This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
---|
The HRSDC portfolio tabled three Government Responses to parliamentary committee reports between March 2010 and March 2011.
|
Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development) |
Auditor General’s 2010 Spring Report – Chapter 1 Aging Information Technology Systems Objective: Overall, the audit found that while the Department has taken some steps to manage the risks related to their aging IT systems, much work remains to be done. Four of the chapter’s five recommendations were jointly directed at the Department and other selected audited entities. The Department accepted the chapter’s recommendations and full implementation of the associated actions is expected by March 2012. The Department’s response can be found at: Auditor General’s 2010 Spring Report – Chapter 2 Objective:
HRSDC, as well as 5 other entities, were selected for examination as part of the audit work based on the size of the organization, staffing volumes, and audit coverage. Neither of the chapter’s two recommendations were directed at the Department. The audit report can be found at: Auditor General’s 2010 Spring Report – Chapter 4 Objective:
Overall, the audit found that HRSDC programs support skills training for Aboriginal peoples in the NWT and monitor short term objectives and targets. However, the Department has yet to assess the longer-term impact of its skills training programs on sustainable employment of Aboriginal peoples in the NWT. It further noted that while progress has been made, key measures remain to be adequately implemented, including the establishment of an environmental regulatory system throughout the NWT and economic development programs that address the Territory's unique needs. One of the chapter's eight recommendations was directed at HRSDC. The Department accepted the chapter’s recommendation and full implementation of the associated actions is expected by December 2014. The Department’s response can be found at: Auditor General’s 2010 Fall Report – Chapter 1 Objective: While none of the chapter’s three recommendations were directed at HRSDC, the Department was indirectly impacted by two of them: Projects funded met eligibility requirements based on information in applications; and Departmental internal auditors provided advice and assurance. Details of these indirect impacts are referenced in the audit report (Paragraph 1.32 – 1.37 and 1.54 – 1.59 respectively). The audit report can be found at: Auditor General’s 2010 Fall Report – Chapter 2 Objective: Overall, the audit found that all three entities had effective control procedures and had applied them as required for the management acquisition cards, contracting, executive travel and hospitality. It further noted that although the entities had sound human resource management practices in the areas examined, documentation for performance agreements and appraisals could be improved. The chapter’s single recommendation is jointly directed at all three entities and was accepted. The Department accepted the chapter’s recommendation and immediatley implemented the associated action (August 2010). The Department’s response can be found at: Auditor General’s 2010 Fall Report – Chapter 3 Objective: Overall, the audit concluded that HRSDC has developed service standards that are clearly communicated to its clients and employees, regularly monitors and reports its performance against these standards, and has acted to resolve service-related issues identified as a result of regular monitoring. More importantly, the chapter recognizes that the Department has taken action in several areas to improve its services and includes as an example, the action taken by the Department to improve service for Employment Insurance. The chapter’s single recommendation is not directed at HRSDC. The audit report can be found at: Auditor General’s 2010 Fall Report – Chapter 4 Objective: Overall, the audit found that while TBS plays an important role related to conflict of interest, it has not provided sustained support to departments. Two areas that have suffered are guidance and training. The audit also noted that audited departments had the required mechanisms and assistance in place for managing conflict of interest; designated officials knowledgeable about their responsibilities; and processes in place to deal with conflict of interest declarations. However, departments need to follow up on required action and ensure declarations are dealt with in a timely manner. Finally, the audit found that while departments have begun to appreciate the need to examine their entire organizations to identify risks of conflict of interest, none had done so. Four of the chapter’s six recommendations were jointly directed at HRSDC. The Department accepted the chapter’s recommendations and full implementation of the associated actions is expected by March 2012. The Department’s response can be found at: |
External Audits: (Note: These refer to other external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages) |
Privacy Commissioner of Canada Objective: HRSDC was selected for this audit based on the extent it used wireless technologies to transmit and store personal information, the number of wireless access points to its wireless network(s), and the number of employees issued portable wireless devices. Overall, the audit identified weaknesses in HRSDC’s security measures for temporary storage of devices waiting to be destroyed. Five of the chapter’s nine recommendations are jointly directed at HRSDC, and one is directed solely at the Department. The Department accepted the chapter’s recommendations and full implementation of the associated actions is expected by the end of August 2011. The Department’s response can be found at: Office of the Procurement Ombudsman Objective: One of the review’s two recommendations was jointly directed at HRSDC. The Department accepted the chapter’s recommendation and implemented the associated actions in winter 2011. A copy of the review can be found at: Canadian Human Rights Commission Objective: Overall, the report recommended that the Department increase self-identification response rates and bridge all the gaps in all occupational categories within three years. HRSDC is committed to creating an inclusive workplace that reflects Canada’s diversity and plans to erase all the gaps by increasing the self-identification response rate, by implementing a new employment equity plan for the period 2010-2012, and by having a closer monitoring process on the progress of representation of designated group members. A copy of the audit report is not publicly available at the time of preparing this report. Office of Commissioner of Official Languages Objective: The Report underlined SC’s considerable efforts to ensure the active offer of bilingual services was efficiently implemented, which has led to tangible results. It also emphasized the leadership and commitment shown by SC’s senior management and in particular by the ADM for Citizen Service Branch. It was noted that bilingual capacity in certain regions is sometimes lacking, particularly with regard to the number of designated bilingual positions and the language profile required for citizen service agents and team leaders, and that better governance is needed in this regard. Seven recommendations pertaining to the requirement to improve service delivery in both official languages at designated service points were directed at Service Canada. The Department accepted the chapter’s recommendations and full implementation of the associated actions is expected by March 2013. The Department’s response can be found at: |