This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Office contributes to a well-managed and accountable government for Canadians through our work in the five types of legislative auditing activities (Exhibit 4).
Financial audits of Crown corporations, territorial governments, and other organizations, and of the summary financial statements of the Government of Canada | Performance audits and studies | Monitoring of sustainable development activities and the environmental petitions process | Special examinations of Crown corporations | Assessments of agency performance reports |
We gather information on the impact of our work and have established indicators and targets to measure the results for our three major activities: financial audits, performance audits, and special examinations. The following sections describe the main activities, expected results, performance objectives, indicators and targets, and planned financial resources for each of these activities.
We recently reviewed all of our targets and revised some effective in 2009–10 (Exhibit 5). We begin our performance target-setting process by identifying any standards established by legislative or other authorities. For example, many of our financial audits have statutory reporting deadlines and, for these audits, our on-time target is 100 percent. Where no such standards exist, we look to identify reasonable expectations and then consider the trend of past performance. For example, while we might expect that all audits would be completed within 150 days of the year end to be timely and useful, our experience has been that about 80 percent are completed within this time period. We believe that our targets represent reasonable performance expectations and failure to meet them would alert us to a potential problem.
Objectives and indicators | Original target | Revised target |
---|---|---|
Percentage of audit committee chairs who find our financial audits add value | 75 | 90 |
Percentage of Crown corporation and large-department senior managers who find our financial audits and special examinations add value | 75 | 80 |
Percentage of department senior managers who find our performance audits add value | 65 | 70 |
Percentage of financial audits of federal organizations with no statutory deadlines completed on time | 70 | 80 |
Percentage of financial audits of territorial organizations completed on time | 55 | 60 |
Percentage of financial audits of territorial organizations completed on budget | 55 | 60 |
We set targets that we believe are realistic and attainable while holding ourselves to a high level of performance. For example, while we believe it is not realistic for all users of our reports to find that we always add value on all dimensions that we monitor, we believe that a realistic and high standard is that 9 out of 10 users of our reports would feel this way. We have therefore set a target of 90 percent for all users of our reports. In the case of the indicator of adding value for the organizations we audit, which are not our primary clients, our targets are slightly lower. Based on past results, we have set this target at 80 percent for senior managers subject to our financial audits and special examinations and 70 percent for senior managers subject to our performance audits. We believe that these targets reflect a very positive level of performance and any significantly different result would warrant our attention.
A complete list of our performance indicators and targets is included in Section III—Supplementary Information.
Financial audits answer the following questions:
Planning highlights. The Office has statutory responsibilities for the audit of the summary financial statements of the Government of Canada and each of the three territorial governments, the financial statements of federal and territorial Crown corporations, and other entities. The audit of the International Labour Organization (a United Nations agency) is included among other entities.
We have also recently been named the auditor of the newly created Canadian Securities Regulation Regime Transition Office. While we were previously joint auditor of the Canada Lands Company Limited, we have recently been appointed sole auditor.
In 2010–11, we will conduct a total of more than 130 financial audits and related assurance engagements.
The following table includes the expected results, performance objectives, indicators and targets, and planned financial resources for financial audits of Crown corporations, territorial governments, and other organizations, as well as the audit of the summary financial statements of the Government of Canada (Exhibit 6).
Expected results
|
|
Objectives | Indicators and targets |
---|---|
Our work adds value for the key users of our reports | 90 percent of audit committee chairs find our financial audits add value |
Our work adds value for the organizations we audit | 80 percent of Crown corporation and large-department senior managers find our financial audits add value |
Key users of our reports and the organizations we audit respond to our findings | 100 percent of the reservations in our audit opinions are addressed from one financial audit to the next |
Planned financial resources 2010–11: $41.1 million |
Performance audits answer the following questions:
Planning highlights. In 2010–11, we plan to report the findings of 24 federal and territorial performance audits identified through our risk-based planning process. Our audit schedule for the coming year is in Section III—Supplementary Information.
The following table includes the expected results, performance objectives, indicators and targets, and planned financial resources for performance audits and studies (Exhibit 7).
Expected results
|
|
Objectives | Indicators and targets |
---|---|
Key users of our reports are engaged in the audit process |
|
Our work adds value for the key users of our reports | 90 percent of selected parliamentary committee members find our performance audits add value |
Our work adds value for the organizations we audit | 70 percent of departmental senior managers find our performance audits add value |
Key users of our reports and the organizations we audit respond to our findings | 75 percent of performance audit recommendations are substantially or fully implemented four years after their publication |
Planned financial resources 2010–11: $41.6 million |
A special examination of a Crown corporation answers the following question:
Planning highlights. During a 10-year period, the Office performs special examinations of about 45 federal Crown corporations. In 2010–11, we plan to report on the special examinations of the 4 corporations listed in Section III—Supplementary Information.
The following table includes the expected results, performance objectives, indicators and targets, and planned financial resources for special examinations of Crown corporations (Exhibit 8).
Expected results
|
|
Objectives | Indicators and targets |
---|---|
Our work adds value for the key users of our reports | 90 percent of board chairs find our special examinations add value |
Our work adds value for the organizations we audit | 80 percent of Crown corporation chief executive officers find our special examinations add value |
Key users of our reports and the organizations we audit respond to our findings | 100 percent of significant deficiencies are addressed from one special examination to the next |
Planned financial resources 2010–11: $1.9 million |
We measure and manage our performance as an organization in a number of ways. The following section describes three key areas of our performance and the objectives, indicators, and targets that we measure our performance against.
The following table includes the objectives, indicators, and targets for delivering our work on time and on budget (Exhibit 9).
Objectives | Indicators and targets |
---|---|
Financial audits | |
On time |
|
On budget |
|
Performance audits | |
On time | 90 percent of performance audit reports are completed by the planned tabling date as published in the Report on Plans and Priorities |
On budget | 80 percent of performance audits are completed on budget |
Special examinations | |
On time | 100 percent of special examination reports are delivered on or before the statutory deadline |
On budget | 80 percent of special examinations are completed on budget |
* “On time” for financial audits means the statutory deadline where one exists (usually 90 days after year end), or 150 days after the year end where no statutory deadline exists. ** “On budget” means that the actual hours to complete an audit did not exceed the budgeted hours by more than 15 percent. |
In 2008–09, we changed our performance indicator from “the percentage of internal practice reviews that find our audits in compliance with our quality management system” to “the percentage of practice reviews that find the opinions and conclusions expressed in our audit reports are appropriate and supported by the evidence.” This change reflects the fact that while compliance with our Quality Management System is intended to ensure that audit opinions and conclusions are appropriate, ultimately it is the reliability of the opinions and conclusions expressed in our reports that is important to Parliament and the public.
The Office is currently undergoing a peer review led by the National Audit Office of Australia. The review encompasses all three of our main audit practices, as well as key services that directly support audit operations. We will report the results of the peer review in mid-2010.
The following table includes the objectives, indicators, and targets for ensuring that our audit reports are reliable (Exhibit 10).
Objectives | Indicators and targets |
---|---|
Our audit reports are reliable | 100 percent of internal practice reviews find the opinions and conclusions expressed in our audit reports are appropriate and supported by the evidence |
Our Quality Management System is suitably designed and operating effectively | External peer reviews find our quality management frameworks are suitably designed and operating effectively |
We are committed to providing a working environment in which all are treated with dignity and respect and encouraged to realize their full career potential. We encourage open and honest communication to create a climate of trust and teamwork. We value each other's talent and diversity and support learning and quality-of-life endeavours. These values define how we conduct ourselves and carry out our work. In addition, the Office strongly supports the values of competency, representativeness, non-partisanship, fairness, employment equity, transparency, flexibility, affordability, and efficiency. The Office includes these values in all of its human resource activities. In addition, since 2005 50 percent of managers' performance pay has been tied to their people management skills. Our biennial Employee Satisfaction Survey provides us with feedback on overall employee satisfaction, things we are doing well, and areas that deserve attention. The next survey is scheduled for 2010.
The following table includes the objectives, indicators, and targets for providing a respectful workplace (Exhibit 11).
Objectives | Indicators and targets |
---|---|
Overall employee satisfaction | 80 percent of employees believe the Office is either an above-average place to work or one of the best places to work |
Bilingual workforce |
|
Diverse workforce | 100 percent representation relative to workforce availability for women, people with disabilities, Aboriginal peoples, and members of visible minorities |
Employee retention | 90 percent retention of audit professionals |