequent implementation of a Cold Water Coral Conservation Strategy for the Newfoundland and Labrador Region.

Arctic Council (HOTO #15)

Activities conducted are part of a broader work plan under the Arctic Council's Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) Working Group; this model facilitates collaboration with relevant stakeholders as they relate to shared and boundary waters. The following activities were conducted in 2008-2009:

  • Review and validation of indicator suites to assess and monitor Arctic Ecosystems.
  • Finalized report on Best Practices in Ecosystem Based Management in the Arctic. A Canadian chapter is included. The report was approved and released at the Arctic Council's Ministerial meeting in early 2009.
  • Preliminary discussions were held between HQ and the Central and Arctic region to encourage involvement in the development of a pilot project to test the Large Marine Ecosystem approach and framework in Beaufort Sea in collaboration with the US.

Gulf of Maine (HOTO #18)

The Ecosystem Overview component of the report was jointly completed by DFO Maritimes and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Northeast Region. For each major section of the report, two lead authors - one from the US and one from Canada - were identified and collaborated in its development. Rather than the traditional approach of focusing on individual species or activities, the EO took a broader community approach and aimed to describe marine community structure and ecosystem linkages. The completion of the EO has ensured that a common understanding of the current ecological conditions in the Gulf of Maine was available to all interested organizations. The report will provide a common basis for planning and management activities as well as contribute to more effective and informed decision-making.

DFO has continued active participation in activities with both the Gulf of Maine Council and the CA-US Steering Committee and ensured that the relationships between Canadian and US federal departments as well as State and Provincial Governments are in place to facilitate ongoing collaborative activities.

Preliminary discussions with NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Northeast Region have begun to explore the relationship between the US Northeast Region Oceans Council (NROC) and the Canadian Regional Committee on Oceans Management (RCOM). These will form the basis for establishment of more formal linkages, regional governance mechanisms and potential shared activities.

Integrated Oceans Management (HOTO #20)

Integrated Oceans Management approach and tools were presented to various stakeholders in an effort to raise awareness and streamline efforts. A report was also developed in an attempt to reconcile the terminology between Oceans Integrated Management and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. The Pathways of Effect National Working Group (PoE-NWG) was established and finalized the holistic Pathways of Effects model as well as established a sub-group to initiate the drafting of a guidance document for the development and use of pathways of effect (PoEs). Two draft Sector PoEs were developed: oil and gas, and shipping. Draft Terms of Reference for a pilot project (Marine Shipping) were developed in consultation with First Nations, the shipping industries, and federal partners.

 


($ thousands)
Federal Partners Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) Names of
Programs for
Federal
Partners
Total Allocation
(from Start to End Date)
Planned Spending for
2008-09
Actual
Spending for
2008-09
Fisheries and Oceans Oceans Management Federal Marine Protected Areas Strategy Implementation in DFO 1,250.0 250.0 250.0
Development of a Federal-Provincial-Territorial MPA Network 2,500.0 525.0 525.0
Arctic Council - Ecosystem Projects 1,000.0 200.0 71.8
Oceans Centres of Expertise (Coastal, Corals, Data Integration, TEK) 3,000.0 700.0 880.8
Collaboration with World Wildlife Fund (WWF) 213.0 42.6 42.6
Gulf of Maine (at DFO) 750.0 250.0 227.0
Marine Protected Areas Establishment 5,250.0 1,350.0 1,255.7
Habitat Management Integrated Management and Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Assessment Tools Linkages 1,450.0 250.0 193.6
Science for Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems Ecosystem Science Support and Advice on Health of the Oceans 5,500.0 1,100.0 1,100.0
Canadian Coast Guard Spill Capacity and Emergency Response Strategy 2,260.0 750.0 267.2
Environment Canada Biodiversity and Corporate services Federal Marine Protected Areas Strategy - Implementation in EC 1,250.0 250.0 103.8
Marine Wildlife Areas Establishment 2,000.0 507.0 To be
determined
Improved knowledge and information on weather and environmental conditions influence decision making and Corporate services Sable Island Weather Station 4,000.0 800.0 800.0
Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes and Corporate services Gulf of Maine (at EC) 751.0 250.0 250.0
Parks Canada Agency Heritage Places Establishment Federal Marine Protected Area Strategy Implementation in Parks Canada 1,250.0 194.0 182.4
National Marine Conservation Area in Lancaster Sound 5,000.0 1,000.0 114.4
Transport Canada Transportation Safety and Security and Internal Services Enforcement of Ballast Water Regulations 4,500.0 966.5 966.5
Pollution Prevention - Surveillance 13,000.0 2,381.3 2,798.3
Pollution Prevention - Dash 7 Outfitting 5,000.0 1,600.0 1,378.9
Arctic International Marine Shipping Assessment 550.0 140.0 149.4
Pollution Prevention - Ship Waste Reduction Strategy 800.0 100.0 25.0
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Northern land Resources Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment/Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment from land-based sources of pollution 175.0 75.0 73.5
Total 61,449.0 13,681.4 11,655.9

Comments on Variances:

Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): —

Contact information:

Harvey Brodkin

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

200 Kent Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E6

Telephone: 613-991-6692

Email: Harvey.Brodkin@dfo-mpo.gc.ca




Sustainable Development Strategy


SDS Departmental Goals: On behalf of the Government of Canada, DFO is responsible for developing and implementing policies and programs that support Canada's scientific, ecological, social and economic interests in oceans and fresh waters. As a department committed to sustainable development, DFO works to protect and conserve Canada's aquatic resources, while supporting the development and use of these resources.

Federal SD Goal(s), including GGO goals:

  • Sustainable Development and Use of Natural Resources
  • Governance for Sustainable Development
  • Sustainable Communities
  • Climate Change

Expected Results for 2008-09 Supporting Performance Measure(s) Results Achieved for 2008-09
Aquatic species at risk are protected or on the way to recovery DFO will receive recommendations from stakeholders and a response proposed to the Minister of Environment will follow DFO provided listing recommendations to the Minister of the Environment for 10 aquatic species. Final listing decisions were made by Governor in Council to list eight aquatic species, to re-classify one species and to refer one species back to COSEWIC in March 2009.
Completion of recovery strategies that are in development by Recovery Teams. One recovery strategy was finalized and posted on the SARA Public Registry, following the 60 day public comment period.
Marine activities are proactively managed and the health of Canada's oceans is preserved in collaboration with stakeholders Number of committees established federally and in each LOMA Integrated management processes have been established in 5 large areas in each of our three oceans. These bring together government regulators, industry, communities and Aboriginal Canadians to develop plans for the sustainable use of our oceans. This work is complemented by the Government's $61.5 million Health of the Oceans agenda which invests in science, marine protection and pollution prevention.

In 2008-09, DFO launched the Pacific North Coast Integrated Management Area to engage Canadians on our West Coast in the development of an integrated management plan for the Pacific North Coast.

Number of sectors represented on committees Oceans governance mechanisms including representatives from all key sectors and regulators are now in place in all of our regions, in four of our five LOMAs and nationally.
Integrated Management Plans in place for all LOMAs Significant progress has also been made on the development of integrated management plans for the Beaufort Sea Integrated Management Area and the Placentia Bay/Grand Banks Large Oceans Management Area. Implementation planning is underway for the integrated management plan development for the Eastern Scotia Shelf.
Creation of at least three new MPAs This planning has also been supported by specific conservation measures including the establishment of Canada's 7th Marine Protected Area (under the Oceans Act) - the Bowie Seamount on Canada's West Coast.

In addition, as part of the Health of the Oceans initiative, DFO has launched consultations throughout the country to engage Canadians in identifying the next candidates for designation as Marine Protected Areas under the Oceans Act. Work was also launched in cooperation with the provinces to design, by 2012, a national system of networks of Marine Protected Areas.

Efficacy in ensuring an effective response to minimize adverse impacts of marine pollution incidents in Canadian waters is enhanced Development of a National Environmental Response Strategy The National Environmental Response Strategy remains a work in progress. CCG has begun an internal review of the draft Strategy and is planning to conduct broader discussions with partners to continue the update of the Strategy. Progress was made in a couple of key areas in 2008-09; competency profiles and a training strategy for Environmental Response management were completed. A senior managers training course was also developed.
Percentage of ship-source spills where Canadian Coast Guard acted as Federal Monitoring Officer, On-Scene Commander and Resource Agency vs. total number of reported ship-source spills CCG acted as Federal Monitoring Officer, On-Scene Commander and Resource Agency for 100% of reported ship-source spills.
A new aquaculture governance regime is developed Number of federal/provincial/territorial implementation agreements signed

* Since this measure was identified, policy direction has changed and the above implementation instruments are no longer valid.

Following the Budget announcement of $70 million in few funding for the Sustainable Aquaculture Program, a new governance regime has been implemented. The internal framework consists of the Departmental Aquaculture Management and Operations Committees and an ad hoc industry liaison committee. Coordination across provinces and territories with the Government is enhanced by the federal Interdepartmental Committee on Aquaculture and the Canadian Council of Fisheries and Aquaculture Ministers Task Group.
A new fisheries management governance model is developed to meet the needs of an evolving industry, recognizing principles of sustainable development, as well as the precautionary approach and ecosystem approach Percentage of conservation frameworks that incorporate the precautionary and ecosystem approach "Conservation frameworks" has been interpreted to mean the sum of the conservation elements in the management framework for individual stocks, which were examined with the Fishery Checklist in 2008: 27.8% (27 of 109 stocks) of major stocks surveyed in 2008 incorporate key elements of the precautionary and ecosystem approaches in their management frameworks.
Number of fisheries with self-rationalization programs Self adjustment and/or rationalization programs have been successfully introduced in all four Atlantic regions to various degrees in lobster, shrimp, crab, herring and various groundfish fisheries.
Completed national co-management policy framework As a result of the Larocque decision, the Department has adopted an alternative approach to working with industry and is currently developing a policy for collaborative arrangements.
Number of roundtables, task groups and summits that address specific fisheries issues
  • Lobster Roundtable meetings (Feb 13 and July 7, 2009)
  • Lobster Roundtable Steering Committee meetings (June 19, 2009, July 17, 2009)
  • Minister's meeting with harvesters on lobster fishery crisis: May 15, 2009
  • Engagement with Aboriginal Harvesters on new Lobster measures: July 20, 2009
  • Engagement with Provinces on new Lobster measures: July 21, 2009
  • Engagement with commercial harvesters on new Lobster measures: July 22, 2009
Number of fisheries with stable sharing arrangements Data for this performance measure is currently being collected. Results will be updated as soon as the information becomes available.
Number of disputes regarding access and allocation that are settled This performance measure is currently being modified. A draft concept paper has been developed. It is a proposed access and allocation policy to be used to ensure transparent mechanisms are in place when changes to sharing arrangements are requested.
Number of education programs and communication and inter-governmental initiatives Sustainable Seafood Outreach Strategy:
  • Launch meeting with CDN Trade Commissioners working in US, December 10, 2008
  • Outreach presentations to groups of US retailers, buyers, etc.
    • Los Angeles, February 5, 2009
    • Cleveland, February 9, 2009
    • Pittsburgh, February 10, 2009
    • Chicago, February 11, 2009
Distribution of Outreach Materials at Key Events:
  • International Boston Seafood Show, March 2009
  • European Seafood Show, April 2009
  • Oceans Day Reception (Ottawa), June 8, 2009
Number of partnerships and negotiated enforceable management measures; number of major case investigations

Increased emphasis on compliance promotion through education and shared stewardship. Approximately 100,000 Fishery Officer hours were dedicated to this activity (35 percent increase from 2007 and 75 percent increase from 2004).

Maintained effort on major case/special investigations to deal with large scale illegal activities and complex investigations (approximately 160,000 Fishery Officer hours).

The Conservation and Protection program currently has approximately 55 formal collaborative arrangements with other government departments and other partners and this involvement of third parties is increasing.

There has been a steady rise in use of ticketing as an alternative to prosecution for minor offences (1338 tickets in 2008 compared to 740 in 2005). Program has also expanded the use of alternative measures such as restorative justice.

Establishment of administrative sanctioning regime Administrative sanctions and ticketing were part of the proposed amendments put forward for parliamentary consideration of a renewed Fisheries Act.
Expanded ticketing system
Strengthened collaboration with Aboriginal groups, contributing to sustainable Aboriginal communities Evaluation of trainee performance by the service provider 87 in-class courses were taken by 45 Fish Harvesters with a 91% success rate.
Development and implementation of software, regional partnership funds, and contribution agreements with participating First Nations 14 Contribution Agreements executed to implement the Fisheries Management System software.
Number of Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy contribution agreements One hundred and thirty nine Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy contribution agreements.
Number of groups with signed contribution agreement There are approximately 200 groups with signed contribution agreements.
Number of short-term Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management capacity-building contribution agreements Eight short-term AAROM capacity-building contribution agreements.
Number of multi-year Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management collaborative management agreements Twenty-three multi-year AAROM collaborative management agreements.
Number of groups who have made the transition from capacity-building to collaborative management One group has made the transition from capacity building to collaborative management.
Environmental impacts are taken into consideration in DFO's policies, plans and programs through the integration of a Strategic Environmental Assessment approach Ten percent increase in number of participants who have completed Strategic Environmental Assessment training and awareness sessions In 2008, there was more than a 20% increase in the number of DFO participants in Strategic Environmental Assessment training and awareness sessions and activities.
Improved awareness of environmental compliance responsibilities by employees who have completed the training modules Development of one additional environmental compliance awareness course module Additional environmental awareness modules and training resources added to the Office of Environmental Coordination website. Delivery methods for specific training are being assessed.
A Canadian Coast Guard that better understands the environmental impact of its business and directs the operation and development of all assets in accordance with a set of industry-leading standards and regulations Completion of condition surveys of all high-risk assets as per the Vessel Condition Survey Plan and the shore-side Asset Condition Survey Plan Surveys of our six highest priority vessels were completed. The intent was to continue the vessel-survey program as a standard practice within CCG, with about 20% of the fleet's vessels being surveyed, to some degree, each year. Instead a new approach has been adopted which consists of conducting Vessel Condition Assessments for all vessels during 2009-10, and, based on the results of the assessments, implementing a Vessel Condition Continuous Survey Program in the following year. A program to assess the condition of shore-side assets was initiated in 2007-08 and as part of its ongoing work, CCG continued to conduct surveys and implement mitigation strategies for any risks or issues found unacceptable.
Implementation of the system to measure health, safety and environmental performance and a basis to track improvements A decision was taken to have one Departmental Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Program. As part of the implementation of an inclusive safety management system, Corporate OHS is researching all best practices of all sectors and regions, including the CCG. Discussions began with Departmental OHS to determine what application a CCG pilot system in Pacific Region may have nationally.
EMP objectives and targets assigned for storage tanks and halocarbons

Operating procedures and training programs will be delivered as EMPs are implemented

Ongoing participation in the FSCAP program for site assessments, remediation and risk management to address contaminated sites.
Number of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) objectives and targets assigned Completed drafting and consultations on the National Storage Tank EMP. Development of additional national EMPs will follow formal approval of Storage Tank EMP.
Development and distribution of standard operating procedures to applicable DFO staff Developed and distributed operating procedures for storage tanks.
Development of training programs related to each EMP Developed and delivered National storage tank awareness training at multiple locations.
Number of site assessments undertaken each year under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan Performed assessment activities at 778 sites.
Number of contaminated sites funded under Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan for remediation or risk management Remediation and/or risk management activities were performed at 164 sites.
Vehicle gas emissions and maintenance costs are reduced by proper vehicle utilization Comparing gas emissions output for vehicles

Continued to control and monitor the purchase of vehicles, balancing equipment needs versus environmental sustainability (including programs when available that encourage purchasing vehicles that consume less fuel, alternative fuels, or both).

Explored different approaches to purchase hybrid or duel fuel where applicable such as Leadership Vehicle Rebate Initiative; potential funding when available.

180 vehicles were purchased in different regions and 7 vehicles were hybrid at a cost of $256,995.

Continued to form part of the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy working group to improve vehicle fleet management, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants and to meet legislation and policy objectives.





Green Procurement

Meeting Policy Requirements

Has the Department incorporated environmental performance considerations in its procurement decision-making processes?


Yes

Summary of initiatives to incorporate environmental performance considerations in procurement decision-making processes:

The Department has introduced Life Cycle Assets Management (LCAM) into the acquisition of Desktop and portable computers so that environmental considerations are specified at the planning and procurement stages as well as timely cycle disposal through the Computer for Schools program.

The Department has listed on the Materiel Management web site, green procurement documentation from OGDs, PWGSC, EC and our own policy as well as links to PWGSC mandatory Green Procurement Standing Offers available. The DFO Green Procurement policy is presently being updated to reflect current initiatives within the Government Sustainable Development Strategy (e.g .GreenHouse Gas reduction for transportation emission).

Discussions are being held with DFO Environmental Response Program (ERP) personnel to create data fields that will allow reporting on green procurement activities.

Results achieved:

While results have been achieved, monitoring cannot begin to measure actual results until the Department's financial system is updated (fields established in the Purchasing Module and Government Acquisition Card Register); target date is January 2010.

Contributions to facilitate government-wide implementation of green procurement:

Thus far, DFO has involved regional and HQ stakeholders in the development of a Green Procurement policy which we aim to have published internally by December 2009. The next step is to educate the procurement community via Canada School of Public Service e-Learning and extend that offer to Acquisition Card Holders within 2009-10.

Green Procurement Targets

Has the Department established green procurement targets?


In progress

Are these green procurement targets the same as those identified in your Sustainable Development Strategy?


Yes

Summary of green procurement targets:

Where feasible, DFO is supporting and promoting the purchase of hybrid vehicles. DFO, in cooperation with PWGSC's Office of Greening Government Operations, has committed to manage electrical and electronic waste more efficiently.

Results achieved:

Currently, 12,000 computers have been placed under a total LCAM regime which has begun to see almost a quarter of these units purchased under the "green" specifications.



Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits

 

Response to Parliamentary Committees


Report Link to Report and Government Response
Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans: Bill S-215, An Act to protect heritage lighthouses (Adopted by the Committee on April 10, 2008; Presented to the House on April 11, 2008)

The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans has considered Bill S-215, An Act to protect heritage lighthouses, and agreed on Thursday, April 10, 2008, to report it with amendments.

http://www2.parl.gc.ca/​HousePublications/​Publication.aspx?DocId=3405994&​Language=E&Mode=1&​Parl=39&Ses=2

No Government response requested.

Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans: Main Estimates 2008-09: Votes 1, 5 and 10 under FISHERIES AND OCEANS (Adopted by the Committee on May 8, 2008; Presented to the House on May 14, 2008)

The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans "has considered Votes 1, 5 and 10 under FISHERIES AND OCEANS in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009, and reports the same less the amounts granted in Interim Supply."

http://www2.parl.gc.ca/​HousePublications/​Publication.aspx?​DocId=3482523&Language=E&​Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=2

No Government response requested.

Fourth Report of the Senate Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans: The Coast Guard in Canada's Arctic: Interim Report (June 2008)

Recommendations from the Senate Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans:

1. The Committee recommends that Canada uphold its position that the waters of the Northwest Passage are its internal waters and should be prepared to defend any legal challenge.

2. The Committee recommends that Canada develop a much stronger year-round, national presence and enforcement capability to show the world that Canada is serious about controlling the Northwest Passage, protecting Canadian interests and its people, and making the waterway a safe and efficient shipping route.

3. The Committee recommends that there be a uniform, common code relating to the construction, manning and equipment of all vessels operating in the Arctic.

4. The Committee recommends that Inuit, with their unique knowledge of the region, be recruited for the Coast Guard wherever possible.

5. The Committee recommends that the Coast Guard formulate a long-term strategic vision to guide it into the future. With nearly a quarter of experienced marine personnel expected to retire in the next five to seven years, staffing issues will present a challenge.

6. The Committee recommends that NORDREG, Canada's current voluntary vessel traffic system in the Arctic, be made compulsory.

7. The Committee recommends that Canada develop a long-term plan for the acquisition of new multi-purpose heavy icebreakers made in Canada and capable of operating year-round in its Arctic Archipelago and on the continental shelf.

8. The Committee recommends the deployment of multi-mission polar icebreakers operated by the Coast Guard as a cost-effective solution to Canada's surveillance and sovereignty patrol needs in the Arctic.

9. The Committee recommends that the Government of Canada move forward to implement, in collaboration with the Government of Nunavut, a comprehensive harbour development plan, as recommended by the DFO-Nunavut Harbours Working Committee in its 2005 Nunavut Small Craft Harbours Report.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/​39/2/parlbus/commbus/​senate/com-e/fish-e/rep-e/​rep04jun08-e.pdf

No Government response requested.

Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans: Condition of the eelgrass beds in James Bay (Adopted by the Committee on June 10, 2008; Presented to the House on June 12, 2008)

The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans "recommends that the federal government, in cooperation with the provinces and territories, conduct in-depth research into the effect of environmental changes on the eelgrass beds of James Bay. In addition, the federal government must establish, within its jurisdiction, a program of research and large-scale monitoring of the ecosystems of James and Hudson bays. It is essential that the various aboriginal communities involved participate in the research and monitoring, so as to incorporate traditional knowledge and local know-how."

http://www2.parl.gc.ca/​HousePublications/Publication.aspx?​DocId=3562841&Language=E&​Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=2

Government Response requested but, based on the parliamentary procedures, the response was not tabled due to the election in October 2008.

First Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans: Supplementary Estimates (B) 2008-09: Votes 1b, 5b and 10b under FISHERIES AND OCEANS (Adopted by the Committee on February 10, 2009; Presented to the House on February 11, 2009)

The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans "has considered Votes 1b, 5b and 10b under FISHERIES AND OCEANS in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009, and reports the same."

http://www2.parl.gc.ca/​HousePublications/​Publication.aspx?DocId=3663798&Language=E&​Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2

No Government response requested.

Second Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans: Report on James Bay eelgrass beds presented to the House during the 2nd Session of the 39th Parliament (Adopted by the Committee on March 5, 2009; Presented to the House on March 11, 2009)

The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans has concurred in the findings of the Report entitled Condition of the Eelgrass Beds in James Bay, which was presented to the House during the 2nd Session of the 39th Parliament.

Note: The content of the Report entitled Condition of the Eelgrass Beds in James Bay is summarized above, under the summary of the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans presented to the House on June 12, 2008.

http://www2.parl.gc.ca/​HousePublications/Publication.aspx?​DocId=3729863&Language=E&​Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2

Government Response required to be tabled in the House by September 14, 2009.

Note: The Response is led by Environment Canada. DFO will provide input and guidance to EC as needed.

Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans: European legislative actions regarding the Canadian seal harvest (Adopted by the Committee on March 10, 2009; Presented to the House on March 11, 2009)

"The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans calls on the government to:

a) intensify representations to the European Parliament and implement a widespread educational campaign in Europe to counteract the inflammatory campaigns of misinformation against the seal hunt waged by abolitionist groups.

b) do everything in its power to ensure that hunters and the seal industry have the best conditions possible for the 2009 hunting season."

http://www2.parl.gc.ca/​HousePublications/Publication.aspx?​DocId=3738060&Language=E&​Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2

No Government Response requested.


 

Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)


Report Link to Report and Government Response
Chapter 1—Management of Fees in Selected Departments and Agencies

The OAG selected thirteen such fees established by six federal organizations responsible for a major portion of the fee revenue reported by the government: Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, Health Canada, Industry Canada, and the Parks Canada Agency. They looked at how these organizations established the cost of the fee and determined the amount to be charged for the fee; they also looked at how they measured, monitored, and reported on the performance of the fee-related activities. In addition, they looked at any related policy or guidance on fees that the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat has provided to departments and agencies; also looked at the scope and application of the User Fees Act passed in 2004.

http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/​English/parl_oag​_200805_01_e_​30697.html
Recommendation

1.27 Fisheries and Oceans Canada should improve the reliability of the information used to allocate costs to the marine navigation services fee. (1.25)

Response

Fisheries and Oceans Canada accepts the recommendation. Since the internal audit of 2005, improvements have been made to clarify and update the business process related to the timeliness and reliability of the fleet operational data and the consistency of cost allocations. The Department is carrying out the Readiness Assessment project to prepare for the independent audited financial statements that are to be available by the 2010-11 fiscal years. The costing systems and processes will be reviewed, after which the Department will assess the actions needed and time required to improve the reliability of the information.

Recommendation

1.28 Fisheries and Oceans Canada should identify the costs associated with the registration fee for fishers and their vessels to ensure that the fee complies with all legislation, policies, and guidance associated with the fee, and take any necessary action to adjust the fee. (1.27)

Response

Fisheries and Oceans Canada accepts the recommendation. The Department has started identifying the costs associated with the issuance of fisher and vessel registrations for which fees are set under regulation. These costs will be compared to the revenues collected for the issuance of these registrations, and the Department will determine the necessary action to be taken, including adjusting the fees if required. Because of the complexity of the regulatory process, adjustments to fisher and vessel registration fees would be completed by 2011.

Recommendation

1.46 Industry Canada (radio licence fees), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (commercial fishing licence fees), Health Canada (medical marihuana fee), and Citizenship and Immigration Canada (permanent residence application fee, right of permanent residence fee, and right of citizenship fee) should establish formal systems and practices to periodically review these fees. In this review, the departments should consider changing fee-related costs or value, the portion of the fee that should accrue to fee payers and taxpayers respectively, and other factors related to changing circumstances. They should also consider developing a longer-term approach to the fee structure that would enable the fee to be automatically adjusted to reflect these various factors, subject to the requirements of the User Fees Act. (1.39-1.45)

Response

Fisheries and Oceans Canada accepts the recommendation. The Department continues to periodically review commercial fishing licence fees. The most recent review was announced 12 April 2007, and is expected to be complete by 2010 in light of the extensive requirements associated with the regulatory process and the User Fees Act. The review is assessing changing factors within the commercial fishery as well as long-term approaches that would allow for timely and automatic updating of commercial fishing fees.

Recommendation

1.73 Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Industry Canada, and Health Canada should consider improving the transparency of their fees that were subject to this audit by providing more complete public reporting of their financial and non-financial performance information. (1.68-1.72)

Response

Fisheries and Oceans Canada accepts the recommendation. The Department will consider the means whereby the fees may be made more transparent through the medium of the Report on Plans and Priorities and the Departmental Performance Report.

 
Chapter 1—National Security: Intelligence and Information Sharing

For this status report, the OAG examined the progress made since 2004 by 14 departments and agencies in their management and sharing of intelligence information, including the interoperability of their systems to support information sharing.

Recommendation

No recommendation for DFO

http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/​internet/English/​parl_oag_200903_01_e_​32288.html
Chapter 2—The Governor in Council Appointment Process

The audit looked at the federal government's process for making Governor in Council appointments to Crown corporations, small federal entities, and the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. They examined the extent of progress made in implementing recommendations on the appointment process from our 2000 and 2005 reports on Crown corporation governance. In the small entities they examined, they looked at appointment-related issues raised in our 2003 audit of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and our 2006 audit of the Office of the Correctional Investigator. They followed up on a related recommendation from our 1997 audit of the Immigration and Refugee Board that the government improve its practices for appointing Board members. The audit did not review the appointment decisions made by the Governor in Council or the roles played by ministers, ministers' offices, or the Prime Minister's Office.

Recommendation

No recommendation for DFO

http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/​internet/English/​parl_oag_200903_02_​e_32289.html
Annual Report on Environmental Petitions

Recommendation

No recommendation for DFO

The chapter describes the nature of environmental petitions and the extent to which some of them may have influenced the federal management of environmental issues in Canada. In fulfillment of statutory obligations contained in the Auditor General Act, the chapter contains an annual report to Parliament on the nature and status of petitions.

The Chapter sites that Fisheries and Oceans Canada improved the timeliness of their responses this year.

http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/​internet/English/​parl_cesd_200812_05_​e_31822.html

 


External Audits
Not applicable; DFO was not subject to any external audits in 2008-09.

Note: These refer to other external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages.




Internal Audits (current reporting period)


Name of Internal Audit Audit Type Status Completion Date
Audit of the Contribution Agreement with Shubenacadie First Nations Contribution Audit Completed June 2008
Aboriginal Inland Habitat Program (AIHP) Contribution Audit Completed September 2008
Class Grants and Contributions Program Program Management Completed September 2008
Contracting (Follow-up Audit) Financial Management Controls Completed March 2009
Human Resources Management Services (Succession Planning) Human Resources Awaiting approval September 2009
Conservation and Protection Program Management Completed June 2009
Salmon Enhancement Program Contracting Practices Financial Management Controls Awaiting approval September 2009
Information Management Services Program Management To be completed in 2009-10 2009-10
Environment Response Assessment Program Management Carried over to 2009-10

Note: The 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities included the following Audits in error: Horizontal Audit, Resource Management, Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy and Conservation and Protection of Fish Habitat. In addition, the planned audit of Fleet Operational Readiness was cancelled.

 


Evaluations (current reporting period)


Name of Evaluation Program Activity Evaluation Type Status Completion Date
Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Science for Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Summative Completed September 16, 2008
DFO Class Grants and Contributions Internal Services Value for money Completed September 16, 2008
Formative Evaluation of the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) (Interdepartmental-Environment Canada) Internal Services Formative Completed April 9, 2009
Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management (AAROM) Program Fisheries and Aquaculture Management Value for money Completed April 9, 2009
Aboriginal Inland Habitat Program (AIHP) Habitat Management Value for money Completed April 9, 2009
Academic Research Contribution Program (ARCP) Science for Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Value for money In progress Tentative September 2009
Fleet Operational Readiness Canadian Coast Guard Value for money In progress Tentative September 2009
Canada's Submission to the Commission on the limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the sea (UNCLOS) Science for Safe and Accessible Waterways Formative In progress Tentative September 2009
Salmonid Enhancement Program (SEP) Fisheries and Aquaculture Management Summative In progress Tentative September 2009
Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) (Interdepartmental- Environment Canada) Habitat Management Summative In progress Lead is Environment Canada
Building Public Confidence in Pesticide Regulation and Improving Access to Pest Management (BPC) (Interdepartmental-Pest Management Regulatory Agency) Science for Healthy and Productive Aquatic Ecosystems Summative In progress Lead is Pest Management Regulatory Agency
Strategic Environmental Assessment (Interdepartmental Evaluation- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency on behalf of the Privy Council Office) Internal Services Summative In progress Lead is Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency on behalf of the Privy Council Office