This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Performance Indicators | Targets |
---|---|
As part of a broader performance measurement strategy, performance indicators have been developed for the Commission and its Secretariat. | Implementation of the performance measurement strategy will need to coincide with the establishment of the Commission. |
Outcomes toward success will include: public recognition and confidence in public appointment systems; partner compliance with the principles and minimum standards established; widespread use of consistent documents and procedures geared to specific organizational needs; identification and widespread dissemination of best practices; application of procedures to provide for a wider range of applicants; and high quality reporting systems. | Ongoing work by the Secretariat includes conducting reviews of best practices for domestic and international jurisdictions, carrying out literature searches, conducting special studies and identifying gaps in existing selection processes, all of which assisted PCO officials in their ongoing reform efforts. Improvements since 2006 are documented in the Government’s Response to the House of Commons March 2009 Report on the Governor-in-Council Appointments Process. Progress noted in this regard included the enhancement of minimum selection standards, improved guidance and communication protocols, improved vacancy management and greater transparency through the development and continuous update of a centralized website to post vacancies and provide information on Governor-in-Council positions. |
Oversight of Governor-in-Council appointments program activities help to ensure that selection processes for Governor-in-Council appointments are fair and competency based.
Human Resources (FTEs) and Planned Spending (thousands of dollars) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011–12 | 2012–13 | 2013–14 | |||
FTEs | Planned Spending | FTEs | Planned Spending | FTEs | Planned Spending |
4 | 970 | 4 | 970 | 4 | 970 |
The financial information shown above reflects planned spending for a fully established Commission and a fully staffed Secretariat.
In 2011-12, the Secretariat will continue to ensure that the groundwork for the Commission is ever-ready, in order to support a quick start-up for the Commission in support of its mandate to provide excellence in Governor-in-Council appointments. Establishing good appointment processes will assist in identifying a range of people with the appropriate skills, knowledge and experience for consideration for Governor-in-Council appointments, which will help to ensure that high quality candidates are recommended to ministers for their review.
In 2011-12, the Secretariat will continue to engage in the following activities:
Planning Highlights
Program Activity 1 | Operational Priority |
---|---|
Oversight of Governor-in-Council appointments | Conducting research into domestic and international selection processes to identify trends and best practices |
Plans to meet this priority in 2011-12 | |
In 2011-12, the Secretariat’s research into domestic and international selection processes to identify trends and best practices will include:
|
Benefits for Canadians
Certainty and consistency in appointment policies help to ensure that appropriate practices and standards are followed during appointment processes. This, in turn, helps to ensure the effectiveness of the governing boards that direct and control government organizations. This approach underlines the Government’s commitment to public service values and, ultimately, contributes to well-managed and efficient government operations.
Internal services program activities support the effective and efficient delivery of activities under Program Activity 1.
Human Resources (FTEs) and Planned Spending (thousands of dollars) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011–12 | 2012–13 | 2013–14 | |||
FTEs | Planned Spending | FTEs | Planned Spending | FTEs | Planned Spending |
0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
The Public Appointments Commission Secretariat is limited in size. Nevertheless, the Secretariat must function as a department within the meaning of Schedule 1.1 of the Financial Administration Act. To this end, the Public Appointments Commission Secretariat has a Memorandum of Understanding with PCO’s Corporate Services Branch, which provides most of the administrative and financial services.
Planning Highlights
The Public Appointments Commission Secretariat engages in effective and efficient internal management practices to support the establishment of the Commission. Presently, the Secretariat operates with a Deputy Executive Director and an Administrative Assistant. The PCO Corporate Services Branch provides most of the administrative and financial services.
Program Activity 2 | Management Priority |
---|---|
Internal services | Internal management |
Plans to meet this priority in 2011-12 | |
|
Benefits for Canadians
In 2011-12, the Secretariat will continue to access the expertise of PCO as part of an effort to reduce operating costs.