Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Correctional Service Canada


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

 SECTION 4  OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST

 4.1 Additional Data on Correctional Results

Complaints and Grievances

Upheld Inmate Health Care-Related Complaints and Grievances


  2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Complaints 268 226 248 252 271
Institutional Level Grievances 40 32 27 37 56
Regional Level Grievances 17 16 24 17 20
National Level Grievances 15 4 9 13 10
Institutional Flowthrough 18,534 18,624 19,040 19,569 20,021
Total 340 278 308 319 357
Rate 1.83% 1.49% 1.62% 1.63% 1.78%

Source: Corporate Reporting System (June 8, 2008). Institutional Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Upheld Accommodation-Related Complaints and Grievances


  2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Complaints 160 181 144 116 162
Institutional Level Grievances 11 20 9 18 24
Regional Level Grievances 3 1 6 9 8
National Level Grievances 2 1 1   1
Institutional Flowthrough 18,534 18,624 19,040 19,569 20,021
Total 176 203 160 143 195
Rate 0.95% 1.09% 0.84% 0.73% 0.97%

Source: Corporate Reporting System (June 8, 2008). Institutional Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Institutional Incidents

Major Institutional Incidents67


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Major Incidents year 142 89 100 112 112
3-year average 136 120 110 100 108
Institutional Flowthrough68 year 18,534 18,624 19,040 19,569 20,021
3-year average 18,567 18,582 18,733 19,078 19,543
Rate year 0.8% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6%
3-year average 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.6%

Source:  Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Source for Escapees:  Security Branch Institutional Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Staff Assaults (by Inmates)


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Staff Assaults year 283 240 289 284 214
3-year average 347 289 271 271 262
Institutional Staff69 year 11,151 11,114 10,913 12,153 11,841
3-year average 11,158 11,190 11,059 11,393 11,636
Rate year 2.5% 2.2% 2.6% 2.3% 1.8%
3-year average 3.1% 2.6% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). HRMS (March 31, 2008)

 

67 Details on major institutional incidents are presented in Section 2.1.1. Major Institutional Incidents include staff murders, inmate murders, hostage taking/forcible confinement, escapees from institutions or escorts, suicides, as well as any assaults on staff, assaults on inmates or inmate fights that result in a major injury.
68 "Institutional Flowthrough" refers to the number of offenders who spend at least one day during the fiscal year in an institution.
69 "Institutional Staff" reflects the number of CSC employees in institutions at a given point in the year. This number is thus a snapshot, rather than a flowthrough.

 

Inmate Assaults (by Inmates)


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Inmate Assaults year 446 445 537 538 497
3-year average 488 470 476 507 524
Institutional Flowthrough year 18,534 18,624 19,040 19,569 20,021
3-year average 18,567 18,582 18,733 19,078 19,543
Rate year 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.7% 2.5%
3-year average 2.6% 2.5% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Institutional Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Staff Injuries due to Assaults by Inmates


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Staff Injuries year 90 67 91 85 45
3-year average 91.3 82.3 82.7 81.0 73.7
Institutional Staff year 11,151 11,114 10,913 12,153 11,841
3-year average 11,158 11,190 11,059 11,393 11,636
Rate year 0.8% 0.6% 0.8% 0.7% 0.4%
3-year average 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). HRMS (March 31, 2008)

Inmate Injuries due to Assaults by Inmates


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Inmates Injuries year 423 435 492 498 496
3-year average 458 447 450 475 495
Institutional Flowthrough year 18,534 18,624 19,040 19,569 20,021
3-year average 18,567 18,582 18,733 19,078 19,543
Rate year 2.3% 2.3% 2.6% 2.5% 2.5%
3-year average 4.9% 4.8% 4.8% 5.0% 5.1%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Institutional Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Random Urinalysis Test
Positive Results


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Positive results year 765 728 764 857 828
3-year average 748 752 752 783 816
Samples tested year 5,733 5,932 6,350 6,876 6,290
3-year average 5,765 5,819 6,005 6,386 6,505
Rate year 13.3% 12.3% 12.0% 12.5% 13.2%
3-year average 13.0% 12.9% 12.5% 12.3% 12.6%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Random Urinalysis Test
Refusal Rate


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Refusals year 835 804 893 836 861
3-year average 917 856 844 844 863
Samples requested year 6,655 6,831 7,412 7,940 7,613
3-year average 6,778 6,769 6,966 7,394 7,655
Rate year 12.5% 11.8% 12.0% 10.5% 11.3%
3-year average 13.5% 12.6% 12.1% 11.4% 11.3%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Re-Offending Data

Section 1 presented summarized results of various measurement strategies on rates of violent and non-violent re-offending convictions during community supervision and post-sentence completion (2 years and 5 years). The following tables provide a comprehensive statistical account for the same period.

Under Supervision

Offenders charged while on Supervision70

    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Charges year 670 623 672 707 750
3-year average 616 643 655 667 710
Release Flowthrough year 16,376 16,158 16,144 16,354 16,358
3-year average 16,651 16,380 16,226 16,219 16,285
Rate year 4.1% 3.9% 4.2% 4.3% 4.6%
3-year average 3.7% 3.9% 4.0% 4.1% 4.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).
Re-Offending with Any Conviction while on Supervision71

    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Convictions year 1,163 1,095 1,108 1,091 1,146
3-year average 1,230 1,146 1,122 1,098 1,115
Release Flowthrough year 16,376 16,158 16,144 16,354 16,358
3-year average 16,651 16,380 16,226 16,219 16,285
Rate year 7.1% 6.8% 6.9% 6.7% 7.0%
3-year average 7.4% 7.0% 6.9% 6.8% 6.8%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).
Offenders charged while on Supervision72

    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Charges year 223 188 211 184 213
3-year average 200 204 207 194 203
Release Flowthrough year 16,376 16,158 16,144 16,354 16,358
3-year average 16,651 16,380 16,226 16,219 16,285
Rate year 1.4% 1.2% 1.3% 1.1% 1.3%
3-year average 1.2% 1.2% 1.3% 1.2% 1.2%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).
Re-Offending with a Violent Conviction while on Supervision73

    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Violent Convictions year 251 249 238 200 209
3-year average 262 250 246 229 216
Release Flowthrough year 16,376 16,158 16,144 16,354 16,358
3-year average 16,651 16,380 16,226 16,219 16,285
Rate year 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.2% 1.3%
3-year average 1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).
Re-Offending with Non-violent Conviction while on Supervision74

    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Non-violent Convictions year 912 846 870 891 937
3-year average 967 896 876 869 899
Release Flowthrough year 16,376 16,158 16,144 16,354 16,358
3-year average 16,651 16,380 16,226 16,219 16,285
Rate year 5.6% 5.2% 5.4% 5.4% 5.7%
3-year average 5.8% 5.5% 5.4% 5.4% 5.5%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Return to Federal Custody within 2 years75 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)

Return to Federal Custody with Violent Conviction within 2 years76 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


    01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission
for violent offence
year 217 232 224 267 265
3-year average 217 227 224 241 252
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 4,586 4,554 4,420 4,461 4,488
3-year average 4,475 4,557 4,520 4,478 4,456
Rate year 4.7% 5.1% 5.1% 6.0% 5.9%
3-year average 4.8% 5.0% 5.0% 5.4% 5.7%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

70 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
71 Ibid.
72 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
73 Ibid.
74 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
75 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
76 Ibid

 

Return to Federal Custody with Non-violent Conviction 2 years77 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


    01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission
for a non-violent offence
year 203 242 242 222 256
3-year average 196 214 229 235 240
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 4,586 4,554 4,420 4,461 4,488
3-year average 4,475 4,557 4,520 4,478 4,456
Rate year 4.4% 5.3% 5.5% 5.0% 5.7%
3-year average 4.4% 4.7% 5.1% 5.3% 5.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Return to Federal Custody within 5 years78 of Warrant Expiry
(End of Sentence)

Return to Federal Custody with Violent Conviction within 5 years79 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


    98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission
for violent offence
year 446 370 435 404 433
3-year average 451 421 417 403 424
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 4,443 4,306 4,532 4,586 4,554
3-year average 4,533 4,427 4,427 4,475 4,557
Rate year 10.0% 8.6% 9.6% 8.8% 9.5%
3-year average 9.9% 9.5% 9.4% 9.0% 9.3%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Return Federal Custody with Non-violent Conviction within 5 years80 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


    98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission for a non-violent offence year 347 340 366 387 427
3-year average 357 345 351 364 393
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 4,443 4,306 4,532 4,586 4,554
3-year average 4,533 4,427 4,427 4,475 4,557
Rate year 7.8% 7.9% 8.1% 8.4% 9.4%
3-year average 7.9% 7.8% 7.9% 8.1% 8.6%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Offenders: Comparative Data

The following tables present reintegration results for Aboriginal and for non-Aboriginal offenders during community supervision and post-sentence completion (Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence). Summary versions of these tables, showing the gap in results between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal offenders, appear in Section 1.6: Departmental Performance.

Under Supervision

Re-Offending with Any Conviction while on Supervision81


Aboriginal   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Convictions year 245 229 221 237 246
3-year average 249 238 232 229 235
Release Flowthrough year 2,452 2,478 2,561 2,640 2,633
3-year average 2,516 2,486 2,497 2,560 2,611
Rate year 10.0% 9.2% 8.6% 9.0% 9.3%
3-year average 9.9% 9.6% 9.3% 8.9% 9.0%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

 


Non-Aboriginal   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Convictions year 918 866 887 854 900
3-year average 981 908 890 869 880
Release Flowthrough year 13,924 13,680 13,583 13,714 13,725
3-year average 14,136 13,894 13,729 13,659 13,674
Rate year 6.6% 6.3% 6.5% 6.2% 6.6%
3-year average 6.9% 6.5% 6.5% 6.4% 6.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

 

77 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
78 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within five years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2002-2003).
79 Ibid.
80 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within five years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2002-2003).
81 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.

 

Re-Offending with Violent Convictions while on Supervision82


Aboriginal   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Violent Convictions year 50 60 60 49 44
3-year average 57 57 57 56 51
Release Flowthrough year 2,452 2,478 2,561 2,640 2,633
3-year average 2,516 2,486 2,497 2,560 2,611
Rate year 2.0% 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% 1.7%
3-year average 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.0%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

 


Non-Aboriginal   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Violent Convictions year 201 189 178 151 165
3-year average 206 193 189 173 165
Release Flowthrough year 13,924 13,680 13,583 13,714 13,725
3-year average 14,136 13,894 13,729 13,659 13,674
Rate year 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.1% 1.2%
3-year average 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Re-Offending with Non-violent Conviction while on Supervision83


Aboriginal   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Non-violent Convictions year 195 169 161 188 202
3-year average 192 181 175 173 184
Release Flowthrough year 2,452 2,478 2,561 2,640 2,633
3-year average 2,516 2,486 2,497 2,560 2,611
Rate year 8.0% 6.8% 6.3% 7.1% 7.7%
3-year average 7.6% 7.3% 7.0% 6.7% 7.0%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

 


Non-Aboriginal   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Non-violent Convictions year 717 677 709 703 735
3-year average 775 715 701 696 716
Release Flowthrough year 13,924 13,680 13,583 13,714 13,725
3-year average 14,136 13,894 13,729 13,659 13,674
Rate year 5.1% 4.9% 5.2% 5.1% 5.4%
3-year average 5.5% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 5.2%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Return to Federal Custody within 2 years84 of Warrant Expiry
(End of Sentence)

Return to Federal Custody for Any Conviction within 2 years85 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


Aboriginal   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for any type of offence year 69 97 98 113 113
3-year average 84 86 88 103 108
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 761 743 719 781 768
3-year average 747 762 741 748 756
Rate year 9.1% 13.1% 13.6% 14.5% 14.7%
3-year average 11.3% 11.3% 11.9% 13.7% 14.3%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Non-Aboriginal   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for any type of offence year 351 377 368 376 408
3-year average 329 355 365 374 384
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 3,825 3,811 3,701 3,680 3,720
3-year average 3,727 3,796 3,779 3,731 3,700
Rate year 9.2% 9.9% 9.9% 10.2% 11.0%
3-year average 8.8% 9.3% 9.7% 10.0% 10.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Return to Federal Custody for Violent Conviction within 2 years86 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


Aboriginal   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for a violent offence year 40 54 59 68 67
3-year average 50 52 51 60 65
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 761 743 719 781 768
3-year average 747 762 741 748 756
Rate year 5.3% 7.3% 8.2% 8.7% 8.7%
3-year average 6.7% 6.8% 6.9% 8.1% 8.5%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Non-Aboriginal   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for a violent offence year 177 178 165 199 198
3-year average 166 175 173 181 187
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 3,825 3,811 3,701 3,680 3,720
3-year average 3,727 3,796 3,779 3,731 3,700
Rate year 4.6% 4.7% 4.5% 5.4% 5.3%
3-year average 4.5% 4.6% 4.6% 4.8% 5.1%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

82 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
83 Ibid.
84 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
85 Ibid.
86 Ibid.

Return to Federal Custody for Non-violent Conviction within 2 years87 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


Aboriginal   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for a non-violent offence year 29 43 39 45 46
3-year average 34 35 37 42 43
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 761 743 719 781 768
3-year average 747 762 741 748 756
Rate year 3.8% 5.8% 5.4% 5.8% 6.0%
3-year average 4.5% 4.6% 5.0% 5.7% 5.7%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Non-Aboriginal   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for a non-violent offence year 174 199 203 177 210
3-year average 163 180 192 193 197
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 3,825 3,811 3,701 3,680 3,720
3-year average 3,727 3,796 3,779 3,731 3,700
Rate year 4.5% 5.2% 5.5% 4.8% 5.6%
3-year average 4.4% 4.7% 5.1% 5.2% 5.3%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Return to Custody within 5 years88 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)

Return to Federal Custody for Any Conviction within 5 years89 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


Aboriginal   98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission for any type of offence year 163 144 169 155 175
3-year average 151 149 159 156 166
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 712 700 781 761 743
3-year average 635 670 731 747 762
Rate year 22.9% 20.6% 21.6% 20.4% 23.6%
3-year average 23.8% 22.4% 21.7% 20.9% 21.9%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Non-Aboriginal   98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission
for any type of offence
year 630 566 632 636 685
3-year average 657 617 609 611 651
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 3,731 3,606 3,751 3,825 3,811
3-year average 3,898 3,757 3,696 3,727 3,796
Rate year 16.9% 15.7% 16.8% 16.6% 18.0%
3-year average 16.9% 16.4% 16.5% 16.4% 17.2%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Return to Federal Custody for Violent Conviction within 5 years90 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


Aboriginal   98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission
for violent offence
year 107 83 120 95 105
3-year average 101 95 103 99 107
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 712 700 781 761 743
3-year average 635 670 731 747 762
Rate year 15.0% 11.9% 15.4% 12.5% 14.1%
3-year average 16.0% 14.2% 14.1% 13.2% 14.0%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Non-Aboriginal   98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission
for violent offence
year 339 287 315 309 328
3-year average 350 326 314 304 317
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 3,731 3,606 3,751 3,825 3,811
3-year average 3,898 3,757 3,696 3,727 3,796
Rate year 9.1% 8.0% 8.4% 8.1% 8.6%
3-year average 9.0% 8.7% 8.5% 8.1% 8.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Return to Federal Custody for Non-violent Conviction within 5 years91 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


Aboriginal   98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission
for a non-violent offence
year 56 61 49 60 70
3-year average 50 55 55 57 60
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 712 700 781 761 743
3-year average 635 670 731 747 762
Rate year 7.9% 8.7% 6.3% 7.9% 9.4%
3-year average 7.8% 8.2% 7.6% 7.6% 7.9%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Non-Aboriginal   98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03
Re-Admission
for a non-violent offence
year 291 279 317 327 357
3-year average 308 290 296 308 334
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 3,731 3,606 3,751 3,825 3,811
3-year average 3,898 3,757 3,696 3,727 3,796
Rate year 7.8% 7.7% 8.5% 8.5% 9.4%
3-year average 7.9% 7.7% 8.0% 8.2% 8.8%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

87 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
88 Ibid.
89 Ibid.
90 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within five years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2002-2003).
91 Ibid.

 

Mental Health: Comparative Data

Under Supervision

Mental Health Cases
Revocation while on Supervision


    03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Revocations year 445 510 529 657 654
3-year average 388 445 495 565 613
Release Flowthrough year 695 806 936 1,069 1,114
3-year average 528 673 812 937 1,040
Rate year 64.0% 63.3% 56.5% 61.5% 58.7%
3-year average 76.1% 67.0% 61.3% 60.4% 58.9%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Mental Health Cases
Offenders charged while on Supervision92


    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Charges year 18 36 46 39 55
3-year average 22 28 33 40 47
Release Flowthrough year 517 695 806 936 1,069
3-year average 358 528 673 812 937
Rate year 3.5% 5.2% 5.7% 4.2% 5.1%
3-year average 7.3% 5.6% 4.8% 5.0% 5.0%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Mental Health Cases
Re-Offending with Any Conviction while on Supervision93


    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Convictions year 46 67 62 56 96
3-year average 56 57 58 62 71
Release Flowthrough year 517 695 806 936 1,069
3-year average 358 528 673 812 937
Rate year 8.9% 9.6% 7.7% 6.0% 9.0%
3-year average 19.7% 11.5% 8.7% 7.8% 7.6%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

Mental Health Cases
Offenders Charged with a Violent offence while on Supervision94


    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Charges year 7 12 14 14 16
3-year average 6 8 11 13 15
Release Flowthrough year 517 695 806 936 1,069
3-year average 358 528 673 812 937
Rate year 1.4% 1.7% 1.7% 1.5% 1.5%
3-year average 1.7% 1.6% 1.6% 1.7% 1.6%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

92 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
93 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
94 Ibid.

Mental Health Cases
Re-Offending with a Violent Conviction while on Supervision95


    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Violent Convictions year 9 15 10 13 28
3-year average 15 13 11 13 17
Release Flowthrough year 517 695 806 936 1,069
3-year average 358 528 673 812 937
Rate year 1.7% 2.2% 1.2% 1.4% 2.6%
3-year average 5.6% 2.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.7%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

Mental Health Cases
Re-Offending with a Non-Violent Conviction while on Supervision96


    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Violent Convictions year 37 52 52 43 68
3-year average 41 44 47 49 54
Release Flowthrough year 517 695 806 936 1,069
3-year average 358 528 673 812 937
Rate year 7.2% 7.4% 6.5% 4.6% 6.4%
3-year average 14.1% 8.8% 7.0% 6.2% 5.9%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Mental Health Cases
Non-Violent Offenders charged while on Supervision97


    02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
All Charges year 11 24 32 25 39
3-year average 16 20 22 27 32
Release Flowthrough year 517 695 806 936 1,069
3-year average 358 528 673 812 937
Rate year 2.1% 3.5% 4.0% 2.7% 3.6%
3-year average 5.6% 4.0% 3.2% 3.3% 3.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

Return to Federal Custody within 2 years98

Mental Health Cases
Return to Federal Custody with Violent Conviction within 2 years99 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


    01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission
for violent offence
year 14 14 24 17 35
3-year average 11 14 17 18 25
Offenders Reaching WED
for any type of offence
year 218 256 261 300 338
3-year average 189 218 245 272 300
Rate year 6.42% 5.47% 9.20% 5.67% 10.36%
3-year average 5.5% 6.6% 7.0% 6.8% 8.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Mental Health Cases
Return to Federal Custody with Non-Violent Conviction within 2 years100 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


    01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for non-violent offence year 4 14 11 18 22
3-year average 5 8 10 15 17
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 218 256 261 300 338
3-year average 189 218 245 272 300
Rate year 1.9% 5.4% 4.2% 6.0% 6.5%
3-year average 2.9% 3.3% 3.9% 5.2% 5.6%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

Mental Health Cases
Return to Federal Custody for New Offence within 2 Years101 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


    01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission year 18 28 35 35 57
3-year average 16 22 27 33 42
Offenders Reaching WED year 218 256 261 300 338
3-year average 189 218 245 272 300
Rate year 8.3% 10.9% 13.4% 11.7% 16.9%
3-year average 8.4% 9.9% 10.9% 12.0% 14.0%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

95 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
96 Ibid.
97 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.
98 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
99 Ibid.
100 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
101 Ibid.

Mental Health Cases
Return to Federal Custody for New Offence within 2 years102 of Warrant Expiry
 (End of Sentence)


Men   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission year 18 25 35 33 55
3-year average 15 20 26 31 41
Offenders Reaching WED year 197 237 244 280 310
3-year average 169 199 226 254 278
Rate year 9.1% 10.5% 14.3% 11.8% 17.7%
3-year average 9.0% 10.3% 11.3% 12.2% 14.6%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Women   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 04-05
Re-Admission year 0 3 0 2 2
3-year average 1 1 1 2 1
Offenders Reaching WED year 21 19 17 20 28
3-year average 20 19 19 19 22
Rate year 0.0% 15.8% 0.0% 10.0% 7.1%
3-year average 3.5% 7.2% 5.3% 8.6% 5.7%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

Men and Women Offenders: Comparative Data

The following tables present reintegration results for men and women offenders during community supervision and post-sentence completion Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence).

Under Supervision

Mental Health Cases
Revocation while on Supervision


Men   03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Revocations year 418 468 483 582 595
3-year average 357 412 456 511 553
Release Flowthrough year 640 725 825 946 980
3-year average 482 611 730 832 917
Rate year 65% 65% 59% 62% 61%
3-year average 77% 68% 63% 62% 60%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 8, 2007.

 


Women   03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Revocations year 27 42 46 75 59
3-year average 31 33 38 54 60
Release Flowthrough year 55 81 111 123 134
3-year average 46 61 82 105 123
Rate year 49% 52% 41% 61% 44%
3-year average 70% 54% 47% 51% 49%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

Re-Offending with Violent Convictions while on Supervision103


Men   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Violent Convictions year 246 245 235 195 207
3-year average 258 246 242 225 212
Release Flowthrough year 15,533 15,334 15,295 15,439 15,438
3-year average 15,796 15,540 15,387 15,356 15,391
Rate year 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.3% 1.3%
3-year average 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

 


Women   02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07
Violent Convictions year 5 4 3 5 2
3-year average 4 4 4 4 3
Release Flowthrough year 843 824 849 915 920
3-year average 855 841 839 863 895
Rate year 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.2%
3-year average 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008). Release Flowthrough as of April 13, 2008.

 

102 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
103 CSC has implemented a one-year delay in reporting new convictions for offenders in order to allow time for the judicial process. Reporting data at the end of each Fiscal Year would misrepresent the actual results since the courts would not have had the opportunity to process the charges.

Return to Federal Custody within 2 years104

Return to Federal Custody for Violent Offence within 2 years105 of Warrant Expiry (End of Sentence)


Men   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for a violent offence year 213 227 222 261 258
3-year average 213 222 221 237 247
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 4,347 4,310 4,179 4,269 4,248
3-year average 4,252 4,321 4,279 4,253 4,232
Rate year 4.9% 5.3% 5.3% 6.1% 6.1%
3-year average 5.0% 5.1% 5.2% 5.6% 5.8%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 


Women   01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Re-Admission for a violent offence year 4 5 2 6 7
3-year average 4 4 4 4 5
Offenders Reaching WED for any type of offence year 239 244 241 192 240
3-year average 222 236 241 226 224
Rate year 1.7% 2.0% 0.8% 3.1% 2.9%
3-year average 1.8% 1.8% 1.5% 2.0% 2.3%

Source: Offender Management System (April 13, 2008).

 

104 2007-2008 data indicating the number of federal offenders who have re-offended and been admitted to CSC custody within two years after reaching the end of their sentence (i.e. 2005-2006).
105 Ibid.

 

 4.2 Incident Investigations 

CSC’s investigations process includes national and local investigations of incidents and issues affecting its operations. Investigations into inmate deaths or serious bodily injury are convened under section 19 of the CCRA, at either the national or the local level. CSC’s Commissioner can also convene investigations under section 20 of the CCRA to report on any matter relating to the operations of CSC.

Other than investigations convened under section 19 and section 20 of the CCRA, the Director General, Incident Investigations and heads of operational units may convene investigations under Commissioner’s Directive 041, Incident Reports, to report on incidents and issues affecting CSC’s operations.

During Fiscal Year 2007-2008, CSC convened 89 national investigations, including 32 investigations convened under Section 20 of the CCRA, and 57 Tier II Investigations--either convened under Section 19 of the CCRA (death or serious bodily injury) or under paragraph 18 of Commissioner’s Directive 041.

Section 20 Investigations


Investigation Type Incident Type Total
Community Aggravated Sexual Assault 1
  Death 1
  Hostage Taking, Forcible Confinement, Assault with a Weapon etc. 1
  Murder 5
  Murder and Attempted Murder 1
  Offering an Indignity to a Body / Accessory to Murder 1
  Sexual Assault 1
  Kidnapping, Possession of Prohibited Weapon and Schedule 1 Substance. 1
  Attempted Murder, Sexual Assault and Robbery 1
  Multiple Drug and Weapons offences 1
  Sexual Assaults, Forcible Confinements, Robberies 1
Community Total   15
Institutional Allegations of Assault and Multiple Use of Force 1
  Assault and Forcible Confinement of a staff by Inmate 1
  Death 1
  Death and Serious Bodily Injuries 1
  Death Unknown Causes 1
  Hostage Taking 3
  Hostage Taking and Attempted Suicide 1
  Suicide 6
  Alleged Inappropriate Injections 2
  Major Disturbance and Inmate Injuries 1
Institutional Total   18
Institutional and Community Deaths by Natural Cause* 3
Institutional and Community Total   3
Grand Total   36

* 38 Deaths by Natural Cause were grouped into three Investigations

Tier II Investigations


Investigation Type Incident Type Total
Community Aggravated Assault 1
  Alleged Sexual Assault & Forcible Confinement 1
  Assault Causing Bodily Harm 1
  Attempted Murder 5
  Death 1
  Death by Overdose 1
  Death Unknown Cause 1
  Drug Trafficking 2
  Drug Trafficking and Weapons 1
  Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking 1
  Robbery 1
  Sexual Assault 6
  Sexual Assault, Sexual Interference and Invitation to Sexual Touching 1
  Suicide 3
  Uttering Threats to Cause Death or Harm 1
  Offender Death 1
Community Total   28
Institutional Assault on Inmate 9
  Attempted Murder 1
  Attempted Suicide 2
  Attempted Suicide / Self-Inflicted Injuries 1
  Death 1
  Death Overdose 1
  Death Unknown Cause 5
  Escape from ETA 1
  Medication Error 1
  Self-Inflicted Injuries 2
  Self-Injurious Behaviours 2
  Use of Force 1
  Overdose Interrupted / Attempted Suicide 1
Institutional Total   28
Grand Total   56

 

 4.3 Glossary

Aboriginal
First Nation, Métis or Inuit.

Aboriginal community
Aboriginal community is a First Nation, tribal council, band, community, organization or other group with a predominantly Aboriginal leadership.

Administrative segregation
Administrative segregation is confinement to keep the offender from associating with other inmates in order to maintain the security of the institution. Inmates may be segregated involuntarily or voluntarily.

Community Residential Facilities (CRF)
The Community Residential Facilities, commonly referred to as halfway houses, are operated by non-governmental organizations and private after-care agencies under contract with the Correctional Service of Canada. CRFs accommodate offenders who have been released to the community on Unescorted Temporary Absence, Day Parole, Full Parole, Work Release, Statutory Release, Statutory Release with Residency and those subject to Long-Term Supervision Orders.

Community Correctional Centres (CCC)
Community Correctional Centres are federally operated Community-based Residential Facilities that provide a structured living environment with 24 hour supervision, programs and interventions for the purpose of safely re-integrating offenders into the community. Like Community Residential Facilities, these facilities accommodate offenders who have been released to the community on Unescorted Temporary Absence, Day Parole, Full Parole, Work Release, Statutory Release, Statutory Release with Residency and those subject to Long-Term Supervision Orders.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act (CCRA)
The legislative framework governing Correctional Service Canada.

Conditional Release
Conditional release helps inmates make a gradual, supervised return to society while serving their sentence. Regardless of the type of conditional release, all offenders are supervised until their Warrant Expiry Date.

  • Temporary Absences (TAs)
    Temporary Absences may be granted to offenders for medical, administrative, community service, family contact, and personal development reasons.

    • Escorted temporary absence (ETA) may be granted at any time during the sentence.
    • Unescorted temporary absence (UTA) may be granted after an offender has served one-sixth of the sentence or six months, whichever is greater.
  • Work Release (WR)
    Work release allows an offender, classified as minimum or medium security and who is judged not to pose an undue risk, to do paid or voluntary work in the community under supervision.
  • Day Parole (DP)
    Day parole allows an offender to participate in community-based activities to prepare for release on full parole or statutory release.
  • Full Parole (FP)
    Inmates are normally eligible to be considered for full parole by the National Parole Board, after serving one-third of their sentence, or seven years, whichever is less.
  • Statutory Release (SR)
    By law, most offenders who are serving sentences of fixed length, and who have not been granted parole or had their parole revoked, must be released on statutory release after serving two-thirds of their sentence.

CORCAN
A Special Operating Agency (SOA) that employs federal offenders for its workforce and, in doing so, provides them with working skills and working habits necessary to compete in the workforce.


Correctional Programs
Correctional programs are designed to improve offenders’ current knowledge and skill level, improving the likelihood of successful reintegration into the community upon release.

Healing Lodge
These types of facilities may or may not be located on First Nations’ reservation land. There are two distinct types of Healing Lodges available to offenders under the care and custody of CSC.

A Section 81 Healing Lodge is an Aboriginal community based correctional facility where the community has entered into an agreement with the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada for the provision of correctional care and custody to Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal offenders. The second type is located on CSC property and run by CSC with the assistance of community Aboriginal people.

Ion scanner
An ion scanner is an electronic device that has the ability to detect residual amounts of particular drugs on personal items such as money or credit cards.

Long Term Supervision Order (LTSO)
A Long Term Supervision Order is an order imposed by the court. The offender who has received such an order is supervised in accordance with the CCRA. The Long Term Supervision Order commences when the offender has finished serving all sentences for offences for which he or she had been convicted. The period of supervision to which the offender is subject at any time must not total more than 10 years.

Maximum Security Institutions
House offenders who pose a serious risk to staff, other offenders and the community. The perimeter of a maximum-security institution is well defined, highly secure and controlled. Offender movement and association are strictly regulated and directly supervised.

Medium Security Institutions
House offenders who pose a risk to the safety of the community. The perimeter of a medium-security institution is well defined, secure and controlled. Offender movement and association is regulated and generally supervised.

Minimum Security Institutions
House offenders who pose a limited risk to the safety of the community. The perimeter of a minimum-security institution is defined but not directly controlled. Offender movement and association within the institution are regulated under minimal supervision.

Multi-level Institutions
House offenders of different security classifications in different secure areas of the institution.

Offender Management System (OMS)
The automated information system used by CSC as its main database for offender information.

Revocation
If parolees violate the conditions of their conditional release, or have been charged with a criminal offence, their conditional release (day parole, full parole) is suspended and they are re-incarcerated. Upon reviewing the case at a formal hearing, the National Parole Board may then decide to revoke parole and have the offender remain incarcerated. If the offender is not revoked, the conditional release is reinstated.

Sections 81/84 of CCRA
Section 81 enables CSC to enter into agreements with Aboriginal communities for the provision of correctional services to Aboriginal offenders. These agreements permit CSC, with the consent of the offender and the Aboriginal community, to transfer the care and custody of the offender to an Aboriginal community. Under Section 84 of the CCRA, CSC gives the Aboriginal community an opportunity to propose a plan for the inmate’s release to, and integration into, the Aboriginal community.

Security Classification
Each offender is reviewed initially on admission and then periodically throughout their sentence and is classified as a maximum, medium or minimum security risk and normally placed in an institution of the same classification. The security risk level is based on an assessment of factors related to public safety, escape risk and institutional adjustment.

Warrant Expiry Date (WED)
The date the sentence imposed by the courts officially ends.

 

 4.4 Further Information

Correctional Service of Canada Internet site: www.csc-scc.gc.ca

CSC Contacts:

Catherine Bélanger
Director
Integrated Strategic Business Planning
Performance Management
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0P9
Telephone:  (613) 947-6436
Facsimile: (613) 995-5064
Email: BelangerCAE@csc-scc.gc.ca

Bill Staubi
Director General
Performance Management
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0P9
Telephone:  (613) 992-8723
Facsimile: (613) 995-5064
Email: StaubiBH@csc-scc.gc.ca

Lynn Garrow
Assistant Commissioner
Performance Assurance
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0P9
Telephone:  (613) 996-1710
Facsimile: (613) 943-9292
Email: GarrowLY@csc-scc.gc.ca