Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Program Activity 1: Management Policy Development and Oversight


Trust and confidence in government is enhanced through the implementation of the Federal Accountability Act (FedAA) and supporting measures and through improved reporting to Parliament.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
Implementation of the FedAA is successfully coordinated under the leadership of the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (the Secretariat). Commitments of all government departments under the FedAA are well coordinated and targets are monitored.

The FedAA is substantially in force.

Work on the last two elements is complete, with an expected coming-into-force date of Q1 2008–09.

Additional commitments under the Federal Accountability Action Plan are completed or in progress.

Ongoing internal and external communications and activities are in place.

Increased transparency and oversight of government operations.
Leadership is provided by the Secretariat in implementing Secretariat elements of the FedAA. The Lobbying Act is brought into force and accompanying regulations are developed.

Consultations are completed and regulations pre-published in the Canada Gazette.

Work is completed to establish a Q1 2008–09 coming-into-force date for final regulations and statutory provisions.

Coordination with the Privy Council Office and the Office of the Registrar of Lobbyists for related work is ongoing.

The FedAA is implemented and departments are supported with updated policies and directives.
Guidance is developed and issued on the dispute resolution mechanisms for the accounting officer model.

Guidance is developed on how to settle disparate views on policy interpretation (expected Q1 2008–09).

Communications on initiatives flowing from the FedAA are coordinated across government and communicated online.

Fed AA amendments to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act are implemented.

The renewed Policy on Access to Information, the Policy on Privacy Protection and the Directive on the Social Insurance Number are expected to come into effect in Q1 2008–09.

Scoping and consultations on the regulation of criteria surrounding coverage of institutions under the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act was completed.

Reporting to Parliament is improved. A plan is developed for public reporting on planned spending and results at a whole-of-government level, i.e. linkages to the Whole-of-Government Framework.

The RPP Overview for Parliamentarians website was launched in March 2007 and a plan for enhancing the website in 2008 was approved.

An enhanced version of the RPP and DPR Overview websites, the Government of Canada Planning and Performance Gateway, was launched in March 2008.

Two new Treasury Board central votes were included in the 2007–08 Supplementary Estimates and in the 2008–09 Main Estimates.

Parliamentarians and Canadians have easy, online access to better reports on government expenditures and performance.
Parliamentarians are provided with a whole-of-government view of actual spending linked to results with the inclusion of spending information in Canada's Performance. Canada's Performance 2006–07, which was tabled in Parliament in November 2007, includes actual spending information.
In consultation with key stakeholders, the guidance and reporting requirements for reports on plans and priorities (RPP) and departmental performance reports (DPR) are streamlined.

Plans for streamlining reporting requirements were approved in July 2007.

The Performance Reporting: Good Practices Handbook was released in August 2007.

The RPPs of the four departments taking part in the Secretariat's concise reporting pilot project were tabled in Parliament in March 2008.

Preparations were made in 2007–08 for the implementation in 2008–09 of the Concise DPR pilot project.

Support is provided for the development of proposals for the implementation of accrual budgeting and appropriations. The President of the Treasury Board sent letters to the chairs of both Public Accounts and Government Operations and Estimates Committees detailing the implementation plan to extend accrual accounting to departmental budgeting and appropriations.
The form, content, and timeliness of Public Accounts continue to be improved. The Public Accounts report that was tabled in Parliament in October 2007 includes improved disclosure on environmental liabilities and public debt.


Responsibilities of deputy heads are clarified in accordance with the Federal Accountability Action Plan—streamlining rules while strengthening accountability and efficiency—through the renewal of the Treasury Board policy suite.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
The Treasury Board policy suite is streamlined and policies are renewed and implemented. The Treasury Board policy suite is streamlined, clear, and consistent, with a reduction in the number of policies by at least 50 per cent.

An additional 20 policy instruments were rescinded, bringing the total of rescinded policy instruments to 55.

The Policy on the Management of IT and the Policy on Information Management received Treasury Board approval and came into effect in July 2007.

Stewardship and management within the government is supported by clarified responsibilities and strengthened accountabilities.
Treasury Board policies relating to service, information management (IM) and information technology (IT), terms and conditions of employment, communications, and government security are renewed.

A draft Service Policy was developed and is targeted for approval by March 31, 2009.

Consultations on service agreements took place and are ongoing.

Based on policy changes following consultations with partner departments, the Guide to Internal Services is no longer required; instead a draft Profile of Internal Services was completed Q2.

Renewal of the Government Security Policy is delayed until 2008–09 due to additional work required, including the review of government-wide individual screening programs and the development of an IT Incident Management Plan in response to an independent panel.

Policies are supported by sound implementation plans as well as communications and training to support departments in meeting requirements.

Communications policy revisions and directives are in the final round of consultations—aiming for Q2 2008–09.

New products have been developed to help departments communicate new or renewed policies.

Renewed policies are developed and implementation plans put in place in response to the Federal Accountability Action Plan review of three key policy areas—grants and contributions, procurement, and financial management. Treasury Board approval of revised policies on grants and contributions is sought resulting from the recommendations of the Independent Blue Ribbon Panel.

A revised Treasury Board Policy on Transfer Payments is expected to be approved in Q1 2008–09, with an anticipated effective date of October 1, 2008.

The Directive on Transfer Payments was drafted. It is expected to be approved before October 1, 2008.

Responsibilities and accountabilities for ministers and deputy heads have been clarified.
Treasury Board approval of revised policies on procurement is sought, resulting from the recommendations of the Independent Procurement Review.

Extensive senior-level consultations have taken place regarding plans and progress to meet the operational prerequisites to implementation.

Treasury Board approval of the proposed policy will be sought in 2008.

The corresponding Procurement Administrative Directive (PAD) is currently being developed.

Treasury Board approval of revised financial management policies is sought, resulting from the recommendations of the Senior Committee on the Review of the Financial Management Framework.

A draft Policy on Financial Management Governance was developed and is targeted for approval by Q2 2008–09.

The remaining financial management policies are under review.

Policies are supported by sound implementation plans as well as communications and training to support departments in meeting requirements. All renewed policies were accompanied with implementation plans and communicated to departments in a timely manner.
Compliance with policies and legislation is strengthened through the development and implementation of a compliance framework. A compliance framework that includes consequences for non-compliance has been developed for consideration by Treasury Board ministers. A Framework for the Management of Compliance, including consequences for non-compliance, has been developed for consideration by Treasury Board ministers. Departments are adequately supported with respect to compliance management.
Mechanisms are established to monitor compliance and an appropriate range of measures is identified to address instances of poor management.

All renewed policies include a monitoring and reporting section and a generic range of consequences for non-compliance.

The Framework for the Management of Compliance has been drafted.

A broad approach to the management of compliance, including discipline, is supported by a committee of deputy ministers to ensure fair, equitable, and consistent practices. A Deputy Ministers Advisory Committee for the Management of Compliance was formed in April 2007 and held several meetings throughout 2007–08.


Management oversight is improved across government through the use of better tools, processes and information (e.g. the Management Accountability Framework).
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
Departmental management practices are enhanced through better understanding, ownership, and use of the Management Accountability Framework (MAF) by deputy ministers. Guidance and support are provided to departments and agencies to strengthen self-assessment and encourage the use of MAF findings in departmental decision making.

Departments and agencies received guidance on how to provide information in support of the assessments.

Stakeholder engagement throughout the MAF assessment process was improved.

Lessons-learned sessions were conducted, both internally and externally.

Government oversight of management performance has been enhanced.
Secretariat management oversight is strengthened through better processes and instruments for assessing management performance. The MAF indicators and the methodologies for measuring and rating departmental performance are further refined in collaboration with the Treasury Board portfolio agencies and departments.

An online MAF portal and database were launched.

A better suite of areas of management and lines of evidence were used for Round V of the MAF.

The government's ability to analyze departmental management performance is enhanced.
Secretariat analysis and advice on departmental and government-wide management performance is enhanced through the application of MAF findings. Proposals are developed for reporting the results of MAF assessments to ministers and central agencies in support of decision making and parliamentary reporting.

Fifty-four departments and agencies were assessed using the MAF.

MAF results were incorporated more systematically into advice to ministers in relation to expenditure decisions.

MAF results provided key input to the Privy Council Office's performance assessments of deputy ministers.

Departmental performance management information is improved.


Financial management and auditing policies, practices, and capacity across the Government of Canada are strengthened.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
Leadership is provided in improving departmental financial management practices in support of renewed policies. Directives, standards, and other guidance is developed and issued; implementation of policy changes is commenced in the areas of grants and contributions and financial management.

The revised Policy on Transfer Payments expects to be approved in Q1 2008–09 and its directives are being revised to reflect the Independent Blue Ribbon Panel's recommendations.

Approval of the draft Policy on Financial Management Governance is anticipated for July 2008.

Work is continuing on remaining financial management policies and directives and their implementation before the end of the year.

The revised Guide to Costing was issued in March 2008.

Readiness assessments were completed and action plans are underway to prepare the largest departments to be in a position to undergo a controls-reliant audit of their financial statements in the future.

Departmental efforts to improve their financial management practices are supported by improved human resources (HR) capacity and clear policy guidance.
Implementation of a comprehensive multi-year HR strategy for the financial management and internal audit communities is underway through the development of methodologies and tools that support enhanced professional capacity and community-based approaches.

Comprehensive HR frameworks for the financial management and internal audit communities have been completed and related HR strategies are being finalized.

Discussion with the Canada Public Service Agency about moving forward on the review of the Financial Administration (FI) and Internal Audit (IA) classification standards was held.

Classification issues analysis with IA community members has been conducted.

Development of the Competency Architecture and Dictionaries, Competency Profiles, and various tool kits as part of the Professional Development Program (PDP) Guide is in progress.

The development of a communications and engagement framework for the IA community was completed.

Departmental communications and consultations regarding new policy requirements and implementation issues are continuing.

Collective staffing initiatives have been undertaken by both FI and IA communities, in collaboration with the Public Service Commission of Canada, to address capacity issues.

Learning curricula are being developed in partnership with the Canada School of Public Service.

Internal audit plans, operations, and practices across government are enhanced. The Directive on Departmental Audit Committees is supported by leading the recruitment, qualification, selection, placement, and ongoing development of external members for departmental audit committees.

Treasury Board has appointed 48 individuals from outside the federal public administration to the audit committees of 18 departments.

Treasury Board's appointment process and instruments are approved.

The appointment of 49 members was accomplished on schedule.

An initiation workshop, tools, and instruments were delivered to chief audit executives of all departments.

Five sessions on "How Government Works" were delivered to new Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) members.

A change management advisor was engaged in July.

Capacity and clarity surrounding internal audit functions are strengthened.
  A program of horizontal audits of small and large departments and agencies is planned and initiated.

Reports on the first two horizontal audits are being readied for release.

Horizontal audits of Contracting Information Systems and Monitoring and Contracting for Professional and Technical Services have been launched.

The first risk-based Government-Wide Horizontal Internal Audit Plan has been completed and communicated.

Incremental funding allocations of about $30 million have been made to large departments and agencies to support compliance with the new requirements of the Policy on Internal Audit.

IA guidance documents have been developed.

A plan for and overview of the Comptroller General's Horizontal Audit Plan and priorities across departments has been released.

 
Technological and other enablers (e.g. an omnibus contracting arrangement) to leverage the internal audit resource base across government are developed.

Bids closed on the omnibus supply arrangement—over 100 proposals were received.

The bid evaluation process for eight separate service lines is complete.

Availability of the supply arrangement to departments is targeted for July 2008.

A performance measurement and assessment strategy for the Policy on Internal Audit is developed and implemented.

An IA performance measurement strategy was outlined with an emphasis placed on comprehensive MAF assessment criteria and results.

A business plan for internal audit practice inspections across government was completed.

The Taking Stock: Status at Oct. 2007 document was completed and distributed. Three studies have considered the status of policy implementation. An interim assessment of policy implementation is slated to commence summer 2008.

In response to reports of the Auditor General of Canada, guidance is developed and issued to audit committees on monitoring and reporting on departmental commitments.

The Guide for Departmental Audit Committees was released to chief audit executives and to new DAC members.

The Office of the Auditor General of Canada (OAG) provided additional specific guidance to chief audit executives on responsibilities (including reporting) for major follow-up exercises.

Investigation of opportunities for the automation of monitoring systems is occurring.

Horizontal professional practice inspection is planned to focus on monitoring and tracking systems.



Management performance is strengthened through the development of strategies and tools to support service transformation.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
Strategies are developed and implemented to address horizontal issues and improve alignment of service transformation initiatives. Forums are created to promote leadership of service transformation and facilitate the sharing of leading practices among deputy ministers (DM), assistant deputy ministers (ADM), and management communities.

Two interdepartmental ADM-level committees were created to bring a community of leaders of service transformation together to improve awareness of the variety of initiatives underway.

Two additional events were held to provide deputy ministers with the opportunity to share leadership insights and best practices regarding service transformation initiatives.

Leadership and performance management related to service transformation initiatives is strengthened.
A process is developed to enable senior officials to review, steer, align, and measure the progress of service transformation initiatives that are underway.

A reporting instrument was developed to monitor the progress of service transformation initiatives.

Analysis of the data collected by the progress-monitoring reporting instrument helped senior executives recognize specific obstacles that were common to several service transformation initiatives.

Labour relations and change management issues are identified and discussed with affected collective bargaining agents.

The ADMs responsible for Corporate Administrative Shared Services (CASS) and bargaining agents were regularly briefed.

Support and advice were provided to departments to address workforce issues related to transformation initiatives.

Secretariat leadership and collaboration from departments are provided to move forward with CASS. A detailed plan for the implementation of a proof of concept for CASS is developed and brought forward to Treasury Board for consideration.

There was continued leadership and support for back office renewal of the Government of Canada.

Acceptance and momentum with five early-adopter departments and key stakeholders were achieved through extensive dialogue, which included two deputy-level meetings, twice monthly ADM-level meetings, a two-day workshop to align major HR transformation initiatives with CASS, and various monthly committees and working groups.

An overall vision for corporate administrative renewal has been developed and is being launched through an initial project that is currently pending approval.

The Secretariat is better positioned to commence implementation of the CASS vision, starting with the HR business solution.
Leadership is provided on key Government of Canada initiatives to implement more effective approaches to technology, information, and service. Strategies are developed on whole-of-government approaches to identification, authentication, and authorization; personalized Web services; and inventory of direct external services. Awareness of the current status and potential for improved alignment of service transformation initiatives was enhanced through the engagement of senior officials in horizontal governance mechanisms. The Government of Canada's ability to meet the service expectations of Canadians is improved.
A detailed examination of linkages between employee engagement, service quality, and citizen satisfaction in the public service value chain is undertaken and results are reported.

A report, Finding Common Ground, summarizing research findings on what drives employee engagement in the public sector was produced. This research was used to examine questions on employee engagement.

Collaborative public sector research on service performance and client satisfaction was completed.

An intergovernmental Citizens First 5 survey was completed; publication is expected summer 2008.

Enhanced capacity is built and supported to enable effective management of technology, information, and service in the Government of Canada. A plan is developed to strengthen IM capacity in a manner that supports increased transparency of government operations and enables effective and efficient program and service delivery.

IM Problem and Definition was completed, including an initial report on the IM Initiatives Inventory in Q1.

GC Enterprise IM Framework was developed in Q2.

Gap analysis and ideal states were identified for each framework element completed in Q3.

Initiative selection for Year 1 activities to support the enterprise IM Strategy was completed.

GC IM Strategy and Action Plan were completed in Q4.

IM Internal Services Profile Summary was completed in Q4.

HR management within the IM and IT business areas is strengthened.
Services and products are created to support the growth and development of leadership and HR capacity in key service transformation communities.

Collective Staffing Initiative was completed in Q2.

Official transfer of the Organizational Readiness Office from Public Works and Government Services Canada to the Secretariat occurred in Q3.

Government-wide IM and IT Human Capacity Plan, IM Generics, and Standards for IM Competencies in GC were approved.

New intake for Leadership Development Program was completed in Q4.

The effectiveness of oversight of significant investments and projects in technology, information, and services is strengthened. Management expectations are clarified and guidance is strengthened in the oversight of IT, IM, and service transformation projects.

Working closely with program sectors through regular meetings, early interventions, and sharing of information ensured timely assessment of Treasury Board submissions and monitoring in excess of 22 major projects.

The Enhanced Management Framework Web presence was updated in Q2.

An analysis guide to improve Secretariat processes for reviewing departmental proposals for IT-enabled projects was developed in Q3.

There was continued renewal of project management policy guidance instruments for management of major IM- and IT-enabled initiatives in Q4, including development of such tools as the Business Case Standard and Guide as well as the Project Charter Standard and Guide.

Oversight of major Government of Canada IT projects and IT investment initiatives is improved.


Canada's regulatory management is improved through a modern approach to smart regulation.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
A strengthened, modern approach to regulating is implemented. An action plan on the implementation of a new directive on regulating is developed by the Secretariat for internal and external use.

The Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation (CDSR) Action Plan was developed for internal and external use and the supporting Treasury Board submission was approved.

The CDSR came into force in April 2007.

Regulatory processes are improved to increase efficiency while protecting the public interest.
Mechanisms for monitoring and reporting are developed.

A review of compliance with the CDSR in the first year of implementation was undertaken to establish a baseline for its performance measurement mechanisms.

Initial assessment of 48 medium- and high-impact proposals was undertaken between April and December 2007.

Areas where compliance can be strengthened were identified.
Support to regulatory departments for the implementation of the regulatory policy is improved. Guidance for the implementation of a new directive on regulating is developed.

The following four guides were developed to support the implementation of the CDSR:

1) Canadian Cost-Benefit Analysis Guide: Regulatory Proposals;

2) Assessing, Selecting, and Implementing Instruments for Government Action;

3) Guidelines on International Regulatory Obligations and Cooperation; and

4) Guidelines for Effective Regulatory Consultations.

The Centre of Regulatory Expertise (CORE) became operational in October 2007.

By March 2008, CORE had over 25 active files from 11 departments and agencies.

Departments are supported in developing their capacity to implement the CDSR.
A curriculum to strengthen the skills of the regulatory community is developed in collaboration with the Canada School of Public Service.

The following three courses were developed:

1. Introduction to Regulating;

2. Regulatory Performance Measurement and Evaluation; and

3. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Risk Analysis for Regulators.

The introductory course was attended by 195 people.

Regulatory cooperation is strengthened and coordinated. A strategy for the strengthening of regulatory cooperation and coordination among departments is proposed. An ADM Steering Committee was established to advise on and coordinate the implementation of the CDSR. International and interdepartmental regulatory coordination and cooperation is strengthened.
Expert advice is provided on national and international regulatory cooperation. A regulatory cooperation agreement was implemented with the US and Mexico (vehicle safety regulations for immobilizers were amended to enable acceptance of American vehicles) and another with the European Union.

Program Activity 2: Expenditure Management and Oversight


Better information and advice is provided to Cabinet and the Treasury Board on new and existing programs to support decision making on resource allocation.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
Treasury Board submission requirements are strengthened and support provided to the Privy Council Office to strengthen requirements for Memoranda to Cabinet to ensure they provide more detail and context to support resource allocation decisions. The Privy Council Office is supported in the development of proposals for strengthening the information content of Memoranda to Cabinet in conjunction with the requirements for Treasury Board submissions being strengthened to better support Cabinet review of new spending proposals.

The Secretariat provided comments on Cabinet documents, as required.

The updated Guide to Preparing Treasury Board Submissions has been online since July 2007 and has been updated as required.

Financial and program information content found in Cabinet proposals and used in strategic reviews is strengthened.
The requirements of the new Expenditure Management System regime are communicated to client departments and agencies.

All departments and agencies were briefed on strategic review requirements.

Departments and agencies involved in the 2007 and 2008 rounds of strategic reviews were briefed at the DM and corporate ADM levels.

The first round of systematic reviews of program spending is conducted. A process and methodology for strategic periodic reviews of program spending are developed, including the development of selection and sequencing criteria for reviews, the selection of candidates for review, and the launch of the first year of reviews.

The first round of strategic reviews has been completed.

The results of the first round of strategic reviews have been successfully communicated through Budget 2008.

Lessons-learned sessions were undertaken to inform the 2008 strategic review process and the terms of reference for strategic reviews.

Government priorities received increased funding from reallocations through the strategic reviews.
Advice to the Treasury Board on resource allocation is strengthened using improved financial and expenditure information as well as audit and evaluation information. The quality of financial, management, and program performance information in the Management, Resources, and Results Structure (MRRS) of departments is improved and made available.

The Secretariat launched the second phase of the MRRS Policy Implementation Plan in July 2007.

Performance measurement frameworks (PMF) have been developed for the vast majority of strategic outcomes and programs of the federal government.

Treasury Board decisions are better supported through improved expenditure and performance information.
Active oversight of evaluation reports is increased and the use of evaluation findings is enhanced to inform Treasury Board policy and expenditure management decision making.

There was continued review of departmental evaluation reports and refinement of assessment criteria.

Progressive implementation of an enhanced sign-off role in departments and the Office of the Comptroller General is commenced. Implementation of the enhanced sign-off role in departments was deferred to the new target date of Q2 2008–09 due to delays in the funding and approval of the new financial management policies.


Capacity is strengthened to provide clear and timely information on expenditures to support oversight and reporting.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
Secretariat capacity for oversight, analysis, and forecasting of expenditures is improved through the timely provision and consolidation of actual spending data. Use of administrative data systems is enhanced to track expenditures during the year to support the management of parliamentary authorities and better forecast year-end spending. Products delivered include the prototype Expenditure Monitor, lapse forecasts for budgets, and various related analytical products and briefing materials. The Government of Canada has access to more accurate expenditure forecasting information.
Data and methodologies to support a total compensation planning approach are improved.

Total compensation comparability studies (TCC) were conducted for four bargaining units; two more TCCs are planned for 2008–09.

Total compensation cost projections were improved to better reflect key assumptions affecting the future cost of various compensation components.

A strategic planning approach for National Joint Council (NJC) employee reimbursement policies is developed, including developing key principles for decision making.

A mandating process for the review of NJC directives has been established.

A first draft of principles has been developed, with consultations to follow in 2008–09.

A tracking tool was developed and is being further refined.

Costs related to the NJC reimbursement policies are now reflected as a pressure in the fall 2007 compensation plan.

Discussions with the NJC are expected to be completed by Q1 2008–09.

More detailed and reliable information is provided to parliamentarians and the public on government spending. Standards are developed for departmental financial analysis and communication of internal and external results.

The use of MAF to identify best practices is planned for the new target date of Q2 2008–09.

Information on new votes will be tabled in the Estimates in Q3 and Q4.

Parliamentarians and Canadians have access to better departmental expenditure information.
The development of tools, training, and guidance to support enhanced departmental financial analysis is ongoing. MAF assessment criteria are being used to communicate expectations to departments.


Results-based management is strengthened, and information on programs and spending is improved.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
The quality of program performance information is improved through Secretariat leadership in the implementation of the MRRS Policy. Departmental program activity architectures (PAA) reflecting all programs are developed in accordance with the MRRS Policy to provide a comprehensive inventory of the government's programs. PAAs for all organizations in the federal government subject to the MRRS Policy were approved by Treasury Board in May 2007.

Expenditure decisions are supported by enhanced performance monitoring and reporting information.

Client departments and agencies are supported in the development of their PAA and performance indicators. Through workshops, presentations, and awareness sessions, the Secretariat provided guidance and support to organizations as they developed their PAAs and PMFs.
Business requirements for the Budget Office Systems Renewal (BOSR) project are identified by users. Under the implementation of MRRS Policy, business requirements for the BOSR project have been identified and updated to reflect additional requirements.
Secretariat capacity to collect and analyze audit and evaluation information to support decision making is strengthened. Internal audit reporting requirements, strategies, and mechanisms are defined.

Key reporting requirements have been mapped.

A guide has been prepared to streamline internal audit reporting and to improve timeliness.

A departmental chief audit executive was identified as the champion for reporting practices.

Best practices were presented at a conference for chief audit executives.

An updated template was prepared to support assessments of audit reports prepared by departments.

An Internal Audit Report Registrar function is being established.

A prototype for an enhanced monitoring system will be operational in the near term.

Audit and evaluation information provided to parliamentarians is improved.
A registry of evaluation reports is maintained and the ability of the Secretariat to use evaluation information to inform decision making is enhanced.

A three-month backlog of information needing to be added to the audit and evaluation database, noted in the previous report, was eliminated in January 2008.



Strengthening the evaluation function is achieved.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
The Evaluation Policy is renewed and an implementation plan developed. The Evaluation Policy is renewed, along with its supporting directive and standards.

Stakeholder consultations on the Evaluation Policy were held to continue refining the policy and to build awareness among departmental evaluation officials of the objectives of the policy renewal process.

Work to align the policy with the overall Secretariat policy renewal framework continued.

Work on the renewed Evaluation Policy has been completed.
The Evaluation Implementation Action Plan is developed. Implementation options were developed to help inform decision making around the renewal of the policy.
Evaluation tools are developed and improved in support of broadened evaluation coverage. New evaluation standards and guidelines are established to support use of the new evaluation tools and implementation of the renewed Evaluation Policy. Testing and refinement, including a third-party review, of the value-for-money assessment tool continued. Departments are more aware of the potential requirements of the new Evaluation Policy and its implementation.
A new suite of evaluation approaches is introduced to support timelier and broader evaluation coverage and to tailor the chosen evaluation approach to an assessment of program risk. Development of guidance documents related to the renewed policy's implementation continued. This work involved stakeholder consultations on the suite of evaluation approaches, which resulted in a series of enhancements to those approaches. Their potential contribution to the policy's successful implementation has been clarified as a result.
New tools and other support are provided to improve competencies and increase capacity. Core evaluation competencies are developed in collaboration with stakeholders and delivery agents. A comprehensive list of core competencies for heads of evaluation and evaluators has been developed in consultation with evaluation stakeholders. The Secretariat is better positioned to support capacity building within the evaluation community in a manner that is consistent with its current resources.
A certification process is developed and a professional development program for government evaluators is launched. A scaled-back alternative is under development, with a target date of March 2011.

Program Activity 3: Corporate Strategy and Services


Corporate enabling strategies are developed and implemented within the Secretariat and across departments, consistent with the renewed role of the Treasury Board.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
Internal and interdepartmental engagement strategies are developed and implemented to support the Government of Canada Management Agenda. An action plan is developed and implemented within the Secretariat, focussed on key management initiatives and on new approaches to working with the Treasury Board, other departments, and central agencies.

The implementation of the internal strategy included the following:

1. Development of an employee engagement strategy;

2. Creation of a tool kit for managers;

3. Dialogue sessions with 1,000 employees from across 15 sectors;

4. The EX Conference of October 2007;

5. Creation of a page dedicated to Management Excellence on the Secretariat InfoSite;

6. Brown Bag Lunches with the Secretary; and

7. A successful Secretariat town hall meeting in February focussing on the change management agenda.

The Government of Canada Management Agenda is supported by internal and external awareness and engagement initiatives.
Learning strategies are developed and implemented in support of the action plan. Principles of the change agenda were embedded into all learning event presentations and materials.
Results of the action plan are communicated, and outreach plans are developed to support the engagement strategy.

A Speakers' Bureau was established; 14 presentations were initiated by the Secretariat since June and 15 email requests were received from departments.

Prototypes for a corporate look for the management agenda are being developed as well as supporting materials, such as a brochure.

Treasury Board operations are strengthened through implementation of new approaches and tools. The updated Guide to Preparing Treasury Board Submissions is posted on the Secretariat website. The Guide to Preparing Treasury Board Submissions was published in July 2007, was updated in September and December 2007, and will continue to be updated to ensure information remains current and accurate. Treasury Board decision making is facilitated by higher quality Treasury Board submissions and clearer internal Secretariat processes.
Internal processes to improve support to Treasury Board are updated to meet the requirements of a new directive on regulating.

Internal processes for improving support to Treasury Board were updated.

The implementation of the CDSR included a new Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement and a review of the triage framework.

A new triage approach was developed to support the CDSR.

The Secretariat Sustainable Development Strategy 2007–09 is implemented. Departmental progress contributes to the improved management of and accountability for sustainable development within the Government of Canada.

The Guide to Preparing Treasury Board Submissions was revised to include guidance on sustainable development.

The Secretariat is working with Environment Canada to revise the 2007–08 DPR guidance.

Departments are supported in the implementation and management of their sustainable development strategies.
The Secretariat contributes to the progress on federal priorities related to sustainable development.

A guide for fleet management, which provides a checklist for green fleet management, was posted in July 2007.

Departmental fleets are managed with sound environmental stewardship in accordance with the directives on fleet management.

The Annual Federal Fleet Workshop was chaired in October 2007.

The Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory provides current information on the progress custodians are making in addressing their contaminated sites.

Environmental stewardship of Secretariat operations is improved. An innovative program to compost pulverized paper to increase waste diversion from 53 per cent to 77.5 per cent was implemented.


Internal management practices continue to be improved in response to the Secretariat's MAF assessment and workplace surveys.
Performance Indicators Performance Measures Performance Summary Result
HR management is improved, with progress on an open and transparent process for staffing, strengthened linkages to Secretariat business planning, and implementation of an HR plan. An HR plan is completed in accordance with the Public Service Modernization Act. The HR plan was completed within prescribed timelines, posted on the Secretariat website, and communicated to all staff. HR capacity is improved to provide support to Secretariat leaders in organizational renewal and transformation. The Secretariat is better positioned to achieve its current and future business objectives.
A corporate resourcing and recruitment plan that is aligned with the Secretariat's business requirements is developed, implemented, and integrated within the business planning process. The HR plans of all sectors were analyzed and results and linkages with business plans were discussed with senior managers for integration in 2008–09 plans.
The Secretariat's career development programs for key communities are strengthened and expanded.

Secretariat learning and competency-based management programs were developed for ES and AS occupational categories.

An approach and tools for an EX-02 and EX-03 talent management program were developed.

Bilingualism continues to be strengthened, and public service values are promoted in the workplace.

Workshops on "Giving Shape to the Public Service Values at the Secretariat" were held in February and March.

A Values and Ethics Network and an Employment Equity and Diversity Advisory Committee were established.

Internal stewardship is improved, with a continued emphasis on improving financial reporting and strengthening IM Significant progress is made on the documentation of key controls to support control-based audit.

Phases 1 and 2 of the readiness assessment were completed and an action plan established.

Monitoring processes are being established to track progress on addressing the observations noted by Deloitte.

The Secretariat is well positioned to continue to strengthen its internal stewardship.
A risk-based audit plan and a risk-based evaluation plan are developed to identify the audits and evaluations that should take place over the planning period.

A Risk-Based Audit Plan was approved in June 2007.

A one-year evaluation plan was approved by the Management Infrastructure Committee on November 27, 2007.

A departmental IM policy is developed, and a pilot project is completed to support development of IM directives and standards.

A draft IM Policy and IM-IT Strategic Framework was developed by March 2008.

The Secretariat's IM pilot project has been put on hold; whether the project is needed will be re-examined in the context of the new strategic framework, once it is approved.

Continued progress is made on efforts to strengthen governance and strategic direction, which include the following: continued integration of strategic, HR, and business planning; the implementation of a corporate risk profile (CRP); and development of a PMF. Interim directives are developed based on the Information Technology Security Policy. Security standards and directives for network computers and for the protection of sensitive information have been developed. The Secretariat is better managed and therefore better able to deliver results to Canadians.
Secretariat strategic planning processes are further refined in accordance with the MRRS Policy and MAF expectations. The Secretariat participated in the RPP pilot project, which resulted in its 2008–09 RPP being much more concise and user-friendly and less bureaucratic. The RPP incorporated the Secretariat CRP and was based on the integrated sector business plans, which included HR planning as a key element.
A Secretariat CRP is used to support senior management discussions and to guide strategic and business planning.

A Secretariat CRP was developed, and it contributed to discussions on establishing Secretariat priorities and to the development of the 2008–09 RPP.

All sector business plans highlighted those aspects of the CRP that were of greatest concern.

The Secretariat PMF is developed in accordance with timelines established for all departments.

The PMF was developed and submitted, although its completion was delayed to Q4 2008–09 due to the complexity of the task.

Identifying appropriate performance measures for policy-based activities proved particularly challenging.