This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
4. Start Date: 2003-04
5. End Date: 2016-17
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): $4.3 Billion[1]
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF), which received funding in the 2001 and 2003 federal budgets, is a cost-shared contribution program for strategic infrastructure projects. To date, funding has been approved to support 76 projects.
Investments are directed to projects of major national and regional significance and are to be made in areas that are vital to sustaining economic growth and supporting an enhanced quality of life for Canadians. The CSIF is delivered through negotiated agreements with provincial, territorial or local governments, private partners or non-governmental organizations. Contribution agreements are tailored based on the project requirements.
The Canada Strategic Infrastructure Act outlines the prime categories of investments in projects that involve fixed capital assets that are used or operated for the benefit of the public. The categories eligible under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund are:
8. Shared outcome(s):
The overall planned results Infrastructure Canada expects to achieve through CSIF are to invest in projects which:
9. Governance structure(s):
All CSIF projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. After project selection, Treasury Board approval is sought for each contribution. At the same time, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by the implementing departments/agencies are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
The fund is delivered in partnership involving primarily three sets of key collaborators:
10. Performance Highlights:
In order to provide funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians, key planning highlights under this program include:
11. Federal Partner: Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $158.2 | $11.7 |
Total: | $158.2 | $11.7 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and ACOA will continue to co-manage two projects currently underway in Newfoundland and Labrador.
11. Federal Partner: Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $144.2 | $14.2 |
Total: | $144.2 | $14.2 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec will continue to co-manage two projects currently underway in Quebec.
11. Federal Partner: Western Economic Diversification (WED)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $655.5 | $37.9 |
Total: | $655.5 | $37.9 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification will continue to co-manage three water and sewage treatment infrastructure projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Once completed, these projects will contribute to a cleaner environment while improving the quality of life of Canadians.
11. Federal Partner: Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $288.0 | $1.2 |
Total: | $288.0 | $1.2 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario) will continue to co-manage one water quality and access project forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Once completed, this project will contribute to liveable communities while improving the quality of life of Canadians.
11. Federal Partner: Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $41.1 | $29.2 |
Total: | $41.1 | $29.2 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) will continue to co-manage a water and sewage treatment infrastructure project in Nunavut and one northern infrastructure project in Yukon both forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Once completed, these projects will contribute to a cleaner environment and liveable communities while improving the quality of life of Canadians.
11. Federal Partner: Transport Canada
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $3,545.4 | $240.7 |
Total: | $3,545.4 | $240.7 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Transport Canada will continue to serve as the lead partner in the management of projects throughout the country that deal with highways and other major transportation infrastructure and is planning to complete 10 projects during the fiscal year 2012-2013 in Ontario, Québec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, the Northwest Territories and Newfoundland and Labrador. Once completed, these projects will contribute to a stronger economy and to liveable communities while improving the quality of life of Canadians.
Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (From Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2012-13 |
---|---|
$4,832.4 Million | $334.9 Million |
17. Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): Infrastructure Canada will continue to monitor three broadband projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013 contributing to a stronger economy in Nunavut and the Northwest Territories.
18. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Border Infrastructure Fund
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Border Infrastructure Fund
4. Start Date: 2003-04
5. End Date: 2015-16
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): $600 Million[2]
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF), which was announced in Budget 2001, is a cost-shared contribution program. It complements some of the Government of Canada’s other infrastructure programs such as the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program, a Transport Canada program.
As part of “Canada’s commitment to address land border pressures, such as traffic congestion, and to continue to facilitate the large volume of trade across the Canada-United States border”, BIF contributions are directed at or on routes leading to Canada’s border crossings, with a particular focus on the six largest:
The fund also directs some funding toward smaller and regionally important border crossings throughout Canada. Once completed, projects supported under BIF will help alleviate traffic congestion, increase system capacity and further the Smart Border Declaration (a Canada-US Declaration; see http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/anti-terrorism/declaration-en.asp).
8. Shared outcome(s):
The overall planned results expected to be achieved through BIF are investments in projects that contribute to safe and efficient border crossings. Expected outcomes are to alleviate border congestion and increase border crossing capacity and to increase security and safety at border crossings, leading to cross border trade efficiencies.
9. Governance structure(s):
All BIF projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults with other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. After project selection, public announcements are made by the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Treasury Board approval is sought for each contribution. At the same time, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by Transport Canada are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
The fund is delivered in partnership involving primarily three sets of key collaborators:
10. Planning Highlights:
In order to provide funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians, key planning highlights under this program include:
11. Federal Partner: Transport Canada
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $604.1 | $35.9 |
Total: | $604.1 | $35.9 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Transport Canada will continue to serve as the lead partner in the management of projects throughout the country that deal with highways and other major transportation infrastructure and is planning to complete one physical infrastructure project during the fiscal year 2012-2013 in Ontario.
Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (From Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2012-13 |
---|---|
$604.1 Million | $35.9 Million |
17. Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): n/a.
18. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund
2. Name of lead department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead department program activity: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund
4. Start date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2004-05
5. End date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2013-14
6. Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): $1.2 Billion[3]
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The $1.2 billion Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) has been structured to provide a balanced response to local infrastructure needs in urban and rural Canada and will ensure that all Canadians, whether they live in large, small or remote communities, will share in the benefits of infrastructure investments.
The fund improves and increases the stock of core public infrastructure in areas such as water, wastewater, culture, recreation. It targets communities of less than 250,000 residents as well as First Nation communities. Like other infrastructure programs, MRIF seeks to ensure that the projects it funds support the goals of the Government of Canada, encourages new and innovative approaches and favours partnerships, including an emphasis on ‘green’ projects which are sustainable and reduce greenhouse gases.
Through MRIF, the Government of Canada continues to work in productive partnerships with provinces, territories, and municipalities, as well as First Nations and the private sector to invest in local infrastructure projects. These projects will be vital to sustaining economic growth and supporting an enhanced quality of life in Canadian communities.
The fund is cost-shared with the Government of Canada contributing, on average, one-third of total project eligible costs. Provinces and municipalities contribute the remainder of these costs. In recognition of the unique circumstances of the First Nations and the Territories, where many communities have no tax base, the Government of Canada may contribute a higher percentage of total project eligible costs.
8. Shared outcome(s):
The overall expected outcomes are:
9. Governance structure(s):
The MRIF is based on a federal partnership arrangement between Infrastructure Canada and five federal partners: Western Economic Diversification, Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec, the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario, and the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency. It involves 14 sub-programs, one joint sub-program for each province and territory and a sub-program for First Nations communities. Each of the 14 sub-programs follows the same general conditions, priorities and approaches. Also, recognizing the individual nature of each sub-program, the various agreements reflect the nature of the partnership as it relates to the order of government.
To affect expected outcomes, MRIF eligible projects must conform to a policy leveraging framework, based on a common baseline, but adapted for each jurisdiction. To ensure broad support and effective, innovative project delivery, partnerships of various types, including public-private partnerships are encouraged in the formulation and delivery of the fund projects. The program relies on strong input from local and rural municipalities, including the support of the locally elected councils. In addition, municipal representatives are involved in the processes and management of the program in the respective province or territory.
10. Planning Highlights:
In order to provide funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians, key planning highlights under this program include:
11. Federal Partner: Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $143.4 | $0.5 |
Total: | $143.4 | $0.5 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency will continue to co-manage 65 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, 11 projects will contribute to a cleaner environment while an additional 54 projects will improve the liveability in communities in Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Over 70 percent of the federal contribution is committed to green projects.
11. Federal Partner: Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $241.8 | $72.9 |
Total: | $241.8 | $72.9 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec will continue to co-manage 76 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, 18 projects will contribute to a cleaner environment while additional 58 projects will improve the liveability in communities in Québec. Over 60 percent of the total federal contribution is committed to green projects.
11. Federal Partner: Western Economic Diversification (WED)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $286.3 | $3.6 |
Total: | $286.3 | $3.6 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Development will continue to co-manage 33 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, two projects will contribute to stronger economy, 11 projects will contribute to a cleaner environment and an additional 20 projects will improve the liveability in communities in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Over 55 percent of the total federal contribution is committed to green projects.
11. Federal Partner: Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $350.3 | $17.7 |
Total: | $350.3 | $17.7 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario will continue to co-manage 58 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, 22 projects will contribute to a cleaner environment while an additional 36 projects will improve the liveability in communities in Ontario. Over 70 percent of the total federal contribution is committed to green projects.
11. Federal Partner: Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. | $59.1 | $0.0 |
Total: | $59.1 | $0.0 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13): Infrastructure Canada and the Canadian Economic Development Agency (CanNor) will continue to co-manage 10 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, 5 projects will contribute to a cleaner environment and additional five will improve the liveability in communities in Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut. Almost 40 percent of the total federal contribution is committed to green projects.
Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (From Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2012-13 |
---|---|
$1,080.9 Million | $94.7 Million |
17. Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): n/a.
18. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Building Canada Fund
2. Name of lead department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead department program activity: Building Canada Fund
4. Start date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2007-08
5. End date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2016-17
6. Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): $8.8 Billion[4]
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The Building Canada Fund focuses on projects that deliver economic, environmental, and social benefits to Canadians.
The national priorities for funding are the core national highway system, drinking water, wastewater, public transit and green energy. Other eligible categories include projects that support economic growth and development (short-line rail and short-sea shipping, connectivity and broadband, tourism and regional and local airports), environmental projects (solid waste management and brownfield re-development), as well as projects that contribute to the ongoing development of safe and strong communities (disaster mitigation, culture, sport, recreation and local roads and bridges). Funding is used to support public infrastructure owned by provincial, territorial and municipal governments and entities, as well as the non-profit sector and private industry, in certain cases.
Funding is allocated for projects in the various provinces and territories based on their population (as of the 2006 Census). In the provinces, the program operates through two components: the Major Infrastructure Component and the Communities Component. In the territories, in recognition of their very low per capita allocations, their funding under the Building Canada Fund has been rolled into the Provincial-Territorial Base Funding Program and is managed under the terms of this latter program in each territory.
The Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) targets larger, strategic projects of national or regional significance. Under this component, at least two-thirds of national funding is to be directed to the above-mentioned national priorities. Projects under the Major Infrastructure Component are selected jointly through federal-provincial/territorial discussions with all projects required to meet minimum federal eligibility criteria.
The Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC) is focused on projects in communities with populations of less than 100,000. Projects are selected through an application-based process and, like projects under the Major Infrastructure Component, are evaluated on the extent to which they meet minimum federal eligibility criteria. This will significantly help smaller communities to address their infrastructure pressures, and serve as a complementary instrument to the Gas Tax Fund.
More information on the Building Canada Fund can be found at: http://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/prog/bcf-fcc-eng.html.
8. Shared outcome(s):
The expected outcomes are to deliver results that matter to Canadians, including cleaner air and water, safer roads and shorter commutes while supporting broad federal priorities of a stronger economy, cleaner environment and liveable communities.
9. Governance structure(s):
i. Major Infrastructure Component of the Building Canada Fund
All BCF-MIC projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities , and priorities are identified through discussions with provinces. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. Following due diligence, the Minister can approve projects under all project categories under the BCF delegated threshold ($100 million federal share). Treasury Board approval is required for contributions to any projects above the delegated threshold (i.e. $100 million federal contribution) or that require exemptions to program terms and conditions. At the same time, should they be required for transportation projects, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by Transport Canada are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
BCF-MIC is delivered in partnership involving primarily three sets of key collaborators:
ii. Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund
BCF-CC is governed by separate federal-provincial contribution agreements, each of which is managed by an Oversight Committee established by the Infrastructure Framework Committee that includes both federal and provincial senior officials. To support the operation of the Communities Component and Oversight Committees, each jurisdiction has a federal-provincial Joint Secretariat staffed by Federal Delivery Partners and provincial officials.
All project applications under BCF-CC are subject to a competitive application-based process. This process is administered by the Joint Secretariat, but a material role for the respective provincial municipal association (for those provinces that have municipal associations) may also have been established as part of the application review process. Allowing some implementation flexibility to the Joint Secretariats and Oversight Committees, all competitive processes issue calls for applications (either one open window for applications or multiple shorter windows with set closing dates). Some provinces may limit the number of applications per community within and/or across all intakes.
Joint Secretariats provide the first level of due diligence, including engineering, environmental, and legal review of the applications, and prepare briefing material for the Oversight Committees. The Oversight Committees review and rank the application against the mandatory and additional leveraging criteria established in the Policy Leveraging Framework of the Building Canada Fund. The Oversight Committee presents the recommended list of projects to the Minister or the Federal Delivery Partner Minister for consideration, in accordance with the delegations of authority. After consulting with other Ministers who have a mandate in the substantive project area, the Minister or the Federal Delivery Partner Minister provide feedback on the list of projects to the Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee then performs a final review of the list and makes a recommendation to the appropriate Minister, in accordance with the delegations of authority. Federal funding for projects is announced once final approval has been granted in writing.
The Framework Agreements stipulate that individual federal-provincial contribution agreements govern the Communities Component in each province, and that these agreements are managed by an Oversight Committee, established under the Infrastructure Framework Committee. Each Oversight Committee includes both federal and provincial senior officials and may also include representatives from provincial municipal associations (where applicable). The federal co-chair of the Oversight Committee is a senior official from Infrastructure Canada appointed by the Minister.
In the federal-provincial contribution agreement, the parties agreed to establish a Joint Secretariat to support the Oversight Committee and administer BCF-CC. This secretariat is staffed by officials from the provincial government and the Federal Delivery Partner.
10. Planning Highlights:
Under BCF-MIC:
In order to provide funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians, key planning highlights under this program include:
Under BCF-CC:
In order to provide funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians, key planning highlights under this program include:
11. Federal Partner: Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component | $155.5 | $30.4 |
Total: | $155.5 | $30.4 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13):
a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component: Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency will continue to co-manage 23 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, 10 projects will contribute to cleaner environment though waste water infrastructure and an additional 13 projects will improve the liveability in smaller communities in Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia through local road, recreation and water infrastructure.
11. Federal Partner: Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component | $422.6 | $72.3 |
Total: | $422.6 | $72.3 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13):
a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component: Infrastructure Canada and the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec will continue to co-manage four projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, two projects will contribute to cleaner environment though waste water infrastructure and an additional two projects will improve smaller communities in Québec through local road, recreation and water infrastructure.
11. Federal Partner: Transport Canada
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component | $3,739.6 | $1,014.4 |
Total: | $3,739.6 | $1,014.4 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13):
a. Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component: Transport Canada will continue to serve as the lead federal department in the management of contribution agreements for transportation projects under BCF-MIC. In its role, Transport Canada will continue to work with recipients to implement Contribution Agreements and to deliver program funding to recipients under the Terms and Conditions of the BCF-MIC. Transport Canada and Infrastructure Canada will continue to work together to review new transportation project priorities that are identified for funds remaining under the BCF-MIC, but Infrastructure Canada will be solely responsible for reviewing transit projects. In addition, Infrastructure Canada and Transport Canada will ensure that all selected projects meet the eligibility criteria of the BCF-MIC as set out in the program Terms and Conditions. Based on information available from project proponents, it is expected that over 15 projectswill be completed during fiscal year 2012-13
11. Federal Partner: Western Economic Diversification (WED)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component | $381.3 | $96.8 |
Total: | $381.3 | $96.8 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13):
a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component: Iinfrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification will continue to co-manage 62 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, 16 projects will contribute to cleaner environment though solid waste and waste water infrastructure and an additional 46 projects will improve smaller communities in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia through local road, disaster mitigation, culture, recreation and water infrastructure.
11. Federal Partner: Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario)
12. Federal Partner Program Activity | 13. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 14. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 15. Planned Spending for 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component | $379.2 | $50.0 |
Total: | $379.2 | $50.0 |
16. Expected results by program as per (13):
a. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component: Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario will continue to co-manage 20 projects forecasted to be completed during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Of these, 9 projects will contribute to cleaner environment though waste water infrastructure and an additional 11 projects will improve smaller communities in Ontario through local road, culture, recreation and water infrastructure.
Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (From Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2012-13 |
---|---|
$5,078.2 Million | $1,263.9 Million |
17. Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): n/a.
18. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
[1] Of the $4.3 billion originally allocated to the CSIF, approximately $50 million has been transferred to Parks Canada Agency to support a high priority infrastructure project. These funds were reallocated through Main Estimates prior to 2012-13. Column 14 of the table reflects the actual project funding delivered by federal delivery partners, under the CSIF terms and conditions, as well as their associated administrative costs.
[2] Of the $600 million originally allocated to the BIF), approximately $18 million has been transferred to Canada Border Services Agency for border projects. These funds were reallocated through Main Estimates prior to 2012-13. Column 14 of the table reflects the actual project funding delivered by federal delivery partners, under the BIF) terms and conditions, as well as their associated administrative costs.
Under the 2010 Strategic Review process, $10.4 million in unallocated funds from the Border Infrastructure Fund was identified for reallocation to other Government priorities. Prior to 2012-13, $5.2 million was removed from departmental reference levels through the 2011-12 Supplementary Estimates. An additional $5.2 million will be removed through the 2012-13 Main Estimates, subject to Parliamentary approval. No projects have been cancelled or otherwise affected as result of this reallocation.
While additional funding to support the G8 Summit (2010) was appropriated by Parliament through the Border Infrastructure Fund, it has been reported separately through the 2010-11 Departmental Performance Report since no border funding was used for G8 Summit-related projects.
[3] Under the 2010 Strategic Review process, $23 million in unallocated funds from MRIF was reallocated to other Government priorities. These funds were removed from departmental reference levels through 2011-12 Supplementary Estimates. No projects have been cancelled or otherwise affected as result of this reallocation. Column 14 of the table reflects the actual project funding delivered by federal delivery partners, under the MRIF terms and conditions, as well as their associated administrative costs.
[4] As a result of the 2010 Strategic Review, Infrastructure Canada is saving $5.4 million and $4.9 million on administration by delivering the BCF-CC and BCF-MIC respectively, more efficiently. These funds are being removed from the Fiscal Framework and made available for other Government of Canada priorities. The funding for projects remains unchanged. Column 14 of the table reflects the actual project funding delivered by federal delivery partners, under the BCF terms and conditions, as well as their associated administrative costs.