This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Honourable John Baird
Minister of the Environment and Minister responsible for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
I am pleased to present the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency's 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities. This report outlines the Agency's key plans, priorities and expected results for Canadians over the next three years.
Each year, approximately 10,000 environmental assessments are conducted under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act to ensure that environmental effects are considered before decisions are taken that would allow projects to proceed. The Agency leads the federal environmental assessment process by providing advice, training, guidance and coordination.
To achieve these goals, the Agency will continue to focus on three key priorities: building a framework for more integrated environmental assessment, playing an active leadership role in federal environmental assessment, and building the capacity and organization to deliver on existing and new responsibilities.
To advance these key priorities, the Agency promotes an integrated, project-management approach to environmental assessments. It provides Canadians with relevant information about the federal environmental assessment process and ensures the public has access to key information about environmental assessments.
By embracing innovative approaches for addressing new and existing challenges, I am confident the Agency will continue to lead efforts to ensure that Canada has a progressive and robust federal environmental assessment framework well into the future.
It pleases me, therefore, to submit the Agency's 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities.
_____________________________________________
John Baird, P.C., M.P.
Minister of the Environment and Minister responsible for the
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
I submit for tabling in Parliament, the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in the Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2008-09 Estimates: Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports.
______________________________
Peter Sylvester
President
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) provides leadership and serves as the centre of expertise for federal environmental assessment processes. The Agency's mandate is to provide Canadians with high-quality environmental assessments that contribute to informed decision making in support of sustainable development.
Led by the President, who reports directly to the Minister of the Environment, the Agency delivers its mandate within the framework of the following instruments:
Consistent with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals, the Agency also supports the Minister of the Environment in promoting the application of environmental assessment in strategic-level decision making by providing training and guidance to federal authorities.
As well, the Agency works with federal authorities on the application of the Cabinet Directive on Implementation of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. The Agency provides advice and guidance on the Directive's expectations, and leads interdepartmental efforts to advance the Directive's goals of delivering high-quality environmental assessments in a predictable, certain and timely manner.
The Agency is responsible for leading the federal environmental assessment process for most major natural resource projects and for coordinating the Government of Canada's Aboriginal engagement and consultation activities with these projects as mandated under the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects and its Memorandum of Understanding.
The President of the Agency has been designated by order-in-council as the federal administrator of the environmental and social protection regimes set out in chapters 22 and 23 of the 1975 James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement.
A strategic outcome defines the work of the Agency: "Environmental considerations are taken into account in federal government decisions respecting policies, plans, programs and projects." The Agency's program activities consist of the Environmental Assessment Development Program overseen by the Vice-President of Policy Development and the Environmental Assessment Support Program managed by the Vice-President of Program Delivery.
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | Environmental Assessment Development Program | Environmental Assessment Support Program | Total ($000s) |
Efficient and Effective Environmental Assessment | $5,956 | $28,500 | $34,456 |
Vote or Statutory Item | Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording | 2008-2009 Main Estimates | 2007-2008 Main Estimates |
---|---|---|---|
15 | Program expenditures | 31,514 | 14,844 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 2,942 | 1,696 |
Total Agency | 34,456 | 16,540 |
The increase in the Main Estimates funding from 2007-08 to 2008-09 is mainly a result of the Budget 2007 announcement establishing an initiative to improve Canada's regulatory framework for major natural resource projects. The Agency also received funding to address Aboriginal consultations for environmental assessment processes, as well as for review panel support and for the evaluation of the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals.
($ thousands) | Forecast Spending 2007-2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 | Planned Spending 2009-2010 | Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Effective and Efficient Environmental Assessment | 20,041 | |||
Environmental Assessment Development Program | 5,956 | 5,209 | 5,073 | |
Environmental Assessment Support Program | 36,501 | 33,832 | 29,726 | |
Budgetary Main Estimates (gross) | 20,041 | 42,457 | 39,041 | 34,799 |
Less: Respendable revenue | (3,501) | (8,001) | (8,001) | (8,001) |
Total Main Estimates | 16,540 | 34,456 | 31,040 | 26,798 |
Adjustments | ||||
Supplementary estimates | ||||
Improve the performance of the regulatory system for Major Resource Projects | 5,486 | |||
Review panel support and evaluation of Cabinet Directive on Environmental Assessment | 1,870 | |||
Aboriginal Consultations for environmental assessment processes | 767 | |||
Federal Accountability Act — Evaluation of contribution programs | 91 | |||
James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement | 72 | |||
Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation | 59 | |||
Transfer from Environment Canada for salary adjustment | 37 | |||
Compensation for collective agreements | 177 | |||
Total adjustments | 8,559 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Planned Spending | 25,099 | 34,456 | 31,040 | 26,798 |
Less: Non-respendable revenue | ||||
Plus: Cost of services received without charge | 3,541 | 3,926 | 3,954 | 3,863 |
Total Departmental Spending | 28,640 | 38,382 | 34,994 | 30,661 |
Full-Time Equivalents | 177 | 248 | 244 | 231 |
The funding change in total planned spending over the planning horizon is mainly a result of the Budget 2007 announcement establishing an initiative to improve Canada's regulatory framework for major natural resource projects. The funding changes are also the result of the approval of temporary funding for Aboriginal consultations for environmental assessment processes, as well as for review panel support and for the evaluation of the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals, which will respectively sunset in 2009-2010 and 2010-2011.
2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|
34,456 | 31,040 | 26,798 |
2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|
248 | 244 | 231 |
Name | Type |
---|---|
1. Build a framework for more integrated environmental assessment | Ongoing |
2. Play an active leadership role in federal environmental assessment | Ongoing |
3. Build the capacity and organization to deliver on existing and new responsibilities | Ongoing |
Planned Spending ($000s) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expected Results | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 | Contributes to the Following Priorities | |
Strategic Outcome | Environmental considerations are taken into account in federal government decisions respecting policies, plans, programs and projects. | 1, 2 and 3 | |||
Environmental Assessment Development Program | See the section Environmental Assessment Development Program | 5,956 | 5,209 | 5,073 | 1 and 2 |
Environmental Assessment Support Program | See the section Environmental Assessment Support Program | 28,500 | 25,831 | 21,725 | 2 and 3 |
Protecting the environment, while continuing to build a strong economy and improving quality of life for Canadians, is an important challenge. Environmental assessment responds to this challenge by ensuring environmental effects are considered before decisions are taken that would allow policies, plans, programs or projects to proceed.
Under the Act, responsible authorities (federal departments and agencies, and parent Crown Corporations) must undertake an environmental assessment before they:
Each year, approximately 10,000 environmental assessments are conducted under the Act. Since the Act came into effect in 1995, over 70,000 projects have been assessed.
Projects subject to environmental assessment under the Act or policies, plans and programs subject to strategic environmental assessment under the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals often raise important issues associated with socio-economic development, environmental protection, Aboriginal concerns and federal-provincial/territorial cooperation. Environmental assessment must continually adapt to emerging trends, such as new scientific methods and insights or evolving public expectations and jurisprudence.
The following provides an overview of the issues and challenges the Agency faces in delivering its key programs.
Under the Canadian Constitution, responsibility for environmental management is an area of shared jurisdiction among various levels of government. To minimize duplication and delays in the conduct of environmental assessments, the Agency works with provinces and territories to bring about greater cooperation in environmental assessment and promote the consistent and predictable application of environmental assessment across Canada. This shared environmental management responsibility is realized by implementing or renewing bilateral agreements, and working with provinces and territories on initiatives, including project-specific arrangements to improve the coordinated delivery of environmental assessment.
The Government of Canada is committed to addressing the challenges facing the federal regulatory system for major resource projects to ensure a more timely and efficient process and help improve Canada's competitiveness. The Major Projects Management Office (MPMO) is being established by Natural Resources Canada to improve the performance of the federal regulatory system for major natural resource projects, in collaboration with other federal departments and agencies, including the Agency.
Under the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects (October 2007) and its Memorandum of Understanding, the Agency will now assume a more comprehensive leadership role, beyond its responsibilities as the Federal Environmental Assessment Coordinator, in the delivery of the environmental assessment for most major natural resource projects. The Agency will assume this role on behalf of the responsible authorities, while not limiting their accountability under the Act.
Projects subject to environmental assessment often give rise to many sensitive issues related to development, community and public expectations, environmental protection, Aboriginal concerns and federal-provincial relations. Projects being assessed can often be complex, with competing interests. Integrating these interests while maintaining productive relationships and delivering high-quality assessments that meet the expectations of Canadians, in a timely and predictable manner, is an ongoing challenge.
The number of environmental assessments required pursuant to the Act is in large part a function of the strength of our economy. The expansion of the Canadian economy has led to a more than 50 percent increase in major projects subject to review under the Act in the past year alone and another 20 percent increase is predicted for the natural resource sector in the near future. The delivery of timely and effective environmental assessments in the face of this increase in development activity is an ongoing challenge.
The recognition of Aboriginal self-government and the development of land claim agreements have reshaped environmental assessment in many regions of Canada. The Agency is working with Aboriginal groups and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada to ensure that environmental assessment regimes developed under these comprehensive land claims, self-government agreements and sectoral arrangements meet key environmental assessment requirements and take into account specific Aboriginal concerns.
Consistent with legislative changes introduced in 2003 through Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, the Agency is also considering how best to engage Aboriginal peoples and consider their concerns with respect to policy issues related to the Act.
The Supreme Court of Canada has established that the Crown - federal and provincial - may have the duty to consult, and possibly accommodate, Aboriginal peoples where it contemplates conduct that may adversely impact potential or established Aboriginal or treaty rights.
As part of the initiative to coordinate and streamline the entire regulatory process for major natural resource projects, the Government of Canada has set out responsibilities under the Memorandum of Understanding to the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects regarding Aboriginal consultation. Specifically, the Agency has responsibility for integrating Aboriginal-Crown consultation into the environmental assessments it coordinates under this initiative and for review panel and joint review panel processes.
The Agency is a strong advocate for the application of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) as a tool to support integrated decision making. Governments around the world are coming to recognize the potential of SEA to advance sustainable decision making. In Canada, the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals sets out the expectations of federal departments and agencies for SEA. In its role of promoting full implementation of the Directive, the Agency will continue to provide training, develop guidance, advocate application of SEA, and provide advice and support to departments and agencies as needed. The Agency will also continue to monitor national and international developments in the field including the emerging interest in regionally focused environmental assessment. The Agency will provide leadership in advancing SEA by supporting the work of a multi-stakeholder advisory committee examining ways of improving SEA and by managing a comprehensive evaluation of the Directive.
International partnerships give Canada the opportunity to share environmental assessment expertise and, at the same time, access the research being undertaken in other countries. Keeping in step with the environmental initiatives of international organizations and other countries also helps to ensure the competitive position of Canadian developers. As a party to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, Canada is required to meet the obligations that it subscribed to under the Convention.
The Agency works with a wide range of stakeholders and develops partnerships to promote sound environmental assessment practices in Canada and abroad. In support of this work, the Agency maintains and supports several mechanisms for receiving advice and consulting with stakeholders and partners. These include the Minister's Regulatory Advisory Committee (multi-stakeholder), the Senior Management Committee on Environmental Assessment (federal departments and agencies) and the Environmental Assessment Administrators Committee (provincial and territorial governments). The Agency is also developing additional mechanisms for consultation with Aboriginal peoples.
The Agency includes the following among its stakeholders and partners.
The Agency administers the federal environmental assessment process and assists federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations in meeting their obligations under the Act. Through its operational policies and procedures, the Agency improves the way in which environmental assessments are conducted at the federal level. In addition, the Agency works closely with federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations on multi-jurisdictional screenings and comprehensive studies; in providing coordination, administrative and technical support to review panels; and in developing training and guidance material.
The Agency works closely with other jurisdictions to coordinate federal and provincial environmental assessment activities, such as joint panel review processes for major projects. It also negotiates federal-provincial framework agreements and works with provincial and territorial governments on all types of environmental assessment review processes.
The Agency advises Indian and Northern Affairs Canada to ensure that the environmental assessment regimes developed and implemented pursuant to comprehensive land claims agreements, self-government agreements and devolution initiatives are consistent with the requirements of the Act and can be coordinated with existing environmental assessment regimes. The Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects and its Memorandum of Understanding give the Agency new responsibilities as leader in the integration of Aboriginal Crown consultation for the environmental assessments it coordinates. This role will be a major priority for the Agency, both in the coordination of the consultation and the development of related policy.
The Agency actively participates in a senior level interdepartmental policy working group tasked with developing a national action plan for the federal government on the legal duty of consultation with Aboriginal peoples.
Providing the necessary tools, guidance and training to all proponents, including the federal government, is a core business of the Agency. Such tools and guidance enable project proponents to meet the requirements of the Act, increase the quality of assessments and allow for the timely and predictable administration of the Act.
The Act promotes the integration of public values in decision making. Accordingly, the Agency seeks to maximize the public's participation throughout the environmental assessment process and places strong emphasis on transparency and information sharing. The Agency provides participant funding to individuals and non-profit organizations to take part in review panels and comprehensive studies. It also maintains the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry Internet site, which facilitates access to information about environmental assessments.
Beyond established program activities, a specific focus of the Agency's 2008-2009 plans and priorities is to better integrate and streamline federal environmental assessment processes.
The current federal environmental assessment system is largely based on the principle of self-assessment. Consequently, departments and agencies have their own discrete environmental assessment responsibilities to execute, though often in relation to the same project. The resulting decentralized system has some advantages, but it also has significant shortcomings.
In November 2005, the Cabinet Directive on Implementation of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act took effect. The Directive sets out the expectations of ministers regarding the Agency's leadership role and instructs the Agency and federal authorities on how they should conduct themselves to deliver high-quality environmental assessments in a timely and predictable manner. The Agency has played a critical role in the implementation of this Directive.
Under the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects (October 2007) and its Memorandum of Understanding, the Agency will now lead, above and beyond its duties as the Federal Environmental Assessment Coordinator, the delivery of the environmental assessment for most major natural resource projects. These are resource sector projects that undergo assessment by a review panel, comprehensive study or a complex screening that involves another jurisdiction. The Agency will undertake this role on behalf of responsible authorities who remain accountable under the current self-assessment process set out in the Act.
Under the same Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects (October 2007) and its Memorandum of Understanding, the Agency is developing mechanisms to integrate Aboriginal-Crown consultations into the environmental assessment processes that it coordinates and for review panel and joint review panel processes.
Through the planning period, the Agency will work closely with the newly established Major Projects Management Office of Natural Resources Canada to develop procedures and measures to meet the objectives of both Cabinet directives for effective and timely environmental assessments.
Building on this strengthening of the federal process, the Agency will work with provinces and territories to identify options over the short and medium term to streamline the delivery of cooperative environmental assessments.
The Agency has three priorities over this planning period: build a framework for more integrated environmental assessment, play an active leadership role in federal environmental assessment and build the capacity and organization to deliver on existing and new responsibilities.
To foster a more effective, efficient, predictable and timely environmental assessment process for Canadians, the Agency plans to continue its work of:
Stronger Agency leadership will:
This includes managing the environmental assessment of most major natural resource projects and integrating Aboriginal-Crown consultations into the environmental assessment process that it manages; continuing to play a strong role as the Federal Environmental Assessment Coordinator for other major resources projects; being a centre of expertise, training, and guidance on emerging issues related to environmental assessment; and introducing improvements to the panel management function.
To move ahead on the first two priorities while meeting existing responsibilities, the Agency must actively develop its internal capacity. This will involve:
Through these three priorities, the Agency will also show increasing leadership in delivering its regular ongoing key programs to partners and stakeholders. For details on these activities, see the section Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome.
Environmental considerations are taken into account in federal government decisions respecting policies, plans, programs and projects.
2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|
5,956 | 5,209 | 5,073 |
2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|
51 | 51 | 50 |
This program is aimed at developing and maintaining an effective, efficient and integrated environmental assessment process at the federal level, taking into full account the interactions with other environmental assessment, consultative and regulatory decision-making processes in Canada, as well as the trans-boundary context for environmental assessment. A sound environmental assessment process is vital to achieving the strategic outcome: "Ensuring that environmental considerations are integrated into federal government decision making through sound environmental assessment practices supports quality of life for Canadians, environmental sustainability and economic competitiveness."
The overall anticipated result of this program is an effective, efficient and integrated environmental assessment process at the federal level. This result will be achieved through efforts to:
Performance in implementing this program and achieving the expected result will be measured in terms of:
This program aligns most closely with the Agency's first priority - to build a framework for more integrated environmental assessment. It involves consulting with partners and stakeholders; monitoring and evaluating emerging issues and challenges, and developing appropriate legislative, regulatory and policy responses; strengthening environmental assessment coordination; and exploring linkages between different forms of assessment. By establishing and maintaining the policy and legislative foundation for the practice of environmental assessment federally, this program will also support the Agency's second business priority to take on a leadership role in federal environmental assessment.
2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|
28,500 | 25,831 | 21,725 |
2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|
197 | 193 | 181 |
This program is aimed at ensuring a transparent and rigorous environmental assessment process while promoting increased public awareness of and participation in this process. The program's goal is to provide meaningful and relevant training courses for stakeholders, up-to-date and topical tools, and mechanisms to support an improved environmental assessment process. This program aims to ensure a process that avoids duplication and delays, is clear and transparent to all participants, respects legislative requirements and is conducted in a cost-effective manner.
The overall anticipated result of this program is a timely and predictable process that produces high-quality environmental assessments, while engaging Canadians in the process by supporting them with tools, guidance and funding assistance to participate in certain environmental assessments. This result will be achieved by:
Performance in implementing this program and achieving the expected result will be measured in terms of:
This program aligns most closely with the Agency's second priority - to play an active leadership role in federal environmental assessment. It involves consulting with partners and stakeholders; developing appropriate monitoring, reporting and evaluation response mechanisms to emerging issues and challenges; demonstrating enhanced leadership in environmental assessment coordination and Aboriginal engagement; and exploring linkages between different forms of assessment. It will also assist in developing capacity to deliver on existing and new responsibilities through its training and guidance endeavours.
Planned Spending ($000s) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expected Results | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome Area | |
Strategic Outcome | Environmental considerations are taken into account in federal government decisions respecting policies, plans, programs and projects. | ||||
Environmental Assessment Development Program | See the section Environmental Assessment Development Program | 5,956 | 5,209 | 5,073 | Strong Economic Growth |
Environmental Assessment Support Program | See the section Environmental Assessment Support Program | 28,500 | 25,831 | 21,725 | Strong Economic Growth |
SDS Departmental Goal
To promote the full and meaningful application of a results-oriented federal environmental assessment framework. |
||
Federal SD Goal Including Greening Government Operations (GGO) Goals
Governance for Sustainable Development: Federal SD Goal VI |
Performance Measure from Current SDS
Improved understanding of how the various components of an effective and efficient environmental assessment framework should work together, and of the strengths and weaknesses of the current framework in supporting integrated decision making. |
Department's Expected Results for 2008-2009
Advance the science and practice of strategic environmental assessment. Advance the science and practice of regional-scale environmental assessment. |
A timelier, coordinated, and consistent approach to the environmental assessment process of major projects is applied. | Promote and ensure the implementation of initiatives that improve the coordination among stakeholders in federal project environmental assessments. Gain a greater understanding of the effectiveness of the Agency and its supporting legislative and policy tools in achieving coordination among stakeholders. | |
Improved knowledge across government of how to engage the public, including Aboriginal peoples, in high-quality environmental assessments. | Build knowledge and capacity internally and throughout the federal government in the area of public and Aboriginal peoples' engagement in environmental assessments. | |
Regular and consistent training in sustainable development tools for planners and analysts across the government of Canada. | Collaborate with other federal departments and agencies to increase awareness and application of the principles of sustainable development and the sustainable development tools. | |
Identification of areas requiring improvement in the application of the Cabinet Directive and the Act. | Evaluate the effectiveness of the SEA and project environmental assessment processes. | |
Identification of opportunities to better integrate the project review process across jurisdictions. | Examine how the Agency can move toward better integration of the project review process at the national level. | |
Themes of research and development reflect issues and needs addressed in the Agency's sustainable development strategies. | Ensure that the research areas promoted and encouraged by the Agency are consistent with, and supportive of, the goals and objectives set out in the Agency's sustainable development strategies. |
The following tables are available electronically at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rpp/2008-2009/info/info-eng.asp
The reporting structure to the Minister of the Environment is shown in the figure below. Planned Spending: $34,456K with 248 FTEs.
Corporate Services support the operating programs and activities of the Agency and include many administrative activities normally performed outside program areas and cannot otherwise be allocated as program support overhead.
The objective of the Agency's Corporate Services is to support the core program activities by providing modern, timely and responsive services that are effective and efficient.
The major elements of Corporate Services are:
Finance and Administration | Corporate finance and administrative functions, including senior management functions not directly attributable to any specific element of the operations program activity. |
Legal Services | Legal services provided by Justice Canada. |
Human Resources | Resources associated with the provision of human resources management services and products. |
Communications | Corporate communication resources associated with the provision of internal and external communications services and products, including translation costs. |
Information Management/Information Technology | Corporate resources associated with the provision of general information management/information technology infrastructure and services. |
The Agency has a total complement of 52 FTEs within Corporate Services (which, for the purpose of this section, includes legal services), exclusively for internal use. The total budget for the corporate services function is $11,290K. These amounts are included in previous tables.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3
Tel: 613-957-0712
Fax: 613-957-0946
E-mail: info@ceaa-acee.gc.ca
Name of Evaluation | Evaluation Type | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Evaluation of the Brunswick Pipeline substitution pilot | Formative | In progress | Spring 2008 |
Participant Funding Program client satisfaction survey | Formative | In progress | Spring 2008 |
Evaluation of the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals | Formative/ Summative |
Preparatory work done | Spring 2009 |
R&D Contribution Program | Formative | Preparatory work done | Fall 2008 |
How is your department planning to meet the objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement? |
---|
|
The Agency works closely with the Office of the Comptroller General of the Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada, in partnership with the community of federal small departments and agencies (SDA), to design, develop and implement the internal audit capacity. A horizontal audit of SDAs is scheduled for 2008-2009. |
The following table outlines the Agency's major and significant regulatory initiatives scheduled for submission for legal examination, approval or for implementation during the planning period.
Regulatory Initiatives | Expected Results |
---|---|
Amendments to Federal Coordination Regulations
Federal Coordination Regulations will be amended to support the Agency's expanded role set out by the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects, and the Cabinet Directive on Implementing the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. |
|
Amendments to Canada Port Authority Environmental Assessment Regulations
In accordance with changes brought about by the renewed Act in 2003, amendments to these regulations are needed to ensure the comprehensiveness, consistency, transparency and overall quality of port authorities' environmental assessment processes. |
|
Airport Authority Regulations
In accordance with changes brought about by the renewed Act, these regulations will close a gap in the Act by requiring airport authorities to conduct an assessment of the environmental effects of projects located on the federal land over which those authorities have administration, management or other specified rights or interests. |
|
Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Charges Order
The Order will be updated to reflect the current costs of providing review panel services and the range of services provided, as well as to incorporate an inflation factor. |
|
Amendments to Comprehensive Study List Regulations
Update the requirements to conduct a comprehensive study for groundwater extraction. |
|
($000s) | 2008-2009 |
---|---|
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada | 1,663 |
Contributions covering employers' share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (excluding revolving funds) | 1,345 |
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada | 918 |
Total services received without charge | 3,926 |
The Agency obtains certain financial, materials management, informatics as well as compensation and benefits services under a shared services agreement with Environment Canada.
Respendable Revenue | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
($000s) | Forecast Revenue 2007-2008 | Planned Revenue 2008-2009 | Planned Revenue 2009-2010 | Planned Revenue 2010-2011 |
Effective and Efficient Environmental Assessment | ||||
Cost recovery for environmental assessment services | 6,360 | |||
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (federal) | 100 | |||
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (external) | 150 | |||
6,610 | ||||
Environmental Assessment Support Program | ||||
Cost recovery for environmental assessment services | 7,751 | 7,751 | 7,751 | |
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (federal) | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (external) | 150 | 150 | 150 | |
Total Respendable Revenue | 6,610 | 8,001 | 8,001 | 8,001 |
Note: Cost recovery of environmental assessment review panel expenditures depends on the level of panel activity that is eligible for cost recovery and may therefore fluctuate. The Agency received additional Vote Netted Revenue authority in 2007-2008.
Name of User Fee | Fee Type | Fee-Setting Authority | Reason for Planned Amendment to Fee | Effective Date of Planned Change | Consultation and Review Process Planned |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendments to the Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Chargers Order | Regulatory Service | Financial Administration Act | Update to reflect current costs and range of services provided | 2009-2010 | A consultation document will be used for broad stakeholder consultations, most notably with industry sectors whose projects may be subject to review panels and with the Minister of the Environment's multi-stakeholder Regulatory Advisory Committee. |