($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriInsurance Program (Statutory)
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The AgriInsurance program is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriInsurance (formerly the Production Insurance program), will aim to reduce the financial impact on producers of production losses caused by uncontrollable natural perils.
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
For 2008-09 producer participation in AgriInsurance had a targeted participation rate of 70% and for forage 50% as measured by a comparison of crops grown to crops insured.
For the main crop groups (excluding forage), Manitoba has the highest participation rate at 81% followed by Saskatchewan at 71.8%, and Quebec at 67%. The national average was 67% which is lower than the target but considered good based on the wide range of uptake across provinces.
Quebec has the highest participation rate for forage at 73%, while the other provinces range from 0% to 20% bringing the national average participation rate for the forage programs to 18%. Overall, numerous enhancements were made this year and will continue to be made to the AgriInsurance program including improvements for forage, horticulture, potato storage, new crops and available coverage levels.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | - | 388.7 | 548.3 | 548.3 | (159.6) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | - | 388.7 | 548.3 | 548.3 | (159.6) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The increase in federal contributions over the planned amount is a result of the substantial increase in premiums caused by the increase in commodity (i.e. grain) prices which are reflected in the insurable values.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No program evaluation was completed for AgriInsurance in 2008-09. There was a program evaluation completed in 2007-08 for Production Insurance (the program that preceded the AgriInsurance Program) and there were no significant findings.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There was no audit undertaken in 2008-09.
Note:
Production Insurance (the program that preceded the AgriInsurance Program) expenditures were $416.4 million in 2007-2008 and $343.1 million in 2006-2007.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriInvest Program (Statutory)
Start Date: December 19, 2007
Agreements were signed with the provinces to implement the program starting in the 2007 program year.
End Date: March 31, 2012
AgriInvest is statutory and ongoing; however, the current policy and program authorities expire on this date.
Description: The AgriInvest program is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriInvest allows producers to self-manage, through producer-government savings accounts, the first 15 percent of their margin losses for a production year and/or make investments to reduce on-farm risks or increase farm revenues. Under the program, annual producer deposits of up to 1.5 percent of their allowable net sales are matched by government deposits. Government deposits are cost-shared 60:40 by federal and provincial governments. In combination with the AgriStability program, AgriInvest is the successor to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program. AgriInvest replaces coverage for smaller income declines where AgriStability assists producers in managing larger losses.
AgriInvest provides producers with a secure, accessible, predictable and bankable source of income assistance to address small drops in farm income and manage on-farm risks.
Federal AgriInvest Website
AgriInvest in Quebec (La Financière agricole du Québec)
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
As of March 31, 2009, approximately $525 million has been made available to producers to seed their AgriInvest accounts through the federal Kickstart initiative. As of this date, approximately $291 million had been withdrawn and $234 million remained in accounts for producers to access when needed to address small income losses and to invest in their farming operations (see note below).
On March 31, 2009, federal program administrators began mailing out letters notifying participants of their benefits under 2007 AgriInvest, their total account balances and how to access the funding in their accounts.
Work continues toward full implementation of AgriInvest, when producer deposits and government contributions will be held by financial institutions for the 2009 program year.
A Performance Measurement Framework is in place for the new BRM suite, which includes Performance Indicators and Targets. Federal and provincial governments are now working to collect the information necessary for reporting and expect to be ready to report on the performance of the new suite of programs in early 2010.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | 165.6 | - | 175.7 | 175.7 | (175.7) |
| Total Contributions | - | 1.7 | 159.5 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 141.8 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 167.3 | 159.5 | 193.4 | 193.4 | (33.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
AgriInvest is demand-driven, rather than being funded from a set allocation for each fiscal year. Although the administrative costs of the program remain relatively constant, the variance of the year to year grant and contribution payments is directly related to both participation and commodity prices, as producer deposits and government contributions are based on a percentage of their income generated from the sale of commodities for a production year.
The variance between planned and actual spending for 2008-09 can be largely attributed to the recent increase in the value of grains and oilseeds which resulted in higher than anticipated allowable net sales.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of AgriInvest was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2011-12 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation. This program may be evaluated individually or together with a cluster of other Business Risk Management programs.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of AgriInvest was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan 2009-10 to 2011-12.
Note:
Expenditures for the AgriInvest Kickstart Program in 2007-2008 were:
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agricultural Disaster Relief Program (ADRP) / AgriRecovery (Statutory)
Start Date: December 6, 2007
Program authorities were obtained to implement the ADRP under the AgriRecovery disaster relief framework beginning with the
2007-08 fiscal year.
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The AgriRecovery framework is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriRecovery facilitates the process for federal, provincial and territorial governments to provide short-term, timely assistance to help producers quickly re-establish their income stream and contain the long-term impacts after a small to mid-size disaster (disease, pest, weather-related). Programs under AgriRecovery are developed on a case-by-case basis after an assessment is completed and it is determined that there is need for assistance not covered by existing programs, such as AgriInvest, AgriStability and AgriInsurance.
Under AgriRecovery, the ADRP helps focus the coordination effort, providing fast-tracked programs of up to $20 million (up to $122.6 million per fiscal year) to quickly fund initiatives under AgriRecovery. Programming not eligible under the ADRP may still utilize the AgriRecovery framework and funding though a separate Treasury Board submission would be required.
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
The ADRP has demonstrated its flexibility and its ability to meet the objectives of providing timely assistance to minimize/contain the impacts of disasters on agricultural producers, address disaster-specific costs and losses not covered by other government programs and help farming operations return to business operations more quickly.
During the 2008-09 fiscal year, AgriRecovery/ADRP was utilized by federal and provincial governments to respond to six disasters, including the Duponchelia moth in Ontario, Golden Nematode in Alberta, Bovine Tuberculosis in British Columbia, drought in areas of Saskatchewan and Manitoba and flooding in Manitoba and Prince Edward Island.
A Performance Measurement Framework is in place for the new BRM suite, which includes Performance Indicators and Targets. Federal and provincial governments are now working to collect the information necessary for reporting and expect to be ready to report on the performance of the new suite of programs in early 2010.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | 0.1 | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | (1.0) |
| Total Contributions | - | - | 108.4 | 55.4 | 55.4 | 53.0 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 0.1 | 108.4 | 56.3 | 56.3 | 52.1 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending is approximately one half of the planned spending. This is due to the unpredictable nature of both the occurrence and scope of agricultural disasters.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of AgriRecovery (ADRP) was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2010-11 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of AgriRecovery was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan 2009-10 to 2011-12.
Note:
The Plum Pox Eradication Program includes two components: survey/research component which accounts for $6.2 million annually; and the financial assistance component which is $2.4 million annually. The annual $2.4 million allocation is sourced from funding available for the AgriRecovery. This amount is reported as part of the costs for that program and is not included in the numbers above.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: AgriStability Program (Statutory)
Start Date: December 19, 2007
Agreements were signed with the provinces to implement the program starting in the 2007 program year.
End Date: March 31, 2012
AgriStability is statutory and ongoing; however, the current policy and program authorities expire on this date.
Description: The AgriStability program is one of four core pillars of the new business risk management (BRM) suite available to producers under Growing Forward.
AgriStability is a margin-based program that provides support when a producer experiences larger farm income losses, which are drops in their margin (eligible farm income, less eligible farm expenses) for the program year of more than 15 percent of the producer's average margin from previous years (i.e., their reference margin). Thus, a payment is triggered under the program when a producer's program year margin drops below 85 percent of their reference margin. AgriStability also includes coverage for negative margins, as well as mechanisms to advance a participant a portion of their expected payment during the year when a significant decline in income is expected (interim payments and Targeted Advance Payments). In combination with the AgriInvest program, it is the successor to the Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program. AgriInvest replaces coverage for smaller income declines where AgriStability assists producers in managing larger losses.
Federal AgriStability Website
AgriStability in Alberta (Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (AFSC))
AgriStability in Ontario (Agricorp)
AgriStability in Quebec (La Financière agricole du Québec)
AgriStability on Prince Edward Island (PEI Agricultural Insurance Corporation)
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
AgriStability payments are based on tax information for the program year. Although much of the processing of payments for the first year of AgriStability (2007 program year) was done in the 2008-09 fiscal year, processing will be finalized and performance data will be analyzed in the 2009-10 fiscal year. AAFC tracks, and makes public, applications processed and the percent of applications processed within established service standards.
This information is available at AgriStability Program Statistics Website.
As of March 29, 2009:
For the 2008 AgriStability Program:
45.0% of received and complete 2008 program year applications have been processed. The out going error rate is based on sampling, and as of March 31, 2009 all files for 2008 were being reviewed, so no accuracy rate had been established at that time.
National Delivery: 5,838 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $248,527,017 at the end of March 2009.
Federal Delivery: 926 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $53,021,050 at the end of March 2009.
For the 2007 AgriStability program:
83.8% of received and complete 2007 program year applications have been processed and the estimated out-going accuracy rate is 96.85% as of the end of March 2009.
National Delivery: 118,910 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $554,242,637 at the end of March 2009.
Federal Delivery: 42,883 complete applications received. Total value of producer payments was $165,011,400 at the end of March 2009.
Performance data collected and analyzed in 2008-09 related to the 2006 CAIS program. The program covered 52 percent of Canadian producers (including those in the supply-managed sectors), representing 66 percent of total market revenue. Although this is below the target of 75 percent, it still represents a significant portion of the industry. It is also anticipated that participation will improve under the new suite of BRM programs. 40 percent of participants received a payment under the 2006 CAIS program, which contributed to increasing the margins of participants from 60 percent of their reference margins to 86 percent. This was above the target of 80 percent.
With respect to the processing of 2007 and 2008 AgriStability payments: Where requested by provinces, the Targeted Advance Payments (TAPs) mechanism provided quicker access to these payments for hog and cattle producers ($98 million to 1,713 hog producers for 2007 and $167 million to 3,767 hog and cattle producers for 2008). Changes such as deeper negative margin coverage and an improved inventory valuation method are also expected to benefit those faced with declining incomes and consecutive years of loss. Details of the processing of payments under AgriStability will be provided in 2009-10.
A Performance Measurement Framework is in place for the new BRM suite, which includes Performance Indicators and Targets. Federal and provincial governments are now working to collect the information necessary for reporting and expect to be ready to report on the performance of the new suite of programs in early 2010.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 377.3 | 655.2 | 340.5 | 340.5 | 314.7 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 377.3 | 655.2 | 340.5 | 340.5 | 314.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
AgriStability is demand-driven rather than being funded from a set allocation for each fiscal year. Although the administrative costs remain relatively constant, the variance of the year to year grant and contribution payments is directly related to participation and the needs of the agriculture industry. As such, in good years, the program will cost governments less, while in bad years (i.e., years with dropping commodity prices, disasters, etc.) the costs of the program will be higher.
The variance between planned and actual spending for 2008-09 can be largely attributed to the recent increase in the value of grains and oilseeds (G&O). Historically, G&O has accounted for a significant portion of coverage under CAIS and higher prices in the sector resulted in both reduced participation and a decrease in the number of payments being triggered as margins in the sector increased.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of AgriStability was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2011-12 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation. This program may be evaluated individually or together with a cluster of other Business Risk Management programs.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of AgriStability was not undertaken in 2008-09. A Follow-Up Audit of the program is currently planned to begin in 2009-10 and will be conducted jointly with the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) as a follow-up to the OAG's Audit of the similar and now sunsetting Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) Program (May 2007), as well as AAFC's Audit of CAIS, which was completed in June 2008.
Note:
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CITI Grants: | 431.0 | (0.7) | 8.4 |
| CITI Contributions: | 442.0 | - | 3.7 |
| CITI Program Expenditures | 873.0 | (0.7) | 12.1 |
| CAIS Program Expenditures | 933.3 | 377.3 | - |
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Private Sector Risk Management Partnership (PSRMP) Program (Voted)
Start Date: January 6, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The PSRMP Program is designed to facilitate the participation of the private sector financial services industry (FSI) in addressing agricultural risks not presently covered by existing risk management tools. It provides financial and technical assistance to assist non-governmental agricultural organizations in the design, development, and delivery of a business case for the development of new business risk mangement products and services to assist producers in mitigating and responsing to their farm-level business risk management issues.
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, PSRMP carried forward 12 projects from Agricultural Policy Framework (APF) (no new applications accepted after March 31, 2008) - all projects continued to meet objectives per signed Contribution Agreements.
Project Results Achieved:
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | - | - | 6.9 | 5.1 | (5.1) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | - | - | 6.9 | 5.1 | (5.1) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
At the time of preparation of the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities, Treasury Board approval for this program had not yet been received and as such, planned spending is shown as zero.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted for PSRMP in 2008-09.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audit was conducted for PSRMP in 2008-09.
Note:
Expenditures for the PSRMP Program (under APF) were $3.8 million in 2006-2007 and $4.1 million in 2007-2008.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Facilitating the Disposal of Specified Risk Materials (Voted)
Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2009 (extended to March 31, 2010)
Description: The federal government continues to provide BSE related assistance to Canada's cattle industry to support its efforts to recover from the impacts of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) first discovered in Canada in May 2003. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has implemented an enhanced feed ban, which is a significant step towards eliminating BSE from the national cattle herd.
This program will help the beef industry mitigate the cost of adapting to the July 12, 2007 enhancements to the feed ban enforced by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The enhancements regulate the disposal of specified risk material (SRM) and adequate disposal infrastructure is required.
Cost-shared federal-provincial programs are in place and offer $127.5 million in financial assistance to the industry (federal: $76.5 million; provincial: $51 million). The program is administered provincially and federal funds are used to support projects that have been approved through the provincial government process.
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
As of March 2009, approximately 259 infrastructure project and research iniatives were approved for a total commitment of $105.1 million to help the beef industry adapt to the enhanced feed ban. Facilities such as federal and provincial abattoirs, SRM rendering plants, research institutions are participating in the program. Furthermore, various technologies are being explored to seek value added options for SRM.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 4.4 | 22.8 | 38.5 | 21.0 | 19.2 | 19.3 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 4.4 | 22.8 | 38.5 | 21.0 | 19.2 | 19.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The reason for the difference in planned spending versus actual spending is due to the reprofiling of $17.5 million from 2008-09 to 2009-10. The program was extended to support provincial initiatives that required a one-year extension in order to meet the objectives of the program.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluations were conducted in 2008-09 and none are planned.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits have been conducted in 2008-09. No audits are planned other than the standard end of program audit.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments in connection with the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act (AMPA) (Statutory) - Advance Payment Program
Start Date: 1997
End Date: On-going under the AMPA legislation
Description: The Advance Payments Program (APP) guarantees cash advances to eligible producers (2006 amendments to AMPA increased the interest free portion of advances from $50,000 to $100,000, and the maximum advance from $250,000 to $400,000) to enable them to produce and market their agricultural products when market conditions are most ideal.
Amendments also now allow livestock producers the ability to receive an advance under AMPA. In February 2008, amendments to the AMPA allowed for emergency advances for livestock producers to address the needs of the livestock industry during unfavourable competitive circumstances. The amendments allowed for a reduced legislative requirements for emergency advances which are issued up to March 31, 2009.
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
The AMPA was amended in 2006 to expand eligibility to the livestock sector, increase loan limits to $400,000, increase interest free loan limit to $100,000, and extend the production period to 18 months.
The AMPA was further amended in February 2008 to improve the delivery of the APP to the livestock sector. These amendments removed the requirement for livestock producers to secure advances with a Business Risk Management (BRM) program such as AgriStability. Advances are now secured using the animals as collateral. The amendments also expanded the circumstances under which an emergency APP advance can be issued to include situations of "severe economic hardship".
For the 2008-09 production period, 61 agreements were signed to deliver the APP with producer organizations and approximately $2.72 billion was issued in advances to approximately 40,539 producers. Of that, $312 million was for emergency advances to hogs and $143 million was for emergency advances to cattle.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 10.6 | 44.1 | 137.5 | 37.0 | 37.0 | 100.5 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 10.6 | 44.1 | 137.5 | 37.0 | 37.0 | 100.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance between actual and planned spending is due to many factors. The main cause for the variance is due to lower default payments than originally forecasted, as well as a lower interest rate than anticipated for the fiscal year.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation of the new APP program was completed during the 2008-09 fiscal year. As per AMPA legislation, a full evalution is to be completed every 5 years.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Formal audits of participating producer organizations in the APP are completed each fiscal year. The current target for formal audits is 6 producer organizations per fiscal year. Due to contract tendering restraints, AAFC did not get the audits completed in 2008-09, and will be completing a total of 12 formal audits of producer organizations during the 2009-10 campaign.
Note:
Enhanced Spring Credit Advance Program (ESCAP) Expenditures for 2007-2008 - $6.8 million
Spring Credit Advance Payment Program (SCAP) Expenditures for 2007-2008 - $8.9 million
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cost of Production Benefit (Statutory)*
Start Date: April 1, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2010
Description: The one-time $400 million federal Cost of Production Benefit (COPB) was announced in March 2007 and was intended to partially compensate producers for the decline in incomes experienced over the previous four years due to production costs increasing at a faster rate than output prices.
Under the COPB, payments were made in two installments, with initial payments beginning in June 2007 based on 2.36 percent of participants' average allowable net sales for 2000 to 2004 and final payments beginning in December 2007 based on 0.36 percent of participants' average allowable net sales for 2000 to 2004. The program was delivered by the federal government in all provinces except Quebec.
Websites:
Federal Delivery
AgriInvest in Quebec (La Financière agricole du Québec)
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
With the COPB, AAFC met its objective of increasing participating producers' farm revenue for 2007 by 1 percent based on program and Statistics Canada data.
As of March 2009:
The numbers above reflect only where Canada delivers payments (i.e., all provinces except Quebec). An additional $44.7 million was transferred to Quebec to allow the province to make similar payments to its producers.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | 353.5 | - | 8.7 | 8.7 | (8.7) |
| Total Contributions | - | 44.7 | - | (0.0) | (0.0) | (0.0) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 398.3 | - | 8.7 | 8.7 | (8.7) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
As a result of an over-estimation of the final payment rate under the COPB, additional funding of approximately $9 million was required to fully meet AAFC's commitments under the program. This funding was sourced from within existing departmental levels.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of the Cost of Production Benefit program was not undertaken in 2008-09. There are currently no existing or planned evaluations for this program.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of the Cost of Production Benefit was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan for 2009-10 to 2011-12.
*For the related $100 million Cost of Production Element program, no payments were triggered in 2008-09 primarily due to a strong rise in crop receipts - mainly in the grains and oilseeds sector, for 2008 over 2007.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Control of Diseases in the Hog Industry- Circovirus Initiative (Voted) - Phase I - Circovirus Inoculation Strategy
Start Date: September 27, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2009 (extended to November 30, 2009)
Description: The Circovirus Inoculation Strategy (CIS) is an Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) initiative aimed at providing assistance in minimizing the overall potential effect of the Porcine Circovirus Associated Diseases (PCVAD) on the Canadian hog herd. AAFC is to provide financial assistance towards the identification and mitigation of the virus.
The overarching goal of the Initiative for the Control of Diseases in the Hog Industry, and the specific goal of its CIP element, is to improve the health of the Canadian hog herd, which will help sustain the long-term viability and profitability of the sector. Encouraging producers to increase disease detection and prevention activities will reduce the number of hog mortalities, and result in healthier Canadian hogs going to market.
The funds are provided to producers through the Circovirus Inoculation Program (CIP). The program is being delivered in all provinces directly to producers by the Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration (PFRA) of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. It consists of two elements.
Under the CIP's diagnostic testing element, eligible applicants are eligible for 50 percent in compensation up to $2,000 per fiscal year and $4,000 over the life of the program. Under the vaccination element, eligible applicants are eligible for 50 percent in compensation to a maximum of $1.00 per piglet and $7.00 per sow, gilt and boar. The maximum assistance over the life of the program is $500,000 per applicant.
Circovirus Inoculation Program Website
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
To date, over 3,500 applications have been approved delivering over $30 million is assistance to Canadian hog producers to detect the disease and inoculate hogs. The program deadline has been extended to August 31, 2009 and applications are still being processed.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 14.3 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 10.8 | - |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 14.3 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 10.8 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
N/A
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of this initiative was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2010-11 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of this initiative was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan for 2009-10 to 2011-12.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cull Breeding Swine Program (Statutory)
Start Date: March 6, 2008
End Date: March 31, 2012
Description: The purpose of the Cull Breeding Swine Program program is to assist in restructuring the Canadian swine industry by facilitating a reduction of the breeding herd. This $50 million initiative is a grant to the Canadian Pork Council (CPC). The objective is to reduce the national breeding herd size by up to 10% over and above normal annual reductions.
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
Financial assistance is provided to the hog industry to assist producers that wish to downsize or exit the industry. $38 million has been transfered to the CPC in 2007-08 for reimbursement of slaughter and disposal costs and payment of $225 per breeding animal. The Program was amended allowing for the program start date to be reset to August 1, 2007 from November 1, 2007. As of June 10, 2009, 649 claims have been received for a total of 124,370 animals.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | 38.0 | - | 12.0 | 12.0 | (12.0) |
| Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 38.0 | - | 12.0 | 12.0 | (12.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The approval of this grant was received after the preparation of the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities, therefore it was not identified in the planned spending.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There are no existing or planned evaluations for this program at this time.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There was no audit completed in 2008-09. An audit of the 2008-09 fiscal year is targeted for the 4th quarter of 2009-10.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Environment (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)
Description: The purpose of the Environment programs is to support the adoption of management practices on farms across Canada, which are beneficial to the environment and economically sustainable.
Strategic Outcome: Health of the Environment
Results Achieved:
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Environment | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 97.0 | 198.8 | 45.6 | 93.3 | 78.2 | (32.6) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 97.0 | 198.8 | 45.6 | 93.3 | 78.2 | (32.6) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending is higher than the planned due to delays in program implementation in previous years.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of the Environment Chapter was commenced in 2007-08 but still has not been completed.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
The following OAG Managing Environmental Programming Audit was completed in 2008-09.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Food Safety and Food Quality (FSQ) (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)
Description: The objective of the program is to assist industry in developing and implementing government-recognized food safety, traceability and quality process control systems throughout the agri-food continuum, in order to:
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
One of the key food safety control tools is the On-Farm Food Safety Recognition (OFFSR) Program which is part of a Horizontal Initiative between AAFC, the lead partner, and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). This program recognizes food safety systems that have been developed and implemented by national producer organizations that are based on the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) process, a preventive approach to food safety.
During this year, seven national producer organizations were participating in OFFSR program. Two organizations were issued letters from CFIA recognizing completion of a technical review stage of the OFFSR program. Since 2004, eighteen such letters have been issued by CFIA.
During this transitional year, the Canadian Food Safety and Quality program (CFSQP) was continued while new food safety programming under Growing Forward was designed.
CFSQP had three components:
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Food Safety & Food Quality | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 10.5 | 45.9 | 24.9 | 29.7 | 16.3 | 8.6 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 10.5 | 45.9 | 24.9 | 29.7 | 16.3 | 8.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The CFSQP is a client driven program. CFSQP projects typically require 3 to 6 years to complete the development and implementation of food safety and traceability systems. The initial planned amount for 2008-09 was $24.9 million. A key challenge was forecasting the client's requirements because 2008-09 was a transitional year. Also some organizations were unable to complete their activities as originally planned due to the complexity of negotiating new agreements at the beginning of the transitional year. During this fiscal year $16.3 million was spent, $3.8 million on Systems Development projects, $4.4 million on On-Farm Implementation projects and $8.1 million on Food Safety Initiatives.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted in 2008-09.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
The Canadian Food Safety & Quality Audit Plan provided for nine project-specific compliance audits. Three audits were completed and two are on-going into 2009-10. The findings of the three completed audits are not considered significant in nature and actions have been taken by the clients to implement the recommendations of the audit reports. There are currently no URLs for these three audits. The remaining audits were not conducted as the projects were assessed to be of low risk and therefore the audit expenditures were not warranted.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food (ACAAF) (Voted) (Grants and Contributions to facilitate adaptation and rural development within the agriculture and agri-food sector)
Start Date: April 1, 2004
End Date: March 31, 2009
Description: The purpose of the ACAAF program is to position Canada's agriculture and agri-food sector at the leading edge to seize new opportunities. It is based on a three-pillar approach, including:
Industry-Led Solutions to Emerging Issues;
Capturing Market Opportunities By Advancing Research Results;
Sharing Information to Advance the Sector.
The ACAAF Program was developed as the successor to the Canadian Adaptation and Rural Development (CARD) II Fund.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
For this last year of ACAAF, 337 new projects were approved and funded. They consisted of 10 new national projects, 265 new Industry Council regional projects and 62 multi-regional collective outcome projects. Most projects were Pillar I initiatives.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | 44.3 | 37.7 | 30.3 | 33.0 | 31.9 | (1.6) |
| Total Contributions | 6.2 | 10.5 | 3.1 | 13.7 | 13.3 | (10.2) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 50.5 | 48.2 | 33.4 | 46.7 | 45.2 | (11.8) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Planned spending for 2008-09 reflects only the funding presented in the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities. The over expenditures for the last year of the program (2008-09) was due to underspending in the first few years; total program spending still falls within the total five year authority of the program.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
The ACAAF Evaluation, which began during the 2007-08 fiscal year, assessed the relevance, success/progress and cost effectiveness of ACAAF in meeting its objectives. Conclusions were generally favorable and the recommendations following the evaluation have been incorporated in the planning of the successor program, Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program (CAAP).
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Initially, one National project recipient was to be selected for a compliance audit. However, due to time constraints and unforeseen delays in setting up the contract for the audit, it was decided to forego the compliance audit. Active monitoring of the National project files and financial audits ensured due diligence was met.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agri-Opportunities Program (New Opportunities for Agriculture Initiatives) (Voted)
Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Agri-Opportunities program is a $134 million program, ending March 2011, that focuses on new innovative value-added agricultural, agri-food and agri-based products, services or processes that are currently not commercially produced or available in Canada and that are ready to be introduced into the marketplace. The program provides repayable contributions for commercialization projects that are expected to increase market opportunities for the Canadian agricultural industry across the value chain and to increase demand for primary agricultural products.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
The Agri-Opportunities program has signed agreements to fund 13 innovative commercialization projects for a total of $31,759,712 helping to accelerate the pace of innovation in Canada.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 2.1 | 40.8 | 12.3 | 9.0 | 31.9 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 2.1 | 40.8 | 12.3 | 9.0 | 31.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual expenditures were less than planned primarily due to the global economic crisis at that time, which was having a serious impact on the Canadian investment climate, particularly the availability of debt and equity financing to companies.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted in 2008-09. An evaluation is planned for 2009-10.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There was no audit conducted this year. An audit is planned for 2010-11.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (Voted)
Start Date: December 14, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP) is an initiative designed to strengthen the capacity of Canadian science providers and industry through the creation of networks for research, technology development, and commercialization of agricultural bioproducts and bioprocesses.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
Nine Networks have been approved for funding under the Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP). Currently the program is fully subscribed and no new proposals are being accepted. In support of the work to be undertaken by the approved networks, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada has signed nine (9) Contribution Agreements with recipients external to the federal government. In addition, eight (8) Agency Agreements between Recipients and the Recipient Agent, and eight (8) Letters of Understanding (LOUs) with other government departments and agencies have been executed.
AAFC will report on the activities and the execution of the Network Agreements negotiated to deal with governance, intellectual properties and related issues with the parties involved in the nine approved ABIP Networks in the next FY 2009-10.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 0.6 | 20.7 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 13.4 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 0.6 | 20.7 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 13.4 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance of $13.4 million in planned versus actual spending is due to the delay in the development and signing of Network Agreements. This new program is utilizing novel structures and requires appropriate lead time for the development of communication and administration tools and access to resources to ensure that internal and external stakeholders are provided clear, consistent, timely and accurate messages on all aspects of program requirements.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There was no evaluation undertaken in 2008-09.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Recipient Auditing: The ABIP Secretariat has adopted a risk-based approach to the selection of contributions for audit. The audit risk of each contribution agreement will be assessed annually. The intent is to audit contributions where the ABIP Secretariat has identified some specific concerns.
There were no audits conducted in 2008-09. The intent for fiscal year 2009-10 is to complete two recipient audits.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Farm Families Options Program (Options) (Voted)
Start Date: June 23, 2006
End Date: March 31, 2010
Description: The Canadian Farm Family Options program is a pilot program that provides short-term financial assistance to low-income farm families and provides eligible clients with access to farm business assessment and training services that could help them increase their long-term on- and off-farm income opportunities. Income payments are issued to eligible applicants based on information for the 2005 and 2006 tax years. Eligible applicants commit to completing a Renewal activity, either a Farm Business Assessment or Canadian Agricultural Skills Service, or an approved equivalent by November 20, 2008.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
The Canadian Farm Family Options Program paid more than $145 million to over 15,000 farm families in its first year (2005 applicants) and more than $76 million to over 9,300 farm families in its second year (2006 applicants). Farmers qualified for Options if their total family income, as submitted to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) in their tax return, fell below $25,000 (below $15,000 for individual farmers). Payments were calculated to bring an individual farmer's total income up to the $15,000 threshold, and a farm family's total income up to the $25,000 threshold.
In total, participants received approximately $221 million, resulting in a total average payment of $17,000. 80.7% or 12,280 of Options participants completed their Renewal requirement (Farm Business Assessment, skills development or equivalent). Of these, 1,898 participated in more than one activity per application, with a total of 14,178 program activities resulting from the Options program. Final payment cheques were mailed to eligible applicants in early August, 2008 and the Options program reached its end on November 20, 2008.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | 145.0 | 76.0 | - | - | (1.0) | 1.0 |
| Total Contributions | - | 11.2 | 16.0 | 14.2 | 10.3 | 5.7 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 145.0 | 87.2 | 16.0 | 14.2 | 9.3 | 6.7 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
On May 31, 2007 changes to the Options program were approved by Treasury Board. These changes resulted in the original $550.0 million budget being reduced to $303.3 million. Approval was obtained to reallocate the remaining funding to other initiatives. Actual spending was lower than planned in 2008-09 as funding for year two was only made available to qualified applicants from year one.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There were no previous evaluations and none conducted in 2008-09. An evaluation of the Options program is to be completed by March 31, 2010.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
There were no previous audits and none conducted in 2008-09. An audit of the Options program is to be completed by March 31, 2010.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Cattlemen's Association Legacy Fund (Statutory)
Start Date: June 27, 2005
End Date: March 31, 2015
Description: The purpose of the Canadian Cattlemen's Association Legacy Fund is to support to the Canadian beef sector to develop markets for beef cattle, beef cattle genetics, beef and beef products in a post-BSE environment. Grants totalling $50 million over 10 years will be provided.
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
Industry is struggling to manage the ongoing impact of BSE and simultaneously regain its competive position given the rapid appreciation in the value of the Canadian dollar, increased feed prices and underutilization of packing capacity. Notwithstanding these challenges, Legacy Funds enabled the Beef Information Centre, Canada Beef Export Federation and Canadian Beef Breeds Council to undertake significant market development programs focussed on key Canadian, US and Asian beef markets. In 2008, beef exports totalled $1.35 billion, up from $1.24 billion in 2007. Sales of beef cattle genetics in 2008 were $26.65 million compared to $14.32 million in 2007.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | 4.9 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | (2.0) |
| Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 4.9 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | (2.0) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
In developing the spending profile for the Legacy Fund, annual expenditures were estimated by spreading the available funding over the ten year time frame in equal annual increments. However, funds are allocated based on the requirements outlined in an annual business plan which reflects the priorities of the three marketing groups. As such the funds needed in any particular year will vary depending on the marketing program developed in that year. These forecasts are made even more difficult by challenges in predicting when a market might actually open to imports of Candian beef.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
The contract with CCA requires a mid-term and a final evaluation.
A third-party review of the grant and the results achieved to date was conducted for the period September 29, 2005 to June 30, 2008. The review determined that the objectives of the grant have been met and the funds were administered in an efficient and effective manner in accordance with the funding agreement.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits were completed in 2008-09 and none are planned at this time.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: EcoAgriculture Biofuels Capital Initiative (Voted)
Start Date: March 29, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The ecoAgriculture Biofuels Capital initiative (ecoABC) is a four-year, $200 million federal initiative that provides conditionally repayable contributions towards the construction or expansion of biofuel facilities that have equity investments from farmers and use agricultural feedstock. The initiative, which is part of the federal renewable fuels strategy, is providing an opportunity for farmers to benefit from the emerging renewable fuels industry while helping the government to achieve its targets for renewable fuel content in gasoline and diesel fuel.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
EcoABC has six signed contribution agreements totalling $44.5 million. These projects have encouraged private sector investment of $42.0 million by 502 agricultural producers, helping to broaden their economic base beyond the farm gate.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 0.6 | 75.0 | 18.1 | 17.4 | 57.6 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 0.6 | 75.0 | 18.1 | 17.4 | 57.6 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual expenditures were less than planned primarily due to the global economic crisis at that time, which was having a serious impact on the Canadian investment climate, particularly the availability of debt and equity financing to emerging industries such as biofuels. Companies were finding it very difficult to secure the financing needed to move forward with their planned biofuels facilities. This in turn slowed the uptake for the EcoABC program which was contingent upon projects being fully financed prior to federal funding approval.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was completed in 2008-09. An evaluation is planned for 2009-10.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audit was undertaken in 2008-09. An audit is planned for 2011-12.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Plum Pox Eradication Program (PPEP) (Voted)
Start Date: April 19, 2004
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Plum Pox Eradication Program (PPEP) provides funding for activities aimed at eradicating the Plum Pox Virus (PPV) from the Niagara region of Canada while ensuring the viability of the tender fruit industry (peaches, plums, apricots, nectarines). The bulk of the funding supports an extensive survey of tender fruit orchards, research and financial assistance for tender fruit producers whose orchards are affected by the PPV. The program also includes an asset loss compensation component. This seven-year program (2004-05 to 2010-11) is a follow-up of the original three-year program (2001-02 to 2003-04).
The program is jointly funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA).
Canadian Food Inspection Agency Website: Plum Pox Virus
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
2008-09 was year five of the seven-year program. Surveillance for the virus continued by the sampling of trees in the quarantine area. Infected trees and trees in infected blocks that met the removal threshold were removed. In 2008, the Plum Pox Virus infection rate has fallen for the third consecutive year. The rate fell from 0.00046% in 2007 to 0.000173% in 2008, a significant decrease.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Business Risk Management | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 6.9 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | - |
| Total Business Risk Management | - | 6.9 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | - |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 5.5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Innovation and Renewal | 5.5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 5.5 | 6.9 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
N/A
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of the Plum Pox Eradication Program was not undertaken in 2008-09. It is currently expected that it will be evaluated in 2010-11 in accordance with AAFC's Five-Year Strategic Evaluation Plan (2009-10 to 2013-14), prepared by AAFC's Office of Audit and Evaluation.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
An internal audit of the Plum Pox Eradication Program was not undertaken in 2008-09. AAFC's office of Audit and Evaluation performs an annual risk assessment exercise to determine its internal audit priorities and considers risks related to this program. This program is not currently included in AAFC's Three Year Risk-Based Audit Plan for 2009-10 to 2011-12.
Note:
The PPEP includes two components: the survey/research component which accounts for $6.2 million annually, and the financial assistance component which is $2.4 million annually. The annual $2.4 million allocation is sourced from funding available for the AgriRecovery/Agricultural Disaster Relief Program (ADRP).
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Renewal (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)
Description: Through Renewal programming, AAFC aims to provide producers with the tools and skills they need to make business decisions based on good knowledge. Renewal programming is built on the concept of continuous learning, and is designed to help producers assess their situations and plan for the future during critical transition times. Renewal programs enhance producers' access to information, advice and training, and enables them to pursue on- and off-farm income opportunities.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
Canadian Agricultural Skills Service (CASS) - 697 applications were received in 2008-09.
In 2008-09, more than 2,384 producers across Canada applied to participate in the Canadian Farm Business Advisory Service (CFBAS) and Planning and Assessment for Value-Added Enterprise (PAVE): 1,835 for Farm Business Assessment (FBA), 510 for Specialized Business Planning Services (SBPS), and 39 for PAVE.
To help producers acquire the skills they need to adapt to rapid changes in the industry, AAFC continued to work strategically with the agriculture and agri-food sector in 2008-09 to identify the new skills and learning opportunities needed in a knowledge-intensive economy.
Funding to National Organizations:
In a 2007 Client Impact Survey with 703 participants of Renewal programs, results showed that program participation was a vehicle for change. Respondents reported that the programs strengthened their understanding of their business; reduced stress; improved communications with family, partners and other business partners; enabled participants to consider their original plans and make changes; had a direct impact on their incomes; and contributed toward the achievement of their goals.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 31.6 | 55.0 | 3.0 | 32.5 | 25.9 | (22.9) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 31.6 | 55.0 | 3.0 | 32.5 | 25.9 | (22.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending was higher than planned since planned spending only included approved amounts for the 2008-09 Main Estimates. Additional funding was approved later in the year.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
An evaluation of Renewal programs was conducted in 2008-09 but has not been finalized yet. An evaluation of funding to national organizations will be conducted in 2009-10.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
Recipient compliance audits have been undertaken in 2008-09 for the following: The delivery of the Canadian Agricultural Skills Service under the Canada-Manitoba Implementation Agreement and under the Canada-Ontario Implementation Agreement, the Managing Risk Education Program under the Canada Implementation Agreement and the Contribution Agreement for the Agricultural Management Institute between Canada, Ontario and the Agricultural Adaptation Council. Final reports are pending.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions for Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - Science and Innovation (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)
Description: The purpose of the Science and Innovation Transfer Payments Program is to accelerate innovation adoption in agriculture. Science and innovation are the cornerstone of efforts to make the Canadian agriculture and agri-food sector the world leader in food safety, innovation and environmentally responsible production and to support its future success and prosperity. Advances in agri-food science and technology are accelerating the development of a wide range of new industrial, health and nutritional products obtained from plants, animals and microorganisms.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
The Broker and Agri-Innovation program successfully concluded March 31, 2009 exceeding the target of 10 collaboration partnerships.
Overall 18 Contribution Agreements were signed during 2008-09 in support of establishing agri-innovations partnerships.
The Broker portion of the program funded 15 projects that supported the development of 11 innovation value chains and the creation of 14 strategies.
The Agri-Innovation portion of the program advanced four strategies that were created with support from the Broker portion of the program.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 54.0 | 73.5 | 6.9 | 10.8 | 9.2 | (2.3) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 54.0 | 73.5 | 6.9 | 10.8 | 9.2 | (2.3) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
The variance between the planned and actual spending is due to an increase in spending of $2.3 million required for additional project activities for recruitment, equipment, and renovations for the Vineland Connections Project at the Vineland Innovation Research Centre.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation of the Program was carried out in 2008-09. A Chapter evaluation, performed in 2007-08, included the Science and Innovation program.
Each recipient submitted a final report which was evaluated before final payment was released.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
A compliance audit for one project was carried out in the 2008-09 fiscal year. The sampled invoices and claims did not show any significant discrepancies during the compliance audit.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Orchards & Vineyards Transition Program (Voted)
Start Date: October 25, 2007
End Date: March 31, 2011
Description: This program funds plant removal which is the very first step towards replanting orchards and vineyards or planting other crops to help producers compete in the changing global markets. The program also responds to the market pressure by funding strategic planning activities which will increase the industry's knowledge and help the industry make decisions. The program operates in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
Plant Removal: About 1250 applications were approved to remove about 10,180 acres of old tree fruit and grapes from orchards and vineyards in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
Strategic Planning: $1,736,500 worth of strategic plan projects have been approved across Canada. Industry associations are currently developing the approved strategic plan projects.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 0.7 | 15.2 | 13.4 | 11.4 | 3.8 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | 0.7 | 15.2 | 13.4 | 11.4 | 3.8 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
While the program uptake met or exceeded forecast demand in most provinces (i.e. British Columbia, Ontario, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia), the uptake in Quebec was much lower than expected. This accounts for the difference between planned and actual spending.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
There was no evaluation conducted in 2008-09. A summative evaluation will be conducted during fiscal year 2010-11.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audit was completed in 2008-09. Any recipient audits will be determined based on the audit work plan. The need for an internal audit will be determined by the Office of Audit and Evaluation.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Tobacco Transition Program (TTP) (Voted)
Start Date: February 12, 2009
End Date: March 31, 2010
Description: The Program facilitated the transition of Ontario flue-cured tobacco quota holders wishing to exit the industry.
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
The Tobacco Transition Program, (TTP) is now completed. The Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers' Marketing Board (the delivery agent) replaced the production controls with a licensing system and 1,050 quota holders applied to the TTP. The total program cost was $284,879,885 to retire 99.8% of the quota (271,134,732 pounds of Basic Production Quota) and pay for the administrative costs incurred by the delivery agent.
As of May 1, 2009, all payments had been received by TTP participants.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Innovation and Renewal | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | - | - | 287.9 | 284.9 | (284.9) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | - | - | - | 287.9 | 284.9 | (284.9) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
At the time of preparation of the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities, Treasury Board approval for this program had not yet been received and as such planned spending is shown as zero.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation was conducted in 2008-09. A summative evaluation will be conducted during fiscal year 2011-12.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
A program implementation audit was conducted in March-April 2009 to ensure that the delivery agent had put in place all the necessary processes to implement the program. The implementation audit found that the delivery agent put in place the necessary processes to ensure that the program would be delivered as per the programs guidelines and that the intent of the program would be upheld. Recipient audits are planned during fiscal year 2009-10. The need for an internal audit will be determined by the Office of Audit and Evaluation.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions in support of Rural Canada and of development in the area of Co-operatives (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)
Description: The purpose of the programs are to carry out plans for Rural and Cooperative development.
The programming covers the following three initiatives:
Strategic Outcome: Innovation for Growth
Results Achieved:
Rural Development
Funding ($226,000) was provided to complete projects under the Models Program. Fifty projects were funded as part of the Rural Partnership Development Program for a total value of $1.575 million. Project final reports are due by June 30, 2009. Partnership projects brought together an average of 6 partners per project.
Total Contributions under Rural Development: $1.8 million.
Co-operative Development
Under CDI, 35 funded projects were undertaken and completed. There was on-going management of 2 existing contribution agreements for CDI-Advisory Services and Ag-CDI. Under Ag-CDI, 45 value-added agricultural co-operatives were supported.
Total Contributions under Co-operative Development: $4.5 million.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Rural and Cooperatives Secretariat | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 9.1 | 10.6 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 6.3 | (0.4) |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 9.1 | 10.6 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 6.3 | (0.4) |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Planned spending only included amounts approved at the time that the 2008-09 Report on Plans and Priorities was prepared. Additional funding for the program was approved later in the year.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
In October 2008, the Office of Audit and Evaluation completed an Assessment of the Canadian Rural Partnership Program (CRP). This assessment relied on a new Value-for-Money tool created by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
Key findings were:
Report on the Mid-term Evaluation of the Co-operative Development Initiative
Assessment of the Canadian Rural Partnerships Program
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits were undertaken in 2008-09.
($ millions)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Agriculture and Agri-food Sector Assistance - International (Canadian Agriculture and Food International Program) (Voted)
Start Date: April 1, 2003
End Date: March 31, 2008 (extended until March 31, 2009)
Description: The purpose of the Canadian Agriculture and Food international (CAFI) program is to provide support to industry to gain and expand international recognition for Canada and enhance market opportunities for Canadian agriculture and food products. The program replaces and improves on AAFC's Agri-Food Trade Program (AFTP).
Strategic Outcome: Security of the Food System
Results Achieved:
In 2008-09, the Canadian Agriculture and Food international (CAFI) program, continued to fund industry activities to improve international markets development and gain recognition for Canada as a leader in supplying high-quality, safe and innovative agriculture, agri-food, beverage and seafood products. The CAFI program provided funding to 49 industry associations - over $22.8 million in support of industry activities including $17.5 million for long-term international strategies and $5.3 million for projects.
In 2008-09, some results achieved included:
The Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance developed a booklet "Top 10 Things Consumers Don't Know About Aquaculture" to showcase how the BC industry focuses on environmental issues such as sustainability and protection of wild salmon. To ensure that the booklet was well received by target audiences, focus groups were conducted to develop and fine tune the copy and overall messaging. The booklet was mailed to buyers, distributors, influencers, and Trade Commissioners in key US markets for BC farmed salmon. The booklet was also distributed at the San Francisco Fancy Food Show in January 2009.
The Canadian Bison Association advertised in the Fall 2007 edition of Flavourful, a magazine which highlights Canadian foods for international tables. 7,000 copies of the magazine were printed and circulated to the Canadian Embassies and trade posts based on language requirements. It was printed in English and French, English and Spanish, English and Japanese, and English and Mandarin. 1000 copies were circulated to the Hospitality, Restaurant, and Hotel Associations. Others were circulated to Food writers. Copies of the magazine were also used by marketers and the association to promote bison products in response to inquiries about bison.
The CAFI program is also committed to increasing international recognition of Canada's capabilities as a net exporter of agriculture, agri-food, and seafood products. To this end, the CAFI program supported numerous incoming missions of international delegations interested in learning about the superior capabilities of the Canadian industry first-hand.
| 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Spending | Actual Spending | Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending | Variance between Actual and Planned | |
| Program Activity: Markets and International | ||||||
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 22.1 | 17.9 | 24.8 | 22.8 | 22.3 | 2.5 |
| Total Transfer Payment Program | 22.1 | 17.9 | 24.8 | 22.8 | 22.3 | 2.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Actual spending was less than planned spending due to the fact that some associations were unable to spend all of their approved funding. All of CAFI's recipients are associations that are undertaking activities in foreign markets and due to the global downturn, some associations were not able to undertake and/or complete some of their activities.
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to Last Evaluation:
No evaluation of the CAFI Program was done in 2008-09.
Significant Audit Findings and URL to Last Audit:
No audits were completed in 2008-09.
Atlantic Innovation Fund (AIF) - Voted
Start date:
May 10, 2001
End date:
March 31, 2011
Description of Transfer Payment Program:
The AIF focuses on increasing research and development linked to economic development and commercialization objectives in areas that are of strategic importance to the region, in particular, the growth of strategic sectors/clusters. The AIF emphasizes building Atlantic Canada's system of innovation, including components that bridge the gap between research institutions and the marketplace. It encourages synergies among the various components of this system through partnerships, alliances and networks. Furthermore, the AIF supports research and development projects that focus on the areas of natural sciences, applied sciences, and social sciences and humanities, where these are linked explicitly to the development of technology-based products, processes or services, or their commercialization, thereby strengthening the region's system of innovation.
More information on the AIF can be found at http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/ImLookingFor/ProgramInformation/AtlanticInnovationFund/Pages/
AtlanticInnovationFund.aspx.
Strategic Outcome:
The AIF is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy."
Results Achieved:
ACOA's flagship innovation program, the Atlantic Innovation Fund, focuses on accelerating the development of the knowledge-based industry, and facilitating transition within traditional industries by increasing the region's capacity to carry out leading-edge research and development, contributing to the development of new technology-based economic activity in Atlantic Canada. Clients of the AIF include businesses and institutions such as universities and research institutes. One of the key accomplishments for 2008-2009 was the successful approval of 25 projects, accounting for over $53 million in ACOA assistance. ACOA's assistance of these projects leveraged an additional $52 million from other sources, such as universities and other research institutions, provincial governments, the private sector and national R&D programs.
The AIF facilitates the development of strategic sectors characterized by regional clusters of firms. Sixteen of the 25 approved projects in 2008-2009, accounting for more than $36 million in AIF funding, augment development of IT, life sciences/biotech, and oil and gas/oceans technology clusters and complement the National Research Council's Atlantic Cluster initiative.
ACOA encourages AIF project proponents to seek opportunities for collaboration in such areas as research and development, project management, marketing or commercialization, in order to help maximize the economic benefits and enhance the likelihood of commercialization success. In 2008-2009, there were 61 meaningful partnerships stemming from AIF - funded projects.
Given that the level of privately funded R&D in Atlantic Canada is well below the national average, the AIF has focused on increasing the level of participation by commercial entities in innovation activity. For example, over half (56%) of approved projects in 2008-2009 were from commercial proponents. In addition, 100% of institutional projects approved in 2008-2009 under Round VI had private sector partners (up from 92% in 2007-2008).
| Program Activity | Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Development | ||||||
| Total Contributions | 59.3 | 57.0 | 68.0 | 58.1 | 58.1 | 9.9 |
| Total Program Activity | 59.3 | 57.0 | 68.0 | 58.1 | 58.1 | 9.9 |
Comment on Variance:
Actual spending under the AIF was less than planned due to complex contribution agreements being negotiated and signed later than planned, following the approval of projects.
Audit completed or planned:
Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009.
Business Development Program (BDP) - Voted
Start date:
June 25, 1995
End date:
March 31, 2010
Description of Transfer Payment Program:
The BDP helps to set up, expand or modernize businesses, and focuses on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Strategic Outcome:
The BDP is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy."
Results Achieved:
During 2008-2009, to improve productivity and preserve long-term prospect of employment, the BDP invested in 31 projects to establish new businesses and in 125 projects to help companies to expand and/or modernize their facilities. This program continues to focus on innovation, skills development and trade activities to enhance the business environment in Atlantic Canada. The program serves to fill gaps in the financing continuum for SMEs and entrepreneurs in Atlantic Canada.
| Program Activity | Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Development | ||||||
| Total Grants | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Total Contributions | 112 | 97.3 | 86.7 | 99.9 | 99.9 | (13.2) |
| Total for Program Activity | 112.2 | 97.5 | 87.7 | 100.1 | 100.1 | (12.4) |
| Community Development | ||||||
| Total Grants | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Total Contributions | 25.3 | 21.4 | 10.5 | 23.3 | 23.3 | (12.8) |
| Total for Program Activity | 25.9 | 21.7 | 11.5 | 23.8 | 23.8 | (12.3) |
| Policy, Advocacy and Coordination | ||||||
| Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Contributions | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | (0.1) |
| Total for Program Activity | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | (0.1) |
| Total for Transfer Payment Program | 138.7 | 119.7 | 99.7 | 124.5 | 124.5 | (24.8) |
Comments on Variances:
An additional $24.8 million was made available for the BDP during the year, mostly as a result of re-profiling of the collection of repayable contributions in prior years, as well as reduced requirements under the Atlantic Innovation Fund and Innovative Communities Fund. The additional financial resources for the BDP were used to accelerate payments for SME projects, easing cash flow challenges during the current economic downturn, and to fund increased demands on Community Development.
Audit completed or planned:
During the year, audits were completed on four components of the BDP: trade, investment, tourism and venture capital. The audits found that, in general, the Agency exercised due diligence in the delivery of these projects; however, all four audits recommended improvements to enhance delivery of the four components.
Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009.
Community Futures (CF) Program - Voted
Start date:
May 18, 1995
End date:
October 2, 2010
Description of Transfer Payment Program:
The Community Futures (CF) Program supports community economic development and builds the capacity of communities to realize their full sustainable potential. The program provides financial support to CF organizations (e.g. Community Business Development Corporations in Atlantic Canada) enabling them, in collaboration with other partners and stakeholders, to assess their situation and develop strategies to meet their needs. The CF Program also provides support to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and social enterprises for undertaking appropriate community economic development initiatives.
Strategic Outcome:
The CF Program is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy".
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the 41 Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs) approved 1,077 loans, which represent an investment of $48.5 million and 892 new jobs in rural communities. The CBDCs also provided 7,578 counselling sessions to clients throughout the Atlantic Canada.
A summative evaluation of the Community Futures Program concluded the following: that there is a continuing need for the CF Program, that Atlantic CBDC activities and objectives closely align with the national CF Program, and that the CF Program aligns well with ACOA’s priorities.
| Program Activity | Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Development | ||||||
| Total Contributions | 14.2 | 13.7 | 12.7 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 0.3 |
| Total Program Activity | 14.2 | 13.7 | 12.7 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 0.3 |
Comment on Variance:
The difference between planned spending and actual spending can be explained by normal program administration, having some project costs incurred later than expected.
Audit completed or planned:
Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009. Audit of Community Futures Program has an expected completion date of September 2009.
Innovative Communities Fund (ICF) - Voted
Start date:
April 1, 2005
End date:
March 31, 2010
Description of Transfer Payment Program:
The program is designed to make non-repayable contributions to support strategic initiatives that respond to the economic development needs of communities. To effectively address the wide range of challenges and opportunities of regions, communities and sectors, the ICF takes a comprehensive approach to working with communities at various stages along the economic development continuum, while ensuring sustainable economic outcomes.
The ICF has two distinct components. The first component, strategic community capacity, is designed to support non-commercial/non-profit strategic initiatives that target the economic development needs of rural communities. The second, proactive investments, is intended to stimulate transformative change. This component will support proactive identification and implementation of strategic opportunities with local partners. The program is designed to respond to the unique and varying needs of communities. The flexible approach will encourage clear links to sustainable economic development outcomes. A focus on outcomes will ensure that the program has the desired impact on Atlantic Canada’s economy.
Strategic Outcome:
The ICF is linked to the strategic outcome "A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy."
Results Achieved:
During fiscal year 2008-2009, 94 projects were approved under the ICF, of which 80 were funded under the strategic community capacity component and 14 under the proactive investment component. These 94 projects had total project costs of $119.4 million. With an ACOA contribution of $32.2 million, dollars leveraged amounted to $87.2 million.
| Program Activity | Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Development | ||||||
| Total Contributions | 38.8 | 46.9 | 55.5 | 48.9 | 48.9 | 6.6 |
| Total Program Activity | 38.8 | 46.9 | 55.5 | 48.9 | 48.9 | 6.6 |
Comment on Variance:
The difference between planned spending and actual spending can be explained by normal program administration, wherein some project costs were incurred later than expected because of unforeseen circumstances in the project.
Audit completed or planned:
Audit of the G&C payment system is ongoing, with an expected completion date of December 2009.
Two transfer payment programs with payments in excess of $5M were administered by the Agency in 2008-2009:
Table 5.1 Children’s Special Allowance Payments (CSA) (Statutory) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Start Date: Aug. 28, 1995[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
|
Tax-free monthly payments made to agencies and foster parents who
are licensed by provincial or federal governments to provide for the care and education of children under
the age of 18 who physically reside in Canada and who are not in the care of their parents.
CSA payments are equivalent to Canada Child Tax
Benefit payments. CSA payments are governed by the
Children’s Special Allowances Act which provides that this allowance be paid out of the Consolidated
Revenue Fund.
|
||||||
|
2008-2009[Footnote 2]
|
||||||
Table 5.2 Payments to Provinces under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 (Statutory) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The export charge, to be levied by Canada on exports of softwood
lumber products to the United States, is collected and administered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) with support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
(DFAIT) on behalf of the
provinces. Under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 (Act), the
CRA is responsible for making disbursements to the provinces
of a portion of the charge collected over the course of the application of the Softwood Lumber Agreement,
2006. These payments are reduced by several factors: refunds paid to the industry, costs for the administration
and implementation of the Agreement and the Act as well as the costs incurred for certain litigation resulting
from the Agreement or Act. The Act applies to the following regions: BC
Interior, BC Coastal, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario
and Quebec. Exports from the remaining provinces and territories are excluded.
|
||||||
|
The first payment covering revenues collected, minus costs for the
period between the entry into force on October 12, 2006 and September 30, 2007, was made to the provinces
on January 11, 2008. A second payment was made on March 31, 2008 covering the calendar quarter from October
1, 2007 to December 31, 2007. Payments will continue on a quarterly basis until the termination of the Agreement,
unless lumber market prices increase to the point where no export charge is applicable for that period.
|
||||||
|
2008-2009[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Compensation Payments
Start date: N/A
End date: N/A
Description of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by regulations under the Plant Protection Act, and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act.
Strategic Outcome: To compensate Canadians, in accordance with the appropriate regulations, for plants ordered destroyed for the purpose of disease control.
Results Achieved: 123 Canadians were compensated for plants ordered destroyed.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) between Planned and Actual Spending 2008-09 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Contributions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 2.0 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 11.0 |
| Total Plant Health Risks and Production Systems | 2.0 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 11.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual compensation payments made to Canadians were $11.0 million higher than the $0.9 million that was earmarked in Planned Spending. This increase is largely attributed to Sudden Oak Death ($9.7M).
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Compensation Payments
Start date: N/A
End date: N/A
Description of Transfer Payment Program: Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by regulations under the Health of Animals Act and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act.
Strategic Outcome: To compensate Canadians, in accordance with the appropriate regulations, for animals ordered destroyed for the purpose of disease control.
Results Achieved: A total of 152 Canadians were compensated for animals ordered destroyed.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) between Planned and Actual Spending (2008-09) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Contributions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.0 |
| Total Animal Health Risks and Production Systems | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.0 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual compensation payments made to Canadians were $8.0 million higher than the $0.6 million that was earmarked in Planned Spending. This increase is mainly on account of Chronic Wasting Disease ($5.9M) and Avian Influenza ($1.1M).
All these transfer payments programs are voted, which means that each year the Parliament of Canada votes annual Appropriation Act or Acts to grant expenditure authority to the Crown for the departments and agencies. This spending authorization lapses at year-end.
Note: In each Transfer Payment Table, row 15 indicates the amount of funding of grants and contributions for the Program Activity corresponding to each program. This total includes only vote 5--Grants & Contributions (G & Cs). These numbers differ from those indicated for each Program Activity in the Performance Summary of the 2008-2009 Departmental Performance Report (section 1.2.1) because the latter numbers include vote 5 (G & Cs) and vote 1 (Operating expenditures).
Citizenship and Heritage Sector
International and Intergovernmental Affairs Sector
Public and Regional Affairs Sector
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Peoples' Program
Start date: 1971-1972
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
For over 30 years, the Department of Canadian Heritage (and its predecessor, the Department of the Secretary of State) has been delivering Aboriginal-specific programs and initiatives that support the full participation of Aboriginal people in Canadian life, and supporting the continuation of Aboriginal living cultures as key elements of the Canadian cultural landscape.
Specifically, these programs:
Strengthen Aboriginal cultural identity and languages; and
The Aboriginal Peoples' Program is organized around two broad themes:
Aboriginal Communities Component supports the efforts of Aboriginal communities to develop innovative and culturally appropriate solutions to the social, cultural, economic and other obstacles that impede community and personal prospects. It focuses specifically on the unique challenges faced by Aboriginal women, youth and urban communities, with the intent of strengthening Aboriginal cultural identity and participation of Aboriginal Peoples in Canadian society.
Strategic Outcome:
Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world.
Canada is an inclusive society built on inter-cultural understanding and citizen participation.
Results Achieved:
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 20.2 | 19.5 | 18.2 | 18.4 | 18.0 | 0.2 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 20.5 | 19.8 | 18.6 | 18.7 | 18.3 | 0.3 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 5.5 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 227.0 | 234.0 | 238.9 | 239.5 | 230.4 | 8.5 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Total Contributions | 39.6 | 39.4 | 38.2 | 38.3 | 38.8 | (0.6) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.3M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Aboriginal Peoples' Program (Aboriginal Communities Component) was completed in December 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12-3/ACC-eng.pdf.
An internal audit of the Aboriginal Peoples' Program (Cultural Living Cultures Component) was completed in May 2009: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2009/2009-05/2009-05-eng.pdf.
As per the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan, there are currently no planned audits related to this program; however, the audit plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Communities through Arts and Heritage
Start date: 2007-2008
End date: 2011-2012
Description:
The Building Communities through Arts and Heritage Program supports local arts and heritage festivals, events and activities that engage Canadians in their local communities through the performing and visual arts and in the expression, celebration and preservation of local heritage.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, a total of $6,826,195 (through 605 grants and 83 contribution agreements) was awarded to festivals and anniversaries held across the country, thus providing Canadians with the opportunity to participate in arts and heritage events and festivals at the community level; offering increased opportunities for local artists to perform within their communities; and increasing citizen exposure to local historical heritage.
In terms of policy implementation, solid policy frameworks have been in place for all components and applied on an ongoing basis. Performance data has been collected, analyzed and used for ongoing reporting.
In terms of program implementation, a pre-Implementation Assessment process was conducted and found that program management took a reasoned and prudent approach to implementation. The Report also outlined a number of opportunities to strengthen the program's control measures, and significant progress has been made in implementing the recommendations. As for program delivery mechanisms, the following results were achieved:
Guidelines, tools and processes were improved based on what was learned in the first year, and training sessions were conducted in the regions and at Headquarters.
A formula-based approach was developed and implemented to translate project assessment scores into funding recommendations.
In terms of regional coordination and consultations, the following results were achieved:
Financial resources were allocated by province and territory to 688 projects across the country.
An outreach strategy was developed prior to deadlines for applications and included a factsheet, new Guide and Application Forms and general guidelines in both official languages. Festival organizers were asked to indicate how they intended to reach both the French and English populations of the locality, if both groups were to be present.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | 0.7 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 0.1 |
| Total Contributions | - | 0.6 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.1 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.2M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Citizen Participation Branch is planned for 2010-2011.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Historical Recognition Program
Start date: 2006-2007
End date: 2011-2012
Description:
In 2006-2007, the Community Historical Recognition Program replaced the Acknowledgement, Commemoration and Education Program. It provides funding for eligible community-based projects that (i) commemorate and/or recognize the historical experiences of communities impacted by federally legislated wartime measures and/or immigration restrictions or prohibitions that were applied in Canada, and (ii) promote their respective contributions. It aims to highlight the contributions these communities have made to Canada and educate Canadians about these historical experiences and contributions.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
The Community Historical Recognition Program established the Canadian First World War Internment Recognition Fund, a $10-million endowment fund to support projects that commemorate and recognize the experiences of ethno-cultural communities affected by the First World War internment. The Fund is managed by the Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko. The Foundation will post calls for proposals, and a multilateral committee representing affected communities will make decisions on projects to be funded. Applicants who wish to propose a project related to the First World War internment can visit the Foundation's website at www.shevchenkofoundation.com.
The Community Historical Recognition Program's first call for proposals was launched, resulting in the first project-funding approval under the Program.
Community-based advisory committees were established to provide advice on project proposals.
Through the approval of funding for projects and the establishment of community-based advisory committees, historical experiences of impacted communities are being recognized and commemorated; information is made available on these experiences.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | 2.8 | 2.8 | - | 2.8 |
| Total Contributions | - | - | 12.4 | 2.6 | - | 12.4 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $15.2M is explained as follows:
Re-profile of funds to 2009-2010 in the amount of $9.1M.
Transfer of $5.0M to Canadian First World War Internment Recognition Fund.
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Historical Recognition Program: Ex-Gratia Payments was completed in December 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12/2008-12-eng.pdf.
The responsibility for the Community Historical Recognition Program was transferred from the Minister of Canadian Heritage to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) on October 30, 2008; therefore, there is no planned audit at PCH for this program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Development of Official-Language Communities Program
Start date: 2003-2004
End date: 2008-2009
Description:
The Development of Official-Language Communities Program fosters the vitality of Canada's English- and French-speaking minority communities and enables them to participate fully in all aspects of Canadian life. Partnerships and agreements with community organizations, provinces, territories, municipalities, and federal departments and agencies enhance minority official-language communities' access to quality education and different programs and services in their language in their communities.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
General satisfaction with services offered to OLMC in their minority language has improved; the general satisfaction rate is 74%, and six out of ten respondents in the PCH-Decima 2006 survey say they are satisfied. The rate of satisfaction is even higher when it comes to specific services (media and communications--85.7%; health and social services--71.1%; daycare and preschool--70.9%).
Also, 31% of members of OLMC say they are delighted that access to services in their language has improved in the last five years. (Less than 15% of Anglophones and less than 8% of Francophone's say services have deteriorated.)
Access to services for members of OLMC has improved over the years. The general satisfaction with the improvement of access to services in OLMC members' language in the last five years is 31%.
Most of PCH's funding for the development of OLMC granted to provinces and territories--$166M on $233M for 2008-2009, are allocated resources for ministries of Education for the delivery of programs that guarantee education for OLMC in their language.
Below-average education amongst the younger generations of Official Language Minorities is lower than that of the majority (15-24 and 25-44 years of age).
A little over one person in five (age 15 years and up) living in a minority language situation in Canada has a University diploma (21%). This proportion is slightly higher compared to the Official Language people living in a majority situation.
The proportion of the population with a higher level of education is greater in OLMC than for the population of Official Languages living in a majority situation (the minority-majority index is 1.28 for those aged 15-24 years, and 1.19 for those aged 25-44 years).
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 5.2 | 7.2 | 36.8 | 34.2 | 7.7 | 29.1 |
| Total Contributions | 216.3 | 226.7 | 202.1 | 205.2 | 222.7 | (20.6) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 227.0 | 234.0 | 238.9 | 239.4 | 230.4 | 8.5 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | 1.7 | (1.7) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $6.8M is explained as follows:
$8.5M was transferred to the Enhancement of Official Languages Program to adjust for emerging priorities.
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Programs was completed in December 2008:
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12-2/OLSP-eng.pdf.
An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Program Branch is planned for 2013-2014. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enhancement of Official Languages
Start date: 2003-2004
End date: 2008-2009
Description:
The Enhancement of Official Languages program promotes among Canadians a better understanding and appreciation of the benefits of linguistic duality. It achieves this through partnerships and agreements with the provinces and territories, and with non-governmental organizations to support second-language learning and initiatives that foster understanding between Anglophone and Francophone Canadians, and encourage the public to recognize and support linguistic duality as a fundamental value of Canadian society.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
More than two out of three respondents (68.8%) believe that since French and English are spoken in Canada it helps increase work opportunities.
More than six out of ten respondents who live in a minority situation (60.5%) believe that relations between Francophones and Anglophones have improved positively compared to 10 years ago.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0.2 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 1.3 | 3.8 |
| Total Contributions | 115.1 | 117.8 | 104.7 | 104.7 | 118.3 | (13.6) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 130.3 | 118.3 | 109.8 | 109.8 | 119.6 | (9.8) |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($8.3M) is explained as follows:
$8.5M was received from the Development of Official-Language Communities Program to adjust for emerging priorities.
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Programs was completed in December 2008:
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-12-2/OLSP-eng.pdf.
An internal audit of the Official Languages Support Program Branch is planned for 2013-2014. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Exchanges Canada Program
Start date: 2000-2001
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The Exchanges Canada Program enables young Canadians to participate in one-way forums and two-way exchanges with youth from communities across the country. It also enables them to obtain information on opportunities for many different types of exchanges within Canada and abroad.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the Exchanges Canada Program offered opportunities to approximately 12,900 youth to enhance their knowledge and understanding of Canada; to create linkages with one another; and to enhance their appreciation of the diversity and shared aspects of the Canadian experience. Through participation in forums and group exchanges, youth were enabled to learn about Canada, its history, geography, industry, institutions, communities, cultures, and languages, and to connect with other youth. In addition, summer work student exchanges offered youth opportunities to develop employability skills. Feedback from youth questionnaires showed, for example, that participation in Exchanges Canada's activities helped youth to learn new things about Canada; increase their desire to get involved in their own communities; and enhance knowledge about cultural communities other than their own.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
| Total Contributions | 22.4 | 17.4 | 17.7 | 18.2 | 18.5 | (0.8) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.7M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Citizen participation Branch is planned for 2010-2011.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Katimavik Program
Start date: 1997-1998
End date: 2010-2011
Description:
Through the Katimavik Program, young Canadians are provided with opportunities to create ties with communities and other Canadians, and to improve their employability. The objectives of the Katimavik program are: to contribute substantially to the personal, social and professional development of participants; to promote community service; and to offer a diverse experience, fostering a better understanding of the Canadian reality and linguistic duality. Through a nine-month program comprised of community service, training and group interaction, participants aged 17 to 21 have the opportunity to acquire personal and professional skills by involving themselves in community projects in one French-speaking and two English-speaking regions of Canada.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the Katimavik Program provided young Canadians with opportunities to enhance their knowledge of Canada and its diversity; to develop their personal, social and professional skills; and to enhance their appreciation of community service. The Program enabled host-community partner organizations to improve their capacity to serve their community. Through their participation in the Katimavik Program, over 930 youth had opportunities to learn more about Canada, including its cultural, linguistic and geographic diversity. A program of community service learning, training and group interaction enabled participants to help approximately 100 community organizations carry out their projects, while the youth gained work experience and enhanced their professional skills.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 17.5 | 18.0 | 19.8 | 19.8 | 19.0 | 0.8 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.8M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Citizen Participation Branch is planned for 2010-2011.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Multiculturalism Program
Start date: 1982-1983
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The Multiculturalism Program of Canadian Heritage is one important means by which the Government of Canada pursues the three goals of the Multiculturalism Policy: identity, social justice, and civic participation. Funding provided under the Program's terms and conditions supports these goals to achieve the following objectives:
The funding priorities are:
The responsibility for the Multiculturalism Program was transferred from the Minister of Canadian Heritage to the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism on October 30, 2008. CIC Multiculturalism staff continue to consult and collaborate with PCH staff as appropriate. The Multiculturalism Program is being incorporated into CIC. This will enable CIC to address short- and longer-term integration challenges facing all Canadians, both newcomers and long-established.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Following the publication of new application guidelines in March 2008, 37 projects were approved that address the new priorities. Two examples include:
Somali-Jewish Canadian Mentorship Project (Canadian International Peace Project)
An interfaith pilot program in Toronto matching Somali teens who are new to the workforce with community businesses. The program facilitates the creation of internships and mentoring relationships for the teens with professionals from the Jewish community.
Examining the School Participation Rate of Ethno-Cultural Communities in Ontario (National African Integration and Families Association [NAIFA])
A community-based pilot project that has resulted in: i) a needs assessment; ii) resource kits to help address barriers that immigrant parents from African communities face in becoming more involved in the Ontario educational system; and iii) a self-sustaining community support group for parents.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0.6 | 0.3 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 0.2 | 7.1 |
| Total Contributions | 8.6 | 6.8 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 4.0 | 5.5 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $12.6M is explained as follows:
$5.7M was transferred to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.
Audit completed or planned:
The responsibility for the Multiculturalism Program was transferred from the Minister of Canadian Heritage to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) on October 30, 2008; therefore, there is no planned audit at PCH for this program.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Museums Assistance Program
Start date: 1972-1973
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The Museums Assistance Program is known as Grant/Contribution to Canadian museums and heritage organizations to promote professional management of, and access to, Canada's diverse heritage.
The Program helps current and future generations of Canadians gain access to, and develop a better appreciation of their heritage. The program provides project support to help exhibitions travel around the country, to foster the adoption of best museum management practices, to support Aboriginal peoples in protecting and presenting their heritage, and to improve museum associations' ability to serve their members.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the Museums Assistance Program received 146 applications and funded 112 new projects. When multi-year projects are taken into consideration, 176 projects received funding: 83 projects supported the production and circulation of domestic travelling exhibitions and associated interpretive material; 21 projects focused on preserving and presenting Aboriginal cultural heritage; and 72 projects helped museums adopt sound professional policies and practices and heritage service organizations develop resources or services for multiple museums. Total funding provided by the Museums Assistance Program is estimated at $6.1 million.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Total Contributions | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | 0.5 | (0.5) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| Total Contributions | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 0.6 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 3.0 | 6.6 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.9 | (0.1) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.5M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Young Canada Works Initiative was completed in December 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-03/2008-3-eng.pdf.
An internal audit of the Museum Assistance Program is planned for 2009-2010.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
An internal audit of the Heritage Policies and Programs Branch is planned for 2011-2012.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Arts Presentation Canada
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The program supports arts presenters in the performing arts, arts festivals and their service organizations to help them strengthen their presentation practices by encouraging diverse programming, organizing audience development, diversification and outreach activities, developing initiatives that bring professional artists into contact with residents of their community, and supporting networking and professional development for presenters. It also supports the emergence of presenters and presenter networks for under-served communities or artistic practices. Its objective is to give Canadians direct access to a diversity of artistic experiences.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the program provided funding to 278 festivals (46%), 225 performing arts series presenters (38%), 67 organizations presenting both a series and a festival (11%), and 29 presenter support organizations (5%).
Arts Presentation Canada (APC) increased access for Canadians to a greater variety of arts experiences. Funded organizations presented a variety of work: music (73% of all funded organizations present some music in their season); dance (48%); theatre (45%); visual arts (26%); literature (15%); and media arts (15%).
A 2008 survey of audience members attending APC-funded music presentations provided further evidence of the program's impact with regards to increased variety. Respondents perceived an increase in the number of performances featuring new musicals styles, artists from a variety of geographical and cultural backgrounds and younger/emerging musicians. Increased programming variety, along with attendance at outreach activities--those that are supported to help audiences get the most out of the work they are seeing--were also noted as improving the likelihood of participants returning to the event in subsequent years.
The program has helped organizations expand and diversify their audiences. The percentages of funded organizations that reach out to the following audiences are: 67%--culturally diverse, 72%--young audiences, 32%--Aboriginals, 39%--rural/remote regions and 37%--official language minorities.
Over the past three years, APC has contributed annual funding to presenters in nearly 240 communities, of which 60% are rural or remote. It is estimated that these arts organizations coordinate outreach activities and programming in over 450 communities.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | 3.1 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 5.8 | 4.7 |
| Total Contributions | 22.1 | 20.2 | 17.9 | 17.3 | 24.1 | (6.2) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($1.5M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.
This planned audit is a branch audit and not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Book Publishing Industry Development Program
Start date: 1980-1981
End date: 2010-2011
Description:
The Book Publishing Industry Development Program (BPIDP) supports the activities of Canadian book publishers and other sectors of the book industry in order to ensure choice of and access to Canadian-authored books, which reflect Canada's cultural diversity and linguistic duality both at home and abroad. The BPIDP aims to meet that objective by fostering a strong, viable Canadian book industry that publishes and promotes Canadian-authored books.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, BPIDP helped to further the Department's goal of supporting the creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural expression through contributions to over 300 organizations in the Canadian book industry for publishing, marketing, professional development, internships, technology-driven collective projects and other activities.
This investment helped contribute to:
A strong, representative domestic book industry: BPIDP continues to support a broad range of industry activities across the country, including 235 Canadian-owned publishers in more than 75 Canadian towns and cities who directly employ over 3,000 Canadians.
A diverse range of Canadian-authored content created: publishers supported by BPIDP in 2008-2009 produced 5,325 new titles by more than 3,500 Canadian writers, including nearly 1,000 first-time authors.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 26.2 | 27.1 | 27.0 | 27.0 | 26.5 | 0.5 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 7.7 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 3.0 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.5M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Book Publishing Industry Development Program was completed in June 2008: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-02/2008-02-eng.pdf.
An internal audit of the Book Publishing Industry Development Program is planned for 2013-2014.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Magazine Fund
Start date: 1999-2000
End date: 2010-2011
Description:
The Canada Magazine Fund (CMF) supports Canadian magazine publishers and not-for-profit organizations representing periodical publishers to: maintain Canadian editorial content in Canadian magazines, increase Canadians' access to Canadian magazines; enhance the quality and diversity of Canadian magazines; and strengthen the infrastructure of the Canadian magazine industry. The fund achieves these goals by providing formula funding for magazines to support and enhance their editorial content, supporting business development projects for small magazine publishers, and helping the development of the periodical industry as a whole.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the CMF contributed $10.5 million to the Department's goal of supporting the creation of Canadian cultural content and almost $3.2 million to support the sustainability of cultural expression.
The CMF helped contribute to:
Strengthened industry infrastructure and capacity: in 2008-2009, the CMF provided funding to 75 projects that dealt with professional development, promotion and marketing, newsstand sales building, research and technology development. These projects helped individual publishers grow their business and improve their capacity, and also supported association-based projects that contribute to the long-term viability of the Canadian periodicals industry.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 11.0 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 0.2 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 4.6 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 0.9 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $1.1M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Canada Magazine Fund program is planned for 2012-2013.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Music Fund
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The Canada Music Fund offers a comprehensive range of both innovative and proven funding components designed to support diversity, capacity and excellence in the music industry at every level, from creators to audiences. Activities supported include song-writing development, demo and CD production, video and musical DVD production, marketing, touring, distribution, public awareness, industry training, workshops, conferences, awards shows, showcasing, archiving, preservation, providing access and industry infrastructure development.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
The Canadian music industry has experienced sharp declines in sales this decade, largely due to the Internet and rapidly changing consumer behaviour.
Despite this decline, Canadians continue to purchase and access more Canadian music. Since the inception of the CMF, the market share of Canadian artist albums sold in Canada increased from 16.0% in 2001 to 26.5% in 2007, with the market share of artists who received federal support at some point in their careers jumping from 6.1% to 13%1.
In 2008-2009, the CMF continued to support the production of and access to a diverse range of Canadian music:
Production support was provided to over 350 albums by Canadian artists through the New Musical Works (NMW) and Canadian Musical Diversity components.
Over 900 projects received marketing, touring or showcasing funding through NMW.
The 22 recipients of the 2008-2009 Music Entrepreneur Component (MEC)--Aid to Canadian Sound Recording Firms released 144 albums by Canadian artists in the past year.
While MEC recipients' CD sales declined 24% over the previous year, their full-length album download and single track sales increased by 31% and 91% respectively;
Digital sales now represent over 22% of MEC recipients' total sales, up from 6% in 2005-2006; and
1 PCH manipulation of Nielsen SoundScan top 2000 charts
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 11.5 | 10.8 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 11.6 | (2.5) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 9.4 | 10.3 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 10.4 | 1.1 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 20.5 | 19.8 | 18.6 | 18.7 | 18.3 | 0.3 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 2.1 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.8 | (1.0) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($2.4M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada New Media Fund
Start date: 2000-2001
End date: 2008-2009
Description:
The Canada New Media Fund (CNMF) administered by Telefilm Canada supports the development, production, marketing and distribution of high-quality, original, interactive, Canadian new media cultural products in both official languages that are intended for the general public.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Canadian Heritage transferred $14.5 million to Telefilm Canada for the CNMF, of which $12.3 million supported 147 projects.
$11.6 million supported 123 content creation projects (Product Assistance component).
The CNMF supported a broad range of products that attract different types and sizes of audiences.
Results are available for those products and websites that were completed in 2008-2009.
Through various digital platforms, Canadians have access to more innovative interactive products developed by Canadian companies. Some of these products have attracted broad audiences, particularly those associated with television programming. Examples include:
Cornemuse.com, created by Telefiction Productions,provides a bilingual magic and stimulating environment where 3- to 5-year-old children can develop relationships with their favourite characters by playing games that are educational and highly interactive. Its average hits per month were 9.7 million in 2008-2009.
A majority of the projects reported more modest traffic statistics, which can be expected from websites that often target niche audiences, such as Se donner le mot produced by ECP Nouveaux médias inc. The interactive website offers a total of 20 hours of interactive games, animated by two famous Quebec humorists. This website received 652,000 visits from October to December 2008.
The CNMF Sectoral Assistance component supports activities designed to increase the competitiveness of the Canadian interactive media sector. These activities gave interactive media companies access to workshops, internships, conferences and other networking events. For example, The Great Canadian Video Game Competition was a pilot Telefilm initiative to elevate the commercial profile of Canadian-owned gaming companies and help the industry grow.
The program was a resounding success. Created with industry support and input, the Competition was a first-of-its-kind initiative that took place in three rounds that mirrored traditional industry financing. In September 2008 the final winner was announced: MindHabits (Montréal, QC) received up to half a million dollars from Telefilm--and each public dollar was matched by private investors. Since its PC launch, the stress-relief game Trainer has received international accolades from the Wall Street Journal, the National Review of Medicine, and the Scientist. The game is available in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and Russian. The PC Retail and Nintendo DS Versions are expected on the market soon and MindHabits has already secured international distribution deals.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 14.0 | 11.5 | 14.2 | 14.2 | 14.5 | (0.3) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($0.3M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Canada New Media Fund Program is planned for 2012-2013.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program (CAHSP) is designed to strengthen organizational effectiveness, build operational and financial capacity within the arts and heritage sectors, and ensure that those organizations operate in communities that value their existence, see them as key assets, and support them. There are six components: Stabilization Projects, Capacity Building, Endowment Incentives, Limited Support to Endangered Arts Organizations, Networking, and Cultural Capitals of Canada.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Enhanced long-term sustainability of Canadian arts and heritage organizations in communities. This helped achieve the Department's strategic outcome in that Canadian artistic expressions and cultural content are created and accessible at home and abroad.
As a result of the departmental participation in the 2008 Strategic Review Exercise, it was determined that the Stabilization component will not be renewed as of 2009-2010, and the budgets for the Capacity Building and Limited Support to Endangered Arts Organizations components have been reduced for 2009-2010.
The 2008-2009 Summative Evaluation did, however, provide evidence of an ongoing need for a program such as CAHSP to help organizations to improve their effectiveness and management and to identify funding sources to enable them to face new challenges. Developing the organizational health of these organizations requires additional effort and continuous attention.
Capacity Building
In 2008-2009, the Capacity Building component of the CAHSP provided support totalling $5,023,473 to 156 projects--104
of which were with arts organizations and 52 with heritage organizations. Types of projects supported included business,
strategic and human resources plans, new financing and ticketing systems, employee training and audience development
strategies.
Endowment Incentives
In 2008-2009, 80 applications received funding totalling $14.8 million. The matching incentive of the Department was
$0.72 for every dollar donated by the private sector. The Endowment Incentives component saw decreases from the previous
year of 18% in the number of applications and 25% in donations received. The global economic downturn may explain these
declines. However, the number of funding applications from provinces where a similar incentive program is available
remains generally higher. Since the launch of the component, the federal government's contribution of $88.6 million
has leveraged $123.6 million in donations from the private sector, for a total of $212.5 million invested in arts organizations'
endowment funds. In addition, the results of the Summative Evaluation confirm the program's importance for its ability
to attract private donations and diversify the organizations' funding sources.
Cultural Capitals of Canada (CCC)
In 2008-2009, five communities were designated Cultural Capitals of Canada (CCC); total contributions approved amounted
to $4.25 million. Since 2002-2003, there have been a total of 140 eligible applications to the program and 34 CCC designations
have been awarded, for a total of $21 million.
A Summative Evaluation was completed in 2008-2009 to assess the relevance and impact of CCC. The evaluation confirmed the findings of the 2007-2008 survey in terms of the positive impact CCC designations have had on communities, including the manner in which these designations brought together many stakeholders who had not previously worked together.
Findings of the evaluation also confirmed CCC's positive impact in terms of incorporating culture into municipal planning and strengthening relationships between local municipal governments and arts and heritage organizations.
Networking Initiatives Component
The total funding approved through the Networking Initiatives component of CAHSP amounted to $258,819 (Creative City
Network and Les Arts et la Ville) during the 2008-2009 fiscal year.
A Summative Evaluation included the Networking Initiatives component and confirmed its success in supporting local cultural involvement.
In 2008-2009, both networks continued to provide members with the support and resources required to further municipal involvement and investment in cultural development.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 15.4 | 16.3 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 15.9 | 1.0 |
| Total Contributions | 4.9 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 3.5 | 1.8 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 3.2 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.9 | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $2.8M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Culture Online Program
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
Canadian Culture Online Program (CCOP) includes three sub-components: Access and Content, Research and Development, and New Media Sector Development. The objectives of the program are to provide Canadians access to and participation in interactive digital resources that reflect our diverse heritage, cultures, languages, and history, and to ensure that the program contributes to a supportive environment for the new media sector in Canada.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the CCOP provided $12.1 million in funding for 54 projects, including:
$9 million in support of 49 access and content creation projects (Gateway Fund and Partnerships Fund) that allow Canadians of all ages to access content that reflects our diverse cultures and heritage; and
The CCOP supported a broad range of projects in both official languages, all of which attract different audiences.
The following results are for websites and research projects completed in 2008-2009.
The trilingual online magazine Bulgarian-Canadian Culture Synergy is a virtual multidisciplinary art centre that features and promotes Canadian talent of Bulgarian origin and enables artists to connect with both Canadian and international audiences. Since its launch in October 2008, it has had over 3,000 visits per month.
Inland Journey--A Cultural Journey Between the Squamish to Lil'wat Nations is an online exhibition that showcases objects, photographs, audio and video relevant to the history of the Squamish and Lil'Wat Nations. This online exhibition will be a world-class offering of the Squamish Lil'Wat Cultural Centre in Whistler, BC--a hallmark attraction at the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.
Support for interactive media research and development projects helped create a stimulating environment conducive to creating and distributing even more dynamic cultural content. Thematic research networks and partnerships have brought 28 Canadian research institutions and interactive media organizations to collaborate on developing 26 innovative tools.
Note: Resources allocated for New Media Sector Development were transferred to Telefilm Canada in 2008-2009. For results, see Sectoral Assistance component in Table 3: Details of Transfer Payment Programs: Canada New Media Fund.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0.6 | - | 0.8 | 0.8 | - | 0.8 |
| Total Contributions | 5.0 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 0.4 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 9.5 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 8.1 | 9.0 | (2.9) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($1.7M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
As per the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan, there are currently no planned audits related to this program; however, the audit plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution in Support of the Canadian Television Fund
Start date: 1996-1997
End date: 2008-2009
Description:
The Canadian Television Fund (CTF) supports the creation and broadcast of high-quality prime-time Canadian programs in both official languages and in Aboriginal languages, and builds audiences for these programs. The CTF supports dramas, youth and children's programs, documentaries, variety shows, and performing arts. It also supports Aboriginal and Francophone productions in minority situations.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the CTF invested over $275 million in Canadian productions, which generated over 2,000 hew hours of Canadian programming*. Since its inception in 1996, the CTF has invested more than $2.7 billion, which generated the production of 27,000 hours of Canadian programs.
* Data is not final until the release of the CTF annual report (Summer 2009).
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 120.0 | 120.0 | 120.0 | 120.0 | 120.0 | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Canadian Television Fund Program is planned for 2012-2013. The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011. This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cultural Spaces Canada
Start date: 2001-2002
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The program supports the construction, renovation and improvement of not-for-profit facilities dedicated to arts and heritage. As a complement to other infrastructure programs such as the "Building Canada Fund", Cultural Spaces Canada specifically contributes to the improvement of the physical conditions that foster creativity and artistic innovation.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Since its inception in 2001-2002, the Cultural Spaces Canada (CSC) program has supported over 728 projects in more than 257 communities across Canada through contributions totalling $212,019,236. In 2008-2009, the CSC program contributed to 93 infrastructure improvement projects across the country and committed $30,144,357. These included funding to 41 construction and major renovation projects; 49 projects devoted specifically to the purchase and installation of specialized equipment; and three projects assisting organizations with the costs of a feasibility study for the creation or renovation of an arts or heritage facility.
These projects improve infrastructure to allow for greater creativity, access and artistic innovation. For instance, a $700,000 contribution from CSC was approved in 2008-2009 for significant renovations and equipment purchases for Montreal's "Les Ateliers créatifs Centre-Sud" to convert a former industrial building into high-quality spaces available for rent by artists and cultural organizations. This project ensures that artists and cultural organizations are able to maintain their presence in a central area of Montreal already recognized as a creative district. In addition, the project created spaces suited to the specific needs of professional artists from different disciplines (i.e., visual arts, media arts) and paid special attention to emerging artists as well as artists from culturally diverse communities.
Also in 2008-2009, assistance was provided to the Yukon Arts Centre, a key arts organization in the Yukon. CSC contributed $57,700 toward the purchase of a state-of-the-art digital audio mixing console, new amplifiers and high-quality video playback equipment. This will allow the Yukon Arts Centre to present larger ensembles, improve the quality of its sound and support touring artists and groups with sophisticated technical requirements who would not otherwise be able perform at this facility. Video components will allow the Yukon Arts Centre to exhibit installations using video by senior Canadian artists and by emerging, young and Aboriginal artists, giving audiences access to those experiences.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 0.3 | 0.4 | 4.1 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 3.6 |
| Total Contributions | 19.8 | 22.9 | 27.4 | 26.3 | 28.7 | (1.3) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $2.3M is explained as follows:
$1.0M was included in CSC's planned spending and should have been included in the Building Communities through Arts and Heritage Program.
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Arts Training Contribution Program
Start date: 1997-1998
End date: 2012-2013
Description:
The National Arts Training Contribution Program (NATCP) is designed to assist independent Canadian not-for-profit organizations that specialize in training Canadians who seek a professional career in the arts.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Since the inception of the program, from 1997-1998 through 2008-2009 the NATCP has disbursed a total of $164M in operating funding to national training schools in various artistic disciplines. In 2008-2009, $18.4M in funding was provided to 37 organizations in a wide variety of artistic disciplines.
A Summative Evaluation of the Program completed in May 2007 found a need for continued federal support in national arts training, and that the Program is meeting its overall objective to provide arts training of the highest calibre. The evaluation also found that the NATCP has an "invaluable" and "significant" impact on Canadians' access to high-quality artistic and cultural products. This speaks to the Program's ultimate outcome: that Canadians and the world benefit from high-quality artistic achievements by Canadian artists trained in Canada.
Key results for NATCP are that graduates of funded institutions have professional careers and are recognized for their excellence in Canada and internationally. Annual surveys of these institutions show that there are approximately 1,200 graduates per year--with another 2,200 participating in shorter-term workshops--and 80% are working professionally (of whom 20% also work internationally). The surveys show that nearly 50% of graduates of NATCP-funded institutions receive an award in their first three years after graduation; the Summative Evaluation revealed that they are more likely to receive honours, distinctions and awards than graduates of unfunded institutions.
The 2007 Summative Evaluation also found that NATCP graduates are more likely to earn a living wholly by the practice of their art within three years, compared to their peers from unfunded schools, who are more likely to seek work not related to their art.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 17.0 | 19.4 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 18.4 | (1.7) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($1.7M) is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the National Arts and Training Contribution Program was completed in February 2009: http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2009/2009-01/2009-01-eng.pdf.
An internal audit of the Arts Policy Branch is planned for 2011-2012.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Publication Assistance Program
Start date: 1996-1997
End date: 2009-2010
Description:
The Publication Assistance Program (PAP) is delivered in partnership with the Canada Post Corporation and decreases costs to eligible Canadian periodicals of mailing copies to Canadian readers. Assistance is provided to more than 800 publishers of almost 1,200 different Canadian periodicals, supporting the delivery of 210 million eligible copies of periodicals. These include: general or special-interest paid circulation magazines, non-daily community newspapers, unpaid request circulation periodicals, and religious, scholarly, Aboriginal, ethno-cultural, farm, and official language minority periodicals.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
In 2008-2009, the PAP contributed to the Department's goal to improve accessibility to Canadian cultural works by providing postal subsidies to 1,130 Canadian magazines and non-daily newspapers. These grants totalled over $59 million, of which Canada Post contributed $13.6M, representing an average of about 65% of the recipients' total mailing costs. This investment supported the distribution of over 183 million copies of periodicals to Canadians.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 45.4 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 45.4 | - |
| Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 115.1 | 123.5 | 136.0 | 135.7 | 135.3 | 0.7 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Publications Assistance Program is planned for 2009-2010.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
An internal audit of the Cultural Industries Branch is planned for 2010-2011.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Athlete Assistance Program
Start date: 1971
End date: 2010-2011
Description:
The Athlete Assistance Program (AAP) contributes to the pursuit of excellence through its support for improved Canadian athlete performances at major international sporting events, enabling athletes to combine their sport and academic or working careers while training intensively in pursuit of world-class performances. To this end, the Program identifies and supports athletes already at or having the potential to be in the top 16 in the world in their sport.
The Program has three specific objectives:
To financially support Canadian athletes identified by National Sport Organizations through criteria established by Sport Canada as performing at or having the greatest potential to achieve top 16 results at Olympic/Paralympic Games and World Championships;
To assist Canada's carded athletes* in preparing to engage in full- or part-time career activities;
*Athletes who are approved for funding and are financially supported through the AAP are referred to as "carded" athletes. AAP support is referred to as "carding."
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Sport Canada supported the continued meaningful offset of incremental costs of training and competition for Canada's carded athletes. In 2008-2009, Sport Canada provided over $26,5M in AAP grants and funded over 1,770 carded athletes.
Sport Canada continued to provide Canada's carded athletes opportunities to prepare for future career activities, through access to education and training. In 2008-2009, Sport Canada provided tuition support for 662 current and former carded athletes.
Sport Canada has contributed to the opportunity for an increased number of athletes to advance through the carding system. In 2008-2009, 293 (16.6%) athletes progressed to or maintained the international standard of the carding system. In 2007-2008, this number was 310 (17.7%). This variance of 1% is not significant and reflects a stable situation.
* Data based on Sport Canada's Annual Olympic Ranking Index of Nations. The Index is based on results per nation across all Olympic events at Olympic Games and World Championships, over a four-year time frame. The Index is produced annually at the end of each calendar year, once the Olympic Games and/or World Championships of that year have been completed. Results are aggregated with those of the three previous years to produce a comprehensive four-year cycle of results across all Olympic events. For summer sports, this represents approximately 1,000 events over a four-year period; for winter sports, almost 300 events.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 25.3 | 25.3 | 26.7 | 26.7 | 26.5 | 0.2 |
| Total Contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.2M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Sport Canada Branch is planned for 2009-2010 and again in 2013-2014.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Hosting Program
Start date: 1967
End date: 2010-2011
Description:
The Hosting Program aims to enhance the development of sport excellence and the international profile of sport organizations by assisting sport organizations to host the Canada Games and international sport events in Canada. These events are expected to produce significant sport, economic, social and cultural benefits.
The Program offers Canada at-large a planned and coordinated approach to realizing direct and significant benefits from bidding and hosting projects in the areas of sport development in terms of economic, social, cultural and community impacts, across a broad range of government priorities.
The objectives of the Program are to:
Strengthen the sport excellence and sport development impacts of bidding and hosting the Canada Games and targeted international sport events;
Increase access and equity for designated under-represented groups through contributions to international bidding and hosting events; and
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Sport Canada worked to increase sport excellence and development impacts from realized planned events. Based on the first 47 reports received (of 64), the Hosting Program has provided opportunities for 2,692 Canadian athletes to participate in international sport events. In 2007-2008, this number was 847.
Sport Canada worked to increase opportunities for Aboriginal Peoples and athletes with a disability to participate in planned events. Based on the first 47 reports (of 64), the Hosting Program has provided opportunities for 729 Canadian athletes with a disability to participate in international sport events. In 2007-2008, this number was 397.
Sport Canada worked to increase economic, social, and cultural and community impacts supporting Government of Canada priorities from realized planned events. As an example, the 2008 Arctic Winter Games, to which Sport Canada contributed $400K, generated approximately $13M in economic activity for the Northwest Territories, of which $10.3M occurred in Yellowknife. These expenditures generated $3.7M in wages and salaries in the Territory through the support of 59 jobs, of which 49 were in Yellowknife. The total net economic activity (GDP) generated by the event was $4.9M through the Territory, with $3.5M occurring in Yellowknife.
(Source: Canadian Sport Tourism Alliance)
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 20.3 | 8.9 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 12.5 | 4.3 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 106.2 | 108.7 | 57.5 | 61.1 | 29.8 | 27.7 |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.2 | (1.2) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $30.8M is explained as follows:
$1.9M was transferred to other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.
Re-profile of funds to 2009-2010 in the amount of $17.5M.
Audit completed or planned:
An internal program audit of the Sport Hosting Program is planned for 2009-2010.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
An internal branch audit of the Sports Canada Branch is planned for 2009-2010 and again in 2013-2014.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sport Support Program
Start date: 1961
End date: 2010-2011
Description:
The Sport Support Program is the primary funding vehicle for initiatives associated with the delivery of the Canadian Sport Policy. Funding is aimed at: developing athletes and coaches at the highest international levels; providing sound technically based sport programming for all athletes; increasing the number of Canadians from all segments of society involved in sport; and advancing Canadian interests and values in Canada and abroad. This funding is provided to eligible organizations in support of programming that supports the goals of the Canadian Sport Policy.
The specific objectives of the Program are to:
Increase the opportunities to participate in quality sport activities for all Canadians, including under-represented groups;
Increase the capacity of the Canadian sport system to systematically achieve world-class results at the highest international competitions;
Contribute to the provision of technical sport leadership within the Canadian sport system; and
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Sport Canada continued to provide sport programs and services to the Canadian sport system by supporting National Sport Organizations (NSOs) and Multisport Service Organizations (MSOs). In 2008-2009, Sport Canada supported 56 NSOs, 15 MSOs, seven Canadian Sport Centres and seven other non-governmental organizations.
Sport Canada worked to increase opportunities for sport participation among all Canadians, including targeted under-represented groups. Sport Canada funded Sport Participation Development Initiatives - for persons with and without a disability - for 44 NSOs and 3 MSOs. Sport Canada funded Sport Participation Projects for five MSOs, one of which included an aboriginal project, and five other non-government organizations. In addition, Sport Canada negotiated bilateral agreements on a matching-funds basis with all 13 provincial/territorial governments to advance the goals of the Canadian Sport Policy. These agreements support grassroots projects to improve sport participation opportunities for children and youth, Aboriginal Peoples and under-represented groups. Agreements in place in 2008-09 included 13 "Generic" agreements, 12 Aboriginal sport agreements and 11 agreements to support team travel to the North American Indigenous Games (NAIG). In total, Sport Canada provided $6M in funding for the Generic, Aboriginal and NAIG team travel bilateral agreements.
A revised set of national accountability standards for 2006-2012 was introduced in 2006-2007, and NSOs receiving Sport Canada funding will be monitored annually with respect to their compliance with these standards. The "first priority" standards that were expected to be fully met A revised set of national accountability standards for 2006-2012 was introduced in 2006-2007 and NSOs receiving Sport Canada funding will be monitored annually with respect to their compliance with these standards. The "first priority" standards which were expected to be fully met by the end of the 2007-08 fiscal year address the following subjects: multi-year planning; official languages services; bilingual website; harassment and abuse; bilingual communication with national teams; national teams - harassment and abuse awareness; and national teams - athlete/coach leadership. In 2006-2007, the first year of monitoring, 93% of NSOs had at least partially met all seven "first priority" standards, while 51% of NSOs had fully met at least five of those seven standards. In 2007-08, the second year of monitoring, 99% of 45 NSOs had at least partially met all seven "first priority" standards and 88% had fully met at least five of the seven standards. In 2008-2009, 55 of 56 NSOs had at least partially met all seven "first priority" standards and 47 of 56 had fully met at least five of the seven standards.
Sport Canada has worked to increase the number of NSOs with a sport-specific Long-Term Athlete Development Model in place. There are now 28 NSOs that have completed their Model. This is up from 2005-06 when only one NSO had completed their LTAD model and 2007-2008 when 12 where completed.
Sport Canada worked with partners to increase the number of NSOs that have implemented the revised National Coaching Certification Program (NCCP). In 2008-2009, 14 NSOs were in conditional approvals and 13 in final approvals in the implementation of the new NCCP level. There are now 64 NSOs that have implemented a new NCCP level. Sport Canada worked with partners to increase the number of coaches participating in the NCCP. Between April 1 and August 31, 2008, 40,265 coaches participated in one of the 2,990 NCCP workshops.
Sport Canada worked to advance Canadian interests, values and ethics in sport at home and abroad. In 2008-2009, 3,951 doping tests were conducted by the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport. Some 2,878 of those tests were conducted by CCES as part of the Canadian Anti-Doping Program. In 2008-2009, 17 Canadian athletes were sanctioned for anti-doping violations.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 92.6 | 90.0 | 86.9 | 94.9 | 96.2 | (9.3) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 320.8 | 304.1 | 311.4 | 319.4 | 318.2 | (6.8) |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | 1.4 | 0.9 | - | - | 1.1 | (1.1) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Contributions | - | 12.3 | 14.6 | 13.7 | 14.6 | - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($10.4M) is explained as follows:
$2.4M was transferred from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of the Sport Canada Branch is planned for 2009-2010 and again in 2013-2014.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: TV5
Start date: 1990-1991
End date: 2012-2013
Description:
Contribute to the international profile of Canadian French-language television programs by participating in TV5MONDE and providing Canadians with a window onto the international Francophonie by participating in TV5 Quebec-Canada.
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
The TV5 program achieves tangible results in: the promotion of Canadian cultural content on the TV5MONDE airwaves; contribution to the cultural expansion of the international Francophonie; Canadian audiovisual production; and Canadians' access to the international and Canadian Francophonie with TV5 Quebec Canada.
This year, there was a slight increase in the percentage of Canadian programming broadcast on TV5MONDE, rising from an average of about 6.8 % in 2007 to about 7.2% in 2008. This enables Canada to showcase Canadian programming on the international stage.
Programming broadcast over TV5 Quebec Canada includes a large component of programming from TV5's European and African partners that is not available over the Canadian French-language networks. Broadcasting these programs on TV5 Quebec Canada provides the Canadian public access to the international Francophonie, enhancing their awareness of its cultural diversity. The network must also broadcast a minimum of 15% of Canadian content. This has also helped enhance the profile of Canadian French-language television productions in Canada.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 4.1 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.5 |
| Total Contributions | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | (0.1) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 186.9 | 184.6 | 133.0 | 134.6 | 101.6 | 31.4 |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of $0.4M is explained as follows:
Audit completed or planned:
An internal audit of TV5 grants and contributions is planned for 2012-2013.
The planned internal audit is based on the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan. The plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
An internal audit of the International Affairs Branch is planned for 2011-2012.
This planned audit is a branch audit, not a program audit. The program is part of the branch but may or may not be included as part of the planned branch audit. There will be no program-specific report findings; reporting will be on the overall branch.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Celebration and Commemoration Program
Start date: 2003-2004
End date: 2012-2013
Description:
The Celebration and Commemoration Program is a theme-based, integrated, and dynamic approach to celebrating and commemorating Canada and Canadians. The program provides continuity and consistency across the diverse celebratory and commemorative activities initiated by federal partners and other orders of government every year. The Celebration and Commemoration Program includes two components: Celebrate Canada! and Commemorate Canada!
The objectives of the Celebration and Commemoration Program are to:
Provide access to celebrations across Canada to enable all Canadians to appreciate Canada's cultural, ethnic, linguistic and geographic diversity;
Provide access to all Canadians to commemorations of national significance to recognize Canada's notable people, places, symbols, anniversaries and accomplishments;
Strategic Outcome:
Results Achieved:
Provision of financial support to over 1,600 projects across Canada and the participation of over 10 million people in more than 3,700 Celebrate Canada events across the country.
Participation of over 12,000 youth (aged 5-18) in the 2008 Canada Day Poster Challenge.
Development of a strategic alliance with the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Federal Secretariat to position the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games as a key theme for the 2009 Canada Day Poster Challenge.
Reconvening of the Interdepartmental Commemoration Committee and a renewal of strategic alliances with 28 federal government organizations, contributing to a more coordinated federal approach to the planning of major national commemorations.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | 2.1 | 2.2 | 5.4 | 6.2 | 3.6 | 1.8 |
| Total Contributions | 11.6 | 19.3 | 23.3 | 36.5 | 42.2 | (18.9) |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | ||||||
| Total Program Activity(ies) | 149.7 | 133.6 | 174.1 | 187.0 | 178.6 | (4.5) |
| Total TPP | 1,150.3 | 1,117.9 | 1,121.9 | 1,144.7 | 1,102.0 | 19.9 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s):
Overall variance of ($17.1M) is explained as follows:
Transfers in the amount of $4.8M from other departmental programs to adjust for emerging priorities.
Audit completed or planned:
As per the current 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 risk-based, rolling multi-year audit plan, there are currently no planned audits related to this program; however, the audit plan is revised annually based on departmental needs and emerging priorities. As such, the content of this plan could evolve and be subject to change.
1. Grants for Research Projects and Personnel Support
Start date: October 2000
End date: N/A
Description:
CIHR provides a wide array of funding programs
under this transfer payment program. This includes grants which provide support for the direct costs of health research
projects and awards that provide support to individual health researchers and trainees. Infrastructure grants help create
optimum environments for the conduct of health research. This includes funding for researcher networking and collaborative
activities and grants to selected organizations such as the Canadian Council on Animal Care that facilitate the ethical
conduct of research.
Strategic Outcomes:
1.0 Advances in Health Knowledge, 2.0 People and Research Capacity, 3.0 Knowledge Translation and Commercialization.
Results Achieved:
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | $ 776.6 | $ 826.3 | $ 849.3 | $ 879.3 | $ 879.0 | $ 0.3 |
| Total Contributions | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
| Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 776.6 | $ 826.3 | $ 849.3 | $ 879.3 | $ 879.0 | $ 0.3 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between authorities and actual spending is not significant.
Audit completed or planned:
2. Canada Graduate Scholarships
Start date: 2003-04
End date: N/A
Description:
The Canada Graduate Scholarships (CGS) Program provides financial support to develop future researchers
at both the Masters and Doctoral levels. The CGS is a tri-council program with
CIHR responsible for administering that portion of
the program that is directed at students pursuing health related studies.
Strategic Outcome: 2.0 People and Research Capacity
Results Achieved:
In 2008-09 CIHR funded over 900 outstanding Master's
and Doctoral students through the CGS Program. With the creation of these awards in Budget 2003,
and with recent additional investments in the CGS Master's and Doctoral awards in Budgets 2007 and
2009, the federal government has ensured that Canada can offer world-class support that will help to attract and retain
the best research students in Canada.
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | $ 10.1 | $ 13.9 | $ 18.9 | $ 19.2 | $ 18.7 | $ 0.5 |
| Total Contributions | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
| Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 10.1 | $ 13.9 | $ 18.9 | $ 19.2 | $ 18.7 | $ 0.5 |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): Variance between authorities and actual spending is not significant.
Audit completed or planned: N/A
3. Institute Support Grants
Start date: October 2000
End date: N/A
Description:
The Institute Support Grant (ISG) Program provides funding to select Canadian academic institutions,
including universities and teaching hospitals, to assist them in hosting the 13 Institutes of
CIHR. The Institutes help CIHR
maintain strong ties to Canada's research communities and to understand their needs. Each CIHR-appointed
Institute Scientific Director is among the top scientists in his/her field and helps CIHR define
its strategic health research priorities and develop research partnerships with other interested parties.
Strategic Outcome: 2.0 People and Research Capacity
Results Achieved:
In 2008-09 CIHR provided each of its 13 virtual Institutes
with a $1M grant, paid to the Institutes' host institutions for the establishment and management of an Institute Office,
from which the CIHR-appointed Scientific Director along with host institution-based staff plans and
executes the operations and activities of their Institute. These activities include facilitating and developing national
research networks linking the Institutes' respective research communities.
Program Activities: 2.3 National and International Partnerships
| Actual Spending 2006-07 |
Actual Spending 2007-08 |
Planned Spending 2008-09 |
Total Authorities 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Grants | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ - |
| Total Contributions | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
| Total Other types of transfer payments | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
| Total Program Activity(ies) | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ 13.0 | $ - |
Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A
Audit completed or planned:
N/A
| Actual Spending 2006-2007 |
Actual Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Total Authorities 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Variance(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Countries of Concentration | ||||||
| Total Grants | 205.56 | 191.40 | 172.74 | 172.68 | 18.72 | |
| Total Contributions | 486.74 | 697.26 | 688.01 | 687.78 | 9.48 | |
| Total Other Types of TPs | ||||||
| Total Program Activity | 0.00 | 692.30 | 888.66 | 860.75 | 860.46 | 28.20 |
| Fragile States and Countries Experiencing Humanitarian Crisis | ||||||
| Total Grants | 473.81 | 488.88 | 697.10 | 696.86 | -207.98 | |
| Total Contributions | 96.72 | 71.94 | 126.66 | 126.63 | -54.69 | |
| Total Other Types | 110.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Program Activity | 0.00 | 680.53 | 560.82 | 823.76 | 823.49 | (262.67) |
| Selected Countries and Regions | ||||||
| Total Grants | 94.03 | 144.96 | 123.43 | 123.38 | 21.58 | |
| Total Contributions | 279.73 | 375.69 | 254.42 | 251.24 | 124.45 | |
| Total Other Types | ||||||
| Total Program Activity | 0.00 | 373.76 | 520.65 | 377.85 | 374.62 | 146.03 |
| Multilateral, International and Canadian Institutions | ||||||
| Total Grants | 576.17 | 442.90 | 624.42 | 612.21 | -169.31 | |
| Total Contributions | 216.69 | 219.88 | 239.36 | 239.29 | -19.41 | |
| Total Other Types | 301.85 | 269.86 | 238.55 | 238.55 | 31.31 | |
| Total Program Activity | 0.00 | 1,094.71 | 932.64 | 1,102.33 | 1,090.05 | -157.41 |
| Engaging Canadian Citizens | ||||||
| Total Grants | 13.00 | 7.51 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 6.38 | |
| Total Contributions | 31.58 | 53.96 | 19.86 | 19.65 | 34.31 | |
| Total Other Types | ||||||
| Total Program Activity | 0.00 | 44.58 | 61.47 | 20.99 | 20.78 | 40.69 |
| Geographic Programs | ||||||
| Total Grants | 545.11 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Contributions | 857.71 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Other Types | 40.00 | |||||
| Total Program Activity | 1,442.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Multilateral Programs | ||||||
| Total Grants | 673.49 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Contributions | 14.50 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Other Types of TPs | 358.28 | |||||
| Total Program Activity | 1,046.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Canadian Partnership | ||||||
| Total Grants | 19.28 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Contributions | 228.75 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Other Types | ||||||
| Total Program Activity | 248.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Policy Coherence | ||||||
| Total Grants | 5.30 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Contributions | 8.95 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Other Types | ||||||
| Total Program Activity | 14.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Engaging Canadians | ||||||
| Total Grants | 5.05 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Contributions | 21.58 | 0.00 | ||||
| Total Other Types | ||||||
| Total Program Activity | 26.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total | 2,778.00 | 2,885.88 | 2,964.24 | 3,185.68 | 3,169.40 | 205.16 |
CIDA grants, contributions and other transfer payments actual spending of $3,169 million accounts for 88.4% of CIDA's 2008-09 Total Actual Spending, excluding non-budgetary expenditures. The variance between the total Authorities and the Actual Spending is $16.3 million (2007-2008: $43 million): from the Grants and Contributions Budget, $1.2 million was not spent and a further $15.1 million represent Treasury Board frozen allotments.
3.3.6) Details on Transfer Payments Programs (TPPs)
Contribution to European Space Agency (ESA) |
|
|---|---|
| Start Date: January 1, 2000 | End Date: December 31, 2009 |
Description: |
|
Strategic Outcome: Canada's presence in space meets the needs of Canadians for scientific knowledge, space technology and information. Expected Results (Program Activity Level) Space Based Earth Observation: The benefits of activities involved in Earth Observation from space serve Canadian users in the fields of environment, resource and land-use management, and security and sovereignty. Space Science and Exploration: Participation in Canadian and international missions expands the scientific knowledge base made available to Canadian academia and R&D communities in the areas of astronomy, space exploration and solar-terrestrial relations, as well as in physical and life sciences. Satellite Communications: State-of-the-art systems and applications are developed to satisfy the needs of the Canadian government and population in order to ensure that Canada remains a world leader in satellite communications. Generic Space Activities in support of EO, SE and SC: Canada's industrial technological capabilities can meet the needs of future space missions and activities. Expected Accomplishments: Successful development and demonstration of advanced technologies, systems, components, or studies provided for in the contracts awarded by ESA to Canadian firms under the following EO programs: EOEP, GMES Service Element, and GMES Space Component. Successful development and demonstration of advanced technologies, systems, components, or studies provided for in the contracts awarded by ESA to Canadian firms under the following Telecommunications programs: ARTES 1, 3, 4, 5, 8 and GalileoSat. Growing utilization of data obtained from ESA on markets and Earth Observation and Telecommunications technologies as strategic information for government departments, agencies and industries in Canada. Demonstration of space-qualified technologies and products developed by Canadian firms for the space exploration markets via our participation to Europe's space exploration program Aurora. Development of new alliances and/or strengthening of established alliances between Canadian and European companies, to diversify Canada's international space partnerships and complement its long-standing relationship with the U.S. Actual Accomplishments: Several technologies and skills have been developed and improved through the participation of Canadian companies in ESA programs. Some businesses have integrated these technologies into products, allowing them to sell these products in other than European markets. In addition to generating revenues, the development and improvement of space technologies also created or maintained specialized jobs. In addition, specialized skills were created in the areas of space hardware, ground segment, and space technology applications. The program served to boost the visibility of Canada in European markets. Canadian contractors see the ESA Contribution program as a means of cultivating business relationships. The program also fosters regional development and access to other markets by virtue of the successes of companies in Europe. Furthermore, Canada expanded its knowledge and technology in fields such as weather and ice movement forecasting, Earth Observation data, satellite communications technologies, environmental monitoring and security. |
|
($ in millions) |
Actual Spending 2006-2007 |
Actual Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Total Authorities 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Variance between Planned vs. Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Space Based Earth Observation | 9.9 | 7.3 | 9.9 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 2.4 |
| Space Science and Exploration | 5.8 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 8.5 | 8.2 | (2.4) |
| Satellite Communications | 11.0 | 13.7 | 12.5 | 11.2 | 10.9 | (1.6) |
| Generic Space Activities in support of EO, SE & SC | 8.7 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 8.3 | (0.2) |
| Total Contributions | 35.5 | 35.2 | 36.3 | 36.3 | 34.9 | 1.4 |
| Total Program Activities | 35.5 | 35.2 | 36.3 | 36.3 | 34.9 | 1.4 |
Notes:
Comments on Variances:
Several factors explain the year-to year fluctuations in spending as well as the yearly variation between program activities under Canada/ European Space Agency (ESA) programs: the budgetary cycle of ESA differs from the one of Canada, the cash flow requirements of ESA programs which Canada is participating in (the budget requirements vary with the project's delivery phase), the slippage in the disbursements for Canada/ESA programs (the programs and associated contracts to industry are delivered by ESA; hence, CSA has no control on actual project implementation), the potential cost increases in development programs, as well as the inflation rate and exchange rate fluctuations.
Consequently, the positive variance of $1.4 million in 2008-2009 mainly corresponds to the risk funds re-profiled to future years arising from the sound management of this Program. The variances are in accordance with the objectives and terms and conditions of the 2000-2009 Canada/ESA Cooperation Agreement.
Significant Audit and Evaluation Findings and URL (s) to the Last Audit and/or Evaluation:
Canada is well thought of by Europeans, as the 28 years of cooperation between ESA and Canada clearly demonstrate. Canadian companies have made a significant contribution to the many technologies developed in the areas of Earth Observation and Satellite Communications.
Several businesses have developed business relationships with Europe thanks to the Agreement, and all stakeholders in the program agree that these relationships could continue, provided that Canada maintains its financial contribution to ESA. Canadian businesses have cultivated alliances with each other to benefit from or facilitate access to European markets through ESA programs under the Agreement.
The program helps diversify and open markets and contributes to the achievement of objectives under the Canadian Space Strategy respecting Earth Observation and Satellite Communications. However, it does not lead to the transfer of technologies as much as to the exchange of information on technologies.
Small and medium-sized companies have difficulty taking part in ESA programs and require greater support, not only to access these markets, but also to develop expertise so that they can continue doing business in these markets after their initial participation in ESA programs.
Source: Evaluation of the Canada/ESA Cooperation Agreement
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/publications/er-0405-0202.asp
CASSIOPE Mission |
|
|---|---|
| Start Date: November 1, 2003 | End Date: March 31, 2012 |
Description: |
|
Strategic Outcome: Canada's presence in space meets the needs of Canadians for scientific knowledge, space technology and information. Expected Results (Program Activity Level) Space Based Earth Observation: The benefits of activities involved in Earth Observation from space serve Canadian users in the fields of environment, resource and land-use management, and security and sovereignty. Space Science and Exploration: Participation in Canadian and international missions expands the scientific knowledge base made available to Canadian academia and R&D communities in the areas of astronomy, space exploration and solar-terrestrial relations, as well as in physical and life sciences. Satellite Communications: State-of-the-art systems and applications are developed to satisfy the needs of the Canadian government and population in order to ensure that Canada remains a world leader in satellite communications. Generic Space Activities in support of EO, SE and SC: Canada's industrial technological capabilities can meet the needs of future space missions and activities. |
|
Expected Accomplishments: Development and demonstration of the CASCADE Ka-Band telecommunications payload designed and built by Canadian companies. CASCADE is the precursor of communication satellite constellations that will help position the Canadian industry on the international market as a supplier of advanced components and a service provider. Development of a small Canadian scientific satellite, the enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (ePOP), which will probe the upper atmosphere and ionosphere region where solar variability influences global change in various time scales. Development of a generic Canadian small satellite bus that could also be used for future Canadian missions. Actual Accomplishments: Completed manufacture, assembly and integration of the Cascade payload. Completed manufacture, assembly and integration of ePOP instruments, data handling units and booms. Completed manufacture, test and integration of the generic small satellite bus. Started the environment testing of the spacecraft at DFL. |
|
($ in millions) |
Actual Spending 2006-2007 |
Actual Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Total Authorities 2008-2009 |
Actual Spending 2008-2009 |
Variance between Planned vs. Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Space Science and Exploration | 2.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Satellite Communications | 16.2 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 3.6 | 2.4 |
| Total Contributions | 18.5 | 8.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| Total Program Activities | 18.5 | 8.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
Notes:
Comments on Variances:
CASSIOPE: CASSIOPE: Program delays due to problems with the development of critical component (DSU) and the move of the launch date from November 2008 to November 2009 due to delays in the development of the Falcon launch vehicle. After detailed reviews of all the mission components, the schedule and milestones were modified to fit the new program schedule and launch date and the cash flow projections were adjusted accordingly.
ePOP: The delays for ePOP were necessitated by the extension of the CASSIOPE schedule and slippage of the launch date, which are beyond the control of the University of Calgary. The schedule extension will require the University of Calgary to stretch instrument test to fit the extended CASSIOPE schedule and maintain the project development teams at the universities and in industry for a longer period. The integration of ePOP with the CASSIOPE spacecraft is MacDonald, Dettwiller and Associates's responsibility, and was performed at Bristol in Winnipeg and at the David Florida Lab in Ottawa. Synchronization of all program elements and activities, including the ePOP payload integration and test, is critical for success.
Significant Audit and Evaluation Findings and URL (s) to the Last Audit and/or Evaluation:
The CSA program management office proactively manages technical aspects of the CASSIOPE contribution program. Effective management mechanisms and practices are implemented to ensure progress towards achieving expected technical results at the technology demonstration phase. The risk management mechanisms ensure that technical risks are effectively monitored and mitigated or reduced for all program elements.
The CSA disposes of sufficient authority and resources to ensure effective management of technical aspects of the CASSIOPE contribution program. The existing management mechanisms and practices provide the CSA with high level expertise in satellite communications and ensure effective coordination with the Communications Research Centre. They also ensure effective coordination between the CSA and each of the two recipients, as well as between the two contribution recipients.
| 2008–2009 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Activity ($ Millions) |
Actual Spending 2006-2007 |
Actual Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
| Integration Program – Grants | |||||
| Grant for the Canada-Quebec Accord [a] | 193.9 | 198.2 | 216.0 | 226.0 | 226.0 |
| Institute for Canadian Citizenship | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Grants | 196.9 | 198.2 | 216.0 | 226.0 | 226.0 |
Canada’s Role in International Migration and Protection – Contributions |
|||||
| Migration Policy Development | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| International Organization for Migration | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Integration Program – Contributions | |||||
| Host Program [b] | 5.0 | 8.1 | 14.5 | 15.6 | 15.6 |
| Immigrant Settlement and Adaptation Program [c] | 70.2 | 115.1 | 192.9 | 192.9 | 181.2 |
| Resettlement Assistance Program [d] | 44.1 | 52.9 | 49.6 | 51.6 | 51.6 |
| Contributions to Provinces [a] | 82.8 | 97.6 | 134.6 | 134.6 | 134.6 |