|
|
|
More
and more, Canadians are embracing their culture
and their diversity and celebrating our Canadian
identity. To be Canadian means to show openness
toward differences and appreciate the cultural
wealth that comes with our diversity.
The 18 agencies and Crown corporations that make up the Canadian Heritage Portfolio strive to strengthen our identity and our sense of belonging and make our diversity our strength in all areas, whether it be culturally, socially, politically or economically. In an era of globalization, Canadians cannot take their values, culture and identity for granted. We must therefore encourage the expression of our cherished values, which shape our identity. The Canadian Heritage Portfolio is proud to join its many partners in supporting the work and success of our artists, creators, athletes and everyone who embodies our values and contributes to Canada's vitality. Through their activities, the members of the Canadian Heritage Portfolio encourage us to learn more about our history and our culture. They help us articulate our values, deepen our mutual understanding and strengthen connections among ourselves.
Through the efforts of the Parks Canada Agency and various stakeholders, Canadians are proud to value their Historic Places and Natural Heritage as fundamental to the health, economic stability and quality of life in this country. Parks Canada manages Canada's systems of National Parks, National Historic Sites and National Marine Conservation Areas as showcases of beauty, learning and enjoyment for all Canadians and visitors from abroad. The Agency provides an in-depth look at the history, culture and heritage of Canada, connecting us with our past, our future and with each other.
It is my hope that this report will be well received by those the Agency is working to better serve, encourage their participation and help give them their rightful place in our society.
Sheila Copps
Minister of Canadian Heritage
Report on Plans and Priorities 2003-2004
I submit, for tabling in Parliament, the 2003-2004 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the Parks Canada Agency.
To the best of my knowledge, the information:
I am satisfied as to the quality assurance processes and procedures used for the RPP's production.
The Planning Reporting Accountability Structure (PRAS) on which this document is based has been approved by Treasury Board Ministers and is the basis for the results achieved with the resources and authorities provided.
__________________________________
Alan Latourelle
Chief Executive Officer
Parks Canada
Date: ____________________
To protect and present nationally significant examples of Canada's natural and cultural heritage, and foster public understanding, appreciation and enjoyment in ways that ensure their ecological and commemorative integrity for present and future generations.
Ecological integrity means, with respect to a park, a condition that is determined to be characteristic of its natural region and likely to persist, including abiotic components and the composition and abundance of native species and biological communities, rates of change and supporting processes.
Ensuring commemorative integrity is Parks Canada's prime consideration at national historic sites. To ensure commemorative integrity, the resources directly related to the reasons for designation must not be impaired or under threat, the reasons for designation must be effectively communicated, and the historic value of cultural resources must be considered in all decisions and actions affecting the site. These three interlocking considerations guide Parks Canada in its stewardship of national historic sites.
For information about the Parks Canada Agency
please go to:
www.parkscanada.gc.ca
Parks Canada objectives are structured into the following three Business Lines:
| ($ thousands) | |||
| Forecast Spending 2002-2003 | Planned Spending 2003-2004 | Planned Spending 2004-2005 | Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| $226,370* | $227,854 | $230,744 | $224,117 |
| 1,900 FTE | 1,940 FTE | 1,960 FTE | 1,960 FTE |
|
*Reflects the best forecast of total net planned spending to the end of the fiscal year |
|||
The establishment, protection and presentation of places that are of natural and cultural heritage significance.
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 1: ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE PLACES | ||||||||
| Created national parks and national marine conservation areas in unrepresented regions and completed unfinished parks. |
|
|||||||
| Designated and commemorated national historic sites, persons and events of national historic significance, particularly in under-represented priority areas. |
|
|||||||
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 2: HERITAGE RESOURCE PROTECTION | ||||||||
| Maintained or restored ecological integrity of national parks and the sustainability of national marine conservation areas. |
|
|||||||
| Maintained or improved commemorative integrity of national historic sites. |
|
|||||||
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 3: HERITAGE PRESENTATION | ||||||||
| Increased awareness, understanding of and support for the values of national parks, national historic sites, and national marine conservation areas. |
|
|||||||
| ($ thousands) | |||
| Forecast Spending 2002-2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-2004 |
Planned Spending 2004-2005 |
Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| $182,190* | $155,269 | $148,921 | $146,870 |
| 1,300 FTE | 1,300 FTE | 1,300 FTE | 1,300 FTE |
|
* Reflects the best forecast of total net planned spending to the end of the fiscal year |
|||
Canadians use and enjoy national heritage places while supporting and participating in the conservation of Canada's heritage.
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 4: VISITOR SERVICES | ||||||||
| Managed visitor expectations and use to ensure visitor satisfaction and minimize impacts on natural and cultural resources. |
|
|||||||
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 5. TOWNSITES | ||||||||
| Sound management practices and leadership in environmental stewardship in park communities. |
|
|||||||
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 6. THROUGH HIGHWAYS | ||||||||
| Highways remain open to through traffic and interventions are designed to minimize ecological impact. |
|
|||||||
| ($ thousands) | |||
| Forecast Spending 2002-2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-2004 |
Planned Spending 2004-2005 |
Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| $53,157* | $51,446 | $51,398 | $51,350 |
| 400 FTE | 400 FTE | 400 FTE | 400 FTE |
|
* Reflects the best forecast of total net planned spending to the end of the fiscal year. |
|||
Parks Canada provides strong leadership, both directly and indirectly, in effectively and efficiently managing its resources to protect and present heritage places.
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 7: MANAGEMENT OF PARKS CANADA | ||||||||
| Improved management frameworks to ensure effective decision making and accountability. |
|
|||||||
| Enhanced participation of Aboriginal peoples in Canada's heritage places. |
|
|||||||
| Planned Result | Related Activities | |||||||
| SERVICE LINE 8: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT | ||||||||
| Improved work environment, workplace renewal, and representativeness. |
|
|||||||
Minister: The Minister of Canadian Heritage is responsible for the Parks Canada Agency.
Chief Executive Officer: Under the Parks Canada Agency Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada is responsible for all three Business Lines: 1) Stewardship of National Heritage Places; 2) Use and Enjoyment by Canadians; and 3) Corporate Services.
| Click on the image above to view it at a larger size. Some scrolling may be necessary. |
Parks Canada's role includes three operational areas:
Through the national parks program, representative examples of Canada's natural regions are protected, their value is communicated to the public, and services and facilities are provided so that people may use and enjoy them. Canada's system of national parks began in 1885 when the federal government reserved 26 square kilometres around the hot mineral springs near what is now the town of Banff. The Banff Hot Springs Reserve was officially set aside in the Rocky Mountains Park Act of 1887. When the National Parks Act was introduced in 1930, there were 14 parks. Today, there are a total of 39 national parks. The establishment of new national parks is guided by the 1997 National Parks System Plan.
The national historic sites program consists of places declared to be of historic significance to the nation by the Minister of Canadian Heritage. The first step toward establishing the national historic sites program took place in 1914, when Fort Howe in Saint John, New Brunswick, was set aside as a Dominion park. The setting aside of historic Fort Anne in Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia in 1917 and the establishment of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada in 1919, laid the foundation for Canada's system of national historic sites. Canada's family of national historic sites now numbers 877 sites across the country, 145 of which are administered by Parks Canada. The Historic Sites and Monuments Act of 1953 provides statutory authority for the commemoration of places of national historic significance. Designations of national historic sites, persons and events are made by the Minister of Canadian Heritage on advice from the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada through a process managed by Parks Canada. The commemorative program is guided by the 2000 National Historic Sites of Canada System Plan.
Historic canals form an integral part of the national historic sites program. In 1972, seven federally operated canals were transferred to Parks Canada from the Department of Transport because of their heritage value. Two other canals were transferred in subsequent years. The authorities for this program are the Department of Transport Act and the Historic Sites and Monuments Act.
In 1986, the national marine conservation areas program was established to protect and preserve a network of areas representative of Canada's marine environments. A system plan was published in 1995 to divide Canada's coastal waters and Great Lakes into 29 marine natural regions. Through the national marine conservation areas program, representative examples of Canada's 29 marine regions will be represented. While the program is still in its formative stages, there are agreements for three marine conservation areas and reserves, including Saguenay-St. Lawrence Marine Park, Fathom Five in Georgian Bay, and Gwaii Haanas (which spans two marine regions) in the Queen Charlotte Islands. These, with the marine component of the Pacific Rim National Park Reserve of Canada, represent five of the 29 marine regions. The newly proclaimed Canada National Marine Conservation Areas Act provides the legislative framework for this program. New national marine conservation areas are established using the process followed for new national parks.
Parks Canada also directs delivery in additional areas that conserve aspects of Canada's heritage as described below.
Parks Canada is responsible for operating the Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office, which provides for the designation of federal heritage buildings. This office manages the evaluations, designations and intervention review processes that are integral to the implementation of the program. Before changes can be made to a federal building 40 years of age or older, the building must be evaluated to determine if it should be designated as a federal heritage building. Once a building has been designated, custodian departments are responsible for protecting its heritage character. Over 1,300 of the federal government's 60,000 buildings have been designated, including landmark federal buildings in communities across Canada, such as the Supreme Court of Canada building. The authority for this program is the Treasury Board Heritage Buildings Policy.
Railways have played a major role in Canada's development, and railway stations are important public symbols. Parks Canada undertakes the research that leads to the designation of Heritage Railway Stations, and processes requests from railway companies for authorization to undertake interventions to designated stations. There are 166 designated heritage railway stations, including Windsor Station in Montréal. The authority for this program is the Heritage Railway Stations Protection Act.
The Canadian Heritage Rivers System (CHRS) is Canada's national program for freshwater heritage conservation. It is a co-operative program involving all provinces, territories and the federal government. The objectives of the program are to give national recognition to Canada's outstanding rivers and ensure long-term management that will conserve their natural, historical and recreational values. To date, 38 rivers from across Canada have been nominated to the system. New rivers are proposed for nomination to the independent Canadian Heritage Rivers Board, usually by provincial governments. The Board recommends nominations to the Minister of Canadian Heritage and to the appropriate provincial or territorial minister.
Parks Canada is the lead federal agency in the CHRS and provides funding assistance and technical advice to provincial and territorial governments for studies and plans leading to the designation of rivers to the System. Parks Canada also provides support in promoting and raising awareness of the CHRS program both nationally and internationally. All federal, provincial and territorial ministers responsible for the CHRS are signatories to the CHRS Charter, which defines the operating principles for the program. These principles are based on intergovernmental co-operation.
The purpose of the Federal Archaeology Program is to protect and manage archaeological sites and artifacts found on federal lands. The authority for this program is the Government of Canada's Archaeological Heritage Policy Framework. Parks Canada's role is to implement this policy by providing expert advice to federal land managers and the necessary administrative tools.
The objective of the National Program for Grave Sites of Canadian Prime Ministers is to ensure that the grave sites are conserved and recognized in a respectful and dignified manner. The national program provides Canadians with information on the lives and accomplishments of each former prime minister as well as the locations of their final resting places. To date, the grave sites of 11 former Prime Ministers have been marked, and the remaining four are in the planning stage.
Parks Canada contributes to international heritage conservation through its leadership and participation in international conventions, programs, agencies and agreements. Parks Canada represents the Government of Canada on the UNESCO Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (the World Heritage Convention). Parks Canada is also the state member for Canada in the World Conservation Union (IUCN), and serves jointly with the Canadian Conservation Institute as the representative to the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM).
In Canada, Parks Canada contributes to the implementation of:
Parks Canada relies on the support and interest of a number of stakeholders. They include:
Parks Canada has increasingly found common ground with Aboriginal peoples on the establishment of new national parks. Interest-based negotiations on new park agreements offer a way for Government and First Nations to work together to preserve natural areas that help sustain traditional ways of life and complete the national parks system. The most recent addition to the national parks system, Sirmilik National Park of Canada on Baffin Island, is an example of this approach.
The consultations and negotiations leading to a park establishment agreement generally address issues such as employment and training opportunities associated with the new national parks, and arrangements for co-operative planning and management involving First Nations and governments. National parks help stimulate employment for local residents by serving as a catalyst for sustainable eco-tourism businesses that include Aboriginal cultural activities. When the establishment of national parks, national historic sites and national marine conservation areas involves land claims issues, Parks Canada can contribute to the resolution of comprehensive land claim settlements. In addition, approximately one third of Canada's 39 national parks have co-operative management boards.
Parks Canada also consults with Aboriginal communities in bringing forward aspects of history related to Aboriginal peoples for consideration by the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada. Additionally, through the National Historic Sites of Canada Cost-Sharing Program, Parks Canada works with Aboriginal communities to protect and present their heritage at national historic sites owned by those communities. Aboriginal communities are important service providers to visitors. Through jointly developed tourism strategies, there are many opportunities for Parks Canada and Aboriginal peoples to promote authentic visitor experiences. These co-operative activities can help to diversify and develop local economies.
The Canadian Parks Partnership is the national organization representing 51 co-operating associations that work at 69 national parks, national historic sites and national marine conservation areas and is present in every province. The roughly 12,000 members of cooperating associations bring about community involvement in management and operations. These nonprofit partners also co-ordinate special programs, such as Parks Day, Take-A-Hike, and kids@parks that increase public awareness of Parks Canada's heritage places. Revenues earned by individual co-operating associations are re-invested in the operation of heritage places.
More than 650 of Canada's national historic sites are owned by non-federal governmental organizations, the profit and not-for-profit sectors, and individuals. Ensuring the commemorative integrity of these places requires a close working relationship between the owners and Parks Canada.
The Canadian Tourism Commission (CTC) has emerged as a strong force in Canadian tourism. By promoting the natural environment and cultural heritage as the country's main tourism products, the CTC's direction supports the efforts of Parks Canada to draw attention to Canada's special places. However, this promotion needs to be carefully targeted and managed to ensure protection of the commemorative and ecological integrity of national historic sites and national parks.
The Tourism Industry Association of Canada (TIAC) works with Parks Canada to foster sustainable tourism, tourism that is economically viable, environmentally supportable and culturally acceptable. An accord signed by the organizations in January 2001 guides collaborative actions including co-operation and communication which are key elements in protecting Canada's heritage places for the enjoyment of future generations.
The year 2001 was proclaimed the International Year of the Volunteer by the United Nations. Volunteers have supported Parks Canada's mandate for approximately 20 years. In 1999-2000, approximately 6,000 volunteers contributed more than 195,000 hours of their time creating historical re-enactments, designing exhibits, studying wildlife for research purposes, presenting archaeological programs and assisting with campground visitor programs.
The most significant development influencing the Parks Canada Agency operating environment is, without a doubt, the commitment made by the Government in the Autumn 2002 Throne Speech and confirmed in the February 18, 2003 Budget with respect to protected heritage areas. The Government committed and provided advance funding to create ten new national parks and five new national marine conservation areas over the next five years. The Throne Speech and Budget 2003 also provided the commitment and funding to begin to address ecological integrity issues in existing national parks. While much of the work to establish new national parks and national marine conservation areas has begun, the completion of planning, negotiation of park agreements, land purchase and ongoing operations will be a major undertaking for the Agency. Budget 2003 also provided financial incentives over three years to compensate business for a portion of costs incurred in restoring heritage buildings.
The Throne Speech announcement was preceded by the proclamation earlier in 2002 of the Canada National Marine Conservation Areas Act. Parks Canada has responsibility under the Act for establishing national marine conservation areas (NMCA) to represent Canada's 29 marine regions, including stewardship of ecological processes and systems essential to maintaining biodiversity. These new responsibilities will influence Parks Canada as it builds organizational capacity to carry out the mandate.
A strong and trusting relationship with Aboriginal communities, both in areas where land claim negotiations involve Parks Canada and in general with all Native communities is essential to future mandate achievement. Parks Canada continues to participate as a senior member of federal teams negotiating land claim agreements with Aboriginal communities, both to establish new national parks and national park reserves and to convert existing national park reserves to national park status.
Polling done by Parks Canada in 2002 shows that nearly 25% of Canadians visited a national park in the past year, and 8% have visited a national historic site. Polling also underscored strong support among Canadians for national systems of protected natural and cultural areas; however, awareness that Parks Canada has a responsibility to carry out this mandate is very weak. There is a very strong opinion among Canadians familiar with the Agency that it does an excellent job carrying out its protection responsibilities. The generally low level of specific awareness of Parks Canada's stewardship of these cultural and natural treasures points to an urgent challenge ahead to fully engage Canadians in our mandate, to increase understanding of Canada's natural and cultural heritage, to provide greater learning opportunities, and to closely associate the Agency with these heritage assets that Canadians clearly support.
Census data released in 2002 reflects an evolving Canadian demographic story, becoming more urban, with immigration patterns building stronger ethnic diversity in larger population centres. This shift points to a very important need to reach Canadians who may be new to, and unfamiliar with Canada's natural and cultural heritage. Making our mandate known and appreciated by both new and established Canadians, and encouraging all Canadians to make national parks and national historic sites preferred destinations will be essential to maintaining ongoing support and understanding for the Parks Canada mandate.
Tourism continues to present Parks Canada with challenges and opportunities. Tracking data shows that the number of visits to national parks and national historic sites is growing slower than the Canadian population is growing. At the same time, growth in eco-tourism is putting stress on select areas of park ecology. The rich cultural heritage of Canada's history presented at national historic sites offers a real opportunity to capitalize on the growing trend toward learning travel.
Recognition is growing among stakeholders, such as the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy, that Parks Canada's protected systems of heritage areas are only part of the solution to preserve Canada's natural heritage. Parks Canada is working with partners to conserve broader ecosystems and to encourage sustainable land use around national parks. More effective preservation of the ecological integrity of national parks will be achieved by the greater focus on activities taking place outside park boundaries.
Many of Canada's national historic sites are under severe threat and there is grave risk they will be lost forever if actions are not taken to preserve them. Since the 1970's, over 25% of Canada's historic places have been lost. According to the 2001 Goldfarb Report, 93% of Canadians consider it important to preserve Canada's heritage and 91% suggest that the preservation of the historical record is essential in promoting pride in the country. Parks Canada is currently working with the Department of Canadian Heritage on legislation to support the Historic Places Initiative, whose objective is to facilitate and encourage the protection of Canada's historic places and archaeological resources.
| Legislation and Regulations | Planned Results |
| Contraventions Regulations - Amendments |
|
| Mingan Archipelago National Park Reserve of Canada Snowshoe Hare Regulations |
|
| Historic Canals Regulations - Amendments |
|
| National Parks Aircraft Access Regulations - Amendments |
|
| Regulations for Gros Morne National Park of Canada - New Regulations |
|
| National Parks
Miscellaneous Amendment Regulations
These regulations made under the authority of the National Parks Act, namely the National Parks Building Regulations, the National Parks Camping Regulations, the National Parks Cemetery Regulations, the National Parks Cottages Regulations, the National Parks Domestic Animals Regulations, the National Parks General Regulations and the National Parks Signs Regulations |
|
| National Parks Wilderness Areas Declaration Regulations - Amendments |
|
| Regulations amending the National Parks Wildlife Regulations |
|
| ($ thousands) | Forecast Spending 2002-2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-2004 |
Planned Spending 2004-2005 |
Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| Total Main Estimates** | 396,890 | 400,369 | 386,863 | 379,137 |
| Adjustments*** | 64,828 | 35,900 | 46,900 | 47,300 |
| Net Planned Spending* | 461,718 | 436,269 | 433,763 | 426,437 |
| Plus: Cost of Services received without charge | 27,757 | 29,687 | 29,269 | 29,121 |
| Net Cost of Program | 489,475 | 465,956 | 463,032 | 455,558 |
| Full Time Equivalents | 3,600 | 3,640 | 3,660 | 3,660 |
| * Reflects the best forecast of total planned spending to the end of the fiscal year |
| ** The Main Estimates and the Planned Spending include amounts equivalent to revenue pursuant to Section 20 of the Parks Canada Agency Act, as detailed in Table 4. |
| *** The Adjustments for 2002-2003 include amounts of $64.8 M funded through Supplementary Estimates as well as TB Votes 10 and 15. Adjustments for 2003-2004 onwards reflect the funding announced in Budget 2003 and a projected increase relating to cost-recovery / fee increases. |
| ($ thousands) | Forecast Spending 2002-2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-2004 |
Planned Spending 2004-2005 |
Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| Parks Canada Agency | ||||
| Stewardship of National Heritage Places | 43,904 | 36,272 | 32,272 | 30,272 |
| Use and Enjoyment by Canadians | 34,949 | 15,070 | 10,770 | 8,770 |
| Corporate Services | 3,700 | 3,700 | 3,700 | 3,700 |
| 82,553 | 55,042 | 46,742 | 42,742 | |
Definition of a Major Capital Project - A departmental undertaking that involves the design and development of new programs, equipment, structures, or systems, and has above-normal risk, is deemed to be a major capital project when:
When a high-risk government project exceeds $100 million in estimated expenditures or includes special requirements, it is deemed to be a Major Crown Project. The Major Crown Project reporting requirements are identified in this Guide originated with the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts dated April 29, 1985. It was subsequently formalized through TB Circular 1991-1, which dealt with Reporting on Major Capital and Major Crown Projects in Part III of the Estimates. The reporting requirements identified in this Guide are consistent with those original intentions and direction.
Table 2 lists each individual Capital Project by Program (if applicable) and then by Business Line. To help identify the type or class of Estimates, five definitions have been listed below. The code (in brackets) is used to identify the class and is displayed at the end of each project.
Substantive Estimate (S) - This estimate is one of sufficiently high quality and reliability so as to warrant Treasury Board approval as a cost objective for the project phase under consideration. It is based on detailed system and component design and takes into account all project objectives and deliverables. It replaces the classes of estimates formerly referred to as Class A or B.
Indicative Estimate (I) - This is a low-quality order of magnitude estimate that is not sufficiently accurate to warrant Treasury Board approval as a cost objective. It replaces the classes of estimates formerly referred to as C or D.
Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) - This defines Treasury Board's authority to initiate a project in terms of its intended operational requirement, including approval of, and expenditure authorization for, the objectives of the project definition phase. Sponsoring departments and agencies are to submit for PPA when the project's complete scope has been examined and costed, normally to the indicative level, and when the cost of the project definition phase has been estimated to the substantive level.
Effective Project Approval (EPA) - Treasury Board's approval of, and expenditure authorization for, the objectives of the project implementation phase. Sponsoring departments and agencies are to submit for EPA only when the scope of the overall project has been defined and when the estimates have been refined to the substantive level.
Delegated Authority (DA) - Projects for which Treasury Board has delegated authority to the Agency.
| ($ millions) | Current Estimated Total Cost |
Forecast Spending to March 31, 2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-04 |
Planned Spending 2004-05 |
Planned Spending 2005-06 |
Future
Year Spending Requirement |
|
Stewardship of National Heritage Places |
||||||
| Yukon | ||||||
| SS Klondike National Historic Site - Retrofit (S-DA) | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | - |
| British Columbia | ||||||
| Gwaii Haanas National Park - Haida Heritage Centre (S-DA) | 6.5 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 0.2 | - |
| Alberta | ||||||
| Banff National Park - Wildlife Crossing over the Rundle Canal near Canmore (I-DA) | 3.0 | 0.2 | 2.8 | - | - | - |
| Ontario | ||||||
| Bruce Peninsula National Park - Land Acquisition (I-DA) | 13.5 | 6.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 5.7 |
| Fort Henry National Historic Site Major Repairs (I-DA) | 10.0 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 5.0 | - | - |
| HMCS Haida National Historic Site Restoration and Relocation (S-DA) | 6.6 | 4.3 | 2.3 | - | - | - |
| Trent-Severn Waterway Swift Rapids Dam - Major Repairs (S-DA) | 4.2 | 2.4 | 1.8 | - | - | - |
| Quebec | ||||||
| Fort Temiscamingue National Historic Site Development (S-DA) | 3.8 | 3.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | - | - |
| Saguenay Marine Park - Development (S-EPA) | 29.8 | 26.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Nova Scotia | ||||||
| Fortress of Louisbourg National Historic Site Slate Roofing of King's Bastion (S-DA) | 3.3 | 1.4 | 1.9 | - | - | - |
|
Use and Enjoyment by Canadians |
||||||
| British Columbia | ||||||
| Mount Revelstoke Glacier National Park - Snowshed Lighting (S-DA) | 3.4 | 3.3 | 0.1 | - | - | - |
| Yoho National Park - Field Sewage Treatment Plant Major Repairs and Upgrade (S-DA) | 3.4 | 0.2 | 3.2 | - | - | - |
| Alberta | ||||||
| Banff National Park Sewage Treatment Plant Major Repairs and Upgrade (S-DA) | 5.8 | 4.5 | 1.3 | - | - | - |
| Manitoba | ||||||
| Riding Mountain National Park Wasagaming Water Treatment Plant Major Repairs and Upgrade (S-DA) | 4.1 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 1.2 | - | - |
| Riding Mountain National Park Wasagaming Sewage Treatment Plant Major Repairs and Upgrade (S-DA) | 2.2 | - | 0.2 | 2.0 | - | - |
| Ontario | ||||||
| Bruce Peninsula National Park - New Visitor Centre (I-DA) | 7.3 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 5.6 |
| Trent-Severn Waterway Ranney Falls Locks 11-12 - Major Repairs (I-DA) | 6.6 | 0.2 | 6.4 | - | - | - |
| Marine Discovery Centre - Hamilton Site development (I-DA) | 7.7 | 1.2 | 6.5 | - | - | - |
| Marine Discovery Centre - Hamilton Exhibits and Galleries (I-DA) | 3.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | - | - | - |
| Quebec | ||||||
| La Mauricie National Park- Park Enhancement (S-DA) | 6.2 | 5.6 | 0.6 | - | - | - |
| Nova Scotia | ||||||
| Grand Pré National Historic Site - New Visitor Centre (I-DA) | 3.7 | 2.5 | 1.2 | - | - | - |
| ($ thousands) | Forecast Spending 2002-2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-2004 |
Planned Spending 2004-2005 |
Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| Grants | ||||
| Stewardship of National Heritage Places | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
| Use and Enjoyment | ||||
| Contributions | ||||
| Stewardship of National Heritage Places | 3,202 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Use and Enjoyment by Canadians | 243 | 189 | 189 | 189 |
| Contributions
from the New Parks and Historic Sites Account |
||||
| Stewardship of National Heritage Places | 1,600 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Total Grants, Contributions and other Transfer Payments | 5,068 | 1,212 | 1,212 | 2,212 |
| Operational
Revenues (Pursuant to section 20
of the Parks Canada Agency Act) ($ thousands) |
Forecast Spending 2002-2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-2004 |
Planned Spending 2004-2005 |
Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| Parks Canada Program | ||||
| Rentals, lands, buildings and concessions | 12,000 | 12,000 | 12,000 | 12,000 |
| Entrance Fees | 30,000 | 31,000 | 31,000 | 31,000 |
| Recreational Fees | 25,000 | 26,000 | 26,000 | 26,000 |
| Municipal Fees | 2,200 | 2,200 | 2,200 | 2,200 |
| Other Revenues | 2,958 | 2,958 | 2,958 | 2,958 |
| Total Operational Revenues | 72,158 | 74,158 | 74,158 | 74,158 |
| Total Revenues - Parks Canada Agency | 72,158 | 74,158 | 74,158 | 74,158 |
| ($ thousands) | Parks Canada Program |
| Net Planned Spending | 436,269 |
| Plus:
Services Received without Charge Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) |
14,075 |
| Contributions covering employees` share of employees` insurance premiums and expenditures paid by TBS | 14,609 |
| Workman`s compensation coverage provided by Human Resources Canada | 156 |
| Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by Justice Canada | 537 |
| Audit services provided by the Office of the Auditor General | 310 |
| 29,687 | |
| Less: Non-Re-spendable Revenue | 0 |
| 2003-2004 Net Cost of Program | 465,956 |
| ($ thousands) | Forecast Spending 2002-2003 |
Planned Spending 2003-2004 |
Planned Spending 2004-2005 |
Planned Spending 2005-2006 |
| Sources of Funds | ||||
| from Payment Vote - 115 | 3,908 | 14,500 | 14,500 | 14,500 |
| from Sale of Lands and Buildings | 419 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| from General Donations | 250 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| from Carryforward of Previous Year | 2,797 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7,374 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 |
| Use of Funds | ||||
| for Capital Projects | 5,774 | 14,000 | 14,000 | 13,000 |
| for Cost-Sharing Contributions | 1,600 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Total | 7,374 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 |
Office of the Chief Executive Officer
Parks Canada
7th Floor, 25 Eddy Street
Gatineau, Quebec
K1A 0M5
Tel.: (819) 953-3545
Internet address: www.parkscanada.gc.ca
Director General
Western and Northern Canada
Parks Canada
#552, 220 - 4th Avenue S.E.
Calgary, Alberta
T2G 4X3
Tel.: (403) 292-5592 Fax: (403) 292-8868
Director General
Eastern Canada
Parks Canada
Historic Properties
Upper Water Street
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3J 1S9
Tel.: (902) 426-4845 Fax: (902) 426-1378