Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - 2008-2009 DPRs - Details on Transfer Payment Programs

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.




Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada


Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriInsurance Program (Statutory)

Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2012

Description: The AgriInsurance program is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.

AgriInsurance (formerly the Production Insurance program), will aim to reduce the financial impact on producers of production losses caused by uncontrollable natural perils.

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
For 2008-09 producer participation in AgriInsurance had a targeted participation rate of 70% and for forage 50% as measured by a comparison of crops grown to crops insured.

For the main crop groups (excluding forage), Manitoba has the highest participation rate at 81% followed by Saskatchewan at 71.8%, and Quebec at 67%. The national average was 67% which is lower than the target but considered good based on the wide range of uptake across provinces.

Quebec has the highest participation rate for forage at 73%, while the other provinces range from 0% to 20% bringing the national average participation rate for the forage programs to 18%. Overall, numerous enhancements were made this year and will continue to be made to the AgriInsurance program including improvements for forage, horticulture, potato storage, new crops and available coverage levels.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - - 388.7 548.3 548.3 (159.6)
Total Transfer Payment Program - - 388.7 548.3 548.3 (159.6)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The increase in federal contributions over the planned amount is a result of the substantial increase in premiums caused by the increase in commodity (i.e. grain) prices which are reflected in the insurable values.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No program evaluation was completed for AgriInsurance in 2008-09. There was a program evaluation completed in 2007-08 for Production Insurance (the program that preceded the AgriInsurance Program) and there were no significant findings.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There was no audit undertaken in 2008-09.

Note:
Production Insurance (the program that preceded the AgriInsurance Program) expenditures were $416.4 million in 2007-2008 and $343.1 million in 2006-2007.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriInvest Program (Statutory)

Start Date: December 19, 2007
Agreements were signed with the provinces to implement the program starting in the 2007 program year.

End Date: March 31, 2012
AgriInvest is statutory and ongoing; however, the current policy and program authorities expire on this date.

Description: The AgriInvest program is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.

AgriInvest allows producers to self-manage, through producer-government savings accounts, the first 15 percent of their margin losses for a production year and/or make investments to reduce on-farm risks or increase farm revenues. Under the program, annual producer deposits of up to 1.5 percent of their allowable net sales are matched by government deposits. Government deposits are cost-shared 60:40 by federal and provincial governments. In combination with the AgriStability program, AgriInvest is the successor to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program. AgriInvest replaces coverage for smaller income declines where AgriStability assists producers in managing larger losses.

AgriInvest provides producers with a secure, accessible, predictable and bankable source of income assistance to address small drops in farm income and manage on-farm risks.

Federal AgriInvest Website
AgriInvest in Quebec (La Financière agricole du Québec)

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
As of March 31, 2009, approximately $525 million has been made available to producers to seed their AgriInvest accounts through the federal Kickstart initiative. As of this date, approximately $291 million had been withdrawn and $234 million remained in accounts for producers to access when needed to address small income losses and to invest in their farming operations (see note below).

On March 31, 2009, federal program administrators began mailing out letters notifying participants of their benefits under 2007 AgriInvest, their total account balances and how to access the funding in their accounts.

Work continues toward full implementation of AgriInvest, when producer deposits and government contributions will be held by financial institutions for the 2009 program year.

A Performance Measurement Framework is in place for the new BRM suite, which includes Performance Indicators and Targets. Federal and provincial governments are now working to collect the information necessary for reporting and expect to be ready to report on the performance of the new suite of programs in early 2010.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - 165.6 - 175.7 175.7 (175.7)
Total Contributions - 1.7 159.5 17.7 17.7 141.8
Total Transfer Payment Program - 167.3 159.5 193.4 193.4 (33.9)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
AgriInvest is demand-driven, rather than being funded from a set allocation for each fiscal year. Although the administrative costs of the program remain relatively constant, the variance of the year to year grant and contribution payments is directly related to both participation and commodity prices, as producer deposits and government contributions are based on a percentage of their income generated from the sale of commodities for a production year.

The variance between planned and actual spending for 2008-09 can be largely attributed to the recent increase in the value of grains and oilseeds which resulted in higher than anticipated allowable net sales.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of AgriInvest was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2011-12 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation. This program may be evaluated individually or together with a cluster of other Business Risk Management programs.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of AgriInvest was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan 2009-10 to 2011-12.

Note:

  1. The Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program was replaced by the AgriStability and AgriInvest programs as of April 1, 2008.
  2. The funds for the one-time federal AgriInvest Kickstart program, as mentioned in the Results Achieved section, are additional to and not included in federal funding numbers for AgriInvest as stated in table above. The Kickstart was a separate federal program intended to help producers transition to the new suite of BRM programs, promote the AgriInvest program and encourage the set up of AgriInvest accounts.

Expenditures for the AgriInvest Kickstart Program in 2007-2008 were:

  • Grants - $484.4 million
  • Contributions - $95.8 million

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agricultural Disaster Relief Program (ADRP) / AgriRecovery (Statutory)

Start Date: December 6, 2007
Program authorities were obtained to implement the ADRP under the AgriRecovery disaster relief framework beginning with the 2007-08 fiscal year.

End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: The AgriRecovery framework is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.

AgriRecovery facilitates the process for federal, provincial and territorial governments to provide short-term, timely assistance to help producers quickly re-establish their income stream and contain the long-term impacts after a small to mid-size disaster (disease, pest, weather-related). Programs under AgriRecovery are developed on a case-by-case basis after an assessment is completed and it is determined that there is need for assistance not covered by existing programs, such as AgriInvest, AgriStability and AgriInsurance.

Under AgriRecovery, the ADRP helps focus the coordination effort, providing fast-tracked programs of up to $20 million (up to $122.6 million per fiscal year) to quickly fund initiatives under AgriRecovery. Programming not eligible under the ADRP may still utilize the AgriRecovery framework and funding though a separate Treasury Board submission would be required.

Federal AgriRecovery Website

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
The ADRP has demonstrated its flexibility and its ability to meet the objectives of providing timely assistance to minimize/contain the impacts of disasters on agricultural producers, address disaster-specific costs and losses not covered by other government programs and help farming operations return to business operations more quickly.

During the 2008-09 fiscal year, AgriRecovery/ADRP was utilized by federal and provincial governments to respond to six disasters, including the Duponchelia moth in Ontario, Golden Nematode in Alberta, Bovine Tuberculosis in British Columbia, drought in areas of Saskatchewan and Manitoba and flooding in Manitoba and Prince Edward Island.

A Performance Measurement Framework is in place for the new BRM suite, which includes Performance Indicators and Targets. Federal and provincial governments are now working to collect the information necessary for reporting and expect to be ready to report on the performance of the new suite of programs in early 2010.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - 0.1 - 1.0 1.0 (1.0)
Total Contributions - - 108.4 55.4 55.4 53.0
Total Transfer Payment Program - 0.1 108.4 56.3 56.3 52.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending is approximately one half of the planned spending. This is due to the unpredictable nature of both the occurrence and scope of agricultural disasters.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of AgriRecovery (ADRP) was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2010-11 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of AgriRecovery was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan 2009-10 to 2011-12.

Note:
The Plum Pox Eradication Program includes two components: survey/research component which accounts for $6.2 million annually; and the financial assistance component which is $2.4 million annually. The annual $2.4 million allocation is sourced from funding available for the AgriRecovery. This amount is reported as part of the costs for that program and is not included in the numbers above.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriStability Program (Statutory)

Start Date: December 19, 2007
Agreements were signed with the provinces to implement the program starting in the 2007 program year.

End Date: March 31, 2012
AgriStability is statutory and ongoing; however, the current policy and program authorities expire on this date.

Description: The AgriStability program is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.

AgriStability is a margin-based program that provides support when a producer experiences larger farm income losses, which are drops in their margin (eligible farm income, less eligible farm expenses) for the program year of more than 15 percent of the producer's average margin from previous years (i.e., their reference margin). Thus, a payment is triggered under the program when a producer's program year margin drops below 85 percent of their reference margin. AgriStability also includes coverage for negative margins, as well as mechanisms to advance a participant a portion of their expected payment during the year when a significant decline in income is expected (interim payments and Targeted Advance Payments). In combination with the AgriInvest program, it is the successor to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program. AgriInvest replaces coverage for smaller income declines where AgriStability assists producers in managing larger losses.

Federal AgriStability Website
AgriStability in Alberta (Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (AFSC))
AgriStability in Ontario (Agricorp)
AgriStability in Quebec (La Financière agricole du Québec)
AgriStability on Prince Edward Island (PEI Agricultural Insurance Corporation)

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
AgriStability payments are based on tax information for the program year. Although much of the processing of payments for the first year of AgriStability (2007 program year) was done in the 2008-09 fiscal year, processing will be finalized and performance data will be analyzed in the 2009-10 fiscal year. AAFC tracks, and makes public, applications processed and the percent of applications processed within established service standards.
This information is available at AgriStability Program Statistics Website.

As of March 29, 2009:

For the 2008 AgriStability Program:
45.0% of received and complete 2008 program year applications have been processed. The out going error rate is based on sampling, and as of March 31, 2009 all files for 2008 were being reviewed, so no accuracy rate had been established at that time.

National Delivery: 5,838 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $248,527,017 at the end of March 2009.

Federal Delivery: 926 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $53,021,050 at the end of March 2009.

For the 2007 AgriStability program:
83.8% of received and complete 2007 program year applications have been processed and the estimated out-going accuracy rate is 96.85% as of the end of March 2009.

National Delivery: 118,910 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $554,242,637 at the end of March 2009.

Federal Delivery: 42,883 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $165,011,400 at the end of March 2009.

Performance data collected and analyzed in 2008-09 related to the 2006 CAIS program. The program covered 52 percent of Canadian producers (including those in the supply-managed sectors), representing 66 percent of total market revenue. Although this is below the target of 75 percent, it still represents a significant portion of the industry. It is also anticipated that participation will improve under the new suite of BRM programs. 40 percent of participants received a payment under the 2006 CAIS program, which contributed to increasing the margins of participants from 60 percent of their reference margins to 86 percent. This was above the target of 80 percent.

With respect to the processing of 2007 and 2008 AgriStability payments: Where requested by provinces, the Targeted Advance Payments (TAPs) mechanism provided quicker access to these payments for hog and cattle producers ($98 million to 1,713 hog producers for 2007 and $167 million to 3,767 hog and cattle producers for 2008). Changes such as deeper negative margin coverage and an improved inventory valuation method are also expected to benefit those faced with declining incomes and consecutive years of loss. Details of the processing of payments under AgriStability will be provided in 2009-10.

A Performance Measurement Framework is in place for the new BRM suite, which includes Performance Indicators and Targets. Federal and provincial governments are now working to collect the information necessary for reporting and expect to be ready to report on the performance of the new suite of programs in early 2010.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 377.3 655.2 340.5 340.5 314.7
Total Transfer Payment Program - 377.3 655.2 340.5 340.5 314.7

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
AgriStability is demand-driven rather than being funded from a set allocation for each fiscal year. Although the administrative costs remain relatively constant, the variance of the year to year grant and contribution payments is directly related to participation and the needs of the agriculture industry. As such, in good years, the program will cost governments less, while in bad years (i.e., years with dropping commodity prices, disasters, etc.) the costs of the program will be higher.

The variance between planned and actual spending for 2008-09 can be largely attributed to the recent increase in the value of grains and oilseeds (G&O). Historically, G&O has accounted for a significant portion of coverage under CAIS and higher prices in the sector resulted in both reduced participation and a decrease in the number of payments being triggered as margins in the sector increased.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of AgriStability was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2011-12 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation. This program may be evaluated individually or together with a cluster of other Business Risk Management programs.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of AgriStability was not undertaken in 2008-09. A Follow-Up Audit of the program is currently planned to begin in 2009-10 and will be conducted jointly with the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) as a follow-up to the OAG's Audit of the similar and now sunsetting Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program (May 2007), as well as AAFC's Audit of CAIS, which was completed in June 2008.

Note:

  1. The Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program was replaced by the AgriStability and AgriInvest programs as of April 1, 2008.
  2. The actual spending amount of $377.3 million reported in 2007-08 pertains to the CAIS Program which preceded Agri-Stability (expenditures also shown below).
Related Program Expenditures:
Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization Inventory Transition Initiative (CITI)
  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
CITI Grants: 431.0 (0.7) 8.4
CITI Contributions: 442.0 - 3.7
CITI Program Expenditures 873.0 (0.7) 12.1

CAIS Program Expenditures 933.3 377.3 -  

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Private Sector Risk Management Partnership (PSRMP) Program (Voted)

Start Date: January 6, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2012

Description: The PSRMP Program is designed to facilitate the participation of the private sector financial services industry (FSI) in addressing agricultural risks not presently covered by existing risk management tools. It provides financial and technical assistance to assist non-governmental agricultural organizations in the design, development, and delivery of a business case for the development of new business risk mangement products and services to assist producers in mitigating and responsing to their farm-level business risk management issues.

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, PSRMP carried forward 12 projects from Agricultural Policy Framework (APF) (no new applications accepted after March 31, 2008) - all projects continued to meet objectives per signed Contribution Agreements.

Project Results Achieved:

  1. Canadian Sheep Federation launched national livestock insurance coverage for Bluetongue Disease in sheep (May 2008);
  2. Pulse Canada launched its western Feed Pea pricing tool (January 2009);
  3. Projects in negotiation with service providers (e.g., Alberta Beef Producers, Western Barley Growers Association, Nova Scotia Egg Producers);
  4. Ontario Livestock and Poultry Council project provided clients with policies, pricing and delivery options for Avian Influenza coverage.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - - - 6.9 5.1 (5.1)
Total Transfer Payment Program - - - 6.9 5.1 (5.1)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
At the time of preparation of the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities, Treasury Board approval for this program had not yet been received and as such, planned spending is shown as zero.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted for PSRMP in 2008-09.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audit was conducted for PSRMP in 2008-09.

Note:
Expenditures for the PSRMP Program (under APF) were $3.8 million in 2006-2007 and $4.1 million in 2007-2008.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Facilitating the Disposal of Specified Risk Materials (Voted)

Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2009 (extended to March 31, 2010)

Description: The federal government continues to provide BSE related assistance to Canada's cattle industry to support its efforts to recover from the impacts of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) first discovered in Canada in May 2003. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has implemented an enhanced feed ban, which is a significant step towards eliminating BSE from the national cattle herd.

This program will help the beef industry mitigate the cost of adapting to the July 12, 2007 enhancements to the feed ban enforced by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The enhancements regulate the disposal of specified risk material (SRM) and adequate disposal infrastructure is required.

Cost-shared federal-provincial programs are in place and offer $127.5 million in financial assistance to the industry (federal: $76.5 million; provincial: $51 million). The program is administered provincially and federal funds are used to support projects that have been approved through the provincial government process.

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
As of March 2009, approximately 259 infrastructure project and research iniatives were approved for a total commitment of $105.1 million to help the beef industry adapt to the enhanced feed ban. Facilities such as federal and provincial abattoirs, SRM rendering plants, research institutions are participating in the program. Furthermore, various technologies are being explored to seek value added options for SRM.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 4.4 22.8 38.5 21.0 19.2 19.3
Total Transfer Payment Program 4.4 22.8 38.5 21.0 19.2 19.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The reason for the difference in planned spending versus actual spending is due to the reprofiling of $17.5 million from 2008-09 to 2009-10. The program was extended to support provincial initiatives that required a one-year extension in order to meet the objectives of the program.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluations were conducted in 2008-09 and none are planned.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits have been conducted in 2008-09. No audits are planned other than the standard end of program audit.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments in connection with the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act (AMPA) (Statutory) - Advance Payment Program

Start Date: 1997
End Date: On-going under the AMPA legislation

Description: The Advance Payments Program (APP) guarantees cash advances to eligible producers (2006 amendments to AMPA increased the interest free portion of advances from $50,000 to $100,000, and the maximum advance from $250,000 to $400,000) to enable them to produce and market their agricultural products when market conditions are most ideal.

Amendments also now allow livestock producers the ability to receive an advance under AMPA. In February 2008, amendments to the AMPA allowed for emergency advances for livestock producers to address the needs of the livestock industry during unfavourable competitive circumstances. The amendments allowed for a reduced legislative requirements for emergency advances which are issued up to March 31, 2009.

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
The AMPA was amended in 2006 to expand eligibility to the livestock sector, increase loan limits to $400,000, increase interest free loan limit to $100,000, and extend the production period to 18 months.

The AMPA was further amended in February 2008 to improve the delivery of the APP to the livestock sector. These amendments removed the requirement for livestock producers to secure advances with a Business Risk Management (BRM) program such as AgriStability. Advances are now secured using the animals as collateral. The amendments also expanded the circumstances under which an emergency APP advance can be issued to include situations of "severe economic hardship".

For the 2008-09 production period, 61 agreements were signed to deliver the APP with producer organizations and approximately $2.72 billion was issued in advances to approximately 40,539 producers. Of that, $312 million was for emergency advances to hogs and $143 million was for emergency advances to cattle.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 10.6 44.1 137.5 37.0 37.0 100.5
Total Transfer Payment Program 10.6 44.1 137.5 37.0 37.0 100.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance between actual and planned spending is due to many factors. The main cause for the variance is due to lower default payments than originally forecasted, as well as a lower interest rate than anticipated for the fiscal year.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation of the new APP program was completed during the 2008-09 fiscal year. As per AMPA legislation, a full evalution is to be completed every 5 years.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Formal audits of participating producer organizations in the APP are completed each fiscal year. The current target for formal audits is 6 producer organizations per fiscal year. Due to contract tendering restraints, AAFC did not get the audits completed in 2008-09, and will be completing a total of 12 formal audits of producer organizations during the 2009-10 campaign.

Note:
Enhanced Spring Credit Advance Program (ESCAP) Expenditures for 2007-2008 - $6.8 million
Spring Credit Advance Payment Program (SCAP) Expenditures for 2007-2008 - $8.9 million

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cost of Production Benefit (Statutory)*

Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2010

Description: The one-time $400 million federal Cost of Production Benefit (COPB) was announced in March 2007 and was intended to partially compensate producers for the decline in incomes experienced over the previous four years due to production costs increasing at a faster rate than output prices.

Under the COPB, payments were made in two installments, with initial payments beginning in June 2007 based on 2.36 percent of participants' average allowable net sales for 2000 to 2004 and final payments beginning in December 2007 based on 0.36 percent of participants' average allowable net sales for 2000 to 2004. The program was delivered by the federal government in all provinces except Quebec.

Websites:
Federal Delivery
AgriInvest in Quebec (La Financière agricole du Québec)

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
With the COPB, AAFC met its objective of increasing participating producers' farm revenue for 2007 by 1 percent based on program and Statistics Canada data.

As of March 2009:

  • Number of Applications Received: 168,172
  • Number of Zero Payments: 3,898
  • Number of Payments: 164,241
  • Applications Remaining to be Processed: 33
  • Total Value of Payments: $359,173,361

The numbers above reflect only where Canada delivers payments (i.e., all provinces except Quebec). An additional $44.7 million was transferred to Quebec to allow the province to make similar payments to its producers.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - 353.5 - 8.7 8.7 (8.7)
Total Contributions - 44.7 - (0.0) (0.0) (0.0)
Total Transfer Payment Program - 398.3 - 8.7 8.7 (8.7)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
As a result of an over-estimation of the final payment rate under the COPB, additional funding of approximately $9 million was required to fully meet AAFC's commitments under the program. This funding was sourced from within existing departmental levels.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of the Cost of Production Benefit program was not undertaken in 2008-09. There are currently no existing or planned evaluations for this program.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of the Cost of Production Benefit was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan for 2009-10 to 2011-12.

*For the related $100 million Cost of Production Element program, no payments were triggered in 2008-09 primarily due to a strong rise in crop receipts - mainly in the grains and oilseeds sector, for 2008 over 2007.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Control of Diseases in the Hog Industry- Circovirus Initiative (Voted) - Phase I - Circovirus Inoculation Strategy

Start Date: September 27, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2009 (extended to November 30, 2009)

Description: The Circovirus Inoculation Strategy (CIS) is an Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) initiative aimed at providing assistance in minimizing the overall potential effect of the Porcine Circovirus Associated Diseases (PCVAD) on the Canadian hog herd. AAFC is to provide financial assistance towards the identification and mitigation of the virus.

The overarching goal of the Initiative for the Control of Diseases in the Hog Industry, and the specific goal of its CIP element, is to improve the health of the Canadian hog herd, which will help sustain the long-term viability and profitability of the sector. Encouraging producers to increase disease detection and prevention activities will reduce the number of hog mortalities, and result in healthier Canadian hogs going to market.

The funds are provided to producers through the Circovirus Inoculation Program (CIP). The program is being delivered in all provinces directly to producers by the Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration (PFRA) of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. It consists of two elements.

Under the CIP's diagnostic testing element, eligible applicants are eligible for 50 percent in compensation up to $2,000 per fiscal year and $4,000 over the life of the program. Under the vaccination element, eligible applicants are eligible for 50 percent in compensation to a maximum of $1.00 per piglet and $7.00 per sow, gilt and boar. The maximum assistance over the life of the program is $500,000 per applicant.

Circovirus Inoculation Program Website

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
To date, over 3,500 applications have been approved delivering over $30 million is assistance to Canadian hog producers to detect the disease and inoculate hogs. The program deadline has been extended to August 31, 2009 and applications are still being processed.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 14.3 10.8 10.8 10.8 -
Total Transfer Payment Program - 14.3 10.8 10.8 10.8 -

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
N/A

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of this initiative was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2010-11 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of this initiative was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan for 2009-10 to 2011-12.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cull Breeding Swine Program (Statutory)

Start Date: March 6, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2012

Description: The purpose of the Cull Breeding Swine Program program is to assist in restructuring the Canadian swine industry by facilitating a reduction of the breeding herd. This $50 million initiative is a grant to the Canadian Pork Council (CPC). The objective is to reduce the national breeding herd size by up to 10% over and above normal annual reductions.

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
Financial assistance is provided to the hog industry to assist producers that wish to downsize or exit the industry. $38 million has been transfered to the CPC in 2007-08 for reimbursement of slaughter and disposal costs and payment of $225 per breeding animal. The Program was amended allowing for the program start date to be reset to August 1, 2007 from November 1, 2007. As of June 10, 2009, 649 claims have been received for a total of 124,370 animals.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - 38.0 - 12.0 12.0 (12.0)
Total Contributions - - - - - -
Total Transfer Payment Program - 38.0 - 12.0 12.0 (12.0)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The approval of this grant was received after the preparation of the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities, therefore it was not identified in the planned spending.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There are no existing or planned evaluations for this program at this time.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There was no audit completed in 2008-09. An audit of the 2008-09 fiscal year is targeted for the 4th quarter of 2009-10.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Environment (Voted)

Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)

Description: The purpose of the Environment programs is to support the adoption of management practices on farms across Canada, which are beneficial to the environment and economically sustainable.

Strategic Outcome: Health of the Environment

Results Achieved:

  • Environmental Farm Plans (EFP) - As of March 31, 2009 over 69,300 reviews of EFPs/Equivalent Agri-Environmental Plans (EAEPs) have been completed under the Agricultural Policy Framework (APF). This represents 30% of all farms across Canada. This is compared with over 56,700 reviews of EFPs/EAEPs completed under the APF as of March 31, 2008.
  • National Farm Stewardship Program (NFSP) - approximately 52,400 Best Management Practices (BMP) Projects completed as of March 31, 2009.
  • Greencover Canada - As of March 31, 2009 approximately 9,000 BMP projects, 572,393 acres converted to long-term perennial cover and 230 technical assistance projects were completed.
  • National Water Supply Expansion Program (NWSEP) - Approximately 8,000 projects completed.
  • Agri-Environmental Standards - Developed standards in the areas of water, biodiversity, pesticides and air.
  • Water Quality Surveillance Program (WQSP) - Conducted pilot studies at several test sites.
  • Information Gaps in Water Quality and Nutrients (GAPS) Study on Regulations - Funded 11 R&D projects.
  • Study on Regulations - Released Phase 1 report in February 2006.
  • National Agri-Environmental Health Analysis and Reporting Program (NAHARP) - Released agri-environmental indicator report.
  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Environment            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 97.0 198.8 45.6 93.3 78.2 (32.6)
Total Transfer Payment Program 97.0 198.8 45.6 93.3 78.2 (32.6)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending is higher than the planned due to delays in program implementation in previous years.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of the Environment Chapter was commenced in 2007-08 but still has not been completed.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
The following OAG Managing Environmental Programming Audit was completed in 2008-09.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Food Safety and Food Quality (FSQ) (Voted)

Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)

Description: The objective of the program is to assist industry in developing and implementing government-recognized food safety, traceability and quality process control systems throughout the agri-food continuum, in order to:

  • protect human health by reducing exposure to food hazards;
  • increase consumer confidence in the safety and quality of food produced in Canada;
  • increase industry's ability to meet or to exceed market requirements for food safety and food quality; and to
  • provide value-added opportunities through the adoption of food safety and food quality systems.

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
One of the key food safety control tools is the On-Farm Food Safety Recognition (OFFSR) Program which is part of a Horizontal Initiative between AAFC, the lead partner, and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). This program recognizes food safety systems that have been developed and implemented by national producer organizations that are based on the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) process, a preventive approach to food safety.

During this year, seven national producer organizations were participating in OFFSR program. Two organizations were issued letters from CFIA recognizing completion of a technical review stage of the OFFSR program. Since 2004, eighteen such letters have been issued by CFIA.

During this transitional year, the Canadian Food Safety and Quality program (CFSQP) was continued while new food safety programming under Growing Forward was designed.

CFSQP had three components:

  1. Systems Development
    AAFC contributed $3.8 million to 21 producer and agri-food organizations for systems development projects as follows: 32 Food Safety (HACCP based), 5 Traceability and 1 Food Quality.
     
  2. On-Farm Implementation
    For the On-Farm Implementation component, AAFC contributed $4.4 million to eight national producer organizations to implement on-farm food safety HACCP based systems for different commodity groups such as dairy, cattle, eggs, turkey and sheep, chickens and horticultural crops.
     
  3. Food Safety Initiative
    Seven provinces participating in the Food Safety Initiative received $8.1 million from AAFC to implement food safety practices in more than 330 non-federally registered food processing plants and conduct over 400 food safety seminars. In 2008-09, Quebec joined the initiative.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Food Safety & Food Quality            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 10.5 45.9 24.9 29.7 16.3 8.6
Total Transfer Payment Program 10.5 45.9 24.9 29.7 16.3 8.6

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The CFSQP is a client driven program. CFSQP projects typically require 3 to 6 years to complete the development and implementation of food safety and traceability systems. The initial planned amount for 2008-09 was $24.9 million. A key challenge was forecasting the client's requirements because 2008-09 was a transitional year. Also some organizations were unable to complete their activities as originally planned due to the complexity of negotiating new agreements at the beginning of the transitional year. During this fiscal year $16.3 million was spent, $3.8 million on Systems Development projects, $4.4 million on On-Farm Implementation projects and $8.1 million on Food Safety Initiatives.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted in 2008-09.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
The Canadian Food Safety & Quality Audit Plan provided for nine project-specific compliance audits. Three audits were completed and two are on-going into 2009-10. The findings of the three completed audits are not considered significant in nature and actions have been taken by the clients to implement the recommendations of the audit reports. There are currently no URLs for these three audits. The remaining audits were not conducted as the projects were assessed to be of low risk and therefore the audit expenditures were not warranted.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food (ACAAF) (Voted) (Grants and Contributions to facilitate adaptation and rural development within the agriculture and agri-food sector)

Start Date: April 1, 2004
End Date: March 31, 2009

Description: The purpose of the ACAAF program is to position Canada's agriculture and agri-food sector at the leading edge to seize new opportunities. It is based on a three-pillar approach, including:

  • Pillar I: Industry-Led Solutions to Emerging Issues;
  • Pillar II: Capturing Market Opportunities By Advancing Research Results;
  • Pillar III: Sharing Information to Advance the Sector.

The ACAAF Program was developed as the successor to the Canadian Adaptation and Rural Development (CARD) II Fund.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
For this last year of ACAAF, 337 new projects were approved and funded. They consisted of 10 new national projects, 265 new Industry Council regional projects and 62 multi-regional collective outcome projects. Most projects were Pillar I initiatives.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants 44.3 37.7 30.3 33.0 31.9 (1.6)
Total Contributions 6.2 10.5 3.1 13.7 13.3 (10.2)
Total Transfer Payment Program 50.5 48.2 33.4 46.7 45.2 (11.8)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Planned spending for 2008-09 reflects only the funding presented in the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities. The over expenditures for the last year of the program (2008-09) was due to underspending in the first few years; total program spending still falls within the total five year authority of the program.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
The ACAAF Evaluation, which began during the 2007-08 fiscal year, assessed the relevance, success/progress and cost effectiveness of ACAAF in meeting its objectives. Conclusions were generally favorable and the recommendations following the evaluation have been incorporated in the planning of the successor program, Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program (CAAP).

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Initially, one National project recipient was to be selected for a compliance audit. However, due to time constraints and unforeseen delays in setting up the contract for the audit, it was decided to forego the compliance audit. Active monitoring of the National project files and financial audits ensured due diligence was met.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agri-Opportunities Program (New Opportunities for Agriculture Initiatives) (Voted)

Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: The Agri-Opportunities program is a $134 million program, ending March 2011, that focuses on new innovative value-added agricultural, agri-food and agri-based products, services or processes that are currently not commercially produced or available in Canada and that are ready to be introduced into the marketplace. The program provides repayable contributions for commercialization projects that are expected to increase market opportunities for the Canadian agricultural industry across the value chain and to increase demand for primary agricultural products.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
The Agri-Opportunities program has signed agreements to fund 13 innovative commercialization projects for a total of $31,759,712 helping to accelerate the pace of innovation in Canada.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 2.1 40.8 12.3 9.0 31.9
Total Transfer Payment Program - 2.1 40.8 12.3 9.0 31.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual expenditures were less than planned primarily due to the global economic crisis at that time, which was having a serious impact on the Canadian investment climate, particularly the availability of debt and equity financing to companies.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted in 2008-09. An evaluation is planned for 2009-10.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There was no audit conducted this year. An audit is planned for 2010-11.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (Voted)

Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: The Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP) is an initiative designed to strengthen the capacity of Canadian science providers and industry through the creation of networks for research, technology development, and commercialization of agricultural bioproducts and bioprocesses.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
Nine Networks have been approved for funding under the Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP). Currently the program is fully subscribed and no new proposals are being accepted. In support of the work to be undertaken by the approved networks, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada has signed nine (9) Contribution Agreements with recipients external to the federal government. In addition, eight (8) Agency Agreements between Recipients and the Recipient Agent, and eight (8) Letters of Understanding (LOUs) with other government departments and agencies have been executed.

AAFC will report on the activities and the execution of the Network Agreements negotiated to deal with governance, intellectual properties and related issues with the parties involved in the nine approved ABIP Networks in the next FY 2009-10.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 0.6 20.7 7.3 7.3 13.4
Total Transfer Payment Program - 0.6 20.7 7.3 7.3 13.4

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance of $13.4 million in planned versus actual spending is due to the delay in the development and signing of Network Agreements. This new program is utilizing novel structures and requires appropriate lead time for the development of communication and administration tools and access to resources to ensure that internal and external stakeholders are provided clear, consistent, timely and accurate messages on all aspects of program requirements.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There was no evaluation undertaken in 2008-09.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Recipient Auditing: The ABIP Secretariat has adopted a risk-based approach to the selection of contributions for audit. The audit risk of each contribution agreement will be assessed annually. The intent is to audit contributions where the ABIP Secretariat has identified some specific concerns.
There were no audits conducted in 2008-09. The intent for fiscal year 2009-10 is to complete two recipient audits.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Farm Families Options Program (Options) (Voted)

Start Date: June 23, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2010

Description: The Canadian Farm Family Options program is a pilot program that provides short-term financial assistance to low-income farm families and provides eligible clients with access to farm business assessment and training services that could help them increase their long-term on- and off-farm income opportunities. Income payments are issued to eligible applicants based on information for the 2005 and 2006 tax years. Eligible applicants commit to completing a Renewal activity, either a Farm Business Assessment or Canadian Agricultural Skills Service, or an approved equivalent by November 20, 2008.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
The Canadian Farm Family Options Program paid more than $145 million to over 15,000 farm families in its first year (2005 applicants) and more than $76 million to over 9,300 farm families in its second year (2006 applicants). Farmers qualified for Options if their total family income, as submitted to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) in their tax return, fell below $25,000 (below $15,000 for individual farmers). Payments were calculated to bring an individual farmer's total income up to the $15,000 threshold, and a farm family's total income up to the $25,000 threshold.

In total, participants received approximately $221 million, resulting in a total average payment of $17,000. 80.7% or 12,280 of Options participants completed their Renewal requirement (Farm Business Assessment, skills development or equivalent). Of these, 1,898 participated in more than one activity per application, with a total of 14,178 program activities resulting from the Options program. Final payment cheques were mailed to eligible applicants in early August, 2008 and the Options program reached its end on November 20, 2008.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants 145.0 76.0 - - (1.0) 1.0
Total Contributions - 11.2 16.0 14.2 10.3 5.7
Total Transfer Payment Program 145.0 87.2 16.0 14.2 9.3 6.7

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
On May 31, 2007 changes to the Options program were approved by Treasury Board. These changes resulted in the original $550.0 million budget being reduced to $303.3 million. Approval was obtained to reallocate the remaining funding to other initiatives. Actual spending was lower than planned in 2008-09 as funding for year two was only made available to qualified applicants from year one.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There were no previous evaluations and none conducted in 2008-09. An evaluation of the Options program is to be completed by March 31, 2010.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There were no previous audits and none conducted in 2008-09. An audit of the Options program is to be completed by March 31, 2010.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Cattlemen's Association Legacy Fund (Statutory)

Start Date: June 27, 2005
End Date: March 31, 2015

Description: The purpose of the Canadian Cattlemen's Association Legacy Fund is to support to the Canadian beef sector to develop markets for beef cattle, beef cattle genetics, beef and beef products in a post-BSE environment. Grants totalling $50 million over 10 years will be provided.

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
Industry is struggling to manage the ongoing impact of BSE and simultaneously regain its competive position given the rapid appreciation in the value of the Canadian dollar, increased feed prices and underutilization of packing capacity. Notwithstanding these challenges, Legacy Funds enabled the Beef Information Centre, Canada Beef Export Federation and Canadian Beef Breeds Council to undertake significant market development programs focussed on key Canadian, US and Asian beef markets. In 2008, beef exports totalled $1.35 billion, up from $1.24 billion in 2007. Sales of beef cattle genetics in 2008 were $26.65 million compared to $14.32 million in 2007.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants 4.9 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 (2.0)
Total Contributions - - - - - -
Total Transfer Payment Program 4.9 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 (2.0)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
In developing the spending profile for the Legacy Fund, annual expenditures were estimated by spreading the available funding over the ten year time frame in equal annual increments. However, funds are allocated based on the requirements outlined in an annual business plan which reflects the priorities of the three marketing groups. As such the funds needed in any particular year will vary depending on the marketing program developed in that year. These forecasts are made even more difficult by challenges in predicting when a market might actually open to imports of Candian beef.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
The contract with CCA requires a mid-term and a final evaluation. A third-party review of the grant and the results achieved to date was conducted for the period September 29, 2005 to June 30, 2008. The review determined that the objectives of the grant have been met and the funds were administered in an efficient and effective manner in accordance with the funding agreement.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits were completed in 2008-09 and none are planned at this time.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: EcoAgriculture Biofuels Capital Initiative (Voted)

Start Date: March 29, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: The ecoAgriculture Biofuels Capital initiative (ecoABC) is a four-year, $200 million federal initiative that provides conditionally repayable contributions towards the construction or expansion of biofuel facilities that have equity investments from farmers and use agricultural feedstock. The initiative, which is part of the federal renewable fuels strategy, is providing an opportunity for farmers to benefit from the emerging renewable fuels industry while helping the government to achieve its targets for renewable fuel content in gasoline and diesel fuel.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
EcoABC has six signed contribution agreements totalling $44.5 million. These projects have encouraged private sector investment of $42.0 million by 502 agricultural producers, helping to broaden their economic base beyond the farm gate.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 0.6 75.0 18.1 17.4 57.6
Total Transfer Payment Program - 0.6 75.0 18.1 17.4 57.6

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual expenditures were less than planned primarily due to the global economic crisis at that time, which was having a serious impact on the Canadian investment climate, particularly the availability of debt and equity financing to emerging industries such as biofuels. Companies were finding it very difficult to secure the financing needed to move forward with their planned biofuels facilities. This in turn slowed the uptake for the EcoABC program which was contingent upon projects being fully financed prior to federal funding approval.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was completed in 2008-09. An evaluation is planned for 2009-10.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audit was undertaken in 2008-09. An audit is planned for 2011-12.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Plum Pox Eradication Program (PPEP) (Voted)

Start Date: April 19, 2004
End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: The Plum Pox Eradication Program (PPEP) provides funding for activities aimed at eradicating the Plum Pox Virus (PPV) from the Niagara region of Canada while ensuring the viability of the tender fruit industry (peaches, plums, apricots, nectarines). The bulk of the funding supports an extensive survey of tender fruit orchards, research and financial assistance for tender fruit producers whose orchards are affected by the PPV. The program also includes an asset loss compensation component. This seven-year program (2004-05 to 2010-11) is a follow-up of the original three-year program (2001-02 to 2003-04).

The program is jointly funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA).

Canadian Food Inspection Agency Website: Plum Pox Virus

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
2008-09 was year five of the seven-year program. Surveillance for the virus continued by the sampling of trees in the quarantine area. Infected trees and trees in infected blocks that met the removal threshold were removed. In 2008, the Plum Pox Virus infection rate has fallen for the third consecutive year. The rate fell from 0.00046% in 2007 to 0.000173% in 2008, a significant decrease.


  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Business Risk Management            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 6.9 8.6 8.6 8.6 -
Total Business Risk Management - 6.9 8.6 8.6 8.6 -
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 5.5 - - - - -
Total Innovation and Renewal 5.5 - - - - -
Total Transfer Payment Program 5.5 6.9 8.6 8.6 8.6 -

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
N/A

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of the Plum Pox Eradication Program was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2010-11 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of the Plum Pox Eradication Program was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan for 2009-10 to 2011-12.

Note:
The PPEP includes two components: the survey/research component which accounts for $6.2 million annually, and the financial assistance component which is $2.4 million annually. The annual $2.4 million allocation is sourced from funding available for the AgriRecovery/Agricultural Disaster Relief Program (ADRP).

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Renewal (Voted)

Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)

Description: Through Renewal programming, AAFC aims to provide producers with the tools and skills they need to make business decisions based on good knowledge. Renewal programming is built on the concept of continuous learning, and is designed to help producers assess their situations and plan for the future during critical transition times. Renewal programs enhance producers' access to information, advice and training, and enables them to pursue on- and off-farm income opportunities.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
Canadian Agricultural Skills Service (CASS) - 697 applications were received in 2008-09.
In 2008-09, more than 2,384 producers across Canada applied to participate in the Canadian Farm Business Advisory Service (CFBAS) and Planning and Assessment for Value-Added Enterprise (PAVE): 1,835 for Farm Business Assessment (FBA), 510 for Specialized Business Planning Services (SBPS), and 39 for PAVE.

To help producers acquire the skills they need to adapt to rapid changes in the industry, AAFC continued to work strategically with the agriculture and agri-food sector in 2008-09 to identify the new skills and learning opportunities needed in a knowledge-intensive economy.

Funding to National Organizations:

  • The Canadian Farm Business Management Council (CFBMC) developed and distributed advanced farm management information and tools for established and beginning farmers;
  • the Canadian 4-H Council (4-H) developed a strong base of skills and knowledge for rural youth, many of whom will become the next generation of Canadian farmers;
  • the Canadian Agricultural Safety Association (CASA) improved the health and safety on Canadian farms;
  • the Canadian Young Farmers' Forum (CYFF) facilitated the exchange of information and best farming practices amongst young and beginning farmers; and
  • the Canadian Outstanding Young Farmers Program (COYFP) recognized young farmers that exemplify excellence in their profession.

In a 2007 Client Impact Survey with 703 participants of Renewal programs, results showed that program participation was a vehicle for change. Respondents reported that the programs strengthened their understanding of their business; reduced stress; improved communications with family, partners and other business partners; enabled participants to consider their original plans and make changes; had a direct impact on their incomes; and contributed toward the achievement of their goals.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 31.6 55.0 3.0 32.5 25.9 (22.9)
Total Transfer Payment Program 31.6 55.0 3.0 32.5 25.9 (22.9)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending was higher than planned since planned spending only included approved amounts for the 2008-09 Main Estimates. Additional funding was approved later in the year.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of Renewal programs was conducted in 2008-09 but has not been finalized yet. An evaluation of funding to national organizations will be conducted in 2009-10.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Recipient compliance audits have been undertaken in 2008-09 for the following: The delivery of the Canadian Agricultural Skills Service under the Canada-Manitoba Implementation Agreement and under the Canada-Ontario Implementation Agreement, the Managing Risk Education Program under the Canada Implementation Agreement and the Contribution Agreement for the Agricultural Management Institute between Canada, Ontario and the Agricultural Adaptation Council. Final reports are pending.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Science and Innovation (Voted)

Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)

Description: The purpose of the Science and Innovation Transfer Payments Program is to accelerate innovation adoption in agriculture. Science and innovation are the cornerstone of efforts to make the Canadian agriculture and agri-food sector the world leader in food safety, innovation and environmentally responsible production and to support its future success and prosperity. Advances in agri-food science and technology are accelerating the development of a wide range of new industrial, health and nutritional products obtained from plants, animals and microorganisms.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
The Broker and Agri-Innovation program successfully concluded March 31, 2009 exceeding the target of 10 collaboration partnerships.

Overall 18 Contribution Agreements were signed during 2008-09 in support of establishing agri-innovations partnerships.

The Broker portion of the program funded 15 projects that supported the development of 11 innovation value chains and the creation of 14 strategies.

The Agri-Innovation portion of the program advanced four strategies that were created with support from the Broker portion of the program.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 54.0 73.5 6.9 10.8 9.2 (2.3)
Total Transfer Payment Program 54.0 73.5 6.9 10.8 9.2 (2.3)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance between the planned and actual spending is due to an increase in spending of $2.3 million required for additional project activities for recruitment, equipment, and renovations for the Vineland Connections Project at the Vineland Innovation Research Centre.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation of the Program was carried out in 2008-09. A Chapter evaluation, performed in 2007-08, included the Science and Innovation program. Each recipient submitted a final report which was evaluated before final payment was released.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
A compliance audit for one project was carried out in the 2008-09 fiscal year. The sampled invoices and claims did not show any significant discrepancies during the compliance audit.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Orchards & Vineyards Transition Program (Voted)

Start Date: October 25, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: This program funds plant removal which is the very first step towards replanting orchards and vineyards or planting other crops to help producers compete in the changing global markets. The program also responds to the market pressure by funding strategic planning activities which will increase the industry's knowledge and help the industry make decisions. The program operates in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
Plant Removal: About 1250 applications were approved to remove about 10,180 acres of old tree fruit and grapes from orchards and vineyards in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Strategic Planning: $1,736,500 worth of strategic plan projects have been approved across Canada. Industry associations are currently developing the approved strategic plan projects.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 0.7 15.2 13.4 11.4 3.8
Total Transfer Payment Program - 0.7 15.2 13.4 11.4 3.8

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
While the program uptake met or exceeded forecast demand in most provinces (i.e. British Columbia, Ontario, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia), the uptake in Quebec was much lower than expected. This accounts for the difference between planned and actual spending.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There was no evaluation conducted in 2008-09. A summative evaluation will be conducted during fiscal year 2010-11.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audit was completed in 2008-09. Any recipient audits will be determined based on the audit work plan. The need for an internal audit will be determined by the Office of Audit and Evaluation.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Tobacco Transition Program (TTP) (Voted)

Start Date: February 12, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2010

Description: The Program facilitated the transition of Ontario flue-cured tobacco quota holders wishing to exit the industry.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
The Tobacco Transition Program, (TTP) is now completed. The Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers' Marketing Board (the delivery agent) replaced the production controls with a licensing system and 1,050 quota holders applied to the TTP. The total program cost was $284,879,885 to retire 99.8% of the quota (271,134,732 pounds of Basic Production Quota) and pay for the administrative costs incurred by the delivery agent.
As of May 1, 2009, all payments had been received by TTP participants.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - - - 287.9 284.9 (284.9)
Total Transfer Payment Program - - - 287.9 284.9 (284.9)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
At the time of preparation of the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities, Treasury Board approval for this program had not yet been received and as such planned spending is shown as zero.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted in 2008-09. A summative evaluation will be conducted during fiscal year 2011-12.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
A program implementation audit was conducted in March-April 2009 to ensure that the delivery agent had put in place all the necessary processes to implement the program. The implementation audit found that the delivery agent put in place the necessary processes to ensure that the program would be delivered as per the programs guidelines and that the intent of the program would be upheld. Recipient audits are planned during fiscal year 2009-10. The need for an internal audit will be determined by the Office of Audit and Evaluation.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions in support of Rural Canada and of development in the area of Co-operatives (Voted)

Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)

Description: The purpose of the programs are to carry out plans for Rural and Cooperative development.

The programming covers the following three initiatives:

  • the renewal and strengthening of the Canadian Rural Partnership which includes the transfer payments program "Models for Rural Development", and "The Partnership Initiative" (formerly the Networking Initiative), both of which focus on approaches to rural development, and building partnerships;
  • the Rural Community Capacity Building Program, which places a focus on tools, services, knowledge, and processes; and
  • the Co-operatives Development Initiative (CDI) ($12.4 million from 2003-04 to 2007-08). In 2006, additional funding was provided to CDI to provide support for co-op development projects to enable farmers to capture new biofuels and other value-added opportunities - Ag-CDI funding (G&Cs): $3.75 million for 2006-07 to 2008-09.

Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth

Results Achieved:
Rural Development
Funding ($226,000) was provided to complete projects under the Models Program. Fifty projects were funded as part of the Rural Partnership Development Program for a total value of $1.575 million. Project final reports are due by June 30, 2009. Partnership projects brought together an average of 6 partners per project.

Total Contributions under Rural Development: $1.8 million.

Co-operative Development
Under CDI, 35 funded projects were undertaken and completed. There was on-going management of 2 existing contribution agreements for CDI-Advisory Services and Ag-CDI. Under Ag-CDI, 45 value-added agricultural co-operatives were supported.

Total Contributions under Co-operative Development: $4.5 million.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Rural and Cooperatives Secretariat            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 9.1 10.6 5.9 7.4 6.3 (0.4)
Total Transfer Payment Program 9.1 10.6 5.9 7.4 6.3 (0.4)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Planned spending only included amounts approved at the time that the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities was prepared. Additional funding for the program was approved later in the year.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
In October 2008, the Office of Audit and Evaluation completed an Assessment of the Canadian Rural Partnership Program (CRP). This assessment relied on a new Value-for-Money tool created by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.

Key findings were:

  • CRP has demonstrated good value-for-money in terms of program relevance and performance.
  • CRP is relevant and consistent with government's priority of building strong communities.

Report on the Mid-term Evaluation of the Co-operative Development Initiative
Assessment of the Canadian Rural Partnerships Program

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits were undertaken in 2008-09.

Return to Top of Page
Top of Page

Details on Transfer Payment Programs for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

($ millions)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - International (Canadian Agriculture and Food International Program) (Voted)

Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)

Description: The purpose of the Canadian Agriculture and Food international (CAFI) program is to provide support to industry to gain and expand international recognition for Canada and enhance market opportunities for Canadian agriculture and food products. The program replaces and improves on AAFC's Agri-Food Trade Program (AFTP).

Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System

Results Achieved:
In 2008-09, the Canadian Agriculture and Food international (CAFI) program, continued to fund industry activities to improve international markets development and gain recognition for Canada as a leader in supplying high-quality, safe and innovative agriculture, agri-food, beverage and seafood products. The CAFI program provided funding to 49 industry associations - over $22.8 million in support of industry activities including $17.5 million for long-term international strategies and $5.3 million for projects.

In 2008-09, some results achieved included:
The Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance developed a booklet "Top 10 Things Consumers Don't Know About Aquaculture" to showcase how the BC industry focuses on environmental issues such as sustainability and protection of wild salmon. To ensure that the booklet was well received by target audiences, focus groups were conducted to develop and fine tune the copy and overall messaging. The booklet was mailed to buyers, distributors, influencers, and Trade Commissioners in key US markets for BC farmed salmon. The booklet was also distributed at the San Francisco Fancy Food Show in January 2009.

The Canadian Bison Association advertised in the Fall 2007 edition of Flavourful, a magazine which highlights Canadian foods for international tables. 7,000 copies of the magazine were printed and circulated to the Canadian Embassies and trade posts based on language requirements. It was printed in English and French, English and Spanish, English and Japanese, and English and Mandarin. 1000 copies were circulated to the Hospitality, Restaurant, and Hotel Associations. Others were circulated to Food writers. Copies of the magazine were also used by marketers and the association to promote bison products in response to inquiries about bison.

The CAFI program is also committed to increasing international recognition of Canada's capabilities as a net exporter of agriculture, agri-food, and seafood products. To this end, the CAFI program supported numerous incoming missions of international delegations interested in learning about the superior capabilities of the Canadian industry first-hand.

  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
  Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Authorities Actual Spending Variance between Actual and Planned
Program Activity: Markets and International            
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 22.1 17.9 24.8 22.8 22.3 2.5
Total Transfer Payment Program 22.1 17.9 24.8 22.8 22.3 2.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending was less than planned spending due to the fact that some associations were unable to spend all of their approved funding. All of CAFI's recipients are associations that are undertaking activities in foreign markets and due to the global downturn, some associations were not able to undertake and/or complete some of their activities.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation of the CAFI Program was done in 2008-09.

Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits were completed in 2008-09.

Top of Page

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Transfer Payment Program:

Atlantic Innovation Fund (AIF) - Voted

Start date:

May 10, 2001

End date:

March 31, 2011

Description of Transfer Payment Program:

The AIF focuses on increasing research and development linked to economic development and commercialization objectives in areas that are of strategic importance to the region, in particular, the growth of strategic sectors/clusters. The AIF emphasizes building Atlantic Canada's system of innovation, including components that bridge the gap between research institutions and the marketplace. It encourages synergies among the various components of this system through partnerships, alliances and networks. Furthermore, the AIF supports research and development projects that focus on the areas of natural sciences, applied sciences, and social sciences and humanities, where these are linked explicitly to the development of technology-based products, processes or services, or their commercialization, thereby strengthening the region's system of innovation.

More information on the AIF can be found at http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/ImLookingFor/ProgramInformation/AtlanticInnovationFund/Pages/
AtlanticInnovationFund.aspx.

Strategic Outcome:

The AIF is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy."

Results Achieved:

ACOA's flagship innovation program, the Atlantic Innovation Fund, focuses on accelerating the development of the knowledge-based industry, and facilitating transition within traditional industries by increasing the region's capacity to carry out leading-edge research and development, contributing to the development of new technology-based economic activity in Atlantic Canada. Clients of the AIF include businesses and institutions such as universities and research institutes. One of the key accomplishments for 2008-2009 was the successful approval of 25 projects, accounting for over $53 million in ACOA assistance. ACOA's assistance of these projects leveraged an additional $52 million from other sources, such as universities and other research institutions, provincial governments, the private sector and national R&D programs.

The AIF facilitates the development of strategic sectors characterized by regional clusters of firms. Sixteen of the 25 approved projects in 2008-2009, accounting for more than $36 million in AIF funding, augment development of IT, life sciences/biotech, and oil and gas/oceans technology clusters and complement the National Research Council's Atlantic Cluster initiative.

ACOA encourages AIF project proponents to seek opportunities for collaboration in such areas as research and development, project management, marketing or commercialization, in order to help maximize the economic benefits and enhance the likelihood of commercialization success. In 2008-2009, there were 61 meaningful partnerships stemming from AIF - funded projects.

Given that the level of privately funded R&D in Atlantic Canada is well below the national average, the AIF has focused on increasing the level of participation by commercial entities in innovation activity. For example, over half (56%) of approved projects in 2008-2009 were from commercial proponents. In addition, 100% of institutional projects approved in 2008-2009 under Round VI had private sector partners (up from 92% in 2007-2008).



($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Enterprise Development
Total Contributions 59.3 57.0 68.0 58.1 58.1 9.9
Total Program Activity 59.3 57.0 68.0 58.1 58.1 9.9

Comment on Variance:

Actual spending under the AIF was less than planned due to complex contribution agreements being negotiated and signed later than planned, following the approval of projects.

Audit completed or planned:

Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009.

 

 

Transfer Payment Program:

Business Development Program (BDP) - Voted

Start date:

June 25, 1995

End date:

March 31, 2010

Description of Transfer Payment Program:

The BDP helps to set up, expand or modernize businesses, and focuses on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Strategic Outcome:

The BDP is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy."

Results Achieved:

During 2008-2009, to improve productivity and preserve long-term prospect of employment, the BDP invested in 31 projects to establish new businesses and in 125 projects to help companies to expand and/or modernize their facilities. This program continues to focus on innovation, skills development and trade activities to enhance the business environment in Atlantic Canada. The program serves to fill gaps in the financing continuum for SMEs and entrepreneurs in Atlantic Canada.



 ($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Enterprise Development
Total Grants 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.8
Total Contributions 112 97.3 86.7 99.9 99.9 (13.2)
Total for Program Activity 112.2 97.5 87.7 100.1 100.1 (12.4)
Community Development
Total Grants 0.6 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total Contributions 25.3 21.4 10.5 23.3 23.3 (12.8)
Total for Program Activity 25.9 21.7 11.5 23.8 23.8 (12.3)
Policy, Advocacy and Coordination
Total Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Contributions 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 (0.1)
Total for Program Activity 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 (0.1)
Total for Transfer Payment Program 138.7 119.7 99.7 124.5 124.5 (24.8)

Comments on Variances:

An additional $24.8 million was made available for the BDP during the year, mostly as a result of re-profiling of the collection of repayable contributions in prior years, as well as reduced requirements under the Atlantic Innovation Fund and Innovative Communities Fund. The additional financial resources for the BDP were used to accelerate payments for SME projects, easing cash flow challenges during the current economic downturn, and to fund increased demands on Community Development.

Audit completed or planned:

During the year, audits were completed on four components of the BDP: trade, investment, tourism and venture capital. The audits found that, in general, the Agency exercised due diligence in the delivery of these projects; however, all four audits recommended improvements to enhance delivery of the four components.

Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009.

 

 

Transfer Payment Program:

Community Futures (CF) Program - Voted

Start date:

May 18, 1995

End date:

October 2, 2010

Description of Transfer Payment Program:

The Community Futures (CF) Program supports community economic development and builds the capacity of communities to realize their full sustainable potential. The program provides financial support to CF organizations (e.g. Community Business Development Corporations in Atlantic Canada) enabling them, in collaboration with other partners and stakeholders, to assess their situation and develop strategies to meet their needs. The CF Program also provides support to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and social enterprises for undertaking appropriate community economic development initiatives.

Strategic Outcome:

The CF Program is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy".

Results Achieved:

In 2008-2009, the 41 Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs) approved 1,077 loans, which represent an investment of $48.5 million and 892 new jobs in rural communities. The CBDCs also provided 7,578 counselling sessions to clients throughout the Atlantic Canada.

A summative evaluation of the Community Futures Program concluded the following: that there is a continuing need for the CF Program, that Atlantic CBDC activities and objectives closely align with the national CF Program, and that the CF Program aligns well with ACOA’s priorities.



($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Community Development
Total Contributions 14.2 13.7 12.7 12.4 12.4 0.3
Total Program Activity 14.2 13.7 12.7 12.4 12.4 0.3

Comment on Variance:

The difference between planned spending and actual spending can be explained by normal program administration, having some project costs incurred later than expected.

Audit completed or planned:

Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009. Audit of Community Futures Program has an expected completion date of September 2009.

 

 

Name of Transfer Payment Program:

Innovative Communities Fund (ICF) - Voted

Start date:

April 1, 2005

End date:

March 31, 2010

Description of Transfer Payment Program:

The program is designed to make non-repayable contributions to support strategic initiatives that respond to the economic development needs of communities. To effectively address the wide range of challenges and opportunities of regions, communities and sectors, the ICF takes a comprehensive approach to working with communities at various stages along the economic development continuum, while ensuring sustainable economic outcomes.

The ICF has two distinct components. The first component, strategic community capacity, is designed to support non-commercial/non-profit strategic initiatives that target the economic development needs of rural communities. The second, proactive investments, is intended to stimulate transformative change. This component will support proactive identification and implementation of strategic opportunities with local partners. The program is designed to respond to the unique and varying needs of communities. The flexible approach will encourage clear links to sustainable economic development outcomes. A focus on outcomes will ensure that the program has the desired impact on Atlantic Canada’s economy.

Strategic Outcome:

The ICF is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy."

Results Achieved:

During fiscal year 2008-2009, 94 projects were approved under the ICF, of which 80 were funded under the strategic community capacity component and 14 under the proactive investment component. These 94 projects had total project costs of $119.4 million. With an ACOA contribution of $32.2 million, dollars leveraged amounted to $87.2 million.



($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Community Development
Total Contributions 38.8 46.9 55.5 48.9 48.9 6.6
Total Program Activity 38.8 46.9 55.5 48.9 48.9 6.6

Comment on Variance:

The difference between planned spending and actual spending can be explained by normal program administration, wherein some project costs were incurred later than expected because of unforeseen circumstances in the project.

Audit completed or planned:

Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009.

Top of Page

Canada Revenue Agency

Table 5 Details on Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)

Two transfer payment programs with payments in excess of $5M were administered by the Agency in 2008-2009:

  • Children’s Special Allowance Payments (CSA) (Statutory); and
  • Transfers to Provinces under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 (Statutory)

Table 5.1 Children’s Special Allowance Payments (CSA) (Statutory)

Start Date: Aug. 28, 1995[Footnote 1] 
End Date: Ongoing
Description of Transfer Payment Program:
Tax-free monthly payments made to agencies and foster parents who are licensed by provincial or federal governments to provide for the care and education of children under the age of 18 who physically reside in Canada and who are not in the care of their parents. CSA payments are equivalent to Canada Child Tax Benefit payments. CSA payments are governed by the Children’s Special Allowances Act which provides that this allowance be paid out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Strategic Outcomes:
Eligible families and individuals receive timely and correct benefit payments
Results Achieved:
Monthly payments were made to 293 agencies and foster parents on behalf of 56,255 children. Payments were issued on schedule, no delays were reported.
Program Activity: Benefit Programs
(in thousands of dollars)
 
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009[Footnote 2]  
 
Actual Spending
Actual Spending
Planned Spending
Total Authorities
Actual Spending
Variance(s) Planned/Actual
Total Grants*
197,768
208,163
219,000
 
 
219,000
Total Contributions
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments**
-
-
-
211,848
211,848
(211,848)
Total
197,768
208,163
219,000
211,848
211,848
7,152
Comment(s) on variance(s): N/A
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s): N/A

[Footnote 1] Responsibility for CSA Satutory Vote payment was transferred effective August 28, 1995 from Human Resources and Social Development Canada (P.C. Order 1995-342)
[Footnote 2] Starting in 2008-2009, the CSA Statutory payment was reclassified from a Grant to an Other Transfer Payment
* A grant is an unconditional transfer payment where the government chooses to further policy or program delivery by issuing payments to individuals or organizations. Eligibility criteria and applications received in advance of payment provide sufficient assurance that the objectives of payment will be met, therefore specific conditional agreements with the recipient are not required. The government must list a grant in the Estimates but may withhold the grant(s) if eligibility criteria are not met.
** Other Transfer Payment is a transfer payment based on legislation or an arrangement that normally includes a formula or schedule as one element used to determine the expenditure amount. However, once a payment is made, the recipient may redistribute the funds among several categories of expenditure in the arrangement.

 


Table 5.2 Payments to Provinces under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 (Statutory)

Start Date: October 12, 2006
End Date: October 12, 2013 with an option for an additional 2 years
Description of Transfer Payment Program:
The export charge, to be levied by Canada on exports of softwood lumber products to the United States, is collected and administered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) with support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) on behalf of the provinces. Under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 (Act), the CRA is responsible for making disbursements to the provinces of a portion of the charge collected over the course of the application of the Softwood Lumber Agreement, 2006. These payments are reduced by several factors: refunds paid to the industry, costs for the administration and implementation of the Agreement and the Act as well as the costs incurred for certain litigation resulting from the Agreement or Act. The Act applies to the following regions: BC Interior, BC Coastal, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. Exports from the remaining provinces and territories are excluded.
Strategic Outcome:
Taxpayers meet their obligations and Canada’s revenue base is protected
Results Achieved:
The first payment covering revenues collected, minus costs for the period between the entry into force on October 12, 2006 and September 30, 2007, was made to the provinces on January 11, 2008. A second payment was made on March 31, 2008 covering the calendar quarter from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007. Payments will continue on a quarterly basis until the termination of the Agreement, unless lumber market prices increase to the point where no export charge is applicable for that period.
Program Activity: Taxpayer and Business Assistance
(in thousands of dollars)
 
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009[Footnote 1]  
 
Actual Spending
Actual Spending
Planned Spending
Total Authorities
Actual Spending
Variance(s) Planned/Actual
Total Grants
Total Contributions
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments*
603,602
180,495
180,495
(180,495)
Total
603,602
180,495
180,495
(180,495)
Comment(s) on variance(s): N/A
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s): N/A

[Footnote 1] There were no Planned Spending amounts shown in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities.
* Other Transfer Payment is a transfer payment based on legislation or an arrangement that normally includes a formula or schedule as one element used to determine the expenditure amount. However, once a payment is made, the recipient may redistribute the funds among several categories of expenditure in the arrangement.
Top of Page

Canadian Food Inspection Agency

3.2.4 Details on Transfer Payments Programs ($ millions)


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Compensation Payments

Start date: N/A

End date: N/A

Description of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by regulations under the Plant Protection Act, and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act.

Strategic Outcome: To compensate Canadians, in accordance with the appropriate regulations, for plants ordered destroyed for the purpose of disease control.

Results Achieved: 123 Canadians were compensated for plants ordered destroyed.

Program Activity: Plant Health Risks and Production Systems
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between Planned and Actual Spending 2008-09
Total Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments 2.0 8.1 0.9 11.9 11.9 11.0
Total Plant Health Risks and Production Systems 2.0 8.1 0.9 11.9 11.9 11.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual compensation payments made to Canadians were $11.0 million higher than the $0.9 million that was earmarked in Planned Spending. This increase is largely attributed to Sudden Oak Death ($9.7M).



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Compensation Payments

Start date: N/A

End date: N/A

Description of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by regulations under the Health of Animals Act and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act.

Strategic Outcome: To compensate Canadians, in accordance with the appropriate regulations, for animals ordered destroyed for the purpose of disease control.

Results Achieved: A total of 152 Canadians were compensated for animals ordered destroyed.

Program Activity: Animal Health Risks and Production Systems
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between Planned and Actual Spending (2008-09)
Total Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments 1.8 2.5 0.6 8.6 8.6 8.0
Total Animal Health Risks and Production Systems 1.8 2.5 0.6 8.6 8.6 8.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual compensation payments made to Canadians were $8.0 million higher than the $0.6 million that was earmarked in Planned Spending. This increase is mainly on account of Chronic Wasting Disease ($5.9M) and Avian Influenza ($1.1M).

Top of Page

Canadian Heritage

Table 3: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)

All these transfer payments programs are voted, which means that each year the Parliament of Canada votes annual Appropriation Act or Acts to grant expenditure authority to the Crown for the departments and agencies. This spending authorization lapses at year-end.

Note: In each Transfer Payment Table, row 15 indicates the amount of funding of grants and contributions for the Program Activity corresponding to each program. This total includes only vote 5--Grants & Contributions (G & Cs). These numbers differ from those indicated for each Program Activity in the Performance Summary of the 2008-2009 Departmental Performance Report (section 1.2.1) because the latter numbers include vote 5 (G & Cs) and vote 1 (Operating expenditures).

Citizenship and Heritage Sector

  • Aboriginal Peoples' Program
  • Building Communities through Arts and Heritage
  • Community Historical Recognition Program
  • Development of Official-Language Communities Program
  • Enhancement of Official Languages
  • Exchanges Canada Program
  • Katimavik Program
  • Multiculturalism Program
  • Museums Assistance Program

Cultural Affairs Sector

  • Arts Presentation Canada
  • Book Publishing Industry Development Program
  • Canada Magazine Fund
  • Canada Music Fund
  • Canada New Media Fund
  • Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program
  • Canadian Culture Online Program
  • Contribution in Support of the Canadian Television Fund
  • Cultural Spaces Canada
  • National Arts Training Contribution Program
  • Publication Assistance Program

International and Intergovernmental Affairs Sector

  • Athlete Assistance Program
  • Hosting Program
  • Sport Support Program
  • TV5

Public and Regional Affairs Sector

  • Celebration and Commemoration Program

Citizenship and Heritage Sector

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Peoples' Program

Start date: 1971-1972

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

For over 30 years, the Department of Canadian Heritage (and its predecessor, the Department of the Secretary of State) has been delivering Aboriginal-specific programs and initiatives that support the full participation of Aboriginal people in Canadian life, and supporting the continuation of Aboriginal living cultures as key elements of the Canadian cultural landscape.

Specifically, these programs:

  • Strengthen Aboriginal cultural identity and languages; and

  • Facilitate the inclusion of Aboriginal people in Canadian society in a manner that recognizes their cultures and fosters their contributions to Canada.

The Aboriginal Peoples' Program is organized around two broad themes:

  • Aboriginal Communities Component supports the efforts of Aboriginal communities to develop innovative and culturally appropriate solutions to the social, cultural, economic and other obstacles that impede community and personal prospects. It focuses specifically on the unique challenges faced by Aboriginal women, youth and urban communities, with the intent of strengthening Aboriginal cultural identity and participation of Aboriginal Peoples in Canadian society.

  • Aboriginal Living Cultures Component supports the preservation and promotion of Aboriginal languages and cultures. Specifically, this component focuses on access to programs and activities that preserve and promote Aboriginal languages and cultures as well as the production and distribution of Aboriginal radio and television programming.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • The transfer agreement between the National Association of Friendship Centres (NAFC) and Canadian Heritage provided for operational support (core funding) to 116 friendship centre organizations across Canada. This core funding enables the urban Aboriginal population to be served through a network of Aboriginal Friendship Centres, whose key activities focused on social development and community engagement through over 1,167 programs across Canada.
  • A contribution agreement with the National Association of Friendship Centres to administer Young Canada Works for Aboriginal Urban Youth provided employment in friendship centres across Canada to 237 summer students. These summer jobs enabled the creation of projects in over 95 communities across Canada that focused on cultural development, social development and community engagement.
  • Contribution agreements provided funding for Aboriginal youth to access programming that incorporates Aboriginal values, cultures and traditional practices into programs and activities designed to help these youth make positive life choices and improve their social, economic and personal prospects. Some 230 projects--supported by community youth committees--in communities across Canada provided Aboriginal youth with the opportunity to learn about their heritage, culture and identity, and to build self-confidence and a sense of pride in being an Aboriginal person, leading to better leadership and citizenship skills and ability to fully participate in Canadian society.
  • Grants and contribution agreements with Aboriginal women's organizations gave Aboriginal women access to 45 projects in communities across Canada that focused on cultural development, social development and community engagement, Aboriginal self-government and family violence.
  • A contribution agreement with the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples provided funding for National Aboriginal Day events in the National Capital Region that included an educational activity attended by 1,540 students at the Canadian Museum of Civilization, the Summer Solstice Arts Festival on Victoria Island with 6,500 visitors, and six community events in the National Capital Region that attracted approximately 4,190 people.
  • A contribution agreement with the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation provided funding for 34 scholarships to Aboriginal post-secondary students. Career fairs, which included 90 workshops, were held in Iqaluit and Winnipeg and were attended by up to 1,300 students in Grades 9 through 12.
  • The contribution agreement with the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation supported the production and television broadcast of the National Aboriginal Achievement Awards, which were bestowed to 15 recipients. The awards show was attended by over 2,000 people and broadcast on APTN and the Global Television network.
  • Contribution agreements with 13 Aboriginal communications societies enabled the production and broadcasting of original television and radio programs that included over 21,232 hours of radio programming and 191 hours of television programming in 29 Aboriginal languages in addition to English and French.

Program Activity: Preservation of Canada's Heritage
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 20.2 19.5 18.2 18.4 18.0 0.2
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 20.5 19.8 18.6 18.7 18.3 0.3



Program Activity: Community Development and Capacity Building
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 5.5 0.2 - - - -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 227.0 234.0 238.9 239.5 230.4 8.5



Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 0.6 0.5 1.3 1.3 0.6 0.7
Total Contributions 39.6 39.4 38.2 38.3 38.8 (0.6)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $0.3M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Aboriginal Peoples' Program (Aboriginal Communities Component) was completed in December 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12-3/ACC-eng.pdf.

An internal audit of the Aboriginal Peoples' Program (Cultural Living Cultures Component) was completed in May 2009: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2009/2009-05/2009-05-eng.pdf.

As per the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan, there are currently no planned audits related to this program; however, the audit plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Communities through Arts and Heritage

Start date: 2007-2008

End date: 2011-2012

Description:

The Building Communities through Arts and Heritage Program supports local arts and heritage festivals, events and activities that engage Canadians in their local communities through the performing and visual arts and in the expression, celebration and preservation of local heritage.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society based on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • In 2008-2009, a total of $6,826,195 (through 605 grants and 83 contribution agreements) was awarded to festivals and anniversaries held across the country, thus providing Canadians with the opportunity to participate in arts and heritage events and festivals at the community level; offering increased opportunities for local artists to perform within their communities; and increasing citizen exposure to local historical heritage.

  • In terms of policy implementation, solid policy frameworks have been in place for all components and applied on an ongoing basis. Performance data has been collected, analyzed and used for ongoing reporting.

  • In terms of program implementation, a pre-Implementation Assessment process was conducted and found that program management took a reasoned and prudent approach to implementation. The Report also outlined a number of opportunities to strengthen the program's control measures, and significant progress has been made in implementing the recommendations. As for program delivery mechanisms, the following results were achieved:

    • Guidelines, tools and processes were improved based on what was learned in the first year, and training sessions were conducted in the regions and at Headquarters.

    • A formula-based approach was developed and implemented to translate project assessment scores into funding recommendations.

  • In terms of regional coordination and consultations, the following results were achieved:

    • Financial resources were allocated by province and territory to 688 projects across the country.

    • An outreach strategy was developed prior to deadlines for applications and included a factsheet, new Guide and Application Forms and general guidelines in both official languages. Festival organizers were asked to indicate how they intended to reach both the French and English populations of the locality, if both groups were to be present.

    • Working group meetings took place weekly with representatives from each region and national headquarters to discuss regional coordination of program delivery.

Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - 0.7 4.5 5.4 4.4 0.1
Total Contributions - 0.6 2.5 1.6 2.4 0.1
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $0.2M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Citizen Participation Branch is planned for 2010-2011.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Historical Recognition Program

Start date: 2006-2007

End date: 2011-2012

Description:

In 2006-2007, the Community Historical Recognition Program replaced the Acknowledgement, Commemoration and Education Program. It provides funding for eligible community-based projects that (i) commemorate and/or recognize the historical experiences of communities impacted by federally legislated wartime measures and/or immigration restrictions or prohibitions that were applied in Canada, and (ii) promote their respective contributions. It aims to highlight the contributions these communities have made to Canada and educate Canadians about these historical experiences and contributions.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • The Community Historical Recognition Program established the Canadian First World War Internment Recognition Fund, a $10-million endowment fund to support projects that commemorate and recognize the experiences of ethno-cultural communities affected by the First World War internment. The Fund is managed by the Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko. The Foundation will post calls for proposals, and a multilateral committee representing affected communities will make decisions on projects to be funded. Applicants who wish to propose a project related to the First World War internment can visit the Foundation's website at www.shevchenkofoundation.com.

  • The Community Historical Recognition Program's first call for proposals was launched, resulting in the first project-funding approval under the Program.

  • Community-based advisory committees were established to provide advice on project proposals.

  • Through the approval of funding for projects and the establishment of community-based advisory committees, historical experiences of impacted communities are being recognized and commemorated; information is made available on these experiences.

  • The resulting media attention has contributed to increasing public awareness about the historical experiences of impacted communities and their contributions to Canadian society.

Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - 2.8 2.8 - 2.8
Total Contributions - - 12.4 2.6 - 12.4
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $15.2M is explained as follows:

  • Re-profile of funds to 2009-2010 in the amount of $9.1M.

  • Transfer of $5.0M to Canadian First World War Internment Recognition Fund.

  • Year-end surplus of $1.1M.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Historical Recognition Program: Ex-Gratia Payments was completed in December 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12/2008-12-eng.pdf.

The responsibility for the Community Historical Recognition Program was transferred from the Minister of Canadian Heritage to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) on October 30, 2008; therefore, there is no planned audit at PCH for this program.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Development of Official-Language Communities Program

Start date: 2003-2004

End date: 2008-2009

Description:

The Development of Official-Language Communities Program fosters the vitality of Canada's English- and French-speaking minority communities and enables them to participate fully in all aspects of Canadian life. Partnerships and agreements with community organizations, provinces, territories, municipalities, and federal departments and agencies enhance minority official-language communities' access to quality education and different programs and services in their language in their communities.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • General satisfaction with services offered to OLMC in their minority language has improved; the general satisfaction rate is 74%, and six out of ten respondents in the PCH-Decima 2006 survey say they are satisfied. The rate of satisfaction is even higher when it comes to specific services (media and communications--85.7%; health and social services--71.1%; daycare and preschool--70.9%).

  • Also, 31% of members of OLMC say they are delighted that access to services in their language has improved in the last five years. (Less than 15% of Anglophones and less than 8% of Francophone's say services have deteriorated.)

  • Access to services for members of OLMC has improved over the years. The general satisfaction with the improvement of access to services in OLMC members' language in the last five years is 31%.

  • Most of PCH's funding for the development of OLMC granted to provinces and territories--$166M on $233M for 2008-2009, are allocated resources for ministries of Education for the delivery of programs that guarantee education for OLMC in their language.

  • Below-average education amongst the younger generations of Official Language Minorities is lower than that of the majority (15-24 and 25-44 years of age).

  • A little over one person in five (age 15 years and up) living in a minority language situation in Canada has a University diploma (21%). This proportion is slightly higher compared to the Official Language people living in a majority situation.

  • The proportion of the population with a higher level of education is greater in OLMC than for the population of Official Languages living in a majority situation (the minority-majority index is 1.28 for those aged 15-24 years, and 1.19 for those aged 25-44 years).

  • Almost eight out of ten people living in a minority situation say they are satisfied with the services offered in their language, in their region in the Education and post-secondary training sectors.

Program Activity: Community Development and Capacity-Building
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 5.2 7.2 36.8 34.2 7.7 29.1
Total Contributions 216.3 226.7 202.1 205.2 222.7 (20.6)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 227.0 234.0 238.9 239.4 230.4 8.5



Program Activity:Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - - - - 1.7 (1.7)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $6.8M is explained as follows:

  • $8.5M was transferred to the Enhancement of Official Languages Program to adjust for emerging priorities.

  • 2008-2009 actual spending includes $1.7M for Young Canada Works, which was not included in planned spending.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Programs was completed in December 2008:
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12-2/OLSP-eng.pdf.

An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Program Branch is planned for 2013-2014. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings;  reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enhancement of Official Languages

Start date: 2003-2004

End date: 2008-2009

Description:

The Enhancement of Official Languages program promotes among Canadians a better understanding and appreciation of the benefits of linguistic duality. It achieves this through partnerships and agreements with the provinces and territories, and with non-governmental organizations to support second-language learning and initiatives that foster understanding between Anglophone and Francophone Canadians, and encourage the public to recognize and support linguistic duality as a fundamental value of Canadian society.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • More than two out of three respondents (68.8%) believe that since French and English are spoken in Canada it helps increase work opportunities.

  • More than six out of ten respondents who live in a minority situation (60.5%) believe that relations between Francophones and Anglophones have improved positively compared to 10 years ago.

  • In 2006, the number of bilingual persons (English-French) reached an all-time high in Canada (5.4 million at the last Census). The rate of bilingualism English-French was 17.4% in 2006.

Program Activity: Promotion of Inter-Cultural Understanding
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 0.2 0.5 5.1 5.1 1.3 3.8
Total Contributions 115.1 117.8 104.7 104.7 118.3 (13.6)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 130.3 118.3 109.8 109.8 119.6 (9.8)



Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4 1.9 1.5
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($8.3M) is explained as follows:

  • $8.5M was received from the Development of Official-Language Communities Program to adjust for emerging priorities.

  • $0.2M was transferred to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Programs was completed in December 2008:
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12-2/OLSP-eng.pdf.

An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Program Branch is planned for 2013-2014. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Exchanges Canada Program

Start date: 2000-2001

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The Exchanges Canada Program enables young Canadians to participate in one-way forums and two-way exchanges with youth from communities across the country. It also enables them to obtain information on opportunities for many different types of exchanges within Canada and abroad.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • In 2008-2009, the Exchanges Canada Program offered opportunities to approximately 12,900 youth to enhance their knowledge and understanding of Canada; to create linkages with one another; and to enhance their appreciation of the diversity and shared aspects of the Canadian experience. Through participation in forums and group exchanges, youth were enabled to learn about Canada, its history, geography, industry, institutions, communities, cultures, and languages, and to connect with other youth. In addition, summer work student exchanges offered youth opportunities to develop employability skills. Feedback from youth questionnaires showed, for example, that participation in Exchanges Canada's activities helped youth to learn new things about Canada; increase their desire to get involved in their own communities; and enhance knowledge about cultural communities other than their own.

  • Support was provided to youth exchanges and forums through 23 contribution agreements with non-governmental organizations. Exchanges Canada formed strategic alliances with two governmental organizations for youth exchange projects (Parks Canada and the Official Languages Support Program). The Exchanges Canada website provided information on opportunities for youth exchanges in Canada and abroad.

Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 0.1 - 0.1 0.1 - 0.1
Total Contributions 22.4 17.4 17.7 18.2 18.5 (0.8)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($0.7M) is explained as follows:

  • Transfers from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Citizen participation Branch is planned for 2010-2011. 

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Katimavik Program

Start date: 1997-1998

End date: 2010-2011

Description:

Through the Katimavik Program, young Canadians are provided with opportunities to create ties with communities and other Canadians, and to improve their employability. The objectives of the Katimavik program are: to contribute substantially to the personal, social and professional development of participants; to promote community service; and to offer a diverse experience, fostering a better understanding of the Canadian reality and linguistic duality. Through a nine-month program comprised of community service, training and group interaction, participants aged 17 to 21 have the opportunity to acquire personal and professional skills by involving themselves in community projects in one French-speaking and two English-speaking regions of Canada.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • In 2008-2009, the Katimavik Program provided young Canadians with opportunities to enhance their knowledge of Canada and its diversity; to develop their personal, social and professional skills; and to enhance their appreciation of community service. The Program enabled host-community partner organizations to improve their capacity to serve their community. Through their participation in the Katimavik Program, over 930 youth had opportunities to learn more about Canada, including its cultural, linguistic and geographic diversity. A program of community service learning, training and group interaction enabled participants to help approximately 100 community organizations carry out their projects, while the youth gained work experience and enhanced their professional skills.

  • The Katimavik Program is delivered by a not-for-profit organization through support from a contribution agreement.

Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 17.5 18.0 19.8 19.8 19.0 0.8
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $0.8M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Citizen Participation Branch is planned for 2010-2011.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Multiculturalism Program

Start date: 1982-1983

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The Multiculturalism Program of Canadian Heritage is one important means by which the Government of Canada pursues the three goals of the Multiculturalism Policy: identity, social justice, and civic participation. Funding provided under the Program's terms and conditions supports these goals to achieve the following objectives:

  • Ethno-cultural/racial minorities participate in decision making (civic participation);
  • Communities in the broad public engage in informed dialogue and sustained action to combat racism (anti-racism, anti-hate, cross-cultural understanding); and
  • Public institutions eliminate systemic barriers (institutional change).

The funding priorities are:

  • Economic, social and cultural integration;
  • Mentorship, volunteerism, leadership and civic education; and
  • Inter-cultural understanding and Canadian values.

The responsibility for the Multiculturalism Program was transferred from the Minister of Canadian Heritage to the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism on October 30, 2008. CIC Multiculturalism staff continue to consult and collaborate with PCH staff as appropriate. The Multiculturalism Program is being incorporated into CIC. This will enable CIC to address short- and longer-term integration challenges facing all Canadians, both newcomers and long-established.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

Following the publication of new application guidelines in March 2008, 37 projects were approved that address the new priorities. Two examples include:

Somali-Jewish Canadian Mentorship Project (Canadian International Peace Project)

  • An interfaith pilot program in Toronto matching Somali teens who are new to the workforce with community businesses. The program facilitates the creation of internships and mentoring relationships for the teens with professionals from the Jewish community.

  • The project is building long-term community cohesion and helping create a successful cadre of young Somali-Canadian professionals who are assuming greater leadership roles in assisting the development of their own community and contributing to Canadian society at large.

Examining the School Participation Rate of Ethno-Cultural Communities in Ontario (National African Integration and Families Association [NAIFA])

  • A community-based pilot project that has resulted in: i) a needs assessment; ii) resource kits to help address barriers that immigrant parents from African communities face in becoming more involved in the Ontario educational system; and iii) a self-sustaining community support group for parents.

  • This project has resulted in a significant increase in the involvement of African immigrant parents of children at four Toronto schools, resulting in parents being better able to navigate the educational system and to address their concerns and issues.

Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 0.6 0.3 7.3 7.3 0.2 7.1
Total Contributions 8.6 6.8 9.5 9.5 4.0 5.5
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $12.6M is explained as follows:

  • $5.7M was transferred to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

  • Year-end surplus of $6.9M.

Audit completed or planned:

The responsibility for the Multiculturalism Program was transferred from the Minister of Canadian Heritage to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) on October 30, 2008; therefore, there is no planned audit at PCH for this program.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Museums Assistance Program

Start date: 1972-1973

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The Museums Assistance Program is known as Grant/Contribution to Canadian museums and heritage organizations to promote professional management of, and access to, Canada's diverse heritage.

The Program helps current and future generations of Canadians gain access to, and develop a better appreciation of their heritage. The program provides project support to help exhibitions travel around the country, to foster the adoption of best museum management practices, to support Aboriginal peoples in protecting and presenting their heritage, and to improve museum associations' ability to serve their members.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

  • In 2008-2009, the Museums Assistance Program received 146 applications and funded 112 new projects. When multi-year projects are taken into consideration, 176 projects received funding: 83 projects supported the production and circulation of domestic travelling exhibitions and associated interpretive material; 21 projects focused on preserving and presenting Aboriginal cultural heritage; and 72 projects helped museums adopt sound professional policies and practices and heritage service organizations develop resources or services for multiple museums. Total funding provided by the Museums Assistance Program is estimated at $6.1 million.

  • Through the Young Canada Works in Heritage organizations Program, 1,858 summer students and graduate interns found work in heritage organizations in 2008-2009, which represents an increase of 203 summer jobs for youth over last year.

Program Activity: Sustainability of cultural expression and participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - -  
Total Contributions 0.5 0.5 - - 0.5 (0.5)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4



Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 1.6 1.2 2.5 2.5 2.0 0.5
Total Contributions 4.7 4.3 4.1 4.1 3.5 0.6
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7



Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 3.0 6.6 7.8 7.8 7.9 (0.1)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $0.5M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Young Canada Works Initiative was completed in December 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-03/2008-3-eng.pdf.

An internal audit of the Museum Assistance Program is planned for 2009-2010.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.

An internal audit of the Heritage Policies and Programs Branch is planned for 2011-2012.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.


Cultural Affairs Sector


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Arts Presentation Canada

Start date: 2001-2002

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The program supports arts presenters in the performing arts, arts festivals and their service organizations to help them strengthen their presentation practices by encouraging diverse programming, organizing audience development, diversification and outreach activities, developing initiatives that bring professional artists into contact with residents of their community, and supporting networking and professional development for presenters. It also supports the emergence of presenters and presenter networks for under-served communities or artistic practices. Its objective is to give Canadians direct access to a diversity of artistic experiences.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

  • In 2008-2009, the program provided funding to 278 festivals (46%), 225 performing arts series presenters (38%), 67 organizations presenting both a series and a festival (11%), and 29 presenter support organizations (5%).

  • Arts Presentation Canada (APC) increased access for Canadians to a greater variety of arts experiences. Funded organizations presented a variety of work: music (73% of all funded organizations present some music in their season); dance (48%); theatre (45%); visual arts (26%); literature (15%); and media arts (15%).

  • A 2008 survey of audience members attending APC-funded music presentations provided further evidence of the program's impact with regards to increased variety. Respondents perceived an increase in the number of performances featuring new musicals styles, artists from a variety of geographical and cultural backgrounds and younger/emerging musicians.  Increased programming variety, along with attendance at outreach activities--those that are supported to help audiences get the most out of the work they are seeing--were also noted as improving the likelihood of participants returning to the event in subsequent years.

  • The program has helped organizations expand and diversify their audiences. The percentages of funded organizations that reach out to the following audiences are: 67%--culturally diverse, 72%--young audiences, 32%--Aboriginals, 39%--rural/remote regions and 37%--official language minorities.

  • Over the past three years, APC has contributed annual funding to presenters in nearly 240 communities, of which 60% are rural or remote. It is estimated that these arts organizations coordinate outreach activities and programming in over 450 communities.

  • In addition to helping increase the variety of artistic experiences offered to Canadians, the 2008 Summative Evaluation revealed that APC-funded organizations and events provided economic development spin-off opportunities within their local economy, inspired innovative partnerships and helped create a better quality of life through revitalized and energized communities. For example, the Stan Rogers Folk Festival is located in Canso, Nova Scotia, a coastal fishing community of fewer than 1,000 residents that suffered significant hardship due to the collapse of the Atlantic ground fishery. The festival has changed the landscape of Canso to accommodate the thousands of visitors who swell the town's population to more than four times its normal size at festival time.

Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - 3.1 10.5 10.5 5.8 4.7
Total Contributions 22.1 20.2 17.9 17.3 24.1 (6.2)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($1.5M) is explained as follows:

  • Transfers from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.

This planned audit is a branch audit and not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Book Publishing Industry Development Program

Start date: 1980-1981

End date: 2010-2011

Description:

The Book Publishing Industry Development Program (BPIDP) supports the activities of Canadian book publishers and other sectors of the book industry in order to ensure choice of and access to Canadian-authored books, which reflect Canada's cultural diversity and linguistic duality both at home and abroad. The BPIDP aims to meet that objective by fostering a strong, viable Canadian book industry that publishes and promotes Canadian-authored books.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

In 2008-2009, BPIDP helped to further the Department's goal of supporting the creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural expression through contributions to over 300 organizations in the Canadian book industry for publishing, marketing, professional development, internships, technology-driven collective projects and other activities.

This investment helped contribute to:

  • A strong, representative domestic book industry: BPIDP continues to support a broad range of industry activities across the country, including 235 Canadian-owned publishers in more than 75 Canadian towns and cities who directly employ over 3,000 Canadians.

  • A diverse range of Canadian-authored content created: publishers supported by BPIDP in 2008-2009 produced 5,325 new titles by more than 3,500 Canadian writers, including nearly 1,000 first-time authors.

  • Readers accessing Canadian content: publishers realized $350 million in book sales in Canada and $103 million in export sales for a total of $453 million. This represents a 6% inflation-adjusted increase over the last five years, indicating that Canadian and international readers continue to seek out and consume Canadian books in strong and growing numbers.

Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 26.2 27.1 27.0 27.0 26.5 0.5
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)



Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 7.7 2.9 4.0 3.0 3.0 1.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4



Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 3.0 6.9 6.7 6.7 6.7 -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $1.5M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Book Publishing Industry Development Program was completed in June 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-02/2008-02-eng.pdf.

An internal audit of the Book Publishing Industry Development Program is planned for 2013-2014.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Magazine Fund

Start date: 1999-2000

End date: 2010-2011

Description:

The Canada Magazine Fund (CMF) supports Canadian magazine publishers and not-for-profit organizations representing periodical publishers to: maintain Canadian editorial content in Canadian magazines, increase Canadians' access to Canadian magazines; enhance the quality and diversity of Canadian magazines; and strengthen the infrastructure of the Canadian magazine industry. The fund achieves these goals by providing formula funding for magazines to support and enhance their editorial content, supporting business development projects for small magazine publishers, and helping the development of the periodical industry as a whole.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

In 2008-2009, the CMF contributed $10.5 million to the Department's goal of supporting the creation of Canadian cultural content and almost $3.2 million to support the sustainability of cultural expression.

The CMF helped contribute to:

  • Strengthened industry infrastructure and capacity: in 2008-2009, the CMF provided funding to 75 projects that dealt with professional development, promotion and marketing, newsstand sales building, research and technology development. These projects helped individual publishers grow their business and improve their capacity, and also supported association-based projects that contribute to the long-term viability of the Canadian periodicals industry.

  • A diverse range of Canadian-authored content created: publishers supported by the Support for Editorial Component in 2008-2009 produced approximately 113,000 pages of Canadian content in 196 titles.

Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 11.0 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.5 0.2
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)



Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 4.6 3.9 4.7 4.7 3.8 0.9
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $1.1M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Canada Magazine Fund program is planned for 2012-2013.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.

An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Music Fund

Start date: 2001-2002

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The Canada Music Fund offers a comprehensive range of both innovative and proven funding components designed to support diversity, capacity and excellence in the music industry at every level, from creators to audiences. Activities supported include song-writing development, demo and CD production, video and musical DVD production, marketing, touring, distribution, public awareness, industry training, workshops, conferences, awards shows, showcasing, archiving, preservation, providing access and industry infrastructure development.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

The Canadian music industry has experienced sharp declines in sales this decade, largely due to the Internet and rapidly changing consumer behaviour.

Despite this decline, Canadians continue to purchase and access more Canadian music. Since the inception of the CMF, the market share of Canadian artist albums sold in Canada increased from 16.0% in 2001 to 26.5% in 2007, with the market share of artists who received federal support at some point in their careers jumping from 6.1% to 13%1.

In 2008-2009, the CMF continued to support the production of and access to a diverse range of Canadian music:

  • Production support was provided to over 350 albums by Canadian artists through the New Musical Works (NMW) and Canadian Musical Diversity components.

  • Over 900 projects received marketing, touring or showcasing funding through NMW.

  • The 22 recipients of the 2008-2009 Music Entrepreneur Component (MEC)--Aid to Canadian Sound Recording Firms released 144 albums by Canadian artists in the past year.

  • MEC funding continues to assist established Canadian sound recording firms in the transition to the Internet and the development of international markets:
    • While MEC recipients' CD sales declined 24% over the previous year, their full-length album download and single track sales increased by 31% and 91% respectively;

    • Digital sales now represent over 22% of MEC recipients' total sales, up from 6% in 2005-2006; and

    • 28% of all CD sales by MEC recipients are garnered internationally, up from 22% in 2005-2006.

1 PCH manipulation of Nielsen SoundScan top 2000 charts


Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 11.5 10.8 9.1 9.1 11.6 (2.5)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)



Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 9.4 10.3 11.5 11.5 10.4 1.1
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4



Program Activity: Preservation of Canada's Heritage
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 20.5 19.8 18.6 18.7 18.3 0.3



Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 2.1 2.4 1.8 2.3 2.8 (1.0)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($2.4M) is explained as follows:

  • Transfers from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada New Media Fund

Start date: 2000-2001

End date: 2008-2009

Description:

The Canada New Media Fund (CNMF) administered by Telefilm Canada supports the development, production, marketing and distribution of high-quality, original, interactive, Canadian new media cultural products in both official languages that are intended for the general public.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

Canadian Heritage transferred $14.5 million to Telefilm Canada for the CNMF, of which $12.3 million supported 147 projects.

  • $11.6 million supported 123 content creation projects (Product Assistance component).

  • $0.7 million supported 24 projects that facilitated the competitiveness of the Canada interactive media sector (Sectoral Assistance component).

The CNMF supported a broad range of products that attract different types and sizes of audiences.

Results are available for those products and websites that were completed in 2008-2009.

Through various digital platforms, Canadians have access to more innovative interactive products developed by Canadian companies. Some of these products have attracted broad audiences, particularly those associated with television programming. Examples include:

  • Cornemuse.com, created by Telefiction Productions,provides a bilingual magic and stimulating environment where 3- to 5-year-old children can develop relationships with their favourite characters by playing games that are educational and highly interactive. Its average hits per month were 9.7 million in 2008-2009.

  • Aces of the Galaxy, produced by Artech, received an 8/10 rating from OXM, the official Xbox 360 magazine in the UK.

A majority of the projects reported more modest traffic statistics, which can be expected from websites that often target niche audiences, such as Se donner le mot produced by ECP Nouveaux médias inc. The interactive website offers a total of 20 hours of interactive games, animated by two famous Quebec humorists. This website received 652,000 visits from October to December 2008.

The CNMF Sectoral Assistance component supports activities designed to increase the competitiveness of the Canadian interactive media sector. These activities gave interactive media companies access to workshops, internships, conferences and other networking events. For example, The Great Canadian Video Game Competition was a pilot Telefilm initiative to elevate the commercial profile of Canadian-owned gaming companies and help the industry grow.

The program was a resounding success. Created with industry support and input, the Competition was a first-of-its-kind initiative that took place in three rounds that mirrored traditional industry financing. In September 2008 the final winner was announced: MindHabits (Montréal, QC) received up to half a million dollars from Telefilm--and each public dollar was matched by private investors. Since its PC launch, the stress-relief game Trainer has received international accolades from the Wall Street Journal, the National Review of Medicine, and the Scientist. The game is available in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and Russian. The PC Retail and Nintendo DS Versions are expected on the market soon and MindHabits has already secured international distribution deals.


Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 14.0 11.5 14.2 14.2 14.5 (0.3)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($0.3M) is explained as follows:

  • Transfers from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Canada New Media Fund Program is planned for 2012-2013.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program

Start date: 2001-2002

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program (CAHSP) is designed to strengthen organizational effectiveness, build operational and financial capacity within the arts and heritage sectors, and ensure that those organizations operate in communities that value their existence, see them as key assets, and support them. There are six components: Stabilization Projects, Capacity Building, Endowment Incentives, Limited Support to Endangered Arts Organizations, Networking, and Cultural Capitals of Canada.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

Enhanced long-term sustainability of Canadian arts and heritage organizations in communities. This helped achieve the Department's strategic outcome in that Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad.

As a result of the departmental participation in the 2008 Strategic Review Exercise, it was determined that the Stabilization component will not be renewed as of 2009-2010, and the budgets for the Capacity Building and Limited Support to Endangered Arts Organizations components have been reduced for 2009-2010. 

The 2008-2009 Summative Evaluation did, however, provide evidence of an ongoing need for a program such as CAHSP to help organizations to improve their effectiveness and management and to identify funding sources to enable them to face new challenges. Developing the organizational health of these organizations requires additional effort and continuous attention.

Capacity Building
In 2008-2009, the Capacity Building component of the CAHSP provided support totalling $5,023,473 to 156 projects--104 of which were with arts organizations and 52 with heritage organizations. Types of projects supported included business, strategic and human resources plans, new financing and ticketing systems, employee training and audience development strategies.

Endowment Incentives
In 2008-2009, 80 applications received funding totalling $14.8 million. The matching incentive of the Department was $0.72 for every dollar donated by the private sector. The Endowment Incentives component saw decreases from the previous year of 18% in the number of applications and 25% in donations received. The global economic downturn may explain these declines. However, the number of funding applications from provinces where a similar incentive program is available remains generally higher. Since the launch of the component, the federal government's contribution of $88.6 million has leveraged $123.6 million in donations from the private sector, for a total of $212.5 million invested in arts organizations' endowment funds. In addition, the results of the Summative Evaluation confirm the program's importance for its ability to attract private donations and diversify the organizations' funding sources.

Cultural Capitals of Canada (CCC)
In 2008-2009, five communities were designated Cultural Capitals of Canada (CCC); total contributions approved amounted to $4.25 million. Since 2002-2003, there have been a total of 140 eligible applications to the program and 34 CCC designations have been awarded, for a total of $21 million.

A Summative Evaluation was completed in 2008-2009 to assess the relevance and impact of CCC. The evaluation confirmed the findings of the 2007-2008 survey in terms of the positive impact CCC designations have had on communities, including the manner in which these designations brought together many stakeholders who had not previously worked together.

Findings of the evaluation also confirmed CCC's positive impact in terms of incorporating culture into municipal planning and strengthening relationships between local municipal governments and arts and heritage organizations.

Networking Initiatives Component
The total funding approved through the Networking Initiatives component of CAHSP amounted to $258,819 (Creative City Network and Les Arts et la Ville) during the 2008-2009 fiscal year.

A Summative Evaluation included the Networking Initiatives component and confirmed its success in supporting local cultural involvement.

In 2008-2009, both networks continued to provide members with the support and resources required to further municipal involvement and investment in cultural development.


Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 15.4 16.3 16.9 16.9 15.9 1.0
Total Contributions 4.9 3.8 5.3 5.3 3.5 1.8
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4



Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 3.2 5.7 4.9 4.9 4.9 -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7



Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 0.2 - - - - -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $2.8M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Culture Online Program

Start date: 2001-2002

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

Canadian Culture Online Program (CCOP) includes three sub-components: Access and Content, Research and Development, and New Media Sector Development. The objectives of the program are to provide Canadians access to and participation in interactive digital resources that reflect our diverse heritage, cultures, languages, and history, and to ensure that the program contributes to a supportive environment for the new media sector in Canada.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

In 2008-2009, the CCOP provided $12.1 million in funding for 54 projects, including:

  • $9 million in support of 49 access and content creation projects (Gateway Fund and Partnerships Fund) that allow Canadians of all ages to access content that reflects our diverse cultures and heritage; and

  • $3.1 million in support of five research and development projects and initiatives (New Media Research Networks Fund and New Media R&D Initiative) that are developing leading-edge technological tools to create, manage, and distribute Canadian digital cultural content.

The CCOP supported a broad range of projects in both official languages, all of which attract different audiences.

The following results are for websites and research projects completed in 2008-2009.

The trilingual online magazine Bulgarian-Canadian Culture Synergy is a virtual multidisciplinary art centre that features and promotes Canadian talent of Bulgarian origin and enables artists to connect with both Canadian and international audiences. Since its launch in October 2008, it has had over 3,000 visits per month.

Inland Journey--A Cultural Journey Between the Squamish to Lil'wat Nations is an online exhibition that showcases objects, photographs, audio and video relevant to the history of the Squamish and Lil'Wat Nations. This online exhibition will be a world-class offering of the Squamish Lil'Wat Cultural Centre in Whistler, BC--a hallmark attraction at the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.

Support for interactive media research and development projects helped create a stimulating environment conducive to creating and distributing even more dynamic cultural content. Thematic research networks and partnerships have brought 28 Canadian research institutions and interactive media organizations to collaborate on developing 26 innovative tools.

Note: Resources allocated for New Media Sector Development were transferred to Telefilm Canada in 2008-2009. For results, see Sectoral Assistance component in Table 3: Details of Transfer Payment Programs: Canada New Media Fund.


Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 0.6 - 0.8 0.8 - 0.8
Total Contributions 5.0 3.6 4.5 4.0 4.1 0.4
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4



Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 9.5 7.5 6.1 8.1 9.0 (2.9)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($1.7M) is explained as follows:

  • Transfers from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

As per the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan, there are currently no planned audits related to this program; however, the audit plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution in Support of the Canadian Television Fund

Start date: 1996-1997

End date: 2008-2009

Description:

The Canadian Television Fund (CTF) supports the creation and broadcast of high-quality prime-time Canadian programs in both official languages and in Aboriginal languages, and builds audiences for these programs. The CTF supports dramas, youth and children's programs, documentaries, variety shows, and performing arts. It also supports Aboriginal and Francophone productions in minority situations.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

In 2008-2009, the CTF invested over $275 million in Canadian productions, which generated over 2,000 hew hours of Canadian programming*. Since its inception in 1996, the CTF has invested more than $2.7 billion, which generated the production of 27,000 hours of Canadian programs.

* Data is not final until the release of the CTF annual report (Summer 2009).


Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

  • No variance

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Canadian Television Fund Program is planned for 2012-2013. The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.

An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cultural Spaces Canada

Start date: 2001-2002

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The program supports the construction, renovation and improvement of not-for-profit facilities dedicated to arts and heritage. As a complement to other infrastructure programs such as the "Building Canada Fund", Cultural Spaces Canada specifically contributes to the improvement of the physical conditions that foster creativity and artistic innovation.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

Since its inception in 2001-2002, the Cultural Spaces Canada (CSC) program has supported over 728 projects in more than 257 communities across Canada through contributions totalling $212,019,236. In 2008-2009, the CSC program contributed to 93 infrastructure improvement projects across the country and committed $30,144,357. These included funding to 41 construction and major renovation projects; 49 projects devoted specifically to the purchase and installation of specialized equipment; and three projects assisting organizations with the costs of a feasibility study for the creation or renovation of an arts or heritage facility.

These projects improve infrastructure to allow for greater creativity, access and artistic innovation. For instance, a $700,000 contribution from CSC was approved in 2008-2009 for significant renovations and equipment purchases for Montreal's "Les Ateliers créatifs Centre-Sud" to convert a former industrial building into high-quality spaces available for rent by artists and cultural organizations. This project ensures that artists and cultural organizations are able to maintain their presence in a central area of Montreal already recognized as a creative district. In addition, the project created spaces suited to the specific needs of professional artists from different disciplines (i.e., visual arts, media arts) and paid special attention to emerging artists as well as artists from culturally diverse communities.

Also in 2008-2009, assistance was provided to the Yukon Arts Centre, a key arts organization in the Yukon. CSC contributed $57,700 toward the purchase of a state-of-the-art digital audio mixing console, new amplifiers and high-quality video playback equipment. This will allow the Yukon Arts Centre to present larger ensembles, improve the quality of its sound and support touring artists and groups with sophisticated technical requirements who would not otherwise be able perform at this facility. Video components will allow the Yukon Arts Centre to exhibit installations using video by senior Canadian artists and by emerging, young and Aboriginal artists, giving audiences access to those experiences.


Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 0.3 0.4 4.1 3.0 0.5 3.6
Total Contributions 19.8 22.9 27.4 26.3 28.7 (1.3)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $2.3M is explained as follows:

  • $1.0M was included in CSC's planned spending and should have been included in the Building Communities through Arts and Heritage Program.

  • A re-profile of $1.3M to future years has been requested (approval pending).

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Arts Training Contribution Program

Start date: 1997-1998

End date: 2012-2013

Description:

The National Arts Training Contribution Program (NATCP) is designed to assist independent Canadian not-for-profit organizations that specialize in training Canadians who seek a professional career in the arts.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

  • Since the inception of the program, from 1997-1998 through 2008-2009 the NATCP has disbursed a total of $164M in operating funding to national training schools in various artistic disciplines. In 2008-2009, $18.4M in funding was provided to 37 organizations in a wide variety of artistic disciplines.

  • A Summative Evaluation of the Program completed in May 2007 found a need for continued federal support in national arts training, and that the Program is meeting its overall objective to provide arts training of the highest calibre. The evaluation also found that the NATCP has an "invaluable" and "significant" impact on Canadians' access to high-quality artistic and cultural products. This speaks to the Program's ultimate outcome: that Canadians and the world benefit from high-quality artistic achievements by Canadian artists trained in Canada.

  • Key results for NATCP are that graduates of funded institutions have professional careers and are recognized for their excellence in Canada and internationally. Annual surveys of these institutions show that there are approximately 1,200 graduates per year--with another 2,200 participating in shorter-term workshops--and 80% are working professionally (of whom 20% also work internationally). The surveys show that nearly 50% of graduates of NATCP-funded institutions receive an award in their first three years after graduation; the Summative Evaluation revealed that they are more likely to receive honours, distinctions and awards than graduates of unfunded institutions.

  • The 2007 Summative Evaluation also found that NATCP graduates are more likely to earn a living wholly by the practice of their art within three years, compared to their peers from unfunded schools, who are more likely to seek work not related to their art.

  • Results of a preliminary 2009 public opinion research survey revealed that the majority of professional Canadian performing arts organizations surveyed had hired individuals from at least one NATCP-funded institution in the last five years, and that graduates of NATCP-funded performing arts programs were highly assessed by employers in all aspects of their training. The highest ratings came in the areas of technical expertise in their discipline (89%), professionalism and career readiness (88%), and performance qualifications and experience (87%). The results of the survey will be only available in 2009--2010. The research confirmed that NATCP-funded training institutions are recognized by Canadian performing arts employers as being among the leaders in their field.

Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 17.0 19.4 16.7 16.7 18.4 (1.7)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($1.7M) is explained as follows:

  • Transfers from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the National Arts and Training Contribution Program was completed in February 2009: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2009/2009-01/2009-01-eng.pdf.

An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Publication Assistance Program

Start date: 1996-1997

End date: 2009-2010

Description:

The Publication Assistance Program (PAP) is delivered in partnership with the Canada Post Corporation and decreases costs to eligible Canadian periodicals of mailing copies to Canadian readers. Assistance is provided to more than 800 publishers of almost 1,200 different Canadian periodicals, supporting the delivery of 210 million eligible copies of periodicals. These include: general or special-interest paid circulation magazines, non-daily community newspapers, unpaid request circulation periodicals, and religious, scholarly, Aboriginal, ethno-cultural, farm, and official language minority periodicals.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

In 2008-2009, the PAP contributed to the Department's goal to improve accessibility to Canadian cultural works by providing postal subsidies to 1,130 Canadian magazines and non-daily newspapers. These grants totalled over $59 million, of which Canada Post contributed $13.6M, representing an average of about 65% of the recipients' total mailing costs. This investment supported the distribution of over 183 million copies of periodicals to Canadians.


Program Activity: Access to Canada's Culture
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 -
Total Contributions - - - - - -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 115.1 123.5 136.0 135.7 135.3 0.7
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

  • No variance

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Publications Assistance Program is planned for 2009-2010.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.

An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.


International and Intergovernmental Affairs Sector


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Athlete Assistance Program

Start date: 1971

End date: 2010-2011

Description:

The Athlete Assistance Program (AAP) contributes to the pursuit of excellence through its support for improved Canadian athlete performances at major international sporting events, enabling athletes to combine their sport and academic or working careers while training intensively in pursuit of world-class performances. To this end, the Program identifies and supports athletes already at or having the potential to be in the top 16 in the world in their sport.

The Program has three specific objectives:

  • To financially support Canadian athletes identified by National Sport Organizations through criteria established by Sport Canada as performing at or having the greatest potential to achieve top 16 results at Olympic/Paralympic Games and World Championships;

  • To assist Canada's carded athletes* in preparing to engage in full- or part-time career activities;

  • To enable Canada's carded athletes to participate in year-round national training and competition regimes to further their athletic goals.

*Athletes who are approved for funding and are financially supported through the AAP are referred to as "carded" athletes. AAP support is referred to as "carding."

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

  • Sport Canada supported the continued meaningful offset of incremental costs of training and competition for Canada's carded athletes. In 2008-2009, Sport Canada provided over $26,5M in AAP grants and funded over 1,770 carded athletes.

  • Sport Canada continued to provide Canada's carded athletes opportunities to prepare for future career activities, through access to education and training. In 2008-2009, Sport Canada provided tuition support for 662 current and former carded athletes.

  • Sport Canada has contributed to the opportunity for an increased number of athletes to advance through the carding system. In 2008-2009, 293 (16.6%) athletes progressed to or maintained the international standard of the carding system. In 2007-2008, this number was 310 (17.7%). This variance of 1% is not significant and reflects a stable situation.

  • Sport Canada worked to improve performance of Canadian athletes at the highest level of competition. In summer sports, Canada ranked 16th in the world based on 59 medals won during the rolling four-year period of 2005-2008. This compares with 53 medals won from 2004-2007, a 17th place ranking. For winter sports, Canada ranked 2nd in the world based on 101 medals won during the rolling four-year period of 2005-2008. This compares with 94 medals won during the 2004-2007 period--also a 2nd place ranking*. In the case of Paralympic sports, World Championships are generally held only once every four years, in even-numbered years between Paralympic Games. Thus, as 2008 was primarily a non-World Championship year for Paralympic sports, no international ranking was conducted.

* Data based on Sport Canada's Annual Olympic Ranking Index of Nations. The Index is based on results per nation across all Olympic events at Olympic Games and World Championships, over a four-year time frame. The Index is produced annually at the end of each calendar year, once the Olympic Games and/or World Championships of that year have been completed. Results are aggregated with those of the three previous years to produce a comprehensive four-year cycle of results across all Olympic events. For summer sports, this represents approximately 1,000 events over a four-year period; for winter sports, almost 300 events.


Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 25.3 25.3 26.7 26.7 26.5 0.2
Total Contributions - - - - - -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $0.2M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Sport Canada Branch is planned for 2009-2010 and again in 2013-2014.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Hosting Program

Start date: 1967

End date: 2010-2011

Description:

The Hosting Program aims to enhance the development of sport excellence and the international profile of sport organizations by assisting sport organizations to host the Canada Games and international sport events in Canada. These events are expected to produce significant sport, economic, social and cultural benefits.

The Program offers Canada at-large a planned and coordinated approach to realizing direct and significant benefits from bidding and hosting projects in the areas of sport development in terms of economic, social, cultural and community impacts, across a broad range of government priorities.

The objectives of the Program are to:

  • Strengthen the sport excellence and sport development impacts of bidding and hosting the Canada Games and targeted international sport events;

  • Increase access and equity for designated under-represented groups through contributions to international bidding and hosting events; and

  • Strengthen the associated economic, social, cultural and community impacts of supported bidding and hosting projects, in keeping with the Government of Canada interests and priorities.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

  • Sport Canada worked to increase sport excellence and development impacts from realized planned events. Based on the first 47 reports received (of 64), the Hosting Program has provided opportunities for 2,692 Canadian athletes to participate in international sport events. In 2007-2008, this number was 847.

  • Sport Canada worked to increase opportunities for Aboriginal Peoples and athletes with a disability to participate in planned events. Based on the first 47 reports (of 64), the Hosting Program has provided opportunities for 729 Canadian athletes with a disability to participate in international sport events. In 2007-2008, this number was 397.

  • Sport Canada worked to increase economic, social, and cultural and community impacts supporting Government of Canada priorities from realized planned events. As an example, the 2008 Arctic Winter Games, to which Sport Canada contributed $400K, generated approximately $13M in economic activity for the Northwest Territories, of which $10.3M occurred in Yellowknife. These expenditures generated $3.7M in wages and salaries in the Territory through the support of 59 jobs, of which 49 were in Yellowknife. The total net economic activity (GDP) generated by the event was $4.9M through the Territory, with $3.5M occurring in Yellowknife.

  • Also, Sport Canada contributed $3.5M to the 2008 North American Indigenous Games, which attracted more than 12,000 athletes, cultural participants and spectators to the Cowichan Valley, spending a combined total of $5.5M. This spending, in combination with the operational expenditures of the organizing committee and others--which totalled $9.9M--resulted in a net increase in economic activity of $18.1M throughout the Province, of which $10M occurred in the Cowichan Valley. The total economic activity supported by the event was $34.3M, supporting $12.7M in wages and salaries throughout the Province. In the Cowichan Valley, a total $8.3M in wages and salaries and 254 jobs were supported by the event. Note that Sport Canada contributed an additional $0.9M for the transportation needs of Aboriginal athletes attending the Games.

(Source: Canadian Sport Tourism Alliance)


Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 20.3 8.9 16.8 16.8 12.5 4.3
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)



Program Activity:Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 106.2 108.7 57.5 61.1 29.8 27.7
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4



Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 1.2 1.0 1.0 2.2 (1.2)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $30.8M is explained as follows:

  • $1.9M was transferred to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

  • Re-profile of funds to 2009-2010 in the amount of $17.5M.

  • A re-profile of $11.4M to future years has been requested (approval pending).

Audit completed or planned:

An internal program audit of the Sport Hosting Program is planned for 2009-2010.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.

An internal branch audit of the Sports Canada Branch is planned for 2009-2010 and again in 2013-2014.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sport Support Program

Start date: 1961

End date: 2010-2011

Description:

The Sport Support Program is the primary funding vehicle for initiatives associated with the delivery of the Canadian Sport Policy. Funding is aimed at: developing athletes and coaches at the highest international levels; providing sound technically based sport programming for all athletes; increasing the number of Canadians from all segments of society involved in sport; and advancing Canadian interests and values in Canada and abroad. This funding is provided to eligible organizations in support of programming that supports the goals of the Canadian Sport Policy.

The specific objectives of the Program are to:

  • Increase the opportunities to participate in quality sport activities for all Canadians, including under-represented groups;

  • Increase the capacity of the Canadian sport system to systematically achieve world-class results at the highest international competitions;

  • Contribute to the provision of technical sport leadership within the Canadian sport system; and

  • Advance Canadian interests, values and ethics in sport at home and abroad.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

  • Sport Canada continued to provide sport programs and services to the Canadian sport system by supporting National Sport Organizations (NSOs) and Multisport Service Organizations (MSOs).  In 2008-2009, Sport Canada supported 56 NSOs, 15 MSOs, seven Canadian Sport Centres and seven other non-governmental organizations.

  • Sport Canada worked to increase opportunities for sport participation among all Canadians, including targeted under-represented groups. Sport Canada funded Sport Participation Development Initiatives - for persons with and without a disability - for 44 NSOs and 3 MSOs. Sport Canada funded Sport Participation Projects for five MSOs, one of which included an aboriginal project, and five other non-government organizations. In addition, Sport Canada negotiated bilateral agreements on a matching-funds basis with all 13 provincial/territorial governments to advance the goals of the Canadian Sport Policy.  These agreements support grassroots projects to improve sport participation opportunities for children and youth, Aboriginal Peoples and under-represented groups.  Agreements in place in 2008-09 included 13 "Generic" agreements, 12 Aboriginal sport agreements and 11 agreements to support team travel to the North American Indigenous Games (NAIG). In total, Sport Canada provided $6M in funding for the Generic, Aboriginal and NAIG team travel bilateral agreements.

  • A revised set of national accountability standards for 2006-2012 was introduced in 2006-2007, and NSOs receiving Sport Canada funding will be monitored annually with respect to their compliance with these standards. The "first priority" standards that were expected to be fully met A revised set of national accountability standards for 2006-2012 was introduced in 2006-2007 and NSOs receiving Sport Canada funding will be monitored annually with respect to their compliance with these standards. The "first priority" standards which were expected to be fully met by the end of the 2007-08 fiscal year address the following subjects: multi-year planning; official languages services; bilingual website; harassment and abuse; bilingual communication with national teams; national teams - harassment and abuse awareness; and national teams - athlete/coach leadership.  In 2006-2007, the first year of monitoring, 93% of NSOs had at least partially met all seven "first priority" standards, while 51% of NSOs had fully met at least five of those seven standards. In 2007-08, the second year of monitoring, 99% of 45 NSOs had at least partially met all seven "first priority" standards and 88% had fully met at least five of the seven standards. In 2008-2009, 55 of 56 NSOs had at least partially met all seven "first priority" standards and 47 of 56 had fully met at least five of the seven standards.

  • Sport Canada has worked to increase the number of NSOs with a sport-specific Long-Term Athlete Development Model in place. There are now 28 NSOs that have completed their Model. This is up from 2005-06 when only one NSO had completed their LTAD model and 2007-2008 when 12 where completed.

  • Sport Canada worked with partners to increase the number of NSOs that have implemented the revised National Coaching Certification Program (NCCP).  In 2008-2009, 14 NSOs were in conditional approvals and 13 in final approvals in the implementation of the new NCCP level. There are now 64 NSOs that have implemented a new NCCP level. Sport Canada worked with partners to increase the number of coaches participating in the NCCP. Between April 1 and August 31, 2008, 40,265 coaches participated in one of the 2,990 NCCP workshops.

  • Sport Canada worked to advance Canadian interests, values and ethics in sport at home and abroad. In 2008-2009, 3,951 doping tests were conducted by the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport. Some 2,878 of those tests were conducted by CCES as part of the Canadian Anti-Doping Program. In 2008-2009, 17 Canadian athletes were sanctioned for anti-doping violations.

  • Sport Canada worked to further expand and strengthen program and policy collaboration within the federal government and with P/T governments and the sport community. In 2008-2009, Sport Canada continued its multi-year bilateral agreements with all 13 provincial/territorial governments to increase sport participation levels as expressed in the Canadian Sport Policy. Furthermore, two additional F-P/T bilateral agreements were negotiated, bringing the number of agreements in place to 12 that encourage and support greater participation of Aboriginal Peoples in sport. In a new initiative, 11 F-P/T bilateral agreements were signed to provide travel support for teams participating in the 2008 North American Indigenous Games.

Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 92.6 90.0 86.9 94.9 96.2 (9.3)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 320.8 304.1 311.4 319.4 318.2 (6.8)



Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 1.4 0.9 - - 1.1 (1.1)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4



Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 12.3 14.6 13.7 14.6 -
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($10.4M) is explained as follows:

  • $2.4M was transferred from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

  • $8.0M was received through 2008-2009 Supplementary Estimates (B) and was not included in the planned spending.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of the Sport Canada Branch is planned for 2009-2010 and again in 2013-2014.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: TV5

Start date: 1990-1991

End date: 2012-2013

Description:

Contribute to the international profile of Canadian French-language television programs by participating in TV5MONDE and providing Canadians with a window onto the international Francophonie by participating in TV5 Quebec-Canada.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.

Results Achieved:

  • The TV5 program achieves tangible results in: the promotion of Canadian cultural content on the TV5MONDE airwaves; contribution to the cultural expansion of the international Francophonie; Canadian audiovisual production; and Canadians' access to the international and Canadian Francophonie with TV5 Quebec Canada.

  • This year, there was a slight increase in the percentage of Canadian programming broadcast on TV5MONDE, rising from an average of about 6.8 % in 2007 to about 7.2% in 2008. This enables Canada to showcase Canadian programming on the international stage.

  • Programming broadcast over TV5 Quebec Canada includes a large component of programming from TV5's European and African partners that is not available over the Canadian French-language networks. Broadcasting these programs on TV5 Quebec Canada provides the Canadian public access to the international Francophonie, enhancing their awareness of its cultural diversity. The network must also broadcast a minimum of 15% of Canadian content. This has also helped enhance the profile of Canadian French-language television productions in Canada.

  • In February 2009, TV5 Quebec Canada also announced the establishment of Fonds TV5 to support digital creation--this will promote the production of French-language video vignettes intended for the new digital platforms. Up to $200,000 will be allocated to the funding and monitoring of projects. This initiative is designed to encourage emerging talent in new media production as well as Francophone culture throughout Canada, since 20% of the projects approved will originate outside Quebec.

Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 4.1 4.7 4.9 4.4 4.4 0.5
Total Contributions 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.6 (0.1)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 186.9 184.6 133.0 134.6 101.6 31.4
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of $0.4M is explained as follows:

  • Transfers to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

Audit completed or planned:

An internal audit of TV5 grants and contributions is planned for 2012-2013.

The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.

An internal audit of the International Affairs Branch is planned for 2011-2012.

This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.


Public and Regional Affairs Sector


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Celebration and Commemoration Program

Start date: 2003-2004

End date: 2012-2013

Description:

The Celebration and Commemoration Program is a theme-based, integrated, and dynamic approach to celebrating and commemorating Canada and Canadians. The program provides continuity and consistency across the diverse celebratory and commemorative activities initiated by federal partners and other orders of government every year. The Celebration and Commemoration Program includes two components:  Celebrate Canada! and Commemorate Canada!

The objectives of the Celebration and Commemoration Program are to:

  • Provide access to celebrations across Canada to enable all Canadians to appreciate Canada's cultural, ethnic, linguistic and geographic diversity;

  • Provide access to all Canadians to commemorations of national significance to recognize Canada's notable people, places, symbols, anniversaries and accomplishments;

  • Create opportunities for all Canadians to participate in national celebrations and commemorations that contribute to building pride and a sense of belonging to Canada.

Strategic Outcome:

  • Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.

Results Achieved:

  • Provision of financial support to over 1,600 projects across Canada and the participation of over 10 million people in more than 3,700 Celebrate Canada events across the country.

  • Participation of over 12,000 youth (aged 5-18) in the 2008 Canada Day Poster Challenge.

  • Development of a strategic alliance with the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Federal Secretariat to position the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games as a key theme for the 2009 Canada Day Poster Challenge.

  • Reconvening of the Interdepartmental Commemoration Committee and a renewal of strategic alliances with 28 federal government organizations, contributing to a more coordinated federal approach to the planning of major national commemorations.

  • Increased awareness by Canadians of the 400th anniversary of Québec City. Survey results indicate that 60% of Canadians were aware in March 2009 that 2008 was the 400th anniversary of Québec City, compared to 37% in June 2007. In addition, 84% of survey respondents indicated that the activities surrounding the celebration of this event improved their knowledge of Canadian history.

Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 2.1 2.2 5.4 6.2 3.6 1.8
Total Contributions 11.6 19.3 23.3 36.5 42.2 (18.9)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 149.7 133.6 174.1 187.0 178.6 (4.5)
Total TPP 1,150.3 1,117.9 1,121.9 1,144.7 1,102.0 19.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Overall variance of ($17.1M) is explained as follows:

  • Transfers in the amount of $4.8M from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.

  • Additional funding received through Supplementary Estimates in the amount of $12.3M.

Audit completed or planned:

As per the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan, there are currently no planned audits related to this program; however, the audit plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.

Top of Page

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Table 5: Transfer Payment Programs1

1. Grants for Research Projects and Personnel Support

Start date: October 2000

End date: N/A

Description:
CIHR provides a wide array of funding programs under this transfer payment program. This includes grants which provide support for the direct costs of health research projects and awards that provide support to individual health researchers and trainees. Infrastructure grants help create optimum environments for the conduct of health research. This includes funding for researcher networking and collaborative activities and grants to selected organizations such as the Canadian Council on Animal Care that facilitate the ethical conduct of research.

Strategic Outcomes:
1.0 Advances in Health Knowledge, 2.0 People and Research Capacity, 3.0 Knowledge Translation and Commercialization.

Results Achieved:

  1. CIHR grants helped maintain a strong and diverse health research base, programs continue to demonstrate strong application pressure and an increase in the average cost of research projects was accommodated through internal reallocation of funding.
  2. CIHR invested a significant portion of its grants budget to fund health research in areas of importance to Canadians, including funding clinical research, pandemic preparedness, HIV/AIDS, cancer, regenerative medicine and Hepatitis C.
  3. CIHR supported in excess of 13,000 researchers and trainees in all domains of health research.
  4. CIHR worked in partnership with small and medium enterprises as well as multi-national pharmaceutical companies to support pre-competitive R&D programs; CIHR provided Research Synthesis grants, which helped researchers translate research findings into new products and services or policies and procedures for the benefit of Canadians.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $ 776.6 $ 826.3 $ 849.3 $ 879.3 $ 879.0 $ 0.3
Total Contributions $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Other types of transfer payments $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Program Activity(ies) $ 776.6 $ 826.3 $ 849.3 $ 879.3 $ 879.0 $ 0.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between authorities and actual spending is not significant.

Audit completed or planned:

  1. Audit of the Financial Administration of Open Operating Grants. (Completed November 2008)
  2. Audit of the Non-Financial Administration of Open Operating Grants (Completed March 2009)
  3. Audit of Salary and Training Awards (Planned 2009-10)
  4. Audit of a Research-Related Activity Program (Planned 2011-12)

2. Canada Graduate Scholarships

Start date: 2003-04

End date: N/A

Description:
The Canada Graduate Scholarships (CGS) Program provides financial support to develop future researchers at both the Masters and Doctoral levels. The CGS is a tri-council program with CIHR responsible for administering that portion of the program that is directed at students pursuing health related studies.

Strategic Outcome: 2.0 People and Research Capacity

Results Achieved:
In 2008-09 CIHR funded over 900 outstanding Master's and Doctoral students through the CGS Program. With the creation of these awards in Budget 2003, and with recent additional investments in the CGS Master's and Doctoral awards in Budgets 2007 and 2009, the federal government has ensured that Canada can offer world-class support that will help to attract and retain the best research students in Canada.


Program Activities: 2.1 Researchers and Trainees
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $ 10.1 $ 13.9 $ 18.9 $ 19.2 $ 18.7 $ 0.5
Total Contributions $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Other types of transfer payments $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Program Activity(ies) $ 10.1 $ 13.9 $ 18.9 $ 19.2 $ 18.7 $ 0.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between authorities and actual spending is not significant.

Audit completed or planned: N/A

3. Institute Support Grants

Start date: October 2000

End date: N/A

Description:
The Institute Support Grant (ISG) Program provides funding to select Canadian academic institutions, including universities and teaching hospitals, to assist them in hosting the 13 Institutes of CIHR. The Institutes help CIHR maintain strong ties to Canada's research communities and to understand their needs. Each CIHR-appointed Institute Scientific Director is among the top scientists in his/her field and helps CIHR define its strategic health research priorities and develop research partnerships with other interested parties.

Strategic Outcome: 2.0 People and Research Capacity

Results Achieved:
In 2008-09 CIHR provided each of its 13 virtual Institutes with a $1M grant, paid to the Institutes' host institutions for the establishment and management of an Institute Office, from which the CIHR-appointed Scientific Director along with host institution-based staff plans and executes the operations and activities of their Institute. These activities include facilitating and developing national research networks linking the Institutes' respective research communities.

Program Activities: 2.3 National and International Partnerships


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ -
Total Contributions $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Other types of transfer payments $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Program Activity(ies) $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ 13.0 $ -

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned:
N/A


  1. the amounts only include grant programs where expenditures exceed $5 million
Top of Page

Canadian International Development Agency

Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-2007
Actual
Spending
2007-2008
Planned
Spending
2008-2009
Total Authorities
2008-2009
Actual Spending
2008-2009
Variance(s)
Countries of Concentration
Total Grants   205.56 191.40 172.74 172.68 18.72
Total Contributions   486.74 697.26 688.01 687.78 9.48
Total Other Types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 0.00 692.30 888.66 860.75 860.46 28.20
Fragile States and Countries Experiencing Humanitarian Crisis
Total Grants   473.81 488.88 697.10 696.86 -207.98
Total Contributions   96.72 71.94 126.66 126.63 -54.69
Total Other Types   110.00       0.00
Total Program Activity 0.00 680.53 560.82 823.76 823.49 (262.67)
Selected Countries and Regions
Total Grants   94.03 144.96 123.43 123.38 21.58
Total Contributions   279.73 375.69 254.42 251.24 124.45
Total Other Types            
Total Program Activity 0.00 373.76 520.65 377.85 374.62 146.03
Multilateral, International and Canadian Institutions
Total Grants   576.17 442.90 624.42 612.21 -169.31
Total Contributions   216.69 219.88 239.36 239.29 -19.41
Total Other Types   301.85 269.86 238.55 238.55 31.31
Total Program Activity 0.00 1,094.71 932.64 1,102.33 1,090.05 -157.41
Engaging Canadian Citizens
Total Grants   13.00 7.51 1.13 1.13 6.38
Total Contributions   31.58 53.96 19.86 19.65 34.31
Total Other Types            
Total Program Activity 0.00 44.58 61.47 20.99 20.78 40.69
Geographic Programs
Total Grants 545.11         0.00
Total Contributions 857.71         0.00
Total Other Types 40.00          
Total Program Activity 1,442.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multilateral Programs
Total Grants 673.49         0.00
Total Contributions 14.50         0.00
Total Other Types of TPs 358.28          
Total Program Activity 1,046.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Canadian Partnership
Total Grants 19.28         0.00
Total Contributions 228.75         0.00
Total Other Types            
Total Program Activity 248.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Policy Coherence
Total Grants 5.30         0.00
Total Contributions 8.95         0.00
Total Other Types            
Total Program Activity 14.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engaging Canadians
Total Grants 5.05         0.00
Total Contributions 21.58         0.00
Total Other Types            
Total Program Activity 26.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 2,778.00 2,885.88 2,964.24 3,185.68 3,169.40 205.16

CIDA grants, contributions and other transfer payments actual spending of $3,169 million accounts for 88.4% of CIDA's 2008-09 Total Actual Spending, excluding non-budgetary expenditures. The variance between the total Authorities and the Actual Spending is $16.3 million (2007-2008: $43 million): from the Grants and Contributions Budget, $1.2 million was not spent and a further $15.1 million represent Treasury Board frozen allotments.

Top of Page

Canadian Space Agency

3.3.6) Details on Transfer Payments Programs (TPPs)


Contribution to European Space Agency (ESA)

Start Date: January 1, 2000 End Date: December 31, 2009

Description:

Enhance Canadian industry's technological base and provide access to European markets for value added products and services in the field of Earth Observation (EO) and Telecommunications, allow the participation of Canadian academia and make possible the demonstration of Canadian space technologies in European Science and Exploration missions.

Strategic Outcome:

Canada's presence in space meets the needs of Canadians for scientific knowledge, space technology and information.

Expected Results (Program Activity Level)

Space Based Earth Observation:

The benefits of activities involved in Earth Observation from space serve Canadian users in the fields of environment, resource and land-use management, and security and sovereignty.

Space Science and Exploration:

Participation in Canadian and international missions expands the scientific knowledge base made available to Canadian academia and R&D communities in the areas of astronomy, space exploration and solar-terrestrial relations, as well as in physical and life sciences.

Satellite Communications:

State-of-the-art systems and applications are developed to satisfy the needs of the Canadian government and population in order to ensure that Canada remains a world leader in satellite communications.

Generic Space Activities in support of EO, SE and SC:

Canada's industrial technological capabilities can meet the needs of future space missions and activities.

Expected Accomplishments:

Successful development and demonstration of advanced technologies, systems, components, or studies provided for in the contracts awarded by ESA to Canadian firms under the following EO programs: EOEP, GMES Service Element, and GMES Space Component.

Successful development and demonstration of advanced technologies, systems, components, or studies provided for in the contracts awarded by ESA to Canadian firms under the following Telecommunications programs: ARTES 1, 3, 4, 5, 8 and GalileoSat.

Growing utilization of data obtained from ESA on markets and Earth Observation and Telecommunications technologies as strategic information for government departments, agencies and industries in Canada.

Demonstration of space-qualified technologies and products developed by Canadian firms for the space exploration markets via our participation to Europe's space exploration program Aurora.

Development of new alliances and/or strengthening of established alliances between Canadian and European companies, to diversify Canada's international space partnerships and complement its long-standing relationship with the U.S.

Actual Accomplishments:

Several technologies and skills have been developed and improved through the participation of Canadian companies in ESA programs. Some businesses have integrated these technologies into products, allowing them to sell these products in other than European markets. In addition to generating revenues, the development and improvement of space technologies also created or maintained specialized jobs. In addition, specialized skills were created in the areas of space hardware, ground segment, and space technology applications.

The program served to boost the visibility of Canada in European markets. Canadian contractors see the ESA Contribution program as a means of cultivating business relationships. The program also fosters regional development and access to other markets by virtue of the successes of companies in Europe. Furthermore, Canada expanded its knowledge and technology in fields such as weather and ice movement forecasting, Earth Observation data, satellite communications technologies, environmental monitoring and security.



($ in millions)

Actual Spending 2006-2007

Actual Spending 2007-2008

Planned Spending 2008-2009

Total Authorities 2008-2009

Actual Spending 2008-2009

Variance between Planned vs. Actual

Space Based Earth Observation 9.9 7.3 9.9 7.6 7.4 2.4
Space Science and Exploration 5.8 6.9 5.8 8.5 8.2 (2.4)
Satellite Communications 11.0 13.7 12.5 11.2 10.9 (1.6)
Generic Space Activities in support of EO, SE & SC 8.7 7.3 8.1 8.9 8.3 (0.2)
Total Contributions 35.5 35.2 36.3 36.3 34.9 1.4
Total Program Activities 35.5 35.2 36.3 36.3 34.9 1.4

Notes:

  • Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.
  • This table details contribution programs with funding in excess of $5 million per annum.

Comments on Variances:

Several factors explain the year-to year fluctuations in spending as well as the yearly variation between program activities under Canada/ European Space Agency (ESA) programs: the budgetary cycle of ESA differs from the one of Canada, the cash flow requirements of ESA programs which Canada is participating in (the budget requirements vary with the project's delivery phase), the slippage in the disbursements for Canada/ESA programs (the programs and associated contracts to industry are delivered by ESA; hence, CSA has no control on actual project implementation), the potential cost increases in development programs, as well as the inflation rate and exchange rate fluctuations.

Consequently, the positive variance of $1.4 million in 2008-2009 mainly corresponds to the risk funds re-profiled to future years arising from the sound management of this Program. The variances are in accordance with the objectives and terms and conditions of the 2000-2009 Canada/ESA Cooperation Agreement.

Significant Audit and Evaluation Findings and URL (s) to the Last Audit and/or Evaluation:

Canada is well thought of by Europeans, as the 28 years of cooperation between ESA and Canada clearly demonstrate. Canadian companies have made a significant contribution to the many technologies developed in the areas of Earth Observation and Satellite Communications.

Several businesses have developed business relationships with Europe thanks to the Agreement, and all stakeholders in the program agree that these relationships could continue, provided that Canada maintains its financial contribution to ESA. Canadian businesses have cultivated alliances with each other to benefit from or facilitate access to European markets through ESA programs under the Agreement.

The program helps diversify and open markets and contributes to the achievement of objectives under the Canadian Space Strategy respecting Earth Observation and Satellite Communications. However, it does not lead to the transfer of technologies as much as to the exchange of information on technologies.

Small and medium-sized companies have difficulty taking part in ESA programs and require greater support, not only to access these markets, but also to develop expertise so that they can continue doing business in these markets after their initial participation in ESA programs.

Source: Evaluation of the Canada/ESA Cooperation Agreement
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/publications/er-0405-0202.asp




CASSIOPE Mission

Start Date: November 1, 2003 End Date: March 31, 2012

Description:

Support the integration of two payloads on a single generic Canadian small satellite bus the CASCADE telecommunications Ka-Band component and the enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (ePOP) scientific instrument.

Strategic Outcome:

Canada's presence in space meets the needs of Canadians for scientific knowledge, space technology and information.

Expected Results (Program Activity Level)

Space Based Earth Observation:

The benefits of activities involved in Earth Observation from space serve Canadian users in the fields of environment, resource and land-use management, and security and sovereignty.

Space Science and Exploration:

Participation in Canadian and international missions expands the scientific knowledge base made available to Canadian academia and R&D communities in the areas of astronomy, space exploration and solar-terrestrial relations, as well as in physical and life sciences.

Satellite Communications:

State-of-the-art systems and applications are developed to satisfy the needs of the Canadian government and population in order to ensure that Canada remains a world leader in satellite communications.

Generic Space Activities in support of EO, SE and SC:

Canada's industrial technological capabilities can meet the needs of future space missions and activities.

Expected Accomplishments:

Development and demonstration of the CASCADE Ka-Band telecommunications payload designed and built by Canadian companies. CASCADE is the precursor of communication satellite constellations that will help position the Canadian industry on the international market as a supplier of advanced components and a service provider.

Development of a small Canadian scientific satellite, the enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (ePOP), which will probe the upper atmosphere and ionosphere region where solar variability influences global change in various time scales.

Development of a generic Canadian small satellite bus that could also be used for future Canadian missions.

Actual Accomplishments:

Completed manufacture, assembly and integration of the Cascade payload. Completed manufacture, assembly and integration of ePOP instruments, data handling units and booms. Completed manufacture, test and integration of the generic small satellite bus. Started the environment testing of the spacecraft at DFL.



($ in millions)

Actual Spending 2006-2007

Actual Spending 2007-2008

Planned Spending 2008-2009

Total Authorities 2008-2009

Actual Spending 2008-2009

Variance between Planned vs. Actual

Space Science and Exploration 2.3 1.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.2
Satellite Communications 16.2 7.0 6.0 6.0 3.6 2.4
Total Contributions 18.5 8.7 6.7 6.7 4.1 2.6
Total Program Activities 18.5 8.7 6.7 6.7 4.1 2.6

Notes:

  • Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.
  • This table details contribution programs with funding in excess of $5 million per annum.

Comments on Variances:

CASSIOPE: CASSIOPE: Program delays due to problems with the development of critical component (DSU) and the move of the launch date from November 2008 to November 2009 due to delays in the development of the Falcon launch vehicle. After detailed reviews of all the mission components, the schedule and milestones were modified to fit the new program schedule and launch date and the cash flow projections were adjusted accordingly.

ePOP: The delays for ePOP were necessitated by the extension of the CASSIOPE schedule and slippage of the launch date, which are beyond the control of the University of Calgary. The schedule extension will require the University of Calgary to stretch instrument test to fit the extended CASSIOPE schedule and maintain the project development teams at the universities and in industry for a longer period. The integration of ePOP with the CASSIOPE spacecraft is MacDonald, Dettwiller and Associates's responsibility, and was performed at Bristol in Winnipeg and at the David Florida Lab in Ottawa. Synchronization of all program elements and activities, including the ePOP payload integration and test, is critical for success.

Significant Audit and Evaluation Findings and URL (s) to the Last Audit and/or Evaluation:

The CSA program management office proactively manages technical aspects of the CASSIOPE contribution program. Effective management mechanisms and practices are implemented to ensure progress towards achieving expected technical results at the technology demonstration phase. The risk management mechanisms ensure that technical risks are effectively monitored and mitigated or reduced for all program elements.

The CSA disposes of sufficient authority and resources to ensure effective management of technical aspects of the CASSIOPE contribution program. The existing management mechanisms and practices provide the CSA with high level expertise in satellite communications and ensure effective coordination with the Communications Research Centre. They also ensure effective coordination between the CSA and each of the two recipients, as well as between the two contribution recipients.

Source: http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/pdf/ar-0607-0102.pdf

Top of Page

Citizenship and Immigration Canada

Table 5 : Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


      2008–2009
Program Activity
($ Millions)
Actual Spending
2006-2007
Actual Spending
2007-2008
Planned
Spending
Total
Authorities
Actual Spending
Integration Program – Grants          
Grant for the Canada-Quebec Accord [a] 193.9 198.2 216.0 226.0 226.0
Institute for Canadian Citizenship 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Grants 196.9 198.2 216.0 226.0 226.0
 

Canada’s Role in International Migration and Protection – Contributions

Migration Policy Development 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7
International Organization for Migration 1.1 1.1 2.0 1.6 1.4
Integration Program – Contributions          
Host Program [b] 5.0 8.1 14.5 15.6 15.6
Immigrant Settlement and Adaptation Program [c] 70.2 115.1 192.9 192.9 181.2
Resettlement Assistance Program [d] 44.1 52.9 49.6 51.6 51.6
Contributions to Provinces [a] 82.8 97.6 134.6 134.6 134.6
Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada [e] 122.3 152.7 274.8 254.1 172.2
Total Contributions 325.9 427.8 668.7 651.1 557.3
Total Transfer Payments [f] 522.8 626.0 884.7 877.1 783.3

[a] The grant for the Canada-Quebec Accord and contributions to provinces recognize the importance of settlement services that respond to the growing need to help immigrants integrate.

[b] Host funds are used to match newcomers with Canadian volunteers—individuals and groups—who help them settle in and integrate.

[c] The Immigrant Settlement and Adaptation Program provides funds for services such as orientation, paraprofessional counselling, translation, job-finding help, and Enhanced Language Training.

[d] The Resettlement Assistance Program helps pay for temporary accommodations, clothing, household effects, and living expenses for up to one year for indigent Convention refugees.

[e] The Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada Program provides funds for basic language training in both of Canada’s official languages to help adult immigrants integrate socially, culturally, economically, and politically.

[f] Total Authorities decreased from Planned Spending by $7.6 million, due to transfers to the operating vote. Actual expenditures were lower than Total Authorities by $93.8 million. This lapse is mainly attributable to lower spending on the Canada-Ontario Immigration Agreement.

Top of Page

Department of Finance Canada

Table 2: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)

Debt Payments on Behalf of Poor Countries to International Organizations

Compensation to Canadian Agencies or Entities Established by an Act of Parliament for Reduction of Debts of Debtor Countries

Payments to the International Development Association

Payment to Nova Scotia in respect of the Crown Share Adjustment Payment regarding amounts relating to previous years up to March 31, 2008

Fiscal Equalization (Part I—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Territorial Formula Financing (Part I.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Canada Health Transfer (Part V.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Canada Social Transfer (Part V.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Payment to Ontario (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Statutory Subsidies (Constitution Act, 1867; Constitution Act, 1982; and other statutory authorities)

Youth Allowances Recovery (Federal-Provincial Fiscal Revision Act, 1964)

Alternative Payments for Standing Programs (Part VI—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Payment to British Columbia (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Payment to Northwest Territories (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Clean Air and Climate Change Trust Fund (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Patient Wait Times Guarantee Trust Fund (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Transitional Payments (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Child Care Spaces (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Human Papillomavirus Immunization Trust Fund (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Incentive for Provinces to Eliminate Taxes on Capital (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Public Transit Capital Trust 2008

Police Officers Recruitment Fund

Saskatchewan Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration Trust

Payment to Nova Scotia for Carbon Storage

Canada Social Transfer Transition Protection Payment to Saskatchewan


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Debt Payments on Behalf of Poor Countries to International Organizations

Start date: 2005–06

End date: Ongoing

Description: Payments for Canada’s commitment to the G8-led Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Responsible administration of financial obligations under the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $45,605 $50,490 $51,200 $151,200 $149,280 $(98,020)
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $45,605 $50,490 $51,200 $151,200 $149,280 $(98,020)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between Actual and Planned Spending is attributable to an increase of $98 million in Vote 5, Grants and contributions, arising from an accelerated payment to the World Bank and African Development Fund to better help these institutions deliver debt relief to low-income, heavily indebted countries. The variance between Actual Spending and Total Authorities arose because of an alternative process for making the $2 million payment to the World Bank for membership in the Debt Management Facility. Payment was made through the International Assistance Envelope inter-pool flexibility mechanism between the Department and the Canadian International Development Agency.

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation to Canadian Agencies or Entities Established by an Act of Parliament for Reduction of Debts of Debtor Countries

Start date: 1991–92

End date: Ongoing

Description: Compensation to Export Development Canada (EDC) and the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) for reduction of debts of debtor countries

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments to the EDC and the CWB to compensate for debt relief to debtor countries


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $203,405 $231 $300,600 $251,600 $172,111 $128,489
Total Contributions $66,587 $42,646 $23,000 $22,910 $16,152 $6,848
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $269,992 $42,877 $323,600 $274,510 $188,263 $135,337

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between Actual and Planned Spending is attributable to the Republic of Congo and the Ivory Coast not receiving anticipated debt-relief payments because they did not achieve the required debt-relief targets. In addition, debt-relief payments to Haiti, Iraq, and Poland were lower than anticipated because of fluctuations in exchange and interest rates.

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments to the International Development Association

Start date: 1960–61

End date: Ongoing

Description: Encashment of demand notes to allow the International Development Association (IDA) to disburse concessional financing for development projects and programs in the world’s poorest countries

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Financial obligations to the IDA were responsibly administrated. The results of IDA operations are detailed in the report on operations under the Breton Woods and Related Agreements Act that is tabled annually in Parliament.


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $318,270 $318,270 $318,280 $318,280 $318,280 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $318,270 $318,270 $318,280 $318,280 $318,280 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payment to Nova Scotia in respect of the Crown Share Adjustment Payment regarding amounts relating to previous years up to March 31, 2008

Start date: 2008–09

End date: 2008–09

Description: On July 13, 2008, Canada signed an agreement with the Province of Nova Scotia to settle that province’s claim in respect of Crown share. Under this agreement, a payment of $234.4 million was made to Nova Scotia in September 2008 relating to previous years up to March 31, 2008.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet terms of the agreement between the Province of Nova Scotia and the Government of Canada


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $234,400 $234,400 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Fiscal Equalization (Part I—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Start date: 1957

End date: Ongoing

Description: Equalization payments are made to provincial governments in fulfillment of the constitutional commitment to ensure provincial governments have sufficient revenues to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation. The new Equalization formula, based on a higher 10‑province standard, brings less prosperous provinces up to the national average fiscal capacity. Equalization payments are unconditional. In 2008–09, five provinces will receive payments under this program.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements for financial support to Canadian provinces to assist them in providing public services


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $11,535,064 $12,924,677 $13,619,924 $13,462,236 $13,462,236 $157,688
Total Program Activity(ies) $11,535,064 $12,924,677 $13,619,924 $13,462,236 $13,462,236 $157,688

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between Actual and Planned Spending is attributable to the Newfoundland and Labrador re-estimate under their Equalization formula. No variance between Actual and Total Authorities.

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Territorial Formula Financing (Part I.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Start date: 1985

End date: Ongoing

Description: Territorial Formula Financing payments are made to all territorial governments to provide the resources they need to deliver services comparable to those delivered by provincial governments, taking into account the high costs and unique challenges in the North.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements for financial support to Canadian territories to assist them in providing public services


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $2,118,264 $2,221,297 $2,312,939 $2,312,939 $2,312,939 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $2,118,264 $2,221,297 $2,312,939 $2,312,939 $2,312,939 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Health Transfer (Part V.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Start date: 2004

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Canada Health Transfer (CHT) provides equal per-capita support for health care, a shared national priority, through cash and tax point transfers to provincial and territorial governments. The CHT supports the government’s commitment to maintain the national criteria and conditions of the Canada Health Act (comprehensiveness, universality, portability, accessibility, and public administration and the prohibitions against user fees and extra-billing) as well as the 2000, 2003, and 2004 Health Accords.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements for financial support to Canadian provinces and territories to assist them in providing health care services reflecting the principles of the Canada Health Act


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $20,139,876 $21,474,272 $22,629,304 $22,759,015 $22,759,015 $(129,711)
Total Program Activity(ies) $20,139,876 $21,474,272 $22,629,304 $22,759,015 $22,759,015 $(129,711)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between Actual and Planned Spending is attributable to prior year adjustments arising from the Estimates cycle as well as deductions made under the Canada Health Act. No variance between Actual and Total Authorities.

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Social Transfer (Part V.1—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act)

Start date: 2004

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Canada Social Transfer (CST) provides equal per capita cash as well as tax point transfers to provincial and territorial governments to assist them in financing shared national priorities—social programs, post‑secondary education, and programs for children. The CST gives provinces and territories the flexibility to allocate payments among supported areas according to their own priorities and supports the government’s commitment to prohibit minimum residency requirements for social assistance.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements for financial support to Canadian provinces and territories to assist them in providing programs and services related to post-secondary education, social assistance and social services, and programs for children


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $8,500,000 $9,590,219 $10,557,729 $10,567,868 $10,567,868 $(10,139)
Total Program Activity(ies) $8,500,000 $9,590,219 $10,557,729 $10,567,868 $10,567,868 $(10,139)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between Actual and Planned Spending is attributable to prior year adjustments arising from the Estimates cycle as well as a revised estimate of 2008–09 requirements made in October 2008. No variance between Actual and Total Authorities.

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payment to Ontario (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: Direct payments are made to the Government of Ontario to assist the province in the transition to a single corporate tax administration, in respect of the Canada–Ontario Agreement.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Effective management of payments to provinces, territories, and Aboriginal governments


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $250,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $250,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Subsidies (Constitution Act, 1867; Constitution Act, 1982; and other statutory authorities)

Start date: 1867

End date: Ongoing

Description: The statutory subsidies provide a source of funding to provinces in accordance with terms of entry into Confederation.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements for financial support to provinces


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $31,821 $31,822 $32,000 $31,968 $31,968 $32
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Allowances Recovery (Federal-Provincial Revision Act, 1964)

Start date: 1964

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Youth Allowances Recovery is a recovery from the Province of Quebec for an additional tax point transfer (three points) above and beyond the Canada Health Transfer and Canada Social Transfer tax point transfer. In the 1960s, Quebec chose to use the federal government’s contracting-out arrangements for certain federal-provincial programs. Quebec continues to receive the value of these tax points through its own income tax system and reimburses the Government of Canada for the discontinued programs for which it receives tax point transfers. Taken together, the Alternative Payments for Standing Programs and the Youth Allowances Recovery are known as the Quebec Abatement and ensure all provinces are treated similarly.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate recoveries from the Province of Quebec that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $(706,788) $(943,805) $(717,374) $(332,659) $(332,659) $(384,715)
Total Program Activity(ies) $(706,788) $(943,805) $(717,374) $(332,659) $(332,659) $(384,715)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between Actual and Planned Spending is attributable to prior year adjustments arising from the Estimates cycle as well as a revised estimate of 2008–09 requirements made in February 2009. The $611 million reduced recovery from 2007–08 is a result of Quebec making a payment in 2007–08 toward its 2008–09 obligation as well as changes in the value of tax points used to calculate the recovery. No variance between Actual and Total Authorities.

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Alternative Payments for Standing Programs (Part VI—Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act

Start date: 1977

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Alternative Payments for Standing Programs is a recovery from the Province of Quebec for an additional tax point transfer (13.5 points) above and beyond the Canada Health Transfer and Canada Social Transfer tax point transfer. In the 1960s, Quebec chose to use the federal government’s contracting-out arrangements for certain federal-provincial programs. Quebec continues to receive the value of these tax points through its own income tax system in lieu of cash, while other provinces receive the corresponding amounts in cash. Taken together, the Alternative Payments for Standing Programs and the Youth Allowances Recovery are known as the Quebec Abatement and ensure all provinces are treated similarly.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate recoveries from the Province of Quebec that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $(3,177,016) $(2,719,889) $(3,256,839) $(2,973,912) $(2,973,912) $(282,927)
Total Program Activity(ies) $(3,177,016) $(2,719,889) $(3,256,839) $(2,973,912) $(2,973,912) $(282,927)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between Actual and Planned Spending is attributable to prior year adjustments arising from the Estimates cycle as well as a revised estimate of 2008–09 requirements made in February 2009. No variance between Actual and Total Authorities.

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payment to British Columbia (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: A one-time payment to support sustainable land and resource management development in the Great Bear Rainforest on the central coast of British Columbia

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative and regulatory requirements for financial support to British Columbia


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payment to Northwest Territories (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: To provide for an adjustment to the Government of the Northwest Territories for the portion of the corporate income tax refund paid out by the territory to date. Funding is accounted for in 2006–07 and was paid in 2007–08, once authorizing legislation received Royal Assent.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative requirements for financial support to the Northwest Territories


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $54,400 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $54,400 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Clean Air and Climate Change Trust Fund (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: A one-time payment to provide support to provinces and territories for projects designed to achieve reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. Funding is accounted for in 2006–07 and was paid into a third-party trust in 2007–08, once authorizing legislation received Royal Assent. Funding is notionally allocated over three years (2007–08 to 2009–10), and provinces and territories have the flexibility to draw down funds according to their respective needs and priorities over the lifespan of the trust.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative requirements for financial support to provinces and territories


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $1,518,925 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $1,518,925 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: : Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Patient Wait Times Guarantee Trust Fund (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: A one‑time payment to provide support to provinces and territories for development of patient wait times guarantees in at least one of the five identified priority areas (cancer treatment, heart procedures, diagnostic imaging, joint replacement, and sight restoration). Funding is accounted for in 2006–07 and was paid into a third-party trust in 2007–08, once authorizing legislation received Royal Assent. Funding is notionally allocated over three years (2007–08 to 2009–10), and provinces and territories have the flexibility to draw down funds according to their respective needs and priorities over the lifespan of the trust.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative requirements for financial support to provinces and territories


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $612,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $612,000 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Transitional Payments (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: One-time transitional payments for outstanding commitments to Ontario, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan for training and for post-secondary education. Funding is accounted for in 2006–07 and was paid into a third-party trust in 2007–08, once authorizing legislation received Royal Assent. Funding is notionally allocated over three years (2007–08 to 2009–10), and provinces have the flexibility to draw down funds according to their respective needs and priorities over the lifespan of the trust.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all legislative requirements for financial support to Ontario, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $614,038 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $614,038 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Child Care Spaces (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: A one-time payment to provide support to provinces and territories for the creation of child care spaces through a direct payment for 2007–08; funding will be included in the Canada Social Transfer beginning in 2008–09.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative requirements for financial support to provinces and territories


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Human Papillomavirus Immunization Trust Fund (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2006–07

End date: 2007–08

Description: A one-time payment to provide support to provinces and territories to launch a national human papillomavirus vaccine program to protect women and girls from cervical cancer. Funding is accounted for in 2006–07 and was paid into a third-party trust in 2007–08, once authorizing legislation received Royal Assent. Funding is notionally allocated over three years (2007–08 to 2009–10), and provinces and territories have the flexibility to draw down funds according to their respective needs and priorities over the lifespan of the trust.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payments that meet all the legislative requirements for financial support to provinces and territories


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Management of Transfer Payments to Provinces and Territories


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Incentive for Provinces to Eliminate Taxes on Capital (Budget Implementation Act, 2007)

Start date: 2008–09

End date: 2010–11

Description: Financial incentive to encourage provinces to accelerate the elimination of provincial capital taxes or restructure an existing capital tax on financial institutions into a minimum tax

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Increased competitiveness of Canadian businesses by strengthening Canada’s business tax advantage


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $170,000 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $170,000 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Public Transit Capital Trust 2008

Start date: 2007–08

End date: 2008–09

Description: The Public Transit Capital Trust 2008 was put in place to support provinces and territories in the establishment of public transit infrastructure. Funding is notionally allocated over two years (2008–09 to 2009–10) and was distributed on an equal per capita basis among provinces and territories.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate administration of payment to provinces and territories for targeted support


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Police Officers Recruitment Fund

Start date: 2007–08

End date: 2008–09

Description: The Police Officers Recruitment Fund was established to support provinces and territories in recruiting 2,500 new front-line police officers. Funding is notionally allocated over five years (2008–09 to 2013–14) and was distributed proportionally among provinces and territories.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate administration of payments to provinces and territories for targeted support


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Saskatchewan Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration Trust

Start date: 2007–08

End date: 2008–09

Description: The Saskatchewan Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration Trust was put in place to support Saskatchewan in the establishment of a full-scale commercial demonstration of carbon capture and storage in the coal-fired electricity sector. Funding is notionally allocated over four years (2008–09 to 2012–13).

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate administration of the payments to provinces and territories for targeted support


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $240,000 $240,000 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $240,000 $240,000 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Social Transfer Transition Protection Payment to Saskatchewan

Start date: 2008–09

End date: 2008–09

Description: A one-time payment to Saskatchewan to protect the province against declines in its Canada Social Transfer (CST) cash payment for 2008–09 to 2012–13, relative to what it would have received in 2007–08 when the CST was moved to equal per capita cash plus its relative share of $250 million for child care. This additional $250 support for child care was provided outside the CST in 2007–08 and was rolled into the CST for 2008–09 and subsequent years.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate payment to Saskatchewan that meets the legislative and regulatory requirements


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $31,204 $31,204 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $31,204 $31,204 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payment to Nova Scotia for Carbon Storage

Start date: 2007–08

End date: N/A

Description: Budget 2008 provided $5 million in 2007–08 that, along with complementary investment by the province, will support geological research examining the potential for carbon storage in the province.

Strategic Outcome: A strong and sustainable economy, resulting in increasing standards of living and improved quality of life for Canadians

Results Achieved: Timely and accurate administration of the payments to provinces and territories for targeted support


Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Contributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0
Total Program Activity(ies) $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None

Top of Page

Department of Justice Canada

Table 3: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Legal Aid Systems (Voted)

Start date: August 17, 1971

End date: March 31, 2012 (ongoing)

Description: The objective of the federal Legal Aid Program is to contribute to sustaining a national system of justice, that helps to ensure that economically disadvantaged persons have access to the justice system, through contribution funding in support of criminal, youth criminal justice and immigration and refugee legal aid services provided by the provinces (funding for criminal and civil legal aid in the territories is provided through the Access to Justice Agreements).

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.

Results Achieved: Provinces were enabled to provide legal aid services to eligible persons involved in serious criminal, youth criminal justice, and immigration and refugee matters.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Contributions $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $0
Total Program Activity $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

N/A

Audit completed or planned:

N/A



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Public Security and Anti-terrorism - Legal Aid (Voted)

Start date: September 24, 2002

End date: March 31, 2012 (ongoing)

Description: Through this program, the Department currently provides contributions to legal aid delivery entities to cover costs for persons eligible for legal aid and charged under the federal government’s anti-terrorism legislation.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.

Results Achieved: In fiscal year 2008-09, 19 cases were funded through contribution agreements with either provinces or their legal aid delivery entities.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Contributions $1,121,100 $3,959,663 $2,000,000 $5,033,048 $4,260,000 $-2,260,000
Total Program Activity $1,121,100 $3,959,663 $2,000,000 $5,033,048 $4,260,000 $-2,260,000

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance in spending is attributable to the difficulty in estimating the cost of funding defence of individuals charged as a result of Canada’s anti-terrorism initiative, given the nature of judicial proceedings, e.g. complexity of the issues, the evidence and the number of judicial proceedings.

Audit completed or planned: N/A


Note: No table was prepared for this program in the Report on Plans and Priorities for 2008-2009 because the Planned Spending and the Total Authorities were both under $5,000,000. Internal transfers totalling $3,033,048 have increased the Total Authorities over the $5,000,000 threshold.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Justice Services Funding Program (Voted)

Start date: April 2, 1984

End date: March 31, 2011 (ongoing)

Description: The overall objective of this Program is to support the policy directions of the Youth Justice Initiative. The specific objectives of the individual agreements are to support and promote an appropriate range of programs and services that: encourage accountability measures for unlawful behaviour that are proportionate and timely; encourage the effective rehabilitation and reintegration of young persons into their communities; target the formal court process to the most serious offences; and target detention and custody to the most serious offences.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.

Results Achieved: The contribution agreements support a sustainable youth justice system that is capable of innovations and supports federal youth justice priorities.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Contributions $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $0
Total Program Activity $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: N/A



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Victims Fund (Victims of Crime Initiative and Federal Victims Strategy)

Start date: VCI April 1, 2005
FVS April 1, 2007

End date: VCI March 31, 2010
FVS March 31, 2011

Description: The Victims Fund is a grants and contributions fund with broad terms and conditions designed to raise awareness and enhance services and assistance to victims of crime. The Victims Fund is administered by the Policy Centre for Victim Issues and provides support to victims of crime as well as to governmental and non-governmental organizations to implement a wide range of victim focused projects and activities.

Strategic Outcome: Strategic Outcome 1: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values Sub sub-activity A1.2.5 (expected result in the PAA is that the experience of victims in the justice system is improved)

Results Achieved: In 2008/09 the Victims Fund:

  1. Provided funding to 303 victims and 81 support persons to attend National Parole Board hearings, totalling $249,310.
  2. Provided funding to 13 Canadians victimized, totalling $200,323.
  3. Provided resources to provincial and territorial governments to meet the needs of under-served victims of crime in their jurisdiction and/or support victims to attend sentencing hearing to submit their Victim Impact Statement, with 11 contribution agreements signed, totalling $1,139,150.
  4. Provided funding to provincial and territorial governments to implement legislation to benefit victims or to advance the Canadian Statement of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime, with 14 contribution agreements signed, totalling $815,391.
  5. Provided for 96 projects and activities funded included training events, evaluation of programs, research, networking, and National Victims of Crime Awareness Week events totalling $1,112,168.

Victims Fund recipients report reduced financial hardship, increased willingness to participate in the criminal justice process, and an overall improved experience for victims of crime in the criminal justice process as a result of funding available.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Grants $343,023 $239,788 $850,000 $850,000 $398,752 $451,248
Total Contributions $1,908,150 $2,426,494 $7,800,000 $7,333,238 $3,100,934 $4,699,066
Total Program Activity $2,251,173 $2,666,282 $8,650,000 $8,183,238 $3,499,686 $5,150,314

Comment(s) on Variance(s): In 2007/08 the Victims Fund was significantly increased from $2M to $7.75M.

In 2008/09, the second year of the enhanced resource levels, the Victims Fund was not fully taken up. However, requests for funding from the Victims Fund by NGOs, provincial and territorial governments and victims of crime has been steadily increasing each year.

In 2008/2009 some provinces implemented new policies regarding signing authority or requested re-negotiation of the text in the standard clauses of the contribution agreement leading to some delays in funding. A related issue is the infrastructure limitations within provincial and territorial governments which impacted their ability to use the Fund resources available. Through 2008/2009 the PCVI worked closely with provincial and territorial partners to simplify the required application and reporting requirements related to the Fund and will continue to do so.

There is a significant allocation of resources in the Victims Fund to support Canadians victimized abroad. While only 13 victims contacted Justice Canada for assistance, resulting in approved agreements representing less than 20% of the resources available, the number of requests and awareness of the Fund are increasing as more outreach is undertaken. Current resource levels in this component of the Fund allow the Department to respond to the unpredictable nature and demand for assistance.

Audit completed or planned: N/A



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision Program (voted)

Start date: April 1st, 2002

End date: March 31, 2013 (ongoing)

Description: The overall objective of this Program is to financially assist the provinces and territories in providing the specialized services required for the implementation of the Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision (IRCS) sentence (paragraph 42(2)(r) and subsection 42(7) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA)) and other sentencing options applicable under the YCJA to serious violent youth offenders with mental health problems. It is expected that these services will reduce the likelihood of further violence in those convicted of the most serious violent offences.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.

Results Achieved: Provinces and Territories have the financial capacity to implement sentencing options that involve specialized treatment services to address the mental health issues of serious violent youth offenders.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Contributions $3,424,450 $4,039,250 $11,048,000 $10,629,441 $9,028,126 $2,019,874
Total Program Activity $3,424,450 $4,039,250 $11,048,000 $10,629,441 $9,028,126 $2,019,874

Comment(s) on Variance(s): While the number of IRCS orders issued by the courts has remained stable, funding requests for other exceptional cases under this Program have come more slowly than expected.

Audit completed or planned: N/A



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Implementation of Official languages Requirements in respect of the Contraventions Act (Contraventions Act Fund – (Voted)

Start date: April 1, 2008

End date: March 31, 2013

Description: The Contraventions Act provides for the identification of federal offences that are to be considered “contraventions” and the establishment of a scheme to prosecute these contraventions. In 2001, the Federal Court was asked to clarify the extent to which judicial and extra-judicial language rights requirements were applicable in the context of the Contraventions Act. The Court concluded that while the federal government is authorized to use the offence scheme of a province or territory in respect of federal contraventions, it must comply with all language rights requirements that would be applicable in the context of a federal prosecution scheme. More specifically, the Court stated that any level of government that processes federal contraventions is, in fact, acting on behalf of the Government of Canada. Following the Federal Court decision, the Department of Justice proceeded to modify existing Contraventions Act agreements to include new provisions to address language rights requirements identified in the decision. Such provisions are now also an integral part of all new agreements with other provinces. To support this process, the Department of Justice established the Contraventions Act Fund.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.

Results Achieved: Four provinces (British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia) are fully prepared to offer trials dealing with federal contraventions in a manner consistent with language rights protected in sections 530 and 530.1 of the Criminal Code. The same four provinces have also taken measures to actively offer extra-judicial services in both official languages in all court locations covered by Part IV of the Official Languages Act. Negotiations are underway with the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. It is anticipated that this agreement will be in place for fiscal year 2009-2010.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Contributions $2,613,100 $2,779,800 $9,094,900 $5,078,100 $4,289,100 $4,805,800
Total Program Activity $2,613,100 $2,779,800 $9,094,900 $5,078,100 $4,289,100 $4,805,800

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The actual spending was lower than anticipated for the following reasons:
The province of Prince Edward Island did not sign an agreement in 2008-2009.
The province of Newfoundland and Labrador did not sign the agreement in 2008-2009 as anticipated.
The contribution to be paid to Ontario was held back until the province's financial report is filed and verified.

Audit completed or planned: N/A



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Access to Justice Services Agreements – the Territories (Voted)

Start date: 1996

End date: March 31st 2012 (ongoing)

Description: The goal of the Access to Justice Services Agreements (AJAs) is to integrate federal government funding support to Canada’s three territories for access to justice services (that is, both criminal and civil legal aid, Aboriginal Courtwork, and Public Legal Education and Information) through ongoing contribution agreements that allow the territories the flexibility needed to provide these services in a challenging environment (vast distances, harsh climate, cultural/linguistic differences). The overarching goal of federal support for Aboriginal Courtwork services is to facilitate and enhance access to justice by assisting Aboriginal people involved in the criminal justice system to obtain fair, just, equitable and culturally sensitive treatment. With regard to legal aid services in the territories, the federal goal is to enable the territories to provide legal aid services to economically disadvantaged persons involved in serious criminal, youth criminal justice and civil matters.. And, with respect to public legal education and information, the goal is to assist the territories in providing members of the public with the legal information they need to make informed decisions and participate effectively in the justice system.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.

Results Achieved: Territories are enabled to provide access to justice services (legal aid, Aboriginal Courtwork and public legal education and information). Contribution funding agreements have been extended with all three territories for one-year, 2009-2010. Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s). The Legal Aid Program’s evaluation for the current five-year period is planned to be completed early in fiscal year 2011-12. The 2008 Aboriginal Courtwork Program Summative Evaluation report indicates that there is a strong and continuing need for the ACW Program; the ACW Program has been successful in achieving its intended outcomes.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Contributions $4,856,593 $5,156,593 $4,856,593 $5,368,593 $5,368,593 $-512,000
Total Program Activity $4,856,593 $5,156,593 $4,856,593 $5,368,593 $5,368,593 $-512,000

Comment(s) on Variance(s): As indicated in the footnote below, additional resources were provided to address severe pressures faced by the territories in delivering access to justice services.

Audit completed or planned: N/A


Note: No table was prepared for this program in the Report on Plans and Priorities for 2008-2009 because the Planned Spending and the Total Authorities were both under $5,000,000. Two internal transfers totalling $512,000 have increased the Total Authorities over the $5,000,000 threshold.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Child-centered Family Justice Fund (Voted)

Start date: April 1, 2008

End date: March 31, 2009

Description: The Child-centred Family Justice Fund (CCFJF) is a key component of the Child-centred Family Law Strategy (CCFL Strategy). While the federal government does not provide direct services to separated and divorced parents since the provinces and territories are responsible for the administration of justice, the Department of Justice is committed to assisting and promoting the development, expansion and maintenance of such services through the CCFJF. The CCFL Strategy ended in March 31, 2008. Budget 2008 provided for a one-year renewal at status quo levels.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values.

Results Achieved: Programs are developed and implemented in response to identified needs and gaps and are integrated with Government priorities and commitments.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s)
.
A Summative Evaluation of the CCFL Strategy was completed in 2007-2008 and has been posted on the Department of Justice web site.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Grants $29,950 $0 $0 $7,600 $7,600 $-7,600
Total Contributions $16,170,761 $16,250,027 $0 $15,992,400 $15,992,391 $-15,992,391
Total Program Activity $16,200,711 $16,250,027 $0 $16,000,000 $15,999,991 $-15,999,991

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Planned Spending for this transfer payment program for 2008-2009 is NIL because the funds were received through the Second Supplementary Estimates.
The amounts of Grants and Contributions received through the Second Supplementary Estimates were $50,000 and $15,950,000 respectively.
An amount of $42,400 was internally transferred from Grants to Contributions.

Audit completed or planned: N/A


Note: No table was prepared for this program in the Report on Plans and Priorities for 2008-2009 because the fund was received through the Second Supplementary Estimates.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Courtwork Program (Voted)

Start date: 1978-1979

End date: March 31st 2013 (ongoing)

Description: The objective of the Aboriginal Courtwork Program (ACW) is to improve access to justice by helping Aboriginal people involved in the criminal justice system obtain fair, just, equitable and culturally-sensitive treatment. It is the only ongoing justice program available to all Aboriginal people (adult and youth) regardless of status and residency. The Program provides Aboriginal persons charged with an offence with timely and accurate information on their rights, obligations, roles and responsibilities at the earliest possible stage of the criminal justice process. Services also include referring clients to appropriate legal and social resources in their community. Aboriginal Courtworkers serve as a “bridge” between criminal justice officials and Aboriginal people and communities, by providing information, cultural context, liaison and promoting communications and understanding.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Results Achieved: The 2008 Aboriginal Courtwork Program Summative Evaluation report indicates that there is a strong and continuing need for the ACW Program; the ACW Program has been successful in achieving its intended outcomes. According to the results of the recent national survey of Aboriginal accused, 90% of clients are satisfied with the information they received from courtworkers. The number of Aboriginal people charged with an offence who received culturally sensitive services from an Aboriginal Courtworker in 2007/2008 based on data received to date (not including the territories): 48,761 adults (male and female) /10,048 youth (male and female) *The data for 2008/2009 is not available until December 31, 2009. Five-year contribution funding agreements are in place with all participating provinces until March 31, 2013.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Contributions $4,836,363 $4,836,363 $4,836,363 $5,361,363 $5,320,708 $-484,345
Total Program Activity $4,836,363 $4,836,363 $4,836,363 $5,361,363 $5,320,708 $-484,345

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The ACW Program expanded its terms and conditions in February 2008, to include a new component, "Projects in support of ACW Program", to support activities such as: specialized training, national data requirements and database development. The costs associated with the new component exceeded the forecasted budget that was based on the regular operations of the ACW program.

Audit completed or planned: N/A


Note: No table was prepared for this program in the Report on Plans and Priorities for 2008-2009 because the Planned Spending and the Total Authorities were both under $5,000,000. An internal transfer of $450,000 has increased the Total Authorities over the $5,000,000 threshold. Also, a transfer of $75,000 from Vote 1 to Vote 5 was approved through the First Supplementary Estimates.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Justice Strategy (Voted)

Start date: 1991-1992 as Aboriginal Justice Initiative

End date: March 31, 2012

Description: The Aboriginal Justice Strategy (AJS) enables Aboriginal communities to have increased involvement in the local administration of justice and, as such, provides timely and effective alternatives to mainstream justice processes in appropriate circumstances. AJS programs are also aimed at reducing the rates of victimization, crime and incarceration among Aboriginal people in communities operating AJS programs, and helping the mainstream justice system become more responsive and sensitive to the needs and culture of Aboriginal communities.

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Results Achieved: In 2008-2009, the AJS supported 104 community-based justice programs serving approximately 400 Aboriginal communities across Canada, along with 22 capacity-building projects. A 2006 recidivism study showed that Aboriginal offenders, who had enrolled in and completed the offered community-based programs, were half as likely to re-offend as those who did not enrol in or complete these programs.

Accurate data on the number of clients served by the AJS programs is not yet available. A national data base is being developed to collect comprehensive data on the number of clients and types of programs/projects/services that are available to clients.

Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Grants $4,000 $96,996 $0 $29,105 $13,105 $-13,105
Total Contributions $7,287,586 $9,586,445 $12,500,000 $12,020,895 $11,706,919 $793,081
Total Program Activity $7,291,586 $9,683,441 $12,500,000 $12,050,000 $11,720,024 $779,976

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Actual spending was lower than anticipated for the following reasons:

  • Ongoing complex negotiations with communities and Provincial/Territorial partners led to delays in funding agreements being finalized on time.
  • Allocation of capacity building funds was delayed, leading to shortened timelines in negotiating agreements, which affected the ability of AJS recipients to complete activities in 08-09.
  • Delays in negotiating agreements in a timely manner were due to organizational challenges.
  • Some AJS recipients were unable to undertake the full extent of proposed community-based initiatives due to capacity and training needs (lack of proper tools and technology, insufficient infrastructure), as well as other delays (organizational instability and high levels of staff turnover) which affected timelines and implementation of projects.

Audit completed or planned: N/A



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Justice Fund (Voted)

Start date: 1999-2000

End date: March 31, 2010

Description: The overall objective of funding under the Youth Justice Fund is to encourage a fairer and more effective youth justice system. Funding is available for non-governmental organizations, youth justice stakeholders, Aboriginal organizations and provinces/territories to help promote and implement alternative approaches to youth justice practices. Priorities are set annually based on identified gaps and emerging federal youth justice policies and priorities. Additional resources have been provided to the Youth Justice Fund for two new on-going priorities - Youth Crime Prevention (Guns, Gangs and Drugs) and Youth Justice Anti-Drug Treatment Component (NADS).

Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Results Achieved: Youth Crime Prevention Strategy with a focus on Guns, Gangs and Drugs

  • A total of 22 projects targeting youth involved in gun, gang and drug activities were supported in 2008-2009. From the 22 projects, seven (7) projects were funded through grants and fifteen (15) through contributions. It is to be noted that of the 22 projects, eighteen (18) on-going projects were also funded in 2008-2009, including two (2) grants and ten (10) contributions.
  • The total value of projects with a focus on guns, gangs and drugs for 2008-2009 was $1,839,594 ($193,969 in grants and $1,645,595 in contributions).
  • From all the projects that received funding, two (2) were national projects and the other ones were for organizations established in the provinces of Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia, British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Alberta.
  • These projects included projects that have emphasized on responding to youth in conflict with the law and involved or at-risk of being involved in gun, gang and drug activities in order to promote the making of “smart choices” through community-based educational, cultural, sporting and vocational opportunities focusing in the following areas:
    • on particular target populations including aboriginal youth, Black Canadian youth, and also gender basis mix;
    • creating awareness of youth gang recruitment and prevention strategies;
    • identifying service gaps and best practices; and
    • developing program responses.

Main Fund: Cities and Community Partnerships; Innovative Programming; and Public Legal Education and Information Components

  • A total of 18 projects were funded in 2008-2009 to enable greater citizen/community participation in the youth justice system and encourage partnerships among youth justice partners and other funders and/or community organizations in order to provide support to youth involved in the criminal justice system. Of the 18 projects, 8 (eight) projects were funded through contributions and 10 (ten) through grants. It is to be noted that of the 18 projects, 8(eight)
  • The total value of projects with a focus on cities and community partnerships, innovation programming and public legal education and information for 2008-2009 was $ 800,772 ($ 697,261 in contributions and $103,511 in grants).
  • From all the projects that received funding, six (6) were national projects and the others were for organizations established in the provinces of Ontario, British Columbia, and the Yukon.
  • These projects target interventions at various points in the youth justice system for successful rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders back into their communities through information sharing and education and project specific programs and services. The projects included support services during the front end of the criminal justice system such as alternative pre-trail options, court liaison services to offer support for youth, and support for youth offenders with unique needs including mental health issues, such as FASD. Other projects encourage partnerships, information sharing and training on how to provide support for youth with FASD involved in the criminal justice system. There were also projects that targeted interventions during reintegration or during custody and supervision orders, such as court ordered volunteer programs, work experience opportunities, mentoring and skill development for youth.

Youth Justice Fund: National Anti-Drug Strategy: Youth Justice Anti-Drug Component

  • A total of 11 projects were funded in 2008-2009 to enhance capacity to plan/deliver a range of treatment services and programs targeted at young persons in conflict with the law who have illicit substance abuse issues. Of the 11 projects, 5 new projects were funded through contributions, 5 through grants and 1 was an on-going contribution from 2007-2008.
  • The total value of these projects in 2008-2009 was $549,429 ($462,740 in contributions and $86,689 in grants).
  • Projects were undertaken in Manitoba, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, British Columbia and New Brunswick. The projects were with 6 provincial government departments, 3 were with front line community organizations and 2 were with National organizations.
  • The projects undertaken in 2008-2009 included the development and/or implementation of programming models (MB and ON), supporting participation of youth justice system representatives in the development of a provincial wide anti-drug strategy and program development (PEI), evaluation of existing drug treatment programs (BC), the development and delivery of an Atlantic conference to support the sharing of information and best practices and support for two national conferences on the issue of youth with illicit substance abuse issues in the justice system.
Program Activity:
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Program Activity Justice policies, laws and programs
Total Grants $790,325 $519,890 $1,080,000 $730,000 $384,169 $695,831
Total Contributions $2,880,238 $2,415,577 $3,925,000 $4,275,000 $2,805,596 $1,119,404
Total Program Activity $3,670,563 $2,935,467 $5,005,000 $5,005,000 $3,189,765 $1,815,235

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Funding criteria was established, posted on the internet and sent to Provincial/Territorial representatives. A number of proposals submitted did not meet program criteria or required extensive development work which resulted in lapsing funds. Also, despite reasonable delivery against government priorities relating to youth justice and guns, gangs and drugs generally, uptake on the new funds allocated for drug treatment as part of the NADS initiative was slow. Once this issue was identified by management, a request was made in September 2008 to reprofile some of the NADS funding. While other NADS partners succeeded in reprofiling NADS funds, the Youth Justice requests were not approved by Justice. Strategies are being developed and implemented to ensure that the variance is addressed.

Audit completed or planned: N/A


Top of Page

Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec

Table 5: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPP)

1) Program activity: Development of communities

2) Name of program: Community Diversification (voted item)

Description:

This program helps Quebec regions maintain and develop their economic activity base. A community’s vitality depends on its ability to develop, grow and thrive by building on its own assets.

This program has three objectives:

  • foster communities’ development and increase their mobilization by drawing up visions and projects of local and regional scope
  • assist communities through support for entrepreneurship and through creation or maintenance of viable enterprises
  • increase communities’ capability to attract tourists and skilled individuals.

3) Start date: April 1, 2007

4) End date: March 31, 2012

5) Strategic outcome: Dynamic and revitalized communities that have a better socio-economic outlook and are developing their economic activity base

6) Results achieved:

  • Communities are pursuing a development vision and implementing resulting initiatives.
  • Enterprises are contributing to community economic growth and maintenance.
  • Communities are recognized for their distinctiveness, brand image and outreach.

(in thousands of dollars) 7) Actual expenditures1
2006-2007
8) Actual expenditures 2007-2008 9) Planned spending 2008-2009 10) Total authorities 2008-2009 11) Actual expenditures 2008-2009 12) Variance between 9) and 11)
13) Program activity:
Development of communities
14) Grants 60 600 288 22 (578)
14) Contributions 75,160 64,182 67,685 67,685 3,503
15) Program activity total 75,220 64,782 67,973 67,707 2,925

16) Comments on variance:
The variance between planned spending and total authorities is primarily attributable to the funding received during the year for the Social Economy Initiative in Quebec ($2.9 million).

17) Significant audit findings and URL to latest audit(s):
Audit of compliance with contractual linguistic obligations by designated Business Development Centres and Community Futures Development Corporations.

Electronic link: www.dec-ced.gc.ca/eng/publications/agency/audit/115/about.html

Management audit of Canada Economic Development business offices
Electronic link:
www.dec-ced.gc.ca/eng/publications/agency/index.html

Note:

1 This table is presented in line with the new Program Activity Architecture. Actual revenue from 2006-2007 has not been categorized.


1) Program activities:
Competitiveness of enterprises (SMEs)
Competitive positioning of sectors and regions

2) Name of program: Business and Regional Growth (voted item)

Description:

This program reinforces conditions conducive to the sustainable growth of regions and SMEs, and has three objectives:

  • help enterprises improve their performance, become more competitive and engage in more innovation to facilitate their sustainable development
  • support the transfer of technology and research outputs to enterprises
  • create the right conditions to attract foreign investment and international organizations.

3) Start date: April 1, 2007

4) End date: March 31, 2012

5) Strategic outcome: Presence of conditions favourable to sustainable growth and the competitive positioning of SMEs and regions

6) Results achieved:

  • Assisted enterprises are using their strategic capabilities.
  • Products and services derived from R&D are being commercialized.
  • New enterprises and strategic capital investments are consolidating the economic base of the regions.
  • Competitiveness poles are being developed and consolidated.
  • Clusters and networks of enterprises in the same sector or region are better structured.
  • The innovation commercialization process is generating medium- and long-range social and economic spinoffs.
  • Competitive regions are attracting direct foreign investment and international organizations.

(in thousands of dollars) 7) Actual expenditures
1

2006-2007
8) Actual expenditures 2007-2008 9) Planned spending 2008-2009 10) Total authorities 2008-2009 11) Actual expenditures 2008-2009 12) Variance between 9) and 11)
13) Program activity: Competitiveness of enterprises (SMEs)
14) Grants 100 100 (100)
14) Contributions 53,642 64,960 40,432 40,432 (24,528)
15) Program activity total 53,642 65,060 40,532 40,432 (24,628)
13) Program activity: Competitive positioning of sectors and regions
14) Grants 100 100 (100)
14) Contributions 38,431 38,166 29,191 29,191 (8,975)
15) Program activity total 38,431 38,266 29,291 29,191 (9,075)
15) Program activities total 92,073 103,326 69,823 69,623 (33,703)

16) Comments on variance:
The variance between planned spending and actual expenditures is attributable to the fact that, in the economic downturn, enterprises put their investment projects on hold, using fewer program resources than expected. It was decided to reallocate the funding for Competitiveness of enterprises (SMEs) and Competitive positioning of sectors and regions. Thus, additional investment was made in infrastructure projects and economic diversification of communities.

17) Significant audit findings and URL to latest audit(s):

Management audit of Canada Economic Development business offices Electronic link: www.dec-ced.gc.ca/eng/publications/agency/index.html


1) Program activity: Development of communities

2) Name of program: Community Futures Program (CFP) (voted item)

Description:

This Canada-wide program provides support for communities in all parts of the country to help them take charge of their own local economic development. In Quebec, the CFP financially supports 57 Community Futures Development Corporations, as well as 15 Community Economic Development Corporations and ten Business Development Centres.

3) Start date: May 18, 1995

4) End date: October 2, 2010

5) Strategic outcome: Dynamic and revitalized communities that have a better socio-economic outlook and are developing their economic activity base

6) Results achieved:

  • Communities are pursuing a development vision and implementing resulting initiatives.
  • Enterprises are contributing to community economic growth and maintenance.

(in thousands of dollars) 7) Actual expenditures 2006-2007 8) Actual expenditures 2007-2008 9) Planned spending 2008-2009 10) Total authorities 2008-2009 11) Actual expenditures 2008-2009 12) Variance between 9) and 11)
13) Program activity: Development of communities
14) Grants
14) Contributions 34,263 40,206 32,000 41,733 41,733 9,733
15) Program activity total 34,263 40,206 32,000 41,733 41,733 9,733

16) Comments on variance:

The variance between planned spending and actual expenditures is attributable to the fact that additional investment was made under this program, including the establishment of the Business Support Fund, making it possible to continue catering to SMEs’ needs in these hard economic times.

17) Significant audit findings and URL to latest audit(s): N/A


1) Program activity: Infrastructure

2) Name of program: Infrastructure Canada Program – Canada-Quebec Agreement 2000 (voted item)

Description:

Within the framework of the pan-Canadian Infrastructure Program under Treasury Board Secretariat responsibility, a Canada-Quebec Agreement was signed in October 2000. The objective of this agreement was to upgrade urban and rural municipal infrastructure in the province and improve Quebecers’ quality of life. The Agency acts on behalf of the Government of Canada as the federal department responsible for implementation in Quebec. This agreement was amended in July 2005 to postpone to March 31, 2009 the deadline for disbursements. Since December 2005, under the terms of the agreement, no more new projects may be approved under the program.

3) Start date: October 2000

4) End date: March 31, 2011

5) Strategic outcome: Dynamic and revitalized communities that have a better socio-economic outlook and are developing their economic activity base

6) Result achieved:

  • Rural and urban communities have quality public infrastructure.

(in thousands of dollars) 7) Actual expenditures 2006-2007 8) Actual expenditures 2007-2008 9) Planned spending 2008-2009 10) Total authorities 2008-2009 11) Actual expenditures 2008-2009 12) Variance between 9) and 11)
13) Program activity: Infrastructure
14) Grants
14) Contributions 91,117 46,032 24,448 50,018 50,018 25,570
15) Program activity total 91,117 46,032 24,448 50,018 50,018 25,570

16) Comments on variance:

The variance between planned spending and actual expenditures is attributable to the fact that actual expenditures depend on progress in completion of infrastructure projects. The Government of Quebec is responsible for management of infrastructure projects.

17) Significant audit findings and URL to latest audit(s):

Internal audit of the Infrastructure Canada Program
Electronic link:
www.dec-ced.gc.ca/eng/publications/agency/index.html

External audit of Canada-Quebec Agreement relative to the Infrastructure Program
Electronic link:
http://www.dec-ced.gc.ca/eng/publications/agency/index.html


1) Program activity: Development of communities

2) Name of program: Grant to the Québec Port Authority for the 400th anniversary of Québec in 2008 (voted item)

Description:

The project is the Government of Canada’s legacy to Québec in commemoration of its 400th anniversary in 2008. It includes three major initiatives:

  • developing the Baie de Beauport nautical park with a view to reinforcing its vocation as a year-round activity site while preserving and enhancing the quality of the environment
  • redeveloping Pointe-à-Carcy with a view to improving the port interface and developing the site’s public spaces and waterfront
  • developing Brown Basin into a public park with a view to highlighting the traces of the past and improving access to the river.

3) Start date: November 1, 2005

4) End date: September 30, 2008

5) Strategic outcome: Dynamic and revitalized communities that have a better socio-economic outlook and are developing their economic activity base

6) Result achieved:

  • Communities are recognized for their distinctiveness, brand image and outreach.

(in thousands of dollars) 7) Actual expenditures 2006-2007 8) Actual expenditures 2007-2008 9) Planned spending 2008-2009 10) Total authorities 2008-2009 11) Actual expenditures 2008-2009 12) Variance between 9) and 11)
13) Program activity: Development of communities
14) Grants 10,350 25,000 9,750 9,750 9,750
14) Contributions
15) Program activity total 10,350 25,000 9,750 9,750 9,750

16) Comments on variance: No variance

17) Significant audit findings and URL to latest audit(s): N/A


Note:

1 This table is presented in line with the new Program Activity Architecture. Actual revenue from 2006-2007 has not been categorized.

Top of Page

Environment Canada

Table 5: Details on Transfer Payment Programs


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to support environmental and sustainable development initiatives

2. Start Date: August 1999

3. End Date: March 31, 2010

4. Description: The purpose of this class contribution is to enable Canadian groups, associations and organizations to become actively involved in environmental and sustainable development initiatives while accommodating regional ecosystem and socio-economic considerations. Contributions enable recipients to plan, manage and complete environmental and sustainable development initiatives at the regional or ecosystem level. This funding also serves to increase awareness and understanding of environmental and sustainable development issues and to encourage environmentally responsible action.

5. Strategic Outcomes

  • Canada's natural capital is restored conserved and enhanced
  • Weather and environmental predictions and services reduce risks and contribute to the well-being of Canadians
  • Canadians and their environment are protected from the effects of pollution and waste

6. Results Achieved: The progress made is reflected through the delivery of Environment Canada's programs and results reported in Section II of the 2008-2009 Departmental Performance Report. This class contribution facilitates access, on a national level, to existing knowledge, tools and methods for making good decisions on the environment and sustainable development that are appropriate, given the social, cultural and economic contexts.



($ millions)
13. Program Activity: 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Biodiversity is conserved and protected 7.3 13.0 16.1 14.6 11.2 4.9
Water is clean, safe and secure 0.2 2.8 0.5 0.5 3.0 (2.5)
Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes 6.6 5.0 5.4 4.9 5.2 0.2
Improved knowledge and information on weather and environmental conditions influences decision-making 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2
Canadians are informed of, and respond appropriately to, current and predicted environmental conditions 1.2 0.1 1.3 1.2 0.6 0.7
Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are reduced 2.6 - 3.2 2.9 0.4 2.8
Canadians adopt sustainable consumption and production approaches 0.1 4.3 0.9 - 1.4 (0.5)
Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are reduced - 1.1 3.2 1.7 4.1 (0.9)
14. Total Contributions 18.2 26.3 30.8 25.9 25.8 4.9
15. Total Program Activities 18.2 26.3 30.8 25.9 25.8  4.9
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): This is one of the Department's class authorities. A number of projects implemented in 2008-2009 fell more correctly into the class "Contributions to support environmental research and development."

17. Audit Completed or Planned: Currently at the reporting stage; findings to be tabled internally to the Departmental Evaluation Committee in 2009-2010.


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Habitat Stewardship Contribution Program

2. Start Date: August 20, 2000

3. End Date: March 31, 2014

4. Description: The purpose of this contribution is to contribute to the recovery of endangered, threatened, and other species of concern, and to prevent other species from becoming a conservation concern, by engaging Canadians in conservation actions to benefit wildlife; and to enable non-governmental organizations, landowners, the private sector, Aboriginal organizations, educational institutions, community groups and other levels of government to plan, manage and complete projects that will achieve the program goal.

5. Strategic Outcome: Canada's natural capital is restored, conserved and enhanced

6. Results Achieved: From April 2008 to March 2009, the Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) contributed $11.9 million to 215 projects addressing terrestrial and aquatic species-at-risk issues in all provinces and territories. The HSP directed $46 million (HSP plus matching funds) to projects addressing both habitat conservation and threat mitigation issues. These stewardship activities benefited more than 350 species at risk designated by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Activities such as monitoring, surveys and inventory work as well as the collection of traditional ecological knowledge, evaluation, and program planning and development activities directly involved more than 19 000 people, and 11 000 people participated in projects aiming at reducing or mitigating threats to species at risk. More than 1900 landowners participated in conservation activities leading to the protection of 24 200 ha of habitat through legally binding protection measures and to an additional 311 000 ha through non-binding protection measures. Moreover, 19 000 ha of habitat and 250 km of shoreline were improved, thanks to the involvement of 6000 people.




($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Biodiversity is conserved and protected 8.9 9.6 13.0 12.8 11.8 1.2
14. Total Contribution 8.9 9.6 13.0 12.8 11.8 1.2
15. Total Program Activity 8.9 9.6 13.0 12.8 11.8 1.2
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The first round of project proposals was undersubscribed. Approval of the second round of project proposals was delayed until late fall 2008 such that it became too late to implement the projects within the 2008-2009 fiscal year. Simplified approval processes and targeted promotion will lead to the full utilization of the funds in 2009-2010.

17. Audit Completed or Planned: Summative evaluation initiated in 2008-2009. Findings and recommendations to be available in June 2009.



1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to EcoAction Community Funding Initiative

2. Start Date: 1998

3. End Date: March 31, 2010

4. Description: Provides financial support to non-profit organizations to undertake environmental projects that yield positive, measurable results and increase public capacity and awareness at the community level.

5. Strategic Outcome: Canada's natural capital is restored conserved and enhanced

6. Results Achieved: The not-for-profit sector is able to leverage funding from other partners, including provinces, territories, the private sector and other non-governmental organizations to deliver projects that produce real environmental results and engage Canadians in protecting the environment. On average, funded projects leverage contributions from partners worth $2.26 for every dollar invested by the Department.

Since the creation of the EcoAction program in 1995:

  • 2070 projects have been completed, with EcoAction providing $65,386,605 in funding for these projects;
  • projects have collectively reduced greenhouse emissions by approximately 3.0 Mt;
  • 3.3 million kg of other air pollutants have been reduced;
  • 7.5 million native plants, trees and shrubs have been planted;
  • 112 710 ha of wildlife habitat have been enhanced or restored;
  • 245 000 ha of riparian habitat or ecosystem have been created, restored, preserved or protected;
  • 101 000 ha of habitat have been permanently protected;
  • 3 million L of pesticides, fertilizers, toxic substances or hazardous waste have been diverted from use or reduced;
  • 2 million kg of pesticides, fertilizers, toxic substances or hazardous waste have been diverted from use or reduced;
  • 297 824 volunteers have been directly involved in projects; and
  • 751 jobs have been created.



($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes 4.6 3.9 5.0 5.0 4.3 0.7
14. Total Contribution 4.6 3.9 5.0 5.0 4.3 0.7
15. Total Program Activity 4.6 3.9 5.0 5.0 4.3 0.7
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The 2008-2009 variance in contribution spending is a result of departmental funding delays.

17. Audit Completed or Planned: A program evaluation covering the 2004-2005 to 2008-2009 fiscal years was completed in 2008-2009, as required by Treasury Board for program renewal. The evaluation examined the program's relevance, success, cost-effectiveness, and design and delivery. Overall, the evaluation of the program was positive. Key findings indicated that the program is aligned with federal priorities; there is a continued need for the program; the program is successful in reaching its intended audiences; the program is working towards achieving its intended outcomes; the program provides good value for money (leveraging $2.26:$1); and has achieved high client satisfaction. The evaluation noted that some areas required improvement: addressing confusion among program staff on the decision-making process; improving program monitoring activities; and assessing the long-term impact of funded projects. The evaluation acknowledged that high administrative costs of the program are a result of program design and the focus on client service; however, some improvements could be made to increase cost-efficiency.

Recommendations focused on improving program forms and tools, examining roles, responsibilities and processes, and improving the program's ability to demonstrate results. The program agrees with the recommendations. The action plan to implement these improvements was approved by the responsible senior management board.


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to Support Canada's International Commitments

2. Start Date: June 1999

3. End Date: March 31, 2010

4. Description: The purpose of this class contribution is to sustain and enhance Canada 's participation in international multilateral and bilateral environmental organizations, agreements and protocols; ensure that Canadian interests are represented in international forums relating to environmental issues; facilitate the participation of developing countries in global environmental and sustainable development issues; and build, strengthen and maintain Canada's links with the international community on global environmental and sustainable development issues.

5. Strategic Outcomes

  • Canada's natural capital is restored conserved and enhanced
  • Weather and environmental predictions and services reduce risks and contribute to the well-being of Canadians
  • Canadians and their environment are protected from the effects of pollution and waste

6. Results Achieved: The results achieved and progress made are reflected through program delivery. This class contribution facilitates access on a national level to existing knowledge tools and methods for making good policy decisions on the environment and health that are appropriate, given the social, cultural and economic contexts.




($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Biodiversity is conserved and protected 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.8 1.5 (1.2)
Improved knowledge and information on weather and environmental conditions influences decision-making - 0.2 - - 0.9 (0.9)
Canadians are informed of, and respond appropriately to, current and predicted environmental conditions 0.4 3.5 2.0 4.9 4.2 (2.2)
Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are reduced - 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.7 (0.6)
Canadians adopt sustainable consumption and production approaches - 3.6 - - - -
Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are reduced 0.3 0.2 0.51 1.2 - 0.5
Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes 0.7 - - - - -
14. Total Contributions 2.2 8.5 2.9 7.2 7.3 (4.4)
15. Total Program Activities 2.2 8.5 2.9 7.2 7.3 (4.4)
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Opportunity to advance contribution agreements before the end of the fiscal year was available resulting in spending more than planned in this grants and contributions program.

17. Audit Completed or Planned: Currently at the reporting stage; findings to be tabled internally to the Departmental Evaluation Committee in 2009-2010.


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to support environmental research and development

2. Start Date: June 1999

3. End Date: March 31, 2010

4. Description: The purpose of this class is to stimulate, increase or improve scientific knowledge and information, to support the promotion and coordination of research and development in areas that support Environment Canada's objectives, such as wildlife, toxicology, climate change and atmospheric studies.

5. Strategic Outcomes

  • Canada's natural capital is restored conserved and enhanced
  • Weather and environmental predictions and services reduce risks and contribute to the well-being of Canadians
  • Canadians and their environment are protected from the effects of pollution and waste

6. Results Achieved: Environment Canada continued ongoing relationships with a number of Canadian universities on a wide variety of initiatives, resulting in increases in knowledge in atmospheric sciences, toxic chemicals, water and the impacts of pollutants on water, wildlife and the impacts of pollutants on wildlife.




($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
2
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Biodiversity is conserved and protected 3.0 2.6 1.0 2.5 2.2 (1.2)
Water is clean, safe and secure 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.7 (0.5)
Improved knowledge and information on weather and environmental conditions influences decision-making 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.8 0.7 (0.4)
Canadians are informed of, and respond appropriately to, current and predicted environmental conditions 0.0 0.4 - - 1.1 (1.1)
Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are reduced 0.7 0.2 - - 0.2 (0.2)
Canadians adopt sustainable consumption and production approaches 0.0 0.1 0.8 2.0 0.5 0.3
Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are reduced - 0.1 - - 0.3 (0.3)
14. Total Contributions 4.2 4.4 2.2 5.7 5.7 (3.4)
15. Total Program Activities 4.2 4.4 2.2 5.7 5.7 (3.4)
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Harbourfront Centre Funding Program

2. Start Date: March 2006

3. End Date: March 31, 2011

4. Description: The primary objective of the Harbourfront Centre Funding Program (HCFP) is to provide operational funding support to the Harbourfront Centre until March 31, 2011. Such support will assist the Centre in covering its fixed operational costs. It will also facilitate its ability to leverage funding from other levels of government and pursue other revenue-generating strategies that will allow the organization to provide the general public with continued access to cultural, recreational and educational programs and activities in Toronto's Waterfront Area.

5. Strategic Outcome: Sustainable urban development and infrastructure renewal in the Toronto Waterfront Area

6. Results Achieved: 2008-2009 was a transitional year for the HCFP, since responsibility for the program was transferred from the Minister of the Environment to the Minister of Finance, as of October 30, 2008. The program fulfilled the planned results set out in Environment Canada's 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities, since it provided a stable foundation for the Harbourfront Centre's administration and operations, and ongoing community access to the site and capital facilities. The Centre spent 100 percent of the $5 million federal contribution it received in 2008-2009 and remained open, providing community and cultural programming for the general public in Toronto Waterfront Area.




($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
2
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Harbourfront Centre Funding Program - 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -
14. Total Contributions - 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -
15. Total Program Activity 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

17. Audit Completed or Planned: A March 2009 on-site federal desk audit of the HCFP concluded that the funds were being spent according to the terms and conditions of the program.


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Initiative

2. Start Date: April 2001

3. End Date: March 31, 2011

4. Description: The Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Initiative is both an infrastructure and an urban renewal investment. The goals of the initiative include positioning Canada, Ontario and Toronto in the new economy and thus ensuring Canada's continued success in the global economy. This includes increasing economic growth and development opportunities, recognizing the intrinsic links between economic, social and environmental health, enhancing the quality of life in Toronto, and encouraging sustainable urban development.

5. Strategic Outcome: Sustainable urban development and infrastructure renewal in the Toronto Waterfront Area

6. Results Achieved: 2008-2009 was a transitional year for the initiative, since responsibility for it transferred from the Minister of the Environment to the Minister of Finance, as of October 30, 2008. Eleven projects receiving federal funding were completed and closed during 2008-2009. Most of these involved preliminary design, with the bulk of the construction expected to occur during the remainder of the initiative, which is currently slated to sunset on March 31, 2011. Projects that were completed and opened for public use during 2008-2009 include the Spadina Wave Deck to enhance pedestrian access to the Lake Ontario waterfront and the 3.6-hectare Cherry Beach Transitional Sports Fields in a brownfield area in Toronto's Port Lands district. Capital work is ongoing on several other projects receiving federal funding.



($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
3
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Initiative 34.5 39.4 85.0 85.7 77.4 7.6
14. Total Contributions 34.5 39.4 85.0 85.7 77.4 7.6
15. Total Program Activity 34.5 39.4 85.0 85.7 77.4 7.6
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Due to the nature and environment in which the Initiative works (e.g. construction delays due to labour disputes and bad weather; challenges of getting all three levels of government to approve and sign certain contribution agreements), the entire budget was not spent within the fiscal year. All lapsed funding has been reprofiled to future years to be spent in its entirety.

17. Audit Completed or Planned: Evaluation completed; posted on Environment Canada's website at http://ec.gc.ca/doc/ae-ve/2008-09/638/toc_eng.htm. An external audit of the Western Beaches Watercourse Facility and an internal desk audit of the Port Lands Preparation Contribution Agreement were carried out in 2008-2009 as per the annual federally led tri-governmental audit plan.


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to the Canada Foundation for Sustainable Development Technology

2. Start Date: April 1, 2007

3. End Date: September 30, 2027 (the last appropriation by Parliament will be in fiscal year 2014-2015, with the last disbursement to Sustainable Development Technology Canada [SDTC] by March 31, 2017)

4. Description: The Foundation will provide grants with conditional repayment terms to eligible recipients for the establishment of first-of-kind, large, demonstration-scale facilities producing next-generation renewable fuels. These facilities must involve both non-conventional technologies and non-traditional feedstocks and be built in Canada, using representative Canadian feedstock. Selection will be based on an in-depth due diligence process developed to assess applications for funding using a roster of biofuels experts and a project review committee.

Since next-generation technologies are capital-equipment-intensive, they constitute a greater debt financing risk. The support provided by the NextGen Biofuels Fund will encourage the retention and growth of technology expertise and innovation capacity for next-generation renewable fuels production in Canada.

Of the $500 million in total funding, $200 million is statutory, with the remaining $300 million being appropriated funding spread over seven fiscal years, beginning in 2008-2009 and ending in 2014-2015.4

5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians and their environment are protected from the effects of pollution and waste

6. Results Achieved: To date, SDTC has received one formal application for funding under the NextGen Biofuels Fund. SDTC is tracking approximately 100 companies as potential applicants both from Canada and abroad. Of these, four have expressed a strong interest in submitting an application in 2009.

The NextGen Biofuels Fund adopted a project assurance process based on best practices used by multinational companies. From end to end, there are seven phases and five decision gates. The Fund also assembled a roster of biofuels experts to assist with the in-depth due diligence exercises required to assess applications for funding. The Project Review Committee was created to support the review of applications. The SDTC Board of Directors approved the NextGen Biofuels Fund Evaluation Framework.



($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Canadians adopt sustainable consumption and production approaches - 1.6 12.5 31.5 31.5 (19.0)
14. Total Grants** 1.6 12.5 31.5 31.5 (19.0)
15. Total Program Activity - 1.6 12.5 31.5 31.5 (19.0)
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to a statutory payment of $19.0 million issued over and above the planned $12.5 million included in Environment Canada's Main Estimates.

17. Audit Completed or Planned: No audit was planned or performed; performance will be assessed through the departmental Science and Technology Plan that is being completed.

Notes:

* Actual spending by SDTC was significantly less than the payments made to SDTC (based on the estimates provided in SDTC's Cash Flow Statements), because the anticipated payments to projects have been delayed (no new projects have been announced yet). The NextGen Biofuels Fund had an opening balance of $65.3 million, as of December 31, 2008. Accordingly, SDTC will have on hand the funds that it has estimated as its requirements for the period from January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2010.

** These grants are Environment Canada's portion of payments made to SDTC based on Cash Flow Statements received from the Canada Foundation for Sustainable Development Technology. Funding is divided equally between Natural Resources Canada and Environment Canada.


1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Vehicle Scrappage

2. Start date: April 1, 2007

3. End date: March 31, 2011

4. Description: The National Vehicle Scrappage Program will provide incentives to encourage Canadians to retire their old vehicles sooner than planned. These incentives will promote sustainable transportation and will provide Canadians with an opportunity to take concrete actions to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians and their environment are protected from the effects of pollution and waste

6. Results Achieved

  • Retire Your Ride/Adieu bazou was launched in all provinces by the Clean Air Foundation, the national not-for-profit organization that is delivering the program with a network of local organizations.
  • 17 000 vehicles were retired. Canadians chose among a suite of incentives as a reward for retiring their older (model year 1995 and earlier) vehicles, including transit passes, car share memberships, bicycle coupons, new vehicle discounts or $300 cash.
  • Program results, including emissions reductions and selection of incentives, are tracked through a database that is updated daily as new program participants decide to retire their vehicles.
  • Advertising and outreach activities by program delivery agents communicated the impacts of old vehicles on the environment and the reasons for Canadians to scrap them.
  • A national code of practice for responsible recycling of vehicles was developed, printed and distributed to vehicle recyclers, who must adhere to the code to participate in the program.
  • A baseline survey of owners of older vehicles was conducted to measure awareness of vehicle scrappage programs and the impacts of older vehicles on the environment.



($ millions)
13. Program Activity 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Risks to Canadians, their health, and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are reduced - 0.2 23.0 23.0 4.6 18.4
14. Total Contributions - 0.2 23.0 23.0 4.6 18.4
15. Total Program Activity - 0.2 23.0 23.0 4.6 18.4
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending in 2008-2009 was lower than planned due to a delay in program launch. Of the approved funding of $23 million, $12.8 million was reprofiled to fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. 3.8 million of expenditures are reflected in the class "Contributions to support environmental and sustainable developmental initiatives", since the Department obtained permission to use the two authorities for this program for this year.

17. Audit Completed or Planned

  • Joint audit and evaluation scheduled to begin in 2011-2012.
  • Recipient audit planned to be completed in December 2009.


1. The Planned Spending figure in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities is incorrect. The figure in the table above is the revised figure.

2. In 2006-2007, responsibility for the HCFP was with the Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada.

3. In 2006-2007, responsibility for the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Initiative was with the Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada.

4. The funding is equally divided between Natural Resources Canada and Environment Canada.
Top of Page

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


  • Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management
  • Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management

Start date: 2005-2006

End date: Ongoing

Description: Launched in October 2004, the Aboriginal Aquatic Resource and Oceans Management (AAROM) Program provides for Capacity Building and Collaborative Management initiatives that supports the involvement of Aboriginal groups, working together, to obtain access to technical, scientific and administrative expertise in order to facilitate their participation in multi-stakeholder and other decision-making processes used to manage aquatic resources and ocean spaces.

Aboriginal groups transition from Capacity Building into Collaborative Management.

Provisions of Contribution Agreements under AAROM may include:
  • establishing AAROM collaborative management structures or AAROM bodies;
  • accessing skilled professional, administrative and technical expertise from within the Aboriginal community or other external sources but excluding public office holders;
  • participating in aquatic resource and oceans management planning — through development of resource and oceans management plans and coordination of community input into the development of plans;
  • developing or providing input into the development of models, structures and processes to guide the interactions of external bodies and agencies with the respective Aboriginal group;
  • planning and holding consultation sessions with member communities on AAROM-related issues;
  • participating in various government technical committees and other multi-stakeholder fora;
  • developing, implementing and monitoring AAROM capacity building strategies;
  • developing enforcement capacity including Aboriginal Fishery Officers and upgrading the skills of Aboriginal Guardians;
  • collaborating in scientific research efforts related to aquatic resource and oceans management;
  • participating in and providing input to various aquatic and oceans resource policy and management processes;
  • undertaking scientific research activities to support appropriate watershed/ecosystem-based management efforts, including the collection and gathering of Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK);
  • conducting community outreach, stewardship and awareness activities;
  • conducting liaison activities with other relevant/interested parties;
  • developing protocols on ATK — dealing with new and innovative approaches to collect, analyze and integrate this information into environmental and habitat assessments and management practices;
  • ongoing program planning, administration and reporting activities of the AAROM Collaborative Management body; and
  • negotiations and implementation of related AAROM agreements (and associated protocols) for which DFO is a signatory.

AAROM is applicable in areas where DFO manages the fishery, and where land claim agreements addressing those matters covered under AAROM are not in place. Where the Aboriginal group has signed a comprehensive land claims agreement, and one or more of the matters covered by the AAROM Program are not dealt with in the agreement, the group would be eligible to apply for support in those matters not covered.

Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture

Results Achieved: In 2008-09, DFO had 11 Capacity Building Agreements, and 21 Collaborative Management Agreements and one Umbrella Agreement. These agreements encompass approximately 319 Aboriginal communities nationally as well as three Native Councils in Atlantic Canada. AAROM agreements have increased collaboration amongst Aboriginal communities and strengthened the relationship between communities and DFO. While the structure of the Collaborative Management agreements varied between Aboriginal organizations, the majority of the agreements focused on enhancing core scientific, technical and administrative capacity of the Aboriginal organizations allowing them to obtain competencies that will enable them to strengthen their ability to participate in aquatic management and oceans resources decision making. Under the AAROM program Aboriginal Organizations have created approximately 263 full time positions. AAROM has also provided approximately $9.5 million to Aboriginal Organizations for commercial access including licenses, quotas, vessels and gear.


Program Activity: Fisheries Management
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-081
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants
Total Contributions 14.7 25.8 22.8 16.2 16.2 6.6
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments
Total Program Activity(ies) 14.7 25.8 22.8 16.2 16.2 6.6

1 The figure for Actual Spending for 2007-08 in the 2007-08 DPR was incorrect ($25.6 million). The correct amount ($25.8 million) is reported here.

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance is due to re-profile of Atlantic Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative of $4.99 million and movement between AFS and AAROM.

Audit Completed or Planned: An evaluation is planned for 2013-14.


 


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy

Start date: 1992

End date: Ongoing

Description: Launched in 1992, the Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy (AFS) provides for negotiated arrangements with Aboriginal groups around the harvesting, use and management of Aboriginal food, social and ceremonial fisheries and, where applicable, communal commercial fisheries.

In 1994, DFO introduced a commercial access component to the AFS, the Allocation Transfer Program (ATP). The ATP facilitates the voluntary retirement of commercial fishing licences and the issuance of communal licences to eligible Aboriginal groups in a manner that does not add to the existing effort on the resource.

Provisions of negotiated fisheries agreements under the AFS may include:

  • a harvest allocation to the Aboriginal group for FSC purposes;
  • terms and conditions pertaining to communal fishing licences;
  • enforcement provisions, including the training and engagement of Aboriginal Fisheries Guardians;
  • arrangements for the co-management and stewardship of fisheries resources and their supporting habitats, including the restoration and protection of species at risk;
  • co-management projects for the improvement of the management of fisheries generally, such as scientific research, stock assessment, fish enhancement and habitat management; and
  • communal commercial fishing arrangements including the transfer of vessels and gear as well as support for fisheries-related economic opportunities (e.g., demonstration fishery projects, aquaculture development, business planning support, etc.).

Where Agreements pertaining to the FSC Fisheries cannot be concluded between DFO and an Aboriginal group, DFO will issue to the group a communal fishing licence that establishes the terms and conditions of its FSC fishery.

The AFS is applicable where DFO manages the fishery and where a fisheries management regime has not already been established under a land claims settlement.

Strategic Outcome: Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture

Results Achieved: In 2008-2009, DFO entered into approximately 140 AFS Agreements with Aboriginal organizations in all DFO regions. These agreements facilitated economic opportunities as well as Aboriginal participation in the management of their fisheries and other aquatic resource management.

Regarding economic development, DFO acquired 22 Commercial licences in Quebec and Pacific Regions and approximately $2M woth of Halibut Quota in the Pacific Region. In addition DFO provided approximately $1.2M for the acquisition of vessels and gear.

AFS agreements provided for management of the FSC fisheries, largely through the Guardian program which comprised of the enforcement component. In 2008 and 2009, 76 Guardians were retrained by DFO to upgrade skills in carrying out enforcement functions, i.e.; issuing warnings, inspecting fish and gear, catch monitoring.

Participation in other aquatic resource management activities included co-management and science related activities such as stock assessment, fish enhancement, counting fences, habitat related work, and river/stream/brook improvement projects.

These economic related and aquatic management activities from AFS agreements created approximately 1,600 seasonal jobs in areas described above.


Program Activity: Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-082
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants
Total Contributions 32.2 32.9 57.3 60.5 58.3 (1.0)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments
Total Program Activity(ies) 32.2 32.9 57.3 60.5 58.3 (1.0)

2 The figure for Actual Spending for 2007-08 in the 2007-08 DPR was incorrect ($32.5 million). The correct amount ($32.9 million) is reported here.

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance is due to movement between AAROM and AFS.

Audit Completed or Planned: The audit of the Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy was approved by the Departmental Audit Committee in November 2007. An evaluation is planned for 2013-14.


Top of Page

Health Canada

Details on Transfer Payment Programs


Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant for the Territorial Medical Travel Fund - Nunavut

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
To support the medical travel fund

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Address the significant and immediate pressures facing the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut (the territories) in the area of medical travel expenditures
  • Offset a portion of the territories' medical travel costs; and
  • Enable the territories to redirect resources to alternative sustainable health reform initiatives.

Program Activity: (PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 NIL
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 NIL

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant for the Territorial Health Access Fund and Operational Secretariat-Yukon

Start date:
September 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
Grant for the territorial Health Access Fund and Operational Secretariat.
(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Strengthened, integrated sustainable health promotion and illness prevention strategies;
  • Enhanced alcohol and drug services, programs, and treatment options;
  • Improved public health services and emergency preparedness and response measures and oral health;
  • Reduced frequency of acute care facilities utilization;
  • Enhanced application of e-health and telehealth solutions;
  • Increased out-reach services to outlying communities;
  • Improved health professional recruitment and retention strategies;
  • Improved access to specialized physician and diagnostic services;
  • Supported territorial-based education and training for health professionals and para-professionals
  •  improved in-territory services to population groups with special needs; and
  • Enhanced medical travel information collection and collation capacity.

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 NIL
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 NIL

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Payments to First Nations and Inuit Health Services Transfer

Start date:
April 2007

End date:
March 2012

Description:
To increase responsibility and control by First Nations and Inuit for their own health programs and services to improve health conditions for First Nations and Inuit people

Strategic Outcome:
Better Health outcomes and reduction of Health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians.

Results Achieved:

  • Increased control or accountability by First Nations and Inuit for their own of health care programs and services.

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0 0 233.9 213.7 213.7 20.2
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 0 0 233.9 213.7 213.7 20.2

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The rate at which these complex transfer agreements have been put in place has be slower than anticipated. This is occuring partly as a result of the fact that the government is in a period of rapid change in terms of the funding mechanisms being created.

Due to improvements in coding, the department is better able to identify specific program activity rather than generic Atransfer@ activities.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Governance and Infrastructure Support

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
Health Governance and Infrastructure Support aims to increase First Nations and Inuit control over health programs and services. Activities include: health planning and management; health research, knowledge and information management; health consultation and liaison; health delivery and infrastructure; integration and adaptation of health services; and health human resources.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Improved health status of First Nations and Inuit through strengthened governance and infrastructure

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 87.8 124.3 191.5 148.6 148.6 42.9
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 87.8 124.3 191.5 148.6 148.6 42.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The branch received $5.5M in funds via Supps C through TB 3 834619, Transitioning Towards Better Results.

The continuation of complex Federal/Provincial/First Nations partnering has resulted in some delays in the development of these agreements.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Community Programs

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
Community programs support child and maternal-child health; mental health promotion; addictions prevention and treatment; chronic disease prevention and health promotion services.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Increased participation of First Nations and Inuit individuals, families, and communities in programs and supports
  • Improved continuum of programs and services in First Nations and Inuit communities

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 288.5 315.3 235.7 285.1 285.1 (49.4)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 288.5 315.3 235.7 285.1 285.1 (49.4)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Due to improvements in coding, the department is better able to identify specific program activity rather than generic Atransfer@ activities.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Facilities and Capital Program

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
Provides funding to eligible recipients for the construction acquisition, leasing, operation and maintenance of nursing stations, health centres, health stations, health offices, treatment centres, staff residences, and operational support buildings.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Increase availability of health facilities, equipment and other moveable assets in First Nations and Inuit communities that support the provision of health services

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 41.7 55.7 46.5 66.1 66.1 (19.6)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 41.7 55.7 46.5 66.1 66.1 (19.6)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The branch received $9.9M in funds via Supps C through TB # 834619, Transitioning Towards Better Results.

The decision was made to advance some capital projects planned for future years.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Benefits

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
A limited range of medically necessary health-related goods and services which supplement those provided through other private or provincial/territorial health insurance plans is provided to registered Indians and recognized Inuit. Benefits include drugs, dental care, vision care, medical supplies and equipment, short-term crisis intervention mental health services, and transportation to access medical services not available on reserve or in the community of residence.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Access by eligible clients to Non-Insured Health benefits

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 136.5 148.1 135.4 150.0 150.0  (14.6)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 136.5 148.1 135.4 150.0 150.0  (14.6)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The branch received $12.2M in funds via Supps C through TB # 834833, Transitioning Towards Better Results.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Health Protection

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
Communicable Disease and Environmental Health and Research programs facilitate prepardness to implement measures in the control, management and containment of outbreaks of preventable diseases and improve management and control of environmental hazards.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Environmental health risk management contributes to improved health status of First Nations individuals, families and communities
  • Improved access to quality well-coordinated communicable disease prevention and control programs for First Nations and Inuit individuals, families, and communities

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 29.0 30.9 11.1 24.4 24.4 (13.3)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 29.0 30.9 11.1 24.4 24.4 (13.3)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The branch received $8M total in funds via Supps A through TB # 834258 (Water and Wastewater Plan), # 834267 (Clean Air Agenda) and # 834269 (Environmental Contaminants).

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions for First Nations and Inuit Primary Health Care

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
Primary Health Care services include emergency and acute care health services, Community primary health care services which include illness and injury prevention and health promotion activities. These programs also include: the First Nations and Inuit Home and Community Care; and the Oral Health Strategy.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Improved access to quality well-coordinated culturally appropriate primary health care programs and services for First Nations and Inuit individuals, families and communities

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 91.7 92.6 122.2 147.9 147.9 (25.7)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 91.7 92.6 122.2 147.9 147.9 (25.7)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The branch received $12.6M funds for Nursing via Supps C. Nursing costs continue to increase beyond planned spending.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions for Bigstone Non-Insured Health Benefits Pilot Project

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
Administration and delivery of benefits with Bigstone Health Commission to registered Indians and recognized Inuit.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Improved access to quality well-coordinated culturally appropriate primary health care programs and services for First Nations and Inuit individuals, families and communities

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 9.0 9.5 8.8 10.0 10.0 (1.2)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 9.0 9.5 8.8 10.0 10.0 (1.2)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
 

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions to the Organization for the Advancement of Aboriginal People=s Health (OAAPH)

Start date:
April 2005

End date:
March 2010

Description:
To support the Organization for the Advancement of Aboriginal People's Health

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Continued empowerment of Aboriginal peoples through advancements in knowledge and sharing of knowledge on Aboriginal health

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 NIL
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 NIL

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Indian Residential Schools Resolution Health Support Program

Start date:
November 2006

End date:
March 2013

Description:
This program is to support the mental wellness of former Indian Residential School students, their families and communities by providing:

  • resolution health support services, delivered by Resolution Health Support Workers;
  • Elder support;
  • support during truth and reconciliation and commemoration events;
  • research and communication activities in support of the mental wellness of former IRS
  • students, and an overall increased awareness of and demand for mental health services available to former IRS
  • tudents and their families during the resolution process.

(Voted)

Strategic Outcome:
Better health outcomes and reduction of health inequalities between First Nations and Inuit and other Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Services which are culturally sensitive, holistic, comprehensive, effective and efficient, ultimately improving emotional and mental wellness of former Indian Residential School students.
  • Services allow former IRS students to disclose accounts of childhood sexual and physical abuses in a safe and effective manner.

Program Activity:(PA)
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions n/a 8.2 0.0 (18.8) (18.8) (18.8)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total PA n/a 8.2 0.0 (18.8) (18.8) (18.8)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The branch received $7.2M in funding via ARLU 08-09, TB # 833196. In addition a vote realignment to vote 10, contributions, was made in the amount of $11M via Supps C.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contribution Program to improve access to health services for official language minority communities

Start date:
June 18, 2003

End date:
June 30, 2009

Description:
The Contribution Program to Improve Access to Health Services for Official Language Minority Communities was created following the 2003 federal budget and the federal Action Plan for Official Languages, announced on March 12, 2003. The budget provided Health Canada with $89 million over five years (2003-2004 to 2007-2008) for the implementation of projects related to training and retention of health professionals and for the creation of community networks designed to improve the access of Official Language Minority Communities -- English-speaking residents of Quebec and Francophones outside of Quebec -- to health services in the language of their choice.

The Program funds networking initiatives as well as health care professional training and retention measures. Within this context, 14 contribution agreements have been signed with recipients in both communities: Société Santé en français and the Quebec Community Groups Network, which originally received $9.3 million and $4.7 million, respectively, over a five-year period to maintain and develop networks for facilitation and co-ordination of activities around health care issues. For training and retention, the Consortium national de formation en santé (10 post-secondary institutions) received $63 million over five years to ensure the availability of health care professionals who can work in French. As well, McGill University received $12 million to organize language training activities to ensure the availability of health care professionals who can work in English in Quebec. Additional funds of $13.7M were allocated during that period.

In December 2008, the Government of Canada approved the five-year extension of this contribution program under the new name of Official Languages Health Contribution Program, for the 2008-2009 to 2012-2013 period. In addition to the ongoing funding of $23M, additional funds totalling $59.3M will be provided over the five year period, for a total commitment of $174.3M. The new funds are pursuant to the government's Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality 2008-2013: Acting for the Future, which was announced in June 2008.

Strategic Outcomes:
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians

Results Achieved:

In 2008-2009, the Training and Retention component of the Contribution Program to Improve Access to Health Services for Official Language Minority Communities generated 822 French-speaking student registrations in post-secondary health care training programs outside Quebec and more than 2000 health professionals received language training in order to better serve the English-speaking community in Quebec.

Networking activities have also continued in 2008-2009, for instance through the organization of meetings and other interactions with provincial/territorial governments and various health care organizations, and through the organization of and participation in research symposiums. Moreover, work was done to develop new networks in Quebec in the Abitibi, Lower St. Lawrence, Laval and North Shore regions.

Further information regarding these projects is available from the websites of Program recipients:

  • Société Santé en français [http://santefrancais.ca/]
  • Community Health and Social Services Network [http://www.chssn.org/]
  • Consortium national de formation en santé [http://www.cnfs.net/]
  • McGill University [http://www.mcgill.ca/hssaccess/]

Program Activity
 
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 24.1 30.6 23.0 27.9 27.9 (4.9)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 24.1 30.6 23.0 27.9 27.9 (4.9)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
On March 23, 2009, the Government of Canada announced an extra $4M in federal support to the CNFS in order to help the Consortium strengthen its promotion and recruitment efforts, expand the scope of distance learning, strengthen clinical training for students through the purchase of new medical equipment, and strengthen continuous learning and teaching recruits. In 2008-2009, SSF also received an extra $500,000 and the Entente Québec-Nouveau Brunswick B Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick, $390,977.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Drug Strategy Community Initiatives Fund (voted contribution dollars)

Start date:
April 2004

End date:
March 31, 2010

Description:
The Drug Strategy Community Initiatives Fund will contribute to reducing drug use among Canadians, particularly among vulnerable populations such as youth, by focussing on health promotion and prevention approaches to address drug abuse before it happens. The objectives of the Fund are to facilitate the development of local, provincial, territorial, national and community-based solutions to drug use among youth and to promote public awareness of illicit drug use among youth. The Program is delivered through Health Canada's regional and national offices and the Northern region.

Strategic Outcomes:
Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances and healthy, sustainable living and working environments

Results Achieved:

  • Received and reviewed a total of 297 applications for funding.
  • As of March 31, 2009 a total of 64 new projects have been supported under the National Anti-Drug Strategy: British Columbia 6; Alberta 10; Manitoba/Saskatchewan 5; Ontario 18; Quebec 12, Atlantic 6, Northern Secretariat 3, and; National 4.
  • In an effort to enhance evaluation and reporting capacity of funding recipients, new evaluation training workshops, manuals and reporting templates have been developed.
  • Three program level evaluation exercises were completed: a program review; a performance measurement strategy in support of the National Anti-Drug Strategy; and a sample of case studies demonstrating project level impacts.
  • A cluster evaluation plan has been developed to capture project level outcomes as contributors to the objectives/outcomes of the overall program.

Program Activity
Substance Use and Abuse
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 10.7 8.7 11.4 4.9 4.9 6.6
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 10.7 8.7 11.4 4.9 4.9 6.6

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
In the fall of 2008, $3M was reprofiled from 08/09 to 10/11. Therefore, a total of $8.4M was ultimately planned spending and the program experienced a $6.6M lapse in funding in 2008-2009. Lapses were due to late project start ups (originally intended for October; most of which began in January or February of 2009) for the following reasons: significant demand on DSCIF program staff due to high demand for fund (need to review nearly 300 applications); in the context of greater accountability and a refocused DSCIF, the proposal assessment process was redesigned to be more rigorous with an emphasis on program impact resulting in a longer review period, and the federal election caused a delay in the Health Canada review and approval process.

Audit completed or planned:
A total of 6 project level audits were planned and conducted during the 2008 2009 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Assessed Contribution to the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO)

Start date:
April 15, 2008

End date:
March 31, 2013

Description:
To support Canada=s membership in PAHO

Strategic Outcomes:
Canada receives direct and indirect benefits from its membership in PAHO. Attendance at meetings of the governing bodies and at expert consultations provides a forum for the wider dissemination of Canadian-based values related to health and the provision of health care services and public health approaches. Participation by Canadian health experts ensures bilateral linkages are created and maintained with key countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The Director of PAHO annually reports the Organization's accomplishments and how it has spent its resources to meet stated objectives. Health Canada provides a website link to PAHO's website: (http://www.paho.org/English/gov/govbodies-index.htm).

Results Achieved:


Program Activity
International Health Affairs
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions n/a n/a 0 12.0 12.0 (12.0)
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity n/a n/a 0 12.0 12.0 (12.0)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
As there was no planned spending for the contribution to PAHO in 2008-2009, there was a $12.0M variance between the planned and actual spending.

Audit completed or planned:
None



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Contributions in support of the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy

Start date:
July 1, 2007

End date:
March 31, 2012

Description:
The purpose of the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy (FTCS) Contribution Program is to contribute to the achievement of FTCS objectives through assistance to provinces, non-governmental organizations, researchers and other tobacco control stakeholders. In 2007 the Government of Canada announced new goals and objectives for the Federal Tobacco Control Strategy until 2011. These are:

Goal:
Reducing the overall smoking prevalence from 19% (2005) to 12% by 2011. 

The new objectives are to:

  • Reduce the prevalence of Canadian youth (15-17) who smoke from 15% to 9%;
  • Increase the number of adult Canadians who quit smoking by 1.5 million;
  • Reduce the prevalence of Canadians exposed daily to second-hand smoke from 28% to 20%;
  • Examine the next generation of tobacco control policy in Canada
  • Contribute to the global implementation of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control; and
  • Monitor and assess contraband tobacco activities and enhance compliance.

Strategic Outcomes:
Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances and healthy, sustainable living and working environments

Results Achieved:

  • Support for the coordination of a practice‑based research project which facilitates the development, testing, and implementation of hospital‑based smoking cessation programs within New Brunswick and British Columbia. The expected results of this project include improved institutional policies and systems related to the systematic identification and treatment of tobacco users at hospitals in Canada.
  • Continued support to organizations to facilitate knowledge transfer and exchange and networking in tobacco control, including support for the 5th National Conference on Tobacco or Health, Edmonton, October 2007.
  • Established a national practice‑based research network to facilitate research and knowledge exchange to inform on the development of tobacco cessation guidelines for use in clinical practice, as well as in population‑based strategies.
  • Strengthened Canadian capacity to support global tobacco control by creating the infrastructure to allow for enhanced Canadian and international tobacco control initiatives through collaboration and information‑sharing with international organizations, and promoting and supporting the implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.
  • Support for the development of tobacco control policy including work on emerging issues.

Program Activity
Substance Use and Abuse
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants n/a n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 NIL
Total Contributions 14.8 2.8 15.8 7.4 7.4 8.4
Total Other types of TPs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Program Activity 14.8 2.8 15.8 7.4 7.4 8.4

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Lapsed funds due to delays in approval processes.

Audit completed or planned:
None



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Drug Treatment Funding Program

Start date:
October 2007 - Services component
April 2008 - Systems component

End date:
March 31, 2012 (Services component)
March 31, 2013(systems component)

Description:
Drug Treatment Funding Program (DTFP), under the National Anti‑Drug Strategy, provides $111 million in financial support over five years to provincial and territorial governments to support illicit drug treatment services for at‑risk youth, and to assist in strengthening the quality of drug treatment services. An additional $10M over five years is designated support for a project in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.

Strategic Outcomes:
Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances and healthy, sustainable living and working environments

Results Achieved:

  • A total of 6 proposals were funded in 2008‑2009: 4 systems projects (Nova Scotia, Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Newfoundland and Yukon ‑ the latter two were developmental in nature); and 2 services projects (British Columbia's Downtown Eastside and Nova Scotia).
  • A national level Best Practices workshop, involving 47 participants from across the country, was held providing the opportunity for program planners, policy makers, and front line workers to network and share their experiences in early intervention treatment.
  • Initiated work to develop individual, project specific performance measurement and evaluation plans.
  • Partnered with HECS to build an integrated Planning and Performance Reporting System to capture and report on project and program level performance for the DTFP

Program Activity
 
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants            
Total Contributions n/a n/a 28.7 1.4 1.4 27.3
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity n/a n/a 28.7 1.4 1.4 27.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
While the total authorities for DTFP during the 2008‑2009 fiscal year were $28.7M, a total of $16.6M was reprofiled from 2008‑2009 into subsequent fiscal years. Therefore, planned spending for the year was reduced to $12.1M with a total of $10.8M lapsing due to delays in the rolling out of the program. Reasons for the delay include: the federal election resulted in delays in the program's ability to conduct the required external assessments of treatment services proposals; the reality that the majority of the provincial/territorial governments required more time than planned to prepare comprehensive plans for the systems component; and provincial/territorial counterparts requiring provincial Cabinet or Treasury Board approval to enter into funding agreements with the federal government (sometimes taking up to 4 months).

Audit completed or planned:
None



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant to the Canadian Blood Services: Blood Safety and Effectiveness Research and Development

Start date:
April 2000

End date:
Ongoing

Description:
To support basic, applied and clinical research on blood safety and effectiveness issues through the auspices of Canadian Blood Services

Strategic Outcomes:
Access to safe and effective health products and food information for healthy choices

Results Achieved:

  • Continued improvements to basic applied and clinical research on blood safety and effectiveness.

Program Activity
Health Products
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 nil
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 nil

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned: None



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Health Care Policy Contribution Program (Voted)

Start date:
September 24, 2002

End date:
March 31, 2013

Description:
The Program provides policy analysis and advice to support the First Ministers' commitment to a more accessible, high-quality, sustainable and accountable health system that will be adaptable to the needs of Canadians. The core component of the Program was established to support research to identify, assess and promote new approaches, models and best practices that respond to health care system priorities, both emerging and on-going, and to foster strategic and evidence-based decision-making for quality health care. The Program has evolved to include delivery of the Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System, the Pan-Canadian Health Human Resources Strategy, the Internationally Educated Health Professionals Initiative, the National Wait Times Initiative and the Patient Wait Times Guarantee (PWTG) Pilot Project Fund.

The Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System (CMIRPS) aims to reduce harm caused by preventable medication incidents through activities such as the collection and analysis of standardized incident data and the development and dissemination of information including best practices in safe medication use systems.

The Pan-Canadian Health Human Resources (HHR) Strategy aims to secure and maintain a stable and optimal health workforce that supports overall health care renewal and a decrease in wait times. The federal government committed $20 million annually to joint initiatives through the pan-Canadian HHR Strategy, including: Pan-Canadian Health Human Resource Planning; Interprofessional Education for Collaborative Patient Centred Practice; and Recruitment and Retention.

The Internationally Educated Health Professionals Initiative (IEHPI) is designed to facilitate the integration of Internationally Educated Health Professionals by reducing barriers to practice and assisting them in obtaining licensure within the Canadian health care workforce. This will result in an increased number of health providers to address workforce shortages and support the achievement of Patient Wait Times Guarantees. In the spring 2005 budget, the Canadian government committed $75 million over five years to support IEHPI.

The Patient Wait Times Guarantee (PWTG) Pilot Project Fund is a three-year initiative (2007-08 through 2009-10) to assist provinces and territories to develop and test innovative approaches to inform the establishment of guarantees, including options for alternate care (recourse) when set time frames for specific health services have been exceeded.

The National Wait Times Initiative (NWTI) was a three-year initiative (2006-07 through 2008-2009) to support research, knowledge development and dissemination to inform the development of policies, best practices, programs, and services aimed at improving access to care and reducing wait times.

Strategic Outcomes:
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians

Results Achieved:
The core component of the Program supports contribution projects that address current and emerging priority health policy issues. In FY 2008-09, this component.......(.Two recent examples of major initiatives that had their beginning within the core component are the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control and the Mental Health Commission of Canada.)

With funds from the core component, CMIRPS has engaged 293 hospitals and 27 long-term care centres to participate in medication safety self-assessment which has lead to a greater understanding of medication incidents occurring in our health care system which in turn has influenced more than 50 system-based safeguards incorporated in the 2008 Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation standards.

The Pan-Canadian Health Human Resource Strategy and the Internationally Educated Health Professionals Initiative enable Health Canada to maintain a leadership role in priority areas of HHR. Some examples include:

  • Mobilizing professionals, professional organizations, employers (such as regional health authorities) and research and educational institutions. For example, in FY 2008-09, 11 interprofessional learning projects across the country helped identify the key components of effective interprofessional education, create learning modules/interventions and build the capacity of educators.
  • Notable accomplishments through the IEHPI include substantial gains in areas such as the development of assessment, bridging, path-finding, orientation and workplace oriented language and communication programs for specific groups of IEHPs. For example, new assessment programs for IENs have been launched in Western and Atlantic provinces, and an innovative off-shore pilot project was implemented to assess IENs prior to immigration. To address orientation needs, an interdisciplinary orientation program to the Canadian health care system is now available, and career support services have been established in new centres in Ontario and British Columbia.
  • Investments in new innovative programs across the country that strengthen recruitment and retention strategies, in FY 2008-09, included 4 pilot recruitment and retention projects, that helped identify interventions that were effective in creating healthier workplaces, reducing injuries and absenteeism, and improving job satisfaction.
  • Building on the F/P/T Framework for Collaborative Pan-Canadian HHR Planning, the Strategy enabled ongoing collaboration with provinces and territories, professional organizations and other key stakeholders to work towards a coordinated, robust, pan-Canadian approach to HHR planning and forecasting.

The PWTG Pilot Project Fund is currently funding 12 pilot projects in 6 provinces and 2 territories, covering a range of clinical areas and approaches to improve wait times management and inform the development of guarantees. Those projects will continue until the end of 2009/2010 and help support provincial/territorial commitments to implement guarantees in at least one clinical area by March 31, 2010.

  • In its last year of operation (2008-09), the NWTI continued to support innovative projects across the country that generate and disseminate new knowledge on wait times management, develop best practices, and complement and lay important groundwork for the implementation of Patient Wait Times Guarantees. A synthesis of lessons learned from the Initiative is currently being completed and will be used to inform future policy directions in the area of wait times and the use of funding mechanisms like the NWTI to achieve federal policy objectives.

Program Activity
Canadian Health System
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 26.7 43.4 51.9 40.6 40.6 11.3
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 26.7 43.4 51.9 40.6 40.6 11.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Estimates of planned spending reflected promising discussions with provincial/territorial governments and other key partners regarding potential health care policy contribution projects. Lapses resulted from the program's inability to finalize these discussions in time to launch projects during the 2008-09 year.

Audit completed or planned:
The Program initiated financial audits for 3 contribution projects in 2008/09 which are due for completion on or before Fall 2009.



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Named Grant to the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI)

Start date:
December 10, 2003

End date:
March 31, 2013

Description:
CPSI is an independent not-for-profit corporation mandated to provide leadership and coordinate the work necessary to build a culture of patient safety and quality improvement throughout the Canadian health system. CPSI promotes leading ideas and best practices, raises awareness and provides advice on effective strategies to improve patient safety.

This named grant provides financial assistance to support CPSI's efforts to implement the provisions in the 2003 First Ministers' Accord on Health Care Renewal towards improving health care quality by strengthening system co-ordination and national collaboration related to patient safety. CPSI's grant agreement was renewed in 2008 for a five-year period, beginning April 1, 2008 and ending March 31, 2013.

Strategic Outcomes:
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians

Results Achieved:
Increased awareness and national co-ordination of patient safety through several major initiatives:

  • Led, in collaboration with the University Health Network, the Canadian adaptation of the World Health Organization's World Alliance for Patient Safety Safe Surgery Saves Lives campaign, in partnership with a working group representing fifteen Canadian organizations. The resulting Safe Surgery Saves Lives Checklist, with a goal of reducing complications and death associated with surgical procedures in Canada, was endorsed by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and made available for use in healthcare organizations across the country;
  • Sponsored the fourth annual Canadian Patient Safety Week with a theme focused on medication reconciliation: Knowledge is the Best Medicine. Ask. Talk. Listen. The 2008 week's goal was to raise awareness of patient safety issues and related programs and projects related to medication reconciliation across Canada;
  • Held the second Canadian Patient Safety Officer Course, a comprehensive course which teaches health care professionals and leaders who have patient safety as part of their portfolio how to build patient safety programs in their organizations;
  • Introduced the first-ever framework of interprofessional patient safety competencies, in collaboration with the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CPSI has undertaken a dissemination strategy to familiarize health care professionals with the Safety Competencies framework, consisting of six core competency domains that are suitable for all health professionals to incorporate into educational programs and professional development activities; and
  • Expanded the number of health care teams and organizations participating in the Safer Healthcare Now! campaign to promote evidence-based strategies aimed at reducing the number of injuries and deaths related to preventable adverse events. Originally launched in 2005 with six evidence-based strategies, CPSI announced on April 2, 2008 that the campaign was moving into Phase II, with the addition of four new interventions to reduce adverse events, with two focussing on long-term care settings.
  • In addition, as set out in its Strategic Plan, CPSI continued to provide leadership and coordination of efforts to prevent and reduce harm to patients, with an emphasis on four key areas: education; interventions and programs; research; and tools and resources.

Program Activity
Canadian Health System
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants n/a 7.6 8.0 8.0 8.0 nil
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity n/a 7.6 8.0 8.0 8.0 nil

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit completed or planned:
Health Canada has not completed an audit of CPSI, and none are currently planned.



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant to the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Voted)

Start date:
April 1, 2007

End date:
March 31, 2012

Description:
The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer is responsible for implementing the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control, a five-year plan with the following objectives: (1) to reduce the expected number of new cases of cancer among Canadians; (2) to enhance the quality of life of those living with cancer; and (3) to lessen the likelihood of Canadians dying from cancer.

The mandate of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer is to provide a leadership role with respect to cancer control in Canada, through the management of knowledge and the coordination of efforts among provinces and territories, cancer experts, stakeholder groups and Aboriginal organizations to champion change and improve health outcomes related to cancer. The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer will act as a pan-Canadian resource to provide the most up-to-date knowledge across strategic priority areas including prevention, screening/early detection, re-balancing the focus towards patient-centred care, clinical practice guidelines, health human resources, standards, as well as supporting key research activities and facilitating the development of a pan-Canadian surveillance system.

Strategic Outcomes:
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Over the past year, the Partnership has initiated a number of landmark projects, including CAREX Canada (a project aiming to develop estimates of the number of Canadians exposed to carcinogens in their workplaces and communities), and The Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow Project (a pan-Canadian cancer cohort study involving approximately 300,000 Canadians that will explore how genetics, environment, lifestyle and behaviour contribute to the development of various cancers over time).

Program Activity
Canadian Health System
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 0 28.8 50.0 58.2 58.2 (8.2)
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 0 28.8 50.0 58.2 58.2 (8.2)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Original plans for spending $50M per year were changed following the reprofiling of 2007-08 funds into future years.

Audit completed or planned:
CPACC will be in the 2011-2012 Health Care Policy Contribution Program, Audit Plan.



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) (Voted)

Start date:
April 1, 2005

End date:
March 31, 2013

Description:
CADTH is an independent not-for-profit corporation funded by federal, provincial, and territorial governments to provide credible, impartial advice and evidence-based information about the effectiveness of drugs and other health technologies to Canadian health care decision-makers. The Named Grant's purpose is to provide financial assistance to support CADTH's core business activities, namely: the Common Drug Review (CDR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), and the Canadian Optimal Medication Prescribing and Utilization Service (COMPUS).

Strategic Outcomes:
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians

Results Achieved:

  • Evidence-based information that supports informed decisions on the effectiveness of drugs and health technologies, in terms of health outcomes and cost.

Program Activity
Canadian Health System
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 17.0 17.2 16.9 16.9 16.9 0.0
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 17.0 17.2 16.9 16.9 16.9 0.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A  

Audit completed or planned:
An independent evaluation of CADTH's core business activities is required as part of Health Canada's 2008-13 funding agreement with CADTH. The funding agreement stipulates that this evaluation cover April 1, 2007 - March 31, 2011, and be submitted to the Minister by December 31, 2011. The evaluation is intended to assess CADTH's performance in achieving the purpose of the Grant, including CADTH's value-for-money.



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Named Grant for the Mental Health Commission of Canada (Voted)

Start date:
April 1, 2008

End date:
March 31, 2017

Description:
As part of Budget 2007, the Government of Canada announced funding for the establishment of a Mental Health Commission of Canada, an independent, arm's length organization, tasked with a mandate to conduct an anti-stigma campaign, build a pan-Canadian Knowledge Exchange Centre, and facilitate/animate a process to elaborate a national mental health strategy for Canada. The structure and role of the Commission is based on the recommendations of the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology, in its comprehensive report on mental health, mental illness and addiction in Canada, entitled "Out of the Shadows at Last".

In serving as a national focal point for addressing mental health and mental illness, the Commission will undertake a more targeted approach to addressing these issues in Canada; foster improved coordination and information sharing among mental health stakeholders and the public health community; and encourage a better public understanding of mental health and mental illness nationally.

Strategic Outcomes:
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians

Results Achieved:

The Commission has made significant headway over the course of its first year and a half in its ability to build partnerships and bring national awareness to the challenges of mental health and illness. Its organizational successes include the establishment of a Board of Directors and eight Advisory Committees (Children and Youth, Mental Health and the Law, Seniors, Aboriginal, Workplace, Family Caregivers, Service Systems, and Science), hiring a permanent staff, and securing the location of its head office in Calgary. Progress has also been made on mandated activities, specifically:

  • The development of a National Strategy: A draft framework document was developed and used to guide cross-Canada consultations with governmental and non-governmental partners. Consultations were concluded in mid-April and the Commission is in the process of finalizing the document.
  • The anti-stigma reduction Initiative: work to develop and launch an anti-stigma / anti-discrimination reduction initiative is well under-way. To support these efforts, two social-marketing pilot projects targeted at children and youth, and health care providers, are also in development. The Commission plans to roll out the pilot projects in 2009, with concurrent evaluations planned throughout.

Program Activity
Canadian Health System
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 0 0 7.5 7.5 7.5 nil
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 0 0 7.5 7.5 7.5 nil

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A  

Audit completed or planned:
As outlined in the Grant funding agreement, the Commission must engage an independent auditor to conduct a full audit of its financial statements each Fiscal Year. The 2008-09 audited financial statements have now been completed and were presented at the Board Meeting for approval on May 31, 2009.



Name of Transfer Payment Program:
Grant to the Canadian Institute for Health Information (Voted)

Start date:
April 1, 1999

End date:
March 31, 2012

Description:
CIHI is an independent, not-for-profit organization supported by federal, provincial and territorial governments that provides essential data and analysis on Canada's health system and the health of Canadians. CIHI was created in 1991 by the F/P/T Ministers of Health toaddress significant gaps in health information. CIHI's data and its reports inform health policies, support the effective delivery of health services and raise awareness among Canadians about the factors that contribute to good health.

Since 1999, the federal government has provided funding to CIHI through a series of grants and conditional grants, known as the Roadmap Initiative. More recently CIHI's funding has been consolidated through the Health Information Initiative.

Through the past Roadmap Initiatives I, II and II Plus, CIHI had been provided with about $260 million since 1999. Budget 2005 allocated an additional $110 million over five years (2005-2006 to 2009-2010) to CIHI through Roadmap III. This has allowed CIHI to provide quality and timely health information, including the delivery of data on a variety of important health indicators and other health publications to support health sector decision-making and improve accountability.

Beginning as of 2007/2008, the Health Information Initiative provides grant funding to CIHI, replacing the previous Roadmap II, II Plus, III funding and also provides additional funds for new initiatives. This funding allows CIHI to continue important work under the Roadmap Initiative and to further enhance the coverage of health data systems so Canadians get information on their health care system, including information on wait times, and continued development of comparable health indicators. The funding will also enable CIHI to respond effectively to emerging priorities. Under this initiative, up to $406.49 million will be delivered to CIHI over five years (2007/2008 to 2011/2012).

Strategic Outcomes:
Accessible and sustainable health system responsive to the health needs of Canadians.

Results Achieved:
During 2008-09 CIHI achieved the key objectives of its Operational Plan. These included:

  • CIHI developed a new product line - National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) Level 1.This new database allows for the submission of a core set of demographic, administrative and wait time data elements for emergency room visits, which will substantially improve the timeliness of reporting of comparative ED wait times.
  • Significant progress was made in expanding jurisdictional uptake of the home and continuing care reporting systems. Five jurisdictions are submitting data to the Home Care Reporting System (HCRS), representing an increase of 4 jurisdictions in the last year
  • On the pharmaceutical front, a total of 6 jurisdictions submitted claim-level data to the National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System (NPDUIS).This enabled CIHI to conduct its first (and second) ever analyses using this data. CIHI also completed a very successful pilot of its Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System (CMIRPS), and will be initiating deployment in fiscal 2009/2010.
  • CIHI initiated work on enhancing its Canadian MIS Database (CMDB) to allow for more frequent data submissions starting in fiscal 2009/2010, thus providing jurisdictions with access to more useful and timely data for analysis
  • CIHI completed the development of and launched data collection for two new Health Human Resources databases on medical laboratory technologists and medical radiation technologists
  • In fiscal 2008/2009, CIHI developed a multi-pronged approach to strengthen primary health care (PHC) information in Canada.
  • CIHI hosted a working conference with senior provincial/territorial wait time measurement representatives, which resulted in a renewed commitment, and the development of strategies and action plans, to improve the consistency and comparability of provincial/territorial wait time indicators, with a particular focus on emergency care waits and specialist waits
  • CIHI also initiated the development of a program of work related to community mental health (CMH).
  • CIHI took a leadership role in the area of data content standards and health system uses of electronic health records/electronic medical records (EHR/EMR). Following the Information Summit in February 2008, CIHI worked collaboratively with Canada Health Infoway (Infoway) and other stakeholders (e.g. CIOs) to propose a plan of action, which was approved by the Deputy Ministers and the Infoway Board of Directors.

Relevant and Actionable Analysis:

  • CIHI developed and released over 60 analytical products, including special analytical reports on priority themes (e.g. access and quality of care, wait times, health outcomes, continuity of care) and special studies related to priority health services themes (e.g. costs, patient safety).
  • With regards to case mix grouping methodologies, CIHI has been working closely with the jurisdictions to perform comparative analyses and providing education and workshops to allow stakeholders to understand and use these tools.
  • Improved Use and Understanding:
  • In order to improve access and use of its data, CIHI promoted the adoption and use of its Portal, which provides access to facility-identifiable data on the delivery of services by hospitals across the country. Uptake of the Portal increased significantly this year to include three ministries of health, nine regional health authorities and 23 facilities
  • CIHI also initiated a project to enhance its public web site to make it more user-friendly and improve accessibility to its numerous data and information products, and launched a number of projects and initiatives to improve access to its existing electronic reports and increase the number and functionality of e-reports made available to provider organizations and health system managers

Program Activity
Canadian Health System
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
Total Grants 19.7 51.1 81.7 81.7 81.7 Nil
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of TPs            
Total Program Activity 19.7 51.1 81.7 81.7 81.7 Nil

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A  

Audit completed or planned: An audit was conducted by Health Canada internal auditors on the Health Information Contribution Program. Auditors concluded that, in general, the internal controls in place at CIHI to manage the Contribution Agreement were sufficient to meet the terms and conditions of the Agreement with minor exceptions. Risk exposure was not serious.

Top of Page

Human Resources and Skills Development Canada

Table 3: Details on Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)

Labour Market


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Human Resources Development Strategy

Start date: April 1, 1999

End date: March 31, 2010

Description: Transfer payments made under the Aboriginal Human Resources Development Strategy are predominantly in the form of contributions to Aboriginal organizations. The Aboriginal Human Resources Development Strategy provides support to Aboriginal organizations to design and deliver:

  • Labour market development programs to assist Aboriginal people, including Aboriginal persons with disabilities, prepare for, obtain, and maintain meaningful and sustainable employment;
  • Special programs to assist Aboriginal Youth to make successful transitions from school to work or to support their return to school, and;
  • Child care programs.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: There are 80 agreements with aboriginal organizations across Canada. The results achieved are an aggregate total of the results of the 80 agreement holders for 2008-09.

There were 59,782 clients served in 2008-09. Of these, 17,820 were employed and 7,602 returned to school, resulting in unpaid EI benefits of $18,813,372. Total clients served include 1,368 persons with disabilities and 32,005 youth.


Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 266.5 266.0 249.3 257.2 257.2 (7.9)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 266.5 266.0 249.3 257.2 257.2 (7.9)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is mainly due to investments in youth aboriginal projects.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative/Summative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation planned for Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned: 2013-2014.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership

Start date: October 3, 2003

End date: March 31, 2012

Description: Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership (ASEP) is a nationally managed, opportunity-driven, project based program that promotes increased participation of Aboriginal people in major economic developments through formalized, Aboriginal and private sector partnerships. The provinces and territories must also contribute to the projects and all partners must contribute at least 50% of the total cost of the project. The ASEP program supports multi-year training to employment strategies that are developed and managed by Aboriginal organizations and employers, leading to long-term skilled jobs for Aboriginal people in existing and emerging economic opportunities.

The Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership (ASEP) program focuses on sustainable employment for Aboriginal people in major economic industries, leading to lasting benefits for Aboriginal communities, families and individuals. ASEP aims to provide Aboriginal people with the skills they need to participate in economic opportunities such as mining, hydro development, fisheries, tourism, and major construction and infrastructure projects across Canada.

ASEP was initially launched in 2003 as an $85M, five year program supporting nine projects that resulted in over 8,700 Aboriginal people trained and more than 3,200 Aboriginal people found long term sustainable jobs. In 2007, the program was extended to 2012 with an additional $105M supporting sixteen more projects. In Canada’s Economic Action Plan, the Government is investing an additional $100M over three years in ASEP to help Aboriginal people participate in the work force and get the training they need to make the most of employment opportunities.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: In 2008-09, 2,505 Aboriginal clients were served under the ASEP program, marking an increase from the 2007-08 result of 1,439 clients. Additionally, 2,646 interventions were completed compared to 2,395 last year; 2,055 clients found employment following an ASEP intervention as opposed to 570 in 2007-08.


Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 14.4 16.1 37.7 27.6 23.9 13.8
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 14.4 16.1 37.7 27.6 23.9 13.8

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is mainly due to re-profiling of funds into future years as there were deferrals of projects to the next fiscal year caused by delays in project proposal start dates.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative evaluation is currently underway. Expected completion date is 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation planned for 2011-2012.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
A Follow-Up Audit of Aboriginal Skills and Employment Partnership is planned for 2010-2011.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enabling Fund for Official Language Minority Communities

Start date: April 1, 2005

End date: March 31, 2010

Description: The objective of the Enabling Fund is to strengthen community economic and human resources development in official language minority communities. The Enabling Fund provides funding to Official Language Minority Communities (OLMC) designated organizations, the Réseau de développement économique et d'employabilité (RDÉE) and Community Economic Development and Employability Committees (CEDEC) through contribution agreements so that these organizations can plan, develop and manage community projects and access additional funding for these projects.

Contributions can be made under the Enabling Fund for the Official Language Minority Communities to support activities such as:

  • Economic and human resources planning, implementing community development plans, research;
  • Creating, implementing and consolidating collaborative projects to enhance the vitality and economic growth of Official Language Minority Communities ;
  • Mobilizing community stakeholders; and
  • Strengthening local and national structures to improve their capabilities to manage and implement community projects.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved:

  • Fourteen agreements were signed with the delegated organizations in the official languages minority communities (OLMCs): thirteen with the Francophone network Réseau de développement économique et d'employabilité (one for each province and territory and one with the umbrella organization) and an agreement with the Community Table as a Quebec Anglophone Network;
  • Community projects were implemented in the OLMCs such as feasibility studies to support employability and entrepreneurship.
  • The Enabling Funds have leveraged resources from other levels of government and of the private and non-profit sectors to support the delivery of the program in OLMCs.
  • Memoranda of Understanding between federal institutions and community partners were signed with both representatives from Anglophone and Francophone minority communities. The Memoranda of Understanding is to help leverage funding and increase cooperation among federal partners to support OLMCs in the areas of human resources and economic development.

Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 11.9 11.8 12.0 12.1 12.1 (0.1)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 11.9 11.8 12.0 12.1 12.1 (0.1)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation planned for 2011-2012.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Labour Market Agreements

Start date: April 1, 2008

End date: March 31, 2014

Description: In Advantage Canada, the Government of Canada set out the goal to create "the best educated, most skilled and most flexible workforce in the world." In Budget 2007, the Government of Canada delivered on this commitment through a New Labour Market Architecture, which included new, six-year bilateral Labour Market Agreements (LMA) with the provinces and territories supported by $500M/yr of new federal investments to address key labour market challenges at local and regional levels.

The LMAs are intended to increase labour force participation of underrepresented groups, ensure that Canadians have the right skills to compete, and encourage employers to provide more training to their workers. The LMAs will provide labour market training to unemployed Canadians who are not eligible for Employment Insurance (EI) and therefore unable to access programs under Part II of the EI Act. In addition to non EI eligible unemployed, the LMAs will also be available to workers with low skills, including those who lack who lack literacy and essential skills.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: Labour Market Agreements were signed with all 10 provinces.


Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments 0.0 0.0 500.0 500.0 459.9 40.1
Total Program Activity(ies) 0.0 0.0 500.0 500.0 459.9 40.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to amounts re-profiled into future years to allow provinces and territories sufficient flexibility to effectively spend funding while putting new programming in place.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Labour Market Agreements Summative evaluation planned for 2012-Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities

Start date: April 1, 2004

End date: Ongoing

Description: The goal of the Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities is to improve the employment situation of Canadians with disabilities, by enhancing their employability, increasing the employment opportunities available to them, and building on their existing knowledge base.

Under the Multilateral Framework for Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities, transfers to provinces are made as 'other transfer payments'. The Government of Canada contributes 50% of the costs incurred by provinces for funded programs and services up to the amount of the federal allocation identified in each bilateral agreement.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: Based on aggregate information from Labour Market Agreement for Persons with Disabilities Annual Reports, the program appears to be serving approximately 300,000 clients per year. This may include individuals who have participated in multi-year interventions.


Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments 218.2 218.3 222.0 219.8 218.3 3.7
Total Program Activity(ies) 218.2 218.3 222.0 219.8 218.3 3.7

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The $3.7 million is earmarked for Territorial funding. Although the Multilateral Framework for the Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities reflects federal-provincial-territorial consensus, it was not formally endorsed by the territories. The territories have confirmed their support for the principles and direction of the Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities but have not signed the agreements. They will continue to provide labour market programs for people with disabilities, and will participate in the Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities in the future if outstanding fiscal arrangement issues are resolved. This situation does not represent a change for the territories, which did not participate in Employability Assistance for People with Disabilities initiative, the predecessor to Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
No evaluation findings as yet, but a demonstration evaluation of the Manitoba Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities is planned to be completed in 2009.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Opportunities Fund for Persons with Disabilities

Start date: April 24, 1997

End date: Ongoing

Description: Transfer payments contribute directly to the program objectives by assisting unemployed persons with disabilities who are not normally eligible for Employment Insurance Part II Employment Programs to find, prepare for and maintain employment or become self-employed. Effective and innovative activities are supported, but not limited to, the following:

  • encouraging employers to provide individuals with work opportunities and experience;
  • working in partnership with organizations for people with disabilities to address barriers to an individual's labour market participation;
  • helping individuals increase their employment skill level and;
  • helping individuals to start their own business.

http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/disability_issues/funding_programs/opportunities_fund/index.shtml

Transfer payments made under the Opportunities Fund are in the form of contribution agreements to individuals, businesses, not-for-profit organizations and other levels of government.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: In 2008-09, through Opportunities Fund programming 4,840 people with disabilities were served, with 1,939 of these either employed or returned to school when their action plan was closed. As well, 2,012 reported having achieved enhanced employability during this reporting period.


Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 24.7 25.4 26.7 28.0 27.2 (0.5)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 24.7 25.4 26.7 28.0 27.2 (0.5)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation completed in 2008-2009.
Summative evaluation planned for Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:-2014.
The summative evaluation reports that the Opportunities Fund for Persons with Disabilities meets an ongoing need, providing significant intended and positive unintended outcomes to persons with disabilities and the associated employers and workplaces in a cost-effective manner. It estimated that incremental earnings gains exceeded the program costs on a long-term basis ($10,475 over five years versus $4,000 to $8,000 per participant). The evaluation identified room to expand the program as only 51.1% of survey participants were aware of the Opportunity Fund.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Targeted Initiative for Older Workers

Start date: October 17, 2006

End date: March 31, 2012

Description: The Targeted Initiative for Older Workers is a federal-provincial/territorial cost-shared initiative providing support to unemployed older workers in communities affected by significant downsizing or closures, and/or ongoing high unemployment, through programming aimed at reintegrating them into employment. In situations where there is little likelihood of immediate employment, programming may be aimed at increasing the employability of older workers and ensuring they remain active and productive labour market participants while their communities undergo adjustment.

Provinces and territories are responsible for identifying affected communities to target for activities, design and delivery of projects, and monitoring and reporting on projects. To be eligible to participate in the Initiative, older workers must be unemployed, legally entitled to work in Canada, lack skills needed for successful integration into new employment, live in an eligible community, and normally be aged 55 - 64. Projects must include employment assistance activities such as résumé writing, interview techniques, counselling and job finding clubs, and at least two other employability improvement activities such as prior learning assessment, skills training, work experience, or assistance to start a small business. As well, they must offer income support to participants in the form of allowances, wages or wage subsidies, and involve at least 25 hours per week of activity for participants. Where possible and appropriate, activities will support community economic development strategies and activities. As an example, skills development activities may prepare participants for emerging employment opportunities. Cities and towns with a population greater than 250,000 are not eligible for Initiative programming. Targeted Initiative for Older Workers was implemented as a two-year interim program, but has been extended by three years to March 31, 2012.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: Agreements have been signed with nine provinces and territories, under which 108 projects have been approved, targeting over 4,000 unemployed older workers.


Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants 0.0 5.0 37.3 37.3 23.1 14.2
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0.0 5.0 37.3 37.3 23.1 14.2

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to re-profiling into 2009-2010 to ensure that federal funding committed through agreements with provinces and territories remains available to them to offer older worker programming.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation planned for 2010-2011.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Employment Strategy

Start date: March 18, 1999

End date: Ongoing

Description: Transfer payments made under the Youth Employment Strategy (YES) are predominantly in the form of contributions from participating departments for wage subsidies for participant youth; or for the development and delivery of youth support services. Such support services include client assessment, case management services and the provision of employability tools, which intend to help participants acquire needed skills. Transfer payments contribute directly to the program objectives by encouraging organizations to create meaningful, skill-enhancing, opportunities for youth.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved:
Total clients served: 16,500
Total clients employed: 6,188
Total clients who returned to school: 1,875


Program Activity: Labour Market
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants     0.1     0.1
Total Contributions 225.3 235.9 239.5 233.8 221.2 18.3
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 225.3 235.9 239.6 233.8 221.2 18.4

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to delays in implementing Skills Link and Career Focus projects, as well the inability of some employers to fill all the positions for which they were approved for Canada Summer Jobs funding, and because some students left their jobs early.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
The Summative Evaluation has been completed and is awaiting final approval. Results from this evaluation will be available for the 2009-10 DPR.
A Summative evaluation is planned for Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:-2014.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An Audit of Youth Employment Strategy is planned for 2011-2012.

Workplace Skills


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills

Start date: April 1, 2006

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: The goal of the Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills Program (ALLESP) is to facilitate the creation of opportunities for Canadians to acquire the learning, literacy and essential skills they need to participate fully in society and to promote lifelong learning through the removal of nonfinancial barriers. The Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills Program is administered by the Office of Literacy and Essential Skills (OLES). Through ALLESP funding, OLES builds knowledge and expertise about what works in upgrading adults’ literacy and essential skills, supports the development, testing and dissemination of literacy and essential skills tools and supports funding recipients in the development and maintenance of effective partnerships and networks. The Adult Literacy and Essential Skills Program is funded from the Consolidated Revenue Fund. Funding is administered through non-statutory grants and contributions.

Additional information can be found at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/workplaceskills/oles/olesindex_en.shtml

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: OLES and its funding recipients work together to ensure that the benefits of literacy and essential skills upgrading are understood, that literacy and essential skills tools and supports are available and used by those who need them and that partners have the capacity to address literacy and essential skills issues.
Results:

  • OLES provided core funding to 22 organizations to help them build their management capacity to ensure they are in a position to address literacy and essential skills issues in their jurisdictions and/or among target groups, such as Aboriginal people and official language minority communities. Recipients are also building and sharing literacy and essential skills expertise, brokering tools, supports and best practices, and developing key partnerships and networks.
  • OLES also provides project-based funding to achieve these direct outcomes. In 2008/09, OLES held three Calls for Proposals in 2008/09 targeted to the key priority areas of workplace, Aboriginal and community-based approaches to literacy and essential skills.
  • OLES works bilaterally with provinces and territories, business, employers, not-for-profit organizations and other partners to explore initiatives for collaboration that improve opportunities for literacy and essential skills upgrading, demonstrate the importance of upgrading and ensure tools and supports are available to those who need them.
  • In 2008-09, OLES published 17 new tools including 10 specifically targeted to Apprenticeships and Skilled Trades. OLES tools make up six of the 10 most ordered HRSDC publications.

Program Activity: Workplace Skills
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants 13.6 12.7 24.9 12.7 7.0 17.9
Total Contributions 11.5 10.6 4.1 16.2 8.1 (4.0)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 25.1 23.3 29.0 28.9 15.1 13.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to delays in financial engagements for several multi-year projects.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Literacy — Planned for 2009-10
Planned Evaluation: A Formative Evaluation of the Adult Learning, Literacy and Essential Skills Program is currently underway. Results are anticipated in September 2009.
A Summative Evaluation will be completed in 2010-2011.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/publications_resources/evaluation/index.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Apprenticeship Incentive Grant

Start date: January 1, 2007

End date: December 31, 2012

Description: The Apprenticeship Incentive Grant aims to promote access to apprenticeships and improve labour mobility by providing a $1,000 grant to registered apprentices in the designated Red Seal trades. This taxable cash grant is designed to reward advancement in the first two years of an apprenticeship program in one of the Red Seal trades, building momentum for apprentices to complete their programs and receive their Red Seal endorsement. Registered apprentices who completed their first or second year of their apprenticeship program in a Red Seal trade designated in the province/territory where they are registered as an apprentice, on or after January 1, 2007, are eligible to apply. The Apprenticeship Incentive Grant provides an incentive for more Canadians to pursue apprenticeships and, taken together with the Apprenticeship Job Creation Tax Credit for employers and the Tradesperson's Tool Deduction, is intended to meet the future need for skilled trades people that is crucial to the sustained growth of the economy. By focusing on the Red Seal trades, for which there are national occupational and training standards, the Apprenticeship Incentive Grant will also support inter-provincial mobility.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: During 2008-2009, the Department completed the second full year of implementation of the Apprenticeship Incentive Grant, processing 73,416 applications (39% increase over the previous year results) and issuing 53,271 grants to eligible apprentices (73% increase over the previous year results). The Department began developing the Apprenticeship Completion Grant in collaboration with the provincial/territorial apprenticeship authorities.


Program Activity: Workplace Skills
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants 0.7 30.9 99.0 99.0 53.4 45.6
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0.7 30.9 99.0 99.0 53.4 45.6

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is mainly due to lower take-up than what was initially projected based on the 2003 Registered Apprenticeship Information System. Take-up issues were identified and reviewed in the recent formative evaluation of the Apprenticeship Incentive Grant program.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation planned for 2010-2011.
Summative evaluation of the Apprenticeship Incentive Grant and Apprenticeship Completion Grant planned for 2011-2012.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Foreign Credential Recognition Program

Start date: February 2, 2004

End date: May 25, 2010

Description: The Foreign Credential Recognition (FCR) Program provides financial and strategic support to provincial and territorial partners and stakeholders, including Sector Councils, regulatory bodies, immigrant serving organizations and post secondary educational institutions, to develop a pan-Canadian approach to assessing and recognizing foreign credentials within targeted occupations and sectors of the economy to facilitate entry into, and mobility within, the Canadian labour market. The Foreign Credential Recognition Program supports the research and project-based activities of partners and stakeholders to develop tools and processes to assess and recognize foreign credentials in targeted occupations and sectors. The goal of the program is to deliver on its mandate of improving the labour market outcomes of internationally trained workers in targeted occupations and sectors.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: At the intergovernmental level, the FCR Program has engaged all ten provinces in discussions about strengthening their FCR capacity. Agreements have been negotiated with 7 provinces, the Canada-Alberta working group still functions, and discussions continue with Quebec and Ontario.

A First Ministers meeting in January 2009 directed the Forum of Labour Market Ministers (FLMM) to develop a Foreign Qualifications Recognition (FQR) framework. As such, an ad hoc Federal-Provincial-Territorial working group co-chaired by HRSDC was formed. Representation comprised of membership from federal departments (HRSDC/CIC), provincial and territorial partners. Additional engagement work has been most evident with assessment agencies, post secondary education institutions, national associations and in enhancing provincial/territorial relations. On October 7, 2008, the FCRP held a one-day Federal-Provincial-Territorial Workshop on Immigrant Labour Market Integration (ILMI) in Ottawa. Participants included: director-level representatives from PT ministries responsible for immigration and/or labour market integration; federal representatives--from the HRSDC-FCRP, Citizenship and Immigration, the Foreign Credentials Referral Office, Health Canada, and the Privy Council Office as well as, academics and policy experts in ILMI issues.

The interdepartmental Director General Forum on Immigrant Integration, met twice in FY 2008-2009 (June 26, 2008 and September 25, 2008). The Forum discussed Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s (CIC) Foreign Credentials Referral Office’s (FCRO) overseas strategy and committed to ongoing collaboration and coordination in terms of its development. CIC also shared initial work on the development of a diagnostique/framework for understanding a federal approach to enhancing immigrant integration.

The program’s approach of engagement, diagnostic, tool development, implementation, and follow-up enables the involvement and buy-in of all stakeholders to help address emerging priorities and pressures. FCRP funded 40 projects in occupations that are classified as regulated, 21 in non-regulated and 49 in non-occupation specific projects. Investments have been made with various organizations including the Canadian Nurses Association, Canadian Alliance of Physiotherapy Regulators, Canadian Council of Professional Engineers, Canadian Foundation for Economic Education, Eco Canada, Maytree Foundation, Textile Human Resources Council and the Medical Council of Canada.

By March 31, 2008, the FCR program had made investments that account for approximately 53.7% of the immigrant labour market. By March 31, 2009, these investments had increased to 57.3%.

The program has invested in pilot projects to examine overseas interventions to help address issues associated with FCR processes prior to immigrants arriving in Canada. The Going to Canada-Immigration Portal was improved with content enhancements, full updates to the Guide, a list of Service Canada and CIC Linc Centers, a logging mechanism for organizations to use, and launching third party tool versions for the Foreign Credentials Referral Office (FCRO) and Success BC.

Substantial investments have been made with partners and key stakeholders. By March 31, 2009, the FCR Program had invested in 110 projects with development and dissemination representing approximately 45% (49) of the projects funded. Out of the 110 projects, 79 have been completed and 31 are still in progress.

The Program continues to work with provincial partners and stakeholders to achieve these short, medium and long-term outcomes in order to meet its ultimate objective of enhancing labour market outcomes of foreign trained individuals in targeted occupations and sectors.


Program Activity: Workplace Skills
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 12.6 14.3 18.0 14.5 13.9 4.1
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 12.6 14.3 18.0 14.5 13.9 4.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is mainly due to re-profiling to ensure sufficient funds are available in 2009-2010 to fund new and existing multi-year projects that respond to the Government of Canada’s priorities with respect to foreign credential assessment and recognition.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation of Foreign Credential Recognition Program and Foreign Qualification Program planned for 2012-Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An OAG audit on Selecting Foreign Workers-Citizenship and Immigration Canada is in its final stages and results will be tabled to Parliament in November 2009. When published the report will be posted at: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/rp_fs_e_25898.html


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sector Council Program

Start date: June 13, 2002

End date: May 30, 2012

Description: Sector Councils are formal, national partnerships of businesses and workers that address human resources and workplace skills development on a sectoral basis ("Sectoral" refers to a defined area of economic activity, as in a sector of the Canadian economy. Since there are many sectors of the economy are that not defined in pure industrial terms, the term "sectoral" is the encompassing term used to represent those economic sectors of the Canadian economy in which sector councils work). Contribution payments under the Sector Council Program support research and project based activities proposed by Sector Councils and other national organizations (sector-like) working on skills and learning issues.

Sector Council Program supports sector council activities that include:

  • Labour market forecasting and analysis;
  • National occupational standards;
  • Curriculum tailored to industry needs;
  • Skills development tools, including e-learning;
  • Literacy and essential skills initiatives;
  • Integration of foreign trained workers; and
  • Targeted recruitment and retention initiatives.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: In the year ending March 31, 2009, Sector Councils leveraged approximately $39 million in additional investments from stakeholders toward HRSDC funded projects and activities. The relevance of sector councils and their activities is demonstrated by the fact that over the past four years Sector Councils have leveraged over $200 million for sectoral initiatives. In addition, each of the 34 sector councils had partnerships with over 3000 stakeholders for a combined reach of over 100,000 stakeholders. Over 22,000 employees were certified based on a certification system for occupational standards developed by or with the assistance of the sector councils. Also, 99 programs of study were accredited by the sector councils. Occupational standards were another key area of work for the sector councils. Occupational standards help pinpoint industry skill requirements and contribute to skills development and mobility. In the year ending March 31, 2009, 495 occupational standards were developed by or with the assistance of the sector councils which includes 168 new or upgraded standards and 327 existing standards.


Program Activity: Workplace Skills
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 22.7 26.9 28.0 28.3 26.7 1.3
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 22.7 26.9 28.0 28.3 26.7 1.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to the deferral of projects into the next fiscal year, caused by delays in the project proposal start dates.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation to be completed 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation planned for 2011-2012.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Workplace Skills Initiative

Start date: May 16, 2005

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: The Workplace Skills Initiative (WSI) funds projects that test and evaluate innovative, partnership-based, outcomes-focused approaches to skills development for employers and employed Canadians:

  • Central to these projects is the development of human capital in and for the workplace;
  • Projects vary in scope and scale (e.g. firm vs. sector);
  • Small- and medium-sized enterprises are a key audience;
  • Projects will generate cumulative knowledge around skills development and best human resources models and practices.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: Currently there are 29 funded projects, involving 233 partners (associations, employers, unions, universities) and over 77,000 participants (employers, employees) with over $18.2M in funding leveraged from non-federal sources.

The WSI is a catalyser initiative whose research-oriented nature leads to longer term impacts. Similarly to R&D investments, WSI projects are not amenable to quantifiable measurements. Despite these challenges, preliminary project results have been very promising.

WSI acts as a mechanism for Canadian employers in investing in workplace skills development, human resource practices and workplace environment models, as evidenced in the following areas:

  • Skills Development: Virtually all WSI projects anticipate an improvement in employee skills as a result of project activities related to workplace training. At least 11 projects have already shown positive results in terms of both technical and non-technical skills development;
  • Human Resource Best Practices: At least 11 WSI projects report improvements in human resource practices and workplace environments as a direct result of their project activities. Examples of improvements in workplace environments include better employee-management relations and enhanced support for employee career development – improvements have been noted in organizations in different sectors and include small and medium-sized enterprises;
  • Partnerships: All projects ensure the long-term sustainability, particularly noted in health sector-related projects. Over 50% of WSI projects have resulted in the development of new partnerships outside project activities and/or the addition of unexpected stakeholders not included in the original proposal;
  • Tool development: An important aspect demonstrating initiative effectiveness, WSI funding has supported, to date, the development of approximately 100 human resource tools addressing skills development, human resource-related activities and workplace change interventions, particularly targeted to the small- and medium-sized enterprise community. Strong uptake of tools by partners and stakeholder organizations is reported and many organizations unaffiliated with projects, representing industry, government and the not-for-profit sector, have expressed a clear interest in having access to these tools.

Program Activity: Workplace Skills
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 1.1 9.7 30.0 27.5 14.2 15.8
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 1.1 9.7 30.0 27.5 14.2 15.8

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Workplace Skills Initiative was not in a position to take on new projects given the absence of future year funding.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation planned for 2010-2011.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.

Learning


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Student Loans Program - Liabilities

Start date: September, 1964

End date: Ongoing

Description: From September, 1964 to August 1, 1995, the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP) operated a Guaranteed Loan regime with Canadian financial institutions, where financial assistance was provided to students through financial institutions in the form of 100% government guaranteed loans.

This transfer payment tracks claims submitted by financial institutions related to the remaining Guaranteed Loan Portfolio.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: These amounts reflect claims for payment on Guaranteed loans held by Financial Institutions for Interest Relief, Debt Reduction in Repayment, In-Study Subsidy and Permanent Disabilities benefits minus the recoveries made by Canada Revenue Agency Collections against returned loan amounts.


Program Activity: Learning
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions (statutory) (17.8) (19.1) 6.8 (14.5) (14.5) 21.3
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) (17.8) (19.1) 6.8 (14.5) (14.5) 21.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and actual spending can be explained by the fact that the actual spending is presented net of recoveries on claims while the planned spending represents the forecasted expenditures of claim payments.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
There is a Canada Student Loans Program Synthesis Evaluation planned for 2010-2011
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An Audit of Canada Student Loans Program is planned for 2011-2012.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Student Loans Program - Interest Payments and Liabilities

Start date: August 1, 1995

End date: Ongoing

Description: This transfer payment represents interest subsidy, Interest Relief benefits, Debt Reduction in Repayment benefits, the amount of loans forgiven, risk premium and put-backs and administrative costs related to students who borrowed under the risk-shared regime which existed from August 1, 1995 to July 31, 2000. At that time the Canada Student Loans Program operated on a shared risk model with Canadian financial institutions.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: As a result of this transfer payment, students who borrowed under the risk-shared regime continue to receive in-study student financial assistance and debt management assistance in repayment. Canada also meets its obligations as set out under the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act and in agreements with financial institutions.


Program Activity: Learning
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions (statutory) 53.8 36.3 24.1 22.9 22.9 1.2
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 53.8 36.3 24.1 22.9 22.9 1.2

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Forecasted expenditures for Interest Payments and Liabilities in the Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 were precise as they are very close to the actual expenditures that occurred in 2008-2009.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
There is a Canada Student Loans Program Synthesis Evaluation planned for 2010-2011
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An Audit of Canada Student Loans Program is planned for 2011-2012.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Student Loans Program - Direct Financing Arrangement

Start date: August 1, 2000

End date: Ongoing

Description: This transfer payment provides interest relief and debt reduction in repayment benefits to borrowers, and the value of loans forgiven according to prescribed criteria.

The transfer payment also provides alternative payments to non-participating jurisdiction. Provinces and territories may choose not to participate in the Canada Student Loans Program. These provinces and territories receive an alternative payment to assist in the cost of delivering a similar student financial assistance program.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: As a result of these alternative payments, post-secondary education students in the province of Québec, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut continue to access financial assistance similar to the assistance provided to students in those jurisdictions that participate in the Canada Student Loans Program.


Program Activity: Learning
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions (statutory) 165.2 207.6 229.4 209.4 209.4 20.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 165.2 207.6 229.4 209.4 209.4 20.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The difference between the planned spending and the actual is mainly due to the lower than expected interest rate resulting in lower cost for the government.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
There is a Canada Student Loans Program Synthesis Evaluation planned for 2010-2011
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An Audit of Canada Student Loans Program is planned for 2011-2012.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Study Grants - Canada Access Grants

Start date: August 1, 1995 for most Canada Study Grants. August 1, 2005 for both Canada Access Grants

End date: Ongoing

Description: Since 1995, the Government of Canada has offered the Canada Study Grant to encourage participation in post-secondary education by providing additional non-repayable assistance and reducing debt.

The Canada Study Grants are designed to address the education-related costs of students with dependants, women in certain doctoral programs, and high-need part-time students, and to accommodate students with permanent disabilities by covering the exceptional education-related costs associated with their disability (such as an interpreter).

In August 2005, the Government of Canada introduced two Canada Access Grants, which provide up-front non-repayable assistance intended to improve access to post-secondary education and reduce financial barriers by reducing students' assessed need for student loans. It is available for first-time, first year students from low-income families, and full- and part-time students with permanent disabilities.

A student may be eligible to receive a combination of Access and Study Grants, depending on their assessed need.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved:

  • Provided targeted grants for eligible borrowers to increase access to post-secondary education by reducing financial barriers.
  • The value of Canada Study Grants and Canada Access Grants disbursed in 2008-2009 was $143.2 million.
  • In 2008-2009 approximately 42,000 Canada Study Grants and 44,000 Canada Access Grants were awarded.

Program Activity: Learning
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 146.4 161.5 142.9 143.2 143.2 (0.3)
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 146.4 161.5 142.9 143.2 143.2 (0.3)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The forecasted expenditures for Canada Student Grants and Canada Access Grants as reported in the Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 were precise as they are very close to the actual expenditures in 2008-2009.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
No Evaluation completed of planned for the reference period.
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Education Savings Program - Canada Learning Bond

Start date: January 1, 2005

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Canada Learning Bond (CLB) is a grant to help low-income families start saving for their child's PSE through RESPs. This is a statutory program and is being administered in partnership with RESP providers such as banks, mutual funds, and scholarship foundations. The clients and beneficiaries include children, parents and agencies or institutions saving for a child's post-secondary education.
Further information regarding the CLB can be found at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/learning/education_savings/public/clb.shtml

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: The Canada Learning Bond has helped 16.3% of low-income families start saving for education (up from 11.8% in 2007). 94% of families who received the Canada Learning Bond in 2008 also contributed their own savings to their RESPs (95% in 2007). Since its inception in 2005, 140,000 children have received over $105 million in Canada Learning Bond payments.

By increasing families’ financial capacity to funds their children’s post-secondary education, the Canada Learning Bond contributes to access to learning. Having more skilled and knowledgeable Canadians, who are able to fully participate in the workplace and society will result in enhanced Canadian productivity and participation in the economy and society.


Program Activity: Learning
($ millions)
* Referring to the Education Savings Incentive.
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 21.8 35.8 34.0 47.8 47.8 (13.8)
Total Contributions * 0.0 1.2 3.6 3.6 3.2 0.4
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 21.8 37.0 37.6 51.4 51.0 (13.4)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The CLB payment was $13.8 million more than planned due to higher participation by low-income families. Since RESP subscribers are not required to make contributions in order to receive CLB, the economic downturn, which has caused decreases in families’ disposable income, did not affect Canadians’ applications for the CLB.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
Summative Evaluation planned for 2011-2012.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Education Savings Program - Canada Education Savings Grant

Start date: January 1, 1998

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG) encourages Canadians to save for the Post-Secondary Education of children by providing a matching grant on savings made for children aged 0-17. This grant is paid on Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) contributions, and an additional CESG is paid to low- and middle-income families. This is a statutory program and is being administered in partnership with RESP providers such as banks, mutual funds, and scholarship foundations. The clients and beneficiaries include children, parents and agencies or institutions saving for a child's post-secondary education.

Further information regarding the CESG can be found at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/learning/education_savings/public/cesg.shtml

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning.

Results Achieved: The Canada Education Savings Grant supported access to learning by encouraging Canadian families to save $3 billion in Registered Education Savings Plans in 2008, close to the same level of savings as last year, despite an economic downturn. In addition, 228,794 students used $1.5 billion of their Registered Education Savings Plan savings to fund their post-secondary education in 2008. The average amount withdrawn was $6,600, demonstrating that RESP savings are a significant source of funding for education for many Canadian families.

Currently, almost 40% of Canadian children under 18 years of age have RESP savings for their future education (up 2% over 2007). As the Program has matured, families have started saving earlier for their children’s post-secondary education – over the past 10 years, the average age at which children receive their first Canada Education Savings Grant has dropped from 8 years to 3.9 years of age. In 2008, families saved an average of $1,440 per child for post-secondary education. An additional 244,000 children joined the program in 2008, but this is slightly lower than the 269,000 who joined last year, likely due to the economic uncertainty. Overall, $4.44 billion in Canada Education Savings Grants have been paid to 3.42 million children over the past 10 years, resulting in, $22.6 billion in education savings available to support access to learning for Canada’s future students.

The Canada Education Savings Grant has helped to enhance the financial ability of families to fund post-secondary education for their children. Having more skilled and knowledgeable Canadians, who are able to fully participate in the workplace and society will result in enhanced Canadian productivity and participation in the economy and society.


Program Activity: Learning
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 505.0 579.7 588.0 580.7 580.7 7.3
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 505.0 579.7 588.0 580.7 580.7 7.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The CESG payment was $7.3 million less than anticipated due to the fact that fewer Canadian families contributed to their children’s Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) than planned as a result of the economic downturn that started to take hold in the Fall of 2008.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned: Formative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
Summative evaluation planned for 2011-2012.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An Audit of Canada Education Savings Grant is planned for 2010-2011.

Social Investment


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Old Age Security (statutory payments)

Start date: 1952

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Old Age Security (OAS) pension is a monthly benefit available to all Canadians 65 years of age or over who meet the residency requirement.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved: The OAS pension continued to provide the first level of income support for seniors. In 2008-2009, an approximately of 4.5 million seniors per month received the basic pension. Benefits were indexed in July and October to reflect increases in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index.


Program Activity: Social Investment
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 22,878.8 24,029.8 25,321.0 25,334.5 25,334.5 (13.5)
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 22,878.8 24,029.8 25,321.0 25,334.5 25,334.5 (13.5)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Several factors contributed to an overall increase in OAS pension payments of $13.5 million from planned estimates. There was an increase in OAS pension payments due to a greater number of beneficiaries and lower amounts recovered through the OAS Recovery Tax because of the underestimation of couples taking advantage of pension income splitting measures.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Objective Achievement Summative evaluation planned for 2010-2011.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An Audit of OAS Management Control Framework is underway.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Guaranteed Income Supplement (statutory payments)

Start date: 1967

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) is a monthly benefit paid to residents of Canada who receive a basic, full or partial Old Age Security pension and who have little or no income.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved: For fiscal year 2008-2009, approximately 1.6 million seniors received GIS benefits. Benefits were indexed in July and October to reflect changes in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index.
To maximize the GIS benefits retained by low-income seniors who choose to work, Budget 2008 replaced the former $500 maximum GIS earnings exemption with an annual earnings exemption of $3,500, which represents the average earnings of working GIS recipients.


Program Activity: Social Investment
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 6,901.1 7,406.7 7,696.0 7,511.5 7,511.5 184.5
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 6,901.1 7,406.7 7,696.0 7,511.5 7,511.5 184.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance in GIS payments ($184.5 million) is mainly due to a decrease in the number of beneficiaries of 2.42% from the planned estimates of 2008-09.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Allowance Payments (statutory payments)

Start date: 1975 — Allowance; 1985 — Allowance for the Survivor

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Allowance is paid to individuals aged 60 to 64 who are the spouse or common-law partner of an Old Age Security pensioner. The Allowance for the Survivor is paid to low-income widows/widowers, aged between 60 to 64.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved: In 2008-2009, approximately 92,708 persons received an Allowance or an Allowance for the Survivor benefit. Benefits were indexed in July and October to reflect changes in the cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index.


Program Activity: Social Investment
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 504.1 518.2 573.0 531.2 531.2 41.8
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 504.1 518.2 573.0 531.2 531.2 41.8

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance in Allowance Payments ($41.8 million) is mainly due to a decrease in the number of beneficiaries from the planned estimates of 2008-09.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation planned for 2011-2012.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Social Development Partnerships Program* (voted payments)

Start date: April 1, 2003

End date: March 31, 2012

Description: The Social Development Partnerships Program provides grants and contributions funding to non-profit organizations working to meet the social development needs of persons with disabilities, children and their families, and other vulnerable or excluded populations in Canada.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved: Results Achieved: In 2008-2009, 51 projects across Canada were funded under the Children and Families component while another 60 projects were funded under the Disability component. A total of 103 projects were approved when adding Understanding the Early Years (37 projects) and Voluntary Sector Strategy (15 projects).

Funded projects generated knowledge on emerging social issues; disseminated information and knowledge and increased public awareness; established and maintained sustainable partnerships; and increased public dialogue and consultations.


Program Activity: Social Investment
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants 9.5 7.1 14.3 9.3 8.7 5.6
Total Contributions 16.3 16.7 11.3 16.3 16.3 (5.0)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 25.8 23.8 25.6 25.6 25.0 0.6

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned and actual spending in the Social Development Partnerships Program ($0.6 million) is due to projects requiring less funding than was originally requested.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.

Note: * Note that funds for the Voluntary Sector Strategy, Understanding the Early Years and Early Childhood Development for Official Language Minority Communities are administered through the SDPP Terms and Conditions. Operating costs are not included.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: New Horizons for Seniors Program (voted payments)

Start date: (original program): October 1, 2004. (expanded program): September 27, 2007.

End date: (original program & expanded program): September 30, 2010.

Description: The program supports local projects across Canada that help ensure seniors are able to benefit from, and contribute to, the quality of life in their community through their social participation and active living. The NHSP accomplishes its objectives through three separate funding streams, namely:

  • Community Participation and Leadership component, which provides grant funding to encourage seniors to contribute to their communities by sharing their skills, wisdom and experience and helping to reduce isolation.
  • Capital Assistance component, which provides grant funding for the upgrading of community facilities and equipment related to existing programs and activities for seniors.
  • Elder Abuse Awareness component, which provides contribution funding for national or regional projects that raise awareness of the abuse of older Canadians.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved: In 2008-2009, the Capital Assistance and Community Participation and Leadership components of the New Horizons for Senior Program contributed $26.3M in total funding towards a total of 1,714 grants across Canada. Under the Elder Abuse Awareness component of the Program, 16 contribution agreements were implemented that helped non-profit organizations develop national, provincial/territorial, or regional awareness activities for seniors, their families, and service providers in order to help prevent the abuse of older adults.


Program Activity: Social Investment
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants 13.9 26.1 26.3 26.3 26.3 0.0
Total Contributions     1.8 1.8 0.5 1.3
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 13.9 26.1 28.1 28.1 26.8 1.3

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance of $1.3 million from the 2008-09 planned estimates is due to delays in approvals and signing of agreements resulting in later than anticipated project start dates.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative/Summative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enabling Accessibility Fund

Start date: December 6, 2007

End date: March 31, 2010

Description: The Enabling Accessibility Fund contributes to the capital costs of construction for participatory abilities centres and renovations to buildings, modifications to vehicles, information and communications related to improving accessibility for people with disabilities.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved: The first Enabling Accessibility fund call for proposals resulted in the conditional approval of 166 small projects and 2 major projects. All projects must meet EAF eligibility requirements and those of other applicable federal programs.


Program Activity: Social Investment
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants 0.0 0.0 6.3 6.3 5.3 1.0
Total Contributions 0.0 0.0 11.7 21.8 0.0 11.7
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0.0 0.0 18.0 28.1 5.3 12.7

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Enabling Accessibility Fund’s total authority for 2008-09 ($28.1 million) is the result of a late re-profiling ($10 million) from 2007-2008 to 2008-09. This re-profiling was necessary to allow the program to fund an exemplary major project to be fully accessible to all people with varying abilities and to serve as a model approach to accessibility in communities.

The variance between planned and actual spending in Enabling Accessibility Fund ($12.7 million) is part of the overall funding re-profiled into future years to construct and renovate permanent structures and small projects to be fully accessible to all Canadians with varying abilities.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation to be completed in 2010-2011.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.

Children and Families


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Universal Child Care Benefit

Start date: July 1, 2006

End date: Ongoing

Description: Effective July 2006 families receive $100 per month (up to $1,200 per year) for each child under six, taxable in the hands of the lower-income spouse. Payments are made directly to families so that they can choose the child care that best meets the needs of their family. The Universal Child Care Benefit is provided in addition to existing federal programs such as the Canada Child Tax Benefit, which includes the National Child Benefit Supplement, the new Child Tax Credit and the Child Care Expense Deduction. The Universal Child Care Benefit does not affect the benefits families receive under these programs. Further information can be found at www.universalchildcare.ca.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved: The UCCB provides Canadian families with children under the age of six with direct financial support to choose the type of child care that best suits their needs. As of May 2009, 100% of the over 2 million eligible children receive the benefit. This represents over 1.5 million families. The UCCB has also lifted approximately 22,000 families with 57,000 children out of low-income.


Program Activity: Children and Families
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 1,784.4 2,474.3 2,470.0 2,547.8 2,547.8 (77.8)
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 1,784.4 2,474.3 2,470.0 2,547.8 2,547.8 (77.8)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to a higher number of recipients than projected and due to a slight increase in take up rates.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Formative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.

Housing and Homelessness


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Homelessness Partnering Strategy (HPS)

Start date: April 1, 2007

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: Provides grants and contributions to not-for-profit organizations, individuals, municipal governments, Band and tribal councils and other Aboriginal organizations, public health and educational institutions, Régies régionales, for-profit enterprises, research organizations and research institutes to carry out research on homelessness to help communities better understand and more effectively prevent and reduce homelessness.

Strategic Outcome: Enhanced income security, access to opportunities and well-being for individuals, families and communities.

Results Achieved:

  • Twelve horizontal pilot projects were launched with other federal departments and agencies, such as Corrections, Immigration, and Justice. The horizontal pilot projects address issues related to institutional release, HIV/AIDS, transitional and supportive housing as well as addiction treatment, basic skills and employment development.
  • For every dollar invested by the HPS in community-based projects, the amount invested in communities by external partners (not-for-profit groups, private sector organizations and other government departments) rose to $2.99; exceeding the $1.50 target.
  • The percentage of all HPS investments in regionally-delivered projects targeted to longer-term transitional and supportive housing and services increased to 78%, exceeding the 65% target.
  • In 2008, the Surplus Federal Real Property for Homelessness Initiative (SFRPHI) program was continued for two years (2009-2011). SFRPHI provides surplus federal properties to community organizations, the not-for-profit sector, and other levels of government for projects to prevent and alleviate homelessness. In 2008-2009, a total of nine housing units were created. Of these, 78% were supportive housing and 22% were longer-term.
  • The Canada-Quebec Agreement was signed on March 31, 2009, and the renewal of the Canada-Ontario MOU is underway. In addition, the HPS explored the potential for new agreements through enhanced dialogue with every province and territory.

Program Activity: Housing and Homelessness
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants 0.9 0.5 0.9 2.5 0.9 0.0
Total Contributions 149.6 86.0 122.9 148.7 117.7 5.2
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 150.5 86.5 123.8 151.2 118.6 5.2

Comment(s) on Variance(s): $5.2M will be reprofiled to 2009-2010 to ensure funds will be available for proposals developed for activities to alleviate homelessness.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
Summative evaluation to be completed in 2009-2010.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
An Audit of the Homelessness Partnering Strategy is currently underway.

Labour


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Wage Earner Protection Program (WEPP), as established by the Wage Earner Protection Program Act.

Start date: WEPP legislation came into force on July 7, 2008.

End date: N/A

Description: WEPP is a targeted federal program providing financial support to workers who lose their job and are owed money when their employer goes bankrupt or becomes subject to receivership under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA).  Specifically, the Program reimburses eligible workers for unpaid wages, vacation, severance, and termination pay up to a current maximum of $3,253 (the equivalent of four weeks’ maximum insurable earnings under the Employment Insurance Act).  The Wage Earner Protection Program is administered by the Labour Program and is delivered by Service Canada.

Strategic Outcome: Safe, healthy, fair, stable, cooperative, productive workplaces and effective international labour standards.

Results Achieved: Successful implementation of WEPP was achieved since its inception in July 2008. Legislative amendments announced in Budget 2009 to expand the coverage of the Act to termination and severance pay were successfully implemented. Canadian workers are now receiving timely and certain payments.


Program Activity: Labour
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
a) Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
b) Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s) between a) and b)
Total Grants (statutory) 0.0 0.0 31.2 3.7 3.7 27.5
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0.0 0.0 31.2 3.7 3.7 27.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The discrepancy between planned spending and actual spending is attributed to several factors:

  • The actual spending amount refers to spending as of April 21, 2009. This figure does not reflect the full amount that will be paid out for fiscal year 2008 2009. This is because retroactive claims under the expanded (Budget 2009) Program are still being received. While the legislative amendments came into force on March 12, 2009, they were retroactive to January 27, 2009, and as a result, claims are still being processed and paid out.
  • The variance is also attributable to the fact that many trustees/receivers pay wage and vacation pay claims directly to employees under the super priority provision of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). This provides coverage for wage claims up to $2,000, thus avoiding the necessity for a WEPP filing unless amounts owing exceed that amount. This practice is likely to change in the new fiscal year as the super priority provisions under the BIA do not cover termination and severance pay that the recently expanded WEPP now reimburses. Therefore, trustees/receivers will have to provide information under the WEPP for those additional amounts, and as a result, may also begin to use the WEPP for all wage claims.

Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:
A formative evaluation of WEPP, looking at program design and delivery, is scheduled for 2010 2011. This will be the first review of the Program since its enactment in July 2008.
Summative evaluation planned for 2012-Audit and/or Evaluation completed or planned:.
When published the report will be posted at: http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/left_nav/publications.shtml
No Audit completed or planned for the reference period.

Top of Page

Indian and Northern Affairs Canada and Canadian Polar Commission

Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments for First Nations, Inuit and Northerners — The Government

Start date: N/A

End date: Ongoing

Description: This program aims to promote good governance, effective institutions and co-operative relationships for First Nations, Inuit and Northerners.

Strategic Outcome: The Government

Results Achieved: See the results chart


($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006–2007
Actual
Spending
2007–2008
Planned
Spending
2008–2009
Total
Authorities
2008–2009
Actual
Spending
2008–2009
Variance(s)
Governance and Institutions of Government
Grants 270.5 277.7 379.4 289.8 288.2 91.2
Contributions 330.1 322.9 234.2 337.4 322.7 (88.5)
Sub-Total 600.6 600.7 613.5 627.2 610.9 2.7
Co-operative Relationships
Grants 5.6 5.6
Contributions 66.0 69.6 78.2 93.6 87.4 (9.3)
Sub-Total 71.6 75.3 78.2 93.6 87.4 (9.3)
Claims Settlements (Note 1)
Grants 1,320.7 806.6 485.0 406.3 400.2
Contributions 1.4 9.8 3.9 (3.9)
Sub-Total 1,322.1 806.6 494.8 410.2 396.3
Northern Governance
Grants
Contributions 2.0 1.3 4.7 8.3 3.8 0.8
Sub-Total 2.0 1.3 4.7 8.3 3.8 0.8
Total
Grants 276.1 1,604.1 1,185.9 774.8 694.5 491.4
Contributions 398.2 395.3 317.0 449.1 417.8 (100.8)
Total Transfer Payment Program 674.3 1,999.4 1,503.0 1,223.9 1,112.3 390.6
Note 1 — Claims Settlements (details)
Excluding Residential Schools 1,322.1 806.6 485.0 406.3 400.2
Residential Schools (after amalgamation with INAC) 9.8 3.9 (3.9)
Total 1,322.1 806.6 494.8 410.2 396.3

Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.

Audit completed or planned:

  • Audit of the Advance Payment Program
  • Audit of the Settlement Allotment
  • Audit of Band Support Funding
  • Post-Implementation Audit of the First Nations and Inuit Transfer Payment System


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments for First Nations, Inuit and Northerners — The People

Start date: N/A

End date: Ongoing

Description: This program aims to strengthen individual and family well-being for First Nations, Inuit and Northerners.

Strategic Outcome: The People

Results Achieved: See the results chart


($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006–2007
Actual
Spending
2007–2008
Planned
Spending
2008–2009
Total
Authorities
2008–2009
Actual
Spending
2008–2009
Variance(s)
Managing Individual Affairs
Grants 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.9 1.9 (0.5)
Contributions 5.7 6.2 8.7 8.4 7.8 0.9
Sub-Total 7.5 7.6 10.1 10.3 9.6 0.5
Education
Grants 32.1 35.8 36.6 35.8 35.0 1.6
Contributions 1,532.6 1,576.1 1,594.4 1,619.6 1,611.9 (17.5)
Sub-Total 1,564.7 1,611.9 1,631.0 1,655.4 1,646.9 (15.9)
Social Development
Grants 8.8 8.8 10.0 8.0 7.6 2.4
Contributions 1,330.8 1,413.0 1,398.3 1,471.5 1,471.5 (73.2)
Sub-Total 1,339.6 1,421.8 1,408.3 1,479.5 1,479.1 (70.8)
Healthy Northern Communities
Grants 44.6 45.5 46.4 46.4 46.4
Contributions 4.2 6.7 16.0 10.5 10.5 5.5
Sub-Total 48.8 52.2 62.4 56.9 56.9 5.5
Total
Grants 87.3 91.5 94.4 92.1 90.8 3.5
Contributions 2,873.3 3,002.0 3,017.5 3,109.9 3,101.7 (84.2)
Total Transfer Payment Program 2,960.6 3,093.5 3,111.8 3,202.0 3,192.5 (80.7)

Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.

Audit completed or planned:

  • Audit of Post-Secondary Education Program
  • Audit of Capital Facilities and Maintenance Program
  • Audit of the Food Mail Program
  • Audit of Capacity Development
  • Audit of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • System under Development Audit of the Certificate of Indian Status — Indian Registration System


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments for First Nations, Inuit and Northerners — The Land

Start date: N/A

End date: Ongoing

Description: This program is designed to promote the sustainable use of lands and resources by First Nations, Inuit and Northerners.

Strategic Outcome: The Land

Results Achieved: See the results chart


($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006–2007
Actual
Spending
2007–2008
Planned
Spending
2008–2009
Total
Authorities
2008–2009
Actual
Spending
2008–2009
Variance(s)
Clarity of Title to Land and Resources
Grants 1.3 0.9 4.1 1.2 1.2 2.9
Contributions 1.0 2.2 1.2 1.2 (1.2)
Sub-Total 2.3 3.1 4.1 2.5 2.5 1.6
Responsible Federal Stewardship
Grants
Contributions 86.8 53.9 33.4 82.3 72.6 (39.2)
Sub-Total 86.8 53.9 33.4 82.3 72.6 (39.2)
First Nations Governance over Land, Resources and the Environment
Grants
Contributions 9.5 9.7 19.8 11.4 11.4 8.4
Sub-Total 9.5 9.7 19.8 11.4 11.4 8.4
Northern Land and Resources
Grants 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 (0.1)
Contributions 27.9 28.6 21.0 22.4 22.4 (1.4)
Sub-Total 29.0 29.6 22.1 23.6 23.6 (1.5)
Total
Grants 2.4 2.0 5.2 2.5 2.4 2.7
Contributions 125.2 94.3 74.2 117.2 107.6 (33.4)
Total Transfer Payment Program 127.6 96.3 79.4 119.7 110.0 (30.6)

Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments for First Nations, Inuit and Northerners — The Economy

Start date: N/A

End date: Ongoing

Description: This program provides payments to First Nations, Inuit and Northerners to reduce the economic gap that exists between these groups and the general population in Canada.

Strategic Outcome: The Economy

Results Achieved: See the results chart


($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006–2007
Actual
Spending
2007–2008
Planned
Spending
2008–2009
Total
Authorities
2008–2009
Actual
Spending
2008–2009
Variance(s)
Economic and Employment Opportunities for Aboriginal People
Grants 34.0 34.0 (34.0)
Contributions 0.9 0.2 2.0 2.0 (2.0)
Sub-Total 0.9 0.2 36.0 36.0 (36.0)
Economic Development
Grants 242.1
Contributions 123.6 127.1 189.1 135.9 135.9 53.2
Sub-Total 365.7 127.1 189.1 135.9 135.9 53.2
Community Infrastructure
Grants 80.6 91.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Contributions 1,070.3 1,032.2 1,082.3 1,088.9 1,057.9 24.4
Sub-Total 1,150.8 1,123.5 1,082.5 1,089.0 1,057.9 24.5
Northern Economy
Grants
Contributions 19.7 20.3 20.3 21.9 21.9 (1.5)
Sub-Total 19.7 20.3 20.3 21.9 21.9 (1.5)
Total
Grants 322.6 91.2 0.1 34.1 34.0 (33.9)
Contributions 1,214.4 1,179.8 1,291.8 1,248.7 1,217.7 74.1
Total Transfer Payment Program 1,537.0 1,271.0 1,292.0 1,282.8 1,251.7 40.2

Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.

Audit completed or planned:

  • Audit of Community Economic Development Funding
  • Audit of Expenditure Management Monitoring


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments for Métis, non-status Indians, and urban Aboriginal people — Office of the Federal Interlocutor

Start date: N/A

End date: Ongoing

Description: This program promotes collaborative engagement among government and stakeholders that contributes to improved socio-economic conditions for Métis, non-status Indians and urban Aboriginals.

Strategic Outcome: Office of the Federal Interlocutor

Results Achieved: See the results chart


($ millions)
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006–2007
Actual
Spending
2007–2008
Planned
Spending
2008–2009
Total
Authorities
2008–2009
Actual
Spending
2008–2009
Variance(s)
Co-operative Relations
Grants
Contributions 29.2 27.1 21.4 30.3 30.3 (8.8)
Total Transfer Payment Program 29.2 27.1 21.4 30.3 30.3 (8.8)


Top of Page

Industry Canada

Table 3: Details on Transfer Payments Programs (TPPs)

The following is a list by strategic outcome of Industry Canada’s transfer payment programs with transfers in excess of $5 million.

A Fair, Efficient and Competitive Marketplace

  • International Telecommunication Union, Switzerland

An Innovative Economy

  • Automotive Innovation Fund
  • Bombardier CSeries Program
  • Industrial Technologies Office — h2 Early Adopters Program
  • Industrial Technologies Office — Technology Partnerships Canada
  • Industrial Technologies Office — Program for Strategic Industrial Projects
  • Industrial Technologies Office — Strategic Aerospace and Defence Initiative

Competitive Industry and Sustainable Communities

  • Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Program
  • Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program
  • Community Access Program
  • Computers for Schools
  • FedNor — Community Futures Program
  • FedNor — Eastern Ontario Development Program
  • FedNor — Northern Ontario Development Program
  • Grant to Brantford Brownfield
  • Ontario Potable Water Program
  • Structured Financing Facility

Details on Other Programs

  • Canada Small Business Financing Program

A Fair, Efficient and Competitive Marketplace


International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Switzerland
Start Date: 1932–1933 End Date: December 31, 2008
Description:
Canada is signatory to the ITU treaty agreement negotiated every 4 years at a plenipotentiary conference, in accordance with its treaty obligations of the ITU Constitution and Convention. Canada’s membership, contribution and standing in the ITU, and its involvement in related events, allow this country to achieve results internationally across a broad range of issues affecting radiocommunication, standardization and telecommunication development. Canada’s contribution to the ITU is commensurate with its international standing and commitment to the United Nations (UN) and UN specialized agencies.
Strategic Outcomes:
A fair, efficient and competitive marketplace
Program Activity: Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications (SITT) — Marketplace
Results Achieved:
Canada achieved results across a broad range of issues affecting the international management of radio frequency spectrum and satellite orbits, the efficient and timely production of international standards, and the facilitation of connectivity in developing countries to help bridge the digital divide to the benefit of Canadian users and producers of telecommunication services and equipment.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Grants 6,099 5,929 6,808 6,808 5,762 1,046
Total Program Activity 6,099 5,929 6,808 6,808 5,762 1,046
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance is due to the fluctuation in the exchange rate between Swiss francs and Canadian dollars.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: An evaluation assessment of Industry Canada’s grant program and related activities for the ITU took place from December 2007 to March 2008. An evaluation by the Audit Evaluation Branch (AEB) was conducted between April and December 2008.

An Innovative Economy


Automotive Innovation Fund
Start Date: May 29, 2008 End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
The Automotive Innovation Fund supports strategic, large-scale research and development projects in developing innovative, greener and more fuel-efficient vehicles.
Strategic Outcomes:
Science and technology, knowledge, and innovation are effective drivers of a strong Canadian economy
Program Activity: Industry Sector — S&T and Innovation
Results Achieved:
A Contribution Agreement has been entered into with 1 automotive company for up to $80 million to establish a leading edge, highly innovative flexible engine assembly plant and to create a North American Centre for Diesel and Advanced Powertrain Research and Innovation (the “Centre”) in Windsor, Ontario. The company’s total investment in the project is estimated to be up to $730 million by 2012 and is estimated to maintain up to 549 jobs in Windsor initially, with an opportunity to grow to 787 jobs if favourable market conditions exist.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions - - - 9,000 9,000 (9,000)
Total Program Activity - - - 9,000 9,000 (9,000)
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: A combined Results-Based Management and Accountability Framework (RMAF) and Risk-Based Audit Framework (RBAF) for the Automotive Innovation Fund was completed in 2008–09. A summative evaluation, managed by the Audit and Evaluation Branch of Industry Canada, is planned for completion in 2012–13.

 


Bombardier CSeries Program
Start Date: September 2008 End Date: October 2015
Description:
In July 2008, the Government announced its intention to make a repayable investment of up to $350 million to Bombardier Aerospace for the research and development of new aircraft technologies related to the CSeries, a new 110–130-seat family of commercial aircraft. The research and development projects will support the Canadian aerospace industry’s goal of developing new technologies for the next generation of more fuel-efficient and safer commercial aircraft. The contribution is being provided by Industry Canada and is conditionally repayable.
Strategic Outcomes:
Science and technology, knowledge, and innovation are effective drivers of a strong Canadian economy
Program Activity: Industry Sector — S&T and Innovation
Results Achieved: The Contribution Agreements for the CSeries and Strategic Technologies projects were signed in March 2009. Bombardier is continuing to conduct R&D under these two projects. Funding was provided from FY 2008–09 funds.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions - - - 46,174 39,661 (39,661)
Total Program
Activity
- - - 46,174 39,661 (39,661)
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Bombardier’s research and development project is large and complex. Delays have occurred in ramping up R&D capacity due primarily to human resource issues.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: A combined Results-Based Management and Accountability Framework (RMAF) and Risk-Based Audit Framework (RBAF) for the Bombardier CSeries Program was completed in 2008–09. A summative evaluation, managed by the Audit and Evaluation Branch of Industry Canada, is planned for completion in 2015–16.

 


Industrial Technologies Office — h2 Early Adopters Program (h2EA)
Start Date: October 9, 2003 End Date: March 31, 2008
Description:
This program provides funding support for new hydrogen technology demonstration projects. In doing so, it fosters the development and early adoption of hydrogen and hydrogen-compatible technologies into the marketplace.

The terms and conditions for this program expired on March 31, 2008.

Strategic Outcomes:
An innovative economy
Program Activity: Industrial Technologies Office
Results Achieved:
No results were achieved, as the program expired on March 31, 2008.
($000) Actual Spending
2006–07
Actual Spending
2007–08
Planned
Spending
2008–09
Total Authorities
2008–09
Actual Spending
2008–09
Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 5,539 2,006 - - - -
Total Program
Activity
5,539 2,006 - - - -
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: An evaluation of the h2 Early Adopters Program was completed by the Audit and Evaluation Branch in 2008–09.

 


Industrial Technologies Office —  Technology Partnerships Canada
Start Date: March 11, 1996 End Date: December 31, 2006
Description:
This program’s objective is to provide funding support for strategic research and development that will produce economic, social and environmental benefits to Canadians. Although Technology Partnerships Canada’s terms and conditions expired on December 31, 2006, and no further projects were contracted, there remain contribution agreements with companies that must be managed according to their specific terms and conditions.
Strategic Outcomes:
An innovative economy
Program Activity: Industrial Technologies Office
Results Achieved:
Investment in research and development activities in the aerospace, defence, environmental and enabling technology industries.
($000) Actual Spending
2006–07
Actual Spending
2007–08
Planned Spending
2008–09
Total Authorities
2008–09
Actual Spending
2008–09
Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 295,251 256,553 195,250 213,379 198,813 (3,563)
Total Program
Activity
295,251 256,553 195,250 213,379 198,813 (3,563)
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The difference between the Planned Spending and the Actual Spending corresponds to increased program spending authorized following Treasury Board approval of additional funding for this program. At the time of preparation of the 2008–09 Report on Plans and Priorities, Treasury Board approval had not yet been received and, as such, the Planned Spending did not reflect this funding.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned:
Summative Evaluation — by December 2011

 


Industrial Technologies Office —  Program for Strategic Industrial Projects
Start Date: October 3, 2005 End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Program for Strategic Industrial Projects (PSIP) provides a framework within which a variety of larger strategic investments are administered in the Canadian automotive sector to broaden economic benefits, environmental improvements and sustainable industrial development.
Strategic Outcomes:
An innovative economy
Program Activity: Industrial Technologies Office
Results Achieved:
No new projects were contracted during 2008–09; however, company claim disbursements continued in technology adaptation and adoption activities in the automotive industry.
($000) Actual Spending
2006–07
Actual Spending
2007–08
Planned Spending
2008–09
Total Authorities
2008–09
Actual Spending
2008–09
Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 41,444 99,006 87,510 39,913 39,913 47,597
Total Program
Activity
41,444 99,006 87,510 39,913 39,913 47,597
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is a result of amounts claimed by companies being lower than anticipated. The automotive industry is experiencing tough economic times during the present global recession.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: An evaluation of the PSIP was initiated by the Audit and Evaluation Branch in 2008–09 and will be completed in 2009–10.

 


Industrial Technologies Office — Strategic Aerospace and Defence Initiative
Start Date: April 2, 2007 End Date: March 31, 2012
Description:
The Strategic Aerospace and Defence Initiative (SADI) provides contributions to industrial research and pre-competitive development in the aerospace and defence sectors. Key objectives include encouraging research and development that will result in innovation and excellence in new products and services; enhancing the competitiveness of Canadian aerospace and defence companies; and fostering collaboration among research institutes, universities and colleges, and the private sector.
Strategic Outcomes:
An innovative economy
Program Activity: Industrial Technologies Office
Results Achieved:
Approved 9 new SADI projects valued at $395.4 million for innovative research and development investment activities, thereby enhancing competitiveness in the aerospace and defence industry. Developed collaborative partnerships with universities, institutes, and the aerospace and defence industry.
($000) Actual Spending
2006–07
Actual Spending
2007–08
Planned Spending
2008–09
Total Authorities
2008–09
Actual Spending
2008–09
Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions - 10,500 11,800 60,000 35,783 (23,983)
Total Program
Activity
- 10,500 11,800 60,000 35,783 (23,983)
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The difference between the Planned Spending and the Actual Spending corresponds to increased program spending authorized following Treasury Board approval of additional funding for this program. At the time of preparation of the 2008–09 Report on Plans and Priorities, Treasury Board approval had not yet been received and, as such, the Planned Spending did not reflect this funding.

As for the variance between the Total Authorities and the Actual Spending, this is attributable to the program approving fewer projects than originally anticipated in its first year of operations in 2007–08, resulting in a lesser amount being disbursed.

Audits/evaluations completed or planned:
Internal Assessment 2009–10
SADI Management Assessment 2009–10
Implementation Review (end of 2009–10)
An audit will be undertaken by the Audit and Evaluation Branch in 2009–10.
Summative Evaluation — End of term (December 31, 2011)

Competitive Industry and Sustainable Communities


Canada–Ontario Infrastructure Program
Start Date: October 25, 2000 End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:

The Canada–Ontario Infrastructure Program (COIP) uses a competitive process to provide funding assistance to municipalities for the construction, renewal, expansion of material enhancement of infrastructure that will contribute to improving the quality of life for Ontarians and to building the foundation for sustained, long-term economic growth in the 21st century.

Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
Set to end on March 31, 2009, the Canada–Ontario Infrastructure Program (COIP) has been extended until March 31, 2011, to facilitate the specific needs of projects that are yet to submit final claims as well as to ensure that projects that are not materially complete can reach completion.

The program has enabled Ontario communities to construct, renew and expand infrastructure, thereby building a foundation for sustainable communities and economic growth.

498 projects are funded under COIP with approximately 3.5% of projects still to be completed.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities
2008–09
Actual Spending
2008–09
Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 94,250 33,004 - 23,534 11,825 (11,825)
Total Program
Activity
94,250 33,004 - 23,534 11,825 (11,825)
Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to the fact that the program was scheduled to end March 31, 2009; however, the COIP agreement was extended to March 31, 2011.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: Not applicable

 


Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program
Start Date: January 1, 2003 End Date: March 31, 2010
Description:
The objective of the Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program (CATIP) is to assist the Canadian apparel and textile firms with initiatives that will help to maximize productivity, identify high-value niche markets, improve e-commerce initiatives, enhance global marketing and branding strategies, and facilitate access to capital. The program has a firm component (private sector applicants) and a national initiatives component (not-for-profit industry associations that represent either the apparel or textile sectors on a national scale). The CATIP firm component was closed in 2005. Since 2004, the program has also had a production efficiency component (CANtex) targeted towards textile producers and, in 2005, introduced a transformative component for textile companies wanting to reorient at least a portion of their current textile production from lesser value-added products to higher value-added textile products targeted at growth niche markets.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Industry Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
The Textile Production Efficiency Component (knows as CANtex) has, since its inception, resulted in the approval of 390 projects representing $96.2 million of total project costs; 148 projects were approved by Canadian Economic Development for Quebec Regions, Industry Canada’s delivery partner for the Province of Quebec.

The National Initiatives Component (NI) has continued to assist apparel and textile associations with projects designed to introduce best practices in manufacturing and value chain development, exploit leading-edge technologies, and develop and implement global marketing strategies. Since the program’s inception, NI has supported close to 222 projects.

Overall, CATIP has funded 930 projects throughout the apparel and textile industries since its inception in 2003.

($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 6,469 5,729 2,212 2,212 1,969 243
Total Program
Activity
6,469 5,729 2,212 2,212 1,969 243
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance between planned and actual spending was primarily due to poor conditions within the economy, compounded by reduction of demand for export products, especially in the U.S. market, causing potential new applicants and recipients to experience financial difficulties. This in turn directly impacted on program demand and cancellation of a number of projects. Adjustments were made by signing additional projects.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned:
The Audit and Evaluation Branch completed an audit of CATIP in 2008. A final evaluation is planned for 2009–10.

 


Community Access Program
Start Date: October 1994 End Date: March 31, 2008
Description:
Community Access Program (CAP) was established under the government’s Connecting Canadians initiative to provide affordable access to the Internet and the services and tools it provides. The program’s goal was to have all Canadians and communities participate fully in the knowledge-based economy. CAP sites are located in schools, libraries, community centres and friendship centres, and they operate through partnerships with provincial/territorial governments and non-profit organizations. CAP also has a complementary youth component, the CAP Youth Initiative, which is funded through Human Resources and Social Development Canada's (HRSDC’s) Youth Employment Strategy (YES). For more information regarding YES, please see the Horizontal Initiatives table in HRSDC’s 2008–2009 Report on Plans and Priorities.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Spectrum, Information and Telecommunications Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
Industry Canada secured funding to deliver the Community Access Program (CAP) in 2008–09 and 2009–10. In 2008–09, 3,760 CAP sites were supported.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 25,534 23,622 12,763 23,375 23,375 (10,612)
Total Program
Activity
25,534 23,622 12,763 23,375 23,375 (10,612)
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance is due to the fact that the planned spending only represents CAP, whereas the total authorities represent CAP as well as CAP Youth.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned:  An evaluation of CAP will be conducted by the Audit and Evaluation Branch in 2009–10.

 


Computers for Schools
Start Date: 1993 End Date: March 31, 2008
Description:
Starting in the 1993–94 fiscal year, Computers for Schools (CFS) was established to support the refurbishing of computers and related equipment donated by governments and businesses and distributing them across Canada to schools, libraries and registered not-for-profit learning organizations. CFS also delivers a complementary youth component, the CFS Youth Initiative, which is funded through Human Resources and Social Development Canada's Youth Employment Strategy (YES). This initiative assists youth between the ages of 15 and 30 years in obtaining information and communications technology (ICT) skills to better prepare them in seeking employment in the knowledge economy through internships in computer refurbishing centres across Canada providing support in activities such as computer repair, technical support and website design.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
Industry Canada secured funding to deliver Computers for Schools (CFS) from 2008–13. In 2008–09, 65,766 computers were refurbished and delivered to schools and not-for-profit learning organizations.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 12,173 7,418 3,400 7,339 7,339 (3,939)
Total Program
Activity
12,173 7,418 3,400 7,339 7,339 (3,939)
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance is due to the fact that the planned spending only represents CFS, whereas the total authorities represent CFS as well as CFS Youth.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned:  A review of the implementation of the program’s results-based management and accountability framework is planned for 2009–10.

 


FedNor — Community Futures (CF) Program
Start Date: 1986 End Date: October 2, 2010
Description:
The Community Futures (CF) Program supports community economic development and builds the capacity of non-metropolitan communities to realize their full sustainable potential. Funding is made available through transfer payments that provide contributions to designated Community Futures organizations in support of repayable business financing through local investment funds, strategic community planning and socio-economic development, business services, and community-based projects and special initiatives.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
There were 1.98 dollars leveraged from other sources for every CF dollar invested. In addition, 3,195 businesses were created, expanded, maintained and strengthened in rural Ontario by Community Futures Development Corporations.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 20,261 20,816 21,360 21,452 21,452 (92)
Total Program
Activity
20,261 20,816 21,360 21,452 21,452 (92)
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Not applicable
Audits/evaluations completed or planned:
An evaluation of the CF Program was completed in 2008–09. The Audit and Evaluation Branch will undertake an audit of the CF Program in 2009–10.

 


FedNor — Eastern Ontario Development Program
Start Date: October 12, 2004 End Date: March 31, 2009
Description:
The Eastern Ontario Development Program (EODP) promotes socio-economic development in Eastern Ontario that leads to business and job opportunities, sustainable self-reliant communities, and a competitive and diversified regional economy. Delivered through Community Futures Development Corporations in Eastern Ontario, the program makes funding available through transfer payments to provide contributions in 5 areas: business and community development, access to capital, skills development, retention and attraction of youth, and technological enhancement.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
There were 2.90 dollars leveraged from other sources for every EODP dollar invested. In addition, 615 rural Eastern Ontario businesses and organizations were created, expanded, maintained or strengthened within the last year.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 9,600 9,400 9,600 9,600 9,600 -
Total Program
Activity
9,600 9,400 9,600 9,600 9,600 -
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Not applicable
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: Not applicable.

 


FedNor — Northern Ontario Development Program
Start Date: April 1, 1996 End Date: June 30, 2011
Description:
The Northern Ontario Development Program promotes economic development and diversification in Northern Ontario. It builds upon the assets and strengths of communities to maximize the sustainable potential of Northern Ontario to succeed in the knowledge-based economy. Funding through transfer payments provides contributions to not-for-profit organizations, and small and medium-sized enterprises in 6 areas: information and communications technology, innovation, community economic development, business financing support, trade, and tourism and human capital.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
There were 2.79 dollars leveraged from other sources for every NODP dollar invested. In addition, 3,376 Northern Ontario businesses and organizations were created, expanded, maintained or strengthened.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 36,859 37,184 40,800 40,800 40,800 -
Total Program
Activity
36,859 37,184 40,800 40,800 40,800 -
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Not applicable
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: Not applicable.

 


Grant to Brantford Brownfield
Start Date: May 8, 2008 End Date: March 31, 2013
Description:
A one-time grant of $12 million to the Corporation of the City of Brantford to be used for the planned remediation of the Mohawk–Greenwich brownfield site. Brownfields are abandoned or underused land, often in urban areas, that formerly housed industrial or commercial facilities. Redevelopment of brownfield land is generally complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination, and by liability or financing issues related to the toxic contamination. There has been significant private sector interest in the Mohawk–Greenwich brownfield site from both developers and the environmental remediation industry; however, the project is not financially viable for the private sector without financial assistance from government.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Industry Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
Results achieved to date include:
  • Removal of underground storage tanks and remnant product
  • Removal of debris and hazardous materials
  • Removal of designated substances and de-designation of PCB site
  • Removal of on-site tenants
  • Management of on-site tenants (military museum)
  • Structural analysis of identified buildings
  • Review of all previous environmental site assessments (ESA) including rail line
  • Development of comprehensive remediation plan
  • Preparation of final development plan
  • Development and completion of a proposal call process to obtain a proponent to remediate and develop the site, together with the execution of all necessary agreements, which may include an agreement of purchase and sale under which the successful proponent would obtain title to the lands following their remediation
  • Demolition of remaining buildings after structural analysis
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Grants 12,000 9,085 404 11,596
Total Program
Activity
12,000 9,085 404 11,596
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance is due to the reprofiling of funds at year end, which has been spread over a 3-year period.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: Not applicable.

 


Ontario Potable Water Program
Start Date: December 13, 2007 End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
The Ontario Potable Water Program (OPWP) provides financial assistance in the form of grants to specific small and rural Ontario municipalities that incurred increased costs in the development of their Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Program drinking water projects.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
To date, the OPWP is assisting 73 Ontario municipalities (36 in 2008–09) that incurred costs in the development of their Canada–Ontario Infrastructure Program drinking water projects. Projects were undertaken to stimulate economic activities that were delayed as a result of the municipality’s need to redirect funds to their Canada–Ontario Infrastructure Program project.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Grants 2,159 29,100 29,100 10,371 18,729
Total Program
Activity
2,159 29,100 29,100 10,371 18,729
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance is due to the reprofiling of funds at year end as a result of a change in cash flow projection.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: Not applicable.

 


Structured Financing Facility
Start Date: September 31, 2001 End Date: March 31, 2011
Description:
This program provides financing support to qualifying domestic and foreign shipowners to build or refit vessels in Canada in order to stimulate economic activities in the Canadian shipbuilding and industrial marine industry and to help position the industry to meet government procurement requirements.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Industry Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
Investment in support of the Canadian shipbuilding industry to help develop necessary critical infrastructure to position the industry for future federal procurement efforts.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Contributions 9,854 4,967 15,507 18,297 15,149 358
Total Program
Activity
9,854 4,967 15,507 18,297 15,149 358
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance was a result of expected potential projects not materializing.
Audits/evaluations completed or planned: An audit of the Structured Financing Facility (SFF) was completed in 2008 by the Audit and Evaluation Branch (AEB). The SFF program is currently undergoing an implementation review by the AEB.

Details on Other Programs


Canada Small Business Financing Program1
Start Date: 1961 End Date: Ongoing
Description:
The Canada Small Business Financing Program (CSBF) is a key federal financing program for small business. It helps small and medium-sized business get access to adequate financing. It also helps fill a gap in the range of financing instruments available to these small businesses, which otherwise have difficulty qualifying for financing that meets their needs.
Strategic Outcomes:
Competitive industry and sustainable communities
Program Activity: Small Business and Marketplace Services and Regional Operations Sector — Economic Development
Results Achieved:
Loans made:
  • A total of 7,846 loans, representing $916.4 million, were made to small and medium-sized enterprises under the CSBF Program in 2008–09.

Claims paid:

  • In 2008–09, 1,979 CSBF claims totalling $106.4 million, 23 SBLA claims totalling $0.6 million and 105 Capital Leasing Pilot Project claims totalling $3.9 million were paid.
($000) Actual Spending 2006–07 Actual Spending 2007–08 Planned Spending 2008–09 Total Authorities 2008–09 Actual Spending 2008–09 Variances Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending
Total Other Types
of Transfer
Payments
81,283 100,259 81,715 110,339 110,339 (28,624)
Total Program
Activity
81,283 100,259 81,715 110,339 110,339 (28,624)
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The 2 major factors contributing to the adjustment were:
  • The planned spending forecasts did not predict changes in the lending practices of financial institutions. The March 31, 2008, update to the expense forecasting model revealed changes in some lending practices, which resulted in higher-than-expected claims.
  • The model also did not factor in unforeseen economic shocks and circumstances, such as the economic slowdown in Canada and around the globe.

Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s):
In 2004–05, the CSBF program underwent an evaluation led by the Audit and Evaluation Branch covering the 5-year period from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2004. The evaluation concluded that the program was still relevant to the needs of small business, there are no viable alternatives to it, and there is minimal overlap between this program (CSBF) and other federal initiatives to support access to financing by small businesses.

Independent research and an outside evaluation of the CSBF program under the direction of a public–private sector committee, based on a results-based management and accountability framework, was completed to support this review.

The next review of the CSBF Program, covering the 5-year period from April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2009, is currently underway and must be tabled in Parliament by March 31, 2010.


1 Industry Canada is responsible for the Canada Small Business Financing (CSBF) Program. This program does not provide grants and contributions, so it is not reported in the table Details on Transfer Payments Programs.

Top of Page

Infrastructure Canada

Table 5: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPP)

Infrastructure Canada manages the following transfer payment programs:

As prescribed by the Policy on Transfer Payments, as of June 30, 2009, the summary of the Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs is available at: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/tpp-ppt/index-eng.html.


Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF)

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF)

2) Start Date: 2003-2004

3) End Date: 2012-2013

4) Description: Directed to projects of major federal and regional significance in areas that are vital to sustaining economic growth and enhancing the quality of life of Canadians.

5) Strategic Outcome: Improving the sustainability of our cities and communities and Canada’s local, regional and national public infrastructure to enhance the economic, social, cultural and environmental quality of life of Canadians.

In May 2008 Strategic Outcome was changed to: Quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities.

6) Results Achieved: Safer and improved water quality in major communities, safer and faster movement of people and goods on Canada’s major land transportation routes, reduced production of greenhouse gases and airborne pollutants, more effective urban development and increased economic activity including tourism.

As of March 31, 2009, total CSIF funding amounted to $5.2 billion. No new projects were announced in 2008-2009. However, contribution agreements were signed for the following projects: Broadband Nunavut Phase 2, Broadband FNESS, Broadband NCSN, Ontario Wastewater Bundle Brockville and Sarnia and the Regional Rural Water Supply System Bundle Project – La Ronge, Water West and Sask Landing. The majority of CSIF funding has been committed, including the $750 million of top up funding announced in Budget 2006.

7) Program Activity: Infrastructure Investments.

In 2008 Program Activity was changed to: Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding.

(in $ thousands)


 

8) Actual Spending 2006-2007

9) Actual Spending 2007-2008

10) Planned Spending 2008-2009

11) Total
Authorities 2008-2009

12) Actual Spending 2008-2009

13) Variance(s) Between 10 and 12

14) Total Grants

$

$

$

$

$

$

15) Total Contributions

$681,218

$922,363

$689,238

$733,418

$505,429

$183,809

16) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments

$

$

$

$

$

$

17) Total Program Activity

$681,218

$922,363

$689,238

$733,418

$505,429

$183,809


18) Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to contribution agreements being signed later than anticipated, and for decreased cash-flow requirements for existing agreements.

19) Audit Completed or Planned: The Audit of the Management Control Framework of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund was completed in was completed in 2007-2008. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/mcf-finrep-ccg-rapfin-eng.html.


Border Infrastructure Fund: (BIF)

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF)

2) Start Date: 2003-2004

3) End Date: 2013-2014

4) Description: Targets Canada-United States border crossing points and activity funding for investments in physical infrastructure, intelligent transportation system infrastructure and improved analytical capacity.

5) Strategic Outcome: Improving the sustainability of our cities and communities and Canada’s local, regional and national public infrastructure to enhance the economic, social, cultural and environmental quality of life of Canadians.

In May 2008 Strategic Outcome was changed to: Quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities.

6) Results Achieved: In partnership with Infrastructure Canada, Transport Canada completed projects of over $125 Million dollars of federal contributions under the Border Infrastructure Fund to help improve the safety and efficiency of the transportation network leading to our international borders. During the course of the fiscal year, the following projects from provinces across Canada were completed:

  • Construction of the Walker Road Rail Grade Separation in Windsor-Essex corridor in Ontario;
  • Components of Route 1 improvements for new international bridge and truck route between New Brunswick and Maine completed. As well, improvements on St Croix to Church Street in New Brunswick, and Improvements on Route 3 to Route 127 in New Brunswick;
  • Highway 15 Widening in British Columbia;
  • Highway 10 Widening in British Columbia;
  • Improvements to Queensborough Bridge in British Columbia;
  • Highway 401/402 Interchange in Ontario; and
  • Highway 402 reconstruction between Lambton Road 26 and Highway 21, Phase 1 in Ontario.

7) Program Activity: Infrastructure Investments.

In 2008 Program Activity was changed to: Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding.

(in $ thousands)


 

8) Actual Spending 2006-2007

9) Actual Spending 2007-2008

10) Planned Spending 2008-2009

11) Total Authorities 2008-2009

12) Actual Spending 2008-2009

13) Variance(s) Between 10 and 12

14) Total Grants

$

$

$

$

$

$

15) Total Contributions

$53,060

$69,903

$69,301

$114,383

$81,111

$-11,810

16) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments

$

$

$

$

$

$

17) Total Program Activity

$53,060

$69,903

$69,301

$114,383

$81,111

$-11,810


18) Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to contribution agreements being signed later than anticipated, and for increased cash flow requirements for existing agreements.

19) Audit Completed or Planned: The Audit of the Management Control Framework of the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2007-2008. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/mcf-finrep-ccg-rapfin-eng.html.


Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF)

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF)

2) Start Date: 2004-2005

3) End Date: 2010-2011

4) Description: To support smaller-scale municipal infrastructure projects to improve the quality of life, sustainable development and economic opportunities, particularly of smaller communities.

5) Strategic Outcome: Improving the sustainability of our cities and communities and Canada’s local, regional and national public infrastructure to enhance the economic, social, cultural and environmental quality of life of Canadians.

In May 2008 Strategic Outcome was changed to: Quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities.

6) Results Achieved: Improved and increased stock of core public infrastructure in areas such as water, wastewater, culture and recreation, improved quality of life and economic opportunities for smaller communities.

During 2008-2009, 164 new MRIF projects were approved, with a total federal contribution of $116.6 Million. Since the MRIF was established in 2003, 1,973 projects have been approved, totalling just over $1 billion in federal contributions.

7) Program Activity: Infrastructure Investments.

In 2008 Program Activity was changed to: Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding.

(in $ thousands)


 

8) Actual Spending
2006-2007

9) Actual Spending 2007-2008

10) Planned Spending 2008-2009

11) Total Authorities 2008-2009

12) Actual Spending 2008-2009

13) Variance(s) Between 10 and 12

14) Total Grants

$

$

$

$

$

$

15) Total Contributions

$81,566

$143,320

$399,885

$399,885

$220,324

$179,561

16) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments

$

$

$

$

$

$

17) Total Program Activity

$81,566

$143,320

$399,885

$399,885

$220,324

$179,561


18) Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to the decrease in cash-flow requirements for existing contribution agreements.

19) Audit Completed or Planned: Assurance Audit (In progress). Please refer to Table 11a: Internal Audits (Current Reporting Period).


Gas Tax Fund (GTF)

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Gas Tax Fund (GTF)

2) Start Date: 2005-2006

3) End Date: Ongoing

4) Description: The Gas Tax Fund program strives to meet the core diverse infrastructure needs of all communities while contributing to national environmental outcomes by supporting capital investments in environmentally sustainable municipal infrastructure to improve water and air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is designed to build competitive and sustainable communities by providing reliable, predictable up-front funding for eligible investments in water, wastewater, solid waste, public transit, community energy systems, local roads and bridges and capacity-building.

5) Strategic Outcome: Improving the sustainability of our cities and communities and Canada’s local, regional and national public infrastructure to enhance the economic, social, cultural and environmental quality of life of Canadians.

In May 2008 Strategic Outcome was changed to: Quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities.

6) Results Achieved: Supported environmentally sustainable infrastructure in support of shared national outcomes. These outcomes are cleaner air, cleaner water, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

The Gas Tax Fund is a unique program with an up-front funding mechanism. Jurisdictions report on an annual basis, providing expenditure details for the previous fiscal year. Therefore, for 2008-2009, the results for 2007-2008 years were submitted to Infrastructure Canada.

  • To date, over 3,400 Canadian municipalities have received funding through the Gas Tax Fund, giving it the largest scope of any infrastructure program of its kind.
  • Since inception, almost $2B in GTF has flowed from Canada for municipal infrastructure project.
  • Of the funds transferred, municipalities have spent more than $1.4B on over 3,900 projects by the end of 2007-2008.
  • Provinces, territories and municipalities have, together banked $515M and earned approximately $34.7M in interest.
  • Interest earned in tandem with marginal administration costs has meant additional dollars for projects over and above municipal allocations.
  • In addition, all provinces and territories, with the exception of Newfoundland, have signed the amendment agreements for the extension of the GTF to 2014 (announced in Budget 2007 at $8 billion), with confirmation of municipal allocations.
  • The performance management framework for outcomes reporting was shared and developed for national reporting.
  • Joint evaluations of the GTF for each province and territory were completed with oversight committee reviews of the evaluation. A national evaluation was initiated.

7) Program Activity: Infrastructure Investments.

In 2008 Program Activity was changed to: Gas Tax Fund.

(in $ thousands)


 

8) Actual Spending 2006-2007

9) Actual Spending 2007-2008

10) Planned Spending 2008-2009

11) Total Authorities 2008-2009

12) Actual Spending 2008-2009

13) Variance(s) Between 10 and 12

14) Total Grants

$

$

$

$

$

$

15) Total Contributions

$

$

$

$

$

$

16) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments

$590,204

$778,203

$987,490

$1,012,134

$984,812

$2,678

17) Total Program Activity

$590,204

$778,203

$987,490

$1,012,134

$984,812

$2,678


18) Comment(s) on Variance(s): Some conditions for payment in 2007-08 for three provinces/territories were only met in 2008-2009. Funding was carried forward to 2008-2009. Some funding will be carried forward to 2009-2010 because the conditions for payment for 2008-2009 for two provinces/territories were not met.

19) Audit Completed or Planned: Assurance Audit (Completed). Please refer to Table 11a: Internal Audits (Current Reporting Period).


Research, Knowledge and Outreach Program

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Research, Knowledge and Outreach Program

2) Start Date: 2004-2005

3) End Date: 2009-2010

4) Description: To enhance implementation of Infrastructure Canada’s Research Strategy, which focuses on three components: Knowledge generation, community-building and knowledge transfer.

5) Strategic Outcome: Improving the sustainability of our cities and communities and Canada’s local, regional and national public infrastructure to enhance the economic, social, cultural and environmental quality of life of Canadians.

In May 2008 Strategic Outcome was changed to: Quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities.

6) Results Achieved: As stated in the Departmental Performance Report, Infrastructure Canada has re-oriented its research and analysis efforts to help deliver key elements of the Building Canada plan. These changes include:

a) A shift from primarily high-level and exploratory research to more applied internal and external research with partners and end-users:

The Research, Knowledge and Outreach initiative announced in 2005, will finish in March 2010. The following research projects were completed during the 2008-2009 fiscal year. Topics include infrastructure research and analysis related to water, transportation, energy, climate change and impacts on the north.

The water infrastructure-related projects included Design and Management Approaches for Sustainable Water Well Infrastructure, which assessed the state of water well infrastructure in Canada; Water Connections, which created a national portal providing information about Canada’s water infrastructure; Municipal Water Supply Infrastructure Governance in Canada: Uptake of Water Conservation Technologies in the Context of Utility Restructuring, which examined the use of innovative technologies in water and wastewater management in Canada; and Community Infrastructure Technology and Innovation Education Symposia (CITIES), which developed training and professional development courses on innovative techniques for constructing and rehabilitating civil infrastructure.

Some transportation-related infrastructure projects included:

  • Best Practices for the Technical Delivery of Transportation Planning Studies, which developed a guide to assist small and medium-sized Canadian communities in performing transportation planning studies;
  • Efficient Planning of Infrastructure for Freight Transportation: Improving Understanding of the Behavioural Underpinnings of Freight Transport Choices, which linked the behavioural underpinnings of shippers and carriers to freight transportation flows and disseminated this information to regional, provincial and federal transportation planners;
  • A Study on the Canadian Status of High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) Lanes - Efficiencies, Enforcement and Innovations, which investigated the overall status of high occupancy vehicle lane utilization in Canada and the efficiencies these lanes have achieved; and
  • Training Program for Winter Road Maintenance, which developed a training program to build capacity for standards and management of winter road maintenance.

An energy-related research project entitled “Toward Energy Sustainability of Community Infrastructure” supported innovative infrastructure planning at the local level, and a research project related to northern issues entitled “Things Change, We Change: Community Planning for Resilience in Tuktoyaktuk (NWT)” developed a framework to guide integrated collaboration for planning.

In addition to these projects, the Research, Knowledge and Outreach initiative established new partnerships. One partnership was with Natural Resources Canada and Engineers Canada to conduct an engineering assessment of the vulnerability of Canada’s public infrastructure to the impacts of climate change, with a particular focus on water infrastructure. Another partnership was developed with the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering to prepare a guideline for asset condition reports for municipal governments, to align these technical aspects with the new Public Sector Accounting Board’s accounting process for municipalities.

b) Increased economic analysis of infrastructure issues:

In May 2008, Infrastructure Canada established the Economic Analysis and Research Directorate under its Policy and Communications Branch. This new section established in-house research and analysis expertise on priority economic issues relating to Infrastructure Canada’s program delivery. Over the reporting period, the new Economic Analysis section analyzed and briefed senior management on the economic benefits of investing in infrastructure, including as a counter-cyclical measure and its longer term impacts on productivity and competitiveness.

The Research, Knowledge and Outreach Program also supported and funded projects that studied the socio-economic impacts of investing in various infrastructure assets, including the following:

  • The Local Economic Infrastructure of Business Improvement Areas in the City of Toronto, Dr. Rafael Gomez, ThinkTankToronto;
  • Social Dynamics of Economic Performance: Innovation, Infrastructure and Creativity in City-Regions, Dr. David Wolfe, Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto;
  • Metropolitan Review of Toronto, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD);
  • Examining the Social Elements of Public Infrastructure Impacts on Competitiveness and Implications for Governance, City of Ottawa, Housing Branch.

c) Better transfer of knowledge and research to external practitioners and internal decision-makers:

Although the Research, Knowledge and Outreach initiative is still in progress, several key outcomes can already be identified. A preliminary review revealed that a large body of knowledge has been created resulting in a substantial increase in understanding of infrastructure issues, in many cases accompanied by recommendations and advice. Some significant accomplishments include projects demonstrating best practices for infrastructure research and evidence of international community linkages which have the potential to increase the profile of Canadian infrastructure and Canadian infrastructure research capabilities. A few projects have developed multi-disciplinary research communities and are maintaining them beyond the life of the project and individual projects have been effective in channelling their generated knowledge within their own communities of interest.

d) Strengthened partnerships to better exchange information and knowledge, better advise on infrastructure priorities, leverage resources to produce higher quality research and address knowledge gaps:

A large number of partnerships have been developed through Research, Knowledge and Outreach funded projects, and have significantly improved the transfer of knowledge and expertise between government departments, academic institutions and other organizations. Some of the organizations within which partnerships have been developed or strengthened include Engineers Canada, the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the National Round Table on Sustainable Infrastructure, the Canadian Institute of Planners, the Canadian Home Builders Association, the Canadian Urban Transit Association, the Canadian Public Works Association, the Canadian Standards Association, the Canadian Water Resources Association, as well as McGill University, Queen’s University, University of Waterloo, University of British Columbia, the British Columbia Institute of Technology and the Centre d’expertise et de recherche en infrastructures urbaines.

Of particular focus in 2008-2009 was Infrastructure Canada’s support of a joint project with the National Research Council and the National Round Table on Sustainable Infrastructure to develop a model framework for the assessment of the state, performance and management of Canada’s core public infrastructure. Core public infrastructure was defined as roads, bridges, public transit, water and wastewater systems. The National Round Table on Sustainable Infrastructure taps expertise from more than 45 infrastructure-related organizations across Canada including many of the above organizations. This model framework is a first step towards providing infrastructure owners and managers with a unified approach to assessing the condition and performance of the infrastructure for which they are responsible and to maximize the return on investment.

7) Program Activity: Policy, Knowledge and Partnership Development.

In 2008 Program Activity was changed to: Knowledge and Research.

(in $ thousands)


 

8) Actual Spending 2006-2007

9) Actual Spending 2007-2008

10) Planned Spending 2008-2009

11) Total Authorities 2008-2009

12) Actual Spending 2008-2009

13) Variance(s) Between 10 and 12

14) Total Grants

$

$

$

$

$

$

15) Total Contributions

$2,972

$3,220

$5,000

$1,693

$1,693

$1,715

16) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments

$

$

$

$

$

$

17) Total Program Activity

$2,972

$3,220

$5,000

$1,693

$1,693

$1,715


18) Comment(s) on Variance(s): The initial budget projection was established in 2004, and was not based on the current year’s projections. Last call for Research, Knowledge and Outreach Program was prepared, as well as targeted funding to address key knowledge gaps, e.g., State and Performance Project, Asset Management, Urban Form and Sustainability, but due to unforeseen circumstances none were approved by the end of the fiscal year.

19) Audit Completed or Planned: Assurance Audit (Re-Focused). Please refer to Table 11a: Internal Audits (Current Reporting Period).


Provincial-Territorial Base Funding Program

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Provincial-Territorial Base Funding Program

2) Start Date: 2007-2008

3) End Date: 2013-2014

4) Description: These funds will provide greater flexibility to address infrastructure needs, particularly for the benefit of smaller jurisdictions which need to respond to basic needs regardless of the size of their population.

5) Strategic Outcome: Improving the sustainability of our cities and communities and Canada’s local, regional and national public infrastructure to enhance the economic, social, cultural and environmental quality of life of Canadians.

In May 2008 Strategic Outcome was changed to: Quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities.

6) Results Achieved: In fiscal year 2008-2009, Infrastructure Canada concluded PT Base Funding Agreements with the following eleven jurisdictions: Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nunavut, Northwest Territories and Yukon. While negotiations with the provinces of Ontario and Quebec started, these were not completed before the end of fiscal year 2008-2009.

In fiscal year 2008-2009, Infrastructure Canada approved 16 Capital Plans from nine different provinces and territories. Collectively, these Capital Plans resulted in federal funding commitments of more than $578 Million for 122 initiatives. Of this amount, $390.6 Million was transferred to provinces and territories. The remaining funds will flow once provinces and territories have satisfied the remaining conditions for payment in accordance with their funding agreement.

Due to the unique up-front funding mechanism of the Provincial-Territorial Base Fund, jurisdictions do not report on progress on an approved Capital Plan until a year after the expenditures take place. Since most jurisdictions only received their first instalment of PT Base Funds in fiscal year 2008-09, the majority have not yet submitted an expenditure report in respect of these expenditures. Therefore it is not possible at this time to report accurately on expenditures incurred or number of initiatives completed for fiscal year 2008-2009.

In terms of funds committed during fiscal year 2008-2009 for approved initiatives, by far the category for which the most federal funds were accessed was national highway system infrastructure followed by water and wastewater infrastructure. While these types of infrastructure investments remain a key priority for jurisdictions during 2008-2009, a number of provinces and territories submitted Capital Plans that also included priority initiatives in other infrastructure categories including sport, culture and tourism as well as solid waste management and disaster mitigation.

The following section highlights some of the key infrastructure commitments that were made by Infrastructure Canada during fiscal year 2008-2009:

  • In British Columbia, the province is combining $25 Million worth of its PT Base Funding envelope with its own funding to implement improvements to Highway 97. The approved initiatives involve expanding a 5-kilometre section of Highway 97 from two lanes to four, and relocating a commercial vehicle inspection station near Red Rock Road. These improvements will increase safety and reduce congestion in the highway and will reduce waiting times at the inspection station, experienced by commercial vehicles.
  • The Province of Newfoundland and Labrador is investing the first $25 Million it received through the PT Base Fund into a series of initiatives including the widening and hard-surfacing of the Trans Labrador Highway, a new bypass Road at Daniel’s Harbour as well as rehabilitation of several routes throughout the province, including Route 2, Route 430 and sections of the Trans Canada Highway. These initiatives will have a tangible impact on the quality of life for people in these communities and will keep people and goods moving safely and on time.
  • The Government of Nunavut is utilizing some of its PT Base Funding to construct the Piqqusilirivvik Cultural Facility in Clyde River. This facility will be used by Elders to provide youth with the opportunity to maintain their cultural values. In doing so, this cultural centre will play a vital role in the preservation of Inuit culture, language, and heritage for future generation.

In summary, excellent progress was made during fiscal year 2008-2009 in regards to the PT Base Fund. The program is meeting the needs of provinces and territories and the Government of Canada by providing funding that is, and will continue to support core infrastructure investments across the country.

7) Program Activity: Infrastructure Investments.

In 2008 Program Activity was changed to: Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding.

(in $ thousands)


 

8) Actual Spending
2006-2007

9) Actual Spending 2007-2008

10) Planned Spending 2008-2009

11) Total Authorities 2008-2009

12) Actual Spending 2008-2009

13) Variance(s) Between 10 and 12

14) Total Grants

$

$

$

$

$

$

15) Total Contributions

$

$

$

$

$

$

16) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments

$

$

$327,771

$654,486

$390,602

$-62,831

17) Total Program Activity

$

$

$327,771

$654,486

$390,602

$-62,831


18) Comment(s) on Variance(s): Contribution agreements were not signed on time for 2007-2008, so spending only took place in 2008-2009. However, as the planned spending for 2008-2009 was not large enough to the cover projects that had been carried over from 2007-2008, this resulted in over-spending.

19) Audit Completed or Planned: An Assurance Engagement Internal Audit is planned for 2010-2011.


Building Canada Fund (BCF)

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund (BCF)

2) Start Date: 2008-2009

3) End Date: 2016-2017

4) Description: To invest in provincial and community infrastructure to address both national, provincial/territorial and community priorities.

5) Strategic Outcome: Improving the sustainability of our cities and communities and Canada’s local, regional and national public infrastructure to enhance the economic, social, cultural and environmental quality of life of Canadians.

In May 2008 Strategic Outcome was changed to: Quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities.

6) Results Achieved: In light of the commitment to accelerate funding under the Building Canada Plan, the department streamlined the federal review and approval of projects, simplifying criteria and reducing the amount of information required in the project assessment process. Complementary to the work that Infrastructure Canada led, changes to the Navigable Waters Protection Act were passed with the Budget Implementation Act, which received Royal Assent on March 16, 2009. A series of regulations under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act were also introduced and came into force in March 2009 to further streamline approvals, minimize duplication, and reduce the number of separate federal environmental assessments for infrastructure projects funded under the Building Canada Plan. This is expected to greatly reduce the number of projects that will be subject to a separate federal environmental assessment in the upcoming construction season.

In 2008-2009, the Government of Canada announced funding for 37 major infrastructure projects with a total federal commitment of approximately $1.38 billion. As a result of the streamlining measures that were quickly implemented by the department, 26 of these projects, with a total federal commitment of just over $1 billion, were announced between January 27, 2009 and March 31, 2009.

All provinces have signed an agreement with Canada regarding the management of the Communities Component part of the Building Canada Plan. Up to March 31, 2009, 486 projects have been approved, totalling $505.6 Million in federal contribution since the beginning of the program. As a result of streamlining measures quickly implemented by the department, 421 of these projects, with a federal contribution totalling $452.6 Million were approved between Budget 2009 and March 31, 2009.

7) Program Activity: Infrastructure Investments.

In 2008 Program Activity was changed to: Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding.

(in $ thousands)


 

8) Actual Spending 2006-2007

9) Actual Spending 2007-2008

10) Planned Spending 2008-2009

11) Total Authorities 2008-2009

12) Actual Spending 2008-2009

13) Variance(s) Between 10 and 12

14) Total Grants

$

$

$

$

$

$

15) Total Contributions

$

$

$390,676

$390,676

$56,233

$334,443

16) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments

$

$

$

$

$

$

17) Total Program Activity

$

$

$390,676

$390,676

$56,233

$334,443


18) Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to contribution agreements being signed later than anticipated.

19) Audit Completed or Planned: Review of the File Management and Documentation Requirements for the Building Canada Fund (BCF) project files, completed in March 10, 2009.

Top of Page

National Defence

Summary of Transfer Payment Programs by Program Activity


($ thousands)   Actual  
2006-07
  Actual  
2007-08
2008-09
Planned
Spending
Total
Authorities
  Actual 
Spending
Grants          
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces 130 124 132 132 123
Conduct Operations - - - - -
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values 5,171 5,213 5,360 5,360 5,208
Total Grants 5,301 5,337 5,492 5,492 5,331
CONTRIBUTIONS          
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces 11,110 10,449 31,789 11,104 11,098
Conduct Operations - - - - -
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values 179,308 160,485 163,486 183,939 182,106
Total Contributions 190,418 170,934 195,275 195,043 193,204
Total Transfer Payments 195,719 176,271 200,767 200,534 198,535

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services) Group
* Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.
Top of Page

National Film Board of Canada

Table 5: Details on Transfer Payment Programs


  2006-07 2007-08 2008-2009
($ thousands) Actual Spending Actual Spending Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending Variance
Total Grants and Contributions
Production of Audiovisual Works 177 105 152 152 152 -
Distribution, Accessibility, Outreach 136 96 98 98 110 12
Revolving Fund - - - - - -
Total 313 201 250 250 262 12

Top of Page

National Research Council Canada

Table 5: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


  • Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP)
  • Tri-University Meson Facility (TRIUMF)
  • Contributions to International Telescope Programs - Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT), Gemini Telescopes, Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA)

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP)

Start date: 1962-1963

End date: Ongoing

Description: NRC-IRAP provides customized value-added advice, information, referrals and financial assistance to Canadian SMEs and builds effective regional innovation system relationships for the benefit of SMEs. NRC-IRAP works with clients at all stages of the innovation-commercialization continuum, including: project development; access to technical assistance, financial, business, marketing or management advice; access to competitive technical information; patent searches; and access to local, regional, national or international linkages. NRC-IRAP works with organizations that receive NRC-IRAP contributions and others to facilitate the implementation of multi-sector, multi-partner initiatives that are relevant to SMEs regionally and nationally.

Strategic Outcome: An innovative, knowledge-based economy for Canada through research and development, technology commercialization and industry support.

Results Achieved:

Increased SME technical R&D capability and capacityNRC-IRAP continued to support firms in hiring technical expertise such as engineers and scientists, as well as university and college graduates. In 2008-09, NRC-IRAP helped support 5,733 jobs within its SME clients and funded the employment of 540 youth graduates under the Federal Youth Employment Program.

NRC-IRAP co-located almost 75% of its Industry Technology Advisors (ITAs) in research centres, universities, and other industry association offices to help to facilitate SME access to technical assistance on a timely basis. NRC-IRAP contributed to firms technical capability by providing technical, research, and business assistance to Canadian SMEs (8,811 funded and non-funded firms). Field staff assisted SMEs to connect to a large network of diverse industry specific associations such as the Canadian Environmental Technology Advancement Corporation-West and the Board of Governors of Red River College's Advanced Transportation and Energy Centre (ATEC).

NRC-IRAP provided over $9 million in assistance to 142 non-commercial organizations to help them build their capacity to support SMEs. They in turn reached out to over 5,000 SMEs, providing them with, for example, access to research expertise, or equipment and facilities for testing their technology.

Increased SME management, marketing and finance capability and capacityNRC-IRAP has a financial agreement with NRC-CISTI to ensure Program clients benefit from NRC-CISTI's Competitive Technical Information (CTI) services. In 2008-09, NRC-CISTI responded to 1,297 requests for user assistance, technical references, information reports, CTI briefs, CTI assessments, searches, training sessions and presentations.

Under a contribution agreement from NRC-IRAP, the Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters (CME) provided 98 custom management consulting services to SMEs across Canada. Client surveys indicate a high level of satisfaction, with 100% saying they would recommend the Canadian Association of Management Consultants (CMC-Canada)/NRC-IRAP Management Advisory Service to other small businesses.

Growth of firms as a result of technology development project support – A recent Evaluation of NRC-IRAP reported that its client firms experienced growth, both in real and comparative terms. Over the five year evaluation period (2002-2007), client firm sales grew on average by over 28%, overall firm employment grew by 30%, and company assets grew on average by 15%. NRC-IRAP clients on average have greater capabilities and capacity than non-client SMEs, and that the infusion of NRC-IRAP funds had the complimentary effect of inducing firms to increase their spending on R&D. (Source: 2007 Impact Evaluation report)

Enhanced SME connections to technology and business networks to source supportNRC-IRAP maintained local, regional, national and international networks of industry sector, government and community economic development groups, bringing the most appropriate expertise to its clients. NRC-IRAP also continued to support firms and organizations related to NRC technology clusters; and addressed SME needs in the bioproducts industry through techno-business meetings with over 72 participants that resulted in increased awareness of technology opportunities. Furthermore, NRC-IRAP worked with specific industry sectors and communities to join together by hosting events, technology workshops or training sessions that resulted in building strong technology clusters, and enhancing Canadian R&D and commerce presence.

NRC-IRAP has formal agreements with various Canadian institutions. For example, the NRC/NSERC/BDC Joint Strategy to accelerate the commercialization of publicly-funded research; and with NRC-CISTI to provide competitive technical information. An agreement with the Consortium for Research and Innovation in Aerospace (CRIAQ) increased the competitive capacity of Quebec SMEs in aerospace by offering their support in the development and adaptation of new technologies. An agreement with the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) fostered the cooperation of Innovation-related activities in the Atlantic region.

The creation of Community of Interest groups, with membership from NRC-IRAP, other parts of NRC and external organizations has increased the sharing of information and creation of knowledge on industry and technology issues which ultimately has contributed to better client service.

Increased adoption/commercialization/collaboration with respect to international endeavours – Two new International Agreements were signed by NRC-IRAP in 2008-09. An agreement with OSEO, the French Agency for Innovation, was established to foster and facilitate close and frequent contact between NRC-IRAP and OSEO to promote the creation of technological partnerships between Canadian and French SMEs; and a collaborative R&D and Technology Partnership with CDTI of Spain. NRC-IRAP has formal and active arrangements with Spain, Ireland, India, China, France, as well as many established relationships with several other countries such as the US, the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands and the European Union. NRC-IRAP collaborates with these countries on a reciprocal basis to support of SME growth, technology transfer and technology development for the purpose of generating economic benefits. These agreements are an opportunity to build greater partnerships among Canadian, international firms and research institutions.

($ millions)
Program Activity: Technology and Industry Support Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $76.6 $86.1 $93.0 $87.9 $86.5 $6.5
Total Program Activity(ies) $76.6 $86.1 $93.0 $87.9 $86.6 $6.4

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance of $6.4 M includes $5.5 M transfer from NRC-IRAP to NRC-HIA in support of the Telescope Initiative, the remaining $0.9 K is the year-end surplus returned to the NRC Finance Branch.

Audit completed or planned: NRC-IRAP Audits of Recipients have started for 2009/10.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Tri-University Meson Facility (TRIUMF)

Start date: 1976

End date: Ongoing

Description: TRIUMF, Canada's national facility for research in subatomic physics, is located on the campus of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. It has been operated since 1968 by a consortium of four Western universities - the University of Alberta, Simon Fraser University, the University of Victoria and the University of British Columbia - under a joint venture agreement. A fifth university, Carleton, joined the consortium on April 1, 2000 and the University of Toronto became the sixth member in April 2005. Seven additional universities (Regina, Manitoba, Guelph, McMaster, Queen's, St. Mary's and Montreal) are associate members.

TRIUMF functions as a national laboratory and as Canada's gateway to international subatomic physics. It houses a particle accelerator that produces energetic beams of mesons and other subatomic particles required for fundamental research in nuclear and particle physics by Canadian and foreign researchers. This research lays the foundation for new technologies in the physical and life sciences and the facility is a major contributor to advanced materials research in Canada and abroad.

Strategic Outcome: An innovative, knowledge-based economy for Canada through research and development, technology commercialization and industry support.

Results Achieved:

General

  • 2,102 visitors including 622 scientists visiting TRIUMF one or more times
  • 157 publications in scientific journals
  • Provided training and employment opportunities for 105 graduate and undergraduate students
  • TRIUMF Accelerator Scientists began teaching a graduate accelerator science course at UBC. Plans are underway to extend the opportunity to other Canadian universities
  • The TRIUMF Five-Year Plan report won the Tom Fairley award for book editing from the Editors' Association of Canada.
  • TRIUMF's main cyclotron was maintained as one of the most reliable in the world at 90% availability
  • TRIUMF received significant publicity during the year, including articles in the Globe and Mail, CBC interviews, a Nature Essay and numerous articles in the CanWest newspaper groups. TRIUMF outreached by delivering community lectures, hosting 8 conferences for 1,159 delegates, producing 5 educational videos, and by hosting a Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology to advance Canadian competitiveness in particle and nuclear physics and nuclear medicine.

Nuclear Science
Conducted experiments that were possible nowhere else in the world; setting new world records for accuracy and precision. For example:

  • The DRAGON facility undertook the world's first precision measurement of a nuclear reaction rate that is critical for understanding how stars produce chemical elements. This is important for producing long-lived radioisotopes
  • TRIUMF's Isotope Separator and Accelerator (ISAC) facility developed the world's most intense accelerated isotope beam. The TUDA experiment used this beam to investigate nuclear reactions occurring in novae. The results aided in understanding satellite gamma-ray observatories such as the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
  • TRIUMF's TITAN facility set world records by performing precision mass measurements of atoms of isotopes shorter-lived and lighter-weight than ever before including the most exotic isotope on earth: Helium-8
  • The ISAC facility accelerated a beam of Rhubidium-80 ions – a world first. ISAC is one of only three facilities in the world with this capability
  • Canadian scientists studied heavy hydrogen and made the first measurement of its chemical reaction rate

Nuclear Medicine

  • A lung cancer hypoxia study patient was scanned for the first time ever in Canada in 2008 at the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) using an innovative radiotracer developed at TRIUMF. This clinical trial has potential to dictate cancer treatment methods with much improved accuracy.
  • TRIUMF supplied medical isotopes to the BCCA and the Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre.
($ millions)
Program Activity: Research and Development Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $45.5 $51.5 $43.6 $43.6 $43.5 $0.1
Total Program Activity(ies) $45.5 $51.5 $43.6 $43.6 $43.5 $0.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to International Telescope Programs - Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT), Gemini Telescopes, Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA)

Start date: 1978

End date: Ongoing

Description: NRC, in partnership with other international bodies, provides financial contributions that support the management and operations of these telescopes and their related facilities and participates in the oversight and direction of the facilities and research. Astrophysics research and development requires large, costly and very precise telescopes and related instruments situated in areas that will provide ideal viewing conditions. It is beyond the capacity of individual firms or even countries to support the costs of developing and maintaining the facilities required for astrophysics research, thus it is necessary for public sector organizations, through international partnerships, to support this R&D.

Strategic Outcome: An innovative, knowledge-based economy for Canada through research and development, technology commercialization and industry support.

Results Achieved:

NRC maintained critical astronomical infrastructure within Canada and contributed to three major international facilities providing Canadian researchers access to forefront research opportunities in the optical and sub-mm spectral windows. In 2008, NRC underwent an international Peer Review in astronomy that concluded that NRC's role is world-class, and establishes Canada as a leading force in both science and technology related to astronomy and astrophysics.

Canadian Astronomy Data Centre – The CADC was integrated into the operations of all the offshore telescopes that NRC operates. During 2008 CADC delivered 1.62 M files comprised of 117 TB of data to 2,772 users.

Canada France Hawaii Telescope – 2008 was the second consecutive year that more than 100 scientific papers were published as a result of research done at this facility. Canadians led three of four new "Large Programmes" approved by the CFHT.

Gemini – Led by NRC's Dr. Christian Marois, a team including several Canadian astronomers used the Gemini Observatory and Marois's novel technique to discover and photograph three planets around HR8799, a nearby star. Dr. Marois was named Scientist of the Year by Radio-Canada and received an NRC Outstanding Achievement Award for his work. Canada enjoyed the highest fraction (>70%) of proposals shared with astronomers from another Gemini partner country. A user survey revealed high satisfaction with support provided to Canadian astronomers by NRC, as well as insight into how both NRC and the Gemini Observatory could improve.

Composite Applications for Radio Telescopes Project (CART) – In three years, NRC developed a leading candidate technology for the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA) world observatory: low-cost, high-performance parabolic reflectors made using composite materials. By September 2008 a production-friendly reflector with improved surface accuracy was ready. It was used to test another novel SKA technology: a custom digital camera for radio imaging. These contributions position Canada among the top technology providers for the SKA.

($ millions)
Program Activity: Research and Development Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $12.6 $9.2 $5.5 $11.0 $10.5 $(5.0)
Total Program Activity(ies) $12.6 $9.2 $5.5 $11.0 $10.5 $(5.0)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:


Top of Page

Natural Resources Canada

Table 3: Transfer Payment Programs Exceeding $5 million/year



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions in support of the Technology and Innovation Initiative

Start date: October 10, 2003

End date: March 31, 2009

Description: To contribute to the objectives of Canada's climate change agenda by reducing long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by means of longer-term advanced technologies and enhanced innovative capacity through research, development and demonstration.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved:
Demonstration Component: The Technology Early Action Measures (TEAM) program was the demonstration component of the Technology & Innovation Initiative. The timeframe of the program, per the T&I Initiative, was from October 2003 to March 31, 2008. However, in December 2007, TEAM received Treasury Board approval for its Terms and Conditions to be extended for one additional year, namely for the 2008-09 fiscal year, in order to allow for the proper implementation of projects started in 2007-08. TEAM demonstration projects are typically multi-year, ranging from 1-5 years. The Climate Change Review had frozen activities in 2005-06, and as a result much of the TEAM funding for 2003-08 had been reprofiled to the 2007-08 fiscal year. The extension of the T&C's for 1 extra year, in 2008-09, allowed the TEAM program to avoid lapsing of a significant amount of G&C funds and more optimally implement demonstration projects over this timeframe. As a result, TEAM received approval to transfer $4.8M allocated to 8 projects to the 2008-09 fiscal year. Out of these 8 projects, 2 were terminated prematurely because proponents were unable to obtain the necessary partner financing to complete the projects. TEAM was able to reallocate $1.5M freed up from these 2 projects, out of the $4.8M for 2008-09, to 5 existing projects that were progressing well. In 2008-09, TEAM lapsed $110k in G&C funds.

During 2008-09, the TEAM program disbursed $4.7M in contributions (G&Cs), providing funding to 13 demonstration projects. G&C contributions typically represent 90% or more of TEAM's annual budget, and are the primary means of funding clean technology demonstration projects. Since inception in 1998, TEAM has funded 140 clean energy demonstration projects, many of which are flagship NRCan projects. Total G&C disbursements to date are approximately $130M, and total project value exceeds $1.1B. The following are highlights of funding activities in 2008-09:

  • TEAM project COM-097 Dockside Green (TEAM contribution $2.3M; total project cost $14M), which is a green real estate development of 26 residential and 7 commercial buildings with over 1200 residential suites, over a 15 acres site in downtown Victoria BC, completed construction of its biomass heating plant, funded by TEAM. This project sets an example and showcase to the world in how to implement sustainable, green, healthy real estate development. The project is only one of 9 projects in Canada to have received the LEED platinum certification and has received the highest LEED platinum rating of any project in the world. The project won an award from the American Institute of Architects as one of its Environmental Top Ten Green Projects for 2009. NRCan contributed at an early stage of the project (feasibility and engineering design), providing needed credibility, financial stability and momentum to the project. Via its GHG assessment process, NRCan helped the Dockside Green management team develop and quantify environmental benefits, in particular the benefits related to the integrated design and systems approach. NRCan focused its funding on the feasibility studies, business cases, and detailed engineering designs of the clean energy (biomass heat system, heat recovery) and water management systems, which are at the heart of the award winning real estate development design and the basis of the LEED platinum certification.
  • TEAM project COM-103 with the Solar Building Research Network was completed (TEAM contribution $1M, total project cost $2.6M). This is the first demonstration of its kind in the world – a combined solar electric and thermal system was integrated into the operations and building envelope of a large commercial building, the John Molson School of Business, at Concordia University in Montreal. This project marks a significant advance in the state-of-the art in attempting to reduce the environmental footprint of buildings. Canadians have developed capacity to further advance the combined heat and power solar technology and to implement its application in real world applications. The project helped strengthen Canadian solar technology companies that participated in the project, including Conserval and Day4Energy. This world leading technology has been featured on the Discovery Channel and will be also promoted at International Energy Agency working groups. The system has an estimated solar efficiency (utilization) of 60%.
  • TEAM project IND-146 Enhanced Joint Implementation of Vapour Extraction (JIVE) was completed (TEAM contribution $1M; total project cost $11.6M). The project significantly advanced knowledge of and demonstrated completely novel enhanced oil recovery techniques for use in the extraction of heavy oil, which have considerable lower environmental impact versus conventional heavy oil extraction techniques. This project, which is co-funded with SDTC, has now evolved and developed into a new Carbon Capture & Storage project funded by ecoENERGY Technology Initiative, as part of its $140M call for proposals for CCS projects. The new $3-4M ecoETI CCS project is with Husky Energy and is called Targeted R&DR&D Activities in CCS for Heavy Oil EOR. NRCan provided its funding at a critical stage of the project, after the SDTC-funded project had started and some problems in implementing the JIVE project had been identified. NRCan targeted its funding to the development of physical and mathematical models, which when used iteratively with data from field operations, could be used to progressively improve the EOR techniques under development. According to the PTRC, the models funded by TEAM are amongst the key elements which have led to the project's success.
  • TEAM project IND-155 Direct-Fired boiler gasification demonstration Project (with Nexterra Energy; TEAM contribution $1.7M; total project cost $7.4M) completed detailed engineering design and obtained funding. The project is a first in the pulp and paper industry. Nexterra's turnkey gasification system will convert locally sourced wood residue into clean burning "syngas" that will be fired directly into a boiler in place of natural gas. The Kruger installation will produce 40,000 lbs/hour of process steam and displace approximately 445,000 gigajoules (GJs) of natural gas annually. This is equivalent to the amount of natural gas used to heat 3,500 homes in Canada for a year. Displacing this amount of natural gas with syngas made from wood fuel will lower the mill's energy costs by millions of dollars a year, making the mill less reliant on fossil fuels. It will also reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the plant by more than 22,000 tonnes per year, the equivalent of removing nearly 5,500 cars off Canadian roads. Nexterra's direct fired gasification system is a platform technology that can be used in many industrial applications. Replicating Nexterra's technology at industrial sites in B.C. could result in an estimated 200,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emission reductions in British Columbia annually by 2020. For this project, NRCan provided support at a critical time, especially given the difficulties experienced by the pulp and paper industry over the past 3 years, as well as the current economic crisis. NRCan stayed with the project even as the project partner and site location changed. NRCan's support, at the highest risk point of the project, was used to leverage additional funding that was needed for the project, from FPInnovations, the new BC ICE program, and Ethanol BC.
  • In 2008-09, TEAM continued to play a role in developing and providing internationally accepted standards (ISO) and tools, relating to the measurement and reporting of Greenhouse Gas emission reductions achieved in clean energy demonstration projects. In addition, TEAM continued its work in implementing qualitative assessments for air quality impacts from demonstration projects. TEAM also submitted a verification protocol to provide a method to audit GHG results; continued to work internationally to draft a guidance documentation for ISO standard 14065 on the accreditation of validation and verification bodies; and implemented an MOU with the Standards Council of Canada for creating a national system for the accreditation of verification bodies and a professional certification scheme for GHG validators, verifiers, and consultants.

Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 5.7 17.2 4.8 4.8 4.7 0.1
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity            

Comment(s) on Variance(s): lapsed at fiscal year end, as could not be reallocated to other projects

Audit completed or planned: Evaluation of TEAM, as a component of the Climate Change Action Fund http://www2cm.nrcan.gc.ca/nrcan/index_e.aspx?DetailID=392; TEAM was also one of the programs evaluated in the Examination of Federal Energy & Environmental S&T Investment (completed in 2006/07). TEAM has been actively working with NRCan's Strategic Knowledge and Evidence Branch on the new evaluations of Transportation & Built Environment that are in the planning stages for 2008-09.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY for Biofuels

Start date: April 1, 2008

End date: March 31, 2017

Description: The ecoENERGY for Biofuels program supports the production of renewable alternatives to gasoline and diesel and encourages the development of a competitive domestic industry for renewable fuels. The program provides an operating incentive to facilities that produce renewable alternatives to gasoline and diesel in Canada.

ecoENERGY for Biofuels will invest up to $1.5 billion over nine years in support of biofuel production in Canada. Recipients will be entitled to receive incentives for up to seven consecutive years.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world-leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: In fiscal year 2008-2009, the program received 46 applications and signed 22 contribution agreements representing a total commitment of $938 million and a volume of 1.63 billion litres of biofuels.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions     112.4 92.4 92.2 0.2
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity     112.4 92.4 92.2 0.2

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY for Renewable Heat Program

Start date: April 1, 2007

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: The program supports non-emitting renewable thermal energy technologies for space heating and cooling, and water heating though a mix of deployment contributions and industry capacity development activities.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: As at March 16, 2009, 466 contribution agreements were signed for deployment of solar thermal systems in institutional, commercial and industrial sector. In addition, program signed 11 contribution agreements with collaborators to implement residential pilot projects for deployment of solar hot water units in homes.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0.0 3.4 8.0 6.7 6.7 0.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 0.0 3.4 8.0 6.7 6.7 0.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Installations under the Residential Pilot Program encountered regulatory barriers so funds were reprofiled to later years.

Audit completed or planned: Recipient audits on 12 Commercial Deployment Initiative projects underway.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY for Renewable Power Program

Start date: April 1, 2007

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: The ecoENERGY for Renewable Power program offers a production incentive of 1 cent per kilowatt hour for ten years to eligible producers of electricity from low impact renewable power sources such as wind, low impact hydro, biomass, geothermal, photovoltaics and ocean energy.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: In fiscal year 2008-2009 40 new contribution agreements were signed for about 1790 megawatts of capacity and contribution of approximately $597 million over ten years.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0.0 16.0 49.3 36.3 30.2 6.1
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 0.0 16.0 49.3 36.3 30.2 6.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The ecoENERGY Renewable Power Program had anticipated more projects built during 2008-2009. Some projects experienced commissioning delays, and others were cancelled due to difficulties in obtaining financing.

Audit completed or planned: During fiscal year 2008-2009, two financial audits of recipients were completed under the program.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes

Start date: April 1, 2007

End date: March 31, 2011

Description:

Announced as part of the suite of ecoENERGY initiatives, under the ecoENERGY Retrofit Program, ecoENERGY Retrofit Homes provides home and property owners with grants up to $5,000 per unit to offset the cost of making energy efficiency improvements. Small mixed-use buildings are also eligible as long as they meet the size requirements and 50% or more of the floor space is used as permanent residences. Property owners can qualify for federal grants by improving the energy efficiency of their homes, and reducing their home's impact on the environment.

The Government of Canada provides grants to owners of low-rise properties who complete energy efficiency retrofits based on the energy advisors' recommendations. Owners of rental properties may also qualify for a grant. The grant amount is based on carrying out energy efficiency retrofits such as increasing attic insulation or replacing a gas furnace with a qualified ENERGY STAR® model. Only homes that have undergone a residential energy efficiency evaluation by an NRCan-licensed advisor are eligible for grants.

As part of the Government of Canada's Economic Action Plan, the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program has been expanded to help 200,000 more homeowners cover the cost of making energy-efficiency retrofits to their homes. The time-limited expansion includes grant-level increases of 25 percent and a $300-million increase in funding over two years.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world-leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: Grants to 94,000 homeowners have been made to support energy efficiency upgrades that will reduce their annual energy consumption. Grants averaged $1,112 per household. All regions of Canada, except one province and one territory, have matching programs that provide homeowners with seamless access to both orders of government support for home retrofits.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants   12.0 46.0 79.0 89.7 (10.7)
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity   12.0 46.0 79.0 89.7 (10.7)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The accelerated success of the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program resulted in eligible claims exceeding authority provisions by $10.7 million. Subsequent year authorities will be adjusted downward by the $10.7 million variance to offset the 2008-2009 over expenditure.

Audit completed or planned: An audit of the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program will take place in 2009/10.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecoENERGY Technology Initiative

Start date: April 1, 2007

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: The ecoENERGY Technology Initiative is a $230-million investment in science and technology by the Government of Canada to accelerate the development and market readiness of technology solutions in clean energy. This initiative is directed towards increasing clean energy supplies, reducing energy waste, and reducing pollution from conventional energy.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: Completion of call for proposals process, followed by proposal assessment and due diligence for large scale projects in carbon capture and storage (CCS) completed. Eight projects selected (in BC, Alberta and Saskatchewan), and negotiations for contribution agreements begun, with projects to start in 2009-10.

Significant progress in broad range of R&D projects in the areas of low emission industrial processes, energy efficient built environment, clean transportation systems, distributed power.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants           0.0
Total Contributions   0.7 24.9 13.6 13.6 0.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity   0.7 24.9 13.6 13.6 0.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned: The Initiative will be evaluated according to NRCan's evaluation plan.

Recipient audits will be undertaken as required under the RBAF for the initiative.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Federal Response to the Mountain Pine Beetle Infestation in BC

Start date: 2006-2007

End date: 2009-2010

Description: The Program is designed to slow the eastward spread of the Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB), recover economic value from beetle-killed trees, and to reduce the threat to public safety in communities and the impacts to forest resources in areas affected by the infestation.

Strategic Outcome: Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.

Results Achieved:
In 2006-07, the Government of Canada announced the $200-million Federal Response to the Mountain Pine Beetle Infestation program. NRCan administers $100M, Transport Canada $56M and Western Economic Diversification $44M. Under this Program, NRCan has worked closely with BC and AB officials to deliver a comprehensive, integrated strategy in response to the beetle infestation. Additional information about this program can be found by visiting http://mpb.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca.

Slowing the Spread
One objective of the federal MPB program is to slow the eastward spread of the beetle outbreak. NRCan worked with scientists from BC and AB to complete a comprehensive assessment of the pine beetle threat to the boreal and eastern pine ecosystems. This assessment contributed to setting spatial priorities for federal funding in beetle detection and control. In 2008-09, over 1.3 million hectares of pine forests were scheduled to be surveyed for active beetle infestation; over 28 thousand beetle-infested trees were planned to be felled and burned; and 1 thousand hectares are identified for prescribed burning to destroy resident beetle populations. Beetle control was undertaken on forestlands in the mountain national parks and the Dominion Coal Blocks in south-eastern BC in areas identified to complement the control activity on provincial forestlands

Recovering Economic Value
NRCan, working with BC agencies, continued delivery of the primary surveys on mineral and energy potential in the Bowser and Nechako Basins of the beetle zone in BC. Working with national sector research institutes and universities, the program enabled the completion of timely studies on:

  • the potential impacts of post-beetle timber management on future forests;
  • how to integrate post-beetle timber into established milling procedures and markets; and
  • the potential for bio-energy and alternative uses for the massive volume of beetle-killed timber.

Protecting Communities and Forest Resources
NRCan has also focused on mitigating post-beetle impacts on community safety and forest resource sustainability. The MPB impacts community safety through increased forest fire fuel loads and dead hazardous trees.

During 2008-09, the Program funded the removal of hazardous beetle-killed trees from school yards and assisted 12 communities in removing these trees from municipal lands; assisted 22 communities and districts in reducing post-beetle fire fuel loads; and assisted 64 First Nations with reducing fire fuel loads to their villages on Reserve lands. The Program requires and funds the completion of a professional forest fuel management plan as a precondition to any support for removing forest fuel loads. The fuel abatement activity is based on the national FireSmart program prescriptions.

NRCan also assisted regional and local economic diversification efforts in tourism by funding the removal of more than 28,000 beetle-killed trees at 128 recreation sites and 11 hiking trails. In addition, 56 archaeological impact assessments were completed.


Program Activity: Adapting to a Changing Climate and Hazard Risk Management
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0.0 24.8 30.8 27.4 17.5 9.9
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 0.0 24.8 30.8 27.4 17.5 9.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between the total authorities and the actual spending is due to reprofiling per 2009-10 ARLU.

Audit completed or planned:
http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/dmo/aeb/aeb-rpts-2007-EV0702-e.htm
NRCan's Strategic Knowledge and Evidence Branch has the beetle program scheduled for evaluation in 09/10.

Recipient audit scheduled for 09/10. NRCan Audit completing audit of compliance of G&C spending with TB T&C's in 09/10.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Forest Industry Long-Term Competitiveness Strategy – Expanding Market Opportunities

Start date: 2006-2007

End date: 2009-2010

Description: There are three initiatives in this program: the Canada Wood Export Program, the North American Wood First Initiative, and the Value to Wood Program. These initiatives aim to increase market opportunities for Canadian wood product producers through market development, branding, and technology development and transfer activities.

Canada Wood Export Program – The Canada Wood Export Program is a national market development program, supporting wood products associations in their efforts to expand offshore export opportunities for Canadian wood products in traditional and emerging markets. More information can be found at http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/subsite/canada-wood/home.

North American Wood First Initiative – North American Wood First will work in collaboration with wood products associations in North America, technical institutes, universities, provinces and American states, and support projects to increase the use of wood products in North American non-residential construction (schools, shopping centres, hospitals, etc.).

Value to Wood Program – The Value to Wood Program is a national research and technology transfer program with the purpose of enhancing the productivity and competitiveness of the value-added wood products industry. Additional information can be found at http://www.valuetowood.ca/html/english/index.php.

Strategic Outcome: Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.

Results Achieved:

Canada Wood Export Program
The Canada Wood Program has continued to develop offshore markets with offices in Shanghai, Beijing, Tokyo, Brussels, London and Seoul. The program has raised the profile of Canadian wood products in the above markets and influenced the development of residential construction codes and standards to accommodate wood use. In Japan, seismic testing of a full scale three-storey traditional post-and-beam house was completed. Shanghai approved the Canadian wood truss re-roofing system, while Korean standards were updated to allow the use of all species of Canadian structural lumber. Canadian wood products and expertise were also used in the reconstruction of public buildings in China devastated by earthquakes in May 2008. The program has also helped increase wood exports (particularly in China and Korea, where Canadian wood exports have increased by 612% and 177% respectively since 2001) and stimulated the establishment of foreign marketing agents for a number of major Canadian wood producers. As well, Canada Wood has provided the framework for Canada's forest sector to take a unified national approach to offshore market development.

North American Wood First Initiative
During 2008/09, the Wood First Program has generated approximately $40 million in new wood sales in North America. Through partners in Quebec, the program influenced the establishment of a 6-storey, 60,000 square foot wood-frame building, the tallest of its kind in Canada. In the United States, the Program has succeeded in convincing builders/clients/authorities to use wood in over 90 non-residential projects in California, the SE US and the mid west as well as reversing a long-standing ban on wood use in Arkansas schools.

Value to Wood Program
The Value to Wood Program, a national research and technology transfer program, funded 26 research projects to support the competitiveness of the value-added wood sector. Industry Advisors funded through the program provided technical assessments involving productivity improvements and cost reductions to over 300 value-added wood firms. These activities supported the competitiveness and productivity of the Canadian wood-manufacturing sector.


Program Activity: Economic Opportunities for Natural Resources
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0.1 14.8 17.5 18.8 15.3 3.5
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 0.1 14.8 17.5 18.8 15.3 3.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between the total authorities and the actual spending is due to reprofiling per 2009-10 ARLU.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Forest Industry Long-Term Competitiveness Strategy – Promoting Forest Innovation and Investment

Start date: 2006-2007

End date: 2009-2010

Description: There are three initiatives in this program: the consolidation of Canada's three forest research institutes, the creation of the Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, and investment in forest innovation. These measures will enhance economic opportunities for Canada's forest sector as a result of increased investment in forest innovation.

Institute Consolidation: FPInnovations – The consolidation of Canada's three forest research institutes (Forintek, FERIC and Paprican) along with NRCan's Canadian Wood Fibre Centre will provide greater efficiency, synergies and strength in innovation and R&D, and will facilitate speaking with a stronger common voice on forest sector issues. Referred to as FPInnovations, this merger will create the world's largest forest research institute. Additional information on FPInnovations can be found at http://www.fpinnovations.ca/.

Canadian Wood Fibre Centre – The Canadian Wood Fibre Centre (CWFC) is an NRCan initiative in collaboration with FPinnovations to increase the economic return from Canada's forest resources. Researchers within the CWFC will work in collaboration with researchers from FPInnovations, or wherever the expertise exists to increase the value of Canadian wood fibre. More information on CWFC can be found at http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/subsite/cwfc.

Investments in Forest Sector Innovation – The purpose of this initiative is to direct and harness the expertise of the newly consolidated FPInnovations – in close conjunction with provinces, industry, and academia – to implement new forest innovation investments in transformative technologies relevant to all segments of the forest sector.

Strategic Outcome: Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.

Results Achieved:

Institute Consolidation: FPInnovations

  • Human resource administrative capabilities have been aligned and integrated so as to provide the required expertise to meet project needs and to support administration of human resources (e.g. hiring policies, retention strategies, staff development).
  • Financial, project management, and procurement systems have been aligned and integrated to support management decision-making, as well as to provide appropriate and prudent support for operational transactions and basic accounting.
  • Legal and practical steps required in creating a new corporate entity and absorbing three existing entities have been completed. This includes all aspects from registration of legal names, logos, and other trademarks, to marketing and communications, transfer of properties and assets, and the very challenging issues of harmonizing pay scales and benefit packages, job descriptions, and pension funds.
  • Director and executive level management have been restructured to create a single, enterprise-wide management team. Governance and advisory bodies have been restructured to support a single Board of Directors that represents the interest of the entire forest sector.

Canadian Wood Fibre Centre

  • Knowledge has been generated to enhance the capacity to identify standing timber with desirable fibre attributes and to efficiently produce wood fibre with desirable attributes by developing innovative silvicultural methods, genetics and genomics techniques, and methods to forecast wood volume and quality responses at the tree and stand levels.
  • A knowledge exchange capacity of 30 Industrial Technology Advisors (Forintek Division); 9 Extension specialists (Feric Division); 7 Knowledge Transfer Specialists (CWFC) was created to ensure that the research results generated by the program were implemented to generate new and improved products and processes.

Transformative Technology Program

  • Research led to changes in the BC building code permitting 6 storey wood frame construction creating opportunities to use wood in novel applications.
  • A laboratory process to utilize nano crystalline cellulose (NCC) – a derivative from tree fibre – was developed to be used as an input in advanced lightweight high strength composite materials for potential use in the automotive and aerospace industries.
  • Demonstration that the lignin and hemi-cellulose components of wood can be converted into value-added products (e.g. the use of lignin as a substitute for black carbon in tires).
  • Successful laboratory trials in utilizing forest biomass to develop new bioproducts and energy conservation processes.
  • Production of new grades of margin-added fine paper utilizing Canadian thermo-mechanical pulp (TMP).

Program Activity: Economic Opportunities for Natural Resources
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0.4 22.6 28.9 31.7 23.7 8.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 0.4 22.6 28.9 31.7 23.7 8.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between total authorities and the actual spending is due to reprofiling per 2009-10 ARLU.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to the University of Calgary for the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy (ISEEE)

Start date: March 25, 2008

End date: March 31, 2012

Description: Funding for ISEEE's Carbon Capture and Storage Research Group. Strategic research that will help to address outstanding issues blocking industry from making investment in carbon capture and storage.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: As of March 15, 2009, ISEEE has allocated over $400,000 in funding to projects, helping to leverage an additional $1.5 million in funding from industry and other governments. Several projects are underway, with results from a few short-term projects already being reported.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants     0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity     0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: In support of the efficiency and alternative energy programs

Start date: April 1, 1997

End date: March 31, 2009

Description: This program provides contribution funding for a variety of energy efficiency and alternative energy initiatives.

Strategic Outcome: Environmental Responsibility – Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: Key performance information is provided in the DPR in Section II under the Clean Energy program activity. As well, more detailed reporting is provided in the 2008-2009 Report to Parliament under the Energy Efficiency Act, which will be tabled in Parliament in late 2009.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 53.9 11.2 9.6 7.5 7.4 0.1
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 53.9 11.2 9.6 7.5 7.4 0.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Treasury Board sets no maximum authority for this program and because it is resourced from A- and B-based departmental funding, there is the possibility to increase spending when greater than anticipated interest and/or opportunities arise, as was the case this year.

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Newfoundland and Labrador Fiscal Equalization Offset Payments

Start date: 2002

End date: Statutory

Description: To make payments to the province to compensate for part of the reduction in fiscal equalization entitlements that would result from offshore revenues being included in the equalization program.

Strategic Outcome: Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive, and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.

Results Achieved: Payments were made to the province in accordance with the provisions of the Act.


Program Activity: Economic Opportunities for Natural Resources
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 109.8 188.6 0.0 556.7 556.7 0.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 109.8 188.6 0.0 556.7 556.7 0.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments to the Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund

Start date: 1987

End date: Statutory

Description: To make payments to the province equivalent to amounts received by Canada in relation to offshore activities in accordance with provisions of the Canada Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act

Strategic Outcome: Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.

Results Achieved: Payments were made to the province in accordance with the provisions of the Act.


Program Activity: Economic Opportunities for Natural Resources
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 313.4 1,701.0 670.8 2,351.0 2,351.0 0.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 313.4 1,701.0 670.8 2,351.0 2,351.0 0.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments to the Nova Scotia Offshore Revenue Account

Start date: 1993

End date: Statutory

Description: To make payments to the province equivalent to amounts received by Canada in relation to offshore activities in accordance with provisions of the Canada Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resource Accord Implementation Act.

Strategic Outcome: Natural resource sectors are internationally competitive, economically productive and contribute to the social well-being of Canadians.

Results Achieved: Payments were made to the province in accordance with the provisions of the Act.


Program Activity: Economic Opportunities for Natural Resources
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 275.4 493.2 407.3 577.4 577.4 0.0
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 275.4 493.2 407.3 577.4 577.4 0.0

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned:



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Wind Power Production Incentive Program

Start date: April 1, 2002

End date: March 31, 2007

Description: The WPPI Program was set up to help establish wind energy as a full-fledged competitor in the electricity market by providing – over a period of ten years – a financial incentive of about 1 cent per each kilowatt-hour produced from the installation of 1,000 MW of new wind power capacity in Canada by 2007. The Government of Canada is to provide – over a 10-year period – an incentive averaging 1 cent per each kilowatt-hour produced from a qualifying wind energy project.

Strategic Outcome: Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources.

Results Achieved: At year end, 22 wind farms were in operation representing 924 megawatts of new wind energy capacity in Canada and about $315 million in contribution funding over 14 years.


Program Activity: Clean Energy
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variances
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 24.9 29.3 36.9 36.9 29.3 7.6
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity 24.9 29.3 36.9 36.9 29.3 7.6

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Wind farms supported under the program had lower than expected production numbers resulting in reduced obligations/lower payments to producers under the provisions of agreements.

Audit completed or planned: During 2008-2009, three audits of recipients were completed under the program.

Top of Page

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Table 2: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)

Table 2(a): Grants and Scholarships

($ millions )


Actual Spending 2006-07 Actual Spending 2007-08 Planned Spending 2008-09 Total Authorities 2008-09 Actual Spending 2008-09 Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending
Program Activities:
Promote Science and Engineering 3.8 4.2 5.9 6.0 4.5 1.4
Support Students and Fellows 90.5 94.2 99.5 105.4 99.9 -0.4
Attract and Retain Faculty 142.7 145.4 164.7 165.6 149.8 14.9
Fund Basic Research 422.4 435.5 363.8 364.2 357.9 5.9
Support for Research Equipment and Major Resources N/A N/A 38.7 51.4 73.3 -34.6
Fund Research in Strategic Areas 49.4 71.4 100 111.3 79.8 20.2
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships 104.4 115.2 90.2 86.6 125.1 -34.9
Support Commercialization 10.7 9.3 11 11.4 11.6 -0.5
Total Grants/Contributions/Other types of transfer payments 823.8 875.2 873.8 901.9 901.9 -28.1
Comment(s) on Variance(s)

NSERC received through Budget 2008 an additional $33.5M for collaborative research that directly contributes to the knowledge and innovation needs of Canada’s automotive, manufacturing, forestry and fishing industries. Lastly NSERC has received and sent funding from and to other departments in support of NSERC’s programs through the Supplementary Estimates. These additional funding were not included in the RPP of 2008-2009.


Table 2(b): Canada Graduate Scholarships

($ millions )


Actual Spending 2006-07 Actual Spending 2007-08 Planned Spending 2008-09 Total Authorities 2008-09 Actual Spending 2008-09 Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending
Program Activity:
Support Students and Fellows 31.4 37.3 39.6 40.1 40.1 0
Total Grants 31.4 37.3 39.6 40.1 40.1 0
Comment(s) on Variance(s)

Table 2(c): Centres of Excellence for Commercialization and Research

($ millions )


Actual Spending 2006-07 Actual Spending 2007-08 Planned Spending 2008-09 Total Authorities 2008-09 Actual Spending 2008-09 Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending
Program Activity:
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships 0.0 57.2 0.0 26.7 26.7 -26.7
Total Grants 0.0 57.2 0.0 26.7 26.7 -26.7
Comment(s) on Variance(s)

NSERC received through Budget 2007, $19.1M for the Centres of Excellence for Commercialization and Research. An additional $7.5 million was transferred from the Networks of Centres of Excellence program within Grants and Scholarships through the supplementary estimates process. This additional funding was not included in the RPP of 2008-2009.


Table 2(d): Business-Led networks of Centres of Excellence

($ millions )


Actual Spending 2006-07 Actual Spending 2007-08 Planned Spending 2008-09 Total Authorities 2008-09 Actual Spending 2008-09 Variance Between Planned and Actual Spending
Program Activity:
Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 -7.0
Total Grants 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 -7.0
Comment(s) on Variance(s)

NSERC received through Budget 2007, $7M for the Business Led Networks of Centres of Excellence Program.This additional funding was not included in the RPP of 2008-2009.


Top of Page

Parks Canada

Details of Transfer Payment Programs ($000)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution in support of the Commercial Heritage Properties Incentive Fund
Start Date: 2003 - 2004
End Date: October 31, 2008
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: Engage a broad range of businesses in the task of preserving Canada's heritage properties
Expected results: Participation of private sector partners (taxable Canadian corporations) in preserving Canada’s heritage through rehabilitation of historic properties for commercial or rental use.
Expected outcomes: Better preservation and protection of Canada’s historic places and greater public and private sector awareness of the importance of conservation and of the significance of Canada’s historic places. Ensuring that more historic properties are “given a function in the life of communities” through use for commercial or rental purposes.
 
Program Activity: Heritage Resources Conservation Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Total Contribution 2,315 1,982 10,000 10,595 10,595 595

 


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Historic Places Initiative Class Contribution Program
Start Date: 2002 - 2003
End Date: March 31, 2011(with renewal every 5 years)
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: To provide direct support for provinces and territories to participate in the development of the Canadian Register of Historic Places and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and to engage municipalities, stakeholders and the general public in the conservation of historic places.
Expected results: Ongoing population and maintenance of the Canadian Register of Historic Places; refinement and dissemination of national Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places; partnership between Parks Canada and provincial and territorial authorities to identify, preserve and protect Canada's historic places; and creation of the basis for further initiatives to encourage preservation and protection of Canada's historic places.
Expected outcomes: Better preservation and protection of Canada's historic places; and greater public awareness of the importance of conservation and of the significance of Canada's historic places.
 
Program Activity: Heritage Resources Conservation Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Total Contribution 6,320 5,693 7,049 5,870 5,870 ($1,179)

 


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cost Sharing Class Contribution Program
Start Date: 1987
End Date: March 31, 2013
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: to assist recipients in conducting activities aimed at conserving the commemorative integrity of certain non-federally administered national historic sites.
Expected results: to reduce the threat to National Historic Sites (NHS), to engage the NHS owners and to help NHS owners find and retain more financial partners to help conserve NHS, establish familiarity and broader use of national conservation standards and guidelines.
Expected outcomes: Better preservation and protection of Canada’s NHS coupled with greater public and institutional awareness of heritage conservation.
 
Program Activity: Heritage Resources Conservation Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Total Contribution   900   100 100 100

 


Name of Transfer Payment Program: General Class Contribution Program (GCCP)
Start Date: 2006-2007
End Date: March 31, 2011 (with renewal every 5 years)
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: The GCCP is atypical in that it is not a program within itself; rather, it is a funding authority available to Agency managers. From time to time, Agency managers with programming responsibilities may determine that, given their priorities, available resources, other program delivery mechanisms already in place, and the players and environment in which they deliver their programs, use of a contribution agreement is the most effective means of achieving program objectives.
Expected results: More Canadians recognizing, appreciating and being engaged in the values of natural and cultural conservation. Stakeholders being further engaged in terms of interest and involvement of common objectives towards ecological or cultural integrity. Access to a better knowledge base on commercial, ecological or aboriginal issues of mutual interest for informed decision making and dialogue for Parks Canada managers and stakeholders. Heritage assets are protected, secured and researched. Targeted audiences are educated in such areas as ecology, safety and other issues.
Expected outcomes: The expected outcomes mirror the Parks Canada mandate of engaging Canadians in preserving and presenting Canada's rich diversity of cultural and natural heritage.
 
Program Activity Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance
Heritage Places Establishment 116 1,027 382 1,250 1,250 868
Heritage Resources Conservation 1,523 1,673 926 1,850 1,850 925
Public Appreciation and Understanding 1,715 674 717 1,001 1,001 284
Visitor Experience 250 577 100 621 621 521
Townsite & Throughway Infrastructure 12 40 37 43 43 6
Total Contribution 3,616 3,991 2,162 4,765 4,765 2,604

Totals may not agree due to rounding

Top of Page

Public Health Agency of Canada

Table 5: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPP)

  1. Aboriginal Head Start Initiative (AHS)
  2. Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP)
  3. Community Action Program for Children (CAPC)
  4. Population Health Fund (PHF)
  5. Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada
  6. National Collaborating Centres for Public Health (NCCPH)
  7. Healthy Living Fund
  8. Canadian Diabetes Strategy (CDS) (non-Aboriginal elements)
  9. Cancer
  10. Canadian HIV Vaccine Initiative (CHVI)

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Head Start Initiative (AHS)

2. Start date: 1995-96

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: Contributions to incorporated, local or regional non-profit Aboriginal organizations and institutions for the purpose of developing early intervention programs for Aboriginal pre-school children and their families.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved:  The annual process evaluation for all 128 Aboriginal Head Start in Urban and Northern Communities (AHSUNC) sites in Canada was completed.  These results will be analyzed and contribute to a multi-year comparative analysis of annual process surveys.  During 2008-09 AHSUNC had over 4,900 children enrolled in pre-school programming.  Planning is complete for a parent involvement survey that will be conducted for all sites in May 2009 to identify parent involvement levels, relevant resources, and success models.  Results will inform development of parent involvement tools.

In collaboration with local Aboriginal stakeholders, a new project in Charlottetown received approval and was launched.  In Montreal, the Rising Sun Childcare Centre opened as a result of collaboration between AHSUNC, the Quebec’s Ministère de la Famille et des Aînés, and local partners. Manitoba/Saskatchewan Region has established a new AHS research team of representatives from AHS Manitoba, AHS Saskatchewan, Healthy Child Manitoba and the University of Saskatchewan and is planning a program of study.

Alberta Region designed and implemented a pilot project to conduct a longitudinal study with a sample of AHSUNC participants.  Key highlights include: children demonstrated school readiness, achievement and problem solving.   British Columbia region designed and implemented Rapid Assessment studies with Aboriginal Head Start projects in the province.  The studies inform the examination of present models for possible reconfiguration or enhancement to reach more children in communities.  The completion of a pan-regional environmental scan provides a snapshot of AHSUNC program delivery models across the country.

National and regional offices continue to support learning and program information/networking exchanges for AHSUNC sites through regional and national training workshops.  In September 2008, a National Training Workshop entitled “Caring for the Spirit of the Child” was held in Regina with approximately 260 participants.  In March 2009, Alberta region held their annual training event for approximately 200 participants, which continues to be a best practice for this region. In Saskatchewan, AHS training events were evaluated to assess preliminary reactions and implications for practice.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Health Promotion
14. Total Contributions $28.7 $30.6 $26.7 $32.0 $31.3 ($4.6)
15. Total Program Activity $28.7 $30.6 $26.7 $32.0 $31.3 ($4.6)

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s):  Variance is due to:

  • Reallocation of surplus funds from other programs towards AHS, and
  • Reversal of program reductions that were planned for as part of the grants and contributions program reduction exercise in fiscal year2007-08.   It was decided that children’s programs would not be affected by this reductions exercise and as a result the total authorities and actual spending were more than planned.

17.Audit planned:  In October 2006, the PHAC Executive Committee approved the Agency Risk-Based Audit Plan (2006-2009). The plan identified the audit of health promotion programs as an audit projected for 2008-09. The PHAC Audit of Health Promotion Programs administered by the PHAC Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, including the Healthy Living Fund, began in December 2008.  The audit should be completed by September 2009.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP)

2. Start date: 1994-95

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: CPNP provides funding to community-based groups and coalitions to develop and deliver comprehensive, culturally appropriate prevention and early intervention programs to promote the health and social development of pregnant women, infants and their families facing conditions of risk.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved: In 2008-09, 330 CPNP projects reached close to 2,000 communities across Canada.  The program served about 50,000 prenatal and postnatal women.  An estimated 28,000 pregnant women and 1,800 postnatal women enter the CPNP. 

The on-going performance measurement and evaluation of the program found the CPNP continued to successfully reach its intended population. The CPNP Welcome Card collected data on program participants that illustrated how vulnerable populations were being reached.

  • 20% of participants were 19 years of age or under
  • 22% of participants were Aboriginal
  • 32% of participants had lived in Canada less than 10 years
  • 28% of participants had completed 10 years of school or less

A multi-year assessment of CPNP national performance data completed in 2008-09 illustrated how CPNP programs are implementing a population health approach that responds to multiple determinants of health with multiple strategies; applying strategies that are consistent with best practice literature; and reporting high levels of participant satisfaction and positive impacts at the individual and family level. Specific qualitative findings demonstrated that:

  • Reduced isolation, linked with increased social networks and social support, was the most frequently reported outcome (42%)
  • 32% of projects reported outcomes focused on increasing the uptake of breastfeeding
  • 29% reported on improving maternal health
  • 26% reported on participants receiving community support
  • 23% reported on improving infant health
  • 16% reported on improvements in community capacity through partnerships, participant involvement and collaboration
  • 14% reported on increasing the incidence of healthy birth weights

A costing analysis for CPNP was conducted in 2008-09 and findings illustrated that the average cost of the initial hospitalization at birth for a low birth weight baby is $10,607 compared to $952 for an infant born at a normal weight. The weighted average hospitalization cost at birth for CPNP newborns was $89 less than that for all Canadian births. For the 17,689 CPNP participants in this study, this would represent a cost savings of $1.6 million in hospital costs at birth. Findings from all CPNP evaluations, both nationally and regionally conducted, will be triangulated to support a Summative Evaluation of the program, to be submitted to the PHAC Evaluation Committee in January 2010.  This evaluation is a requirement from Treasury Board and will examine the program’s success, continued relevance and cost effectiveness.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Health Promotion
14. Total Contributions $26.7 $27.4 $24.9 $27.5 $27.2 ($2.3)
15. Total Program Activity $26.7 $27.4 $24.9 $27.5 $27.2 ($2.3)

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s):  Variance is due to:

  • Reallocation of surplus funds from other programs towards CPNP, and
  • Reversal of program reductions that were planned for as part of the grants and contributions program reduction exercise in fiscal year 2007-08.   It was decided that children’s programs would not be affected by this reductions exercise and as a result the total authorities and actual spending were more than planned.

17.Audit planned:  In October 2006, the PHAC Executive Committee approved the Agency Risk-Based Audit Plan (2006-09). The plan identified the audit of health promotion programs as an audit projected for 2008-09. The PHAC Audit of Health Promotion Programs administered by the PHAC Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, including the Healthy Living Fund, began in December 2008.  The audit should be completed by September 2009.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Action Program for Children (CAPC)

2. Start date: 1993-94

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: CAPC provides funding to community-based groups and coalitions to develop and deliver comprehensive, culturally appropriate prevention and early intervention programs to promote the health and social development of children (0-6 years) and their families facing conditions of risk.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved:

In 2008-09, 450 CAPC projects were available to serve more than 3,000 communities across the country.

The on-going performance measurement and evaluation of the program found CAPC continued to successfully reach its intended population. Preliminary figures from a one-month Snapshot Census conducted in November 2008 illustrate that CAPC projects across Canada reached 16,500 families and 22,000 individual children. Specific findings on reach indicated that:

  • 21% of participants were born outside of Canada
  • 13% of participants identified as Aboriginal
  • 24% of participants were single parents
  • 23% of participating families earned less than $15,000/annually

A multi-year assessment of CAPC national performance data completed in 2008-09 examined whether there was evidence in CAPC that projects have contributed to healthy child development. The analysis of annual CAPC success stories was organized to reflect how CAPC data provided ample evidence on how projects contributed to improved health and social development of children, increased parental capacity and increased community capacity. Specific findings demonstrated:

  • Parental personal improvement was the most frequently reported project outcome (50%)
  • 48% of CAPC projects reported healthy child development outcomes
  • 42% reported on increasing or improving community capacity as an outcome
  • 37% reported on social networking outcomes
  • 32% reported on improvements to parenting skills 

A costing analysis of CAPC was conducted in 2008-09 that used a cost avoidance model to assess whether the investments in CAPC are associated with significant returns related to child academic performance, avoidance of youth crime, and overall health impacts. Findings from this study indicate that when the results of evaluations of programs similar to CAPC are applied to the Canadian context, there are significant cost savings to the education, health care and judicial systems, as well as government revenue gains.

Findings from all CAPC evaluations, both nationally and regionally conducted, will be triangulated to support a Summative Evaluation of the program, to be submitted to the PHAC Evaluation Committee in January 2010.  This evaluation is a requirement from Treasury Board and will examine the program’s success, continued relevance and cost effectiveness.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Health Promotion
14. Total Contributions $55.7 $57.0 $48.8 $56.0 $56.0 ($7.2)
15. Total Program Activity $55.7 $57.0 $48.8 $56.0 $56.0 ($7.2)

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance is due to:

  • Reallocation of surplus funds from other programs towards CAPC, and
  • Reversal of program reductions that were planned for as part of the grants and contribution program reduction exercise in fiscal year 2007-08.   It was decided that children’s programs would not affected by this reductions exercise and as result the total authorities and actual spending were more than planned.

17. Audit completed or planned:

In October 2006, the PHAC Executive Committee approved the Agency Risk-Based Audit Plan (2006-2009). The plan identified the audit of health promotion programs as an audit projected for 2008-09. The PHAC Audit of Health Promotion Programs administered by the PHAC Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, including the Healthy Living Fund, began in December 2008.  The audit should be completed by September 2009.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Population Health Fund (PHF)

2. Start date: 1999-2000

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: The Population Health Fund is a federal grants and contribution initiative designed to coordinate action on the key factors that affect the health of Canadians. Through the new Innovation Strategy under the PHF, the objective is to enhance support for the development, implementation, and evaluation of innovative interventions and initiatives to reduce health disparities. A key component is the exchange and application of practical information on what works to address the underlying causes of health disparities and effective ways to deal with public health issues of a complex nature.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved:  The PHF supported projects at the national and regional level to encourage action on the key factors that affect the health of Canadians.  Projects to develop models for applying the population health approach, to increase the knowledge base for program and policy development on population health, and to increase partnerships and collaboration were supported.  Outcome evaluation indicates that the projects have achieved the intended results.  The new Innovation Strategy will build on the population health knowledge base from the PHF, strengthen benefits to Canadians, and improve evaluative data gathering and reporting.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Health Promotion
14a. Total Grants $3.4 $0.8 $11.4 $5.3 $0.9 $10.5
14b. Total Contributions $7.0 $5.2 $3.3 $6.5 $6.4 ($3.1)
15. Total Program Activity $10.4 $6.0 $14.7 $11.8 $7.3 $7.4
13. Program Activity: Chronic Disease Prevention and Control
14a. Total Grants - $0.9 - - $0.5 ($0.5)
14b. Total Contributions - $1.1 - - $0.1 ($0.1)
15. Total Program Activity - $2.0 - - $0.6 ($0.6)
15. Total Program Activities $10.4 $8.0 $14.7 $11.8 $7.9 $6.8

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variances are due to delays in releasing funds as a result of the creation of the Innovation Strategy within the context of the PHF, to better align priorities with the PHAC Strategic Plan.

17.Audit planned: The Audit of Public Health Promotion Programs is currently underway.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada

2. Start Date: January 2005

3. End Date: Ongoing

4. Description: Contributions towards the Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada

5. Strategic Outcome(s): Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity

6. Results Achieved: Through funding provided to community-based organizations, the Agency’s Federal Initiative transfer payments improved access to more effective HIV/AIDS prevention, diagnosis, care, treatment and support for eight key populations most affected by HIV and AIDS in Canada (gay men, people who use injection drugs, Aboriginal peoples, prison inmates, youth at risk, women, people from countries where HIV is endemic, and people living with HIV and AIDS).

In 2008-09, the Agency’s National Transfer Payment Funds supported:

  • 20 projects through the Non-reserve First Nations, Inuit and Métis HIV/AIDS Project Fund to help in the reduction of HIV incidence among Canada’s Aboriginal Peoples and to facilitate access to quality diagnosis, care, treatment and social support for all Aboriginal Peoples living with HIV and AIDS;
  • 7 projects through the National HIV/AIDS Voluntary Sector Response Fund: to increase coordination and action to respond to HIV/AIDS and other related diseases across the voluntary sector; to enhance the capacity of front-line organizations to plan and deliver programs and services to address HIV/AIDS and other related diseases; to increase national level engagement and leadership of people living with HIV and AIDS and key populations in the policies and practices that affect their lives; and to increase the capacity of the voluntary sector to engage in strategic communications to increase Canadians’ awareness of the seriousness of the Canadian HIV/AIDS epidemic;
  • 7 projects through the Specific Populations HIV/AIDS Initiatives Fund to support national policy, program and social marketing initiatives that increased the prevention of HIV infection amongst Canada’s populations most affected by HIV and AIDS and most vulnerable to infection, and improved their access to appropriate diagnosis, care, treatment and support; and
  • 1 project under the National HIV/AIDS Knowledge Exchange Fund. Through this fund, the Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange (CATIE) was established as the knowledge broker for information on HIV/AIDS, spanning the full spectrum from prevention, through access to diagnosis, care, treatment and support. CATIE gathered, synthesized and communicated relevant research, epidemiological data and other evidence-based information, such as best practices, to the front lines to increase their capacity to plan and deliver programs and services in prevention, care, treatment and support. This was accomplished through multiple channels, including regional and national networks, exchanges at national and regional conferences, on-site training, web-based information and interactive learning modules.

Through the AIDS Community Action Program (ACAP), a funding program delivered by the Agency's Regional Offices, supported 46 time-limited and 83 operational projects across Canada. These projects created supportive environments for those living with HIV and AIDS as well as for those vulnerable to the disease. ACAP projects did various activities with the aim to prevent HIV/AIDS in key populations. The projects facilitated health promotion for those living with HIV and AIDS, and strengthened community-based organizations that work with the key populations. Four of these projects were integrated with Hepatitis C funding to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C. Over 60% of projects that responded reported inclusion of target populations in community, organization, and peer groups. Moreover, 63% of responding projects reported that they had expanded the inclusion of target populations.

ACAP projects contributed to knowledge development by providing hundreds of prevention workshops for vulnerable populations, awareness campaigns and events, and support to people affected and/or living with HIV and AIDS. All of the projects tracking changes in knowledge about HIV transmission and risk factors in target populations (75%) reported improvements. All of the projects in Ontario and Quebec tracking changes in intention to adopt practices that may reduce HIV transmission and risk behaviours in target populations (68%) reported improvements.

Projects worked with a variety of partners to enhance access to services and address many of the social determinants of health to improve the quality of life for people living with HIV and AIDS and those vulnerable to the disease. In 2008-09, 49 ACAP projects reported that it was their intention to improve access to health and social services. Among these projects, 60% reported monitoring changes in access through tracking numbers of people using services or through assessment of perceived accessibility.

Projects also worked to enhance their organizational capacity by providing skills building sessions for staff and volunteers; 40% of the projects reported that they had developed organizational or community capacity beyond existing partnerships.

ACAP projects involve thousands of volunteers. Economic analysis of data from 40% of ACAP-funded projects across Canada show that from April-September 2008, ACAP volunteers contributed approximately 25,900 hours of service, which is labour with an approximate market value of $528,300.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Infectious Disease Prevention and Control
14a. Total Grants $0.8 $0.9 $6.6 $0.5 $0.4 $6.2
14b. Total Contributions $20.4 $19.5 $16.4 $22.7 $21.3 ($4.9)
15. Total Program Activity $21.2 $20.4 $23.0 $23.2 $21.7 $1.3

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Funds planned for grants were reallocated to contributions. Delays in approval and solicitation processes impeded the full use of approved resources.

17. Audit completed or planned: An audit was begun in 2008-09. Results will be available in 2009-10.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Collaborating Centres for Public Health (NCCPH)

2. Start date: 2004-05

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: Contribution to persons and agencies to support health promotion projects in the area of community health, resource development training and skill development and research. The National Collaborating Centres focus on improving the use of scientific and other knowledge to enhance the effectiveness and strengthen the capacity of Canada’s public health system. They identify knowledge gaps, make useful knowledge/evidence available to and foster linkages among public health practitioners, researchers, and others within the public health community. They promote the sharing of knowledge across this network to strengthen public health practice across Canada.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved: All 6 National Collaborating Centres for Public Health were established by the end of 2006. It has established an Agency secretariat to support the monitoring and evaluation requirements for contribution agreements and established an international, expert Advisory Council to provide advice and guidance on the scientific merit of their products and activities. Each Centre has established a diversified, often international, Advisory Board for their own context specific use. All Centres have established numerous connections with existing networks in public health, nationally and internationally, and developed key documentation and tools leveraging existing and new research for wide distribution and dissemination to policy makers and practitioners.  Each Centre has their own context specific website and shares the responsibility for a shared website to post their seminal documentation.  Given the demand for their presence in a variety of sectors, the Centres have established a central scientific lead/secretariat to manage all collaborative documentation, meetings, marketing requirements and networking opportunities.

The Centres jointly with the Agency have held annual Summer Institutes for public health professionals to learn more about knowledge synthesis, translation and exchange. Demands for the Centres to be engaged in a broad spectrum of activities are increasing. Demands include, but are not limited to, linkages to partnerships with Canadian Institute of Health Research, various Canadian Public Health Associations, provinces, territories, national and international partners, Canadian universities and others (WHO, PAHO) - supporting Masters in Public Health programs, Doctor of Philosophy field locums for various thematic expertise, etc. Requests for scientific leadership to sit on national public health professional boards and quotes and notations in national and international journals speak to the influence and value that the National Collaborating Centres for Public Health exert.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Strengthen Public Health Capacity
14. Total Contributions $6.8 $8.4 $8.4 $9.0 $8.8 ($0.4)
15. Total Program Activity $6.8 $8.4 $8.4 $9.0 $8.8 ($0.4)

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): None.

17. Audit completed or planned: A financial review of each Centre was conducted.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Healthy Living Fund

2. Start date: June 2005

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: Contribution funding to support and engage the voluntary sector and to build partnerships and collaborative action between governments, non-governmental organizations and other agencies. The Fund supports healthy living actions with community, regional, national and international impact.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved: Through the Healthy Living Fund, the Agency promotes healthy living practices and supports collaborative action among stakeholders and communities.  The results of funded projects also help build knowledge of best practices on approaches to improve Canadians’ physical activity levels and healthy eating practices. The Agency supported 11 national projects aimed at improving the physical activity levels and healthy eating practices of Canadians.  The Boys and Girls Club of Canada, for example, received funding to provide after-school healthy living programs for at-risk children and youth.  Everybody Gets to Play, an internationally recognized initiative developed by the Canadian Parks and Recreation Association, makes recreation more accessible for low-income children and their families.  The Healthy Living Fund also supports the development of environments that help make healthy choices easier choices.  For example, the innovative School Travel Planning project, delivered by Green Communities Canada, will pilot test new school travel planning models which are aimed at addressing barriers that prevent children from being physically active while on their way to school (e.g., inadequate walking space and poor signage).  Additional resources were allocated to knowledge development and exchange for surveillance of Canadian physical activity levels and updating evidence underlying the physical activity guidelines.

Bilateral agreements were entered into with all of the provinces and territories that will help deliver a pan-Canadian response to the issues of physical inactivity and unhealthy eating and their relationship to healthy weights. Regional projects funded through these bilateral agreements to help improve the physical activity and healthy eating practices of Canadians include 10 jointly funded by the Agency and P/Ts as well as 7 funded solely by the Agency. (Note that 22 additional projects funded solely by the P/Ts form part of the base for the Agency's matched funding.) These projects will take place in a variety of settings including Aboriginal and at-risk communities, formal and community-based institutions, as well as Francophone communities and schools.

The Agency also funded ParticipACTION to promote physical activity to Canadians.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Health Promotion
14. Total Contributions - $4.8 $5.2 $9.9 $7.8 ($2.6)
15. Total Program Activity - $4.8 $5.2 $9.9 $7.8 ($2.6)

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The total authorities for the Healthy Living Fund increased to 9.9M from 5.2M largely due to a surplus of funds in the regions that carried forward from 2007-08 to 2008-09 and also due to a transfer of 1.5M for a ParticipAction communications initiative. For this reason, actual spending was 2.6M more than planned spending.   The variance between actual spending and total authorities is due to delays in signing Bilateral Agreements with some provinces and territories and internal Agency delays and changes in decision making processes.  As a result, the funds either could not be moved out of PHAC to the projects last fiscal year or recipients could not take the funds with sufficient capacity to spend so late in the fiscal year.

17. Audit completed or planned: A HLF audit is currently underway as part of a larger audit in the PHAC Risk-Based Audit Plan (2006-2009). The plan identified the audit of health promotion programs for 2008-09. This audit of the program administered by PHAC’s Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, (including the Healthy Living Fund), began in December 2008 and the audit report should be completed by September 2009.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Diabetes Strategy (CDS) (non-Aboriginal elements)

2. Start date: 2005-06

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: The CDS is the Agency’s diabetes program. Since its renewal within the Agency’s Healthy Living and Chronic Disease initiative in 2005, the CDS targets information to Canadians who are at higher risk (e.g., family history, high blood pressure, high cholesterol in blood, certain ethnic groups), especially those who are overweight, obese or pre-diabetic; and the prevention of complications among those with diabetes.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved:  The Agency supported provincial and territorial stakeholder efforts through grants and contributions for:  Community-based programs that target those at high risk, the early detection of type 2 diabetes and the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes. Four Memoranda of Agreement have been put in place with provinces for diabetes risk assessment projects.  A further two Memoranda of Agreement, and three new grants will address innovative screening interventions for type 2 diabetes.

The Diabetes Policy Review Expert Panel was tasked with reviewing the CDS to ensure the annual federal investment of $18 million delivered results for Canadians. The Expert Panel completed its work and provided its link Report on the Strategy to the Minister in June 2008. The Report will help inform government policies, programs and initiatives as we move forward on this important program.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Chronic Disease Prevention and Control
14a. Total Grants $6.3 $3.1 $3.5 $1.8 $0.3 $3.2
14b. Total Contributions $0.1 $1.3 $3.5 $4.0 $2.7 $0.8
15. Total Program Activity $6.4 $4.4 $7.0 $5.8 $3.0 $4.0

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variances arose from the suspensions of solicitations for new projects during the Diabetes Policy Review process, and subsequently during the 2008 federal election period.

17. Audit completed or planned: An audit for Diabetes is planned for 2010-11.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cancer

2. Start date: 2005-06

3. End date: Ongoing

4. Description: Building on other Cancer transfer programs such as the Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative, and the named grant to the National Cancer Institute of Canada, the Agency is working with the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer Corporation (CPACC) to implement the Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control (CSCC). The CPACC is charged with working with stakeholders across the country to foster greater knowledge across the health system and maximize innovation, while respecting provincial jurisdictions and responsibility in health services delivery with the objective of reducing the number of new cases of cancer, improving the quality of life of those living with cancer, and reducing the number of deaths from cancer. The Agency’s Cancer Program is part of the CSCC. It connects existing federal cancer programs to the CSCC so that well-established, effective infrastructure and networks are built on and gaps are filled. Initiatives include:

  • Healthy Living and Chronic Disease – supports cancer surveillance, risk assessment, and community programs in areas of priority (children, seniors and aboriginal peoples);
  • Cancer in Young People in Canada (CYP-C) Program – a multi-stakeholder collaboration that advances the understanding of the impact of cancer on children and the long term effects of childhood cancer treatment; and
  • International cancer collaboration – government to government policy and program development.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved: Results include activities in support of the implementation of the CSCC and continued collaboration with CPACC, through the Agency’s representation on most of CPACC’s action groups, and participation on CPACC’s Advisory Council. Collaboration continues with other stakeholders, provinces and territories to enhance the national cancer surveillance system, improve screening and early detection for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers through informed decision making, and the identification of effective community-based models, programs, policies and public health interventions that contribute to cancer prevention and reduce the impact of cancer on Canadians. Under Healthy Living and Chronic Disease, grants were provided to organizations involved in work relating to children and cancer.


($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Chronic Disease Prevention and Control
14a. Total Grants $2.4 $0.4 $3.2 $2.3 $0.6 $2.6
14b. Total Contributions - - $2.5 $0.5 - $2.5
15. Total Program Activity $2.4 $0.4 $5.7 $2.8 $0.6 $5.1

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Although a solicitation for new projects was successfully completed in September, 2008, greater time for approval of new projects was required due to an Agency-wide review of grants and contributions approval and solicitation processes.

17. Audit completed or planned: No audits are planned for the Cancer Transfer Payment.

1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian HIV Vaccine Initiative (CHVI)

2. Start date: 2007-08

3. End date: 2012-13

4. Description: The CHVI is a collaborative undertaking between the Government of Canada and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to contribute to the global effort to develop a safe, effective, affordable and globally accessible HIV vaccine. This collaboration builds on the Government of Canada’s commitment to a comprehensive, long-term approach to address prevention technologies. Participating federal departments and agencies are the Canadian International Development Agency, the Public Health Agency of Canada, Industry Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Health Canada. The CHVI’s overall objectives are to: strengthen HIV vaccine discovery and social research capacity; strengthen clinical trial capacity and networks, particularly in low and middle income countries (LMICs); increase pilot scale manufacturing capacity for HIV vaccine clinical trial lots; strengthen policy and regulatory approaches for HIV vaccines and promote the community and social aspects of HIV vaccine research and delivery; and ensure horizontal collaboration within the CHVI and with domestic and international stakeholders.

5. Strategic Outcome: Healthier Canadians, reduced health disparities, and a stronger public health capacity.

6. Results Achieved:

  • Letters of intent received and reviewed from not-for-profit corporations (NFPs) willing to build and operate a pilot scale facility to manufacture test vaccines in clinical trial lots
  • Applications were received from NFPs, and a review process was initiated.  It could not be completed during the fiscal year as planned, due to the requirement for extensive consultations including web-based consultation with Canadian and international experts (June –August 2008) and face to face consultations during October 2008.
  • International consultations on CHVI Policy Agenda were completed as planned
  • A new HIV Vaccine Community Engagement Funding Program was implemented in partnership with Health Canada.  Applications for funding were received from community-based organizations, and a review process was initiated but was not completed as planned due to the requirement for extensive consultations
  • While development of an evaluation framework was not completed as planned, solicitation of independent evaluation firm to develop such a framework was initiated
     

($ millions) 7. Actual
Spending
2006-07
8. Actual
Spending
2007-08
9. Planned
Spending
2008-09
10. Total
Authorities
2008-09
11. Actual
Spending
2008-09
12. Variance(s)
Between Planned
and Actual Spending
13. Program Activity: Infectious Disease Prevention and Control
14. Total Contributions - - $0.8 $0.8 - $0.8
15. Total Program Activity - - $0.8 $0.8 - $0.8

16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The CHVI is a new initiative, and extensive consultations were conducted to ensure that the CHVI’s program areas would be responsive to the initiative’s stakeholders and potential program recipients. While applications for funding were received, the selection processes could not be completed during 2008-09.

17. Audit completed or planned: None.

Top of Page

Public Works and Government Services Canada

Table 5 – Details on Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)



(in millions of dollars)
Project Actual
2007-08
2008-09
Planned
Revenues
Total
Authorities
Actual
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Federal Accommodation and Holdings
GRANTS
Municipalities and Other Taxing Authorities1 1.60 (1.17) (1.17)
  1.60 (1.17) (1.17)
Total Transfer Payments 1.6 (1.17) (1.17)


Top of Page

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Table 5: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Pensions under the RCMP Pension Continuation Act (PCA)

Start date: 1959

End date: Ongoing as long as there are remaining plan members and survivors

Description: The PCA is a defined benefit pension plan the purpose of which is to provide a lifetime benefit for RCMP members and their survivors. It provides for the payment of pensions to Officers, Non-Commissioned officers and Constables engaged prior to March 1, 1949, except those who elected to come under the RCMP Superannuation Act. The PCA is predecessor to the RCMP Superannuation Act.

Strategic Outcome: N/A

Results Achieved: Pension benefits have been provided to eligible RCMP pensioners and survivors.


Program Activity: Statutory Payment
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants            
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments 20.4 19.6 23.0 18.9 18.9 4.1
Total Program Activity(ies) 20.4 19.6 23.0 18.9 18.9 4.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned: Funding requirements for this program were reviewed as part of the comprehensive strategic review conducted by the RCMP in 2008. Any resulting adjustment to the planned spending levels will be reflected in future estimates.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to compensate members of the RCMP for injuries received in the performance of their duties.

Start date: 1959

End date: Ongoing

Description: This program significantly contributes to the higher level of expected results of the organization’s mandate in that it protects members of the organization in a real way in the event they become disabled as a result of carrying out the duties and activities associated with endeavouring to provide safe homes and safe communities for Canadians. This program provides financial assistance to members of the RCMP who die or suffer a permanent work related illness or injury leading to a loss of quality of life. The program's financial assistance extends to the members' survivors.

Strategic Outcome: Applicable to all strategic outcomes

Results Achieved: Eligible clients are appropriately compensated for the non-economic effects of a service related illness/injury and/or death


Program Activity: Applicable to all program activities
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants 55.1 62.0 69.3 73.4 73.4 -4.1
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 55.1 62.0 69.3 73.4 73.4 (4.1)

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned: There are no planned evaluations.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Firearms Funding Program for Opt-in Provinces and/or Territorial Governments - Aboriginal and/or Other Communities and Organizations

Start date: 1995-1996

End date: Ongoing

Description: Annual funding to participating provinces and/or territories for the reimbursement of costs incurred in the administration of the Firearms Program within their jurisdiction.

Strategic Outcome: Quality Firearms program and support - The risks to public safety from firearms in Canada and international communities are minimized.

Results Achieved: Reduced access to firearms for those who pose a threat to public safety. Useful information made available for policing and law enforcement purposes. Safe use and storage of firearms. Increased understanding and knowledge of program requirements by clients, community organizations and Canadians.


Program Activity: Firearms Registration and Firearms Licensing and Supporting Infrastructure
($ millions)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Firearms Registration
Contributions 0.2 0.2 1.3 0.3 0.2 1.1
Firearms Licensing and Supporting Infrastructure
Contributions 11.1 12.5 14.5 14.2 13.4 1.1
Total Contributions 11.3 12.7 15.8 14.5 13.6 2.2

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Audit completed or planned: The RCMP has conducted a program evaluation. A report is expected to be published in 2009.

Top of Page

Status of Women Canada

 
Table 2 – Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program:  Women’s Program
 
2. Start date:  1973
 
3. End date:  September 2011
 
4. Description:  The mandate of the Women’s Program (Voted) is to advance equality for women across Canada through the improvement of their economic and social conditions and their participation in democratic life.
 
5. Strategic Outcome:  Strengthen the full participation of women in the economic, social and cultural life of Canada.
 
6. Results Achieved:  Refer to performance summary of Program Activity 2
 
13. Program Activity:  Financial assistance for projects to improve social, economic, and cultural outcomes for women
 
($ millions)
  7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
  Actual Actual Planned Total Actual Vari-
  spend- spend- spend- author- spend- ance(s)
  ing ing ing ities ing  
  2006–07 2007–08 2008–09 2008–09 2008–09  
14. Total grants $10.6 $13.5 $16.25 $17.6 $17.6 $1.3
14. Total contributions   $0.8 $4.7 $6.6 $3.5 $1.2
15. Total program activity
 
$10.6 $14.2 $20.95 $24.2 $21.1 $2.5
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s):  The variance between planned spending and actual spending within Grants is explained by a $1M re-profile from 2007–2008 and funding of $300K received from Canadian Heritage through the Interdepartmental Partnership with the Official Language Communities. The variance between planned spending and total authorities within contributions is explained by a $1.9M re-profile from 2007–08.
 
The variance of $1.2M between planned and actual spendings in WPF was due to a number of factors: 2009–2010 commitments against the WPF are significant and SWC was unable to recommend a number of projects due to pressures against the 2009–2010 budget, several organizations were unable to spend their approved funding, and the development of some of the proposals took longer than expected, which led to delays in submission and approval.
 
17. Audit completed or planned:  N/A
 
Top of Page

Transport Canada

Table 5: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)

Transport Canada administers a number of transfer payment programs (TPPs). Transfer payments are transfers of money, goods, services or assets made from an appropriation to individuals, organizations or other levels of government, without the federal government directly receiving goods or services in return.

Transport Canada is subject to the revised policy on transfer payments, which requires departments to report on TPPs greater than $5 million.

In 2008-2009, Transport Canada administered the following TPPs where at least $5 million was spent or planned to be spent when the 2008-2009 RPP was published.

The summary of the three-year transfer payment programs plan is available on Transport Canada's website at: http://www.tc.gc.ca/corporate-services/finance/rpp/three_year_plan.htm.

An Efficient Transportation System

  1. Grant to the Province of British Columbia for ferry and coastal freight and passenger services.
  2. Contribution for ferry and coastal passenger and freight services
  3. Contributions to provinces toward highway improvements to enhance overall efficiency and promote safety while encouraging, industrial development and tourism from a regional economic perspective: Outaouais Road Development Agreement
  4. Gateways and Borders Crossing Fund
  5. Airports Capital Assistance Program
  6. Contribution Program for operating, capital and start-up funding requirement for Regional and Remote Passenger Rail Services
  7. Northumberland Strait Crossing subsidy payment under the Northumberland Strait Crossing Act (Statutory)
  8. Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund (TIF)
  9. Port Divestiture Fund
  10. Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program (SHIP)

An environmentally responsible transportation system

  1. Action Plan 2000 for Climate Change - Urban Transportation Showcase Program
  2. ecotransport Strategy

A safe and secure transportation system

  1. Divesture of St. Romuald
  2. Grade Crossing Improvement Contribution Program (approved under Railway Safety Act)
  3. Marine Security Contribution Program
  4. Passenger Rail and Urban Transit Security Contribution Program (Transit - Secure)
  5. Airports Policing Contribution Program
  6. Contribution to NAV Canada to support security for the 2010 Winter Olympic games

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to the Province of British Columbia for ferry and coastal freight and passenger services.

Start date: 1977

End date: ongoing

Description: The Province of British Columbia (BC) assumes the entire responsibility for the operation of ferry and coastal freight and passenger services.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: The grant allowed BC ferry service to continue to provide transportation of coastal freight and passengers.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants 25,309 25,856 26,447 26,439 26,294 153
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 25,309 25,856 26,447 26,439 26,294 153

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The planned spending was based on an estimate of the BC consumer price index. Actual spending reflects the actual consumer price index, which was lower than anticipated.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009. There are currently no plans to do so under the 2009-10 to 2011-2012 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution for ferry and coastal passenger and freight services

Start date: 1941

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: Operating funding for three regional passenger and vehicle ferry services, CTMA Traversier Ltee; Northumberland Ferry Ltd.; and Bay Ferries Ltd.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: The services continued to provide transportation of freight and passengers in Atlantic Canada and Quebec. In addition, these services continued to support tourism and one continued to provide a link to a remote location.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 11,493 13,345 11,243 16,181 16,056 ( 4,813 )
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 11,493 13,345 11,243 16,181 16,056 ( 4,813 )

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was more than planned due to unforeseen maintenance costs (traffic decline and increase of fuel costs) as well as a contribution to a pilot project for one of the ferries to operate in winter months.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009. There are currently no plans to do so under the 2009-10 / 2011-2012 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to provinces toward highway improvements to enhance overall efficiency and promote safety while encouraging, industrial development and tourism from a regional economic perspective: Outaouais Road Development Agreement

Start date: January 17, 1972

End date: March 31, 2009

Description: Contributions to the Province of Quebec related to the Outaouais Roads Agreement toward highway improvements made to enhance overall efficiency and promote safety while encouraging regional and industrial development and tourism.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: Construction has started on Phase 1 of the extension of Highway 5 to prolong the divided highway while studies are underway for Phase 2. Two noise barriers projects - Maloney noise barrier and the St-Raymond noise barrier - were completed in 2008-2009. All of these projects contributed to enhance the safety and the efficiency of the Outaouais road network


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants 14,596 18,998 15,075 11,462 7,340 7,735
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 14,596 18,998 15,075 11,462 7,340 7,735

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The Outaouais Road Agreement is a cost sharing agreement between the federal government and the province of Québec where the federal government funds up to 50% of eligible costs on infrastructure projects covered under this agreement. There is no funding ceiling to this agreement. Transport Canada ensures that expenditures, under this agreement cover only up to 50% of eligible costs.

In 2008-09, delays occurred in the completion of the studies for Phase 2 of Highway 5 due to a narrow right of way established in the 1980's. The project design will most likely result in an encroachment on adjacent federal lands. Further discussions and preparation of alternative options were required to minimize the encroachment.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009. There are currently no plans to do so under the 2009-10 to 2011-2012 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Gateways and Border Crossings Fund (GBCF)

Start date: February 7, 2008 (Treasury Board approval)

End date: March 31, 2014

Description: The GBCF aims to improve the flow of goods and people between Canada and the rest of the world and enhance infrastructure at key locations in order to advance the competitiveness of the Canadian economy.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: The Report on Plans and Priorities indicates that the GBCF will promote infrastructure and technology investments, such as Intelligent Transportation Systems, that enhance multi-modal integration of major transportation systems, as well as their efficiency, safety, security, and sustainability. In this context, GBCF achieved the following results:

  • The majority of the $2.12 billion GBCF has been committed, and only $105 million (M) remains unencumbered.
  • The federal government signed Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with the respective provincial jurisdictions and is engaged with the Atlantic Provinces (Atlantic Gateway), Ontario Québec (Continental Gateway and Trade Corridor) in analytical and consultative processes to develop gateway strategies that will ensure informed infrastructure investment decisions in support of international trade and investment. A separate table has been established with the Western Provinces.
  • The GBCF funded several studies and research to analyse the transportation network, identify other issues and opportunities, and look at future trade growth and patterns.
  • Several significant projects have been announced for all three gateways, including projects to improve the Core National Highway System, enhance strategic border crossings, and improve key ports.
  • Three contribution agreements and one MOU were signed in 2008-2009 for a total project commitment from Transport Canada of $154.5M dollars.

($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0 0 210,960 207,831 4,246 206,714
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0 0 210,960 207,831 4,246 206,714

Comment(s) on Variance(s): $5M was transferred to Parks Canada in 08/09 through an MOU for a total project commitment of $100M dollars.

Transport Canada had estimated it would spend a total of $210,960,000 in FY 2008-2009, the first year of the GBCF. As the fiscal year progressed, it became clear that such an estimate would not be met. There are several related explanations for this variance.

Treasury Board (TB) approval for the implementation of the GBCF was not received until February 2008, later than originally scheduled. As a result, Transport Canada did not receive the funds for FY 2008-2009 until July 2008.

In a number of cases, for projects that were publicly announced (by the Prime Minister, the Minister of Transport, or other Government of Canada representatives), business cases were not received from the project proponents and thus contribution agreements or MOUs could not be signed in a timely fashion.

The 2008 federal election also precluded the Department from obtaining Treasury Board approval for funding of specific projects throughout much of Fall 2008.

Finally, in several other cases, work by proponents on approved projects slowed down and some of the planned contributions had to be reprofiled to future years.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009. There are currently plans to do so under the 2009-10 to 2011-2012 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Airports Capital Assistance Program

Start date: April 1, 1995

End date: March 31, 2010

Description: Airports Capital Assistance Program (ACAP) assists eligible applicants in financing capital projects related to safety, asset protection and operating cost reduction.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: In 2008/09, ACAP contributed to 50 safety-related airside projects at 41 eligible airports.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 36,277 32,306 49,800 51,062 51,062 (1,262)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 36,277 32,306 49,800 51,062 51,062 (1,262)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was more than planned due to multi-year projects that proceeded more quickly than expected.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada conducted an internal audit on ACAP in 2007. A copy of the report is available via the following link: http://www.tc.gc.ca/corporate-services/aas/audit/2006/1577-06-101/menu.htm



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution Program for operating, capital and start-up funding requirement for Regional and Remote Passenger Rail Services

Start date: June 1, 2004

End date: March 31, 2010

Description: Provide operating funding for the regional and remote passenger rail services not provided by VIA Rail, for capital and start-up costs for regional and remote passenger rail services, and to address potential costs of transferring regional services.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: The contribution program allowed Keewatin Railway Company, Algoma Central Railway, Ontario Northland transportation Commission, and Tshiuetin Rail Transportation to continue to provide safe, reliable and sustainable passenger rail services.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 13,080 12,437 5,600 16,514 16,514 (10,914)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 13,080 12,437 5,600 16,514 16,514 (10,914)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Funding of $5.6M was provided through the 2008-09 Main Estimates. However, it was not sufficient to maintain the network of regional and remote services and an additional $10.9M was received from Budget 2008 through Supplementary Estimates.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada completed an audit of this contribution program in 2003. The report can be found at the following link: http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/corporate-services/aas-audit-2003-424.htm



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Northumberland Strait Crossing subsidy payment under the Northumberland Strait Crossing Act (Statutory)

Start date: May 31, 1997

End date: April 1, 2032

Description: Subsidy payments are made to bridge operator to honour constitutional obligations to provide a transportation link between Prince Edward Island and the mainland

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: The subsidy payments allowed the bridge operator to continue to provide an efficient year-round transportation service between Prince Edward Island and the mainland.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions            
Total Other types of transfer payments 54,265 54,897 54,897 56,066 56,066 (1,169)
Total Program Activity(ies) 54,265 54,897 54,897 56,066 56,066 (1,169)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): As per the Northumberland Strait Crossing Act, payments to Northumberland Strait Crossing are $41.9 million, adjusted annually for inflation in accordance with the Consumer Price Index.

The actual spending reflects the actual Consumer Price Index, which was more than originally anticipated.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009. There are currently no plans to do so under the 2009-10 to 2011-2012 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund (TIF)

Start date: October 19, 2006

End date: March 31, 2014

Description: To establish the best transportation network facilitating global supply chains between Asia and North America. Transportation infrastructure investments to address near term capacity problems and build strategically for the future

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: Transport Canada completed two infrastructure projects and four others are under construction. In addition, five Shortsea SHIPping projects and five North Shore Trade Area projects were announced. Three contribution agreements were also signed.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 8,400 40,403 82,100 101,748 56,592 25,508
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 8,400 40,403 82,100 101,748 56,592 25,508

Comment(s) on Variance(s): A number of the TIF projects that were scheduled to advance this year were either delayed or moved to future years by proponents. In particular, though it is moving well, the South Fraser Perimeter Road did not advance as quickly as planned. Also the slow down in the economy caused a number of the private sector projects to be pushed into future years as the proponent's capital plans had to be readjusted.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Port Divestiture Fund

Start date: April 1, 1996

End date: March 31, 2012

Description: Facilitate the divestiture process by providing a new owner with the resources to take over the port.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved: As of March 31, 2009, Transport Canada had divested 471 of its original 549 ports (86% complete) and has saved taxpayers an estimated $531 million that would otherwise have been spent on the ports.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 513 16,004 33,000 33,060 384 32,616
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 513 16,004 33,000 33,060 384 32,616

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was less than planned because several significant port divestitures anticipated for 2008-09 were delayed to 2009-10.

Audit completed or planned: Audits of this program were completed in 2001, 2003 and 2004. While the 2001 report has been archived, the 2003 and 2004 reports are available via the following links: http://www.tc.gc.ca/corporate-services/aas/audit/2003/1577-03-026/menu.htm and http://www.tc.gc.ca/corporate-services/aas/audit/2003/1577-03-020/menu.htm. Transport Canada is currently conducting an audit that was started in 2009.



Name of Transfer Payment Program:

Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program (SHIP) - Highway Component

Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program - Border Crossing Transportation Initiative and
Transportation Planning and Modal Integration (TPMI) Initiative

Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program - Intelligent Transportation Systems Initiative

Start date: March 29, 2001

End date:

SHIP - Highway Component: extended until March 31, 2009.

SHIP - Border Crossing Transportation Initiative and Planning and Modal Integration (TPMI) Initiative: extended until March 31, 2010.

SHIP - Intelligent Transportation Systems Initiative: extended until March 31, 2010.

Description:

SHIP - Highway Component: Provide federal funding under cost-shared contribution agreements with provincial and territorial governments for highway improvement projects to address the needs of Canada's National Highway System.

SHIP - Border Crossing Transportation Initiative and TPMI Initiative: Provide federal funding under cost-shared contribution agreements with provincial, territorial, municipal governments and other partners to improve the access to land border crossings, mobility, modal integration and transportation efficiency.

SHIP - Intelligent Transportation Systems Initiative: Provide federal funding under cost-shared contribution agreements with provincial, territorial, municipal governments and other partners to enable the undertaking of the deployment of intelligent transportation systems.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system that contributes to Canada's economic growth and trade objectives.

Results Achieved:

Highway Component: As of March 31, 2009, Canada has completed 9 of the 10 Provincial SHIP agreements and all three of the Territorial Agreements. The SHIP program has seen over 70 projects completed across Canada under the $600M program.

Border Crossing Transportation Initiative and Transportation Planning and Modal Integration (TPMI) Initiative: As of March 31, 2009 all of the SHIP Border projects have been completed. Prior to final payment being made by Canada for a project, the recipient must submit a signed affidavit stating the project was completed as per Engineering guidelines. Once the Province of British Columbia submits its final affidavits, the remaining funds in the SHIP Border fund will be released and all funding will be disbursed.

Intelligent Transportation Systems Initiative: As of March 31, 2009, Transport Canada continues to collaborate with stakeholders in advancing the development and deployment of intelligent transportation systems. 23 projects were successfully concluded, including the implementation of 18 road weather information stations along the National Highway System; the implementation of technologies to provide road and traffic information for traveller information systems; and the implementation of technologies to increase efficiencies for commercial vehicles at roadside inspection stations.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs and Infrastructure in support of a market-based framework Transportation Policy Development and Infrastructure Programs
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 80,407 19,755 2,287 17,805 15,907 (13,620)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 80,407 19,755 2,287 17,805 15,907 (13,620)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Funding of $2.287M was provided through the 2008-09 Main Estimates. However, subsequent funding was provided through Supplementary Estimates for two components: the SHIP Border Crossing Transportation Initiative and Planning and Modal Integration (TPMI) Initiative, and the SHIP Intelligent Transportation Systems Initiative.

The SHIP Intelligent Transportation Systems Initiative spent less than planned due to the delays associated with the construction of the projects (weather, industry's capacity, timing of activities) and, to a lesser extent, to delays in the provincial and federal approval process of the projects (provincial capital planning and available funding, environmental assessment process, permits, etc) required prior to construction start.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada completed an audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009 that was approved by the Audit and Review Committee in May 2009. Posting of the report on the internet is pending.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Action Plan 2000 for Climate Change - Urban Transportation Showcase Program (UTSP)

Start date: June 21, 2001

End date: March 31 st, 2009

Description: To test and measure the impacts of strategies to reduce urban greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation, so as to lay a foundation for the adoption of effective, integrated GHG reduction strategies in urban centres across Canada by 2010.

Strategic Outcome: An environmentally responsible transportation system that contributes to Canada's sustainable development objectives.

Results Achieved: The showcase component of UTSP, which aims to demonstrate, measure and monitor the effectiveness of a range of integrated urban GHG reduction strategies, began analysis of the final results for the Halifax, Whitehorse, and Toronto showcases. Preliminary results from Halifax show a thirty percent modal shift from cars to the new transit service that will provide a two kiltotonne per year reduction in GHG emissions. In Toronto, there was a reported 17,500 tonne reduction in GHG emissions and the development of a strong regional partnership of organizations, businesses, governments and others dedicated to making commuting more sustainable. Whitehorse final project results include an estimated GHG reduction of ninety tonnes from elements of the project that were measurable; as well, the municipality is now replicating project elements in forthcoming municipal infrastructure work.

Implementation of showcase activities in the following five municipalities, Region of Waterloo, Vancouver, Winnipeg, Gatineau-Montreal, and Quebec City were completed as of March 31, 2009. However, measurement and compiling of results is ongoing for these showcase municipalities. Progress reports indicated that these showcase municipalities are reaching their objectives to change travel behaviour, foster replication, and innovate in the delivering of urban transportation infrastructure and services. All proponents cite the involvement of Transport Canada as a critical factor in implementing the projects.

The second component of UTSP is the Information Network, which focuses on information transfer in order to drive replication of effective sustainable transportation strategies. Results in 2008/2009 for the Information Network include:

  • The development of thirteen case studies and issue papers, as well as four case study updates, that highlight sustainable transportation strategies and issues;
  • Creation of a bike-sharing guide that will aid Canadian municipalities in determining the feasibility of a bike sharing system and how to implement one;
  • Supported two awards programs: The Transportation Association of Canada's Sustainable Urban Transportation Award and The Federation of Canadian Municipalities' Sustainable Transportation Award;
  • Sponsored fifteen sustainable transportation workshops and conference sessions across Canada in collaboration with federal departments, sector associations, and non-profit groups that were attended by over nine hundred targeted stakeholders.
  • Undertook an extensive upgrade to the Urban Transportation Emissions Calculator (UTEC), allowing municipalities to more accurately measure GHG and CAC emissions from transportation projects;
  • Upgraded the UTSP website in order to comply with CLF 2.0 requirements; a major task owing to the fact the website is over four thousand pages in size;
  • Developed and hosted four webinars that shared information with over three hundred transportation practitioners on effective sustainable transportation initiatives;
  • Hosted a workshop for UTSP showcase proponents that enabled information sharing on project implementation; and
  • Produced an annual report that summarized UTSP activities, which is available at: http://www.tc.gc.ca/utsp/

($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies and Programs in support of sustainable transportation Sustainable Transportation Development and the Environment
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 3,841 6,687 5,043 8,383 7,969 ( 2,926 )
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 3,841 6,687 5,043 8,383 7,969 ( 2,926 )

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Supplementary Estimates (A: $527,000; B:$2,195,000; C:$390,912) and internal cash flow of $227,457 were approved after the Main Estimates for a Total Authorities of $8,383,000. This resulted in an adjusted variance or surplus of $414,000 due to one proponent who significantly reduced the scope of its project.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada is currently conducting an audit of the Urban Transportation Showcase Program.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: ecotransport Strategy

Start date: April 1, 2007

End date: March 31st, 2011

Description: The ecotransport Strategy involves a series of initiatives designed to reduce the amount of fuel consumed, improve transportation efficiency and introduce cleaner transportation technologies. Launched as part of the Government's Environmental Agenda, this strategy features the ecomobility program; the ecotechnology for Vehicles Program and the ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles Program; and the ecofreight program. The ecoAUTO Rebate Program was introduced separately but is complementary to the programs for personal vehicles.

  • The ecomobility program is a $10 million initiative that seeks to work with municipalities to help cut urban-passenger transportation emissions by encouraging commuters to choose public transit or other sustainable transportation options. Working with cities across Canada, this initiative will help develop programs, services and products that improve sustainable transportation options in urban areas.
  • The ecotechnology for Vehicles Program includes in-depth testing and showcasing of advanced technologies vehicles in order to raise awareness and foster important new partnerships with the automotive industry and encourage the introduction of a broader range of environmental technologies in Canada. The ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles Program, delivered by NRCan will provide fuel consumption information and decision-making tools to encourage consumers to purchase fuel-efficient vehicles that are currently available in the market. Together these two programs have a combined funding of $36 million.
  • The ecofreight program, with $61 million in funding, features new steps to reduce the environmental and health effects of freight transportation through technology and will be delivered by Transport Canada and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). These steps include addressing regulatory barriers, reducing fuel use and emissions, establishing a Freight Technology Demonstration Fund, providing cost-shared funding for the purchase and installation of proven technologies, building industry partnerships, and supporting up to four pilot projects to demonstrate the installation and use of shore-based power for marine vessels in Canadian ports.
  • The ecoAUTO Rebate Program is a $264 million program to provide performance-based rebates to consumers who purchase fuel-efficient vehicles. It requires eligible vehicles to meet a performance standard or fuel consumption rating. This is intended as an interim measure to increase consumer purchases of more efficient advanced technology vehicles before the new fuel-efficiency standards take effect with model year 2011.

Strategic Outcome: An environmentally responsible transportation system that contributes to Canada's sustainable development objectives.

Results Achieved *: Financial incentives and assistance were provided to members of the transport sector to increase uptake of emission-reducing technologies. In 2008-2009, over 116,000 ecoAUTO Rebate applications were processed, and almost $120 million was distributed to eligible applicants. Six projects, which will receive funding of about $2 million, continue to be implemented under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund, and an additional nine projects for $3.5 million in funding were selected in January, 2009 and are underway. The two rounds of funding under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund have allowed an uptake of 1254 pieces of emerging technology equipment across four modes of transportation. Similarly, fifteen projects with funding of $3.7 million are underway under the Freight Technology Incentives Program, and an additional 17 projects, with funding of $3.8 million, were selected in February, 2009. The two rounds of funding under the Freight Technology Incentives Program have allowed an uptake of 1654 pieces of proven technology equipment. Under the ecomobility Program, 14 projects worth $3 million were selected, of which three contribution agreements were signed in 2008-2009 and the remainder are under negotiation; proposals for a second round of funding were received on May 1, 2009. Following a competitive process, the Port Metro Vancouver was awarded $3 million in funding (including $2M under the Marine Shore Power Program and $1M under the Western Economic Diversification) to implement marine shore power at Canada Place - the first such initiative in Canada and the third in the world.

* The financial and non-financial results includes Transport Canada's program only


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Programs in support of Sustainable Development Sustainable Development and the Environment
Total Grants 0 71,342 100,200 168,758 119,864 (19,664)
Total Contributions 0 0 11,569 11,669 5,805 5,764
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0 71,342 111,769 180,427 125,669 (13,900)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Supplementary Estimates of $75,558,000 and other authorities of $7,000,000 were approved for a ‘Total Authorities' of $168,758,000 resulting in an adjusted variance of $48,894,000 due to lower application intake due in part, to a downturn in the economy resulting in fewer automobile purchases. Variance was due to downturn in the economy resulted in fewer automobile purchases and lower ecoAuto rebate applications.

Supplementary Estimates of $4,660,820 and other authorities of $1,103,000 were approved for a ‘Total Authorities' of 11,669,000 resulting in an adjusted variance of $1,203,749. Variance was due to time required to establish programs' structure (staffing, developing guidelines and forms, initiating outreach activities); delays in acquiring vehicle technology to be tested; and late reprofiling not reflected in the above.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009. There are currently no plans to do so under the 2009-10 to 2011-2012 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Divestiture of St-Romuald

Start date:

End date: March 31, 2009

Description: Divestiture of St-Romuald Marine Emergency Duties Training Assets to the Province of Quebec.

Strategic Outcome: A safe and secure transportation system that contributes to Canada's social development and security objectives.

Results Achieved: Lump-sum contribution of $6,300,000 was provided to the province of Quebec, allowing it to continue to provide Marine Emergency Duties training in French in the foreseeable future. Seafarers wishing to be trained in the French language will receive the necessary training to obtain a recognized level of proficiency in marine emergency duties practices and procedures, thereby contributing to the safety on our waters. The program will also attract and qualify Canadian seafarers thereby increasing the number of francophone seafarers in the Canadian marine industry.

The divestiture will allow the Department to focus on the policy and regulatory framework while the Province assumes responsibility for the continued provision of MED training in the French language for the next 25 years.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity   Transportation Safety and Security
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0 0 0 6,300 6,300 (6,300)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0 0 0 6,300 6,300 (6,300)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): No funding was provided through the 2008-09 Main Estimates. However, Transport Canada subsequently received funding of $6.3M in fiscal year 2008-09 through Supplementary Estimates to support the St-Romuald Contribution Program.

Note: In December 2008, the Minister provided an approval in principle to continue consultations with the Province of Quebec on the divestitutre of St-Romuald within the context of a supplemented offer of contribution not to exceed $6.3M for the divestiture of St-Romuald training facility and related assets in fiscal year 2008-09. Although the province of Quebec signed an agreement in principle on March 27, 2009 for $6.3M, the signature on the final agreement is pending.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grade Crossing Improvement Contribution Program (approved under Railway Safety Act)

Start date: 1989

End date: Ongoing

Description: Payments made to railway companies and municipalities to improve the safety at public road/railway grade crossings.

Strategic Outcome: A safe and secure transportation system that contributes to Canada's social development and security objectives.

Results Achieved: Since 1989, over $100 million has been spent by Transport Canada to fund improvements at public road/railway grade crossings across Canada, under federal jurisdiction. It is conservatively estimated that the program is responsible for 53% of the reduction in collisions at grade crossings.

In 2008-09, 143 grade crossing improvement projects were funded through this program to enhance the safety of Canada's road/railway system. Examples of project improvements included the installation of flashing lights, bells and gates; the interconnection of crossing signals to nearby highway traffic signals; the modification of operating circuits within automatic warning systems; the improvement of roadway alignment or grades.


($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Rulemaking, Monitoring and Outreach in support of a safe and secure transportation system Transportation Safety and Security
Total Grants 140 155 300 120 120 180
Total Contributions 3,505 7,280 7,145 7,325 7,315 (170)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 3,645 7,435 7,445 7,445 7,435 10

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending of grants was less than planned primarily due to a decrease in the number of applications received under the grant program to close crossings and the remainder was transferred to the contribution program to improve crossings.

Actual spending of contributions was more than planned primarily due to an increase in the number of projects funded and the remainder was due to cash flow management.

Audit completed or planned: An audit of the Grade Crossing Review Program was completed in November 2001. The report has been archived. There are currently no plans to do an audit during the 2009-10 to 2011-2012 fiscal years.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Marine Security Contribution Program

Start date: December 1, 2004

End date: November 30, 2009

Description: Financial assistance to aid in the speedy implementation of security measures and to help offset the costs of operators who would not have the financial capacity to cover security costs without significantly affecting operating costs.

Strategic Outcome: A safe and secure transportation system that contributes to Canada's social development and security objectives

Results Achieved:

  • Transport Canada has continued to provide financial contributions towards marine security enhancements
  • All funded projects are inspected by Transport Canada Regional Security Inspectors to verify that projects have been completed
  • The program has contribution agreements that have been signed or are pending totalling $103.1M.

($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Rulemaking, Monitoring and Outreach in support of a safe and secure transportation system Transportation Safety and Security
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 12,559 30,806 28,046 15,300 7,826 20,220
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 12,559 30,806 28,046 15,300 7,826 20,220

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Transport Canada received $28M through the Main Estimates. However, due to program requirements funding was re-profiled to 2009-2010. In addition, $2.5 million was part of the department's Strategic Review commitments. Actual spending reflects total authorities provided.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada is currently conducting an audit of the Marine Security Contribution Program. The final report is scheduled to be released in 2009.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Passenger Rail and Urban Transit Security Contribution Program (Transit - Secure)

Start date: June 22, 2006

End date: March 31, 2009

Description: The program is designed to enhance the security of Canada's passenger rail and urban transit system by providing incentives to operators of passenger rail and urban transit services to implement new and enhanced security measures rapidly.

Strategic Outcome: A safe and secure transportation system that contributes to Canada's social development and security objectives.

Results Achieved:

  • Passenger rail and urban transit security in Canada was enhanced through the completion of 130 security projects. This program helped passenger rail and urban transit operators make improvements to the security of their operations (e.g. enhanced physical security and access controls, employee training, public awareness campaigns and increased domain awareness).
  • In completing these projects, passenger rail and urban transit operators made extensive use of guidelines, technical advice (from Transport Canada Security Inspectors) and best practices (as shared at Surface and Intermodal Security Conferences) made available through the program.
  • Security enhancements undertaken by this program have enhanced the ability of Canadian passenger rail and urban transit operators to prevent, mitigate, respond to and recover from terrorist attacks.

($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Rulemaking, Monitoring and Outreach in support of a safe and secure transportation system Transportation Safety and Security
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0 8,077 61,400 69,400 58,894 2,506
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0 8,077 61,400 69,400 58,894 2,506

Comment(s) on Variance(s):

Total spending was less than planned primarily because operators had some significant difficulties (e.g. securing heritage approvals, Ottawa bus strike, labour shortages) in completing projects, running up to the program completion date. Most of these challenges were successfully addressed by operators and projects were completed, however, they did result in under expenditures.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada conducted an Audit of Rail and Urban Transit Security Contribution in 2008-2009 that was approved by the Audit and Review Committee in May 2009. Posting of the report on the internet is pending.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Airports Policing Contribution Program

Start date: April 2008

End date: Ongoing

Description: The Program was established in 2002 under the responsibility of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA). In 2007, a decision was made to transfer the program to Transport Canada. The program was created to assist eligible, designated airports in financing the heightened cost of security-related policing in accordance with Transport Canada's regulated security measures.

Strategic Outcome: A safe and secure transportation system that contributes to Canada's social development and security objectives

Results Achieved:

  • Performance data from airports indicates an effective armed police officer response to alarms at screening checkpoints and restricted area access points.
  • The 2008-09 data will be used as a reference point for future assessments.

($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Rulemaking, Monitoring and Outreach in support of a safe and secure transportation system Transportation Safety and Security
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0 0 15,645 15,621 14,216 1,429
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0 0 15,645 15,621 14,216 1,429

Comment(s) on Variance(s): When the program was transferred from the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority to Transport Canada in 2008-09, the original funding allocation of $14,307,960 was maintained. A re-examination of the funding allocation was envisioned to assess how best to distribute the remaining $1,337,400 that was lapsed annually. However, this did not occur because the remaining amount was cut in the Budget 2009 announcement to phase out the program to certain recipients. The remaining variance is due to eligible costs for some recipients being lower than expected.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009. There are currently no plans to do so under the 2009-10 to 2011-2012 fiscal year.



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution to NAV Canada to support security for the 2010 Winter Olympic games

Start date: June 23, 2008

End date: June 30, 2010

Description: NAV Canada Olympic Security Contribution Program provides financial assistance to NAV Canada for systems and services to ensure the safe movement of security aircraft in the Sea-to-Sky corridor and to ensure aviation domain awareness and control of restricted airspace during the 2010 Winter Olympics.

Strategic Outcome: A safe and secure transportation system that contributes to Canada's social development and security objectives

Results Achieved:

  • Installation of Multi-lateration equipment in the Sea-to-Sky corridor
  • Provision and installation of new Vancouver area control centre (ACC) controlled VHF radio frequencies to allow for communications capability in the Sea-to-Sky corridor
  • Provision and installation of Aviation Security Operations Command Centre positions and related data feeds at the RCMP Integrated Security Unit
  • Provision and installation of new ACC controlled VHF radio frequencies to allow for communications capability around the Vancouver Airport with civilian and DND aircrafts

($ thousands) Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Between
Planned &
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Program Activity Policies, Rulemaking, Monitoring and Outreach in support of a safe and secure transportation system Transportation Safety and Security
Total Grants            
Total Contributions 0 0 0 6,600 6,600 (6,600)
Total Other types of transfer payments            
Total Program Activity(ies) 0 0 0 6,600 6,600 (6,600)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): No funding was provided through the 2008-09 Main Estimates. However, Transport Canada subsequently received funding of $6.6M in fiscal year 2008-09 through Supplementary Estimates to support the Program.

Audit completed or planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this contribution program in 2008-2009.

Top of Page

Veterans Affairs

Table 5: Details on Transfer Payments Programs (TPPs)



Name of Transfer Payment Program: Pensions, and Allowances for Disability and Death
Start Date: September 1, 1919 End Date: Ongoing
Description: Provide pensions for disability or death and economic support in the form of allowances to: members of the Canadian Forces and Merchant Navy Veterans who served in the First World War, the Second World War or the Korean War; certain civilians who are entitled to benefits because of their wartime service; former and serving members of the Canadian Forces (including those who served in Special Duty Areas); survivors and dependants of military and civilian personnel.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other clients achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Summary of Results Achieved: Successfully met
($ millions) Actual Spending 2006-2007 Actual Spending 2007-2008 Planned Spending 2008-2009 Total Authorities 2008-2009 Actual Spending 2008-2009 Variance Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending 2008-2009
Pensions, Awards, Allowances for Disability and Death; and Financial Support            
Total Grants 1,740.8 1,737.8 1,755.9 1,755.9 1,734.7 21.2
Total Program Activity 1,740.8 1,737.8 1,755.9 1,755.9 1,734.7 21.2
Comment on Variance(s): The variance is primarily due to a lower average cost per Canadian Forces pensioner than originally forecast for 2008-09
Audit completed or planned:  




Name of Transfer Payment Program: Earnings Loss and Supplemental Retirement Benefit
Start Date: April 1, 2006 End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Earnings Loss benefit provides temporary income replacement benefits while the Canadian Forces Veteran participates in rehabilitation in preparation for employment in civilian life. Ongoing long-term income replacement benefits are provided to age 65 when the Veteran is unable to engage in any suitable employment due to total and permanent incapacity. At age 65, recipients of long-term income replacement benefits receive a lump-sum retirement benefit to compensate for lost opportunity to contribute to a retirement pension due to a career-ending or service-related disability.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other clients achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Summary of Results Achieved: Successfully met
($ millions) Actual Spending 2006-2007 Actual Spending 2007-2008 Planned Spending 2008-2009 Total Authorities 2008-2009 Actual Spending 2008-2009 Variance Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending 2008-2009
Pensions, Awards, Allowances for Disability and Death; and Financial Support            
Total Grants 3.5 11.7 33.8 20.8 19.1 14.7
Total Program Activity 3.5 11.7 33.8 20.8 19.1 14.7
Comment on Variance(s): The variance is due to actual client numbers in receipt of Earnings Loss Benefits being less than forecast for 2008-09
Audit completed or planned:  




Name of Transfer Payment Program: Disability Awards and Allowances
Start Date: April 1, 2006 End Date: Ongoing
Description: Provide disability awards for disability or death and economic support in the form of allowances to former and serving members of the Canadian Forces, and in some cases to survivors and dependants, for the non-economic effects of a service-related disability, including pain and suffering, functional loss and the effects of permanent impairment on the lives of members, Veterans and their families.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other clients achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Summary of Results Achieved: Successfully met
($ millions) Actual Spending 2006-2007 Actual Spending 2007-2008 Planned Spending 2008-2009 Total Authorities 2008-2009 Actual Spending 2008-2009 Variance Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending 2008-2009
Pensions, Awards, Allowances for Disability and Death; and Financial Support            
Total Grants 50.0 157.0 190.4 245.4 238.5 (48.1)
Total Program Activity 50.0 157.0 190.4 245.4 238.5 (48.1)
Comment on Variance(s): The variance is due to a greater number of existing pension clients coming forward with new conditions than originally forecast for 2008-09, and due to the allocation of additional resources to the disability award adjudication process to reduce both pending applications and approved applications awaiting payment.
Audit completed or planned:  




Name of Transfer Payment Program: War Veterans Allowance/Civilian War Allowance
Start Date: September 1, 1930 End Date: Ongoing
Description: The War Veterans Allowance (WVA) is a form of financial assistance available to eligible Veterans, qualified civilians and their survivors, dependants and orphans. In recognition of war service, qualified persons are provided with regular, monthly income to meet basic needs. WVA is based on income, domestic status and number of dependants. Recipients are paid at a single, married or orphan's rate. Payments are indexed annually to the CPI. Eligibility for WVA is determined by the wartime service of a Veteran or qualified civilian, age or health, income or residency.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other clients achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Summary of Results Achieved: Successfully met
($ millions) Actual Spending 2006-2007 Actual Spending 2007-2008 Planned Spending 2008-2009 Total Authorities 2008-2009 Actual Spending 2008-2009 Variance Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending 2008-2009
Pensions, Awards, Allowances for Disability and Death; and Financial Support            
Total Grants 18.5 16.4 16.2 16.2 14.6 1.6
Total Program Activity 18.5 16.4 16.2 16.2 14.6 1.6
Comment on Variance(s): The variance is due to a slightly lower than expected number of clients receiving benefits.
Audit completed or planned:  




Name of Transfer Payment Program: Veterans Independence Program
Start Date: 1981 End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Department's Veterans Independence Program is a national home care program that assists eligible clients to remain independent in their own homes or communities by offering a variety of programs and services, such as housekeeping, grounds maintenance, and personal care.
Strategic Outcome: Eligible Veterans and other clients achieve their optimum level of well-being through programs and services that support their care, treatment, independence, and re-establishment.
Summary of Results Achieved: Successfully met
($ millions) Actual Spending 2006-2007 Actual Spending 2007-2008 Planned Spending 2008-2009 Total Authorities 2008-2009 Actual Spending 2008-2009 Variance Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending 2008-2009
Health Care and Re-establishment Benefits and Services            
Total Contributions 286.7 303.2 325.4 332.3 320.0 5.4
Total Program Activity 286.7 303.2 325.4 332.3 320.0 5.4
Comment on Variance(s): The variance is due to lower than expected nursing home care expenditures, primarily due to changes in provincial coverage in New Brunswick.
Audit completed or planned:  




Name of Transfer Payment Program: Last Post Fund
Start Date: N/A End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Last Post Fund is a non-profit corporation which administers funeral, burial, and grave marking services for Veterans Affairs Canada. Canada Remembers provides eligible Veterans and civilians with a dignified funeral and burial through the Last Post Fund.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians remember and demonstrate their recognition of all those who served in Canada's efforts during war, military conflict and peace.
Summary of Results Achieved: Successfully met
($ millions) Actual Spending 2006-2007 Actual Spending 2007-2008 Planned Spending 2008-2009 Total Authorities 2008-2009 Actual Spending 2008-2009 Variance Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending 2008-2009
Remembrance Programming            
Total Grants 11.0 9.6 14.8 14.8 10.0 4.8
Total Program Activity 11.0 9.6 14.8 14.8 10.0 4.8
Comment on Variance(s): The variance is due to a lower number of payments for funeral and burial costs than provided for in reference levels.
Audit completed or planned:  




Name of Transfer Payment Program: Commonwealth War Graves Commission
Start Date: N/A End Date: Ongoing
Description: The Commonwealth War Graves Commission was established by Royal Charter in 1917. It's duties are to mark and maintain the graves of the members of the forces of the Commonwealth who were killed in the two World Wars, to build memorials to those who have no known grave and to keep records and registers of Canadian war dead. Canada Remembers maintains Canadian war graves and cemeteries through a partnership with the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians remember and demonstrate their recognition of all those who served in Canada's efforts during war, military conflict and peace.
Summary of Results Achieved: Successfully met
($ millions) Actual Spending 2006-2007 Actual Spending 2007-2008 Planned Spending 2008-2009 Total Authorities 2008-2009 Actual Spending 2008-2009 Variance Between Planned Spending and Actual Spending 2008-2009
Remembrance Programming            
Total Grants 8.8 9.2 8.6 8.9 8.6 -
Total Program Activity 8.8 9.2 8.6 8.9 8.6 -
Comment on Variance(s):  
Audit completed or planned:  

Top of Page

Western Economic Diversification Canada

Table 3: Details of Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Infrastructure Canada Program

Start date: October 10, 2000

End date: March 31, 2011

Description: This transfer payment program was designed to improve urban and rural community infrastructure in Canada.

Strategic Outcome: Economically viable communities in Western Canada with a high quality of life.

Results Achieved: Improve Canadians' quality of life through investments that enhance the quality of the environment, support long-term economic growth, and improve community infrastructure. Build a 21st century infrastructure through the use of technologies, new approaches and best practices.


Program Activity: Infrastructure
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $80,429 $30,659 $8,700 $13,632 $12,950 $- 4,250
Total Other types of transfer payments $80,429 $30,659 $8,700 $13,632 $12,950 $- 4,250

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance is due to the reprofiling of 2007/2008 funds through Supplementary Estimates (B)

Audit completed or planned: An audit of Infrastructure Programs covering the period April 01, 2006 to March 31, 2008, was completed in February 2009.

 

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Futures Program

Start date: May 1995

End date: October 2, 2010

Description: This transfer payment program was designed to promote economic development and diversification in Western Canada and advance the interests of Western Canada in national policy, program and project development and implementation.

Strategic Outcome: SO 1- A competitive and expanded business sector in Western Canada and a strengthened western Canadian innovation system.

SO 2 - Economically viable communities in Western Canada with a high quality of life.

Results Achieved: Strategic community planning: working with communities to assess local problems, establish objectives, plan and implement strategies to develop human, institutional and physical infrastructures, entrepreneurship, employment, and the economy.

Business Services: Delivering a range of business, counseling and information services to small- and medium-sized enterprises.

Access to capital: Provide capital to assist businesses or to help entrepreneurs to create new businesses.


Program Activity: Community Economic Planning, Development and Adjustment
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $12,950 $13,881 $13,948 $13,948 $18,508 $- 4,560
Total Community Economic Planning, Development and Adjustment $12,950 $13,881 $13,948 $13,948 $18,508 $- 4,560



Program Activity:
Business Development and Entrepreneurship
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $13,442 $14,429 $13,948 $13,948 $19,274 $- 5,326
Total Business Development and Entrepreneurship $13,442 $14,429 $13,948 $13,948 $19,274 $- 5,326
Total Program Activities $26,392 $28,310 $27,986 $27,986 $37,782 $-9,886

Comment(s) on Variance(s): WD invested at total of $10.0 M in the Community Futures Network Lending & Investment Pools in Alberta and British Columbia

 

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Western Diversification Program

Start date: 1987-1988

End date: On-going (program evaluation scheduled for 2011-2012)

Description: This program was designed to promote economic development and diversification in Western Canada and advance the interests of Western Canada in national policy, program and project development and implementation.

Strategic Outcome: SO 1- A competitive and expanded business sector in Western Canada and a strengthened western Canadian innovation system.

SO 2 - Economically viable communities in Western Canada with a high quality of life

SO 3 - Policies and programs that support the development of Western Canada

Results Achieved: - A strengthened western innovation system.

- An expanded business sector in Western Canada.

- Increased investment in strategic federal/regional economic development priorities that improves the viability, prosperity and quality of life in communities across Western Canada.

- A better understanding of Western Canada's needs, opportunities and aspirations inside and outside of the region leading to improved programs and services for western Canadians.


Program Activity: Collaboration and Coordination
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $73 $0 $115 $115 $0 $115
Total Collaboration and Coordination $73 $0 $115 $115 $0 $115



Program Activity:
Research and Analysis
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $472 $514 $578 $586 $923 $-345
Total Research and Analysis $472 $514 $578 $586 $923 $-345



Program Activity:
Advocacy
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Contributions $0 $20 $115 $115 $0 $115
Total Advocacy $0 $20 $115 $115 $0 $115



Program Activity:
Community Economic Planning, Development and Adjustment
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $15,000 $16,500 $1,475 $0 $0 $1,475
Total Contributions $71,144 $34,194 $46,101 $83,697 $41,774 $4,327
Total Community Economic Planning, Development and Adjustment $86,144 $50,694 $47,576 $83,697 $41,774 $5,802



Program Activity:
Business Development and Entrepreneurship
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $32,000 $2,000 $1,645 $0 $0 $1,645
Total Contributions $11,898 $19,747 $22,438 $24,252 $21,382 $1,056
Total Business Development and Entrepreneurship $43,898 $21,747 $24,083 $24,252 $21,382 $2,701



Program Activity:
Innovation
($ thousands)
  Actual
Spending
2006-07
Actual
Spending
2007-08
Planned
Spending
2008-09
Total
Authorities
2008-09
Actual
Spending
2008-09
Variance(s)
Total Grants $0 $0 $1,880 $0 $0 $1,880
Total Contributions $51,560 $63,439 $59,885 $78,801 $70,151 $-10,266
Total Innovation $51,560 $63,439 $61,765 $78,801 $70,151 $-8,386
Total Program Activities $182,147 $136,414 $134,232 $187,566 $134,230 $2

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Not applicable

Audit Completed or planned: An audit will be completed in 2009/2010.