This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
I am pleased to present the 2009-2010 Departmental Performance Report of the Public Service Commission (PSC) of Canada.
The PSC is an independent agency reporting to Parliament, mandated to safeguard the integrity of public service staffing and the political neutrality of the public service. We also recruit qualified Canadians from across the country. Under the delegated, values-based staffing system envisioned in the Public Service Employment Act, the PSC fulfills its mandate by providing clear policy direction, conducting effective oversight, delivering innovative staffing and assessment services and reporting to Parliament on the performance of the staffing systems.
After four and a half years of continuous effort by the PSC, by heads of departments and agencies and by managers and human resources specialists, a well-functioning and fully delegated system is in place. Formal delegation agreements are signed by deputy heads, and I personally review these agreements. We receive and analyze accountability reports and the results of our analysis are provided to deputy heads and presented in our Annual Reports to Parliament.
Our first priority, as set out in our Report on Plans and Priorities, was to continue to put in place a well-functioning delegated staffing model. Overall, we concluded that, for 2009-2010, the majority of departments and agencies have implemented the necessary infrastructure to manage their delegated staffing authorities.
Our second priority was to provide independent oversight and assurance to Parliament on the integrity of the staffing system and the non-partisanship of the federal public service. Work continues on improving our audit and monitoring activities in line with the recommendations of the Independent Oversight Review Committee. We enhanced the risk-based approach to our monitoring of the staffing system without increasing the reporting burden.
Our third priority was to enable organizations to manage their delegated responsibilities. Under the delegated system, the PSC maintains the authorities and accountabilities but also the obligation to resolve problems and support the efficient and effective operation of the staffing system. We have continued to provide guidance and support for organizations through our renewed policies, tools, systems and services.
We continued to move forward with our fourth priority, to provide integrated and modernized staffing and assessment services, by investing in modernizing those services and offering our expertise and efficiencies to departments and agencies. We also reached an agreement with departments and agencies on a permanent solution for the funding of the Public Service Staffing Modernization Project.
With respect to our fifth priority, to build on the model organization, we made further progress by starting to implement our Talent Management initiative and responding to the results of two on-line employee surveys.
During this period, we also continued to live within budget restraints resulting from the government’s 2009 horizontal strategic review of human resources management, through attrition and efficiencies. Our achievements across the organization are a testament to the strong dedication of our employees and their continuing commitment to excellence. Through their efforts, the PSC is able to perform its important work, on behalf of Parliament, to ensure that Canadians will continue to benefit from a professional, merit-based and non-partisan public service.
Maria Barrados, PhD
President
September 2, 2010
The Public Service Commission (PSC) is dedicated to building a public service that strives for excellence. We protect merit, non-partisanship and the use of both official languages while ensuring respect for the values of access, fairness, transparency and representativeness.
We recruit talented Canadians from across the country to the public service. We continually renew our recruitment services to meet the needs of a modern and innovative public service.
On behalf of Parliament, the PSC safeguards the integrity of staffing and the non-partisan nature of the public service. In this respect, the PSC works closely with government and is accountable to Parliament yet is independent from ministerial direction.
The PSC’s mandate is threefold:
First, to appoint, or provide for the appointment of, persons to and from within the public service. This has been delegated to departments and agencies. The PSC provides staffing and assessment functions and services to support staffing in the public service.
Second, to oversee the integrity of the staffing system and ensure non-partisanship. This oversight role includes maintaining and interpreting data on the public service, carrying out audits that provide assurance and making recommendations for improvements and conducting investigations that can lead to corrective action in the case of errors or problems.
Third, to administer the provisions of the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA) related to the political activities of employees and deputy heads.
The PSC’s Program Activity Architecture consists of one strategic outcome and four program activities.
Strategic Outcome
To provide Canadians with a highly competent, non-partisan and representative public service, able to provide service in both official languages, in which appointments are based on the values of access, fairness, transparency and representativeness
Program Activities |
Program Sub-Activities |
---|---|
1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality |
1.1.1 Policy, Regulation, and Exclusion Approval Orders and Guides |
1.2.0 Oversight of Integrity of Staffing and Political Neutrality |
1.2.1 Monitoring |
1.3.0 Staffing Services and Assessment |
|
2.1.0 Internal Services |
Information by sub-activity can be found in the publications section of the PSC’s Web site at www.psc-cfp.gc.ca.
Planned Spending | Total Authorities* | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
95,120 | 112,918 | 106,768 |
*The increase in the Total Authorities from Planned Spending of $17,798 thousand is mainly attributable to funding received for the Public Service Staffing Modernization Project (PSSMP) and the operating budget carrying forward from the previous year, as well as from pay and compensation adjustments
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
989 | 995 | (6) |
In 2009-2010, PSC expenditures were $106,768 thousand against total authorities of $112,918 thousand, resulting in a planned under-expenditure of $6,150 thousand appearing in the Public Accounts of Canada. The under-expenditure is due mainly to a frozen allotment of $2,733 thousand resulting from the Human Resources Horizontal Review reductions, which the PSC was not allowed to spend. The balance of the under-expenditure of $3,417 thousand is part of the carry-forward to 2010-2011.
The following is a summary of expected results and financial resources associated with each program activity that contributes to the achievement of the PSC’s strategic outcome. The performance status of each expected result is indicated below. On the whole, the PSC achieved the results it planned in 2009-2010.
Strategic Outcome: To provide Canadians with a highly competent, non-partisan and representative public service, able to provide service in both official languages, in which appointments are based on the values of access, fairness, transparency, and representativeness. | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes: Government Affairs - Safeguarding and fostering the integrity and political neutrality of public servants |
Program Activity Information by program activity is outlined in Section II. |
2008-2009 Actual Spending ($ thousands) |
2009-2010 ($ thousands) | Expected Result | Performance Status** | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities* |
Actual Spending |
||||
1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality | 17,047 | 9,948 | 10,672 | 12,304 | 11,671 | Recruitment strategies, staffing practices and political activities consistent with the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA)and PSC strategic outcome, are implemented across the public service | Mostly met |
1.2.0 Oversight of Integrity of Staffing and Political Neutrality | 33,071 | 21,679 | 21,706 | 22,066 | 21,240 |
1. Organizations have implemented PSC monitoring and audit recommendations and corrective actions as a result of investigations that contribute to safeguarding the integrity of staffing and political neutrality 2. Enhanced risk-based oversight of the integrity of public service staffing |
1. Mostly Met 2. Met all |
1.3.0 Staffing Services and Assessment | 56,167 | 21,623 | 30,660 | 38,389 | 35,494 | Staffing and assessment services and products meet the needs of federal departments and agencies operating within a fully delegated staffing environment under the PSEA | Somewhat met |
2.1.0 Internal Services*** | n/a | 38,517 | 32,082 | 40,159 | 38,363 | ||
Total | 106,285 | 91,767 | 95,120 | 112,918 | 106,768 | ||
Less: Non-respendable revenues | 1,471 | 1,900 | n/a | n/a | 1,672 | ||
Total PSC Spending | 104,814 | 89,867 | n/a | n/a | 105,096 | ||
Full-time Equivalents | 1,009 | n/a | 989 | n/a | 995 |
* Total Authorities represent the PSC’s internal budget allocations.
** Performance Status is based on the following grid: Exceeded (completed more than 100% of the 2009-2010 target); Met all (completed 100% of the 2009-2010 target); Mostly met (completed 80-99% of the 2009-2010 target); Somewhat met (completed 60-79% of the 2009-2010 target); and Did not meet (completed less than 60% of the 2009-2010 target).
*** Commencing in the 2009-2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities. They are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates (consequently in the 2008-2009 actual spending column). This has affected the comparability of spending and full-time equivalent information by program activity between fiscal years.
The PSC has made significant progress in achieving its strategic outcome and meeting the five priorities identified in its 2009-2010 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP).
Operational priorities
Priority I | Type |
Linkages to Program Activities |
Performance Status |
---|---|---|---|
Put in place a well-functioning delegated staffing model |
Previously committed, revised wording in RPP 2009-2010 |
1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality 1.2.0 Oversight of Integrity of Staffing and Political Neutrality |
Met All |
The PSEA and the PSC’s Appointment Framework (AF) enable departments and agencies to design their staffing processes to address their own situations and needs. Progress in 2009-2010 against RPP planning highlights includes:
|
Priority II | Type |
Linkages to Program Activities |
Performance Status |
---|---|---|---|
Provide independent oversight and assurance to Parliament on the integrity of the staffing system and the non-partisanship of the federal public service |
Previously committed |
1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality 1.2.0 Oversight of Integrity of Staffing and Political Neutrality |
Mostly Met |
The PSC oversees the integrity of the staffing system and the political impartiality of the public service. The PSC developed and continued to refine a continuum of oversight mechanisms and tools. Progress in 2009-2010 against RPP planning highlights includes:
|
Priority III | Type |
Linkages to Program Activities |
Performance Status |
---|---|---|---|
Enable organizations to manage their delegated responsibilities |
Previously committed |
1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality 1.2.0 Oversight of Integrity of Staffing and Political Neutrality |
Somewhat Met |
While organizations have made progress in implementing the PSEA, ongoing efforts continue to fully transform the practices and processes for recruitment and staffing in the public service. Progress in 2009-2010 against RPP planning highlights includes:
|
Priority IV | Type |
Linkages to Program Activities |
Performance Status |
---|---|---|---|
Provide integrated and modernized staffing and assessment services |
Previously committed |
1.3.0 Staffing Services and Assessment |
Somewhat Met |
Progress in 2009-2010 against RPP planning highlights includes:
|
Management priority
Priority V |
Type |
Linkages to Program Activities |
Performance Status |
---|---|---|---|
Build on the model organization |
Previously committed |
2.1.0 Internal Services |
Mostly Met |
Progress in 2009-2010 against RPP planning highlights includes:
|
The general economic downturn and government budgetary constraints impacted the public service and the PSC through the 2009-2010 reporting period, resulting in additional budgetary restraints and a search for further operating efficiencies.
In 2009-2010, costs recovered from billable assessment and staffing services rose to 81% ($11,300,000) of the Treasury Board’s cost recovery ceiling of $14,000,000. The demand for assessment products and services was comparable to 2008-2009 in some areas but declined in others. Test volumes for Second Language Evaluation and assessment services for executive counselling remained relatively stable. Use of occupational tests decreased for the second consecutive year. This is due to a range of factors, in particular, the transition of many occupational tests to cost recovery, the decline in public service staffing activity and the greater use of Public Service Employment Act (PSEA) flexibilities, such as asset criteria and other volume reduction strategies in place of standardized tests.
To respond to this challenge, the Personnel Psychology Center (PPC) has diversified its assessment products and services and focused on other forms of assessment developed from appropriations, such as unsupervised internet testing. Outreach to clients has also been enhanced to better inform them of the value-added of standardized testing.
The combination of a new Act, new policies, retirements of experienced HR personnel and the required training of incoming HR specialists has created a vulnerability in HR capacity in the public service.
In order to address these challenges, the PSC has undertaken measures, such as the delivery of information sessions to newly appointed HR officers from various organizations across Canada, enabling the PSC to ensure that the advice and guidance provided by new HR staff to delegated managers are consistent with PSC expectations.
Strategic consultants and Direct Access Department (DAD) managers participated in 85 committees, councils, regional networks and in various other working groups, which enabled the PSC to provide additional updates and advice concerning the delegated appointment authorities and policy interpretations.
In 2009-2010, the PSC responded to 6234 calls and e-mails from organizations concerning staffing advice, to empower them to fully exercise their delegated authorities. Overall, queries dropped by 10.5% compared to the previous year. However, the number of complex queries increased by 9%.
There remains a need for greater understanding, on the part of hiring managers and the HR community, of some of the key features and requirements of the values-based staffing regime, such as the concept of “right fit,” the use of non-advertised processes, investigations conducted by deputy heads and collective staffing.
Feedback received during consultations for the Appointment Policy Review highlighted the need for the PSC to continue to develop stronger ties with line managers and the HR community, to assist them as they undergo the cultural change required so that they can fully benefit from the flexibilities afforded by the new regime, as well as to ensure that the PSC’s policies remain current and pertinent.
The federal public service faces significant challenges with respect to demographics. Departures of “baby boomers” combined with growth in the public service generated a high level of movement measured by appointments to the public service, promotions, lateral movements and acting appointments. The nature and level of mobility in the public service reinforces the need for HR planning to address organizational requirements. Mobility has impacted certain groups more than others, notably the Personnel Administration Group, the Economics, Sociology and Statistics Group and the Executive Group. Moreover, the increased staffing activity coupled with the ongoing implementation of the PSEA affects the workload of those in the HR community.
Departures, however, provide an opportunity to renew the public service. A corporate approach, such as the Post-Secondary Recruitment (PSR) campaign, is one way in which the public service can compete more effectively for the smaller cohort of new workers as well as develop targeted approaches to recruiting candidates who are representative of Canada’s diverse population.
The recommendations of the Independent Review Committee1 were accepted as was the goal of auditing departments and agencies on a cyclical basis of five to seven years. The PSC has commenced the implementation of the 18-point action plan,2 and is currently building its capacity to meet the Independent Review Committee’s recommendations. Refinement in methodologies and increased communication with organizations about expectations will also allow for increased efficiency and understanding in the audit process.
The PSSMP has delivered a national e-recruitment system – the PSRS – used for external government hiring since the PSEA was introduced in 2005. Funding for the project will cease in March 2011.
The PSC has therefore implemented a business plan for the PSSMP to secure support in the form of cost-sharing from departments and agencies subject to the PSEA, in order to sustain operations and facilitate system enhancements. At a February 2010 meeting, deputy minister members of the Public Service Management Advisory Committee endorsed the PSC's proposed funding approach to cover the annual costs of the PSRS.
The PSC’s Corporate Risk Profile and mitigation strategies are located in the publications section of the PSC Web site at www.psc-cfp.gc.ca.
As part of Canada's Economic Action Plan, the PSC has received funding to enhance federal public service student employment in the amount of $70K (horizontal item as part of Budget 2009). The PSC spent the full amount in 2009-2010 and is planning to spend the same amount in 2010-2011.
The PSC’s spending trend from 2007-2008 through 2009-2010 is illustrated in Figure 1. Total spending consists of the net spending (appropriated) amount plus net voting revenues. The PSC has Treasury Board approval to use cost recovery for assessment services of up to $14 million.
Figure 1: Total Spending-Actuals by Fiscal Year
*Net voting revenues adjusted to include the refund of the previous year’s revenue ($126K). The difference in totals is due to rounding.
Vote or Statutory Item | Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording | 2007-08 Actual Spending |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Main Estimates |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
95 | Program Expenditures | 90,692 | 93,601 | 79,815 | 92,810 |
(S) | Contributions to Employee Benefit Plans | 12,189 | 12,680 | 11,952 | 13,957 |
(S) | Spending of Proceeds from the Disposal of Surplus Crown Assets | - | 4 | - | 1 |
Total Voted and Statutory Items | 102,881 | 106,285 | 91,767* | 106,768 |
*Total authorities were $112.9 million. For detailed information, see the Performance summary table.