We are currently moving our web services and information to Canada.ca.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat website will remain available until this move is complete.

Minister's Message

Tony Clement

Our government is committed to positioning Canada to exit the current downturn quickly and emerge stronger and more competitive in the global economy. In doing so, Industry Canada and its Portfolio partners will continue to play their key roles in increasing the country's capacity to create jobs and economic growth — for next year and the next decade.

While the recession originated beyond our borders, it had real consequences for Canadians and Canadian business. And despite improving conditions, there is work to be done. In 2010, a major focus will be completing the stimulus measures of Canada's Economic Action Plan (www.actionplan.gc.ca). Introduced in Budget 2009, the Plan's full effect will be felt in 2010–11, and its measures will help solidify the recovery.

Over this period, Industry Canada and its Portfolio partners will work with industries and sectors hit hardest by the recession. Initiatives will include activities to boost community economic development and to extend broadband infrastructure to underserved or unserved areas across the country. To build on the momentum gained through our past investments in science and technology, significant effort will be directed to shaping the knowledge-based economy.

Industry Canada will also focus on supporting business and industry to capitalize on emerging opportunities at home and abroad. Getting our economic frameworks right, through forward-looking policies, is central to ensuring Canada's place in the global marketplace. We remain committed to two-way trade and investment, which raises our capacity to create jobs and economic growth and provides for sustainable prosperity.

In 2010–11, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada will build a competitive advantage in priority science and technology areas by training an increasing number of graduates with the skills needed for today's economy, creating strategic partnerships with the private sector, and providing the best Canadian scientists and engineers with the resources that allow them to develop as leaders in the global research community.

I will work with my colleagues, the private sector and other governments to advance the recovery and build the foundation for a strong, competitive economy.

It is my pleasure to present this year's Report on Plans and Priorities for the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

 

Tony Clement
Minister of Industry


Section I – Overview

Raison d'ĂȘtre

The vision of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) is to make Canada a country of discoverers and innovators for the benefit of all Canadians. NSERC aims to maximize the value of public investments in research and development (R&D) and to advance prosperity and quality of life in Canada by supporting the creation and transfer of knowledge in the natural sciences and engineering (NSE) and by ensuring that people are trained to discover, develop and apply knowledge and technology.

NSERC Quick Facts: 2010-11

President: Dr. Suzanne Fortier

Chair: The Honourable James Edwards

Budget: $1.05 billion

Head Office: Ottawa, Ont.

Regional Offices:

  • Moncton, N.B.
  • Montreal, Que.
  • Winnipeg, Man.
  • Vancouver, B.C.
  • Mississauga, Ont.

Employees: 372 Full-time Equivalents (FTEs)

Reach:

  • 28,000 students and postdoctoral fellows
  • 12,000 university professors
  • 1,500 Canadian companies
  • over 90 universities and colleges

Responsibilities

NSERC is a departmental corporation of the Government of Canada and was created in 1978. It is funded directly by Parliament and reports to it through the Minister of Industry. NSERC's Council is composed of the President and up to 21 other distinguished members selected from the private and public sectors. The elected Vice-President is the Chair of Council and of its Executive Committee. The Council is advised on policy matters by various standing committees. The President of NSERC is the Chief Executive Officer. Funding decisions are approved by the President on the basis of recommendations made by peer review committees.

In fiscal year 2010-11, NSERC will invest over $1 billion in post-secondary research and training in the NSE. NSERC's budget represents 10 percent of the federal government's expenditures for science and technology (S&T), and 20 percent of all university R&D funding in the NSE.

Mandate

The functions of NSERC, based on the authority and responsibility assigned to it under the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Act (1976-1977, c.24), are to:

NSERC's Governance Structure


Governance Structure

(Text description of this image is available on a separate page.)

Strategic Outcomes

In order to achieve its mandate, NSERC works toward the following strategic outcomes:

  1. People: Highly skilled science and engineering professionals in Canada Building our human capital in the natural sciences and engineering by attracting and developing highly skilled science and engineering professionals.
  2. Discovery: High quality Canadian-based competitive research in the natural sciences and engineering Unleashing the power of our researchers to create knowledge and opportunities.
  3. Innovation: Productive use of new knowledge in the natural sciences and engineering Seizing strategic opportunities for our country and realizing the benefits of research in industry and society.

NSERC's focus on people, discovery and innovation maps directly onto the Federal S&T Strategy which emphasizes building a People Advantage, a Knowledge Advantage and an Entrepreneurial Advantage for Canada. All of NSERC's funding relates to these advantages.

Program Activity Architecture


Strategic Outcomes
People
Highly skilled science and engineering professionals in Canada
Discovery
High quality Canadian-based competitive research in the natural sciences and engineering
Innovation
Productive use of new knowledge in the natural sciences and engineering
Promote Science and Engineering Fund Basic Research Fund Research in Strategic Areas
Sub-Activities Sub-Activities Sub-Activities
  • PromoScience
  • Centres for Research in Youth, Science Teaching and Learning
  • Prizes
  • Discovery Grants
  • Special Research Opportunity Grants
  • General Support
  • Strategic Partnerships
  • Collaborative Health Research Projects1
Support Students and Fellows Support for Research Equipment and Major Resources Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships
Sub-Activities Sub-Activities Sub-Activities
  • Undergraduate Student Research Awards
  • NSERC Postgraduate Scholarships
  • Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarships1
  • Georges Philias Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships1
  • Postdoctoral Fellowships
  • Industrial Research and Development Fellowships
  • Industrial Research and Development Internships1
  • Collaborative Research and Training Experience
  • Research Tools and Instruments
  • Major Resources Support Grants
  • Collaborative Research and Development Grants
  • Research Partnership Agreements
  • Networks of Centres of Excellence1
  • Business-Led Networks of Centres of Excellence1
Attract and Retain Faculty   Support Commercialization
Sub-Activities   Sub-Activities
  • Canada Excellence Research Chairs1
  • Canada Research Chairs1
  • Industrial Research Chairs
  • Chairs in Targeted Areas of Research
  • University Faculty Awards
 
  • Idea to Innovation Program
  • College and Community Innovation Program1
  • Centres of Excellence for Commercialization and Research1

Planning Summary


Financial Resources ($ millions)2
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
$1,050.69 $1,036.35 $1,010.93


Human Resources (FTEs)
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
372 372 372


Strategic Outcome 1: People ─ Highly skilled science and engineering professionals in Canada
Performance Indicator Targets
Total researchers per thousand employed relative to other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries Maintain top 10 world ranking (Canada was eighth in 20053)
Program Activity4 ($millions) Forecast Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes5
2010-11 2012-12 2012-13
1.1 Promote Science and Engineering $6.59 $5.66 $5.54 $5.54 Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy
1.2 Support Students and Fellows $168.79 $166.08 $157.07 $143.78
1.3 Attract and Retain Faculty $165.21 $175.78 $177.55 $177.55
Total Planned Spending $347.52 $340.16 $326.87  


Strategic Outcome 2: Discovery - High quality Canadian-based competitive research in the natural sciences and engineering
Performance Indicator Targets
Average number of times that Canadian papers in the NSE are cited by other researchers (Average Relative Citation factor of Canadian publications in the NSE ― comparison with other countries) Maintain top eight world ranking (Canada was fifth among G8 countries in 20076)
   
Program Activity ($millions) Forecast Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes
2010-11 2012-12 2012-13
2.1 Fund Basic Research $364.98 $356.43 $352.84 $351.94 Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy
2.2  Support for Research Equipment and Major Resources $40.11 $38.49 $36.53 $26.08
Total Planned Spending $394.92 $389.37 $378.02  


Strategic Outcome 3: Innovation - Productive use of new knowledge in the natural sciences and engineering
Performance Indicator Targets
Percentage growth in the number of partner companies annually Greater than five percent per year
Program Activity ($millions) Forecast Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes
2010-11 2012-12 2012-13
3.1 Fund Research in Strategic Areas $124.22 $134.00 $135.60 $135.52 Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy
3.2 Fund University-Industry-Government Partnerships $110.44 $107.57 $104.87 $104.65
3.3 Support Commercialization $44.47 $40.60 $40.79 $41.45
Total Planned Spending $282.17 $281.26 $281.62  

 

Strategic Outcome 4: Internal Services
Program Activity ($millions) Forecast Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes
2010-11 2012-12 2012-13
4.1 Internal Services7 $28.61 $26.08 $25.56 $24.42  

Contribution of Priorities to Strategic Outcome(s)


Operational Priorities
Priority 1. People Advantage: Inspire new generations of students to pursue careers in science and engineering, and provide them with the means to develop their full potential.
Type Ongoing Links to Strategic Outcomes 1.0 People
Why this is a priority
  • To build a stronger culture of science and innovation in our country and to encourage young people to study science and engineering, a need identified in the Federal S&T Strategy;
  • To ensure Canada has a supply of highly qualified people (HQP) by supporting university students and fellows during their training in research and by providing them with opportunities to develop professional, job-ready skills and to experience enriched and varied research environments; and
  • To position Canada as a destination of choice for top foreign students and researchers as many foreign students will elect to stay in Canada at the end of their studies.
Plans for meeting the priority
  • Identify opportunities to streamline and integrate the delivery of the Canada Graduate Scholarships (CGS) with SSHRC and CIHR; (New)
  • Make efforts to increase available support for postdoctoral fellows to attract the world's top talent to conduct research in Canada, for example, through the Collaborative Research and Training Experience (CREATE) program or the Discovery Accelerator Supplements; (New)
  • Partner with the National Research Council Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP) to create opportunities to place more Industrial Research and Development Fellowships (IRDF) candidates with Canadian small and medium enterprises (SMEs); (New)
  • Review NSERC's suite of scholarship and fellowship programs to ensure optimal results in relation to the evolving environment; (New)
  • Enable more students to gain research experience in industry while undertaking advanced studies in Canada; (Ongoing with new elements) and
  • Implement the strategies of Budget 2009 (Canada's Economic Action Plan) to further develop a highly skilled workforce by promoting the training of highly qualified personnel to meet the needs of Canada's knowledge-based economy. (Ongoing with new elements)
Priority 2. Knowledge Advantage: Fuel the advancement of knowledge in science and engineering and ensure that Canadian scientists and engineers can be leaders and key players in a global knowledge economy.
Type Ongoing Links to Strategic Outcomes 1.0 People
2.0 Discovery
Why this is a priority
  • To ensure that Canada strives for excellence in developing and maintaining the capacity to conduct world-class research in the broad areas of NSE;
  • To seed creativity that will become future innovation; and
  • To capitalize on benefits arising from Canadians leading or participating in international collaborations.
Plans for meeting the priority
  • Raise the bar of excellence and creativity by increasing the competitiveness of the Discovery Grants (DG) program to provide the opportunity for significant increases for those with superior proposals; (New)
  • Fully implement the new peer review structure by replacing the 28 grant selection committees with 12 broader Evaluation Groups to reflect the evolving research environment (e.g. multidisciplinary research); (Previously committed to, with new elements)
  • Continue to implement the expansion of the Discovery Accelerator Supplements (DAS) for researchers who can capitalize on research breakthroughs, particularly in the priority areas identified in the Federal S&T Strategy; (Previously committed to) and
  • Enable new faculty with high research potential to firmly launch their research programs and realize their creative potential as competitive contributors to Canada's research, research training and innovation base.
Priority 3. Entrepreneurial Advantage: Connect and apply the strength of the academic research system to addressing the opportunities and challenges of building prosperity for Canada.
Type Ongoing Links to Strategic Outcomes 3.0 Innovation
Why this is a priority
  • To stimulate business investment in R&D in Canada. Business investment in R&D in Canada is low relative to other OECD countries with the majority of private sector R&D investment in Canada being concentrated in a small number of very large companies.
  • To enable innovation to enhance the productivity of Canadian industry. Canadian industry has a productivity gap with other leading nations, one that can partly be addressed through innovation8.
  • To connect Canada's research strength to industry to promote innovation and prosperity in Canada. Canada ranks first in the G8 for R&D performed in the higher-education sector as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)9. Innovation and prosperity in Canada can be enhanced by more effectively connecting this research strength to industry, particularly in areas of strategic importance.
Plans for meeting the priority
  • Implement NSERC's Strategy for Partnerships and Innovation (SPI)10 as follows: (New)
    • Build sustainable relationships by facilitating interactions between industry and post-secondary researchers to create a strong foundation for future collaborations; (Ongoing, with new elements)
    • Streamline NSERC's existing innovation-oriented policies and programs to increase the success of academic-industry collaborations and their productivity; and develop new approaches to ease business access to the expertise and specialized facilities within colleges and universities; (Ongoing, with new elements)
    • Connect people and skills by advancing "innovation skills" in students and making it more attractive for innovating companies, particularly small companies, to involve students in their business and hire graduates; (Ongoing, with new elements)
    • Focus on national priorities by supporting large-scale research groups seizing exceptional opportunities to advance solutions to some of Canada's most challenging economic, environmental and societal problems; (New)
    • Focus NSERC's five regional offices on facilitating industry-academic partnerships; (New)
  • Continue to implement the industry-driven strategies addressed in Budget 2008 aimed at the following sectors: automotive, manufacturing, forestry, and fisheries; explore means to increase and sustain existing partnerships across all sectors during the current economic situation; (Previously committed to) and
  • Continue to increase the number of partnerships in priority areas identified in the Federal S&T Strategy: environment, energy, health and related life science technologies, and information and communication technology (ICT).


Management Priorities
Demonstrate NSERC's accountability and how the results of its investments in Canadian research and training benefit Canadians.
Type Ongoing Links to Strategic Outcomes 1.0 People
2.0 Discovery
3.0 Innovation
Why this is a priority
  • To demonstrate accountability and stewardship in the management of Canada's investments in S&T;
  • To increase effectiveness and client service; and
  • To measure the results and impacts of the government's investments.
Plans for meeting the priority
  • Continue to develop NSERC-Stats, NSERC's new system to track investments including those in priority areas, present an integrated picture of Canada's investments in postsecondary R&D and measure Canada's performance in relation to international benchmarks; (New)
  • Ensure compliance with all new policies and frameworks (i.e., Internal Audit, Evaluation, Management Accountability Framework [MAF], Policy on Transfer Payments);
  • With SSHRC and CIHR, revise the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Integrity in Research and Scholarship (TCPS-I) in consultation with universities and colleges; (New) and
  • With CIHR, SSHRC and CFI, work to improve reporting and integrated measurement of results and impacts of investments in post-secondary research and advanced training. (Previously committed to)
Priority 5. Increase visibility of Canadian research
Type Ongoing Links to Strategic Outcomes 1.0 People
2.0 Discovery
3.0 Innovation
Why this is a priority
  • To demonstrate value of federal government investment in science and technology to Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and to demonstrate to industry that there is value in partnering with federally supported researchers to achieve mutually beneficial objectives.
Plans for meeting the priority
  • Showcase the science and engineering community to KOLs, including federal government decision makers, key media, industry partners and influential business leaders; (New)
  • Increase Canada's awareness of groundbreaking research partnerships that fuel Canada's knowledge-based economy; (Previously committed to, with new elements) and
  • Launch e-Bulletin to increase awareness in industry about benefits of collaborating with academia. (New)

Risk Analysis

NSERC's strategic and operational priorities are managed and are monitored according to NSERC's integrated Management and Accountability Framework (MAF) and Risk-based Audit Framework (RBAF). In the development of the MAF-RBAF, a number of different types of risks were identified and four risks are considered significant. These four significant risks, which may impact NSERC's plans and priorities over the reporting period, are summarized below:

Risk Mitigation
Ability to meet the needs for support,  remain relevant and implement strategic decisions that align with the evolving context. NSERC ensures the relevance of its activities and investments by aligning very closely with the priorities of the Federal S&T Strategy.  NSERC actively consults stakeholders through various governance and advisory committees. NSERC conducts reviews, surveys and consultations to keep abreast of issues, opportunities and challenges and to ensure the continued effectiveness of its progress. For example, NSERC's Strategy for Partnerships and Innovation (SPI) was developed after extensive consultations with hundreds of representatives of industry, government and academia. An advisory committee of leaders from these sectors was mobilized to help develop the Strategy based on what we learned from the consultations.
Ability of the peer review process to operate efficiently and effectively. NSERC's funding decisions are informed by a rigorous peer review process to foster excellence and ensure that the research supported is gauged against the highest international standards. The blue-ribbon committee that conducted the International Review of the Discovery Grants Program concluded that the program “is an unusually effective and efficient method of research support, particularly in the Canadian context.” As recommended, NSERC implemented changes to its peer review of Discovery Grants to ensure emphasis on merit and impact of contribution to research and to training of highly qualified people. This has enabled a more dynamic system that raised the bar of excellence.
Ability to ensure integrity in research. NSERC grant recipients must abide by the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS) which outlines guidelines for the ethics of research involving humans. In order to be eligible for NSERC support, institutions must develop an institutional human research ethics policy and institutional guidelines and procedures to review the ethics of research involving humans that, as a minimum, meets the requirements set out in the TCPS. Institutions may release research funds to researchers only after an Institutional Research Ethics Board (REB) has approved the research.11 Reflecting the agencies' commitment to make the TCPS a “living” document, in 2001 NSERC, together with SSHRC and CIHR, created the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics (PRE or the Panel), to provide independent, multidisciplinary advice on the evolution and use (interpretation, education, and implementation) of the TCPS. NSERC, together with SSHRC and CIHR, conducted a review of the TCPS policy framework and process, and identified improvements that can be made.12 The second edition of TCPS will be released in the fall of 2010. NSERC will be implementing these improvements over the coming year. 
The capability of NSERC to ensure that the administration of its programs operates efficiently. NSERC is currently making progress in developing the Enterprise Awards Management System (EAMS) to better manage the applications and awards process, and eventually replace a paper-based system. In addition NSERC, together with SSHRC and CIHR, have a Memorandum of Understanding with the institutions that administer funds from the federal granting agencies on behalf of researchers, to ensure that the funds entrusted to NSERC are well managed and are used effectively, economically and in the best interest of the research supported by the award.  

NSERC continues to assess and update its risk profiles to ensure that they remain relevant. Periodic reviews are fundamental to ensure that the risk assessment process is adequately robust in highlighting key risk areas.

In addition, NSERC experiences risks related to the current economic situation that are integral to all of its programs and that could influence plans, priorities, performance and decision making over the three-year reporting period. For example, the reduced capacity of Canadian industry to engage in R&D in times of economic uncertainty may compromise NSERC's ability to deliver on partnership programs that require contributions from industrial partners. NSERC's Strategy for Partnerships and Innovation serves as a framework to reduce further risks for industry to keep them engaged. A risk in launching our new Strategy for Partnerships and Innovation is in the modest amount of resources available at this time. The mitigation strategy is an approach to SPI that is scalable; progress toward achieving the SPI goals will be achieved through pilots and the internal reallocation of resources.

While NSERC administers a significant budget, the Council's overall risk level compared to other government entities is considered low, in terms of continuity of government operations and the maintenance of services to, and protection of interests of, the Canadian public. This assessment of risk level is further supported by the Blue Ribbon Panel report on Grants and Contributions which stated, "The record of performance by the federal research granting agencies, including CFI, has been deemed high by international standards. The two councils and CIHR have successfully managed their own research portfolios, using a rigorous system of oversight, including detailed memorandum of understanding signed by all recipient institutions and regular financial monitoring visits of recipient universities."

Expenditure Profile

For the 2010-11 fiscal year, NSERC plans to spend $1,050.7 million to meet the expected results of its program activities and contribute to its strategic outcomes. The figure below illustrates NSERC's spending trend from 2007-08 to 2012-13.

Expenditure Profile - Spending Trend Graph

(Text description of this image is available on a separate page.)

Spending increase:
From 2007-08 to 2009-10, NSERC's total budget increased as a result of the following new investments:

Spending decrease:
In 2008, NSERC conducted a comprehensive review of the funding, relevance and performance of all its programs. The conclusions of this Strategic Review were accepted by Treasury Board and reflected in Budget 2009. As a result of this exercise, NSERC's core funding will decline by $11.2 million in 2009-10, $23.3 million in 2010-11 and $34.7 million in subsequent years (relative to 2008-09 spending levels).

A second reason for the spending decrease observed since 2009-10 is that the BL-NCE program will cease to have funding in 2012-13. The BL-NCE program will have administered the $34.8 million over five years that was earmarked for this program in Budget 2007 and administered through NSERC. 

Also, the last of the $38.5 million received by NSERC as part of Canada's Economic Action Plan for increased CGS and IRDI programs will be spent in 2010-11.


Voted and Statutory Items displayed in the Main Estimates
($ millions)
Vote # or Statutory Item (S) Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording 2009-10
Main Estimates
2010-11
Main Estimates
70 Operating expenditures13 $41.39 $42.51
75 Grants $922.90 $973.26
(S) Contributions to employee benefit plans $4.10 $4.42
Total $968.39 $1,020.19

NSERC's administration costs are just over four percent of its total budget and this percentage is decreasing. This is low compared to similar agencies in Canada and around the world. NSERC is able to maintain this low level of overhead expenses by extensively using volunteer committee members and peer reviewers, obtaining agreement from Canadian universities that receive NSERC funds to participate in their administration, and sharing the costs of common administrative services through a successful partnership with SSHRC.

Date modified: