Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

 

ARCHIVED - Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency - Report

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.





2010-11
Departmental Performance Report



Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency





The original version was signed by
The Honourable Peter Kent, P.C., M.P.
Minister of the Environment and Minister responsible for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency





Table of Contents

Minister's Message

Section I: Organizational Overview

Section II: Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome

Section III: Supplementary Information

Section IV: Other Items of Interest



Minister's Message

As Minister responsible for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, I am pleased to present the 2010-2011 Departmental Performance Report for the Agency. This report compares performance with the priorities set out at the beginning of the fiscal year in the Agency's Report on Plans and Priorities.

The past year was one of changing priorities for the Agency, driven largely by the amendments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act that came into force in July 2010, making the Agency responsible for conducting most comprehensive studies. This is a significant step in support of more integrated federal-provincial environmental assessment.

Looking forward, the Agency is well positioned to provide support to the upcoming legislative review of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and to develop proposals in response to its recommendations.

Meanwhile, I invite parliamentarians and other Canadians to read this 2010-2011 Departmental Performance Report to gain a better appreciation of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency's mandate and performance.

 

The Honourable Peter Kent, P.C., M.P.
Minister of the Environment and Minister responsible for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency



 

Section I: Departmental Overview

In this section:

 

Raison d’être

Environmental assessment contributes to informed decision making in support of sustainable development. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) delivers high-quality environmental assessments (EAs) and serves as the centre of expertise on environmental assessment within the federal government.

Responsibilities

Environmental assessment ensures that federal government authorities identify and consider the potential environmental effects of policies, plans, programs, and projects before final decisions are made. It supports decisions that protect the environment, while fostering strong economic growth and a high quality of life for Canadians.

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) establishes the requirements for the EA of projects, and the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals sets out the EA requirements for those types of decisions. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency plays key roles in delivering and supporting assessments under the Act and providing guidance to assessments under the Cabinet Directive.

The Act sets out three main types of environmental assessment for proposed projects: screenings, comprehensive studies, and assessments by review panels. The Agency advises and assists the Minister of the Environment in establishing review panels and supports panels in their work. The Agency manages screenings for major resource projects and, after July 2010 amendments to the Act, conducts most comprehensive studies on behalf of the Government of Canada. For review panels, and for the comprehensive studies and screenings for which it is responsible, the Agency integrates the Government of Canada's Aboriginal consultation activities into the EA process to the greatest extent possible.

As the centre of expertise on environmental assessment within the federal government, the Agency provides advice and guidance across government to assist federal authorities in carrying out their EA responsibilities. The Agency leads interdepartmental efforts to improve the delivery of high-quality environmental assessments in a predictable and timely manner. The Agency works with federal authorities on the application of the Cabinet Directive on Implementing the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects.

The Agency also leads the coordination of federal EA requirements with those of the provinces and territories and administers a participant funding program to facilitate public participation and Aboriginal consultation during comprehensive studies of major resource projects and assessments by review panels.

The Agency also has responsibilities for reviewing projects under the environmental and social protection regimes set out in sections 22 and 23 of the 1975 James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. The President of the Agency is designated by order-in-council as the federal administrator of these processes.

The Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals establishes a self-assessment process for conducting a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of a policy, plan, or program proposal that may result in major environmental effects. An SEA is required when the proposal is being submitted to a minister or Cabinet for approval. The Agency supports the Minister of the Environment in promoting the application of the Cabinet Directive and provides training and guidance for federal authorities.

The Agency was established in 1994 and is headed by a president who reports directly to the Minister of the Environment. The Agency has its headquarters in Ottawa and regional offices in Halifax, Québec City, Toronto, Winnipeg, Edmonton, and Vancouver.

 

Strategic Outcome and Program Activity Architecture

The Agency's strategic outcome provides overarching direction for its activities.

  • Environmental considerations are taken into account in federal government decisions respecting policies, plans, programs and projects.

The Agency strives to achieve this outcome through the efficient and effective delivery of key components of federal environmental assessments and by providing advice and support to federal organizations on the delivery of their EA responsibilities.

The chart illustrates the alignment of the Agency's program activities and strategic outcome with the Government of Canada's strong economic growth outcome area.

Program Activity Architecture

[Program Activity Architecture]

Organizational Priorities


Priority: Build a Framework for More Integrated Environmental Assessment Type*: Ongoing Strategic Outcome(s) and/or Program Activity(ies): Environmental Assessment Development Program
Mostly met
  • Amendments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act that came into force July 12, 2010 made the Agency responsible for the conduct of most comprehensive studies. These amendments present a significant accomplishment in support of more integrated environmental assessment.
  • As a result of these changes, the Agency is now responsible for conducting timely, high-quality comprehensive study environmental assessments and for coordinating federal requirements with provincial and territorial EA processes.
  • To complement the amendments, proposed regulations to establish time lines for the conduct of comprehensive studies by the Agency were made available for consultation in the Canada Gazette, Part I (enacted June 23, 2011).
  • The Agency engaged federal partners in understanding the amended approach to comprehensive studies through regional and headquarters interdepartmental discussions, and engaged the provinces and territories in similar discussions through regional environmental assessment committees. The Agency also provided information and responded to inquiries from Aboriginal groups and stakeholders.
  • Other activities in support of integrated environmental assessment include the renewal of the Canada-Quebec Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation, advice to Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada to ensure that EA regimes pursuant to comprehensive land claims and self-government agreements are consistent with the requirements of the Act, and consultation on proposals to improve alignment of the environmental assessment requirements for commercial ski areas in national parks with Parks Canada's applicable management processes and policies.

* Type is defined as follows: Previously committed to—committed to in the first or second fiscal year before the subject year of the report; Ongoing—committed to at least three fiscal years before the subject year of the report; and New—newly committed to in the reporting year of the DPR.


Priority: Play an Active Leadership Role in Federal Environmental Assessment Type*: Ongoing Strategic Outcome(s) and/or Program Activity(ies): Environmental Assessment Support Program
Mostly met
  • The Agency led federal environmental assessment by fulfilling the following key roles:
    • conducting comprehensive studies;
    • managing multi-jurisdictional screenings of major resource projects;
    • managing review panels or co-managing joint review panels;
    • integrating Aboriginal consultation into the environmental assessment process for review panels and the comprehensive studies and other major resource project EAs it leads;
    • providing funding to support public participation and Aboriginal consultation in EAs; and
    • coordinating federal participation in multi-jurisdictional screenings of non-major resource projects.
  • July 2010 amendments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act gave the Agency specific authorities with respect to most comprehensive studies, enabling it to play a strong and active leadership role in delivering high-quality environmental assessments in a timely manner.
  • The Agency coordinated 207 federal environmental assessments across Canada. It managed 26 EAs of major resource projects (including 14 comprehensive studies), conducted 13 non-major resource project comprehensive studies, contributed to the coordination of 14 James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement projects, and provided support to 12 projects subject to an EA by a review panel.
  • The Agency's Participant Funding Program awarded $300,000 to 35 recipients to facilitate public participation in the EAs of 15 projects and $1.9 million to 67 recipients to enable Aboriginal consultation and participation in the EAs of 13 projects.
  • Based on its experience in integrating Aboriginal consultation into the EA process, the Agency contributed to strengthening interdepartmental governance and communication on consistent and effective Aboriginal consultation across the federal government.
  • The Agency supported the Privy Council Office's update of the Guidelines for Implementing the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. It also led an interdepartmental community of practice, providing guidance and advice to federal departments and agencies on developing and updating their SEA processes and tools.

* Type is defined as follows: Previously committed to—committed to in the first or second fiscal year before the subject year of the report; Ongoing—committed to at least three fiscal years before the subject year of the report; and New—newly committed to in the reporting year of the DPR.


Priority: Build Capacity and Organization to Deliver on Existing and New Responsibilities Type*: Ongoing Strategic Outcome(s) and/or Program Activity(ies): Environmental Assessment Development Program / Environmental Assessment Support Program
Mostly met
  • The Agency focused on building internal capacity for the effective delivery of its new role in the conduct of comprehensive studies. To this end, the Agency developed processes, guidance, training, and regulatory instruments to support the effective delivery of its EA responsibilities. The Agency also implemented organizational changes to support regional delivery of the comprehensive study process.
  • The Agency manages the integration of Aboriginal consultation into the EAs it leads on behalf of the federal government. The Agency further refined its model for integrating Aboriginal consultation into the EA process and keeping detailed records of such consultations. This included training of employees in regional offices across the country on the delivery of the approach when conducting comprehensive studies and adapting the model for use in review panels.

* Type is defined as follows: Previously committed to—committed to in the first or second fiscal year before the subject year of the report; Ongoing—committed to at least three fiscal years before the subject year of the report; and New—newly committed to in the reporting year of the DPR.

Risk Analysis

Agency Operating Environment and Challenges

Protecting the environment, while supporting strong economic growth and improving the quality of life of Canadians, is an important challenge. Environmental assessment assists in addressing this challenge by ensuring that environmental effects are considered before decisions are made to allow policies, plans, programs, or projects to proceed.

Under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, responsible authorities (federal departments, agencies, and parent Crown corporations) must undertake an EA before carrying out a project; providing financial assistance to enable a project to be carried out; selling, leasing, or otherwise disposing of federal land to enable a project to be undertaken; or issuing certain authorizations to enable a project to go forward.

Projects subject to an EA under the Act—and policies, plans, and programs subject to an SEA under the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals—often raise important issues associated with socio-economic development, environmental protection, Aboriginal and treaty rights, and federal–provincial/territorial cooperation. Environmental assessment must continually adapt to factors, such as changing economic and environmental conditions, new technologies, interpretations of statutory and common law, and evolving public expectations.

The following sections provide an overview of the Agency's operating environment and associated considerations and challenges.

Shared Responsibility for Environmental Management

Under the Canadian Constitution, environmental management is an area of shared responsibility between the federal and provincial/territorial governments. When the federal government and the government of a province or territory both require an environmental assessment, the Agency works with the other jurisdiction to design and deliver a single, effective, and efficient environmental assessment process. Bilateral agreements and project-specific arrangements define the roles and responsibilities in implementing the process in a manner that satisfies the requirements of both parties.

Supporting the Canadian Economy

An effective, timely, and predictable regulatory system which includes high-quality environmental assessments is a key contributor to a strong Canadian economy. The Agency continues to be an active partner in improving the performance of the regulatory system by implementing innovative ways to ensure that environmental considerations are taken into account in federal decision making and that federal EAs provide clear benefits to Canadians. The integration of the environmental effects of projects into planning and decision-making processes in a manner that promotes sustainable development will remain the focus of these efforts.

Amendments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act

Through amendments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act that came into force July 12, 2010, the Agency became responsible for the conduct of most comprehensive study EAs from the time a project becomes known until the Agency delivers its report to the Minister of the Environment. This shift in accountability from coordinating to delivering comprehensive studies represented a significant change in the Agency's operating environment.

Meaningful Participation of the Public

Projects subject to environmental assessment and their effects on the environment are complex, often giving rise to competing views on whether a project should proceed. Providing meaningful opportunities for Canadians to participate is central to the delivery of high-quality environmental assessments.

Aboriginal Consultation

The federal Crown has a duty to consult and—where appropriate—accommodate Aboriginal groups when it contemplates conduct that may adversely affect potential or established Aboriginal or treaty rights. As a result of the 2007 Cabinet Directive on Improving the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects, it was decided that for major resource projects the environmental assessment process would be relied upon, to the extent possible, to fulfil the legal duty to consult. The Agency integrates Aboriginal consultations into the environmental assessments that it leads, consistent with the whole-of-government approach set out by the federal government in the above-mentioned Cabinet Directive. Aboriginal consultation presents opportunities to integrate traditional knowledge and diverse perspectives on the nature and exercise of Aboriginal or treaty rights into project assessment. Some associated challenges include reaching affected Aboriginal groups in locations that are often remote, or when a project intersects with the interests of multiple groups and may require diverse approaches to Aboriginal consultation.

Regulatory Improvement Initiative for Major Resource Projects

By conducting or managing the EAs and associated Aboriginal consultation for major resource projects, the Agency makes a major contribution to meeting the objectives of the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects (October 2007) to provide a more efficient and effective regulatory system that will support an innovative and prosperous economy, protect the health and safety of Canadians, and conserve the environment.

Litigation

Litigation regarding the interpretation of the Act and the Crown's duty to consult Aboriginal groups may result in a need to take the necessary time to adjust practices to conform to court decisions. Rulings of the Supreme Court of Canada on the scope of the project to be considered in a federal EA and whether the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act applies to projects located on the territory subject to section 22 of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement led to significant adjustments to federal EA practices.

International Considerations

International dialogue provides opportunities for Canada to share its environmental assessment experience and expertise and to learn from the EA practices of international organizations and other countries. Benefits include being able to incorporate best practices from elsewhere and to be aware of the effects of other environmental assessment regimes on Canada's competitiveness. The Agency will continue to develop relationships and maintain dialogue with the United States and other jurisdictions with comparable EA regimes. In addition, the Agency will continue to monitor Canada's obligations as a party to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context.

Parliamentary Review of the Act

The 2003 Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act requires a legislative review by the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development of the provisions and operation of the Act. The Committee's report will be followed by a government response. The Agency is well-positioned to provide support to the committee process and to analyze and respond to any recommendations.

 

Summary of Performance

2010–2011 Financial Resources ($ thousands)*


Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending
28,960 32,461 29,034

* Financial Resources should equal the Total line for Program Activities and Internal Services.

Note: At the end of the 2010–2011 fiscal year, the Agency's lapse of operating funds was due mainly to delays in the environmental assessment process as a result of changes to the design and timing of projects by proponents (and therefore outside the control of the Agency) and the delay of the initiation of the parliamentary review of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.

2010–2011 Human Resources (Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs))


Planned Actual Difference
235 235 0

Strategic Outcome


Performance Indicators Targets 2010-2011 Performance
Percentage of policy, plan, and program proposals for consideration by Cabinet that include strategic environmental considerations 90% of memoranda to Cabinet include strategic environmental considerations Not met
  • Of the proposals reviewed by the Agency, 45% included a statement indicating the completion of a preliminary scan or a strategic environmental assessment, as per the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals.
  • This result shows that many proposals do not explicitly state that they have included strategic environmental considerations. This may reflect an overall lack of awareness or a misinterpretation by departments and agencies of the requirements of the Cabinet Directive. It is clear that further guidance is needed to clarify and raise awareness around these requirements.
Percentage of EAs where the Agency is the federal environmental assessment coordinator (FEAC) or EA manager for which an EA work plan is developed and implemented by the Agency An EA work plan is developed and implemented for 100% of project-specific EAs for which the Agency is FEAC or EA manager Met all
  • A work plan was developed and implemented by the Agency for 100% of the environmental assessments for which the Agency was FEAC or EA manager.

 

($ thousands)
Program Activity		 2009–2010
Actual
Spending
 2010–2011* Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome
Main
Estimates		 Planned
Spending		 Total
Authorities		 Actual
Spending
Environmental Assessment Development Program 4,238 4,153 4,153 4,482 3,765 Strong Economic Growth
Environmental Assessment Support Program 16,182 17,107 17,107 17,922 15,263 Strong Economic Growth
Total 20,420 21,260 21,260 22,404 19,028  

 

($ thousands) Program Activity 2009–2010
Actual
Spending
 2010–2011*
Main
Estimates		 Planned
Spending		 Total
Authorities		 Actual
Spending
Internal Services 9,940 7,700 7,700 10,058 10,006

* Beginning with the 2009–2010 estimates cycle, the resources for Program Activity Internal Services are displayed separately from other program activities. They are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous main estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between fiscal years.

 

Expenditure Profile

Departmental Spending Trend Graph

[Departmental Spending Trend]

For the 2010–2011 fiscal year, the Agency spent $29.0 million to achieve the expected results of its program activities and contribute to its strategic outcome.

For the 2007–2008 to 2010–2011 periods, total spending includes all parliamentary appropriations and revenue sources. It also includes carry-forward adjustments.

For the 2011–2012 to 2013–2014 periods, the total spending corresponds to planned spending and revenues. Supplementary funding and carry-forward adjustments are unknown at this point and, therefore, are not reflected.

As a result of the Budget 2007 initiative to improve Canada's regulatory framework for major resource projects, the Agency has increased its spending. The Agency was also granted funding for review panel support and Aboriginal consultations conducted as part of an environmental assessment. Both sources of funding are scheduled to end in 2011–2012.

 

Estimates by Vote

For information on our organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please see the 2010–11 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II) publication. An electronic version is available at the Public Works and Government Services Canada website.



Section II: Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome

In this section:

 

Strategic Outcome

Environmental considerations are taken into account in federal government decisions respecting policies, plans, programs and projects.

Program Activity: Environmental Assessment Development Program

Program Activity Description

The program develops and maintains an effective, efficient, and integrated environmental assessment process at the federal level, fully considering the interactions with other environmental assessments (EAs) and consultative and regulatory decision-making processes in Canada, and mindful of the transboundary context. A sound environmental assessment process is vital to achieving the strategic outcome. Ensuring that environmental considerations are integrated into federal government decision making through sound EA practices supports a high quality of life for Canadians, environmental sustainability, and economic competitiveness.


2010–2011 Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending
4,153 4,482 3,765
The lapsed funds under the Environmental Assessment Development Program were mainly attributable to a delay in the initiation of the parliamentary review of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act by the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. Planned work to respond to the review was delayed pending the committee proceeding with the review.


2010–2011 Human Resources (FTEs)
Planned Actual Difference
40 41 1


Expected
Results		 Performance
Indicators		 Targets Performance
Status
Federal organizations have the instruments they need to meet their EA responsibilities Percentage of federal organizations that agree that the instruments provided by the Agency set out and explain the EA requirements within the federal government 75% of federal organizations agree that the instruments provided by the Agency set out and explain the EA requirements at the federal level Partially met
  • Agency consultations with federal counterparts generally revealed a high level of satisfaction with the basic operational policy and regulatory instruments. These meetings also suggested the need for additional support in relation to major projects, cumulative effects, and strategic environmental assessments (SEAs).
  • During the reporting period, the Canadian Environmental; Assessment Agency (the Agency) focused on guidance and tools to support its new responsibility for comprehensive studies. The Agency will identify priorities for action in the coming fiscal year.
Federal departments and agencies have access to the training and information they need to implement the Cabinet Directive on Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals Percentage of course participants from federal departments and agencies indicating their satisfaction with training course content and materials 85% of course participants from federal departments are satisfied with training course content and materials Not assessed
  • The Agency did not offer its course on implementation of the Cabinet Directive (SEA 101) during this period so cannot report on this indicator. The Agency is renewing the course to reflect the new guidelines released in 2010–2011.
  • The Agency provided ongoing advice and engaged in discussions with departmental SEA practitioners on the requirements of the revised guidelines.
Key issues are addressed, contributing to an improved federal EA framework consistent with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) Percentage of key issues being addressed through the development of new or amended policies, procedures, regulations, or legislative proposals Over five years, 100% of key issues are being addressed as a result of new or amended policies, procedures, regulations, or legislative proposals Met all
  • 100% of these key issues were addressed:
    • Aboriginal consultation;
    • streamlining EA processes;
    • project scoping;
    • federal–provincial coordination; and
    • federal coordination (multiple responsible authorities).

Explanatory Note for Key Issues Indicator

Since 2009–2010 was the first year the Agency reported against these key issues, the Agency will be able to report against the five-year target in 2013–2014. There may be some variability in the key issues addressed from year to year over the five-year period. During 2010–2011, the Agency addressed the following key issues.

Aboriginal Consultation

  • The Agency developed a practitioner's guide to support the integration of Aboriginal consultation into comprehensive studies.
  • Important instruments were also developed to provide broad direction and detailed guidance to Agency employees engaged in Aboriginal consultation.
  • The Agency provided training to the federal community on consulting Aboriginal groups in environmental assessment.

Streamlining the Environmental Assessment Process

  • Proposed regulations that establish time lines for the conduct of comprehensive studies by the Agency were pre-published in the Canada Gazette, Part I.

Project Scoping

  • Policy direction was provided to federal departments and agencies in response to the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in the Red Chris Mine case (MiningWatch Canada v. Canada).

Federal-Provincial Coordination

  • The Canada-Quebec Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation was renewed.
  • Implementation of amendments to the Act allowed assessments of large-scale projects to start sooner and facilitated coordination with provincial assessment processes.

Federal Coordination

  • Consultation took place on proposals to improve alignment of the environmental assessment requirements for commercial ski areas in national parks with Parks Canada's applicable management processes and policies.
  • Implementation of amendments to the Act allowed for more efficient management of the federal environmental assessment process by making the Agency responsible for the conduct of most comprehensive studies.
  • Memoranda of understanding were finalized with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the National Energy Board concerning the conditions under which their processes may be substituted for a federal review panel under the Act.
Performance Summary and Analysis of Program Activity

The Environmental Assessment Development Program Activity aligns most closely with the Agency's priority to build a framework for more integrated EAs. By establishing and maintaining the policy and legislative foundation for the practice of environmental assessment at the federal level, the program activity also supports the Agency's priority to play an active leadership role in the federal EA process.

The Agency consulted with partners and stakeholders, and monitored and evaluated emerging issues to develop appropriate responses in support of effective, efficient, and integrated environmental assessments. This required consideration of interactions with other EAs, consultative and regulatory decision-making processes in Canada, and EAs in a transboundary context.

Strengthening Coordination and Cooperation

The Agency continued to consult with its provincial counterparts and renewed the Canada-Quebec Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation to reduce duplication between federal and provincial processes and improve the delivery of high-quality, timely environmental assessments.

A decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in January 2010—MiningWatch Canada v. Canada—provided clarification on the scope of a project under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. The Supreme Court found that the scope of the project for the purpose of an EA is, at a minimum, the project as proposed by the proponent. The development of operational guidance for departments and agencies responsible for conducting environmental assessments in response to the outcome of that decision continued into the reporting period.

Amendments to the Act in July 2010 made the Agency responsible for most comprehensive studies and resulted in an earlier determination of when to begin an environmental assessment. This allows for better alignment with provincial EA processes where both regimes apply, which promotes stronger coordination and cooperation.

As complements to the amendments to the Act, proposed regulations that establish time lines for the conduct of comprehensive studies by the Agency were made available for consultation in the Canada Gazette, Part I. The Agency also developed and finalized memoranda of understanding with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the National Energy Board concerning the conditions under which their processes may be substituted for an environmental assessment by a review panel under the Act.

Aboriginal Consultation

The Government of Canada consults with Aboriginal peoples for reasons of good governance, sound policy development, and decision making, in addition to legal obligations. The government takes a whole-of-government approach to Aboriginal consultation for major projects, to ensure that Aboriginal groups are consulted and accommodated when it contemplates actions that may adversely affect established or potential Aboriginal and treaty rights.

This approach is mandated by the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects and the associated memorandum of understanding (2007), and is based on Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation: Updated Guidelines for Federal Officials to Fulfill the Legal Duty to Consult–2011 (March 2011).

The Agency integrates Aboriginal consultation into the environmental assessments it leads, on behalf of the federal government. During the reporting period, this leadership role was further defined through consolidation of the policy framework and early implementation.

This resulted in a more refined approach to integrating Aboriginal consultation into environmental assessments and a net improvement in the capacity to deliver. Key stepping stones included distribution throughout the Agency of an Aboriginal consultation practitioners' guide and training sessions delivered to Agency and interested federal employees across the country.

The Agency also worked to strengthen interdepartmental governance and communication to ensure the duty to consult is fulfilled on those projects where it serves as Crown consultation coordinator. Notably, the Agency contributed content on key elements of the Integration of Aboriginal Consultation into the EA Process model for inclusion in the Government of Canada's Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation: Updated Guidelines for Federal Officials to Fulfill the Legal Duty to Consult–2011.

In support of Aboriginal consultation and the overall EA process, the Agency continued to develop its geographic information system (GIS) capacity. This effort included further development of partnerships with other federal departments and agencies and additional refinements to deliver a more useful product. A GIS provides visual analysis tools for practitioners and an effective means of communicating information to decision makers.

Parliamentary Review of the Act

The 2003 Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act requires a review of the provisions and operation of the Act led by a parliamentary committee. During the reporting period, the Agency considered observations from the 2009 report by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development and conducted research and analysis to prepare for—and contribute to—the review, if requested by the parliamentary committee.

Research and Analysis

The Agency undertook research and analysis to establish a solid understanding of how federal environmental assessment is being implemented, focusing on identifying impediments to the efficient and effective conduct of those assessments.

The Agency's Quality Assurance Program published Effectiveness of the Environmental Assessment Track Process under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. Under the Act, as amended in 2003, departments responsible for conducting a comprehensive study followed a process, commonly referred to as the track process, to provide a recommendation to the Minister of the Environment on whether the assessment should continue by means of a comprehensive study or be referred to a review panel. The analysis conducted under the Quality Assurance Program informed amendments to the Act that came into effect in July 2010. The amendments to the Act significantly changed the comprehensive study process by removing the requirement for an EA track decision. Those amendments are expected to improve timeliness, accountability, and coordination with provincial reviews, as shown in the analysis.

Research and reporting in relation to the following five studies reached an advanced stage: developing a framework for analysis of the quality of screening reports; applying the framework to a sample of recent screening reports; assessing the effectiveness of measures taken to improve the timeliness of initiating environmental assessments; describing and evaluating various systems used by responsible authorities to ensure implementation of mitigation measures; and describing experience to date in designing and implementing follow-up programs. The Agency plans to publish these studies during the 2011–2012 fiscal year.

Strengthening Federal Policy Development

The Agency worked with the Privy Council Office and Environment Canada to update the Guidelines for Implementing the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. The renewed Guidelines, issued in October 2010, link strategic environmental assessments with the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy, improve transparency, include new reporting requirements, and clarify roles and responsibilities for the application of the Cabinet Directive. Strategic environmental assessments support informed decision making by identifying potential important environmental effects (positive or negative) and propose measures to mitigate them for proposals submitted to ministers or Cabinet. During the reporting period, the Agency provided ongoing advice and renewed guidance consistent with the revised Guidelines. The Agency also facilitated ongoing discussions with an interdepartmental community of practice—including a workshop to support the development of SEA performance metrics and associated processes—to strengthen the application of federal SEAs.

Consulting with Partners, Stakeholders, and Other Jurisdictions

During the reporting period, the Agency participated in regional-scale initiatives, such as the Beaufort Regional Environmental Assessment and the Lower Athabasca Regional Plan to further explore the potential of regional assessment to inform federal decisions, most notably for the management of cumulative effects. The Agency also examined lessons learned and approaches used in other jurisdictions.

The Agency worked collaboratively with the international community through such forums as meetings with the United States Environmental Protection Agency to discuss issues of mutual interest. The Agency participated in the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Special Symposium on Climate Change and Impact Assessment in November 2010, joining other organizations in the international impact assessment community to share ideas and best practices. The Agency also supported the work of the Secrétariat international francophone pour l'évaluation environnementale (SIFÉE) by chairing a session and giving a presentation at the 2010 conference in Paris.

The Agency provided specialist advice to Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada to ensure that environmental assessment regimes developed and implemented pursuant to comprehensive land claim and self-government agreements were consistent with the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.

With respect to specific negotiations across Canada, the Agency provided expertise and support for the development of environmental assessment chapters for the Innu of Labrador land claim agreement-in-principle, the Akwesasne self-government agreement, and six modern treaties in British Columbia. In addition, review and coordination of input to the Nunatsiavut Environmental Protection Act, developed pursuant to the Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement, was undertaken.

Ongoing Improvements for Major Resource Projects

In 2008, the Major Projects Management Office (MPMO) was established within Natural Resources Canada to provide overarching project coordination for major resource projects and to identify opportunities to improve the regulatory process. The Agency has worked closely with the MPMO since its establishment, with—as anticipated by the Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects—a particular emphasis on the development of measures to improve the performance of the regulatory system for major resource projects.

An interdepartmental evaluation committee led by Natural Resources Canada was established to evaluate the MPMO initiative. It will examine the relevance and performance (both effectiveness and efficiency) of the initiative in meeting its objectives. The Agency is a member of the committee and is collaborating with the evaluation team at Natural Resources Canada to ensure a well-informed and accurate evaluation.

Lessons Learned

The amendments to the Act that came into force in July 2010 necessitated significant changes to database systems, including the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry Internet site and internal information management tools. These modifications afforded an opportunity to address some existing weaknesses and to prepare for the development of more robust systems that would increase meaningful public engagement and awareness by enhancing the transparency, timeliness, credibility, and integrity of EA information.

In advance of the amendments to the Act coming into force and during the weeks following their implementation, the Agency invested efforts in outreach activities to federal departments and agencies. Federal organizations are key collaborators to ensure an effective and timely environmental assessment process under the amended Act. The goal was to ensure departments and agencies were informed of the amendments, provide them with an opportunity to voice their concerns and for the Agency to see how delivery of the amendments could be improved to address some of the concerns raised. The efforts invested in outreach activities proved to be an effective means to ensure a successful implementation of the amendments.

Program Activity: Environmental Assessment Support Program

Program Activity Description

This program comprises the Public Participation Program, the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, the federal EA training program, the delivery of policy and guidance products, the Class Screening Program, and the Environmental Assessment Management Program—the various means by which Canadians, industry, stakeholders, and interested parties interact and meet their various obligations pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. This includes public participation, information dissemination, guidance, and record keeping. This is done to ensure that a transparent and rigorous environmental assessment process is applied under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.


2010–2011 Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending
17,107 17,922 15,263
The Environmental Assessment Support Program lapsed funding was mainly due to delays in the environmental assessment process as a result of proponent decisions. It is not uncommon for the EA process to be put on hold as a result of proponent decisions to redesign or delay a project. Funds allocated to support public and Aboriginal group participation in the EA process may therefore not be spent when projected to be required. The Agency is working to reprofile Participant Funding Program resources so that the funds would be available to reimburse eligible expenses when incurred in future years.


2010–2011 Human Resources (FTEs)
Planned Actual Difference
134 135 1


Expected
Results		 Performance
Indicators		 Targets Performance
Status
The Agency contributes to a reduction in time to complete the EA of major resource projects Percentage of times in which the Agency meets the time line for its activities, as established in the Major Projects Management Office project agreement Agency meets 100% of the time lines for its activities, as established by the MPMO project agreement Not met
  • The Agency met the time line for its activities established in the MPMO project agreements 53% (11) of the time for 21 milestones associated with seven projects.
  • However, for five of the 10 milestones where time lines were not met, the time lines were exceeded by less than three days.
  • Reasons for not meeting milestones included adjustments to remain aligned with provincial environmental assessment process requirements.
  • The Agency is striving to improve performance with respect to achieving milestone targets. During the 2010–2011 reporting year, the Agency worked with the MPMO and other departments and agencies to develop templates to expedite the project agreement development stage for projects. These templates have been designed to align with provincial environmental assessment processes and the Agency is working to ensure that the time lines established in the project agreements are realistic and achievable thus ensuring improved performance in future years.
A single EA report produces the necessary information to support federal and provincial EA decisions when both jurisdictions require EAs of a project Percentage of times when a cooperative EA report produces the necessary information to support federal and provincial EA decisions 80% of cooperative EA reports produce the necessary information to support federal and provincial EA decisions Exceeded
  • 100% of cooperative environmental assessments included reports that produced the necessary information to support federal and provincial EA decisions.
  • Sixteen projects where the Agency was EA manager or FEAC received an EA decision, and all 16 had one set of environmental impact statement guidelines to satisfy the requirements for both the federal and provincial environmental assessments.
Responsible authorities and proponents understand the Agency's role in implementing the major resource projects process Percentage of responsible authorities and proponent representatives who agree that they understand the Agency's role in relation to the EA of projects subject to the major resource projects process 85% of responsible authorities and proponents agree that they understand the Agency's role in relation to the EA of projects subject to the major resource projects process Exceeded
  • Ten project agreements, which outline roles and responsibilities of the Agency in implementing the major resource projects process, were signed by responsible authorities in the reporting period and are publicly available. Project proponents access these documents and thus are provided with an understanding of the Agency's role. The Agency also led project review teams, which serve as a forum to define the role of the Agency as well as the various roles of federal departments.
Interests of Aboriginal groups in relation to the EA of projects where the Agency is EA manager are documented and presented to support decision making Percentage of projects where the Agency is the Crown consultation coordinator for which an Aboriginal consultation work plan is developed and implemented by the Agency An Aboriginal consultation work plan is developed and implemented for 100% of projects where the Agency is the Crown consultation coordinator Met all
  • Aboriginal interests are documented and presented to support the decision-making process for all major resource projects where the Agency is the EA manager.
  • Decisions under the Act for two major resource projects (Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine and the Naikun Wind Farm) were made, and documentation of the results of Aboriginal consultation informed those decisions.
The Agency facilitates meaningful public participation in federal EAs by providing funding to support certain activities Percentage of funding recipients that agree that the funding provided by the Agency improved their ability to participate meaningfully in the EA process 75% of funding recipients agree that the funding provided by the Agency improved their ability to participate meaningfully in the EA process Exceeded
  • The Agency sent 23 satisfaction surveys seeking information on funding recipients' satisfaction regarding the Participant Funding Program process. The completed surveys indicated an average satisfaction level of 90%, suggesting that the funding enhanced the recipient's ability to participate, in a meaningful way, in the EA.
The Agency provides high-quality EA training courses that are effective in providing practical skills and knowledge Percentage of course participants who agree that the training given by the Agency was effective in providing practical skills and knowledge 85% of course participants agree that the training given by the Agency was effective in providing practical skills and knowledge Met all
  • The Agency offered 31 training sessions during the reporting period. Of the participants providing feedback, 89% indicated a high overall satisfaction with the course; 82% of respondents rated their satisfaction with the effectiveness of the course in providing practical skills and knowledge between very good (4) and outstanding (6) on a six-point scale. In addition, 97% of the respondents considered their needs met by the training.

Performance Summary and Analysis of Program Activity

The Environmental Assessment Support Program Activity focuses on delivering the Agency's responsibilities under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and related policy direction. It aligns most closely with the Agency's strategic priorities to play an active leadership role in federal environmental assessment and to build the capacity and organization to deliver on existing and new responsibilities.

During 2010–2011, these priorities took on new dimensions as amendments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act came into force on July 12, 2010. On this date, the Agency became responsible for the conduct of most comprehensive study EAs from the time a project becomes known until the Agency delivers a report to the Minister of the Environment.

The Agency played an active leadership role in federal environmental assessments by:

  • conducting comprehensive studies;
  • managing multi-jurisdictional screenings of major resource projects;
  • managing review panels or co-managing joint review panels;
  • integrating Aboriginal consultation into the environmental assessment process for review panels and those comprehensive studies and major resource projects it leads; and
  • coordinating federal participation in multi-jurisdictional screenings of non-major resource projects.

The Agency enhanced internal capacity through guidance and training development, and updating and implementing organizational changes to support regional operations with a particular emphasis on supporting its new comprehensive study responsibilities and its increasing Aboriginal consultation role.

Managing and Coordinating Environmental Assessments

Delivery of high-quality EAs requires effective and efficient management of the process, including coordination within the federal government and with provincial/territorial and Aboriginal governance partners. The Agency worked with federal authorities and other jurisdictions to develop work plans to avoid duplication and to coordinate EA activities, including environmental impact statement guidelines, public participation, and Aboriginal consultation.

On July 12, 2010, the Agency assumed responsibility for the conduct of 22 ongoing comprehensive studies. Since that time, one of those projects has been referred to a review panel (Marathon—Ontario) and three have been terminated as they no longer have triggers (Direct Shipping Ore—Newfoundland and Labrador, Bevan Groundwater—British Columbia, and Lac-au-Saumon Groundwater—Quebec). As of March 31, 2011, of the 18 comprehensive studies that remain, seven are inactive, pending information from the proponent on the future of the project.

Between July 12, 2010, and March 31, 2011, the Agency began six comprehensive studies:

  • three mines in British Columbia: Schaft Creek, Kitsault, and Central South;
  • two all-weather roads in Saskatchewan: highways 905 and 914; and
  • one mine in New Brunswick: Elmtree.

In addition, the Agency continued to play a lead role in the completion of four comprehensive studies that were not affected by the July 2010 amendments and to support the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission as required on five comprehensive studies it is conducting.

During the reporting period, the Agency undertook a coordination role in the EA of 207 projects. These included 41 new projects (13 comprehensive studies, 3 review panels, and 25 screenings), and ongoing assessments that carried over from the previous year. Two comprehensive studies and one review panel were completed or terminated.

The Agency provided support to 12 projects subject to environmental assessment by a review panel. This support ranged from review panel public hearings, such as the Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine (for which the government announced a decision in November 2010) and the Joslyn North Mine, to providing advice to the Minister of the Environment on referring the Marathon Platinum Group Metals and Copper Mine and the Pierre River Mine and Jackpine Mine Expansion projects to review by panel. To deliver a high-quality EA in an efficient manner, 10 of these review panels are or will be conducted jointly with another jurisdiction or regulatory body. For example, joint review panels are being undertaken with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, the National Energy Board, and the governments of Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador. In addition, the Environmental Impact Review Board process managed under the Inuvialuit land claim agreement was substituted for the federal review panel process for the proposed Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway project in the Northwest Territories.

Aboriginal Consultation

The 2007 Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Resource Projects and its memorandum of understanding gave the Agency responsibility to integrate, to the greatest extent possible, Aboriginal–Crown consultation into the environmental assessments of the major resource projects it leads. With the amendments to the Act in July 2010, the Agency, on a policy basis, also assumed that role for all comprehensive studies it conducts. As Crown consultation coordinator, the Agency initiated early engagement with Aboriginal groups, developed consultation plans, coordinated consultation activities, and summarized the outcomes of consultation for decision makers.

The Agency, through the Aboriginal Funding Envelope (AFE) of the Participant Funding Program, provided $1.9 million to 67 recipients to support Aboriginal consultation and participation in the environmental assessments of 13 projects.

Canada, British Columbia, and the Nisga'a Lisims Government are working together to implement the environmental assessment chapter of the Nisga'a Final Agreement in the context of several major resource projects. As part of this work, the parties are collaborating in the development of a socio-economic and cultural well-being assessment for the Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell and Kitsault Mining projects, with the goals of fulfilling treaty commitments and supporting the long-term economic development of northwest British Columbia.

The Agency and the Government of Alberta have developed federal–provincial collaboration procedures for Aboriginal consultation associated with major projects requiring environmental assessments. To date, implementation of the two-year work plan for this initiative by the Agency's Alberta and Northwest Territories regional office and Alberta Environment has resulted in common early notification criteria and consultation plans. Encouraged by the efficiency of this approach, other federal departments, including Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, are using the procedures to inform delivery and coordination of Aboriginal consultation activities. The Agency has also created a federal regulatory consultation working group to share the experiences of Aboriginal consultation practitioners and develop common tools and methods for consultation with Aboriginal people in Alberta.

In Quebec, the Agency and the James Bay Cree First Nation developed an approach to support the participation of the Cree in the environmental assessment process under the Act. This initiative was launched following a Supreme Court of Canada decision clarifying the application of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act in the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement territory.

The Agency has worked with the Assembly of First Nations Chiefs of New Brunswick to encourage development of a new approach to consultation with First Nations. An Assembly consultation committee representing 13 of the 15 New Brunswick First Nations has been established via a resolution signed by the chiefs, and is working with the Crown as part of the Elmtree Gold Mine and Sisson Brook comprehensive studies.

Through the Atlantic Aboriginal Consultation Practitioners forum, an Agency-led working group is examining approaches to sharing information among federal and provincial departments. An Aboriginal consultation information sharing website houses guidance material, Aboriginal group contact information, and background information on Aboriginal groups in Atlantic Canada.

The Agency has worked with the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, along with potentially impacted Aboriginal groups, to develop a harmonized environmental assessment process and a joint federal–provincial consultation plan for the Lower Churchill Generation project and the Labrador–Island Transmission Link project. Collectively, the harmonized EA processes and whole-of-government approaches to consultation are intended to provide clarity, process certainty, and efficiency to both Aboriginal groups and governments.

Public Participation

The Agency sought to maximize public participation in the environmental assessment process, by emphasizing transparency and information sharing. The Agency provided nearly $300,000 in participant funding to 35 recipients, including individuals, non-profit organizations, and Aboriginal groups to take part in 15 projects. The Participant Funding Program continues to implement a client satisfaction survey to collect quantitative and qualitative information on whether the objectives of the program are being met.

The Agency maintained the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry Internet site (CEARIS), which facilitates public access to information and records about environmental assessments that are being conducted under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. During 2010–2011, nearly 5500 environmental assessments were entered into the online registry and over 100 000 users visited CEARIS. Agency staff regularly responded to public requests for information and records.

Joint review panel public hearings were completed on the Joslyn North Mine, the Darlington New Nuclear Power Plant, and the Lower Churchill Hydroelectric Generation projects. A decision was announced on the Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine. The Agency and the National Energy Board conducted information sessions on the Northern Gateway Pipeline project.

Opportunities to provide comments on the project and the comprehensive study, or to participate in the comprehensive study, were provided for each of the 18 active comprehensive studies conducted by the Agency.

Working with Partners and Stakeholders

The Agency worked with other jurisdictions and stakeholders to harmonize EA processes for a wide range of projects across Canada. The following examples show how the Agency has contributed to the streamlining of regulatory processes while ensuring federal EA requirements are met.

The British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office, further to delegation as per section 17(1) of the Act, proceeded with the EA of the Northwest Transmission Line project. Key Agency actions to support and learn from these experiences included establishing a governance approach for the delegated process, coordinating federal consultation for the Northwest Transmission Line project, and managing an initial third party evaluation of the delegation experience to date.

The Raven Underground Coal project has been the subject of a high degree of public interest since the beginning of the comprehensive study in May 2010. The Agency and the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office work closely to ensure that the cooperative EA of the project proceeds in an efficient and effective manner. This has included collaborating on joint environmental impact statement guidelines (known provincially as application information requirements) and applying an innovative approach to public consultation to address the needs of local communities while meeting the requirements of federal and provincial legislation. The environmental assessment for this project is ongoing.

The Agency and Alberta Environment are working collaboratively to develop tools that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the EA process and enhance alignment between the two jurisdictions. Tools developed to date include:

  • joint federal–provincial project disclosure guidelines that provide proponents with a single source of information when disclosing a project to regulators; and
  • joint federal–provincial public notices that meet the provincial proposed terms of reference notice requirements and provide the first public participation opportunity under the federal comprehensive study process. Alignment at this stage prevents process duplication and reduces stakeholder consultation fatigue.

In the Agency's Prairie Region, there has been a continuation of cooperation in environmental assessment matters that was initiated during the 1990s, renewed in 2000, and again in 2005. With the Agency's expanded role in federal environmental assessment, new cooperative initiatives involving Aboriginal consultation relating to the regulatory reviews of large resource development projects are being tested.

An example of the emerging approaches is the cooperative consultation exercise for the Star Orion South Diamond Project in central Saskatchewan. Lessons learned over the years of cooperation with provincial partners are being applied to consultation. As is the case in the context of a cooperative environmental assessment, the necessary consultation with several affected First Nations and the Métis is being led by the officials in Saskatchewan's Aboriginal Affairs Branch with the support and participation of the appropriate federal authorities.

In Ontario, the Agency has worked with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment toward the establishment of a joint review panel for the Marathon Platinum Group Metals and Copper Mine project. This would be the first joint review panel established under the Act between the federal government and Ontario.

The Atlantic regional office coordinated federal and Prince Edward Island authorities involved in the EA for the Charlottetown Convention Centre project. This included Aboriginal and public consultation and the development of terms of reference, draft and final EA reports, an environmental protection plan, and a habitat compensation plan. The EA began in November 2010, and provincial and federal decisions were posted in March 2011.

Training and Guidance

The Agency focused on enhancing its capacity to deliver its new responsibility for conducting comprehensive studies and to further integrate Aboriginal consultation into the EA process. The Agency also delivered training and advice on environmental assessments to the federal community and other interested parties through courses, such as Orientation to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and Screenings under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. During the reporting period, 31 training sessions were offered to 562 participants.

The Agency developed an Aboriginal consultation practitioner guide and updated its training package on Aboriginal consultation for delivery to the federal community. This training was coordinated with Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada and Department of Justice courses on the Government of Canada's Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation: Interim Guidelines for Federal Officials to Fulfill the Legal Duty to Consult (2008). The Agency's early experience with integrating Aboriginal consultation in EA also identified the need for more detailed advice and guidance leading, for example, to a set of internal guidelines on the breadth and depth of consultation.

The Agency also provided instruments and services to its staff to support the conduct of comprehensive studies and the delivery of high-quality EAs. Introductory training on the amendments to the Act was provided to Agency employees in the summer of 2010, and the Process Guide on Comprehensive Studies was revised to provide employees with a practitioner's guide.

An intranet site was developed to provide Agency staff with visual, user-friendly access to a range of materials to support their day-to-day work, build capacity, and contribute to the efficient and effective delivery of the Agency's responsibilities. It will house knowledge-based reports, guidance instruments that support the delivery of Aboriginal consultation and high-quality EAs, and specialized training material.

Program Activity: Internal Services

Program Activity Description

Internal Services groups related activities and resources to support the needs of programs and other corporate obligations of the Agency. This includes Management and Oversight Services; Communications Services; Legal Services; Human Resources Management Services; Financial Management Services; Information Management Services; Information Technology Services; the Access to Information and Privacy Office; Real Property Services; Material Management Services; Acquisition Services; and Travel and Other Administrative Services. Internal Services includes activities and resources that apply across an organization, not those provided specifically to a program.


2010–2011 Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual Spending
7,700 10,058 10,006


2010–2011 Human Resources (FTEs)
Planned Actual Difference
61 59 -2

Performance Summary and Analysis of Program Activity

Internal Services supports the operating programs and activities of the Agency and includes many administrative activities performed outside program areas that are not otherwise allocated as program support.

The Agency's Internal Services supports core program activities by providing modern, timely, and responsive services that are effective and efficient.

Key Highlights

Communications Services

Communications Division provides advice and support to the Agency and the Minister of the Environment on external announcements and issues, corporate communications, and language services in support of the Agency's mandate.

During 2010–2011, the Division provided communications advice and support on numerous policy initiatives. In addition, significant effort was directed in designing and delivering public information in support of the Agency's enhanced public consultation mandate for comprehensive studies. Communications advisors also assisted panel managers in the delivery of information sessions and public hearings, including on-site attendance and media relations services for review panels.

Human Resources Management Services

The Human Resources (HR) Division ensures that the necessary strategies, programs, practices, and tools are in place to attract and retain the employees required to deliver the Agency's strategic priorities.

In 2010–2011, the Agency implemented the Integrated HR Plan (IHRP) that establishes objectives and strategies for the 2010–2013 period. Further to the review of its strategic priorities, the Agency reconfirmed its three HR management objectives.

Strategies were implemented to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of staffing and creating new positions. For example, the Agency led three collective staffing processes to establish a pool of qualified candidates for positions that have historically created a heavy staffing workload. In addition, the Agency implemented revised generic work descriptions for all AS-01 administrative officer positions across the organization.

As the Agency's responsibilities have increased, the importance of employees not only providing honest and impartial advice but also being seen doing so, has increased. Mandatory half-day sessions on values and ethics were delivered to Agency staff with the initial focus on the Operations Sector, where employees are on the leading edge of interactions with proponents, the public, and other parties with strong interests in the outcome of the environmental assessment process.

Information Management and Information Technology Services

During 2010–2011, the Agency focused on deploying the Government of Canada standards-based Electronic Document and Records Management System. The solution is referenced internally to the Agency as InfoZONE, based on the OpenText Content Server (Livelink 9.7.1) solution.

This system will be the Agency's sole repository for Agency information. The migration of shared drives, email systems, regional electronic storage systems, and physical records management started in February 2010. At fiscal year end, the project was estimated as being 75% complete. It is projected to be completed by March 2012.

The InfoZONE Team (employees from the Information Management and Information Technology units) is responsible for the Agency's migration to InfoZONE. The Team assists each work unit in the creation of its own file structure, organizes the migration to InfoZONE, and provides training about information management and using InfoZONE.

In 2010–2011, the Agency's Access to Information and Privacy Office continued improving its response times. The Agency's renewed procedures and ongoing training were key factors in this success.

Other Administrative Services

The Agency developed a plan to implement new Treasury Board policies, including internal control, transfer payments, investment planning, and financial management governance, to improve its internal control framework. This includes continued capacity building on financial, material, and risk management to strengthen financial management stewardship, oversight, transparency, and accountability.

As an integral part of the plan, the Agency reviewed and instituted specific internal service improvements to enhance delivery to program managers. In an effort to reduce a multiplicity of rules, corporate policy instruments were reviewed, simplified, and consolidated where feasible and—where required—new policy instruments were introduced throughout the year.

Also, the procurement planning and contract review functions were strengthened in 2010. An oversight committee was established to ensure that procurement aligns with the plans, investments, and priorities of the Agency. The oversight committee reviews and monitors ongoing contracting activities and approves strategies when there is a degree of risk associated with Treasury Board regulations, policies, and legislation.

During the year, the Agency completed its corporate risk profile 2010–2013, an integral part of the annual strategic planning exercise. An Agency risk action plan was also developed to ensure appropriate response strategies are in place for the risks identified.

Benefits for Canadians

Internal Services contributes to the efficient and effective delivery of Agency programs by providing support services, expertise, and advice to enable informed decision making.



Section III: Supplementary Information

In this section:

 

Financial Highlights


Condensed Statement of Financial Position
As at March 31, 2011 ($)
  % Change 2010–2011 2009–2010
Total assets 50 4,273,137 2,843,427
Total liabilities -16 5,919,154 7,107,781
Equity of Canada 61 (1,646,017) (4,264,354)
  50 4,273,137 2,843,427

Note: 2009–2010 amounts were restated in adherence with the TBAS 1.2 requirement for departments and agencies to record amounts due from the Consolidated Revenue Fund effective fiscal year 2010–2011.


Condensed Statement of Operations
For the year ended March 31, 2011 ($)
  % Change 2010–2011 2009–2010
Total expenses 2.6 36,808,042 37,810,127
Total revenues -28.0 3,377,821 4,710,677
Net cost of operations 0.9 33,430,221 33,099,450

 

Financial Statements

Detailed financial statements can be found on the Agency's website.

 

List of Supplementary Information Tables

All electronic supplementary information tables found in the 2010–2011 Departmental Performance Report can be found on the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's website.

  • Green Procurement
  • Internal Audits and Evaluations
  • Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits
  • Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue
  • User Fees Reporting

 

Section IV: Other Items of Interest

In this section:

 

Organizational Contact Information

Director of Communications

Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor

Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3

Tel: 613-957-0712

Fax: 613-957-0946

E-mail: info@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency's Website

www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca

Treasury Board Secretariat's Website

www.tbs-sct.gc.ca

 

Additional Information

Statistical Summaries of Environmental Assessments

The table below provides a statistical summary of environmental assessments conducted under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. It outlines the total number of projects that underwent an environmental assessment (EA) during the 2010–2011 reporting period.

Fiscal Year 2010–2011 EA Decisions Taken This Fiscal Year
EA Type Ongoing on April 1, 2010 Initiated this fiscal year Not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects Likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects Terminated
Screening 2906 2944 2526 0 298
Class Screening N/A N/A 232 N/A N/A
Comprehensive Study 26 13 1 0 3
Review Panel 9 3 1 1 0
Panel Substitution 0 1 0 0 0

Note: Of the 39 comprehensive studies that were active during 2010–2011, 26 were ongoing as of April 1, 2010 and 13 were initiated during the year. Following passage of the amendments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) under the Jobs and Economic Growth Act, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) assumed responsibility for completion of 22 comprehensive studies; one of which was subsequently terminated during this reporting period. Twelve ongoing comprehensive studies remained within the management of the responsible authorities, including one for which an EA decision was reached. Of the 13 comprehensive studies that were initiated during the year, seven were initiated by responsible authorities or were initiated as screening level assessments and were re-designated as comprehensive studies. Two of these comprehensive studies were subsequently terminated. The Agency, in exercising the powers and performing the duties of a responsible authority, in accordance with the amendments to the Act, initiated six comprehensive studies during this reporting period.

In addition, within the 2010–2011 reporting period, a total of 2245 screenings were completed by the Business Development Bank of Canada and Farm Credit Canada. Since June 11, 2006, these Crown corporations are required to conduct environmental assessments of their projects subject to the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, but with a modified process with respect to reporting on the Registry Internet site.

For further information about environmental assessments undertaken under the Act, consult the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency's website.