This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
(in millions of dollars)
Loans, Investments and Advances | Actual as of March 31 | ||
---|---|---|---|
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |
GOVERNMENT SERVICES | |||
Seized Property Working Capital Account (Note 1) | (0.2) | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OTHER | |||
Miscellaneous accountable imprest and standing advances (Note 2) | 20.8 | 10.7 | 16.6 |
Total Loans, Investments and Advances (Note 3) | 20.6 | 12.7 | 17.7 |
Note 1: The Seized Property Working Capital Account was established by Section 12 of the Seized Property Management Act. The total amount authorized to be outstanding at any time is $50 million. Note 2: The miscellaneous accountable imprest and standing advances represent amounts recoverable from all federal departments and agencies by the Receiver General. The total amount authorized to be outstanding at any time is $22 million. Note 3: Further details on the above loans, investments and advances can be found in Volume 1 of the Public Accounts of Canada - Summary Report and Financial Statements. Note 4: Totals may not add up due to rounding. |
(in millions of dollars)
2007-2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government Services - Program Activity |
Actual 2005-2006
|
Actrual 2006-2007
|
Planned Revenues | Total Authorities | Actual |
Respendable Revenues | |||||
Real Property | |||||
Federal Accommodation and Holdings | |||||
Rentals and Concessions |
436.3
|
472.3
|
286.8
|
756.4
|
756.4
|
Real Property Stewardship |
1.7
|
2.0
|
1.9
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
Real Property Services Revolving Fund | |||||
Recoveries of disbursements on behalf of clients |
742.3
|
831.4
|
734.7
|
734.7
|
891.6
|
Fee revenues from real property related common services | 170.0 | 153.4 | 157.6 | 157.6 | 144.6 |
912.3
|
984.8
|
892.3
|
892.3
|
1,036.2
|
|
Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund | |||||
Sales of real properties | 6.7 | 8.9 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 11.2 |
Total – Real Property | 1,357.0 | 1,468.0 | 1,193.0 | 1,664.0 | 1,807.1 |
Acquisitions | |||||
Acquisition Services | |||||
Major Crown Projects |
12.1
|
16.9
|
6.6
|
15.5
|
15.5
|
Acquisitions |
19.2
|
19.6
|
14.8
|
36.8
|
36.8
|
Canadian General Standards Board |
2.1
|
2.3
|
2.3
|
2.8
|
2.8
|
Crown Assets Distribution |
2.6
|
2.5
|
-
|
2.4
|
2.4
|
Seized Property Management |
6.5
|
6.7
|
6.5
|
7.1
|
7.1
|
Others | 12.7 | 12.5 | 12.2 | 17.8 | 17.8 |
55.2
|
60.5
|
42.4
|
82.4
|
82.4
|
|
Supply Operations Stewardship |
7.4
|
3.7
|
8.5
|
4.7
|
4.7
|
Optional Services Revolving Fund | |||||
Traffic and Vaccine |
83.3
|
85.8
|
90.0
|
90.0
|
96.1
|
Crown Assets Distribution (Note 1) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Communication Procurement |
4.5
|
3.1
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
3.6
|
Locally Shared Support Services |
6.2
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
5.1
|
Software Brokerage / Benchmarking | - | - | - | - | - |
94.0 | 95.2 | 100.4 | 100.4 | 104.8 | |
Total – Acquisitions | 156.6 | 159.4 | 151.3 | 187.5 | 191.9 |
Information Technology | |||||
IM/IT Services |
219.0
|
196.0
|
212.5
|
249.6
|
249.6
|
IM/IT Stewardship |
3.2
|
0.8
|
0.6
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
Telecommunications and Informatics Common Services Revolving Fund | 131.5 | 168.2 | 134.3 | 134.3 | 196.6 |
Total – Information Technology |
353.7
|
365.0
|
347.4
|
385.0
|
447.3
|
Receiver General and Public Service Compensation | |||||
Receiver General Services | 4.8 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Receiver General Stewardship | 14.2 | 18.0 | 13.5 | 19.5 | 19.5 |
Public Service Compensation | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Public Service Pay Stewardship | 6.9 | 7.8 | 3.8 | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Public Service Pension Stewardship | 48.9 | 52.6 | 37.9 | 74.2 | 74.2 |
Total – Receiver General and Public Service Compensation | 77.7 | 84.4 | 60.3 | 106.2 | 106.2 |
Government Information | |||||
Government Information Services | 14.8 | 9.2 | 11.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Government Information Stewardship | 0.2 | - | - | - | - |
Total – Government Information | 15.0 | 9.2 | 11.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Business Integration | |||||
Business Integration Services | 15.4 | 22.9 | 22.3 | 28.2 | 28.2 |
Business Integration - Performance Management | 38.2 | 34.6 | 30.0 | 38.6 | 38.6 |
Total – Business Integration | 53.6 | 57.5 | 52.3 | 66.8 | 66.8 |
Consulting and Audit Canada | |||||
Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund | 103.6 | 71.9 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 35.3 |
Translation Bureau | |||||
Translation Bureau Revolving Fund | |||||
Translation Services | 200.7 | 202.7 | 211.1 | 211.1 | 210.4 |
Interpretation Services | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
Terminology Services | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.7 |
Total – Translation Bureau | 204.9 | 207.1 | 214.9 | 214.9 | 215.3 |
Office of Green Government Operations | |||||
Office of Green Government Operations Services | - | - | - | - | - |
Office of Green Government Operations Stewardship | - | 5.4 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Total Office of Green Government Operations | - | 5.4 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Total Respendable Revenues | 2,322.1 | 2,427.9 | 2,088.6 | 2,685.9 | 2,877.7 |
Non-Respendable Revenues | |||||
Dry Docks | 5.1 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Net proceeds from sale of seven (7) office complexes and lands (Note 1) | - | - | - | 1,335.8 | 1,335.8 |
Miscellaneous Non-tax Revenues | |||||
Seized Properties | 17.2 | (4.4) | - | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Other non-tax revenue | 45.1 | 62.7 | 15.9 | 74.3 | 74.3 |
Total Non-Respendable Revenues | 67.4 | 63.8 | 20.9 | 1,417.3 | 1,417.3 |
DEPARTMENT TOTAL | 2,389.5 | 2,491.7 | 2,109.5 | 4,103.2 | 4,295.0 |
Note 1: Gross sale price from the Sale and Leaseback of buildings are $1,411.1M. From that amount, $57.8M is related to a lease inducement and $17.5M for various expenses attributable to the transaction such as consulting fees, legal fees, and insurance premiums. The net amount of $1,335.8 has been deposited in the Consolidated Revenue Fund. Note 2: Totals may not add up due to rounding. |
We have prepared the accompanying financial statements of the Real Property Services Revolving Fund as required by and in accordance with the policy of Treasury Board on revolving funds and the reporting requirements and standards of the Receiver General for Canada. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies set out in Note 2 of the statements, on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.
Responsibility for the integrity and objectivity of these financial statements rests with the management of the Fund. The information included in these financial statements is based on management's best estimates and judgment with due consideration given to materiality. To fulfill its accounting and reporting responsibilities, management maintains a set of accounts which provides a centralized record of the Fund's financial transactions. Financial information submitted to the Public Accounts of Canada and included in the Departmental Performance Report is consistent with these financial statements.
Management develops and disseminates financial management and accounting policies and issues specific directives which maintain standards of financial management, accounting and reporting. Management maintains systems of financial management and internal control which give due consideration to costs, benefits and risks. They are designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized by Parliament, are executed in accordance with prescribed regulations, and are properly recorded to maintain accountability of government funds and safeguard the assets under the Fund's administration. Management also seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of data in its financial statements by the careful selection, training and development of qualified staff, by organizational arrangements that provide appropriate divisions of responsibility, and by communication programs aimed at ensuring that its regulations, policies, standards and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization.
With the exception of the statement of authority provided and the reconciliation of unused authority, management has presented the financial statements to external auditors who have audited them and have provided an independent opinion which is appended to these financial statements.
Approved by:
MIKE HAWKES
Chief Financial Officer
Finance Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 30, 2008
TIM MCGRATH
Assistant Deputy Minister
Real Property Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 26, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
|
In thousands of dollars | ||||
Net results |
-
|
7,059
|
-
|
(13,191)
|
Add: items not requiring use of funds |
-
|
(6,531)
|
-
|
4,292
|
Operating source (use) of funds |
-
|
528
|
-
|
(8,899)
|
Add: recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
8,903
|
Less: items requiring use of funds Net other assets and liabilities |
-
|
24
|
-
|
4
|
Authority provided |
-
|
504
|
-
|
-
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Credit (debit) balance in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority |
8,731
|
(18,565)
|
Add: | ||
PAYE charges against the appropriation account after March 31 |
175,010
|
212,696
|
Less: | ||
Amounts credited to the appropriation account after March 31 |
184,245
|
194,131
|
Net authority provided, end of year |
(504)
|
-
|
Authority limit (note 1) |
150,000
|
150,000
|
Unused authority carried forward |
150,504
|
150,000
|
We have audited the statement of financial position of the Real Property Services Revolving Fund (the “Fund”) as at March 31, 2008 and the statements of operations and net assets (liabilities) and cash flow for the year then ended. These financial statements have been prepared to comply with Section 6.4 of Treasury Board’s Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Fund. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as at March 31, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended in accordance with the basis of accounting described in Note 2 to the financial statements.
These financial statements, which have not been, and were not intended to be, prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, are solely for the information and use of the management of the Fund and the Treasury Board to comply with Section 6.4 of the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. The financial statements are not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than specified users or for any other purpose.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Ottawa, Ontario
May 30, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Assets | ||
Current | ||
Cash in transit |
80
|
19
|
Accounts receivable | ||
Government of Canada |
175,843
|
184,743
|
Outside parties |
10,777
|
8,143
|
Other assets (note 3) |
7,615
|
9,314
|
194,315
|
202,219
|
|
Liabilities and net assets (liabilities) | ||
Current | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||
Government of Canada |
8,741
|
3,644
|
Outside parties |
156,193
|
198,114
|
Professional liability fund |
2,138
|
2,301
|
Other liabilities |
6,276
|
4,602
|
173,348
|
208,661
|
|
Allowance for employee termination benefits |
11,008
|
17,954
|
184,356
|
226,615
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) (note 4) |
9,959
|
(24,396)
|
194,315
|
202,219
|
|
Contractual obligations (note 5) | ||
Contingent liabilities (note 6) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Gross revenues (note 7) |
1,036,579
|
974,858
|
Recoverable disbursements made on behalf of clients |
892,001
|
821,459
|
Net revenues |
144,578
|
153,399
|
Operating expenses | ||
Salaries and employee benefits |
85,314
|
94,686
|
Employee termination benefits |
(2,477)
|
(997)
|
Overhead chargeback |
28,841
|
36,378
|
Corporate and administrative services |
18,427
|
23,241
|
Occupancy costs |
5,608
|
7,017
|
Provisions for claims and other expenses |
1,806
|
6,265
|
137,519
|
166,590
|
|
Net results |
7,059
|
(13,191)
|
Net liabilities, beginning of year |
(24,396)
|
(37,669)
|
Recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
-
|
8,903
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
27,296
|
17,561
|
Net assets (liabilities), end of year |
9,959
|
(24,396)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Operating activities | ||
Net results |
7,059
|
(13,191)
|
Provision for employee termination benefits |
(2,477)
|
(997)
|
4,582
|
(14,188)
|
|
Changes in working capital (note 8) |
(27,409)
|
(9,060)
|
Payments on provision for employee termination benefits |
(4,469)
|
(3,216)
|
Net financial resources used by operating activities |
(27,296)
|
(26,464)
|
Financing activity | ||
Recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
-
|
8,903
|
Net financial resources provided by the financing activity |
-
|
8,903
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
(27,296)
|
(17,561)
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, beginning of year |
18,565
|
36,126
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year (note 4) |
(8,731)
|
18,565
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
The Real Property Services Revolving Fund (“the Fund”) provides, on a fee-for-service basis, optional real property services to other custodian departments and to other departments and agencies requesting services over and above those provided under the Federal Accommodation and Holdings Service Line program. More specifically, the Fund looks after architectural and engineering activities, property management, holdings and divestiture, and support services.
The Fund has a continuing non-lapsing authority from Parliament to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purposes of working capital, capital acquisitions and the temporary financing of accumulated operating deficits, the total of which is not to exceed $150,000,000 at any time.
The Fund receives funding by way of a separate vote, to cover the net draw down authority used in order to comply with the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. The amount received in 2007-2008 was nil (2006-2007: $8,903,266).
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies issued by the Treasury Board. The basis of accounting used in these financial statements differs from Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector because the employee termination benefits liability is based on management's estimate of this liability rather than based on actuarial valuations.
The significant accounting policies are as follows:
a) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with the reporting requirements for Revolving Funds described by the Receiver General for Canada requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
b) Revenue recognition
Revenues earned on professional and technical services performed and revenues to recover disbursements made on behalf of other government departments and outside parties are recognized as costs are incurred by the Fund.
c) Expenses
Overhead chargeback, corporate and administrative services and occupancy costs are based on the budgeted direct service delivery personnel costs as determined in the 2007-2008 Budget Framework for the Fund and the Federal Accommodation and Holdings Program Activities of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
d) Inventories
Inventories are valued at cost and are recorded on a first-in, first-out basis.
e) Pension plan
Employees of the Fund are covered by the Public Service Superannuation Act and the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Act. The Government of Canada’s portion of the pension cost is included in the employee benefits charge assessed against the Fund. The actual payment of the pension is made from the Public Service
Superannuation and Supplementary Retirement Benefits Accounts.
f) Employee termination benefits, vacation pay and time-off in lieu
Termination benefits accrue to employees over their years of service with the Government of Canada as provided for under collective agreements, and the estimated costs of these benefits are recorded in the accounts as they are earned by the employees.
The liability for vacation pay and compensatory leave is calculated at the salary levels in effect at the end of the year for all unused vacation pay and time-off in lieu benefits accruing to employees.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Goods and Services Tax refundable advances |
7,586
|
9,246
|
Other advances |
20
|
7
|
Prepaid expenses |
9
|
3
|
Inventories |
-
|
58
|
7,615
|
9,314
|
The accumulated surplus (deficit) is the accumulation of each fiscal year's surpluses and deficits since the inception of the Fund. The accumulated net charge against the Fund’s authority is the non-lapsing authority amount that has been used since the inception of the Fund.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Accumulated deficit, beginning of year |
(5,831)
|
(1,543)
|
Net results |
7,059
|
(13,191)
|
Recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
-
|
8,903
|
Accumulated surplus (deficit), end of year |
1,228
|
(5,831)
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year |
8,731
|
(18,565)
|
9,959
|
(24,396)
|
The Fund is engaged in contractual obligations for property services. Expected future payments are as follows:
In thousands of dollars | ||
Year ending March 31, | 2009 |
253,042
|
2010 |
41,112
|
|
2011 |
20,411
|
|
2012 |
18,469
|
|
2013 and thereafter |
85,389
|
|
418,423
|
Multiple claims have been made against the Fund in the normal course of operations. Some of these potential liabilities may become actual liabilities when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. To the extent that the future event is likely to occur or fail to occur, and a reasonable estimate of the loss can be made, an estimated liability is accrued and an expense is recorded in the financial statements. A material claim where the outcome is not determinable is described below.
A statement of claim has been filed against the Crown and other parties alleging damages of $39.7 million in connection with an implied breach of contractual obligations. The Crown has filed its statement of defence. The Crown is unable to assess the possibility of settlement and the amount at risk or estimate the amount of any settlement. No accrual for this contingency has been made in the financial statements.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Recoverable disbursements made on behalf of clients |
892,001
|
821,459
|
Project fees |
133,217
|
139,308
|
Payroll recoveries |
6,785
|
10,007
|
Inventory management fees |
2,381
|
3,095
|
Other revenues |
2,195
|
989
|
1,036,579
|
974,858
|
In thousands of dollars | |||
2008
|
2007
|
Changes
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Current assets |
194,315
|
202,219
|
7,904
|
Current liabilities |
173,348
|
208,661
|
(35,313)
|
(27,409)
|
The Fund's financial instruments consist of cash in transit, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value because of their short terms to maturity. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Fund is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.
We have prepared the accompanying financial statements of the Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund as required by and in accordance with the policy of Treasury Board on revolving funds and the reporting requirements and standards of the Receiver General for Canada. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies set out in Note 2 of the statements, on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.
Responsibility for the integrity and objectivity of these financial statements rests with the management of the Fund. The information included in these financial statements is based on management's best estimates and judgment with due consideration given to materiality. To fulfill its accounting and reporting responsibilities, management maintains a set of accounts which provides a centralized record of the Fund's financial transactions. Financial information submitted to the Public Accounts of Canada and included in the Departmental Performance Report is consistent with these financial statements.
Management develops and disseminates financial management and accounting policies and issues specific directives which maintain standards of financial management, accounting and reporting. Management maintains systems of financial management and internal control which give due consideration to costs, benefits and risks. They are designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized by Parliament, are executed in accordance with prescribed regulations, and are properly recorded to maintain accountability of government funds and safeguard the assets under the Fund's administration. Management also seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of data in its financial statements by the careful selection, training and development of qualified staff, by organizational arrangements that provide appropriate divisions of responsibility, and by communication programs aimed at ensuring that its regulations, policies, standards and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization.
With the exception of the statement of authority provided and the reconciliation of unused authority, management has presented the financial statements to external auditors who have audited them and have provided an independent opinion which is appended to these financial statements.
Approved by:
MIKE HAWKES
Chief Financial Officer
Finance Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 30, 2008
TIM MCGRATH
Assistant Deputy Minister
Real Property Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 26, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
|
In thousands of dollars | ||||
Net results |
8,000
|
8,796
|
8,000
|
6,741
|
Less: items requiring use of funds |
-
|
85
|
-
|
636
|
Authority provided |
8,000
|
8,711
|
8,000
|
6,105
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Debit balance in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority |
(1,912)
|
(1,594)
|
Add: | ||
Deposits on disposals |
603
|
203
|
Less: | ||
Amounts credited to the appropriation account after March 31 |
-
|
3
|
Net authority provided, end of year |
(1,309)
|
(1,394)
|
Authority limit (note 1) |
5,000
|
5,000
|
Unused authority carried forward |
6,309
|
6,394
|
We have audited the statement of financial position of the Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund (the “Fund”) as at March 31, 2008 and the statements of operations and net assets and cash flow for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Fund. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as at March 31, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Ottawa, Ontario
May 30, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Assets | ||
Current | ||
Cash in transit |
-
|
3
|
Accounts receivable | ||
Outside parties |
4
|
-
|
Work in process |
3,691
|
3,606
|
3,695
|
3,609
|
|
Liabilities and net assets | ||
Current | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||
Government of Canada |
1
|
-
|
Deposits on disposals |
606
|
203
|
607
|
203
|
|
Net assets (note 3) |
3,088
|
3,406
|
3,695
|
3,609
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Revenues |
11,163
|
8,861
|
Operating expenses | ||
Fees |
1,454
|
915
|
Disbursements |
913
|
1,205
|
2,367
|
2,120
|
|
Net results |
8,796
|
6,741
|
Net assets, beginning of year |
3,406
|
2,561
|
Transfer of part of the accumulated surplus to the Consolidated Revenue Fund (note 1) |
(8,796)
|
(6,741)
|
Net financial resources used (provided) and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
(318)
|
845
|
Net assets, end of year |
3,088
|
3,406
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Operating activities | ||
Net results |
8,796
|
6,741
|
Changes in working capital (note 4) |
318
|
(845)
|
Net financial resources provided by operating activities |
9,114 | 5,896 |
Financing activity | ||
Transfer of part of the accumulated surplus to the Consolidated Revenue Fund (note 1) |
(8,796)
|
(6,741)
|
Net financial resources used by the financing activity |
(8,796)
|
(6,741)
|
Net financial resources provided (used) and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
318 | (845) |
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, beginning of year |
1,594 | 2,439 |
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year (note 3) |
1,912
|
1,594
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
The Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund (“the Fund”) provides, on a cost recovery basis, routine disposals of real property assets no longer required in order to generate revenue for the Crown.
The Fund has a continuing non-lapsing authority from Parliament to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purposes of working capital, the total of which is not to exceed $5,000,000 at any time.
All proceeds of sale are deposited to the Consolidated Revenue Fund net of disposal costs and expenses. In accordance with the terms and conditions approved by the Treasury Board, any year end accumulated surplus in the Fund in excess of $5,000,000 is deposited to the Consolidated Revenue Fund. The amount transferred to the Consolidated Revenue Fund in 2007-2008 was $8,796,426 (2006-2007: $6,741,867).
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies issued by the Treasury Board which are consistent with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector.
The significant accounting policies are as follows:
a) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with the reporting requirements for Revolving Funds described by the Receiver General for Canada requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
b) Revenue recognition
Revenues are recognized in the period in which both the title is transferred to the purchaser and the full payment is received by the Fund.
c) Work in process
Work in process includes labour and disbursements incurred for services performed or goods delivered for sales or transfers of properties not finalized at the fiscal year end.
d) Deposits on disposals
Deposits on disposals represent receipts on future disposals of properties that are not closed at the fiscal year end.
The accumulated surplus is the accumulation of each fiscal year's surpluses since the inception of the Fund. The accumulated net charge against the Fund’s authority is the non-lapsing authority amount that has been used since the inception of the Fund.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year |
5,000
|
5,000
|
Net results |
8,796
|
6,741
|
Transfer of part of the accumulated surplus to the Consolidated Revenue Fund (note 1) |
||
(8,796)
|
(6,741)
|
|
Accumulated surplus, end of year |
5,000
|
5,000
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year |
(1,912)
|
(1,594)
|
3,088
|
3,406
|
In thousands of dollars | |||
2008
|
2007
|
Changes
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Current assets |
3,695
|
3,609
|
(86)
|
Current liabilities |
607
|
203
|
404
|
318
|
The Fund's financial instruments consist of cash in transit, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value because of their short terms to maturity. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Fund is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.
We have prepared the accompanying financial statements of the Optional Services Revolving Fund as required by and in accordance with the policy of Treasury Board on revolving funds and the reporting requirements and standards of the Receiver General for Canada. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies set out in Note 2 of the statements, on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year. Some previous year's figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Responsibility for the integrity and objectivity of these financial statements rests with the management of the Fund. The information included in these financial statements is based on management's best estimates and judgment with due consideration given to materiality. To fulfill its accounting and reporting responsibilities, management maintains a set of accounts which provides a centralized record of the Fund's financial transactions. Financial information submitted to the Public Accounts of Canada and included in the Departmental Performance Report is consistent with these financial statements.
Management develops and disseminates financial management and accounting policies and issues specific directives which maintain standards of financial management, accounting and reporting. Management maintains systems of financial management and internal control which give due consideration to costs, benefits and risks. They are designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized by Parliament, are executed in accordance with prescribed regulations, and are properly recorded to maintain accountability of government funds and safeguard the assets under the Fund's administration. Management also seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of data in its financial statements by the careful selection, training and development of qualified staff, by organizational arrangements that provide appropriate divisions of responsibility, and by communication programs aimed at ensuring that its regulations, policies, standards and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization.
With the exception of the statement of authority provided and the reconciliation of unused authority, management has presented the financial statements to external auditors who have audited them and have provided an independent opinion which is appended to these financial statements.
Approved by:
MIKE HAWKES
Chief Financial Officer
Finance Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 30, 2008
LILIANE SAINT PIERRE
Assistant Deputy Minister
Acquisitions Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 28, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
|
In thousands of dollars | ||||
Net results |
-
|
3,043
|
-
|
2,099
|
Add: items not requiring use of funds |
-
|
275
|
-
|
(1,204)
|
Operating source of funds |
-
|
3,318
|
-
|
895
|
Less: items requiring use of funds | ||||
Net other assets and liabilities |
-
|
(1)
|
-
|
2
|
Authority provided |
-
|
3,319
|
-
|
893
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Debit balance in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority |
(10,257)
|
(7,770)
|
Add: | ||
PAYE charges against the appropriation account after March 31 |
4,543
|
6,036
|
Less: | ||
Amounts credited to the appropriation account after March 31 |
852
|
1,512
|
Net authority provided, end of year |
(6,566)
|
(3,246)
|
Authority limit (note 1) |
35,000
|
35,000
|
Unused authority carried forward |
41,566
|
38,246
|
We have audited the statement of financial position of the Optional Services Revolving Fund (the “Fund”) as at March 31, 2008 and the statements of operations and net liabilities and cash flow for the year then ended. These financial statements have been prepared to comply with Section 6.4 of Treasury Board’s Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Fund. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as at March 31, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended in accordance with the basis of accounting described in Note 2 to the financial statements.
These financial statements, which have not been, and were not intended to be, prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, are solely for the information and use of the management of the Fund and the Treasury Board to comply with Section 6.4 of the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. The financial statements are not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than specified users or for any other purpose.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Ottawa, Ontario
May 30, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Assets | ||
Current | ||
Cash in transit |
12
|
242
|
Accounts receivable | ||
Government of Canada |
798
|
812
|
Outside parties |
2,684
|
2,988
|
Other assets (note 3) |
41
|
459
|
3,535
|
4,501
|
|
Liabilities and net liabilities | ||
Current | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||
Government of Canada |
147
|
4
|
Outside parties |
3,177
|
4,890
|
Other liabilities |
177
|
116
|
3,501
|
5,010
|
|
Allowance for employee termination benefits |
809
|
822
|
4,310
|
5,832
|
|
Net liabilities (note 4) |
(775)
|
(1,331)
|
3,535
|
4,501
|
|
Contractual obligation (note 5) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Revenues (note 6) |
104,491
|
96,665
|
Direct costs |
94,556
|
88,565
|
Gross margin |
9,935
|
8,100
|
Operating expenses | ||
Salaries and employee benefits |
3,865
|
3,451
|
Employee termination benefits |
72
|
40
|
Professional and special services |
1,776
|
1,513
|
Corporate and administrative services |
505
|
278
|
Occupancy costs |
462
|
452
|
Transportation and telecommunications |
93
|
106
|
Information |
43
|
46
|
Utilities, materials and supplies |
24
|
26
|
Rentals |
14
|
17
|
Purchased repairs and maintenance |
5
|
5
|
Amortization |
-
|
11
|
Other expenses |
33
|
56
|
6,892
|
6,001
|
|
Net results |
3,043
|
2,099
|
Net liabilities, beginning of year |
(1,331)
|
(2,338)
|
Net financial resources used (provided) and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
(2,487)
|
2,908
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(4,000)
|
Net liabilities, end of year |
(775)
|
(1,331)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Operating activities | ||
Net results |
3,043
|
2,099
|
Items not affecting use of the Fund's authority | ||
Amortization |
-
|
11
|
Provision for employee termination benefits |
72
|
40
|
3,115
|
2,150
|
|
Changes in working capital (note 7) |
(543)
|
(1,058)
|
Payments on provision for employee termination benefits |
(85)
|
-
|
Net financial resources provided by operating activities |
2,487 | 1,092 |
Financing activity | ||
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(4,000)
|
Net financial resources used by the financing activity |
-
|
(4,000)
|
Net financial resources provided (used) and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
2,487 | (2,908) |
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, beginning of year |
7,770
|
10,678
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year (note 4) |
10,257 | 7,770 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
The Optional Services Revolving Fund (“the Fund”) provides specialized services to client departments, such as communication procurement services, taxi management system, travel management services, central removal services and central freight services. The Fund also procures vaccines and drugs on behalf of provinces and territories.
The Fund has a continuing non-lapsing authority from Parliament to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purposes of working capital, capital acquisitions and the temporary financing of accumulated operating deficits, the total of which is not to exceed $35,000,000 at any time.
On November 30, 2006, the Fund received authorization from the Treasury Board to contribute $4,000,000 from its accumulated surplus for the implementation of Budget 2006 expenditure restraint measures.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies issued by the Treasury Board. The basis of accounting used in these financial statements differs from Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector because the employee termination benefits liability is based on management's estimate of this liability rather than based on actuarial valuations.
The significant accounting policies are as follows:
a) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with the reporting requirements for Revolving Funds described by the Receiver General for Canada requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
b) Revenue recognition
Recoveries from the vaccine program are recognized using a blended rate established by fixed price contracts and based on the proportion of total goods delivered at year end. Any losses on the fixed price contracts are recognized during the period in which they are identified.
Locally shared support services revenues are recognized as service provider costs are provided to the Fund.
Revenues earned on communication, printing and audio-visual services are recognized using the completed contract method.
Traffic management recoveries consist of travel commissions, central freight and central removal services. Travel commissions and central removal services recoveries are recognized based on service utilization whereas central freight recoveries are recognized as service provider costs are provided to the Fund.
c) Capital assets
Capital assets are recorded at their acquisition cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each asset. All capital assets were fully amortized as at March 31, 2007.
d) Pension plan
Employees of the Fund are covered by the Public Service Superannuation Act and the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Act. The Government of Canada’s portion of the pension cost is included in the employee benefits charge assessed against the Fund. The actual payment of the pension is made from the Public Service
Superannuation and Supplementary Retirement Benefits Accounts.
e) Employee termination benefits, vacation pay and time-off in lieu
Termination benefits accrue to employees over their years of service with the Government of Canada as provided for under collective agreements, and the estimated costs of these benefits are recorded in the accounts as they are earned by the employees.
The liability for vacation pay and compensatory leave is calculated at the salary levels in effect at the end of the year for all unused vacation pay and time-off in lieu benefits accruing to employees.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Goods and Services Tax refundable advances |
40
|
455
|
Other advances |
1
|
4
|
41
|
459
|
The accumulated surplus is the accumulation of each fiscal year's surpluses, net of deficits, since the inception of the Fund. The accumulated net charge against the Fund’s authority is the non-lapsing authority amount that has been used since the inception of the Fund.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year |
6,439
|
8,340
|
Net results |
3,043
|
2,099
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(4,000)
|
Accumulated surplus, end of year |
9,482
|
6,439
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year |
(10,257)
|
(7,770)
|
(775)
|
(1,331)
|
The Fund leases its premises under an occupancy instrument. An occupancy instrument is a formal agreement between the Fund and Public Works and Government Services Canada recording the specific details of an individual occupancy and the terms and conditions that govern the provision and occupancy of the accommodation. Expected future payments for the existing occupancy instrument are as follows:
In thousands of dollars | |
Year ending March 31, 2009 |
75
|
75
|
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Vaccine program recoveries |
61,073
|
53,998
|
Traffic management recoveries |
34,810
|
33,162
|
Locally shared support service centre sales |
5,074
|
6,304
|
Communication, printing and audio-visual recoveries |
3,509
|
3,141
|
Benchmarking program |
25
|
60
|
104,491
|
96,665
|
In thousands of dollars | |||
2008
|
2007
|
Changes
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Current assets |
3,535
|
4,501
|
966
|
Current liabilities |
3,501
|
5,010
|
(1,509)
|
(543)
|
Certain of the prior year’s figures have been reclassified in order to conform to the presentation adopted in the current year.
The Fund's financial instruments consist of cash in transit, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value because of their short terms to maturity. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Fund is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.
We have prepared the accompanying financial statements of the Defence Production Revolving Fund as required by and in accordance with the policy of Treasury Board on revolving funds and the reporting requirements and standards of the Receiver General for Canada.
There were no financial transactions in the Fund during the year ended March 31, 2008.
Approved by:
MIKE HAWKES
Chief Financial Officer
Finance Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 30, 2008
LILIANE SAINT PIERRE
Assistant Deputy Minister
Acquisitions Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 28, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Joint authority limit (note 1) |
100,000
|
100,000
|
Net authority available for the Fund's account |
100,000
|
100,000
|
Unused authority carried forward |
100,000
|
100,000
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Joint authority limit (note 1) | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Less : Authority limit applied to the Defence Production | ||
Revolving Fund | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Unused authority carried forward | - | - |
The Defence Production Revolving Fund (“the Fund”) was established by Section 15 of the Defence Production Act. It was established in 1951 for the purpose of:
a) financing the stockpiling of defence supplies or strategic materials;
b) making loans or advances to aid in defence procurement, such as working capital loans for advance payments on contracts, but not including loans or advance payments for capital purposes; and
c) permitting initial payments for defence supplies which can be promptly billed to a Government department, agency or an associated government in advance of delivery of goods.
The Adjustment of Accounts Act (S.C. 1980, c.17) had the effect of creating a separate Defence Production Loan Account for loans or advances authorized under the Defence Production Act, item (b) above.
The Fund and the Defence Production Loan Account have a joint continuing non-lapsing authority from the Parliament to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund, the total of which is not to exceed $100 million at any time.
We have prepared the accompanying financial statements of the Telecommunications and
Informatics Common Services Revolving Fund as required by and in accordance with the policy of Treasury Board on revolving funds and the reporting requirements and standards of the Receiver General for Canada. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies set out in Note 2 of the statements, on a basis consistent with that of the
preceding year. Some previous year's figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Responsibility for the integrity and objectivity of these financial statements rests with the
management of the Fund. The information included in these financial statements is based on management's best estimates and judgment with due consideration given to materiality. To fulfill its accounting and reporting responsibilities, management maintains a set of accounts which provides a centralized record of the Fund's financial transactions. Financial information submitted to the
Public Accounts of Canada and included in the Departmental Performance Report is consistent with these financial statements.
Management develops and disseminates financial management and accounting policies and
issues specific directives which maintain standards of financial management, accounting and reporting. Management maintains systems of financial management and internal control which give due consideration to costs, benefits and risks. They are designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized by Parliament, are executed in accordance with prescribed
regulations, and are properly recorded to maintain accountability of government funds and safeguard the assets under the Fund's administration. Management also seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of data in its financial statements by the careful selection, training and development of qualified staff, by organizational arrangements that provide appropriate divisions of
responsibility, and by communication programs aimed at ensuring that its regulations, policies, standards and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization.
With the exception of the statement of authority provided and the reconciliation of unused
authority, management has presented the financial statements to external auditors who have audited them and have provided an independent opinion which is appended to these financial statements.
Approved by:
MIKE HAWKES
Chief Financial Officer
Finance Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 30, 2008
STEVEN POOLE
Chief Executive Officer
Information Technology Services Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 26, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
|
In thousands of dollars | ||||
Net results |
-
|
816
|
-
|
11,181
|
Add: Items not requiring use of funds |
175
|
(80)
|
175
|
570
|
Operating source of funds |
175
|
736
|
175
|
11,751
|
Less: items requiring use of funds | ||||
Net capital acquisitions |
175
|
62
|
175
|
4,913
|
Net other assets and liabilities |
-
|
4
|
-
|
3
|
Authority provided |
-
|
670
|
-
|
6,835
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Debit balance in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority |
(6,942)
|
(10,342)
|
Add: | ||
PAYE charges against the appropriation account after March 31 |
54,168
|
47,544
|
Less: | ||
Amounts credited to the appropriation account after March 31 |
57,430
|
46,736
|
Net authority provided, end of year |
(10,204)
|
(9,534)
|
Authority limit (note 1) |
20,000
|
20,000
|
Unused authority carried forward |
30,204
|
29,534
|
We have audited the statement of financial position of the Telecommunications and Informatics Common Services Revolving Fund (the “Fund”) as at March 31, 2008 and the statements of operations and net assets and cash flow for the year then ended. These financial statements have been prepared to comply with Section 6.4 of Treasury Board’s Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Fund. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as at March 31, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended in accordance with the basis of accounting described in Note 2 to the financial statements.
These financial statements, which have not been, and were not intended to be, prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, are solely for the information and use of the management of the Fund and the Treasury Board to comply with
Section 6.4 of the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. The financial statements are not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than specified users or for any other purpose.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Ottawa, Ontario
May 30, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Assets | ||
Current | ||
Cash in transit |
2
|
48
|
Accounts receivable | ||
Government of Canada |
54,786
|
43,919
|
Outside parties |
1,322
|
889
|
Other assets (note 3) |
2,615
|
2,739
|
58,725
|
47,595
|
|
Capital assets (note 4) |
5,004
|
5,047
|
63,729
|
52,642
|
|
Liabilities and net assets | ||
Current | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||
Government of Canada |
578
|
70
|
Outside parties |
53,634
|
47,499
|
Other liabilities |
917
|
703
|
55,129
|
48,272
|
|
Allowance for employee termination benefits |
3,406
|
3,392
|
58,535
|
51,664
|
|
Net assets (note 5) |
5,194
|
978
|
63,729
|
52,642
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Revenues (note 6) |
197,054
|
167,844
|
Cost of sales |
152,972
|
123,774
|
Gross margin |
44,082
|
44,070
|
Operating expenses | ||
Salaries and employee benefits |
17,599
|
14,472
|
Employee termination benefits |
411
|
336
|
Professional and special services |
21,490
|
14,913
|
Corporate and administrative services |
1,939
|
1,456
|
Occupancy costs |
744
|
784
|
Transportation and telecommunications |
596
|
499
|
Purchased repairs and maintenance |
187
|
20
|
Utilities, materials and supplies |
150
|
249
|
Amortization |
105
|
128
|
Other expenses |
45
|
32
|
43,266
|
32,889
|
|
Net results |
816
|
11,181
|
Net assets (liabilities), beginning of year |
978
|
(2,124)
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
3,400
|
10,921
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(19,000)
|
Net assets, end of year |
5,194
|
978
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Operating activities | ||
Net results |
816
|
11,181
|
Items not affecting use of the Fund's authority | ||
Amortization |
105
|
128
|
Provision for employee termination benefits |
411
|
336
|
1,332
|
11,645
|
|
Changes in working capital (note 7) |
(4,273)
|
1,707
|
Payments on provision for employee termination benefits |
(397)
|
(360)
|
Net financial resources provided (used) by operating activities |
(3,338)
|
12,992
|
Investing activity | ||
Capital assets - acquisitions |
(62)
|
(4,913)
|
Net financial resources used by the investing activity |
(62)
|
(4,913)
|
Financing activity | ||
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(19,000)
|
Net financial resources used by the financing activity |
-
|
(19,000)
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
(3,400)
|
(10,921)
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, beginning of year |
10,342
|
21,263
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year (note 5) |
6,942
|
10,342
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
The Telecommunications and Informatics Common Services Revolving Fund (“the Fund”) provides network and infrastructure services, voice telecommunications services, satellite services and managed services.
The Fund has a continuing non-lapsing authority from Parliament to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purposes of working capital, capital acquisitions and the temporary financing of accumulated operating deficits, the total of which is not to exceed $20,000,000 at any time.
On November 30, 2006, the Fund received authorization from the Treasury Board to contribute $19,000,000 from its accumulated surplus for the implementation of Budget 2006 expenditure restraint measures.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies issued by the Treasury Board. The basis of accounting used in these financial statements differs from Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector because the employee termination benefits liability is based on management's estimate of this liability rather than based on actuarial valuations.
The significant accounting policies are as follows:
a) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with the reporting requirements for Revolving Funds described by the Receiver General for Canada requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
b) Revenue recognition
Revenues earned on telecommunications and informatics services are recognized as costs are incurred by the Fund. Revenues earned on goods purchased from telecom suppliers on behalf of customers are recognized when the goods are delivered to other government departments or outside parties.
c) Capital assets
Capital assets are recorded at their acquisition cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each asset as follows:
Category
|
Estimated useful life
|
---|---|
Informatics hardware | 3 to 5 years |
Informatics software | 3 to 5 years |
Assets under construction | Once in service, in accordance with asset class |
d) Pension plan
Employees of the Fund are covered by the Public Service Superannuation Act and the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Act. The Government of Canada’s portion of the pension cost is included in the employee benefits charge assessed against the Fund. The actual payment of the pension is made from the Public Service
Superannuation and Supplementary Retirement Benefits Accounts.
e) Employee termination benefits, vacation pay and time-off in lieu
Termination benefits accrue to employees over their years of service with the Government of Canada as provided for under collective agreements, and the estimated costs of these benefits are recorded in the accounts as they are earned by the employees.
The liability for vacation pay and compensatory leave is calculated at the salary levels in effect at the end of the year for all unused vacation pay and time-off in lieu benefits accruing to employees.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Goods and Services Tax refundable advances |
2,607
|
2,735
|
Prepaid expenses |
8
|
4
|
2,615
|
2,739
|
In thousands of dollars | |||
Capital assets
|
Balance
beginning of year |
Acquisitions
|
Balance end
of year |
---|---|---|---|
Informatics hardware |
1,275
|
-
|
1,275
|
Informatics software |
216
|
-
|
216
|
Assets under construction |
4,843
|
62
|
4,905
|
6,334
|
62
|
6,396
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
Balance
beginning of year |
Current year
amortization |
Balance end
of year |
Informatics hardware |
1,142
|
82
|
1,224
|
Informatics software |
145
|
23
|
168
|
1,287
|
105
|
1,392
|
|
Net |
5,047
|
5,004
|
The accumulated surplus is the accumulation of each fiscal year's surpluses, net of deficits, since the inception of the Fund. The accumulated net charge against the Fund’s authority is the non-lapsing authority amount that has been used since the inception of the Fund.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year |
11,320
|
19,139
|
Net results |
816
|
11,181
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(19,000)
|
Accumulated surplus, end of year |
12,136
|
11,320
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year |
||
(6,942)
|
(10,342)
|
|
5,194
|
978
|
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Data network infrastructure services |
86,494
|
79,630
|
Voice network services |
45,835
|
41,143
|
Government enterprise network management services |
60,348
|
44,392
|
Perimeter defense services |
2,432
|
2,289
|
Other revenues |
1,945
|
390
|
197,054
|
167,844
|
In thousands of dollars | |||
2008
|
2007
|
Changes
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Current assets |
58,725
|
47,595
|
(11,130)
|
Current liabilities |
55,129
|
48,272
|
6,857
|
(4,273)
|
Certain of the prior year’s figures have been reclassified in order to conform to the presentation adopted in the current year.
The Fund's financial instruments consist of cash in transit, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value because of their short terms to maturity. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Fund is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.
We have prepared the accompanying financial statements of the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund as required by and in accordance with the policy of Treasury Board on revolving funds and the reporting requirements and standards of the Receiver General for Canada. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies set out in Note 2 of the statements, on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year. Some previous year's figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Responsibility for the integrity and objectivity of these financial statements rests with the management of the Fund. The information included in these financial statements is based on management's best estimates and judgment with due consideration given to materiality. To fulfill its accounting and reporting responsibilities, management maintains a set of accounts which provides a centralized record of the Fund's financial transactions. Financial information submitted to the Public Accounts of Canada and included in the Departmental Performance Report is consistent with these financial statements.
Management develops and disseminates financial management and accounting policies and issues specific directives which maintain standards of financial management, accounting and reporting. Management maintains systems of financial management and internal control which give due consideration to costs, benefits and risks. They are designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized by Parliament, are executed in accordance with prescribed regulations, and are properly recorded to maintain accountability of government funds and safeguard the assets under the Fund's administration. Management also seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of data in its financial statements by the careful selection, training and development of qualified staff, by organizational arrangements that provide appropriate divisions of responsibility, and by communication programs aimed at ensuring that its regulations, policies, standards and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization.
With the exception of the statement of authority provided and the reconciliation of unused authority, management has presented the financial statements to external auditors who have audited them and have provided an independent opinion which is appended to these financial statements.
Approved by:
MIKE HAWKES
Chief Financial Officer
Finance Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 30, 2008
JANE MEYBOOM-HARDY
Assistant Deputy Minister
Consulting, Information and
Shared Services Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 26, 2008
ANDRÉ AUGER
Chief Executive Officer
Audit Services Canada
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 26, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
|
In thousands of dollars |
(restated)
|
|||
Net results |
(646)
|
(7,940)
|
(53)
|
(3,004)
|
Add: items not requiring use of funds |
646
|
1,374
|
834
|
(1,867)
|
Operating source (use) of funds |
-
|
(6,566)
|
781
|
(4,871)
|
Add: recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
-
|
6,406
|
-
|
5,351
|
Less: items requiring use of funds | ||||
Net capital acquisitions |
-
|
-
|
300
|
-
|
Net other assets and liabilities |
-
|
(180)
|
-
|
19
|
Authority provided |
-
|
20
|
481
|
461
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Debit balance in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority |
(1,825)
|
(4,389)
|
Add: | ||
PAYE charges against the appropriation account after March 31 |
2,080
|
8,395
|
Less: | ||
Amounts credited to the appropriation account after March 31 |
4,881
|
8,023
|
Allocation from the Treasury Board Vote 5 (Government Contingencies) |
-
|
590
|
Net authority provided, end of year |
(4,626)
|
(4,607)
|
Authority limit (note 1) |
20,000
|
20,000
|
Unused authority carried forward |
24,626
|
24,607
|
We have audited the statement of financial position of the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund (the “Fund”) as at March 31, 2008 and 2007 and the statements of operations and net liabilities and cash flow for the years then ended. These financial statements have been prepared to comply with Section 6.4 of Treasury Board’s Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Fund. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as at March 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the years then ended in accordance with the basis of accounting described in Note 2 to the financial statements.
These financial statements, which have not been, and were not intended to be, prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, are solely for the information and use of the management of the Fund and the Treasury Board to comply with Section 6.4 of the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. The financial statements are not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than specified users or for any other purpose.
As described in note 3, the financial statements of the Fund as at March 31, 2007 and for the year then ended have been restated. Our previous auditors’ report dated June 1, 2007 on those financial statements has been withdrawn.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Ottawa, Ontario
May 30, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars |
(restated)
|
|
Assets | ||
Current | ||
Cash in transit |
-
|
185
|
Accounts receivable | ||
Government of Canada |
4,850
|
8,166
|
Outside parties |
125
|
1,655
|
Other assets (note 4) |
43
|
272
|
5,018
|
10,278
|
|
Capital assets (note 5) |
7
|
89
|
5,025
|
10,367
|
|
Liabilities and net liabilities | ||
Current | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||
Government of Canada |
85
|
940
|
Outside parties |
1,497
|
7,095
|
Other liabilities |
2,053
|
1,643
|
3,635
|
9,678
|
|
Allowance for employee termination benefits |
5,172
|
5,501
|
8,807
|
15,179
|
|
Net liabilities (note 6) |
(3,782)
|
(4,812)
|
5,025
|
10,367
|
|
Contractual obligations (note 8) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars |
(restated)
|
|
Revenues (note 7) |
34,088
|
72,811
|
Direct costs |
3,474
|
38,793
|
Gross margin |
30,614
|
34,018
|
Operating expenses | ||
Salaries and employee benefits |
29,195
|
27,620
|
Employee termination benefits |
418
|
(275)
|
Occupancy costs |
2,772
|
2,020
|
Corporate and administrative services |
2,720
|
3,208
|
Professional and special services |
1,212
|
2,440
|
Transportation and telecommunications |
1,077
|
1,197
|
Utilities, materials and supplies |
500
|
435
|
Interest on draw down |
138
|
19
|
Rentals |
131
|
123
|
Amortization |
82
|
183
|
Other expenses |
309
|
52
|
38,554
|
37,022
|
|
Net results |
(7,940)
|
(3,004)
|
Net liabilities, beginning of year as originally reported |
(3,085)
|
(3,571)
|
Change in accounting policy (note 3) |
(1,727)
|
(1,987)
|
Net liabilities, beginning of year as restated |
(4,812)
|
(5,558)
|
Recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
6,406
|
5,351
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
2,564
|
4,399
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(6,000)
|
Net liabilities, end of year |
(3,782)
|
(4,812)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars |
(restated)
|
|
Operating activities | ||
Net results |
(7,940)
|
(3,004)
|
Items not affecting use of the Fund's authority | ||
Amortization |
82
|
183
|
Provision for employee termination benefits |
418
|
(275)
|
(7,440)
|
(3,096)
|
|
Changes in working capital (note 9) |
(783)
|
(385)
|
Payments on provision for employee termination benefits |
(747)
|
(269)
|
Net financial resources used by operating activities |
(8,970)
|
(3,750)
|
Financing activities | ||
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(6,000)
|
Recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
6,406
|
5,351
|
Net financial resources provided (used) by financing activities |
6,406
|
(649)
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
(2,564)
|
(4,399)
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, beginning of year |
4,389
|
8,788
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year (note 6) |
1,825
|
4,389
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
1. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE
The Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund ("the Fund") is a Special Operating Agency that provides, on an optional and fee-for-service basis, consulting and audit services to federal departments and agencies. Upon request, these services are also provided to provincial, territorial, municipal and aboriginal governments in Canada, to foreign governments and to international organizations.
The Fund has a continuing non-lapsing authority from Parliament to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purposes of working capital, capital acquisitions and the temporary financing of accumulated operating deficits, the total of which is not to exceed $20,000,000 at any time.
The Fund receives funding by way of a separate vote, to cover the net draw down authority used in order to comply with the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. The amount received in 2007-2008 was $6,406,228 (2006-2007: $5,350,967).
On November 30, 2006, the Fund received authorization from the Treasury Board to contribute $6,000,000 from its accumulated surplus for the implementation of Budget 2006 expenditure restraint measures.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies issued by the Treasury Board. The basis of accounting used in these financial statements differs from Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector because the employee termination benefits liability is based on management's estimate of this liability rather than based on actuarial valuations.
The significant accounting policies are as follows:
a) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with the reporting requirements for Revolving Funds described by the Receiver General for Canada requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
b) Revenue recognition
Revenues on consulting and audit services performed by the Fund are earned primarily on a daily rate basis and are recognized as the services are provided.
For fixed price projects, revenues are recognized using the percentage of completion method based on the proportion of services provided at year end. Any losses on fixed price projects are recognized during the period they are identified.
c) Capital assets
Capital assets are recorded at their acquisition cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each asset as follows:
Category
|
Estimated useful life
|
---|---|
Informatics hardware | 3 to 5 years |
Informatics software | 3 to 5 years |
Leasehold improvements | Lesser of the remaining term of the occupancy instrument or useful life of the improvement |
d) Pension plan
Employees of the Fund are covered by the Public Service Superannuation Act and the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Act. The Government of Canada’s portion of the pension cost is included in the employee benefits charge assessed against the Fund. The actual payment of the pension is made from the Public Service
Superannuation and Supplementary Retirement Benefits Accounts.
e) Employee termination benefits, vacation pay and time-off in lieu
Termination benefits accrue to employees over their years of service with the Government of Canada as provided for under collective agreements, and the estimated costs of these benefits are recorded in the accounts as they are earned by the employees.
The liability for vacation pay and compensatory leave is calculated at the salary levels in effect at the end of the year for all unused vacation pay and time-off in lieu benefits accruing to employees.
f) Interest on draw down
Interest is charged to the Fund at a rate set by the Department of Finance and is calculated monthly on the credit balance of the accumulated net charge against the Fund’s authority account.
3. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY
In 2007-2008, the Fund changed its accounting policy and recorded an accrual to recognize the allowance for employee termination benefits on service with the Government of Canada prior to April 1, 1992, the date the Fund was established.
The Treasury Board funded these severance entitlements for a period of 15 years from the commencement date of the Fund which ended on March 31, 2007. Effective April 1, 2007, the funding from Treasury Board ceased as this 15 year period ended. Henceforth, the Fund will record the full liability of these severance entitlements.
Accordingly, the Fund has restated its financial position as at March 31, 2007 as well as its results of operations and cash flow for the year then ended to reflect the new obligation. As a result of this change in accounting policy, the 2006-2007 operating expenses were reduced by $259,989, the net liabilities at the beginning of the 2006-2007 fiscal year were increased by $1,987,094 and the allowance for employee termination benefits was increased by $1,727,105 as at March 31, 2007.
4. OTHER ASSETS
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Goods and Services Tax refundable advances |
30
|
260
|
Other advances |
13
|
12
|
43
|
272
|
5. CAPITAL ASSETS
In thousands of dollars | |||
Capital assets |
Balance
beginning of year |
Acquisitions
|
Balance end
of year |
---|---|---|---|
Informatics hardware |
413
|
-
|
413
|
Informatics software |
288
|
-
|
288
|
Leasehold improvements |
683
|
-
|
683
|
1,384
|
-
|
1,384
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
Balance
beginning of year |
Current year
amortization |
Balance end
of year |
Informatics hardware |
412
|
1
|
413
|
Informatics software |
288
|
-
|
288
|
Leasehold improvements |
595
|
81
|
676
|
1,295
|
82
|
1,377
|
|
Net |
89
|
7
|
6. NET LIABILITIES
The accumulated surplus (deficit) is the accumulation of each fiscal year's surpluses and deficits since the inception of the Fund. The accumulated net charge against the Fund’s authority is the non-lapsing authority amount that has been used since the inception of the Fund.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
(restated)
|
||
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year as originally reported |
1,304
|
5,217
|
Change in accounting policy (note 3) |
(1,727)
|
(1,987)
|
Accumulated surplus (deficit), beginning of year as restated |
(423)
|
3,230
|
Net results |
(7,940)
|
(3,004)
|
Recovery of net draw down authority used (note 1) |
6,406
|
5,351
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(6,000)
|
Accumulated deficit, end of year |
(1,957)
|
(423)
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year |
(1,825)
|
(4,389)
|
(3,782)
|
(4,812)
|
7. REVENUES
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Consulting services |
17,702
|
55,559
|
Audit services |
16,386
|
17,252
|
34,088
|
72,811
|
8. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Fund leases its premises under occupancy instruments. An occupancy instrument is a formal agreement between the Fund and Public Works and Government Services Canada recording the specific details of an individual occupancy and the terms and conditions that govern the provision and occupancy of the accommodation. Expected future payments for the existing occupancy instruments
are as follows:
In thousands of dollars | ||
Year ending March 31, | 2009 |
2,287
|
2010 |
1,868
|
|
2011 |
1,747
|
|
2012 |
1,750
|
|
2013 |
1,705
|
|
9,357
|
9. CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL
In thousands of dollars | |||
2008
|
2007
|
Changes
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Current assets |
5,018
|
10,278
|
5,260
|
Current liabilities |
3,635
|
9,678
|
(6,043)
|
(783)
|
10. COMPARATIVE FIGURES
Certain of the prior year’s figures have been reclassified in order to conform to the presentation adopted in the current year.
11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Fund's financial instruments consist of cash in transit, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value because of their short terms to maturity. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Fund is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.
We have prepared the accompanying financial statements of the Translation Bureau Revolving Fund as required by and in accordance with the policy of Treasury Board on revolving funds and the reporting requirements and standards of the Receiver General for Canada. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies set out in Note 2 of the statements, on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year. Some previous year's figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Responsibility for the integrity and objectivity of these financial statements rests with the
management of the Fund. The information included in these financial statements is based on management's best estimates and judgment with due consideration given to materiality. To fulfill its accounting and reporting responsibilities, management maintains a set of accounts which provides a centralized record of the Fund's financial transactions. Financial information submitted to the
Public Accounts of Canada and included in the Departmental Performance Report is consistent with these financial statements.
Management develops and disseminates financial management and accounting policies and
issues specific directives which maintain standards of financial management, accounting and reporting. Management maintains systems of financial management and internal control which give due consideration to costs, benefits and risks. They are designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized by Parliament, are executed in accordance with prescribed
regulations, and are properly recorded to maintain accountability of government funds and safeguard the assets under the Fund's administration. Management also seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of data in its financial statements by the careful selection, training and development of qualified staff, by organizational arrangements that provide appropriate divisions of
responsibility, and by communication programs aimed at ensuring that its regulations, policies, standards and managerial authorities are understood throughout the organization.
With the exception of the statement of authority used and the reconciliation of unused authority, management has presented the financial statements to external auditors who have audited them and have provided an independent opinion which is appended to these financial statements.
Approved by:
MIKE HAWKES
Chief Financial Officer
Finance Branch
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 30, 2008
FRANCINE KENNEDY
Chief Executive Officer
Translation Bureau
Public Works and Government Services Canada
May 26, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
Estimates
|
Actual
|
|
In thousands of dollars | ||||
Net results |
(1,654)
|
(8,819)
|
(3,718)
|
(7,325)
|
Add: items not requiring use of funds |
2,654
|
6,938
|
5,156
|
5,118
|
Operating source (use) of funds |
1,000
|
(1,881)
|
1,438
|
(2,207)
|
Less: items requiring use of funds | ||||
Net capital acquisitions |
1,000
|
1,397
|
1,000
|
2,439
|
Net other assets and liabilities |
-
|
4
|
438
|
(30)
|
Authority used |
-
|
(3,282)
|
-
|
(4,616)
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Debit balance in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority |
(7,859)
|
(14,915)
|
Add: | ||
PAYE charges against the appropriation account after March 31 |
10,535
|
15,371
|
Less: | ||
Amounts credited to the appropriation account after March 31 |
22,093
|
20,044
|
Allocation from the Treasury Board Vote 5 (Government Contingencies) |
-
|
3,111
|
Allocation from the Treasury Board Vote 23 (Paylist Requirements) |
1,319
|
-
|
Net authority provided, end of year |
(20,736)
|
(22,699)
|
Authority limit (note 1) |
10,000
|
10,000
|
Unused authority carried forward |
30,736
|
32,699
|
We have audited the statement of financial position of the Translation Bureau Revolving Fund (the “Fund”) as at March 31, 2008 and the statements of operations and net liabilities and cash flow for the year then ended. These financial statements have been prepared to comply with Section 6.4 of Treasury Board’s Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Fund. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as at March 31, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended in accordance with the basis of accounting described in Note 2 to the financial statements.
These financial statements, which have not been, and were not intended to be, prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, are solely for the information and use of the management of the Fund and the Treasury Board to comply with Section 6.4 of the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities. The financial statements are not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than specified users or for any other purpose.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Ottawa, Ontario
May 30, 2008
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Assets | ||
Current | ||
Cash in transit |
114
|
120
|
Accounts receivable | ||
Government of Canada |
21,623
|
19,615
|
Outside parties |
432
|
214
|
Other assets (note 3) |
353
|
302
|
Deferred employee termination benefits - current portion |
1,319
|
3,111
|
23,841
|
23,362
|
|
Deferred employee termination benefits |
7,270
|
8,589
|
Capital assets (note 4) |
6,927
|
9,402
|
38,038
|
41,353
|
|
Liabilities and net liabilities | ||
Current | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||
Government of Canada |
1,383
|
5,939
|
Outside parties |
12,101
|
12,424
|
Other liabilities |
8,309
|
4,779
|
21,793
|
23,142
|
|
Allowance for employee termination benefits |
29,929
|
30,132
|
51,722
|
53,274
|
|
Net liabilities (note 5) |
(13,684)
|
(11,921)
|
38,038
|
41,353
|
|
Contractual obligations (note 6) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Revenues (note 7) |
215,553
|
203,891
|
Operating expenses | ||
Salaries and employee benefits |
139,049
|
131,558
|
Employee termination benefits |
2,225
|
3,149
|
Professional and special services |
53,472
|
47,087
|
Corporate and administrative services |
9,509
|
9,927
|
Occupancy costs |
8,389
|
8,618
|
Transportation and telecommunications |
4,012
|
4,183
|
Amortization |
2,555
|
3,359
|
Purchased repairs and maintenance |
1,814
|
1,200
|
Utilities, materials and supplies |
1,720
|
1,875
|
Write-off of capital assets |
1,317
|
-
|
Rentals |
163
|
171
|
Information |
77
|
73
|
Other expenses |
70
|
16
|
224,372
|
211,216
|
|
Net results |
(8,819)
|
(7,325)
|
Net liabilities, beginning of year |
(11,921)
|
(3,029)
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
7,056
|
9,433
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(11,000)
|
Net liabilities, end of year |
(13,684)
|
(11,921)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
In thousands of dollars | ||
Operating activities | ||
Net results |
(8,819)
|
(7,325)
|
Items not affecting use of the Fund's authority | ||
Amortization |
2,555
|
3,359
|
Write-off of capital assets |
1,317
|
-
|
Provision for employee termination benefits |
2,225
|
3,149
|
(2,722)
|
(817)
|
|
Changes in working capital (note 8) |
(3,620)
|
8,064
|
Receipts on deferred employee termination benefits |
3,111
|
-
|
Payments on provision for employee termination benefits |
(2,428)
|
(2,632)
|
Net financial resources provided (used) by operating activities |
(5,659)
|
4,615
|
Investing activity | ||
Capital assets - acquisitions |
(1,397)
|
(3,048)
|
Net financial resources used by the investing activity |
(1,397)
|
(3,048)
|
Financing activity | ||
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(11,000)
|
Net financial resources used by the financing activity |
-
|
(11,000)
|
Net financial resources used and change in the accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, during the year |
(7,056)
|
(9,433)
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, beginning of year |
14,915
|
24,348
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year (note 5) |
7,859
|
14,915
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
The Translation Bureau Revolving Fund (“the Fund”) is a Special Operating Agency that provides, on a cost recovery basis, translation, technolinguistic and other linguistic services to the judiciary and federal departments and agencies and, upon request, to other governments in Canada and international organizations.
The Fund has a continuing non-lapsing authority from Parliament to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purposes of working capital, capital acquisitions and the temporary financing of accumulated operating deficits, the total of which is not to exceed $10,000,000 at any time.
On April 19, 2007, the Fund received authorization from the Treasury Board to access its unused authority for a total amount of up to $14,200,000 to allow sustained funding of its investment program ($6,000,000 in 2006-2007; $6,200,000 in 2007-2008; $2,000,000 in 2008-2009). The actual amount used in 2007-2008 was $3,281,823 ($4,616,021 in 2006-2007).
On November 30, 2006, the Fund received authorization from the Treasury Board to contribute $11,000,000 from its accumulated surplus for the implementation of Budget 2006 expenditure restraint measures.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the significant accounting policies issued by the Treasury Board. The basis of accounting used in these financial statements differs from Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector because:
The significant accounting policies are as follows:
a) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with the reporting requirements for Revolving Funds described by the Receiver General for Canada requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
b) Revenue recognition
Revenues from translation services performed by the Fund for other government departments and external clients are recognized using the percentage of completion method based on the proportion of services provided at year end.
Revenues from the Parliamentary Vote for translation services and revenues for interpretation services are recognized as costs are incurred by the Fund.
c) Capital assets
Capital assets are recorded at their acquisition cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each asset as follows:
Category
|
Estimated useful life
|
---|---|
Machinery and equipment | 3 to 20 years |
Informatics hardware | 3 to 5 years |
Informatics software | 3 to 5 years |
Assets under construction | Once in service, in accordance with asset class |
Leasehold improvements | Lesser of the remaining term of the occupancy instrument or useful life of the improvement |
d) Pension plan
Employees of the Fund are covered by the Public Service Superannuation Act and the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Act. The Government of Canada’s portion of the pension cost is included in the employee benefits charge assessed against the Fund. The actual payment of the pension is made from the Public Service
Superannuation and Supplementary Retirement Benefits Accounts.
e) Employee termination benefits, vacation pay and time-off in lieu
Termination benefits accrue to employees over their years of service with the Government of Canada as provided for under collective agreements, and the estimated costs of these benefits are recorded in the accounts as they are earned by the employees.
An accrual was made for severance entitlements on service prior to April 1, 1995. The asset account “Deferred Employee Termination Benefits” represents benefits earned prior to April 1, 1995. The account is drawn down as benefits are paid to the related employees and become recoverable from the Treasury Board. The Treasury Board will continue to reimburse for termination benefits paid by the Bureau, for service prior to April 1, 1995, until March 31, 2010. After March 31, 2010, the Treasury Board has no further obligation to reimburse for benefits paid.
The liability for vacation pay and compensatory leave is calculated at the salary levels in effect at the end of the year for all unused vacation pay and time-off in lieu benefits accruing to employees.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Goods and Services Tax refundable advances |
328
|
286
|
Other advances |
25
|
16
|
353
|
302
|
In thousands of dollars | |||||
Capital assets | Balance beginning of year |
Transfers | Acquisitions | Write-off | Balance end of year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Machinery and equipment |
114
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
114
|
Informatics hardware |
1,796
|
-
|
110
|
(98)
|
1,808
|
Informatics software |
12,344
|
1,475
|
318
|
-
|
14,137
|
Assets under construction |
2,792
|
(1,475)
|
851
|
(1,317)
|
851
|
Leasehold improvements |
3,513
|
-
|
118
|
-
|
3,631
|
20,559
|
-
|
1,397
|
(1,415)
|
20,541
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
Balance beginning of year |
Transfers | Current year amortization |
Write-off | Balance end of year |
Machinery and equipment |
62
|
-
|
9
|
-
|
71
|
Informatics hardware |
1,526
|
-
|
184
|
(98)
|
1,612
|
Informatics software |
7,461
|
-
|
1,718
|
-
|
9,179
|
Leasehold improvements |
2,108
|
-
|
644
|
-
|
2,752
|
11,157
|
-
|
2,555
|
(98)
|
13,614
|
|
Net |
9,402
|
6,927
|
The accumulated surplus (deficit) is the accumulation of each fiscal year's surpluses and deficits since the inception of the Fund. The accumulated net charge against the Fund’s authority is the non-lapsing authority amount that has been used since the inception of the Fund.
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Accumulated surplus, beginning of year |
2,994
|
21,319
|
Net results |
(8,819)
|
(7,325)
|
Expenditure restraint measure (note 1) |
-
|
(11,000)
|
Accumulated surplus (deficit), end of year |
(5,825)
|
2,994
|
Accumulated net charge against the Fund's authority account, end of year |
(7,859)
|
(14,915)
|
(13,684)
|
(11,921)
|
The Fund leases its premises under occupancy instruments. An occupancy instrument is a formal agreement between the Fund and Public Works and Government Services Canada recording the specific details of an individual occupancy and the terms and conditions that govern the provision and occupancy of the accommodation. Expected future payments for the existing occupancy instruments are as follows:
In thousands of dollars | ||
Year ending March 31, | 2009 |
6,547
|
2010 |
3,072
|
|
2011 |
2,051
|
|
2012 |
468
|
|
2013
|
234
|
|
12,372
|
In thousands of dollars | ||
2008
|
2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Translation services |
210,595
|
199,331
|
Interpretation services |
3,208
|
3,034
|
Termium sales |
1,643
|
1,402
|
Other |
107
|
124
|
215,553
|
203,891
|
In thousands of dollars | |||
2008
|
2007
|
Changes
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Current assets |
23,841
|
23,362
|
(479)
|
Less: Deferred employee termination benefits - current portion |
(1,319)
|
(3,111)
|
(1,792)
|
22,522
|
20,251
|
(2,271)
|
|
Current liabilities |
21,793
|
23,142
|
(1,349)
|
(3,620)
|
Certain of the prior year’s figures have been reclassified in order to conform to the presentation adopted in the current year.
The Fund's financial instruments consist of cash in transit, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value because of their short terms to maturity. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Fund is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.
2007-2008 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
User Fee | Fee Type |
Fee-setting Authority |
Date Last Modified |
Forecast Revenue ($000) |
Actual Revenue ($000) |
Full Cost ($000) |
Performance Standard |
Performance Results | Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue ($000) |
Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filled under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) | Other Products and Services (O) | ATIA | 1992 | 12.34 | 6.58 | 2,260 | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. | 71.1% | 2008-2009 | 6.25 | 5,150 |
2009-2010 | 5.94 | 3,350 | |||||||||
2010-2011 | 5.64 | 3,520 | |||||||||
Total 12.34 |
Total 6.58 |
Total 2,260 |
Total 17.83 |
Total 12,020 |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: N/A |
|||||||||||
C) Other Information: It is the department’s practice to waive fees where (a) the total reproduction costs that could be assessed amounts to less than $25; and (b) the legislative time limits have been exceeded by more than 6 months and the request contains a voluminous number of records. In 2007-2008, fees were waived in 63% of ATI requests
completed, amounting to $7,300 waived. In an effort to reduce the amount of paper copied, applicants can request that certain information be provided to them by electronic means, such as by diskette, CD or email, in order to reduce the amount of fees to be paid. In 2007-2008, 19% of responses to ATI were made by electronic means; an increase of 6% compared to previous fiscal year. |
Canada Gazette
2007-2008 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
User Fee | Fee Type |
Fee-setting Authority |
Date Last Modified |
Forecast Revenue ($000) |
Actual Revenue ($000) |
Full Cost ($000) |
Performance Standard |
Performance Results | Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue ($000) |
Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
Subscription rates charged to external/private sector clients for printing and distributing the hardcopy version of the Canada Gazette | Regulatory (R) | Subscription fees are set in the Statutory Instruments Act assented to in 1971 | Subscription fees last revised in 1985 | 38.0 | 97.7 | 310.0 |
Meet all the legislated publication deadlines for the Canada Gazette and meet the publication deadlines for each of our clients.
Achieve less than 1% error count in all editions of the Canada Gazette. |
100%: All notices were published within the legislated deadlines. 100%: The Canada Gazette Directorate met all of its publication dates for all formats of the Canada Gazette. 100%: The error count was 0.16%, which represents only 7 errors in 4,311 pages published. |
2008-2009 Subscriptions 2009-2010 Subscriptions 2010-2011 Subscriptions |
97.7
97.7
|
310.0
|
Total 38.0 |
Total 97.72 |
Total 310.03 |
Total 293.1 |
Total 930.0 |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: July 2, 2008. |
|||||||||||
C) Other Information: 1. Subject to a departmental legal assessment the Canada Gazette Directorate is reporting annually on the Subscription Fees charged to external/private sector clients as the User Fees Act does not apply to internal clients, i.e. other government departments or agencies. Information on insertions fees is no longer included in this table as these fees fall under the contracting authority of the Minister of PWGSC. 2. These figures are only the direct costs of producing the documents. 3. These figures forecast only the direct costs of producing the documents. |
2007-2008 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
User Fee | Fee Type |
Fee -setting Authority |
Date Last Modified | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Full Cost ($000) | Performance Standard | Performance Results | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
Booking | Regulatory (R) as per Esquimalt Graving Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-332 and SOR/95-462). | Order-in-Council | 1995 | See Note 2 | 231.0 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
EGD meets on a regular and on-going basis with its tenant clients to ensure customer service and client needs are met. | Last fiscal EGD met on a formal basis every other month (6 times/year) with all tenant clients. Additionally, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were met. |
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 |
See Note 2 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
Draining | 195.5 | ||||||||||
Dockage for a vessel per unit of gross tonnage (minimum 2500 tons), per day | 1,555.1 | ||||||||||
Dockage for cargo on board per tonne of cargo, per day | - | ||||||||||
Berthage at North Landing Wharf, per metre, per day (a) working vessels | 112.5 | ||||||||||
Berthage at North Landing Wharf, per metre, per day (b) non-working vessels | 1.6 | ||||||||||
Berthage at South Jetty, per metre, per day | 120.3 | ||||||||||
Storage of cargo, building materials, equipment or machinery, per tonne, per day | - | ||||||||||
Top wharfage, per tonne (minimum 50 tonnes) (one-time charge) | 5.4 | ||||||||||
Crane per hour (a) with light hook | 791.3 | ||||||||||
Crane per hour (b) with main hook, up to 50 tonne lift | 76.4 | ||||||||||
Crane per hour (c) with main hook, over 50 tonne lift | 31.1 | ||||||||||
Mobile Crane, per hour (a) 9-tonne crane | 19.3 | ||||||||||
Mobile Crane, per hour (b) 20-tonne crane | 0.4 | ||||||||||
Forklift per hour | 0.2 | ||||||||||
Air Compressor, per manifold hour | 508.6 | ||||||||||
Motor work boat, per hour | 2.2 | ||||||||||
Fresh water, per cubic metre | 47.8 | ||||||||||
Electric power, per kilowatt hour | 755.0 | ||||||||||
Parking, per section, per shift | 114.2 | ||||||||||
Tie-up and letting go | 7.5 | ||||||||||
Flood-lights (a) per standard (high mast), per hour | - | ||||||||||
Flood-lights (b) per caisson (4 lights), per hour | - | ||||||||||
Overtime labour of dry-dock employees, per employee, per hour | 339.8 | ||||||||||
Commissionaire service, per employee, per hour | 196.7 | ||||||||||
Other User Fees (see Additional Tariff Items below) | Other Products and Services (O) | Order-in-Council | 1995 | See Note 2 | 1,167.9 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
EGD meets on a regular and on-going basis with its tenant clients to ensure customer service and client needs are met. | Last fiscal EGD met on a formal basis every other month (6 times/year) with all tenant clients. Additionally, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were met. |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
See Note 2 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
Sub-total (R) Sub-total (O) |
Sub-total (R) 5,111.7 Sub-total (O) 1,167.9 |
Sub-total (R) Sub-total (O) |
Sub-total Sub-total Sub-total |
2008-2009 5,600.0 2009-2010 2010-2011 |
2008-2009 11,423.5 2009-2010 2010-2011 |
||||||
Total |
Total 6,279.6 |
Total 11,423.6 |
Total 17,200.0 |
Total 39,165.7 |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: No substantial modification has been made since March 31, 2004. | |||||||||||
C) Other Information: Note 1: Revenue forecast assumes no rate increase during planning horizon. Submission to change rates currently under way. Note 2: Since revenues are not forecasted and costs are not calculated based on individual fee items, only the total figures are provided for all user fees at the EGD. |
TARIFF ITEMS | UNIT RATE |
1" Rope | $240.00 / ea |
16 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
16 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
18 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
24/25 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
Administration | $100.00 / hr |
Air compressor(secondary) | $25.00 / hr |
Air compressor(portable) | $8.00 / hr |
Aluminum Oxide | $0.80 / lb |
Aluminum Oxide,"A" Grade | $0.80 / lb |
AVAC | $40.00 / hr |
Berthage at Jenkins Footprint | $0.00 / m-d |
Berthage at S. Jetty (working vessel) | $2.75 / m-d |
Berthage at Tug Wharf | $2.50 / m-d |
Boat Rental | $55.00 / hr |
Bond | $10,000.00 / ea |
Brown Aluminum Oxide (All Grades) | $0.80 / lb |
Clean up | $1,000.00 / ea |
Commissionaire service (new rate) | $317.21 / d |
Damages | $1,000.00 / ea |
EBE 250V - SP10 | $1.20 / ft2 |
EBE 250V - SP5 | $1.30 / ft2 |
EBE 250V - SP6 | $1.10 / ft2 |
EBE 250V - SP7 | $1.00 / ft2 |
EBE 350 DECK | $0.70 / ft2 |
EBE 350 (Deck) - SP10 | $0.91 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP10 | $0.91 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP5 | $1.58 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP6 | $0.70 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP7 | $0.53 / ft2 |
EBE 350V - SP10 | $1.75 / ft2 |
EBE 350V - SP5 | $2.10 / ft2 |
EBE 350V - SP6 | $1.30 / ft2 |
EBE 350V – SP7 | $0.60 / ft2 |
EBE 500 DECK | $1.00 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP10 | $1.30 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP5 | $2.25 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP6 | $1.00 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP7 | $0.75 / ft2 |
ENVIROBLAST 500VH | $150.00 / hr |
EBE 500V - SP10 | $2.00 / ft2 |
EBE 500V - SP5 | $2.25 / ft2 |
EBE 500V - SP6 | $1.50 / ft2 |
EBE 500V - SP7 | $0.75 / ft2 |
EBE A-Vac | $40.00 / ft2 |
EBE Operator | $0.15 / ft2 |
Fine | $100.00 / ea |
Freight | $155.48 / ea |
Lease | $398.00 / m2 |
Miscellaneous | $7,500.00 / ea |
Miscellaneous Parts | $7,500.00 / ea |
Road Sweeper | $55.00 / hr |
Property lease | $2,916.68 / ea |
S360 Steel shot | $0.60 / lb |
S390 Steel shot | $0.60 / lb |
S460 Steel shot | $0.60 / lb |
Service Charge | $55.00 / hr |
Shackles | $29.45 / ea |
Short term lease | $3.33 / m2 |
Storage by Area | $3.33 / m2 |
Storage by Weight | $1.00 / t/day |
Supplementary Charge | $0.67 / ft2 |
Thimbles | $3.28 / ea |
Vessel on EDC Floating Drydock | $0.00 / month |
350 VH | $2,500.00 / day |
2007-2008 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
User Fee | Fee Type |
Fee -setting Authority |
Date Last Modified | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Full Cost ($000) | Performance Standard |
Performance Results |
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
See Tariff Items below | Regulatory (R) as per Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-331) | Department of Public Works and Government Services Act (1996, c.16) |
1989 PC 1989-1198 |
17.7 See Note 1 |
18.8 See Note 1 |
207.7 See Note 1 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
The user fees were introduced prior to March 31, 2004. Performance standards have not yet been established as contracts are established on an individual custom basis. | Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-dock services are responsive to, and satisfy the specific needs of each external user, in accordance with the Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-dock regulations. |
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 |
22.7 22.7 n/a see note 2
|
198.0 52.7 n/a see note 2 |
Sub-total (R) 17.7 |
Sub-total (R) 18.8 |
Sub-total (R) 207.7 |
Sub-total Sub-total Sub-total |
2008-2009 22.7 2009-2010 2010-2011 |
2008-2009 198.0 2009-2010 2010-2011 |
||||||
Total 17.7 |
Total 18.8 |
Total 207.7 |
Total 45.4 |
Total 250.7 |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: No substantial modification has been made since March 31, 2004. | |||||||||||
C) Other Information: Note 1: Since revenues are not forecasted and costs are not calculated based on individual fee items, only the total figures are provided for all user fees. Note 2: This facility is slated for disposal by 2010. |
TARIFF OF DOCK CHARGES | |
---|---|
ITEM SERVICES AND FACILITIES | DOCK CHARGES ($) |
Entry fee | 655.00 |
Setting up keel and bilge blocks | 655.00 |
Hauling out vessel | 515.00 |
Launching vessel | 515.00 |
Accommodation of vessel in the dry dock per day, per unit of gross tonnage | 1.05 |
Fee for the winter term, one vessel | 6,000.00 |
Fee for the winter term, tow vessels, per vessel | 3,000.00 |
Additional charge pursuant to subsection 36(1) up to a maximum of $1000.00 per day, per unit of gross tonnage | 1.80 |
Canada Gazette
A. External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Result | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Subscription rates are charged for the printing and distribution of the Canada Gazette.
|
100% compliance with the legislated publication deadlines for the Canada Gazette and the legislated publication deadlines for each of its clients. Error rate of less than 1%. |
100%: All notices were published within the legislated deadlines. The Canada Gazette Directorate met all its publication dates for all formats of the Canada Gazette. The error count was 0.16 % which represents only 7 errors in 4,311 pages.
|
The subscription rates have not been modified since 1985. The establishment of the current fee structure pre-dates the November 2004 Policy On Service Standards for External Fees.
|
B. Other Information N/A |
(in millions of dollars) |
||||||
Project |
Current Estimated Total Cost |
Actual 2005-2006 | Actual 2006-2007 | Planned Spending 2007-2008 | Total Authorities (at March 31, 2008) | Actual 2007-2008 |
REAL PROPERTY SERVICES | ||||||
Office Accommodation Projects | ||||||
Nova Scotia | ||||||
Halifax - New Government of Canada Building, Bedford Institute of Oceanography – (CANCELLED) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Halifax - New Royal Canadian Mounted Police Government of Canada Building - Construction (LPA)1 |
109.3 |
2.3 |
1.0 |
2.5 |
109.3 |
1.2 |
Prince Edward Island | ||||||
Charlottetown – Jean Canfield Building - Construction (S-EPA)2 |
52.8 |
13.8 |
19.4 |
7.2 |
50.3 |
6.9 |
Quebec | ||||||
Montréal - 740 Bel-Air Street – Construction of multi-purpose building including items funded by National Defence (S-EPA) |
54.7 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
0.2 |
60.3 |
0.2 |
National Capital Area (Quebec) | ||||||
Gatineau - Laurier Taché Garage - Renovation (S-EPA) |
67.9 |
13.4 |
11.6 |
4.5 |
67.9 |
6.1 |
National Capital Area (Ontario) | ||||||
Ottawa - Federal Judicial Building –New Construction – (DEFERRED) |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Ottawa - Skyline Campus - Renovation and Federal Occupancy (S-EPA-MCP)3 |
105.8 |
7.4 |
9.3 |
55.0 |
114.3 |
35.9 |
Ottawa - Central Heating and Cooling Plant - East Tunnel Replacement (I-PPA) |
31.1 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
1.8 |
0.2 |
Parliamentary Precinct 4 | ||||||
Ottawa - Library of Parliament (LOP) - Conservation, Rehabilitation and Upgrade (EPA) |
127.9 |
17.5 |
7.4 |
4.4 |
127.9 |
0.9 |
Ottawa - West Block (PPA)5 |
769.2 |
15.3 |
13.5 |
167.7 |
252.2 |
24.7 |
Ottawa - Site Infrastructure - New Construction (PPA)5, 6 |
82.5 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
0.0 |
Ottawa - Wellington Building - Renovation (PPA)5 |
425.2 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
14.8 |
101.4 |
1.0 |
Ottawa - Bank Street - New Construction (PPA)5, 6 (DEFERRED) |
197.9 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
18.9 |
0.0 |
Saskatchewan | ||||||
Regina - Government of Canada Building – Acquisition, renovation and fit-up (EPA) 7 |
48.4 |
20.0 |
4.7 |
8.8 |
48.4 |
6.0 |
British Columbia | ||||||
Surrey - Royal Canadian Mounted Police "E" Division HQ Relocation - Purchase Land and Public Private Partnership (P3) Design, Build, Finance, Maintain (DBFM) (I-PPA-MCP)8 |
1,000.0 |
2.5 |
0.8 |
2.4 |
438.7 |
1.6 |
Non-Office Accommodation Projects | ||||||
Parliamentary Precinct | ||||||
Ottawa – Portrait Gallery of Can. – Renovation (EPA)9 |
32.4 |
2.7 |
0.8 |
10.0 |
32.3 |
0.1 |
Lease Accommodation Projects | ||||||
National Capital Area (Ontario) | ||||||
269 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, (LPA)10,11 |
231.4 |
5.1 |
24.0 |
5.6 |
45.9 |
12.2 |
131 Queen Street, Ottawa, (LPA)4 |
166.3 |
4.3 |
39.2 |
44.9 |
166.3 |
24.3 |
181 Queen Street, Ottawa, (LPA)4 |
59.9 |
6.4 |
6.3 |
5.5 |
59.9 |
6.3 |
Ontario | ||||||
180 Queen Street West, Toronto, (LPA) (COMPLETED)12 |
239.0 |
9.3 |
12.8 |
8.6 |
239.0 |
4.4 |
277 Front Street East, Toronto, Lease (LPA)13 |
75.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
4.7 |
75.5 |
7.9 |
Engineering Assets Projects | ||||||
Newfoundland and Labrador | ||||||
Argentia - Environmental remediation (EPA) |
93.5 |
6.0 |
4.8 |
10.0 |
93.5 |
4.1 |
National Capital Area (Quebec) | ||||||
Laniel Dam - Reconstruction (R-EPA) |
36.0 |
2.9 |
6.7 |
5.8 |
36.0 |
6.8 |
National Capital Area (Ontario) | ||||||
Alexandra Bridge - Rehabilitation/Deck Replacement (EPA) |
28.7 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
28.7 |
0.4 |
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPENSATION | ||||||
Pension Modernization Project- Definition Phase (PPA)14 |
18.415 |
5.6 |
7.8 |
1.3 |
18.4 |
1.3 |
Pension Modernization Project- Implementation Phase (EPA)16 |
200.117 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
44.618 |
200.1 |
29.619 |
1. Description
PWGSC is the custodian of the buildings and grounds within the Parliamentary Precinct. Part of this important mandate is to maintain the historical and architectural integrity of these assets.
A Long Term Vision and Plan (LTVP) for the Parliamentary Precinct was developed to help guide the fulfillment of this mandate. It was originally approved in 2001. In May 2005, Cabinet instructed the Minister of PWGSC to return with options to revise the LTVP and its associated costs.
A revised LTVP was presented and approved by Cabinet in June 2007. This update which was undertaken in conjunction with the Parliamentary Partners – the Senate, the House of Commons and the Library of Parliament, established a comprehensive approach for rehabilitating the heritage buildings, providing additional parliamentary accommodations and creating a secure and welcoming environment for parliamentarians, staff, visitors and tourists.
One of the key features of the 2007 LTVP is a new Implementation Strategy. This strategy is composed of a broad strategic direction and a series of cyclical five-year programs. These cycles provide greater flexibility in planning and implementation based on changing government and parliamentary priorities, building conditions, etc. This flexibility allows for more accurate costing and more realistic project timelines.
Each five-year program is composed of three components:
An important element in the LTVP is a strong reporting framework that enables the Parliamentary Partners and PWGSC to set both long-term direction and achieve immediate priorities. The revised LTVP has strong oversight and accountability measures that will ensure more effective management of the costing, planning and scheduling of the LTVP through new government approvals every five years. In addition to the annual Departmental Performance Report, the Parliamentary Precinct provides regular quarterly report cards to the Minister and the Parliamentary Precinct Oversight Advisory Committee. An annual report on progress of the LTVP program to the Treasury Board Secretariat is also provided.
2. Project Phase: Ongoing
3. Leading and Participating Departments
4. Prime Contractors and Major Sub-Contractors
See separate notes for each of the following projects: West Block Renovation Program and Wellington Building Renovation Project.
5. Major Milestones
Milestone | RPP 2007-2008 | DPR 2007-2008 |
---|---|---|
Memorandum to Cabinet – Update on the LTVP for the Parliamentary Precinct | Not included | Completed – July 2002 |
Memorandum to Cabinet – LTVP for the Parliamentary Precinct – Update | Not included | Completed – May 2005 |
Memorandum to Cabinet – The Long Term Vision and Plan for the Parliamentary Precinct – Update 2007 | Not included | Completed – June 2007 |
6. Progress Report and Explanation of Variances
Progress against each of the three programs in fiscal year 2007-2008 to-date is highlighted below:
See separate notes for additional information on the following initiatives: West Block Renovation Program and Wellington Building Renovation Project.
7. Industrial Benefits
See separate notes for each of the following initiatives: West Block Renovation Program and Wellington Building Renovation Project.
Summary of Non-recurring Expenditures
See separate notes for each of the following initiatives: West Block Renovation Program and Wellington Building Renovation Project.
1. Description
The West Block, located within the parliamentary Precinct, is the oldest of the parliamentary buildings located on the "Hill". The three-storey building was built in three phases starting in 1859 and completed in 1906. The West Block provides accommodation for Members of Parliament (MPs) and for parliamentary functions and support services.
Renovations of the building are required for health and safety and asset integrity reasons. In order to implement the renovations, the building has to be completely vacated, thus requiring the provision of alternate accommodations for the MPs, parliamentary functions and support services. Consequently, the program of work will be undertaken in two phases.
Phase 1 involves:
Phase 2 involves:
The most recent Preliminary Project Approval (June 2005) in current dollars is $769.2 million (GST excluded) / $821.5 million (GST included). This approval includes most swing space projects, however, it does not include the funding for the Wellington Building.
The current schedule calls for MPs and support staff to vacate the West Block in 2010-2011 (Phase 1), with rehabilitation work (Phase 2) to start shortly thereafter.
2. Project Phase:
West Block Building: Project Definition (Design); and
Interim Locations: Project Definition (Design), Project Implementation through Project Close-out
3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
4. Prime Contractors and Major Sub-Contractors
5. Major Milestones
Milestones reported against the West Block Renovation Program include:
Milestone | RPP 2007-2008 | DPR 2007-2008 |
---|---|---|
Revised Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) | Completed - June 2005 | Completed - June 2005 |
Partial Effective Project Approval (Phase 1) | Completed - June 2005 | Completed - June 2005 |
$17. million Spending Authority Approved | Approved – December 2006 | Approved – December 2006 |
Full Effective Project Approval (Phase 1) | October 2007 | Partial EPA (Phase 1) – February 2007 |
Revised PPA for West Block Program | December 2008 | Q1 2010-2011 |
Effective Project Approval (Phase 2) | December 2008 | Q1 2010-2011 |
La Promenade swing space completion | December 2009 | Q1 2010-2011 |
MPs vacate West Block | December 2009 | Q1 - Q2 2010-2011 |
Major construction start | Summer 2010 | Q3 2010-2011 |
Major construction completion | Summer 2018 | Q3 2020-2021 |
6. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances
Variances of the Major Milestones:
Previous reported milestones have been revised to reflect progressive iterations of the various projects within the West Block Renovation Program. Program milestones, the overall program/project schedules and program cost changes are in response to schedule slippage in the La Promenade Renovation Project. This slippage is the result of: challenges in relocating commercial tenants; changes to the functional program and design; and difficulties in relocating the La Promenade committee rooms. This delay impacts the move schedule for MPs from the West Block and therefore affects the overall West Block Renovation Program schedule. An active management approach has been instituted to avoid further delays, and lessons learned have been captured and are being applied to subsequent projects of this nature.
In addition, in an attempt to accelerate the overall schedule of the West Block Renovation Program, we are exploring strategies to advance the program schedule. This includes exploring the relocation of committee rooms at the same time as moving Members of Parliament. This would enable the West Block to be completely vacant during construction, therefore reducing potential construction work delays and allowing for simultaneous construction activities.
Progress Report and Status Update:West Block Renovation Program activities for 2007-2008 to-date include:
7. Industrial Benefits
A number of multi-million dollar contracts will be awarded for the building construction phase, as well as for the Building Components and Connectivity (BCC) component of the project (information technology systems, multimedia systems, furniture and miscellaneous equipment). The number of available jobs will be determined upon award of the West Block building construction contract and the BCC contracts for the West Block renovation program.
Summary of Non-recurring Expenditures
($ Millions) |
Estimated Total Expenditure (PPA – June 2005) |
Actual Expenditures to March 31, 2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 | Future Years’ Requirements |
---|---|---|---|---|
West Block Renovation Program (incl. swing space – excluding Wellington) (current dollars – GST excluded) |
$769.2 | $66.9 | $40.9 | $661.4 (PPA – June 2005) |
1. Description
The Wellington Building, located at 180 Wellington Street, in Ottawa is a recognized federal heritage building and key Parliament Hill asset. It is a six-storey structure first built in 1925 and later enlarged in the 1950’s by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. The House of Commons has been the major tenant since the Crown expropriated the building in 1973 to provide future accommodation for the needs of Parliament and the Government of Canada. Seven commercial tenants occupy the ground floor facing Sparks Street.
Renovations of the building are required for health and safety reasons and involve extensive exterior and interior work. The building systems and life safety systems are obsolete and have long surpassed their life expectancy (over 40 years old). Work will comprise asbestos removal, upgrading obsolete building systems, meeting new seismic and environmental standards, reinforcing the structure, restoring the exterior masonry and renovating the interior space.
The planned start of construction is in the third quarter of 2009-2010, with completion of the committee rooms in the third quarter of 2014-2015 and parliamentary office units in the third quarter of 2015-2016. The building will be completely vacated during the renovations. The current cost estimate (Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) – February 2008) in constant dollars is $425.2 million (GST excluded) / $445.3 million (GST included).
The work will be completed in two overlapping stages to expedite project delivery.
The Wellington project is a key enabler of the LTVP by relocating Parliamentarians and functions from the West and East Blocks and thus facilitating the renovation of the Centre Block. Initially it will facilitate the West Block program by providing interim accommodations for the West Block committee rooms during its renovation. It will also provide office units for the Senate during renovation of the East Block.
2. Project Phase: Planning Phase
3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
4. Prime Contractor and Major Sub-Contractors
The contract award for the prime consultant architectural and engineering design team is scheduled for second quarter of 2008-2009.
5. Major Milestones
Milestones reported against the Wellington Building Renovation Project.
Milestone | RPP 2007-2008 | DPR 2007-2008 |
---|---|---|
Initial Functional Program | Completed – May 2005 | Preliminary Functional Program – Revised completed – July 2007 |
Revised PPA and Phase 1 Effective Project Approval | April 2007 | Revised PPA and Stage 1 EPA – Completed – February 2008 |
Consultant Contract Award | September 2007 | Q2 2008-2009 |
Revised Functional Program | March 2008 | Q2 2008-2009 |
Phase 2 Effective Project Approval (EPA) | January 2009 | Stage 2 EPA – Q2 2010-2011 |
Phase 1 Construction Start | July 2009 | Stage 1 Construction Start – Q1 2010-2011 |
Phase 1 Construction Completion | September 2010 | Stage 1 Construction Completion – Q3 2011-2012 |
Phase 2 Construction Start | September 2010 | Stage 2 Construction Start – Q4 2010-2011 |
Phase 2 Construction Completion | August 2013 | Stage 2 Construction Completion: Committee Rooms – Q3 2014-2015 Parliamentary Office Units – Q3 2015-2016 |
6. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances
Variances of the Major Milestones:
Previous reported milestones have been revised to reflect progressive iteration of the project requirements. Project milestones, the overall project schedule and project cost changes can be attributed to three major drivers: change in the building's use, national building code changes, and construction cost escalation. The shift from the original project scope of restoring the Wellington Building to accommodate parliamentary support services to that of accommodating ten committee rooms and 69 parliamentary suites has had a significant impact on project requirements such as structural design, information technology, and security. In addition, subsequent to the 2001 cost estimate, the seismic code and sustainability standards have changed significantly.
Note: These changes have direct cost implications, which are compounded when project escalation is considered. The total estimated cost is now expressed in current dollars (including escalation) whereas previously it was in constant dollars.
Progress Report and Status Update:
Since obtaining PPA in June 2001, pre-planning activities were undertaken pertaining to the swing space needed to vacate the building and studies were conducted to address areas such as House of Commons program requirements, to analyze the need to completely empty the building (including commercial tenants) during the renovation, to assess the building condition, to develop approaches to meet sustainability objectives, the new seismic code, conservation of the heritage fabric, and to develop cost estimates, project schedules and risk management plans.
Revised PPA and partial EPA were received in February 2008. Current activities include the preparation of a Threat Risk Assessment and associated Security Design Guidelines, a Blast Mitigation Study, and the final Functional Program. A Prime Consultant contract for architectural services was awarded in the second quarter of 2008-2009.
7. Industrial Benefits
A number of multi-million dollar contracts will be awarded for the building construction phase, as well as for the Building Components and Connectivity (BCC) component of the project (information technology systems, multimedia systems, furniture and miscellaneous equipment). The number of available jobs will be determined upon award of the construction contract and the BCC contracts for the Wellington Building Renovation Project.
Summary of Non-Recurring Expenditures:
($millions) | Current Estimated Total Expenditure (PPA – February 2008) | Actual Expenditures to March 31, 2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 | Future Years Requirement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wellington Building Renovation Project – (Current dollars GST excluded) | $425.2 | $3.5 | $5.0 | $416.6 |
1. Description
The GCPMP is a major component of PWGSC's Transformation of Pension Administration agenda. The purpose of this project is to renew PWGSC's pension administration systems and services, and transform its business processes. This will allow PWGSC to provide industry standard pension administration services to employees, employers and pensioners.
PWGSC's approximately 40-year-old systems and business-process infrastructure for pension administration are in grave need of renewal. The limited capabilities of existing processes and the archaic technology of the legacy systems severely compromise PWGSC's ability to sustain current service levels. As well, they severely limit PWGSC's ability to offer future services that are comparable to the delivery performance and cost-effectiveness industry standards.
Employers are looking to provide better and broader services to their employees. Demographic trends indicate that by 2016, approximately 40% of the current public service will have become eligible for retirement. As a result, increasingly large numbers of employees are seeking retirement counselling and want access to capabilities that allow them to analyze their pension benefit options. Similarly, demands for enrolment services are increasing as new employees are hired to replace retirees. At the same time, pension administration business units face significant losses of experienced, trained personnel, as approximately 42% of the compensation trainers, supervisors, managers, and coaches will be eligible to retire by the fall of 2009.
The GCPMP has completed its Project Definition Phase. A Requirements Mapping and Gap Analysis for the business and technical requirements and the solution proposed was completed in the spring of 2006; this exercise included the mapping of the proposed future business processes as well as the core processes built into the solution’s commercial products. The project team has also completed the preliminary system design and implementation planning, developed substantive estimates, and received Effective Project Approval (EPA) from Treasury Board in June 2007.
In July 2007, the project began its Implementation Phase activities, which are expected to take 4½ years to complete. The project will replace the current pension systems and business processes with commercial-off-the-shelf software applications and industry-standard business processes. Implementation will involve using a phased approach that will introduce new systems and functionality over five releases. The first release will first introduce a new interactive voice response system, as well as modern case management tools, for the pension services centre in Shediac, New Brunswick. The next release will add enhanced case management tools and document imaging capabilities. This will be followed by the replacement of the systems and processes currently used to administer both active member accounts and retired member accounts. Finally, the project will introduce new processes and system functionality in support of pension fund accounting and reporting.
The project is currently completing the first release, and is expecting to complete the implementation in the fall of 2008, as planned.
2. Project Phase
The two Transformation of Pension Administration projects, the GCPMP and the Centralization of Pension Services Delivery Project (CPSDP) are currently in their Implementation Phases. Implementation activities began in July 2007 and are expected to be completed in January 2012.
3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
Sponsoring Department: Public Works and Government Services Canada
Contracting Authority: Public Works and Government Services Canada
Stakeholder Departments: Treasury Board Secretariat, Department of National Defence
4. Prime and Major Sub-Contractor
Prime Contractor: EDS Canada Inc. (EDS)
Major Sub-Contractors: James Evans and Associates, Siebel Systems, and Vangent (formerly Pearson Canada Solutions)
5. Major Milestones
Milestone | Date completed |
---|---|
Project Definition Phase (from PPA to EPA): | |
Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) received from Treasury Board (TB) | May 3, 2004 |
Release of draft RFP (Completion: May 2004) |
May 25, 2004 |
Consultations with vendors (Completion: July 2004) |
July 2004 |
Release of final RFP (Completion: September 2004) |
October 22, 2004 (Release of RFP was delayed to allow the project to address feedback from consultations) |
Close of bidding period (Completion: December 31, 2004) |
January 31, 2005 (Bidding period was extended at the request of the bidders) |
Evaluation of bids (Completion: March 2005) |
May 27, 2005 (Completion date was deferred to accommodate the extended bidding period and the larger than expected number of bids) |
Preparation of the TB submission for contract authority / Contract award (Completion: June 2005) |
November 4, 2005 – Contract signed with EDS November 7, 2005 – Vendor began work (contract award was deferred to accommodate the extended bidding and evaluation periods. TB approved the contract award to EDS Canada Inc. on October 31, 2005) |
Requirements Mapping and Gap Analysis These activities were rescheduled from original planned date of January 2006 to April 2006 following contract award. |
April 2006 |
Architecture and Design (Completion: September 2006) |
September 2006 |
Effective Project Approval (Completion: November 2006) |
June 13, 2007
(Completion of the Treasury Board Submission was delayed to accommodate Treasury Board’s request to prepare a single submission for both the GCPMP and the Centralization of Pension Services Delivery Project) |
Implementation Phase (EPA to Close-Out): | |
Phase 5 – EPA Start-Up Activities (Completion: January 2008) |
March 2008 (Final Crown approval and sign-off of vendor deliverables was completed March 7, 2008) |
Phase 6 – Design, Construction and Implementation:
|
(See note below) |
Phase 7 – Final Maintenance Transition (Completion: January 2012) |
|
Phase 8 – Close-out Phase (Completion: January 2012) |
Note: The dates for the implementation phase have been updated to reflect the implementation plans completed during the preparation of the TB Submission for EPA.
6. Progress Report and Explanation of Variances
The initiation and preliminary planning phases were conducted from September 2000 to January 2004, leading up to the finalization and presentation of the Treasury Board Submission for Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) in April 2004. Approval in principle was received from the Treasury Board in March 2004. PPA was received in May 2004, and the project proceeded with the Project Definition Phase.
Following the receipt of PPA, the GCPMP completed and released a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for the procurement of a contractor for the development and implementation of business transformation and the COTS software-based solution. Industry feedback was analyzed and integrated into the final RFP, which was released in October 2004. The close of the bidding period was extended from December 2004 to January 2005 at the request of bidders. The evaluation of bids was conducted from February to May 2005. Contractor selection was based on the evaluation processes and scoring specified in the RFP. These processes included: the evaluation of hard copy proposals; an evaluation of each bidder’s corporate capabilities, references, presentations and readiness assessment; and the evaluation of financial proposals.
As the EDS Canada Inc. proposal was fully compliant and obtained the highest proposal score, EDS was the recommended bidder. An independent third-party (fairness monitor) was engaged to observe and verify that the evaluation process was conducted with integrity, objectivity and impartiality. The fairness monitor reported that the recommended bidder was selected appropriately.
On November 4, 2005, following approval from Treasury Board, a contract was signed with EDS for the provision of professional services to complete the Project Definition Phase for the new commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) based pension administration system. The EDS team, including product specialists from James Evans and Associates Ltd. (Penfax), Siebel Systems, and Pearson Canada Solutions (now named Vangent), joined the GCPMP team on November 7, 2005.
The Project Definition Phase activities completed in 2006-2007 included:
Following the completion of these activities in late 2006, the GCPMP completed its business case and prepared its request for Effective Project Approval from the Treasury Board. The presentation of the TB Submission for EPA was delayed from its original target date of December 2006 to June 2007, to accommodate more pressing Treasury Board priorities.
The project is now proceeding with the actual implementation of the new COTS software based pension administration systems and services. To date the project has begun work on the implementation of two of the five planned releases. Implementation of the five releases is expected to occur over 4 ½ years and progress to date includes the following:
The contract with EDS includes options for the completion of the releases of the GCPMP solution. These options include professional services, COTS software, and maintenance and support services as required to implement the new pension system for the Public Service Superannuation Act (PSSA). Although the project is focused on the PSSA administration, the project will implement a multi-plan solution that will provide for other pension plans within the public service.
7. Industrial Benefits
A multi-million dollar contract has been awarded for the COTS products, as well as for the implementation of the new systems and business processes, support services and ongoing maintenance. The products will include Penfax for core pension administration and Siebel for the Customer Relationship Management functions. Implementation of the new solution, business processes and associated business transformation, is the responsibility of the System Integrator to whom the contract was awarded. The implementation will be conducted in several phases over a four and a half year period (July 2007 to January 2012). During that time, it is expected that there will be some temporary positions required to support the system implementation and business transformation activities in both the National Capital Area and Shediac, New Brunswick. In the long term, the project will provide the infrastructure and processes essential to the sustainability of current pension administration operations, and positions, in Shediac, New Brunswick.
1. Description
The STSI is an end-to-end travel solution aimed at delivering value to the Government of Canada and savings to Canadian taxpayers. Its objective is to provide high-quality travel services to Government of Canada employees within an integrated travel management system that enables departments to manage travel more efficiently and maintain the Government of Canada's priority of transparency and accountability in the public sector. STSI offers fully functional, comprehensive and seamlessly integrated travel services to employees travelling on government business, and allows for better travel expense management. Travel services include the following:
2. Project Phase
The last component of the STSI, the Expense Management Tool (EMT), has been designed and fully implemented across the Government of Canada. STSI is now focusing its efforts on working closely with the Treasury Board Secretariat and other government departments to increase adoption and usage of all services and tools.
3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
Lead Department or Agency | The STSI is a joint-initiative between Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) and Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS). |
Contracting Authority | PWGSC, Acquisitions Branch |
Participating Departments and Agencies | The STSI solution applies to all departments and agencies listed within the Financial Administration Act. The following seven departments were engaged as Vanguards in the Production Acceptance Test of the EMT: Atlantic Canada Opportunity Agency (ACOA), Health Canada, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, National Energy Board, PWGSC, Statistics Canada, and Veterans Affairs Canada. |
4. Prime and Major Subcontractors
Prime Contractor | Accenture Inc. |
Major Subcontractors | Amex Canada Inc, Bell Canada Inc, and Concur Technologies Inc. |
5. Major Milestones
Major Milestones | Date |
---|---|
Travel Card and Travel Call Centre | April 1, 2004 |
On-line Booking Tool and Travel Portal | November 2004 |
Expense Management Tool - Pilot Phase | December 2005 |
Expense Management Tool - Production Phase | June 2006 |
6. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances
7. Industrial Benefits
Canadian industry in the following regions of Canada will benefit from this project: N/A
Summary of Expenditures:
($millions) | Actual Expenditure 2007-2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 | Planned Spending 2009-2010 | Planned Spending 2010-2011 |
---|---|---|---|---|
STSI | 8.733 | 9.480 | 9.480 | 9.480 |
Additional information for the above table:
All expenditures are recovered through various sources of revenues. The Accenture contract runs until 2011-2012. Program funding requirements will likely change at that point. STSI received the authorities from Treasury Board in 2007-2008 to recover costs (established rate) from other government departments for fiscal years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. STSI will be submitting a request in
the fall of 2008-2009 to Treasury Board for on going authorities to generate revenues.
PWGSC is not responsible for administering conditional grant funding agreements.
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Remediation Project |
|||||
2. Name of Lead Department(s): PWGSC |
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Office of Greening Government Operations Services |
||||
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: May 12, 2004 |
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2014 |
||||
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): Up to $280 million (+ $120 million Province of Nova Scotia’s share = total project funding of $400 million). |
|||||
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): Federal –Provincial Cost Share to remediate the Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens sites situated on federally and provincially owned lands in the heart of Sydney, Nova Scotia. These sites were contaminated as a result of a century of manufacturing steel. The project is in support of the federal governments' sustainable development initiative, recognizing the environmental, social and economic dimensions of the Sydney area. The project will have long term benefits for all Canadians. When remediation is complete, Nova Scotia will take ownership of the lands. Any remaining contaminants will be managed and monitored by the Province of Nova Scotia in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement. The provincial agency’s website can be found at: http://www.tarpondscleanup.ca. The website for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency is: http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/050/viewer_e.cfm?cear_id=8989#Documents |
|||||
8. Shared Outcome(s) The project will result in environmental, economic, and social benefits for Nova Scotians, First Nations Communities and all Canadians. Downtown Sydney will have new land to be developed, which will aid in rejuvenation of the economically depressed area. |
|||||
9. Governance Structure(s)
|
|||||
10. Federal Partners |
11. Federal Partner Program Activity |
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners |
13. Total Allocation (2004-2014) |
14. Actual Spending for 2007-2008 |
15. Planned Spending for 2008-2009 |
1. ENVIRONMENT CANADA | Provision of advice to PWGSC on technical issues, historical studies and scientific issues related to contaminated sites. | a. N/A | $7,640,000 | $678,086 | $619,742 |
2. HEALTH CANADA | Provision of advice to PWGSC on issues related to human health, technical issues and risk assessment. | a. N/A | $4,410,000 | $515,396 | $550,000 |
3. PWGSC
PWGSC Cost Share Payment: |
Federal lead | a. N/A |
$25,870,000
|
$1,845,565
|
$2,928,000
|
Total $320,160,000 |
Total $11,393,814 | Total $25,548,785 | |||
16. Expected Results for 2007-2008:
|
|||||
17. Results Achieved in 2007-2008: Completion of preliminary and preventative works. |
|||||
18. Comments on Variances: N/A |
|||||
19. Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): Nova Scotia's Sydney Tar Ponds Agency federal funding for cost shared expenditures in remediation work for fiscal year 2008-2009 is estimated at $21.5 million. |
|||||
20. Contact Information: Randy Vallis, Director, Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Remediation Project Brenda Powell, Chief Business Management, Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Remediation Project |
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Government of Canada Marketplace (GoCM) |
|||||
2. Name of Lead Department(s): PWGSC |
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Acquisition Services |
||||
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: December 2002 |
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2008 |
||||
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $47.73 million | |||||
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The Government of Canada Marketplace (GoCM) is an electronic catalogue that enables departments and agencies to search for goods and services available through PWGSC standing offers and supply arrangements and to generate order forms for the selected goods and services. E-tools, such as the GoCM, support Government of Canada Procurement Renewal by automating and simplifying purchasing processes, facilitating standardized reporting on purchasing activities, and maintaining high levels of transparency and accountability. |
|||||
8. Shared Outcome(s) The GoCM will contribute $127 million of savings. These anticipated and quantifiable benefits derive from the contribution of electronic tools to facilitate compliance with mandatory procurement instruments, process efficiencies due to automated business processes and facilitating lower prices through accurate and timely purchasing information needed to leverage the buying power across Government spending. |
|||||
9. Governance Structure(s) PWGSC, in addition to being responsible for the development of the economic and business models to support this initiative, will conduct oversight for the various elements of the GoCM Service throughout its implementation and operational lifecycle. The GoCM Project addresses potential policy and legislative changes as opportunities arise for doing business in a different manner through the GoCM. This is done in collaboration with PWGSC legal and policy/program groups and TBS.
|
|||||
10. Federal Partners |
11. Federal Partner Program Activity |
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners |
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) |
14. Actual Spending for 2007-2008 |
15. Planned Spending for 2008-2009 |
1. PWGSC |
Acquisition Services | GoCM | $ 13.63 million | $ | $6.542 million |
2. TBS funding |
Acquisition Services | GoCM | $ 34.1 million | $ 9.685 million | $ |
Total $ 47.73 million | Total $9.685 million | Total $6.542 million | |||
16. Expected Results for 2007-2008
|
|||||
17. Results Achieved in 2007-2008 Following the launch of the GoCM in December 2006, PWGSC undertook a series of client consultations with the objective of increasing user satisfaction and increasing uptake of the tool. Four hundred online surveys were completed and ten focus groups were conducted across Canada. These consultations indicated a number of areas where the GoCM could be improved. PWGSC identified the user interface, content, and training as areas of concentration for version 2.0 of the tool. Users were involved over the summer of 2007 to influence the development of the user interface of version 2.0. PWGSC worked with a content aggregator to enhance GoCM content resulting in an improved experience for users. In addition, the entire online training site was revamped to correspond to the new user interface. Feedback from users indicated that the new version represented a significant improvement over the original version. User registration increased over 60% in the three months following the release of version 2.0. As part of the business case for the GoCM, PWGSC committed to making the standing offers and supply arrangements (~2,400) supporting the ten mandatory commodities available through the tool. In an effort to make the tool as useful as possible to clients, PWGSC decided to load all agreements (~8,500) for both the mandatory and non-mandatory commodities. This action exceeded the commitment made by PWGSC regarding the GoCM. PWGSC was required to meet a series of commitments with respect to receiving project funding from Treasury Board for the GoCM. All commitments have been met and PWGSC has closed the GoCM project. As of April 1, 2008, the GoCM is being operated under normal PWGSC authorities. It was initially anticipated that some benefits from GoCM would be derived from compliance with mandatory procurement instruments, automated business process efficiencies and leveraging the buying power across Government spending via accurate and timely purchasing information. This expectation was based on assumptions that the system would have operability with financial systems of departments, require mandatory use of the system and receive support for a centralized approach. These assumptions were overtaken by recent trends within the federal community. Decisions on similar large Informatics Technology (IT) projects have moved the government towards a more decentralized, incremental approach to large IT projects to better manage risks and costs. In addition, recent legislation has expanded deputy minister accountabilities established by the accounting officer role, to include administrative functions like human resources and procurement. This approach runs counter to centralized regimes like the GoCM. In response to this, a more collaborative approach, based on optional take-up and new, easier to use and access purchasing instruments, is required to meet these new accounting officer expectations as well as the call for a service-oriented approach on behalf of client departments. To support the new strategy, review and consultation is underway to determine the most appropriate approach given this new context. Given this shift in direction, and that at this time the GoCM is a partial tool, providing departments with an electronic catalogue that is not linked with their financial systems, exact savings cannot be determined. Savings opportunities through the use of pre-competed sources of supply were still accessed through the use of this system with a potential savings rate of 7-8%. |
|||||
18. Comments on Variances: N/A | |||||
19. Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): N/A | |||||
20. Contact Information: Ian Christie, Business Manager, Government of Canada Marketplace, Acquisitions Branch Liliane saint pierre, Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch |
1. SDS Departmental Goal:Our SDS 2007-2009 fully supports the Greening of Government Operations Guidance for Organizations Developing Sustainable Development Strategies, incorporating targets and performance measures for the three key priority areas of Building Energy, Vehicle Fleet and Green Procurement. This will ensure that we are well positioned to work and report on the priority areas in a coordinated, government-wide fashion. As well, PWGSC fully supports the common federal sustainable development goals, and uses them as a framework for our departmental commitments. Therefore, for SDS 2007-2009, PWGSC’s goals are: Goal 1: Governance for Sustainable Development – Strengthen federal governance and decision making to support sustainable development Goal 2: Sustainable Development and Use of Natural Resources Goal 3: Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Goal 4: Sustainable Communities – Communities enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and equitable society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations More information on SDS 2007 is available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/sd-env/sds2007/strategy/sdd-sds2007-tc-e.html |
||
2. Federal SD Goal including GGO goals |
3. Performance Measure from Current SDS |
4. Department’s Expected Results for 2007-2008 |
Goal 1 is contributing to federal SD Goal VI (Strengthen federal governance and decision making to support sustainable development) and GGO goal on green procurement. |
Goal 1:
|
Goal 1:
|
Goal 2 is contributing to federal SD Goal V (Sustainable Development and Use of Natural Resources) |
Goal 2:
|
Goal 2:
|
Goal 3 is contributing to federal SD Goal III (Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions) and GGO goals on building energy and vehicle fleet |
Goal 3:
|
Goal 3:
|
Goal 4 is contributing to federal SD Goal IV (Sustainable Communities – Communities enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and equitable society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations) |
Goal 4:
|
Goal 4:
|
5. Achieved SDS Departmental Results for 2007-2008 | For the 2007-2008 reporting period, PWGSC continued to make progress on its four overarching goals and respective objectives. Detailed progress is provided in the PWGSC Sustainable Development Performance Report. This report is available on the internet at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/sd-env/text/performance-report-e.html. |
Response to Parliamentary Committees | |
---|---|
Standing Committee on Public Accounts 2007 May Report |
Chapter 5- Relocation Members of the Canadian Forces, RCMP, and Federal Public Service of the November 2006 Report on the Auditor General of Canada This report focused on the tendering progress of the Integrated Relocation Program (IRP). |
Recommendation | That the contracts for the Canadian Forces, and for RCMP/Federal Public Service relocation services be re-tendered for commencement in November 2009, and that the current contracts not be extended. |
Government Response | The Government accepts this recommendation. |
Recommendation | 2- That Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS), the Department of National Defence (DND), and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) develop detailed action plans for the implementation of each of the recommendations in Chapter 5 of the Auditor General’s Report of November 2006 that apply to them. Copies of these plans must be submitted to the Committee no later than 30 September 2007. |
Government Response |
The Government accepts this recommendation and the consolidated action plan is attached as an Annex to this Response. The action plan indicates the progress to date in fully implementing all of the recommendations contained in Chapter 5 of the November 2006 Auditor General’s Report. |
Recommendation | 3- That PWGSC, TBS, DND and RCMP report their progress in achieving commitments made in response to recommendations made by the Auditor General that apply to them to the Public Accounts Committee no later than 30 September 2007. |
Government Response | The Government accepts this recommendation and had prepared an action plan which indicates the progress to date in fully implementing all of the recommendations contained in Chapter 5 of the November 2006 Auditor General’s Report. |
Recommendation | 4- That the recommendations made by the Auditor General and accepted by the departments be fully implemented prior to the initiation of a new tendering process for the Integrated Relocation- Program. |
Government Response | The Government accepts this recommendation, and as indicated in the attached Action Plan, the ten recommendations contained within Chapter 5 of the Auditor General’s Report have been addressed and will be fully implemented prior to the initiation of the new tendering process. |
Recommendation | 5- That the Department of National Defence, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and Treasury Board Secretariat include, in their annual Departmental Performance Reports, references to the Integrated Relocation-Program as it relates to their employees. Information on the numbers of employees using the Program, the costs, and the extent to which the purposes of the Program are being achieved must be included. This performance information must be included in DPRs beginning with Reports for the period ending 31 March 2008. |
Government Response | The Government accepts this recommendation. |
Recommendation | 6- That PWGSC use information generated by monitoring the performance of the Integrated Relocation Program in the development of the next Request for Proposals issued for the Program’s contracts. |
Government Response | The Government accepts this recommendation. |
Recommendation | 7- That PWGSC works closely with TBS and its client departments to develop a certification process designed to ensure the accuracy of data provided for inclusion in the Requests for Proposals and ensure that such a process is in place prior to the tendering of the next contracts for the Integrated Relocation Programs. |
Government Response | The Government accepts this recommendation. |
Recommendation | 8- That DND and the Canadian Forces (CF) establish a target date of no later than 30 September 2007 for the completion of the review of relocation files and for full compensation for all CF members who have been inappropriately charged for property management services. That the Government of Canada take steps to full recover funds from Royal LePage Relocation Services (RLRS) and that PWGSC report progress in this effort in its departmental performance report. |
Government Response | The Government accepts this recommendation and a review of all property management transactions since November 2004 has been completed. These transactions occurred under the current contract. The review found that 16 members were charged a rate in excess of the ceiling rate for this service. These members have been fully reimbursed by RLRS. A review of all property management transactions under the previous contract has also been completed. The results of this review need to be discussed with various stakeholders before follow-up action is taken. The work will be substantially completed by September 2007. |
Recommendation | 9- That Treasury Board Secretariat provide the Standing Committee on Public Accounts with a full explanation for the failure to provide the Auditor General and her Office with information on the logic model used to generate estimated business volumes for property management services during the audit of the Integrated Relocations Program. This explanation must be given to the Committee no later than 30 September 2007. |
Government Response | TBS has reviewed all documentation and minutes in the sharing of the information with the Office of the Auditor General. The documentation on file indicates that the Office of the Auditor General was informed at all times that the numbers used for the section on Property Management Services of the Request For Proposal were constructed in the absence of complete or relevant data and were based on a number of assumptions (logic) made by the interdepartmental group. The assumptions made by the interdepartmental group were based on the knowledge and data available during the development of the RFP. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat also confirms that the numbers used in the Request for Proposal were not actual business volumes but rather estimates for the sole purpose of bid evaluation. |
For more information of this report, the recommendations and the government’s response, please see: http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10466&Lang=1&SourceId=211193 http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10466&Lang=1&SourceId=214863 |
Responses to the Auditor General and the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development | |
---|---|
Auditor General 2007 May Report |
Chapter 1—Use of Acquisition and Travel Cards The objective of the audit was to determine whether the government has an appropriate management control framework over the use of acquisition and designated travel cards and if the government knows whether it is achieving the intended benefits from these programs. |
Recommendation |
1.25 Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) should provide departments and agencies with operational guidelines pertaining to the provisions of the contract with the travel card service provider, including guidelines pertaining to the responsibility of the government for unpaid travel card balances. 1.67 Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) and PWGSC should monitor developments regarding the evolving practices of acquisition and travel card programs to identify the benefits versus the incremental costs. 1.76 TBS and PWGSC should establish a forum for sharing best practices for acquisition cards across government. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_200705_01_e_17476.html |
Auditor General 2007 October Report |
Chapter 1- Safeguarding Government Information and Assets in Contracting The audit focused on how PWGSC delivers its Industrial Security Program and how it carries out its role as the lead contracting authority for the government. |
Recommendations |
1.51 PWGSC should ensure that before it awards a contract, it has received from the client department a completed Security Requirements Checklist identifying the necessary security requirements, or a certification that there are none. 1.52 PWGSC should ensure that it completes the development and approval of standard operating procedures for the Industrial Security Program and that they are consistently followed. 1.59 PWGSC should ensure that the Industrial Security Program has adequate resources to meet its program objectives. 1.60 PWGSC should ensure that its secure information technology environment for the operations of the Industrial Security Program is certified, as mandated by the Government Security Policy. It should also review its departmental business continuity plan to determine whether it makes adequate provisions for the Industrial Security Program. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/aud_ch_oag_2007_1_e_23825.html |
Auditor General 2007 October Report |
Chapter 3—Inuvialuit Final Agreement The audit examined the federal government's implementation of its obligations in relation to the Inuvialuit Final Agreement. Specifically, federal government activities designed to meet a select number of specific federal obligations were examined. The audit included the Parks Canada Agency, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada, and PWGSC, each of whom have responsibilities with respect to specific obligations under the Agreement. |
Recommendations | 3.46 In consultation with TBS, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, PWGSC, the Parks Canada Agency, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and Environment Canada should develop and/or enhance systems and procedures to enable them to monitor their compliance with the Inuvialuit Final Agreement's contracting provisions. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/aud_ch_oag_2007_3_e_23827.html |
CESD 2007 October Report |
Chapter 1—Sustainable Development Strategies The CESD set out to determine whether Environment Canada and the Privy Council Office made satisfactory progress implementing key recommendations for improvement from previous reports; whether selected departments and agencies implemented specific commitments from their 2004–2006 sustainable development strategies; and whether the 2007–2009 strategies of selected departments represent substantive plans for helping them progress toward sustainable development. |
Recommendation | No recommendation directed at Public Works and Government Services Canada. |
CESD 2008 March Report |
Chapter 9—Management Tools and Government Commitments—Strategic Environmental Assessment The objective of the audit was to determine whether selected departments and agencies have made satisfactory progress in addressing selected recommendations, observations, and commitments made to implement the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. |
Recommendation | No recommendation directed at PWGSC. |
CESD 2008 March Report |
Chapter 10—Management Tools and Government Commitments—Greening of Government Operations The overall objective was to assess the progress made by selected departments in responding to the underlying issues derived from certain recommendations, observations, and commitments made in prior years with respect to certain aspects of greening government operations. |
Recommendations |
10.51 PWGSC, in consultation with TBS, Environment Canada, and other departments and agencies as appropriate, should revisit the authorities, roles, responsibilities, and capacities for greening government operations, with a view to clarifying the leadership and responsibility for:
10.69 PWGSC should develop the integrated comprehensive commodity management plans required by the Commodity Management Framework to ensure that it maximizes its greening efforts while respecting other government priorities for procurement. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/aud_ch_cesd_200803_10_e_30136.html - ch10hd3e |
Response to the Public Service Commission of Canada (PSC) | |
Public Service Commission of Canada 2007 October Report |
Audit of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Secretariat – Canadian Section The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the NAFTA Secretariat – Canadian Section, has an appropriate framework, systems and practices for managing staffing activities; and the Secretariat's staffing transactions comply with the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA), relevant policies, and the delegation instrument signed with the Public Service Commission (PSC). Audit activities consisted of interviews with human resources specialists from Shared Human Resources Services of PWGSC, PSC representatives, and Secretariat managers responsible for staffing. |
Recommendation | No recommendation directed at PWGSC. |
Response to the Commissioner of Official Languages | |
Commissioner of Official Languages 2007-2008 Annual Report to Parliament
|
Each year, the Commissioner takes a close look at the performance of federal institutions in their implementing of the Official Languages Act. The Commissioner analyzes their performance in terms of the various parts of the Act, paying special attention to Part IV (Communications with and Services to the Public), Part V (Language of Work) and Part VII (Advancement of English and French). |
Recommendation | No recommendations were directed specifically at PWGSC. |
1. Name of Internal Audit | 2. Audit Type | 3. Status | 4. Completion Date | 5. Electronic Link to Report |
---|---|---|---|---|
Audit of the Contract Related to the Business Transformation Initiative | Assurance | Completed (carry forward from 2006-2007) | May 18, 2007 | http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb/text/archive/06-747-e.html |
Annual Attest Audits of the Financial Statements of Revolving Funds for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007:
|
Annual Financial Attest Audits of Revolving Funds | Completed (planned 2007-2008 internal audit) | September 28, 2007 | http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/recgen/pdf/51-eng.pdf |
Annual Attest Audit of the Financial Report of Administrative Costs Chargeable to the Canada Pension Plan Account for the Year Ended March 31, 2006 | Annual Financial Attest Audit | Completed (planned 2007-2008 internal audit) | September 28, 2007 |
Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb
|
Audit of Contract Quality Control and Quality Assurance Functions, Acquisitions Business Line | Assurance | Completed (carry forward from 2005-2006) | September 28, 2007 | http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb/text/archive/pfd/05-715-e.pdf |
Audit of Contract Management – Roles and Responsibilities - Acquisitions Business Line | Assurance | Completed (carry forward from 2005-2006) | September 28, 2007 | http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb/text/archive/pfd/05-718-e.pdf |
Audit of the Real Property Branch Revolving Fund Drawdown Authority | Assurance | Completed (carry forward from 2005-2006) | October 31, 2007 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb |
Follow-up Audit of PWGSC Compliance to Departmental Policy 078 on Workplace Emergency Evacuation | Assurance | Completed (2007-2008 follow-up internal audit) | November 1, 2007 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb |
Audit of Management Practices Related to PWGSC Bridges | Assurance | Completed (carry forward from 2006-2007) | December 20, 2007 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb |
System-Under-Development Audit of the Financial Systems Transformation Project (SIGMA) | Assurance | Completed (planned 2007-2008 internal audit) | May 2, 2008 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb |
Audit of Project Management Applicable for Major IT Projects | Assurance | Integrated into System-Under-Development Audit of the Financial Systems Transformation Project (SIGMA) as this is a Major IT Project | ||
Audit of Risk Management in Human Resources | Assurance | Completed (planned 2007-2008 internal audit) | June 25, 2008 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb |
Audit of the Administration of the Public Service Pension Plan (selected issues) | Assurance |
In-progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Compliance Audit of Receiver General Settlement System Security Standards | Assurance |
Planned (deferred to 2009-2010) |
March 2010 | |
Audit of Pension Modernization – Project Methodology | Assurance |
In-progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Audit of Major Crown Projects | Assurance | Integrated into the Audit of Pension Modernization as this is a Major Crown Project | ||
Audit of Materiel Management | Assurance |
In-progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Audit of Cost Management – Cost Allocation Model | Assurance |
Planned (deferred to 2009-2010) |
March 2010 | |
Audit of Revenue Management Cycle | Assurance |
Planned (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Audit of Environmental Liabilities | Assurance |
In-Progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Audit of Succession Planning in Acquisitions and Accounting, Banking and Compensation Branches | Assurance | In-progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) | March 2009 | |
Audit of Configuration Management | Assurance |
In-Progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Audit of Access Management | Assurance |
In-Progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Audit of Designated Properties – Project Management in Parliamentary Precinct | Assurance |
Planned (deferred from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | |
Audit of Office Facilities – Lease and Lease Escalations | Assurance |
In-Progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 |
1. Name of Evaluation | 2. Program Activity | 3. Evaluation Type | 4. Status | 5. Completion Date | 6. Electronic Link to Report |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation Framework for the Policy on Green Procurement | Evaluation Framework | Completed (carry forward from 2006-2007) | September 28, 2007 | http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb/text/archive/pfd/06-606-e.pdf | |
Evaluation Framework for the Office of Small and Medium Enterprises | Evaluation Framework | Completed (planned 2007-2008 evaluation) | October 31, 2007 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb | |
Interim Evaluation of the 2005 Alternative Forms of Delivery Initiative for Real Property Services – Phase 2 | Impact Evaluation | Completed (carry forward from 2006-2007) | October 31, 2007 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb | |
Targeted Evaluation of the 2005 Alternative Forms of Delivery Initiative | Impact Evaluation | Completed (planned 2007-2008 evaluation) | May 2, 2008 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb | |
Strategic Evaluation of Publishing and Depository Services Programs | Impact Evaluation | Completed (carry forward from 2007-2008) | May 2, 2008 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb | |
Evaluation of PWGSC’s Moveable Crown Assets Distribution Program | Impact Evaluation | Completed (carry forward from 2007-2008) | May 2, 2008 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb | |
Evaluation Framework for the Information Technology Shared Services | Evaluation Framework | Completed (carry forward from 2007-2008) | June 25, 2008 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb | |
Evaluation Framework for Real Property Optional Services | Evaluation Framework | Completed (carry forward from 2007-2008) | June 25, 2008 | Report will be available at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb | |
Evaluation Framework for PWGSC’s Government of Canada Marketplace Initiative | Evaluation Framework | In-progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) | March 2009 | ||
Impact Evaluation for PWGSC’s involvement in the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan | Impact Evaluation |
In-progress (carry forward from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 | ||
Evaluation Framework for PWGSC’s Vendor Performance Policy | Evaluation Framework |
Planned (deferred from 2007-2008) |
March 2009 |
TPSGC respecte et utilise la Politique concernant les voyages du Secrétariat du Conseil du Trésor conformément au Autorisations spéciales de voyager et à la Directive sur les voyages en ce qui concerne les taux et les indemnités.