Advisory Committee on Senior Level Retention and Compensation
Archived information
Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject à to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
The Honourable
Vic Toews, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
President of
the Treasury Board
House of
Commons
Ottawa, On K1A 0A6
Dear Minister Toews:
In this report, our tenth since 1998, we have made recommendations about compensation for executives, deputy ministers, governor in council appointees and chief executive officers of Crown corporations.
In formulating the recommendations, we examined not only labour market data but also the compensation principles and methodologies that were established with our first reports, principles that the government has accepted.
We have also reviewed progress by the government in implementing previous recommendations.
In our eighth and ninth reports, we recommended that a portion of the compensation increase be put into performance pay to support the recognition of good performance and begin to address the gap with the Canadian labour market at higher levels of the executive cadre. We have recommended this approach again. On average, for the senior executives, we are recommending an increase of 4.1 per cent, consisting of an economic increase of 2 per cent applied to base salaries and 2.1 per cent increase to the maximum performance award. At the more senior levels, we are recommending a higher percentage increase to performance awards for the reason stated.
Finally, we urge you to make a timely decision on our recommendations. We believe it is important to implement compensation increases in a timely fashion such that they align with annual performance objectives of the executives of the public service.
I look forward to the continuing work of the Committee to provide advice and experience to the government in the effort to renew the Public Service of Canada.
Sincerely,
The paper version was signed by
Carol Stephenson
Chair:
Carol M. Stephenson
Dean
Richard Ivey School of Business
Members:
Gaétan Lussier
President
Gaétan Lussier and Associates
Patrick O'Callaghan
B.A.,
M.B.A.,
President, Patrick O'Callaghan and Associates
Sarah E. Raiss
Executive
Vice-President,
TransCanada Corporation
Raymond Royer
L.L.B., M.A.,
President and CEO, Domtar Inc.
Table of Contents
- Compensation
- Recommendations
- Progress since our last report
- Appendix One: Mandate of the Advisory Committee on Senior Level Retention and Compensation
- Appendix Two: The Advisory Committee on Senior Level Retention and Compensation
- Appendix Three: Recommended Salary Ranges and Performance Awards
Compensation
Our ninth report, dated January 2008, focused on broad human resources management recommendations for the public service, pointing to the aging demographics of the senior levels of the public service. The demographics, increased focus on accountability and increased competition for human resources are good reasons for strong management of all aspects of human resources. And, as we promised in the ninth report, we have turned our focus to compensation to ensure that senior level compensation continues to support the coming recruiting and retention challenges.
When our Committee began its work in 1997, we established compensation principles and methodologies that we have since followed rigorously.
- Compensation Structure: We developed a compensation structure that recognizes the responsibility, know-how, problem solving and accountability of executive positions and remunerates them accordingly.
- Benchmarking: We established a methodology of benchmarking the foundation of the compensation structure, namely the EX-1 position, to the median of the Canadian labour market to ensure that public service executive salaries support recruitment at the entry level. We study labour market data from over 500 Canadian organizations in addition to other labour market studies. We ensure that the compensation for all levels is somewhat above the broader public sector, recognizing the federal public service is the senior level of government.
- Timely Compensation Adjustments: We established a routine process for recommending timely increases to keep up with the labour market and maintain the purchasing power of senior levels.
- Fiscal Prudence: We have adopted a 'lag' strategy. As those experienced with the theory and practice of compensation know, in establishing a relation with the labour market, organizations typically adopt a 'lead, lag or match' compensation strategy. In comparison, a lead strategy means that changes to the organization's pay structure are timed to be ahead of other organizations in the labour market, to compete for labour. The implication of our 'lag' strategy is that the compensation we recommend is put in place after the labour market has already moved on to new salary levels. For example, in February 2008, we looked at compensation that was in place in September 2007 in the Canadian labour market to recommend compensation for public servants beginning in April 2008 for the next fiscal year.
- Total Compensation Methodology: We ensure that our recommendations are based on total compensation. This approach ensures that the right mix of components is in the compensation 'envelope' and that the envelope is consistent with recruitment and retention needs, and that in our labour market comparisons, we are comparing 'apples to apples'.
- Performance Pay: We take the government's record in administering performance pay into account. We are confident that the government is managing this program in a disciplined way, and as it was intended.
- Salary Inversion and Compression: We ensure that the incidence of compression and inversion is considered in our deliberations.
Recommendations
After taking the labour market research for 2007 into account and following the principles and methodologies we have established, we recommend:
- For executives and deputy ministers:
- a 4.1 per cent increase to cash compensation, consisting of an economic increase of 2.0 per cent and an increase of 2.1 per cent increase to the maximum lump sum performance award to be paid based on performance, effective April 1, 2008.
- that the government provide executives with annual information on the value of their total compensation, beyond the statement of benefits that employees already receive.
- For Governor in Council appointees:
- For GC-1 to GC-5, a salary range increase of 2 per cent and a maximum performance award of 13.6 per cent
- For GC-6 to GC-9, a salary range increase of 2 per cent and a maximum performance award of 23.4 per cent
- For GC-10, a salary range increase of 2 per cent and a maximum performance award of 28.4 per cent
- That the GC-Q salary ranges be adjusted accordingly
- For CEOs of Crown corporations:
- That the compensation structure for Crown corporations move to an eight group structure from the current ten group structure:
- A 20 per cent differential between groups
- A 2 per cent salary range increase
- An increase in the maximum performance award for CEOs of Crown corporations to be more in-line with EX/DM performance awards
- For Groups 1 to 3, a maximum performance award of 15 per cent
- For Groups 4 to 5, a maximum performance award of 26 per cent
- For Groups 6 to 7, a maximum performance award of 28 per cent
- For Group 8, a maximum performance award of 33 per cent
- Given the completion of the structural and compensation review for the CEOs of Crown corporations, that a study be undertaken to look at the compensation for Directors and Chairs of Crown corporations.
- That the compensation structure for Crown corporations move to an eight group structure from the current ten group structure:
The current and recommended salary ranges are shown in Appendix Three.
Progress since our last report
Progress in implementing our recommendations of the Ninth Report is summarized below.
Recommendation | Status as of April 2007 |
---|---|
That the government continue the practice of putting some of future compensation increases into performance pay in order to address the gap with the Canadian labour market at higher levels of the executive cadre, while ensuring that their compensation remains above that of the broader public sector. | The government has consistently accepted and implemented our recommendations. |
That the government pursue its practice of steady, timely progress in approving compensation increases to maintain the federal government's capacity to recruit and retain high potential individuals. | The Stephenson Committee met in February 2008 to consider recommendations to Treasury Board for salary increases for senior executives to take effect April 1, 2008. |
That the government continue the practice of publishing results of the performance management program, in the interests of transparency and to ensure that executives see performance pay as part of the total value proposition. | The government has published results annually since 2003–2004. Results for the 2006–2007 fiscal year are the most recent. |
That the excellent practice of using the Management Accountability Framework (MAF) as a critical element of deputy head assessment continue and that it be cascaded down to other executive levels in the organization. | Development of the MAF as a tool for assessing deputy head performance is ongoing and is being used for deputy head performance assessment again in 2008. |
That the Canada Public Service Agency (CPSA) begin the research and consultations necessary for our Committee to provide recommendations to modernize severance pay as a retention tool by making a portion of it accessible to executives at different stages of their careers, for example at ten or twenty years of service. | Research and consultations are in progress. |
That the CPSA develop a policy and tools to simplify the process of termination when there is a need to facilitate separation where there is no cause, such as lack of fit with the job. | The Canada Public Service Agency is conducting research and consultation on this question. |
That deputy heads be fully accountable for the development and implementation of HR plans, and support these efforts in human resources planning with adequate recognition and resources. | The Deputy Ministers' Committee on Public Service Renewal developed the 2007–2008 Public Service Renewal Action Plan. One of the four priorities is planning and by March 2008, 35 of 36 departments and agencies will have developed and distributed their integrated plan to their employees and put it on their website. |
That recruitment and retention at senior levels of high potential individuals be based on capacity, regardless of age and experience, with adequate supports such as a buddy system and capitalizing on the knowledge and experience of retired public and private sector executives. | Some initiatives are currently underway and will be pursued further in 2008–2009, for example: a bridging program, coaching services available from the Canada School and the Personnel Psychology Centre (PSC). |
That executives be encouraged to take risks and learn from their mistakes to foster creativity and innovation. | This behaviour is being encouraged through incorporation in vision and cultural changes promoted in PS Renewal initiatives. |
That deputy heads and their senior executives be personally involved in external recruitment on campus and that timelines match those in the private sector. | The 2007–2008 Public Service Renewal Action Plan stated that by March 2008, deputy ministers were to increase the number of post-secondary graduates appointed directly to indeterminate positions to at least 3,000. The Clerk's Fifteenth Report shows that over 4,000 recent post-secondary graduates have been recruited. |
That the Key Leadership Competencies, with a focus on people management, be used in formal assessment of executive performance beginning in 2007–2008 and that emphasis on the management of people be further strengthened in 2008–2009. | The revised Policy on the Management of Executives (approved by Treasury Board in June 2007) requires deputy heads to attest that the Key Leadership Competencies were used to assess executive performance. The Canada Public Service Agency has provided tools and training to support this assessment in a publication, the Gold Standard for Performance Management. |
That the government focus on promoting the excellent personal and career growth opportunities in the federal public service and continue expanding such opportunities. These should be discussed annually in individual development plans and department-wide. | The 2007-08 PS Renewal Action Plan stated that by March 2008, deputy ministers were to ensure at least 90 per cent of Public Service employees had learning plans in place and that a corresponding discussion and an assessment of the plans between employee and supervisor occurs annually in connection with performance review. The Clerk’s Fifteenth Report indicates that 30 of 36 deputy ministers have confirmed that at least 90 per cent of their employees will have learning plans in place by March 2008. In 2007-2008, the Agency developed guidance on learning to assist managers and employees to develop learning plans in the context of ongoing discussions. This guidance has also been integrated into the School's e-learning course "Introduction to Personal Learning Plans" and its online learning plan tool, "My Learning Planner". It is developing guidance on organizational learning strategies and updating the guidance for managers on learning as part of the integrated business and human resources planning process. This work will assist with improved planning and completion of individual learning and development activities to develop identified skills, competencies and knowledge, thereby better supporting employee development and departments’ business objectives, both now and into the future. |
That the government create further initiatives to publicly celebrate the accomplishments of public servants and that when a public servant has been recognized, the government follow-up with media advertising nationally and especially regionally. | A new awards strategy is being developed including provision for increased visibility of public service awards, such as the Outstanding Achievement Awards, through such avenues as publication of award winners in national and regional newspapers and nominating PS executives for external awards. |
That the government make more proactive use of Interchange Canada and the Fellows Program, enhance orientation programs for those new to the public service, and provide mentoring and coaching. |
The inaugural intake of the Fellows Program has concluded
with the selection of eight Fellows in the first year. Marketing of the
program for 2008–2009 inside and outside the Public Service of Canada should
lead to an increased number.
A pro-active marketing strategy is being developed for Interchange Canada. As of March 20, 2008, there are 51 active incoming EX participants and 28 outgoing EX participants. |
That the work on corporate talent management be extended, on a priority basis, to the rest of the EX population. | Talent management for Assistant Deputy Ministers will be further expanded in 2008-2009 to the rest of the EX cadre. |
Appendix One: Mandate of the Advisory Committee on Senior Level Retention and Compensation
To provide independent advice and recommendations to the President of the Treasury Board concerning executives, deputy ministers and other Governor-in-Council appointees of the federal Public Service and public sector on:
- developing a long-term strategy for the senior levels of the Public Service that will support the human resource management needs of the next decade,
- compensation strategies and principles, and
- overall management matters comprising among other things human resource policies and programs, terms and conditions of employment, classification and compensation issues including rates of pay, rewards and recognition.
To present recommendations in a report to the President of the Treasury Board. The report will be made public by the President of the Treasury Board.
Appendix Two: The Advisory Committee on Senior Level Retention and Compensation
Carol
M. Stephenson, B.A., (Committee Chair)
Dean, Richard Ivey School of Business, Ms. Stephenson, a widely respected CEO
in the Canadian telecom industry, was appointed Dean of the Richard Ivey School
of Business in July 2003. In 1999 she was appointed Chief Executive Officer of
Lucent Technologies Canada. Prior to that, she was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Stentor Resource Centre Inc., and Vice-President of Bell
Canada.
Gaétan Lussier, O.C., B.Sc. (Agr.), M.Sc., Ph.D.
President, Gaétan Lussier and Associates, Mr. Lussier is a past Assistant
Deputy Minister and Deputy Minister at the Quebec Ministry of Agriculture; and,
federally, a past Deputy Minister of Agriculture Canada and past Deputy
Minister and Chairman, Employment and Immigration Canada. Mr. Lussier was also
President of the External Advisory Committee on Smart Regulation and is the
founder of the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute (2004). Moreover, he was
President of Boulangeries Weston Québec Ltd. and past President and Chief Executive
Officer of Culinar Inc.
Patrick O'Callaghan, B.A., M.B.A.
President,
Patrick O'Callaghan & Associates, Mr. O'Callaghan specializes in Board
effectiveness and director recruitment in the public, private and not-for-profit
sectors. Since 1992, Patrick O'Callaghan & Associates has provided Board
governance advice to organizations in a wide range of industries throughout
Canada, including assignments with federal and provincial crown corporations.
Mr. O'Callaghan is a frequent speaker and seminar leader on corporate
governance issues. He has first-hand experience as a director of public and
private Canadian corporations and several not-for-profit organizations.
Currently, Mr. O'Callaghan is a director of Women on BoardTM and a
member of the Directors Advisory Group of the Canadian Institute of Chartered
Accountants.
Sarah
E. Raiss, B.Sc., M.B.A.
Executive Vice President, Corporate Services of TransCanada Corporation Ms.
Raiss is responsible for human resources, information systems,
aviation, real estate and corporate
services at TransCanada Corporation. Prior to holding this position, she was
President of S. E. Raiss Group, Inc.; Vice President of Customer Service,
Training and IT Support at Ameritech; Senior Consultant at Metzler and
Associates; as well as holding various positions
in engineering and operations
with Michigan Bell.
Raymond Royer,
L.L.B., M.A.
President and CEO, Domtar Inc., Before his appointment at Domtar, Mr. Royer was
President and Chief Operating Officer at Bombardier. He is noted for his
outstanding financial management and his ability to integrate acquired
businesses through a management system that engages employees.
Appendix Three: Recommended Salary Ranges and Performance Awards
Level | Current 2007-2008 | Recommended 2008-2009 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Salary Range Maximum | Maximum At Risk Pay |
Maximum Bonus | Salary Range Maximum | Maximum
At Risk Pay |
Maximum Bonus | |
EX-1 | 113,100 | 9.6% | 3.0 % | 115,400 | 12.0% | 3.0 % |
EX-2 | 126,800 | 9.6% | 3.0 % | 129,400 | 12.0% | 3.0 % |
EX-3 | 141,900 | 9.6% | 3.0 % | 144,800 | 12.0% | 3.0 % |
EX-4 | 162,900 | 16.4% | 6.0 % | 166,200 | 20.0% | 6.0 % |
EX-5 | 182,500 | 16.4% | 6.0 % | 186,200 | 20.0% | 6.0 % |
DM-1 | 204,200 | 16.4% | 6.0 % | 208,300 | 20.0% | 6.0 % |
DM-2 | 234,900 | 19.4% | 8.0 % | 239,600 | 25.0% | 8.0 % |
DM-3 | 263,000 | 19.4% | 8.0 % | 268,300 | 25.0% | 8.0 % |
DM-4 | 294,500 | 23.4% | 9.0 % | 300,400 | 30.0% | 9.0 % |
Level | Current 2007-2008 | Recommended 2008-2009 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Salary Range Maximum | Maximum
At Risk Pay |
Maximum Bonus |
Salary Range Maximum | Maximum
At Risk Pay |
Maximum Bonus |
|
Level 1 | 78,300 | 8.5% | 3.0 % | 79,900 | 10.6 % | 3.0 % |
Level 2 | 90,000 | 8.5% | 3.0 % | 91,800 | 10.6 % | 3.0 % |
Level 3 | 103,800 | 8.5% | 3.0 % | 105,900 | 10.6 % | 3.0 % |
Level 4 | 119,300 | 8.5% | 3.0 % | 121,700 | 10.6 % | 3.0 % |
Level 5 | 137,200 | 8.5% | 3.0 % | 140,000 | 10.6 % | 3.0 % |
Level 6 | 157,700 | 15.3% | 6.0 ù% | 160,900 | 17.4 % | 6.0 % |
Level 7 | 181,400 | 15.3% | 6.0 % | 185,100 | 17.4 % | 6.0 % |
Level 8 | 208,500 | 15.3% | 6.0 % | 212,700 | 17.4 % | 6.0 % |
Level 9 | 239,800 | 15.3% | 6.0 % | 244,600 | 17.4 % | 6.0 % |
Level 10 | 275,700 | 18.3% | 8.0 % | 281,300 | 20.4 % | 8.0 % |
Level | Current 2007-2008 | Recommended 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
Level 1 | 84,700 | 88,100 |
Level 2 | 97,400 | 101,200 |
Level 3 | 112,300 | 116,800 |
Level 4 | 129,100 | 134,200 |
Level 5 | 148,500 | 154,400 |
Level 6 | 181,800 | 188,900 |
Level 7 | 209,200 | 217,300 |
Level 8 | 240,400 | 249,700 |
Level 9 | 276,500 | 287,200 |
Level 10 | 327,000 | 338,700 |
Level | Job Rates | Maximum Performance Award |
---|---|---|
Group 1 | 132,000 | 10% |
Group 2 | 147,800 | 10% |
Group 3 | 165,600 | 10% |
Group 4 | 185,500 | 10% |
Group 5 | 207,700 | 10% |
Group 6 | 238,900 | 15% |
Group 7 | 274,700 | 15% |
Group 8 | 315,900 | 15% |
Group 9 | 379,100 | 20% |
Group 10 | 455,000 | 25% |
Level | Job Rates | Maximum Performance Award |
---|---|---|
Group 1 | 134,700 | 15.0% |
Group 2 | 161,600 | 15.0% |
Group 3 | 193,900 | 15.0% |
Group 4 | 232,700 | 26.0% |
Group 5 | 279,200 | 26.0% |
Group 6 | 335,000 | 28.0% |
Group 7 | 402,000 | 28.0% |
Group 8 | 482,400 | 33.0% |
- Date modified: