This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
In addition to the tables in this section, the following supplementary information tables can be found on the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat website or on the Office of the Auditor General website:
Auditor General—Spring Report
Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development
Report to the Board of Internal Economy of the House of Commons
Report to the Senate Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration
Reports to Northern Legislatures
Auditor General—Fall Report
Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development
Auditor General—Status Report (follow-up on previous audit work)
Reports to Northern Legislatures
The following tables summarize our targets and actual performance for 2010–11 and our targets for 2012–13 (Exhibits 10 and 11).
Objectives and indicators | 2010–11 Actual |
2010–11 Target |
2012–13 Target |
---|---|---|---|
Our work adds value for the key users of our reports | |||
Percentage of audit committee chairs who find our financial audits add value | 81% | 90% | 90% |
Percentage of parliamentary committee members who find our performance audits add value | n/a1 | 90% | 90% |
Percentage of board chairs who find our special examinations add value | n/a2 | 90% | 90% |
Our work adds value for the organizations we audit | |||
Percentage of Crown corporation and large-department senior managers who find our financial audits add value | 89% | 80% | 80% |
Percentage of departmental senior managers who find our performance audits add value | 74% | 70% | 70% |
Percentage of Crown corporation chief executive officers who find our special examinations add value | n/a2 | 80% | 80% |
Key users of our reports are engaged in the audit process | |||
Number of parliamentary hearings and briefings we participate in relative to the number of sitting days | 46 | Maintain or increase3 | Maintain or increase3 |
Percentage of performance audits reviewed by parliamentary committees | 62% | Maintain or increase3 | Maintain or increase3 |
Key users of our reports and the organizations we audit respond to our findings | |||
Percentage of reservations that are addressed from one financial audit to the next | 26%4 | 100% | 100% |
Our indicator for performance audit is under review5 | |||
Our indicator for special examinations is under review5 |
Objectives and indicators | 2010–11 Actual |
2010–11 Target |
2012–13 Target |
---|---|---|---|
Our work is completed on time | |||
Percentage of financial audits completed on time6 | |||
|
96% | 100% | 100% |
|
96% | 100% | 100% |
|
100% | 80% | 80% |
|
31% | 60% | 60% |
Percentage of performance audit reports completed by the planned tabling date, as published in the Report on Plans and Priorities | 92% | 90% | 90% |
Percentage of special examination reports delivered on or before the statutory deadline | 100% (4 of 4) |
100% | 100% |
Our work is completed on budget | |||
Percentage of audits completed on budget7 | |||
|
69% | 80% | 80% |
|
65% | 80% | 80% |
|
69% | 80% | 80% |
|
26% | 80% | 80% |
|
88% | 80% | 80% |
|
50% (2 of 4) |
80% | 80% |
Our audit reports are reliable | |||
Percentage of internal practice reviews that find the opinions and conclusions expressed in our audit reports are appropriate and supported by the evidence | 95% (18 of 19) |
100% | 100% |
External peer reviews find our System of Quality Control is suitably designed and operating effectively | Mostly8 | Yes | Yes |
We provide a respectful workplace | |||
Percentage of employees who believe the Office is an above-average place to work | 78%9 | 80% | 80% |
Percentage of management who meet our language requirements | |||
|
84% | 100% | 100% |
|
73% | 75% | 75% |
Percentage representation relative to workforce availability for | |||
|
116% | 100% | 100% |
|
106% | 100% | 100% |
|
105% | 100% | 100% |
|
86% | 100% | 100% |
Percentage retention of audit professionals | 89% | 90% | 90% |
1 Due to the federal election, no survey of parliamentarians was conducted in 2010–11. 2 Due to the small number of respondents, percentage results are not presented. The feedback we have received has been positive and consistent with our targets. 3 There is no numeric target for these indicators, since they depend on the number of days Parliament is sitting. Instead, the target is to maintain the percentage of parliamentary hearings and briefings we participate in, relative to the number of sitting days, and to maintain the percentage of audits reviewed by parliamentary committees. 4 In completing our financial audits in 2010–11, we found that 8 of the 31 reservations contained in our 2009–10 financial audit opinions had been addressed by the organizations we audited. Of the 23 reservations that were not addressed, 16 (70%) were violations related to Compliance with Authorities. 5 We are currently reviewing the indicators we use for measuring how the organizations we audit respond to our findings. For special examinations, our indicator has been the number of significant deficiencies identified in our examinations that are addressed by the audited corporation from one special examination to the next. Since the increase in the period between examinations has increased from 5 to 10 years, we are looking to identify a more timely indicator. For performance audits, our indicator has been the percentage of our recommendations that are implemented by the audited department. We are considering options for how we measure this indicator, to provide parliamentarians with the most reliable information available. 6 “On time” for financial audits means the statutory deadline where one exists (usually 90 days after year end), or 150 days after the year end where no statutory deadline exists. 7 “On budget” means that the actual hours to complete an audit did not exceed the budgeted hours by more than 15 percent. 8 Our most recent external peer review (2009–10) found that our System of Quality Control was suitably design and is overall operating effectively. 9 Our employee survey is conducted every two years. The percentage shown is from our most recent survey in 2010. |