ARCHIVED - Compliance Criteria for each Requirement and Checkpoint - CLF 2.0 Assessment Methodology
This information has been archived because it is outdated and no longer relevant.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Compliance Criteria for each Requirement and Checkpoint
Each CLF 2.0 requirement and checkpoint has compliance criteria which have been grouped according to priority. To achieve 100% compliance with a requirement or checkpoint, all applicable criteria must be met for each priority level (High, Medium, and Low).
Where a requirement or criterion is not applicable, it must not be included in the calculation of the level of compliance.
The level of compliance with a requirement or checkpoint is determined as follows:
| Possible scenarios | All applicable High priority criteria met? | All applicable Medium priority criteria met? | All applicable Low priority criteria met? | Level of compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100% |
| Scenario 2 | Yes | Yes | No | % compliance indicated in the Low priority section title |
| Scenario 3 | Yes | No | n/a | % compliance indicated in the Medium priority section title |
| Scenario 4 | No | n/a | n/a | 0% |