Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Status of Women Canada - Supplementary Tables


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

 
User Fees and Regulatory Charges
 

 
1. User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of requests filed under the Access to Information Act

2. Fee Type: Other products and services

3. Fee-setting Authority: ATIA

4. Date Last Modified: 1992

5. Performance Standards:

Response is to be provided within 30 days following receipt of a request. The response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA Notice of extension is to be provided within 30 days after receipt of the request.

6. Performance Results:

  • Of the 57 ATIP requests received in 2010–2011 and carried over from 2009–2010, 84.2 per cent were completed during the reporting year.
  • The agency was able to respond in 30 days in 21.05 per cent of the completed cases. Responding time for the remaining cases was:
    • 26.32 per cent within 31–60 days
    • 21.05 per cent within 61–120 days
    • 15.79 per cent within 121 days or more
7. 2010–2011 ($ thousands) 7. Planning Years ($ thousands)
8.
Forecast
Revenue
9.
Actual
Revenue
10.
Full
Cost
Fiscal
Year
11.
Forecast
Revenue
12.
Estimated
Full Cost
0 225.00 285,458 2011–2012 250.00 190,000
2012–2013 300.00 190,000
2013–2014 300.00 195,000

 
Other Information:

SWC collects user fees for information requests in accordance with the ATIA. The total user fees collected in 2010–2011 represent application fees only. For that period, SWC did not collect preparation, search or reproduction fees. In 2010–2011, SWC purchased two perpetual licences of Privasoft Access ProSuite.

Note: According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:

  • the performance standard, if provided, would not have received parliamentary review; and
  • the performance standard, if provided, may not respect all established requirements under the UFA (e.g., international comparison or independent complaint address); and
  • the performance result, if provided, is not legally subject to section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.