The PSDPA came into force on April 15, 2007, replacing the Treasury Board’s Policy on the Internal Disclosure of Information Concerning Wrongdoing in the Workplace. All internal disclosures brought through the previous policy will continue as though they had been made under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act. Investigations will continue in a seamless fashion.
The PSDPA:
The Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act defines wrongdoing* in the public sector as:
*For exact legal language, view the Act.
A disclosure of wrongdoing is the filing of any information by a public servant that could show that a wrongdoing has been committed or is about to be committed. Information showing that a public servant has been asked to commit a wrongdoing is also considered to be a disclosure of wrongdoing.
A disclosure of wrongdoing is protected if it is made in good faith and in accordance with the provisions of the PSDPA.
As a public servant, you are strongly encouraged to raise issues of suspected wrongdoing with your supervisor, the Senior Officer for Disclosure or the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner, who is an independent agent of Parliament.
A disclosure to the public is protected only if there is not enough time to make it in accordance with the PSDPA and you believe that there has been a serious breach of federal or provincial laws, or an imminent risk to the life, health and safety of persons or the environment.
It is important to remember that in making a disclosure under the Act, a public servant must follow established procedures or practices for the secure handling, storage, transportation and transmission of information or documents.
Any public servant has a choice of making a disclosure to:
If the disclosure is to a supervisor, the supervisor passes it on to the Senior Officer for Disclosure, in accordance with an organization’s internal disclosure procedures.
The Senior Officer for Disclosure is designated by each chief executive in the Public Service to establish an internal disclosure process. The process involves assessing the disclosure, investigating it, where necessary, and reporting on it, if there are any findings. (Due to size, small organizations may be exempt from designating a Senior Officer for Disclosure, in which case, disclosures may be made to the Public Service Integrity Commissioner.)
The Integrity Commissioner can perform the same roles as the Senior Officer for Disclosure, and can be contacted in a number of ways:
The Act is not limited to public servants; any person outside the public sector can provide information about a possible wrongdoing in, or relating to, the public sector to the Public Service Integrity Commissioner.
There are several provisions in the Act to make information public in situations of founded wrongdoing.
Specific sanctions will depend on the type and seriousness of the wrongdoing. In addition to any sanctions that may be required by law, chief executives have the authority to apply administrative and disciplinary penalties. These may include:
The Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act clearly stipulates that no public servant shall be subject to any reprisal for having made a disclosure in accordance with this Act.
Reprisal is any measure taken against a public servant because they made a protected disclosure or co-operated in an investigation into a possible wrongdoing. Reprisal includes:
The process for a public servant to bring a complaint of reprisal to the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner is similar to the process for making a disclosure of wrongdoing. However, the complaint must be filed within 60 days* of the day on which the complainant knew or ought to have known when reprisal action was taken.
A public servant should provide the following information, preferably in writing:
*The Integrity Commissioner has discretion to allow a complaint to be filed after the 60-day period if he or she believes that it is appropriate considering the circumstances of the complaint.
The Integrity Commissioner may refuse to deal with reprisal complaints if:
If no settlement is reached after the conclusion of the investigation, the Integrity Commissioner may apply to the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal. The Tribunal will determine whether or not an act of reprisal was taken against the complainant and will:
There are a number of possible remedial measures if an act of reprisal is found to have occurred, including:
The Tribunal receives applications from the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner to hear and deal with reprisal complaints. The Tribunal will determine if reprisal has occurred, and, if so, make orders for the appropriate remedial measures in favour of the complainant. The Tribunal may also consider ordering disciplinary action against those who have engaged in reprisal.
Any person who, in good faith, provides information to the Integrity Commissioner about a possible wrongdoing in the federal public sector is also protected under the Act. The Act prohibits:
Non-public servants who believe they have suffered reprisal may have their complaints dealt with through existing labour relations processes that ordinarily apply to them. They may also apply to the Integrity Commissioner to obtain free legal advice if they meet the criteria under the PSDPA.
The Public Service Agency of Canada is responsible for:
The Agency is working with departments, agencies, Crown corporations, bargaining agents, professional communities and key stakeholders to ensure that employees across the public sector understand the purpose and processes of the PSDPA.
Yes, the Integrity Commissioner has the authority to provide public servants, and any Canadian who may be considering making a disclosure of wrongdoing or who may be thinking about providing information about wrongdoing in the federal public sector, access to legal advice valued up to $1,500. Access to legal advice may be extended to public servants who are considering making a complaint of reprisal to the Commissioner, and any person who is involved in an investigation or proceeding under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act.
The Public Sector Integrity Commissioner may provide access to legal advice to a qualifying person if the Commissioner is satisfied that the person does not have other access to free legal advice. To qualify, the person must also demonstrate the likelihood of a wrongdoing that might lead to an investigation. The Commissioner may choose to provide access to legal advice valued to a maximum of $1,500 to a qualifying person. In exceptional circumstances, the maximum amount can be increased to $3,000.
For more specific information, please visit Access to Independent Legal Advice.