ARCHIVED - Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency - Supplementary Tables
This page has been archived.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
2010-11
Departmental Performance Report
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Table of Contents
- Sources of Respendable and Non-respendable Revenue
- User Fees/External Fees
- Green Procurement
- Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits
- Internal Audits and Evaluations
Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue
Respendable Revenue
($ thousands)
| Program Activity | 2008–09 Actual |
2009–10 Actual |
2010–11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Estimates |
Planned Revenue |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |||
| Environmental Assessment Support | ||||||
| Cost recovery for environmental assessment services | 4,008.9 | 3,158.9 | 7,751.0 | 7,751.0 | 7,751.0 | 2,685.4 |
| Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (federal) | 83.2 | 125.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 237.8 |
| Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (external) | 104.3 | 113.8 | 150.0 | 150.0 | 150.0 | 70.1 |
| Total Respendable Revenue | 4,196.4 | 3,398.1 | 8,001.0 | 8,001.0 | 8,001.0 | 2,993.3 |
Non-Respendable Revenue
($ thousands)
| Program Activity | 2008–09 Actual |
2009–10 Actual |
2010–11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Estimates |
Planned Revenue |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |||
| Environmental Assessment Support | 56.9 | 188.5 | — | — | 165.9 | 165.9 |
| Total Non-Respendable Revenue | 56.9 | 188.5 | — | — | 165.9 | 165.9 |
User Fees and Regulatory Charges
User Fees and Regulatory Charges
User Fee: Environmental Assessment Review Panels
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Environmental Assessment Review Panel Services Charges Order
Date Last Modified: 2002
Performance Standards: The Agency has identified shortcomings with regards to the sufficiency of the Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Charges Order.
Performance Results: The Agency has identified solutions for addressing the deficiencies of the Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Charges Order and will work to implement these solutions in the 2011–2012 reporting period.
| 2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
| 7,751.0 | 2,685.4 | 3,850.0 | 2011–12 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 |
| 2012–13 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 | |||
| 2013–14 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 | |||
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act, ss. 11(1) and par. 77(1) d); Access to Information Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: A response is to be provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. A notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after receipt of the request.
The Access to Information Act provides further details: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/.
Performance Results: Statutory deadlines were met 96% of the time.
| 2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 205 | 2011–12 | 0.7 | 215 |
| 2012–13 | 0.7 | 215 | |||
| 2013–14 | 0.7 | 215 | |||
User Fee Totals
| 2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
| Subtotal Regulatory | 7,751.0 | 2,685.4 | 3,850.0 | 2011–12 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 |
| 2012–13 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 | ||||
| 2013–14 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 | ||||
| Subtotal Other Products and Services | 0.1 | 0.1 | 205 | 2011–12 | 0.7 | 215 |
| 2012–13 | 0.7 | 215 | ||||
| 2013–14 | 0.7 | 215 | ||||
| Total | 7,751.1 | 2,685.5 | 4,055.0 | 2011–12 | 7,751.7 | 11,221.4 |
| 2012–13 | 7,751.7 | 11,221.4 | ||||
| 2013–14 | 7,751.7 | 11,221.4 | ||||
Green Procurement
Green Procurement Capacity Building
| Activity | Target as % (as reported in 2010–11 RPP) | Actual Results as % | Description/Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training for Procurement and Materiel Management Staff | 100% | 33% | One of three employees completed training in the field of procurement and materiel management. Employee training plans will include the CSPS C215 and more tailored training for each FTE for 2011–12. |
| Training for Acquisition Cardholders | 75% | 50% | Agency policy and procedures for cardholders are posted on the Agency's intranet site. The Agency is developing procedures to ensure current and new cardholders receive basic training. |
| Performance Evaluations | N/A | N/A | At this time, it is not possible to provide this information. The Agency will need to re-evaluate the possibility in the next fiscal year. |
| Procurement Processes and Controls | 75% | 95% | Limited acquisition requirements. 98% of goods/assets and 100% of acquired services are centralized, therefore enabling an effective oversight of processes and controls. A new oversight approach has been approved by senior management and adopted/applied/enforced by the Agency's Procurement Unit. All acquired services are reviewed by the Agency's Operations Committee. |
Use of Green Consolidated Procurement Instruments
| Good/Service | Target as % (as reported in 2010–11 RPP) | Actual Results as % | Description/Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper | 98% | 98% | All Agency paper was recycled paper bought via suppliers on the Standing Offer Index (SOI). 98% of all paper was made of at least 30% post-consumer waste. Only a very small percentage was purchased outside the standing offer vehicle. |
| Desktops/Laptops | 100% | 100% | All Agency desktops and laptops were purchased jointly with Environment Canada through a Request for Volume Discount (RVD) and they incorporated environmental considerations. The process is similar to the SOI with supplier pricing based on a larger requested volume. |
Reduction Initiatives for Specific Goods
| Consumable/Asset | Target as % Reduction or # per FTE | Actual Results as % Reduction or # per FTE | Description/Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper | 3,500 | 3,783 | Developing employee awareness about paper consumption was the main vehicle used for reduction (i.e. all-staff email reminders with messaging such as: do not print draft document if unnecessary; proofread documents prior to printing; read emails on screen instead of printing). The Agency teamed up with the Agency's Green Team to develop messages and best practices to reduce paper consumption. |
| Desktops/Laptops | 1 | 1 | Since 2007, reduction efforts have been implemented by extending the supplier onsite warranty when acquiring desktops and laptops through an RVD. Monitoring to ensure a cost-effective lifecycle was the Agency's main target. |
Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits
| Response to Parliamentary Committees |
|---|
| No recommendations received during the reporting period |
| Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development) |
| No recommendations received during the reporting period |
| External Audits (Note: These refer to other external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages) |
| The Agency did not participate in any external audits during the reporting period. |
Internal Audits and Evaluations
Internal Audits (current reporting period)
| Name of Internal Audit | Internal Audit Type | Status | Completion Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| No internal audits were conducted during the reporting period. | |||
Evaluations (current reporting period)
| Name of Evaluation | Program Activity | Status | Completion Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals | Environmental Assessment Support Environmental Assessment Development |
Completed | March 2010 |
| Evaluation of the Promotion, Research and Development Program | Environmental Assessment Development | Completed | March 2010 |