This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Program Activity |
Actual 2007-08 |
Actual 2008-09 |
2009-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Revenue |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |||
Program Activity 2 : |
||||||
Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO) |
3.5 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.8 |
Program Activity 3 : |
||||||
Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) |
1.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
Program Activity 4 : |
||||||
International Expositions |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
Total Respendable Revenue | 5.3 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Program Activity |
Actual 2007-08 |
Actual 2008-09 |
2009-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Revenue |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |||
Non-Respendable Revenue |
||||||
Federal-Provincial Lottery Agreement |
63.8 | 65.2 | N/A | 63.9 | N/A | 64.9 |
Total Non-Respendable Revenue |
63.8 | 65.2 | 0 | 63.9 | 0.0 | 64.9 |
Total Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue |
69.1 | 69.6 | 4.0 | 67.9 | 4.5 | 69.0 |
User Fee: Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days of receipt of request. Response time may be extended pursuant to s. 9 of the Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request.
Performance Results: See Note 1
2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$3,500 | $4,000 | $750 000 (See Note 2) |
2010-11 | (See Note 3) | $1,096 |
2011-12 | (See Note 3) | (See Note 4) | |||
2012-13 | (See Note 3) | (See Note 4) |
Other Information:
Note 1: Taking into account external factors, 59 per cent of requests were completed within the prescribed time frame.
Note 2: This figure consists of salary and O&M costs in relation to the administration of the Access to Information Act.
Note 3. This figure cannot be provided as revenue is based on information requests received under the Access to Information Act.
Note 4: Budget information not provided in advance. Cannot provide figures for 2011-2012 and 2012-2013.
User Fee: External Fees
Fee Type: Certification Fees
Fee-setting Authority: Departmental Act
Date Last Modified: February 26, 2004
Performance Standards: Issuance of certificates within 10 weeks from receipt of a complete application
Performance Results: 8 per cent
2009–2010 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$3,300,000 | $3,798,617 | $3,193,500 | 2010-2011 | $3,800,000 | $3,200,000 |
2011-2012 | $3,800,000 | $3,350,000 | |||
2012-2013 | $3,800,000 | $3,500,000 |
* Please note that according to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004 the:
2009-10 | Planning Years | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Sub-Total (Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act |
$3,500 | $4,000 | $750,000 (See Note 2) |
2010-11 | (See Note 3) | $1,096,000 |
2011-12 | (See Note 3) | (See Note 4) | ||||
2012-13 | (See Note 3) | (See Note 4) | ||||
Sub-Total (External Fees) | $3,300,000 | $3,798,617 | $3,193,500 | 2010-11 | $3,800,000 | $3,200,000 |
2011-12 | $3,800,000 | $3,350,000 | ||||
2012-13 | $3,800,000 | $3,350,000 | ||||
Total | 2010-11 | N/A | $4,296,000 | |||
2011-12 | N/A | N/A | ||||
2012-13 | N/A | N/A |
Note 1: Taking into account external factors, 59 per cent of requests were completed within the prescribed time frame.
Note 2: This figure consists of salary and O&M costs in relation to the administration of the Access to Information Act.
Note 3: This figure cannot be provided as revenue is based on information requests received under the Access to Information Act.
Note 4: Budget information not provided in advance. We cannot provide figures for 2011-2012 and 2012-2013.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | Response provided within 30 days of receipt of request. Response time may be extended pursuant to s. 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. | 59 per cent of requests were completed on time. | This service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and its regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information:
Website on Access to Information: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/a-1/8.html
Website on Access to Information Regulations: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/SOR-83-507/page-1.html
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Certification Fees | The current service standard of the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO) is the issuance of certificates within 10 weeks from receipt of a complete application. | CAVCO was unable to meet its goal service standard due to a period of unusually high staff turnover because of departures for maternity leave (3), medical leave (3), and a deployment (1). The time required to transition in-process files and to fully train replacement analysts led to an unusually large backlog. However, once analysts were up to speed, CAVCO met its service standard 65 per cent of the time. In 2010-2011, CAVCO management will strive to ensure a more stable human resources base. There will also be an opportunity to adjust CAVCO's service standard in line with clients' uptake of the new online application system. | In 2011-2012, CAVCO will survey its clients to measure their satisfaction following the implementation of the CAVCO online application system. |
A. External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Result | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Special publications and products Special publications and products prices are determined by comparing market prices and prices of other CCI publications, and by considering the size, content, and printing and translating costs for the product. |
CCI responds to general questions or requests about publications within 2 working days if requests are telephoned or e-mailed to Publications Sales or to Client Services; or sent through E-Services on CCI website. CCI processes publications and special products orders within a week of receiving payment. Packaging materials and procedures ensure that less than 2 per cent of its material arrives defective. |
100 per cent of requests were processed according to service standards. | N/A |
Learning opportunities-workshops CCI offers 14 Regional workshops costing $500 each. Clients are eligible for one regional workshop per fiscal year. Additional workshops are available at $500 each plus all expenses (transportation, accommodation, daily allowance, travel time, materials, transportation, and equipment rental). |
CCI responds to general questions or requests about training within 2 working days if requests are telephoned or e-mailed to Learning Opportunities or Client Services; or sent through E-Services on CCI website. For regional workshops, clients are notified of acceptance or rejection within 8 weeks of the December 1 application deadline. CCI responds to new requests within 3 weeks. Clients are notified of acceptance or rejection within 8 weeks and informed of whatever terms, conditions, and fees apply. CCI maintains an overall client satisfaction rate of 100 per cent, based on 11 quality parameters. (Note B1). Target of participants who reported improvement in knowledge, skills and practices is at least 90 per cent. |
100 per cent of participants reported improved knowledge, skills and practices. | N/A |
Library services Photocopies, books and audio-visual material loans: no fees for Canadian clients and libraries. Small fees for foreign clients: Photocopies : US$10 for up to 20 pages (including shipping and handling); US$.20 for each additional page; Loans: US$10 per book (including shipping and handling). Replacement costs for loss or damage: cost of the item plus a $50 processing fee. |
CCI responds to general questions or requests about library services within 2 working days if requests are telephoned or e-mailed to Library Services or Client Services; or sent through E-Services on the CCI website. CCI processes requests for photocopies, books or facsimile transmissions within 1 week of receiving the request. |
100 per cent of requests are processed within 1 week. | N/A |
B. Other information:
B1: Quality parameters (client satisfaction survey): Processing of the request, acknowledgment of receipt of the initial request, explanation of fees, explanation of service provided, communications in the course of the project, speed of service, quality of service, usefulness of service, quality of documents supplied (reports), attitude of personnel (friendly, courteous, competent), overall value.
B2: Client categories: CCI places clients in 18 categories to determine eligibility for various services and fees payable.
Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI), 2009-2010
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Arts Presentation Canada Program
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The objective of the Arts Presentation Canada program is to give Canadians direct access to a wide range of professional artistic experiences. The program supports presenters in the performing arts, arts festivals, and presenter support organizations. The activities supported by the Program encourage a variety of programming; help to organize audience development and outreach activities; develop initiatives that bring professional artists into contact with residents of their community; and support networking and professional development for presenters. The Program also supports the emergence of presenters and presenter networks for under-served communities or artistic practices.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
The following two examples illustrate results achieved by organizations and activities funded by the Program in 2009-2010:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $3,135,471 | $5,803,425 | $10,500,000 | $10,500,000 | $7,025,086 | $3,474,914 |
Total Contributions | $20,199,143 | $24,066,547 | $17,862,112 | $17,862,112 | $21,649,785 | ($3,787,673) |
Total TPP | $23,334,614 | $29,869,972 | $28,362,112 | $28,362,112 | $28,674,871 | ($312,759) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $100,481,412 | $133,756,351 | $138,904,779 | ($38,423,367) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.3M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009–2010 and Actual Spending 2009–2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cultural Spaces Canada Program
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description: Cultural Spaces Canada seeks to improve physical conditions for artistic creativity and innovation, as well as increase Canadians’ access to performing arts, visual arts, media arts, and to museum collections and heritage displays. It provides financial assistance for renovation and construction projects of arts and heritage facilities. The Program also provides support to acquire specialized equipment and prepare feasibility studies for cultural infrastructure projects. Funding is provided for non-profit arts and heritage organizations operating professionally. Provincial/territorial governments, municipal or regional governments and their agencies, as well as Aboriginal, Inuit and Métis equivalent agencies are also eligible recipients.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
These projects improve infrastructure to allow for greater creativity, access and artistic innovation. For instance, a $1.8 million contribution from the Program was approved in 2009-2010 to support the construction of the Aanischaaukamikw Cultural Institute. This project allows nine James Bay Cree communities to develop the necessary infrastructure to preserve and share their rich heritage by means of exhibition halls, a resource and documentation centre, and spaces for archiving, storing, and preserving the museological and archeological assets of the Aanischaaukamikw Cultural Institute. The Cultural Institute will serve as an exceptional site allowing the Cree of Oujé-Bougoumou to present, share and pass on the treasures of Cree Culture to their own communities but also to visitors from Canada and abroad.
As another example in 2009-2010, assistance was provided to the Fort York National Historic Site, which is the birthplace of urban Toronto. The Program contributed $4,000,000 to support construction of a new 22,000 square-foot visitor centre as part of the larger Fort York revitalization project. This new facility including exhibition, heritage programming and collections storage purposes will be functional by 2012, in time for the Bicentennial Commemoration of the War of 1812, in which Fort York played an important role.Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $418,009 | $477,866 | $4,750,000 | $4,000,000 | $2,105,630 | $2,644,370 |
Total Contributions | $22,873,763 | $28,652,220 | $27,082,801 | $54,459,560 | $61,549,649 | ($34,466,848) |
Total |
$23,291,772 | $29,130,086 | $31,832,801 | $58,459,560 | $63,655,279 | ($31,822,478) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $100,481,412 | $133,756,351 | $138,904,779 | ($38,423,367) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($31.8M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Arts Training Contribution Program
Start date: 1997-1998
End date: 2012-2013
Description: The National Arts Training Contribution Program aims to contribute to the development of Canadian creators and future cultural leaders of the Canadian arts sector through the provision of stabilizing support to organizations that offer Canadians access to the highest quality training in preparation for national and international artistic careers; and through the provision of targeted funds to smaller, yet nationally significant institutions that may need to consolidate one aspect of their operations, such as administrative and/or governance capacity. The Program supports independent professional Canadian not-for-profit institutions or organizations that specialize in training Canadians seeking a professional career in the arts in Canada and abroad.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $19,420,000 | $18,400,000 | $16,703,920 | $23,542,520 | $21,825,000 | ($5,121,080) |
Total TPP | $19,420,000 | $18,400,000 | $16,703,920 | $23,542,520 | $21,825,000 | ($5,121,080) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $100,481,412 | $133,756,351 | $138,904,779 | ($38,423,367) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($5.1M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program aims to strengthen organizational effectiveness, build operational and financial capacity within the arts and heritage sectors, and ensure that those organizations operate in communities that value their existence, see them as a key asset, and support them. The Program has four active components: Capacity Building; Endowment Incentives; Cultural Capitals of Canada and Networking Initiatives. Two components, Stabilization Projects and Limited Support to Endangered Arts Organizations, are inactive. The Program provides grants and contributions to Canadian not-for-profit professional arts and heritage organizations, and Canadian communities, including First Nations, Métis, and Inuit equivalent governments.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
The following are highlights of the results achieved by the Program in 2009-2010, based on key performance indicators. The expected result is: well-managed arts and heritage organizations are supported in Canadian communities through financial and other partnerships.
The 2009-2010 fiscal year marked the final year of Capacity Building individual project support, with a reduced grants and contributions budget. From 2002-2003 to 2009-2010, close to 1,300 projects have been supported, 36% of which were related to improved governance, 32% to financial self-sufficiency, 19% to audience and market development and 13% to management practices.
In 2009-2010, the following was observed:
The Endowment Incentives component of the Program aims to incent private sector donations to well-managed arts organizations by providing matching funds to these organizations’ endowment funds.
In 2009-2010, 66 applications received funding totalling $14.9 million from the program, matching $0.71 for every dollar donated by the private sector.
Despite the global economic recession, the private sector contributed close to $21 million to arts applicant organizations’ endowment funds1, representing only 1% less from the previous year. Of this amount, nearly half (46% or $9.6 million) was donated by individuals while corporations and non-government foundations donated 23% each ($4.9 million and $4.7 million respectively – the remainder came from other sources.
This significant financial commitment is a clear indication that Canadians and arts organizations continue to believe in the value of endowments.
Since the launch of the component, the federal government’s contribution of $103 million has leveraged $149 million in donations from the private sector, for a total combined investment of $252 million in arts organizations’ endowment funds across Canada.
Cultural Capitals of Canada (CCC) recognizes and supports Canadian communities that have a record of harnessing the many benefits of arts and culture in community life. Its objective is to stimulate sustained community support for the arts and heritage.
In 2009-2010, eleven eligible applications were submitted. Of these, three were awarded a designation, for a total of $4,750,000 in approved contributions. The 2010 Cultural Capitals of Canada are: Saguenay, Quebec; Saint John, New Brunswick and Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Based on the proposed projects of these designated Cultural Capitals, over 40 partner organizations within the community have committed to assist their municipality in undertaking arts and culture activities during the year of designation. Examples of partners include: private sector organizations, post-secondary institutions, arts and culture organizations, economic development associations, as well as local Aboriginal, culturally diverse and Official Language Minority community associations.
The application process alone brought together over 1352 partners within applicant communities to develop proposals.
Since 2002-2003, 141 eligible applications have been submitted to the program and 37 CCC designations have been awarded, for total of $26.2 million in approved contributions.
1 This $21 million is the amount requested by arts organizations applying to and eligible for the Endowment Incentives component.
2 Based on applications of all eleven applicants to the 2010 CCC awards.Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $16,322,808 | $15,930,869 | $16,884,420 | $16,884,000 | $15,685,600 | $1,198,820 |
Total Contributions | $9,517,341 | $8,376,411 | $7,228,159 | $7,038,159 | $6,599,029 | $629,130 |
Total Other types of transfer payments | $25,840,149 | $24,307,280 | $24,112,579 | $23,922,159 | $22,284,629 | $1,827,950 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $100,481,412 | $133,756,351 | $138,904,779 | ($38,423,367) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.8M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: Evaluation of the Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program – completed May 2009
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Television Fund
Start date: 1996-1997
End date: 2010-2011
Description: The Canadian Television Fund provides policies and one program that encourage the creation and production of Canadian television programs. The Program contributes to enhance the creation and broadcast of high-quality Canadian television programs. It is a public-private partnership funded by the Government of Canada, cable companies and direct-to-home satellite service providers. Support is provided to independent television producers to make programs licensed by Canadian broadcasters in English, French and Aboriginal languages in the genres of drama, documentaries, children’s and youth and variety and performing arts. Support is provided in the form of a license fee top-up and equity investment.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2009-2010, the Program invested over $350 million in Canadian productions, which generated over 2,400 new hours of Canadian programming.*
A contribution agreement between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Canada Media Fund Corporation (CMFC) (formerly known as Canada Television Fund Corporation, CTFC) was signed and funds flowed to the CMFC as per the terms of the contribution agreement.
* Data is not final until the release of the program’s annual report. Numbers may not add up due to rounding. The CTF annual report for 2009-2010 will be available at www.cmf-fmc.ca.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants |
$0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions |
$119,950,000 | $119,950,000 | $20,400,000 | $119,950,000 | $119,950,000 | ($99,550,000) |
Total TPP |
$119,950,000 | $119,950,000 | $20,400,000 | $119,950,000 | $119,950,000 | ($99,550,000) |
Total Program Activity(ies) |
N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($99.6M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Music Fund
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2014-2015
Description: The Canada Music Fund supports diversity, capacity and excellence in the sound recording industry at every level, from creators to audience. The Program consists of seven components: 1) Canadian Music Memories; 2) Collective Initiatives; 3) Creator’s Assistance; 4) Music Entrepreneur; 5) New Musical Works; 6) Support to Sector Associations; and 7) Canadian Musical Diversity. These components are designed to: enhance Canadians’ access to a diverse range of Canadian music choices through existing and emerging media, increase the opportunities available for Canadian music artists and entrepreneurs to make a significant contribution to Canadian cultural expression, and ensure that Canadian music artists and entrepreneurs have the means to succeed in a global and digital environment.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2009-2010, the Program contributed to the Department’s goal of creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural content through:
In 2009-2010:
MEC recipients’ overall sales of albums by Canadian artists (including CDs and full-length album downloads) increased by 4% over the previous year.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $23,636,320 | $24,907,581 | $23,364,082 | $23,364,082 | $25,340,985 | ($1,976,903) |
Total TPP | $23,636,320 | $24,907,581 | $23,364,082 | $23,364,082 | $25,340,985 | ($1,976,903) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($2.0M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Book Publishing Industry Development Program
Start date: 1980-1981
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The Book Publishing Industry Development Program (BPIDP) has four components: 1) Aid to Publishers; 2) Supply Chain Initiative; 3) Collective Initiatives; and 4) International Marketing Assistance. The Program supports the activities of Canadian book publishers and other sectors of the book industry to improve the capacity of the Canadian-owned book industry to publish and market Canadian-authored books. This support is aimed at achieving the Program’s objective of ensuring access to a diverse range of Canadian-authored books in Canada and abroad.
This support is delivered through formula funding for Canadian-owned book publishers, as well as funding for collective projects that improve the capacity of the industry to publish and market Canadian-authored books.Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2009-2010, the Program helped to further the Department’s goal of supporting the creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural expression through contributions to over 300 business and non-profit organizations in the Canadian book industry for publishing, marketing, professional development, internships, technology-driven collective projects and other activities.
In 2009-2010:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $36,817,639 | $36,206,767 | $37,387,660 | $36,637,660 | $36,001,249 | $1,386,411 |
Total TPP | $36,817,639 | $36,206,767 | $37,387,660 | $36,637,660 | $36,001,249 | $1,386,411 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.4M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Magazine Fund
Start date: 1999-2000
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The Canada Magazine Fund has four components: 1) Support for Arts and Literary Magazines; 2) Support for Business Development for Magazine Publishers; 3) Support for Industry Development; and 4) Support for Editorial Content. The Program provides support to Canadian magazine publishers and not-for-profit organizations in the publishing sector to: foster the creation of Canadian editorial content in Canadian magazines; increase Canadians' access to Canadian magazines; enhance the range and diversity of Canadian magazines; and strengthen the infrastructure of the Canadian magazine industry. The support is provided through formula funding for magazines, including arts and literary magazines, to support and enhance their editorial content, and through project support for business development for small magazine publishers and for projects that develop the periodical industry as a whole.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2009-2010, the Program contributed to the Department’s goal of supporting the creation of Canadian cultural content through 330 contributions to magazine publishers and industry associations.
In 2009-2010:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $14,581,046 | $14,296,262 | $14,881,182 | $14,881,638 | $13,892,239 | $988,943 |
Total TPP | $14,581,046 | $14,296,262 | $14,881,182 | $14,881,638 | $13,892,239 | $988,943 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.0M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Publications Assistance Program
Start date: 1996-1997
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The Publications Assistance Program decreases the costs of mailing eligible Canadian periodicals to Canadian readers, ensuring they have access to a wide diversity of Canadian periodicals. Assistance is provided to more than 800 publishers of almost 1,200 different Canadian periodicals, supporting the delivery of 210 million eligible copies of periodicals including: general interest magazines, non-daily community newspapers; and ethno-cultural, farm, and official language minority periodicals. The Program is delivered in partnership with the Canada Post Corporation. Canadian Heritage receives and assesses applications for financial support, while Canada Post tracks mailings by eligible recipients.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2009-2010, the Program helped to further the Department’s goal of supporting the dissemination of Canadian cultural content through postal subsidies to 1,083 Canadian magazines and non-daily newspapers. These grants totalled over $52M*, representing an average of about 65% of the recipients’ total mailing costs.
In 2009-2010, the Program funded over 167 M copies of periodicals mailed to Canadians.
* The grant total of over $52M refers to approved amounts for recipients in 2009-2010. It does not match actual spending totals in column 11 of the table below because the total in the table includes funds transferred to Canada Post, which are greater than the actual amounts issued to recipients. Reconciliation is done in the months following year-end.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $45,400,000 | $45,400,000 | $45,400,000 | $60,400,000 | $56,300,000 | ($10,900,000) |
Total Contributions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total TPP | $45,400,000 | $45,400,000 | $45,400,000 | $60,400,000 | $56,300,000 | ($10,900,000) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($10.9M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Culture Online Program
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The objectives of the Canadian Culture Online program, which includes the Partnerships Fund and the Gateway Fund, are to provide Canadians access to and encourage their participation in interactive digital resources that reflect Canada’s diverse heritage, cultures and languages.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2009-2010, 42 contribution agreements were signed under the program to award a total of 8 million in funding in support Web sites presenting Canadian content (Gateway Fund and Partnerships Fund) that allow Canadians of all ages to access content that reflects our diverse cultures and heritage. The CCOP supported a broad range of projects, in both official languages, all of which attract different audiences.
The following results are for Websites projects that were completed in 2009-2010.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $11,116,076 | $13,065,512 | $5,567,143 | $9,103,923 | $8,056,875 | ($2,489,732) |
Total TPP | $11,116,076 | $13,065,512 | $5,567,143 | $9,103,923 | $8,056,875 | ($2,489,732) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($2.5M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada New Media Fund
Start date: 2000-2001
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The Canada New Media Fund, administered by Telefilm Canada, supports the development, production, marketing and distribution of Canadian cultural interactive products, in both official languages. It also assists the Canadian interactive media industry to become more competitive in domestic and international markets.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
* The above is based on preliminary data received from Telefilm Canada. Complete and final data is not available until the release of the Program’s annual report which will be tabled at the end of Summer 2010.
1 Nordicity, CIAIC 2008 Canadian Interactive Industry Profile.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $11,500,000 | $14,500,000 | $14,196,077 | $14,196,077 | $14,300,000 | ($103,923) |
Total TPP | $11,500,000 | $14,500,000 | $14,196,077 | $14,196,077 | $14,300,000 | ($103,923) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.1M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: TV5 Contributions
Start date: 1990-1991
End date: 2012-2013
Description: The international French-language TV channel TV5 is a partnership made up of France, Belgium’s Francophone community, Switzerland, Canada and Quebec. The Department provides annual funding to the channel (single-recipient program) through a contribution agreement to TV5 Québec Canada and a grant to TV5 MONDE. Funding from the Department and the province of Quebec enables Canadian productions to be presented in Canada and abroad, and provides Canadians with an additional French-language channel that allows them to become familiar with the many diverse cultures that make up the international Francophonie. TV5 enriches Francophone programming across the country and provides outlets for Francophone productions from every region of Canada. Canada's contribution to TV5 makes it possible to offer all Canadians a window on the Francophonie.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $4,674,105 | $4,385,826 | $4,940,000 | $8,000,000 | $7,049,448 | ($2,109,448) |
Total Contributions | $3,031,043 | $2,581,174 | $2,470,000 | $4,410,000 | $5,093,440 | ($2,623,440) |
Total Other types of transfer payments | $7,705,148 | $6,967,000 | $7,410,000 | $12,410,000 | $12,142,888 | ($4,732,888) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,781,144 | $297,118,380 | $285,984,236 | ($111,203,092) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $4.7M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Museums Assistance Program
Start date: 1972-1973
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The Museums Assistance Program supports museums in their effort to reach audiences and care for their collections by providing grants and contributions to Canadian museums and related organizations for projects to develop and circulate travelling exhibitions across different regions of Canada, to preserve and protect Aboriginal heritage, and to enhance professional knowledge, skills and practices in the management of key museological functions. The Program also provides funding for projects submitted under the Canada-France Agreement on Museum Cooperation and Exchanges, and it provides support to the Canadian Museums Association for activities that help to sustain professional standards across Canada’s museum community.
In addition, the Program includes the Young Canada Works at Building Careers in Heritage andthe Young Canada Works in Heritage Organizations components, in support of the Youth Employment Strategy, a horizontal initiative coordinated by Human Resources and Social Development Canada. The objective for the heritage components is to enable heritage institutions to benefit from the assistance of young, qualified workers by providing summer employment and career internship opportunities to help students develop and upgrade their skills in heritage institutions and to encourage them to pursue advanced studies in this field.Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2009–2010, the Program funded a total of 165 projects, of which 49 were multiyear projects initiated in previous years and 116 were new projects. The program assessed 136 applications in 2009-2010.
The Young Canada Works in Heritage Program created 1,808 youth employment opportunities in 1,046 heritage institutions (summer jobs and career internships) to improve key museological knowledge, skills and practices.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $1,150,038 | $1,973,189 | $2,500,000 | $2,500,000 | $1,774,587 | $725,413 |
Total Contributions | $11,386,644 | $11,990,808 | $11,945,845 | $11,946,000 | $12,195,813 | ($249,968) |
Total TPP | $12,536,682 | $13,963,997 | $14,445,845 | $14,446,000 | $13,970,400 | $475,445 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $15,609,525 | $15,610,000 | $14,365,019 | $1,244,506 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.5M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Museums Assistance Program – June 2009
Evaluation completed or planned: Evaluation of the Museums Assistance Program – January 2010
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Celebration and Commemoration Program
Start date: 2003-2004
End date: 2011-2012
Description: The Celebration and Commemoration Program aims to support or create opportunities for Canadians to celebrate/commemorate their history, diversity and achievements through a two-fold approach that includes the Celebrate Canada 11-day period culminating on July 1 with Canada Day celebrations, and a five-year plan which is a theme-based dynamic approach to celebrating and commemorating significant people, places, symbols, anniversaries and events. These activities are delivered in collaboration with other federal departments, agencies, regions, partners and stakeholders. The Program provides opportunities to bring Canadians together in their communities to discover and appreciate the richness and diversity of Canadian society and to show their sense of belonging to Canada and pride in being Canadian.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $2,158,192 | $3,643,642 | $9,784,000 | $9,784,000 | $8,473,765 | $1,310,235 |
Total Contributions | $19,263,281 | $42,243,050 | $34,555,687 | $36,601,706 | $49,754,485 | ($15,198,798) |
Total TPP | $21,421,473 | $45,886,692 | $44,339,687 | $46,385,706 | $58,228,250 | ($13,888,563) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $83,947,126 | $86,321,941 | $99,663,403 | ($15,716,277) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($13.9M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Ceremonies and Events / Vancouver 2010 Directorate of the Major Events and Celebration Branch – February 2010
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Exchanges Canada Program
Start date: 2000-2001
End date: No end date, program continued indefinitely (but subject to evaluation every 5 years.)
Description: The Exchanges Canada Program supports youth participation initiatives that allow young Canadians across the country to learn about Canada, create linkages with each other and better appreciate the diversity and common aspects of the Canadian reality. The Program has two main components: Youth Exchanges Canada and Youth Forums Canada. The Program works with non-profit delivery organizations to enable young Canadians to: access a range of exchange and national/international forum activities; experience Canada's cultural, geographical and linguistic diversity; build their knowledge of Canada; and develop their Canadian identity and sense of belonging to Canada.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 0 | $100,000 |
Total Contributions | 17,423,572 | 18,537,122 | 17,686,359 | 17,736,359 | 17,882,489 | ($196,130) |
Total TPP | 17,423,572 | 18,537,122 | 17,786,359 | 17,836,359 | 17,882,489 | ($96,130) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | 83,947,126 | 86,321,941 | 99,663,403 | ($15,716,277) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.1M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: Summative Evaluation of the Exchanges Canada Program – March 2010
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Given that the results from participant surveys for a specific fiscal year are only made available the following fiscal year in September, statistics provided here reflect the 2008-2009 survey results.
3 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Katimavik Program
Start date: 1997-1998
End date: 2010-2011
Description: Through the Katimavik Program, young Canadians are provided with opportunities to create ties with communities and with other Canadians, and to improve their employability. The objectives of the Katimavik program are to contribute substantially to the personal, social and professional development of the participants; to promote community service; and to offer a diverse experience, fostering a better understanding of the Canadian reality and linguistic duality. Through a nine-month program comprised of community service, training and group interaction, participants aged 17 to 21 have the opportunity to acquire personal and professional skills by involving them in community projects in one French-speaking and two English-speaking regions of Canada.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $18,028,683 | $18,992,154 | $19,776,000 | $19,776,000 | $20,411,654 | ($635,654) |
Total TPP | $18,028,683 | $18,992,154 | $19,776,000 | $19,776,000 | $20,411,654 | ($635,654) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $83,947,126 | $86,321,941 | $99,663,403 | ($15,716,277) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.6M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: Summative Evaluation of the Katimavik Program – November 2010
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Communities through Arts and Heritage Program
Start date: September 1, 2007
End date: March 31, 2012
Description: The program’s objective is to build stronger citizen engagement in communities through the performing and visual arts and in the expression, celebration and preservation of local heritage. The Building Communities Through Arts and Heritage program has two components: 1) Local Arts and Heritage Festivals; and 2) Community Historical Anniversaries Programming. The Program provides support for both local arts and heritage festivals that feature the presentation of local artists or local heritage, and major historical anniversaries of local importance.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $718,316 | $4,427,594 | $12,405,000 | $14,355,000 | $8,399,200 | $4,005,800 |
Total Contributions | $609,925 | $2,381,951 | $1,350,000 | $3,300,000 | $6,154,664 | ($4,804,664) |
Total TPP | $1,328,241 | $6,809,545 | $13,755,000 | $17,655,000 | $14,553,864 | ($798,864) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $99,775,754 | $82,500,967 | $76,623,691 | $23,152,063 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.8M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Peoples’ Program
Start date: 1971-1972
End date: 2009-2010
Description: The Aboriginal Peoples’ Program is organized around two broad themes: 1) the Aboriginal Communities Component supports the efforts of Aboriginal communities to develop innovative and culturally appropriate solutions to the social, cultural, economic and other obstacles that impede community and personal prospects, by funding the network of Aboriginal Friendship centres across Canada, urban Aboriginal youth projects including Young Canada Works for Aboriginal Urban Youth, and projects undertaken by Aboriginal women's organizations; and 2) the Aboriginal Living Cultures Component supports the preservation and promotion of Aboriginal languages and cultures through community-based projects, and funds the production and distribution of Aboriginal radio and television programming by northern Aboriginal communications societies.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $545,289 | $598,426 | $1,340,000 | $1,340,000 | $586,568 | $753,432 |
Total Contributions | $59,004,436 | $56,810,730 | $56,522,911 | $58,197,911 | $59,040,288 | ($2,517,377) |
Total TPP | $59,549,725 | $57,409,156 | $57,862,911 | $59,537,911 | $59,626,856 | ($1,763,945) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $99,775,754 | $82,500,967 | $76,623,691 | $23,152,063 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($1.8M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: Audit of Aboriginal Peoples’ Program: Aboriginal Culture Living Component – May 2009
Evaluation completed or planned: Horizontal Evaluation of the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation – November 2009; Summative Evaluation of the Aboriginal Peoples’ Program – October 2010
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Development of Official Languages Communities Program
Start date: 2003-2004
End date: 2013-2014 (pending approval)
Description: The Development of Official-Languages Communities Program has two components: Community Life and Minority Language Education. The Program fosters the vitality of Canada’s English- and French-speaking minority communities and enables them to participate fully in all aspects of Canadian life. Through partnerships and agreements with community organizations, provinces, territories, municipalities and federal departments and agencies, the Program aims to enhance the capacity of minority official language communities to have greater access to quality education and different programs and services in their language in their communities.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $7,151,550 | $7,666,376 | $36,823,293 | $36,823,001 | $6,592,172 | $30,231,121 |
Total Contributions | $226,674,891 | $224,391,091 | $204,372,464 | $206,081,142 | $225,418,803 | ($21,046,339) |
Total TPP | $233,826,441 | $232,057,467 | $241,195,757 | $242,904,143 | $232,010,975 | $9,184,782 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $353,206,739 | $354,914,743 | $351,479,343 | $1,727,397 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $9.2M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enhancement of Official Languages Program
Start date: 2003-2004
End date: 2013-2014 (pending approval)
Description: The Enhancement of Official Languages Program has two components: Promotion of Linguistic Duality and Second Language Learning. The Program promotes a better understanding and appreciation of the benefits of linguistic duality. Through partnerships and agreements with the provinces and territories and non-governmental organizations in support of second-language learning and initiatives that foster understanding between Anglophone and Francophone Canadians, the Program encourages the public to recognize and support linguistic duality as a fundamental value of Canadian society.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $544,575 | $1,293,027 | $5,098,093 | $5,098,000 | $655,167 | $4,442,926 |
Total Contributions | $121,231,376 | $120,180,195 | $106,912,889 | $106,912,600 | $118,813,200 | ($11,900,311) |
Total Other types of transfer payments | $121,775,951 | $121,473,222 | $112,010,982 | $112,010,600 | $119,468,368 | ($7,457,386) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $353,206,739 | $354,914,743 | $351,479,343 | $1,727,396 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($7.5M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
Evaluation completed or planned: No projects were completed or planned for the 2009-2010 reporting period.
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Hosting Program
Start date: 1967
End date: 2010-2011
Description: The Hosting Program is a key instrument in the Government of Canada’s overall approach to sport development in Canada and aims to enhance the development of sport excellence and the international profile of sport organizations by assisting sport organizations to host the Canada Games and international sport events in Canada. These events are expected to produce significant sport, economic, social and cultural benefits. The Program has four components: 1) International Major Multisport Games; 2) International Single Sport Events; 3) International Multisport Games for Aboriginal Peoples and Persons with a Disability; and 4) the Canada Games. The Hosting Program offers Canada-at-large a planned and coordinated approach to realizing direct and significant benefits, from bidding and hosting projects, in the areas of sport development and economic, social, cultural and community impacts, across a broad range of government priorities. The Program is characterized by active liaison with collaborators/stakeholders and by a diligent contribution system.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $118,688,000 | $44,521,653 | $43,992,404 | $80,784,404 | $58,499,142 | ($14,506,738) |
Total TPP | $118,688,000 | $44,521,653 | $43,992,404 | $80,784,404 | $58,499,142 | ($14,506,738) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,281,587 | $210,976,280 | $198,264,884 | ($23,983,297) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($14.5M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Hosting Program (Sport Canada) – November 2009
Audit of the Sport Canada Branch – June 2010
Evaluation completed or planned: Summative Evaluation of Sport Canada – March 2011
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sport Support Program
Start date: 1961
End date: 2010-2011
Description: The Sport Support Program is the primary funding vehicle for initiatives associated with the delivery of the Canadian Sport Policy. Sport Support Program funding is aimed at: developing athletes and coaches at the highest international levels; providing sound, technically based sport programming for all athletes; increasing the number of Canadians from all segments of society involved in sport; and advancing Canadian interests and values in Canada and abroad. Funding helps to ensure that the essential components of an ethically based, athlete/participant-centred development system are in place and is provided to eligible organizations for programming that supports the goals of the Canadian Sport Policy.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Note:
* This is an approximate number of participants as the Department has not received all of the 2008-2009 year end reports from all P/Ts. Actual numbers will be finalized at a later date. Please also note that the nature of the project might change if a P/T has negotiated a new bilateral agreement.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Contributions | $103,112,337 | $111,930,707 | $101,113,183 | $101,014,876 | $113,657,960 | ($12,544,777) |
TotalTPP | $103,112,337 | $111,930,707 | $101,113,183 | $101,014,876 | $113,657,960 | ($12,544,777) |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,281,587 | $210,976,280 | $198,264,884 | ($23,983,297) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($12.5M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Sport Canada Branch – June 2010
Evaluation completed or planned: Summative Evaluation of Sport Canada – March 2011
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009-2010 and Actual Spending 2009-2010.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Athlete Assistance Program
Start date: 1971
End date: 2010-2011
Description: The Athlete Assistance Program contributes to the pursuit of excellence through its support for improved Canadian athlete performances at major international sporting events, enabling athletes to combine their sport and academic or working careers while training intensively in pursuit of world-class performances. To this end, the Program identifies and supports athletes already at or having the potential to be in the top 16 in the world in their sport.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Grants | $25,313,598 | $26,486,000 | $26,676,000 | $26,677,000 | $26,107,782 | $568,218 |
Total Contributions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Other types of transfer payments | $25,313,598 | $26,486,000 | $26,676,000 | $26,677,000 | $26,107,782 | $568,218 |
Total Program Activity(ies) | N/Aš | N/Aš | $174,281,587 | $210,976,280 | $198,264,884 | ($23,983,297) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.6M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned: Audit of the Sport Canada Branch – June 2010
Evaluation completed or planned: Summative Evaluation of Sport Canada – March 2011
1 The Department undertook a major review of its 2009-2010 Program Activity Architecture and therefore cannot report on 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 expenditures under the new architecture.
2 Difference between Planned Spending 2009–2010 and Actual Spending 2009–2010.
Name of Recipient: Endowment Fund – Canadian Institute for Research on Linguistic Minorities
Start Date: 2001-2002
End Date: Perpetual
Total Funding: $10 million
Description: Thanks to an endowment funded by the Department of Canadian Heritage, the Canadian Institute for Research on Linguistic Minorities (CIRLM) was created in March 2002 for the purpose of becoming a national centre of expertise to better understand the challenges that official-language minority communities face and the trends in their environment. Although it is housed at the Université de Moncton, it has a national mission. It carries out activities related to official-language minority communities through revenues generated by the Endowment Fund and other revenues.
The goal of the Institute is to increase research on issues related to minority official-language communities. More and improved research will ensure that leaders of minority-language communities and officials responsible for developing public policy will have a better understanding of the issues that affect the development of Canada’s Francophone and Anglophone minority communities.Strategic Outcome(s): Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.
Summary of Results Achieved by the Recipient:
The evaluation of the CIRLM conducted in 2008-2009, confirms the following results:
The evaluation of the CIRLM established some recommendations that are being progressively implemented by the CIRLM.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Comments on Variance(s): N/A
Significant Evaluation findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan:
The last evaluation confirmed that the CIRLM reached its main objectives from through its activities and networking (in particular, becoming a key researcher on linguistic minority communities).
Significant Audit findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan: N/A
Name of Recipient: Grant to the 2010 Games Operating Trust
Start Date: 2004-2005
End Date: Perpetual
Total Funding: $55 million
Description: In accordance with Multi-Party Agreement (MPA), the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia each contributed $55 million to the Legacy Endowment Fund, which is managed by the 2010 Games Operating Trust. The 2010 Games Operating Trust Society is the legal entity that oversees the business activities of the 2010 Games Operating Trust. The Legacy Endowment Fund supports the maintenance and operating expenses of specific 2010 Winter Games sporting venues and charitable and not-for-profit organizations conducting high-performance amateur sport and coach development programming at those venues and elsewhere in Canada. The three legacy facilities receiving the funds are the Richmond Oval (Richmond, BC), Whistler Olympic Park and the Whistler Sliding Centre (Resort Municipality of Whistler, BC). This commitment by the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia ensures that Canadians will continue to use the venues and benefit from sport programming well beyond 2010 (http://www.vancouver2010.com).
The Board of Directors of the 2010 Games Operating Trust Society consists of eight representatives from the signatories to the MPA (Government of Canada, the Province of British Columbia, the Canadian Olympic Committee, the Canadian Paralympic Committee, the Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (VANOC), the City of Vancouver, the City of Richmond, and the Resort Municipality of Whistler). The 2010 Games Operating Trust Society will oversee and manage this Trust until an agreed-upon future date or until the end of the Monarchy.
Sustainable social, economic, cultural and sports benefits for Canadians are the overall strategic goals for hosting the Olympic Games. Beyond maintaining and operating the three principal venues, the 2010 Games Operating Trust will provide the needed funding to continue high-performance programming for Canadian athletes at these venues and elsewhere in Canada.Strategic Outcome(s): Canadians participate and excel in sport
Summary of Results Achieved by the Recipient: The 2010 Games Operating Trust Society will continue to monitor the investment of the Legacy Endowment Fund with regular advice and guidance from a team of investment professionals in order to maximize the Fund's growth and ensure the continued operation of legacy venues, leaving a lasting sports legacy for all Canadians beyond 2010. The Society will hold annual general meetings to determine and approve the annual distribution amounts for the venues and determine if funds are available for related high-performance sports development initiatives. Payments are contingent upon post-Games Operating Agreements provided by the legacy venues owners and operators and are monitored regularly by a Society sub-committee. The Society is also committed to undertaking and publicly disclosing annual audits of the Trust and the Trust Society's Financial Statements.
($ thousands) | Total Declared in 2007 & 2008 |
Total Paid in 2007 & 2008 |
Declared in 2009 |
Paid in 2009 |
Payable in 2009 |
Total Declared as of Dec 31 2009 |
Total Paid as of Dec 31 2009 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
City of Richmond | $6,639 | $4,142 | $4,538 | $4,730 | $2,305 | $11,177 | $8,872 |
VANOC (WOP & WSC) | $6,639 | $6,639 | $4,430 | $2,233 | $2,197 | $11,069 | $8,872 |
$13,278 | $10,781 | $8,968 | $6,963 | $4,502 | $22,246 | $17,744 |
($ thousands) | Fund Balance 31 Dec 08 |
Income Net of Expenses |
Realized and Unrealized losses |
DistributionsDeclared in |
Fund Balance 31 Dec 2009 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Richmond Olympic Oval | $39,397 | $1,392 | $4,152 | -$4,538 | $40,403 |
WOP & WSC | $39,397 | $1,334 | $3,978 | -$4,430 | $40,279 |
Contingency Fund | $20,947 | $882 | $2,122 | $0 | $23,951 |
$99,741 | $3,608 | $10,252 | -$8,968 | $104,633 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Comments on Variance(s): N/A
Significant Evaluation findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan: N/A
Significant Audit findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan: N/A
URL to the recipient’s site: http://www.r-oval.ca/docs/2010%20games%20operating%20trust%202009%20financial%20stmts.pdf
Name of Recipient: National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation
Start Date: 2003-2004
End Date: 2009-2010
Total Funding: $ 22M
Description: : The National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation (NAAF) promotes the development and education of Aboriginal peoples and their professional advancement in Canadian society through the implementation of such initiatives as: the Blueprint for the Future, Post-Secondary Education Program, the National Aboriginal Achievement Awards and Taking Pulse. Overall, the Foundation's programs are made possible through the support of the federal government, corporate sponsors, charitable foundations and individual donors.
The Foundation’s core focus continues to be providing scholarships for Aboriginal students. NAAF is the largest supporter of Aboriginal education outside the federal government. In 2003–2004 Canadian Heritage provided a $12-million endowment for the establishment of an Aboriginal Post-secondary Scholarship Program. An additional endowment of $10 million was approved in March 2007. Investment revenues of the endowment are used to award scholarships and bursaries to Aboriginal post-secondary students across Canada.
This Endowment Fund encourages higher levels of achievement in education to help Aboriginal Canadians gain the skills and learning needed to contribute fully to the economic life of their communities and Canadian society. More specifically, the scholarship program assists Status Indian, Non-Status Indian, Métis and Inuit post-secondary students engaged in various fields of study including those that support and contribute to Aboriginal self-government and self-reliance goals.Strategic Outcome(s): Canadians have a sense of their Canadian Identity
Summary of Results Achieved by the Recipient: Investment revenues from the endowment provided funding for bursaries to Aboriginal post-secondary students.
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$302,000.00 | $227,000.00 | $227,000.00 | $0 | $237,000.00 | $0 |
Comments on Variance(s): N/A
Significant Evaluation findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan:
Evaluation of the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation – November 2009
This Evaluation was lead by the Department, however, the Foundation has undertaken an evaluation of the Endowment in compliance with its funding agreement.
SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS
Rationale and relevance
Design and delivery
Program success
Value for money and alternatives
Significant Audit findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan: N/A
Name of Recipient: The Trans Canada Trail Foundation
Start Date: December 2003
End Date: March 2010
Total Funding: $15 million
Description: The Trans Canada Trail Foundation leads an initiative, based on widespread voluntary support, to establish a national recreational trail that runs through every Canadian province and territory, linking hundreds of communities. The federal grant for this project is used solely to establish a fund to achieve the following objectives: to administer a program of grants to community-based groups in support of trail-building capital projects (thereby leveraging additional support from other sources); to provide planning for and coordinate development of the Trail; and to establish Trail Pavilions and signage along the route.
The Trail will connect Canadians from all regions of the country with each other, with their environment, and with Canada's cultural and natural diversity.Strategic Outcome(s): Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.
Summary of Results Achieved by the Recipient:
In March 2010, the initial agreement, originally scheduled to end March 31, 2010, was extended to March 31, 2011. This will allow the organization responsible for the Trail to use the entire 15 million dollars, as well as any interest earned, according to the terms of the agreement, and to meet the planned objectives.
Approximately 72 % of the Trans Canada Trail, or more than 16,798 km, has been completed. More than 4 out of 5 Canadians live within 30 minutes or less of the Trail. Once completed, it will be the longest trail (or network of trails) in the world.
In 2009‑2010, 33 projects for the development of portions of the Trail were approved by the Fund. Since 2003, 86 pavilions, with bilingual interpretation panels, have been built along the Trail to inform the public of the richness and diversity of Canada’s nature (i.e. indigenous flora and fauna, geographical features).
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Planned Spending 2009-10 |
Total Authorities 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Variance(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Comments on Variance(s): The total grant of $15 million was paid to the Foundation in 2003–2004.
Significant Evaluation findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan: Performance evaluations of the $15M Fund are scheduled for May 2010 and May 2011.
Significant Audit findings by the recipient during the reporting year and future plan: N/A
Please be advised that a change was made to the French version of this document. A missing program for the Immediate Outcome 1.3 was added to the table: Support to francophone immigration in New Brunswick by the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency.
Name of Horizontal Initiative: 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games – Delivering on our Commitments
Name of Lead Department(s): Department of Canadian Heritage
Lead Department Program Activity: Sport
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2003-2004
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2012
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $580.24M
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
To monitor and report on the Government of Canada’s contribution to the 2010 Winter Games, which engage Canadians from across the country; reflect Canadian values and priorities in their planning, delivery, and international profile, and promote opportunities to advance public policy goals and to make strategic investments that support long-term tangible economic benefits, and sport, social, cultural and environmental legacies for all Canadians (www.pch.gc.ca).
The Government of Canada is a key partner in the 2010 Winter Games. The 2010 Federal Secretariat (2010 FS) within the Department of Canadian Heritage works horizontally to support and promote federal engagement in the planning and delivery of the Games, which includes providing high quality essential federal services, as well as capital and legacy funding. Fifteen federal departments are providing services deemed essential for conducting successful Games. These departments, whether receiving incremental funding for this purpose or supporting the services from their A-base, are accountable for delivering essential federal services under the Multiparty Agreement, signed in 2002. The 2010 FS works with its partners and stakeholders to leverage the Games as an opportunity to advance public policy objectives, establish lasting legacies, and derive maximum benefit for all Canadians (www.canada2010.gc.ca).
Canadian Heritage is the lead department for federal participation in support of the 2010 Winter Games with the exception of Games Security and Public Safety. In October 2007, the Prime Minister appointed Ward Elcock as the Coordinator for the 2010 Olympic and G8 Security and established an office within the Privy Council Office (PCO). As a result of this appointment, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) became the lead coordinating department to develop a Horizontal Results-Based Management and Accountability Framework (RMAF) for Games Security and Public Safety collectively with Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA); Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC); Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS); Department of National Defence (DND); Industry Canada (IC); Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC); Public Safety Canada (PS); Transport Canada (TC); Health Canada (HC); Canadian Coast Guard (CCG); Canada Post; and PCO. As the lead agency responsible for the development and delivery of the 2010 Winter Games security, the RCMP leads a multi-organisational, Integrated Security Group known as the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit (V2010 ISU) which has the overall responsibility for coordinating and providing security for the 2010 Winter Games. Departments and agencies responsible to provide security for the 2010 Winter Games report on their achievements under commitments established in the security RMAF through RCMP (reference and link to RCMP Department Performance Report (DPR) on Security) and are not included in this report.
Please note that the $108.3 million originally reported in this DPR is now included in the RCMP DPR. Also on September 17, 2009, $35.54 million in new funding was approved for the 2010 Winter Games and there was a reduction of the First Nations grant from $34.55M to $34M. This grant was fully disbursed in 2008-2009.Shared Outcome(s) 1:
There are three levels of shared outcomes as identified below:
2010 FS
Representative Working Group (RWG)
The 2010 FS, under the leadership of the Deputy Minister of Canadian Heritage, supports the Framework for Federal Coordination (FFC)—the primary mechanism for promoting horizontal management of the Winter Games. This governance structure consists of:
Working-level Issue Clusters support intergovernmental coordination and information sharing.
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2009-102 |
Actual Spending for 2009-10 |
Expected Results for 2009-10 |
Results Achieved in 2009-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final outcomes: Sport, economic, social and cultural legacies are established for the benefit of all Canadians; Canada is recognized as a capable and inclusive host | |||||||
Intermediate outcomes: Pan-Canadian engagement in sport, economic, social and cultural activities related to the 2010 Winter Games; Canadians and international participants experience safe and high quality games | |||||||
Immediate outcomes: Leverage 2010 Winter Games to advance existing federal priorities; Successful delivery of mandated essential federal services | |||||||
Service Area: Federal Coordination | |||||||
A. Canadian Heritage | Canadians participate and excel in sport |
Sport Hosting Program 2010 FS |
$412M |
$47.062M |
$9.8M Salary and Operations $10.792M Venue Construction $26.47M Paralympic Operations $0M |
Positive domestic and international exposure. Canada has established sport, social and cultural legacies. |
The 2010 FS provided support to federal government departments, partners and stakeholders to leverage the 2010 Winter Games to advance federal priorities through 35 coordinated initiatives. The 2010 FS provided coordination and regular support to the governance committees part of the FFC in order to support the whole of government approach to the Games. Forty-six
federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations (including departments delivering essential services) were represented at those committees and worked together seamlessly and horizontally on the 2010 Winter Games; a number of enormously complex tasks, touching a vast array of different fields of interest were well-managed over this period; all existing
and emerging opportunities available as the Host Country were identified and capitalized upon for the benefit of Canadians; and a legacy of strong partnerships and corporate knowledge was created in order to strengthen future federal investments and activities. The Government of Canada was recognized as a key partner of the 2010 Winter Games as shown by the results of
a public opinion research survey conducted prior to the Games in February 2010. In January 2010, the 2010 FS contracted Decima Research to conduct a national omnibus survey of over 2,000 Canadians aimed at gauging Canadians’ overall awareness of the 2010 Winter Games and exploring their perceptions of the economic, social, and cultural benefits associated with
Canada’s hosting of these Games. Previously, two rounds of public opinion research had been conducted on the same topic: in June 2007 and in January 2009. As the results of the pre-Games research demonstrate, for the most part, Canadians believed that the 2010 Winter Games would have positive impacts on the country.
Canadians had opportunities to be engaged in outreach events and activities related to the 2010 Winter Games and organized by the 2010 FS. More than half-a-million people—40% of them from other countries—visited the Canada 2010 website developed by the 2010 FS. The website helped increase awareness and understanding of Canada's 2010 priorities. The website will be archived by Library and Archives of Canada to ensure it remains part of our national memory of the Games. Through the summer and fall of 2009, the 2010 FS joined a travelling Pavilion for a nine-city tour to talk to Canadians about the 2010 Winter Games. Altogether, approximately 80,000 Canadians wereprovided with information related to the Games, the role of the Government of Canada, and the benefits and opportunities of being the Host Country. All contribution agreements managed by the 2010 FS enabling various organizations to deliver benefits were in place in a timely manner. |
B. PWGSC | Translation Bureau (new funding) | $5.3M | $5.3M | $3.3M | Translation and interpretation services are provided to VANOC in a timely manner |
The Translation Bureau provided translation services to help VANOC offer quality communications in both of Canada's official languages. To provide efficient translation services, the Bureau set up three separate translation centres with their own mandate across the country to work in partnership with VANOC:
In addition to meeting the professional standards of the Translation Bureau and the language industry, all mutually agreed deadlines were met and 100% of biographies were translated and updated within the agreed-upon timeline. The Translation Bureau also provided interpretation services for the Paralympic Games and had six on-site official languages interpreters. It was the first time in the history of the Games that official interpretation services were provided at the Paralympic Games. In addition, the Translation Bureau assessed and validated the interpretation infrastructure put in place by VANOC for the duration of the Olympic Games. |
|
Final outcomes: Sport, economic, social and cultural legacies are established for the benefit of all Canadians; Canadian excellence and values are promoted domestically and internationally | |||||||
Intermediate outcomes: Pan-Canadian engagement in sport, economic, social and cultural activities related to the 2010 Winter Games; Enhance Canada's domestic and international profile | |||||||
Immediate outcomes: Leverage 2010 Winter Games to advance existing federal priorities; Positive exposure and heightened recognition of Government of Canada as a key partner in the 2010 Winter Games | |||||||
Service area: Promotion and Participation | |||||||
C. Canadian Heritage |
1) Celebration and Commemoration Program (CCP)
|
$80.23M |
1) $17.05M (celebration sites)
|
1) $9.3M (CCP) $9.0M
|
1) Canadians have access to information related to 2010 Winter Games related activities;
|
1) Whistler and Vancouver Live Sites: Canadians and all visitors had free access to physical infrastructure at the Whistler and Vancouver Live Sites to share the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games and artistic experiences. Construction of Live Sites was completed and sites were functional for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games in accordance with the respective contribution agreements. The public had the opportunity to meet athletes, enjoy shows from local, Canadian and international performers, follow media coverage of the competitions and watch the Opening Ceremony on a large screen. During the Olympic Games, the attendance at the celebration sites in Vancouver was estimated at 550,000 and the attendance at the Whistler celebration site was estimated at 680,000 people. |
|
$24.5M (Torch Relays)
|
$23.3M
|
Olympic and Paralympic Torch Relays: The Department of Canadian Heritage, through the CCP, provided grants to 189 celebration communities to support local community celebrations. In addition, the Department also supported 96 youth-oriented projects with an Olympic theme that gave young Canadians an opportunity to express their creativity and energy. |
|||||
$0.4M (Cultural Olympiad Digital Edition [CODE]) |
$0.4M
|
Canada CODE: CODE was the on-line home of distinctive and engaging digital programming including digital art exhibitions, digital shorts by Canadian filmmakers, as well as a portal through which users could experience live interactive art and cutting-edge music taking place during the Cultural Olympiad. Another initiative of CODE— called “Canada CODE” and a first for Canada and the Olympics—let Canadians take part on-line in a joint creative project by uploading their own photos and stories of their daily lives. The Canada CODE project, supported by the Department of Canadian Heritage, also connected Canadians from coast-to-coast-to coast during the relays. Communities had the opportunity to share their experience and excitement. Approximately 1 million people viewed the Canada CODE content on public screens. Every part of the country participated in the creation of Canada CODE with more than 10,000 contributions from people ages 7 to 78. |
|||||
$17.4M (Opening Ceremonies) |
$17.4M
|
Supporting the Opening Ceremonies: The Department of Canadian Heritage supported the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Opening Ceremony which showcased Canadian talent and Canada’s culture and history. The Opening Ceremony was the most-watched television event in Canadian history to date, and drew 13.3 million Canadian viewers. |
|||||
$0.9M
|
$0.2M
|
|
Victory Medal Ceremonies: Seven provinces/territories received financial support to ensure French programming and performances at the pre-event of the Victory Medal Ceremonies. Media coverage and reports received indicate a very high level of enthusiasm, participation and satisfaction from Canadians. |
||||
2) Aboriginal Peoples Program
|
2) $0.4M
|
2) $0.4M
|
2) Aboriginal languages and cultures are shared with the world Aboriginal people received broadcast of the 2010 Winter Olympics Games in Aboriginal languages |
2) 317 Aboriginal youth (24 Inuit, 24 Métis and 269 First Nations) from across Canada participated in cultural and language elements. Number of participants was lower than anticipated due to availability of youth. The sport events were broadcast in 8 different Aboriginal languages. APTN broadcasted more than 200 hours of the 2010 Winter Games. |
|||
3) Canada Pavilion (new funding)
|
3) $10.4M
|
3) $9.9M
|
3) Canadian and international visitors have access to information on Canadian sport excellence and innovation, and the Government of Canada’s contribution to the Games. Content and programming will highlight Canada’s tourism opportunities to visitors from all over the world, and reflect Canada’s cultural richness, our country’s two official languages, and our regional diversity. |
3) In September 2009, the Minister of State (Sport), announced $10 million for a Canada Pavilion at the 2010 Winter Games. |
|||
4) Sport Canada (new funding) |
4) $1.75M
|
4) $0.4M
|
4) Athletes' successes are celebrated
|
4) The athlete tribute was held on April 22, 2010 in the House of Commons. Participation:
|
|||
5) $0.28M Governor General Protocol | 5) $0.224M |
5) Contribution to a lasting positive impression of Canada as a capable host |
5) The Governor General, with the Prime Minister, hosted receptions for both domestic and international high level dignitaries attending the Olympic and Paralympic Games Opening Ceremonies. | ||||
D. Canadian Tourism Commission (CTC) | $26.0M | $7.7M |
$9.9M (Includes 2009 + January-March 2010). Note: this total includes additional partnership funding. |
Relationships built with key 2010 media partners
Continued growth of tourism export revenues for Canada |
The advertisement equivalency value from January to June 2009 was $9M. $83.3M (print only) for 2009. Tourism export revenues are provided on an annual basis by Statistics Canada. The preliminary result from January to December 2009 was $14.2 billion. |
||
E. DFAIT |
Total Invest in Canada Bureau: Global Business Leaders Initiative
Office of Protocol |
$3.41M |
$1.53M (new funding)
1.88M (new funding) |
$1.53M
$0.567M |
Increased global awareness of Canada’s brand profile and investment advantages
Investment stakeholders in Canada benefit from face-to-face networking and relationship-building opportunities with new and existing investment prospects
Essential protocol services are provided to Heads of State/Government in a timely manner during the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games so that Canada fulfills its international obligations Contribution to a lasting positive impression of Canada as a capable host |
Over 100 foreign companies/officials heard testimonials and received marketing material on Canada. 33 top international business executives took part in the program. The Global Business Leaders’ Day successfully engaged 115 foreign investor prospects, senior executives from multinational companies currently invested in Canada, Canadian business leaders as well as key government leaders. The event which was held in association with the Financial Times (FT) also reached global business executives through seven event notifications placed in the North American edition of the FT newspaper reaching 462,000 influential, elite readers in the US and banner ads on FT.com which generated over 2.5 million impressions. The Global Business Leaders Day was the only investment outreach event that engaged all provincial and territorial investment promotion partners to present a coherent and cohesive Canada Brand to business audiences during the Games. Overall, 47 government dignitaries and officials attended including: three Canadian federal ministers; the Premier of British Columbia; the US Ambassador to Canada; eight provincial ministers responsible for trade, investment, industry, finance, and/or intergovernmental relations; and several deputy ministers from the provinces and territories, C-level executives from regional economic development agencies, and other senior officials. The Office of the Minister for International Trade held 18 one-on-one meetings with potential investors; created networking opportunities in suites; and reached out to international companies through site visits. Provinces were engaged through co-operative sharing of contacts engagement at events and cross development of leads/contacts. Global business leaders were successfully reached through visibility initiatives including: The National Courtesy Clearance Program processed over 160 clearances, and met all deadlines in a timely manner. A total of 1,579 people were processed during the Olympic and Paralympic Games (39 Heads of State/Government, 2 Vice-Presidents, 1 Premier, 55 Ministers, 4 Deputy Prime Ministers, 1 head of an international organization, 24 other dignitaries during Olympic Games and accompanying delegation members). DFAIT Protocol fulfilled its international obligations which met the expectations of high level visitors as well as those of VANOC and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) as set out in the “Host City Contract.” 39 Heads of State/Government received courtesy clearances. Two companies were hired through a bidding process (RFP) to provide local transportation and support those needs not offered by either RCMP or VANOC. The Prime Minister met the United States Vice President, the Netherlands Prime Minister and the Secretary General of the Francophonie. The Minister of National Defence met the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Finland. The Office of the Minister of International Trade met the President of Estonia, the Prime Minister of Latvia, the Deputy Prime Minister of Russia and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slovakia. All of those mentioned above were offered modest hospitality. The Chief of Protocol received positive feedback from the diplomatic community on the services that were rendered during the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Both obligations were met and fulfilled in a timely manner. The Prime Minister and the Governor General jointly hosted receptions for both the domestic and international high level dignitaries attending the Olympic and Paralympic Games Opening Ceremonies. There was excellent collaboration with both British Columbia and Manitoba Protocol, VANOC, the Cities of Vancouver, Whistler and Richmond, the 2010 FS, RCMP, HC and the first ever collaboration with the Four Host First Nations (FHFN) as a full partner. DFAIT established a strong partnership to deliver seamless coordination of protocol services delivery. DFAIT eliminated the duplication of duties, maximized resources and established an Operation Centre under one roof. |
|
Final outcomes: Canada is recognized as a capable and inclusive host | |||||||
Intermediate outcomes: Canadians and international participants experience safe and high quality games | |||||||
Immediate outcomes: Successful delivery of mandated essential federal services |
|||||||
Service area: Essential Federal Services | |||||||
F. Human Resources and Social Development Canada (HRSDC) |
Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning |
Foreign workers and immigrants |
N/A |
N/A |
HRSDC/Service Canada, in collaboration with CIC/CBSA, will develop an end-to-end process to facilitate the entrance of temporary foreign workers, when warranted, for employers to support the 2010 Games. |
An end-to-end process to facilitate the entrance of temporary foreign workers, when warranted, for employers to support the 2010 Games was developed and implemented. Updates to HRSDC and CIC websites were made in 2009 to reflect policy changes related to the entry of foreign nationals to work in Canada during the 2010 Winter Games. Service standards:
Processing and outreach results as of April 1, 2010:
|
|
G. HC |
Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances, and safer living and working environments |
Regions and Programs Branch:
|
TB support: $2.6M |
TB support:
|
$1.757M
|
Response capability and access to health services are of a high standard
|
HC developed a protocol for carrying out an Operational Readiness Assessment for the Physical Emergency Preparedness and Response (PEPR) Vancouver Operation in preparation for the Games. Teams were equipped, completed joint operational exercises were completed (TPOF and GOLD) and training of officers began in the third quarter of 2009-2010. Employee Assistance Services (EAS) had employees and mental health professional on site ready to respond when required/requested. There was no request for EAS’ assistance in BC. EAS successfully delivered support as requested in the National Capital Region (NCR). Two teams were deployed as per the Concept of Operations. The teams were deployed with the Vancouver Fire and Rescue Service Hazmat team. PEPR was available to provide input 24/7 to requests. There were no incidents to respond to. |
|
$0.200M
|
$0.304M
|
Internationally Protected Persons (IPPs) health contingency needs are met
|
The medical and health needs of IPPs and their family members were met at 100%. Enough professionals, equipment, supplies and ambulances were available to meet needs.
|
|||
Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch:
|
$0.200M
|
$0.180M
|
Ensure that all conveyances are meeting recommended public health standards or guidelines
|
Two Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) worked full time in Vancouver Airport to provide assistance to the local team when needed. The local Environmental Health Manager (EHM) was on-call 24/7. Cleaning and Disinfection Guidance documents were sent to the conveyance operators in November 2009. Conveyance operators were notified individually to contact the EHM directly to report any unusual public health activities. Daily reports were received from the Province through the Provincial Surveillance System. The systems did not pick up any increase of communicable disease (including H1N1) in Canada during the Olympic period. |
|||
Health Products and Food Branch: Import of drugs |
$0.325M | $0.325M | Ensure that all points of entry are meeting recommended public health standards or guidelines | HC received 21 applications from 17 different countries for review during the period; 75 applications were reviewed and approved (including applications received in the previous quarter). 10 export applications were received after the Olympics. | |||
H. PHAC | $2.7M | $1.5M | $1.5M |
Ensured standard operating procedures (SOPs), infrastructure and operational capacity for 24/7 activation of the Health Portfolio Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) and Health Portfolio Regional Operation and Coordination Centre (ROCC) in BC
Augmented capacity to respond to the increase in passenger load at ports of entry in Canada. Federal public health communications strategy during the 2010 Games
Public Health Mass Gathering Plan and 2010 Annex
Forward Assessment Team on site during the 2010 Games and Health Emergency Response Teams (HERT) ready to be deployed during the 2010 Games BC/Yukon Regional Office will engage in and monitor activities at numerous levels in the region to inform all of the Agency's 2010 activities and ensure collaboration of service delivery at the local level |
Following the H1N1 response, a series of lessons learned and after action reviews were conducted to identify required changes and augmentations to SOPs and EOC-related documents. Based on lessons learned, an Information Management Policy was developed, staff were trained on its use and it was implemented. Information related to the 2010 Games was stored on TeamWorks and archived following the Games. Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) training was delivered to BC and Winnipeg regional staff as well as NCR staff. The BC ROCC was activated 24/7 to Level 2 from February 3, 2010 to March 21, 2010 and the Health Portfolio EOC was activated at a Level 2 from February 3, 2010 to March 21, 2010. The National Microbiological Laboratory Operations Centre (NML OC) was activated 24/7 from January 4, 2010 to March 29, 2010. These activations were preceded by extensive planning, training, collaboration with regional stakeholders and participation in Exercises Bronze, Silver and Gold. Additional quarantine staff from other Quarantine Stations enabled the program to respond to the additional need of support from stakeholders and the increase in passenger load at ports of entry in BC. The 2010 Winter Games Communication Framework was developed, as well as detailed media relations, e-communications, health promotion and internal communications plans. Some of the activities in these plans, such as the launch of a portfolio 2010 Winter Games website, development of a speech module/key messages/good news story regarding healthy living, the identification of potential Ministerial opportunities around the Torch Relay, development of messages for staff promoting healthy living, and provincial partnerships were completed. An evergreen media lines package was developed. PHAC communications support requirements for the Health Portfolio EOC and ROCC were identified and filled. The Health Portfolio Mass Gathering Public Health Plan for 2010 Vancouver Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games was successfully approved and implemented during this event. A $1M PHAC grant to VANOC supported staffing, training and operation of a Mobile Medical Unit which served as an Emergency Room and critical care unit. Twenty-one physicians, nurses and respiratory therapists from the Agency’s HERT were part of the medical team that staffed the unit for 60 days. The ROCC served as the hub of the portfolio’s emergency response activities, and acted as an information conduit; monitored portfolio-related events; provided situational awareness to the other operations centres; liaised with key regional contacts such as the BC Centre of Disease Control, Public Safety Canada, Vancouver Coastal Health, and VANOC; and coordinated routine activities. |
||
I. Environment Canada (EC) | Weather and environmental predictions and services reduce risks and contribute to the well-being of Canadians | Improved knowledge and information on weather and environmental conditions influence decision-making. | $9.3M | $2.3M | $2.56M | Delivery of weather services in support of federal partners, Games operations and for the benefit of the public and visitors to Canada. |
All necessary infrastructure and supporting technologies were developed and implemented well before the Opening Ceremonies. Completion of the monitoring network occurred in the third quarter of 2009-2010 and was fully operational including Whistler radar and Squamish Wind Profiler. A secondary network of more scientific, research-oriented instruments operated in tandem with the basic network before and during the Games. New 2010 public weather services were prototyped using EC’s popular web site http://www.weatheroffice. More than 99% of weather observations were delivered on time, as the monitoring system in place demonstrated. All forecasts were delivered on time during the 2010 Games. Forecasts were used proactively to alter the Games competition schedule, sometimes days in advance of originally planned events. This is by far the most extensive use of weather forecasts by any Olympic Games. Routine and specialized weather services were made available to Federal Essential Services agencies both prior to and at Games time including easy access to sophisticated weather modeling and forecasts for security and environmental emergency response. The futures of most observing systems were ascertained. Most sites will be decommissioned in fiscal year 2010-2011. Negotiations for several legacy agreements for ongoing operations of some of the Olympic weather observing network are underway and will be completed in 2010-2011. Other legacy projects include a Mountain Weather Course, forecast tools, scientific knowledge and data, as well as knowledge sharing with the weather service providers for London 2012 and Sochi 2014, and for EC’s support for the 2015 Pan-American Games. |
Canada's natural capital is restored, conserved and enhanced |
Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes. |
$2.6M | $0.5M | $0.49M | Promotion of environmental sustainability for the 2010 Winter Games and the establishment of sustainable legacies for Canadians |
EC engaged in several events during the fiscal year of 2009-2010 designed to promote overall environmental sustainability and showcase Canadian innovation, technologies and best practices as well as a greater awareness of environmental sustainability initiatives associated with the 2010 Winter Games. EC participated in many showcasing/public awareness events (such as EPIC 2009, National Public Service Week (NPSW) Tradeshow, Commuter Challenge, VANOC Sustainability Fair, Governexx, Transportation Fair, Sustainability Challenge, and others). These events enabled EC to reach a wide audience within the public service as well as the general public. Several promotional materials and informational products designed to communicate sustainability messaging were created for use at the events – fact sheets, sustainability video supplemental materials, showcasing presentation slides, biodiversity informational products, etc. Advice was provided through various committees and meetings. EC’s coordination role expanded from sustainability to assist in the Department’s operational planning during Games time. This included coordinating and disseminating informational resources, liaising among the various units responsible for EC’s daily operations, and preparing and coordinating briefing materials for senior management. EC tracked and recorded efforts undertaken by Essential Federal Services departments to reduce their Games-related environmental footprint in support of the Government of Canada’s commitments to the sustainability of the Games. EC participated as a member of the Technical Committee on Sustainable Events to develop a draft Canadian Standards Association standard for public review. The 2010 Greening Government Toolkit was launched. A regional pilot project was designed to assist employees in greening government operations. EC financially supported and contributed to the creation of the Vancouver 2010 Sustainability Journey. The VANOC-led initiative developed an animated video to help tell the sustainability story of the Games. Promotional materials were also created to supplement the Vancouver 2010 Sustainability Journey. EC produced specially adapted versions (voice-over and text overlay on two separate themes) of the animated “Vancouver 2010 Sustainability Journey” video. Videos were made available to the public via YouTube (www.YouTube.com/Environmentcan). Specially adapted “Vancouver 2010 Sustainability Journey” videos were featured within the Canada Pavilion during the Games, and were also widely disseminated through federal government channels, shown at Service Canada and others. EC partnered with VANOC, the United Nation Environment Programme and other Games partners on a “Do Your Part” video contest aimed towards youth. The Minister of the Environment also attended and delivered a short speech at the recognition event. Public education and outreach materials were developed in an attempt to link the environmental protection efforts made during the 2010 Winter Games venue development to promote 2010, the International Year of Biodiversity. Six Biodiversity Profiles were created as annexes to the interactive Urban and Nature BioKits developed by EC's Biosphere to highlight the biodiversity found near several of the major 2010 Winter Games venues. These profiles were created for the Richmond Skating Oval, UBC Thunderbird Arena, Vancouver Olympic and Paralympic Village, Cypress Mountain, Whistler Olympic Park, and Whistler Creekside and Sliding Centre. The Biodiversity Profiles were distributed through Natural Resources Canada's (NRCan) Geological Survey of Canada storefront on Robson Street, and are now posted on the EC BioKit webpage. The profiles are a precursor to the development of a Vancouver BioKit, to be done during 2010-2011 in conjunction with Canadian Wildlife Service and several potential partners including Metro Vancouver, the Stanley Park Ecological Society, Bird Studies Canada, the Nature Conservancy of Canada, and TransCanada Trail. Green Guide project development: In the final quarter of fiscal 2009-2010, environmental sustainability of the 2010 Games was promoted through 6 high profile events and activities during and after the Games. There were two IOC Observer Program presentations, two Ministerial announcements (carbon offsetting, youth video contest), the Sustainability Video at the Canada Pavilion, and a booth at GLOBE 2010. The Games resulted in expanded reach and scope due to increases in website traffic and public awareness from these events. EC partnered with DFAIT, NRCan and TC on a 2010 Sustainability exhibit at GLOBE 2010. The booth highlighted the Government of Canada’s contributions to the 2010 Winter Games legacies in sustainable building, sustainable transportation, environmental footprint reduction, and environmental awareness and engagement. Approximately 350 visitors directly engaged with booth staff (they either picked up some of the handout material or spoke with the booth staff). The booth showcased all the previously developed sustainability products as well as new products developed for the event. |
|
Environmental assessment is integral part of program and policy decision-making. |
Efficient and effective environmental assessments |
$1.5M | $0.1M | $0.1M | Completion of environmental assessment follow-up activities. |
All environmental assessments previously were completed as required. |
|
J. Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Healthy and productive aquatic eco-systems. | Habitat management |
$0.6M |
$0.1M | $0 |
Environmental assessment work conducted as required. |
All environmental assessments were completed as required. |
Total | $546.24M | $143.052M | $140.099M |
Comments on Variances: INAC disbursed a $34M First Nations Grant in 2008-2009. This amount is included in the “Total Non-Security Federal Funding Allocation” of $580.24M but it is not included in the totals in column 13 of the body of the report.
Results achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): N/A.
Contact information: Charles-Antoine Drouin, 819-956-9792
1 The statement of the shared outcomes is further detailed from those announced in the 2009-2010 RPP in order to strengthen the accountability. Since the Horizontal RMAF for Games Security and Public Safety was released in March 2009, the 2010 FS updated the Horizontal Integrated RMAF/RBAF, logic model and performance measurement strategy to reflect the evolving nature of the horizontal initiative; subsequently, the shared outcomes were further clarified.
2 Additional funding was obtained in September 2009, which is not included in the 2009-2010 RPP. Subsequently, two departments which are recipients of incremental funding were included in the horizontal initiative, namely the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) and the Department of Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC).
Name of Horizontal Initiative: Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality 2008-2013: Acting for the Future
Name of Lead Department(s): Canadian Heritage
Lead Department Program Activity: Promotion of inter-cultural understanding
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: April 1, 2008
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2013
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $1,110.10 M
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The Roadmap for Canada’s Linguistic Duality 2008–2013: Acting for the Future (Roadmap) is a Government of Canada policy statement that includes a number of initiatives to strengthen and promote linguistic duality. Fourteen federal institutions have received funds for sectoral programs and activities related to official languages. The Roadmap contributes to the attainment of a strategic outcome for Canadian Heritage (Canadians have a sense of their Canadian identity) and to the Government of Canada’s outcome (A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion).
Another key component of the Roadmap is the implementation of an accountability framework and a coordinated government-wide approach to official languages. The implementation of the Roadmap is a component of the broader Official Languages Program (OLP), as defined and approved by the Committee of Deputy Ministers on Official Languages in December 2004.
Web site: http://www.pch.gc.ca/slo-ols/
Shared Outcome(s):
Three levels of outcomes have been established.
Ultimate outcome: Canadians enjoy the benefits of linguistic duality; live and work in communities that reflect Canadian values with respect to the use of English and French; and have access to government services in the language of choice.
Three intermediate outcomes:
Eight immediate outcomes:
Governance Structure(s):
The Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages is responsible for the implementation of the Roadmap. The Official Languages Secretariat (OLS) (Canadian Heritage) supports the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages. With respect to roles and responsibilities, the OLS is responsible for developing and coordinating the results of the Roadmap. The OLS ensures that all information (financial and non-financial) needed is gathered and that the content of all logic models of the Roadmap’s structure is taken into consideration. The OLS is also responsible for the complete implementation and the accountability framework for the Roadmap. This role was given to the OLS by the partners through the development of a Management Framework for the Roadmap, which outlines the activities and results structure, the governance structure, as well as the roles and responsibilities of departments and different interdepartmental committees, while also identifying the relevant operational issues concerning its horizontal implementation. The OLS will also support the governance of the Official Languages Program through various mechanisms and committees.
A governance structure has been established; the highest level is the Committee of Assistant Deputy Ministers on Official Languages (CADMOL). It acts on behalf of all federal departments, agencies and organizations that are partners in the Roadmap in a variety of ways: it supports the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages and all ministers who have responsibilities under the Official Languages Act (OLA); it ensures leadership for managing the OLP, and particularly the Roadmap, by making decisions and overseeing the coordination of partners’ actions; it guides the implementation of the Horizontal Results-based Management and Accountability Framework (HRMAF) and oversees the evaluation of the government strategy regarding official languages (the Roadmap). During CADMOL meetings, departments having specific responsibilities under the OLA (for instance, Canadian Heritage, Justice Canada, and the Canada Public Service Agency) report on achievements that are specific to their mandate and describe the challenges and issues related to these responsibilities.
Three interdepartmental committees support CADMOL’s work by providing recommendations. Firstly, the Interdepartmental Policy Committee (IPC) provides an information-sharing forum between partners in order to present a joint approach to strategic issues regarding the OLP. The Interdepartmental Management Committee for the Official Languages Program (IMCOLP) seeks to ensure that interdepartmental coordination of the OLP is formalized and structured, most notably by assessing the implementation of the OLP and strengthening the accountability process. The Coordinating Committee on Official Languages Research (CCOLR) ensures that official languages research is coordinated. The committees may create working groups as needed to complete specific projects. For example, the Working Group on the HRMAF Revision (Working Group) was created in the summer of 2008.
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2009-10 |
Actual Spending for 2009-10 |
Expected Results for 2009-10 |
Results Achieved in 2009-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ultimate outcome: Canadians enjoy the benefits of linguistic duality; live and work in communities that reflect Canadian values with respect to the use of English and French; and have access to government services in the language of choice. | |||||||
Intermediate outcome 1: Enhanced capacity of Canadians (English speaking in Quebec and French-speaking across Canada) to live and work in vibrant communities in the language of choice. | |||||||
Immediate outcome 1.1: Continued and improved access to justice services in both official languages. | |||||||
Justice Canada | Justice, Policy, Legislation and Programs |
Contraventions Act Fund
|
$47.46 M | $9.49 M | $5.13 M | Continued and increased access to justice in both official languages by the implementation of the Contraventions regime in one province. |
The negotiation of agreements is very detailed and requires strong collaboration with provincial and territorial governments. |
Justice Canada | Internal Services | Contraventions Act Fund | $1.92 M | $0.38 M | $0.26 M | N/A | N/A |
Justice Canada | Justice, Policy, Legislation and Programs |
Initiative of support to access to justice in both languages (new component: justice training)
|
$38.02 M | $6.97 M | $4.46 M |
Training priorities established following results of the nationwide needs analysis on training needs in both official languages in the area of justice. Coordination mechanism related to training is created and functional. Eight financial agreements concluded in terms of core funding from the Support Fund. 30% of financed projects will focus on awareness or knowledge. 35% of projects will have other sources of funding (other than from the Department). Five projects will fall under the training component. |
The Department held an Access to Justice in Both Official Languages Sub-Committee meeting in November 2009. The objective of the meeting was to enable participants to generate ideas for potential partnerships to develop projects in line with the findings of the Canada- wide Analysis of Official Language Training Needs in the area of Justice.
|
Justice Canada | Internal Services | Initiative of support to access to justice in both languages (new component: justice training) | $1.89 M | $0.44 M | $0.21 M | N/A | N/A |
Immediate Outcome 1.2: Continued and improved access to health services in both official languages. | |||||||
3. Health Canada |
Canadian Health System |
Training, Networks and Access to Health Services Results for the 2008–2013 Roadmap:
|
$174.3 M | $34.8 M | $36.3 M |
Elaborate a baseline study to identify gaps in information, to strengthen the database, to systematically collect baseline information on performance indicators, to serve as a reference point, and to measure change over time. |
Performance reporting templates were developed in 2009-2010 in collaboration with recipients of the Official Languages Health Contribution Program. The first draft of the baseline study was completed in June 2010 and will be further revised in 2010-2011 following receipt of reporting template data provided by program recipients for fiscal 2009-2010.
23 contribution agreements were launched with educational institutions and community-based organizations for the engagement of new program activities to address program objectives.
|
Immediate Outcome 1.3: Improved social and economic development of official language minority communities (OLMC). | |||||||
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada | Social Development |
Strengthening NGOs’ means for Early Childhood Development
|
$4.0 M | $0.8 M | $0.8 M |
Develop tools for the implementation of the National Framework for Collaboration on Early Childhood Development to enhance the language and culture of minority Francophone communities in Canada:
|
The following educational tools and products have been developed: The Commission nationale des parents francophones, the recipient of grant funding,developed a framework for data collection and a guide to help its members to elaborate a strategic plan for ECD in their respective regions. Strategic plans have been completed in each region and plans monitoring progress made in ECD in every province. Two forums were organized to allow parents and ECD professionals to share information. |
Skills and Employment |
Family Literacyi
|
$7.5 M | $1.8 M | $1.2 M |
Initiate four research projects on the specific literacy needs of new groups such as immigrants, fathers, grand-parents, exogamous families, eligible clients, and on ways of integrating family literacy in other areas such as the workplace, sport, and theatre. Initiate the development, testing and adaptation of six new family literacy models responding to the needs of new groups. Initiate the development of four new promotion and awareness models for partner literacy organizations targeting new groups. Implement a performance and results-based measurement framework. |
Five research projects were launched to identify 1) family literacy needs of the specific groups: new parents, grandparents, seasonal workers, exogame family and rights-holder to French education, and 2) ways to integrate family literacy in other areas such as the workplace. The development, testing and adaptation of three new family literacy models designed to address the needs of new groups have begun.
|
|
Internal Services |
Child Care Pilot Projectii
|
$13.5 M | $2.7 M | $1.7 M | Conduct child assessments and parent and community surveys in order to add to the collective knowledge of what works to help ensure Francophone minority children have the abilities to succeed when they start school. |
The second of two years of preschool program delivery and research activities was completed in the six participating minority Francophone communities. The impacts of the preschool program on the children’s readiness for schooling in French were analyzed. Research activities to measure the children’s future achievement in school, 12 and 24 months after the end of the preschool program, have started. |
|
Skills and Employment |
Enabling Fund for Official Language Minority Communities
|
$69.0 M | $13.8 M | $13.8 M |
Sign contribution agreements with 14 organizations responsible for enhancing community economic development and human resources development within official language minority communities. |
Fourteen agreements were signed with the delegated organizations in the official languages minority communities, including one for each province and territory and one for the francophone network at the national level (the Réseau de développement économique et d’employabilité RDÉE Canada).
|
|
Citizenship and Immigration Canada | Integration of French-speaking immigrants |
Recruitment and integration of immigrants Result for the 2008–2013 Roadmap:1) French-speaking immigrants obtain reinforced services of establishment in OLMCs. |
$20.0 M | $4.5 M |
$6.77 M |
For 2009–2010, CIC will continue existing activities to foster immigration to Francophone minority communities (FMCs). This period will be used to strengthen implementation of the Strategic plan to Foster Immigration to Francophone Minority Communities.
|
Two committees, which are co‑chaired by Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and the community, bring together our federal, provincial and territorial government partners, as well as community representatives. 1) The CIC-Francophone Minority Communities Steering Committee held a meeting on June 1, 2009. The vast majority of participants said that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the subjects covered at the meeting (over 90% were satisfied with most of the criteria). Four annual priorities were confirmed. 2) The Strategic Plan Implementation Committee also held three meetings in 2009‑2010. The three related working groups (international, social, economic) also held a total of three meetings. One of the major results of this cooperative effort was the adoption of a common definition for community networks. CIC is in the process of compiling information about programs offered by its partners that support the implementation of the Strategic Plan. This information will be distributed as part of our communication efforts and exchange of best practices (distribution scheduled for 2010‑2011). As part of the March 2010 National Metropolis Conference, CIC co‑organized a working session on the role of governments, networks and community partners. This session brought together representatives from across the country and provided an opportunity for very productive discussions on best practices and partnership opportunities. The Best Practices Manual on Francophone Immigration in Canada and the Current Research Compendium on Francophone Immigration in Canada were also released at this conference. Finally, with the help of funding from CIC, Statistics Canada published the Statistical Portrait of the French‑Speaking Immigrant Population Outside Quebec, which describes recent trends in the characteristics of French-speaking immigrants. With regard to recruitment and promotion, Destination Canada 2009 made it possible for 79 representatives from 10 provinces and two territories and from Francophone organizations, regions and municipalities to meet over 2,200 prospective immigrants. For the first time, officers from visa offices in Abidjan, Bucharest, Damascus, Cairo, Rabat and Tunis attended the preparatory session in order to gather information on the potential for the recruitment of French-speaking immigrants in their respective regions.
|
Industry Canada—FedNor
|
Community, Economic and Regional Development
Northern Economy |
Economic Development Initiative
|
$10.5 M
|
$2.60 M
|
$0.89 M
|
Industry Canada will hold community consultations at the national level with partners. FedNor: Expected results for 2009-2010 are to develop 30 projects with the planned funding for the same year. The emphasis will be put on community strategic planning and economic and enterprise development initiatives to foster economic development of OLMCs.
|
Industry Canada held two consultations meetings with Anglophone SMEs in Quebec and OLMCs SMEs through CEDEC and RDEE to gather information on issues pertaining to SMEs in OLMCs and Anglophone minority communities. National consultations will be held in September and October 2010. Socio-economic analysis based on 2006 census as well as 3 studies with partners were undertaken to collect data on OLMCs, to better understand their needs. $245,032.15 has been invested while $104,967.85 has lapsed.
|
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) Note: Roadmap programming was transferred to CanNor in August 2009 |
$0.4 M | $0.1M | $0.1M |
INAC: Encourage the economic development of OLMCs across the territories and will complement current economic development efforts in these communities. |
|||
CanNor: Encourage the economic development of OLMCs across the territories and will complement current economic development efforts in these communities. |
CanNor supported the social and economic development of OLMCs via funding for a project led by the Association des Francophones du Nunavut that also included participation of Francophone partners from across the North. This project accounted for the entirety of CanNor’s EDI budget and leveraged an additional $73,000 from other CanNor programs. | ||||||
Canada Economic Development (CED) for Quebec regions | Community Development |
Economic Development Initiative
|
$10.2 M | $2.0 M |
$1.02 M |
CED will put in place the Economic Development Initiative for English communities of Quebec. The priority will be put on projects, such as local planning, entrepreneurship, creation and development of SME, tourism, integration of targeted groups and attractive funding in order to create an economic environment which helps and attracts the development of enterprises in OLMCs, especially for young people |
10 EDI projects underway in 2009-2010 Result 1 - Increased capacities of SMEs and communities: 5 projects: 3 projects which support capacity development and economic diversification and 2 projects which support partnership activities to promote integration of OLMCs and participation in local development. Result 2 - Develop OLMC SMEs: 5 projects which support the development / maintenance of OLMC SMEs or capacity development
|
Western Economic Diversification Canada |
Research and Analysis; Community Economic Planning, Development and Adjustment; Business Development and Entrepreneur-ship; Innovation |
Economic Development Initiative
|
$3.2 M | $0.8 M | $0.68 M |
Improved understanding of Western Canadian economic issues, challenges, opportunities and priorities. |
Manitoba (CEDEM) initiative to support youth, rural diversification, and business development: Place de la Francophonie 2010: 24 SMEs and NPOs participation in international event for the promotion of francophone tourism and agri-food industries, encouraged cultural tourism, and strengthened OLMC economic development. |
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency | Community Development |
Economic Development Initiative
|
$6.2 M | $1.8 M | $0.35 M |
Number of partnerships in Atlantic Canada with groups representing OLMCs (10). Number of projects approved (10). |
Twenty partnerships were created with groups representing OLMCs in Atlantic Canada Six projects were approved. |
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency | Community Development |
Support to francophone immigration in New-Brunswick
|
$10.0 M | $2.7 M | $0.66 M |
Number of immigration centres opened in OLMCs (2). Number of immigration awareness sessions to business owners (4). |
One center was opened in the Acadian Peninsula. Twenty-eight awareness sessions were offered to business owners. |
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Minority Language Education –
|
$280.0 M | $56.0 M | $56.0 M |
Renew the Multilateral Protocol with the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) and various agreements containing action plans with the provinces and territories concerning minority language education |
Renewal of 13 various agreements on minority language education with provinces and territories and multilateral Protocol with the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC).
|
Official Languages |
Minority Language Education –
|
$5.2 M | $1.04 M | $1.04 M |
Implementation of an agreement with the CMEC for the delivery of the Odyssee (Monitors) program to support learning in minority area classrooms. |
The amount of participants in the Odyssee program was maintained with 108 participants. |
|
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Minority Language Education –
|
$1.72 M | $0.34 M | $0.34 M |
Implementation of an agreement with the CMEC for the delivery of Destination Clic (Bursary) program for young francophone’s of OLMC’s. |
This program helps almost 185 young francophone’s outside Quebec to enrich their first language while discovering new communities in Canada. |
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Community vitality –
|
$10.5 M | $10.5 M | $10.5 M |
Grants and contributions for the implementation of youth projects and activities in different areas, which allows the use of the language of the minority. |
Implementation of youth projects and activities that allow and promote the use of the language of the minority. Note: The Official Languages Support Programs Branch was unable to conduct the survey planned for 2009 that would allow to measure the capacity for OLMC’s to live in their own language in their milieu. The OLSP is currently reviewing its performance measurement strategy. |
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Community vitality –
|
$22.5 M (including admin. cost) | $4.5 M | $4.5 M | Grants and contributions for the creation, improvement and delivery of activities and services to support life environments fostering the use of the language in minority area. |
Investment indicated in the Road Map has permitted the improvement of programs to create, improve and deliver activities and services intended for OLMC that promote a sense of belonging, such as investments in organizations that support French language culture and minority community medias. Note: The Official Languages Support Programs Branch was unable to conduct the survey planned for 2009 that would allow to measure the capacity for OLMC’s to live in their own language in their milieu. The OLSP is currently reviewing its performance measurement strategy. |
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Community vitality –Component: Intergovernmental Cooperation.
|
$22.5 M | $4.5 M | $4.5 M | Implementation of agreements with provincial and territorial governments for the delivery of provincial and territorial services in the language of the minority. |
Renewal of 8 various agreements on minority-language education with provinces and territories.
|
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Community vitality –Component: Cultural Development Funds
|
$14.0 M | $3.5 M | $3.5 M | Grants and contributions for the implementation of services, activities and cultural products fostering the development of cultural vitality in OLMCs. |
Investment indicated in the Road Map has permitted the implementation of 79 projects (services, activities and cultural products) fostering the development of cultural vitality in OLMC’s. Note: The Official Languages Support Programs Branch was unable to conduct the survey planned for 2009 that would allow to measure the capacity for OLMC’s to live in their own language in their milieu. The OLSP is currently reviewing its performance measurement strategy. |
Intermediate Result 2: Increased proportion of Canadians who are aware of the benefits and have the necessary tools to appreciate linguistic duality. | |||||||
Immediate Result 2.1: Strengthened capacity of language industries. | |||||||
Public Works and Government Services Canada |
Linguistic Management & Services |
Language Industry Initiative
|
$10.0 M | $1.68 M | $0.44 M |
Launch of the Language Industry Initiative in Spring 2009. |
In July 2009, the Canadian Language Sector Enhancement Program of Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) proceeded with a call for proposals of projects that aim to provide support for the development of a skilled labour force and to strengthen the capacity of the Canadian language sector. Following the call for proposals, PWGSC signed in 2009-2010 eight contribution agreements for a three-year period to support the promotion of the language industry, the integration of language technologies and innovative projects which will aim to strengthen the capacity of the Canadian language sector. |
Public Works and Government Services Canada | Linguistic Management & Services |
University Scholarships Program in Translation
|
$8.0 M | $1.45 M | $0.67 M | Launch of the University Scholarships Program in Translation in Fall 2009. |
In July 2009, the Canadian Language Sector Enhancement Program of Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) proceeded with a call for proposals of projects that aim to provide support for the development of a skilled labour force and to strengthen the capacity of the Canadian language sector. Following the call for proposals, PWGSC signed in 2009-2010 five contribution agreements for a three-year period to allocate university scholarships and student internships in translation to support the development of a skilled labour force. |
National Research Council of Canada | Information Technologies |
Languages Technologies Research Centre
|
$10.0 M | $2.0 M | $2.07 M |
Immediate result: Transfer of knowledge and technology. Implementation of a machine translation system PORTAGE in the Translation Bureau (Public Works and Government Services Canada) and, at least, in a translation firm of the private sector. Negotiation of a commercial license for machine translation technology, PORTAGE. |
Negotiations continued with the Translation Bureau (BtB) concerning the use of the PORTAGE statistical machine translation system at the BtB. A large Canadian private sector translation bureau conducted trials of PORTAGE; the positive results of the trials led this translation bureau to acquire a commercial licence for PORTAGE at the
beginning of 2010-2011. A prototype of the Terminoweb terminology research tool was deployed at the School of Translation and Interpretation of the University of Ottawa. |
Immediate Result 2.2: Improved knowledge and use of both official languages. | |||||||
Public Works and Government Services Canada | Linguistic Management & Services |
Language Portal of Canada Result for 2008–2013 Roadmap: 1) Canadians have better access to quality language resources in both official languages. |
$16.0 M | $4.48 M | $4.48 M |
Launch of the Language Portal of Canada in Fall 2009. |
Public Works and Government Services Canada developed the Language Portal of Canada, which provides all Canadians with free access to a wide range of writing resources and tools, including TERMIUM, the terminology and linguistic databank of the Government of Canada. The Portal was officially launched on October 8th, 2009 and is now accessible by all Internet users. The Translation Bureau professionals add new content and update daily the Portal by creating new additions and revising existing content. In 2009-2010, 392 articles and headlines, 358 flash quizzes and 8 articles from contributors have been published on the Portal. Three partnership agreements with external partners have also been signed for the development of linguistic resources to add new content to the Portal. Moreover, the Discover section of the Portal contains over 1000 hyperlinks that refer to Anglophone and Francophone minority communities, the Canadian language training, Canadian tools and language-related works, and resources and articles from the provinces and dealing with the situation of languages in Canada. |
Canada School of Public Service |
Foundational learning Official Languages Learning
|
Expanding Universities’ Access to Language Learning
|
$2.5 M | $0.9 M | $0.68 M | New partnerships with Canadian universities. | 10 new partnerships have been established with Canadian universities |
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Second Language Education –
|
$190.0 M | $38.0 M | $38.0 M |
Renew the Multilateral Protocol with the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) and various agreements containing action plans with the provinces and territories concerning second language learning |
Renewal of 13 various agreements concerning second language education with provinces and territories and multilateral Protocol with the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC).
|
Canadian Heritage |
Official Languages |
Second Language Education –
|
$14.8 M | $2.96 M | $2.96 M | Implementation of an agreement with the CMEC for Odyssee (Monitor) program delivery to support learning in second-language classrooms. | The Odyssee program is maintained. This program allowed for 240 students to participate. |
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Second Language Education –
|
$38.3 M | $7.66 M | $7.66 M | Implementation of an agreement with the CMEC for the delivery of the Explore program delivery for second-language bursaries. | 7,767 scholarship holders took advantage of the Explore program. This program offers a cultural exchange that help learners perfect their comprehension of their second official language. |
Canadian Heritage |
Official Languages |
Promotion of Linguistic Duality – Component: Youth Initiatives
|
$2.0 M | $2.0 M | $2.0 M | Grants and contributions for the implementation of youth projects and activities in different areas, which allows the use of the second language and the exposure to second language. |
Implementation of youth projects and activities that promote the use of the second-language and exposure to it. |
Immediate Result 2.3: Improved access to cultural expressions of both linguistic groups. | |||||||
Canadian Heritage |
Official Languages Broadcasting Policy and Programs |
CTRC Study
|
Non- monetary | N/A | N/A | CRTC report on availability and quality of English- and French-language services in the linguistic minority communities in Canada completed by March 31, 2009. |
1) As part of the Roadmap for Canada’s Linguistic Duality, the government issued an order in council under section 15 of the Broadcasting Act requesting that the CRTC examine the availability and quality of English- and French‑language broadcasting services in Anglophone and Francophone minority communities in Canada, and that it propose measures to
encourage and facilitate access to the widest range of these services.
|
Canadian Heritage | Cultural Industries |
Musical Showcase Program for Artists from Official-language Communities Result for the 2008–2013 Roadmap: 1) Improved access to cultural expressions of both linguistic groups. |
$4.5 M | $1.0 M | $1.0 M |
Funding agreements are in place with partners who organize showcases and finance the artists.
Music showcases are organized and presented.
|
Funding agreements signed with FACTOR and Musicaction, the third-party administrators responsible for delivering the funds to organize music showcases for artists coming from OLMC.
|
Canadian Heritage | Cultural Industries |
National Translation Program for Book Publishing |
$5.0 M | $0.75 M | $0.75 M |
Funding is allocated to book publishers for eligible translations. |
Funding was allocated to book publishers for eligible translations.
61 translations of Canadian-authored books in both official languages by Canadian publishers were funded. |
Intermediate Result 3: Strengthening capacity of the Government of Canada relating to official languages. | |||||||
Immediate Result 3.1: Reinforced coordination for the Official Languages Program (OLP). | |||||||
Justice Canada | Legal Services to Government |
Accountability and Coordination Framework
|
$2.18 M | $0.44 M | $0.46 M |
Client-focused service delivery. |
Legal opinion and advice services for federal institutions:
|
Internal Services | Accountability and Coordination Framework | $0.15 M | $0.03 M | $0.03 M | N/A | N/A | |
Canadian Heritage | Official Languages |
Accountability and Coordination Framework
|
$13.5 M | $2.8 M | $2.12 M |
Support to Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages and senior officials in elaborating timely documentation and in insisting on quality assurance of given information and strategic advice.
|
Support for the Minister of Official Languages and the senior managers Update of the Accountability and Coordination Framework
Coordination of the committees Coordination of the interdepartmental committees ensures that the Roadmap is implemented effectively. The significance of the Roadmap’s implementation and the Government of Canada’s commitment to the official languages were key themes of the 40th anniversary celebration of the Official Languages Act in 2009. Development of the HRMAF public document |
Immediate Result 3.2: Reinforced linguistic duality in federal public service. | |||||||
Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer 3 |
Policy Direction. Partnerships and Integration Program
|
Centre of excellence
|
$17.0 M | $3.4 M | $2.76 M |
Simplified, updated and restructured official languages policy instruments to allow deputy heads to better discharge their responsibilities regarding the implementation of the Official Languages Act. An interpretation service for policy instruments made available to institutions subject to the Official Languages Act. Support reviewing the policy instruments of other policy centres for everything regarding official languages. Support, opinion and advice provided to institutions subject to the Official Languages Act to better assist them in applying the provisions of the relevant policy instruments. Information sessions and workshops offered to federal institutions to help them to better understand the requirements of the Act and of the policy instruments. Awareness-raising activities with institutions’ senior management in need of additional support. |
The 130 or so requirements contained in official languages policy instruments have been reviewed in depth and undergone a risk analysis using the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Smart Rules Charter. 8 policy instruments from other policy centres were commented on. Moreover, guidelines on social media were drafted and should be disseminated soon. 38 requests for individualized interpretation were handled. 3 horizontal interpretations were carried out. They included an interpretation for the application of the Supreme Court’s CALDECH decision. This function was combined with the function for providing simplified policy instruments. This function was not renewed under the reorganization that took place in 2009. 11 information sessions and workshops were offered to federal institutions. A forum on good practices was also organized. This function is not part of the renewed functions in 2009. |
Strategic Services Program |
Renewed method of cooperation with champions to encourage stronger leadership on official languages. Renewed method of cooperation with advisory committees to suggest ideas and encourage them to take shared initiatives to improve the overall official languages performance of institutions. |
The method of co-operation was renewed. A conference of the network of champions was organized. The method of co-operation was renewed. Advisory committees are more independent and institutions are playing a more active role in the committees’ work. 2 meetings of the DACOL and 2 meeting of the CCACOL were held. |
|||||
Integrity and Sustainability Program |
Monitoring of official languages management practices and controls in the context of conducting risk-based official languages annual reports. An assessment of the state of official languages in the institutions that make up the core public administration in the context of the Management Accountability Framework (MAF). An Annual Report on Official Languages presented to Parliament that gives a strategic picture of the Program in the institutions subject to the Official Languages Act while focusing on a specific theme for the year. |
The method used for the annual reports on official languages exercise was completely rethought in order to base it on better risk management. Official languages management practices and control in institutions were reviewed in 2009–2010 using this new method. 77 annual reports were requested from institutions and 72 were received. Official languages were evaluated in the context of the MAF. The structure and content of the Annual Report were completely rethought to provide a strategic picture of the Program in institutions. The 2007–2008 report was the first to be written according to this new methodology. The 2007–2008 annual report was tabled in October 2009. |
|||||
Total | $1,108.4 M | $235.61 M | $220.79 M |
Comments on Variances:
ACOA:
EDI: Project approvals amount to $2,110,725. However, delays in implementing projects have resulted in $348,639.00 being claimed in 2009-2010.
FRANCOPHONE IMMIGRATION: The proponent placed emphasis on holding awareness sessions directed at the communities where welcoming centers are to be opened. Thus only one center was opened in 2009-2010 and claims for funding were therefore fewer than expected.
CED: TBS and Finance have agreed to transfer in 2010-2011 the amount of $ 1 100 000 in grants and contributions.
CIC: Please take note that CIC’s actual spending for 2009-2010 is higher than the planned spending for the same period. In fact, an additional 2.5 million dollars (10 million dollars for four years) was taken from the department’s settlement funds for the implementation of official languages initiatives, as specified in
CIC’s submission to the Treasury Board in relation to the Roadmap.
CSPS: • The Roadmap TB submission was approved at Treasure Board in December 2008 under condition (see attached). For this reason, as long as the conditions stated in the letter of decision were not fulfilled, the funds to implement the Roadmap initiatives could not be released.
• Heritage Canada and its partners have worked to develop a more detailed management framework fulfilling the Minister's requirements. A new presentation to Treasury Board was made in April 2009. This time, the submission was approved and the funds were released.
• Once the funds were received for the pilot project with universities (and the other projects of the Roadmap), the staffing process started and employees joined the project in June 2009.
• A request for proposal was posted for universities to apply and a selection was made in August 2009.
The Official announcement and launch of the pilot project was made by the Parliamentary secretary, Andrew Saxton, on October 14, 2009 at Simon Fraser University. Up till that date, the information about the selected universities was under embargo. This is only once the official announcement was made the School could start discussions with the universities.
• Some universities faced some difficulties to recruit students due to short deadline to proceed to the selection of the students, to familiarize them with the project and also due to administrative challenges in their organization. Therefore, some universities became active in the initiative not in January, but in February or March 2010; one will even begin in
September 2010. The students gradually joined the pilot-project (the majority between, end of January and end of March). Due to this situation and a matter of volume the Public Service Commission and the Learning plan service of the School could not administer all the tests before the end of the fiscal year 2009-2010. A part of the money allocated to these tasks was
not spent. The tests will continue in 2010-2011.
• For the reasons stated above, the School spent $681,401 on a budget of $ 900, 000 for the 2009-2010 fiscal year, a difference of $ 218, 599.
• However, the Canada School of Public Service expect to spend the funds that were not spent in 2009-2010 during the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 fiscal years.
Health Canada: In 2009-2010, $2,000,000 in additional funding was provided to the 11 member institutions making up the Consortium national de formation en santé to promote its activities/programs and recruit students, to expand the scope of distance learning, to strengthen clinical training through the purchase of medical equipment and to strengthen
continuous learning by recruiting teaching personnel. In addition, some program recipients did not spend the entire contribution to which they were entitled in 2009-2010, which brought the actual spending to $36,300,000.
Industry Canada: Discrepancy is due to the creation of the Agency in August 2009. The new agency was not able to make decisions as quickly as needed. The Agency needed more time to ensure a proper implementation’s process of the programme. Thus, 1 million has been postponed to 2010-2011.
Concerning FedNor, many projects are funded on a multi-annual basis. The funds have also been postponed to 2010-2011.
Justice Canada:
CONTRAVENTIONS: The province of Newfoundland and Labrador did not sign an agreement in 2009-2010 as anticipated.
The province of Prince Edward Island did not sign an agreement in 2009-2010.
The Department has been approached by Alberta and Saskatchewan to begin discussions on the manner in which to implement a Contraventions agreement. No agreement has yet been signed.
OFFICIAL LANGUAGES: There were fewer projects than anticipated related to the training component that were received and approved in fiscal year 2009-2010.
Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer:
Centre of Excellence: In 2009-2010, the operations of the Official Languages Centre of Excellence have been aligned with the new regime for human resources management, established in response to the findings of the horizontal review of human resources management functions and to the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on the Public Service.
PWGSC:
Language Industry Initiative: Of the total authorized expenditure for 2009-2010, $800,000 was deferred to 2010-2011.
University Scholarships Program in Translation: Of the total authorized expenditure for 2009-2010, $700,000 was deferred to 2010-2011 and 2011-2012.
Western Economic Diversification Canada: Grant and Contribution (Gs&Cs) discrepancy relates to unspent amount, based on the disbursement information originating from processed claims, as opposed to EDI allocated amount for this period.
PCH (OLS):The days of dialogue and the development phase of the Official Languages Performance and Information Management System (OLPIMS) will be postponed to 2010-2011, which explain the difference between planned spending and actual spending for 2009-2010.
Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): N/A
Contact information: Kirk Giroux (819-997-0622)
1 Family Literacy Initiative: As of April 19th, 2010, 11 projects have been approved totalling $2.61M since 2008. In fact, many of the projects approved were to be realized in multiple phases: research phases undertaken to identify the needs of the francophone minority communities and develop models or programs pertinent to the different target groups. It will be followed by pilot testing of literacy models or programs adapted to this clientele. The Office of Literacy and Essential Skills expects that all available funding will be engaged in the near future and that the total funding will be spent before March 31st, 2013.
2 Child Care Pilot Project: All funds allocated for the ongoing Child Care Pilot Project were spent. A process to identify additional research projects for future years was begun during 2009-2010, but did not identify any projects that could have started during 2009-2010.
3 In February 2009, the Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer has been created. It aggregates the Canada Public Service Agency and some parts of Treasury Board Secretariat related to compensation and human resources.
Has the department incorporated environmental performance considerations in its procurement decision-making processes?
Yes | No | In progress |
Summary of initiatives to incorporate environmental performance considerations in procurement decision-making processes:
Results achieved:
Contributions to facilitate government-wide implementation of green procurement:
Has the department established green procurement targets?
Yes | No | In Progress |
Summary of green procurement targets:
Results achieved:
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
---|
Response to the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Issues and Challenges Related to Local Television.
Link to the Government Response: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx? Response to the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Report on the Analysis of the Arts Programs that were cancelled in summer 2008.
Link to the Government Response: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=40177 Response to the Second Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women entitled: "Towards Gender Responsive Budgeting: Rising to the Challenge of Achieving Gender Equality".
Link to the Government Response: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4017756& Response to the Third Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages entitled: Francophone Arts and Culture: Living Life to Its Fullest in Minority Settings.
The Government Response is not available online. |
Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development) |
---|
Auditor General's 2009 Fall Report – Chapter I - Evaluating the Effectiveness of Programs
|
Name of Audit | Program Activity | Audit Type | Status | Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aboriginal Peoples' Program: Aboriginal Cultures Living Component | Engagement and Inclusion (5) | Internal Audit |
Completed |
May 2009 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/ em-cr/assurnc/2009/2009-05/index-eng.cfm |
Museum Assistance Program | Heritage (3) | Internal Audit |
Completed |
June 2009 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/ em-cr/assurnc/2009/2009-06/index-eng.cfm |
Hosting Program (Sport Canada) | Sport (7) | Internal Audit |
Completed |
November 2009 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/ em-cr/assurnc/2009/2009-11/index-eng.cfm |
Ceremonies & Event / Vancouver 2010 Directorate of the Major Events & Celebration Branch | Promotion of and attachment to Canada (4) | Internal Audit |
Completed |
February 2010 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/ em-cr/assurnc/2010/2010-02-1/index-eng.cfm |
Sport Canada Branch | Sport (7) | Internal Audit | In Progress | June 2010 |
Official Languages Secretariat | Official Languages (6) | Internal Audit |
In Progress | June 2010 |
Payroll, Expenses, Leave and Employee Benefits (Stewardship) | Services (8) | Internal Audit |
In Progress | June 2010 |
Name of Evaluation | Program Activity | Program Type | Status | Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Summative Evaluation of the Arts, Culture and Diversity Program | Arts (1) |
Summative Evaluation | Completed | June 2010 |
Summative Evaluation of the Exchanges Canada Program | Promotion of and attachment to Canada (4) |
Summative Evaluation | Completed | March 2010 |
Summative Evaluation of the Human Rights Program |
Engagement and Inclusion (5) |
Summative Evaluation | Completed | March 2010 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2010/2010-03/index-eng.cfm |
Summative Evaluation of the Movable Cultural Property Program |
Heritage (3) |
Summative Evaluation | Completed | January 2010 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2010/2010-01/index-eng.cfm |
Evaluation of Museums Assistance Program |
Heritage (3) |
Evaluation | Completed | January 2010 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2010/2010-01-2/index-eng.cfm |
Summative Evaluation of Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program |
Arts (1) |
Summative Evaluation |
Completed | May 2009 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2009/2009-03/index-eng.cfm |
Horizontal Evaluation of the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation |
Engagement and Inclusion (5) |
Summative Evaluation (Horizontal) |
Completed | November 2009 http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2009/2009-11/index-eng.cfm |
Aboriginal Peoples' Program | Engagement and Inclusion (5) |
Summative Evaluation | In Progress | October 2010 |
Canadian Studies Program | Promotion of and attachment to Canada (4) |
Summative Evaluation | In Progress | June 2010 |
Canada Travelling Exhibitions Indemnification Program | Heritage (3) |
Summative Evaluation | In Progress | December 2010 |
Katimavik Program | Promotion of and attachment to Canada (4) |
Summative Evaluation | In Progress | November 2010 |
2010 Olympic and Paralympics Winter Games | Sport (7) |
Summative Evaluation | In Progress | January 2011 |
Sports Canada | Sport (7) |
Summative Evaluation | In Progress | March 2011 |
Shanghai 2010 Exposition | Promotion of and attachment to Canada (4) |
Summative Evaluation | In Progress | December 2011 |