This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Honourable Gerry Ritz
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
Section II: Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome
Section III: Supplementary Information
Section IV: Other Items of Interest
Vision:To excel as a science-based regulator, trusted and respected by Canadians and the international community. Mission:Dedicated to safeguarding food, animals and plants, which enhances the health and well-being of Canada’s people, environment and economy. Statement of Values:Our Values As employees of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency . . .
|
This section provides an overview of the organization, the strategic planning context, and the program and management priorities.
I am pleased to present the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s (CFIA ) Report on Plans and Priorities for 2008–09. This plan details how the Agency intends to use its resources to deliver its mandate of safeguarding Canada’s food supply and protecting the animals and plants upon which safe and high-quality food depends.
Since being appointed Minister in August 2007, I have been impressed by the teamwork and sense of dedication shown by the partner organizations in the Agriculture and Agri-Food (AAF) Portfolio. These organizations — Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, the CFIA , Farm Credit Canada, the Canadian Grain Commission, the Canadian Dairy Commission and the National Farm Products Council — have different mandates, different roles and responsibilities and operate under different legislation. However, the organizations’ common denominator is their shared goal of supporting and enhancing the agriculture and agri-food sector.
Now under the vision of Growing Forward, we are striving to build a profitable and innovative industry that seizes emerging market opportunities and contributes to the health and well-being of Canadians. I am relying on the continued collaborative efforts of a strong AAF Portfolio to realize this vision, while delivering the best possible services to our farmers and benefits for all our citizens.
During the coming year, the Government of Canada, as outlined in the Speech from the Throne, will introduce measures on food safety to ensure that Canadian families can continue to have confidence in the quality and safety of what they buy. The CFIA will play a key role in the development and implementation of these important measures.
It will also be important that the CFIA , Canada’s largest science-based regulatory Agency, continues to build its multi-jurisdictional partnerships with other areas of government and industry as it addresses issues such as emergency planning in the event of an animal or plant disease outbreak or a pandemic.
The CFIA has close to 7,000 dedicated professionals delivering its programs across this country. I have every confidence in their ability to focus on the priorities outlined in this report.
The CFIA will be reporting on the progress against this plan in the Agency’s 2008–09 Performance Report.
The Honourable Gerry Ritz
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board.
I submit for tabling in Parliament, the 2008–09 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2008–09 Estimates: Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports:
Carole Swan
President, Canadian Food Inspection Agency
On behalf of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA ), I am pleased to bring forward the Agency’s Report on Plans and Priorities for 2008–09.
The Agency celebrated its 10th anniversary in 2007. Staff can be proud of what has been accomplished over the past ten years as they have worked with dedication and skill to safeguard Canada’s food supply and the plants and animals upon which safe food depends.
Looking ahead to the future, I am confident we will build on the legacy of our first decade by enhancing and modernizing our regulatory system and program delivery to meet evolving needs.
CFIA’s plans and priorities link directly to the Government of Canada’s priorities for bolstering economic prosperity, strengthening security at the border and of the safety of the food supply, protecting the environment and contributing to the health of Canadians. It is through these means that the CFIA will support the government’s commitment to address food safety concerns to ensure that Canadians continue to have high confidence in the safety and quality of food available on the Canadian marketplace.
We will also focus on the renewal of the CFIA to ensure we continue to foster the knowledge and skills needed to sustain our tradition of excellence and leadership.
Carole Swan
President, Canadian Food Inspection Agency
CFIA’s MANDATE |
|||||||
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA ) is mandated to safeguard Canada’s food supply and the plants and animals upon which safe and high-quality food depends. |
|||||||
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA OUTCOMES |
|||||||
Healthy Canadians |
Strong economic growth A clean and healthy environment |
A fair and secure marketplace A prosperous Canada through global commerce |
|||||
CFIA’s CONTRIBUTION |
|||||||
OUR STRATEGIC OUTCOMES |
Public health risks associated with the food supply and transmission of animal disease to humans are minimized and managed |
A safe and sustainable plant and animal resource base |
Contributes to consumer protection and market access based on the application of science and standards |
||||
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES |
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks |
Zoonotic Risk |
Animal Health Risks and Production Systems |
Plant Health Risks and Production Systems |
Biodiversity Protection |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks |
Domestic and International Market Access |
CFIA’s FOUNDATION |
|||||||
Sound science • An effective regulatory base • Effective inspection delivery • Strong partnerships |
Financial Resources ($ millions): | |||
|
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
Gross Planned Spending |
660.3 |
619.4 |
606.4 |
Less: Respendable Revenue |
55.0 |
55.0 |
55.0 |
Net Planned Spending |
605.3 |
564.4 |
551.4 |
Human Resources (FTEs)1: | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
6,294 |
6,182 |
6,107 |
1 Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) are different than the number of staff the Agency has. An FTE of 1.0 means that the person is equivalent to a full-time worker, while an FTE of 0.5 means that the person is working only half-time.
The CFIA’s following five priorities have been established by management and identify critical areas of focus necessary to achieve the Agency’s strategic outcomes.
Program Priorities |
Type |
1. Enhancing regulatory compliance, with a focus on safety of domestic and imported food |
Ongoing |
2. Strengthening preparedness to mitigate and respond to animal and plant diseases and pests |
Ongoing |
3. Improving the program and regulatory framework to support continued consumer protection and economic prosperity |
Ongoing |
Management Priorities |
Type |
4. Implementing Human Resources Renewal |
New |
5. Enhancing alignment and coordination within the Agency to better integrate risk management into effective policy development, program design and program delivery |
Ongoing |
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA ) is Canada’s largest, science-based regulatory agency. It is responsible for the delivery of all federally mandated programs for food inspection, plant and animal health products and production systems, and consumer protection as it relates to food. The CFIA’s mandate is vast and complex, with responsibilities flowing from 13 federal statutes and 42 sets of regulations.
With close to 7,000 dedicated professionals working across Canada, the CFIA is committed to serving Canadians by protecting public health, contributing to economic growth, and protecting Canada’s environment.
The sectors regulated by the CFIA include agriculture, agri-food, fish, seafood, plant, nursery and forestry. Those who benefit from the Agency’s services include farmers, fishers, foresters, processors, distributors (importers and exporters) and — ultimately — all Canadian consumers.
Key to the CFIA’s success are several interrelated and integral factors — sound science, an effective regulatory base, the delivery of effective inspection programs and the fostering of strong partnerships. In an international context, the CFIA strives to ensure that the international regulatory framework, as it relates to the Agency’s mandate, is strong, coherent and science-based.
THE CFIA’s LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY
|
Sound Science
The CFIA relies on science as the basis for designing and delivering its programs and as an essential component of its regulatory decision making. Science is pivotal to dealing with emerging issues such as safety assessments of new biotechnology-derived products and issues related to avian influenza and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The specific activities for which the CFIA needs and uses science to support its daily work include laboratory activities, risk assessment, surveillance, research, and technology development. The Agency also analyses scientific research data and other information to provide technical advice and intelligence that enables CFIA officials to identify and prepare for emerging issues. The CFIA’s scientific expertise makes an integral contribution to regulatory policy and standards development, not only in Canada, but worldwide.
An Effective Regulatory Base
For a regulatory regime to be effective, the legislative authorities must be consistent with the organization’s mandate and sufficiently comprehensive to enable the full suite of responsibilities that the mandate represents. Regulations must be clear, enforceable, fair and consistently applied. The CFIA is continually reviewing its legislative authorities and updating its regulatory base in order to strengthen its capacity to contribute to public policy objectives, taking into account the domestic and international environment in which the Agency undertakes its responsibilities. Consistent with this, the CFIA supports the Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation, which aims to improve Canada’s regulatory system.
The CFIA represents Canada at international standard-setting bodies for food safety, animal health and plant health issues. In addition to domestic regulation, the Agency is responsible for regulating both imported and exported products, and its actions are disciplined by international obligations, primarily through the Sanitary and Phytosanitary2 Agreement of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Additionally, the Agency conducts a broad range of activities in this regard with organizations such as the World Organisation for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties - OIE), North American Plant Protection Organization (NAPPO), and the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) to name a few. See section 4.2 for a list of all of our Partners and Stakeholders.
2 Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures and Agreement: These are measures to protect human, animal and plant life or health and to ensure that food is safe to eat. For more information on the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) visit the website: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm
Delivery of Effective Inspection Services
Products that may be subject to inspection or certification by the CFIA range from agricultural inputs, such as seeds, feeds and fertilizers, to fresh foods — including meat, fish, eggs, dairy products, fruit and vegetables — and prepared and packaged foods. The Agency sets, or upholds, standards and establishes compliance and enforcement priorities based on scientifically established risk-based strategies. Compliance with applicable acts and regulations is assessed through inspections, audits, product sampling and verifications. To facilitate compliance, the CFIA carries out education and awareness activities that are intended to clarify and increase regulated parties’ understanding of statutory requirements and standards. Where non-compliance is identified, the CFIA uses a broad range of enforcement approaches from verbal and written warnings to administrative monetary penalties and prosecution. Critical to effectively fulfilling the CFIA’s mandate is the ongoing design, development and review of inspection-related tools and processes
Strong Partnerships
The Agency’s mandate is broad, and to effectively deliver on its mandate, CFIA must partner regularly with various federal, provincial and municipal government departments, diverse regulated sectors of industry, producers, international counterparts, and consumer organizations.
THE CFIA’s KEY FEDERAL PARTNERS:
|
The CFIA is headed by a President, who reports to the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food. The CFIA has an integrated governance structure whereby all branch heads have specific accountabilities that contribute to the achievement of each of the CFIA’s strategic objectives. The following organizational chart depicts the reporting structure within the CFIA .
With its headquarters in the National Capital Region, the CFIA is organized into four operational areas (Atlantic, Quebec, Ontario and Western) that are subdivided into 18 regional offices, 185 field offices (including border points of entry) and 408 offices in non-government establishments, such as processing facilities. The Agency also has 15 laboratories and research facilities that provide scientific advice, develop new technologies, provide testing services and conduct research.
Over the next three years the CFIA will align resources towards effective and efficient delivery of program activities to achieve expected results and strategic outcomes. To do so, resources will be focussed on identified Agency priorities that are critical to achieving the Agency’s objectives and addressing corporate risks.
Voted and Statutory Items displayed in the Main Estimates3 ($ millions) | |||
Vote or Statutory Item |
Vote or Statutory Wording |
2008–09 Main Estimates |
2007–08 |
30 | Operating Expenditures and Contributions | 471.9 | 495.1 |
35 | Capital Expenditures | 34.7 | 19.7 |
(S) | Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by Regulations under the Health of Animals Act and the Plant Protection Act, and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act | 1.5 | 1.5 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 67.5 |
71.1 |
Total Agency | 575.6 | 587.4 |
3 There is a net decrease of $11.8 million from the 2007-2008 Main Estimates to the 2008-2009 Main Estimates. The major items accounting for the decrease are: sunsetting of resources for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) as it relates to “Specified Risk Materials Removal from Food and Re-Entering Export Markets” and “Ensuring the future of the Canadian Beef Industry” ($20.2 million); sunsetting of resources for Agricultural Policy Framework ($5.3 million); transfer to Western Economic Diversification of Canada for the International Vaccine Centre’s (InterVac) Biosafety Level III Containment Facility in Saskatoon ($4.0 million); reduction related to the Cost Efficiencies Savings Exercise ($3.5 million); decrease in resources for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) as it relates to “Measures to address the BSE Recovery Program by Facilitating the Transition for the Cattle and Other Ruminant Industries” ($3.2 million); offset by additional resources for the implementation of Enhanced Animal Feed Restrictions (BSE) ($24.7 million).
Agency Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents | ||||
($ millions) |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks |
278.8 |
268.9 |
263.6 |
264.1 |
Zoonotic Risk |
123.8 |
124.3 |
100.7 |
101.1 |
Animal Health Risks and Production Systems |
76.5 |
75.6 |
72.2 |
72.4 |
Plant Health Risks and Production Systems |
81.3 |
81.0 |
79.7 |
65.4 |
Biodiversity Protection |
15.1 |
14.9 |
14.1 |
14.2 |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks |
23.3 |
23.0 |
22.0 |
22.0 |
Domestic and International Market Access |
43.6 |
42.9 |
41.4 |
41.5 |
Budgetary Main Estimates (gross) |
642.4 |
630.6 |
593.7 |
580.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenue |
55.0 |
55.0 |
55.0 |
55.0 |
Total Main Estimates4 |
587.4 |
575.6 |
538.7 |
525.7 |
Adjustments5 |
||||
Supplementary Estimates: |
||||
Funding for the implementation of Enhanced Animal Feed Restrictions to mitigate public health risks associated with Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) |
21.9 |
- |
- |
- |
Funding to relieve pressures due to a one-time retroactive payment for costs arising from the reclassification of meat inspector positions |
16.6 |
|||
Funding related to government advertising programs (horizontal item) |
3.1 |
4.0 |
- |
- |
Transfer from Public Works and Government Services Canada – To return funding for the relocation of the agency’s activities and programs to other custodial facilities |
0.6 |
- |
- |
- |
Funding to increase the tender fruit sector’s viability and profitability by eradicating the Plum Pox Virus in Canada (horizontal item) |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer from National Defence - For public security initiatives (horizontal item) |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
Funding to prepare for Canada’s participation in International Polar Year 2007-2008, an extensive international research program in the Arctic and Antarctic (horizontal item) |
0.2 |
- |
- |
- |
Funding for implementation of the action plan to strengthen Canada’s regulatory system and establish a Centre of Regulatory Expertise within the Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada (horizontal item) |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Western Economic Diversification - For the design and construction of the International Vaccine Centre’s (InterVac) Biosafety Level III Containment Facility in Saskatoon |
(2.0) |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Foreign Affairs and International Trade (Foreign Affairs) - To provide support to staff located at missions abroad |
(0.4) |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer to Public Service Human Resources Management Agency of Canada - To support the National Managers’ Community | (0.1) |
- |
- |
- |
Other: |
||||
Treasury Board Vote 22 (Operating Budget Carry Forward) |
52.1 |
- |
- |
- |
Slaughterhouse Inspection |
- |
25.0 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
Treasury Board Vote 23 (Paylist Shortfalls) |
10.2 |
- |
- |
- |
Treasury Board Vote 15 (Collective Bargaining) |
7.5 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
Treasury Board Vote 10 (Internal Audit) |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
Financial Pressures (Loan Repayment for the Reclassification of Meat Inspector positions) |
- |
(5.0) |
(5.0) |
(5.0) |
Total Adjustments |
110.7 |
29.7 |
25.7 |
25.7 |
Total Planned Spending6 |
698.1 |
605.3 |
564.4 |
551.4 |
Total Planned Spending |
698.1 |
605.3 |
564.4 |
551.4 |
Less: Non-respendable revenue |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Plus: Cost of services received without charge |
54.0 |
54.9 |
55.3 |
55.9 |
Total Agency Spending |
751.0 |
659.1 |
618.6 |
606.2 |
Full Time Equivalents7 |
6,492 |
6,294 |
6,182 |
6,107 |
4 The 2007–08 Main Estimates have been restated to reflect the 2008–09 Program Activity Architecture structure.
5 The adjustments below do not include the impact of Employee Benefit Plan (EBP) charges in 2007–08. The adjustments for the 2008–09 and future years do include EBP charges.
6 Planned Spending changes from 2008–09 to 2009-10
The Planned Spending decrease of $40.9 million is primarily related to the sunsetting of resources for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) ($16.7 million) as it relates to “Repositioning the Canadian Beef and Cattle Industry” and “Measures to address the BSE Recovery Program by Facilitating the Transition for the Cattle and Other Ruminant Industries”; the sunsetting of resources for the Organic Agriculture Products Regime ($2.6 million); the sunsetting of Major Capital resources received in 2008–09 only for the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy to allow the
CFIA to work with manufacturers to develop, test and build mobile incineration units or alternate disposal methodologies for the mass disposal of infected animals ($20.0 million); the sunsetting of resources related to government advertising programs ($4.0 million); decrease in operating funds related to the Avian and Pandemic
Influenza Preparedness Strategy ($2.0 million) and an increase of $4.0 million as a result of the sunsetting of resources transferred to Western Economic Diversification Canada in 2008–09 only for the International Vaccine Centre’s (InterVac) Biosafety Level III Containment Facility in Saskatoon.
Planned Spending changes from 2009-10 to 2010-11
The Planned Spending decrease of $13.0 million is primarily related to the sunsetting of resources for the Invasive Alien Species Strategy for Canada ($11.5 million) and the repayment toward client costs for the Skyline complex ($1.6 million).
7 Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) are different than the number of staff the Agency has. An FTE of 1.0 means that the person is equivalent to a full-time worker, while an FTE of 0.5 means that the person is working only half-time.
In 2007–08, the CFIA continued its work on the implementation of the Management, Resources and Results Structure (MRRS) Policy, which included revision of strategic outcomes, the Program Activity Architecture (PAA) and the associated Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) and governance structure.
The objectives of this modernization initiative were to: ensure alignment of strategic outcomes and the PAAwith the Agency’s mandate; improve clarity and measurability of strategic outcomes; enhance alignment of program activities with strategic outcomes; and, build a PMF that would enable collection, integration and use of performance information to support Agency and Parliamentary decision making.
The new PAA features three strategic outcomes that are supported by seven program activities (illustrated below). This new structure is an improvement over its predecessor as it highlights significant Agency programs, enabling effective planning and reporting at more strategic levels. The top level of the new PAA is as follows:
The Agency is planning on further developing and enhancing its PMF in 2008–09 to gauge Agency performance against its new strategic outcomes and PAA.
The table below provides a crosswalk of the Agency’s previous PAA to the new PAA.
2008-2009 Program Activity Architecture (PAA) Crosswalk ($ millions) |
||||||||
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks |
Zoonotic Risk |
Animal Health Risks and Production Systems |
Plant Health Risks and Production Systems |
Biodiversity Protection |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks |
Domestic and International Market Access |
Total |
|
Food Safety and Public Health |
258.2 |
121.2 |
- |
- |
- |
3.5 |
- |
382.9 |
Science and Regulation |
2.7 |
4.0 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
16.0 |
30.3 |
60.1 |
Animal and Plant Resource Protection |
- |
0.9 |
62.1 |
65.7 |
12.4 |
- |
- |
141.1 |
Public Security |
- |
- |
10.3 |
10.9 |
- |
- |
- |
21.2 |
Total |
260.9 |
126.1 |
74.7 |
79.0 |
14.8 |
19.5 |
30.3 |
605.3 |
On April 1, 1997, Canada became a unique model with the creation of a single agency that consolidated all federally-mandated compliance and enforcement activities for food and the plant and animal resource base. These services had been previously provided by four federal government departments (Health Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Industry Canada, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada).
The CFIA’s operating context is evolving and the scope of activities under its mandate is expanding. In comparison to 1997, the CFIA faces an increasingly complex operating environment, attributable to and amplified by a number of factors.
Globalization
Economically, socially, culturally, technologically, politically and ecologically, the world is more connected than ever before. Markets have become increasingly interconnected and borders more porous. This increased global dependence and integration has had several tangible impacts for CFIA -related activities.
Since the creation of the Agency in 1997, imports and exports of products subject to CFIA regulation have increased by 45.6 per cent8. The import of food into Canada is on the rise; an increasing proportion of which is being sourced from developing countries and emerging trading partners. Similarly, increased exports of CFIA -regulated commodities have placed greater demands on the CFIA for export-related inspection and certification.
Global supply chains have fundamentally changed the way in which food and plant and animal commodities are produced, processed, packaged, distributed and sold. Ingredients are sourced worldwide and finished products are globally distributed, amplifying the potential scope and impact of failures in food safety control systems and making the task of tracking ingredients increasingly difficult. The increasing and diverse trade in agricultural commodities also poses increased risks to both plant and animal health through enhanced pathways for the unintentional flow of pests and pathogens.
Population Demographics
Immigration continues to increase and has accounted for approximately 60 per cent9 of Canada’s population growth since 2000. The changing face of Canada has translated into demands for a greater variety of ethnic and imported foods from an increasing number of countries.
Our aging population is also a consideration. The elderly are more susceptible to foodborne pathogens, and there are increasing demands for food fortification and nutrient supplements.
Evolving Consumer Preferences
Canadian consumer demands for food products are shifting as a result of changing demographics, lifestyles, eating patterns and an increased focus by consumers on the food they buy and provide to their families. Busy families are seeking more convenient foods and ready-to-eat products ranging from bagged salads to fresh entrees. A growing number of consumers are demanding healthy food choices, greater variety and choice regardless of the season or country of origin. Consumers are also demanding informative labels that allow them to make choices about nutrition as well as production methods, such as organics, novel foods and the humane treatment of animals.
Evolving Federal Science and Technology
The Government of Canada is committed to strengthening the effectiveness of its investments in science and technology to ensure Canadians benefit from scientific innovation and that Canada continues to have a competitive advantage.
In May 2007, the Government of Canada released its Science and Technology (S&T) Strategy, Mobilizing Science and Technology to Canada’s Advantage, which sets out a multi-year framework designed to create a business environment that encourages the private sector to innovate, and to guide intelligent strategic investments of public funds. The Strategy underscores the importance of science and technology in the development of regulations and policy.
In the future, numerous challenges will drive more integrated approaches and multi-stakeholder collaboration in federal science activities. These challenges include the increasing complexity of scientific issues, multidisciplinary science in emerging fields, emphasis on interrelated policy priorities, and limited public resources. Additional challenges will be faced with the retirement of a significant number of public service scientists in the next five years and difficulties in attracting bright, young scientists to federal research.
A More Complex Trading Environment
Increasingly, sanitary and phytosanitary negotiations, requirements of international trade agreements and demands of trading partners, play a key role in facilitating trade of agriculture and food products. Globalization, increasing trade volumes, changing consumer demands, higher international standards and new production practices, combined with high-profile food and product recalls, have raised international public concern about the safety of food products traded around the world. These concerns have translated into a greater regulatory requirements for many Canadian exporters and importers and additional requirements for CFIA intervention to facilitate trade.
In responding to these demands, where appropriate, the CFIA seeks out regulatory cooperation with trading partners in order to facilitate the development of compatible regulations while maintaining the highest level of health, safety and environmental protection.
9 Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census.
The CFIA’s capacity to achieve its strategic outcomes is influenced by its ability to recognize, assess and manage potential risks.
In accordance with the Agency’s commitment to risk-based planning and the integration of risk management into policy development, program design, delivery and decision-making, the Agency has completed a systematic process of risk identification and assessment for the purpose of renewing its Corporate Risk Profile (CRP). The CRP is intended to identify risks faced by the Agency and put in place approaches for mitigating these risks.
The Agency’s CRP identifies nine key strategic risks. The associated mitigation strategies for 2008–09 form the basis of this Report on Plans and Priorities. The risks, and where the detailed mitigation strategies can be found, are:
The opportunities and challenges arising from the evolving operating environment and the identified in Corporate Risk Profile will require that the Agency embark on a transformative agenda that will help it to:
For 2008–09, CFIA has identified the following program and management priorities. These priorities, and the activities contained within, represent the Agency’s directions for action in advancing its strategic outcomes. Each priority supports the achievement of the Agency’s strategic outcomes that are aligned to the broader Government of Canada priorities as identified in Canada’s Performance 2007 and the Speech from the Throne.
The CFIA’s program priorities focus on areas where additional effort will be directed over the fiscal year either to address a gap, or to comply with broader government direction to increase activity.
Priority 1: Enhancing regulatory compliance, with a focus on safety of domestic and imported food
Link to Government of Canada Outcomes
Link to the CFIA’s Strategic Outcomes
As a regulatory agency, the principle means by which the CFIA carries out its mandate is assessing industry compliance with regulatory requirements. For 2008–09, the CFIA will focus on compliance of food products and inputs into Canada’s food system, both of domestic and international origin.
This priority is supported by the October 16, 2007, Speech From the Throne, in which the Government of Canada committed to ensuring that Canadians could expect the same standards of quality and safety from imported goods as they do from products made at home. On December 17, 2007, the Prime Minister announced Canada’s new Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan, a comprehensive and integrated strategy of active prevention and targeted oversight and response.
Measures proposed to advance this initiative, from a food perspective, include:
In 2008–09, CFIA will develop and initiate implementation of the Food Safety Action Plan. This will better position CFIA to respond to emerging risks to food safety stemming from the increasing volume of food imports, new production practices, global marketing and mass distribution networks. The Agency will use this opportunity to engage foreign governments, industry and consumers in addressing those risks along the entire food continuum.
The CFIA’s initiatives in support of this priority include implementation of a Food Safety Research Strategy, which will assist in developing effective tools to carry out the Agency’s food safety programming; continued promotion and implementation by industry of Good Importing Practices; and continuing to encourage industry to maximize its role in the food safety system by putting in place quality management systems such as Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP). These initiatives are elaborated in Section 2 of this report.
10 As identified in Canada’s Proposed Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan. For more information, visit: http://www.healthycanadians.gc.ca/pr-rp/plan_e.html
Priority 2: Strengthening preparedness to mitigate and respond to animal and plant diseases and pests
Link to Government of Canada Outcomes
Link to the CFIA’s Strategic Outcomes
The CFIA’s state of preparedness to address existing and emerging animal diseases, some of which have the potential to affect humans (such as avian influenza), and plant diseases and pests is key to its ability to deliver its mandate. The Agency continuously strives to improve and enhance its capacity and capability to predict and to respond to outbreaks and cases of animal and plant health issues.
Since 2004, Canada has faced three outbreaks of avian influenza (AI) in domestic poultry flocks. The CFIA and its partners will continue to review and update elements of the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy including the National Emergency Response Plan, the Animal Health Functional Plan, the Notifiable Avian Influenza Hazard Specific Plan, as well as other emergency response plans necessary to address a potential outbreak of highly pathogenic AI in domestic poultry. In 2008, efforts will continue to recruit, hire and train veterinarians for the Canadian Veterinary Reserve and work will continue within the auspices of the North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza, announced at the November 2007 North American Leaders’ Summit in Montebello, Quebec.
Plant pests and diseases have the potential to pose a significant threat to Canada’s environment and to its economic well-being. The CFIA is leading the development of a comprehensive and integrated federal/provincial National Plant Health Cooperation Framework that will enable a coordinated approach to protecting Canada’s resource base and the environment from the impact of new plant pests and new invasive species.
Priority 3: Improving the program and regulatory framework to support continued consumer protection and economic prosperity
Link to Government of Canada Outcomes
Link to the CFIA’s Strategic Outcomes
The CFIA’s efforts to provide a fair, efficient and outcome-based regulatory regime for food, animals and plants enables timely access to foreign markets for Canadian products and make a diverse and safe supply of food products available year-round for Canadians. The CFIA works to protect consumers from misrepresentation and marketplace deception in food production, packaging, labelling and advertising. At the international level, the CFIA works to represent the interests of Canadian consumers and producers and promotes science-based standards for world trade in food, animals, plants, and animal and plant products.
In 2008–09, the CFIA , with its government partners, will initiate the implementation of Canada’s new Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan. In support of consumer protection and market access, the Agency will address consumer concerns associated with labelling policies through a review of current voluntary "Product of Canada" and "Made in Canada" policies.
In support of the government-wide Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation (CDSR), which is aimed at improving the Government of Canada’s existing regulatory system, the CFIA will continue to develop pilot projects and work on its own regulatory processes to keep pace with today’s realities and evolving needs. CFIA will continue its efforts toward the Government of Canada Paperwork Burden Reduction Initiative (PBRI) and will strive to reduce the administrative burden posed by regulatory and administrative requirements by 20% by November 2008.
The CFIA will contribute to the Single Window Initiative (SWI) led by the Canada Border Services Agency. This initiative endeavours to implement a streamlined approach for the electronic collection, use and dissemination of commercial trade data. The SWI will provide a single interface that will allow traders to fulfil all import, export and transit-related regulatory requirements more efficiently, thereby reducing the paper burden and potential duplication posed by the current system.
The CFIA will also move forward and contribute to several other key initiatives including: the Enhanced Import Control Program to provide equivalency between import and domestic food safety and nutrition regulatory requirements; the continued implementation of the Destination Inspection Service for fresh fruits and vegetables to facilitate dispute resolution between buyers and sellers of fresh fruit and vegetables which have a Canadian destination; amendments to the Health of Animals Act and Regulations to support the National Aquatic Animal Health Program (NAAHP) to encompass aquatic animals and reportable and notifiable diseases of trade concern, as well as of concern to protection of wild and cultured aquatic animals from diseases that threaten productivity and industry sustainability; addition of a list of toxic substances to the Health of Animals Regulations to allow the CFIA to respond to toxic contamination events in the same manner as it responds to animal disease emergencies, which will strengthen the CFIA’s regulatory control for instances of contamination along the entire food production continuum; and advancing the National Plant Biosecurity Strategy will contribute to modernizing and strengthening Canada’s plant regulatory system.
The CFIA has identified the following management priorities based on the results of recent Management Accountability Framework (MAF) Assessments, the renewal of the Corporate Risk Profile and the need to put in place strategies to address the need for workforce renewal.
Priority 4: Implementing Human Resources Renewal
The CFIA faces many workforce challenges including: intense competition for talented knowledge workers; a significant number of impending retirements of experienced staff; an increasingly diverse Canadian society; fewer appropriately skilled workers; and the ongoing demands of technological change.
As business needs and activities are fundamentally linked to human resources needs and activities, workforce renewal is a top priority. Given the CFIA’s profound responsibilities, attracting and retaining the best people is essential and a solid talent management strategy is necessary to close skills gaps. The CFIA Workforce Renewal Plan will optimize our human resources capacity so we may continue to deliver on our mandate as a science-based regulatory body. The Workforce Renewal Plan is also a key element for linking Agency plans and activities to the federal government’s renewal priorities.
Over the next three years, the Agency’s five key human resource priorities are:
Attracting Talent (Recruitment)
The Agency faces the same human capital challenges as other public-sector organizations, but must also address the ongoing competitive challenges of recruitment and retention in the scientific and technical field. This reality has made recruitment our top priority. The Agency has developed and is implementing a recruitment strategy which focuses on Agency branding, strategic and collaborative recruitment efforts and group-specific recruitment action plans for critical skill shortages.
Leadership Development
The Agency has a widely distributed national workforce and many employees work in non-traditional settings (e.g. on the road, in laboratories, etc.). This presents challenges to providing staff with the competencies required to lead and inspire the best performance. Leadership development programs will help meet the current and future leadership needs and employment equity goals of the Agency.
Building Capacity (Learning and Development)
In our knowledge-based economy and society, organizational performance will increasingly depend on the rapid acquisition and application of skills and knowledge. The Agency must be prepared to respond quickly to emergencies, as well as new and evolving policies and regulatory changes. The CFIA is committed to providing all employees with the training and tools they need to do their jobs and to support them with career-long learning and development opportunities.
Employee Engagement (Retention)
The Agency will continue to value its employees’ contributions towards creating a high-performing workforce. The CFIA will support a culture of internal and external recognition, incorporate and promote safe workplace initiatives, strive to have a fully representative workforce, and continue to foster an environment of linguistic duality. We will tailor compensation and classification to the unique needs of the Agency and will continue to seek feedback on employee engagement through employee surveys. To support these efforts, the Agency will continue to integrate human resources planning with business planning.
A Supportive HR Management Architecture
The Agency will continue to introduce human resource management tools and processes to more efficiently and effectively support our commitment to human resources excellence. This ongoing transformation of Agency human resource services will help us to better meet the CFIA’s needs. The foundation of this human resources architecture will be consistent, standardized human resources processes and technologies. As new tools and technologies are introduced, their availability will be promoted through effective communication activities.
Priority 5: Enhancing alignment and coordination within the Agency to better integrate risk management into effective policy development, program design and program delivery
The foundation of a well aligned and coordinated organization includes integrated risk management and effective information and knowledge management which informs policy and program development and delivery over the next three years. Over the next three years, the Agency’s priorities in integrated risk management are:
Integrated Risk Management (IRM)
Integrated Risk Management is a continuous, proactive and systematic process for understanding, managing and communicating risk from an organization-wide perspective. It involves ongoing, structured assessments of risks that can affect the achievement of organizational objectives at the strategic, operational, and project levels.
The CFIA acknowledges the central importance of risk management as a core mandate enabler. CFIA policies, programs and practices have been built on risk management concepts and principles, and CFIA has a long tradition of experience with, and excellence in, effective risk management.
The Agency continually improves its practices to reduce risks to an acceptable level, and conducts ongoing horizon scanning, collaboration and research to provide early indication of potential risks that could affect the Agency’s ability to achieve its mandate.
Fully functioning IRM is embedded within, and supports, existing organizational processes, such as strategic planning and reporting, business planning, program and policy development, as well as day-to-day decision making. The CFIA will continue to implement the Integrated Risk Management (IRM) Policy, which was introduced in 2007. The IRM Policy is designed to:
Effective Information and Knowledge Management
Information Management (IM) should effectively support CFIA’s ability to develop, implement and measure the effectiveness of its policy and programs.
As a maturing and rapidly growing regulatory organization, the CFIA requires a significant degree of integration of its information, and the ability to collect, organize and retrieve this information in a way that meets multiple needs including policy design, program modernization, compliance and enforcement, performance measurement, etc.
The CFIA is increasing IM/IT capacity and capability with a view to enhancing system inter-operability and a business-based approach to information management across the Agency. Improved IM/IT governance practices have and are being instituted, such as the Sub-Committee on Information Management and Technology (SCIMT) whose membership consists of the senior cadre of the Agency. The IM Way Forward is an umbrella IM approach that encompasses a number of IM projects and project proposals, including those required in support of litigation. The approach includes awareness sessions to Agency staff on their IM obligations.
Modernization of the PAA and MRRS
The Agency will continue to advance its PAA and MRRS, including integration, use and reporting of performance information. In 2008–09, with the updated MRRS in place, the CFIA will use the renewed PAA as the basis for planning and reporting and use the associated Performance Measurement Framework to collect and integrate performance information into decision making at all levels of the organization.
For information on other key management initiatives, see Section 4.1 of this report.
For planning, performance reporting and management decision making, it is essential that performance results are linked with resources. The table below shows the alignment of CFIA’s strategic outcomes and program activities to resources and priorities. Details on priorities follow in section II.
Expected Results |
Planned Spending |
Contributes to the following program priorities |
|||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
|||
Strategic Outcome: Public health risks associated with the food supply and transmission of animal diseases to humans is minimized and managed |
1 and 2 |
||||
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks |
Risks associated with food, including nutrition, are managed within acceptable limits |
260.9 | 254.2 | 254.8 | 1 |
Zoonotic Risk |
Risks of the transmission of animal diseases to humans are managed within acceptable limits |
126.1 |
101.6 |
102.0 |
2 |
Strategic Outcome: A safe and sustainable plant and animal resource base |
2 |
||||
Animal Health Risks and Production Systems |
Risks to the animal resource base are managed within acceptable limits |
74.7 |
70.8 |
71.0 |
2 |
Plant Health Risks and Production Systems |
Risks to the plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits |
79.0 |
77.0 |
62.6 |
2 |
Biodiversity Protection |
Risks to the biodiversity within the animal and plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits |
14.8 |
13.9 |
13.9 |
2 |
Strategic Outcome: Contributes to consumer protection and market access based on the application of science and standards |
3 |
||||
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks |
The CFIA’s regulatory framework provides the greatest net benefit for Canadians as it is based on scientific approaches and takes into account international contributions and stakeholders’ interests |
19.5 |
18.3 |
18.4 |
3 |
Domestic and International Market Access |
Canadian producers of food, plants, animals and related products operate within a fair and efficient marketplace, from which Canadian consumers benefit |
30.3 |
28.6 |
28.7 |
3 |
Section II provides more detailed information about the Agency’s program activities and strategies to achieve expected results. This information is organized according to strategic outcome. For each strategic outcome, this section includes details on what the Agency is doing and plans to do to meet its priorities, mitigate strategic risks, and move toward achieving its strategic outcomes and, ultimately, fulfilling its mandate.
GoC Outcome | Healthy Canadians | |
CFIA Strategic Outcome | Public health risks associated with the food supply and transmission of animal diseases to humans are minimized and managed | |
Expected Results | Risks associated with food, including nutrition, are managed within acceptable limits | Risks of the transmission of animal diseases to humans are managed within acceptable limits |
Program Activities | Food Safety and Nutrition Risks | Zoonotic Risk |
Key Strategic Risks | Foodborne Hazards | Zoonotic Outbreaks / Incidents |
Priorities | Enhancing regulatory compliance, with a focus on safety of domestic and imported food | Strengthening preparedness to mitigate and respond to animal and plant diseases and pests |
Strategies |
• Improving and modernizing inspections approaches • Maintaining capacity to predict and respond to emergencies • Carrying out education and outreach activities |
• Conducting disease surveillance, detection and control activities; and • Collaborating with partners to enhance program and regulatory frameworks |
SO1 Strategic Planning Framework |
Protecting human health is the highest priority for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA ). As a key contributor to the Government of Canada’s integrated approach to population health, the CFIA , in partnership with others, protects Canadians from preventable health risks related to unsafe food. Such health risks may be caused by pathogens, undeclared allergens, chemical contaminants or by animal diseases that have the potential to be transmissible to humans, such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and avian influenza. Additionally, the CFIA contributes to the health of Canadians by ensuring that consumers have appropriate information on which to make safe and healthy food choices.
Key risks to the CFIA’s capacity to achieve this strategic outcome are: foodborne hazards and zoonotic outbreaks/incidents. In order to mitigate these risks, the Agency will concentrate its efforts on the delivery of the following priorities:
The key strategies are presented, per the CFIA’s Program Activity Architecture (PAA), under two program activities:
These key strategies and the planned activities that support them are described in the following sections 2.1a and 2.1b.
Food safety and nutrition risk management programming works with federal, provincial and municipal partners and organizations to improve the overall health of Canadians. A primary contribution to this effort is in minimizing and managing risks, and deliberate threats, to food and food production systems. Consumers are also provided with appropriate information on which to base safe and nutritious food choices. We achieve this by developing and delivering programs designed to verify that food safety and nutrition information is accurate. Programs and services are developed and delivered to protect Canadians from preventable food safety hazards, by managing food safety emergencies effectively, and supporting public awareness of, and the contribution to, food safety in imported and domestic food.
Expected Result: Risks associated with food, including nutrition, are managed within acceptable limits11 | |
Performance Indicators | Targets |
Extent to which inspected federally-registered establishments comply with federal food safety requirements | ≥ 98 per cent compliance |
Extent to which domestic and imported food products comply with federal chemical residue requirements | ≥ 95 per cent compliance |
Time taken to issue public warnings for Class I recalls | 100 per cent of Class I recalls are issued within 24 hours of a recall decision |
Extent to which food packaging inspected for nutrition labelling displays nutrition information12 | ≥ 80 per cent of food packaging inspected for nutrition labelling includes nutrition information |
Financial Resources ($ millions) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
260.9 |
254.2 |
254.8 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
3,014 |
2,995 |
2,995 |
11 Acceptable limits are currently being defined in terms of established performance indicators. The CFIA is undertaking an extensive exercise to review all of its indicators to ensure that they are fair, reliable and valid measures that comprehensively capture the extent to which the Agency has achieved its expected results.
12 For this fiscal year, the CFIA is concentrating its efforts on ensuring that nutrition labels are displayed. In future years, it will be concentrating on the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the labels.
Risk Context
Foodborne Hazards — Canadians have access to a food supply that is safe and nutritious. The CFIA and its regulatory partners, industry and consumer groups have worked to significantly reduce the threat of foodborne hazards in Canada; however, the risk that such illness will arise always remains. The CFIA and co-operating jurisdictions must continue to improve the capacity and capability to detect, track and mitigate risks associated with diseases, pathogens, toxins, chemical contaminants and other health hazards in the registered and non-federally registered food sectors.
Strategies for mitigating risks and achieving expected results
Risks to food safety are diverse and complex. Significant hazards that can affect human health may be introduced at any point along the food continuum — from production (including fertilizer application), to processing, to transportation and through the practices consumers follow in handling and preparing food. Today the food continuum is even more complex, with global production and processing systems using ingredients that have been sourced through global supply chains.
The CFIA employs the following three strategies under this program activity to mitigate the identified risks and achieve the expected result:
Strategy One: Improving and modernizing inspection approaches
In order to advance Strategy One, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
13 For more information on the Government of Canada’s proposed Food Safety Action Plan, visit http://www.healthycanadians.gc.ca
Learn About … MEAT INSPECTION REFORM (MIR) The objective of MIR is to bring consistency to meat inspection across Canada, enhance the safety and suitability of domestically produced meat and poultry products, to sustain consumer confidence and to provide a sound regulatory base for industry and effective use of resources for inspection program delivery. MIR has expanded beyond reforms to existing federal programs to include the development of a single meat and poultry products standard for Canada — the Canadian Meat Hygiene Standard (CMHS) — developed to provide a general, outcome-based framework for the production of safe and suitable meat and poultry products in Canada. The standard may be used as a template by provinces and territories, providing an opportunity to update their meat inspection regulations to be aligned with federal Meat Inspection Regulations. |
Learn About … HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS
|
Note: Meat Inspection Reform, Good Importing Practices and HACCP initiatives also support section 2.3b Domestic and International Market Access.
Strategy Two: Maintaining capacity to predict and respond to emergencies
In order to advance Strategy Two, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Strategy Three: Carrying out education and outreach activities
In order to advance Strategy Three, in 2008–09, CFIA will:
Zoonotic risk programs work with federal and provincial partners and organizations to improve the overall health of Canadians. A primary contribution to this effort is in protecting Canadians from the spread of diseases transmissible, or potentially transmissible, from animal populations to humans. Zoonotic risks are managed and minimized through the development and delivery of programs and services focused on the animal health aspect and designed to help prevent and control the spread of zoonotic diseases, support public awareness, conduct inspections, and monitor and test.
Expected Result: Risks of the transmission of animal diseases to humans are managed within acceptable limits.14 | |
Performance Indicators | Targets |
Number of incidents of avian influenza that expand beyond the initial control zone | No expansion of the disease beyond the initial control zone |
Financial Resources ($ millions) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
126.1 |
101.6 |
102.0 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
913 |
821 |
821 |
14 Acceptable limits are currently being defined in terms of established performance indicators. The CFIA is undertaking an extensive exercise to review all of its indicators to ensure that they are fair, reliable and valid measures that comprehensively capture the extent to which the Agency has achieved its expected results.
Risk Context
Zoonotic Outbreaks/Incidents — Animals, both domestic and wild, can potentially transmit disease-causing agents to humans. BSE, avian influenza, the spread of West Nile virus and the detection of new strains of rabies are examples of the potential for diseases of animal origin that could affect public health. The CFIA’s science, program and regulatory frameworks must keep pace with existing and emerging disease threats.
Strategies for mitigating risks and achieving expected results
The CFIA employs the following two strategies under this program activity to mitigate the identified risks and achieve the expected result:
Strategy One: Conducting surveillance, detection and control activities
In order to advance Strategy One, in 2008–09, CFIA will:
Learn About… CANADIAN ANIMAL HEALTH SURVEILLANCE NETWORK (CAHSN) The CFIA’s surveillance activities are supported by a nationwide network known as the Canadian Animal Health Surveillance Network (CAHSN), which draws on the disease detection capabilities of practising veterinarians, provincial and university diagnostic laboratories and the federal government. The CAHSN focuses on early detection of animal disease threats that could have zoonotic potential in order to provide a rapid response to minimize the human health and economic risks to Canada. Surveillance data received from many sources is combined and simultaneously alerts both human and animal health authorities in other jurisdictions within Canada when potential animal disease threats are identified. |
Strategy Two: Collaborating with partners to enhance program and regulatory frameworks
In order to advance Strategy Two, in 2008–09, CFIA will:
Learn About… BSE RISK STATUS In 2006, the OIE established a new process to assign BSE risk status to member countries based primarily on the strength of three program elements: import controls; feed ban; and surveillance. The integrity and quality of Canada’s surveillance efforts have been critical to the OIE’s recommendation in 2007 that Canada be considered “controlled risk” for BSE. Annual OIE reassessment of BSE programs will be required to retain “controlled risk” status, and rigorous surveillance data will be required to demonstrate the effectiveness of the Enhanced Feed Ban (See section 2.2a Animal Health Risks and Production Systems for more information) in accelerating the eradication of BSE. |
Learn About… AVIAN INFLUENZA (AI): POTENTIAL THREATS Canada faces two major, interrelated animal and public health threats with respect to avian influenza. The first is the possibility that the highly pathogenic H5N1 Asian sub-type of avian influenza will spread to wild birds and domestic fowl, which would severely impact Canada’s poultry industry and other sectors. The second, far more troubling threat is the potential for a human pandemic influenza caused by a mutation of H5N1 or other viruses. For more information on the CFIA’s AI programming, visit: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/disemala/avflu/avflue.shtml |
GoC Outcome | Strong Economic Growth | A Clean and Healthy Environment | ||||
CFIA Strategic Outcome | A safe and sustainable plant and animal resource base | |||||
Expected Results | Risks to the animal resource base are managed within acceptable limits | Risks to the plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits | Risks to biodiversity within the animal and plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits | |||
Program Activities | Animal Health Risks and Production Systems | Plant Health Risks and Production Systems | Biodiversity Protection | |||
Key Strategic Risks | Animal Disease Hazards | Science and Technology Capacity | Plant Pest Hazards | Science and Technology Capacity | Animal Disease and Plant Pest Hazards | Science and Technology Capacity |
Priorities | Strengthening preparedness to mitigate and respond to animal and plant diseases and pests | |||||
Strategies |
• Conducting animal disease surveillance, detection and control activities; and • Collaborating with partners and stakeholders to enhance program and regulatory frameworks |
• Conducting plant disease surveillance, detection and control activities • Collaborating with partners and stakeholders to enhance proram and regulatory frameworks |
• Preventing the spread of invasive alien species and assessing agricultural products for safety and efficacy; and • Collaborating with partners and stakeholders to enhance program and regulatory frameworks |
|||
SO 2 Strategic Planning Framework |
The Government of Canada recognizes that our traditional industries such as agriculture and forestry have long been anchors of our nation’s economic and social well-being. In support of maintaining the integrity and viability of these key sectors, the Government has announced, among its priority commitments, its intention to provide for a prosperous future and to improve and protect the environment.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s (CFIA ) contribution to these Government priorities is focused on the promotion of a safe and sustainable plant and animal resource base. This entails protecting Canada’s crops, forests, livestock, aquatic animals and biodiversity from regulated pests and diseases; preventing the introduction of undesirable or dangerous substances into human food through animal and plant production systems by way of animal feeds, seeds, fertilizers and supplements; and assessing the environmental sustainability of new products derived through enabling technologies, such as biotechnology.
Key risks to the CFIA’s capacity to achieve this strategic outcome are: animal and plant pest hazards and science and technology capacity. In order to mitigate these risks, the Agency will concentrate its efforts on the delivery of the following priority:
The key strategies are presented, per the CFIA’s Program Activity Architecture (PAA), under three program activities:
These key strategies and the planned activities that support them are described in the following sections 2.2a, 2.2b and 2.2c.
Protecting the animal resource base is integral to the Canadian food supply and critical to the well-being of all Canadians. The CFIA’s animal heath risks and production systems programming plays an important role in minimizing and managing risk by protecting Canada’s animals (including livestock, aquatic species and wildlife) from regulated diseases and from deliberate threats to the resource base. Programs and services are designed to protect Canadian animal resources, feeds and animal products, as well as to manage animal disease emergencies effectively. Public confidence in animal health status, production systems, safety of animal products and their by-products is significantly enhanced by Canada’s reputation for effectively mitigating the risk of serious diseases.
Expected Result: Risks to the animal resource base are managed within acceptable limits15 | |
Performance Indicators | Targets |
Extent to which the CFIA’s data indicates that foreign regulated animal diseases have entered Canada via specified regulated pathways | No evidence (i.e. confirmed by the CFIA’s data) that foreign regulated animal diseases have entered into Canada through specified regulated pathways |
Extent to which the CFIA’s data indicates the spread of foreign regulated animal diseases which entered into Canada this fiscal year16 | No evidence of spread of foreign regulated animal diseases beyond the initial control zone |
Extent to which renderers and feed mills inspected are without any major deviations with respect to the Feeds Regulations and the Health of Animals Regulations (Enhanced Feed Ban) | ≥ 95 per cent compliance rate |
Financial Resources ($ millions) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
74.7 |
70.8 |
71.0 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
751 |
751 |
751 |
15 Acceptable limits are currently being defined in terms of established performance indicators. The CFIA is undertaking an extensive exercise to review all of its indicators to ensure that they are fair, reliable and valid measures that comprehensively capture the extent to which the Agency has achieved its expected results.
16 This indicator reflects only foreign animal diseases at this point. The CFIA also conducts a wide variety of activities with regard to animal diseases already established in Canada. Performance measures to illustrate performance in this regard will be developed and will be reported on in future years.
Risk Context
Animal Disease Hazards — A healthy and sustainable animal resource base in Canada is critical to the environmental objectives and the economy. The CFIA , along with its partners, utilizes numerous measures to identify and reduce threats to the animal resource base, ranging from surveys and movement control to eradication and emergency response. The numerous possible pathways for entry of animal diseases into Canada, together with the potential environmental impact, and to some degree social and/or economic impact of a major animal disease outbreak, make this a significant challenge that must continue to be actively addressed by the CFIA .
Science and Technology Capacity — Trade globalization has amplified the number, scope and sophistication of organizations subject to CFIA inspections. Additionally, globalization has resulted in more commodities from higher-risk markets being imported into Canada, thereby increasing Canada’s exposure to contamination and increasing the introduction of new vectors for disease transmission. The CFIA’s science and technology capacity must keep pace with these considerations in order to adequately conduct its compliance and enforcement activities to protect the animal resource base.
Strategies for mitigating risks and achieving expected results
Canada’s ability to market animals, animal products and by-products, and livestock feed depends on its freedom from serious zoonotic diseases. It also depends on maintaining the confidence of consumers and international officials in Canada’s commitment to protecting the health of animals, humans and the ecosystem.
The CFIA’s animal health and livestock feed programming is instrumental in helping the CFIA to protect the health of animals and the integrity of the food chain. Ongoing activities to advance these efforts include research in support of program/policy development and decision making; regular monitoring, inspection and testing of imported animals; disease control and eradication activities; and, administration of a national inspection program for feed.
The CFIA employs the following two strategies under this program activity to mitigate the identified risks and achieve the expected result:
Strategy One: Conducting animal disease surveillance, detection and control activities
In order to advance Strategy One, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Learn About… FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE PREPAREDNESS STRATEGY Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD)17 is an extremely contagious viral disease that can affect cloven-hoofed animals such as cattle, hogs and sheep. An outbreak of FMD in Canada would result in substantial economic losses due to the cost of control
measures, the loss of revenue in the trade of animals and animal products, and the negative impact on tourism. Most notably, international markets would close to Canadian animals and meat, the livelihood of producers and processors would be severely affected, and animals would need to be destroyed. Over the last several years, the CFIA has refined its plans and procedures related to FMD based on lessons learned and the experiences of other countries, such as the United Kingdom in 2001. |
17 For more information on FMD, visit the CFIA’s FMD website at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/heasan/disemala/fmdfie/inf_e.shtml.
Learn About… CANADIAN VETERINARY RESERVE In November 2006, the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board and the President of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA), announced that a pool of private sector veterinarians would be established to assist governments in responding to animal health emergencies such as disease outbreaks or natural disasters. The Canadian Veterinary Reserve (CVR) supplements existing response capabilities of federal and provincial governments and provides Canada with additional flexibility to increase its support for international animal disease control efforts. The first phase of the CVR program focuses on providing a roster of private sector veterinarians who could be called upon to assist the CFIA on an as-needed basis to provide short term support in defined emergency situations, such as Avian Influenza, anywhere in Canada. In the future, the CVR could also provide vets in civil emergencies such as natural disasters and international crisis situations. A recruitment campaign is currently in full swing, with a target to sign up 50 to 150 vets in this initial phase. The reserve is expected to grow to 300 to 500 over five years. Close to 100 CVR members have been trained by the CFIA in foreign animal disease response at the Agency’s National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease in Winnpeg, Manitoba. |
Strategy Two: Collaborating with partners and stakeholders to enhance program and regulatory frameworks
In order to advance Strategy Two, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
18 North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza is available on the Internet at: http://www.spp.gov/pdf/nap_flu07.pdf
Learn About… THE NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH STRATEGY AND ANIMAL HEALTH SCIENCE FORESIGHT The CFIA is leading the development of an integrated National Animal Health Strategy (NAHS) to consolidate animal health risk management activities and approaches across the country. The NAHS will cover animal populations such as wildlife, farm animals, pets, aquatic animals, laboratory animals and zoo animals, and will focus on inclusive approaches to governance, accountability and investment on the part of federal, provincial and private sector stakeholders. It will also reflect advances in production systems and disease control approaches, and will address environmental sustainability issues such as animal disposal and disease impacts on the ecosystem. Supporting activities to the NAHS include developing Animal Health Science Foresight to enhance capability and capacity among partners and stakeholders to respond to animal health concerns. An integrated approach will foster collaboration among animal health science organizations across governments, industry, academia and other domestic and international organizations; will better enable technology and knowledge transfer; and will guide policy development. |
Learn About… THE ENHANCED FEED BAN The Enhanced Feed Ban came into effect on July 12, 2007. It consists of a series of regulatory controls and measures intended to further mitigate the risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and to protect the health of Canadian livestock. Under the amended regulations, the use of certain cattle tissues capable of transmitting BSE, known as specified risk material (SRM), is strictly prohibited in the manufacture of animal feed, pet food and fertilizer. All SRM must be properly segregated and appropriately managed with permits through to disposal. All persons must comply with these requirements. The amended regulations also provide new requirements for the certification for export of products of rendering plants or fertilizer, fertilizer supplements or animal food that contain a product of a rendering plant. |
Protection of the plant resource base is integral to the Canadian food supply and critical to the well-being of all Canadians. Plant health risks and production systems programming plays an important role in minimizing and managing risk by protecting Canada’s plant resource base (crops and forests) from regulated pests and disease — including deliberate threats to the resource base — and by regulating agricultural products. Programs and services are developed and delivered to protect Canadian plant resources, fertilizers and plant products. Public confidence in plants, production systems and plant products is significantly enhanced by Canada’s reputation for effectively mitigating the risk of serious pests and diseases.
Expected Result: Risks to the plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits.19 | |
Performance Indicators | Targets |
Extent to which CFIA data indicates the entry and establishment of new and foreign regulated plant diseases and pests into Canada (listed diseases/pests in the Regulated Pest List for Canada) | No evidence (i.e. confirmed CFIA data) of the entry and establishment of new foreign regulated plant diseases and pests into Canada through specified regulated pathways |
Extent of change in the presence of regulated plant diseases or pests beyond the regulated areas | No evidence of increase in the size of regulated areas for plant diseases/pests attributable to human activity |
Extent to which plant health risks identified by the CFIA (within and outside Canada), are communicated to the affected stakeholders | Following the identification of a plant health risk, appropriate information is communicated with the relevant stakeholders in less than one month |
Financial Resources ($ millions) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
79.0 |
77.0 |
62.6 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
753 |
752 |
677 |
19 Acceptable limits are currently being defined in terms of established performance indicators. The CFIA is undertaking an extensive exercise to review all of its indicators to ensure that they are fair, reliable and valid measures that comprehensively capture the extent to which the Agency has achieved its expected results.
Risk Context
Plant Pest Hazards — A healthy and sustainable plant resource base in Canada is critical to the environment, social objectives and the economy. The CFIA , along with its partners, utilizes numerous measures to identify and reduce threats to the plant resource base, ranging from surveys and movement control to eradication and emergency response. The numerous possible pathways for entry of plant diseases into Canada, together with the potential environmental and economic impacts of the spread of a plant pest, make this a significant challenge that must continue to be actively addressed by the CFIA .
Science and Technology Capacity — Trade globalization has amplified the number, scope and sophistication of organizations subject to CFIA inspections. Additionally, globalization has resulted in more commodities from higher-risk markets being imported into Canada, thereby increasing Canada’s exposure to contamination and increasing the introduction of new vectors for disease transmission. The CFIA’s science and technology capacity must keep pace with these considerations in order to adequately conduct its compliance and enforcement activities to protect the plant resource base.
Strategies for mitigating risks and achieving expected results
The CFIA has the mandate under the Plant Protection Act to protect the plant resource base from plant pests and diseases. This resource base includes commercial plant-based agriculture and forestry. The Plant Health program is continuously updating and adjusting to respond to risks caused by expanding global trade with the most effective risk management strategies possible using available resources.
The CFIA administers the regulatory oversight for agricultural inputs, such as seeds and fertilizer, for Canada’s plant-based commercial agriculture system under the Seeds Act and the Fertilizers Act. The mandate is to ensure that plant varieties, innovative plant products (including products of biotechnology), fertilizers and supplements, are beneficial, do not impact on environmental sustainability within the agricultural production system and mitigate potential adverse human health impacts associated with handling and use of the products.
The CFIA employs the following two strategies under this program activity to mitigate the identified risks and achieve the expected result:
Strategy One: Conducting plant disease surveillance, detection and control activities
In order to advance Strategy One, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Learn About… REGULATING AGRICULTURAL INPUTS TO THE PLANT-BASED AGRICULTURAL SYSTEM Canada’s crops and forests are also protected by the CFIA’s ongoing efforts related to the regulation of seeds, innovative plant products (including products of biotechnology), and plant supplements and fertilizers. For fertilizers and plant supplements, the CFIA conducts product inspections at blending and manufacturing plants, retail outlets and warehouses. The CFIA also routinely assesses and samples fertilizers and supplements to verify that they meet Canada’s standards for safety. The samples are tested for contaminants such as heavy metals, pesticides and pathogens such as salmonella. When necessary, the CFIA undertakes compliance and enforcement activities. Pre-market assessments, as well as field inspections to ensure that required control measures are being met, are conducted on innovative plant products such as plants with novel traits. These pre-market risk assessments and field inspections mitigate potential environmental risks that may be caused by the introduction of innovative products. Pre-market assessments are also conducted prior to commercialization of most new commercial plant varieties. |
Strategy Two: Collaborating with partners and stakeholders to enhance program and regulatory frameworks
In order to advance Strategy Two, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Learn About… FORESTRY RESEARCH PLAN FOR PLANT QUARANTINE PESTS The value of the forestry industry within Canada is over $80 billion annually. The introduction of pests can have devastating effects on forest health, loss of native biodiversity and losses to timber and other valuable forest resources. Trade issues due to pest quarantines also pose significant challenges for the government. Hence, the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) and the CFIA have collaborated on a Forestry Research Plan for Plant Quarantine Pests to forecast research needs for the next five years. This initiative will improve collaboration between the CFIA and CFS and strategically align resources towards areas of concern while providing the necessary flexible framework to structure research needs for future plant quarantine pest problems. Working collaboratively will enhance capacity to support the development and improvement of policies to prevent the introduction and establishment of plant quarantine pests in Canada, and will improve technology and knowledge transfer to support the development of policies, regulations, international agreements and management tools. |
The term biodiversity refers to the range of organisms present in a particular ecological community or system. It can be measured by the numbers and types of different species, or by genetic variations within and between species. Biodiversity provides the conditions and drives the processes that sustain the global economy and our very existence on earth.
Protection of Canada’s biodiversity is critical to the sustainability of Canada’s environment. Biodiversity protection programming plays an important role in minimizing and managing risks to Canada’s environment by developing and delivering programs and risk mitigation strategies to protect Canada’s biodiversity from the spread of invasive species and other pests due to environmental change and from novel agricultural products, including products of emerging technologies. Programs are developed and delivered to assess and manage environmental safety for the introduction of agricultural products. Through these programs, public confidence in Canada’s ability to assess and manage the risks associated with the introduction of new species and/or new agricultural products is maintained and significantly enhanced.
The CFIA provides regulatory oversight for novel agricultural products, including products of biotechnology, and for agricultural inputs that have the potential to impact natural and managed ecosystems through the destruction of plant material or to harm other organisms in that environment.
While all Canadians benefit from the preservation of our natural habitats, the key beneficiaries of this program activity are the agricultural and forestry sectors, as economic and environmental losses for producers and foresters that could be incurred through destructive plant pests and diseases, or by the introduction of harmful innovative plant products and agricultural inputs, are reduced or prevented. These programs also benefit Canadian industry by instilling international confidence in our regulatory systems, thereby supporting export of Canadian products.
Expected Result*: Risks to biodiversity within the animal and plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits. | |
Performance Indicators | Targets |
TBD | TBD |
TBD | TBD |
* Biodiversity protection is a new program activity for the CFIA . As such, the Agency is currently in the process of developing performance indicators and targets that accurately and comprehensively capture the effectiveness of our work under this program activity.
Financial Resources ($ millions) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
14.8 |
13.9 |
13.9 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
130 |
130 |
130 |
Risk Context
Animal Disease and Plant Pest Hazards — A healthy and sustainable plant and animal resource base in Canada is critical to the environment, social objectives and the economy. The CFIA , along with its partners, utilizes numerous measures to identify and reduce threats to the animal and plant resource base, ranging from surveys and movement control to eradication and emergency response. The numerous possible pathways for entry of plant and animal diseases into Canada, together with the potential environmental impact, and to some degree social and/or economic impact of a major animal disease outbreak or the spread of a plant pest, make this a significant challenge that must continue to be actively addressed by the CFIA .
Science and Technology Capacity — Globalization has resulted in more commodities from higher-risk markets, and of novel agricultural inputs, being imported into Canada, thereby increasing the introduction of new vectors for disease transmission. The CFIA’s science and technology capacity must keep pace with these considerations in order to protect biodiversity in Canada’s animal and plant resource base.
Strategies for mitigating risks and achieving expected results
The CFIA employs the following two strategies under this program activity to mitigate the identified risks and achieve the expected result:
Strategy One: Preventing the spread of invasive alien species and assessing agricultural products for safety and efficacy
In order to advance Strategy One, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Learn About… PREVENTING THE SPREAD OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES Invasive alien species (IAS) are plants, animals and other living organisms that spread when introduced to new areas and that cause serious and often irreversible damage where they become established. Due to their impacts as predators, parasites and competitors of the established flora and fauna in invaded areas, IAS are considered to be the second most significant threat to biodiversity after habitat loss. Species such as Asian long-horned beetle attack native Canadian species, reducing their viability and potentially threatening their continued existence in parts of their natural range. New IAS may be introduced by pathways that include plants, plant products and people. The CFIA Plant Health program focuses on the prevention of IAS through the identification and regulation of high-risk species and pathways and — in collaboration with partners such as the Canadian Forest Service — the detection and management of critical species. Activities to protect biodiversity include the identification of high-risk species through risk analysis, surveillance, response planning, regulation of high-risk pathways, and collaboration with partners to respond effectively to existing IAS and to provide information to Canadians on IAS. |
Strategy Two: Collaborating with partners and stakeholders to enhance program and regulatory frameworks
In order to advance Strategy Two, in 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Learn About… THE FIVE-YEAR BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PLAN, 2008-13 Canada is a leader in biotechnology research and development, and the biotechnology industry is a vital part of the Canadian economy. Products of biotechnology offer many potential benefits to consumers and the environment, but appropriate regulation is essential if these benefits are to be realized. The CFIA regulates products of biotechnology and other novel organisms through mandatory pre-market evaluation programs that determine whether such products can be safely released into the environment and marketplace. The CFIA has exclusive or shared regulatory responsibilities for novel plants, feeds, fertilizers, animals, veterinary biologics and foods. Research in support of regulation is a critical component of Canada’s regulatory system. As new products of biotechnology are developed, new knowledge is required to support policy development and to make and enforce regulatory decisions. The Biotechnology Research Plan will support the CFIA in achieving its regulatory responsibilities through coordinated biotechnology research and development activities. This research strategy will align research themes with the CFIA’s mandate and Government of Canada priorities and foster the engagement of stakeholders for the effective development and delivery of research activities. |
GoC Outcome | A Fair and Secure Marketplace | A Prosperous Canada through Global Commerce | |
CFIA Strategic Outcome | Contributes to consumer protection and market access based on the application of science and standards | ||
Expected Results | The CFIA’s regulatory framework provides the greatest net benefit for Canadians as it is based on scientific approaches and takes into account international contributions and stakeholders’ interests | Canadian producers of food, plants, animals and related products operate within a fair and efficient marketplace, from which Canadian consumers benefit | |
Program Activities | Integrated Regulatory Frameworks | Domestic and International Market Access | |
Key Strategic Risks | Partnership: Roles and Responsibilities | Program Framework | |
Priorities | Improving the program and regulatory frameworks to support continued consumer protection and economic propserity | ||
Strategies |
• Improving and modernizing program and regulatory frameworks; and • Promoting national and international alignment. |
• Protecting consumers and the marketplace from unfair practices; • Contributing to a fair and efficient marketplace and improving market access; and • Promoting the security of Canada’s food supply and agricultural resource base. |
|
SO3 Strategic Planning Framework |
A fair and secure marketplace maintains and enhances consumer confidence and gives businesses an optimal environment for competitiveness. The CFIA is committed to maintaining and improving the legislative and regulatory base related to its mandate in order to protect consumers and support high standards for a safe, fair and secure trading system. The CFIA will continue to promote strong, coherent and science-based regulation and standards, both domestically and internationally, for food safety and public health, consumer protection and animal and plant health.
The CFIA will also concentrate its efforts on strengthening and modernizing its regulatory base to protect consumers and facilitate market access. The objective is to have an outcome-oriented regulatory base that incorporates, by reference, international science-based standards that are effective and support innovation by regulated industry, while providing for appropriate oversight by the CFIA .
The strategies, programs and activities related to achieving this strategic outcome also contribute to enabling the CFIA to achieve the strategic outcomes previously covered in this document. The roles and responsibilities of the key federal partners and international standard-setting organizations for this strategic outcome are described in section 4.2 of this report.
Key risks to the CFIA’s capacity to achieve this strategic outcome are the program framework and partnership. In order to mitigate these risks, the Agency will concentrate its efforts on the delivery of the following priority:
The key strategies are presented per the CFIA’s Program Activity Architecture (PAA), under two program activities
These key strategies and the planned activities that support them are described in the following sections 2.3a and 2.3b.
Integrated regulatory frameworks programming enables economic prosperity of Canadians through its contribution to the development and effective implementation of national and international regulatory frameworks for food, animals and plants, and their products that are transparent, science-based, rules-based and mutually reinforcing. By contributing to the development of these frameworks, the ability of different jurisdictions to protect against sanitary and phytosanitary20 risks, and to pursue other legitimate objectives in a manner that is consistent with a fair and competitive market economy, is reinforced.
Expected Result: The CFIA’s regulatory framework provides the greatest net benefit for Canadians as it is based on scientific approaches and takes into account international contributions and stakeholders’ interests | |
Performance Indicators | Targets |
The proportion of regulatory initiatives that are pre-published in Canada Gazette, Part I prior to publication in Canada Gazette, Part II21 | ≥ 95 per cent of regulatory initiatives are pre-published in Canada Gazette, Part I prior to publication in Canada Gazette, Part II |
Financial Resources ($ millions) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
19.5 |
18.3 |
18.4 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
237 |
237 |
237 |
20 Phytosanitary: Pertaining specifically to the health of plants.
21 There are instances where a regulatory initiative would be published in Canada Gazette Part II without being pre-published in Canada Gazette Part I. This is a measure of the extent to which stakeholders and partners have the opportunity to comment on specific initiatives.
Risk Context
Program Framework — Outdated statutes, insufficient authority and a variable statutory base could impede the CFIA’s ability to carry out its mandate to protect consumers from preventable health risks and unsafe or deceptive practices in a uniform manner. The CFIA will continue to pursue mechanisms to update and modernize its program and regulatory frameworks.
Retaining, strengthening and reinforcing rules and science-based approaches within the international regulatory framework will help to achieve Canada’s regulatory objectives and security and protect Canadian exporters from discriminatory and unnecessary barriers. The Agency must continue to work through international institutions to help develop and operationalize international rules and in other international fora to promote the development of international standards and policies that are based on sound science to ensure that human, animal, ecosystem or plant life or health are protected in a world where trade is expanding.
Partnership: Roles and Responsibilities — In delivering the various aspects of its mandate, the Agency works with various external parties, including other government departments and other levels of government, other nations, industry, and national and international bodies. Given the number and complexities of these relationships, it is essential that all roles and responsibilities be aligned and coordinated to enable effective program delivery.
Strategies for mitigating risks and achieving expected results
As food safety, animal and plant health, and consumer protection issues continue to emerge, there is a need to integrate, modernize and consolidate standards and inspection techniques. A modernized legislative and regulatory foundation would move the Agency from a regulatory base that is variable across different commodities and in some cases outdated, to one that is modern, consistent, science-based and outcome-oriented. To respond to the need for more effective regulation of new products, the Agency is committed to pursuing strategies aimed at reducing barriers.
The CFIA employs two strategies under this program activity to mitigate the identified risks and achieve the expected result:
Strategy One: Improving and modernizing program and regulatory frameworks
In order to advance Strategy One, the CFIA will:
The CFIA’s complete regulatory plan for 2008–09 can be found in Section III of this report.
22 For more information on the CDSR, visit the official Government of Canada regulations website: http://www.regulation.gc.ca/directive/directive00-eng.asp
23 For more information of the PBRI, visit the official Industry Canada PBRI website: http://www.reducingpaperburden.gc.ca/epic/site/pbri-iafp.nsf/en/h_sx00001e.html
24 For more information, visit the official Agriculture and Agri-food Canada Growing Forward website: http://www.agr.gc.ca/pol/grow-croiss/index_e.php
Learn About… PLANT PROGRAMS MODERNIZATION Within the Plant Health programs, significant program modernization initiatives are currently underway in both the areas of seed and fertilizer regulation. The objective of these program modernization initiatives is to minimize unnecessary regulatory burden, reduce barriers to innovation and trade, and to facilitate competitiveness of the Canadian agricultural sector while maintaining the highest safety, quality and environmental sustainability standards. These initiatives also focus on increasing transparency and strengthening the consultation capacity through ongoing dialogue, consensus building and active stakeholder engagement at all stages of the regulatory renewal process. |
Strategy Two: Promoting national and international alignment
In order to advance Strategy Two, the CFIA will:
Learn About… CFIA’s ENGAGEMENT IN INTERNATIONAL FORA The CFIA leads Canada’s participation in a number of international regulatory fora, including the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement25 discussions; the International Plant Protection Convention; and, the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). Additionally, the CFIA co-leads, with Health Canada, the government’s participation in the Codex Alimentarius Commission, an international standard-setting organization, and actively participates in a variety of other international fora focussed on regulatory issues. (See Section IV for more information on the specific objectives of these international fora.) The CFIA works bilaterally and multilaterally with a number of national and international partners to remain at the forefront of scientific developments and to advance sound, science-based decision making. Agency researchers strive to keep abreast of changing technologies and regulatory requirements by developing methods and diagnostic tools that support compliance and enforcement, and participate in negotiation of sanitary and phytosanitary measures that facilitate trade. International rules and standards form the basis for regulating imports and exports of products that could pose a risk to food safety, consumer protection, and animal and plant health. The CFIA promotes the Canadian experience, objectives, and use of the best available scientific knowledge in the development of international agreements, arrangements and standards. The CFIA continues to make gains for Canada in the resolution of phytosanitary technical market access issues on exports. At the same time, the Agency considers international agreements, arrangements and standards when developing and updating standards here in Canada. |
25 Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures and Agreement: These are measures to protect human, animal and plant life or health and to ensure that food is safe to eat. For more information on the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) visit the website: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm
Domestic and international market access programming contributes to securing the conditions for an innovative and prosperous economy. It does so primarily by enabling products to enter markets through the implementation and enforcement of an effective and efficient regulatory system that is accessible, understandable and responsive to domestic and international market requirements. Information provided to consumers by producers is verified as truthful and not misleading and Canadian products are verified as meeting high quality and safety standards.
Expected Result: Canadian producers of food, plants, animals and related products operate within a fair and efficient marketplace, from which Canadian consumers benefit | |
Performance Indicators | Targets |
The extent to which products, labels, and advertisements inspected are accurately represented | 70 per cent of products, labels, and advertisements inspected are accurately represented26 |
Extent to which certified food, animal and plant shipments meet the receiving country’s import requirements | ≥ 99 per cent meet requirements |
Extent to which the service standards within the plant program are met27 | ≥ 95 per cent of plant programs applications which are subject to service standards are completed within the service standard identified |
Financial Resources ($ millions) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
30.3 |
28.6 |
28.7 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | ||
2008–09 |
2009–10 |
2010–11 |
496 |
496 |
496 |
26 The Agency conducts targeted inspections of products, labels and advertisements to find those that are more likely to be in non-compliance. As a result, the target of 70% is deemed appropriate.
27 The plant program has various service standards in relation to the applications they receive. This indicator is a measure of the extent to which they are able to achieve the established standards.
Risk Context
Program Framework — Potential misalignment of Canadian inspection systems with international demands may increase the risk associated with diminished market access for Canadian producers. The CFIA’s program framework must have the capacity required to develop inspections systems that will address risks in an effective manner to respond to international and domestic market demands and maintain international and domestic confidence in Canada’s inspection systems.
Strategies for mitigating risks and achieving expected results
International trade requirements, the security of Canada’s food supply and resource base, and increasing consumer demands require a more proactive and flexible approach in system design and delivery in order to protect consumers and enhance market access. In a fair marketplace, there is an expectation that buyer and seller have equal power. The CFIA is responsible for promoting and maintaining fair competition by, among other things, setting labelling standards that mitigate the risk of false or misleading representation of products.
The CFIA employs three strategies under this program activity to mitigate the identified risks and achieve the expected result:
Strategy One: Protecting consumers and the marketplace from unfair practices
In order to advance Strategy One, the CFIA will:
Learn About… FAIR LABELLING PRACTICES The Government of Canada requires basic labelling information on all pre-packaged food products to protect consumers and provide them with accurate information. Canadians have asked for more information to assist them in making more informed decisions and food choices. Fair Labelling Practices — The Fair Labelling Practices Program protects consumers from deceptive practices (e.g., unfairly and inaccurately presenting net weight and contents through labelling). It also facilitates fair competition for industry by verifying that the labels on their products comply with the provisions of the Food and Drug Regulations and the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Regulations that relate to net quantity, composition, labelling and advertising. These provisions apply to both domestically produced and imported food products. The CFIA is responsible for enforcing food labelling provisions in Canada and plays a key role in protecting consumers and in enabling them to make informed choices. Through its technical committee process, the CFIA identifies and prioritizes potential deceptive labelling practices in the marketplace, and develops strategies to direct inspection and laboratory resources towards products and establishments determined to pose the greatest non-compliance risk to consumers. The CFIA also requires labelling for a number of commodities such as seed and fertilizers to mitigate the risk of false or misleading representation of products. Regulatory oversight of product quality and/or efficacy in these areas also ensures consumer protection. |
Strategy Two: Contributing to a fair and efficient marketplace and improving market access
In order to advance Strategy Two, the CFIA will:
Learn About… EXPORT CERTIFICATION The CFIA is recognized by foreign governments as the competent authority in Canada for the regulation of food, plants and animals. As a result, the CFIA is involved in marketplace monitoring and is also requested to certify thousands of export shipments each year, attesting to the safety of Canadian products and the rigour of Canada’s inspection system. The certification process plays an important role in Canada’s international trade and helps to protect the excellent international reputation of Canada’s exports of foods, plants, animals and associated products. |
Strategy Three: Promoting the security of Canada’s food supply and agricultural resource base
In order to advance Strategy Three, the CFIA will:
28 For more information, visit the official Government of Canada SPP website: http://www.spp.gov/
This section contains the following information:
Table 1: Agency links to the Government of Canada Outcomes | |||||
Expected Results | Planned Spending ($ millions) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome Area | |||
2008–09 | 2009–10 | 2010–11 | |||
Strategic Outcome: Public health risks associated with the food supply and transmission of animal diseases to humans are minimized and managed | |||||
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks | Risks associated with food, including nutrition, are managed within acceptable limits | 260.9 | 254.2 | 254.8 | Healthy Canadians |
Zoonotic Risk | Risks of the transmission of animal diseases to humans are managed within acceptable limits | 126.1 | 101.6 | 102.0 | Healthy Canadians |
Strategic Outcome: A safe and sustainable plant and animal resource base | |||||
Animal Health Risks and Production Systems | Risks to the animal resource base are managed within acceptable limits | 74.7 | 70.8 | 71.0 | Strong economic growth |
Plant Health Risks and Production Systems | Risks to the plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits | 79.0 | 77.0 | 62.6 | Strong economic growth |
Biodiversity Protection | Risks to the biodiversity within the animal and plant resource base are managed within acceptable limits | 14.8 | 13.9 | 13.9 | A clean and healthy environment |
Strategic Outcome: Contributes to consumer protection and market access based on the application of science and standards | |||||
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks | The CFIA’s regulatory framework provides the greatest net benefit for Canadians as it is based on scientific approaches and takes into account international contributions and stakeholders’ interests | 19.5 | 18.3 | 18.4 | A fair and secure marketplace |
Domestic and International Market Access | Canadian producers of food, plants, animals and related products operate within a fair and efficient marketplace, from which Canadian consumers benefit | 30.3 | 28.6 | 28.7 | A prosperous Canada through global commerce |
Table 2: Services Received Without Charge ($ millions) | |
2008–09 | |
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), border crossings, airports and other government departments | 23.0 |
Contributions covering employers’ share of employees’ insurance premiums and expenditures paid by Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS), excluding revolving funds; Employer’s contribution to employees’ insured benefits plans and expenditures paid by TBS | 30.8 |
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada | 1.1 |
2008–09 Services received without charge | 54.9 |
Table 3: Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity ($ millions) | ||||
Forecast Spending 2007–08 |
Planned Spending 2008–09 |
Planned Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
|
Food Safety and Nutrition Risk | 11.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 5.7 |
Zoonotic Risk | 5.8 | 22.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
Animal Health Risks and Production Systems | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Plant Health Risks and Production Systems | 3.7 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Biodiversity Protection | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Domestic and International Market Access | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Total29 | 26.5 | 34.7 | 14.6 | 13.0 |
Changes from 2007–08 Forecast Spending to 2008–09 Planned spending
The increase of $8.2 million is primarily related to the following items: increase of $20.0 million received in 2008–09 only for the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy to allow the CFIA to work with
manufacturers to develop, test and build mobile incineration units or alternate disposal methodologies for the mass disposal of infected animals; decrease of $6.8 million related to the 2006-07 carry forward which is included in the 2007–08 Forecast Spending amount only; decrease of $4.8 million related to resources received for the Avian Influenza Preparedness Strategy for
specialized equipment (including personal protective equipment), laboratory surge capacity, and real property requirements; decrease of $0.2 million related to the sunsetting of resources for the Invasive Alien Species Strategy for Canada.
Planned Spending changes from 2008–09 to 2009-10
The decrease of $20.1 million is primarily related to the sunsetting of resources received in 2008–09 only for the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy to allow the CFIA to work with manufacturers to develop, test and build
mobile incineration units or alternate disposal methodologies for the mass disposal of infected animals ($20.0 million).
Planned Spending Changes from 2009-10 to 2010-11
The decrease of $1.6 million is related to the repayment towards client costs for the Skyline complex.
Table 4: Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue ($ millions) | ||||
Respendable Revenue | ||||
Forecast Revenue 2007–08 |
Planned Revenue 2008–09 |
Planned Revenue 2009–10 |
Planned Revenue 2010–11 |
|
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks Vote-netted Revenue |
32.1 | 32.1 | 32.1 | 32.1 |
Zoonotic Risk Vote-netted Revenue |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Animal Health Risks/Production Systems Vote-netted Revenue |
2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Plant Health Risks/Production Systems Vote-netted Revenue |
3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Biodiversity Protection Vote-netted Revenue |
0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks Vote-netted Revenue |
3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
Domestic and International Market Access Vote-netted Revenue |
13.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 |
Total Respendable Revenue | 55.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 |
Non-Respendable Revenue | ||||
Forecast Revenue 2007–08 |
Planned Revenue 2008–09 |
Planned Revenue 2009–10 |
Planned Revenue 2010–11 |
|
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks | ||||
Administrative Monetary Penalties | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Interest on Overdue Accounts Receivable | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Proceeds from sale of Crown Assets | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Zoonotic Risk | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Animal Health Risks/Production Systems | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Plant Health Risks/Production Systems | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Biodiversity Protection | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Domestic and International Market Access | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total Non-Respendable Revenue | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Total Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue | 56.1 | 56.1 | 56.1 | 56.1 |
The CFIA enforces 42 sets of regulations related to the 13 acts that form the Agency’s legislative mandate. When significant regulatory initiatives are proposed, a major cost-benefit analysis is completed. Proposed major regulatory initiatives for 2008–09 are listed below.
Regulations | Expected Results |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Humane Transport of Animals) Part XII of the Health of Animals Regulations (regulations that control animal transportation in Canada) will be modernized by setting reasonable standards of care that address the welfare of animals in transit. |
The regulatory standards for Part XII of the Health of Animals Regulations will be strengthened and clarified. This regulatory proposal requires that carriers involved in the transport of live animals have knowledge of the species being transported. It identifies animal transportation risk factors, and requires that these be assessed prior to transport and that remedial action be taken to address any factors that may result in injury, suffering or death to the animals. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Medicated Feeds Regulations) New regulations are being developed under the Health of Animals Act that will regulate how feeds are manufactured and will implement manufacturing to ensure that finished products meet regulatory standards. These regulations will apply to both commercial and non-commercial manufacturing operations that wish to manufacture medicated feed on their premises. |
Address potential public health risks associated with the food supply. Over-medicated feeds for food producing animals pose a risk of drug residues in meat, milk and eggs as well as allergic reactions A safe and sustainable animal resource base Better control of medications in feed limits over and under medication. Under medication inadequately controls animal disease, compromises efficient animal production and as such, the animal resource base. Over medication can pose a safety risk both to animals and humans consuming food from these animals. |
Regulations amending the Licensing and Arbitration Regulations (L&A) and Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Regulations (FFV) (Destination Inspection) The purpose of this amendment is to remove the links between both the FFV Regulations and the L&A Regulations with respect to the requirements for CFIA -delivered destination inspections. This amendment is designed to offer flexibility to licensees under the L&A Regulations by deregulating the requirement to have only the CFIA deliver destination inspection. |
By de-linking the FFV and L&A Regulations in this manner, licensees will benefit from the flexibility to choose their provider of inspection services and from more timely delivery of inspection services. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Aquatic Animal Health) The objective of this amendment is to bring fish under the authority of the Health of Animals Regulations, thereby making fish subject to disease requirements and also qualify when compensation |
The proposal is the regulatory basis for implementation of the National Aquatic Animal Health Program (NAAHP). It adds reporting requirements for diseases of aquatic animals to the Health of Animals Regulations. The proposal also adds regulations controlling the importation into Canada — or the movement within Canada — of aquatic animals, their products or anything else that could introduce disease into Canada. |
Regulations amending the Seed Regulations (Variety Registration) The objective of this amendment package is to create a flexible, variety registration system that will allow for the necessity of merit and pre-registration testing to be determined based on crop kind. |
The proposed regulatory amendment is designed to increase the ability of the variety registration system to respond to evolving agri-food sector needs. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Toxic Substances Regulations) While the Act currently provides the authority to prescribe (toxic substances), none are presently prescribed. The Act further specifies the way in which (toxic substances) can be prescribed. The addition of a list of toxic substances to the federal Health of Animals Regulations is therefore being proposed. |
Public health risks associated with the food supply The CFIA will enhance its ability to take regulatory action in instances where animals are suspected of being, or are known to have been, contaminated by toxic substances. The contamination of animals by chemicals or toxins has the potential to affect animal health, and public health via the human food chain. This proposal will also strengthen Canada’s ability to respond to emergency situations, either accidental or deliberate such as via bioterrorist attacks through the contamination of livestock feed and/or animals. Market access based on the application of science and standards The integrated regulatory framework will better align Canada with international standards (including meeting EU standards) ensuring a regulatory infrastructure that supports safe food animal production. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Hog Identification) This regulatory initiative amends the Health of Animals Regulations in order to establish the identification and movement components of a national hog traceability system. |
The main objective of the national program is to help minimize the impacts of a foreign animal disease outbreak or a food safety crisis by: a) correctly identifying the source of the disease or contamination, and correctly establishing the control area; b) reducing the response time; c) helping to zone Canada in addressing the guidelines of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE), and meeting trading partners’ expectations; and d) ensuring that the national traceability system is compatible with systems developed by other Canadian livestock sectors and packers. |
As per TBS guidelines, a horizontal initiative, for the purposes of this table, is an initiative in which partners from two or more organizations have received program funding and have formally agreed (e.g. Memoranda to Cabinet, Treasury Board Submissions, and federal/provincial agreements) to work together to achieve shared outcomes. The following table outlines the CFIA’s horizontal initiatives for 2008–09.
Initiative | Profile | Partners |
Building Public Confidence in Pesticide Regulation and Improving Access to Pest Management Products (BPC) |
This initiative incorporates efforts of six federal government partners to increase public and stakeholder confidence in the pesticide regulatory system, to protect health and environment and to increase the competitiveness of the agri-food and forestry sectors. The CFIA is delivering two of the 13 programs: • Enhanced monitoring and enforcement of pesticide residue limits in foods and feed (Chemical Residues, Food Safety); • Enhanced monitoring and enforcement of pesticide residues in fertilizers and pesticide guarantee verification in fertilizer-pesticide combinations (Fertilizer Section, Plant Products Directorate). A total amount of $5.1 million was allocated to the CFIA to cover these two programs over a seven-year period, starting in 2002–03 and ending in 2008–09. A formative evaluation was conducted in 2005–06 to assess strengths and weaknesses of the initiative and identify adjustments required to achieve the planned outcomes. A summative evaluation will be conducted in 2007–08 to examine progress toward achievement of expected outcomes. |
Lead: Health Canada (PMRA) • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada • Department of Fisheries • Environment Canada • Natural Resources Canada |
Public Security and Anti-terrorism (PSAT) Initiative |
In the 2001 Budget, the government allocated $7.7 billion in new funds to the PSAT initiative to enhance security for Canadians. As a contributing Agency, the CFIA will: • deliver all federal food inspection, animal health, and plant protection measures; and, • respond to outbreaks of pests and diseases in plants and animals. |
Lead: Public Safety Canada • Provinces/Territories • Canada Border Service Agency |
Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: Focus on Animal and Human Health Issues |
Canada is facing two major, interrelated animal and public health threats: the potential spread of avian influenza virus (H5N1) to wild birds and domestic fowl in Canada and the potential for a human-adapted strain to arise, resulting in human-to-human transmission, potentially triggering a human influenza pandemic. A coordinated and comprehensive plan to address both
avian and pandemic influenza is required. Under the umbrella of “Preparing for Emergencies” in 2006 the CFIA obtained $195 million to be spent over five years to enhance Canada’s state of avian influenza preparedness. Canada’s Avian Influenza Working Group was established in 2006 to update policies, protocols, operating procedures, and systems to enhance Canada’s state of preparedness — through collaborations and partnership — in five pillars of strategies and processes for prevention and early warning, emergency preparedness, emergency response, recovery and communications. |
Lead: Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) • Public Safety Canada • Health Canada • Environment Canada • Provinces/Territories • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |
Chemical, Biological Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Research and Technology Initiative (CRTI) |
The events of September 11, 2001 moved the issues of counter terrorism and national security to the forefront of the nation’s concerns. CRTI represents the federal science community’s response and commitment to providing science solutions to
these issues. Through the creation of laboratory networks across the federal government that collaborate with industry, academia and first responder communities, and through key research and technology development initiatives, the CFIA will provide new knowledge, technology, and capacity necessary for
CBRN prevention preparedness and response. As well, the CFIA will continue to co-chair the biological cluster of federal laboratories with the Public Health Agency of Canada. Current CRTI-related research initiatives include the following: • Developing more effective rapid detection tests, including those that use high throughput techniques and nanotechnology for sensitive and more efficient detection, and • Continuing to develop surveillance and communication networks with provincial partners in order to improve early detection of high-threat animal diseases and to improve linkages, with the National US Animal Health Laboratory Network. |
Lead: National Defence • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada • Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Canadian Security and Intelligence Service • Defence Research and Development Canada • Fisheries and Oceans Canada • Environment Canada • Health Canada • Public Health Agency of Canada • National Research Council • Natural Resources Canada • Public Safety Canada • Royal Canadian Mounted Police • Transport Canada |
Canadian Regulatory System for Biotechnology (CRSB) | The CRSB aims to develop an efficient, credible and well-respected regulatory system that safeguards the health of all Canadians and the environment and permits safe and effective products. It does this by enhancing human resource capacity, by improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the regulatory system, by improving transparency and public awareness, and by increasing knowledge to improve decision making. The CRSB will also continue to provide a bridge to adapt to emerging novel applications of biotechnology, as guided by the Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation principles and by a strengthened horizontal governance mechanism for shared regulatory policy development and decision making. |
Lead: Rotating • Health Canada • Environment Canada • Industry Canada • Fisheries and Oceans Canada • Natural Resources Canada |
National Aquatic Animal Health Program (NAAHP) |
Provincial and territorial governments, aquatic veterinarians and seafood industry sectors agree on the urgent need to develop and implement the NAAHP to prevent the spread and introduction of aquatic animal diseases of concern to Canada. The NAAHP has been built on the CFIA’s regulatory and animal health management expertise as well as Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s laboratory infrastructure and aquatic animal health research expertise. The NAAHP will protect aquatic resources by minimizing the risk of introducing aquatic animal diseases of concern into Canada; remove trade barriers imposed by trade partners because Canada did not have a NAAHP in place; and allow Canada to impose import control measures on trade partners who do not have a national aquatic animal health program based on OIE standards. |
Lead: CFIA • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) |
More information on horizontal initiatives can be found at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca |
The following table provides a list of the planned audit projects that are currently in progress or that will begin in next fiscal year.
1. Name of Internal Audit | 2. Internal Audit Type | 3. Status | 4. Expected Completion Date |
Audit of Compliance with Delegated Authorities | Compliance | On-going | 2007–08 |
Audit of Compliance with Tied Funding Policy | Compliance | On-going | 2007–08 |
Mapping of the Corporate Planning and Reporting Process | Management Control Framework | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of the Management of Imported Food | Management Control Framework | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of Management of Third-Party Agreements | Compliance | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of Fleet Management | Compliance | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of Food Labelling | Management Control Framework | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of the Animal Health Program | Management Control Framework | Planned | 2008–09 |
Audit of the Plant Protection | Management Control Framework | Planned | 2008–09 |
5. – 6. Electronic links to internal audits and plan can be found at: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/agen/eval/evale.shtml |
Other audits will be undertaken in 2008–09 following an update of the CFIA’s risk-based audit plan and further direction from the Office of the Comptroller General for government-wide internal audits. The CFIA will also continue to work on the implementation of all elements of the revised Policy on Internal Audit.
The following table provides a list of the planned evaluation projects that are currently in progress or that will begin in the next fiscal year.
1. Name of Evaluation | 2. Evaluation Type | 3. Status |
4. Expected Completion Date |
Evaluation of the Safety of Imported Food | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food Labelling Program | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Enhanced Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Programming – Part A – Enhanced Programming | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Enhanced Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Programming – Part B – Feed | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Invasive Alien Species Program | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food Sampling & Testing Program |
Follow up | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food and Drugs Act – Compliance and Enforcement | Follow up | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food Recalls Program | Follow up | Planned | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the National Aquatic Animal Health Program | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of Pesticide Regulation | Summative | Planned | 2008–09 |
5. Electronic link to evaluation plan: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/agen/eval/evale.shtml |
The five-year evaluation plan for 2008–09 to 2012–13 is being developed for consideration by the CFIA’s Policy Committee in the next fiscal year. This plan will meet the requirements of the Federal Accountability Act and the TBS Evaluation
Policy. Once approved by EPC, the plan will be posted on the CFIA website at the following address: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/agen/eval/evale.shtml
Also, executive summaries of completed evaluations can be referenced at the same link.
* The Evaluation of the Meat Inspection Program was erroneously included in the 2007–08 RPP.
1. How is your department planning to meet the objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement?
Green procurement has been identified as a key aspect of the CFIA environmental management program. The CFIA Environmental Policy commits the CFIA to working within the federal government framework for greening government operations.
Green procurement is a greening priority of the federal government.
Under the CFIA’s Environmental Management Program, procurement considerations are reflected in plans and strategies for managing other environmental aspects eg. ozone-depleting substances phase-outs, energy audits, waste reduction initiatives and increasing the hybrid fleet.
One of the current CFIA targets for green procurement is aimed at providing procurement personnel and material managers with the knowledge and awareness to apply green procurement consideration in their day-to-day work tasks.
2. Has your department established green procurement targets?
3. Describe the green procurement targets that have been set by your department and indicate the associated benefits anticipated.
Green procurement target # 1 – 100 per cent of material managers and procurement personnel will have attended green procurement training by 2010.
Green procurement target # 2 – It is planned that the environmental criteria for inclusion in competitive requests for proposals initiated by the CFIA be developed and implemented by March 2008.
Establishment and achievement of the green procurement targets are intended to contribute to reducing environmental impacts associated with CFIA operations and activities and to contribute to reducing the consumption of resources and associated costs.
This section contains other items of interest related to the CFIA’s 2008–09 plans and priorities. The following items are included:
The MAF sets out the Treasury Board’s expectations of senior public service managers for good public service management. The framework provides a vision of excellence in management that is the basis for initiatives to improve performance launched at all levels of organizations within the federal government.
The CFIA uses the results of annual MAF assessments to report to Parliament on management plans and performance in the RPP.
Over the next years the CFIA will continue to integrate the overall modern management principles of MAF, demonstrating the Agency’s commitment to accountability and sound management.
This section highlights the CFIA’s key management initiatives for 2008–09 (in addition to the Management Priorities identified in section I of this report).
More information on the MAF can be found at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/maf-crg/index_e.asp.
MAF Element: Citizen-focused Service Services are citizen-centred, policies and programs are developed from the “outside in”, and partnerships are encouraged and effectively managed. |
Quality Management in Operations — “Consistency Initiative”
Since September 2003, the CFIA has taken steps to improve the consistency of operational delivery of the Agency’s services across the country. A key component is the implementation of a quality management system which applies to three broad areas of activity: verification of compliance to regulations, provision of services for fees, and incident management.
The Quality Management System and Consistency Initiative, while internal processes, will have a definite impact on Canadians through the improvement of our effectiveness and impact in delivering the CFIA mandate. Implementation of consistency initiatives will continue for all program sectors in 2008–09.
Compliance and Enforcement Policy
In 2008, the CFIA issued a new Compliance and Enforcement Policy. The 2008 Policy is in place to update and address various issues with the previous Compliance and Enforcement Policy. The Agency needs to ensure that all stakeholders understand the principles that guide the CFIA in carrying out its compliance and enforcement activities. The 2008 Policy aims to:
The CFIA’s plans for 2008–09 relating to the 2008 Compliance and Enforcement Policy include internal and external communication initiatives; development and implementation of enforcement strategies for agricultural inputs, animal and plant health, and food; and development of training material to support the 2008 Policy.
Corporate Communications Strategy
In 2008-2009, the CFIA will implement a proactive Corporate Communications Strategy (CCS). The multifaceted strategy will guide communications activities across the CFIA over the next 3 years (2008-2011).
Management issues that CCS will address include:
MAF Element: Stewardship The departmental control regime (assets, money, people, services, etc.) is integrated and effective, and its underlying principles are clear to all staff. |
Strategic Review
In 2007, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency conducted an in-depth review of the funding, relevance and performance of all its programs and spending to ensure results and value for money from programs that are a priority for Canadians. The results of this Strategic Review were submitted to Treasury Board last fall, for subsequent review by Cabinet. The results of this Review will be reflected in future reporting to Parliament.
Procurement and Contract Management
The CFIA delegation of Financial Signing Authorities provides managers with Spending Authority but restricts all Contracting Authority above $10K to Finance, Administration and Information Technology Branch employees within the National Procurement and Contracting Services (NPCSC) and the National Asset and Fleet Management Services Center (NAFMSC).
The organizational structure and mandate of the NPCSC continues to evolve to remain in line with the Government of Canada “Way Forward” Procurement Reform initiative. The organization’s approach continues to shift from transactional to providing strategic procurement planning and sourcing advisory services. Under the Acquisition Card program, the NPCSC is looking at ways to increase the use of this efficient procurement tool. The NPCSC is also reviewing the Emergency Contracting Policy and Procedures with the view that goods and services required for emergency response be delivered in a timely fashion without compromising financial controls.
Integrated Asset Management Framework (IAMF)
The CFIA’s Integrated Asset Management Framework (IAMF) was developed in response to the Treasury Board condition on the 2005 approval of the Agency’s Long-term Capital Plan for 2005-06 to 2009-10.
The CFIA’s asset portfolio plays an integral part in providing sound agency management. CFIA’s IAMF will ensure sound management and safeguarding of real property and moveable assets (critical information technology infrastructure, fleet vehicles, and capital equipment) and include a governance regime for asset management strategies, integrated capital investment planning, and process improvements for life-cycle management practices.
The IAMF is a continuously evolving management regime. In 2008–09, an Environmental Strategy for the Management of Assets will be developed. The strategy will provide direction for the implementation of best practices to meet current environmental challenges and their various management responsibilities for the lifecycle management of assets. It will contain an action plan that will layout the scope, timelines, and resources (human and financial) to implement the strategy, and will also include four environmental management directives (for fleet, real property, IT, and laboratory and scientific equipment) to guide the implementation of the action plan.
By the end of 2008–09, the Major Capital Investment Planning Directive will be complete and under implementation Agency-wide. The Directive will provide formal direction for the management and accountability of capital investment planning for the Agency’s capital assets.
For the effective implementation of IAMF, providing employees with the skills and knowledge to be successful in their job as asset experts is of paramount importance. A Core Competency Guide for Asset and Security Management Directorate (ASMD) has been developed. Core Competency profiles are a set of competencies and levels of proficiency required for achieving quality results in a specific business role. By the end of 2008–09, a core competency baseline for ASMD employees and the related positions will be established. The baseline will be used to link training and learning opportunities to the business of the Agency and ensure that ASMD employees have the skills, knowledge, attributes, and values required for the delivery of an efficient and effective asset portfolio.
Environmental Management Program
As an agency of the federal Government, the CFIA is responsible for ensuring that its activities and operations are conducted in an environmentally sustainable manner and meet federal environmental laws and policies. With the announcement of a revised environmental policy in 2007, the Agency has committed itself to complying with applicable environmental regulatory requirements, reducing resource consumption and associated operating costs, reducing environmental liabilities and impacts as well as conserving significant biological resources. One of the main drivers for this initiative is the Government of Canada’s effort to green its own operations as well as supporting the Federal Government’s Ecoaction plan to reduce greenhouse gases and air pollution.
In 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Specific targets:
Strategic Plan for Sustainable Development
As an agency responsible for food safety, animal health and plant protection, the CFIA must manage significant issues with potential economic, environmental and social impacts. A sustainable development plan for the Agency would aim to consider social and environmental issues along side economic priorities in policy development, management practices and decision making procedures. Although the CFIA is not obligated to table a sustainable development strategy in the House of Commons, outlining its plan forward on sustainable development would position the Agency in step with Government of Canada priorities and strategies, as sustainability is one of the federal government’s main goals.
In 2008–09, the CFIA will:
Food safety and public health as well as animal and plant health and production systems are complex activities which can involve the expertise and interdependence of many of the groups and organizations charged with protecting the health of Canadians, our environment and our economy. Some the CFIA’s partners and stakeholders are:
AAF | Agriculture and Agri-Food |
AAFC | Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |
AI | Avian Influenza |
APF | Agricultural Policy Framework |
ASMD | Asset and Security Management Directorate |
BSE | Bovine spongiform encephalopathy |
CAHSN | Canadian Animal Health Surveillance Network |
CBRN | Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear |
CBSA | Canada Border Services Agency |
CCIA | Canadian Cattle Identification Agency |
CDSR | Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation |
CFIA | Canadian Food Inspection Agency |
CFS | Canadian Forest Service |
CMHS | Canadian Meat Hygiene Standard |
CODEX | Codex Alimentarius Commission |
CRSB | Canadian Regulatory System for Biotechnology |
CRP | Corporate Risk Profile |
CRTI | Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Radio-Nuclear Research and Technology Initiative |
DFO | Fisheries and Oceans Canada |
DND | Department of National Defence |
EBP | Employee Benefit Plan |
EC | Environment Canada |
EPC | Executive Policy Committee |
EU | European Union |
F/P/T | Federal/Provincial/Territorial |
FAD | Foreign Animal Disease |
FBIP | Federal Biodiversity Information Partnership |
FF&V | Fresh fruits and vegetables |
FMD | Food and Mouth Disease |
FSEP | Food Safety Enhancement Program |
FTEs | Full-time equivalent |
GIP | Good Importing Practices |
GoC | Government of Canada |
HACCP | Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point |
HC | Health Canada |
HR | Human Resources |
IAMF | Integrated Asset Management Framework |
IAS | Invasive Alien Species |
IC | Industry Canada |
IM/IT | Information Management/Information Technology |
IRM | Integrated Risk Management |
InterVac | International Vaccine Centres |
IPPC | International Plant Protection Convention |
MAF | Management Accountability Framework |
MOU | Memorandum of Understanding |
MRRS | Management, Resources and Results Structure |
NAAHP | National Aquatic Animal Health Program |
NABS | National Avian Biosecurity Strategy |
NAFMSC | National Asset and Fleet Management Services Center |
NAHS | National Animal Health Strategy |
NAPPO | North American Plant Protection Organization |
NPBS | National Plant Biosecurity Strategy |
NPCSC | National Procurement and Contracting Services |
NRCAN | Natural Resources Canada |
OECD | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |
OFFS | On-Farm Food Safety |
OIE | World Organisation for Animal Health |
PAA | Program Activity Architecture |
PBRI | Paperwork Burden Reduction Initiative |
PHAC | Public Health Agency of Canada |
PMF | Performance Management Framework |
PNTs | Plants with novel traits |
PRP | Poultry Rejection Policy |
PSAT | Public Security and Anti-Terrorism |
QMP | Quality Management Program |
RFP | Request for Proposal |
RPP | Report on Plans and Priorities |
SPS | Sanitary and Phytosanitary |
SPP | Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America |
SRM | Specified risk material |
SWI | Single Window Initiative |
S&T | Science and technology |
TBS | Treasury Board Secretariat |
TSEs | Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies |
WTO | World Trade Organization |
UK | United Kingdom |
The following table provides a list of the planned evaluation projects that are currently in progress or that will begin in the next fiscal year.
1. Name of Evaluation | 2. Evaluation Type | 3. Status |
4. Expected Completion Date |
Evaluation of the Safety of Imported Food | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food Labelling Program | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Enhanced Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Programming – Part A – Enhanced Programming | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Enhanced Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Programming – Part B – Feed | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Invasive Alien Species Program | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food Sampling & Testing Program |
Follow up | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food and Drugs Act – Compliance and Enforcement | Follow up | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the Food Recalls Program | Follow up | Planned | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of the National Aquatic Animal Health Program | Formative | Ongoing | 2008–09 |
Evaluation of Pesticide Regulation | Summative | Planned | 2008–09 |
5. Electronic link to evaluation plan: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/agen/eval/evale.shtml |
The five-year evaluation plan for 2008–09 to 2012–13 is being developed for consideration by the CFIA’s Policy Committee in the next fiscal year. This plan will meet the requirements of the Federal Accountability Act and the TBS Evaluation
Policy. Once approved by EPC, the plan will be posted on the CFIA website at the following address: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/agen/eval/evale.shtml
Also, executive summaries of completed evaluations can be referenced at the same link.
* The Evaluation of the Meat Inspection Program was erroneously included in the 2007–08 RPP.
1. How is your department planning to meet the objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement?
Green procurement has been identified as a key aspect of the CFIA environmental management program. The CFIA Environmental Policy commits the CFIA to working within the federal government framework for greening government operations.
Green procurement is a greening priority of the federal government.
Under the CFIA’s Environmental Management Program, procurement considerations are reflected in plans and strategies for managing other environmental aspects eg. ozone-depleting substances phase-outs, energy audits, waste reduction initiatives and increasing the hybrid fleet.
One of the current CFIA targets for green procurement is aimed at providing procurement personnel and material managers with the knowledge and awareness to apply green procurement consideration in their day-to-day work tasks.
2. Has your department established green procurement targets?
3. Describe the green procurement targets that have been set by your department and indicate the associated benefits anticipated.
Green procurement target # 1 – 100 per cent of material managers and procurement personnel will have attended green procurement training by 2010.
Green procurement target # 2 – It is planned that the environmental criteria for inclusion in competitive requests for proposals initiated by the CFIA be developed and implemented by March 2008.
Establishment and achievement of the green procurement targets are intended to contribute to reducing environmental impacts associated with CFIA operations and activities and to contribute to reducing the consumption of resources and associated costs.
As per TBS guidelines, a horizontal initiative, for the purposes of this table, is an initiative in which partners from two or more organizations have received program funding and have formally agreed (e.g. Memoranda to Cabinet, Treasury Board Submissions, and federal/provincial agreements) to work together to achieve shared outcomes. The following table outlines the CFIA’s horizontal initiatives for 2008–09.
Initiative | Profile | Partners |
Building Public Confidence in Pesticide Regulation and Improving Access to Pest Management Products (BPC) |
This initiative incorporates efforts of six federal government partners to increase public and stakeholder confidence in the pesticide regulatory system, to protect health and environment and to increase the competitiveness of the agri-food and forestry sectors. The CFIA is delivering two of the 13 programs: • Enhanced monitoring and enforcement of pesticide residue limits in foods and feed (Chemical Residues, Food Safety); • Enhanced monitoring and enforcement of pesticide residues in fertilizers and pesticide guarantee verification in fertilizer-pesticide combinations (Fertilizer Section, Plant Products Directorate). A total amount of $5.1 million was allocated to the CFIA to cover these two programs over a seven-year period, starting in 2002–03 and ending in 2008–09. A formative evaluation was conducted in 2005–06 to assess strengths and weaknesses of the initiative and identify adjustments required to achieve the planned outcomes. A summative evaluation will be conducted in 2007–08 to examine progress toward achievement of expected outcomes. |
Lead: Health Canada (PMRA) • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada • Department of Fisheries • Environment Canada • Natural Resources Canada |
Public Security and Anti-terrorism (PSAT) Initiative |
In the 2001 Budget, the government allocated $7.7 billion in new funds to the PSAT initiative to enhance security for Canadians. As a contributing Agency, the CFIA will: • deliver all federal food inspection, animal health, and plant protection measures; and, • respond to outbreaks of pests and diseases in plants and animals. |
Lead: Public Safety Canada • Provinces/Territories • Canada Border Service Agency |
Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: Focus on Animal and Human Health Issues |
Canada is facing two major, interrelated animal and public health threats: the potential spread of avian influenza virus (H5N1) to wild birds and domestic fowl in Canada and the potential for a human-adapted strain to arise, resulting in human-to-human transmission, potentially triggering a human influenza pandemic. A coordinated and comprehensive plan to address both
avian and pandemic influenza is required. Under the umbrella of “Preparing for Emergencies” in 2006 the CFIA obtained $195 million to be spent over five years to enhance Canada’s state of avian influenza preparedness. Canada’s Avian Influenza Working Group was established in 2006 to update policies, protocols, operating procedures, and systems to enhance Canada’s state of preparedness — through collaborations and partnership — in five pillars of strategies and processes for prevention and early warning, emergency preparedness, emergency response, recovery and communications. |
Lead: Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) • Public Safety Canada • Health Canada • Environment Canada • Provinces/Territories • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |
Chemical, Biological Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Research and Technology Initiative (CRTI) |
The events of September 11, 2001 moved the issues of counter terrorism and national security to the forefront of the nation’s concerns. CRTI represents the federal science community’s response and commitment to providing science solutions to
these issues. Through the creation of laboratory networks across the federal government that collaborate with industry, academia and first responder communities, and through key research and technology development initiatives, the CFIA will provide new knowledge, technology, and capacity necessary for
CBRN prevention preparedness and response. As well, the CFIA will continue to co-chair the biological cluster of federal laboratories with the Public Health Agency of Canada. Current CRTI-related research initiatives include the following: • Developing more effective rapid detection tests, including those that use high throughput techniques and nanotechnology for sensitive and more efficient detection, and • Continuing to develop surveillance and communication networks with provincial partners in order to improve early detection of high-threat animal diseases and to improve linkages, with the National US Animal Health Laboratory Network. |
Lead: National Defence • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada • Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Canadian Security and Intelligence Service • Defence Research and Development Canada • Fisheries and Oceans Canada • Environment Canada • Health Canada • Public Health Agency of Canada • National Research Council • Natural Resources Canada • Public Safety Canada • Royal Canadian Mounted Police • Transport Canada |
Canadian Regulatory System for Biotechnology (CRSB) | The CRSB aims to develop an efficient, credible and well-respected regulatory system that safeguards the health of all Canadians and the environment and permits safe and effective products. It does this by enhancing human resource capacity, by improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the regulatory system, by improving transparency and public awareness, and by increasing knowledge to improve decision making. The CRSB will also continue to provide a bridge to adapt to emerging novel applications of biotechnology, as guided by the Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation principles and by a strengthened horizontal governance mechanism for shared regulatory policy development and decision making. |
Lead: Rotating • Health Canada • Environment Canada • Industry Canada • Fisheries and Oceans Canada • Natural Resources Canada |
National Aquatic Animal Health Program (NAAHP) |
Provincial and territorial governments, aquatic veterinarians and seafood industry sectors agree on the urgent need to develop and implement the NAAHP to prevent the spread and introduction of aquatic animal diseases of concern to Canada. The NAAHP has been built on the CFIA’s regulatory and animal health management expertise as well as Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s laboratory infrastructure and aquatic animal health research expertise. The NAAHP will protect aquatic resources by minimizing the risk of introducing aquatic animal diseases of concern into Canada; remove trade barriers imposed by trade partners because Canada did not have a NAAHP in place; and allow Canada to impose import control measures on trade partners who do not have a national aquatic animal health program based on OIE standards. |
Lead: CFIA • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) |
More information on horizontal initiatives can be found at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca |
The following table provides a list of the planned audit projects that are currently in progress or that will begin in next fiscal year.
1. Name of Internal Audit | 2. Internal Audit Type | 3. Status | 4. Expected Completion Date |
Audit of Compliance with Delegated Authorities | Compliance | On-going | 2007–08 |
Audit of Compliance with Tied Funding Policy | Compliance | On-going | 2007–08 |
Mapping of the Corporate Planning and Reporting Process | Management Control Framework | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of the Management of Imported Food | Management Control Framework | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of Management of Third-Party Agreements | Compliance | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of Fleet Management | Compliance | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of Food Labelling | Management Control Framework | On-going | 2008–09 |
Audit of the Animal Health Program | Management Control Framework | Planned | 2008–09 |
Audit of the Plant Protection | Management Control Framework | Planned | 2008–09 |
5. – 6. Electronic links to internal audits and plan can be found at: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/agen/eval/evale.shtml |
Other audits will be undertaken in 2008–09 following an update of the CFIA’s risk-based audit plan and further direction from the Office of the Comptroller General for government-wide internal audits. The CFIA will also continue to work on the implementation of all elements of the revised Policy on Internal Audit.
The CFIA enforces 42 sets of regulations related to the 13 acts that form the Agency’s legislative mandate. When significant regulatory initiatives are proposed, a major cost-benefit analysis is completed. Proposed major regulatory initiatives for 2008–09 are listed below.
Regulations | Expected Results |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Humane Transport of Animals) Part XII of the Health of Animals Regulations (regulations that control animal transportation in Canada) will be modernized by setting reasonable standards of care that address the welfare of animals in transit. |
The regulatory standards for Part XII of the Health of Animals Regulations will be strengthened and clarified. This regulatory proposal requires that carriers involved in the transport of live animals have knowledge of the species being transported. It identifies animal transportation risk factors, and requires that these be assessed prior to transport and that remedial action be taken to address any factors that may result in injury, suffering or death to the animals. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Medicated Feeds Regulations) New regulations are being developed under the Health of Animals Act that will regulate how feeds are manufactured and will implement manufacturing to ensure that finished products meet regulatory standards. These regulations will apply to both commercial and non-commercial manufacturing operations that wish to manufacture medicated feed on their premises. |
Address potential public health risks associated with the food supply. Over-medicated feeds for food producing animals pose a risk of drug residues in meat, milk and eggs as well as allergic reactions A safe and sustainable animal resource base Better control of medications in feed limits over and under medication. Under medication inadequately controls animal disease, compromises efficient animal production and as such, the animal resource base. Over medication can pose a safety risk both to animals and humans consuming food from these animals. |
Regulations amending the Licensing and Arbitration Regulations (L&A) and Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Regulations (FFV) (Destination Inspection) The purpose of this amendment is to remove the links between both the FFV Regulations and the L&A Regulations with respect to the requirements for CFIA -delivered destination inspections. This amendment is designed to offer flexibility to licensees under the L&A Regulations by deregulating the requirement to have only the CFIA deliver destination inspection. |
By de-linking the FFV and L&A Regulations in this manner, licensees will benefit from the flexibility to choose their provider of inspection services and from more timely delivery of inspection services. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Aquatic Animal Health) The objective of this amendment is to bring fish under the authority of the Health of Animals Regulations, thereby making fish subject to disease requirements and also qualify when compensation |
The proposal is the regulatory basis for implementation of the National Aquatic Animal Health Program (NAAHP). It adds reporting requirements for diseases of aquatic animals to the Health of Animals Regulations. The proposal also adds regulations controlling the importation into Canada — or the movement within Canada — of aquatic animals, their products or anything else that could introduce disease into Canada. |
Regulations amending the Seed Regulations (Variety Registration) The objective of this amendment package is to create a flexible, variety registration system that will allow for the necessity of merit and pre-registration testing to be determined based on crop kind. |
The proposed regulatory amendment is designed to increase the ability of the variety registration system to respond to evolving agri-food sector needs. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Toxic Substances Regulations) While the Act currently provides the authority to prescribe (toxic substances), none are presently prescribed. The Act further specifies the way in which (toxic substances) can be prescribed. The addition of a list of toxic substances to the federal Health of Animals Regulations is therefore being proposed. |
Public health risks associated with the food supply The CFIA will enhance its ability to take regulatory action in instances where animals are suspected of being, or are known to have been, contaminated by toxic substances. The contamination of animals by chemicals or toxins has the potential to affect animal health, and public health via the human food chain. This proposal will also strengthen Canada’s ability to respond to emergency situations, either accidental or deliberate such as via bioterrorist attacks through the contamination of livestock feed and/or animals. Market access based on the application of science and standards The integrated regulatory framework will better align Canada with international standards (including meeting EU standards) ensuring a regulatory infrastructure that supports safe food animal production. |
Regulations amending the Health of Animals Regulations (Hog Identification) This regulatory initiative amends the Health of Animals Regulations in order to establish the identification and movement components of a national hog traceability system. |
The main objective of the national program is to help minimize the impacts of a foreign animal disease outbreak or a food safety crisis by: a) correctly identifying the source of the disease or contamination, and correctly establishing the control area; b) reducing the response time; c) helping to zone Canada in addressing the guidelines of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE), and meeting trading partners’ expectations; and d) ensuring that the national traceability system is compatible with systems developed by other Canadian livestock sectors and packers. |
Services Received Without Charge ($ millions) |
|
2008–09 | |
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), border crossings, airports and other government departments | 23.0 |
Contributions covering employers’ share of employees’ insurance premiums and expenditures paid by Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS), excluding revolving funds; Employer’s contribution to employees’ insured benefits plans and expenditures paid by TBS | 30.8 |
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada | 1.1 |
2008–09 Services received without charge | 54.9 |
Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue ($ millions) |
||||
Respendable Revenue | ||||
Forecast Revenue 2007–08 |
Planned Revenue 2008–09 |
Planned Revenue 2009–10 |
Planned Revenue 2010–11 |
|
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks Vote-netted Revenue |
32.1 | 32.1 | 32.1 | 32.1 |
Zoonotic Risk Vote-netted Revenue |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Animal Health Risks/Production Systems Vote-netted Revenue |
2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Plant Health Risks/Production Systems Vote-netted Revenue |
3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Biodiversity Protection Vote-netted Revenue |
0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks Vote-netted Revenue |
3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
Domestic and International Market Access Vote-netted Revenue |
13.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 |
Total Respendable Revenue | 55.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 |
Non-Respendable Revenue | ||||
Forecast Revenue 2007–08 |
Planned Revenue 2008–09 |
Planned Revenue 2009–10 |
Planned Revenue 2010–11 |
|
Food Safety and Nutrition Risks | ||||
Administrative Monetary Penalties | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Interest on Overdue Accounts Receivable | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Proceeds from sale of Crown Assets | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Zoonotic Risk | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Animal Health Risks/Production Systems | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Plant Health Risks/Production Systems | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Biodiversity Protection | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Domestic and International Market Access | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total Non-Respendable Revenue | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Total Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue | 56.1 | 56.1 | 56.1 | 56.1 |
Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity ($ millions) |
||||
Forecast Spending 2007–08 |
Planned Spending 2008–09 |
Planned Spending 2009–10 |
Planned Spending 2010–11 |
|
Food Safety and Nutrition Risk | 11.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 5.7 |
Zoonotic Risk | 5.8 | 22.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
Animal Health Risks and Production Systems | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Plant Health Risks and Production Systems | 3.7 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Biodiversity Protection | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Integrated Regulatory Frameworks | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Domestic and International Market Access | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Total29 | 26.5 | 34.7 | 14.6 | 13.0 |
Changes from 2007–08 Forecast Spending to 2008–09 Planned spending
The increase of $8.2 million is primarily related to the following items: increase of $20.0 million received in 2008–09 only for the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy to allow the CFIA to work with
manufacturers to develop, test and build mobile incineration units or alternate disposal methodologies for the mass disposal of infected animals; decrease of $6.8 million related to the 2006-07 carry forward which is included in the 2007–08 Forecast Spending amount only; decrease of $4.8 million related to resources received for the Avian Influenza Preparedness Strategy for
specialized equipment (including personal protective equipment), laboratory surge capacity, and real property requirements; decrease of $0.2 million related to the sunsetting of resources for the Invasive Alien Species Strategy for Canada.
Planned Spending changes from 2008–09 to 2009-10
The decrease of $20.1 million is primarily related to the sunsetting of resources received in 2008–09 only for the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy to allow the CFIA to work with manufacturers to develop, test and build
mobile incineration units or alternate disposal methodologies for the mass disposal of infected animals ($20.0 million).
Planned Spending Changes from 2009-10 to 2010-11
The decrease of $1.6 million is related to the repayment towards client costs for the Skyline complex.