ARCHIVED - Canadian International Development Agency - Supplementary Tables

This page has been archived.

2010-11
Departmental Performance Report

Canadian International Development Agency

Supplementary Information (Tables)

---

Table of Contents

• Sources of Respendable and Non-respendable Revenue
• User Fees/External Fees
• Details on Transfer Payments Programs
• Green Procurement
• Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits
• Internal Audits and Evaluations

Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue

Non-Respendable Revenue

($ millions)

Program Activity	2008-09 Actual	2009-10 Actual	2010-11
			Main Estimates	Planned Revenue	Total Authorities	Actual
*Discrepency between Form E and A attributable to an amount of $227,243,765 for MOV (Maintenance of Value) pour la IADB (Inter-American Development Bank) Must be excluded since link to a balance sheet account instead of budgetary results.
Gain for revaluation at year end of International Financial Institutions liabilities	162.8	170.2				32.0*
Refund of previous year expenditures	13.9	14.2				17.2
Return on investments	5.2	3.8				3.0
Miscellaneous	0.3	1.0				0.3
Total Non-respendable Revenue	182.2	189.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	52.5

Source: Form E

The Agency's revenues totalled $52.5 million in 2010-2011 compared to $189.2 million in 2009-10. The difference is mainly explained by the variation in the gain for reevaluation due to the canadian dollar fluctuation.

User Fees and Regulatory Charges

User Fee: Processing of access requests

Fee Type: R (R: Regulation, or O: other goods and services)

Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act

Date Last Modified: 1992

Performance Standards: Response within the time limit prescribed by the Act; minimum of 80%

Performance Results: Response time of 87.9%

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
0.0	1,305.0	4,545.4	2011-12	n.a.	n.a.
			2012-13	n.a.	n.a.
			2013-14	n.a.	n.a.

External Fees

External Fee	Service Standard	Performance Results	Stakeholder Consultation
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act	Minimum of 80.0%	87.9% for 2010-2011	Not applicable, as per policies and guidelines issued by the Treasury Board Secretariat, institution responsible for the ATIP program

Last year performance results didn't reach the performance standard (66.3%). Corrective measures were taken in 2010-2011.

Details of Transfer Payment Programs

Green Procurement

Meeting Policy Requirements

1. Has the department incorporated environmental performance considerations in its procurement decision-making processes?

• Yes

2. Summary of initiatives to incorporate environmental performance considerations in procurement decision-making processes:

• Staff from Corporate Security, Infrastructure and Management Services as well as from Information Management and Technology Branch were involved in training sessions.
• Workgroup was formed to address changes.
• Training for new incumbents is planned for 2011.
• Corporate credit card holders were trained.
• Green criteria are included in telecommunication purchases (e.g. rebuilt telephone sets).
• MM Green Procurement Report development in SAP has been initiated (completion by March 31, 2011).
• Pilot project involving partitions was implemented: a reusable partition system was purchased and installed, rather than building two new rooms with gypsum, which cannot be re-used once floor plans change.

3. Results achieved:

• Training was delivered on as-required basis.
• MM Green Procurement Report was developed, and is ready to be implemented.
• There is a more comprehensive approach in accommodations plans and fit-up standards.
• The re-utilization of existing furniture and refurbishing of partitions was implemented where possible.
• Messages were posted on Entre Nous (CIDA intranet) to increase employees' awareness of Earth Day and Environment Week, and of their impact on the environment (their environmental footprint).
• The first fully ''green'' barbecue was held during National Public Service Week: recycling and composting measures were carried out, which resulted in a very small amount of garbage.

4. Contributions to facilitate the government-wide implementation of green procurement:

• N/A

Green Procurement Targets

5. Has the department established green procurement targets?

• The department is already using 100% green procurement for paper, computers, monitors, laptops, servers, furniture, and vehicles through the National Masters Standing Offers of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
• A printing strategy will be developed to reduce the amount of equipment related to printing, scanning, faxing, and photocopying.

6. Summary of green procurement targets:

• Provide training to all credit card holders in the Agency.
• Provide training to new cardholders for corporate purchases.
• Develop with Human Resources a communications strategy to integrate training on environmental aspects in performance evaluations.
• Implement an agreement with a non-profit organization for recycling printer cartridges.
• Provide training for modifications to SAP MM for Green Reporting.

7. Results achieved:

• Recycling of used BlackBerry smart phones and parts, and cellular phones.
• Current vehicle fleet meets Green Procurement Policy requirements: no change to fleet during the year.
• Ten additional videoconference systems purchased and installed.
• Green procurement standing offers used for all furniture purchased.

Response to Parliamentary Committees 2010- 2011

Response to Standing Committee on Public Accounts
Report 18: Chapter 8, Strengthening Aid Effectiveness - Canadian International Development Agency of the Fall 2009 Report of the Auditor General of Canada (presented to the House on September 20, 2010)
Government response: The Eighteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts Entitled Chapter 8, Strengthening Aid Effectiveness - Canadian International Development Agency of the Fall 2009 Report of the Auditor General of Canada (Presented to the House on January 19, 2011
Response to the Standing Committee on the Status of Women
Report 2: Maternal and Child Health (Presented to the House on June 16, 2010)
Government Response: Second Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women entitled: "Maternal and Child Health" (Presented to the House on October 8, 2010)

Internal Audits and Evaluations

Internal Audits (reporting period: April 1st 2010 to March 31st 2011)

Name of Internal Audit	Audit Type	Status	Completion Date
IT asset management	Management Audit	Completed	May 2010
Payroll Controls	Financial Controls Audit	Completed	October 2010
Follow-up Audit – Implemented Internal Audit Recommendations	Management and Controls Audit	Completed	October 2010
Internal Audit of Financial Management [PDF Format]	Management Audit	Completed	March 2011
Horizontal Internal Audit of the Grants and Contributions Management Control Framework in Large Departments and Agency	Controls Audit	In-progress
Audit of Travel Management	Management Audit	In-Progress
Audit of Administrative Arrangement	Management Audit	In-Progress

Evaluations Completed in FY 2010/2011

Name of evaluation	Program activity	Evaluation Type	Status	Completion Date
Canada Fund for Africa	Selected countries and regions	Summative evaluation	Completed	January 2011
Senegal Program	Countries of concentration	Country program evaluation	Completed	February 2011
Southern Sudan Program	Fragile countries and crisis-affected communities	Multidonor evaluation	Completed	February 2011
Afghanistan Program	Fragile countries and crisis-affected communities	Scoping/Evaluability Assessment	Completed	April 2011
CIDA Pilot: Methodology to evaluation development effectiveness of multilateral organizations	Multilateral, international, and Canadian institutions	Multidonor evaluation	Completed	February 2011

Evaluations started in FY 2010/2011 & to be completed in FY 2011/2012

Name of Evaluation	Program Activity	Evaluation Type	Status	Completion Date
Inter-American Program	Countries of concentration	Regional program evaluation	In Progress	July 2011
Ukraine Program	Countries of concentration	Country program evaluation	In Progress	July 2011
Paris Declaration Joint Evaluation, Phase II	Multilateral, international, and Canadian institutions	Multidonor evaluation	In Progress	July 2011
Canada Investment Fund for Africa	Selected countries and regions	Joint mid-term evaluation with DFAIT	In Progress	October 2011
Review of the Effectiveness of CIDA's Grants and Contributions	Corporate/Thematic	TB request	In Progress	September 2011
General Budget Support: Mali	Corporate/Thematic	Multidonor evaluation	In Progress	October 2011
Honduras Program	Countries of concentration	Country program evaluation	In Progress	October 2011
World Health Organization	Multilateral, international, and Canadian institutions	Multidonor evaluation	In Progress	December 2011
Asian Development Bank	Multilateral, international, and Canadian institutions	Multidonor evaluation	In Progress	December 2011
Evaluation of Humanitarian Assistance Programs	Corporate/Thematic	Corporate evaluation	In Progress	February 2012

Evaluations started in FY 2011/2012 & to be completed in FY 2012/2013

Name of Evaluation	Program Activity	Evaluation Type	Status	Completion Date
General Budget Support: Tanzania	Corporate/Thematic	Multidonor evaluation	In Progress	June 2012
Mali Program	Countries of concentration	Country program evaluation	In Progress	June 2012
Tanzania Program	Countries of concentration	Country program evaluation	In Progress	June 2012
Afghanistan Program	Fragile countries and crisis-affected communities	Country program evaluation	In Progress	April 2012
Inter-American Development Bank	Multilateral, international, and Canadian institutions	Multilateral	In Progress	February 2012
World Food Programme	Multilateral, international, and Canadian institutions	Multilateral	In Progress	February 2012
UNDP	Multilateral, international, and Canadian institutions	Multilateral	In Progress	February 2012

Please note: this list includes only evaluations conducted by the CIDA's Evaluation Directorate. Branch-led evaluations are not included in this list.