Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Office of the Auditor General of Canada - Report


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Section III—Supplementary Information

Supplementary information tables

In addition to the tables in this section, the following supplementary information tables can be found on the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat website or on the Office of the Auditor General website:

  • Sources of respendable and non-respendable revenue
  • Internal audits planned for 2012–13 to 2014–15
  • Green Procurement

Planned reports for 2012–13

Reports to the House of Commons

Spring 2012

Auditor General—Spring Report

  • Border Controls on Commercial Imports
  • Replacing Canada’s Fighter Jets
  • Interest-Bearing Debt—Finance Canada
  • Non-Filers and Non-Registrants—Canada Revenue Agency
  • Oversight of Civil Aviation—Transport Canada
  • Special Examinations of Crown Corporations—2011

Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development

  • Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act
  • Meeting Canada’s 2020 Climate Change Commitments
  • Federal Contaminated Sites and Their Impacts

Report to the Board of Internal Economy of the House of Commons

  • Administration of the House of Commons

Report to the Senate Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration

  • Administration of the Senate

Reports to Northern Legislatures

  • Yukon—Status Report (June 2012)

Fall 2012

Auditor General—Fall Report

  • Grants and Contributions
  • Professional Service Contracts in the Public Service
  • Cyber Security Strategy
  • Military Infrastructure—National Defence
  • Transition of Ill and Injured Military Personnel to Civilian Life—Veterans Affairs Canada
  • Science and Technology Grants and Contributions—Industry Canada
  • Long Term Fiscal Sustainability—Finance Canada

Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development

  • Protecting Marine Biodiversity
  • Offshore Petroleum Boards
  • Financial Assurances for Environmental Risks
  • A Study of Federal Support to the Fossil Fuels sector
  • Environmental Petitions

Spring 2013

Auditor General—Status Report (follow-up on previous audit work)

  • Collections—Canada Revenue Agency
  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Programs
  • Public Safety and Anti-Terrorism Initiative
  • Protecting Government Information and Assets in Contracting

Reports to Northern Legislatures

  • Yukon—Capital Projects of the Yukon Hospital Corporation (February 2013)
  • Northwest Territories—Income Security Programs (March 2013)

Our performance indicators and measures

The following tables summarize our targets and actual performance for 2010–11 and our targets for 2012–13 (Exhibits 10 and 11).

Exhibit 10—Summary of our indicators of impact


Objectives and indicators 2010–11
Actual
2010–11
Target
2012–13
Target
Our work adds value for the key users of our reports
Percentage of audit committee chairs who find our financial audits add value 81% 90% 90%
Percentage of parliamentary committee members who find our performance audits add value n/a1 90% 90%
Percentage of board chairs who find our special examinations add value n/a2 90% 90%
Our work adds value for the organizations we audit
Percentage of Crown corporation and large-department senior managers who find our financial audits add value 89% 80% 80%
Percentage of departmental senior managers who find our performance audits add value 74% 70% 70%
Percentage of Crown corporation chief executive officers who find our special examinations add value n/a2 80% 80%
Key users of our reports are engaged in the audit process
Number of parliamentary hearings and briefings we participate in relative to the number of sitting days 46 Maintain or increase3 Maintain or increase3
Percentage of performance audits reviewed by parliamentary committees 62% Maintain or increase3 Maintain or increase3
Key users of our reports and the organizations we audit respond to our findings
Percentage of reservations that are addressed from one financial audit to the next 26%4 100% 100%
Our indicator for performance audit is under review5      
Our indicator for special examinations is under review5      

 

Exhibit 11—Summary of our organizational performance


Objectives and indicators 2010–11
Actual
2010–11
Target
2012–13
Target
Our work is completed on time
Percentage of financial audits completed on time6      
  • federal Crown corporations with statutory deadlines
96% 100% 100%
  • other federal organizations with statutory deadlines
96% 100% 100%
  • federal organizations with no statutory deadlines
100% 80% 80%
  • territorial organizations
31% 60% 60%
Percentage of performance audit reports completed by the planned tabling date, as published in the Report on Plans and Priorities 92% 90% 90%
Percentage of special examination reports delivered on or before the statutory deadline 100%
(4 of 4)
100% 100%
Our work is completed on budget
Percentage of audits completed on budget7      
  • Financial audits—federal Crown corporations
69% 80% 80%
  • Financial audits—other federal organizations with statutory deadlines
65% 80% 80%
  • Financial audits—federal organizations without statutory deadlines
69% 80% 80%
  • Financial audits—territorial organizations
26% 80% 80%
  • Performance audits
88% 80% 80%
  • Special examinations
50%
(2 of 4)
80% 80%
Our audit reports are reliable
Percentage of internal practice reviews that find the opinions and conclusions expressed in our audit reports are appropriate and supported by the evidence 95%
(18 of 19)
100% 100%
External peer reviews find our System of Quality Control is suitably designed and operating effectively Mostly8 Yes Yes
We provide a respectful workplace
Percentage of employees who believe the Office is an above-average place to work 78%9 80% 80%
Percentage of management who meet our language requirements
  • Assistant auditors general and principals as well as the Auditor General
84% 100% 100%
  • Directors in bilingual regions
73% 75% 75%
Percentage representation relative to workforce availability for
  • Women
116% 100% 100%
  • People with disabilities
106% 100% 100%
  • Aboriginal peoples
105% 100% 100%
  • Members of visible minorities
86% 100% 100%
Percentage retention of audit professionals 89% 90% 90%

1 Due to the federal election, no survey of parliamentarians was conducted in 2010–11.

2 Due to the small number of respondents, percentage results are not presented. The feedback we have received has been positive and consistent with our targets.

3 There is no numeric target for these indicators, since they depend on the number of days Parliament is sitting. Instead, the target is to maintain the percentage of parliamentary hearings and briefings we participate in, relative to the number of sitting days, and to maintain the percentage of audits reviewed by parliamentary committees.

4 In completing our financial audits in 2010–11, we found that 8 of the 31 reservations contained in our 2009–10 financial audit opinions had been addressed by the organizations we audited. Of the 23 reservations that were not addressed, 16 (70%) were violations related to Compliance with Authorities.

5 We are currently reviewing the indicators we use for measuring how the organizations we audit respond to our findings. For special examinations, our indicator has been the number of significant deficiencies identified in our examinations that are addressed by the audited corporation from one special examination to the next. Since the increase in the period between examinations has increased from 5 to 10 years, we are looking to identify a more timely indicator. For performance audits, our indicator has been the percentage of our recommendations that are implemented by the audited department. We are considering options for how we measure this indicator, to provide parliamentarians with the most reliable information available.

6 “On time” for financial audits means the statutory deadline where one exists (usually 90 days after year end), or 150 days after the year end where no statutory deadline exists.

7 “On budget” means that the actual hours to complete an audit did not exceed the budgeted hours by more than 15 percent.

8 Our most recent external peer review (2009–10) found that our System of Quality Control was suitably design and is overall operating effectively.

9 Our employee survey is conducted every two years. The percentage shown is from our most recent survey in 2010.