This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Start Date: 2002-2003
End Date: March 31, 2010
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: To provide direct support for provinces and territories to participate in the development of the Canadian Register of Historic Places and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and to engage municipalities, stakeholders and the general public in the conservation of historic places.
Expected results: Ongoing population and maintenance of the Canadian Register of Historic Places; refinement and dissemination of national Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places; partnership between Parks Canada and provincial and territorial authorities to identify, preserve and protect Canada's historic places; and creation of the basis for further initiatives to encourage preservation and protection of Canada's historic places.
Expected outcomes: Better preservation and protection of Canada's historic places; and greater public awareness of the importance of conservation and of the significance of Canada's historic places.
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
Planned Spending 2013-14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heritage Resources Conservation | 5,018 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Contributions | 5,018 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note: Figures do not include new Budget 2009 funding.
Start Date: 2006-2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: The GCCP is atypical in that it is not a program within itself; rather, it is a funding authority available to Agency managers. From time to time, Agency managers with programming responsibilities may determine that, given their priorities, available resources, other program delivery mechanisms already in place, and the players and environment in which they deliver their programs, use of a contribution agreement is the most effective means of achieving program objectives.
Expected results: More Canadians recognizing, appreciating and being engaged in the values of natural and cultural conservation. Stakeholders being further engaged in terms of interest and involvement of common objectives towards ecological or cultural integrity. Access to a better knowledge base on commercial, ecological or aboriginal issues of mutual interest for informed decision-making and dialogue for Parks Canada managers and stakeholders. Heritage assets are protected, secured and researched. Targeted audiences are educated in such areas as ecology, safety and other issues.
Expected outcomes: The expected outcomes mirror the Parks Canada mandate of engaging Canadians in preserving and presenting Canada's rich diversity of cultural and natural heritage.
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
Planned Spending 2013-14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity 1: Heritage Places Establishment | 712 | 15 | — | — | — | — |
Program Activity 2: Heritage Resources Conservation | 1,543 | 624 | 305 | — | — | — |
Program Activity 3: Public Appreciation and Understanding | 1,986 | 320 | 226 | — | — | — |
Program Activity 4: Visitor Experience | 196 | 140 | 139 | — | — | — |
Program Activity 5: Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | 37 | 37 | 25 | — | — | — |
Total Contributions | 4,474 | 1,136 | 695 | — | — | — |
Note: The Agency intends to seek renewal of authorities for the General Class Contribution Program (GCCP). Figures do not include new Budget 2009 funding.
Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown
In December 2006, the Minister of the Environment tabled the 2007-2009 Parks Canada Agency Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) in Parliament. The complete SDS document is accessible at: http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/strat/sdd-sds-2007/index.
Parks Canada’s mandate aligns well with the goals of sustainable development. The business of Parks Canada is the protection and presentation of significant examples of Canada’s history and culture and representative examples of Canada’s ecosystems and biodiversity. In doing this, Parks Canada plays a key role in the implementation of the federal government’s commitment to sustainable development.
Parks Canada’s actions in support of government priorities include commitments to increase and expand the system of national parks and national marine conservation areas; designate new national historic sites of Canada; maintain or improve the overall ecological integrity in all national parks; improve the overall average commemorative integrity rating in national historic sites; and minimize the environmental impact of its operations.
The following table provides an update on nine of the key commitments of the Parks Canada SDS.
1. Federal SD goal: Water — Clean and secure water for people, marine and freshwater ecosystems | ||
SDS Agency Commitment 2007-2009 |
Performance measure from current SDS | Agency’s Planning Highlights for 2009-10 |
---|---|---|
Provide responsible environmental stewardship, heritage conservation, and efficient and affordable administration to the five national park townsites administered by Parks Canada. | Townsite targets for growth, sewage effluent quality and management of contaminated sites are met.3 | Parks Canada will continue to demonstrate environmental stewardship by minimizing the impact of townsite operations; meeting townsite targets for limits to growth, sewage effluent quality and management of contaminated sites. |
Parks Canada will create national parks and national marine conservation areas in unrepresented regions. | Increase the number of represented terrestrial natural regions from 28 in March 2007 to 30 of 39 by March 2010; make progress towards establishing national parks in six unrepresented regions by March 2011.1 | As of March 31, 2008, 28 of Canada’s 39 natural regions are represented by one or more national parks. Work will continue on assessing feasibility or negotiating park agreements for six proposed national parks. |
Increase the number of represented marine regions from three in March 2007 to four of 29 by March 2010; make progress towards establishing national marine conservation areas in two unrepresented regions by March 2011.1 | As of March 31, 2008, three of Canada’s 29 marine regions are represented. Work will continue on two national marine conservation area (NMCA) proposals (Gwaii Haanas and Southern Strait of Georgia), which are at the feasibility assessment and agreement negotiation stages. Subject to territorial or provincial government readiness, two other projects (Lancaster Sound and Îles de la Madeleine) could proceed to feasibility assessment. | |
It will complete or expand some existing parks. | Expand two national parks by March 2010 and increase the targeted land holdings in three unfinished national parks.1 | Work will continue on the expansion of Nahanni National Park Reserve of Canada and Tuktut Nogait National Park of Canada. |
Parks Canada will conduct ecological monitoring and reporting on the state of aquatic ecosystems in national parks and national marine conservation areas. | Approved monitoring guidelines and indicators to measure the state of ecological sustainable use in 2 operating sites by March 2013.2 | Parks Canada will continue to develop, as a priority, the various elements of the national marine conservation areas program. A national zoning framework for national marine conservation areas that reflects a spectrum of management approaches has been developed and is being applied. Parks Canada will develop a framework to report on the state of ecosystem health in national marine conservation areas. |
Outside of national parks in the far north with an already acceptable ecological integrity status, 80% of national parks have at least one improved ecological integrity indicator from March 2008 to March 2013.3 | Through active management and restoration initiatives, the Agency will continue to address conservation challenges in Canada’s national parks. Strategic initiatives to demonstrate improvements in key indicators of ecological integrity will be devised and implemented. Priority management strategies and actions will be identified in park management
plans and ecological integrity conditions and trends will be reported in state of park reports. Examples of active management projects planned for 2009-10 include: • implementing a multi-year, regional ecosystem restoration program in Kootenay National Park of Canada to restore traditional winter habitat for bighorn sheep through the re-establishment of fire-maintained open forest and grasslands. • restoring salmon-bearing stream and coastal dune ecosystems with their associated species at risk in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve of Canada. •restoring the hydrological function and populations of genetically-unique, indigenous brook trout in La Mauricie National Park of Canada. |
|
4. Federal SD goal: Sustainable communities — communities enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and equitable society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations | ||
SDS Agency Commitment 2007-2009 |
Performance measure from current SDS | Agency’s Planning Highlights for 2009-10 |
Designate and commemorate places, persons and events of national historic significance, particularly in under-represented priority areas. | 33% of yearly recommended designations are for under-represented themes in Canada’s history.3 | Parks Canada will continue to support the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada and the Minister in the designation and commemoration of places, persons and events of national historic significance that represent the breadth and diversity of Canadian history. Through the New Commemorations Initiative, Parks Canada will undertake consultations with Aboriginal and ethnocultural communities as well as women's groups in order to encourage new nominations of places, persons and events of national historic significance in these under-represented themes. |
Parks Canada will work with local and Aboriginal communities to develop experience opportunities for current and potential visitors. | Increase the percentage of visitors at all surveyed locations that consider the place is meaningful to them by March 2014.5 | Visitor experience opportunities will be further enhanced by fostering economic and tourism opportunities related to authentic Aboriginal cultural experiences. |
In collaboration with ethnocultural organizations and stakeholders, provide learning experiences for these new audiences. | Increase the percentage of targeted Canadians that appreciate the significance of heritage places administered by Parks Canada by 2014.5 | Canadians in large metropolitan areas like Montreal, around Lachine Canal National Historic Site of Canada, and Vancouver with the 2010 Olympics will be more aware, understand and appreciate Parks Canada heritage places, as these places promote their role and relevance as community resources and places of pride. Urban Canadians will have opportunities
to learn and develop a sense of connection to these heritage places through collaborations with heritage and environmental organizations, the arts and culture community, and other stakeholders. Ethnocultural communities, Aboriginal and women’s groups and stakeholders will be involved in new designations and commemorations of national historic places, persons or events. |
5. Federal SD goal: Sustainable development and use of natural resources | ||
SDS Agency Commitment 2007-2009 |
Performance measure from current SDS | Agency’s Planning Highlights for 2009-10 |
Parks Canada will provide meaningful opportunities by facilitating experiential connections with Canada’s protected heritage areas. | Increase the percentage of visitors at all surveyed locations that consider the place is meaningful to them by March 2014.5 85% of visitors at surveyed locations are satisfied, and 50% are very satisfied, with their visit.5 |
Canadians and international travelers’ desires, expectations, needs and social values will be reflected in the opportunities for visitor experience facilitated by Parks Canada at its heritage places. This will be achieved through applying a market based approach to: identify and understand target markets; develop products, programs, events,
facilities and services; and promote and deliver those meaningful opportunities. In collaboration with a broad range of partners, an increased number of visitors will be attracted through the enhancement of existing and the development of new visitor experience opportunities, including improved and diversified accommodation offers, front country trail systems, and an expanded number of interpretive products. Strategies will be identified in management plans and results will be reported in state of park and site reports. |
6. Federal SD goal: Strengthen federal governance and decision-making to support sustainable development | ||
SDS Agency Commitment 2007-2009 |
Performance measure from current SDS | Agency’s Planning Highlights for 2009-10 |
Parks Canada will develop legislative proposals to better protect national historic sites, federal heritage buildings, and archaeological resources under federal jurisdiction. | Not applicable | The Agency will prepare for the implementation of the Heritage Lighthouse Protection Act in May 2010 by developing criteria for designation and processes related to the receipt of petitions and their evaluation. This information will be publicly accessible. Parks Canada will continue working on the development and implementation of a concept related to the creation of a National Trust for Canada as announced in Budget 2007. The intention is that the Trust would be at arm's-length from government and support heritage in Canada. |
1 Due to the increasing complexity of the national park and NMCA establishment process, the deadline for achieving the target was updated from March 2008 to March 2010.
2 Deadline extended from March 2009 to March 2013 due to a change in the scope of the work.
3 Performance measure updated to reflect current targets of the Agency.
4 Performance measure updated to reflect the next phase of work to be undertaken.
5 Performance measure updated to better align with the expected result.
Name of Internal Audit | Internal Audit Type | Status | Expected Completion Date | Electronic Link to Report |
---|---|---|---|---|
Financial and Administrative Audit Office of DG Eastern Canada |
Assurance | Complete | June 2008 | http://pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/rve-par/index_e.asp |
Financial and Administrative Audit Office of DG Western/Northern Canada |
Assurance | Complete | June 2008 | http://pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/rve-par/index_e.asp |
Financial and Administrative Audit National Parks Directorate |
Assurance | Complete | September 2008 | http://pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/rve-par/index_e.asp |
Audit of Values and Ethics Regime | Assurance | In progress | December 2008 | |
Audit of Vehicle/Vessel Management | Assurance | In progress | January 2009 | |
Audit of Revenue Management (entry fees, campground) | Assurance | In progress | February 2009 | |
Audit of Fire Management Emergency Funds | Assurance | In progress | January 2009 | |
Follow-up Financial and Administrative Audit Western Quebec Field Unit |
Assurance | In progress | December 2008 | |
Audit Framework Collaborative Arrangements and Managing With Others | Description of Audit Entity and Controls | Planned | June 2009 | |
Overtime Process | Description of Audit Entity and Controls | Complete | June 2008 | N/A |
Sustainable HR Policies and HR Planning | Description of Audit Entity and Controls | Planned | June 2009 | |
Information Management and Privacy | Assurance | Planned | July 2009 | |
Information Technology and Systems | Description of Audit Entity and Controls | In progress | January 2009 | |
National Level Finance and Administrative Management Control Framework | Description of Audit Entity and Controls | In progress | January 2009 | |
Financial and Administrative Audit External Relations and Visitor Experience Directorate |
Assurance | Planned | October 2009 | |
Financial and Administrative Audit Strategy and Plans Directorate |
Assurance | Planned | October 2009 | |
Financial and Administrative Audit (sites to be determined) |
Assurance | Planned | March 2010 | |
Follow up of Pay and Benefit Audit (including overtime) | Assurance | Planned | March 2010 | |
Audit of Revenues Management (Others) | Assurance | Planned | March 2010 | |
Espace 400e Quebec City | Assurance | Planned | December 2009 | |
IT- Campground Reservation System and Point of Sale System | Assurance | Planned | March 2010 | |
6. Electronic link to internal audit plan: http://pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/rve-par/48/index_e.asp |
Name of Evaluation | Program Type | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Through Highways Management | Program Sub Activity | Planning | March 2010 |
Visitor Experience: Visitor Activities and Services | Program Sub Activity | Planning | June 2010 |
National Parks Conservation (includes Species at Risk) | Program Sub Activity | Work has not started | June 2011 |
National Park Establishment and Expansion | Program Sub Activity | Work has not started | March 2012 |
National Historic Sites of Canada Cost Sharing Program | Contribution Program | Work has not started | March 2012 |
National Historic Sites Conservation | Program Sub Activity | Work has not started | March 2013 |
Visitor Experience: Interpretation Programming | Program Sub Activity | Work has not started | March 2013 |
5. Electronic link to evaluation plan: http://pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/rve-par/48/index_e.asp |
Forecast Revenue 2008-09 |
Planned Revenue 2009-10 |
Planned Revenue 2010-11 |
Planned Revenue 2011-12 |
Planned Revenue 2012-13 |
Planned Revenue 2013-14 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Appreciation and Understanding | ||||||
Heritage Presentation Programs | 935 | 935 | 935 | 935 | 935 | 935 |
935 | 935 | 935 | 935 | 935 | 935 | |
Visitor Experience | ||||||
Entrance Fees | 54,761 | 54,761 | 54,761 | 54,761 | 54,761 | 54,761 |
Camping Fees | 15,750 | 15,750 | 15,750 | 15,750 | 15,750 | 15,750 |
Lockage and Mooring Fees | 3,048 | 3,048 | 3,048 | 3,048 | 3,048 | 3,048 |
Pools | 3,603 | 3,603 | 3,603 | 3,603 | 3,603 | 3,603 |
Other Recreational Fees | 4,261 | 4,261 | 4,261 | 4,261 | 4,261 | 4,261 |
81,423 | 81,423 | 81,423 | 81,423 | 81,423 | 81,423 | |
Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | ||||||
Municipal Service Fees | 2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 |
2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 | 2,676 | |
Other Revenue | ||||||
Real Property and Business Fees | 17,614 | 17,614 | 17,614 | 17,614 | 17,614 | 17,614 |
Miscellaneous | 8,352 | 8,352 | 8,352 | 8,352 | 8,352 | 8,352 |
25,966 | 25,966 | 25,966 | 25,966 | 25,966 | 25,966 | |
Total Respendable Revenue | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 |
Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown
Forecast Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
Planned Spending 2013-14 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity 1: Heritage Places Establishment | 790 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 |
Program Activity 2: Heritage Resources Conservation | 27,512 | 30,412 | 30,412 | 30,412 | 30,412 | 30,412 |
Program Activity 3: Public Appreciation and Understanding | 3,353 | 4,717 | 4,596 | 4,846 | 4,206 | 4,086 |
Program Activity 4: Visitor Experience | 60,744 | 64,554 | 64,383 | 64,383 | 64,383 | 64,349 |
Program Activity 5: Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | 46,265 | 69,030 | 59,024 | 54,018 | 34,258 | 29,360 |
Internal Services | 3,290 | 3,290 | 3,290 | 3,290 | 3,290 | |
Total | 138,664 | 172,678 | 162,380 | 157,624 | 137,224 | 132,172 |
Note: Figures do not include new Budget 2009 funding.
Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown
Name of User Fee | Fee Type | Fee Setting Authority1 | Reason for Planned Fee Introduction of or Amendment to Fee | Effective date of planned change | Completed / Planned Consultation and Review Process |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Park and National Historic Site Entry Fees for commercial operators– Approved (AMENDED). Gros Morne National Park e.g. $7.30 to $8.30 |
Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | Rebuild or replace deteriorated visitor facilities using new revenues from fee increases. | 2009/10 | This increase was approved as part of a multiple year strategy approved in June 2005. Commercial tour rates were approved for one additional year due to Parks Canada’s commitment to tourism industry to provide 18 months advance notice on all fee increases. Prior to being approved, this strategy was subject to consultations carried out between November 2003 and February 2004, and was tabled in Parliament as required by the User Fees Act. |
National Park and National Historic Site Entry Fees – Proposed (AMENDED) | Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | 2010/11: adjustments to local pricing 2011/12 and 2012/13: adjustments to national pricing to keep pace with inflationary pressures on costs |
2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 |
Parks Canada will consult locally with the public and stakeholders through meetings with advisory and client groups and through direct mailings. Elected officials will be informed through meetings and letters. Parks Canada will also hold meetings with commercial group tour operators at travel trade shows, consult directly with national stakeholders and interest groups and conduct a national public opinion poll and focus group sessions. Notice will be provided on the Parks Canada website on proposals for price increases. A comparison of Parks Canada’s proposed fees with those charged by parks organizations in Canada and other countries will be conducted. Pursuant to the User Fees Act, the local fees adjustment proposal will be tabled in Parliament in January 2010 and a national fees proposal for inflation in January 2011 prior to being submitted to the Minister responsible for Parks Canada for enactment. |
National Park Camping Fees – Proposed (AMENDED) | Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | As above | 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 |
|
Historic Canal Lockage Fees – Proposed (AMENDED) | Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | As above | 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 |
|
National Park and National Historic Site Recreation Fees Proposed (AMENDED) |
Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | As above | 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 |
|
Fishing License Fees – Proposed (AMENDED) |
Rights and Privileges | Parks Canada Agency Act | To earn a fair return for the use of publicly owned resources and use the associated revenue to rebuild visitor facilities. | 2011/12 2012/13 |
|
Hot Pool Fees – Proposed (AMENDED) | Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | Maintain current level of service using new revenues from fee increases. | 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 |
|
Business Licenses – Proposed (AMENDED) |
Rights and Privileges | Parks Canada Agency Act | To earn a fair return for the commercial use of publicly owned resources. | 2011/12 |
Parks Canada will consult on a business license fees proposal with business operators, business associations, chambers of commerce, elected officials, provincial parks and tourism ministries, national tourism organizations, park stakeholder groups and Canadians generally in 2009. To respect our commitment to provide 18 months advance notice, implementation of the proposed new business fees will be 2011/12. Pursuant to the User Fees Act, this proposal will be tabled in Parliament in January 2010 prior to being submitted to the Minister responsible for Parks Canada for approval. |
1 According to Sections 23 and 24 of the Parks Canada Agency Act, the Minister sets all fees and charges for rights and privileges