Skip to content Skip to institutional links

Common menu bar links

Breadcrumb Trail

Institutional links

Expenditure Management

Departmental Performance Reports

2007-08

Supplementary Tables
Table of Contents
Sources of Respendable and Non-respendable Revenue
User Fees/External Fees
Details on Transfer Payments Programs

Versions

Print Version

ARCHIVED - Canadian Food Inspection Agency

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Table 3–5: Details on Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)
1) Name of Transfer Payment Program: Statutory Compensation Payments
2) Start Date: N/A	3) End Date: N/A
4) Description: Compensation payments in accordance with requirements established by regulations under the Health of Animals Act and the Plant Protection Act, and authorized pursuant to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act.
5) Strategic Outcomes: To compensate Canadians, in accordance with the appropriate regulations, for animals or plants ordered destroyed for the purpose of disease control.
6) Results Achieved: Over 500 Canadians were compensated for animals and plants ordered destroyed.
($ Millions)	7) Actual Spending 2005–2006	8) Actual Spending 2006–2007	9) Planned Spending 2007–2008	10) Total Authorities 2007–2008	11) Actual Spending 2007–2008	12) Variance(s) Between 9 and 11
13) Animal and Plant Resource Protection
14) Total Grants	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
14) Total Contributions	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
14) Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	9.5	3.8	1.5	10.6	10.6	9.1
15) Total Animal and Plant Resource Protection	9.5	3.8	1.5	10.6	10.6	9.1
16) Comment on Variance: Actual compensation payments made to Canadians were $9.1 million higher than the $1.5 million that was earmarked in Planned Spending. This increase is due to Sudden Oak Death $7.1M (Plant Diseases), Chronic Wasting Disease $1.2M (Animal Diseases) and Emerald Ash Borer $0.7M (Plant Diseases).
17) Significant Audit and Evaluation Findings and URL (s) to Last Audit and / or Evaluation: N/A