Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Correctional Service Canada - Supplementary Tables


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits


Response to Parliamentary Committees

In December 2008, the Office of the Auditor General tabled its report, including a chapter (7) on the Economy and Efficiency of Services - Correctional Service Canada. The Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) released its 15th report in June 2009 as a result of this chapter. A government response was developed and was tabled in the House of Commons on October 19, 2009: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_200812_e_31776.html

PACP report: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=3960844&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2

Government Response: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4144540&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2

A final status report was tabled in November 2010.

In April 2010, the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU) tabled its 1st report, Prison Farm Closures and Food Provisionment. A government response was developed and was tabled in the House of Commons on September 20, 2010.

SECU Report:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4410256&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=3

Government Response: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=3&DocId=4655210&File=0

In June 2010, the Standing Committee on Health (HESA) tabled its 6th report, Promoting Innovative Solutions to Health Human Resource Challenges. A government response was developed and was tabled in the House of Commons on October 6, 2010.

HESA Report:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4631326&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=3

Government Response: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=3&DocId=4677841&File=0

Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)

In February 2009, the Auditor General of Canada tabled her December 2008 report in the House of Commons. As noted in the previous section, Chapter 7 related to CSC. In its response to the Auditor General’s report, CSC agreed to all five recommendations and committed to address them by March 31, 2010. All recommendations were fully implemented by the end of 2010-2011. The OAG‘s report, including CSC’s response can be found at:
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_200812_e_31776.html

In addition, the December 2008 annual report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development (CESD) made reference to CSC, more specifically with respect to the following commitment: “Reduction of water consumption via the implementation of multiple measures to conserve potable water. By March 2010, CSC will reduce its potable water consumption by 10 percent.”

The audit observed that because of a lack of accurate monitoring and reporting by its facilities, CSC is unable to reliably track progress on its commitment. Since the time of the audit, measures have been taken to enhance our ability to track progress on our commitments and we remain on track to meet our reduction target. The CESD report can be found at:
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_cesd_200812_04_e_31821.html#hd3c

External Audits: (Note: These refer to other external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages)

In November 2010, the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages tabled in Parliament Volume II of its Annual Report for 2009-2010 including the Report Card.

CSC’s overall rating was ‘D’ or ‘poor’. CSC acknowledged the results and committed to making improvements. A result-based official languages improvement action plan aimed at addressing the weaknesses identified was developed. This plan, approved at the National Human Resource Management Committee in January 2011, is currently being implemented. It includes amongst other topics a robust monitoring of the active offer across the Department which includes:

  • A monthly monitoring of in-person and by-phone active offer at all sites, with a compliance report produced and shared with the Executive Committee members on a quarterly basis.

The report card can be found at:
http://www.ocol-clo.gc.ca/html/csc_scc_09_10_e.php