As the employer of the federal Public Service, the Treasury Board is committed to providing a work environment where all persons working for the Public Service are treated with respect and dignity. Bargaining agents are also supportive of this and involved in initiatives to promote such an environment.
Harassment affects workplace and individual well-being and will not be tolerated. This policy aims to prevent harassment by promoting increased awareness, early problem resolution and the use of mediation. The application of this policy will help create a work environment where all are treated with respect and dignity. It will not only promote the well-being of all in the workplace, but it will reinforce those values of integrity and trust that are the foundation of a sound organization.
Dealing with harassment can be a complex matter. What one person may consider to be proper behaviour, another may believe to be harassment. Note that the proper exercise of one's authority or responsibility does not generally constitute harassment. The Appendix provides some examples for better understanding.
The Canadian Human Rights Act provides every person in the workplace the right to freedom from harassment based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and pardoned conviction. These are referred to as prohibited grounds.
The Treasury Board policy goes beyond these requirements by addressing other types of workplace harassment such as harassment of a general nature not related to the grounds prohibited under the Canadian Human Rights Act, including rude, degrading or offensive remarks or e-mails, threats or intimidation.
The policy promotes the prevention of harassment and focuses on the prompt resolution of harassment. Whether the source of harassment comes from within the Public Service or from outside, any allegation of harassment is serious and should be taken seriously. Harassment needs to be addressed with sensitivity, promptness and discretion. Open communication and early intervention are essential in preventing and resolving harassment.
The effective date of this policy is June 1, 2001.
The purpose of this policy is to foster a respectful workplace through the prevention and prompt resolution of harassment.
Harassment in the workplace is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. All persons working for the Public Service, whether or not they are employees, should enjoy a harassment-free workplace.
This policy applies to all departments and organizations of the Public Service listed in Schedule I, Part I of the Public Service Staff Relations Act.
The complaint process as defined in this policy applies to federal public service employees. Though other persons who work for the Public Service cannot access the complaint process described in the policy, managers are nevertheless expected to abide by the spirit of the policy and ensure that their harassment concerns are addressed.
The policy does not apply to complaints from the public. The responsibility for follow-up on such complaints lies with departments/organizations.
The ultimate responsibility and authority for applying this policy rests with the deputy head and his or her authorized representative(s).
The objective of early resolution is to resolve any situation or conflict as soon as possible, in a fair and respectful manner without having to resort to the complaint process. Every effort should be made to resolve the problem early with open communication and in a co-operative manner. The use of problem resolution mechanisms such as coaching, counselling and facilitation can in many instances resolve the issue and prevent the situation from escalating to the point where filing a complaint is necessary. An allegation of harassment is serious. If a person working for the Public Service believes that he or she has been harassed, the following actions should be taken.
The person who feels offended by the actions of another person working for the Public Service is encouraged to make it known to that person as soon as possible in an attempt to resolve the problem.
If the problem is not resolved or if the offended person does not want to speak directly with the other, the offended person should meet with his or her supervisor, or with another manager, or seek advice from the person who is designated by their department/organization to provide information on harassment, in an attempt to find a solution and resolve the problem.
Management must make every effort to resolve the issue between the parties as quickly as possible, if necessary with the assistance of a resource person.
The complaint process applies to federal public service employees. Other persons working for the Public Service who believe they have been harassed may report the incident to their supervisor/manager, or, if necessary, to another appropriate manager who will address the situation and take appropriate action.
If early resolution is not successful or is not deemed appropriate, an employee may file a complaint with the delegated manager. All steps should be completed without undue delay, normally in six months or less. Departments must establish time frames appropriate to their particular organizations, in consultation with their union officials.
When dealing with complaints, requirements of the Official Languages Act must be taken into account.
The sharing of information related to the harassment complaint with the parties must comply with the principles of privacy and access to information legislation.
The complainant submits a complaint in writing to the delegated manager, or to the next person in the hierarchy if the delegated manager is the subject of the complaint, within one year of the alleged harassment leading to the complaint. The complaint must include the nature of the allegations; the name of the respondent; the relationship of the respondent to the complainant (e.g., supervisor, colleague); the date and a description of the incident(s); and, if applicable, the names of witnesses. The information provided should be as precise and concise as possible.
Upon receipt of the complaint, the delegated manager screens and acknowledges receipt of the complaint. The criteria used in the screening are that the complaint:
If these criteria are met, the delegated manager informs the respondent that a complaint has been received and provides him/her with the particulars of the complaint in writing, including the allegations.
If these criteria are not met, the delegated manager informs the complainant in writing that he or she cannot accept the complaint. If appropriate, the delegated manager suggests other means of resolving the issue.
Once the complaint has been acknowledged, the delegated manager reviews the complaint and if necessary, seeks additional information to determine if the allegations are related to harassment.
If the delegated manager concludes that the complaint is not related to harassment, he or she informs the complainant and the respondent in writing. The delegated manager re-directs the complainant to the appropriate avenue of recourse or suggests other means of resolving the issue.
If the allegations are related to harassment, the delegated manager determines what efforts have been made to resolve the problem, identifies immediate avenues of resolution if any, and takes appropriate action.
If the harassment complaint remains unresolved, the delegated manager must offer mediation. If the parties agree to mediation, the delegated manager obtains mediation services as noted above under "Delegated managers", section (f).
If mediation has not resolved the complaint, or if mediation was not undertaken, the delegated manager launches an investigation and notifies all involved parties. The investigator must meet the requirements as noted previously under "Delegated managers", section (h). The investigator must provide the delegated manager with a written report that includes his or her findings and conclusions.
If mediation is undertaken at any time during the investigation process, the investigation is suspended. It is resumed only if mediation is unsuccessful.
If the delegated manager is satisfied that he or she has all the facts and that the parties have been heard, he or she may decide not to undertake an investigation and to proceed to Step 6.
The delegated manager reviews all the relevant information and decides what action to take. He or she then informs the parties in writing of the outcome of the investigation and ensures that corrective and/or disciplinary measures are taken, if warranted.
Under an agreement with the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, the Public Service Commission will act as an expert resource body by developing programs and providing services to departments in the prevention and resolution of harassment in the workplace, in such areas as training, mediation and investigation.
Employees may wish to discuss grievance options with their bargaining agent.
If harassment is based on one of the grounds of discrimination prohibited under the Canadian Human Rights Act, employees have the right to file a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
Assaults including sexual assault are covered by the Criminal Code and in such cases the police should be contacted.
If a complaint on the same issue is or has been dealt with through another avenue of recourse, the complaint process under this policy will not proceed further and the file will be closed.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and departments/organizations will work together to monitor results in achieving the policy objective and statement.
Enquiries relating to this policy should be referred to the responsible officer designated in departmental/organizational headquarters, who in turn may direct questions regarding interpretation to the Human Resources Branch of the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
Some questions that can help assess whether the behaviour (act, comment or display) constitutes harassment:
It is also important to consider the severity and impropriety of the act, the circumstances and context of each situation, and whether the behaviour is prohibited under the Canadian Human Rights Act. The prohibited grounds are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and pardoned conviction.
The following are some examples, but not an exhaustive list, to clarify what is meant by "harassment".
What generally constitutes harassment | What may constitute harassment | What does not generally constitute harassment |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sexual and physical assault are covered by the Criminal Code.