Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec - Supplementary Tables

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.





2010-11
Departmental Performance Report



Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec






Supplementary Information (Tables)






Table of Contents




Sources of Non-Respendable Revenue

Non-Respendable Revenue


Program Activity 2008-09
Actual
($ thousands)
2009-10
Actual
($ thousands)
2010-11 ($ thousands)
Planned
Revenue
Actual
Community development
Repayable contributions 6,153 8,030 6,000 6,921
All other revenue 1,003 305 - 529
Infrastructure
Repayable contributions - - - -
All other revenue 6 - - 11
Special intervention measures
Repayable contributions - - - 478
All other revenue - - - 166
Enterprise competitiveness
Repayable contributions 41,365 36,010 33,000 35,846
All other revenue 2,756 1,109 - 1,030
Competitive positioning of sectors and regions
Repayable contributions 1,347 4,045 3,000 1,818
All other revenue 218 858 - 34
Policies, programs and initiatives
Repayable contributions - - - 52
All other revenue 5 - - -
Internal services
Repayable contributions - 11 - -
All other revenue - 40 - 21
Total non-disposable revenue 52,853 50,408 42,000 46,906



Report on User Fees

User Fees and Regulatory Charges (User Fees Act)


User Fee: Fees may be charged under the Access to Information Act. Where applicable, other fees may also be charged for reproduction, alternative format, research, preparation, production and programming.

Fee Type: Other products and services

Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act and Regulations

Date Last Modified: March 2011

Performance Standards: The person responsible in the organization is responsible for conveying in whole or in part the documents requested, within 30 days following receipt of the access to information request. Pursuant to section 9 of the Act, the response time may be extended; notice of extension must then be sent. Further details on the Access to Information Act can be found at: Department of Justice Web site.

Performance Results: In 2010-2011, the Agency responded to 83% of requests within
30 days following their receipt.

2010-11 ($ thousands) Planning Years ($ thousands)
Planned Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Planned Revenue Estimated Full Cost
0.2 0.08 117.6 2011-12 0.1 177.6
2012-13 0.1 173.0
2013-14 0.1 176.9

Other Information: The Agency follows Treasury Board Secretariat guidelines with regard to imposing and waiving access fees. For example, it waives the collection of fees of less than $25. For amounts exceeding $25, the Agency decides whether to collect fees in whole or in part, based on an assessment of public interest.

External Fees (Policy on Service Standards for External Fees)


External Fee Service Standard Performance Results Stakeholder Consultation
Fees charged for processing access requests submitted to the Agency under the Access to Information Act Under the Act, a response to an access to information request must be provided within 30 days following receipt of the request.

Pursuant to section 9 of the Act, the response time may be extended in certain situations; notice of extension must then be sent to the applicant within 30 days after receipt of the request.

Further details on the Access to Information Act can be found at Department of Justice website.
In 2010-2011, 15 requests (83%) were processed within 30 days.

Two requests (11%) were processed in 31-60 days. One of the two requests was the subject of an extension of which the applicant was notified.

One request (6%) was processed in 61-120 days and was the subject of an extension.
No consultation, since the Regulations and the Access to Information Act establish the service standards.


Details of Transfer Payment Programs


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Diversification. This program represents a voted item, except for 2009-2010, for which the funding portion dedicated to Canada’s Economic Action Plan (CEAP) corresponds to a statutory appropriation.

Start Date: April 1, 2007

End Date: March 31, 2012

Description: The Community Diversification program helps Quebec regions maintain and develop their economic activity base. A community’s vitality depends on its ability to develop by building on its own assets. This program has three objectives: to foster communities’ development and increase their mobilization by drawing up visions and projects of local and regional scope; to assist communities through support for entrepreneurship and through creation or maintenance of viable enterprises; and to increase communities’ capability to attract tourists and skilled individuals.

This program has also led to intervention for implementation of the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF), a temporary CEAP initiative (2009-2010 and 2010-2011), and of the Temporary Initiative for the Strengthening of Quebec’s Forest Economies (TISQFE) and the Economic Development Initiative (EDI).

Eligible beneficiaries are primarily small and medium-sized enterprises and non-profit organizations.

Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec

Results Achieved:

  • Communities are pursuing a development vision and implementing resulting initiatives.
  • Enterprises are contributing to community economic growth and maintenance.
  • Communities are recognized for their distinctiveness, brand image or outreach.

With respect to the CAF:

  • Number of communities with increased economic opportunities and greater capacity
    to meet challenges.
  • Enterprises created, maintained and expanded.
  • Jobs created or maintained.
($ millions)
  2008-09
Actual
Spending
2009-10
Actual
Spending
2010-11
Planned
Spending
2010-11
Total
Authorities1
2010-11
Actual
Spending
Variance(s)
Program activity: Community development
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 67.7 86.7 93.7 96.7 82.3 (9.2)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Program activity: Special intervention measures
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 78.0 81.1 86.0 86.0 2.8
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Total Program Activities 67.7 164.7 174.8 182.7 168.3 (6.4)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Total authorities are higher than planned spending, primarily owing to the awarding of new funding to support vulnerable communities, for the CAF and for implementation of the TISQFE.

The variance between total authorities and actual expenditures is primarily attributable to the reprofiling of funds to 2011-2012 for such initiatives as the Support Initiative for International Cruise Development, the Linguistic Duality Economic Development Initiative and the Montreal Planetarium project.

Audit Completed or Planned: N/A

Evaluation Completed or Planned: The formative evaluation of the Community Diversification program was completed in 2010. The report is available at: Formative Evaluation of the Community Diversification and Business and Regional Growth programs . The summative evaluation is in progress, and will be completed in 2011-2012.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Futures Program (CFP). This program represents a voted item.

Start Date: May 18, 1995

End Date: Indeterminate, in line with the Treasury Board of Canada’s Policy on Transfer Payments, in effect since October 1, 2008.

Description: This Canada-wide program provides support for communities in all parts of the country to help them take charge of their own local economic development. In Quebec, the CFP financially supports local and regional development agencies, including
Community Futures Development Corporations (CFDCs), Community Economic
Development Corporations
(CEDCs) and Business Development Centres (BDCs).

Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec

Results Achieved:

  • Communities are pursuing a development vision and implementing resulting initiatives.
  • Enterprises are contributing to community economic growth and maintenance.
($ millions)
  2008-09
Actual
Spending
2009-10
Actual
Spending
2010-11
Planned
Spending
2010-11
Total
Authorities2
2010-11
Actual
Spending
Variance(s)
Program activity: Community development
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 41.7 42.6 32.3 44.0 44.0 11.7
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Total Program Activity 41.7 42.6 32.3 44.0 44.0 11.7

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the payment of funds, in 2010-2011, for the Business Startup and Succession initiative and the Réseau mandataire initiative and for capitalization of the Fonds commun des SADC (CFDC Common Fund). Actual expenditures correspond to total authorities.

Audit Completed or Planned: N/A

Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP)

Start Date: October 2000

End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: Within the framework of the pan-Canadian Infrastructure Program under Treasury Board Secretariat responsibility, a Canada-Quebec Agreement was signed in October 2000. The objective of this agreement was to upgrade urban and rural municipal infrastructure in the province and improve Quebecers’ quality of life. The Agency acts on behalf of the Government of Canada as the federal department responsible for implementation in Quebec. This agreement was amended in July 2005 to postpone the deadline for disbursements to March 31, 2011. Since December 2005, under the terms of the agreement, no more new projects may be approved under the program.

Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec

Results Achieved: Rural and urban communities have quality public infrastructure.

($ millions)
  2008-09
Actual
Spending
2009-10
Actual
Spending
2010-11
Planned
Spending
2010-11
Total
Authorities3
2010-11
Actual
Spending
Variance(s)
Program activity: Infrastructure
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 50.0 12.0 0.0 14.0 10.7 10.7
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Total Program Activity 50.0 12.0 0.0 14.0 10.7 10.7

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the reprofiling of unused funds under the ICP in 2009-2010, with a view to improving water quality, fostering transit and generating regional economic spinoffs.

The variance between actual expenditures and authorities is attributable to progress in
the completion of ICP-funded projects. Under the agreement signed with the Government
of Canada, the Quebec government is the implementing authority for the program.

Audit Completed or Planned: The annual audit of the Infrastructure Canada Program was completed in 2011, and the report will be available during 2011-2012.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: The summative evaluation of the Canada-Quebec Infrastructure Works 2000 program was completed in 2010. The report is available at: Evaluation of the Canada-Quebec Infrastructure Works 2000 Program.


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Recreational Infrastructure Canada (RInC)

Start Date: April 1, 2009

End Date: October 31, 2011

Description: RInC is a Canada-wide initiative intended to be a targeted, short-term measure to stimulate the Canadian economy. Its aim is to help reduce the impact of the recent global recession by increasing the total value of construction activities associated with recreational infrastructure. RInC-funded projects primarily involve modernizing, repairing, replacing or expanding existing recreational infrastructure, such as swimming pools, arenas and playing fields. In Quebec, the program is implemented in partnership with the Quebec government.

Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec

Results Achieved: Rural and urban communities have quality public infrastructure.

($ millions)
  2008-09
Actual
Spending
2009-10
Actual
Spending
2010-11
Planned
Spending
2010-11
Total
Authorities4
2010-11
Actual
Spending
Variance(s)
Program activity: Infrastructure
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 0.0 1.4 73.1 76.7 60.2 (12.9)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Total Program Activity 0.0 1.4 73.1 76.7 60.2 (12.9)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the reprofiling of $3.6 million in funding under RInC between 2009-2010 and 2010-2011.

Actual expenditures, which are lower than authorities obtained, depend on progress in the completion of projects. Under the agreement signed with the Government of Canada, the Quebec government is the implementing authority for RInC. Funds unused in 2010-2011 were thus carried forward to 2011-2012.

Audit Completed or Planned: An internal audit of project analyses under the CAF and RInC was completed in 2010-2011. An internal audit on the co-ordination of the delivery of financial assistance under the CAF and RInC also ended in 2010-2011. The Agency is currently conducting a follow-up review of agreements under the CAF and RInC, which is to be completed during 2011-2012.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution program to supply the Municipality of Shannon with drinking water

Start Date: April 1, 2009

End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: Financial assistance for the water treatment project to supply the Municipality of Shannon, Quebec, with drinking water.

Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec

Results Achieved: Rural and urban communities have quality public infrastructure.

($ millions)
  2008-09
Actual
Spending
2009-10
Actual
Spending
2010-11
Planned
Spending
2010-11
Total
Authorities5
2010-11
Actual
Spending
Variance(s)
Program activity: Infrastructure
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 0.0 6.4 7.3 6.9 6.9 (0.4)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Total Program Activity 0.0 6.4 7.3 6.9 6.9 (0.4)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance between planned spending and total authorities is attributable to the fact that certain work scheduled for 2010-2011 was brought forward to 2009-2010. Actual expenditures correspond to authorities.

Audit Completed or Planned: N/A

Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A


Name of Transfer Payment Program: Business and Regional Growth

Start Date: April 1, 2007

End Date: March 31, 2012

Description: This program reinforces conditions conducive to the sustainable growth of regions and SMEs, and has three objectives:

  • to help enterprises improve their performance, become more competitive and engage
    in more innovation to facilitate their sustainable development;
  • to support the transfer of technology and research outputs to enterprises;
  • to create the right conditions to attract foreign investment and international
    organizations.

This program has also been used for implementation of the CAF, a temporary CEAP initiative (2009-2010 and 2010-2011), and of the TISQFE and the Linguistic Duality Economic Development Initiative (EDI).

Eligible recipients are primarily small and medium-sized enterprises and non-profit organizations.

Strategic Outcome: A competitive and diversified economy for the regions of Quebec

Results Achieved:

  • Assisted enterprises are using their strategic capabilities.
  • Products and services derived from R&D are being commercialized.
  • New enterprises and investment in strategic capital assets are consolidating the regions’ economic base.
  • Competitiveness poles are being developed and consolidated.
  • Clusters and networks of enterprises in the same sector or region are better structured.
  • The innovation commercialization process is generating medium- and long-range economic and social spinoffs.
  • Competitive regions are attracting foreign direct investment and international organizations.

With respect specifically to the CAF:

  • Number of communities with increased economic opportunities and greater capacity to meet challenges
  • Enterprises created, maintained and expanded
  • Jobs created or maintained
($ millions)
  2008-09
Actual
Spending
2009-10
Actual
Spending
2010-11
Planned
Spending
2010-11
Total
Authorities6
2010-11
Actual
Spending
Variance(s)
Program activity: Enterprise competitiveness
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 40.4 60.7 67.0 100.1 79.7 5.9
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Program activity: Competitive positioning of sectors and regions
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions 29.2 34.1 30.3 36.2 36.2 2.7
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Program activity: Special intervention measures
Total Grants - - - - - -
Total Contributions - 17.8 25.3 18.1 18.1 0.9
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments - - - - - -
Total Program Activities 69.6 112.6 122.6 154.4 134 9.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Total authorities are higher than planned spending owing to the receipt of additional funding for vulnerable communities, through the Business and Regional Growth program, and for implementation of the TISQFE.

The variance between total authorities and actual expenditures is attributable to the fact that contribution applications were submitted at a slower pace than anticipated. Part of the unused funding will be carried forward to 2011-2012.

Audit Completed or Planned: N/A

Evaluation Completed or Planned: The formative evaluation of the Business and Regional Growth program was completed in 2010. The report is available at: Formative Evaluation of the Community Diversification and Business and Regional Growth programs. The summative evaluation of the program is in progress, and will be completed in 2011-2012.

Notes:

1 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.

2 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.

3 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.

4 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.

5 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.

6 Parliamentary authorities are awarded by global votes. So authorities by program activity are estimates, and are presented as a guide only.



Green Procurement

Part A: Reinforcement of Green Procurement Capability


Activity Target as % (as reported in 2010–11 RPP) Actual Results as % Description/Comments
Training for employees
responsible for purchasing
and materiel management
10% 10% Personal guidance upon the arrival of new assistants at the Agency was the focus in 2010-2011. Different formulas will be used over the coming year to update contracting knowledge in the Agency’s different directorates.
Training for Acquisition Cardholders To be determined with the offices selected for the pilot project Deployment under preparation

The two procurement card (credit card) holders at the Agency have had their awareness raised with respect to green procurement. It is planned to increase the number of procurement card holders at the Agency, and these employees’ awareness will also be raised with regard to green procurement.

Performance Evaluations 100%
(Maintain
the rate)
100% Integration of environmental considerations is not explicitly mentioned in performance evaluations, but such considerations are factors in the different procurement decisions.
Procurement Processes and Controls 100%
(Maintain
the rate)
100% The procurement process is part of the quality management system (ISO). The Agency has integrated a green component in its Asset Management Framework and acquisitions strategy. A Contracts Committee has been set up to review all acquisitions.

Part B: Use of Bundled Green Procurement Instruments


Good/Service Target as % (as reported in 2010–11 RPP) Actual Results as % Description/Comments
Vehicles 17% 40% Vehicle purchasing is carried out centrally for the Agency. Suppliers recommended by PWGSC are used. When automobiles are replaced, the Agency acquires hybrid vehicles.
Paper 75% 89% The Agency buys 30% and 100% recycled paper, of Canadian manufacture, for all Agency business offices and Head Office.
Service contract for sustainable disposal of items 100% 100% For disposal of its items, the Agency uses companies recommended by PWGSC that perform recycling and safe disposal of end-of-life electronic equipment.

Part C: Reduction Initiatives Targeting Specific Items


Non-durable goods / capital goods Target as % Reduction or as ratio per FTE (as per RPP 2010-11) Actual Results as % or as ratio per FTE Description/Comments
Photocopiers Increase to more than 65% the number of leased photocopiers including print, fax and other functions 90% 28 photocopiers at the Agency include the different functions.
Shredders 24 for 422 employees, or 1 per 17 employees

(Maintain the number)
24 for 442 employees, or 1 per 18 employees (Slight increase in ratio) The use of shredders at the Agency reduces the amount of paper thrown in the garbage and allows for recycling.
Service contract for Shred-It recycling boxes Maintain the service Service
maintained
The Agency is maintaining the service contract for Shred-It recycling boxes.


Response to Parliamentary Committees and to External Audits


Response to Parliamentary Committees
No recommendations were issued by any Parliamentary Committees concerning the Agency for 2010-2011.
Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)
2010 Fall Report of the Auditor General of Canada, Chapter 1—Canada’s Economic Action Plan.

The objective of this audit was to determine whether selected federal entities have adequately managed selected programs for Canada’s Economic Action Plan by putting in place appropriate management practices and providing programs to eligible recipients in a timely manner. The Community Adjustment Fund (CAF) and the Recreational Infrastructure Canada (RInC) program, delivered by regional development agencies, were included within the scope of this audit. No recommendation was made to the Agency. The complete report from the Office of the Auditor General may be consulted at: the Agency website.
External Audits: (Note: These refer to other external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages)
Audit of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec by the Public Service Commission of Canada (PSC).

The PSC conducted an audit at the Agency in 2010-2011 to determine whether the Agency has an appropriate framework, practices and systems for managing its appointment activities, then to determine whether appointments and the appointment process comply with the Public Service Employment Act and other governing authorities. The release of the audit report is scheduled to take place during 2011.


Internal Audits and Evaluations

Internal Audits (2010-2011)


Name of Internal Audit Internal Audit Type Status Completion Date
Internal audit on the Financial Management Control Framework for initiatives related to Canada's Economic Action Plan Audit of controls Completed July 2010
Internal audit on analysis of projects under the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF) and the Recreational Infrastructure Canada (RInC) program Audit of controls Completed November 2010
Internal audit on co-ordination of funding assistance provided under the CAF and the RInC program Audit of controls Completed November 2010

All the audit reports listed above may be consulted on the Agency Website.

Audit of follow-up on recommendations concerning administration Audit of controls Completed November 2010
Audit of follow-up on recommendations concerning operations Audit of controls Completed November 2010
Audit of follow-up on recommendations concerning human resources Audit of controls Completed November 2010
Audit of follow-up on recommendations concerning information integrity Audit of controls Completed November 2010
Audit of follow-up on recommendations concerning risk management Audit of controls Completed November 2010
Annual audit of the Infrastructure Canada Program Audit of controls Completed May 2011
Annual audit of the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund Audit of controls Completed May 2011
Audit of the integrity of data in the Hermès Finances system Audit of controls Completed July 2011
Continuous audit application: grants and contributions (G&C) payables at year end (PAYE) Review of controls Completed (added to audit plan 2010-2011) August 2011
Follow-up review of agreements under the CAF and the RInC program Review of controls In progress August 2011
Audit of collection and recovery mechanisms Audit of controls In progress 2nd quarter 2011-2012
Study on the management framework related to business offices’ development activities (non-financial activities) Study of controls In progress (added to audit plan 2010 2011) 3rd quarter 2011-2012
Audit of the Financial Management Control Framework, regular programming Audit of controls Planned 4th quarter 2011-2012
Audit of level of preparedness for certification of financial statements Audit of controls Planned 4th quarter 2011-2012
Annual audit of the Building Canada Fund Communities Component Audit of controls Postponed N/A
Audit of integration of risk management concepts in operations Audit of controls Cancelled N/A
Audit of program design Audit of controls Cancelled N/A

Evaluations (2010-2011)


Name of Evaluation Program Activity Status Completion Date
Support Initiative for International Cruise Development Community development Completed, pending approval in 2010-2011 2011-2012
Evaluation of the Community Diversification program Community development In progress 2011-2012
Evaluation of the Business and Regional Growth program Enterprise competitiveness

Competitive positioning of sectors and regions
In progress 2011-2012
Economic Development Initiative–Official Languages Act Community development In progress with Industry Canada and Canadian Heritage in 2010-2011 2012-2013