Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Indian Claims Commission


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

SECTION IV - OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST

1. List of All Claims Addressed by the ISCC in Inquiries and of Mediations Concluded with Reports

This table updates readers on the status of claims for which the Indian Specific Claims Commission has completed its inquiry or mediation activities. For all the claims listed below, an inquiry or mediation report has been published and is available at http://www.indianclaims.ca/publications/claimsreportsen.asp.

The table tracks the progress of each claim through the specific claims process once the ISCC has completed its inquiry or mediation/facilitation services.

The first column lists the name of the First Nation and the type or title of the specific claim it brought to the ISCC for inquiry or mediation/facilitation. This information is followed by the outcome of the ISCC's inquiry or its mediation activities. The next column contains the date of the ISCC's report, which is followed by a column containing the date of Canada's response to ISCC's recommendation(s). The nature of that response and any settlement information available are also found in the last column.


Name of First Nation, Province

Type or title of claim

Outcome

Date and Type of ISCC Report Canada's Response
1 Alexis, AB

TransAlta Utilities rights of way

ISCC recommendation to negotiate rejected by INAC

Inquiry

March

2003

In July 2005, government rejected recommendations, stating that a lump sum payment was adequate compensation, that there was no duty to advise the First Nation respecting its taxation powers, and that informed consent to the expropriation was not required.
2 Athabasca Chipewyan, AB

W.A.C. Bennett Dam and damage to IR 201

ISCC recommendation to negotiate rejected by INAC

Inquiry

March

1998

In April 2001, government rejected recommendation, disagreeing that it had a fiduciary duty or a duty under Treaty 8 to protect reserve from effects of Bennett Dam caused by BC Hydro, a third party, or to invoke Navigable Waters Protection Act respecting the dam.
3 Athabasca Denesuline, SK

Treaty harvesting rights

ISCC recommendation to negotiate outside specific claims process rejected by INAC.

1995 supplementary report noted failure of negotiations; recommended government recognize treaty rights or provide litigation funding.

Inquiry

December

1993

Supplementary report

November

1995

In August 1994, government rejected recommendations made in December 1993 report.

November 1995 supplementary report acknowledged; no further response.

4 Betsiamites Band, QC

Highway 138

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2005

In January 2004, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
5 Betsiamites Band, QC

RiviPre Betsiamites Bridge

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2005

In January 2004, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
6 Bigstone Cree Nation, AB

Treaty land entitlement

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2000

In October 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
7 Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa, AB

1889 Akers surrender

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

June

1999

In April 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
8 Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa, AB

Akers surrender

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

August

2005

In September 2003, claim settled for $3.55 million in compensation.
9 Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa, AB

Big Claim

Recommended claim respecting southern boundary be accepted for negotiation and that position on TLE claim be re-evaluated

Inquiry

March

2007

Outcome as yet unknown.
10 Blueberry River and Doig River, BC

Highway right of way IR 172

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2006

In September 2004, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
11 Buffalo River, SK

Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights

ISCC recommendation that part of claim be accepted for negotiation rejected by INAC

Inquiry

September

1995

In March 2002, government rejected recommendations, stating: "[C]ompensation for commercial harvesting rights was not based on either Indian status or membership in an Indian Band; rather, it was to be paid to anyone who held a licence on the land which became the Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range."
12 Canoe Lake, SK

Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range - breach of treaty and fiduciary obligations

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

August

1993

In June 1997, claim settled for $13,412,333 in federal compensation and a requirement that the First Nation purchase between 2,786 hectares and 20,224 hectares of land.
13 Canupawakpa Dakota, MB

Turtle Mountain surrender

Recommended claim not be accepted, but recommended Canada and the First Nation work together to acquire and properly designate the burial sites

Inquiry

July

2003

Report acknowledged October 2003.
14 Carry the Kettle, SK

Cypress Hills

Recommended claim not be accepted, but, pursuant to supplementary mandate, recommended government recognize the Carry the Kettle First Nation's historical connection to the Cypress Hills and restore to the Assiniboine people their connection to the territory

Inquiry

July

2000

Rejected in January 2001.

Government agreed with the Commission's conclusion that the claim did not disclose a lawful obligation on the part of the government under the Specific Claims Policy. The government rejected the Commission's recommendation to restore to the Assiniboine people their connection to the territory.

15 Chippewa Tri-Council, ON

Coldwater-Narrows reservation surrender

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2003

In July 2002, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
16 Chippewa Tri-Council, ON

Collins Treaty

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

1998

In December 1998, claim settled for $565,000 in federal compensation.
17 Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point, ON

1927 surrender

Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation, finding fiduciary duty to have been breached

Inquiry

March

1997

No response yet received from government.

In 1998, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal finding the surrender valid. The courts expressly did not deal with the fiduciary issue.

18 Chippewas of the Thames, ON

Clench defalcation

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2002

In June 2001, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
19 Chippewas of the Thames, ON

Clench defalcation

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

August

2005

In November 2004, claim settled for $15 million in federal compensation.
20 Chippewas of the Thames, ON

Muncey land inquiry

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

December

1994

In January 1995, claim settled for $5,406,905 in federal compensation.
21 Cold Lake, AB

Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range - breach of treaty and fiduciary obligations

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

August

1993

In March 2002, claim settled for $25.5 million in federal compensation.
22 Cowessess, SK

1907 surrender - Phase I

ISCC recommendation that the portion of IR 73 surrendered in 1907 be accepted for negotiation rejected by INAC

Inquiry

March

2001

In March 2002, government rejected recommendation, disagreeing with finding of number of voters present and with interpretation of "majority," but proceeded to phase II of this inquiry as previously agreed.
23 Cowessess, SK

1907 surrender - Phase II

Majority recommended that claim not be accepted for negotiation; minority found a fiduciary breach and recommended that claim be accepted

Inquiry

July

2006

Outcome as yet unknown.
24 Cowessess, SK

QVIDA flooding claim

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

1998

In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
25 Cumberland House, SK

IR 100A

Recommended that the claim regarding IR 100A be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

March

2005

Outcome as yet unknown.
26 Duncan's, AB

1928 surrender

Majority of claim not recommended for negotiation; however, recommended that the surrender of IR 151E be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

September

1999

In June 2001, government rejected recommendation regarding IR 151E made in September 1999 report, stating: "[T]he Commission did not examine the terms of the proposed lease and, as a result, made no finding that the 1923 lease proposal was either more or less advantageous to the First Nation than a surrender."
27 Eel River Bar, NB

Eel River Dam

Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

December

1997

Outcome as yet unknown.
28 Esketemc, BC

IR 15, 17, and 18

ISCC recommendation that the disallowance or reduction of IR 15, 17, and 18 be accepted for negotiation, rejected by INAC

Inquiry

November

2001

In June 2005, government rejected recommendation, stating that Canada had no obligation or power to create reserves for the First Nation, and that the Commission's conclusions "are largely premised on findings ... that the First Nation had aboriginal rights and title to the land at issue."
29 Fishing Lake, SK

1907 surrender

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

1997

In August 1996, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
30 Fishing Lake, SK

1907 surrender

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

March

2002

In August 2001, claim settled for $34.5 million in federal compensation.
31 Flying Dust, SK

Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights

ISCC recommendation that part of claim be accepted for negotiations, rejected by INAC

Inquiry

September

1995

In March 2002, government rejected recommendations made in September 1995 report, stating: "[C]ompensation for commercial harvesting rights was not based on either Indian status or membership in an Indian Band; rather, it was to be paid to anyone who held a licence on the land which became the Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range."
32 Fort McKay, AB

Treaty land entitlement

ISCC recommendation that government owed outstanding entitlement of 3,815 acres to First Nation, accepted by INAC

Inquiry

December

1995

In April 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
33 Friends of the Michel Society, AB

1958 enfranchisement

No lawful obligation found, but recommended that government grant special standing to submit specific claims

Inquiry

March

1998

In October 2002, government "declined to accept the ISCC's recommendation to grant the Friends of the Michel Society special standing to advance specific claims."
34 Gamblers, MB

Treaty land entitlement

ISCC recommendation that outstanding treaty land entitlement, if any, should be based on 1877 date of first survey and that claim not be negotiated, accepted by INAC

Inquiry

October

1998

In November 1998, government accepted recommendation.
35 Homalco, BC

Aupe IR 6 and 6A - statutory or fiduciary obligation to obtain 80 acres of land from province of BC

ISCC recommendation to negotiate part of claim, re: 10 acres, rejected by INAC

Inquiry

December

1995

In December 1997, government rejected recommendation, stating that, as the lands were not alleged to be reserve lands, the Policy does not apply, and that Canada does not "recognize a general duty to protect traditional Indian lands (as distinct from reserve lands) from the actions of others."
36 James Smith, SK

IR 100A

Recommended that the lawful obligations that arise from Canada's dispositions of IR 100A be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

March

2005

Outcome as yet unknown.
37 James Smith, SK

Chakastaypasin IR 98

Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

March

2005

Outcome as yet unknown.
38 James Smith, SK

Treaty land entitlement

Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

February

2007

Outcome as yet unknown.
39 Joseph Bighead, SK

Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights

Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

September

1995

Outcome as yet unknown.
40 Kahkewistahaw, SK

Treaty land entitlement

Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

November

1996

Outcome as yet unknown.
41 Kahkewistahaw, SK

1907 reserve land surrender

Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

February

1997

In December 1997, government accepted claim for negotiation.
42 Kahkewistahaw, SK

1907 surrender

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation February

2003

In November 2002, claim settled for $94.65 million in federal compensation.
43 Kawacatoose, SK

Treaty land entitlement

ISCC recommendation that government owed a shortfall of 8,576 acres to Band, subject to confirming research, accepted by INAC

Inquiry

March

1996

In October 2000, claim settled for $23 million in federal compensation.
44 The Key, SK

1909 surrender

Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

March

2000

Outcome as yet unknown.
45 Keeseekoowenin, MB

1906 land claim

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

August

2005

In March 2005, claim settled for $6,999,900 in compensation.
46 Kluane, YK

Kluane Game Sanctuary and Kluane National Park Reserve creation

Claim resolved by agreement related to comprehensive claim settlement

Inquiry

February

2007

No substantive response from government required.
47 Lac La Ronge, SK

Treaty land entitlement

Recommended that treaty land entitlement obligation was satisfied, and that any claim to be made on restitutionary or fiduciary grounds should be subject of a separate inquiry

Inquiry

March

1996

Recommended that treaty land entitlement obligation was satisfied, and that any claim to be made on restitutionary or fiduciary grounds should be subject of a separate inquiry.
48 Lax Kw'alaams, BC

Demand for absolute surrender as precondition to settlement

ISCC recommendation that Aboriginal interests be excluded from the surrender that was to be a condition of the claim settlement, rejected by INAC

Inquiry

June

1994

In December 2001, government rejected recommendations on ground that, as Aboriginal interests were included in appraisals considered in negotiations, they cannot be excluded from settlement discussions; their inclusion is also required to achieve certainty. However, Canada hopes "to move toward settlement" based on "a revised mandate."
49 Long Plain, MB

Loss of use of treaty entitlement land

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

2000

In November 2005, government accepted claim for negotiation.
50 Lucky Man, SK

Treaty land entitlement

ISCC recommendation for further research to establish proper TLE population, accepted by INAC

Inquiry

March

1997

In May 1997, government accepted recommendation: government research indicated no TLE shortfall; First Nation is reviewing and conducting its own research.
51 Mamaleleqala Qwe'Qwa'Sot'Enox, BC McKenna-McBride applications

ISCC recommendation to negotiate rejected by INAC

Inquiry

March

1997

In December 1999, government rejected recommendations, disagreeing with the interpretation of "lawful obligation" in Outstanding Business, and asserting that no fiduciary obligation can exist "in relation to Aboriginal interests in non-reserve lands."
52 Micmacs of Gesgapegiag, QC

Pre-Confederation claim to 500-acre island

No substantive recommendations made because government agreed to reconsider merits of claim

Inquiry

December

1994

In March 1995, government acknowledged receipt of report and advised claim was in abeyance pending outcome of related court case.
53 Mikisew Cree, AB

Economic benefits under Treaty 8

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

1997

In December 1996, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
54 Mississaugas of the New Credit, ON

Toronto Purchase

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

June

2003

In July 2002, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
55 Mistawasis, SK

1911, 1917, and 1919 surrenders

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2002

In September 2001, claim settled for $16.3 million in federal compensation.
56 Moose Deer Point, ON

Pottawatomi rights

ISCC recommendation for additional research rejected by INAC

Inquiry

March

1999

In March 2001, government rejected recommendations, stating that the claim submission had already been "fully researched."
57 Moosomin, SK

1909 reserve land surrender

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

March

1997

In December 1997, government accepted claim for negotiation.
58 Moosomin, SK

1909 reserve land surrender

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

March

2004

In September 2003, claim settled for $41 million in federal compensation.
59 Muscowpetung, SK

QVIDA flooding claim

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

1998

In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
60 Nak'azdli, BC

Aht-Len-Jees IR 5

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

1996

In January 1996, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
61 'Namgis, BC

Cormorant Island

ISCC recommendation to negotiate rejected by INAC

Inquiry

March

1996

In May 2001, government rejected recommendation, disagreeing that any fiduciary obligation arose on the facts of this claim.
62 'Namgis, BC

McKenna-McBride applications

ISCC recommendation to negotiate part of claim rejected by INAC

Inquiry

February

1997

In December 1999, government rejected recommendation, disagreeing with the interpretation of "lawful obligation" in Outstanding Business and disagreeing that any fiduciary obligation arose on the facts of this claim.
63 Nekaneet, SK

Agricultural and other benefits under Treaty 4

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

1999

In October 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
64 Ochapowace, SK

QVIDA flooding claim

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

1998

In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
65 Opaskwayak, MB

Streets and lanes claim

First Nation withdrew claims during inquiry

Inquiry

February

2007

No substantive response from government required.
66 Paul, AB

Kapasiwin townsite Recommended claim not be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

February

2007

Outcome as yet unknown.
67 Pasqua, SK

QVIDA flooding claim

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

1998

In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
68 Peepeekisis, SK

File Hills Colony

ISCC recommendation to negotiate rejected by INAC

Inquiry

March

2004

In June 2006, government rejected recommendation.
69 Peguis, MB

Treaty land entitlement

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

2001

In June 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
70 Qu'Appelle Valley Indian Development Authority (Cowessess, Kahkewistahaw, Muscowpetung, Ochapowace, Pasqua, Piapot, Sakimay), SK

Flooding claim

Parties unable to come to an agreement; separate negotiations ongoing with Cowessess, Muscowpetung, Pasqua, Sakimay

Mediation

December

2005

Outcome as yet unknown.
71 Roseau River Anishinabe, MB

1903 surrender

Recommended that claim be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

September

2007

Outcome as yet unknown.
72 Roseau River Anishinabe, MB

Medical aid

ISCC recommendation to negotiate rejected by INAC

Inquiry

February

2001

In September 2003, government rejected recommendations, stating that medical aid deductions from the trust fund account were permissible, that no treaty promise of medical aid was made or survived, and that no outstanding lawful obligation exists.
73 Roseau River Anishinabe, MB

Treaty land entitlement

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

March

1996

In March 1996, claim settled for $14 million in federal compensation.
74 Sakimay, SK

QVIDA flooding claim

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

1998

In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
75 Sakimay, SK

Treaty land entitlement

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

February

2007

In September 2006, government accepted claim for negotiation while inquiry underway.
76 Sandy Bay Ojibway, MB

Treaty land entitlement

Recommended that claim not be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

June

2007

Outcome as yet unknown.
77 Standing Buffalo, SK

QVIDA flooding claim

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

1998

In December 1998, government accepted claim for negotiation.
78 Standing Buffalo, SK

QVIDA flooding claim

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

March

2004

In March 2003, claim settled for $3.6 million in compensation and the ability to acquire up to 640 acres of agricultural land to be set apart as reserve land pursuant to Canada's Additions to Reserves Policy.
79 Sturgeon Lake, SK

Red Deer Holdings agricultural lease

Accepted for negotiation without full inquiry

Inquiry

March

1998

In October 1998, claim settled for $190,000 in federal compensation.
80 Sumas, BC

IR 6 railway right of way

ISCC recommendation to negotiate accepted by INAC

Inquiry

February

1995

In June 2005, government accepted claim for negotiation.
81 Sumas, BC

1919 surrender of IR 7

Recommended joint research to assess fair market value of surrendered land

Inquiry

August

1997

In January 1998, government stated it was willing to explore possibility of joint research to determine if evidence exists for a claim.
82 Taku River Tlingit, BC

Wenah specific claim

Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

March

2006

Outcome as yet unknown.
83 Thunderchild, SK

1908 surrender

Settled with assistance of Commission

Mediation

March

2004

In September 2003, claim settled for $53 million in compensation and ability to acquire up to 5,000 acres of land within 15 years to be set apart as a reserve.
84 Touchwood Agency, SK

Mismanagement (1920-24) claim

Parties unable to come to an agreement; Agency requested ISCC inquiry

Mediation

August

2005

Outcome as yet unknown.
85 Walpole Island, ON

Boblo Island

ISCC recommendation that First Nation resubmit its claim under the Comprehensive Claims Policy, and that claim not be negotiated, accepted by INAC

Inquiry

May

2000

Outcome as yet unknown.
86 Waterhen Lake, SK

Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II - loss of commercial and treaty harvesting rights

ISCC recommendation to negotiate part of claim, rejected by INAC

Inquiry

September

1995

In March 2002, government rejected recommendations made in September 1995 report, stating: "[C]ompensation for commercial harvesting rights was not based on either Indian status or membership in an Indian Band; rather, it was to be paid to anyone who held a licence on the land which became the Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range."
87 Williams Lake, BC

Village site

Recommended claim be accepted for negotiation

Inquiry

March

2006

Outcome as yet unknown.
88 Young Chipeewayan, SK

Stoney Knoll IR 107

Recommended that claim not be accepted for negotiation but that further research be undertaken

Inquiry

December

1994

Outcome as yet unknown.

2. List of Active ISCC Inquiries

As directed by Order in Council P.C. 2007-1789, the Commission is no longer accepting new claims for inquiry and has ceased all its activities on inquiries not yet at the community session stage. Work has ceased on inquiries which had not reached the community session stage on November 27, 2007, when Bill C-30, the Specific Claims Tribunal Act, was tabled. First Nations have been notified of the cessation of the ISCC's inquiry.

Carry the Kettle First Nation [1905 surrender]

Esketemc First Nation [Wright's meadow preemption claim]

Lower Similkameen Indian Band [Victoria, Vancouver and Eastern Railway right of way]

Lucky Man Cree [Treaty land entitlement - Phase II]

Muskowekwan First Nation [1910 and 1920 surrenders]

Nadleh Whut'en Indian Band [Lejac School]

Neskonlith, Adams Lake and Little Shuswap Bands [Neskonlith reserve]

Red Earth and Shoal Lake Cree Nations [Quality of reserve lands (agriculture)]

Sturgeon Lake First Nation [1913 surrender]

U'mista Cultural Centre [Prohibition of the potlatch]

3. List of Ceased ISCC Inquiries

Athabasca Chipewayan First Nation [Compensation criteria - agricultural benefits]

Blueberry River First Nation and Doig River First Nation [Compensation criteria - Highway right of way - IR 172 claim]

Chippewas of the Thames First Nation [Ontario Hydro right of way]

Conseil des Montagnais du Lac-Saint-Jean [Flooding of the Mashteuiatsh reserve in 1926]

Fisher River Cree Nation [1896 alienation claim]

Kitselas First Nation [Railway specific claim]

Lheidli T'enneh Band [Surrender Fort George IR 1]

Little Black Bear First Nation [1928 surrender]

Mississaugas of the New Credit [Crawford Purchase]

Mississaugas of the New Credit [Gunshot Treaty]

Ocean Man First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]

Pasqua First Nation [1906 surrender]

Shuswap Indian Band [1914 railway right of way]

Shuswap Indian Band [1,940 acres]

Siksika Nation [1910 surrender]

Stanjikoming First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]

Stó:lt Nation [Douglas reserves]

Touchwood Agency Tribal Council (Five First Nations) [Mismanagement claim - compensation criteria]

Treaty 8 Tribal Association (Seven First Nations) [Consolidated annuity claim]

Tsawwassen First Nation [English Bluffs specific claim]

Whitefish Lake First Nation [Agricultural benefits pursuant to Treaty 8: compensation criteria]

Whitefish Lake First Nation [Agricultural benefits pursuant to Treaty 8: historic claim]

Wolf Lake First Nation [Reserve lands]

4. List of Claims in Mediation/Facilitation

Blood Tribe/Kainaiwa [Cattle claim]

Chippewa Tri-Council [Coldwater-Narrows reservation claim]

Cote First Nation [Pilot project]

Cote First Nation [1905-07-13-14 surrenders claim]

Cowessess First Nation [Flooding claim]

Fort William First Nation [Boundary claim]

Fort William First Nation [Pilot project]

Fort Pelly Agency [Pelly Haylands claim]

George Gordon First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]

Lac Seul First Nation [Flooding claim]

Metepenagiag Mi'kmaq Nation [Hosford Lot and Indian Reserve 7 claim]

Michipicoten First Nation [Pilot project]

Missanabie Cree First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]

Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation [Toronto Purchase claim]

Mohawk Council of Akwesasne [Dundee claim]

Mohawk Council of Akwesasne [Kawehno:ke claim]

Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte [Culbertson Tract]

Muscowpetung First Nation [Flooding claim]

Muskoday First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]

Nekaneet First Nation [Treaty benefits]

Pasqua First Nation [Flooding claim]

Pasqua First Nation [Treaty land entitlement claim]

Sakimay First Nation [Flooding claim]

Sakimay First Nation [Treaty land entitlement claim]

Siksika Nation [Castle Mountain claim]

Skway First Nation [Schweyey Road claim]

Sturgeon Lake First Nation [Treaty land entitlement]